Re: php5
On 25 Sep 2007, at 00:20, Thomas Abthorpe wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 24 September 2007 18:59:00 Bill Banks wrote: I just installed php5 but if I goto index.php it wants to download it and not display it. What am I missing? You are likely missing the following lines from your httpd.conf AddType application/x-httpd-php .php AddType application/x-httpd-php-source .phps Also make sure you compiled the apache module. If installing from ports it asks you. However, if you installed from a package it won't have this enabled. Assuming you're using apache, natch. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gvinum and RAID 5 (again)
Hi, I've found out that gvinum won't let you grow a RAID 5 system without obliterating it first. Something that I haven't been able to ascertain is if gvinum will let you add discs to a RAID 5 array later on as hot spares? Many thanks for so much help Gabe ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Netatalk
On 24 Sep 2007, at 06:16, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: Gabriel, Ignore Martin he doesen't know how to get it running so he's pulling the old spurning what he cannot do refer to the Aesop fable Fox and the Grapes for more information. If you run OS9 emulation under OSX you need AFP. Many older print servers only speak AFP AFP handles the split resource/data fork properly, Samba does not. You will see this in a number of minor ways. To get it running: define NETATALK in kernel and recompile cd /usr/ports/net/netatalk make WITH_SRVLOC=yes install add the following in /etc/rc.conf: slpd_enable=YES netatalk_enable=YES atalkd_enable=YES cnid_metad_enable=YES afpd_enable=YES cd /usr/ports/net/howl make install cd /etc vi rc.conf add in mdnsresponder_enable=YES mdnsresponder_flags=-f /usr/local/etc/mDNSResponder.conf then create the config file as such vi /usr/local/etc/mDNSResponder.conf BigMac _afpovertcp._tcp local. 548 BigMac _ssh._tcpServers. 548 MUST BE TABS BETWEEN ITEMS and NEWLINE AT END! BigMac is your servername test with slptool findsrvs service:service-agent and mDNSResponder lookups your problem is that afpd only advertises over appletalk, not over tcp/ip. Since your Macs are all OSX they don't listen to appletalk announcements. They listen to appletalk-over-tcp/ip announcements which use the rendezevous protocol which is what mdnsresponder is all about. One important note - try to keep the samba shares separate from the appletalk shares. Samba clients do not update the desktop file when they move/change/delete files which will result in a corrupted desktop file. (ie: CNID database) If that happens do this: /usr/local/etc/rc.d/netatalk.sh stop cat /usr/local/etc/AppleVolumes.default (shares are listed at the bottom) go to each share with the problem and rename the directory, ie: cd /home/shares/Public mv .AppleDB .AppleDB-temp-backup restart netatalk /usr/local/etc/rc.d/netatalk.sh start verify people can mount the shares and get to their files Delete the .AppleDB-temp-backup dirs. Ted PS: Appletalk is older networking technology but there is nothing wrong with it and it works no worse than newer technologies. Thank you so much for this comprehensive reply. I can see there are several things in there that I didn't get, as they were missed out in my other guides. Seems like a small nightmare setting up netatalk, hope it will be worth it! Thanks again, I really appreciate it. Gabe ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Why is sendmail in the core of FreeBSD?
On 23 Sep 2007, at 11:22, cpghost wrote: On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 19:30:59 +0300 Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/22/07, Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i personally use only sendmail. Yep... if it works, don't 'fix' it. same with any other things :) I would prefer to have postfix vs sendmail since it built with security in mind Ditto here. I've switched to postfix after a talk by Wietse Venema at the SANE 1998: http://www.sane.nl/events/sane98/daily/19/venema.html (postfix was still named VMailer back then) and never looked back since. I was lucky doing so, because soon after, there had been a flurry of sendmail exploits, while postfix kept chugging along undisturbed. But more importantly, its behaviour under stress and huge traffic bursts is excellent. I have a russian friend, he's a sysadmin, works exclusively with FreeBSD. He reckon Postfix is also great under pressure. Since sendmail is in the core of FreeBSD, does that mean it will quickly get security updates when exploits are found? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
packages compiled from source
Hi, trying to find out where the complete packge files are for the packges that I compiled from ports. I wanted to save these somewhere so I wouldn't have to recompile them in the future. The handbook doesn't shed any light on this:( Best regards gabriel ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: packages compiled from source
Many thanks too all who ansered, that's really helpful. I just had a hard time compiling lighttpd and php5 together, so wanted to save them as packages to spare me the headache in the near future. Have read the ports man I see that I can change the PACKAGES in the environment, but how do I change the environment. Would I edit /etc/ make.conf at a guess? On 23 Sep 2007, at 15:35, Karol Kwiatkowski wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: Gabriel Dragffy wrote: Hi, trying to find out where the complete packge files are for the packges that I compiled from ports. I wanted to save these somewhere so I wouldn't have to recompile them in the future. The handbook doesn't shed any light on this:( They are not saved separately but you can create backups using pkg_create -b. In addition, you can use 'package' (or 'package-recursive') target instead of 'install' to create packages automagically. In that case target directory is set by PACKAGES variable. Have a look at ports(7) manpage for details. Cheers, Karol -- Karol Kwiatkowski karol.kwiat at gmail dot com OpenPGP 0x06E09309 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Netatalk
On 23 Sep 2007, at 16:13, Martin Hepworth wrote: Why you need netatalk - you still got some old MacOS 8/9 machines about? -- no, they are all os x macbook pros. However we sometimes access over the internet using AFP, and this uses encrypted passwords which is safer. Also, afp integrates very well with the mac machines, better than samba and far better than NFS. I've been using FreeNAS which has worked well, but unfortunately freezes every few hours, so it's useless. Trying to build my own version of it. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Software RAID5
On 22 Sep 2007, at 09:03, Wojciech Puchar wrote: If you google for gvinum you'll find tutorials etc. AFAICT, you can't have the root device on a RAID5 gvinum. Just make a small root partition. yes you can __ Hi Wojciech Would you be able to give me any tips or know of any howtos that explain installing freebsd root on to gvinum raid5 array? I really cannot find any tutorials for this :( Many thanks gabriel ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Software RAID5
On 22 Sep 2007, at 01:13, Maxim Khitrov wrote: On 9/21/07, Gabriel Dragffy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all Hoping to get some help setting up software RAID5. Guides on the internet seem to be few and far between, and official documentation is a little too technical. Basically I have 3 x 500GB hard drives which I'd like to have in a raid5 configuration, using software, root partition on their too would be a bonus. I'd be grateful for assistance. Best regards Gabriel From what I know, you're not going to be able to boot from them. However, a simple solution to that is to get a 64+ MB USB flash drive and put the kernel on that. Just use fdisk and bsdlabel to write the boot blocks. As long as the kernel has all needed drivers and you specify which root device to use (either via kernel configuration or /etc/fstab), that should allow you to put everything else on the RAID array. This is how I currently do full-disk encryption on my laptop using GELI. Kernel is outside, everything else is encrypted, same idea for RAID. Hi Maxim This sounds good. How exactly did you manage to encrypt discs and then install freebsd there? I can just about setup software raid once freebsd is installed, but by then I am unable to use a hard drive because it already has freebsd on it. Regards gabe ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Netatalk
On 23 Sep 2007, at 19:14, Martin Hepworth wrote: Beg to differ on the AFP vs samb issues from what we use at work using a mixed environment (*nix, windoze and Mac's). the filetyping goes alot better using smb than appletalk with MacOS X, and smb will use encrypted passwds (however poorly encoded) by default, and even SMB is alot faster than AFP which is horrible slow. You'll find that using a VPN to access over the internet alot more secure in any case. anyway a quick google gives this.. http://www.caboo.se/articles/2006/1/18/apple-file-sharing-via-freebsd Thanks, I've already read that link, what was suggested didn't work. I don't mind using smb, but I have a question or two I would be glad if you could answer: Can you connect to a smb server over the internet? For example in OS X give the address as smb://example.com? Also, how would you get the passwords encrypted? Is this done by default. Best regards Gabe ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: packages compiled from source
On 23 Sep 2007, at 19:51, Karol Kwiatkowski wrote: Please try not to top-post while replying to freebsd mailing list. It makes it hard to follow reading from the archives. Comments below. I'm sorry, was I guilty of top-posting? Didn't mean to :P Gabriel Dragffy wrote: On 23 Sep 2007, at 15:35, Karol Kwiatkowski wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: Gabriel Dragffy wrote: Hi, trying to find out where the complete packge files are for the packges that I compiled from ports. I wanted to save these somewhere so I wouldn't have to recompile them in the future. The handbook doesn't shed any light on this:( They are not saved separately but you can create backups using pkg_create -b. In addition, you can use 'package' (or 'package-recursive') target instead of 'install' to create packages automagically. In that case target directory is set by PACKAGES variable. Have a look at ports(7) manpage for details. Many thanks too all who ansered, that's really helpful. I just had a hard time compiling lighttpd and php5 together, so wanted to save them as packages to spare me the headache in the near future. Have read the ports man I see that I can change the PACKAGES in the environment, but how do I change the environment. Would I edit /etc/make.conf at a guess? PACKAGES is environmental variable - you'll want to change the variable, not the environment ;) To change it system wide permanently - yes, editing /etc/make.conf would be a good idea. The alternatives are setting it in your shell environment (depends on what you use) or defining it at install time (every time) with something like 'make PACKAGES=/some/dir package'. And there are probably other methods, too :) Thanks, I'll look in to this, glad that my wild guess wasn't too far wide Regards Gabe ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Software RAID5
On 23 Sep 2007, at 19:30, Matthew Seaman wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Roland Smith wrote: The things that you should encrypt are /home and maybe /var. and swap. Encrypting the swap is really quite important. Cheers, Matthew Oh you know what? I grabbed an ubuntu disc, in the installation I configured each of the three hard drives with a 1GB partition which became software RAID 1, and the rest of the space another partition which became RAID 5 doodah. I configured all this during the installation using that debian installer, booted no probs. Next thing was to: sudo -i sudo aptitude update sudo aptitude install netatalk -y OK, done, RAID 5 system, with the OS running on RAID 1, netatlk installed and working a few seconds after, total time was about 45 minutes. I've spent 4 days chasing my tail in freebsd. Wish freebsd would be able to help me out with software raid in sysinstall. I'd still very much like to figure out how to do this in freebsd, but unfortunately spending two weeks to do it makes me look incompetent to my employers. FreeBSD is running a web/database/email server and doing a fantastic job for that, so it might just be a case of horses for courses... Regards Gabe ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: migrate from postfix to qmail
On 22 Sep 2007, at 05:29, Lotfi kecir wrote: HI, thank's for your post. to give answer to your answer: i rent a dedicated server (Fedora 6) witch has qmail installed on. and in my old Server witch is in our office turn has Postfix. The new sever has as Admin panel Plesk. I already create all email acounts and now i'm looking to transfert all my user acount mailboxes. and i don't have any idea to do it. Thanks for your help Yeah right. I don't have hands-on experience with any MTA other than Postfix, but I never read a good thing about qmail. Thing is, I work for a design company - we have 3 VPSs two using Plesk and another on extend, I noticed that behind the scenes it is Qmail for all of them. How come it is used by these control panels when it is so poor? Just a small whine from me :) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Software RAID5
On 22 Sep 2007, at 08:42, Roland Smith wrote: On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 11:50:58PM +0100, Gabriel Dragffy wrote: Hi all Hoping to get some help setting up software RAID5. Guides on the internet seem to be few and far between, and official documentation is a little too technical. Basically I have 3 x 500GB hard drives which I'd like to have in a raid5 configuration, using software, root partition on their too would be a bonus. I'd be grateful for assistance. What you need for RAID5 is gvinum(8), which replaces the older vinum (4) driver. Hi, reading the BSD Handbook I did find this out and I've been trying to use it. If you google for gvinum you'll find tutorials etc. I have found a couple of tutorials but like I said it is either too technical, or not descriptive enough and none of them describe root on raid 5 :( AFAICT, you can't have the root device on a RAID5 gvinum. Just make a small root partition. I read in the FreeBSD hanbook that I can have root on raid 5 by doing the following: There is another option as well, to have /boot/loader (Section 12.3.3) load the vinum kernel module early, before starting the kernel. This can be accomplished by putting the line: geom_vinum_load=YES into the file /boot/loader.conf. This was on the following page: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/ en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/vinum-root.html The handbook is good, but it only describes how to do raid 0 and raid 1, it says I can do raid 5 but doesn't describe the process. I also totally stumped at how to make a raid 5 device and install freebsd on it - the sysinstall doesn't allow the configuration of raid arrays and I can only install to a slice. I need access to tools such as gvinum before installation... but how? Oh the pain! best regards gabriel Roland -- R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/ ~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Software RAID5
On 22 Sep 2007, at 01:13, Maxim Khitrov wrote: However, a simple solution to that is to get a 64+ MB USB flash drive and put the kernel on that. Just use fdisk and bsdlabel to write the boot blocks. As long as the kernel has all needed drivers and you specify which root device to use (either via kernel configuration or /etc/fstab), that should allow you to put everything else on the RAID array. This is how I currently do full-disk encryption on my laptop using GELI. Kernel is outside, everything else is encrypted, same idea for RAID. I haven't ever done software RAID in FreeBSD, so can't help you with the practical aspects of it. But I will say that technical or not, man pages are still the best way to learn about these things. From what I can see, RAID 5 is done through vinum, and GEOM offers RAID 3. Someone else here may be able to tell you which one is better to use. It's also worth noting that with software, the performance of RAID 5 is not going to be very good. I generally advise against software RAID 5. If you want good performance and reliability using software RAID, the best bet is RAID 10, but there the utilization is 50%. I think that if you can afford another 500GB drive and performance is important to you, a software RAID 10 using GEOM will perform much better. It is also easier to recover, and you can lose two drives (not any two, but still) without completely losing all the data. Hi, thank you for your post. I read the following in the BSD handbook which lead me to believe I could have root on RADI5: quote There is another option as well, to have /boot/loader (Section 12.3.3) load the vinum kernel module early, before starting the kernel. This can be accomplished by putting the line: geom_vinum_load=YES into the file /boot/loader.conf. /quote That's here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/ handbook/vinum-root.html I appreciate your post about using an alternative system to RAID 5. Many thanks Gabriel ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why is sendmail in the core of FreeBSD?
Just been wondering about this. If you do a standard install of FreeBSD it includes things such as a basic FTP daemon, all the various utilities such as df, ls, etc. SSHD etc. I assum these are all in FreeBSDs core, as developed in the same CVS repo. Having read the mails on this list for several weeks it seems obvious that most people regard Postfix or EXIM to be the best MTAs, so I'm wondering why is sendmail the MTA that is integral to FreeBSD? Wouldn't it be ace to have the default one be Postfix or something? Regards Gabe ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Software RAID5
On 22 Sep 2007, at 12:19, Roland Smith wrote: To elaborate, the loader doesn't know about the RAID layout. It is only usable _after_ the kernel has loaded. I read in the FreeBSD hanbook that I can have root on raid 5 by doing the following: There is another option as well, to have /boot/loader (Section 12.3.3) load the vinum kernel module early, before starting the kernel. This can be accomplished by putting the line: geom_vinum_load=YES into the file /boot/loader.conf. The thing is that vinum is not gvinum! Gvinum is a replacement for vinum using the GEOM framework. I guess nobody has gotten around to update the handbook yet. Did you read the handbook? They say at the beginning of the chapter 20 (20.1): Starting with FreeBSD 5, Vinum has been rewritten in order to fit into the GEOM architecture (Chapter 19), retaining the original ideas, terminology, and on-disk metadata. This rewrite is called gvinum (for GEOM vinum). The following text usually refers to Vinum as an abstract name, regardless of the implementation variant. Any command invocations should now be done using the gvinum command, and the name of the kernel module has been changed from vinum.ko to geom_vinum.ko, and all device nodes reside under /dev/gvinum instead of /dev/vinum. As of FreeBSD 6, the old Vinum implementation is no longer available in the code base. So that makes me think they have updated the handbook. and in the chapter 20.9.1 it says: load the vinum kernel module early, before starting the kernel. This can be accomplished by putting the line: geom_vinum_load=YES into the file /boot/loader.conf. For Gvinum, all startup is done automatically once the kernel module has been loaded, so the procedure described above is all that is needed. The following text documents the behaviour of the historic Vinum system, for the sake of older setups. It seems perfectly clear the handbook has both been updated and is saying i can have root on raid, or am I mistaken? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Why is sendmail in the core of FreeBSD?
On 22 Sep 2007, at 12:34, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 11:55:51AM +0100, Gabriel Dragffy wrote: Just been wondering about this. If you do a standard install of FreeBSD it includes things such as a basic FTP daemon, all the various utilities such as df, ls, etc. SSHD etc. I assum these are all in FreeBSDs core, as developed in the same CVS repo. Having read the mails on this list for several weeks it seems obvious that most people regard Postfix or EXIM to be the best MTAs, so I'm wondering why is sendmail the MTA that is integral to FreeBSD? Wouldn't it be ace to have the default one be Postfix or something? At the time sendmail was integrased into FreeBSD other MTA's were pretty much out of the question. Ever since then, the integration has been very well-maintained (thanks to gshapiro) and changing the default MTA to something else is simply not worth the pain that comes with it. Personally I use Postfix wherever I need an MTA, it only takes a few minutes to install it from ports. The benefit of ports is you can configure all the options you need. We can't keep mysql client and dovecot sasl in the base system, most people would have to reinstall Postfix from ports even if it was the default MTA in our base. I see, thank you for the heads-up. It is interesting. Personally I try to use the software that comes with the OS where possible. Especially in the case of FreeBSD, as I find the core software is rock solid and I love that. I think I'll learn how to configure sendmail and try sticking with it. At least it is documented somewhat in the handbook. Many thanks to all Regards gabriel ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Netatalk
I've been following several different tutorials on the net for getting netatalk working. I've compiled in the neccessary option to the kernel, installed the port. Added various things to rc.conf, run / usr/local/etc/rc.d/netatalk start and... nothing :( I think the problem is that all the tutorials I have found are years our of date. Does someone know how to get the modern port of netatalk on 6.2 working? Many thanks Gabriel ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Software RAID5
Hi all Hoping to get some help setting up software RAID5. Guides on the internet seem to be few and far between, and official documentation is a little too technical. Basically I have 3 x 500GB hard drives which I'd like to have in a raid5 configuration, using software, root partition on their too would be a bonus. I'd be grateful for assistance. Best regards Gabriel ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lighttpd won't serve up php pages - 500 internal server error
Hi all I've install php5 and php5-extensions from the latest ports and also lighty too. I compiled php5 with fastcgi support. In lighttpd's error log I see the following: 2007-09-12 17:32:06: (mod_fastcgi.c.1731) connect failed: Connection refused on unix:/tmp/php-fastcgi.socket-3 2007-09-12 17:32:06: (mod_fastcgi.c.2885) backend died; we'll disable it for 5 seconds and send the request to another backend instead: reconnects: 0 load: 1 2007-09-12 17:32:06: (mod_fastcgi.c.2658) child signaled: 11 2007-09-12 17:32:06: (mod_fastcgi.c.2462) unexpected end-of-file (perhaps the fastcgi process died): pid: 26390 socket: unix:/tmp/php- fastcgi.socket-3 2007-09-12 17:32:06: (mod_fastcgi.c.3211) child signaled: 11 2007-09-12 17:32:06: (mod_fastcgi.c.3254) response not received, request sent: 850 on socket: unix:/tmp/php-fastcgi.socket-3 for / phpinfo.php , closing connection I added the following to php.ini: cgi.fix_pathinfo = 1. And the relevant sections of lighttpd.conf are: server.modules = ( mod_access, mod_fastcgi, ) server.document-root= /usr/local/www/data/ fastcgi.server = ( .php = ( localhost = ( socket = /tmp/php- fastcgi.socket, bin-path = /usr/local/bin/php- cgi ) ) ) The web page shown just displys 500 - Internal Server Error. Thank you Gabriel ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hunks failed, is this bad?
Hi all I hope you can help me. I have a clean install of freebsd. I changed to /usr and made ports directory. Then I ran portsnap fetch and then extract. Then I changed to ports-mngmt/portmanager and did make install clean. When I try to install any port using either 'make install clean' or 'portmanager www/lighttpd' (for example) I see hunks failed in stdout. As an exaple I saw one of these flas by when installing lighttpd: |--- /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk Tue Nov 8 01:02:51 2005 |+++ bsd.port.mkWed Nov 16 02:16:57 2005 -- Patching file bsd.port.mk using Plan A... Hunk #1 failed at 2049. 1 out of 1 hunks failed--s As far as I can tell I see similar errors no matter what port I try to install. Is this a problem? Many thanks Gabriel Dragffy ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hunks failed, is this bad?
Hi all I hope you can help me. I have a clean install of freebsd. I changed to /usr and made ports directory. Then I ran portsnap fetch and then extract. Then I changed to ports-mngmt/portmanager and did make install clean. When I try to install any port using either 'make install clean' or 'portmanager www/lighttpd' (for example) I see hunks failed in stdout. As an exaple I saw one of these flas by when installing lighttpd: |--- /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk Tue Nov 8 01:02:51 2005 |+++ bsd.port.mkWed Nov 16 02:16:57 2005 -- Patching file bsd.port.mk using Plan A... Hunk #1 failed at 2049. 1 out of 1 hunks failed--s As far as I can tell I see similar errors no matter what port I try to install. Is this a problem? Many thanks Gabriel Dragffy ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello
Dear list members. I just wanted to say hi to all of you. My name is Gabriel, and I have just been setting up a FreeBSD server at work, having moved from Linux. There are just a couple of things that aren't working quite as I would like, and I was hoping someone might be kind enough to help me out. I've been using the FreeBSD handbook, and I must say it is quite superb, and makes starting with FreeBSD much easier. Using sysinstall I enabled anonymous FTP, with uploads allowed in the folder /incoming. Uploading works a treat, however the files don't have permissions to be downloaded again (by anon user). I know I could change this by executing a cron job every two minutes that would chmod the files in /incoming. But surely there must be a far better way...? The FreeBSD handbook says it doesn't recommend allowing anon users to d/load files uploaded anonymously, however I would still like to implement this. I'd be very appreciative for any help. Best regards Gabriel Dragffy [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
