Re: [LegacyUG] Missing RINs

2010-05-24 Thread Martin Hahn
Thanks to those who answered my questions about how RINs (and other
numbering systems) might be used.  I appreciate the insight.

I also apologize for hijacking part of this thread onto a bit of a tangent.

--
Marty

On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Ron Ferguson
ronfergy@tiscali.co.ukwrote:

 Gene Young wrote:
  On 5/22/2010 6:11 PM, Ron Ferguson wrote:
  Martin,
 
 
  Secondly the file names for Pedigree webpages are the RIN with the
  .html extension, hance it is easier to think in RINs rather than
  names.
 
  Ron Ferguson
  _
 
 
  This is not true in every instance.  When I generate web pages Legacy
  orders the pages alphabetically then assigns file names sequentially,
  starting at i1.htm, i2.htm, ...ixxx.htm.  The file names bear no
  resemblance to the contents.  I have to rename every file generated to
  include the RIN, ie; i2356_Gene_Young.htm.  Since I have to rename the
  file anyway it is no more work to add the name with the RIN.


 With respect Gene, what I said was absolutely accurate, you are *NOT*
 referring to *Pedigree* webpages but Family Group, or similar.

 Ron Ferguson
 _

 *New* Tutorial: Add Location Pins to Google Earth
 http://www.fergys.co.uk
 Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw
 And the Fergusons of N.W. England
 




 Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

 Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

 Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

 Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

 To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp







Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




Re: [LegacyUG] Two Citation Questions...

2010-05-24 Thread Jenny M Benson
smithmp wrote
1.  There are times when I find in a source only the date of an event
such as a birth date but no location.  Then I'll find just the location
but not the date or at least not the full date.  How do I source it in
Legacy to reflect that a source had half of the birth date and another
source had the other half with out having to put an alt. birth event? 
Or is this the only way to do this?  Because if this is so then reports
like the Pedegree chart will only list half of the information.

In this situation - or when some of the information given I *know* to be
wrong and differs from what I have recorded - I write something like
relates to place of birth only in the Source Detail Comments field.
Where it's warranted I might also write Date of birth shown as 01 July
1900 is incorrect or Other Sources indicate that date of birth should
be 01 June 1900.
--
Jenny M Benson



Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





RE: [LegacyUG] Search function

2010-05-24 Thread Sherry/Support
Print the Search list making sure to include cemetery as one of the fields, 
save to CSV and then open that in your word processor, where you can sort on 
any column.

Thanks for using Legacy.

Sherry
Customer Support
Millennia Corporation
supp...@legacyfamilytree.com
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com

We are changing the world of genealogy!

-Original Message-
From: gcr...@juno.com [mailto:gcr...@juno.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2010 3:21 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Search function

I used the SEARCH function to extract information from my databaseall 
individuals buried in a given county. The search results contain *hits* for 
several individuals in different cemeteries.

How do I order the report from this search so that all individuals in the 
county are grouped according to the cemetery name and surname within the 
cemetery?

gc




Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] When a married couple have the same grandparents, how highlight this?

2010-05-24 Thread T Bredin
From Todd Bredin  May 24
YES - Connie Sheets on May 20 has the answer, she says for the Ancestor
Chart, on the Report Options Format Tab, ensure that Don't repeat
duplicate lines is checked.  When you check this box, the chart says
duplicate line, see page x   next to the second occurrence  of the pair.
Now I need to find how to do the same thing in the CHARTING program.

Thank you everyone for the lively discussion, and it has raised the question
if Legacy should ask you when it appears a duplicate person is being
entered.  This would have to be an option as, in my case - PA 1800s-  there
are plenty of duplicate first-last name combos in my ancestors, you have to
get into vital record dates to tell them apart, OR who their
parents/ancestors are, e.g. who you connect them to.

Yes mine were first cousins, not second.  My situation arose from piecing
together bits of relationships from different sources, and not knowing how
the wife, with a maiden name same as her husband, was related to him.  I
found they were first cousins by happening to see that the CHARTING ancestor
chart showed the same apparent couple at the grandparents level, and
pursuing that.

By the way, one thing I did was research if/when Pennsylvania had a law
about first cousins marrying, and it did pass a law in 1901 but before
that it was not illegal.
See  h
ttp://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=950CE2D81139EF32A25750C2A9609C946097D6CFhttp://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=950CE2D81139EF32A25750C2A9609C946097D6CF
I also found the following about 2009

 About half of the states allow first cousins to marry (2007) , according to
stateline.org, a research site on state laws.  PA does not. “   First
cousins who were denied a marriage license by a Pennsylvania judge earlier
this month [yr 200?] were wed in a civil ceremony in Maryland“

- Now [~ 2002] a study by the National Society of Genetic Counselors
  
sayshttp://www.ingenta.com/isis/searching/ExpandTOC/ingenta?issue=infobike://klu/jogc/2002/0011/0002index=2WebLogicSession=PLL5m8l54wPFB5UZ50jg|-1426079639200025319/-1052814329/6/7051/7051/7052/7052/7051/-1that
having a child with your first cousin raises the risk of a significant
  birth defect from about 3-to-4 percent to about 4-to-7 percent.

  Signed  Todd.

 -- --


On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:32 PM, RICHARD SCHULTHIES
fourpa...@verizon.netwrote:

   You are saying, if I am translating this correctly, that the children of
 the grandparents are full siblings to each other? In some cultures that is
 not illegal nor immoral, but most societies frown on it. In other societies,
 third cousins needed permission to marry from the 'leaders'.
 What do you want the computer to do? This is a possible judgement taboo,
 not a physically impossible one. On a documentary I saw last year it was of
 British couples doing this and they had formed a 'support'  group.
 If I am reading the situation wrong, I am sorry.
 Rich in LA CA

 --- On *Wed, 5/19/10, Jennifer Crockett jcrock...@optusnet.com.au*wrote:


 From: Jennifer Crockett jcrock...@optusnet.com.au
 Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] When a married couple have the same grandparents,
 how highlight this?
 To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
 Date: Wednesday, May 19, 2010, 3:29 PM


  I don’t know the answer to your question, but this couple are first
 cousins.



 Jennifer



 *From:* T Bredin [mailto:tbredinl...@gmail.com]
 *Sent:* Thursday, 20 May 2010 5:22 AM
 *To:* LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com
 *Subject:* [LegacyUG] When a married couple have the same grandparents,
 how highlight this?



 I have a married couple that share/have the same grandparents but different
 parents. I guess this makes them second cousins.I did not notice this
 when I input the data for this couple as each's data came from different
 sources.  Later I connected them by deleting one copy of the grandparents
 and hooking the 'loose' children to the remaining duplicate grandparents.

 When doing the 'ancestor' display, the ancestor chart in V7, and the
 ancestor chart in Charting there is nothing to call these common grand
 parents to my attention as each 'ancestor' line from the married couple lead
 back to separate listings/boxes of the same grandparent people. (if shown,
 the person-id is the same for the same person at the different location in
 the ancestor chart. )



 My question is, does anyone have a trick, or method to highlight this on
 reports/charts/screens?Would you expect Legacy to warn you when entering
 data that a 'duplicate' seems to exist?





 Legacy User Group guidelines:

 http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asphttp://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Etiquette.asp
 Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
 Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

Re: [LegacyUG] Two Citation Questions...

2010-05-24 Thread T Bredin
I have the same problem,  for now I add to the persons' general notes
something like
BIRTH-  the day of month is from K90B002 [my document coding scheme]
when this is from a different source than what I have in teh SOURCE
information.
I'm thinking of moving this kind of note to the Research Notes, as I
anticipate when I publish to a wide audience, I will not include research
notes.
Todd.



On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Jenny M Benson ge...@cedarbank.me.ukwrote:

 smithmp wrote
 1.  There are times when I find in a source only the date of an event
 such as a birth date but no location.  Then I'll find just the location
 but not the date or at least not the full date.  How do I source it in
 Legacy to reflect that a source had half of the birth date and another
 source had the other half with out having to put an alt. birth event?
 Or is this the only way to do this?  Because if this is so then reports
 like the Pedegree chart will only list half of the information.

 In this situation - or when some of the information given I *know* to be
 wrong and differs from what I have recorded - I write something like
 relates to place of birth only in the Source Detail Comments field.
 Where it's warranted I might also write Date of birth shown as 01 July
 1900 is incorrect or Other Sources indicate that date of birth should
 be 01 June 1900.
 --
 Jenny M Benson



 Legacy User Group guidelines:

   
 http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asphttp://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Etiquette.asp

 Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

 Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

 Online technical support: 
 http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asphttp://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Help.asp

 To unsubscribe: 
 http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asphttp://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp







Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




RE: [LegacyUG] Can I use my backup to install my data to the free version?

2010-05-24 Thread Sherry/Support
Family Files can be easily shared between a Deluxe and a Standard Edition of 
Legacy as long as they're the same version/build number.

The only difference between Standard and Deluxe are the number of features and 
reports. The data is the same.

Linking multimedia files should not be a problem.  Picture Center is a Deluxe 
feature but Picture Gallery is available in both.

If the file path is the same on both computers (which is why we suggest using 
the sub-folders in the c:\Legacy\ folder - i.e., docs, data, pictures, sounds, 
videos), then you have less of a problem than if the multimedia files were 
linked to while they were in the My Documents folder.  But Legacy should be 
able to locate the multimedia files with no problem.  When you see a question 
mark icon, just click on the icon to bring up the Find File window and try 
either letting Legacy find the file or looking for it yourself.  Click on the 
Help button in that window for full details.

Thanks for using Legacy.

Sherry
Customer Support
Millennia Corporation
supp...@legacyfamilytree.com
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com

We are changing the world of genealogy!

-Original Message-
From: blr...@optonline.net [mailto:blr...@optonline.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 3:17 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Can I use my backup to install my data to the free version?

Thanks guys,So I can't install a tree in Legacy free version on another 
computer from my backup of my deluxe version.What if I install my tree from a 
Gedcom and copy the media folder(not the backup)to her computer,then direct 
Legacy to one file in the folder,will Legacy find all the items in the folder 
and place them where they belong,as it does with MY deluxe version I 
use?Or,does anybody have a suggestion as to how I can enter my data with all 
media on her computer without having to link over 300 media files 
individually?Thank you,Brian Lehman





Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





[LegacyUG] How do Source storage fields relate to where used on reports etc.

2010-05-24 Thread T Bredin
I am pulling my hair at Sourcing.  I can't seem to understand, in Legacy,
 which informatoin in which source fields ends up in which report
locations.  There are so many different boxes to enter data into.


Q - Is there a chart, diagram, document, that shows if  'xxx' is put into,
for example, the Master Source Author field then it shows up in the endnotes
at this location in the endnote paragraph, or at this location in the
subsequent endnote, or at this location in the biblography.   Does
the Master Source List name or the TItle go into
the footnotes/endnotes etc.Doe's Mill's book show which data to put into
which Legacy source field?

Q - Also, I have some sources in the basic source system and some in the
Source Writer, and if so for the same source, which is used where?
q

 When I go to a person in family view, I select their SOURCE icom, I see a
list of events that some have sources I have put in  I select a row, I
select EDIT DETAIL  and I might get different subsequent screens that have
different date in them 

Q - how do I list/view all my sources to see if I have duplicates (I know I
do) and go edit them without having to go to a person that has that source
to get to edit the Master Source.



Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




Re: [LegacyUG] Two Citation Questions...

2010-05-24 Thread Jenny M Benson
T Bredin wrote
I have the same problem,  for now I add to the persons' general notes
something like
BIRTH-  the day of month is from K90B002 [my document coding scheme] 
when this is from a different source than what I have in teh SOURCE
information.
I'm thinking of moving this kind of note to the Research Notes, as I
anticipate when I publish to a wide audience, I will not include
research notes.

But surely if the day of the month came from K90B002 and the month a
year came from X10Y0102 or whatever, then *both* documents should be
cited as Sources?  (With an indication that day was from one and month
and year from another.)

If you have June 1900 stated in the document you have as SOURCE
information but have derived the day from K90B002 which is only
mentioned in Research Notes, when you publish to a wider audience they
(the audience) will see unsourced information.
--
Jenny M Benson



Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] How do Source storage fields relate to where used on reports etc.

2010-05-24 Thread T Bredin
SORRY,  Please look at my second email on this topic, a few minutes
later.I'm still learning how to use GMAIL and did not realize I sent
this first draft.
Todd.

On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:36 AM, T Bredin tbredinl...@gmail.com wrote:

 I am pulling my hair at Sourcing.  I can't seem to understand, in Legacy,
  which informatoin in which source fields ends up in which report
 locations.  There are so many different boxes to enter data into.


 Q - Is there a chart, diagram, document, that shows if  'xxx' is put into,
 for example, the Master Source Author field then it shows up in the endnotes
 at this location in the endnote paragraph, or at this location in the
 subsequent endnote, or at this location in the biblography.   Does
 the Master Source List name or the TItle go into
 the footnotes/endnotes etc.Doe's Mill's book show which data to put into
 which Legacy source field?

 Q - Also, I have some sources in the basic source system and some in the
 Source Writer, and if so for the same source, which is used where?
 q

  When I go to a person in family view, I select their SOURCE icom, I see a
 list of events that some have sources I have put in  I select a row, I
 select EDIT DETAIL  and I might get different subsequent screens that have
 different date in them 

 Q - how do I list/view all my sources to see if I have duplicates (I know I
 do) and go edit them without having to go to a person that has that source
 to get to edit the Master Source.









Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




Re: [LegacyUG] How do Source storage fields relate to where used on reports etc.

2010-05-24 Thread Jenny M Benson
T Bredin wrote
Q - Is there a chart, diagram, document, that shows if  'xxx' is put
into, for example, the Master Source Author field then it shows up in
the endnotes at this location in the endnote paragraph, or at this
location in the subsequent endnote, or at this location in the
biblography.   Does the Master Source List name or the TItle go into
the footnotes/endnotes etc.    Doe's Mill's book show which data to put
into which Legacy source field?

Last question first, No because SourceWriter is based on Mills, not the
other way round!  The best way to see what goes where is to create a few
Sources and print a few Reports and see what you like the look of and
what you want to change.
 
Q - Also, I have some sources in the basic source system and some in
the Source Writer, and if so for the same source, which is used where?

When citing the Sources, Legacy won't distinguish between the two types
in *placement*, only in *style*.
q
 
 When I go to a person in family view, I select their SOURCE icom, I
see a list of events that some have sources I have put in  I select a
row, I select EDIT DETAIL  and I might get different subsequent screens
that have different date in them 

If you go to an existing Source Detail and select to Edit it, you are
creating a new Source Detail in place of the old one.  Is this what you
want to do?  Sometimes it will be, for example if you have copied a
citation to the Source Clipboard and then pasted it to another
individual but need to make some changes.
 
Q - how do I list/view all my sources to see if I have duplicates (I
know I do) and go edit them without having to go to a person that has
that source to get to edit the Master Source.

 From the Menu Bar, select ViewMaster ListsSource...
--
Jenny M Benson



Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] How do Source storage fields relate to where used on reports etc.

2010-05-24 Thread Connie Sheets

T Bredin tbredinl...@gmail.com wrote:

I am pulling my hair at Sourcing.  I can't seem to understand, in Legacy,  
which informatoin in which source fields ends up in which report locations.  
There are so many different boxes to enter data into.
 
Q - Is there a chart, diagram, document, that shows if  'xxx' is put into, 
for example, the Master Source Author field then it shows up in the endnotes at 
this location in the endnote paragraph, or at this location in the subsequent 
endnote, or at this location in the biblography.   Does the Master Source List 
name or the TItle go into the footnotes/endnotes etc.    Doe's Mill's book show 
which data to put into which Legacy source field?

A:  The closest thing to the chart you are seeking is the Output Preview on 
the right hand side of the Master Source and Source Detail screen.

No, Mill's book is not going to show you exactly which data to put into which 
Legacy field for every type of source (although the QuickCheck Models in the 
book may help with you figuring it out).  Evidence Explained will help you 
understand the *reasons* why sources are constructed as they are in the 
templates, and give you examples of what a completed source citation should 
look like.

What I do is watch the Output Preview; if I don't like the way it looks, I move 
data around until I get it the way I want.  Then I take screen shots and keep 
them in a binder so I can remember what I've done that works for me (I don't do 
this for frequently used sources like census, just for templates I use 
occasionally).

If you find SourceWriter too confusing, you might want to stick with the Basic 
Source system.  I'm not sure I would be using SourceWriter except for the fact 
I've done a lot of study on the issue of source citation and it is important to 
me to have properly cited sources.
 
Q - Also, I have some sources in the basic source system and some in the 
Source Writer, and if so for the same source, which is used where?

When I go to a person in family view, I select their SOURCE icom, I see a 
list of events that some have sources I have put in I select a row, I select 
EDIT DETAIL and I might get different subsequent screens that have different 
date in them 

A:  I'm afraid I don't fully understand these questions.  It doesn't matter 
whether you used Basic or Sourcewriter, Legacy will use whichever one you 
attach to an event.  If you attached both a Basic and a Sourcewriter source to 
the same event, it should show both.

I have noticed that sometimes a Sourcewriter detail screen seems to appear when 
I try to edit the detail of a Basic source, but it hasn't caused me any 
problems, so I don't worry about it.  (That may be, however, because I rarely 
edit Basic sources; if I find the need to do that, I usually replace them 
completely with a Sourcewriter source).

I don't see how different dates would appear unless you entered different dates 
at some time in the past, but I'm not sure exactly what you mean?  In what 
field(s) do the different dates appear?
 
Q - how do I list/view all my sources to see if I have duplicates (I know I 
do) and go edit them without having to go to a person that has that source to 
get to edit the Master Source.

A:  Master Source List  Options  Print  Ensure Master Sources and All 
Citations to Each One, Include specific events, include citation detail.

Depending upon the size of your database/number of sources, you may want to tag 
and work with only a few sources at a time.

Connie Sheets
Arizona




 
 
 
 
 




Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp










Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] [ LEGACY UG] Simple Sourcing in Legacy 7 Which Data Fields Go Where on Reports.

2010-05-24 Thread Connie Sheets

T Bredin tbredinl...@gmail.com wrote (in part):

I have a person, when I look at their Source icon via the Family view, and 
see the Assigned Sources For window with all the event rows with source master 
and detail columns, and I want to change something in the Detail column and 
select that row, then select Edit Detail, sometimes I get a simple window, 
under the  Detail Information  tab  with a DETAIL box that has what shows on 
the previous Assigned Sources window, and I can change it. 

And sometimes I get many boxes to fill in, e.g. under the first tab ' Detail 
Info ' the boxes are Roll, page, col, line, id (which I think is the Source 
Writer) . At this screen,the only place I can find what is showing in the 
Assigned Sources For - detail column is in the Override tab of the Source 
Detail For xx  screen where it is the last word in the Footnote/Endnote 
Citation box..   I can change that override info, but what shows on the 
Assigned Sources screen does not change. ???

I think this is a bug, and an inconsistent one at that.  The basic source 
detail screens should appear if you are attempting to edit a basic source, but 
I agree that sometimes (and it is only sometimes, not always), the SourceWriter 
detail screen will appear.  I have not noticed a pattern, but I rarely use 
Basic Sources any more.  (I do have many of them from earlier versions of 
Legacy, and even from gedcoming in from another program almost a decade ago).

Have you tried backing out of the screen, perhaps changing to another person, 
or even restarting the program and trying again?

Perhaps someone who still uses the Basic Source system has more info, but then 
perhaps the problem doesn't occur if one doesn't have a mixture of Basic and 
Sourcewriter sources in their database?

Connie Sheets
Arizona

 







Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] [ LEGACY UG] Simple Sourcing in Legacy 7 Which Data Fields Go Where on Reports.

2010-05-24 Thread Jenny M Benson
T Bredin wrote
Please point me to the educational material for how to use Legacy 7
Sources, and why to use which fields, relative to where they end up on
which reports. 

As I said before, your best bet is to try it out and see for yourself.
Do bear in mind that (this is particularly relevant with SourceWriter)
you do not necessarily have to put data into a field just because it's
there, or put a particular type of data into the field of that name.

You might also want to look at HelpShow Help Index and select Tutorial
Lessons in the right-hand column.  Near the bottom, under Sources, is
the link for How to Document Your Information.  It contains links to 2
other more detailed pages.  In addition, click on the Legacy Home tab,
under Support on the right-hand side select Watch Training Videos.  CD4
relates to Sourcing.  You can preview the cd online and purchase it if
you wish.
--
Jenny M Benson



Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] Missing RINs

2010-05-24 Thread JLB
I have reams of paper filed under the MRIN filing system and have never
run into a situation of having to duplicate paper. If the MRIN is, say,
5013, then all Citation ID's, no matter whose it is, is still going to
be 5013.
-
JL
JLog - simple computer technology for genealogists
http://www.jgen.ws/jlog

On 5/24/2010 8:40 AM, Jenny M Benson wrote:
 Charles Apple wrote
 Your system is fine as long as it meets your specific requirements.

 Oh yes, I am very happy with it and have no intention of doing things
 differently and certainly wasn't intending to imply that it was either
 the only way or even the best way.  I was just curious about how a RIN
 or MRIN system deals with a document referencing several people who
 might not even be of the same family.




Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





RE: [LegacyUG] Missing RINs

2010-05-24 Thread Connie Sheets
Charles Apple apple1...@embarqmail.com wrote:

 Filing hard copies is really a personal preference and any
 system that suites your needs is OK, as long as there is no
 duplication of records as you have pointed out.

I agree completely that paper filing systems are a matter of personal 
preference, but lest newbies think that filing by number is the only reasonable 
way to do it, there are many genealogists who use alphabetical systems.  They 
have advantages such as (1) anyone who comes after me doesn't have to wonder 
what MRIN2008 means, (2) no one gets confused because my file is MRIN2008 but 
my cousin's file on the same couple is MRIN4376, and (3) I don't get headaches 
thinking about a bunch of numbers.

SHIRLEY, James (1852 - Aft 1920) on the file label is easily distinguishable 
from SHIRLEY, James (Abt 1802 - 1893).  (And for women, JONES, Frances m. ALLEN 
distinguishes JONES, Frances m. HORTON; sometimes I add dates to them too).

I have no problem with multiple copies, if needed:  there are advantages to 
putting copies of a document that relates to both my Jones and my Allen 
families in both my Jones and Allen files.

But we're getting off topic...

Connie Sheets
Arizona










Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] [ LEGACY UG] Simple Sourcing in Legacy 7 Which Data Fields Go Where on Reports.

2010-05-24 Thread T Bredin
I want to thank you both for the explanations and ideas.   I will explore
this more tomorrow.
Todd,
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Jenny M Benson ge...@cedarbank.me.ukwrote:

 T Bredin wrote
 Please point me to the educational material for how to use Legacy 7
 Sources, and why to use which fields, relative to where they end up on
 which reports.

 As I said before, your best bet is to try it out and see for yourself.
 Do bear in mind that (this is particularly relevant with SourceWriter)
 you do not necessarily have to put data into a field just because it's
 there, or put a particular type of data into the field of that name.

 You might also want to look at HelpShow Help Index and select Tutorial
 Lessons in the right-hand column.  Near the bottom, under Sources, is
 the link for How to Document Your Information.  It contains links to 2
 other more detailed pages.  In addition, click on the Legacy Home tab,
 under Support on the right-hand side select Watch Training Videos.  CD4
 relates to Sourcing.  You can preview the cd online and purchase it if
 you wish.
 --
 Jenny M Benson



 Legacy User Group guidelines:

   
 http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asphttp://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Etiquette.asp

 Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

 Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

 Online technical support: 
 http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asphttp://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Help.asp

 To unsubscribe: 
 http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asphttp://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp







Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




Re: [LegacyUG] Two Citation Questions...

2010-05-24 Thread T Bredin
I'm thinking about all the detail and overhead that it will generate in the
Source construct, that is very short as a note. It is much faster to get to
a note then to get to a source to see it or change it.
 For now, as long as I have it someplace in Legacy  I am happy.
Todd





On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Jenny M Benson ge...@cedarbank.me.ukwrote:

 T Bredin wrote
 I have the same problem,  for now I add to the persons' general notes
 something like
 BIRTH-  the day of month is from K90B002 [my document coding scheme]
 when this is from a different source than what I have in teh SOURCE
 information.
 I'm thinking of moving this kind of note to the Research Notes, as I
 anticipate when I publish to a wide audience, I will not include
 research notes.

 But surely if the day of the month came from K90B002 and the month a
 year came from X10Y0102 or whatever, then *both* documents should be
 cited as Sources?  (With an indication that day was from one and month
 and year from another.)

 If you have June 1900 stated in the document you have as SOURCE
 information but have derived the day from K90B002 which is only
 mentioned in Research Notes, when you publish to a wider audience they
 (the audience) will see unsourced information.
  --
 Jenny M Benson



 Legacy User Group guidelines:

   
 http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asphttp://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Etiquette.asp

 Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

 Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

 Online technical support: 
 http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asphttp://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Help.asp

 To unsubscribe: 
 http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asphttp://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp







Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




[LegacyUG] Sourcing question

2010-05-24 Thread Scott Hall
Hey Sourcing experts ... I'm stumped.

How do I cite this source?

The City of Rochester, NY owns two cemeteries, Mount Hope Cemetery and
Riverside Cemeteries.  The cemetery records for each cemetery, from
their opening through 2002 have been scanned and are available online
at a site hosted by the Department of Rare Books  Special Collections
of the River Campus Libraries of the University of Rochester.

To comply with the rules, I won't post the link, but you can find it
by simply Googling Mount Hope Cemetery Records.  To comply with the
source of a source rules and the guidelines set out by Elizabeth Shown
Mills, how would you properly cite this in Legacy with SourceWriter?
I can't really find a good example in Mills' book, nor can I find a
good template to use.  Could someone put together a citation for me?

Many thanks!


Scott



Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcing question

2010-05-24 Thread RICHARD SCHULTHIES
First question. Does the DB tell which cemetery for each person, or lump both? 
Since I always make most of my Sources location based, I would use,  USA, NY, 
Monroe County, fill in correct cemetery. Which ever of the three choices of 
cemetery names. (left-righr-both). Treating a website as if a book, the title 
is the name on the page, the author/compiler is the Libraries of the University 
of Rochester unless the cemetery gave transcriptions to the libray, and the 
repository is 'Department of Rare Books  Special Collections of the River 
Campus Libraries of the University of Rochester'.
Do the notes for the database say how it was compiled? Cemetery's DB or 
volunteers reading the stones? These facts may make it clearer how to fill in 
the fields.
Rich in LA CA

--- On Mon, 5/24/10, Scott Hall seh0...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: Scott Hall seh0...@gmail.com
 Subject: [LegacyUG] Sourcing question
 To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
 Date: Monday, May 24, 2010, 1:35 PM
 Hey Sourcing experts ... I'm
 stumped.

 How do I cite this source?

 The City of Rochester, NY owns two cemeteries, Mount Hope
 Cemetery and
 Riverside Cemeteries.  The cemetery records for each
 cemetery, from
 their opening through 2002 have been scanned and are
 available online
 at a site hosted by the Department of Rare Books 
 Special Collections
 of the River Campus Libraries of the University of
 Rochester.

 To comply with the rules, I won't post the link, but you
 can find it
 by simply Googling Mount Hope Cemetery Records.  To
 comply with the
 source of a source rules and the guidelines set out by
 Elizabeth Shown
 Mills, how would you properly cite this in Legacy with
 SourceWriter?
 I can't really find a good example in Mills' book, nor can
 I find a
 good template to use.  Could someone put together a
 citation for me?

 Many thanks!


 Scott



 Legacy User Group guidelines:

    http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

 Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

    http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

 Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21
 2009:

    http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

 Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

 To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp







Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] A Different Way of Printing source citations...

2010-05-24 Thread Brian/Support
The fix for this problem will be included in the next update to Legacy.

Brian
Customer Support
Millennia Corporation
br...@legacyfamilytree.com
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com

We are changing the world of genealogy!
When replying to this message, please include all previous correspondence.
Thanks.

On 23/05/2010 4:10 PM, smithmp wrote:
 snip
 I ask this because
 Legacy has a glitch at the moment that will not print your sources for your
 to-do list.  It just lists a number and nothing else.  I already asked tech
 support and they are aware of this problem and will fix it on a future
 release.  I'm am just hoping there might be a work around in the meanwhile.



Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcing question

2010-05-24 Thread Dennis M . Kowallek
On Mon, 24 May 2010 15:21:26 -0700, Brian L. Lightfoot
br...@the-lightfoots.com wrote:

Then isn't the actual source those records and not the online database?

I would make note of both pieces of info.

--

Dennis Kowallek (LTools)
http://zippersoftware.com/ltools
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ltools



Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcing question

2010-05-24 Thread Steve Voght
But surely you might have this problem in almost any scenario, short
of providing a copy of the original source material with your family
file -- countless records have burned over the years as courthouses
have gone up in flame; oral histories disappear when the ancestor
dies; a microfilm reader devours an 1800s-era newspaper film; a rare
worm-eaten book turns to dust and the original is lost forever.
Admittedly the issue is now more frequently encountered in the context
of the internet, but this is precisely why we need to transcribe
relevant details and date of entry, rather than just a source name.

I agree with you that it's important to chase the rabbit down the hole
as far as it goes and find the most original source of any supplied
data because errors can and do crop up with every copy and
transcription (especially with indexes of hand-written records!), but
more and more these days an online database or transcription is the
original work, especially when it comes to modern court and cemetery
records.  Ideally you would use a source like this as a foundation to
then go to the cemetery and either obtain the original records or
verify the tombstone in person (at which point this can be discarded
as a source since it was merely a means to finding the real source),
but practically speaking that's not always possible and thus it's most
important to provide sufficient detail about when you obtained the
record, along with a faithful transcription of the relevant portion of
the database (and if you want, you can also take a screen shot and
attach that to the source.)  That way, even if the original database
disappears or moves, you've still got a record of what it did say (and
when it said it), so others can make judgment as they see fit.

-Steve

On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Brian L. Lightfoot
br...@the-lightfoots.com wrote:
 I wanted to throw in my two cents about this type of online source and 
 many other online databases. The whole purpose of a source citation is to 
 explain where you got the data and hopefully allow future viewers of your 
 family file to go back to that source and check the authenticity and validity 
 of the information. So right there we have a problem with all online 
 databases. While the link may work today, chances are that in one year or 
 longer, the link will be dead. And at that point, the source of your 
 information as you show it in your citation becomes hidden from the world. 
 There really is no way around this as that is the very nature of the Internet 
 beast. Like politicians, links come and go.

 Now if you could check the information about the online database itself and 
 determine from where the database info came from, then in reality, that is 
 the real source of the information. I'm just making this up here as an 
 example, but let's pretend the online database of the cemetery is based on a 
 book or official records from the Mount Hope Cemetery Association.  Then 
 isn't the actual source those records and not the online database? Those 
 official records tend to stay around and be archived by either a government 
 agency or a local historical society for a much longer period than any web 
 site. Many such online databases will explain the source of the data and the 
 actual repository. I guess the problem is in digging deep enough in order to 
 make that determination.

 Just thinking out loud here.


 Brian in CA



Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcing question

2010-05-24 Thread RICHARD SCHULTHIES
Exactly. As I asked, who created the list, the online server, the cemetery, or 
the people who read the cemetery. That way, in the future, a person can track 
down the 'creator' of the DB, to see if that entity is still around with a new 
server address.
Rich in LA CA

--- On Mon, 5/24/10, Dennis M. Kowallek kowal...@iglou.com wrote:

 From: Dennis M. Kowallek kowal...@iglou.com
 Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcing question
 To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
 Date: Monday, May 24, 2010, 3:30 PM
 On Mon, 24 May 2010 15:21:26 -0700,
 Brian L. Lightfoot
 br...@the-lightfoots.com
 wrote:

 Then isn't the actual source those records and not the
 online database?

 I would make note of both pieces of info.

 --

 Dennis Kowallek (LTools)
 http://zippersoftware.com/ltools
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ltools



 Legacy User Group guidelines:

    http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

 Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

    http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

 Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21
 2009:

    http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

 Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

 To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp







Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] Filing by RINs (was Missing RINs)

2010-05-24 Thread Bruce Tweedley
Hello Jenny
I have changed the Subject as we are getting away from Missing RINs)

No I only have one hard copy.
For hard copy, the Detail Source starts with say, File TW6892 which
tells me where it is filed, irrespective of what/who it is for.
As I mentioned previously if you only want it for your own
information it can be encased in [[.]].

Regarding Certificates - The Master Source for each one is in the form -
Birth Certificate - Smith, James TW234. (if applicable, I add the
word Transcript or similar)
So all Birth Certificates appear as a list in alphabetical order of
surname, then alphabetical order of the Given Name.
The Detail Source for each one starts with File TW234.
If it is used for someone else it still starts with File TW234.
Again, if you don't want TW234 to show in reports it can be encased
in [[...]].

For Letters, E-Mails the Master Source is in the form -
Letter - Smith, James TW234 dated 2010 05 25 .
So they appear in alphabetical order of surname, alphabetical order
of Given Name and date order for a particular person.
The Detail Source starts with File TW. (the RIN number where it is filed)

For Newspapers the Master Source is in the form -
Newspaper - London Times.
The Detail Source starts with File TW.. (the RIN number where
it is filed) and holds the Date, Issue No, Page No etc.

To ensure the system stays intact I use the ID system provided by Legacy  -
Options - Customise -  Other - Fill all ID fields - in Text
I type TW to distinguish it from other numbers I use - Save.
And of course I create regular backups.

I know this may produce a long Master Source List, but because of the
format used it is quick and easy to find what you want in the list by
using Find at the top of the Master Source List and typing the
first one or two letters of keyword ie. Newspapers.

I don't suggest this is the best system, it is just what has
developed after trying other systems over 25 years and works for me.

Regards - Bruce


At 09:17 PM 24/05/2010, you wrote:
Bruce Tweedley wrote
 My Source Detail starts with say File TW6892 so I go straight to the
 filing system to find the hard copy. It can be placed in [[]] if
 you don't want it shown in reports.

I have *masses* of hard copy Source material where one document relates
to anything up to a dozen or even more people.  Do people who file their
hard copies by RIN (or MRIN for that matter) have multiple copies - one
for every person referenced?  If so, that would seem a shocking waste of
resources and space.

I file my documents according to *type* - Certificates all together,
Letters all together, newspaper clippings all together, etc etc.  Next
to each person referenced I write their UserID (which incorporates their
RIN.)  Within Legacy, I record the location of each document in the
Source Detail FileID field - eg Certificates  Documents, page C10 or
Correspondence  Reports, page L2.

No duplication of paperwork and I can quickly and easily refer from
paper to Legacy or from Legacy to paper.
--
Jenny M Benson



Legacy User Group guidelines:

http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcing question

2010-05-24 Thread Jenny M Benson
Brian L. Lightfoot wrote
The whole purpose of a source citation is to explain where you got the
data and hopefully allow future viewers of your family file to go back
to that source and check the authenticity and validity of the
information. So right there we have a problem with all online
databases. While the link may work today, chances are that in one year
or longer, the link will be dead. And at that point, the source of your
information as you show it in your citation becomes hidden from the
world. There really is no way around this as that is the very nature of
the Internet beast. Like politicians, links come and go.

Now if you could check the information about the online database itself
and determine from where the database info came from, then in reality,
that is the real source of the information.

I cite all sorts of online databases and the SW templates usually
provide a field in which to enter citing ... which gives the original
source of the data.

I would not say that where the database info came from is the real
source - it is the source used by the compiler(s) of the database, but
not the source *I* used.  Ideally, of course, one should go back to the
original info (when possible) as the database may not be an accurate
representation of the data.
--
Jenny M Benson



Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





RE: [LegacyUG] Sourcing question

2010-05-24 Thread smithmp
Steve,
(and if you want, you can also take a screen shot and attach that to the
source.)  That way, even if the original database disappears or moves,
you've still got a record of what it did say (and when it said it), so
others can make judgment as they see fit.

Where ever possible I try to scan or take a picture of any source I find,
except for the internet research.  Usually because most of the time this is
a secondary source that points me (hopefully) to the original source. I scan
the Title copyright page and add the scan or photo into the picture tab of
the source.  Then in the detail section of the citation I add a scan or
picture of the page that I am transcribing from.  This works well with
printed material, databases, microfilm, etc.

But I thought I would mention that websites do not disappear as easily as
you might think.  I have been able to access material from websites that are
now defunct by using the Internet Archive Wayback Machine (as long as you
have the website address).  This only is available though if the website
material had remained active for at least a few months and goes back (I
believe to 1996).  Unfortunately you can not search using keywords yet
(hence the need for the actual website name and if possible website page
otherwise you might be 'browsing for a while').  More and more, many
libraries, repositories, universities, governments and companies are
archiving their historical data on the internet in places such as the
wayback machine.  If the servers are down there, you can also access the
Internet archive at the New Library of Alexandria, Egypt, which mirrors the
Wayback Machine.  So as technology advances, so does the available ways in
which to preserve internet sources.

Paulette Smith



-Original Message-
From: Steve Voght [mailto:stevevo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 6:39 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcing question

But surely you might have this problem in almost any scenario, short of
providing a copy of the original source material with your family file --
countless records have burned over the years as courthouses have gone up in
flame; oral histories disappear when the ancestor dies; a microfilm reader
devours an 1800s-era newspaper film; a rare worm-eaten book turns to dust
and the original is lost forever.
Admittedly the issue is now more frequently encountered in the context of
the internet, but this is precisely why we need to transcribe relevant
details and date of entry, rather than just a source name.

I agree with you that it's important to chase the rabbit down the hole as
far as it goes and find the most original source of any supplied data
because errors can and do crop up with every copy and transcription
(especially with indexes of hand-written records!), but more and more these
days an online database or transcription is the original work, especially
when it comes to modern court and cemetery records.  Ideally you would use a
source like this as a foundation to then go to the cemetery and either
obtain the original records or verify the tombstone in person (at which
point this can be discarded as a source since it was merely a means to
finding the real source), but practically speaking that's not always
possible and thus it's most important to provide sufficient detail about
when you obtained the record, along with a faithful transcription of the
relevant portion of the database (and if you want, you can also take a
screen shot and attach that to the source.)  That way, even if the original
database disappears or moves, you've still got a record of what it did say
(and when it said it), so others can make judgment as they see fit.

-Steve

On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Brian L. Lightfoot
br...@the-lightfoots.com wrote:
 I wanted to throw in my two cents about this type of online source and
many other online databases. The whole purpose of a source citation is to
explain where you got the data and hopefully allow future viewers of your
family file to go back to that source and check the authenticity and
validity of the information. So right there we have a problem with all
online databases. While the link may work today, chances are that in one
year or longer, the link will be dead. And at that point, the source of your
information as you show it in your citation becomes hidden from the world.
There really is no way around this as that is the very nature of the
Internet beast. Like politicians, links come and go.

 Now if you could check the information about the online database itself
and determine from where the database info came from, then in reality, that
is the real source of the information. I'm just making this up here as an
example, but let's pretend the online database of the cemetery is based on a
book or official records from the Mount Hope Cemetery Association.  Then
isn't the actual source those records and not the online database? Those
official records tend to stay 

RE: [LegacyUG] Sourcing question

2010-05-24 Thread Kirsten Bowman
Scott:

Do consider what you want the lead element in the citation to be.  Personally 
I'd like it to be the name of the cemetery.  Using one of the cemetery 
templates it's then easy enough to state that the transcription comes from an 
online database and any of the other pertinent details.  Another researcher 
might use the URL that you would include (assuming it would still be valid), or 
possibly go to the university to find the original cemetery records, or even go 
to the cemetery itself to search out the marker.

Kirsten

-Original Message-
From: Scott Hall [mailto:seh0...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 1:36 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Sourcing question


Hey Sourcing experts ... I'm stumped.

How do I cite this source?

The City of Rochester, NY owns two cemeteries, Mount Hope Cemetery and
Riverside Cemeteries.  The cemetery records for each cemetery, from
their opening through 2002 have been scanned and are available online
at a site hosted by the Department of Rare Books  Special Collections
of the River Campus Libraries of the University of Rochester.

To comply with the rules, I won't post the link, but you can find it
by simply Googling Mount Hope Cemetery Records.  To comply with the
source of a source rules and the guidelines set out by Elizabeth Shown
Mills, how would you properly cite this in Legacy with SourceWriter?
I can't really find a good example in Mills' book, nor can I find a
good template to use.  Could someone put together a citation for me?

Many thanks!


Scott






Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





[LegacyUG] locations

2010-05-24 Thread Jan Roberts
I know - I may be in trouble for sending in html but I need to see if this
method works.  Now for my question -



(And I may be in trouble for trying to do what I want to do - with the
purists anyway.)



I have an event which I have called Photograph.  In description I write who
is in the photo, in place I may want to put something like 'outside their
house', or 'next to the monument' - in other words, something which is not
strictly a location.  I used to be able to do this and each word would stay
in lower case.  Now 'outside their house' automatically becomes 'Outside
Their House'.  If I try to edit the location it appears to stick, but then
reverts to initial caps.  Places I have previously entered in all lower case
are unchanged.  Has there been a change to the way Legacy treats locations?
Interestingly, if I enter (say) Morwell, Victoria, australia it doesn't
change!



Cheers

Jan





Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp