Re: SYSTEM KEY Programming Was: IVSK and SPKA

2015-07-12 Thread Jim Mulder
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU wrote on 
07/12/2015 09:40:25 PM:

 From: Walt Farrell walt.farr...@gmail.com
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Date: 07/12/2015 11:08 PM
 Subject: Re: SYSTEM KEY Programming Was: IVSK and SPKA
 Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 
 On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 17:34:41 -0400, Scott Ford idfzos...@gmail.com 
wrote:
 
 No sir, its subpool=231, linkage=system, thus supervisor state required
 
 
 From Authorized Assembler Services description of the STORAGE macro:
 http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/iea2a4b1/
 11.1.1?SHELF=all13be9DT=20120813104512CASE= 
 or http://preview.tinyurl.com/o3ca8au
 quote
 
 Environment: The requirements for the caller are:
  ... 
 For LINKAGE=SYSTEM or LINKAGE=SVC: for all other 
 subpools [Walt: that is, for subpools except 0-127, 131, or 132], 
 one or more of the following: 
 
  °   Supervisor state 
  °   PSW key 0-7 
  °   APF-authorization.
 /quote
 
 -- 
 Walt

  APF-authorization checking was added for STORAGE with LINKAGE=SYSTEM
in z/OS 1.10. 

Jim Mulder   z/OS System Test   IBM Corp.  Poughkeepsie,  NY

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SYSTEM KEY Programming Was: IVSK and SPKA

2015-07-12 Thread Walt Farrell
On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 20:42:19 +0300, Binyamin Dissen 
bdis...@dissensoftware.com wrote:

On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 12:54:02 -0400 Scott Ford idfzos...@gmail.com wrote:

:I have question then

:I inherited some code..it's called passed a value for a storage obtain...
:Before the obtain, they go into mode=sup, storage
:obtain,length(value),sp=231,loc=any, then back into mode=prog. Is this the
:old way of setting key zero or a piece of storage ?

CSA allocations via the STORAGE macro requires supervisor state.


If I've read the book correctly, PSW key 0-7 or APF authorization should also 
work. And if Scott's code doesn't already have one of those wouldn't the 
MODESET to supervisor state fail?

-- 
Walt

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SYSTEM KEY Programming Was: IVSK and SPKA

2015-07-12 Thread Scott Ford
No sir, its subpool=231, linkage=system, thus supervisor state required

Scott

On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Walt Farrell walt.farr...@gmail.com
wrote:

 On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 20:42:19 +0300, Binyamin Dissen 
 bdis...@dissensoftware.com wrote:

 On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 12:54:02 -0400 Scott Ford idfzos...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
 :I have question then
 
 :I inherited some code..it's called passed a value for a storage
 obtain...
 :Before the obtain, they go into mode=sup, storage
 :obtain,length(value),sp=231,loc=any, then back into mode=prog. Is this
 the
 :old way of setting key zero or a piece of storage ?
 
 CSA allocations via the STORAGE macro requires supervisor state.
 

 If I've read the book correctly, PSW key 0-7 or APF authorization should
 also work. And if Scott's code doesn't already have one of those wouldn't
 the MODESET to supervisor state fail?

 --
 Walt

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SYSTEM KEY Programming Was: IVSK and SPKA

2015-07-12 Thread Shane Ginnane
Two threads in a couple of weeks re the inability of people to learn MVS 
principles properly these days.
Terrible indictment of the OCO decision years ago that public lists like this 
are now the proxy mentor that some of us were fortunate enough to have had when 
we needed one.

Enough from me - hooroo.
Shane ...

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SYSTEM KEY Programming Was: IVSK and SPKA

2015-07-12 Thread Walt Farrell
On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 17:34:41 -0400, Scott Ford idfzos...@gmail.com wrote:

No sir, its subpool=231, linkage=system, thus supervisor state required


From Authorized Assembler Services description of the STORAGE macro:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/iea2a4b1/11.1.1?SHELF=all13be9DT=20120813104512CASE=
 
or http://preview.tinyurl.com/o3ca8au
quote
   
Environment: The requirements for the caller are:
 ... 
For LINKAGE=SYSTEM or LINKAGE=SVC: for all other 
subpools [Walt: that is, for subpools except 0-127, 131, or 132], one or more 
of the following:  
  
 °   Supervisor state 
 °   PSW key 0-7  
 °   APF-authorization.
/quote

-- 
Walt

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: PAGE DS SLOTS TYPE75

2015-07-12 Thread R Hey
Thanks Barry.

for the archive:
print PAGETYPE PAGEDSN to see that figures are for LOCAL/PLPA/COMMON 
the repeated lower #s were for PLPA  COMMON.

Cheers.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: XCF HELP!

2015-07-12 Thread Ed Finnell
It may really be 'broke'. I'd open a sevcrit to get the CE's  dispatched.
 
 
In a message dated 7/12/2015 1:29:45 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
pinnc...@rochester.rr.com writes:

If that  doesn't work, try CONFIG CHP OFF and ON (assuming that there 
are no other  devices you need on that CHPID).  I'm thinking either one 
or both of  the varies may be required to clear the  intervention.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SYSTEM KEY Programming Was: IVSK and SPKA

2015-07-12 Thread Jim
Rob.

LOL !! ... 

My apologies and yes, IMS does indeed (and DB2) use key7. I don't have the 
specific posts at hand 
but, I'll try to find one or two that speaks of key2 usage by IMS and, if / 
when I do, I'll send it over..  

Key9 is also used by CICS in certain circumstances (as an example, BSG type 
code and IIRC, debuggers).


Kind Regards,

Jim Thomas

617-233-4130  (mobile)
636-327-7333  (res / wrk)
j...@thethomasresidence.us   (pvt email)

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Rob Scott
Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2015 5:47 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SYSTEM KEY Programming Was: IVSK and SPKA

Jim,

Yeah - perhaps I should have said well known IBM products.

ISVs can and do use both key2 and key4 (myself included).

I thought IMS was key7 along with MQ and DB2

For the archives, here is the current key usage of IBM software that I am aware 
of :

0Supervisor
1Job scheduler
3Availability manager
5Data management
6Communications (VTAM, TCP/IP)
7DB2, IMS and MQ
8,9V=V problem programs
10-15V=R problem programs


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Jim
Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2015 6:23 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SYSTEM KEY Programming Was: IVSK and SPKA

Rob,

Forgive me, I strongly agree and advocate what you've stated but 

Strobe runs (for the most part) in key 2. Further, key 2 used to be used by 
VSCR (in the good ol' days) but, IIRC, IMS is (or has) ramping up with key 2 
usage.

Worthless bit of trivia perhaps but .. just thought I'd put it out there.


Kind Regards,

Jim Thomas

617-233-4130 (mobile)
636-327-7333 (res / wrk)
j...@thethomasresidence.us   (pvt email)

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Rob Scott
Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2015 4:55 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SYSTEM KEY Programming Was: IVSK and SPKA

I spend quite a lot of time writing code for software products that have to do 
things beyond the scope of normal problem state.

The problem with going to key0 is pretty much always not what you intended to 
do - but what happens when your code goes wrong (and everyone's code goes 
wrong) or when your caller passes you something bad by error or by design.

This is why I avoid key0 as much as I possibly can - and the way to do that if 
you are writing system software is take advantage of a SCHEDxx PARMLIB setting 
and declare your server jobstep program as running in *another* system key. Of 
the remaining seven keys, two of them (key2 and key4) seem to not be used by 
any well-known current software products.

Once your server jobstep program is running non-key0 system key, most of the 
authorized services can be called without having to switch to key0 - and this 
can only be good news for your code and your customers systems.

Client code, of course, should always run in problem state and use a 
well-defined and secure method to communicate to your server (for example a 
space-switch PC).

Anyone writing authorized code should read and understand the system integrity 
issues and there are some very good presentations given by Karl Schmitz out 
there on the internet.

I think that what is lacking in the Authorized Programming manuals is a really 
well written example of how to implement a client server application. While the 
descriptions of the services and their parameters are well documented, a decent 
working example would really help the community understand the issues and 
prevent the proliferation of public domain code with (how shall I put it?) 
non-optimal designs.

Rob Scott
Principal Software Engineer
Rocket Software
77 Fourth Avenue . Suite 100 . Waltham . MA 02451-1468 . USA
Tel: +1.781.684.2305
Email: rsc...@rs.com
Web: www.rocketsoftware.com

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Blaicher, Christopher Y.
Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2015 5:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SYSTEM KEY Programming Was: IVSK and SPKA

Interesting question that I haven't really thought too much about because when 
I have to do something special, generally it is key 0.

With that said, in a previous life I wrote utilities for DB2.  For those we got 
into key 7 as the default because that is what DB2 runs in.  There are ways to 
attach a task in a key other than 8, but that is another topic.  In the 
processing of the utilities we still had to get to key 0 and get back, so it 
was no different, except that the base key was different.

In the Diagnosis Manual, in the Storage section, there is a brief list of the 
storage 

Re: SYSTEM KEY Programming Was: IVSK and SPKA

2015-07-12 Thread Steve Thompson
If it still exists, IBM Prolog for 370, the MVS version (as 
opposed to the original which ran under VM/CMS) uses keys beyond 9.


In fact, we were in the middle of Beta tests when I had to go 
back and change code from using KEY9 because of what CICS had 
just done (circa 1991). Apparently someone doing testing of 
Prolog with CICS found that our code was causing CICS a migraine.


And hasn't support for DAT OFF (V=R) been dropped? Only the DAT 
OFF nucleus actually runs DAT OFF now?


Regards,
Steve Thompson

On 07/11/2015 06:47 PM, Rob Scott wrote:

Jim,

Yeah - perhaps I should have said well known IBM products.

ISVs can and do use both key2 and key4 (myself included).

I thought IMS was key7 along with MQ and DB2

For the archives, here is the current key usage of IBM software that I am aware 
of :

0Supervisor
1Job scheduler
3Availability manager
5Data management
6Communications (VTAM, TCP/IP)
7DB2, IMS and MQ
8,9V=V problem programs
10-15V=R problem programs



SNIPPAGE

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


XCF HELP!

2015-07-12 Thread Crabtree, Anne D
For the first time ever, when shutting down an LPAR in a sysplex, I forgot to 
issue the V XCF,lparname,OFF!

Now, I can't get that LPAR to join the sysplex.  Luckily, the important LPAR is 
up.  The second LPAR is supposed to be in a sysplex and I am the only one using 
it.  It currently has z/os 2.1 running on  it.

I keep getting error:
IXC409D
SIGNAL PATHS BETWEEN sysname1 AND sysname2 ARE LOST. REPLY RETRY OR 
SYSNAME=SYSNAME OF THE SYSTEM TO BE REMOVED.

I've tried to RETRY and to give it SYSNAME that's down, but nothing helps!  I'm 
sure there's some SETXCF command I need to do, but I've never done this before 
so I'm unsure.

I put a question in to IBM but won't hear back till tomorrow.  It would be nice 
if someone is out there and can help me!!

Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
Bldg 6, Room B-110
Charleston, WV  25305
(304)957-8292
(304)558-1441 fax


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SYSTEM KEY Programming Was: IVSK and SPKA

2015-07-12 Thread Rob Scott
In one word - carefully.

Treat every instruction that you execute in key0 as being a candidate to cause 
the next unscheduled IPL.

I would advise to straddle the code that *actually* requires key0 with a save 
current key, go to key0 and then a restore saved key sequence - I typically 
put this in a macro.

Make sure that your recovery routines are aware that this code can key-switch 
and let them restore the environment cleanly.

Always be aware of the key of your caller and use it to read and write data 
owned by them - MVCDK and MVCSK are your friends (also good candidates for 
macro encapsulation).

SAF protect any services that you provide to problem state callers.

Never return to your caller with any changes to their execution authority.

Test your code (on a test system) with the dirty regs and dirty 
getmain/freemain diagnostic traps.



-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Scott Ford
Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 11:57 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SYSTEM KEY Programming Was: IVSK and SPKA

With all the discussion, what's the safest way to use key=0 , if it is required 
?

Scott

On Sunday, July 12, 2015, Tom Marchant  
000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:

 On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 11:29:01 -0400, Steve Thompson  wrote:

 And hasn't support for DAT OFF (V=R) been dropped? Only the DAT OFF
 nucleus actually runs DAT OFF now?

 V=R doesn't mean DAT off.
 Just that virtual addresses map to the same real addresses.

 I've never seen anything that ran V=R, but ADDRSPC=REAL is still
 documented.

 --
 Tom Marchant

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
 email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu javascript:; with the message:
 INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Rocket Software, Inc. and subsidiaries ■ 77 Fourth Avenue, Waltham MA 02451 ■ 
+1 800.966.3270 ■ +1 781.577.4321
Unsubscribe From Commercial Email – unsubscr...@rocketsoftware.com
Manage Your Subscription Preferences - 
http://info.rocketsoftware.com/GlobalSubscriptionManagementEmailFooter_SubscriptionCenter.html
Privacy Policy - http://www.rocketsoftware.com/company/legal/privacy-policy


This communication and any attachments may contain confidential information of 
Rocket Software, Inc. All unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is 
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Rocket 
Software immediately and destroy all copies of this communication. Thank you.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SYSTEM KEY Programming Was: IVSK and SPKA

2015-07-12 Thread Charles Mills
As little as possible. g

Don't leave yourself in key 0 because you're going to need it again in 20 
instructions. Get in and get out. Five years from now some other programmer may 
introduce a branch out in the middle of your 20 instructions, with potentially 
unhappy results.

Comment the code to help reduce the above possibility:


*** Entering key 0 *


*** Exiting key 0 **

Desk check, desk check, desk check.

Don't use key 0 simply because it is easier or simpler to code than using some 
particular non-8 key.

Charles

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Scott Ford
Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 8:57 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SYSTEM KEY Programming Was: IVSK and SPKA

With all the discussion, what's the safest way to use key=0 , if it is required 
?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SYSTEM KEY Programming Was: IVSK and SPKA

2015-07-12 Thread Scott Ford
Binyamin,

I thought that might be the case.

Todah habah

Regards,
Scott

On Sunday, July 12, 2015, Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com
wrote:

 On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 12:54:02 -0400 Scott Ford idfzos...@gmail.com
 javascript:; wrote:

 :I have question then

 :I inherited some code..it's called passed a value for a storage obtain...
 :Before the obtain, they go into mode=sup, storage
 :obtain,length(value),sp=231,loc=any, then back into mode=prog. Is this
 the
 :old way of setting key zero or a piece of storage ?

 CSA allocations via the STORAGE macro requires supervisor state.

 --
 Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com javascript:;
 http://www.dissensoftware.com

 Director, Dissen Software, Bar  Grill - Israel


 Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
 you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.

 I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems,
 especially those from irresponsible companies.

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu javascript:; with the message:
 INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SYSTEM KEY Programming Was: IVSK and SPKA

2015-07-12 Thread Tom Marchant
On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 11:29:01 -0400, Steve Thompson  wrote:

And hasn't support for DAT OFF (V=R) been dropped? Only the DAT
OFF nucleus actually runs DAT OFF now?

V=R doesn't mean DAT off.
Just that virtual addresses map to the same real addresses.

I've never seen anything that ran V=R, but ADDRSPC=REAL 
is still documented.

-- 
Tom Marchant

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SYSTEM KEY Programming Was: IVSK and SPKA

2015-07-12 Thread Scott Ford
I have question then

I inherited some code..it's called passed a value for a storage obtain...
Before the obtain, they go into mode=sup, storage
obtain,length(value),sp=231,loc=any, then back into mode=prog. Is this the
old way of setting key zero or a piece of storage ?

Scott

On Sunday, July 12, 2015, Rob Scott rsc...@rocketsoftware.com wrote:

 In one word - carefully.

 Treat every instruction that you execute in key0 as being a candidate to
 cause the next unscheduled IPL.

 I would advise to straddle the code that *actually* requires key0 with a
 save current key, go to key0 and then a restore saved key sequence - I
 typically put this in a macro.

 Make sure that your recovery routines are aware that this code can
 key-switch and let them restore the environment cleanly.

 Always be aware of the key of your caller and use it to read and write
 data owned by them - MVCDK and MVCSK are your friends (also good candidates
 for macro encapsulation).

 SAF protect any services that you provide to problem state callers.

 Never return to your caller with any changes to their execution authority.

 Test your code (on a test system) with the dirty regs and dirty
 getmain/freemain diagnostic traps.



 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 javascript:;] On Behalf Of Scott Ford
 Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 11:57 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU javascript:;
 Subject: Re: SYSTEM KEY Programming Was: IVSK and SPKA

 With all the discussion, what's the safest way to use key=0 , if it is
 required ?

 Scott

 On Sunday, July 12, 2015, Tom Marchant 
 000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu javascript:; wrote:

  On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 11:29:01 -0400, Steve Thompson  wrote:
 
  And hasn't support for DAT OFF (V=R) been dropped? Only the DAT OFF
  nucleus actually runs DAT OFF now?
 
  V=R doesn't mean DAT off.
  Just that virtual addresses map to the same real addresses.
 
  I've never seen anything that ran V=R, but ADDRSPC=REAL is still
  documented.
 
  --
  Tom Marchant
 
  --
  For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
  email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu javascript:; javascript:; with
 the message:
  INFO IBM-MAIN
 

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
 to lists...@listserv.ua.edu javascript:; with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
 
 Rocket Software, Inc. and subsidiaries ■ 77 Fourth Avenue, Waltham MA
 02451 ■ +1 800.966.3270 ■ +1 781.577.4321
 Unsubscribe From Commercial Email – unsubscr...@rocketsoftware.com
 javascript:;
 Manage Your Subscription Preferences -
 http://info.rocketsoftware.com/GlobalSubscriptionManagementEmailFooter_SubscriptionCenter.html
 Privacy Policy -
 http://www.rocketsoftware.com/company/legal/privacy-policy
 

 This communication and any attachments may contain confidential
 information of Rocket Software, Inc. All unauthorized use, disclosure or
 distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
 notify Rocket Software immediately and destroy all copies of this
 communication. Thank you.

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu javascript:; with the message:
 INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: XCF HELP!

2015-07-12 Thread Crabtree, Anne D
Doesn't help to system reset, then respond DOWN... I still crash when trying to 
activate.

Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer 
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
Bldg 6, Room B-110
Charleston, WV  25305
(304)957-8292 
(304)558-1441 fax


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Bill Bishop (TEMA TPC)
Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 12:26 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: XCF HELP!

Quickref says that you can reply SYSNAME=sysname,DOWN AFTER you have put the 
down'ed LPAR through a system reset.

Thanks

Bill Bishop

Specialist
Mainframe Support Group
Server Development  Support
Toyota Motor Engineering  Manufacturing North America, Inc.
bill.bis...@tema.toyota.com
(502) 570-6143

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Crabtree, Anne D
Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 12:18 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: XCF HELP!

For the first time ever, when shutting down an LPAR in a sysplex, I forgot to 
issue the V XCF,lparname,OFF!

Now, I can't get that LPAR to join the sysplex.  Luckily, the important LPAR is 
up.  The second LPAR is supposed to be in a sysplex and I am the only one using 
it.  It currently has z/os 2.1 running on  it.

I keep getting error:
IXC409D
SIGNAL PATHS BETWEEN sysname1 AND sysname2 ARE LOST. REPLY RETRY OR 
SYSNAME=SYSNAME OF THE SYSTEM TO BE REMOVED.

I've tried to RETRY and to give it SYSNAME that's down, but nothing helps!  I'm 
sure there's some SETXCF command I need to do, but I've never done this before 
so I'm unsure.

I put a question in to IBM but won't hear back till tomorrow.  It would be nice 
if someone is out there and can help me!!

Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
Bldg 6, Room B-110
Charleston, WV  25305
(304)957-8292
(304)558-1441 fax


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: XCF HELP!

2015-07-12 Thread Crabtree, Anne D
IXC466I INBOUND SIGNAL CONNECTIVITY ESTABLISHED WITH SYSTEM IPO2 245  
 VIA DEVICE 0342 WHICH IS CONNECTED TO DEVICE 0412 
 IXC466I OUTBOUND SIGNAL CONNECTIVITY ESTABLISHED WITH SYSTEM IPO2 246 
 VIA DEVICE 0343 WHICH IS CONNECTED TO DEVICE 0413 
 IXC466I INBOUND SIGNAL CONNECTIVITY ESTABLISHED WITH SYSTEM IPO2 247  
 VIA DEVICE 0340 WHICH IS CONNECTED TO DEVICE 0410 
 IXC466I OUTBOUND SIGNAL CONNECTIVITY ESTABLISHED WITH SYSTEM IPO2 248 
 VIA DEVICE 0341 WHICH IS CONNECTED TO DEVICE 0411 
 PXM4704 XMANAGER PLEXGRPX GRP= MEM=   
 PXM4704 XMANAGER PLEXGRPX GRP= MEM=   
 PXM4705 XMANAGER PLEXGRPX NEW=00 OLD=00 TYPE=0B   
 PXM4705 XMANAGER PLEXGRPX NEW=00 OLD=00 TYPE=0B   
 PXM4704 XMANAGER PLEXGRPX GRP= MEM=   
 PXM4705 XMANAGER PLEXGRPX NEW=00 OLD=00 TYPE=0B   
 ISG011I SYSTEM IPO2 - JOINING GRS COMPLEX 
 IXC467I RESTARTING PATHIN DEVICE 0340 256 
 USED TO COMMUNICATE WITH SYSTEM IPO2  
 RSN: INTERVENTION REQUIRED
 IXC467I RESTARTING PATHIN DEVICE 0342 257 
 USED TO COMMUNICATE WITH SYSTEM IPO2  
 RSN: INTERVENTION REQUIRED
 IXC467I RESTARTING PATHOUT DEVICE 0341 258
 USED TO COMMUNICATE WITH SYSTEM IPO2  
 RSN: INTERVENTION REQUIRED
 IXC467I RESTARTING PATHOUT DEVICE 0343 260
 USED TO COMMUNICATE WITH SYSTEM IPO2  
 RSN: INTERVENTION REQUIRED
*18 IXC409D SIGNAL PATHS BETWEEN IPO2 AND IPO1 ARE LOST. REPLY RETRY OR
 SYSNAME=SYSNAME OF THE SYSTEM TO BE REMOVED.  
 CTM916W PROGRAM CTMCKP   WAITING FOR CTM.CKPT  10 SEC 
 CTM916W PROGRAM CTMCKP   WAITING FOR CTM.CKPT  70 SEC 
 R 18,SYSNAME=IPO2,DOWN
 IEE600I REPLY TO 18 IS;SYSNAME=IPO2,DOWN  
*19 IXC417D CONFIRM REQUEST TO REMOVE IPO2 FROM THE SYSPLEX. REPLY 
 SYSNAME=IPO2 TO REMOVE IPO2 OR C TO CANCEL.   
 R 19,SYSNAME=IPO2 
 IEE600I REPLY TO 19 IS;SYSNAME=IPO2   
 IXC101I SYSPLEX PARTITIONING IN PROGRESS FOR IPO2 REQUESTED BY 270
 XCFAS. REASON: SYSTEM ENTERED WAIT STATE  
*ISG178E GLOBAL RESOURCE SERIALIZATION HAS BEEN DISRUPTED.  GLOBAL 
RESOURCE REQUESTORS WILL BE SUSPENDED.   
IXC808I ELEMENTS FROM TERMINATED SYSTEM IPO2 WERE NOT PROCESSED BY 272   
THIS SYSTEM.  ARM COUPLE DATA SET IS NOT AVAILABLE TO THIS SYSTEM.   
IXC105I SYSPLEX PARTITIONING HAS COMPLETED FOR IPO2 273  
- PRIMARY REASON: SYSTEM ENTERED WAIT STATE  
- REASON FLAGS: 22   
ISG179I SYSTEM IPO1 INITIATED AUTO RESTART PROCESSING.   
ISG175I SYSTEM IPO1 RESTARTED GLOBAL RESOURCE SERIALIZATION. 
ISG011I SYSTEM IPO2 - BEING PURGED FROM GRS COMPLEX  
ISG013I SYSTEM IPO2 - PURGED FROM GRS COMPLEX

But if I try to activate IPO2 after this, I get same IXC409I message.

Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer 
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
Bldg 6, Room B-110
Charleston, WV  25305
(304)957-8292 
(304)558-1441 fax


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 12:45 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: XCF HELP!

A question or two.
Did you wait long enough when the IXC409D was produced?
The system continues and will process the response when entered.
Cross-system coupling facility (XCF) tries to restart the signaling path. If 
XCF restores connectivity, the message will be deleted before it is answered. 
If XCF cannot fully restore connectivity between the two systems, the system 
issues message IXC409D again.


Did you see any other IXC message?
IXC402D or IXC102A, XCF signaling connectivity to the removed system is no 
longer relevant and the system deletes the message.

Could you post the RSP to the IXC409D you entered?  And any additional messages 
that occurred after that?


Not sure what is going on at this point.  So, the worst case scenario would be 

Re: SYSTEM KEY Programming Was: IVSK and SPKA

2015-07-12 Thread Scott Ford
With all the discussion, what's the safest way to use key=0 , if it is
required ?

Scott

On Sunday, July 12, 2015, Tom Marchant 
000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:

 On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 11:29:01 -0400, Steve Thompson  wrote:

 And hasn't support for DAT OFF (V=R) been dropped? Only the DAT
 OFF nucleus actually runs DAT OFF now?

 V=R doesn't mean DAT off.
 Just that virtual addresses map to the same real addresses.

 I've never seen anything that ran V=R, but ADDRSPC=REAL
 is still documented.

 --
 Tom Marchant

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu javascript:; with the message:
 INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: XCF HELP!

2015-07-12 Thread Lizette Koehler
A question or two.
Did you wait long enough when the IXC409D was produced?
The system continues and will process the response when entered.
Cross-system coupling facility (XCF) tries to restart the signaling path. If
XCF restores connectivity, the message will be deleted before it is
answered. If XCF cannot fully restore connectivity between the two systems,
the system issues message IXC409D again.


Did you see any other IXC message?
IXC402D or IXC102A, XCF signaling connectivity to the removed system is no
longer relevant and the system deletes the message.

Could you post the RSP to the IXC409D you entered?  And any additional
messages that occurred after that?


Not sure what is going on at this point.  So, the worst case scenario would
be a sysplex wide COLD start.  All LPARs down, then one up with INITIAL, the
rest JOIN.  But that is not necessarily what is needed, just what might be
the very worst thing that might need to be done.

Nice webpage with XCF Commands summary
http://www.oocities.org/smtwango/MAINFRAME/MFCOMMANDS/sysplexcmd.html



Thanks

Lizette

 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
 On Behalf Of Crabtree, Anne D
 Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 9:18 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: XCF HELP!
 
 For the first time ever, when shutting down an LPAR in a sysplex, I forgot
to
 issue the V XCF,lparname,OFF!
 
 Now, I can't get that LPAR to join the sysplex.  Luckily, the important
LPAR is
 up.  The second LPAR is supposed to be in a sysplex and I am the only one
 using it.  It currently has z/os 2.1 running on  it.
 
 I keep getting error:
 IXC409D
 SIGNAL PATHS BETWEEN sysname1 AND sysname2 ARE LOST. REPLY RETRY
 OR SYSNAME=SYSNAME OF THE SYSTEM TO BE REMOVED.
 
 I've tried to RETRY and to give it SYSNAME that's down, but nothing helps!
 I'm sure there's some SETXCF command I need to do, but I've never done
 this before so I'm unsure.
 
 I put a question in to IBM but won't hear back till tomorrow.  It would be
nice
 if someone is out there and can help me!!
 
 Anne D. Crabtree
 System Programmer
 WV Office of Technology Data Center
 1900 Kanawha Blvd East
 Bldg 6, Room B-110
 Charleston, WV  25305
 (304)957-8292
 (304)558-1441 fax
 
 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: XCF HELP!

2015-07-12 Thread Thomas Conley

On 7/12/2015 12:51 PM, Crabtree, Anne D wrote:

IXC466I INBOUND SIGNAL CONNECTIVITY ESTABLISHED WITH SYSTEM IPO2 245
  VIA DEVICE 0342 WHICH IS CONNECTED TO DEVICE 0412
  IXC466I OUTBOUND SIGNAL CONNECTIVITY ESTABLISHED WITH SYSTEM IPO2 246
  VIA DEVICE 0343 WHICH IS CONNECTED TO DEVICE 0413
  IXC466I INBOUND SIGNAL CONNECTIVITY ESTABLISHED WITH SYSTEM IPO2 247
  VIA DEVICE 0340 WHICH IS CONNECTED TO DEVICE 0410
  IXC466I OUTBOUND SIGNAL CONNECTIVITY ESTABLISHED WITH SYSTEM IPO2 248
  VIA DEVICE 0341 WHICH IS CONNECTED TO DEVICE 0411
  PXM4704 XMANAGER PLEXGRPX GRP= MEM=
  PXM4704 XMANAGER PLEXGRPX GRP= MEM=
  PXM4705 XMANAGER PLEXGRPX NEW=00 OLD=00 TYPE=0B
  PXM4705 XMANAGER PLEXGRPX NEW=00 OLD=00 TYPE=0B
  PXM4704 XMANAGER PLEXGRPX GRP= MEM=
  PXM4705 XMANAGER PLEXGRPX NEW=00 OLD=00 TYPE=0B
  ISG011I SYSTEM IPO2 - JOINING GRS COMPLEX
  IXC467I RESTARTING PATHIN DEVICE 0340 256
  USED TO COMMUNICATE WITH SYSTEM IPO2
  RSN: INTERVENTION REQUIRED
  IXC467I RESTARTING PATHIN DEVICE 0342 257
  USED TO COMMUNICATE WITH SYSTEM IPO2
  RSN: INTERVENTION REQUIRED
  IXC467I RESTARTING PATHOUT DEVICE 0341 258
  USED TO COMMUNICATE WITH SYSTEM IPO2
  RSN: INTERVENTION REQUIRED
  IXC467I RESTARTING PATHOUT DEVICE 0343 260
  USED TO COMMUNICATE WITH SYSTEM IPO2
  RSN: INTERVENTION REQUIRED
*18 IXC409D SIGNAL PATHS BETWEEN IPO2 AND IPO1 ARE LOST. REPLY RETRY OR
  SYSNAME=SYSNAME OF THE SYSTEM TO BE REMOVED.
  CTM916W PROGRAM CTMCKP   WAITING FOR CTM.CKPT  10 SEC
  CTM916W PROGRAM CTMCKP   WAITING FOR CTM.CKPT  70 SEC
  R 18,SYSNAME=IPO2,DOWN
  IEE600I REPLY TO 18 IS;SYSNAME=IPO2,DOWN
*19 IXC417D CONFIRM REQUEST TO REMOVE IPO2 FROM THE SYSPLEX. REPLY
  SYSNAME=IPO2 TO REMOVE IPO2 OR C TO CANCEL.
  R 19,SYSNAME=IPO2
  IEE600I REPLY TO 19 IS;SYSNAME=IPO2
  IXC101I SYSPLEX PARTITIONING IN PROGRESS FOR IPO2 REQUESTED BY 270
  XCFAS. REASON: SYSTEM ENTERED WAIT STATE
*ISG178E GLOBAL RESOURCE SERIALIZATION HAS BEEN DISRUPTED.  GLOBAL
RESOURCE REQUESTORS WILL BE SUSPENDED.
IXC808I ELEMENTS FROM TERMINATED SYSTEM IPO2 WERE NOT PROCESSED BY 272
THIS SYSTEM.  ARM COUPLE DATA SET IS NOT AVAILABLE TO THIS SYSTEM.
IXC105I SYSPLEX PARTITIONING HAS COMPLETED FOR IPO2 273
- PRIMARY REASON: SYSTEM ENTERED WAIT STATE
- REASON FLAGS: 22
ISG179I SYSTEM IPO1 INITIATED AUTO RESTART PROCESSING.
ISG175I SYSTEM IPO1 RESTARTED GLOBAL RESOURCE SERIALIZATION.
ISG011I SYSTEM IPO2 - BEING PURGED FROM GRS COMPLEX
ISG013I SYSTEM IPO2 - PURGED FROM GRS COMPLEX




Anne,

I would try to VARY 0340-0343,OFFLINE to both systems, then VARY ONLINE. 
 If that doesn't work, try CONFIG CHP OFF and ON (assuming that there 
are no other devices you need on that CHPID).  I'm thinking either one 
or both of the varies may be required to clear the intervention.


Regards,
Tom Conley

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: HMIGRATE vs. ENQ

2015-07-12 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 21:26:56 -0400, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:

My suggestion was to the question of how to insure the dataset was
still ENQ'ed until job end not how to do an early DEQ while the job
was still running.
 
Your suggestion does not address the problem with I opened the
thread; it could only aggravate it.  Others had hijacked the thread
and you were answering them, not me.

In fact, I submitted a batch job:

//STEP1  IEFBR14 DISP=OLD

//STEP2  IKJEFT01 HMIGRATE

STEP1 waited for several hours for all the Browsers to log off.
At that point, by good fortune, there were no remaining ENQs
and HMIGRATE succeeded.  If there had been further ENQs
(I can't control this) HMIGRATE would have failed.

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SYSTEM KEY Programming Was: IVSK and SPKA

2015-07-12 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 01:26:44 -0500, Shane Ginnane wrote:

Two threads in a couple of weeks re the inability of people to learn MVS 
principles properly these days.
Terrible indictment of the OCO decision years ago that public lists like this 
are now the proxy mentor that some of us were fortunate enough to have had 
when we needed one.

Enough from me - hooroo.
 
That edge can cut in both directions.  Conversely, any programmer
able to read the source code is likely to feel entitled and competent
to modify it.

I am not an advocate of OCO; I prefer other controls.

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: XCF HELP!

2015-07-12 Thread Crabtree, Anne D
Tried that.  Still get message.  Will try again.  

Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer 
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
Bldg 6, Room B-110
Charleston, WV  25305
(304)957-8292 
(304)558-1441 fax

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Bill Bishop (TEMA TPC)
Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 12:26 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: XCF HELP!

Quickref says that you can reply SYSNAME=sysname,DOWN AFTER you have put the 
down'ed LPAR through a system reset.

Thanks

Bill Bishop

Specialist
Mainframe Support Group
Server Development  Support
Toyota Motor Engineering  Manufacturing North America, Inc.
bill.bis...@tema.toyota.com
(502) 570-6143

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Crabtree, Anne D
Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 12:18 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: XCF HELP!

For the first time ever, when shutting down an LPAR in a sysplex, I forgot to 
issue the V XCF,lparname,OFF!

Now, I can't get that LPAR to join the sysplex.  Luckily, the important LPAR is 
up.  The second LPAR is supposed to be in a sysplex and I am the only one using 
it.  It currently has z/os 2.1 running on  it.

I keep getting error:
IXC409D
SIGNAL PATHS BETWEEN sysname1 AND sysname2 ARE LOST. REPLY RETRY OR 
SYSNAME=SYSNAME OF THE SYSTEM TO BE REMOVED.

I've tried to RETRY and to give it SYSNAME that's down, but nothing helps!  I'm 
sure there's some SETXCF command I need to do, but I've never done this before 
so I'm unsure.

I put a question in to IBM but won't hear back till tomorrow.  It would be nice 
if someone is out there and can help me!!

Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
Bldg 6, Room B-110
Charleston, WV  25305
(304)957-8292
(304)558-1441 fax


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: XCF HELP!

2015-07-12 Thread Bill Bishop (TEMA TPC)
Quickref says that you can reply SYSNAME=sysname,DOWN AFTER you have put the 
down'ed LPAR through a system reset.

Thanks

Bill Bishop

Specialist
Mainframe Support Group
Server Development  Support
Toyota Motor Engineering  Manufacturing North America, Inc.
bill.bis...@tema.toyota.com
(502) 570-6143

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Crabtree, Anne D
Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 12:18 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: XCF HELP!

For the first time ever, when shutting down an LPAR in a sysplex, I forgot to 
issue the V XCF,lparname,OFF!

Now, I can't get that LPAR to join the sysplex.  Luckily, the important LPAR is 
up.  The second LPAR is supposed to be in a sysplex and I am the only one using 
it.  It currently has z/os 2.1 running on  it.

I keep getting error:
IXC409D
SIGNAL PATHS BETWEEN sysname1 AND sysname2 ARE LOST. REPLY RETRY OR 
SYSNAME=SYSNAME OF THE SYSTEM TO BE REMOVED.

I've tried to RETRY and to give it SYSNAME that's down, but nothing helps!  I'm 
sure there's some SETXCF command I need to do, but I've never done this before 
so I'm unsure.

I put a question in to IBM but won't hear back till tomorrow.  It would be nice 
if someone is out there and can help me!!

Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
Bldg 6, Room B-110
Charleston, WV  25305
(304)957-8292
(304)558-1441 fax


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SYSTEM KEY Programming Was: IVSK and SPKA

2015-07-12 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 12:54:02 -0400 Scott Ford idfzos...@gmail.com wrote:

:I have question then

:I inherited some code..it's called passed a value for a storage obtain...
:Before the obtain, they go into mode=sup, storage
:obtain,length(value),sp=231,loc=any, then back into mode=prog. Is this the
:old way of setting key zero or a piece of storage ?

CSA allocations via the STORAGE macro requires supervisor state.

--
Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com
http://www.dissensoftware.com

Director, Dissen Software, Bar  Grill - Israel


Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.

I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems,
especially those from irresponsible companies.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: XCF HELP!

2015-07-12 Thread Jim
Ma'am,

I believe that XCF / GRS are having problems with your CDS's and or, perhaps
even
alternate CDS's. 

I suggest checking XCF and GRS on all systems while this is in progress,
with 
commands such as D XCF,S,ALL and D GRS to find their status. Please check
for
INACTIVE and or QUIESCE'd paths .. if this is the case .. you might have to
issue
PATHIN / OUT to recover. XCF has to be has to be able to signal other
images. 

If you find problematic paths... please give GRS enough time (I usually ask
that you
give it at least ten to fifteen minutes ... just to be on the safe side) to
try and recover.

If you still see GRS INACTIVE or QUIESCE'd status thereafter, try to QUIESCE
the 
'dead' system (IPO2 in this instance I think).

If the above is unsuccessful, try to SETXCF STOP / START POLICY. 


Kind Regards,

Jim Thomas

617-233-4130  (mobile)
636-327-7333  (res / wrk)
j...@thethomasresidence.us   (pvt email)

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Crabtree, Anne D
Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 11:52 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: XCF HELP!

IXC466I INBOUND SIGNAL CONNECTIVITY ESTABLISHED WITH SYSTEM IPO2 245  
 VIA DEVICE 0342 WHICH IS CONNECTED TO DEVICE 0412 
 IXC466I OUTBOUND SIGNAL CONNECTIVITY ESTABLISHED WITH SYSTEM IPO2 246 
 VIA DEVICE 0343 WHICH IS CONNECTED TO DEVICE 0413 
 IXC466I INBOUND SIGNAL CONNECTIVITY ESTABLISHED WITH SYSTEM IPO2 247  
 VIA DEVICE 0340 WHICH IS CONNECTED TO DEVICE 0410 
 IXC466I OUTBOUND SIGNAL CONNECTIVITY ESTABLISHED WITH SYSTEM IPO2 248 
 VIA DEVICE 0341 WHICH IS CONNECTED TO DEVICE 0411 
 PXM4704 XMANAGER PLEXGRPX GRP= MEM=   
 PXM4704 XMANAGER PLEXGRPX GRP= MEM=   
 PXM4705 XMANAGER PLEXGRPX NEW=00 OLD=00 TYPE=0B   
 PXM4705 XMANAGER PLEXGRPX NEW=00 OLD=00 TYPE=0B   
 PXM4704 XMANAGER PLEXGRPX GRP= MEM=   
 PXM4705 XMANAGER PLEXGRPX NEW=00 OLD=00 TYPE=0B   
 ISG011I SYSTEM IPO2 - JOINING GRS COMPLEX 
 IXC467I RESTARTING PATHIN DEVICE 0340 256 
 USED TO COMMUNICATE WITH SYSTEM IPO2  
 RSN: INTERVENTION REQUIRED
 IXC467I RESTARTING PATHIN DEVICE 0342 257 
 USED TO COMMUNICATE WITH SYSTEM IPO2  
 RSN: INTERVENTION REQUIRED
 IXC467I RESTARTING PATHOUT DEVICE 0341 258
 USED TO COMMUNICATE WITH SYSTEM IPO2  
 RSN: INTERVENTION REQUIRED
 IXC467I RESTARTING PATHOUT DEVICE 0343 260
 USED TO COMMUNICATE WITH SYSTEM IPO2  
 RSN: INTERVENTION REQUIRED
*18 IXC409D SIGNAL PATHS BETWEEN IPO2 AND IPO1 ARE LOST. REPLY RETRY OR
 SYSNAME=SYSNAME OF THE SYSTEM TO BE REMOVED.  
 CTM916W PROGRAM CTMCKP   WAITING FOR CTM.CKPT  10 SEC 
 CTM916W PROGRAM CTMCKP   WAITING FOR CTM.CKPT  70 SEC 
 R 18,SYSNAME=IPO2,DOWN
 IEE600I REPLY TO 18 IS;SYSNAME=IPO2,DOWN  
*19 IXC417D CONFIRM REQUEST TO REMOVE IPO2 FROM THE SYSPLEX. REPLY 
 SYSNAME=IPO2 TO REMOVE IPO2 OR C TO CANCEL.   
 R 19,SYSNAME=IPO2 
 IEE600I REPLY TO 19 IS;SYSNAME=IPO2   
 IXC101I SYSPLEX PARTITIONING IN PROGRESS FOR IPO2 REQUESTED BY 270
 XCFAS. REASON: SYSTEM ENTERED WAIT STATE  
*ISG178E GLOBAL RESOURCE SERIALIZATION HAS BEEN DISRUPTED.  GLOBAL 
RESOURCE REQUESTORS WILL BE SUSPENDED.   
IXC808I ELEMENTS FROM TERMINATED SYSTEM IPO2 WERE NOT PROCESSED BY 272   
THIS SYSTEM.  ARM COUPLE DATA SET IS NOT AVAILABLE TO THIS SYSTEM.   
IXC105I SYSPLEX PARTITIONING HAS COMPLETED FOR IPO2 273  
- PRIMARY REASON: SYSTEM ENTERED WAIT STATE  
- REASON FLAGS: 22   
ISG179I SYSTEM IPO1 INITIATED AUTO RESTART PROCESSING.   
ISG175I SYSTEM IPO1 RESTARTED GLOBAL RESOURCE SERIALIZATION. 
ISG011I SYSTEM IPO2 - BEING PURGED FROM GRS COMPLEX  
ISG013I SYSTEM IPO2 - PURGED FROM GRS COMPLEX