Support for IE6 isn't feasible in this format?
In the section Image Sprites of this doc(http://code.google.com/ webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideClientBundle.html#ImageResource), Google says: = Support for IE6 isn't feasible in this format, because structural changes to the DOM are necessary to implement a windowing effect. Once it's possible to distinguish ie6 and ie7 in user.agent, we could revisit support for ie6. In the current implementation, the ie6 code won't render correctly, although is a purely cosmetic issue. = How do i understand why IE6 couldn't be supported? Does IE itself not support CSS sprite? Does this mean I won't benefit from GWT's image sprite feature if I want my application to run well on IE6? Any reply will be appreciated. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Support for IE6 isn't feasible in this format?
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit/browse_thread/thread/63ac58ecc27dee47 http://www.businessinsider.com/microsoft-launches-anti-marketing-campaign-for-ie6-2011-3 http://googleenterprise.blogspot.com/2010/01/modern-browsers-for-modern-applications.html On Jul 29, 11:01 pm, Kurtt kurtt@gmail.com wrote: In the section Image Sprites of this doc(http://code.google.com/ webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideClientBundle.html#ImageResource), Google says: = Support for IE6 isn't feasible in this format, because structural changes to the DOM are necessary to implement a windowing effect. Once it's possible to distinguish ie6 and ie7 in user.agent, we could revisit support for ie6. In the current implementation, the ie6 code won't render correctly, although is a purely cosmetic issue. = How do i understand why IE6 couldn't be supported? Does IE itself not support CSS sprite? Does this mean I won't benefit from GWT's image sprite feature if I want my application to run well on IE6? Any reply will be appreciated. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Cell Table, Remote Paging Issues
I am trying out Remote Paging with a Cell Table Implementation of Abstract Pager . For now I am limiting the CellTable to 30 rows for data. My Pager takes care of fetching the next batch of 30 rows from RemoteService, when the next or previous button is clicked. I get 30 rows of data from the service, which I put into a list and set it to the ListDataProvider. The List can have only 30 rows of data at a time. I am doing all the calculations for calculating which page I am in, and when do I have to fetch the data. Everything is working perfectly except for one scenario, I am on the last page which has only 20 rows, as the data is exhausted on the Server. When I go previous, I set the table Visible range to(20,10), 10 being the pageSize, then I get the previous batch of data so that when the listDataProvider gets the new List the table shows the last page. But I find that it always goes to the first page which is visible range (0,10).. The reason is that when I set the Visible Range to 20,10 since present table count is only 20, the visible range is not set properly.. If i set the Visible Range after I get the data from the server, the problem is pretty much the same, since the server call for data is asynchronous and data comes much after I set the visible range. Only option is to use a timer but I don't think that would be wise. Any ideas is much appreciated? I guess it is just about a better logic to handle to handle the paging. Mine seems to be lacking.. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/wb947E_CezoJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: GWT Page flows - want to start a open source project - thoughts
Then what just you dont use JSP or JSF then ? GWT follows a different paradigm then those technologies. I just cant see the benefit of similutationg JSP with GWT 2011/7/30 dreamer venugopal.vasire...@gmail.com What if we need to port very complex web app with 100's of jsp/html pages into GWT ? Yes. swing and gwt got lot of similarities. But loosing web advantages being on web may be not cool. yep Swing is Forms flow with thick client nature. There is a huge paradigm shift between these two worlds. as per my understanding GWT is trying to simulate thick client (yep swing) where all the forms/pages are at client and makes rpc to create Models thus MVP to refresh GUI. My thought is to preserve the thin client nature, when you are getting completely new page, just make URL / URI call to load javascript component. Server serves Model and View, on client presenter can update view, before rendering GUI. this way application stays very light weight , just like HTML pages, I beleive complex application with hundereds of jsp/html pages can be easily ported into GWT. sure AJAX reduces # of pages. but not down to one or two pages. Partial refreshes will will be done as usual. - venu - http://schoolk12.appspot.com/ On Jul 29, 7:34 am, Juan Pablo Gardella gardellajuanpa...@gmail.com wrote: Is swing applications pageflow? I think not. Perhaps you can look at architecture proposed in ProGWT book http://books.google.com/books?id=OG816JSZYVcCprintsec=frontcoverdq=... . In this architecture you don't need use a whole page. 2011/7/29 dreamer venugopal.vasire...@gmail.com Hi, I want to start a new opensource project - GWT page flows - similar to struts. With my moderate GWT knowledge, I did not find any way to weave application with pages, though components are there. Not all ajax applications are single page apps. Here are my thoughts from very high level - === Use composites (widgets) as pages - build using designer. Weave all these pages with the help of something like struts- config.xml. == It would have been great if GWT compilation is component by component more transparently. Some thing under the hood is happening on these lines. Even loading javascript into browser would have happened page by page, only when it is needed. Few questions: Is it possible to build page flow on the above lines using GWT as is? Are these features available in any other form, that I did not realize? (UiBinder seems slightly different than I want) Just I would like to brainstorm. Please share your thoughts. - venu - http://schoolk12.appspot.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- GWT API for non Java based platforms http://code.google.com/p/gwt4air/ http://www.gwt4air.appspot.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Dynamically convert between TextBox and PasswordTextBox
Just to get my understanding straight, on what event would you change the textBox to a PasswordBox? If there is really a event can't you create a new passwordTextBox to replace the TextBox? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/GZDInuSh5k8J. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Gwt touch ui
Yes it is a GWT API for Sencha Touch. Glad you guyz like it :) 2011/7/29 leandro borbosa leandrob...@googlemail.com Just tested it on the IPad2 works great. It looks like Sencha Touch. Is it Sencha touch ? 2011/7/29 Juan Pablo Gardella gardellajuanpa...@gmail.com Thanks Alain!! Wonderfull!! 2011/7/29 Alain Ekambi jazzmatad...@googlemail.com Here is a preview of gwt4touch 1.0 wich will be shipped in the next release of gwt4air. http://gwt4air.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/touch/GwtAir.html Like alway feedbacks are really welcome Cheers, Alain 2011/7/8 Gal Dolber gal.dol...@gmail.com great news! thanks Alain On Friday, July 8, 2011, Alain Ekambi jazzmatad...@googlemail.com wrote: Not Flash.Pure Gwt based solution 2011/7/8 Gal Dolber gal.dol...@gmail.com Hi Alain,touch support with flash? do you mean only for android devices? On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Alain Ekambi jazzmatad...@googlemail.com wrote: gwt4air 2.2 will actually have a Gwt Touch moduleStay tuned :) 2011/7/8 Gal Dolber gal.dol...@gmail.com Is anyone doing some open source work on gwt + touch ui? This demo is totally incredible http://dev.sencha.com/deploy/touch/examples/kitchensink/ We must have this implemented with gwt -- Guit: Elegant, beautiful, modular and *production ready* gwt applications. http://code.google.com/p/guit/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- GWT API for non Java based platforms http://code.google.com/p/gwt4air/http://www.gwt4air.appspot.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- Guit: Elegant, beautiful, modular and *production ready* gwt applications. http://code.google.com/p/guit/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- GWT API for non Java based platforms http://code.google.com/p/gwt4air/ http://www.gwt4air.appspot.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- Guit: Elegant, beautiful, modular and *production ready* gwt applications. http://code.google.com/p/guit/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- GWT API for non Java based platforms http://code.google.com/p/gwt4air/ http://www.gwt4air.appspot.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com . To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Re: Tested class changes not visible to test class using gwt-maven-plugin
I haven't tested it myself, but
thishttp://stackoverflow.com/questions/1427048/how-can-i-add-build-path-items-to-eclipse-3-5-using-relative-paths
seems
to deal with how to create relative paths. Another solution may be to edit
the .classpath manually.
If I don't move the external folder at the bottom, then I won't be able to
properly use Eclipse F3 / Go to definition functions - they will bring me to
the class file, not to the source, which renders navigation a bit
cumbersome.
There may be something around this too; it hasn't bothered me much (I'm on a
single-person project at the moment and can easily live with this), but if
you find something I'd be glad to know :)
Cheers,
--
Sébastien Tromp
2011/7/29 cri chuck.irvine...@gmail.com
I like your workaround a little better than mine. It does result in a
non project relative directory path in my .classpath file. We
check .classpath files into svn and the non relative directory
wouldn't match the directory setup of other users. I'm thinking that
there may be a way to make this relative. Do you know how?
I suppose that I'll find out soon enough, but that problems occur if
you don't move the external classpath to the bottom of order and
export?
Thanks a lot Sebastien!
Chuck
On Jul 29, 12:14 pm, Sébastien Tromp sebastien.tr...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have the same issue, and am using a similar workaround. The only
difference is that I add the external class folder to my Java build path.
When I run JUnit tests, I make sure the class folder is at the top of the
Order and Export list, and when in standard development I put it at the
bottom.
This way it works for all test cases - but still not a great workaround.
--
Sébastien Tromp
2011/7/29 cri chuck.irvine...@gmail.com
Can anyone help with this? (I know there is a separate mailing list
for gwt-maven-plugin but I'm not sure it has a lot of subscribers.)
Given that you have a JUnit test case class in /src/test/java/*/
FooTest.java and a tested class /src/main/java/*/Foo.java. If you
attempt run your test case in FooTest.java you will get a runtime
error indicating that FooTest doesn't have access to the modified
Foo.class file.
Steps to reproduce.
1) Generate a GWT project using the gwt-maven-plugin archetype.
2) Import the project into Eclipse using new-Existing Projects into
Workspace.
3) Create class Foo.java in /src/main/java/**/client.
4) Define a simple test method in Foo.java public hello(){return
hello}
5) Create class FooTest.java in /src/test/java/**/client.
6) Define a test in FooTest.java:
@Test public void testFooTest() {Foo foo = new Foo();
assertEquals(hello, foo.hello());}
7) Run the test case method. You will get a runtime message
complaining that Foo can't be found.
A workaround is to:
1) open the junit run configuration.
2) select the classpath tab.
3) select user entries
4) click advanced button
5) select Add folders radio button
6) click ok button
7) add folder src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/classes
Its not a great workaround since you have to do this with every test
case run configuration.
Another workaround is to run Project/clean on the project.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Cell Table, Remote Paging Issues
This is a well known issue with Abstract Pager/SimplePager. I don't like this behavior (and the look of the default SimplePager), so I ended up writing my own pager along the following lines: http://www.mail-archive.com/google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com/msg62763.html Basically, I had to overwrite lastPage(), firstPage(), nextPage() and previousPage() with the behavior that I wanted. On Jul 30, 3:29 am, BST babusri...@gmail.com wrote: I am trying out Remote Paging with a Cell Table Implementation of Abstract Pager . For now I am limiting the CellTable to 30 rows for data. My Pager takes care of fetching the next batch of 30 rows from RemoteService, when the next or previous button is clicked. I get 30 rows of data from the service, which I put into a list and set it to the ListDataProvider. The List can have only 30 rows of data at a time. I am doing all the calculations for calculating which page I am in, and when do I have to fetch the data. Everything is working perfectly except for one scenario, I am on the last page which has only 20 rows, as the data is exhausted on the Server. When I go previous, I set the table Visible range to(20,10), 10 being the pageSize, then I get the previous batch of data so that when the listDataProvider gets the new List the table shows the last page. But I find that it always goes to the first page which is visible range (0,10).. The reason is that when I set the Visible Range to 20,10 since present table count is only 20, the visible range is not set properly.. If i set the Visible Range after I get the data from the server, the problem is pretty much the same, since the server call for data is asynchronous and data comes much after I set the visible range. Only option is to use a timer but I don't think that would be wise. Any ideas is much appreciated? I guess it is just about a better logic to handle to handle the paging. Mine seems to be lacking.. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Support for IE6 isn't feasible in this format?
Oh, my bad, I've known about the png problem under IE6. Thanks a million for your reply ! :-) On Jul 30, 2:21 pm, Jim Douglas jdou...@basis.com wrote: http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit/browse_thread/threa... http://www.businessinsider.com/microsoft-launches-anti-marketing-camp... http://googleenterprise.blogspot.com/2010/01/modern-browsers-for-mode... On Jul 29, 11:01 pm, Kurtt kurtt@gmail.com wrote: In the section Image Sprites of this doc(http://code.google.com/ webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideClientBundle.html#ImageResource), Google says: = Support for IE6 isn't feasible in this format, because structural changes to the DOM are necessary to implement a windowing effect. Once it's possible to distinguish ie6 and ie7 in user.agent, we could revisit support for ie6. In the current implementation, the ie6 code won't render correctly, although is a purely cosmetic issue. = How do i understand why IE6 couldn't be supported? Does IE itself not support CSS sprite? Does this mean I won't benefit from GWT's image sprite feature if I want my application to run well on IE6? Any reply will be appreciated. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Eclipse Analyzing Sources Slow
I have installed this one,but problem still existed. On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 20:30 -0700, gutto wrote: Pulled down an update for GPE today. Google Plugin for Eclipse 3.7 2.3.3.r37v201107211953 com.google.gdt.eclipse.suite.e37.feature.feature.groupGoogle, Inc. Problem appears to have disappeared! On Jul 29, 11:27 am, gutto thomas.gutteri...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks, that's interesting. Obviously related. I had noticed that content assist in templates is slow the first time I tried to use it. I was quite pleased to see that in Indigo it will actually auto- complete, whereas in Helios it did nothing when I selected an entry from the suggestion list. On Jul 26, 8:17 pm, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote: They did:http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5265 Maybe not that many times, and *a priori* not at the same time (not when building the project, but when opening the XML files), but still. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
DisclosurePanelImages alternative?
DisclosurePanelImages is depreciated, so I wondered whats the correct
method for getting to the Disclosure panels default images?
(for, say, making a custom header)
My old code was;
final DisclosurePanelImages dpimages = (DisclosurePanelImages)
GWT.create(DisclosurePanelImages.class);
class DisclosurePanelHeader extends HorizontalPanel
{
AbstractImagePrototype closedImage =
dpimages.disclosurePanelClosed();
AbstractImagePrototype openImage =
dpimages.disclosurePanelOpen();
Image arrowImage = closedImage.createImage();
public DisclosurePanelHeader()
{
..
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: GWT Page flows - want to start a open source project - thoughts
Very good point. I have gone through same thought process. After using designer to build composites (html pages), I came to conclusion that this is what I want to build my web sites with. Just drag and drop widgets and build pages, Yes we got new world for page design and development, but web is highly distributed network, it can never become thick client application which just makes jdbc calls to server, or some thing like that. I was fascinated by JSF and its Idea, but it my fascination faded down slowly after struggling few weeks. But not with GWT and App engine. I found what I am looking for, thing is how to make these better, so that we can build more complex enterprise apps without much re- engineering. - venu - http://schoolk12.appspot.com/ On Jul 30, 12:38 am, Alain Ekambi jazzmatad...@googlemail.com wrote: Then what just you dont use JSP or JSF then ? GWT follows a different paradigm then those technologies. I just cant see the benefit of similutationg JSP with GWT 2011/7/30 dreamer venugopal.vasire...@gmail.com What if we need to port very complex web app with 100's of jsp/html pages into GWT ? Yes. swing and gwt got lot of similarities. But loosing web advantages being on web may be not cool. yep Swing is Forms flow with thick client nature. There is a huge paradigm shift between these two worlds. as per my understanding GWT is trying to simulate thick client (yep swing) where all the forms/pages are at client and makes rpc to create Models thus MVP to refresh GUI. My thought is to preserve the thin client nature, when you are getting completely new page, just make URL / URI call to load javascript component. Server serves Model and View, on client presenter can update view, before rendering GUI. this way application stays very light weight , just like HTML pages, I beleive complex application with hundereds of jsp/html pages can be easily ported into GWT. sure AJAX reduces # of pages. but not down to one or two pages. Partial refreshes will will be done as usual. - venu - http://schoolk12.appspot.com/ On Jul 29, 7:34 am, Juan Pablo Gardella gardellajuanpa...@gmail.com wrote: Is swing applications pageflow? I think not. Perhaps you can look at architecture proposed in ProGWT book http://books.google.com/books?id=OG816JSZYVcCprintsec=frontcoverdq=... . In this architecture you don't need use a whole page. 2011/7/29 dreamer venugopal.vasire...@gmail.com Hi, I want to start a new opensource project - GWT page flows - similar to struts. With my moderate GWT knowledge, I did not find any way to weave application with pages, though components are there. Not all ajax applications are single page apps. Here are my thoughts from very high level - === Use composites (widgets) as pages - build using designer. Weave all these pages with the help of something like struts- config.xml. == It would have been great if GWT compilation is component by component more transparently. Some thing under the hood is happening on these lines. Even loading javascript into browser would have happened page by page, only when it is needed. Few questions: Is it possible to build page flow on the above lines using GWT as is? Are these features available in any other form, that I did not realize? (UiBinder seems slightly different than I want) Just I would like to brainstorm. Please share your thoughts. - venu - http://schoolk12.appspot.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- GWT API for non Java based platformshttp://code.google.com/p/gwt4air/http://www.gwt4air.appspot.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: GWT Page flows - want to start a open source project - thoughts
I forgot to mention about JNLP based swing applications, I see lot similarities with GWT. Once difference is jar files will be downloaded instead of JavaScript module. Ultimate jnlp app runs in local jvm and makes some socket calls to server. for sure, JNLP addressed issue of client deployment. Though JavaScript runs on browser and makes ajax calls, I am not seeing web concentric approach. All these efforts are leading to P2P approach. If I have to compare web with network models , I would say it works like a start network model that way we can avoid any initial downloads, cache issues, script engine version issues (we got lot many jvm version issues with JNLP). Just like web page build with pure HTML pages, user experience should be same, no version issues, dll conflicts nothing. I would even go one step forward and ask why java to javascript compilation , why not java to 'html+javascript' compilation ? ( javascript for ajax). DOM api should be able to generate HTML directly, where there is no dynamic refresh, we don't need JavaScript. - venu - http://schoolk12.appspot.com/ On Jul 30, 6:24 am, dreamer venugopal.vasire...@gmail.com wrote: Very good point. I have gone through same thought process. After using designer to build composites (html pages), I came to conclusion that this is what I want to build my web sites with. Just drag and drop widgets and build pages, Yes we got new world for page design and development, but web is highly distributed network, it can never become thick client application which just makes jdbc calls to server, or some thing like that. I was fascinated by JSF and its Idea, but it my fascination faded down slowly after struggling few weeks. But not with GWT and App engine. I found what I am looking for, thing is how to make these better, so that we can build more complex enterprise apps without much re- engineering. - venu - http://schoolk12.appspot.com/ On Jul 30, 12:38 am, Alain Ekambi jazzmatad...@googlemail.com wrote: Then what just you dont use JSP or JSF then ? GWT follows a different paradigm then those technologies. I just cant see the benefit of similutationg JSP with GWT 2011/7/30 dreamer venugopal.vasire...@gmail.com What if we need to port very complex web app with 100's of jsp/html pages into GWT ? Yes. swing and gwt got lot of similarities. But loosing web advantages being on web may be not cool. yep Swing is Forms flow with thick client nature. There is a huge paradigm shift between these two worlds. as per my understanding GWT is trying to simulate thick client (yep swing) where all the forms/pages are at client and makes rpc to create Models thus MVP to refresh GUI. My thought is to preserve the thin client nature, when you are getting completely new page, just make URL / URI call to load javascript component. Server serves Model and View, on client presenter can update view, before rendering GUI. this way application stays very light weight , just like HTML pages, I beleive complex application with hundereds of jsp/html pages can be easily ported into GWT. sure AJAX reduces # of pages. but not down to one or two pages. Partial refreshes will will be done as usual. - venu - http://schoolk12.appspot.com/ On Jul 29, 7:34 am, Juan Pablo Gardella gardellajuanpa...@gmail.com wrote: Is swing applications pageflow? I think not. Perhaps you can look at architecture proposed in ProGWT book http://books.google.com/books?id=OG816JSZYVcCprintsec=frontcoverdq=... . In this architecture you don't need use a whole page. 2011/7/29 dreamer venugopal.vasire...@gmail.com Hi, I want to start a new opensource project - GWT page flows - similar to struts. With my moderate GWT knowledge, I did not find any way to weave application with pages, though components are there. Not all ajax applications are single page apps. Here are my thoughts from very high level - === Use composites (widgets) as pages - build using designer. Weave all these pages with the help of something like struts- config.xml. == It would have been great if GWT compilation is component by component more transparently. Some thing under the hood is happening on these lines. Even loading javascript into browser would have happened page by page, only when it is needed. Few questions: Is it possible to build page flow on the above lines using GWT as is? Are these features available in any other form, that I did not realize? (UiBinder seems slightly different than I want) Just I would like to brainstorm. Please share your thoughts. - venu - http://schoolk12.appspot.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Re: GWT Page flows - want to start a open source project - thoughts
There is this, http://claudiushauptmann.com/a-framework-for-gwt-multipage-applications.html Which might be of interest to you. On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:00 PM, dreamer venugopal.vasire...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I want to start a new opensource project - GWT page flows - similar to struts. With my moderate GWT knowledge, I did not find any way to weave application with pages, though components are there. Not all ajax applications are single page apps. Here are my thoughts from very high level - === Use composites (widgets) as pages - build using designer. Weave all these pages with the help of something like struts- config.xml. == It would have been great if GWT compilation is component by component more transparently. Some thing under the hood is happening on these lines. Even loading javascript into browser would have happened page by page, only when it is needed. Few questions: Is it possible to build page flow on the above lines using GWT as is? Are these features available in any other form, that I did not realize? (UiBinder seems slightly different than I want) Just I would like to brainstorm. Please share your thoughts. - venu - http://schoolk12.appspot.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
java to HTML+JavaScript cross compiler/generator - is this possible?
Hi, on the GWT lines, is it possible to cross compile/generate to HTML +JavaScript. Static ports to - HTML Dynamic portions to - JavaScript Please share your thoughts -Venu http://schoolk12.appspot.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Out of Memory when compiling for all browser combinations.
We are getting out of Memory issue when compiling our project for all
the browser combination.
Version using : GWT 2.3.0
Enabled draftCompiletrue/draftCompile in pom.xml
extraJvmArgs -Xmx1024m -Djava.io.tmpdir=${basedir}/tmp/
extraJvmArgs
Can you please suggest why it is taking so much time to do a clean
compile?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Web-/Server Management Tool with GWT
Hi everybody! I'm in charge of all the websites and web-plattforms in our company. To make my and others life (maybe :-)) easier, I'm planning a kind of web- and server management tool with GWT for our company. I've read the whole GWT-Docs and at the moment I'm reading Essential GWT by Federico Kereki. Somehow I have some difficulties getting into the whole GWT- stuff... :-) Therefore I wanted to ask you, what you think about my plans and if you have any suggestions on how to approach this. Also I'm interested in suggestions, on how you would split up the modules. In addition, there are a few functionalities I'm not even sure, if they are possible to implement. The tool should do the following: - I thought of the following layout: -- The tool could be split up into modules. -- An overall tool is responsible for user authentication and management and for embedding each of the modules. Also the settings of each module are configured within the overall tool. - The following modules I want to implement: -- an already existing project management tool I wrote in PHP (this I'm going to translate it into Java/GWT) -- a calendar where each user can also share appointments with other users -- a task-tool (users can also share tasks) -- we are using Microsoft Hosted Exchange - do you know, if it is possible to make the HEX-Account accessible from within this tool? I mean, the user would safe his credentials to the database and then, each time, he logs in to the tool, he will be also authenticated to HEX and he can access his E-Mails from the tool (without the need of loading/authenticating another Website). I know, saving these credentials to the database isn't really secure (maybe there are more secure ways to do this). -- Server Status: in this module I'd like to see different information about the (Debian-)server, the tool is running on (like CPU load, available memory, running services). And also the possibility to start and stop some services (like Mail, FTP, Apache, MySQL, etc.). In a future more advanced version, I could also imagine registering all our servers and seeing their status. -- module to manage one of our plattforms run on TYPO3 (nothing big, just making DB-entries for a particular TYPO3-Extension) -- Manage FTP-Users (PureFTP-Server) The aim of the whole thing is also to provide a system, where a single login is needed for all. I'm curious about your comments. Greets -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Anonymous javascript function call using JSNI
Hello friends, If you have some idea how can I invoke Anonymous javascript function using JSNI, then please let me know. Thanks Ritu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Dev Mode = Stale Cache?
I'm using GWT 2.3, IntelliJ, and a Maven generated project. It seems that dev mode rarely picks up my changes to static files. When I make a simple change to a .css file, I often have lots of trouble getting the dev mode to use the updated version of the file. Even after stopping the dev mode, doing a complete rebuild, and relaunching dev mode, I'm still seeing stale files that don't reflect recent changes. This issue is driving me nuts. Is there any way I can resolve? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: GWT/GPE 2.4.0 RC1 is available
To ask, does the DataGrid differ from CellTable only in the content area being scrollable? Are there are differences I'm not seeing? Thanks, -James On Jul 27, 12:55 pm, David Chandler drfibona...@google.com wrote: GWT 2.4.0 adds a new DataGrid widget with scrollable data area and many enhancements to RequestFactory (seehttp://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/RequestFactory_2_4). Google Plugin for Eclipse 2.4.0 introduces a wizard to publish your application to Google Apps Marketplace. SDK:http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/downloads/list Eclipse update sites:http://code.google.com/eclipse/beta/docs/download.html gwt-2.4.0-rc1 will appear in Maven Central shortly. Docs, Javadocs, and release notes will be published with the final release. -- David Chandler Developer Programs Engineer, GWT+GAE w:http://code.google.com/ b:http://turbomanage.wordpress.com/ b:http://googlewebtoolkit.blogspot.com/ t: @googledevtools -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
gwt python
Is it possible to use python with gwt ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Excluding Classes in a Legacy Application using GWT 2.3
1) My legacy application is setup like this: com.app.model com.app.exception com.app.util com.app.service etc. There are 20 classes in the model package, but I only want to serialize and use 4 for RPC. The others have heavy code in them that error out upon compilation. 2) There are references to apache log4j that the GWT cannot find source for: No source code is available for type org.apache.log4j.Logger; did you forget to inherit a required module? This is the same for java.util.Calendar, org.junit.Assert, etc. -- I have tried using the extend-configuration-property rpc.blacklist like extend-configuration-property name=rpc.blacklist value=- java.util.Calendar/ But this seems to do nothing at compile time. I have also tried to use the blacklist to exclude everything in the model package except the classes I need, but the other classes still error out. Is there anyway to tell GWT to only compile certain classes, and ignore others? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Web Workers in GWT
Hello, I am currently playing around with GWT and I would like to implement some HTML5 features with it like web workers. In the GWT documentation I see that it supports a couple HTML5 features but no Web Workers. Are there any libraries out there that would implement web workers in GWT ? Or can anybody point me to a simple tutorial ? I would appreciate. Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
GWT project tree setup
We are re-writing our ERP system using Java/GWT/Spring.It is something
big. We would like to get some suggestion regarding the tree setup.
1. Application.gwt.xml
---
We have above 70 modules today. But all of it's having only one entry
point and is Application.gwt.xml.
But becuase of the same :
But each module seems we need to specify in main *.gwt.xml
eg.
source path='ecommerce/arn/client' /
source path='ecommerce/arn/shared' /
source path='ecommerce/bol/client' /
source path='ecommerce/bol/shared' /
source path='ecommerce/bkg/client' /
source path='ecommerce/bkg/shared' /
Instead of this, Is there any way to specify this source path using
file globs ?
for e.g:
ie,source path='ecommerce/*/{shared,client}' /
or ie,
source path='ecommerce/*/shared' /
source path='ecommerce/*/client' /
2. This is regarding css file.
Since each time if there is a change in the file, we seems need to
compile and run using GWT.
This is fine for a development server and via eclipse.
But for a very simple change in production server, may be just a font
issue,seems the entire tree need to compile. So we moved the resources
filed outside the .war file.
ie in a folder say
project/resources/css/bol/bol.css
project/resources/css/bol/arn.css
project/resources/images/a.png
project/resources/images/b.png
and applied the styles directly in the GWT files. But this found there
is no 'GWT-Cache' for images. Is there any fix around for this? Means
images are loading now like a normal website, taking time. We tried
GWT image pre-load as well, but not a good idea to re-load all the
images at single shot as there are many.
What is the best approach here else?
Please suggest.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Layout and styling of HorizontalPanel/VerticalPanel
The setStyleName method sets the CSS class of the generated table element. Is there any way I can set the CSS class of the generated td elements within the table? What I want to do is add spacing *between* HorizontalPanel/ VerticalPanel cells but not around the outer edge of the HorizontalPanel/VerticalPanel itself. I don't believe you can do this at the table level in HTML. BTW, the setSpacing method sets the cellspacing attribute of the table element which doesn't produce the result that I'm looking for. Also, if I may ask, why does VerticalPanel use table rather than div? It seems to be there should be a Panel layout class that generates a sequence of div elements, which is a very common layout approach in raw HTML. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
GWT CSS URL Problem
I have a CSS stylesheet defined at projectroot/src/main/webapp/MyStyles.css In my module's .gwt.xml file I reference this with: stylesheet src='MyStyles.css'/ In dev mode, GWT generates the following CSS URL which results in a 404 not found error: http://127.0.0.1:/module/MyStyles.css The following URL works (when I try manually): http://127.0.0.1:/MyStyles.css In production mode, GWT generates the following CSS URL which results in a 404 not found error: http://localhost:8080/project/module/MyStyles.css The following URL works (when I try manually): http://localhost:8080/project/MyStyles.css I'm using: GWT 2.3 Project built with Maven archetype: mvn archetype:generate - DarchetypeRepository=repo1.maven.org - DarchetypeGroupId=org.codehaus.mojo -DarchetypeArtifactId=gwt-maven- plugin -DarchetypeVersion=2.3.0-1 IntelliJ 10.5.x What am I doing wrong? How can I resolve this? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: GWT 2.2 and gwt-maps.jar not compatible
On Jul 27, 3:20 am, André Nunes an...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi, how i can rebuild gwt-maps ?? I using gwt 2.3, what version of gwt-maps i should use ? tkxs ! I had the same issue, you can download from here: You can download it from http://nexus.bedatadriven.com/content/repositories/thirdparty/com/google/gwt/google-apis/gwt-maps/1.1.0/ If you use maven/ivy you can add it so: dependency groupIdcom.google.gwt.google-apis/groupId artifactIdgwt-maps/artifactId version1.1.0/version classifiergwt23/classifier scopeprovided/scope /dependency repositories repository idbedatadriven-public/id nameBedatadriven Public Repo/name urlhttp://nexus.bedatadriven.com/content/groups/public/ url snapshots enabledtrue/enabled /snapshots /repository /repositories -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Google Code Tutorials and Documentation - GWT OAuth
Hello, This message I hope finds its way to someone that works on the Google Code Documentation and Tutorials for GWT for the greater good, but I have taken a look at the posts and reply on this group and I am aware there are many people out there that help others out with their issues and I would appreciate that as well. I have been writing code for less than 3 months, I normally move dirt with a shovel for a living and I am determined to be a software engineer or something cool like that in a year or so. I have created only one app in my entire life, it is a chess program and it is not very good (yet!). Just letting you geniuses out there know that I am an beginner and I didn't go to college, I learned Java from a book I stole from the library (it was written in 1995 and feels a bit dated, i.e. Java 2). Note: I write using Eclipse. THE ISSUE: GWT tutorials and documentation. I am sure there are numerous reasons why you would use the GWT without the app engine, but I am primarily interested in writing app engine apps with the GWT - there is a annoying division of tutorials and documentation regarding GWT and the Google App Engine. In the Google App Engine site there are tutorials for OpenID, OAuth, and the like, I cannot find a decent step by step tutorial for using OpenID with GWT. I would really like to see more tutorials for the GWT - especially on OpenID, but also - how to play audio, how to use the data store with GWT, Single Sign-On, etc I guess what it comes down to is - How can I apply the tutorials in App Engine Documentation to the GWT? Can the GWT or App Engine doc site include an explanation of how the two work together or how they relate - I want to use the GWT because it makes writing client-side code very easy for me, I want to use the App Engine because it makes deployment very easy for me. I want to use the two together. see for me App Engine is great because I can host my site for free, I can publish my app on the Chrome Web Store. You got to try and imagine how cool it is for a guy like me (im a loser and know it, just trying to change it) to publish an application on Google Chrome Web Store - I feel like I am learning things that can really change my life and for a couple of months now its all I can think of. to all those who may take the time to write me something - thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: gwt python
Short answer - no I am a beginner, I may be wrong, but from what i know GWT is used exclusively for writing Java code that will be compiled to Javascript. This helps because Java is OOP while Javascript is not, so with GWT you can write classes or use ones that have been created by others. Hope that helps. P.S. you may already know but you can write Python code for Google App Engine On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:13 AM, fix3d aleksandre...@gmail.com wrote: Is it possible to use python with gwt ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: gwt python
I also heard tha there is a similat project like gwt for python. That turn python code to JS. You might want to check that one 2011/7/30 Matthew Cote mcjavalear...@gmail.com Short answer - no I am a beginner, I may be wrong, but from what i know GWT is used exclusively for writing Java code that will be compiled to Javascript. This helps because Java is OOP while Javascript is not, so with GWT you can write classes or use ones that have been created by others. Hope that helps. P.S. you may already know but you can write Python code for Google App Engine On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:13 AM, fix3d aleksandre...@gmail.com wrote: Is it possible to use python with gwt ? - You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- GWT API for non Java based platforms http://code.google.com/p/gwt4air/ http://www.gwt4air.appspot.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
ValueProxy Implementation Rule ?
Hi all, I'm using valueProxies in order to give Criterias to a static method find located in my ServerSide Entity. Each ValueProxy had a setter and a getter. But today I realized that only setter had to be used Client side so I decided to remove all the getters on the Proxy but let them on *.shared POJO which my proxy is a valueProxy for. But It don't seems to work. The application is still compling but I'm facing a RuntimeException: Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: searchKey at com.google.web.bindery.autobean.shared.impl.AutoBeanCodexImpl.doCoderFor(AutoBeanCodexImpl.java: 524) at com.google.web.bindery.autobean.shared.impl.AbstractAutoBean.setProperty(AbstractAutoBean.java: 276) I didn't understand why but I suppose that RequestFactory don't manage any ValueProxies without getters AND setters declared. Maybe it has to call getters when object are created Server Side ??? If it is true, maybe this implementation rule should be documented. Anybody in this case ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: GWT Page flows - want to start a open source project - thoughts
Note that the current build is for GWT = 2.1. If you're using 2.2+, currently you'll need to get the source and build it against 2.2+ yourself. I did some work a couple of months ago to create a jar that would work for any version of GWT, but haven't committed it yet. In fact, that's the only reason I hadn't already mentioned gwt-multipage in this thread. Now that it has been mentioned, I'll make sure I commit my changes this weekend, at least on a branch. BTW, the project page is http://gwtmultipage.org/, and the google code page is http://code.google.com/p/gwt-multipage/. -- Brian On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Aidan O'Kelly aida...@gmail.com wrote: There is this, http://claudiushauptmann.com/a-framework-for-gwt-multipage-applications.html Which might be of interest to you. On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:00 PM, dreamer venugopal.vasire...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I want to start a new opensource project - GWT page flows - similar to struts. With my moderate GWT knowledge, I did not find any way to weave application with pages, though components are there. Not all ajax applications are single page apps. Here are my thoughts from very high level - === Use composites (widgets) as pages - build using designer. Weave all these pages with the help of something like struts- config.xml. == It would have been great if GWT compilation is component by component more transparently. Some thing under the hood is happening on these lines. Even loading javascript into browser would have happened page by page, only when it is needed. Few questions: Is it possible to build page flow on the above lines using GWT as is? Are these features available in any other form, that I did not realize? (UiBinder seems slightly different than I want) Just I would like to brainstorm. Please share your thoughts. - venu - http://schoolk12.appspot.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com . To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: ValueProxy Implementation Rule ?
I think this is a known bug. I saw it mentioned recently and thought that there was a new issue filed, however I couldn't find it. I did however find this older issue: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5760 that appears to be related. -- Brian On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Romain BIARD biard.rom...@gmail.comwrote: Hi all, I'm using valueProxies in order to give Criterias to a static method find located in my ServerSide Entity. Each ValueProxy had a setter and a getter. But today I realized that only setter had to be used Client side so I decided to remove all the getters on the Proxy but let them on *.shared POJO which my proxy is a valueProxy for. But It don't seems to work. The application is still compling but I'm facing a RuntimeException: Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: searchKey at com.google.web.bindery.autobean.shared.impl.AutoBeanCodexImpl.doCoderFor(AutoBeanCodexImpl.java: 524) at com.google.web.bindery.autobean.shared.impl.AbstractAutoBean.setProperty(AbstractAutoBean.java: 276) I didn't understand why but I suppose that RequestFactory don't manage any ValueProxies without getters AND setters declared. Maybe it has to call getters when object are created Server Side ??? If it is true, maybe this implementation rule should be documented. Anybody in this case ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: gwt python
its called pyjamas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/dLmcKl-n4QoJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: ERROR: GWT 2.3 + gwt-maps
Hi, i prefer to use a official api v3, because i've a book that explain very much the new things of this version. For use this annex, I need to add this .jar in external jars in build path, and wich inherits, script, or other things I need to add in .xml module ? Can you explain this steps, that are before the compile time ? Because use GWT, Google Maps, Eclipse, all this I've a knowledge, but doesn't compile Gmaps.jar . I really appreciate your help, and sorry for my bad english. On 28 jul, 03:24, Bin Wu b...@bluepoint.net.au wrote: Qual biblioteca você realmente quer usar? O oficial do Google gwt-maps api ou a lib do 3o partido a partir dehttp://code.google.com/p/gwt-google-maps-v3/? A lib do 3o partido apóia GMaps versão 3, mas já foi preterido por um ano. Então eu não sei muito sobre ele. O oficial do Google api parece suportar apenas mapas versão 2. Eu chequei o fonte e compilado com GWT2.3, até agora tudo que eu preciso só funciona bem. Eu junto em anexo o jar lib com este post. Ver se isso ajuda. 2011/7/27 André Nunes an...@ hotmail.com Oi, eu usando GWT 2.3 com gwt-maps.jar, mas eu tenho problemas, não Compilação, mas eu sigo todos os passos que guia. Uma parte dos problemas estão listados abaixo: [ERROR] Erros em 'jar: file: / C: / eclipse/gwt-maps-1.1.0/gwt- Maps3-0.2a.jar! / Com / google / gwt / maps / cliente / base / LatLng.java ' [ERROR] Erro interno do compilador Java.lang.IncompatibleClassChangeError: interface encontrado Com.google.gwt.core.ext.typeinfo.JClassType, mas a classe era esperado Em Com.google.gwt.jsio.rebind.JSWrapperGenerator.generate (JSWrapperGenerator.j ava: 276) Em Com.google.gwt.core.ext.GeneratorExtWrapper.generate (GeneratorExtWrapper.ja va: 48) Alguém pode me ajudar? - Você recebeu esta mensagem porque está inscrito para o Google Groups Google Web Toolkit grupo. Para postar neste grupo, envie um e-mail para google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Para sair deste grupo, envie um email para Google-web-toolkit + unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Para mais opções, visite este grupo em http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. gwt-maps.jar 995KExibirdownload -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: ValueProxy Implementation Rule ?
I posted a message about this recently, and was pointed to the bug referenced by Brian below. Currently you do need to have getters in order for AutoBean to know the property exists. Ryan On Jul 30, 11:44 am, Brian Reilly brian.irei...@gmail.com wrote: I think this is a known bug. I saw it mentioned recently and thought that there was a new issue filed, however I couldn't find it. I did however find this older issue: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5760 that appears to be related. -- Brian On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Romain BIARD biard.rom...@gmail.comwrote: Hi all, I'm using valueProxies in order to give Criterias to a static method find located in my ServerSide Entity. Each ValueProxy had a setter and a getter. But today I realized that only setter had to be used Client side so I decided to remove all the getters on the Proxy but let them on *.shared POJO which my proxy is a valueProxy for. But It don't seems to work. The application is still compling but I'm facing a RuntimeException: Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: searchKey at com.google.web.bindery.autobean.shared.impl.AutoBeanCodexImpl.doCoderFor(Au toBeanCodexImpl.java: 524) at com.google.web.bindery.autobean.shared.impl.AbstractAutoBean.setProperty(Ab stractAutoBean.java: 276) I didn't understand why but I suppose that RequestFactory don't manage any ValueProxies without getters AND setters declared. Maybe it has to call getters when object are created Server Side ??? If it is true, maybe this implementation rule should be documented. Anybody in this case ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Google Code Tutorials and Documentation - GWT OAuth
Well, if you've reached a point where you want to do stuff, that there are no step-by-step tutorials for, you need to stop looking for tutorials, and starting looking at reference material, ie, API documentation, or documents/tutorials/papers on a specific technology. You've touched upon it in your post, but GWT and App Engine are very separate, and very different things. That the App Engine has a Java runtime for you to run server-side code in, and that GWT compiles Java to client-side code, is convenient, in that you stay in one language, but that's all. Now, they DO make a good match, as they are both very good at what they do (GWT on client-side, App-Engine on server-side) but they are very different beasts, so you can't really 'apply app-engine tutorials to GWT'. What you can do is, use them on App Engine, and then use the result to power your GWT app. You might want to read up on the HTTP protocol, Web Services / REST architecture, if you haven't already, as these are the core protocols used to make your GWT app talk to your App Engine back-end. I'm pretty sure you understand that, but its important to have a clear idea of your 'software stack'. What each component is, what it can can't do, what its responsible for. Perhaps make some toy projects that only use App Engine(serving up static HTML), or only use GWT, to get a better idea of where the separation is. (This works for any other components/libraries you add later, it can be good to test them in isolation before using them in tandem with other pieces of software) Just a quick note on OpenID.. I dont know it that well, I looked at the specs a few years ago, and will be again soon, but unless you really really need it, its probably best to stick with the Google Authentication API at first, as its stable and a LOT less complicated to get right. Hope this helps, my main point is, API References/User Guides/Protocol Specs are your friends, when no-one has made a tutorial for a specific case. Good luck, Aidan On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Matthew Cote mcjavalear...@gmail.com wrote: I am sure there are numerous reasons why you would use the GWT without the app engine, but I am primarily interested in writing app engine apps with the GWT - there is a annoying division of tutorials and documentation regarding GWT and the Google App Engine. In the Google App Engine site there are tutorials for OpenID, OAuth, and the like, I cannot find a decent step by step tutorial for using OpenID with GWT. I would really like to see more tutorials for the GWT - especially on OpenID, but also - how to play audio, how to use the data store with GWT, Single Sign-On, etc I guess what it comes down to is - How can I apply the tutorials in App Engine Documentation to the GWT? Can the GWT or App Engine doc site include an explanation of how the two work together or how they relate - I want to use the GWT because it makes writing client-side code very easy for me, I want to use the App Engine because it makes deployment very easy for me. I want to use the two together. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Google Code Tutorials and Documentation - GWT OAuth
wow, thanks a lot for all that, I got to head out so I can't digest atm but the sheer volume of advise here is incredible, gtg but Im gonna write back later. thanks On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Aidan O'Kelly aida...@gmail.com wrote: Well, if you've reached a point where you want to do stuff, that there are no step-by-step tutorials for, you need to stop looking for tutorials, and starting looking at reference material, ie, API documentation, or documents/tutorials/papers on a specific technology. You've touched upon it in your post, but GWT and App Engine are very separate, and very different things. That the App Engine has a Java runtime for you to run server-side code in, and that GWT compiles Java to client-side code, is convenient, in that you stay in one language, but that's all. Now, they DO make a good match, as they are both very good at what they do (GWT on client-side, App-Engine on server-side) but they are very different beasts, so you can't really 'apply app-engine tutorials to GWT'. What you can do is, use them on App Engine, and then use the result to power your GWT app. You might want to read up on the HTTP protocol, Web Services / REST architecture, if you haven't already, as these are the core protocols used to make your GWT app talk to your App Engine back-end. I'm pretty sure you understand that, but its important to have a clear idea of your 'software stack'. What each component is, what it can can't do, what its responsible for. Perhaps make some toy projects that only use App Engine(serving up static HTML), or only use GWT, to get a better idea of where the separation is. (This works for any other components/libraries you add later, it can be good to test them in isolation before using them in tandem with other pieces of software) Just a quick note on OpenID.. I dont know it that well, I looked at the specs a few years ago, and will be again soon, but unless you really really need it, its probably best to stick with the Google Authentication API at first, as its stable and a LOT less complicated to get right. Hope this helps, my main point is, API References/User Guides/Protocol Specs are your friends, when no-one has made a tutorial for a specific case. Good luck, Aidan On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Matthew Cote mcjavalear...@gmail.com wrote: I am sure there are numerous reasons why you would use the GWT without the app engine, but I am primarily interested in writing app engine apps with the GWT - there is a annoying division of tutorials and documentation regarding GWT and the Google App Engine. In the Google App Engine site there are tutorials for OpenID, OAuth, and the like, I cannot find a decent step by step tutorial for using OpenID with GWT. I would really like to see more tutorials for the GWT - especially on OpenID, but also - how to play audio, how to use the data store with GWT, Single Sign-On, etc I guess what it comes down to is - How can I apply the tutorials in App Engine Documentation to the GWT? Can the GWT or App Engine doc site include an explanation of how the two work together or how they relate - I want to use the GWT because it makes writing client-side code very easy for me, I want to use the App Engine because it makes deployment very easy for me. I want to use the two together. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Google Code Tutorials and Documentation - GWT OAuth
This open source book can also help you. http://code.google.com/p/gwt-gae-book/ It is not up to date, it's on my todo list to update it and contribute to it by the end of october. Cheers, On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Matthew Cote mcjavalear...@gmail.comwrote: wow, thanks a lot for all that, I got to head out so I can't digest atm but the sheer volume of advise here is incredible, gtg but Im gonna write back later. thanks On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Aidan O'Kelly aida...@gmail.com wrote: Well, if you've reached a point where you want to do stuff, that there are no step-by-step tutorials for, you need to stop looking for tutorials, and starting looking at reference material, ie, API documentation, or documents/tutorials/papers on a specific technology. You've touched upon it in your post, but GWT and App Engine are very separate, and very different things. That the App Engine has a Java runtime for you to run server-side code in, and that GWT compiles Java to client-side code, is convenient, in that you stay in one language, but that's all. Now, they DO make a good match, as they are both very good at what they do (GWT on client-side, App-Engine on server-side) but they are very different beasts, so you can't really 'apply app-engine tutorials to GWT'. What you can do is, use them on App Engine, and then use the result to power your GWT app. You might want to read up on the HTTP protocol, Web Services / REST architecture, if you haven't already, as these are the core protocols used to make your GWT app talk to your App Engine back-end. I'm pretty sure you understand that, but its important to have a clear idea of your 'software stack'. What each component is, what it can can't do, what its responsible for. Perhaps make some toy projects that only use App Engine(serving up static HTML), or only use GWT, to get a better idea of where the separation is. (This works for any other components/libraries you add later, it can be good to test them in isolation before using them in tandem with other pieces of software) Just a quick note on OpenID.. I dont know it that well, I looked at the specs a few years ago, and will be again soon, but unless you really really need it, its probably best to stick with the Google Authentication API at first, as its stable and a LOT less complicated to get right. Hope this helps, my main point is, API References/User Guides/Protocol Specs are your friends, when no-one has made a tutorial for a specific case. Good luck, Aidan On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Matthew Cote mcjavalear...@gmail.com wrote: I am sure there are numerous reasons why you would use the GWT without the app engine, but I am primarily interested in writing app engine apps with the GWT - there is a annoying division of tutorials and documentation regarding GWT and the Google App Engine. In the Google App Engine site there are tutorials for OpenID, OAuth, and the like, I cannot find a decent step by step tutorial for using OpenID with GWT. I would really like to see more tutorials for the GWT - especially on OpenID, but also - how to play audio, how to use the data store with GWT, Single Sign-On, etc I guess what it comes down to is - How can I apply the tutorials in App Engine Documentation to the GWT? Can the GWT or App Engine doc site include an explanation of how the two work together or how they relate - I want to use the GWT because it makes writing client-side code very easy for me, I want to use the App Engine because it makes deployment very easy for me. I want to use the two together. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- Christian Goudreau www.arcbees.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Celltable Cell Grouping (Rowspan, Colspan)
Hi, any tips on how to implement this? brgds. Papick -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/CfRqwR3K7E0J. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Celltable Cell Grouping (Rowspan, Colspan)
Just found the answer. http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=10476 On 31 Jul., 00:13, P.G.Taboada pgtabo...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, any tips on how to implement this? brgds. Papick -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Support for IE6 isn't feasible in this format?
Kurtt, What's your situation with IE6? Do you develop software for corporate users who refuse to upgrade? Did you look at the other links? Google posted that note about IE6 more than a year and a half ago, and Microsoft is literally begging people to stop using IE6. http://www.ie6countdown.com/ This story is just funny: http://edition.cnn.com/2011/TECH/web/07/29/internet.explorer.dumb/ On Jul 30, 5:22 am, Kurtt kurtt@gmail.com wrote: Oh, my bad, I've known about the png problem under IE6. Thanks a million for your reply ! :-) On Jul 30, 2:21 pm, Jim Douglas jdou...@basis.com wrote: http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit/browse_thread/threa... http://www.businessinsider.com/microsoft-launches-anti-marketing-camp... http://googleenterprise.blogspot.com/2010/01/modern-browsers-for-mode... On Jul 29, 11:01 pm, Kurtt kurtt@gmail.com wrote: In the section Image Sprites of this doc(http://code.google.com/ webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideClientBundle.html#ImageResource), Google says: = Support for IE6 isn't feasible in this format, because structural changes to the DOM are necessary to implement a windowing effect. Once it's possible to distinguish ie6 and ie7 in user.agent, we could revisit support for ie6. In the current implementation, the ie6 code won't render correctly, although is a purely cosmetic issue. = How do i understand why IE6 couldn't be supported? Does IE itself not support CSS sprite? Does this mean I won't benefit from GWT's image sprite feature if I want my application to run well on IE6? Any reply will be appreciated. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Google Code Tutorials and Documentation - GWT OAuth
For Aidan O'Kelly -I just got back from that thing and I couldn't wait to go through this email slowly. I think the main points of this email should be posted on the getting started sites of App Engine and GWT - its brilliant, I mean I can't explain to you how perfect this is for me, you have surely saved me time. Thanks - I am serious, Now, they DO make a good match, as they are both very good at what they do (GWT on client-side, App-Engine on server-side) but they are very different beasts, so you can't really 'apply app-engine tutorials to GWT'. What you can do is, use them on App Engine, and then use the result to power your GWT app. You might want to read up on the HTTP protocol, Web Services / REST architecture, if you haven't already, as these are the core protocols used to make your GWT app talk to your App Engine back-end. I needed that, I can't wait to get into it, it makes perfect sense too, my client-side code is done and what I want to do is use the app engine server-side. Now stop me if I am wrong, lets say I want to use only google technology, cause it rocks and its free, and I want to create a rich client-side UI that communicates with the cloud - and I mean google's cloud - then I want to use the GWT and the App Engine together like described above? If this is the case, then i feel there ought to be more on the joining of the two in the Tutorials - like a Advanced Tutorial. However, I rather like the idea of figuring it out on my own as you also described in your email, I am sure to learn more and for me that is what it is all about, but you definitely set me in the right direction. Peace. On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Aidan O'Kelly aida...@gmail.com wrote: Well, if you've reached a point where you want to do stuff, that thereIf are no step-by-step tutorials for, you need to stop looking for tutorials, and starting looking at reference material, ie, API documentation, or documents/tutorials/papers on a specific technology. You've touched upon it in your post, but GWT and App Engine are very separate, and very different things. That the App Engine has a Java runtime for you to run server-side code in, and that GWT compiles Java to client-side code, is convenient, in that you stay in one language, but that's all. Now, they DO make a good match, as they are both very good at what they do (GWT on client-side, App-Engine on server-side) but they are very different beasts, so you can't really 'apply app-engine tutorials to GWT'. What you can do is, use them on App Engine, and then use the result to power your GWT app. You might want to read up on the HTTP protocol, Web Services / REST architecture, if you haven't already, as these are the core protocols used to make your GWT app talk to your App Engine back-end. I'm pretty sure you understand that, but its important to have a clear idea of your 'software stack'. What each component is, what it can can't do, what its responsible for. Perhaps make some toy projects that only use App Engine(serving up static HTML), or only use GWT, to get a better idea of where the separation is. (This works for any other components/libraries you add later, it can be good to test them in isolation before using them in tandem with other pieces of software) Just a quick note on OpenID.. I dont know it that well, I looked at the specs a few years ago, and will be again soon, but unless you really really need it, its probably best to stick with the Google Authentication API at first, as its stable and a LOT less complicated to get right. Hope this helps, my main point is, API References/User Guides/Protocol Specs are your friends, when no-one has made a tutorial for a specific case. Good luck, Aidan On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Matthew Cote mcjavalear...@gmail.com wrote: I am sure there are numerous reasons why you would use the GWT without the app engine, but I am primarily interested in writing app engine apps with the GWT - there is a annoying division of tutorials and documentation regarding GWT and the Google App Engine. In the Google App Engine site there are tutorials for OpenID, OAuth, and the like, I cannot find a decent step by step tutorial for using OpenID with GWT. I would really like to see more tutorials for the GWT - especially on OpenID, but also - how to play audio, how to use the data store with GWT, Single Sign-On, etc I guess what it comes down to is - How can I apply the tutorials in App Engine Documentation to the GWT? Can the GWT or App Engine doc site include an explanation of how the two work together or how they relate - I want to use the GWT because it makes writing client-side code very easy for me, I want to use the App Engine because it makes deployment very easy for me. I want to use the two together. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email
Re: Google Code Tutorials and Documentation - GWT OAuth
. figuring it out on your own. Just an observation: Google is a pathless land. It is not a highway. Most of the time, companies build highway and developers just follow the users guide and build applications to fit on that highway. Development will be much easier and simpler; but creativity and innovations are limited by the width and breadth of the highway. Moreover, all applications may look similar; may be on different flavors. Many vehicles are on the highway; Flavors may be different; sports vehicle; hybrid; bike, van, suv, limo, truck and bus. But all are just vehicles. In a pathless land, developers have total and complete freedom. No boundary. It is a pathless land. You build totally new and fresh applications. Figuring it out on your own - gives you total and complete freedom. Come up with creative and innovative idea. Identify the API and try to use them; If the current API doesn't meet your requirements, ask for new API; Google may build it for you. Again, Google is a pathless land. Enjoy the total and complete freedom. Regards, Bala On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Matthew Cote mcjavalear...@gmail.comwrote: For Aidan O'Kelly -I just got back from that thing and I couldn't wait to go through this email slowly. I think the main points of this email should be posted on the getting started sites of App Engine and GWT - its brilliant, I mean I can't explain to you how perfect this is for me, you have surely saved me time. Thanks - I am serious, Now, they DO make a good match, as they are both very good at what they do (GWT on client-side, App-Engine on server-side) but they are very different beasts, so you can't really 'apply app-engine tutorials to GWT'. What you can do is, use them on App Engine, and then use the result to power your GWT app. You might want to read up on the HTTP protocol, Web Services / REST architecture, if you haven't already, as these are the core protocols used to make your GWT app talk to your App Engine back-end. I needed that, I can't wait to get into it, it makes perfect sense too, my client-side code is done and what I want to do is use the app engine server-side. Now stop me if I am wrong, lets say I want to use only google technology, cause it rocks and its free, and I want to create a rich client-side UI that communicates with the cloud - and I mean google's cloud - then I want to use the GWT and the App Engine together like described above? If this is the case, then i feel there ought to be more on the joining of the two in the Tutorials - like a Advanced Tutorial. However, I rather like the idea of figuring it out on my own as you also described in your email, I am sure to learn more and for me that is what it is all about, but you definitely set me in the right direction. Peace. On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Aidan O'Kelly aida...@gmail.com wrote: Well, if you've reached a point where you want to do stuff, that thereIf are no step-by-step tutorials for, you need to stop looking for tutorials, and starting looking at reference material, ie, API documentation, or documents/tutorials/papers on a specific technology. You've touched upon it in your post, but GWT and App Engine are very separate, and very different things. That the App Engine has a Java runtime for you to run server-side code in, and that GWT compiles Java to client-side code, is convenient, in that you stay in one language, but that's all. Now, they DO make a good match, as they are both very good at what they do (GWT on client-side, App-Engine on server-side) but they are very different beasts, so you can't really 'apply app-engine tutorials to GWT'. What you can do is, use them on App Engine, and then use the result to power your GWT app. You might want to read up on the HTTP protocol, Web Services / REST architecture, if you haven't already, as these are the core protocols used to make your GWT app talk to your App Engine back-end. I'm pretty sure you understand that, but its important to have a clear idea of your 'software stack'. What each component is, what it can can't do, what its responsible for. Perhaps make some toy projects that only use App Engine(serving up static HTML), or only use GWT, to get a better idea of where the separation is. (This works for any other components/libraries you add later, it can be good to test them in isolation before using them in tandem with other pieces of software) Just a quick note on OpenID.. I dont know it that well, I looked at the specs a few years ago, and will be again soon, but unless you really really need it, its probably best to stick with the Google Authentication API at first, as its stable and a LOT less complicated to get right. Hope this helps, my main point is, API References/User Guides/Protocol Specs are your friends, when no-one has made a tutorial for a specific case. Good luck, Aidan On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Matthew Cote
Re: RequestFactoryEditorDriver example?
Vasily, can you post the updated snippet for PhoneListEditor and related UI code. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/VlHFEGDAeWwJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: gwt python
Hi You can use python only on server side of a GWT application and then you will not be able to use RPC mechanism (because of using python on server side ). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Cell Table, Remote Paging Issues
I didn't think of overriding last Page first Page. Thanks for the pointer.. I shall look into the link. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/S4Q4OUsM4y8J. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r10482 committed - Improve error message when a RequestFactory 2.3 request is received....
Revision: 10482
Author: b...@google.com
Date: Sat Jul 30 02:03:17 2011
Log: Improve error message when a RequestFactory 2.3 request is
received.
Issue 6628.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1503803/
Patch by: bobv
Review by: rjrjr
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=10482
Modified:
/trunk/user/src/com/google/web/bindery/requestfactory/server/SimpleRequestProcessor.java
/trunk/user/test/com/google/web/bindery/requestfactory/gwt/client/RequestFactoryTest.java
===
---
/trunk/user/src/com/google/web/bindery/requestfactory/server/SimpleRequestProcessor.java
Fri Jun 17 03:15:41 2011
+++
/trunk/user/src/com/google/web/bindery/requestfactory/server/SimpleRequestProcessor.java
Sat Jul 30 02:03:17 2011
@@ -126,7 +126,6 @@
try {
process(req, responseBean.as());
} catch (ReportableException e) {
- e.printStackTrace();
// Create a new response envelope, since the state is unknown
responseBean = FACTORY.response();
responseBean.as().setGeneralFailure(createFailureMessage(e).as());
@@ -200,7 +199,12 @@
final RequestState source = new RequestState(service);
// Make sure the RequestFactory is valid
-service.resolveRequestFactory(req.getRequestFactory());
+String requestFactoryToken = req.getRequestFactory();
+if (requestFactoryToken == null) {
+ // Tell old clients to go away
+ throw new ReportableException(The client payload version is out of
sync with the server);
+}
+service.resolveRequestFactory(requestFactoryToken);
// Apply operations
processOperationMessages(source, req);
===
---
/trunk/user/test/com/google/web/bindery/requestfactory/gwt/client/RequestFactoryTest.java
Fri Jun 17 03:15:41 2011
+++
/trunk/user/test/com/google/web/bindery/requestfactory/gwt/client/RequestFactoryTest.java
Sat Jul 30 02:03:17 2011
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
*/
package com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.gwt.client;
+import com.google.web.bindery.autobean.shared.AutoBeanCodex;
import com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.EntityProxy;
import com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.EntityProxyChange;
import com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.EntityProxyId;
@@ -23,6 +24,8 @@
import com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.Receiver;
import com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.Request;
import com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.RequestContext;
+import com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.RequestTransport;
+import
com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.RequestTransport.TransportReceiver;
import com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.ServerFailure;
import com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.SimpleBarProxy;
import com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.SimpleBarRequest;
@@ -31,7 +34,10 @@
import com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.SimpleFooRequest;
import com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.SimpleValueContext;
import com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.SimpleValueProxy;
+import
com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.impl.MessageFactoryHolder;
import
com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.impl.SimpleEntityProxyId;
+import
com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.messages.ResponseMessage;
+import
com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.messages.ServerFailureMessage;
import java.math.BigDecimal;
import java.math.BigInteger;
@@ -563,6 +569,49 @@
}
});
}
+
+ /**
+ * Tests the server behavior when an empty JSON object is sent.
+ */
+ public void testEmptyRequestBlankObject() {
+delayTestFinish(DELAY_TEST_FINISH);
+RequestTransport transport = req.getRequestTransport();
+transport.send({}, new TransportReceiver() {
+ @Override
+ public void onTransportFailure(ServerFailure failure) {
+fail();
+ }
+
+ @Override
+ public void onTransportSuccess(String payload) {
+ResponseMessage resp =
+AutoBeanCodex.decode(MessageFactoryHolder.FACTORY,
ResponseMessage.class, payload).as();
+ServerFailureMessage failure = resp.getGeneralFailure();
+assertNotNull(failure);
+finishTestAndReset();
+ }
+});
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * Tests the server behavior when a zero-length payload is sent.
+ */
+ public void testEmptyRequestZeroLength() {
+delayTestFinish(DELAY_TEST_FINISH);
+RequestTransport transport = req.getRequestTransport();
+transport.send(, new TransportReceiver() {
+ @Override
+ public void onTransportFailure(ServerFailure failure) {
+// Expect a 500 since the payload is malformed
+finishTestAndReset();
+ }
+
+ @Override
+ public void onTransportSuccess(String payload) {
+fail(Should not have succeeded);
+ }
+});
+ }
/**
* Tests that enum values used only as method parameters in a
[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r10483 committed - Integrate r10482 into GWT 2.4 branch....
Revision: 10483
Author: b...@google.com
Date: Sat Jul 30 02:20:04 2011
Log: Integrate r10482 into GWT 2.4 branch.
Issue 6628.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=10483
Modified:
/releases/2.4/user/src/com/google/web/bindery/requestfactory/server/SimpleRequestProcessor.java
/releases/2.4/user/test/com/google/web/bindery/requestfactory/gwt/client/RequestFactoryTest.java
===
---
/releases/2.4/user/src/com/google/web/bindery/requestfactory/server/SimpleRequestProcessor.java
Fri Jun 17 05:16:47 2011
+++
/releases/2.4/user/src/com/google/web/bindery/requestfactory/server/SimpleRequestProcessor.java
Sat Jul 30 02:20:04 2011
@@ -126,7 +126,6 @@
try {
process(req, responseBean.as());
} catch (ReportableException e) {
- e.printStackTrace();
// Create a new response envelope, since the state is unknown
responseBean = FACTORY.response();
responseBean.as().setGeneralFailure(createFailureMessage(e).as());
@@ -200,7 +199,12 @@
final RequestState source = new RequestState(service);
// Make sure the RequestFactory is valid
-service.resolveRequestFactory(req.getRequestFactory());
+String requestFactoryToken = req.getRequestFactory();
+if (requestFactoryToken == null) {
+ // Tell old clients to go away
+ throw new ReportableException(The client payload version is out of
sync with the server);
+}
+service.resolveRequestFactory(requestFactoryToken);
// Apply operations
processOperationMessages(source, req);
===
---
/releases/2.4/user/test/com/google/web/bindery/requestfactory/gwt/client/RequestFactoryTest.java
Fri Jun 17 05:16:47 2011
+++
/releases/2.4/user/test/com/google/web/bindery/requestfactory/gwt/client/RequestFactoryTest.java
Sat Jul 30 02:20:04 2011
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
*/
package com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.gwt.client;
+import com.google.web.bindery.autobean.shared.AutoBeanCodex;
import com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.EntityProxy;
import com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.EntityProxyChange;
import com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.EntityProxyId;
@@ -23,6 +24,8 @@
import com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.Receiver;
import com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.Request;
import com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.RequestContext;
+import com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.RequestTransport;
+import
com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.RequestTransport.TransportReceiver;
import com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.ServerFailure;
import com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.SimpleBarProxy;
import com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.SimpleBarRequest;
@@ -31,7 +34,10 @@
import com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.SimpleFooRequest;
import com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.SimpleValueContext;
import com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.SimpleValueProxy;
+import
com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.impl.MessageFactoryHolder;
import
com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.impl.SimpleEntityProxyId;
+import
com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.messages.ResponseMessage;
+import
com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.messages.ServerFailureMessage;
import java.math.BigDecimal;
import java.math.BigInteger;
@@ -563,6 +569,49 @@
}
});
}
+
+ /**
+ * Tests the server behavior when an empty JSON object is sent.
+ */
+ public void testEmptyRequestBlankObject() {
+delayTestFinish(DELAY_TEST_FINISH);
+RequestTransport transport = req.getRequestTransport();
+transport.send({}, new TransportReceiver() {
+ @Override
+ public void onTransportFailure(ServerFailure failure) {
+fail();
+ }
+
+ @Override
+ public void onTransportSuccess(String payload) {
+ResponseMessage resp =
+AutoBeanCodex.decode(MessageFactoryHolder.FACTORY,
ResponseMessage.class, payload).as();
+ServerFailureMessage failure = resp.getGeneralFailure();
+assertNotNull(failure);
+finishTestAndReset();
+ }
+});
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * Tests the server behavior when a zero-length payload is sent.
+ */
+ public void testEmptyRequestZeroLength() {
+delayTestFinish(DELAY_TEST_FINISH);
+RequestTransport transport = req.getRequestTransport();
+transport.send(, new TransportReceiver() {
+ @Override
+ public void onTransportFailure(ServerFailure failure) {
+// Expect a 500 since the payload is malformed
+finishTestAndReset();
+ }
+
+ @Override
+ public void onTransportSuccess(String payload) {
+fail(Should not have succeeded);
+ }
+});
+ }
/**
* Tests that enum values used only as method parameters in a
RequestContext
--
