Re: questions@ vs. freebsd-questions@

2007-08-15 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Wednesday 15 August 2007 08:15:46 pm Chad Perrin wrote:
 On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 07:14:43AM -0400, Gerard wrote:
  Is there a reason that you cannot just use the address specified in
  the email headers of messages distributed by this forum. This is a
  snippet from the headers from your message.
 
  List-Id: User questions freebsd-questions.freebsd.org
  List-Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions, 
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  List-Archive: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions
  List-Post: mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
  List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  List-Subscribe:
  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions, 
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 That reminds me: Is there any particular reason there isn't a List-Reply
 for this list?

You wouldn't happen to be referring to:
List-Post: mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
would you?

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: reposted question

2006-12-20 Thread Donald J. O'Neill

Well, if it were me, I'd simply do:
   # rm -r /home/ncvs

Then I'd change prefix='home/ncvs to prefix=/usr, just so I could 
cvsup the ports tree if I ever wanted to.

But after makeing that change, I'd run:
   # portsnap fetch extract
And know that that next time I wanted to update the ports tree, I'd run:
# portsnap fetch update
Followed by (since I'd have portupgrade installed) running:
   # portversion -v | grep needs or some other method of 
dtermining which ports needed upgrading.


But that's just me, and the way I would do it. There are other ways.

Don


Z. Wade Hampton wrote:

Hello to all,
Not long ago, I ran cvsup successfully.
In the example cvs-supfile, the following opening lines exist:

# base=/var/db
#   This specifies the root where CVSup will store information
#   about the collections you have transferred to your system.
#   A setting of /var/db will generate this information in
#   /var/db/sup.  Even if you are CVSupping a large number of
#   collections, you will be hard pressed to generate more than
#   ~1MB of data in this directory.  You can override the
#   base setting on the command line with cvsup's -b base
#   option.  This directory must exist in order to run CVSup.
#
# prefix=/home/ncvs
#   This specifies where to place the requested files.  A
#   setting of /home/ncvs will place all of the files
#   requested in /home/ncvs (e.g., /home/ncvs/src/bin,
#   /home/ncvs/ports/archivers).  The prefix directory
#   must exist in order to run CVSup.



I attempted running cvsup with base and prefix locations other than the 
ones stated above; and, it did not work.


However, when I edited the supfile as described above, the whole process ran 
to completion, successfully.


Well, now I have an updated ports tree in /home/ncvs/ports instead 
of /usr/ports.


So, my question this morning is what do I do with that?  Do I 
treat /home/ncvs/ports as if it were /usr/ports?


Do I copy the entire /home/ncvs/ports directory to /usr/ports for updated 
ports?


Thank you in advance for directives.

Z. Wade Hampton
Twin Bridges, Montana
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: freebsd desktop

2006-11-26 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Sunday 26 November 2006 13:15, probsd org wrote:
 Regarding my earlier email Do not install FreeBSD as a desktop

   I don't care how long I have been using FreeBSD, or yadda yadda or yadda

   when I cvsup ports, update the databse, and install www/firefox and go to
 a website I expect firefox's javascript or whatever to work.

   Perhaps you enjoy perusing the internet looking for different switches
 and knobs to make it work, I don't.




Maybe it would be good if you install java. It just might work then. If you 
don't, you can't expect it too work.

Since you don't care, yadda, yadda, yadda, etc, I'll tell you anyway: if you 
don't install something that's needed to make something else work and you 
don't get the results you want, it won't work. No ifs, ands, or buts about 
it, it just won't work. And that's a fact, Jack.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Apache port compile error

2006-11-25 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Saturday 25 November 2006 05:31, VeeJay wrote:
 Hi


 When compiling apache20 from ports and enabling/diabling knobs, I am
 writing the make command as follow;

 #make WITHOUT_MODULES=charset-lite include env setenvif status autoindex
 asis cgi negotiation imap actions userdir alias so
 WITH_MODULES=mpm=prefork access auth log_config mime dir

 #make install


 And after compiling with above command, I am getting this error when
 running apache


 # /usr/local/sbin/apachectl start

 Syntax error on line 41 of /usr/local/etc/apache2/httpd.conf:
 Invalid command 'Order', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a module not
 included in the server configuration


 Even though I have added access, auth modules already in the make
 command...


 Please help!!!

What's on line 40, 41, and 42 of your httpd.conf?

I you just want a working apache20, skip what you're doing and just do a make 
install. 

Is there a reason that you would want to use apache20 rather than apache22? 
Just curious.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Installworld Problem... Please help!!!

2006-11-19 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Sunday 19 November 2006 06:47, VeeJay wrote:
 Hello,

 Please help!!!
 I have CVSup'ed my 6.1 Fresh Install. No problems with buildworld or kernel
 build, but I am getting failures
 during installworld. When I give this command in single user mode:

 # make installworld

 A Partial output of the Screen Dump

 cd /usr/src/etc;  make distrib-dirs
 mtree -eU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.root.dist -p /
 mtree -eU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.var.dist -p /var
 mtree -eU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.usr.dist -p /usr
 mtree -eU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.include.dist -p /usr/include
 mtree -deU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BIND.chroot.dist -p /var/named
 mtree -deU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.sendmail.dist -p /
 cd /; rm -f /sys; ln -s usr/src/sys sys
 rm: /sys: Read-only file system
 *** Error code 1

 Stop in /usr/src/etc.
 *** Error code 1

 Stop in /usr/src.
 *** Error code 1

 Stop in /usr/src.
 *** Error code 1

 Stop in /usr/src.
 *** Error code 1

 Stop in /usr/src.
 #


 Information about my FSTAB:

 # cat /etc/fstab
 # DeviceMountpoint  FStype   Options Dump   Pass#
 /dev/mfid0s1b  none swapsw 00
 /dev/mfid0s1a  / ufsrw  1 1
 /dev/mfid0s1g  /home ufs   rw  2 2
 /dev/mfid0s1e  /tmp  ufs rw  2 2
 /dev/mfid0s1f  /usr  ufs rw  2 2
 /dev/mfid0s1d  /var  ufs rw  2 2
 /dev/acd0/cdromcd9660  ro, noauto  0 0

What are you doing to go into single user mode? It looks like your not 
mounting in r/w. The handbook Section 21.4.5, gives a very good method (two 
actually) of what to do. I used to use the first, I have used the second for 
several years. Try that.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Qmail Vpopmail From Ports

2006-11-18 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Saturday 18 November 2006 20:54, Rachel Florentine wrote:
 7883- Original Message 
 From: Tom Ierna [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  I've installed qmail/vpopmail many ways - from source, using the
  instructions from qmailrocks and most recently using the instructions
  found here:
 
 
  http://www.tnpi.biz/internet/mail/toaster/install.shtml108
 
 
  The toaster method seems to me to be the most comprehensive, and you
  can use (or not use) ports as you see fit.

 make test resulted in this:

 Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail  Failed  List of Failed
 ---
 t/Toaster.t1   256411   2.44%  22
 t/toaster-watcher.t1   256231   4.35%  21
 7 tests and 5 subtests skipped.
 Failed 2/24 test scripts, 91.67% okay. 2/364 subtests failed, 99.45% okay.
 *** Error code 255

 Stop in /usr/local/Mail-Toaster-5.03.

 I'm toast.
 Rachel


To run that script and install the toaster, you are going to find that you 
need to install one heck of a lot of perl programs. You did see the part at 
the very beginning about installing perl, correct? It's not just install 
perl, that's the easy part, it's all the other perl helper programs that need 
to be installed.

A very much easier method to install is located here:
http://freebsdrocks.net/

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: firefox 2.0 and flash 7

2006-11-04 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Saturday 04 November 2006 09:24, Michael S wrote:
 Thanks for the tip. I will try it out.


Just don't remove the old symlinks in /usr/X11r6/lib/browser_plugins, if you 
take them out, firefox won't open. Put in the new ones 
in /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins and you should be good to go.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: firefox 2.0 and flash 7

2006-11-03 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Friday 03 November 2006 16:06, Michael S wrote:
 Good day all.

 I am running 5.5 RELEASE and I have just upgraded
 Firefox from 1.5 to 2.0. Flash 7 was working very well
 under 1.5, however after upgrade it didn't. Moreover,
 flash doesn't appear anymore in the about:plugins.

 Has anyone had a similar experience and was able to
 resolve it?

 Thanks in advance,
 Michael
 ___

Check to see if firefox is now located in /usr/local/lib. If it is, you need 
to change your Flash symlinks from /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_links 
to /usr/local/lib/browser_links.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: atapicam trouble

2006-10-17 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 05:47, Johan Johansen wrote:
 Actually, on my system I can do mount_udf /dev/acd0 and copy a 3GB
 file, I just tried. My problem is adding CAM support, which the
 handbook tells me I have to use to burn dvd.

 johan

  I'm unable to copy a file from a udf-mounted DVD regardless of whether
  atapicam is loaded or not, so I'm not sure if atapicam is just making
  a problem more apparent or what. Are you able to do so?
 
  Thanks,
  Josh
 
  On 10/16/06, Johan Johansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   I still have the same problem as below, even when running 6.2-BETA2
   from a FreeSBIE - cd. I wonder if this could have to do with badly
   supportet motherboard, ASUS P5B, since I dont see any temp-readings
   with sysctl. cpuTemp and MBTemp are displayed under bios-config.

 ___

Look in /boot/kernel and see if atapikam.ko is there. It should be. If it is, 
you can use 'atapicam_load=YES' in /boot/loader.conf to load atapicam at 
boot. You can use 'kldload atapicam.ko' to just load it while system is 
running to see if it works before going any further.

You can use kldstat to varify that it's loaded. Below is the output of kldstat 
from one of my systems:

# kldstat
Id Refs AddressSize Name
 1   15 0xc040 5cae28   kernel
 21 0xc09cb000 59f4 snd_atiixp.ko
 32 0xc09d1000 22b88sound.ko
 41 0xc09f4000 4ae8 atapicam.ko
 51 0xc09f9000 5a78 if_fwip.ko
 61 0xc09ff000 59f00acpi.ko
 72 0xc4f2f000 16000linux.ko
 81 0xc504a000 2000 rtc.ko

Hope this will help you guys a bit.


Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: startkde: cannot start kdeinit. Check your installation

2006-10-14 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Friday 13 October 2006 21:17, Karl Agee wrote:
 --- Donald J. O'Neill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Friday 13 October 2006 20:11, Karl Agee wrote:
   6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #4: Mon Oct
 
  2
 
   08:40:06 PDT 2006
  
   I cannot start kde.  Installed kde 3.5.4 from
 
  pkg_add
 
   -r kde and everything installed fine.  I put in my
   ~/.xinitrc file:
  
   startkde
  
   but I keep getting this error:
  
   /usr/local/bin/startkde: permission denied
   startkde: could not start kdeinit.  check your
   installation
  
   I have changed the entry in .xinitrc to :
   exec startkde
   # and to
   /usr/local/bin/startkde
  
   with the same results.  I also cannot start kde as
   root, I get the same thing.
  
   kdeinit is:
  
   -r--r--r--  1 root  wheel  39876 Oct  6 01:18
   /usr/local/bin/kdeinit
  
  
  
  
  
   I have tried changing permissions on kdeinit but
 
  with
 
   the same result.  I have also removed the kdebase
   package and reinstalled it, but with the same
 
  results.
 
   I've searched everywhere and have seen the same
   problems posted with different OS's and versions
 
  of
 
   kde but nothing solid as to solutions.
  
   anybody got any ideas?
 
  chmod 555 /usr/local/bin/kdeinit
  permisions should also be 555 for startkde
 
  You may have some other files permission problems.
 
  Don

 Don:  I did that, same exact error.

 --Karl


Karl,

Try this. What do you get, now.

#ls -l /usr/local/bin/kdeinit
-r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  39716 Sep 29 03:22 /usr/local/bin/kdeinit

#ls -l /usr/local/bin/startkde
-r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  11828 Jul 23 09:23 /usr/local/bin/startkde

#ls -l .xinitrc
-rw-r--r--  1 username  username  48 Sep 23 07:10 .xinitrc

#cat .xinitrc
exec startkde

Do you have xorg installed? xorg.conf is in place and configured? What happens 
if you:
#xdm
Does x start up?

Have you looked at the handbook for information on x? What about the FAQ? You 
have a permissions problem somewhere.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: startkde: cannot start kdeinit. Check your installation

2006-10-14 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Saturday 14 October 2006 11:44, Karl Agee wrote:
 Don:

  ls -la /usr/local/bin/kdeinit
 -r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  39876 Oct  6 01:18
 /usr/local/bin/kdeinit
  ls -la /usr/local/bin/startkde
 -r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  11828 Oct 13 17:04
 /usr/local/bin/startkde
  ls -la .xinitrc
 -rw-r--r--  1 kdagee  wheel  37 Oct 13 19:14 .xinitrc

 I use X all the time.  I use windowmaker as my
 environment.  Works fine.  Using X.org.

  cat .xinitrc
 /usr/X11R6/bin/wmaker
 #exec startkde

 when I try starting kde I remove the # from the
 starkde line and put it in the wmaker line.

 Nothing abnormal in my .kde directory or owned by
 others.

  ls -la .kde
 total 8
 drwx--   3 kdagee  wheel   512 Oct 13 09:30 .
 drwxr-xr-x  43 kdagee  wheel  3584 Oct 14 09:25 ..
 lrwxr-xr-x   1 kdagee  wheel24 Oct 12 21:01
 cache-enterprise.myhome.westell.com -
 /var/tmp/kdecache-kdagee
 lrwxr-xr-x   1 kdagee  wheel24 Oct 12 21:59
 cache-myhome.westell.com - /var/tmp/kdecache-kdagee
 drwx--   8 kdagee  wheel   512 Oct 12 21:01 share
 lrwxr-xr-x   1 kdagee  wheel19 Oct 13 09:30
 socket-myhome.westell.com - /tmp/ksocket-kdagee
 lrwxr-xr-x   1 kdagee  wheel15 Oct 13 09:30
 tmp-myhome.westell.com - /tmp/kde-kdagee


 --Karl

Hi Karl,

Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner. I had to weld up a special grill to go 
over a fire pit, and it took a long time. Then of course, it had to be tested 
with steaks, and of course, lots of beer. It worked great, looks good, I 
might have to sell some of these.

I think I've exhausted all of the things I can tell you to check. I haven't 
exhausted all of my knowledge, but I can't think of anything else to say. 
Somewhere, something doesn't have the correct permissions. Startkde is a 
script, if you go through it and check the permissions on what it's calling 
up, it may give you a better idea of where the problem is. When you find the 
problem, and I'm sure you will, it's probably going to be something so easy 
that you'll be kicking yourself for not seeing it. The brain is a funny 
thing, it will most often see what is expected, rather than what is. 

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: startkde: cannot start kdeinit. Check your installation

2006-10-13 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Friday 13 October 2006 20:11, Karl Agee wrote:
 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #4: Mon Oct  2
 08:40:06 PDT 2006

 I cannot start kde.  Installed kde 3.5.4 from pkg_add
 -r kde and everything installed fine.  I put in my
 ~/.xinitrc file:

 startkde

 but I keep getting this error:

 /usr/local/bin/startkde: permission denied
 startkde: could not start kdeinit.  check your
 installation

 I have changed the entry in .xinitrc to :
 exec startkde
 # and to
 /usr/local/bin/startkde

 with the same results.  I also cannot start kde as
 root, I get the same thing.

 kdeinit is:

 -r--r--r--  1 root  wheel  39876 Oct  6 01:18
 /usr/local/bin/kdeinit





 I have tried changing permissions on kdeinit but with
 the same result.  I have also removed the kdebase
 package and reinstalled it, but with the same results.


 I've searched everywhere and have seen the same
 problems posted with different OS's and versions of
 kde but nothing solid as to solutions.

 anybody got any ideas?



chmod 555 /usr/local/bin/kdeinit
permisions should also be 555 for startkde

You may have some other files permission problems.

Don





 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
 http://mail.yahoo.com
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Problems properly setting up /etc/exports

2006-09-30 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Saturday 30 September 2006 13:39, stan wrote:
 I've  got a FBSD 6 machine built from a 6.2 PRERELEASE set of sources
 that I need to use as an NFS server for some other similar machines.
 If I specify the machines by host name, or IP address in /etc/exports,
 I can mount the requisite directories from the test client.

 However, I really need to be able to allow 2 whole 1/2 class C's
 to mount these directories. My reading of the /etc/exports man page
 leads me to believe that I should be able to use a line like this:

 /usr/ports/distfiles   maproot=root -network aaa.bbb.ccc.0 -mask
 255.255.255.128

 When I do this, and start mountd with the -d flag, I get:

 ountd: getting export list
 mountd: got line /usr/ports/distfiles   maproot=root -network
 aaa.bbb.ccc.0 -mask 255.255.255.128mountd: making new ep
 fs=0x3e331e2f,0xe47d1981

 But when I try to mount from a client n this network, it reports
 premission denied.

 I also tried putting a line like this in /etc/exports:

 /usr/ports/distfiles   maproot=root -network mine

 and putting the following in /etc/networks:

 mineaaa.bbb

 But I still get the same error.

 What am I doing wrong?

Try this line in /etc/exports: 
/usr /usr/ports /usr/ports/distfiles -maproot=root \
-network aaa.bbb.ccc -mask 255.255.255.128

Do you have something like this in /etc/rc.conf:
rpcbind_enable=YES
nfs_server_enable=YES
mountd_flags=-r

That should help you.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: The Ports collection / FreeBSD CDs

2006-09-12 Thread Donald J. O'Neill

Perry Hutchison wrote:
Before you can build from ports, you need to have ports tree
in place, the standard way to do this is by running portsnap.
 
with the caveat that, at least in my recent experience, an

up-to-date ports tree does not always play nicely with a
not-updated base install from CD.  OP might be better off
loading the ports collection from the same CD set as the
rest of the system.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



That's very interesting. However, the ports tree on the CD isn't 
complete, as in: not all the ports are there. I stopped installing the 
ports tree from the install CD a long time ago for that reason.


Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: The Ports collection / FreeBSD CDs

2006-09-12 Thread Donald J. O'Neill

Perry Hutchison wrote:
... at least in my recent experience, an up-to-date ports tree 
does not always play nicely with a not-updated base install from
CD.

That's very interesting. However, the ports tree on the CD isn't
complete, as in: not all the ports are there.


Any idea why?  (I am referring to the ports tree itself, i.e. the
collection of skeleton directories.  The set of distfiles provided
on CDs 3 and 4 is necessarily incomplete, both due to limited space
and because some distfiles have legal restrictions that prevent 
their inclusion.)



I stopped installing the ports tree from the install CD a long
time ago for that reason.


Perhaps sysinstall's rather strong recommendation to install the
ports ought to be toned down a bit, e.g. to suggest installing
the ports from CD only if one does not have a high-speed Internet
connection.



You've asked a question, given some clarification as to what you are 
referring to, and I can tell you I don't have anything other than 
possibilities - which may be far from the truth - as to why this is. 
You're referring to a 4 CD set, that can't be downloaded from 
FreeBSD.org, that has to come from somewhere else, such as the
FreeBSD Mall or somewhere else. I would use that if I couldn't connect 
to the Internet at all.


Maybe, I should say: I can't tell you why it is that way. I've never 
been very concerned about it, just understood that it was that way and 
lived with it. I've never had a problem with an up-to-date ports tree 
not playing nicely with a RELEASE or a STABLE install. I suspect the 
reason is that I just never happened to up-date the ports tree at a time 
when there were problems. It does happen at times, but then... You've 
probably heard the advice somethings wrong with your ports tree, blow 
it off and re-install it. It's not a big problem to deal with, the 
problem comes when you need to do it and don't.


Sysinstall only asks if you want to install the ports tree. If I was 
going to update it with cvsup, I would install it from there. I use 
portsnap, so I don't install it from the CD.



Yes, I have a hi-speed connection. It makes things easier. I wouldn't be 
without it.


Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Word processor for 6.1

2006-09-04 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Monday 04 September 2006 02:08, Perry Hutchison wrote:
 Anyone know where I can find a working word processor for 6.1?
 AbiWord and OpenOffice both require Gnome, which won't build.
 richtext builds OK, but as soon as I try to select bold it
 writes 4 lines to stderr and drops core:

   Message backtrace:
bold
bold
   OutOfBounds: offset 0, size 0
 ___

You can go to http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/ and download 
openoffice2.0.3 pre-built binaries from there. I would suggest that, rather 
than trying to build it.

You're probably going to need java. I suggest getting the pre-built binary for 
diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.00, you can get it here: 
http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/downloads/java.shtml

Try to save yourself as much pain as possible. Building openoffice from ports 
tends to fall in the category of pain.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Word processor for 6.1

2006-09-04 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Monday 04 September 2006 13:55, Perry Hutchison wrote:

  Try to save yourself as much pain as possible. Building openoffice
  from ports tends to fall in the category of pain.

 So it would seem :(

 I thought the whole point of the Ports Collection was to avoid this
 sort of problem.


That's the idea, and in most cases that's true. The ports system just keeps 
getting better and better. However,there are some ports that are just a pain 
to build and install. Either they can be tricky to do, they take a really 
long time, or both. OpenOffice falls in there. I'll avoid building it and use 
a pre-built package. After you install it, you'll find that it shows up for 
an update because two lines were swapped in the Makefile. Since I don't care 
to accidentally be rebuilding openoffice because of this, I have +IGNOREME 
in /var/db/pkg/en-openoffice.org-US-2.0.3, it doesn't show up as needing an 
upgrade.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Word processor for 6.1

2006-09-04 Thread Donald J. O'Neill


  If you installed programs from packages when you installed the
  system, you may get problems with version conflicts installing
  from an updated ports collection - this happens usually when the
  last release is getting old. In that case, maybe you should clean
  out the system, deinstall all packages, update ports and start
  again. This takes time  but given that 6.2 is coming up.

 It would also thoroughly defeat the purpose of installing from CD!


Not hardly. It doesn't even come close to it. 
 

 I wonder if I ought to wipe the partitions and start completely over
 with a fresh install, and this time *don't* try to update the Ports.

This is a decision you have to make for yourself. I personally think it to be 
a very unwise choice and one I would never consider, but then...

I would also like to point out that when you ask for help on questions@ and 
someone asks you a question, if you have the information it should be given, 
even if it was already posted on another list. I'm pretty sure that most of 
us don't follow all of the possible lists. So, even if I did follow the gnome 
list, if you said something is already posted there, that's too bad, I'm not 
about to do a lot of extra work trying to help you out. That's time I can put 
to better use working on my own equipment, or helping someone who will work 
with me to help them.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Kernel won't build: 6.1-RELEASE 6.1-STABLE

2006-07-22 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Saturday 22 July 2006 10:49, Kyrre Nygard wrote:
 Hello,

 I'm trying to upgrade my kernel from 6.1-RELEASE to 6.1-STABLE.

 But it will not work, it fails out when dealing with umass.

 This is a freshly installed system.

 The command I issued was: make buildworld KERNCONF=SURIA

You really only need 'make buildworld', KERNCONF=SURIA isn't used at this 
point.


 #
 # /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/SURIA
 #

 machine i386
 cpu I686_CPU

 ident SURIA

Try with a GENERIC config file, see if that builds. You may have taken 
something out that needed to be in the config file. I have one computer that 
has to be done that way. 


 options SCHED_4BSD
 options FFS
 options SOFTUPDATES
 options UFS_ACL
 options UFS_DIRHASH
 options MAC
 options MD_ROOT
 options NFSSERVER
 options MSDOSFS
 options CD9660
 options PROCFS
 options PSEUDOFS
 options COMPAT_43
 options COMPAT_FREEBSD4
 options COMPAT_FREEBSD5
 options KTRACE
 options SYSVSHM
 options SYSVMSG
 options SYSVSEM

 options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING
 options KBD_INSTALL_CDEV
 options AHC_REG_PRETTY_PRINT
 options AHD_REG_PRETTY_PRINT

 options ADAPTIVE_GIANT

 device isa
 device eisa
 device pci
 device sio
 device agp
 device apic

 device ata
 device atadisk
 device atapicd
 device atapifd
 device fdc

 device firewire
 device sbp

 device uhci
 device ohci
 device ehci
 device usb
 device udbp
 device ugen
 device uhid
 device ukbd
 device ums
 device ulpt
 device uscanner
 device umass

 device psm
 device atkbdc
 device atkbd
 device vga
 device radeondrm
 device splash
 device sc

 device npx

 device ether
 device miibus
 device bge

 device loop
 device mem
 device io
 device random
 device sl
 device ppp
 device tun
 device pty
 device md

 options INET
 options INET6
 options IPSEC
 options IPSEC_ESP
 options IPSEC_DEBUG

 device gif
 device faith
 device bpf
 device pf
 device pflog

 #
 # Build transcript
 #

 [...]



 *** Error code 1

 Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SURIA.
 *** Error code 1

 Stop in /usr/src.
 *** Error code 1

 Thank you all,
 Kyrre

 ___

You may have a problem with your sources. You can try blowing off the source 
tree and re-cvsuping it. I've had to do that before.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: post re jdk port

2006-07-21 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Friday 21 July 2006 04:54, eoghan wrote:
 Hi
 I postd a question about the jdk port but didnt see my message get to
 the list. Since Im using a gmail account it may be something to do with
 this, but I do remember seeing previous posts I made. Can someone let me
 know if it got through and if not I can post the same again.
 Thanks
 Eoghan.
 ___

It got through to the list. Have a little more patience, sometimes things 
don't work quite as we want them to.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: jdk port

2006-07-21 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Thursday 20 July 2006 16:11, eoghan wrote:
 Hi
 While installing openoffice I had to grab jdk15. This is the build
 error:

 Note: * uses or overrides a deprecated API.
 Note: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for details.
 Note: Some input files use unchecked or unsafe operations.
 Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details.
 21 errors
 12 warnings
 gmake[3]: *** [.compile.classlist] Error 1
 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make/
 java/java'
 gmake[2]: *** [all] Error 1
 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make/java'
 gmake[1]: *** [all] Error 1
 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make'
 gmake: *** [j2se-build] Error 2
 *** Error code 2

 Stop in /usr/ports/java/jdk15.
 *** Error code 1

 Are the suggested zip for jdk the same for amd64? How would I go
 about fixing this problem?
 Thanks
 Eoghan
 ___


Installing openoffice can be a pain and so can installing jdk15. So, unless 
you're determined to have the experience of installing them from the Ports 
Tree, I would suggest installing pre-built binaries instead.

For java, you can find what you want here:
http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/downloads/java.shtml

For openoffice, look here:
http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/

Install the diablo package first, then openoffice.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: CUPS, one more try

2006-07-13 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Wednesday 12 July 2006 22:42, E. J. Cerejo wrote:
 I've been trying to configure my HP Officejet 4315 using CUPS 1.2.0 but so
 far all I can do is configure a printer using the web interface and I'm
 able to print a test page but when I try to print any other document I'm
 unable to print, I get that quick popup window saying that cups is starting
 but nothing else, but today I notice something else whenever I run lpstat
 command I get this:

 Printer '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' - cannot open connection - No such file or
 directory Make sure the remote host supports the LPD protocol
 Printer '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' - cannot open connection - No such file or
 directory Make sure the remote host supports the LPD protocol

 pr-b is the name of my printer, through some googling I found out it maybe
 looking for my printer, do I need to edit some other file to tell lpd where
 this printer is?



 EJC
 www.only7bucks.com

 -


Did you happen to check /usr/bin/ to see if lp, lpq, lpr, and lprm are there? 
If they are, you need to either remove them or rename them. Cups installs 
these in /usr/local/bin and since it's later in the path, they're never used.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: CUPS, one more try

2006-07-13 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Thursday 13 July 2006 08:09, E. J. Cerejo wrote:

 Don


 I just did what you told me but I still get the same message when run
 lpstat, and still can't print.


 EJC
 www.only7bucks.com

 -

Take a look at:
http://home.nyc.rr.com/computertaijutsu/cups.html
Go to the section on FreeBSD and NetBSD, this should help you out.

There are a number of suggestions here that I didn't give, sorry, I wanted to 
give you some help, not hand it to you on a platter.

Do a 'ps ax |grep cup' and make sure that you see 'cupsd'. If you don't, you 
will need to do a 'cupsd', recheck that you have cupsd running.

Go to http://localhost:631/admin (user would probably be root and password 
would be the root password. Configure printers from there.

Don



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: ATAPICAM

2006-07-11 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Tuesday 11 July 2006 14:16, Beni wrote:
 On Tuesday 11 July 2006 18:33, Chris Maness wrote:
  How do I load atapicam at boot time.  I tried to have it load the same
  way I have the sound modules load, and it doesn't work.  After the
  system is up and running I can load just fine.

 Why don't you add device atapicam to your kernel and rebuild the kernel ?
 It should take care of loading it at boot too.

 Beni.
 ___

Or, you could put 'atapicam_load=YES' in /boot/loader.conf and save the 
kernel for another time.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: how to avoid recompiling applications?

2006-06-05 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Monday 05 June 2006 09:49, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
 Jonathan Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  so, could i theoretically use 'make reinstall' on a fresh system
  where the port had never been previously installed?

 Maybe, maybe not.  If make install doesn't work because there's
 already a .install_done...  file in the work directory, then
 reinstall will be what you need.
 ___

I think a fresh system, where a port has never been installed, would not 
have a work directory in that port, so make install would work unless 
the port is broken. Using make reinstall in a port on a system that 
has been freshly reinstalled isn't going to save the OP anytime by 
avoiding recompiling ports, they'll be recompiled. How to save time is 
what he asked about, as he tends to experiment with this system and 
screw it up, requiring a reinstall from scratch. He also said that 
using pkg_add -r with, say kde, always tends to have something wrong 
with it.

The answer is: when he installs the ports, make a package using make 
package. Unfortunately, this doesn't make a package for ports required 
for that port, But, make package-recursive would, with the exception 
of certain ports, and he can get around that if he's clever enough. 

Another thing he can do is: use pkg_create -b 
some-port-already-installed and save it somewhere. Then he can 
do pkg_add that-saved-port.tbz and get that port and the required 
dependencies. If he's missing a dependency, oh well, guess what.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: how to avoid recompiling applications?

2006-06-04 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Sunday 04 June 2006 12:19, Nikolas Britton wrote:
 On 6/4/06, Jonathan Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  so, could i theoretically use 'make reinstall' on a fresh system
  where the port had never been previously installed?


No, you can't.

 Yes... but what's the point?... when you can make your own packages.
 instead of typing 'make install' type 'make package', this will spit
 out a .tbz file you can use with pkg_add etc...
 http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2003/08/07/FreeBSD_Basics.html

Now, this is what I do, except do it make package-recursive, that way 
you get any packages that have been installed as requirements.

Be sure to do mkdir /usr/ports/packages, otherwise, the packages 
you're making are going to be stored in the individual port. If you 
have /usr/ports/packages, they'll be stored in one location that you 
can copy elsewhere, cd or dvd for instance.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: how to avoid recompiling applications?

2006-06-04 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Sunday 04 June 2006 12:54, Mikhail Goriachev wrote:
 Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
  On Sunday 04 June 2006 12:19, Nikolas Britton wrote:
  On 6/4/06, Jonathan Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  so, could i theoretically use 'make reinstall' on a fresh system
  where the port had never been previously installed?
 
  No, you can't.
 
  Yes... but what's the point?... when you can make your own
  packages. instead of typing 'make install' type 'make package',
  this will spit out a .tbz file you can use with pkg_add etc...
  http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2003/08/07/FreeBSD_Basics.html
 
  Now, this is what I do, except do it make package-recursive, that
  way you get any packages that have been installed as requirements.
 
  Be sure to do mkdir /usr/ports/packages, otherwise, the packages
  you're making are going to be stored in the individual port. If you
  have /usr/ports/packages, they'll be stored in one location that
  you can copy elsewhere, cd or dvd for instance.

 You could also use pkg_create.

 man pkg_create

 Cheers,
 Mikhail.


Yes, you could, if it's already installed on the computer. If I took the 
output from pkg_info and compared it to what packages were 
in /usr/ports/packages/All, I could use pkg_create to build the missing 
packages I wanted to save to do a fast reinstall. But, if the port 
hasn't been built and installed yet, pkg_create will complain about it 
and conk out.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: makeworld FAILURE on 5.4-STABLE

2006-05-17 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Wednesday 17 May 2006 05:10, Kyrre Nygard wrote:

 Hey man,

 # df
 Filesystem SizeUsed   Avail Capacity  Mounted on
 /dev/ad4s1a248M 35M193M15%/
 devfs  1.0K1.0K  0B   100%/dev
 /dev/ad4s1d248M 80M148M35%/var
 /dev/ad4s1e248M 10K228M 0%/tmp
 /dev/ad4s1f142G118G 12G91%/usr

 Great shot! :)

 So in my case, can I not first mount /dev/ad4s1f from FreeSBIE
 maybe, delete everything except my home directory, and then run a
 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE reinstall, skipping the parts that would
 mess with my /dev/ad4s1f?

 Hehe, no it would not be the end of the world.
 But it would put an end to the fruits of a lot of struggle.

 See you around man,
 Kyrre

The problem is that you've got home mounted under usr. Usr is going to 
have to be redone when you install 6.1 . 

Did you set your disk up according to what was recommended? I got bit in 
the ass one time doing it that way, it took me about a week to 
determine that '/' wasn't big enough. After that, I setup according to 
what I know won't give me a problem if I ever have to do something. 

I think, if it was me, I'd look at some big harddrives and go from 
there.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: makeworld FAILURE on 5.4-STABLE

2006-05-16 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Tuesday 16 May 2006 03:30, Kyrre Nygard wrote:

 Hello Don!

 Yes it's the `make buildworld' as far as I know.

 The /etc/make.conf contains PERL_VER=5.8.7 and PERL_VERSION=5.8.7.

 Is it possible, do you think, to use a FreeSBIE CD maybe to clean out
 everything on my harddrive but my /home/kyrre where all my important
 files are, and then reinstall the latest FreeBSD without
 reformatting?

 It might be risky, let's say I hit the wrong switch and it does
 format everything,
 but you get my point right? To just lay a new FreeBSD on top of an
 empty harddrive?

 I hope this is possible somehow ...

 Well, take care Don!

 -- Kyrre
Is /home on a slice of its own. Mine is, for the reason that if I have 
to blow off the system and reinstall, I can safely do that, as long as 
I don't make any changes to /home, just remount it as /home. You can do 
this with sysinstall, very easlily.

Send the output from 'df', I can tell from that.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: makeworld FAILURE on 5.4-STABLE

2006-05-16 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Tuesday 16 May 2006 05:30, Kyrre Nygard wrote:
 Is /home on a slice of its own. Mine is, for the reason that if I
  have to blow off the system and reinstall, I can safely do that, as
  long as I don't make any changes to /home, just remount it as
  /home. You can do this with sysinstall, very easlily.
 
 Send the output from 'df', I can tell from that.
 
 Don

 Hello!

 Actually, my /home is under /usr ... uh oh huh?
 No can do then?

 Thanks for the tip of having /home as a seperate slice though,
 I'll treasure it for the rest of my days!

 Peace,
 Kyrre

Not as you have it now. However, I read a possible solution that I think 
might work, to you from David Stanford. I think it will work, it just 
needs a couple of suggestions to flesh it out a bit.

I'll requote it here:
How large is your /var slice? If it's large enough to fit /home (or at 
least the files you'd like to save), maybe try booting into single-user 
mode, mount /usr and /var, wipe out /var, copy the files from /usr/home 
to /var, and just remember to document what slice /var was. Then you 
could just reinstall the base system around it using a 6.1-RELEASE CD, 
no?

Just a shot in the dark...
===

Not a bad shot in the dark, I think it will work if you do it this way:
1) Follow what David said above,  be sure to document what slice /var 
is. You're going to need that information when you reinstall with the 
6.1-RELEASE disc.

2) boot up the release disc. Use the standard install method. The first 
thing you come to is fdisk partitioning. The only thing you're going 
to do here is make an existing partition bootable, don't change 
anything else, don't make any new partitions, don't delete any. Just 
make the one partition bootable, then go on to the next step and 
install the boot manager.

3) BSDlabel is the next step. Since you didn't change any partitions on 
your disc, the existing slices should come up. You can remove and 
recreate all of them except the one you had for /var. You're going to 
mount that one as /home. At this point, you can create your other 
slices and mount points. Make sure that the slice you now have as /home 
is not going have 'newfs' run on it, all the others need to have it 
done, but not /home. Then go on with the installation.

Until you go through the disk label step, you haven't changed anything. 
Once you get through that step, you're committed, and what will be, 
will be. So, if you need any clarification, ask for it. Just remember, 
if you make a mistake, it's unpleasant and you'll be kicking yourself 
in the ass, but it's not the end of the world. 

Don


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: makeworld FAILURE on 5.4-STABLE

2006-05-15 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Monday 15 May 2006 04:03, Kyrre Nygard wrote:

 Hello Don, good old friend :)

 Yes I am back. I had to change my alias because too many people
 were after me. And also I'm still stuck on the same problem. I did
 make a clean 6.1-RELEASE blow at my Pentium 120mhz firewall which
 needed the buildworld the most. Now it's my Pentium III 3,2ghz
 workstation that needs it, however it's got too much data on it that
 I'm currently in no position to back up, not even temporarily, so I'm
 not sure what to do other than this buildworld. Any suggestions?

 Oh yeah, I accidentally left the `*' out in chflags -R noschg.

 Take care,
 K*

I was hoping it be as simple as a missing '*', but I would think there 
would be error messages  showing up about that. Oh, well.

Ok, you're stuck in the same place as before, and by that I mean you are 
failing the 'make buildworld' part of the sequence, correct?. That 
means that there's something you're either doing or not doing, prior to 
starting the buildworld that's causing a problem.

What's in your /etc/make.conf?

Try doing 'make buildworld' with the GENERIC conf file rather than your 
NINJA one. The problem may be there. If you can get through the upgrade 
using the GENERIC you've got the upgrade in place and you can find out 
what's wrong with NINJA. That's the best I can suggest for now. And do 
the 'make cleandir' twice, as Gerard suggested. It's not irrelevant.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: makeworld FAILURE on 5.4-STABLE

2006-05-14 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Sunday 14 May 2006 07:31, Kyrre Nygard wrote:

 I believe it should be:
 
 chflags -R noschg /usr/obj/usr
 rm -rf /usr/obj/usr
 cd /usr/src
 
 
 Yes, the 'make cleandir' statement is run twice.
 
 --
 Gerard Seibert
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Once or twice, it is still irrelevant.

 Thank you so much though.

 -- Kyrre


Ah, Kristian, I see you're back. And you still can't get 
past 'buildworld'. And you're still giving kind of flip answers, 
although with a thank you at the end. What processor are you using?

You know, your best bet might be to blow off the 5.4 and do a new 
install with a 6.1-RELEASE disk. At least then you could get upgraded.

Ok, I saw an error in your beginning procedure:
cvsup -g -L 2 /etc/cvsupfile
cd /usr/obj
chflags -R noschg

It's right here. You need to use this:
chflags -R noschg *

rm -rf *
cd /usr/src
make clean

Also, Instead of 'make clean' , run 'make cleandir', twice, as was 
suggested.

Try that and be sure to keep it out of a script.

Don

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE !!

2006-05-08 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Monday 08 May 2006 10:55, Ceri Davies wrote:
 On 8/5/06 15:39, Jonathan Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  on a dev box, did a cvsup and buildworld yesterday... and now my
  kernel says 6.1 stable!
 
  fbsd60-2# uname -a
  FreeBSD fbsd60-2.dev.dfwlp.com 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #0:
  Sun May 7 18:33:48 CDT 2006
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FBSD60-2  i386
 
  *shrug* i look on freebsd.org, but i didnt see an announcement
  about it yet.  how close to release does this put us?

 It essentially means that the release has been finished, and is being
 built/uploaded.

 Ceri


It's sitting on the mirror sites, if you look. I downloaded one this 
morning.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Why do I have to keep doing portsnap extract?

2006-05-05 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Friday 05 May 2006 01:06, Peggy Wilkins wrote:
 On 5/4/06, Colin Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Peggy Wilkins wrote:
   On 5/4/06, Jason Morgan 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Did you run `extract' after your original `fetch'?
  
   Yes, I did; I followed the instructions exactly.  I ran portsnap
   for the first time a couple weeks ago after which I successfully
   did a bunch of portupgrades.  Then the ports tree sat there on my
   disk untouched for a couple of weeks until I ran portsnap fetch
   update today.  For some reason it insisted that I needed to run
   extract when as far as I can tell that shouldn't have been
   necessary.
 
  Do you have a .portsnap.INDEX file in your ports tree?

 Yes; I don't know if it was there before I ran portsnap today,
 though.

 -rw-r--r-- 1 root  wheel   1230186 May  4 16:39 .portsnap.INDEX

 plw
 ___

Have you stopped using cvsup for updating your ports? If you do, you're 
going to have to use extract the next time you use portsnap.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Kernel not compiling

2006-05-02 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 10:07, Steve Davidson wrote:
 Here are the last few lines from the kernel build output:
 /usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_output.c: In function `ip_ctloutput':
 /usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_output.c:1550: internal compiler error: in
 expand_stmt, at c-semantics.c:883
 Please submit a full bug report,
 with preprocessed source if appropriate.
 See URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions.
 *** Error code 1

 Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ROBAIX.
 *** Error code 1

 Stop in /usr/src.
 *** Error code 1

 On 5/1/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 05:48:52PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
   On Mon, 1 May 2006 14:38:37 -0700
  
   Steve Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
I recently installed FreeBSD 6_0 and after building a custom
kernel it failed to compile. I saved the output from make
kernel KERNCONF=CUSTOMKERNELbut it is so long I wasn't sure if
posting here was such a good idea.
Forgive as I am relatively new to FreeBSD, should I be posting
to a different list? The only error I see from the output is
error type
 
  1. Any
 
help or a point in the right direction would be most
appreciated
  
   This is the right list.  Generally, posting the last 100 lines or
   so of the output will be enough for people to help you.  If folks
   need more information, they'll ask you for it.  I recommend using
   the script(1) command to capture everything, then truncated to to
   just the last 100 lines or so when you email it.
 
  First go back and compare your custom kernel to GENERIC: chances
  are you removed something mandatory and broke the build that way.
 
  Kris

 --
 Steve
 Macs, Music and more
 ___

What you sent doesn't help at all. The last 100 lines or so would have 
told more. Send that.

Also send your /etc/make.conf and your custom_KERN-conf. Just paste them 
right into the e-mail. 

Just what was the procedure you used.

Don

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: pkg_add -r openoffice Error: FTP Unable to get ftp:

2006-05-01 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Monday 01 May 2006 02:31, robert wrote:
 On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 03:12 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Thanks but:
 
 pkg_add -r openoffice.org
 pkg_add: can't stat package file 'openoffice.org'
 
  that was the logical and first thing I tried.
 
  On Mon, 1 May 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
   On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 11:04:32PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   pkg_add -r openoffice.org-2.0.2.tbz
  
   You don't use the full versioned package name, you use the name
   in the Latest/ directory, which is probably something like
   openoffice.org.
  
   Error: FTP Unable to get
  
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/
   Latest/openoffice.org-2.0.2.tbz:
  
   Kris
 
  _
  Douglas Denault
  http://www.safeport.com
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Voice: 301-469-8766

 Doug,

 With open office, you need to chose the major revision, both 1.0 and
 2.0 are listed. You may need to add the major version number ie
 pkg_add -r openoffice.org-2.0 may work.

 Rob

I don't understand what the problem is that you all are having. Yes I 
do, you're not using a procedure that works well.

If you want the latest Openoffice binary package, which is 2.0.2, you 
trundle your web browser over to here:
http://www.openoffice.org/
Click on the green box that says: Get openoffice.org version 2.0.2 
which redirects you to: 
http://download.openoffice.org/2.0.2/index.html. When you get to this 
page, you click on the box that says: Download OpenOffice.org which 
gets you to a page where you select your language, OS, and download 
site. If you did it correctly, that download site clickdown box will 
have FreeBSD page in it when selected. This will take you to another 
page, here you select the Continue to Download box which takes you to 
the actual site where you get to pick what you want to download.

Maybe you can go straight to it by using this URL:
http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/

Once you get there, download the darn thing and install it 
using pkg_add whatever the name is or using pkg_add -v whatever 
the name is.

Oh, I almost forgot, this is how you get a binary package that was built 
for Freebsd 5.5 or 6.1

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: I think I butchered my supfile - can anyone tell me why I get this result?

2006-04-12 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Wednesday 12 April 2006 06:45, Jim Stapleton wrote:

 
 *default host=cvsup13.us.FreeBSD.org
 *default base=/var/db
 *default prefix=/usr
 *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6
 *default delete use-rel-suffix
 *default date=2006.04.01.12.00.00

 collections. src-all tag=.
 ports-all tag=.
 doc-all tag=.
 

 Thanks,
 -Jim

Hi Jim,

The line collections.src-all tag=. is your problem. A line 
like src-all would fix it.

Since you want to follow 6-STABLE, I think you would be better off using 
three separate sup-files, which could be done like this:

sup-src:

*default tag=RELENG_6
*default host=cvsup8.freebsd.org
*default base=/var/db
*default prefix=/usr
*default release=cvs delete use-rel-suffix

src-all
*
sup-ports:
*default tag=.
*default host=cvsup8.freebsd.org
*default base=/var/db
*default prefix=/usr
*default release=cvs delete use-rel-suffix

ports-all

*
sup-doc:
*default tag=.
*default host=cvsup8.freebsd.org
*default base=/var/db
*default prefix=/usr
*default release=cvs delete use-rel-suffix

doc-all


Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Best way to print photos

2006-04-03 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Monday 03 April 2006 14:27, M. Warner Losh wrote:
 OK.  I got bordered photo printing working.  I haven't gotten
 borderless printing working, alas.

 The key points I learned:

 (1) Install print/cups.
 (2) Install graphics/hpijs.   This filters .ps - goo the printer groks
 (3) Install graphics/gimp.This makes .ps files
 (4) Kill lpr/lpd before starting cups.
 (5) Make sure you configure lpr/lpd not to startup on boot
 (6) Remove lp* binaries
 (7) Setup buildworld /etc/make.conf so it doesn't build lpr with
 NO_LPR or WITHOUT_LPR
 (8) Add printer via localhost:631 web interface.
 (8) Set printer to draft mode via cups for testing
 (9) Use firefox to generate test prints.
 (10) To print from gimp, I have to remove the '-l' from the command
  line every time I print in the printer setup.  This causes the
  raw .ps file to go to the printer, rather than via cups'
  postscript filter for the printer.
 (11) To get photos, one must set photo quality via cups setup
  interface.

 #10 is was tripped me up for a long time.  That's why printing to the
 black and white printer worked for me (it was a postscript printer),
 while it failed to the color.  I hadn't noticed before that it
 printed the raw postscript and then lots of new lines.  Since these
 newlines weren't accompanied by CR, all text was off the edge of
 the papper, all I got was a bunch of blank pages.

 #5 bit me on boot.  Since cups replaces the /etc/printcap
 unconditionally, when lpd started it failed to start.  I lost a bunch
 of print jobs before I worked out where they had gone and why things
 had gone south.

 I'd love to know how to print borderless prints (right now I get 1/4
 (8mm) boarder on the prints).  I'd also love to know how to setup
 gimp correctly.  However, these are really side issues now that I
 have basic functionality working.

 Thanks to everybody who was helpful in getting me to this point.  It
 got me over the hump.  My HP DeskJet 5850 is working great as a color
 printer with CUPS and my LaserJet 2200 continues to work like before.

 Now, all I gotta do is to figure out my OfficeJet 4200, at least the
 scanning portion...  But that can wait until my photo printing
 backlog is cleared...

 Thanks again,

 Warner

Hi Warner,

You have to have a printer that's capable of doing borderless prints. 
Most printers will only print to within 1/4 of the page. Try a custom 
size paper (increase the size by 1/2), maybe that will help do it.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: ACPI disables network (why?)

2006-04-01 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Friday 31 March 2006 21:59, Peter wrote:
 Here is what I have for irq.  It looks like irq 22 is being
 overused.

 $ dmesg | grep irq
 ioapic0 Version 1.1 irqs 0-23 on motherboard
 ohci0: OHCI (generic) USB controller mem 0xfc003000-0xfc003fff irq
 22 at device 2.0 on pci0
 ohci1: OHCI (generic) USB controller mem 0xfc004000-0xfc004fff irq
 21 at device 2.1 on pci0
 ehci0: EHCI (generic) USB 2.0 controller mem 0xfc005000-0xfc0050ff
 irq 20 at device 2.2 on pci0
 pcm0: nVidia nForce3 250 port 0xe000-0xe07f,0xdc00-0xdcff mem
 0xfc001000-0xfc001fff irq 22 at device 6.0 on pci0
 nvidia0: GeForce FX 5500 mem
 0xe000-0xefff,0xf800-0xf8ff irq 16 at device 0.0 on
 pci1
 skc0: Marvell Gigabit Ethernet port 0xc000-0xc0ff mem
 0xfb00-0xfb003fff irq 19 at device 11.0 on pci2
 fdc0: floppy drive controller port 0x3f7,0x3f0-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on
 acpi0
 sio0: 16550A-compatible COM port port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10
 on acpi0
 sio1: 16550A-compatible COM port port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0
 ppc0: Standard parallel printer port port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on
 acpi0 atkbdc0: Keyboard controller (i8042) port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on
 acpi0 atkbd0: AT Keyboard irq 1 on atkbdc0

 __
Not necessarily, I counted two uses. On one of my computers, irq 19 is 
used 4 times. There's only so many irq's available, sometimes some of 
them are shared. The problem is when some devices don't want to share.

Do 'dmesg | grep storm', and 'dmesg | grep throt' that will tell you 
what irq has the problem and something is being shutdown. Then you can 
do 'dmesg | grep irq from above' to find what devices are using that 
irq and determine what to do. With my computers I have found a bad usb 
mouse (dam' microsloth product, should have known better), some devices 
that couldn't be plugged into the usb2.0 ports I have, they had to be 
plugged into usb1.1 ports only, a modem that I thought was shot but 
would work like a champ by repositioning it on the pci bus, and some 
NICs that would work best by repositioning. 

I also found out, what FreeBSD likes, Windows XP doesn't necessarily 
like. After I got everything straightened around for FreeBSD-STABLE, 
Windows XP took a 1/2 hour to come up, booting up with the XP install 
disc took about the same. It still did it after a fresh install of XP. 
so, I told my wife: Windows is shot, Microsoft wans me to call them to 
get a new number which won't help. You don't do anything on Windows 
that you can't do as well as or better on FreeBSD. I can't tell exactly 
what's wrong, Microsoft doesn't want me to know, FreeBSD thinks I want 
to know. I'm pulling the plug on windows and their money grubbing ways. 
By the way, I do give FreeBSD lessons, but pay attention or you'll have 
to learn on your own. Yeah, one less Windows XP installation to worry 
about. Of course, I didn't figure out a reason (for myself) for what 
was happening with Windows XP till later.

You're probably going to have to put your NIC in a different slot.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Best way to print photos

2006-03-31 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Friday 31 March 2006 00:08, M. Warner Losh wrote:
 Let us suppose that I have a HP DeskJet 5850 that I can talk to via
 CUPS.  I can print test pages w/o any problem.

 What are my options to print photos and what kind of quality can I
 expect relative to Windows?

 Warner
 ___

Hi Warner,

The reviews of the 5850 say it prints pretty good pictures. So, the 
printer is capable. The problem is the cups driver your using may not 
be so capable, and you need to locate one that is capable of photo 
quality printing.

A long (couple of years or so) I had an HP 2000c. The driver for windows 
would print very good color pictures. Since this was a networked 
printer and I had a FreeBSD computer connected to the LAN, I wanted to 
be able to use it through FreeBSD. The cups driver did a very good job 
with text and graphics that didn't need to be photo quality. On photos, 
it just plain sucked. I think I was able to use the HP2000c PPD from 
the Windows install - I can't say positively that's where I got it 
from. I had to have the 2000c installed in cups twice, once as HP2000, 
with the cups PPD; and once as PHOTO, with the photo capable PPD. You 
don't want to use the photo PPD for plain text. With that setup it was 
capable of print quality every bit as good as Windows.

So, you should be able to print photos with the same quality as Windows, 
if you locate a PPD that will do it.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Best way to print photos

2006-03-31 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Friday 31 March 2006 10:34, M. Warner Losh wrote:
 Let's assume for the moment that my PPD is good.  I guess I'm looking
 for something more basic: how do I take the .jpg from my camera and
 get a photo on my printer.  What's the conversion process?

 Warner

Your going to have to look at gphoto2 and libgphoto2, and digikam. I 
don't have a camera anymore so I can't check it to make sure of the 
exact procedure. I would also expect to be doing it as root until you 
get the permissions set right.

The camera I used connected to a serial port. There are more options 
available now with newer cameras.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Best way to print photos

2006-03-31 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Friday 31 March 2006 10:37, M. Warner Losh wrote:
 Bob,

 Thanks for the tips.  I have these ports installed, but am tripping
 over something stupidly basic: what converts the pict0001.jpg into
 something that can be fed to the hpijs driver that will print?

 Warner
 ___
Gimp will do image manipulation as well as print, openoffice, several in 
kde - kuickshow for one, several in gnome. I just printed a jpg using 
kuickshow, so I know it will do it. Pretty much, once you've got the 
jpg off the camera, what you do with it depends on your preferences.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Best way to print photos

2006-03-31 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Friday 31 March 2006 11:56, M. Warner Losh wrote:
 In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Donald J. O'Neill [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 : On Friday 31 March 2006 10:37, M. Warner Losh wrote:
 :  Bob,
 : 
 :  Thanks for the tips.  I have these ports installed, but am
 :  tripping over something stupidly basic: what converts the
 :  pict0001.jpg into something that can be fed to the hpijs driver
 :  that will print?
 : 
 :  Warner
 :  ___
 :
 : Gimp will do image manipulation as well as print, openoffice,
 : several in kde - kuickshow for one, several in gnome. I just
 : printed a jpg using kuickshow, so I know it will do it. Pretty
 : much, once you've got the jpg off the camera, what you do with it
 : depends on your preferences.

 gimp doesn't have my printer listed, and printing .ps to it fails. 
 Is there some file I need to put somewhere?

 Warner

Are you using cups? Or something else? If you have your printer working 
under cups, then I would think that gimp would print to it. I remember 
when I was using an HP2000c, it wasn't listed under gimp either, but I 
was able to install it there because I was able to use it with cups. 
Failing that, there are other programs you can use to print the 
adjusted jpg file, kuickshow is one, openoffice2.0.2 has several, kde 
has several besides kuickshow, gnome2 has several.

Warner, I know you are expert on FreeBSD, and know you know your way 
around a computer at least as well as I do, if not better, I have 
several emails from you concerning ACPI, and you show up in various 
other lists that I belong to, so I know who you are. My question to you 
is: do you have some hidden reason for showing up on questions and 
acting like a newbie, or are you sincerely looking for help here. With 
the hand holding your asking for, I'm beginning to wonder. If you do 
in-fact, need the help, then you should know that without providing 
information, that you haven't been volunteering, we aren't going to get 
anywhere fast. 

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Best way to print photos

2006-03-31 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Friday 31 March 2006 14:16, Bob Johnson wrote:

 In principle, an application feeds it to CUPS, CUPS feeds it to
 GhostScript, and GhostScript uses the HPIJS driver to print it. Or
 something like that.  In practice, I use APSFILTER instead of CUPS,
 and I haven't ever tried to do photo printing from FreeBSD, although
 getting my wife's HP photo printer working with FreeBSD is on my list
 of things to do this weekend, or next weekend, or maybe the weekend
 after that.

 The process works for printing JPEGs from web pages on my laser
 printer (although not with HPIJS), and since the HPIJS driver is
 supposed to autodetect photo paper in your printer, I would expect it
 to just work for photos if you can print a web page with it.


 As for a specific application, The Gimp knows something about
 printing photos, but again, I haven't actually done it.   Digikam
 also looks very promising as a photo manipulation tool.  Anything
 that can display it and knows how to print ought to do it (kview for
 example?). I'm sure someone with actual experience can provide a more
 complete answer.;-)

 So far, I've printed from the Gimp by writing the file to a USB
 thumbdrive, and plugging that into the photo printer.  The Gimp will
 let you define the picture dimensions in inches, which may be
 necessary to get the printing results you want.  Otherwise you may
 end up with a picture that is 1 x 1.5 inches, or one point by one
 point, or a piece of an 8x10 printed on 4x6 paper, or any of several
 other possible defaults I've managed to print in the past.  Some
 printers also do bad things if the image has too many pixels (or
 maybe bytes), so I've sometimes needed to reduce the image resolution
 before printing.

 - Bob
 ___

Unless the printer was capable of determining what sort of paper it was 
loaded with, I just don't see how the HPIJS driver would autodetect 
photopaper. 

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: 6.0 APCI Config PMAP

2006-03-31 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Friday 31 March 2006 18:55, Don O'Neil wrote:
 I am 'burning in' some hardware and drives before putting them into
 production using various tools (raidtest, etc...) and have a couple
 of questions..

 Occasionally under high load when doing the raid test, I see:

 collecting pv entries -- suggest increasing PMAP_SHPGPERPROC

 What does this mean, and what should I change it to to correct the
 problem? I also get the occasional error that it couldn't write to
 the device (twed) ... Everything seems to work ok though.

 Also, my motherboards APCI is horribly broken, I can boot ok without
 APCI if I select option 2 from the boot menu (it's a 'stock' 6.0
 install). How do I configure the system to boot without APCI
 automatically?

 Thanks!

 ___
Moving to 6-STABLE should fix APCI. It's about the first thing I do. 
After that, no problems with APCI.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: ACPI disables network (why?)

2006-03-31 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Friday 31 March 2006 19:16, Peter wrote:
 I've been meaning to ask this one for awhile.

 I'm running 5.4-STABLE and I cannot use my network card *without*
 booting with ACPI enabled.  The net contains trouble with people
 having this type of issue with Realtek cards and ACPI *enabled*.  I
 have a Gigabyte m/b with an onbard adapter that is assigned the sk
 driver.

 So the symptom is watchdog timeout during DHCP discovery at the
 boot stage.  My networking is non-functional if I try to boot with
 ACPI.

 dmesg says (during a successful boot):

 pcib2: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 14.0 on pci0
 pci2: ACPI PCI bus on pcib2
 skc0: Marvell Gigabit Ethernet port 0xc000-0xc0ff mem
 0xfb00-0xfb003fff irq 19 at device 11.0 on pci2
 skc0: Marvell Yukon Lite Gigabit Ethernet rev. (0x9)
 sk0: Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. Yukon on skc0
 sk0: Ethernet address: 00:0f:ea:ec:f1:4e
 miibus0: MII bus on sk0
 e1000phy0: Marvell 88E1000 Gigabit PHY on miibus0
 e1000phy0:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX,
 1000baseTX-FDX, auto

 Any ideas?

 __

One thing you can check for in DMESG is irq storms, throttling offending 
device. If you see that, it means you've got devices that don't want to 
share an irq, and you'll have to shuffle the cards on the pci bus until 
that clears up.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: ASCII files becoming double lined

2006-03-30 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Thursday 30 March 2006 09:04, Kris Kennaway wrote:
 On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 04:59:36PM +0200, Vaaf wrote:
  Hello!
 
  Sometimes I notice ASCII files becoming double lined.
  As in there somehow appearing an empty line in between every line.
 
  Why is this? And:
 
  01 How can I detect files with double lines?
  02 And then eliminate this double lining?

 Haha, what makes you think you can troll the mailing list one day and
 then ask for help the next?  Go away, silly person.

 Kris

I'm not sure, but I think his most useful purpose is providing comic 
relief for the list. 

On the face of it Kris, you're comment to him isn't much, but I keep 
laughing about it. Just think, all this comedy comes from one person. 
One person who can't successfully do a buildworld sequence, even with 
all the advice he's received on this list. 

What can I say

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: a number of widly varied questions [FreeBSD 6.0; stdc++6, Xorg/Drivers issues, one KDE issue]

2006-03-30 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Thursday 30 March 2006 09:48, Jim Stapleton wrote:
 Sorry if some of these aren't all exactly appropriate for here, but
 this seems like the best place to ask for a number of them,
 especially given my system is FreeBSD, and I've gotten everything
 from ports. I'm putting all of this in one email as just a
 not-so-quick, quick overview, and to ask if I should do everything in
 one email, or should I split it into several emails?

 snip 
  Regardless, my monitor (Samsung 712N) likes 1280x1024, Xorg refuses
 to run at anything but 1280x960 (which isn't even in my
 /etc/X11/xorg.conf file). I expect in answering this my xorg.conf and
 my Xorg.0.log file will be desired quantities, but this is just an
 overview mail, and I don't want to waste space until I know this
 group is right for this question, or you are going to ship me off to
 one of the xorg lists (which I can't seem to find on their site).
 I'm using the dri driver module. Also, on an athlon64, and a 64 bit
 installtion, what's the best way to get the drm module working?
 ports/graphics/drm-kmod wants an i386 compile (and while I'll be
 setting up a i386 cross compiler for open office, I seriously doubt a
 386 kernel module will be happy in a 64 bit kernel).


 Thank you for your time,
 -Jim Stapleton
 ___

I can help you with the monitor part. I have a Samsung 712N that runs at 
1280x1024. 

Towards the end of xorg.conf there is a section that looks something 
like this:

Section Screen
Identifier  Screen0
Device  Card0
Monitor Monitor0
DefaultDepth24
SubSection  Display
Viewport0 0
Depth   24
Modes   1280x1024
EndSubSection

That's what's in mine, and thats what gets the 1280x1024 display.

You're also going to have to look for something that looks like this:

Section Monitor
#DisplaySize340 270 # mm
Identifier  Monitor0
HorizSync   30.0 - 81.0
VertRefresh 56.0 - 75.0
#   Option  DPMS
EndSection


I think using 'Xorg -configure' will generate a pretty good xorg.conf 
file (actually xorg.conf.new) that you can look at, make changes to, 
and test with 'Xorg -configure xorg.conf.new', you'll have to use 
^Backspace to get out of it, but you'll find out if you've get things 
set right and if the mouse is working.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: ASCII files becoming double lined

2006-03-30 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Thursday 30 March 2006 11:27, Vaaf wrote:
 At 17:58 30.03.2006, Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
 On Thursday 30 March 2006 09:04, Kris Kennaway wrote:
   On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 04:59:36PM +0200, Vaaf wrote:
Hello!
   
Sometimes I notice ASCII files becoming double lined.
As in there somehow appearing an empty line in between every
line.
   
Why is this? And:
   
01 How can I detect files with double lines?
02 And then eliminate this double lining?
  
   Haha, what makes you think you can troll the mailing list one day
   and then ask for help the next?  Go away, silly person.
  
   Kris
 
 I'm not sure, but I think his most useful purpose is providing comic
 relief for the list.
 
 On the face of it Kris, you're comment to him isn't much, but I keep
 laughing about it. Just think, all this comedy comes from one
  person. One person who can't successfully do a buildworld sequence,
  even with all the advice he's received on this list.
 
 What can I say
 
 Don

 Whatever. You guys asked for root password, that's a risk I can't
 take.

I don't see anything on here asking for a root password, so you must be 
referring to somewhere else.

I'll tell you what. I wouldn't give out a root password either. I think, 
though, the reason it was asked for was you were proving to be so inept 
that it was wanted so the problem could be fixed and you would stop 
with your shenanigans on that issue.

If you would use the suggestions given, so you have a base to work from, 
you could then figure out how to put it in a script and run the script 
to your hearts content. But until you have that base to work from, a 
whole lot of you're scripts aren't going to work the way you want them 
to.

Before you can run, you learn to walk; before you walk, you learn to 
stand; before you stand, you learn to crawl; before you crawl, you 
learn to sit up; before you learn to sit up, you lay there and shit in 
your diapers. I'm not sure exactly were you are, but I know it's not at 
the run stage.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Thunderbird and Firefox dead after portupgrade

2006-03-30 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Thursday 30 March 2006 17:53, Albert Shih wrote:
  Le 30/03/2006 à 14:42:10-0800, Micah a écrit

  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  1.5.0.1_2 was commited last night, so it's probably a recent
  breakage. I just found a bug report on it at
  http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=95100
  So we have four confirmed cases of firefox not working.

 five...but not for firefox...for thunderbird (well I don't use it at
 all...;-) )

 Same problem when I try to laucnh thunderbird, nothing append, no
 error..

 Regards.

 using : FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE

 --
 Albert SHIH
 Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT)
 U.F.R. de Mathematiques.
 Heure local/Local time:
 Fri Mar 31 01:51:25 CEST 2006
 ___

This happened to me also, until I remembered this has happened before 
and what to try. 

Login as root, start the GUI (mine is KDE), open a terminal program and 
start firefox from there. After that, I had no problems. It's working 
fine.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FBSD 6.0 ipfilter nat redirect not working.

2006-03-29 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
Just a quick question. How are you connecting to the Internet, by that I 
mean are you using aDSL? If you are, I can help you.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Error Compiling Open Office

2006-03-29 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Tuesday 28 March 2006 22:08, Chris Maness wrote:
 I just updated my ports and tried to compile open office.  got this
 failure while trying to compile.  Any suggestions?

 g++-ooo: Internal error: Killed: 9 (program cc1plus)
 Please submit a full bug report.
 See URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions.
 dmake:  Error code 1, while making '../unxfbsd.pro/obj/textenc.obj'
 '---* tg_merge.mk *---'

 ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making
 /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOB680_m5/sal/textenc
 dmake:  Error code 1, while making 'build_instsetoo_native'
 '---* *---'
 *** Error code 255
 ___

Just a thought. You can download the package for 2.0.2 and install that. 
Are you sure you want the experience of doing it from the port?

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Why are so many people using 4.x?

2006-03-29 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Wednesday 29 March 2006 09:27, Vaaf wrote:
 At 14:46 29.03.2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   of FreeBSD to building a skyscraper on shallow grounds.
 
 apparently, you did not read much of the source tree did you. or
 appreciate the fact that FreeBSD boots so fast and clean.

 Whatever.

 I love FreeBSD, however I'm just stating the facts.

 anyway, you rant made me think why my email block was not working
  properly.
 
 i need to check the to: and cc: -fields as well!
 
 thanks alot!
 
 regards,
 
 usleep

 ___

I have a question for you Kristian. Since you switched to DragonFly, why 
are you asking questions here? Isn't DragonFly providing support? Don't 
they go along with your failed method of doing a buildworld sequence 
either? I saw in an earlier post of yours, that we told you your method 
was wrong, but you think you're right. That would mean that everyone 
who can do it and tried to help you is wrong, and you who can't do it 
with your method, is right. Is that what it amounts to? I have to think 
about that.

As for blocking your email, while the idea sounds good,  I won't do 
that. I would miss out on some serious entertainment that you provide.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Fwd: package vs ports question

2006-03-27 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Monday 27 March 2006 09:26, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
 Luiz Eduardo Guida Valmont wrote:
 Thanks for the answer. I just hope I'm not messing things too much.
 
 So if a port may override a package, is the only solution to this
 generate a package then install it? Now if this happens, what will
 happen for example (supposing I install everything from packages -
  or make package then pkg_add for that matter) when I install
  Adobe Acrobat? Are all its dependancies going to be installed as
  well? I mean, ports doesn't know which packages were installed by
  pkg_add, which is how I suppose those packages are installed. Sorry
  if I cannot make myself clear enough, but there's still the fog
  that blinds newbies like me. :)

 Sorry if I'm interjecting stupid stuff here .. . haven't yet
 backtracked this thread.

 What exactly do you mean, ports doesn't *know* which packages
 were installed by pkg_add ... they use the same database, and as
 far as the ports(7) mechanism is concerned, they are the same thing.

 The difference is in the details visible to the user; as far as the
 ports system is concerned, files is files, and port/package data is
 data.

 Is it possible to generate packages for all the dependancies? Does
 make package do this for all packages for which a package can be
 created? I hope I won't need to reinstall them but you know... you
 never know. :)

 'make package' should include all dependencies, by my understanding;
 however, my understanding isn't the greatest, so YMMV.

 Thanks again...

 HTH,

 KDK

'make package' will install the missing dependencies but will only make 
a package of the the port being installed. If you want to make a 
package of the dependent ports you need to use 'make 
package-recursive'. Be advised, probably somewhere in the build of the 
packages, something will be missing and it will break. At least, it 
always has for me. So, packages are built for some of the dependent 
ports, but not for others.

You need to check that /usr/ports/packages exists and if it doesn't, do 
a 'mkdir /usr/ports/packages', otherwise the built packages are put in 
the port. Not a really convenient place.

I very seldom build packages anymore.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Fwd: package vs ports question

2006-03-27 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Monday 27 March 2006 09:49, RW wrote:
 On Monday 27 March 2006 14:20, Norberto Meijome wrote:
  make package will actually make the package and install it for you,
  you dont need to do a pkg_add after that (yes, a bit
  counter-intuitive, but really handy)

 Make package creates a package out of an installed port (it will
 install the port first, if neccessary). It doesn't install the
 package - there would be no point.
 ___

'make install' builds a package from the port and installs it. 'make 
package' builds a package and installs it, it also saves it in 
compressed form so it can be reinstalled if necessary. 

A port is a skeleton, it contains the information needed to build a 
package and that's it. The ports aren't installed, it's the package 
that results from building a port that is installed. Ports are only 
skeletons, the contain the information necessary to allow the port to 
be built into an installable package. 

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Portupgrade fails to upgrade after using portsnap

2006-03-18 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Saturday 18 March 2006 08:06, Jez Hancock wrote:
 Hi all,

 For a long time I've been using cvsup and portupgrade to update the
 ports tree once a week; this has worked well for years now.  Recently
 though I changed to using portsnap to update the ports tree, still
 using portupgrade once a week to update the ports.  I followed the
 method outlined in the handbook more or less for upgrading using
 portsnap, essentially running a cronjob:

 portsnap cron  portsnap update  portupgrade -arRF  pkg_version
 -v -I -l 

 to grab and extract the latest port snapshot, fetch any newer port
 distfiles/tarballs and then report by mail what ports are out of
 date.

 This worked well for a few weeks up until Feb 25th - since then not a
 single out of date port has been reported and 'portupgrade -arR'
 fails to upgrade anything. I thought this might have been to do with
 the recent ports freeze, though checking now I see that only went on
 from the start of March...

 I've changed back to use cvsup and the old method - basically 'cvsup
 -g -L2 supfile  cd /usr/ports  make fetchindex  portsdb -u' -
 but still no joy.  I was convinced it was the ports db files that
 were out of synch and thought this might do the trick to fix the
 problem, but unfortunately no - if I view the resulting INDEX file
 from this procedure I can see there are ports out of date as well,
 it's just 'portupgrade -arR' etc refuses to find any updates.

 Questions then:

 What could the problem be?
 For future reference what is the best way to purge the ports system
 of out of date db files and regenerate them all so 'portupgrade
 -arRi' will work?

 Cheers.
 --
 Jez Hancock
 ___

Doing a little better job of reading the man page would help. While it 
tells you how to set up a cronjob, it also tells you this is a bad 
idea.

You ran the cronjob, which succeeded, but failed to update the ports 
tree because it had nothing to update it with. If you had ever run 
portsnap manually, I think you would have set-up your cronjob a little 
differently.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Portupgrade fails to upgrade after using portsnap

2006-03-18 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Saturday 18 March 2006 08:06, Jez Hancock wrote:
 Hi all,

 For a long time I've been using cvsup and portupgrade to update the
 ports tree once a week; this has worked well for years now.  Recently
 though I changed to using portsnap to update the ports tree, still
 using portupgrade once a week to update the ports.  I followed the
 method outlined in the handbook more or less for upgrading using
 portsnap, essentially running a cronjob:

 portsnap cron  portsnap update  portupgrade -arRF  pkg_version
 -v -I -l 

 to grab and extract the latest port snapshot, fetch any newer port
 distfiles/tarballs and then report by mail what ports are out of
 date.

 This worked well for a few weeks up until Feb 25th - since then not a
 single out of date port has been reported and 'portupgrade -arR'
 fails to upgrade anything. I thought this might have been to do with
 the recent ports freeze, though checking now I see that only went on
 from the start of March...

 I've changed back to use cvsup and the old method - basically 'cvsup
 -g -L2 supfile  cd /usr/ports  make fetchindex  portsdb -u' -
 but still no joy.  I was convinced it was the ports db files that
 were out of synch and thought this might do the trick to fix the
 problem, but unfortunately no - if I view the resulting INDEX file
 from this procedure I can see there are ports out of date as well,
 it's just 'portupgrade -arR' etc refuses to find any updates.

 Questions then:

 What could the problem be?
 For future reference what is the best way to purge the ports system
 of out of date db files and regenerate them all so 'portupgrade
 -arRi' will work?

 Cheers.
 --
 Jez Hancock
 ___
Jez,

I think my first response was a little unkind and I apologize for that.

The way I see it, your cronjob succeeded in doing what you set it to do. 
It just didn't do what you wanted.

First, portsnap requires fetch to get the files it needs, 'portsnap 
upgrade' doesn't do that. You need to run 'portsnap fetch upgrade' or 
'portsnap fetch'  ' portsnap upgrade'. Had you done that, it probably 
would have worked and you would have gotten something from the 
portupgrade portion of your cronjob. As it was, there was nothing new 
for portupgrade to work with and report.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Portupgrade fails to upgrade after using portsnap

2006-03-18 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Saturday 18 March 2006 12:06, Jez Hancock wrote:
 Hi Donald,

 Thanks for the replies.

 On 3/18/06, Donald J. O'Neill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Saturday 18 March 2006 08:06, Jez Hancock wrote:
   Hi all,
  
   For a long time I've been using cvsup and portupgrade to update
   the ports tree once a week; this has worked well for years now. 
   Recently though I changed to using portsnap to update the ports
   tree, still using portupgrade once a week to update the ports.  I
   followed the method outlined in the handbook more or less for
   upgrading using portsnap, essentially running a cronjob:
  
   portsnap cron  portsnap update  portupgrade -arRF 
   pkg_version -v -I -l 
  
   to grab and extract the latest port snapshot, fetch any newer
   port distfiles/tarballs and then report by mail what ports are
   out of date.
  
   This worked well for a few weeks up until Feb 25th - since then
   not a single out of date port has been reported and 'portupgrade
   -arR' fails to upgrade anything. I thought this might have been
   to do with the recent ports freeze, though checking now I see
   that only went on from the start of March...
  
   I've changed back to use cvsup and the old method - basically
   'cvsup -g -L2 supfile  cd /usr/ports  make fetchindex 
   portsdb -u' - but still no joy.  I was convinced it was the ports
   db files that were out of synch and thought this might do the
   trick to fix the problem, but unfortunately no - if I view the
   resulting INDEX file from this procedure I can see there are
   ports out of date as well, it's just 'portupgrade -arR' etc
   refuses to find any updates.
  
   Questions then:
  
   What could the problem be?
   For future reference what is the best way to purge the ports
   system of out of date db files and regenerate them all so
   'portupgrade -arRi' will work?
  
   Cheers.
   --
   Jez Hancock
   ___
 
  Jez,
 
  I think my first response was a little unkind and I apologize for
  that.
 
  The way I see it, your cronjob succeeded in doing what you set it
  to do. It just didn't do what you wanted.
 
  First, portsnap requires fetch to get the files it needs, 'portsnap
  upgrade' doesn't do that. You need to run 'portsnap fetch upgrade'
  or 'portsnap fetch'  ' portsnap upgrade'. Had you done that, it
  probably would have worked and you would have gotten something from
  the portupgrade portion of your cronjob. As it was, there was
  nothing new for portupgrade to work with and report.

 Ok, I think you posted that before I clarified things in my last post
 :)

 By the by anyway... the issue I have is that when I run pkg_version
 or portversion I'm told there are a dozen or so ports need upgrading.
 However when I run portupgrade, portupgrade finds no ports to
 upgrade. Very frustrating.

 The general gist is in the following typescript/commandline output:

 [14:43:05] [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports#  portversion -vl 
 bash-3.1.10   needs updating (port has 3.1.10_1)
 mtr-nox11-0.69_2  needs updating (port has 0.69_3)
 mutt-devel-1.5.11_1   needs updating (port has 1.5.11_2)
 mysql-server-4.0.26_1 needs updating (port has 4.0.26_2)
 netpbm-10.26.25   needs updating (port has 10.26.26)
 nmap-4.01 needs updating (port has 4.01_1)
 p5-Archive-Tar-1.28   needs updating (port has 1.29)
 p5-Mail-Tools-1.73needs updating (port has 1.74)
 p5-XML-RSS-1.05_1 needs updating (port has 1.10)
 tiff-3.8.0_1  needs updating (port has 3.8.1)
 vim-6.4.6 needs updating (port has 6.4.6_1)
 w3m-0.5.1_4   needs updating (port has 0.5.1_5)

 [14:43:10] [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports# portupgrade -arRi
 ---  Session started at: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 14:43:16 +
 -snip-
 ** No need to upgrade 'bash-3.1.10' (= bash-3.1.10). (specify -f to
 force) -snip-
 ** No need to upgrade 'mtr-nox11-0.69_2' (= mtr-nox11-0.69_2).
 (specify -f to force)
 -snip-
 ** No need to upgrade 'mutt-devel-1.5.11_1' (= mutt-devel-1.5.11_1).
 (specify -f to force)

 etc etc

 This is all the result after running 'cd /usr/ports  make
 fetchindex' to get the latest ports INDEX db then running 'portsdb
 -u' to update /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db.

 Any ideas why portversion says various ports are out of date but
 portupgrade doesn't want to update them?  Is there any db that
 portupgrade would use to determine out of date ports other than
 /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db?

 Thanks again.

 --
 Jez Hancock
   - System Administrator / PHP Developer

 http://munk.nu/
 http://freebsd.munk.nu/  - A FreeBSD Diary
 http://ipfwstats.sf.net/- ipfw peruser traffic logging
 ___
Jez,

I have no clue. If portversion is saying there is a port in need of 
upgrade, 'portupgrade -arRi' should find it. That's a portupgrade 
problem, not a portsnap problem. I would suggest trying

Re: Portupgrade fails to upgrade after using portsnap

2006-03-18 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Saturday 18 March 2006 15:50, Duane Whitty wrote:
 Hi,

 I seem to remember needing to run portsnap fetch extract update
 the first time I ran portsnap.  Afterwards portsnap fetch update
 worked as I expected.  Perhaps you have already tried this?  If so,
 my apologies for the useless noise.

 HTH,

 Duane

 --

Hi Duane,

Don't worry about trying to help out. Sometimes the simple things can go 
un-noticed and cause problems. Of course, it's easy for me to say, I 
didn't have the problem.

I think, from what Lex has been saying to me, that he's pretty much 
decided that, at least for now, he's going to go with cvsup.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: I386 Installation

2006-03-14 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 02:47, Eileen Wasson wrote:
 I'm a newbie to unix and freebsd. I'm trying to follow
 your documentation and keep failing the install. I
 have an HP COmpaq desktop dc5100 MT and it will NOT
 detect my iso image for the i386. i did not see it in
 your hardware list.htm. does that mean it's not
 supported or do i need new drivers? if i put it in an
 older ibm, the cd works. i also tried using your
 floppy method and that failed as well. it said no
 boot/loader. this box has xp loaded it already.

 any help would be greatly appreciated.

 ~Eileen

 __

You need to burn that iso to a cd, then you can boot from it and it'll 
go into install. 

It looks like your computer came with an 80GB hard drive. Do you have 
only 1 hard drive, or do you have 2? If only 1, are you planning on 
over-writing what's presently installed?

Which iso image do you have?

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Mail client like mulberry

2006-03-14 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 12:40, Benjamin Lutz wrote:
 On Tuesday 14 March 2006 18:15, Paul Schmehl wrote:
   What does this New Messages feature do?
 
  It's like Favorites, except it only displays folders that have new
  messages in them.  I have so many folders that it's a real PITA to
  have to scroll through 20 that have no new messages in them just to
  get to 10 that do.
 
  It also needs to be SMIME/PGP aware and handle IMAP gracefully
  (according to the RFCs, not like MS crap.)

 How about KMail then. It's SMIME/PGP implementation is very good (and
 it renders signed content very nicely too imo) and works great with
 IMAP. It can be comfortably used with the keyboard only (much more so
 than, say, Thunderbird).

 It doesn't filter folders, however it has a Next Unread Folder
 command, which makes it directly switch to the next folder with
 unread messages in it.

 Cheers
 Benjamin


Yes, Kmail does filter folders, if you're talking about filtering 
messages that come in from e-lists (such as questions@) and moving them 
to a designated folder. The filters are easy to set up. The folders can 
show how many messages are in the folder,how many are new and will 
decrement the new filter count as they are accessed. It can also remove 
duplicate messages from a folder.

It is one heck of an e-mail client and I haven't found anything to touch 
it.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Mail client like mulberry

2006-03-14 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 17:39, Norberto Meijome wrote:
 On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 13:15:07 -0600

 Donald J. O'Neill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   It doesn't filter folders, however it has a Next Unread Folder
   command, which makes it directly switch to the next folder with
   unread messages in it.
  
   Cheers
   Benjamin
 
  Yes, Kmail does filter folders, if you're talking about filtering
  messages that come in from e-lists (such as questions@) and moving
  them to a designated folder. The filters are easy to set up.

 I think the original poster meant the virtual folders that only show
 folders with new email - not email filtering (which is, I'd say, a
 must have feature of any software worth calling itself mail client).

  The
  folders can show how many messages are in the folder,how many are
  new and will decrement the new filter count as they are accessed.
  It can also remove duplicate messages from a folder.

 sylpheed-claws can do all this, as well as creating processing (as
 well as filters, of course) rules (which I have NO idea how or what
 to use it for ...but i does sound cool :D). supports IMAP and
 identities, like thunderbird. IMAP is not a problem at all.

 and I have all my folders with new email in a nice bright blue (vs.
 grey for folders w no unread email, and black for folders with unread
 email, but no new email)

 PGP inline and SMIME works great too.

  It is one heck of an e-mail client and I haven't found anything to
  touch it.

When you subscribe to a lot of e-lists (I subscribe to about35) and you 
get a lot messages coming in, you learn really quick about filter rules 
and how handy they are.

I used sylpheed-claws a number of years ago and it was very good. I used 
it for a bit. There is also evolution, I haven't looked at it in a 
while. I may want to look at them again.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: cg 0: bad magic number (used to be Disappointed with version 6.0)

2006-03-12 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Saturday 11 March 2006 21:08, you wrote:
 Hi Donald.  It's me again.  I sent this to the list and saw I didn't
 include you.

I haven't seen the one on the list yet, this one got here first.
 .

 Ok, I have narrowed down my problem a great deal.  It appears that
 FreeBSD cannot read the partition table of my 300 GB Seagate
 Barracuda. My dos diagnostic utility works because it accesses the
 disk in a different way.

 I used the entire disk (one slice/partition) and attempted to format
 it.  This is what I get after it reaches the end of the disk:

 cg 0: bad magic number

 It also slows down significantly about 3/4 through the procedure.


Are you doing this through sysinstall or are you manually running fdisk 
and bsdlabel.

Well, maybe with a disk that big , it was getting tired and wanted to 
rest up before giving you the bad news.

 Now the funny part.  I create two partitions and the newfs output is
 exactly the same as before when I try to format the first partition!
 It tries to format as if there is only one partition and produces the
 same error.

 If I remove the slice via sysinstall and then try fdisk I get this:

 # fdisk -vBI ad3
 *** Working on device /dev/ad3 ***
 parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are:
 cylinders=581421 heads=16 sectors/track=63 (1008 blks/cyl)

 Figures below won't work with BIOS for partitions not in cyl 1
 parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are:
 cylinders=581421 heads=16 sectors/track=63 (1008 blks/cyl)

 Information from DOS bootblock is:
 1: sysid 165 (0xa5),(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD)
 start 63, size 586072305 (286168 Meg), flag 80 (active)
 beg: cyl 0/ head 1/ sector 1;
 end: cyl 812/ head 15/ sector 63
 2: UNUSED
 3: UNUSED
 4: UNUSED
 fdisk: Geom not found

 Anyone?

 --
 Peter

 __
Peter,

Is this a brand new disk? Has it ever been used before? Is it still 
under warrantee? If it is, take it back and get it replaced.

Hey, I just saw it. You made Google search.

It looks to me like things just went through the motions and not the 
actuality of installing ufs on the drive. That's happened to me a 
couple of times and from what I remember, I had to start the install 
over from the beginning - and I seem to recall something about having 
to install windows first and reformatting all the hard-drives with 
NTFS, then I could go back in and install FreeBSD. Otherwise, I 
couldn't get FreeBSD to install, it just went through the motions, 
wiping out whatever was on the hard-drives but not putting in FreeBSD. 
Without a CDROM, it's going to be a little bit rough to do.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: cg 0: bad magic number (used to be Disappointed with version 6.0)

2006-03-12 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Saturday 11 March 2006 23:51, Peter wrote:

  Are you doing this through sysinstall or are you manually running
  fdisk
  and bsdlabel.

 Through sysinstall.  Both disklabel and fdisk don't work.  The former
 gives input/output error and output to the latter I gave in my last
 post.

 
  Is this a brand new disk? Has it ever been used before? Is it still
  under warrantee? If it is, take it back and get it replaced.

 Yeah, I'm leaning that way too.

  Hey, I just saw it. You made Google search.

 Huh?

Yeah. Do a google search for Seagate ST3300831A, then search within for 
problems and there it is, at the bottom of the first page:
Google Group results for Seagate ST3300831A problem
Disappointed in version 6.0 - list.freebsd.questions - March 11, 2006
Seagate hard drive warranty - comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.stora ...

If you search for petermatulis, there are about 263 hits. It appears at 
one time you were doing OpenBSD. Just a piece of trivia. I can be found 
also. 

  It looks to me like things just went through the motions and not
  the actuality of installing ufs on the drive. That's happened to me
  a couple of times and from what I remember, I had to start the
  install over from the beginning - and I seem to recall something
  about having
 
  to install windows first and reformatting all the hard-drives with
  NTFS, then I could go back in and install FreeBSD. Otherwise, I
  couldn't get FreeBSD to install, it just went through the motions,
  wiping out whatever was on the hard-drives but not putting in
  FreeBSD.
  Without a CDROM, it's going to be a little bit rough to do.

 I don't understand why you mention Windows.  Surely I don't require
 Windows to get this drive to work.  As for the cdrom, I can always
 put it back to do an install.  It doesn't cause  trouble -just slows
 down the boot drive.

I had a hard drive one time that I just couldn't get FreeBSD to format, 
no matter what I did. I finally gave up and put WindowsXP on it, which 
was somewhat of struggle too. After that, since what I wanted was 
FreeBSD, I retried installing it, it worked this time, I don't know why 
but it did. I can only think that there was something wrong with the 
original installation of FreeBSD and I wasn't experienced enough, at 
that time to figure out what it was, other than it wasn't working 
right. If I'm remembering correctly, a while later the drive would 
operate intermittently and I put it in the basement.

 --
 Peter

Hi Peter,

Since you can play around a bit. Try reconnecting the CDROM and just the 
300GB Seagate on the other ata channel. Then see if FreeBSD will 
successfully install on the drive.

How much time do you have to work with this problem?

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: pkgdb warning message

2006-03-12 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Sunday 12 March 2006 07:07, Gerard Seibert wrote:
 When running the following command: pkgdb -Fv, I receive the
 following message:

 Duplicated origin: devel/libtool15 - libtool-1.5.22_1
 libtool-1.5.22_2 Unregister any of them? [no]

 I am unsure of what action to take, therefore I have chosen the
 default [no] one suggested. Would it be prudent to delete one of
 these duplicates, and if so does it matter which one?

If it was me, I would think that when libtool-1.5.22_1 was upgraded to 
libtool-1.5.22_2, the registration for libtool-1.5.22_1 wasn't removed 
from the database properly. So, yes, it would be best to delete the 
registration of libtool-1.5.22_2 through pkgdb -F. Answer [no] yes cr 
and get rid of it.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Disappointed with version 6.0

2006-03-11 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Friday 10 March 2006 22:57, Peter wrote:
 I'm setting up a new server on 6.0 I've been planning for a long time
 and I am very disappointed with two critical issues.  My motherboard
 is the ASUS K8V-X SE that I chose because it was listed as compatible
 at the FreeBSD/amd64 Project:

 http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/amd64/motherboards.html

 I wonder if going back to 5.4 might help?

 Onto the problems...

 1. I have 4 IDE drives:

 primary controller: Maxtor 40 GB hd (master) and LG cdrom (slave)
 secondary controller: Seagate Barracuda 200 GB hd (master) and
 Seagate Barracuda 300 GB (slave)

 Problem: The 300 GB drive is unusable.

 I set it up ok with sysinstall during the installation but the system
 will not boot properly if it has an entry in /etc/fstab.  I get many
 errors like:

 ad3: WARNING - READ_DMA UDMA ICRC error (retrying request) LBA=63

 I also get input/output error if I try to examine its label with
 disklabel.

 dmesg output is at the end of this post when I booted without fstab
 line.

 The strange thing is that the two drives on the secondary controller
 are so similar.  Same manufacturer, same product line, the speeds are
 the same.  Everything is the same except the size.  I ran dos-level
 diagnostics on it and no problems were found.

 2.  I can't use my USB ports!

 I get a line like this for each of my ports:

 uhci0: VIA 83C572 USB controller port 0xb800-0xb81f irq 21 at
 device 16.0 on pci0
 uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED]



 Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project.
 Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993,
 1994
   The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
 FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Thu Nov  3 09:36:13 UTC 2005
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
 ACPI APIC Table: A M I  OEMAPIC 
 Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
 CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+ (2002.58-MHz 686-class CPU)
   Origin = AuthenticAMD  Id = 0xf4a  Stepping = 10
 Features=0x78bfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,P
GE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2 AMD
 Features=0xe0500800SYSCALL,NX,MMX+,LM,3DNow+,3DNow
 real memory  = 536543232 (511 MB)
 avail memory = 515702784 (491 MB)
 snip 
 ad0: DMA limited to UDMA33, device found non-ATA66 cable
 ad0: 39205MB Maxtor 6K040L0 NAR61HA0 at ata0-master UDMA33
 acd0: CDROM GCR-8525B/1.02 at ata0-slave PIO4
 ad2: 190782MB Seagate ST3200826A 3.03 at ata1-master UDMA100
 ad3: 286168MB Seagate ST3300831A 3.03 at ata1-slave UDMA100
 Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a

 __
You've got a problem alright, and you don't even see it.

==
The ata driver sets the maximum transfer mode supported by the hardware 
as default.  However the ata driver sometimes warns: ``DMA limited to 
UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device''.  This means that the ata driver 
has detected that the required 80 conductor cable is not present or 
could not be detected properly, or that one of the devices on the 
channel only accepts up to UDMA2/ATA33.
==

You've got your 40GB Maxtor (you've installed FreeBSD on it), an ATA100 
device, connected with your CDROM, an ATA33 device. The result is: your 
boot drive is running at UDMA33 instead of UDMA100. This is not going 
to work real well, as you can see.

Do you really need that 40GB Maxtor? If you do, you're going to have to 
try adding an ATA controller card into one of your PCI slots and use 
that to connect your hard drives to.

Try removing the 40GB Maxtor and reinstalling FreeBSD on the other two 
drives. I think that will clear up some problems for you.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Disappointed with version 6.0

2006-03-11 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Saturday 11 March 2006 13:38, Peter wrote:
 --- Donald J. O'Neill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 [...]

   ad0: DMA limited to UDMA33, device found non-ATA66 cable
   ad0: 39205MB Maxtor 6K040L0 NAR61HA0 at ata0-master UDMA33
   acd0: CDROM GCR-8525B/1.02 at ata0-slave PIO4
   ad2: 190782MB Seagate ST3200826A 3.03 at ata1-master UDMA100
   ad3: 286168MB Seagate ST3300831A 3.03 at ata1-slave UDMA100
   Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a
  
   __
 
  You've got a problem alright, and you don't even see it.
 
  ==
  The ata driver sets the maximum transfer mode supported by the
  hardware
  as default.  However the ata driver sometimes warns: ``DMA limited
  to
 
  UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device''.  This means that the ata
  driver has detected that the required 80 conductor cable is not
  present or could not be detected properly, or that one of the
  devices on the channel only accepts up to UDMA2/ATA33.
  ==
 
  You've got your 40GB Maxtor (you've installed FreeBSD on it), an
  ATA100
  device, connected with your CDROM, an ATA33 device. The result is:
  your
  boot drive is running at UDMA33 instead of UDMA100. This is not
  going
 
  to work real well, as you can see.
 
  Do you really need that 40GB Maxtor? If you do, you're going to
  have to
  try adding an ATA controller card into one of your PCI slots and
  use that to connect your hard drives to.
 
  Try removing the 40GB Maxtor and reinstalling FreeBSD on the other
  two
  drives. I think that will clear up some problems for you.

 Can this be causing the problem with the 300 GB drive on the other
 controller?  What I don't understand is why is there a problem only
 with one drive on the secondary controller?

 As for the cdrom, how else can it be connected?  It will ALWAYS be
 slower than the hard disk.  Or do you mean it should just not be
 connected to the boot drive?  I never had such a problem before. 
 I'll move around my drives and see what happens.

 Thanks for your help.

 --
 Peter

Hi Peter,

You're going to have to have the cdrom connected, just not with a 
hard-drive or you'll have problems. As for the third hard-drive, that 
may have more to do with the way you set up the system than the 
problems with the connections as they are now. But, if you remove that 
drive and reinstall the system, I think (actually, I know, if you do it 
right) that will clear up a lot of problems. You've got two SATA ports 
on that MB, I think you would have problems then too. If you need that 
40 GB drive, I suggest you go out and get a controller that you can run 
all three drives off of..

What I mean is, if you have the cdrom and the 40GB HD connected to the 
same port, on the same cable, as you have, it will only run at the 
speed of the cdrom. You have to get the HD off of that port. Since 
you've used the slave port with the other two HDs, your only choice is 
to install a Controller card, like a Promise or some other card. I had 
a problem like that at one time and that was the only way to fix it. 
That's why I sent that snippet from the at man page, it tells you 
what's going to happen if you do it this way. I don't think you're 
going to like have at ATA100 drive as the system drive running at 
UDMA33, it just might result in timing problems.

Don

PS At this point I probably can't answer anymore questions, at least not 
today. I've had too many beers and I'm having a tough time typing. I 
can still make sense, I just am having a problem getting it from my 
brain to the e-mail. And I intend to have some more.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Disappointed with version 6.0

2006-03-11 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Saturday 11 March 2006 18:48, Peter wrote:

 You can answer me tomorrow if you like but here is an update:

 I removed the cdrom and the problem remains.  I got the usb ports to
 work as well by updating the bios and fiddling with some settings. 
 It is truly a mystery why this 300 GB drive cannot talk to FreeBSD.
 Again, it is detected fine by the bios; it passes dos level
 diagnostics; it is on the same ide cable (as slave) as the 200 GB
 drive that is identical to it save for an extra 100 GB.  My next step
 is to boot with knoppix to see how it behaves.

 --
 Peter

Hi Peter,

I've recovered sufficiently enough that I can type without spending all 
my time correcting spelling errors that a spelling checker can't fix.

OK, does dmesg still give this with the cdrom removed:

ad0: DMA limited to UDMA33, device found non-ATA66 cable
ad0: 39205MB Maxtor 6K040L0 NAR61HA0 at ata0-master UDMA33
acd0: CDROM GCR-8525B/1.02 at ata0-slave PIO4
ad2: 190782MB Seagate ST3200826A 3.03 at ata1-master UDMA100
ad3: 286168MB Seagate ST3300831A 3.03 at ata1-slave UDMA100
Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a

If the message for ad0 has changed, and it is now detected as an ata100 
device and is running at UDMA100, you've solved part of your problem. 
Your system will access the boot drive at a higher speed.

ad3 is still detected but you can't access it. So, I have to ask: when 
you set up the system, did you install a ufs system on it? Did you 
carve it up using bsdlabel? Or, did you leave it alone because you 
plane on using it for something else? This would be a reason for why it 
shows up on dmesg, but you can't access it.

Now, you need to do something about the cdrom. It's kind of unhandy to 
be without one. That's why I asked if you really needed the 40GB Maxtor 
and if you did, suggested you get an ata controller card, then you 
could use all three drives. And I also asked if you could just remove 
that drive and use the two Seagates. 

I guess there's one other question: how did you get from 5.4 to 6.0, and 
is it 6.0 or is it 6 STABLE?

Don


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Disappointed with version 6.0

2006-03-11 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Saturday 11 March 2006 20:03, Peter wrote:
  OK, does dmesg still give this with the cdrom removed:
 
  ad0: DMA limited to UDMA33, device found non-ATA66 cable
  ad0: 39205MB Maxtor 6K040L0 NAR61HA0 at ata0-master UDMA33
  acd0: CDROM GCR-8525B/1.02 at ata0-slave PIO4
  ad2: 190782MB Seagate ST3200826A 3.03 at ata1-master UDMA100
  ad3: 286168MB Seagate ST3300831A 3.03 at ata1-slave UDMA100
  Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a
 
  If the message for ad0 has changed, and it is now detected as an
  ata100
  device and is running at UDMA100, you've solved part of your
  problem.

 dmesg now says:

 ad0: 39205MB Maxtor 6K040L0 NAR61HA0 at ata0-master UDMA133
 ad2: 190782MB Seagate ST3200826A 3.03 at ata1-master UDMA100
 ad3: 286168MB Seagate ST3300831A 3.03 at ata1-slave UDMA100

 So ad0's speed has increased by 100 MB/s?


I was guessing that it was an ata100, it seems to be an ata133 instead. 
Now you can see what the difference is when connecting a hard-drive 
with a cdrom.


  Your system will access the boot drive at a higher speed.
 
  ad3 is still detected but you can't access it. So, I have to ask:
  when
  you set up the system, did you install a ufs system on it? Did you
  carve it up using bsdlabel? Or, did you leave it alone because you
  plane on using it for something else? This would be a reason for
  why it
  shows up on dmesg, but you can't access it.

 Yes, per install defaults ufs (and most probably soft updates) was
 used.  Everything was done via the default sysinstall procedure.  I
 said to use entire drive and then made one partition.  It creates
 /dev/ad3s1d.

 I just entered sysinstall again to start fresh and during the format
 portion Doing newfs I hear some sounds I've never heard before on a
 hard drive.  Like a mechanical arm is trying to move but it keeps
 bouncing back.  Then I get:

 Error mounting /dev/ad3s1d on /images : Input/output error

 But if there was something mechanically wrong then my dos-level
 diagnostics would of picked it up (I had an disk excercise tool
 running on it for 20 minutes without any problems).


No, Microsloth makes things run (or appear to run) by hiding a lot of 
information from you. When did you run the dos-level diagnostics on the 
disk, before or after you installed FreeBSD? I ask because if it was 
after, well, dos-level disk diagnostics can't access a ufs formated 
disk without doing nasty things to what's on it. If was before, you 
should have run spinrite 6.0 on it, but that's going to run for about , 
oh say, at a wild guess, on a drive that size, 2 or 3 days. Your twenty 
minute run on that drive wouldn't really tell you much unless the drive 
was drastically failing.

  Now, you need to do something about the cdrom. It's kind of unhandy
  to
  be without one. That's why I asked if you really needed the 40GB
  Maxtor
  and if you did, suggested you get an ata controller card, then you
  could use all three drives. And I also asked if you could just
  remove
 
  that drive and use the two Seagates.

 I need all three drives:

 1. system drive (40 GB)
 2. client data backups (200 GB)
 3. client data images (300 GB)

 The #3 drive (the problematic one) will actually be removed offsite
 once the (client hard drive) images have been stored.  And this is
 where I might be able to weasel out of my current predicament.  I can
 put back the cdrom afterwards.

  I guess there's one other question: how did you get from 5.4 to
  6.0, and is it 6.0 or is it 6 STABLE?

 No, no.  This is a brand new install of 6.0 (I can therefore mess
 around with impunity).  When I mentioned go back to 5.4 I did not
 mean to imply I upgraded.

Just don't cable back with the cdrom.

 --
 Peter


Now, what about your usb? a message like: 
uhci0: VIA 83C572 USB controller port 0xb800-0xb81f irq 21 at device 
16.0 on pci0 uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED]

Nothing wrong with that message. Base on that message, you don't have a 
problem. It's when you see messages like irq storm on  some device 
throttling source, or device returns some error message, or can't 
assign an irq, then you know you've got a problem that's going to 
require some swapping around on the pci bus. As a matter of fact, I was 
having usb problems until I went 6-RELEASE to 6-STABLE. Which at that 
time I was able to determine that it wasn't actually a usb problem, I 
was having a problem with a modem and bad usb mouse. I pulled the modem 
and was going to throw it away, put it away instead, until I had a need 
for one at which point I found out that it's position on the pci bus 
made the difference in whether it would play nicely with the cards or 
not. The mouse did get tossed, it would work intermittently under 
windows and FreeBSD would only get to a certain load point and then 
reboot. Actually, finding it was a little more difficult than I've 
said. 

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Haven't been able to make world in about a year

2006-03-06 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Monday 06 March 2006 10:31, Kristian Vaaf wrote:
 At 16:36 03.03.2006, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
 On 2006-03-03 15:08, Kristian Vaaf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Sorry sorry sorry, I am so very sorry.
   http://www.home.no/hedhnta/result.txt is indeed online now.
 
 This doesn't look right.  Are you sure your source tree is clean and
  up to date?  As Donald has posted latter:
 
 On 2006-03-03 09:09, Donald J. O'Neill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
   Alright Kristian, why don't you post your supfile, make.conf,
   rc.conf, output of uname -a, a description of what equipment
   your doing this with, what you're trying to accomplish and why,
   what you're doing to make this come about, what you expected to
   happen, what did happen. How you're taking all the advice
   you've been given and bending it to suit yourself - which, I
   have to tell you, IS NOT WORKING, or you would be singing a
   different tune.
 
 Please post all the details Donald has requested.

 You all got the details I posted earlier?

 Alright, I just finished retrying the whole process after adding
 these lines to my /etc/make.conf:

 CFLAGS= -O2 -pipe
 COPTFLAGS= -O2 -pipe

 And there is no change, I still get:

 --

   stage 2.3: build tools

 --
 cd /usr/src; MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj  INSTALL=sh
 /usr/src/tools/install.sh
 PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy
/usr/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/games:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/u
sr/bin WORLDTMP=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp  MAKEFLAGS=-m
 /usr/src/tools/build/mk  -m /usr/src/share/mk
 /usr/obj/usr/src/make.i386/make -f
 Makefile.inc1  DESTDIR=  BOOTSTRAPPING=504100 -DNO_LINT
 -DNO_CPU_CFLAGS -DNO_WARNS build-tools
 === bin/csh (obj,build-tools)
 grep 'ERR_' /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.err.c | grep
 '^#define'  sh.err.h
 cc -E -O2 -pipe -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh
 -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='/bin/csh'
 -DHAVE_ICONV  -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/include
 /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/tc.const.c
 /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.char.h
 /usr/src/bin/csh/config.h
 /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/config_f.h
 /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.types.h sh.err.h -D_h_tc_const

 | grep 'Char STR' |  sed -e 's/Char \([a-zA-Z0-9_]*\)\(.*\)/extern

 Char \1[];/' |  sort  tc.const.h
 In file included from /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.h:93,
   from
 /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/tc.const.c:33:
 /usr/include/wchar.h:33:18: cwchar: No such file or directory cc -o
 gethost  -L/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/lib -O2 -pipe -I.
 -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh
 -D_PATH_TCSHELL='/bin/csh'
 -DHAVE_ICONV  -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/include
 /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/gethost.c
 In file included from /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.h:93,
   from
 /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/gethost.c:33:
 /usr/include/wchar.h:33:18: cwchar: No such file or directory In file
 included from /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.h:93, from
 /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/gethost.c:33:
 /usr/include/wchar.h:35: error: syntax error before std
 In file included from
 /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/gethost.c:33:
 /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.h:97: error: syntax error
 before eChar /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.h:97: warning:
 data definition has no type or storage class
 In file included from /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.h:1304,
   from
 /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/gethost.c:33:
 /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.decls.h:221: error: syntax
 error before readc
 /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.decls.h:221: warning: data
 definition has no type or storage class
 *** Error code 1
 Stop in /usr/src/bin/csh.
 *** Error code 1
 Stop in /usr/src.
 *** Error code 1
 Stop in /usr/src.
 *** Error code 1
 Stop in /usr/src.

 Just to be clear, this is on the Pentium 120MHz, as I have a make
 buildworld problem on both of my FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE boxes.

 Good bye,
 Vaaf

Well Kristian, it looks to me like your procedure sucks, since it's 
failing on two computers. That should tell you something is wrong with 
the way you're doing things. This has been going on for over three 
weeks. Pick someone you think knows what they're doing and follow their 
suggestions.

Running a script is not saving you any time if it fails. Do it without 
running a script. There is a difference between running a script and 
running script (the program) to make a record of what went on. 

In your supfile, I suggest the following changes:

*default host=cvsup.no.FreeBSD.org
Are you actually using this line? Or, are you trying to disguise it so 
we're more confused than already and assume you actually know 
something.

*default base=/usr
change this to:
*default base=/var/db

*default prefix=/usr

Re: Haven't been able to make world in about a year

2006-03-06 Thread Donald J. O'Neill


Well Kristian, it looks to me like your procedure sucks, since it's 
failing on two computers. That should tell you something is wrong with 
the way you're doing things. This has been going on for over three 
weeks. Pick someone you think knows what they're doing and follow their 
suggestions.

Running a script is not saving you any time if it fails. Do it without 
running a script. There is a difference between running a script and 
running script (the program) to make a record of what went on. 

In your supfile, I suggest the following changes:

*default host=cvsup.no.FreeBSD.org
Are you actually using this line? Or, are you trying to disguise it so 
we're more confused than already and assume you actually know 
something.
+++
My apologies about the above comment Kristian. I see that it does exist

Don


*default base=/usr
change this to:
*default base=/var/db

*default prefix=/usr

*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6
change this to:
default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6_0

*default delete use-rel-suffix

src-all
#ports-all tag=.
#doc-all tag=.
Just upgrade src. Don't be mucking around with ports and doc at this 
time. Leave them be.

Blow away your sources and re-cvsup src. Follow somebodies procedure 
that is known to work.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Haven't been able to make world in about a year

2006-03-05 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Sunday 05 March 2006 07:38, Kristian Vaaf wrote:
 At 16:36 03.03.2006, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
 On 2006-03-03 15:08, Kristian Vaaf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Sorry sorry sorry, I am so very sorry.
   http://www.home.no/hedhnta/result.txt is indeed online now.
 
 This doesn't look right.  Are you sure your source tree is clean and
  up to date?  As Donald has posted latter:
 
 On 2006-03-03 09:09, Donald J. O'Neill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
   Alright Kristian, why don't you post your supfile, make.conf,
   rc.conf, output of uname -a, a description of what equipment
   your doing this with, what you're trying to accomplish and why,
   what you're doing to make this come about, what you expected to
   happen, what did happen. How you're taking all the advice
   you've been given and bending it to suit yourself - which, I
   have to tell you, IS NOT WORKING, or you would be singing a
   different tune.
 
 Please post all the details Donald has requested.

 Sure thing!

 # cat /etc/cvsupfile

 *default host=cvsup.no.FreeBSD.org
 *default base=/usr
 *default prefix=/usr
 *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6
 *default delete use-rel-suffix

 src-all
 ports-all tag=.
 doc-all tag=.

 # uname -a

 FreeBSD arba.domain.com 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #4:
 Wed Sep 21 01:34:15 CEST 2005
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ARBA i386

 These apply to both the box that fails into result.txt (Intel Pentium
 120MHz) and result_2.txt (Intel Pentium 4 3,2GHz).

 I am trying to upgrade these boxes. I expect things to work :)

 This is how I do it:

 cvsup -g -L 2 /etc/cvsupfile
 cd /usr/obj  chflags -R noschg *  rm -rf *
 cd /usr/src  make clean
 make buildworld
 make buildkernel KERNCONF=ARBA
 make installkernel KERNCONF=ARBA
 make installworld
 mergemaster

 Hope that helps!

 All the best,
 Vaaf

 ___

Yes, it does.

If this is the way you do it, after all the advice you've been given, it 
tells me that you aren't much on following advice that you have sought. 
Keep on doing it your way and continue to fail. If that's not what you 
have in mind, go back and reread the advice already given by myself, 
and others. We are successful, you are not. That's why we're giving 
advice and you're asking. You could be successful.

You still only gave part of what was asked for.

Sorry if this upsets you, but that's the way it is. I, for one, can't 
help you if you refuse to accept advice already given.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: script(1) Why does it output in CR/LF?

2006-03-03 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Friday 03 March 2006 04:52, Kristian Vaaf wrote:
 At 16:05 28.02.2006, James Bailie wrote:
 Glenn Dawson wrote:
   At 02:30 AM 2/28/2006, Kristian Vaaf wrote:
   Hello.
  
   I am just curious why the files I generate with script(1) output
   in CR/LF forcing me to run dos2unix on them everytime?
  
   Script just captures the output of your shell, and your shell has
   to send crlf in order to get the cursor back to the beginning of
   a line.
 
 No it doesn't.  The script(1) utility interposes a
 pseudo-terminal between the program whose output is to be
 captured and itself, so the program thinks its running on a
 terminal device and behaves accordingly.  Then script(1) acts
 like a transparent filter, shuttling data back-and-forth from the
 actual terminal to the pseudo-terminal, while sending a copy of
 the program's output to the log file as well.  It is the terminal
 driver in canonical mode, inside the pseudo-terminal, that is
 expanding NLs in the proggy's output stream into CRNL pairs.
 
 --
 James Bailie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.jamesbailie.com

 Thank you man, that was a wonderful description :)

 The last question though,
 don't you find it the least bit stupid?

 Thanks!

Christian,

Just a quick question: what are you using to look at them?

If things just work, there is no problem. I don't understand why you 
have to do this. Are you looking at them on a windows box? I know 
you're emailing the list from a windows box.

Don


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Users and groups properly organized?

2006-03-03 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Friday 03 March 2006 08:32, Kristian Vaaf wrote:
 Hello.

 Have you all ever had a look at your /etc/master.passwd and
 /etc/group? Stupid question. But notice the user and group
 identifications being thrown about as if they didn't matter. To me
 they do, and I would like some order in my system. Starting with my
 user and group identifications.

 Can I do something like this?

 find -s . -uid foo | xargs chown bar
 find -s . -gid foo | xargs chgrp bar

 To be able to arrange master.passwd like this,
 where UIDs and GIDs go by a chronological order?

 nobody:*:5:5::0:0:Unprivileged:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin
 root:$1$xsL49xbt$of5hvUCiVT/b/D3B70bZv1:0:0::0:0:Core:/root:/usr/loca
l/bin/zsh

 daemon:*:1:1::0:0:System Processes:/root:/usr/sbin/nologin
 operator:*:2:2::0:0:Operator:/:/usr/sbin/nologin
 kmem:*:3:65533::0:0:KMem:/:/usr/sbin/nologin
 bin:*:4:4::0:0:Binaries:/:/usr/sbin/nologin
 tty:*:5:65533::0:0:Titty:/:/usr/sbin/nologin
 news:*:6:6::0:0:News:/:/usr/sbin/nologin
 man:*:7:7::0:0:Manuals:/usr/share/man:/usr/sbin/nologin

 sshd:*:101:101::0:0:Secure Shell:/var/empty:/usr/sbin/nologin
 www:*:102:102::0:0:World Wide Web:/usr/local/www:/usr/sbin/nologin
 ftp:*:103:103::0:0:File Transfer
 Protocol:/home/websites:/usr/sbin/nologin
 mysql:*:104:104::0:0:MySQL:/var/db/mysql:/sbin/nologin
 proxy:*:105:105::0:0:Packet Filter:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin
 smmsp:*:106:106::0:0:Sendmail
 Submission:/var/spool/clientmqueue:/usr/sbin/nologin
 mailnull:*:107:107::0:0:Sendmail
 Default:/var/spool/mqueue:/usr/sbin/nologin
 postfix:*:108:108::0:0:Postfix:/var/spool/postfix:/usr/sbin/nologin
 cyrus:*:109:109::874400:0:Cyrus:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin
 spamd:*:110:110::0:0:SpamAssassin:/var/spool/spamd:/sbin/nologin
 vscan:*:111:111::0:0:Scanner:/var/amavis:/bin/sh
 clamav:*:112:112::0:0:ClamAV:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin
 tinydns:*:113:113::0:0:TinyDNS:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin
 axfrdns:*:114:114::0:0:Transfers:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin
 dnscache:*:115:115::0:0:Cache:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin
 dnslog:*:116:116::0:0:Logging:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin

 vaaf:*:1001:0::0:0:Kristian:/home/vaaf:/usr/local/bin/zsh
 nomad:*:1002:1002::0:0:Hednod:/home/nomad:/usr/local/bin/zsh
 polvott:*:1003:1003::0:0:Thomas:/home/polvott:/usr/local/bin/zsh
 speak:*:1004:1004::0:0:Poetry:/home/speak:/usr/local/bin/zsh

 And groups equally:

 nobody:*:5:
 wheel:*:0:root

 daemon:*:1:
 operator:*:2:root
 kmem:*:3:
 bin:*:4:
 tty:*:5:
 news:*:6:
 man:*:7:
 sshd:*:101:

 www:*:102:
 ftp:*:103:
 mysql:*:104:
 proxy:*:105:
 smmsp:*:106:
 mailnull:*:107:
 postfix:*:108:
 cyrus:*:119:
 spamd:*:110:
 vscan:*:111:
 clamav:*:112:
 tinydns:*:113:
 axfrdns:*:114:
 dnscache:*:115:
 dnslog:*:116:

 nomad:*:1002:
 polvott:*:1003:
 speak:*:1004:

 And so on ...

 Maybe such order, harmony or balance or whatever will help
 boost system performance? Just a superstitious thought. Cheers! :)

 All the best,
 Vaaf

=
Try to take care of one problem at a time. If you don't look at them, 
they have plenty of harmony and balance, and they work.

Concentrate more on 'make buildworld', you haven't gotten through that 
yet.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Haven't been able to make world in about a year

2006-03-03 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Friday 03 March 2006 08:08, Kristian Vaaf wrote:
 Sorry sorry sorry, I am so very sorry.

 http://www.home.no/hedhnta/result.txt is indeed online now.

 Also, strangely, my other FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE box (I have two) also
 errors out on build world. Different error though.

 Please also see http://www.home.no/hedhnta/result_2.txt

 The file was originally 8MB or so, so I had to cut it down a little.

 Basically, what I really need to do (among all these brilliant tips
 and tricks I've received) is to run mergemaster before I start
 making?

 One question, however, is it possible to make mergemaster install new
 files automatically except the ones that I've edited? That is, the
 ones without a FreeBSD
 CVS $Id$ tag? Normally, or actually in all cases, I say yes to
 install newer versions of all files except the ones that are part of
 my custom configuration.

 Well, that's it.
 Again I'm sorry for standing you guys up with the upload.

 All the best,
 Vaaf
=
Alright Kristian, why don't you post your supfile, make.conf, rc.conf, 
output of uname -a, a description of what equipment your doing this 
with, what you're trying to accomplish and why, what you're doing to 
make this come about, what you expected to happen, what did happen. How 
you're taking all the advice you've been given and bending it to suit 
yourself - which, I have to tell you, IS NOT WORKING, or you would be 
singing a different tune. 

How can you take the advice that I gave you, which has worked for me 
since FreeBSD 4.4, and it doesn't work for you. What about the advice 
that others gave you that was similar to mine and should have the same 
outcome. You're obviously doing something wrong. I would think you 
would want to successfully get through at least one buildworld sequence 
before screwing with things. 

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: plugin in firefox

2006-03-03 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
This libmap.conf is what works for me, compare it with yours. It's one I 
spent a whole lot of time and trouble reading advice for what worked.

Don

===
# /etc/libmap.conf for FreeBSD 6.0(6.0-BETA3 and later) and 7-current
# $Id: libmap.conf-FreeBSD6,v 1.23 2005/11/13 01:46:14 nork Exp $

###
# [ALPHA SUPPORT] Flash7 with Mozilla
[/usr/X11R6/lib/linux-flashplugin7/libflashplayer.so]
libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.2
libdl.so.2  pluginwrapper/flash7.so
libz.so.1   libz.so.3
libm.so.6   libm.so.4
libc.so.6   pluginwrapper/flash7.so


###
# Flash6 with Opera is not avilable.

# Flash6 with Konqueror
# SEE ALSO: http://freebsd.kde.org/howtos/konqueror-flash.php
# This configuration was integrated to following one.

# Flash6 with Mozilla/Firebird/Galeon/Epiphany/Konqueror/Kazehakase
[/usr/X11R6/lib/linux-flashplugin6/libflashplayer.so]
libpthread.so.0 pluginwrapper/flash6.so
libdl.so.2  pluginwrapper/flash6.so
libz.so.1   libz.so.3
libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3libstdc++.so.5
libm.so.6   libm.so.4
libc.so.6   pluginwrapper/flash6.so


###
# Acrobat5 with Mozilla/Firebird/Galeon/Epiphany/Konqueror/Kazehakase
[/usr/X11R6/Acrobat5/Browsers/intellinux/nppdf.so]
libc.so.6   pluginwrapper/acrobat.so

# Acrobat7 with Mozilla/Firebird/Galeon/Epiphany/Konqueror/Kazehakase
[/usr/local/lib/acroread/usr/local/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so]
libc.so.6   pluginwrapper/acrobat.so

# Japanese Acrobat7 with 
Mozilla/Firebird/Galeon/Epiphany/Konqueror/Kazehakase
[/usr/X11R6/Acrobat7/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so]
libc.so.6   pluginwrapper/acrobat.so


###
# Helix RealPlayer with 
Mozilla/Firebird/Galeon/Epiphany/Konqueror/Kazehakase
[/usr/X11R6/lib/linux-mozilla/plugins/nphelix.so]
libstdc++.so.5  libstdc++.so.5
libc.so.6   pluginwrapper/realplayer.so


###
# Java3D
# NOTE: THESE ARE SAMPLES.  PLEASE SEE ALSO INSTALL MESSAGES
#   OF java/java3d PORT.
[/usr/local/jdk1.4.2/jre/lib/i386/libJ3D.so]
libdl.so.2  pluginwrapper/java3d.so
libm.so.6   libm.so.4
libnsl.so.1 pluginwrapper/java3d.so
libpthread.so.0 pluginwrapper/java3d.so
libc.so.6   pluginwrapper/java3d.so

[/usr/local/jdk1.4.2/jre/lib/i386/libj3daudio.so]
libm.so.6   libm.so.4
libnsl.so.1 pluginwrapper/java3d_snd.so
libpthread.so.0 pluginwrapper/java3d_snd.so
libc.so.6   pluginwrapper/java3d_snd.so

[/usr/local/jdk1.4.2/jre/lib/i386/libJ3DUtils.so]
libpthread.so.0 pluginwrapper/java3d.so
libc.so.6   pluginwrapper/java3d.so


###
# Java Advanced Imaging (JAI) API
# NOTE: THIS IS A SAMPLE.  PLEASE SEE ALSO INSTALL MESSAGES
#   OF java/jai PORT.
[/usr/local/jdk1.4.2/jre/lib/i386/libmlib_jai/libmlib_jai.so]
libm.so.6   libm.so.4
libc.so.6   pluginwrapper/jai.so


###
# JAI Image I/O Tools
# NOTE: THIS IS A SAMPLE.  PLEASE SEE ALSO INSTALL MESSAGES
#   OF java/jai-imageio PORT.
[/usr/local/jdk1.4.2/jre/lib/i386/libclib_jiio.so]
libm.so.6   libm.so.4
libc.so.6   pluginwrapper/jai.so


###
# Photo Image Print System (for EPSON bubble jet printers driver)
#[/usr/local/lib/pips/]
#libc.so.6  pluginwrapper/pips.so
#libdl.so.2 pluginwrapper/pips.so


###
#[/compat/linux/usr/lib/oracle/10.1.0.3/client/lib/libclntsh.so.10.1]
#libdl.so.2 pluginwrapper/oci8.so
#libm.so.6  libm.so.4
#libpthread.so.0libpthread.so.2
#libnsl.so.1pluginwrapper/oci8.so
#libc.so.6  pluginwrapper/oci8.so



===
On Friday 03 March 2006 09:15, Antony M Rasat wrote:
 First try man ldconfig.

 An example quick-fix for your situation is perhaps
 ldconfig -m /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins.

 Regards,

 Anthony M. Rasat
 PT. Kalteng Pos Press
 Palangkaraya - Indonesia.-


 -Original Message-
 From: Mikael Backman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
 Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 15:50:34 +0100
 Subject: plugin in firefox

  I use FreeBSD 6.0 and Firefox 1.5
  I think I've done all the things I 

Re: plugin in firefox

2006-03-03 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Friday 03 March 2006 10:07, Mikael Backman wrote:


 Thank you for your reply. But it didn't help to replace libmap.conf
 with your file or run ldconfig. I get the same error messages. I must
 be doing somthing stupid somewhere. Maybe I should use linux-firefox?
 ___
No, it does work with a native firefox. I've got it working on mine, I 
have FreeBSD 6.1 PRERELEASE, so you can get it working on yours. The 
big problem is, I can't remember where I found the information. It 
could have been on ports@, I think there was quite a discussion on 
there at one time.

ls -l /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins  should look something like this:
===
flashplayer.xpt - /usr/X11R6/lib/linux-flashplugin6/flashplayer.xpt

 libflashplayer.so 
- /usr/X11R6/lib/linux-flashplugin6/libflashplayer.so

 libjavaplugin_oji.so 
- /usr/local/jdk1.4.2/jre/plugin/i386/ns610/libjavaplugin_oji.so

 nphelix.so - /usr/X11R6/lib/linux-mozilla/plugins/nphelix.so

 nphelix.xpt - /usr/X11R6/lib/linux-mozilla/plugins/nphelix.xpt

 nppdf.so 
- 
/usr/local/lib/acroread/usr/local/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so
==

It appears that I've got some more work to do to get Acrobat7 to work, 
but everything else is.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Tracking Security in Ports and Base System

2006-03-02 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Thursday 02 March 2006 13:59, Chris Hill wrote:
 On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 [snip]

  Is my supfile correct to track security for freebsd-6.0?

 [snip]

  *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6

 [snip]

 As I understand it, that tag will get you the latest released version
 of 6.x. So today it would apply security and bugfix updates for 6.0,
 but after 6.1 comes out you would get 6.1, and so on. If you want to
 track 6.0 specifically, use RELENG_6_0. Right now there is no
 difference between RELENG_6 and RELENG_6_0, but later there will be.




 As everyone else has said, see the Handbook for definitive answers.

 HTH.

 --
 Chris Hill   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ** [ Busy Expunging | ]
 ___

This is not quite correct. tag=RELENG_6 will give you the src for 
6-STABLE, which is to say FreeBSD 6.1 PRELEASE, or maybe its 
RELEASECANDIDATE now. tag=RELENG_6_0 will get you the sources for the 
6.0 release branch, used only for security and other critical fixes. So 
yes, there is a difference between the two tags.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Tracking Security in Ports and Base System

2006-03-02 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Thursday 02 March 2006 16:23, Chris Hill wrote:
 

 Sorry for the misinformation! You are right, RELENG_6 is equivalent
 to -STABLE. I sit corrected.

 --
 Chris Hill   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ** [ Busy Expunging | ]

That's ok Chris. I knew you really knew what you were talking about. It 
just didn't quite come out the way you meant. That's happened to me 
often enough. After I send something, actually as I'm in motion to hit 
the send, I realize too late, what I said was just a little off. 

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Making APC 500 Back UPS (basic) work with FreeBSD

2006-03-01 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
Hi Mannish,

I guess all you have to do is look at the first four letters in FreeBSD. 
One of the many reasons why I love this operating system, and it just 
keeps getting better, even I'm not.

Don



On Wednesday 01 March 2006 13:15, manish jain wrote:
 Hi Don,

   Thanks for the reply. But yes, APC is selling in India the models
 it can't sell anywhere else. My 500 VA Back UPS (purchased new last
 month) does not have any cuaa/usb interface. It's not just APC alone,
 there's a whole lot of companies that throw their junk in here in
 this country. Thankfully FreeBSD is not one of them.

   Regards
   Manish Jain

 Donald J. O'Neill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   On Tuesday 21 February 2006 08:26, Chuck Swiger wrote:
  manish jain wrote:
   I just purchased an APC 500 Back UPS (the basic model, not the
   pro/smart one).
   It does not have any serial/usb interface. Can I get apcupsd or
   any other daemon to work with it so that the system automatically
   shuts down before backup supply runs out ?
 
  No. If your UPS isn't smart and does not have an external USB or
  serial port, apcupsd has nothing to work with.

 As best I can tell from the OP's description, and the APC website,
 they all have a UPS port. Go from there.

 Don

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Tracking Security in Ports and Base System

2006-03-01 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Wednesday 01 March 2006 16:31, Chris Maness wrote:

 Thanks, I do have port audit installed.  I was refering to system
 security.  The base system + FreeBSD userland.  I wanted to do this
 because I did get a notice from the security list today.  Do I do a
 make buildworld, to update the system?  Do I do this in /usr/src ?
 ___

There are a couple of ways to do it. First, did you read the 
announcement? It tells you what the methods are that you can use. I 
suggest you start there and don't pay any attention to any other 
nonsense. 

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Where to place refuse file for CVSUP?

2006-03-01 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Wednesday 01 March 2006 21:10, Jose Borquez wrote:
 In my ports-supfile my base=/var/db and prefix=/usr.  Does that mean
 I should place my refuse file in /var/db/sup/ ?  I am a little
 confused, so if anyone can help me out it would be greatly
 appreciated.

 Thanks in advance,
 Jose

 ___

Why do you want to use a refuse file? Do you understand that if you use 
one you are going to create upgrading problems for yourself? 

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Haven't been able to make world in about a year

2006-02-28 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 05:46, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
 On 2006-02-28 12:15, Kristian Vaaf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Your buildworld sequence appears to be a little lacking - either
   in the detail you gave, or because some things are missing.
  The buildworld sequence I us is:
  ===
   (I use the alternate step 10 when I run the sequence)
  
  1)Script /home/script/buildworld/bw-?€date run?
  2)cd /usr/obj   pwd
  3)chflags -R noschg *
  4)rm -rf *
  5)cd /usr/src   pwd make cleandir   make
   cleandir 6)make buildworld  make buildkernel
   KERNCONF=customconfname 7)make installkernel
   KERNCONF=customconfname
  8)exit
  9)shutdown now  Enter
  10) Enter to accept default location of sh
  
  alternate step 10
  a)  shutdown -r now Enter
  b)  at boot menu6
  c)  boot -s Enter
  d)  fsck -p Enter
  e)  mount -u /  Enter
  f)  mount -a -t ufs Enter
  g)  swapon -a   Enter
  h)  cd /usr/src Enter
  i)adjkerntz -i  Enter
  
  11)  script /home/script/buildworld/iw-?€date run
  12)  cd /usr/srcpwd
  13)  mergemaster -p
  14)  make installworld
  15)  mergemaster -i ?€œinstall everything?
  16)  exit
  17)shutdown -r now
  ===
  
  This should help a bit.
 
  Hello Don!
  Thank you for some good help.
 
  My make.conf only had some use.perl stuff.
  I added your flags.
 
  Also I've revised my sequence:
 
  cvsup -g -L 2 /etc/cvsupfile \
 
   cd /usr/obj \
   chflags -R noschg * \
   rm -rf * \
 
   cd /usr/src ; make clean \
   make buildworld \
   make buildkernel KERNCONF=NINJA \
   make installkernel KERNCONF=NINJA \
   make installworld \
   mergemaster \
 
  And am now ready to give it another go :)

 Until you are satisfied that everything works without any problems at
 all, please don't use scripts to run the builds.

 For instance, your script above lacks a call to ``mergemaster -p''
 before the ``make buildworld'' step, which may be necessary.

That's a call to 'script' to run, telling it where to put the resulting 
text file. While it is running, commands are given and executed. Later, 
if something goes wrong, or you saw something you want to check on, you 
have a record of what happened that you can look at, and pass on to 
others, if needed. 

Could you explain the logic of running mergemaster -p, when you have 
nothing to run it on. /usr/obj was blown away at the beginning of the 
buildworld sequence. What are you going to check at that point? Please 
take a look at the handbook for the sequence that things should occur 
in. I would say look at /usr/src/UPDATING, but their sequence doesn't 
include installing the kernel anymore.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Haven't been able to make world in about a year

2006-02-28 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 05:15, Kristian Vaaf wrote:

 Hello Don!

 Thank you for some good help.

 My make.conf only had some use.perl stuff.
 I added your flags.

 Also I've revised my sequence:

 cvsup -g -L 2 /etc/cvsupfile \

  cd /usr/obj \
  chflags -R noschg * \
  rm -rf * \

  cd /usr/src ; make clean \
  make buildworld \
  make buildkernel KERNCONF=NINJA \
  make installkernel KERNCONF=NINJA \
  make installworld \
  mergemaster \

 And am now ready to give it another go :)

 All the best,
 Vaaf

Krisstian,

There are some places in your sequence, that I think are going to give 
you trouble. DO NOT run this as a script, run script while you're doing 
it. I think you're misunderstanding some things, so, I give the 
procedure I use again with some comments about what is happening:

cvsup -g -L 2 sup-src

script /home/script/buildworld/bw-20060228

cd /usr/obj
 pwd
/usr/obj   this is confirmation I am where I want to be
 ls
usrHey, there is something there

chflags -R noschg *
rm -rf *
ls
   it's gone, great

cd /usr/src
pwd
/usr/src   I am where I want to be

make cleandir  whole bunch of action on the screen
make cleandir  run it again, yes you want to do that

make buildworld  make buildkernel KERNCONF=PRES1750-i386

make installkernel KERNCONF=PRES1750-i386

exit   shut off script
shutdown -r now

at the boot menu, hit the 6 key you want to come up in single-user 
mode, not multi-user. If you make a mistake, reboot and do it right. If 
it went by too fast, use the spacebar to halt the boot process.

 6
OK  boot -s boots up but you're not done yet
Enter full pathname of shell or RETURN for /bin/sh:  Enter
# fsck -p   Enter
# mount -u /Enter
# mount -a -t ufs   Enter
# swapon -a Enter

# script /home/script/buildworld/iw-20060228
# cd /usr/src
# pwd   am I where I want to be
# /usr/src  yes, I am
# mergemaster -prun mergemaster in preinstall mode

# make installworld hey, look at it go
# mergemaster -i
answer d to remove the old temporary directory, you don't need it 
anymore. 
answer i to everything mergemaster asks, I don't care that the 
recommedation is to handle it later, if you don't know what you're 
doing, doing anything other i is just likely to screw you up in ways 
you don't understand now, but you will later.

# exit  shutdown 'script'

# shutdown -r now   boot the system, come back up in multiuser mode.

If you did everything right, you're done with the buildworld sequence.

Again, DO NOT run this in a script. You're running the 'script' program. 
If you don't want to sit and watch this go on, do something else. It 
takes me about an hour and ten minutes to run it with an AMD64 3500+, 
with an amd-tbird (1.3Mhz), it takes about two hours, with a 500Mhz 
Pentium pIII, I run the buildworld and buildkernel part (and maybe the 
installkernel, usually not) overnight.

I hope I caught you in time.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Haven't been able to make world in about a year

2006-02-28 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 08:52, Kris Kennaway wrote:
 On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 08:48:15AM -0600, Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
11)  script /home/script/buildworld/iw-???date run
12)  cd /usr/srcpwd
13)  mergemaster -p
14)  make installworld
15)  mergemaster -i ???install everything?
16)  exit
17)shutdown -r now
===

This should help a bit.
   
Hello Don!
Thank you for some good help.
   
My make.conf only had some use.perl stuff.
I added your flags.
   
Also I've revised my sequence:
   
cvsup -g -L 2 /etc/cvsupfile \
   
 cd /usr/obj \
 chflags -R noschg * \
 rm -rf * \
   
 cd /usr/src ; make clean \
 make buildworld \
 make buildkernel KERNCONF=NINJA \
 make installkernel KERNCONF=NINJA \
 make installworld \
 mergemaster \
   
And am now ready to give it another go :)
  
   Until you are satisfied that everything works without any
   problems at all, please don't use scripts to run the builds.
  
   For instance, your script above lacks a call to ``mergemaster
   -p'' before the ``make buildworld'' step, which may be necessary.
 
  That's a call to 'script' to run, telling it where to put the
  resulting text file. While it is running, commands are given and
  executed. Later, if something goes wrong, or you saw something you
  want to check on, you have a record of what happened that you can
  look at, and pass on to others, if needed.
 
  Could you explain the logic of running mergemaster -p, when you
  have nothing to run it on. /usr/obj was blown away at the beginning
  of the buildworld sequence. What are you going to check at that
  point? Please take a look at the handbook for the sequence that
  things should occur in. I would say look at /usr/src/UPDATING, but
  their sequence doesn't include installing the kernel anymore.

 He means to run mergemaster -p before make installworld, as in the
 instructions quoted at the top of this email and in
 /usr/src/UPDATING. Also, the documented sequence *does* include
 installing the kernel, so I don't know what you mean there either.

 Kris

He may mean that, but it's not what he said. I went by what he said.

From /usr/src/UPDATING:

To rebuild everything and install it on the current system.
---
# Note: sometimes if you are running current you gotta do more than
# is listed here if you are upgrading from a really old current.

make sure you have good level 0 dumps
make buildworld
make kernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE
[1]
reboot in single user [3]
mergemaster -p  [5]
make installworld
make delete-old
mergemaster [4]
reboot

To upgrade in-place from 5.x-stable or higher to 6.x-stable
---
make sure you have good level 0 dumps
make buildworld [9]
make kernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE   [8]
[1]
reboot in single user [3]
mergemaster -p  [5]
make installworld
make delete-old
mergemaster -i  [4]
reboot

I just don't see where it says make installkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL. 
It used to. That's where I got my original procedure from as the 
handbook at the time was somewhat confusing. Now the procedure in the 
handbook is better.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Haven't been able to make world in about a year

2006-02-28 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 09:02, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
 On 2006-02-28 08:48, Donald J. O'Neill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
  On Tuesday 28 February 2006 05:46, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
   Until you are satisfied that everything works without any
   problems at all, please don't use scripts to run the builds.
  
   For instance, your script above lacks a call to ``mergemaster
   -p'' before the ``make buildworld'' step, which may be necessary.
 
  That's a call to 'script' to run, telling it where to put the
  resulting text file. While it is running, commands are given and
  executed. Later, if something goes wrong, or you saw something you
  want to check on, you have a record of what happened that you can
  look at, and pass on to others, if needed.
 
  Could you explain the logic of running mergemaster -p, when you
  have nothing to run it on. /usr/obj was blown away at the beginning
  of the buildworld sequence. What are you going to check at that
  point? Please take a look at the handbook for the sequence that
  things should occur in. I would say look at /usr/src/UPDATING, but
  their sequence doesn't include installing the kernel anymore.

 On 2006-02-28 09:52, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  He means to run mergemaster -p before make installworld, as in the
  instructions quoted at the top of this email and in
  /usr/src/UPDATING. Also, the documented sequence *does* include
  installing the kernel, so I don't know what you mean there either.

 Yes, thanks Kris.

 Sorry for the buildworld/installworld confusion.  I meant right
 before 'make installworld'.

 There are cases where 'installworld' will try to chown files to a
 newly added system account (i.e. `_dhcp'), but will fail, leaving a
 half-installed system if you don't run ``mergemaster -p'' before
 ``installworld''.

 This is why I suggested *avoiding* a scripted, unattended build and
 install cycle, until the OP who started this thread is comfortable
 that his builds and installs are indeed going to succeed.

I knew where to do it, I hoped you did, but the OP might not and try to 
do it where you said.

I agree with you on running a script. What I told the OP to do was run 
script and do things inside there. After I sent my response off, I took 
another look at what Kristian had written and decided I misunderstood 
what you had said. Sorry, I agree with you to not run it in a script, 
however, I do think he should run the program 'script' and do things 
from there, to at least have something to refer to when things go 
wrong. They will go wrong.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Haven't been able to make world in about a year

2006-02-28 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 13:17, Kris Kennaway wrote:

 OK, but you were still confused, because mergemaster doesn't need a
 populated /usr/obj to do its thing (only a source tree).  You can run
 it at any time, before during or after your buildworld.


Well, I learned something new then. Thank you.


  make kernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE   [8]
  [1]
  reboot in single user [3]
  mergemaster -p  [5]
  make installworld
  make delete-old
  mergemaster -i  [4]
  reboot
 
  I just don't see where it says make installkernel
  KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL. It used to. That's where I got my original
  procedure from as the handbook at the time was somewhat confusing.
  Now the procedure in the handbook is better.

 'make kernel' = 'make buildkernel' + 'make installkernel'

 Kris

OK, I can see that I totally about different make targets and just read 
that as being half a step - reading it as really being 'make 
buildkernel'. However, the 'make buildkernal' 'install kernel' steps 
are more explicit and I prefer that. Possibly I looked on it as similar 
to 'make world'. Maybe that's why I never said anything about it in the 
past. 

Thank you again.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: portsnap failing

2006-02-27 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Monday 27 February 2006 03:19, Ashley Moran wrote:
 On Saturday 25 February 2006 03:07, Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
  Why are you deleting the portsnap files. That's a 39 MB file that
  you have to download everytime you do that. The idea is to just
  download the patches necessary to update the ports tree after
  'portsnap fetch', 'portsnap install' has been run once. After that,
  all you need to do is run 'portsnap fetch update', you'll get
  plenty of action from that. I think by now you're going to have to
  remove the ports tree and start over. Why not do it an easier way.

 I deleted the portsnap files because the incremental update didn't
 work, so I wanted to know if it would work from scratch.  I'm not in
 a habit of deleting them every time I update the ports tree!  For
 some reason though, neither works now, although they fail in
 (apparently) different ways.

 Ashley

That file you were missing, lives in /var/db/portsnap/files/ , did you 
look there to see if it was there or not?

Did you do anything to the setup of portsnap?

Did you somehow, happen to install portsnap from the ports system?

A dumb question I know, but it's got to be asked. did you make any 
changes to /etc/portsnap.conf?

Just what portsnap files did you delete?

How did you use portsnap, any options when you ran it?

Just a funny thought: do you have defaultrouter=some IP address 
in /etc/rc.conf.

One final thought, did portsnap ever work for you?

Don

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Bandwidth Problems with Freebsd 5.x

2006-02-26 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Sunday 26 February 2006 08:10, ptitoliv wrote:
 Hello Everybody,

 I made lots of searches on the Internet and I found something about
 the option

 net.inet.tcp.inflight.enable.

 If I set this value to 0, my bandwitdh problems are resolved.

 Does anybody knows something about this options and why can it be the
 origin of this problem ?

 Regards,
 Ptitoliv
 ___

I made some quick check, there is some information available. Most of it 
seems to be pretty recent. I suggest joining freebsd-stable@ as there 
is some questions going on about it there.

You can also google for information on:
net.inet.tcp.inflight.enable
There may be other things to look at and good reasons to have it 
enabled, or disabled.

Take from chapter 11 of the handbook:
=
11.13.2.2 TCP Bandwidth Delay Product

The TCP Bandwidth Delay Product Limiting is similar to TCP/Vegas in 
NetBSD. It can be enabled by setting net.inet.tcp.inflight.enable 
sysctl variable to 1. The system will attempt to calculate the 
bandwidth delay product for each connection and limit the amount of 
data queued to the network to just the amount required to maintain 
optimum throughput.

This feature is useful if you are serving data over modems, Gigabit 
Ethernet, or even high speed WAN links (or any other link with a high 
bandwidth delay product), especially if you are also using window 
scaling or have configured a large send window. If you enable this 
option, you should also be sure to set net.inet.tcp.inflight.debug to 0 
(disable debugging), and for production use setting 
net.inet.tcp.inflight.min to at least 6144 may be beneficial. However, 
note that setting high minimums may effectively disable bandwidth 
limiting depending on the link. The limiting feature reduces the amount 
of data built up in intermediate route and switch packet queues as well 
as reduces the amount of data built up in the local host's interface 
queue. With fewer packets queued up, interactive connections, 
especially over slow modems, will also be able to operate with lower 
Round Trip Times. However, note that this feature only effects data 
transmission (uploading / server side). It has no effect on data 
reception (downloading).

Adjusting net.inet.tcp.inflight.stab is not recommended. This parameter 
defaults to 20, representing 2 maximal packets added to the bandwidth 
delay product window calculation. The additional window is required to 
stabilize the algorithm and improve responsiveness to changing 
conditions, but it can also result in higher ping times over slow links 
(though still much lower than you would get without the inflight 
algorithm). In such cases, you may wish to try reducing this parameter 
to 15, 10, or 5; and may also have to reduce net.inet.tcp.inflight.min 
(for example, to 3500) to get the desired effect. Reducing these 
parameters should be done as a last resort only.

Note: In 4.X and earlier releases of FreeBSD the inflight sysctl 
variables are directly under net.inet.tcp. Their names were (in 
alphabetic order): net.inet.tcp.inflight_debug, 
net.inet.tcp.inflight_enable, net.inet.tcp.inflight_max, 
net.inet.tcp.inflight_min, net.inet.tcp.inflight_stab.


Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Help with IP Filter 4.1.8

2006-02-26 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Sunday 26 February 2006 11:19, fbsd_user wrote:
 Since you say the same ipf rules work on your 5.3 system and you
 are trying to run them on 6.1-PRERELEASE, I would say the problem
 is 6.1-PRERELEASE.

 Prereleases versions and RC version are not intended for public use.
 They are version for people who know how to debug kernel code and
 help the developers test new version.

 It does not look like you know how to debug kernel code or you
 would not be asking this question.

 You should be using 6.0 as that's the current production version.
 If you still have this problem on 6.0 then repost your question.




 Hi all,

 I am having a problem with ipf after recent upgrade to
 6.1-PRERELEASE. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

 ipf: IP Filter: v4.1.8 (416)
 Kernel: IP Filter: v4.1.8
 Running: yes
 Log Flags: 0 = none set
 Default: pass all, Logging: available
 Active list: 0
 Feature mask: 0xa

 I am trying to allow outgoing dns requests from my server to DNS
 server of ISP. Here is my ruleset:

 ipfstat -oh
 0 pass out quick on lo0 from any to any
 0 pass out quick on xl0 proto tcp from any to any port = domain flags
 S/FSRPAU keep state
 1 pass out quick on xl0 proto udp from any to any port = domain keep
 state
 0 block out log quick on xl0 all

 ipfstat -ih
 0 pass in quick on lo0 from any to any
 0 block in quick on xl0 all

 I tried `host www.google.com` and the connection was timed out,
 although there was a hit on a rule allowing 53/udp.

 The interesting thing is that there is another server running
 5.3-STABLE with ipf v3.4.35 (336) and it has the same ruleset and
 everything is working just fine.

 Thank you for your time.
 ___

If you're not going to give any better advice than this, why did you 
give it all? 

I don't see anything in the OP's message that requires kernel debugging. 
Just some advice that he should check to see what changes have been 
made to ipf v4.1.8 as compared to v3.4.35 and how they affect rules.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: How to upgrade portsnap in freebsd 6.0?

2006-02-26 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Sunday 26 February 2006 16:50, Steve P. wrote:
 pkg_delete worked, as confirmed by pkg_version does not show it
 anymore.

 However, when I attempt to make install it from ports, I get this:

 # make install
 ===  portsnap-1.0 portsnap now contained in the base system.
 *** Error code 1

 Any idea?

  - Original Message -
  From: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Steve P. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: How to upgrade portsnap in freebsd 6.0?
  Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 17:33:26 -0500
 
  On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 05:29:26PM -0500, Steve P. wrote:
   I am attemping to upgrade my portsnap program as a result of
   this:
  
   $ pkg_version -v | grep portsnap
   portsnap-0.9.4 needs updating (port has
   1.0)
  
   When I attempt to upgrade via portupgrade, I get this:
  
   # portupgrade portsnap
   /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf:213: warning: already initialized
   constant HOLD_PKG   S
   ** Port marked as IGNORE: sysutils/portsnap:
   portsnap now contained in the base system
  
   I would appreciate info on how to upgrade this item.
 
  It's now contained in the base system, so the correct way to
  upgrade it is to use pkg_delete.
 
  Kris
   2.dat 
Reread what Kris replied, especially the part that says: It's now 
contained in the base system, then read the message from when you try 
to make from the ports system: === portsnap-1.0 now contained in the 
base system. What that all means is that since you deinstalled the 
port, you are done. Finished. Nothing more to do. Nothing tricky 
needed. Just use portsnap v1.0

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Bandwidth Problems with Freebsd 5.x

2006-02-25 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Sunday 19 February 2006 11:54, ptitoliv wrote:
 Mathieu CHATEAU a écrit :
 try this:
 ping -c 1000 -s 1500 IP_TO_PING
 
 wait for the 1000 ping to go trough. You should not have more than
 0,5% of loss (is the servers aren't overload). If it's more or equal
 than 0,5%, it comes from the network (cables or switches fault).
 Each host would be in 100 full (via autoselect to be sure the conf
  is ok on the switch).

 I made the tests on the two boxes = 0 % packet loss.

 I man an other interesting test. I try to transfert between the BSD
 Box and a server located at home behind my 1MB/s ADSL Line. Here are
 the results :

 FreeBSD box = Workstation at home : 300 kB/s
 Debian box on the same network  = Workstation at home : 950 kB/s.

 This test confirms cleraly that there is a problem with the BSD, I
 guess.

 Could it be a bug from the VR driver ?

 Regards,
 Ptitoliv
 ___

Not hardly. I'll bet that 950kB/s for the Debian box was the peak 
download speed and it didn't maintain it through the entire download. 

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Bandwidth Problems with Freebsd 5.x

2006-02-25 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Saturday 25 February 2006 16:30, ptitoliv wrote:
 Donald J. O'Neill a écrit :
 Not hardly. I'll bet that 950kB/s for the Debian box was the peak
 download speed and it didn't maintain it through the entire
  download.
 
 Don

 The Debian Box is capable to make a 5 MB/s stable connection easily.

 Regards,
 Ptitoliv


Maybe, but not to the internet on an  1.5Mb/s connection. Your aDSL line 
is only good for at most 1.5M and that's not guaranteed to happen all 
the time. There are a lot of things that go on to throttle that. At 
home I can connect between computers at 100 Mb/s, so what. I can't 
connect to the internet at faster than what's capable of being supplied 
by the ISP.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Bandwidth Problems with Freebsd 5.x

2006-02-25 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Saturday 25 February 2006 18:00, ptitoliv wrote:
 Donald J. O'Neill a écrit :
 Maybe, but not to the internet on an  1.5Mb/s connection. Your aDSL
  line is only good for at most 1.5M and that's not guaranteed to
  happen all the time. There are a lot of things that go on to
  throttle that. At home I can connect between computers at 100 Mb/s,
  so what. I can't connect to the internet at faster than what's
  capable of being supplied by the ISP.

 I think there is a misunderstanding : boxes are not on my ADSL line
 but on a datacenter with 100 Mbits/s connectivity.

 When I say the Debian is able to make a 5 MB/s connexion it is not
 with my adsl line but another server located on the internet.

 Ptitoliv


I guess you're right to say there's a misunderstanding. I was going by 
what you said here:

===
I made the tests on the two boxes = 0 % packet loss.

I man an other interesting test. I try to transfert between the BSD Box
and a server located at home behind my 1MB/s ADSL Line. Here are the
results :

FreeBSD box = Workstation at home : 300 kB/s
Debian box on the same network  = Workstation at home : 950 kB/s.

This test confirms cleraly that there is a problem with the BSD, I 
guess.

Could it be a bug from the VR driver ?

Regards,
Ptitoliv
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: portsnap failing

2006-02-24 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Thursday 23 February 2006 05:33, Ashley Moran wrote:
 I'm trying to update my ports tree on a 6.0-RELEASE/amd64 machine.  I
 get this error:

 Updating from Wed Feb 15 08:30:17 GMT 2006 to Thu Feb 23 10:20:03 GMT
 2006. Fetching 3 metadata patches.. done.
 Applying metadata patches... done.
 Fetching 3 metadata files... /usr/sbin/portsnap: cannot open
 f1777c019669546744ef448c17531bdd125884253a6bf4b73f6e77001d7a0b12.gz:
 No such file or directory


 If I delete the portsnap files and try to fetch a new snapshot, I get
 this error instead:

 Fetching snapshot generated at Thu Feb 23 03:09:19 GMT 2006:
 f4b0454e7bce8a4decdb9190e22b8325a966e92005df5f 97% of   39 MB  118
 kBps 00m08s fetch: transfer timed out


 Neither of my i386 boxes have this problem.  Does anyone know where
 the issue lies?

 Ashley

Why are you deleting the portsnap files. That's a 39 MB file that you 
have to download everytime you do that. The idea is to just download 
the patches necessary to update the ports tree after 'portsnap fetch', 
'portsnap install' has been run once. After that, all you need to do is 
run 'portsnap fetch update', you'll get plenty of action from that. I 
think by now you're going to have to remove the ports tree and start 
over. Why not do it an easier way.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: release in cvsup supfile

2006-02-24 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Friday 24 February 2006 20:35, Peter wrote:
 --- Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hey people,
 
  I notice that in my supfile, I have this:
 
  *default release=cvs tag=.
 
  I'm using FreeBSD 5.4. Should I change the tag to 5.4-RELEASE? I
  don't want
  ports that aren't going to work on 5.4. Is that a concern?

 No, that's the way it should be.  The Handbook is quite clear on this
 point:

 http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html#
CVSUP-CONFIG-VERS

Well now, I think that depends on what else he's got in his supfile. He 
may have a problem at some point.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: release in cvsup supfile

2006-02-24 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Friday 24 February 2006 22:35, Peter wrote:
 --- Nikolas Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On 2/24/06, Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Hey people,
  
   I notice that in my supfile, I have this:
  
   *default release=cvs tag=.
  
   I'm using FreeBSD 5.4. Should I change the tag to 5.4-RELEASE? I
   don't
 
  want
 
   ports that aren't going to work on 5.4. Is that a concern?
 
  No, but you need to have at least two cvsup files, one for the
  system and the other for ports

 Maybe I'm doing something wrong.  I have only one file for
 everything:

 *default host=cvsup1.ca.FreeBSD.org
 *default base=/var/db
 *default prefix=/usr
 *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5
 *default delete use-rel-suffix
 *default compress

 src-all
 doc-all
 ports-all tag=.

It works the way you have it. However,You can split that into three 
files. You're following 5-STABLE, there are times when you don't want 
to be downloading src, unless you're planning to run buildworld cycles 
a lot. Instead of cvsuping ports, you could use portsnap. Once it's run 
the first time, it's a lot, lot faster way to upgrade the ports tree 
than using cvsup.

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Newbie Alert : pkg_add and packages Q (do not want to compile)

2006-02-23 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Wednesday 22 February 2006 21:59, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
 On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 21:36 -0600, Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
  On Wednesday 22 February 2006 20:59, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
   what about the dependency then? Ignore it? What if there are
   files needed by xorg-clients? eg: libXX.so.Y and which is not
   present in the new xterm?
 
  Since you want to replace it with a newer version, why are you
  worried about the dependencies. The newer version will take care of
  that. Of course, if you delete xterm and don't replace it, then you
  will have to handle the dependencies.

 So, I do pkg_del -f xterm and then a pkg_add -vr xterm-206_1 and it
 will upgrade xorg-clients if needed? If yes, then Good.

No. It would only upgrade xterm. Xterm isn't dependent on xorg-clients. 
It's required by xorg-clients.

So, that brings up a question. Are you really trying to upgrade xorg and 
xterm was the example you used? If that's the case, my advice would 
have been different. 

What you are trying to do is update using downloaded packages
and that is going to work for you. You need to upgrade those
packages using the ports system.
  
   IS or is not?
 
  Is or is not what? I don't understand what you're asking here. You
  need to use more than a 4 word question, of which 2 of the words
  are the same. It tends to be confusing.

 Sorry but You're confusing me too. Read your sentence update using
 downloaded packages and that is (?NOT?) going to work for you

OK, I see what happened. I didn't put not in the sentence, as you 
pointed out. Since not is what I meant, I refused to see that it 
wasn't there, in fact my brain expected it to be there, and so when I 
looked at what you were asking, I saw it. Sorry. 
   Again, I don't want to compile it. I want the binary package.
   It's available on the mirrors.
 
  No It's not. The port is available on the mirrors. So compile it,
  or leave the old one in place.

 lftp ftp.tw.frebsd.org
 lftp ftp.tw.freebsd.org:/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/x11
 ls -l | grep xterm
 lrwxr-xr-x Nov 28 09:12 xterm-206_1.tbz - ../All/xterm-206_1.tbz
 get xterm-206_1.tbz
 quit
 tar -v -t -f xterm-206_1.tar
 -rw-r--r-- root/wheel 1560 2006-02-07 15:20:18 +CONTENTS
 -rw-r--r-- root/wheel   42 2006-02-07 15:20:18 +COMMENT
 -rw-r--r-- root/wheel  479 2006-02-07 15:20:18 +DESC
 -r--r--r-- root/wheel 8654 2006-02-07 15:20:18 +MTREE_DIRS
 -r--r--r-- root/wheel 1313 2006-02-07 15:19:55
 man/man1/resize.1.gz -r--r--r-- root/wheel41772 2006-02-07
 15:19:55 man/man1/xterm.1.gz -rwxr-xr-x root/wheel10104
 2006-02-07 15:19:54 bin/resize -rwxr-xr-x root/wheel 2118
 2006-02-07 15:19:54 bin/uxterm -rws--x--x root/wheel   252996
 2006-02-07 15:19:54 bin/xterm -r--r--r-- root/wheel 1527
 2006-02-07 15:19:55
 lib/X11/app-defaults/UXTerm
 -r--r--r-- root/wheel 6551 2006-02-07 15:19:55
 lib/X11/app-defaults/XTerm
 -r--r--r-- root/wheel 4232 2006-02-07 15:19:55
 lib/X11/app-defaults/XTerm-color

   I'm proficient with the CLI, and being a long time Linux person,
   I'm sad to say that FreeBSD ports/packages is really confusing to
   me.
 
  Use Windows instead. All that takes is money.

 Why the sarcasm?

At that moment, I had a lapse of brain power.  My fingers took control 
of the keyboard without interference from the part of my brain which 
says DON'T do this. It's wrong to say something like that. And then 
they hit the send button and it was too late to retract it. I believe: 
once something is said or done, it cannot be unsaid or undone, it may 
be fixed, forgiven, but not forgotten. I'm sorry for the sarcasm.

Available packages are not as up to date as the ports system
is.
  
   Again, the package _is_ available and I've verified it.
   Thanks
 
  I'm sorry. You've verified the port was available. The package is
  not. I just checked.

 See above. I too do my own verification before shooting emails out to
 mail lists

OK, I see where you were looking. I looked in the wrong place. When you 
look in the right place, yes, it's there.

  At this point, I'm going to close my ears eyes to you. You've been
  given advice by me and others

 and I thank you and them for it.

 Thanks again.

I hope that by this time, you've received enough information to do what 
you wanted to do. 

One thought just occurred to me. What is the output from 'uname -a', 
mine is: 
FreeBSD pres1750.mylan.net 6.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #0: Wed 
Feb  8 08:20:10 CST 2006 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PRES1750-i386  i386

You'll see that it has FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE in it.
If yours has FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE in it. Then you can't install a 
package using pkg_add -r 'some package' for a package built for 
FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE. You need to have 6.0-STABLE in order to install 
packages built for 6.0-STABLE. 

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd

Re: Making APC 500 Back UPS (basic) work with FreeBSD

2006-02-22 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Wednesday 22 February 2006 05:07, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Donald J.
 O'Neill
 Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 8:47 AM
 To: Chuck Swiger
 Cc: manish jain; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
 Subject: Re: Making APC 500 Back UPS (basic) work with FreeBSD
 
 
 
 Then, thats got to be a really old, old one. I've been working
  (playing with actually) with computers since the color computer. I
  won't admit to anything further back than that. I've never seen one
  that didn't have some means of communication (monitoring). Not from
  APC anyway.

 APC has made a lot of older BackUPSs that didn't have the com port
 that date back to the Color Computer days, you just wern't paying
 attention.  For example the BackUPS 200VA (that unit was discontinued
 years ago) didn't have one, neither did the BackUPS 250 and 300 VA
 units from that era.  (all of those are discontinued)  However the
 models that didn't have the com port back in the olden days, were all
 very low, low VA units, under 350VA.

 It wasn't until modern times that APC decided to screw it all up.

 Ted

Bill Gates had come out with: you can't do multi-user, multitasking with 
an 8 bit micro-processor. Here was this inexpensive computer from Radio 
Shack, already on the market, that would if you used OS9, also 
available from Radio Shack. About that time, I decided that Bill Gates 
aught to pay more attention to what was going on.

At that time, my concern with, and about, power backup units was 
somewhere between none and none. I did know what one was, what it did, 
and why it was desirable to have one. I just didn't really have a need 
for one for a long time. After all, if you shutoff the PC, who cared if 
the power went down - as long as you shut down before that happened.

As to your last statement, I'm wondering if you were saying, in a 
different way: they took a nice, simple piece of equipment, that did 
its job well, and added capabilities to it, that in order to utilize 
them, required more capabilities added to the units they were supplying 
power backup to. Ah, I see by your later post to the list  OP, given 
more in depth and with good advice, that's what you meant. 

Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Newbie Alert : pkg_add and packages Q (do not want to compile)

2006-02-22 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Wednesday 22 February 2006 19:58, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
 Hi,

 I've googled. I've read the handbook, I've read Absolute BSD and
 still I can't understand FreeBSD Ports/Packages esp when it comes to
 upgrading via packages. I'm from a Linux (gentoo linux) background so
 I'm not a rough diamond.

 Problem statement.
 FreeBSD-Release-6
 Install from minimal cd (and packages added via FTP)
 i've done cvsup (cvsup -L2 -h
 cvsup.tw.freebsd.org /usr/share/examples/ports-supfile)

 pkg_version -v states that I have a few packages which can be
 upgraded. eg:
 xterm-203 needs updating (port has 206_1)

 $pkg_add -vr xterm
 pkg_add: unable to fetch
 'ftp://ftp.tw.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/xt
erm.tbz' by URL

 $pkg_add -vr  x11/xterm
 pkg_add: unable to fetch
 ftp://ftp.tw.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/x11
/xterm.tbz' by URL

 ftp into it, it's listed via with it's suffix. (google found that
 for some odd reason, pkg_add doesn't add the suffix)

 $pkg_add -vr x11/xterm-206_1
 pkg_add: package 'xterm-206_1' or its older version already installed

 So.. How do I install it?

 $pkg_delete xterm-203
 pkg_delete: package 'xterm-203' is required by these other packages
 xorg-clients-6.8.2

pkg_delete -f xterm-203
cd /usr/ports/x11/xterm
make install

This will handle that problem for you.

 So.. That can't be done. What can I do to upgrade my packages?

 I've even tried sysinstall but that only lists xterm-203 as the
 package to install. (I suspect this is because its packagesite is
 packages-6-release)

 $export | grep -i pack
 declare -x
 PACKAGESITE=ftp://ftp.tw.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages
-6-stable/

 In gentoo, it's a simple emerge xterm and all will be done
 automatically. (Granted, this is compile from source and not from
 binary packages, which I know can do cd /usr/ports/x11/xterm  make
 install clean, but since FreeBSD has binary packages, I rather use
 that)


 Thanks

What you are trying to do is update using downloaded packages and that 
is going to work for you. You need to upgrade those packages using the 
ports system. 

You really need to look at the Handbook. That's why it was written.

Available packages are not as up to date as the ports system is. 


Don
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


  1   2   >