[FairfieldLife] Re: WTC - New evidence for use of explosives--nuts
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozg...@... wrote: Vaj wrote: On Apr 7, 2009, at 12:49 PM, Bhairitu wrote: What would the Muslim world have to gain from the attacks anyway? Cause a hawkish US President of questionable intelligence to, as a knee-jerk reaction, go into a war which drains the nation, forcing it's economy into a tailspin AND gain support for recruiting worldwide? The RADICAL Muslim world would have a lot to gain. The moderate and progressive Muslim world would have a lot to lose. That's a rather superficial point of view. It is entirely possible the whole thing was a false flag operation but I wouldn't be surprised if Dubya was out of the loop. False flag operations have been used throughout history to cause wars or make money for the war profiteers. They are pretty much standard operating procedure. The military industrial complex was hurting after the Cold War ended. They needed a new war to bolster their sagging profits. There were corporations and banks under scrutiny too (and those records conveniently got destroyed during 9-11). I think they all co-conspired with rogue right leaning military to create 9-11 and use the Arabs as patsies. It just makes too much sense that way and the official story does not. The whole think looks like it was cooked up by a think tank (complete with plan B, C, and Ds) and not by a bunch of Arabs in caves. As for Muslims, just like any other religion 85% of them pay lip service to it. Some I have known were only born Muslim and never practiced it. Muhammad invented Islam to rid the area of war lords back them. Now we find ourselves once again saddled with war lords and need to get rid of them. In this time the big war lords are the military industrial complex. We don't need a religion to do this, just the truth. Here is the truth if you can handel it. we live in an age where the President of the United States can't even get a blow job in the White House with out the whole world finding out. you really think the 400 or so people it would take to pull of the lose change type conspiracy have never talked or anybody has found out anything about it. you all live in a paralell universe where people make up stories, then teach themselves how to believe them, then want other people to be as crazy as they are. Have another crazey day. Chris
[FairfieldLife] Re: WTC - New evidence for use of explosives--nuts
menkemeyer menkeme...@... wrote: Here is the truth if you can handel it. we live in an age where the President of the United States can't even get a blow job in the White House with out the whole world finding out. you really think the 400 or so people it would take to pull of the lose change type conspiracy have never talked or anybody has found out anything about it. you all live in a paralell universe where people make up stories, then teach themselves how to believe them, then want other people to be as crazy as they are. Have another crazey day. Chris Chris, H. Do you believe in any conspiracies? While the logic about 400 people being unable to police all their members enough to keep them all quiet is difficult to counter, I still cannot shake the intuition alarms that 100% start ringing whenever I attend to many of the various conspiracies. Not that I think there's a Bigfoot to be found or a UFO stored in Area 51, but that there can be no proof of a negative -- which leaves the conspiracy in a moot debate, and thus open to every manner of speculation. BTW, what part about follow the money didn't you get? What would be your bottom line price? What amount would bribe you? Given the hardness of the upbringing of some quite capable people, I have no trouble imagining a bought and paid for cabal of some sort. We know how hard it is to get prisoners to rat on each other or for our POWs to be tortured into making anti-USA statements -- certainly it's possible for some high IQ, black-ops, group to have made themselves into true believers that their drastic actions would better our country's homeland security, and, once done, they'd all have prison to face if they do come forward. We certainly have no trouble getting our troops to invade any country, so, why not a well rewarded group of true believers? Yeah, again, 400 is a lot of folks to keep handcuffed until they all die, and when they get older, they'll value their integrity more and their blind loyalties less, but that just means they have to be killed off too if they show any sign of being a whistle-blower. For the Y2K issue, we saw that virtually every single company refused to come forward and reveal the true state of their computers and what it would take to reprogram them. Somehow the nightmare never manifested, but, we can certainly learn that companies are paying their employees enough to keep them mum about such matters. That's pretty cheap as pay offs and bribes go, eh? Not that the electric companies were hiding anything, but that they showed the wherewithal to face the world with a blank stare and denial running at the redline. I attended a confrontation with the electric company during that time and shouted questions from the group -- the guy simply did what the TBs here do -- used every manner of obfuscation, weak answers, I don't know yet...I'll get back to you, diversions and outright lying. Yet, I'm sure he didn't get a bonus to cover his company's ass -- even though he was avoiding giving out complete truths. He knew if he told the true status that there'd be a much bigger chance at lawsuits etc. He was there to massage us until it was too late. Since nothing happened of note, it was all for naught, but some real life lines were drawn in the sand by some very underpaid folks. It doesn't take much to get someone to lie for someone else. Edg
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WTC - New evidence for use of explosives--nuts
menkemeyer wrote: Here is the truth if you can handel it. we live in an age where the President of the United States can't even get a blow job in the White House with out the whole world finding out. you really think the 400 or so people it would take to pull of the lose change type conspiracy have never talked or anybody has found out anything about it. you all live in a paralell universe where people make up stories, then teach themselves how to believe them, then want other people to be as crazy as they are. Have another crazey day. Chris There are many ways to cover the tracks of 400 people (it has been estimated that it might have been only 200 or less). One is compartmentalization. An example of that would be someone without the clearance would be kept from knowing what someone with higher clearance knows. Or it is not in their area so they are told they can't have access to that information. Also people may have been involved that had no idea that what they did contributed. There has been an accusation which should be entertained whether it is the truth or not that the remote planes were flown by military staff who believed they were flying a simulation for the war games going on that day. They didn't realize what they had done until they took a break to check sports scores and saw the news. Supposedly they were threatened with death or family member death if they spoke out (but who would believe them anyway). Now that may well be a work of fiction but a logical scenario that might have played out. You are aware there were war game exercises going on that day? You are aware that the traffic controllers were trying to verify if what they were seeing was real or part of the game? And if some people spoke out they would be discredited as being kooks anyway. But some with credibility who wanted to speak out are probably no longer with us. As much as 24 is a work of fiction (and often silly as to be a comedy) I think the current scenario is a good attempt to show that false flag and the interests of the military industrial complex can take precedent over the interests of the public. I have a relative, retired military, who spoke vehemently about the Clinton administration leaving the military weak. It is not that much of a stretch to believe that some of these folks would support an operation like 9-11 if they thought that it would regain military supremacy for the US. Right wingers are very hard core and very stubborn about these things. That makes them dangerous.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WTC - New evidence for use of explosives--nuts
One not being able to see and understand that said below, certainly means they are programmed with nonsense like the masses. menkemeyer wrote: Here is the truth if you can handel it. we live in an age where the President of the United States can't even get a blow job in the White House with out the whole world finding out. you really think the 400 or so people it would take to pull of the lose change type conspiracy have never talked or anybody has found out anything about it. you all live in a paralell universe where people make up stories, then teach themselves how to believe them, then want other people to be as crazy as they are. Have another crazey day. Chris There are many ways to cover the tracks of 400 people (it has been estimated that it might have been only 200 or less). One is compartmentalizatio n. An example of that would be someone without the clearance would be kept from knowing what someone with higher clearance knows. Or it is not in their area so they are told they can't have access to that information. Also people may have been involved that had no idea that what they did contributed. There has been an accusation which should be entertained whether it is the truth or not that the remote planes were flown by military staff who believed they were flying a simulation for the war games going on that day. They didn't realize what they had done until they took a break to check sports scores and saw the news. Supposedly they were threatened with death or family member death if they spoke out (but who would believe them anyway). Now that may well be a work of fiction but a logical scenario that might have played out. You are aware there were war game exercises going on that day? You are aware that the traffic controllers were trying to verify if what they were seeing was real or part of the game? And if some people spoke out they would be discredited as being kooks anyway. But some with credibility who wanted to speak out are probably no longer with us. As much as 24 is a work of fiction (and often silly as to be a comedy) I think the current scenario is a good attempt to show that false flag and the interests of the military industrial complex can take precedent over the interests of the public. I have a relative, retired military, who spoke vehemently about the Clinton administration leaving the military weak. It is not that much of a stretch to believe that some of these folks would support an operation like 9-11 if they thought that it would regain military supremacy for the US. Right wingers are very hard core and very stubborn about these things. That makes them dangerous.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WTC - New evidence for use of explosives--nuts
Which post are you referring to? Arhata Osho wrote: One not being able to see and understand that said below, certainly means they are programmed with nonsense like the masses. menkemeyer wrote: Here is the truth if you can handel it. we live in an age where the President of the United States can't even get a blow job in the White House with out the whole world finding out. you really think the 400 or so people it would take to pull of the lose change type conspiracy have never talked or anybody has found out anything about it. you all live in a paralell universe where people make up stories, then teach themselves how to believe them, then want other people to be as crazy as they are. Have another crazey day. Chris There are many ways to cover the tracks of 400 people (it has been estimated that it might have been only 200 or less). One is compartmentalizatio n. An example of that would be someone without the clearance would be kept from knowing what someone with higher clearance knows. Or it is not in their area so they are told they can't have access to that information. Also people may have been involved that had no idea that what they did contributed. There has been an accusation which should be entertained whether it is the truth or not that the remote planes were flown by military staff who believed they were flying a simulation for the war games going on that day. They didn't realize what they had done until they took a break to check sports scores and saw the news. Supposedly they were threatened with death or family member death if they spoke out (but who would believe them anyway). Now that may well be a work of fiction but a logical scenario that might have played out. You are aware there were war game exercises going on that day? You are aware that the traffic controllers were trying to verify if what they were seeing was real or part of the game? And if some people spoke out they would be discredited as being kooks anyway. But some with credibility who wanted to speak out are probably no longer with us. As much as 24 is a work of fiction (and often silly as to be a comedy) I think the current scenario is a good attempt to show that false flag and the interests of the military industrial complex can take precedent over the interests of the public. I have a relative, retired military, who spoke vehemently about the Clinton administration leaving the military weak. It is not that much of a stretch to believe that some of these folks would support an operation like 9-11 if they thought that it would regain military supremacy for the US. Right wingers are very hard core and very stubborn about these things. That makes them dangerous.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WTC - New evidence for use of explosives--nuts
The one explaining how 9-11 could have been an inside job and how people could keep quite. Which post are you referring to? Arhata Osho wrote: One not being able to see and understand that said below, certainly means they are programmed with nonsense like the masses. menkemeyer wrote: Here is the truth if you can handel it. we live in an age where the President of the United States can't even get a blow job in the White House with out the whole world finding out. you really think the 400 or so people it would take to pull of the lose change type conspiracy have never talked or anybody has found out anything about it. you all live in a paralell universe where people make up stories, then teach themselves how to believe them, then want other people to be as crazy as they are. Have another crazey day. Chris There are many ways to cover the tracks of 400 people (it has been estimated that it might have been only 200 or less). One is compartmentalizatio n. An example of that would be someone without the clearance would be kept from knowing what someone with higher clearance knows. Or it is not in their area so they are told they can't have access to that information. Also people may have been involved that had no idea that what they did contributed. There has been an accusation which should be entertained whether it is the truth or not that the remote planes were flown by military staff who believed they were flying a simulation for the war games going on that day. They didn't realize what they had done until they took a break to check sports scores and saw the news. Supposedly they were threatened with death or family member death if they spoke out (but who would believe them anyway). Now that may well be a work of fiction but a logical scenario that might have played out. You are aware there were war game exercises going on that day? You are aware that the traffic controllers were trying to verify if what they were seeing was real or part of the game? And if some people spoke out they would be discredited as being kooks anyway. But some with credibility who wanted to speak out are probably no longer with us. As much as 24 is a work of fiction (and often silly as to be a comedy) I think the current scenario is a good attempt to show that false flag and the interests of the military industrial complex can take precedent over the interests of the public. I have a relative, retired military, who spoke vehemently about the Clinton administration leaving the military weak. It is not that much of a stretch to believe that some of these folks would support an operation like 9-11 if they thought that it would regain military supremacy for the US. Right wingers are very hard core and very stubborn about these things. That makes them dangerous.
[FairfieldLife] Re: WTC - New evidence for use of explosives--nuts
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Arhata Osho arhatafreespe...@... wrote: The one explaining how 9-11 could have been an inside job and how people could keep quite. They couldn't. This is one of those topics that pop up from time to time that drives anti-conspiracy posters nuts, and then it disappears. Government dweebs don't keep their mouthes shut and NOT rat out their friends and co-conspirators to save their asses. You nailed it brother. Which post are you referring to? Arhata Osho wrote: One not being able to see and understand that said below, certainly means they are programmed with nonsense like the masses. menkemeyer wrote: Here is the truth if you can handel it. we live in an age where the President of the United States can't even get a blow job in the White House with out the whole world finding out. you really think the 400 or so people it would take to pull of the lose change type conspiracy have never talked or anybody has found out anything about it. you all live in a paralell universe where people make up stories, then teach themselves how to believe them, then want other people to be as crazy as they are. Have another crazey day. Chris There are many ways to cover the tracks of 400 people (it has been estimated that it might have been only 200 or less). One is compartmentalizatio n. An example of that would be someone without the clearance would be kept from knowing what someone with higher clearance knows. Or it is not in their area so they are told they can't have access to that information. Also people may have been involved that had no idea that what they did contributed. There has been an accusation which should be entertained whether it is the truth or not that the remote planes were flown by military staff who believed they were flying a simulation for the war games going on that day. They didn't realize what they had done until they took a break to check sports scores and saw the news. Supposedly they were threatened with death or family member death if they spoke out (but who would believe them anyway). Now that may well be a work of fiction but a logical scenario that might have played out. You are aware there were war game exercises going on that day? You are aware that the traffic controllers were trying to verify if what they were seeing was real or part of the game? And if some people spoke out they would be discredited as being kooks anyway. But some with credibility who wanted to speak out are probably no longer with us. As much as 24 is a work of fiction (and often silly as to be a comedy) I think the current scenario is a good attempt to show that false flag and the interests of the military industrial complex can take precedent over the interests of the public. I have a relative, retired military, who spoke vehemently about the Clinton administration leaving the military weak. It is not that much of a stretch to believe that some of these folks would support an operation like 9-11 if they thought that it would regain military supremacy for the US. Right wingers are very hard core and very stubborn about these things. That makes them dangerous.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WTC - New evidence for use of explosives--nuts
curtisdeltablues wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Arhata Osho arhatafreespe...@... wrote: The one explaining how 9-11 could have been an inside job and how people could keep quite. They couldn't. This is one of those topics that pop up from time to time that drives anti-conspiracy posters nuts, and then it disappears. Government dweebs don't keep their mouthes shut and NOT rat out their friends and co-conspirators to save their asses. You nailed it brother. Curtis, have you ever worked for the federal government? Arhata was being a bit ambiguous in his reply but I think he means that people buying the official story are the ones programmed with nonsense.
[FairfieldLife] Re: WTC - New evidence for use of explosives--nuts
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , Bhairitu noozg...@... wrote: curtisdeltablues wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , Arhata Osho arhatafreespeech@ wrote: The one explaining how 9-11 could have been an inside job and how people could keep quite. They couldn't. This is one of those topics that pop up from time to time that drives anti-conspiracy posters nuts, and then it disappears. Government dweebs don't keep their mouthes shut and NOT rat out their friends and co-conspirators to save their asses. You nailed it brother. Curtis, have you ever worked for the federal government? Arhata was being a bit ambiguous in his reply but I think he means that people buying the official story are the ones programmed with nonsense. And everyone forgets the 'suicide' of the government scientist who was going to be investigated for the anthrax, and several other fishy deaths and suicides that seem way too many coincidences since they were always people who may have given damning evidence if they lived -- but guess what, they conveniently died in plane crashes or 'committed suicide' OffWorld
[FairfieldLife] Re: WTC - New evidence for use of explosives--nuts
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_re...@... wrote: Curtis, have you ever worked for the federal government? No, but I did business with enough of them to know that they aren't special in any way. And for a while there, after 9-11,the people involved would have had to have been James Bond to keep it all together. Arhata was being a bit ambiguous in his reply but I think he means that people buying the official story are the ones programmed with nonsense. You may be right. Arhata, pick a card...but before you answer, I hope you will read what Off has written below. He is on the conspiracy team. And everyone forgets the 'suicide' of the government scientist who was going to be investigated for the anthrax, and several other fishy deaths and suicides that seem way too many coincidences since they were always people who may have given damning evidence if they lived -- but guess what, they conveniently died in plane crashes or 'committed suicide' OffWorld --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote: curtisdeltablues wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , Arhata Osho arhatafreespeech@ wrote: The one explaining how 9-11 could have been an inside job and how people could keep quite. They couldn't. This is one of those topics that pop up from time to time that drives anti-conspiracy posters nuts, and then it disappears. Government dweebs don't keep their mouthes shut and NOT rat out their friends and co-conspirators to save their asses. You nailed it brother. Curtis, have you ever worked for the federal government? Arhata was being a bit ambiguous in his reply but I think he means that people buying the official story are the ones programmed with nonsense. And everyone forgets the 'suicide' of the government scientist who was going to be investigated for the anthrax, and several other fishy deaths and suicides that seem way too many coincidences since they were always people who may have given damning evidence if they lived -- but guess what, they conveniently died in plane crashes or 'committed suicide' OffWorld
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WTC - New evidence for use of explosives--nuts
9-11 story obviously is different than the government line. The country, unfortunately would go topsy turvey if the real story came out, which it won't in our lifetime if ever. It's a 'follow the money' situation. Transparency - ha! Never happen with WTC's. WTC 7 of course is a key. My nephew was in military intelligence with a pretty inside understanding of 'intelligence' - he said, 'if the CIA is there, the building is 'set' to implode! You can bet no one would have rented in WTC 7 if they new that! I had been on every floor of all 3 buildings many times with many memories. --- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, off_world_beings no_re...@.. . wrote: Curtis, have you ever worked for the federal government? No, but I did business with enough of them to know that they aren't special in any way. And for a while there, after 9-11,the people involved would have had to have been James Bond to keep it all together. Arhata was being a bit ambiguous in his reply but I think he means that people buying the official story are the ones programmed with nonsense. You may be right. Arhata, pick a card...but before you answer, I hope you will read what Off has written below. He is on the conspiracy team. And everyone forgets the 'suicide' of the government scientist who was going to be investigated for the anthrax, and several other fishy deaths and suicides that seem way too many coincidences since they were always people who may have given damning evidence if they lived -- but guess what, they conveniently died in plane crashes or 'committed suicide' OffWorld --- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com mailto:FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com , Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote: curtisdeltablues wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com mailto:FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com , Arhata Osho arhatafreespeech@ wrote: The one explaining how 9-11 could have been an inside job and how people could keep quite. They couldn't. This is one of those topics that pop up from time to time that drives anti-conspiracy posters nuts, and then it disappears. Government dweebs don't keep their mouthes shut and NOT rat out their friends and co-conspirators to save their asses. You nailed it brother. Curtis, have you ever worked for the federal government? Arhata was being a bit ambiguous in his reply but I think he means that people buying the official story are the ones programmed with nonsense. And everyone forgets the 'suicide' of the government scientist who was going to be investigated for the anthrax, and several other fishy deaths and suicides that seem way too many coincidences since they were always people who may have given damning evidence if they lived -- but guess what, they conveniently died in plane crashes or 'committed suicide' OffWorld
[FairfieldLife] Re: WTC - New evidence for use of explosives--nuts
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Arhata Osho arhatafreespe...@... wrote S Bhairitu, I was just wondering if anyone knew of something that goes well with crow? Something that makes the crow flavor linger a bit less? My sincere I was so wrong apologies. 9-11 story obviously is different than the government line. The country, unfortunately would go topsy turvey if the real story came out, which it won't in our lifetime if ever. It's a 'follow the money' situation. Transparency - ha! Never happen with WTC's. WTC 7 of course is a key.� My nephew was in military intelligence with a pretty inside understanding of 'intelligence' - he said, 'if the CIA is there, the building is 'set' to implode!� You can bet no one would have rented in WTC 7 if they new that!� I had been on every floor of all 3 buildings many times with many memories. --- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, off_world_beings no_reply@ . wrote: Curtis, have you ever worked for the federal government? No, but I did business with enough of them to know that they aren't special in any way. And for a while there, after 9-11,the people involved would have had to have been James Bond to keep it all together. Arhata was being a bit ambiguous in his reply but I think he means that people buying the official story are the ones programmed with nonsense. You may be right. Arhata, pick a card...but before you answer, I hope you will read what Off has written below. He is on the conspiracy team. And everyone forgets the 'suicide' of the government scientist who was going to be investigated for the anthrax, and several other fishy deaths and suicides that seem way too many coincidences since they were always people who may have given damning evidence if they lived -- but guess what, they conveniently died in plane crashes or 'committed suicide' OffWorld --- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com mailto:FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com , Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote: curtisdeltablues wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com mailto:FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com , Arhata Osho arhatafreespeech@ wrote: The one explaining how 9-11 could have been an inside job and how people could keep quite. They couldn't. This is one of those topics that pop up from time to time that drives anti-conspiracy posters nuts, and then it disappears. Government dweebs don't keep their mouthes shut and NOT rat out their friends and co-conspirators to save their asses. You nailed it brother. Curtis, have you ever worked for the federal government? Arhata was being a bit ambiguous in his reply but I think he means that people buying the official story are the ones programmed with nonsense. And everyone forgets the 'suicide' of the government scientist who was going to be investigated for the anthrax, and several other fishy deaths and suicides that seem way too many coincidences since they were always people who may have given damning evidence if they lived -- but guess what, they conveniently died in plane crashes or 'committed suicide' OffWorld
[FairfieldLife] Re: WTC - New evidence for use of explosives--nuts
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_re...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote: curtisdeltablues wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , Arhata Osho arhatafreespeech@ wrote: The one explaining how 9-11 could have been an inside job and how people could keep quite. They couldn't. This is one of those topics that pop up from time to time that drives anti-conspiracy posters nuts, and then it disappears. Government dweebs don't keep their mouthes shut and NOT rat out their friends and co-conspirators to save their asses. You nailed it brother. Curtis, have you ever worked for the federal government? Arhata was being a bit ambiguous in his reply but I think he means that people buying the official story are the ones programmed with nonsense. And everyone forgets the 'suicide' of the government scientist who was going to be investigated for the anthrax, and several other fishy deaths and suicides that seem way too many coincidences since they were always people who may have given damning evidence if they lived -- but guess what, they conveniently died in plane crashes or 'committed suicide' OffWorld suicide-- suicided, became a verb.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WTC - New evidence for use of explosives--nuts
curtisdeltablues wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_re...@... wrote: Curtis, have you ever worked for the federal government? No, but I did business with enough of them to know that they aren't special in any way. And for a while there, after 9-11,the people involved would have had to have been James Bond to keep it all together. Well, I have worked in the government as a temp for EDS. Most don't know what is going on so that is why you wouldn't have heard of anything. Things are compartmentalized. All those G levels. Military and intel officers (I knew some of the latter from my brother's business) won't talk if pressed. I would have loved to have dug deeper with my relative regarding 9-11 but it was not the time. I just replied to his comment on the military cutback and told him that I didn't believe the official story on 9-11 to see his reaction. Some other time I'll dig deeper if I get anything. Another relative worked in the Pentagon in the section that was hit but was working at home that day because that section was being remodeled (did the press ever mention that -- I think they did). I would love to press him but I think his wife (my relative) divorced him so I won't get the chance.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WTC - New evidence for use of explosives--nuts
Maybe some BBQ sauce? Collard greens? Actually can't blame you much due to the ambiguity of Arhata's post. curtisdeltablues wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Arhata Osho arhatafreespe...@... wrote S Bhairitu, I was just wondering if anyone knew of something that goes well with crow? Something that makes the crow flavor linger a bit less? My sincere I was so wrong apologies.
[FairfieldLife] Re: WTC - New evidence for use of explosives--nuts
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozg...@... wrote: curtisdeltablues wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: Curtis, have you ever worked for the federal government? No, but I did business with enough of them to know that they aren't special in any way. And for a while there, after 9-11,the people involved would have had to have been James Bond to keep it all together. Well, I have worked in the government as a temp for EDS. Most don't know what is going on so that is why you wouldn't have heard of anything. Things are compartmentalized. All those G levels. Military and intel officers I know there are all sorts of monkey business deals in the government, I just don't buy the 9-11 conspiracy thing. But inprinciple I believe in the idea that we should always challenge what the government tells us so I'm with you in general, just not in this specific case. (I knew some of the latter from my brother's business) won't talk if pressed. I would have loved to have dug deeper with my relative regarding 9-11 but it was not the time. I just replied to his comment on the military cutback and told him that I didn't believe the official story on 9-11 to see his reaction. Some other time I'll dig deeper if I get anything. Another relative worked in the Pentagon in the section that was hit but was working at home that day because that section was being remodeled (did the press ever mention that -- I think they did). I would love to press him but I think his wife (my relative) divorced him so I won't get the chance.
[FairfieldLife] Re: WTC - New evidence for use of explosives--nuts
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltabl...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote: curtisdeltablues wrote: I know there are all sorts of monkey business deals in the government, I just don't buy the 9-11 conspiracy thing. But inprinciple I believe in the idea that we should always challenge what the government tells us so I'm with you in general, just not in this specific case. And the government should not be primarily telling us how it is -- we are the ones tasked to tell the government how it is. And how to do it. It may seem a naive point, but in my view its fundamental. A sort of foreground / background, frame and reference issue. If you give up on that -- then the government, or those who seek to manipulate and take power via it, have won. Then one has abdicated their power, their free thinking.
