[FairfieldLife] Re: About the Amma Cult

2011-04-26 Thread Ravi Yogi

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@... wrote:




 I'm not parroting anything Ravee. It's just what I know from having
talked to Rajneesh followers, that's all.

So now you are clearly admitting that you don't have any intelligence to
experience him for yourself and you are merely parroting what Rajneesh
followers have told you. A parrot's a parrot's a parrot.
 If anyone needs a new comedy routine...dude it's you. Sorry, it ain't
workin'...






Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: About the Amma Cult

2011-04-26 Thread Vaj


On Apr 26, 2011, at 6:29 AM, Ravi Yogi wrote:



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@... wrote:




 I'm not parroting anything Ravee. It's just what I know from  
having talked to Rajneesh followers, that's all.



So now you are clearly admitting that you don't have any  
intelligence to experience him for yourself and you are merely  
parroting what Rajneesh followers have told you. A parrot's a  
parrot's a parrot.



Last I heard Ravey, he was dead.

You probably are too young to remember when his followers poisoned  
the people in a town in Oregon using salmonella.

[FairfieldLife] Re: About the Amma Cult

2011-04-26 Thread Ravi Yogi

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@... wrote:


 On Apr 26, 2011, at 6:29 AM, Ravi Yogi wrote:

 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote:
  
  
  
  
   I'm not parroting anything Ravee. It's just what I know from
  having talked to Rajneesh followers, that's all.
  
 
  So now you are clearly admitting that you don't have any
  intelligence to experience him for yourself and you are merely
  parroting what Rajneesh followers have told you. A parrot's a
  parrot's a parrot.


 Last I heard Ravey, he was dead.

 You probably are too young to remember when his followers poisoned
 the people in a town in Oregon using salmonella.


Yes I have heard it all. So how does that matter? I don't pay too much
attention to the accidental and I'm not surprised that there are people
who have different problems, they are there everywhere not just at
Rajneesh, people who are after power,  greedy, cruel, sad, happy,
miserable, pathetic, loving, charitable, joyous - surprise, surprise.  I
certainly see them at Ammachi's, I even meet people at Amma's who
criticize Osho - doesn't bother me.  His personal life, details are
accidental - nothing of significance, they are of interest to people who
engage in hero worship rather than worship of the essence. Does that
mean he was not enlightened, does that mean I would have joined his cult
- no.  Does that mean there isn't anything of value that he shared?  For
someone one who doesn't care for dogma or tradition he presents it just
right.


[FairfieldLife] Re: About the Amma Cult

2011-04-26 Thread WillyTex


  You probably are too young to remember when his 
  followers poisoned the people in a town in Oregon 
  using salmonella.
 
Ravi Yogi:
So how does that matter? 

Others have pointed to the fact that although Sheela 
had bugged Osho's living quarters and made her tapes 
available to the U.S. authorities as part of her own 
plea bargain, no evidence has ever come to light that 
Osho had any part in her crimes...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osho_(Bhagwan_Shree_Rajneesh)



[FairfieldLife] Re: About the Amma Cult

2011-04-25 Thread turquoiseb
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Tom Pall thomas.pall@... wrote:

 http://www.experiencefestival.com/wp/article/outsider-vs-insider-doctrine-of-the-hugging-saint

This is an interesting article. I'd heard some of this
before from a former Amma devotee I knew in France. She
blew the lid off of the stuff we show the outside
world vs. stuff we don't dual nature of the Amma org 
long before I ever heard much about her here.

The fascinating thing from my side is that it reminds 
me of a story I once wrote. In Tibetan Buddhism there
is a tradition of supposedly higher, non-physical beings
taking over the bodies of humans. That's their view 
of what is going on with the Tibetan State Oracles. On
another level entirely, there is a tradition of some
men and women allowing these higher beings to take
over their bodies and dance for followers.

My story was written while commuting every week from
Santa Fe to Detroit. The Detroit airport just sucked,
and I didn't want to spend any more time there than
absolutely necessary. So I discovered a strip club that
was brilliantly located across the street from the 
rental car return lot. You could turn in your car, then
walk across the street and wait for your flight in the
strip club. They even had monitors up above the bar so
you could check on the status of your flight. Then they
would drive you to the airport in their limo. I spent
many a happy hour sitting at the bar of that strip club
writing stories, and chatting with the dancers. Never
once got a private dance, never once sat by the stage
to watch them dance; sitting at the bar was fine for me.

Anyway, there was one dancer there who was really GOOD.
I talked with her a lot, and found that she had trained 
as a modern dancer for years, and it showed. So one day
I thought of a story with her as the protagonist. Sorta.

She's up there on stage dancing for the guys at the
strip club, and suddenly one of these ancient Tibetan
goddesses takes over her body. At first it's confusing
for the goddess, because looking around at the bar, this
is just not like the temples she's used to dancing in. :-)
But she kinda gets into it, pulls out all the stops,
and does a dance for the patrons of the strip club that
blasts them with mega-shakti and leaves all of them 
stunned and a couple of them enlightened. I had a lot 
of fun writing it, and my friend the stripper was quite 
flattered.

Anyway, that's what I thought of when I read the accounts
of Amma playing dressup. Now you know how low-vibe I 
really am. It's much worse than my detractors here would
have you believe. :-)





[FairfieldLife] Re: About the Amma Cult

2011-04-25 Thread Ravi Yogi

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray1 steve.sundur@...
wrote:


 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Tom Pall thomas.pall@ wrote:
 
 

http://www.experiencefestival.com/wp/article/outsider-vs-insider-doctrin\
\
 e-of-the-hugging-saint
 
 Not sure how you spin the Devi Bhava deal as anything thing but text
 book cult.  I'd love to hear the official  version on that one.  I
 mean, they could just come out and admit the truth, but there would be
 fallout.  In general the whole affair seems to be pretty much standard
 cult.  Makes me glad I retired from the guru worshipping business.


Steve - you don't have to worship her. I have never worshiped Amma nor
did I see her as my Guru for a long time. I was among those who had no
particular fascination for Devi Bhava, I loved Amma and would always
complain to people around me that I didn't like Amma dressed in a
colorful sari with a crown, I would even say I hate it. So to say that
its a cult and everyone worships her is just so totally false, I'm a
prime example of that - if it was a cult a person like who revels in
shocking and mocking others would not have been entertained.
In fact I used to detest the cult like behavior of certain people at
Amma's but now I have to come to understand that people when they come
to spirituality comes with issues of hurt, pain and betrayal. They find
that the outside world and objects don't seem to give the everlasting
happiness. Obviously these people are very sensitive and loving are not
happy with the superficial toys of money, house, spouse and a couple of
kids. They feel the need to be loved, long to be part of a group that
can accept them for who they are. They may get Hindu names, they may
wear saris/dhotis, bindis - they are very enthusiastic and think
spirituality means aping certain outer manners and behavior. But this is
all optional, Amma never insists on that.  They slowly realize that the
outer has no significance to the inner but this takes time so we can't
just judge.
In fact the article is just BS, sure they might downplay Devi Bhava, I
can see why even I, being an Indian am highly uncomfortable with the
Devi Bhava but the important thing it is not because of *malice*, it is
not *deception* - they are just downplaying it for the Western audience,
it is just being practical and pragmatic. The western audience wouldn't
necessarily understand that the Devi is just a symbol for the supreme
consciousness that pervades one and all. Once they love Amma and
understand the Hindu concepts they slowly start understanding the Hindu
principles, but these concepts are not mainstream, very few Westerners
understand it so it makes sense to downplay it. Its very hard for
Westerners who are conditioned by the Judeo-Christian concepts and who
have no prior knowledge of Eastern traditions to understand Devi Bhava
even before they come to meet Ammachi,
The article makes it sound as if this is deceptive without actually
saying that because they know they can't say that word, so they use
innuendo to manipulate the readers into believing there is malice and
deception. The article and the authors of it are being very deceptive.
Sure depending on the samskara of a devotee she might declare herself an
avatar, a devi but then people miss the point. An awakened Guru is a
manifestation of the supreme consciousness and the supreme consciousness
can take any form based upon the samskara of a person hence millions of
deities in Hinduism. The number of dieties in Hinduism is just a
metaphor, that each to his own - that each has his own unique path, that
the supreme consciousness is so mysterious and powerful that it can
manifest in a unique way for each individual. This symbolism is powerful
and unique to Hinduism. This shows that Hinduism is really not a
religion, it is called Sanatana Dharma, the eternal law - it is purely a
recognition and celebration of the individual and his/her unique path to
self-realization.


[FairfieldLife] Re: About the Amma Cult

2011-04-25 Thread Ravi Yogi

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Tom Pall thomas.pall@ wrote:
 
 
http://www.experiencefestival.com/wp/article/outsider-vs-insider-doctrin\
e-of-the-hugging-saint

 This is an interesting article. I'd heard some of this
 before from a former Amma devotee I knew in France. She
 blew the lid off of the stuff we show the outside
 world vs. stuff we don't dual nature of the Amma org
 long before I ever heard much about her here.

 The fascinating thing from my side is that it reminds
 me of a story I once wrote. In Tibetan Buddhism there
 is a tradition of supposedly higher, non-physical beings
 taking over the bodies of humans. That's their view
 of what is going on with the Tibetan State Oracles. On
 another level entirely, there is a tradition of some
 men and women allowing these higher beings to take
 over their bodies and dance for followers.

 My story was written while commuting every week from
 Santa Fe to Detroit. The Detroit airport just sucked,
 and I didn't want to spend any more time there than
 absolutely necessary. So I discovered a strip club that
 was brilliantly located across the street from the
 rental car return lot. You could turn in your car, then
 walk across the street and wait for your flight in the
 strip club. They even had monitors up above the bar so
 you could check on the status of your flight. Then they
 would drive you to the airport in their limo. I spent
 many a happy hour sitting at the bar of that strip club
 writing stories, and chatting with the dancers. Never
 once got a private dance, never once sat by the stage
 to watch them dance; sitting at the bar was fine for me.

 Anyway, there was one dancer there who was really GOOD.
 I talked with her a lot, and found that she had trained
 as a modern dancer for years, and it showed. So one day
 I thought of a story with her as the protagonist. Sorta.

 She's up there on stage dancing for the guys at the
 strip club, and suddenly one of these ancient Tibetan
 goddesses takes over her body. At first it's confusing
 for the goddess, because looking around at the bar, this
 is just not like the temples she's used to dancing in. :-)
 But she kinda gets into it, pulls out all the stops,
 and does a dance for the patrons of the strip club that
 blasts them with mega-shakti and leaves all of them
 stunned and a couple of them enlightened. I had a lot
 of fun writing it, and my friend the stripper was quite
 flattered.

 Anyway, that's what I thought of when I read the accounts
 of Amma playing dressup. Now you know how low-vibe I
 really am. It's much worse than my detractors here would
 have you believe. :-)


Oh yeah you are totally fascinated with yourself..:-). But I like your
story, it's a good metaphor on the work of the Divine Mother. Men tend
to objectify women, they fantasize and drool over the woman to get her
into bed. The woman plays along, you get married to her and then she
shows who's the boss..LOL..I married the right woman or the existence
chose me the right woman, she called herself as a daughter of Kali, she
was beautiful, one of the most beatiful I have ever seen - I was
infatuated with her, I married her and then she drove me insane and made
me a yogi. Thats why I am forever indebted to her and the divine mother.
Amma is not my Guru, my Guru is my beloved Aruna..:-)


[FairfieldLife] Re: About the Amma Cult

2011-04-25 Thread seventhray1

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Yogi raviyogi@... wrote:
Thanks for your reply.  Well you are right.  There are so many issues,
and so many ways to interpret them.  As you say, what one sees as
deception, may just be an attempt not to confuse by another.  What one
sees as worship, may just be symbolism for another.  So, as Rick pointed
out, and I guess Peter, you just navigate through, and pick out what
works for you and what doesn't.  Definitely a caveat emptor type
sitiuation.  I have to say though,  IMHO, I see the gurus often having
a hard time resisting some of the perks that accompany their fame,
fortune and power.  I mean, I think, a really hard time.  But that's
okay, because it doesn't affect me, and people,of course, are free to
act and believe as they see fit.
 Steve - you don't have to worship her. I have never worshiped Amma nor
 did I see her as my Guru for a long time. I was among those who had no
 particular fascination for Devi Bhava, I loved Amma and would always
 complain to people around me that I didn't like Amma dressed in a
 colorful sari with a crown, I would even say I hate it. So to say that
 its a cult and everyone worships her is just so totally false, I'm a
 prime example of that - if it was a cult a person like who revels in
 shocking and mocking others would not have been entertained.
 In fact I used to detest the cult like behavior of certain people at
 Amma's but now I have to come to understand that people when they come
 to spirituality comes with issues of hurt, pain and betrayal. They
find
 that the outside world and objects don't seem to give the everlasting
 happiness. Obviously these people are very sensitive and loving are
not
 happy with the superficial toys of money, house, spouse and a couple
of
 kids. They feel the need to be loved, long to be part of a group that
 can accept them for who they are. They may get Hindu names, they may
 wear saris/dhotis, bindis - they are very enthusiastic and think
 spirituality means aping certain outer manners and behavior. But this
is
 all optional, Amma never insists on that. They slowly realize that the
 outer has no significance to the inner but this takes time so we can't
 just judge.
 In fact the article is just BS, sure they might downplay Devi Bhava, I
 can see why even I, being an Indian am highly uncomfortable with the
 Devi Bhava but the important thing it is not because of *malice*, it
is
 not *deception* - they are just downplaying it for the Western
audience,
 it is just being practical and pragmatic. The western audience
wouldn't
 necessarily understand that the Devi is just a symbol for the supreme
 consciousness that pervades one and all. Once they love Amma and
 understand the Hindu concepts they slowly start understanding the
Hindu
 principles, but these concepts are not mainstream, very few Westerners
 understand it so it makes sense to downplay it. Its very hard for
 Westerners who are conditioned by the Judeo-Christian concepts and who
 have no prior knowledge of Eastern traditions to understand Devi Bhava
 even before they come to meet Ammachi,
 The article makes it sound as if this is deceptive without actually
 saying that because they know they can't say that word, so they use
 innuendo to manipulate the readers into believing there is malice and
 deception. The article and the authors of it are being very deceptive.
 Sure depending on the samskara of a devotee she might declare herself
an
 avatar, a devi but then people miss the point. An awakened Guru is a
 manifestation of the supreme consciousness and the supreme
consciousness
 can take any form based upon the samskara of a person hence millions
of
 deities in Hinduism. The number of dieties in Hinduism is just a
 metaphor, that each to his own - that each has his own unique path,
that
 the supreme consciousness is so mysterious and powerful that it can
 manifest in a unique way for each individual. This symbolism is
powerful
 and unique to Hinduism. This shows that Hinduism is really not a
 religion, it is called Sanatana Dharma, the eternal law - it is purely
a
 recognition and celebration of the individual and his/her unique path
to
 self-realization.




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: About the Amma Cult

2011-04-25 Thread Vaj


On Apr 24, 2011, at 11:19 PM, seventhray1 wrote:

Not sure how you spin the Devi Bhava deal as anything thing but  
text book cult.  I'd love to hear the official  version on that  
one.  I mean, they could just come out and admit the truth, but  
there would be fallout.  In general the whole affair seems to be  
pretty much standard cult.  Makes me glad I retired from the guru  
worshipping business.



I saw it as a modern carryover of the very ancient practice of a  
woman being emotionally possessed by the goddess and then being  
worshipped as a living embodiment of Her. So it was like a window on  
the ancient past, but right here, right now, in the present. Her  
hugging seemed (to me) to be a way of showing people how to embrace  
totality and to embrace people as they are, with unconditional loving  
kindness, cosmic maternal love being a kind of lubricant of totality.


Of course this is done in a very traditional Hindu fashion, of which  
bhava samadhi has some similarities to Christian charismatic  
practices. But it truly is a modern survival of the cult of Shakti,  
although not necessarily a cult in the negative sense.


In the more negative sense we have women who are chosen to be  
goddesses for life, kumaris, who have little sign of spiritual  
accomplishment and it garnishes considerable wealth for their  
families. The movie Living Goddess is a good example of the negative  
side of this ancient way of life IMO. People like Amma, IMO, seem to  
be restoring the original tradition.

[FairfieldLife] Re: About the Amma Cult

2011-04-25 Thread seventhray1

I know you are somewhat into Osho, and I have to say, that although I
know little about him, the one thing that I've always enjoyed is that he
seems real upfront about who he is, and his lifestyle.  Didn't seem to
hide behind a lot of sanctimonious crap.  Like I say, I've only seen a
handful of videos and a few of the writings, but I like what I saw.


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray1 steve.sundur@...
wrote:


 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Yogi raviyogi@ wrote:
 Thanks for your reply. Well you are right. There are so many issues,
 and so many ways to interpret them. As you say, what one sees as
 deception, may just be an attempt not to confuse by another. What one
 sees as worship, may just be symbolism for another. So, as Rick
pointed
 out, and I guess Peter, you just navigate through, and pick out what
 works for you and what doesn't. Definitely a caveat emptor type
 sitiuation. I have to say though, IMHO, I see the gurus often having
 a hard time resisting some of the perks that accompany their fame,
 fortune and power. I mean, I think, a really hard time. But that's
 okay, because it doesn't affect me, and people,of course, are free to
 act and believe as they see fit.
  Steve - you don't have to worship her. I have never worshiped Amma
nor
  did I see her as my Guru for a long time. I was among those who had
no
  particular fascination for Devi Bhava, I loved Amma and would always
  complain to people around me that I didn't like Amma dressed in a
  colorful sari with a crown, I would even say I hate it. So to say
that
  its a cult and everyone worships her is just so totally false, I'm a
  prime example of that - if it was a cult a person like who revels in
  shocking and mocking others would not have been entertained.
  In fact I used to detest the cult like behavior of certain people at
  Amma's but now I have to come to understand that people when they
come
  to spirituality comes with issues of hurt, pain and betrayal. They
 find
  that the outside world and objects don't seem to give the
everlasting
  happiness. Obviously these people are very sensitive and loving are
 not
  happy with the superficial toys of money, house, spouse and a couple
 of
  kids. They feel the need to be loved, long to be part of a group
that
  can accept them for who they are. They may get Hindu names, they may
  wear saris/dhotis, bindis - they are very enthusiastic and think
  spirituality means aping certain outer manners and behavior. But
this
 is
  all optional, Amma never insists on that. They slowly realize that
the
  outer has no significance to the inner but this takes time so we
can't
  just judge.
  In fact the article is just BS, sure they might downplay Devi Bhava,
I
  can see why even I, being an Indian am highly uncomfortable with the
  Devi Bhava but the important thing it is not because of *malice*, it
 is
  not *deception* - they are just downplaying it for the Western
 audience,
  it is just being practical and pragmatic. The western audience
 wouldn't
  necessarily understand that the Devi is just a symbol for the
supreme
  consciousness that pervades one and all. Once they love Amma and
  understand the Hindu concepts they slowly start understanding the
 Hindu
  principles, but these concepts are not mainstream, very few
Westerners
  understand it so it makes sense to downplay it. Its very hard for
  Westerners who are conditioned by the Judeo-Christian concepts and
who
  have no prior knowledge of Eastern traditions to understand Devi
Bhava
  even before they come to meet Ammachi,
  The article makes it sound as if this is deceptive without actually
  saying that because they know they can't say that word, so they use
  innuendo to manipulate the readers into believing there is malice
and
  deception. The article and the authors of it are being very
deceptive.
  Sure depending on the samskara of a devotee she might declare
herself
 an
  avatar, a devi but then people miss the point. An awakened Guru is a
  manifestation of the supreme consciousness and the supreme
 consciousness
  can take any form based upon the samskara of a person hence millions
 of
  deities in Hinduism. The number of dieties in Hinduism is just a
  metaphor, that each to his own - that each has his own unique path,
 that
  the supreme consciousness is so mysterious and powerful that it can
  manifest in a unique way for each individual. This symbolism is
 powerful
  and unique to Hinduism. This shows that Hinduism is really not a
  religion, it is called Sanatana Dharma, the eternal law - it is
purely
 a
  recognition and celebration of the individual and his/her unique
path
 to
  self-realization.
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: About the Amma Cult

2011-04-25 Thread Vaj


On Apr 25, 2011, at 8:43 AM, seventhray1 wrote:

I know you are somewhat into Osho, and I have to say, that  
although I know little about him, the one thing that I've always  
enjoyed is that he seems real upfront about who he is, and his  
lifestyle.  Didn't seem to hide behind a lot of sanctimonious  
crap.  Like I say, I've only seen a handful of videos and a few of  
the writings, but I like what I saw.



Osho, aka Rajneesh, was a Nitrous Oxide addict who also had a love of  
marijuana milkshakes and Valium. Some of his books are said to have  
been dictated while under Nitrous from a local dentist.





[FairfieldLife] Re: About the Amma Cult

2011-04-25 Thread WillyTex


  Like I say, I've only seen a handful of videos 
  and a few of the writings, but I like what I saw.
 
Vaj:
 Osho, aka Rajneesh, was a Nitrous Oxide addict who 
 also had a love of marijuana milkshakes and Valium. 
 Some of his books are said to have been dictated 
 while under Nitrous from a local dentist.

Apparently, Osho consumed no dairy and none of his 
books were dictated after he moved to Oregon and met 
the dentist up there.



[FairfieldLife] Re: About the Amma Cult

2011-04-25 Thread Ravi Yogi

You are right, I loved Osho because he was not into avatar, infallible crap. He 
always said he was as fallible as anyone else, he clearly illustrated the 
qualities of the outer and the inner, the difference between the essential and 
accidental. No one has influenced me more than Osho, what I liked about him was 
his brutal honesty without caring for the need to sound holy and respectable 
and this is one of the qualities that I try to emulate because it matches my 
samskara.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray1 steve.sundur@... wrote:

 
 I know you are somewhat into Osho, and I have to say, that although I
 know little about him, the one thing that I've always enjoyed is that he
 seems real upfront about who he is, and his lifestyle.  Didn't seem to
 hide behind a lot of sanctimonious crap.  Like I say, I've only seen a
 handful of videos and a few of the writings, but I like what I saw.
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray1 steve.sundur@
 wrote:
 
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Yogi raviyogi@ wrote:
  Thanks for your reply. Well you are right. There are so many issues,
  and so many ways to interpret them. As you say, what one sees as
  deception, may just be an attempt not to confuse by another. What one
  sees as worship, may just be symbolism for another. So, as Rick
 pointed
  out, and I guess Peter, you just navigate through, and pick out what
  works for you and what doesn't. Definitely a caveat emptor type
  sitiuation. I have to say though, IMHO, I see the gurus often having
  a hard time resisting some of the perks that accompany their fame,
  fortune and power. I mean, I think, a really hard time. But that's
  okay, because it doesn't affect me, and people,of course, are free to
  act and believe as they see fit.
   Steve - you don't have to worship her. I have never worshiped Amma
 nor
   did I see her as my Guru for a long time. I was among those who had
 no
   particular fascination for Devi Bhava, I loved Amma and would always
   complain to people around me that I didn't like Amma dressed in a
   colorful sari with a crown, I would even say I hate it. So to say
 that
   its a cult and everyone worships her is just so totally false, I'm a
   prime example of that - if it was a cult a person like who revels in
   shocking and mocking others would not have been entertained.
   In fact I used to detest the cult like behavior of certain people at
   Amma's but now I have to come to understand that people when they
 come
   to spirituality comes with issues of hurt, pain and betrayal. They
  find
   that the outside world and objects don't seem to give the
 everlasting
   happiness. Obviously these people are very sensitive and loving are
  not
   happy with the superficial toys of money, house, spouse and a couple
  of
   kids. They feel the need to be loved, long to be part of a group
 that
   can accept them for who they are. They may get Hindu names, they may
   wear saris/dhotis, bindis - they are very enthusiastic and think
   spirituality means aping certain outer manners and behavior. But
 this
  is
   all optional, Amma never insists on that. They slowly realize that
 the
   outer has no significance to the inner but this takes time so we
 can't
   just judge.
   In fact the article is just BS, sure they might downplay Devi Bhava,
 I
   can see why even I, being an Indian am highly uncomfortable with the
   Devi Bhava but the important thing it is not because of *malice*, it
  is
   not *deception* - they are just downplaying it for the Western
  audience,
   it is just being practical and pragmatic. The western audience
  wouldn't
   necessarily understand that the Devi is just a symbol for the
 supreme
   consciousness that pervades one and all. Once they love Amma and
   understand the Hindu concepts they slowly start understanding the
  Hindu
   principles, but these concepts are not mainstream, very few
 Westerners
   understand it so it makes sense to downplay it. Its very hard for
   Westerners who are conditioned by the Judeo-Christian concepts and
 who
   have no prior knowledge of Eastern traditions to understand Devi
 Bhava
   even before they come to meet Ammachi,
   The article makes it sound as if this is deceptive without actually
   saying that because they know they can't say that word, so they use
   innuendo to manipulate the readers into believing there is malice
 and
   deception. The article and the authors of it are being very
 deceptive.
   Sure depending on the samskara of a devotee she might declare
 herself
  an
   avatar, a devi but then people miss the point. An awakened Guru is a
   manifestation of the supreme consciousness and the supreme
  consciousness
   can take any form based upon the samskara of a person hence millions
  of
   deities in Hinduism. The number of dieties in Hinduism is just a
   metaphor, that each to his own - that each has his own unique path,
  that
   the supreme consciousness is 

[FairfieldLife] Re: About the Amma Cult

2011-04-25 Thread Ravi Yogi


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@... wrote:

 
 On Apr 25, 2011, at 8:43 AM, seventhray1 wrote:
 
  I know you are somewhat into Osho, and I have to say, that  
  although I know little about him, the one thing that I've always  
  enjoyed is that he seems real upfront about who he is, and his  
  lifestyle.  Didn't seem to hide behind a lot of sanctimonious  
  crap.  Like I say, I've only seen a handful of videos and a few of  
  the writings, but I like what I saw.
 
 
 Osho, aka Rajneesh, was a Nitrous Oxide addict who also had a love of  
 marijuana milkshakes and Valium. Some of his books are said to have  
 been dictated while under Nitrous from a local dentist.


This is so hilarious in it's outrageousness. Vaj, the one trick parrot with his 
daily choking routine of parroted stuff, with the daily discourses on the 
Parama Vakra Gita, messiah of the fallen TM'ers - good to have your comedy 
routine back.



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: About the Amma Cult

2011-04-25 Thread Vaj

On Apr 25, 2011, at 6:33 PM, Ravi Yogi wrote:

 Osho, aka Rajneesh, was a Nitrous Oxide addict who also had a love of  
 marijuana milkshakes and Valium. Some of his books are said to have  
 been dictated while under Nitrous from a local dentist.
 
 
 This is so hilarious in it's outrageousness. Vaj, the one trick parrot with 
 his daily choking routine of parroted stuff, with the daily discourses on the 
 Parama Vakra Gita, messiah of the fallen TM'ers - good to have your comedy 
 routine back.

I'm not parroting anything Ravee. It's just what I know from having talked to 
Rajneesh followers, that's all.

If anyone needs a new comedy routine...dude it's you. Sorry, it ain't workin'...

[FairfieldLife] Re: About the Amma Cult

2011-04-24 Thread Alex Stanley




--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@... wrote:

 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com]
 On Behalf Of Tom Pall
 Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2011 8:17 PM
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] About the Amma Cult
 
  
 
   
 
 http://www.experiencefestival.com/wp/article/outsider-vs-insider-doctrine-of
 -the-hugging-saint
 
 who's behind this site? The Bhagavan  Amma people who give diksha? That's
 my impression, but it's hard to tell.

The site also has articles that are positive towards her:

http://www.experiencefestival.com/wp/article/ammachi-full-expression-of-generosity-and-love

http://www.experiencefestival.com/wp/article/my-experiences-with-divinity-called-amma-the-hugging-saint-from-india

The site can't seem to make up its mind what bias to have. Or, maybe it's just 
a general repository of Eastern/New Age spiritual themed articles.




[FairfieldLife] Re: About the Amma Cult

2011-04-24 Thread seventhray1

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Tom Pall thomas.pall@... wrote:


http://www.experiencefestival.com/wp/article/outsider-vs-insider-doctrin\
e-of-the-hugging-saint

Not sure how you spin the Devi Bhava deal as anything thing but text
book cult.  I'd love to hear the official  version on that one.  I
mean, they could just come out and admit the truth, but there would be
fallout.  In general the whole affair seems to be pretty much standard
cult.  Makes me glad I retired from the guru worshipping business.


[FairfieldLife] Re: About the Amma Cult

2011-04-24 Thread seventhray1

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@... wrote:


http://www.experiencefestival.com/wp/article/outsider-vs-insider-doctrin\
e-of
 -the-hugging-saint

 who's behind this site? The Bhagavan  Amma people who give diksha?
That's
 my impression, but it's hard to tell.

Is this the shoot the messager type response?  You know, the don't
address the issues raised, focus on the messager type response.   Basic
cult mentality.  Kind of like the mentality you regularly fault the TMO
for displaying.


[FairfieldLife] Re: About the Amma Cult

2011-04-24 Thread seventhray1

Some are free to ignore activities in an organization that appear to be
hypocritical and focus on the benefits they feel they are receiving. 
And others may like to see a little consistency in their organization
even if it means they can be accused of being stuck in their ego.  
Often another convenient manipulation.


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@... wrote:

 People are so lost in their thoughts and concepts. Go with your direct
experience. The rest is ridiculous. Who cares what collection of
concepts you have that says right,right, right, wrong, wrong, wrong. And
then people run out to warn others as if nobody but they have the true
understanding of what is really going on. And all the time that divine
is present in all it's infinite profundity, just right there. Right
there pulling that absurd ego right into it stripping everything.Be
as little children; open, clear, simple.Â

 --- On Sun, 4/24/11, Rick Archer rick@... wrote:

 From: Rick Archer rick@...
 Subject: RE: [FairfieldLife] About the Amma Cult
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Sunday, April 24, 2011, 9:40 PM























 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Tom Pall
 Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2011 8:17 PM
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] About the Amma Cult   
http://www.experiencefestival.com/wp/article/outsider-vs-insider-doctrin\
e-of-the-hugging-saintwho’s behind this site? The Bhagavan  Amma
people who give diksha? That’s my impression, but it’s
hard to tell.





RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: About the Amma Cult

2011-04-24 Thread Rick Archer
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of seventhray1
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2011 10:19 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: About the Amma Cult


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Tom Pall thomas.pall@... wrote:


http://www.experiencefestival.com/wp/article/outsider-vs-insider-doctrine-of
-the-hugging-saint

Not sure how you spin the Devi Bhava deal as anything thing but text book
cult.  I'd love to hear the official  version on that one.  I mean, they
could just come out and admit the truth, but there would be fallout.  In
general the whole affair seems to be pretty much standard cult.  Makes me
glad I retired from the guru worshipping business. 

 

I guess different people view it differently. I find it entertaining, in a
ceremonial sort of way. I don't take the symbolism very literally, nor am I
overly invested in any type of expression of Indian spirituality. I think
spirituality is universal, and Indians have their own festive way of
celebrating it. To each his own.

 



[FairfieldLife] Re: About the Amma Cult

2011-04-24 Thread seventhray1

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@... wrote:
 I guess different people view it differently. I find it entertaining,
in a
 ceremonial sort of way. I don't take the symbolism very literally, nor
am I
 overly invested in any type of expression of Indian spirituality. I
think
 spirituality is universal, and Indians have their own festive way of
 celebrating it. To each his own.

Makes sense.  Take what you, want and leave the rest