Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
Another alternative is to back out the changes for OPENJPA-182 until we get the complete solution.. But, looking at the changes for OPENJPA-182, that looks to be quite the job and I'm not sure how many of these parts have been touched since that commit... I would rather wait until OPENJPA-222 tests clean and then go forward with another vote... But, I am open to other suggestions. Kevin On 4/19/07, Kevin Sutter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Craig and others, Here's the scoop with OPENJPA-222... A couple of weeks ago, DaveW committed some changes to OPENJPA-182. Patrick reviewed the changes and through discussions on the dev mailing list and the Issue itself, re-worked and re-committed the changes. We dropped the ball and didn't sufficiently test these new changes against DB2 until recently. We are finding that basically any sub-selects will not work with DB2 with the changes for OPENJPA-182. The changes for OPENJPA-222 will resolve these issues. This problem (no sub-selects with DB2) seems severe enough to warrant a re-spin of the release. I know this pushes us out another couple of days, but I think from a customer perspective, it's worth the effort. As far as this 0.9.7 being bundled with some significant release... We (IBM) were planning to use the 0.9.7 release with a refresh of the EJB3 Feature Pack. Our plans have since changed, so the urgency is no longer present. I just want any OpenJPA release to be usable and not regress expected function. Thanks, Kevin On 4/18/07, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This isn't the last release of openjpa. What is the urgency for fixing this before our major event (the last release before exiting the incubator)? Is this release planned to be bundled with some other significant release? Craig On Apr 18, 2007, at 4:40 PM, Michael Dick wrote: I probably should have worded that differently since I haven't run the tests against DB2. I believe Dave's team has. Dave, can you comment on how big the impact of OpenJPA-222 is? On 4/18/07, Patrick Linskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm a little nervous about OpenJPA-222. From talking with Dave it sounds like it has a large effect on DB2. I'd like to get that issue resolved if possible. I'm a little nervous about scope creep. Is there some good reason why OPENJPA-222 needs to be resolved now vs. later? -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. _ __ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. -Original Message- From: Michael Dick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 2:24 PM To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release On 4/18/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael- On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:27 PM, Michael Dick wrote: I'd rather not cut another release, but I think we do need to resolve the issue with the docbook jar. If we can live with the extra jar then the vote can proceed. Personally, I think it is sufficiently ugly to release with the docbook jar to justify starting another release. However, if others disagree, I'll happily accede to the majority. For now, my vote changes to +0. I agree but like you I can be talked out of it. I'll take another look over everything and start another release tonight / tomorrow. I'm a little nervous about OpenJPA-222. From talking with Dave it sounds like it has a large effect on DB2. I'd like to get that issue resolved if possible. -- -Michael Dick Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. -- -Michael Dick Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
Hi Kevin, I agree that the problem with sub-selects on DB2 seems significant enough to stop the release. Craig On Apr 19, 2007, at 7:52 AM, Kevin Sutter wrote: Another alternative is to back out the changes for OPENJPA-182 until we get the complete solution.. But, looking at the changes for OPENJPA-182, that looks to be quite the job and I'm not sure how many of these parts have been touched since that commit... I would rather wait until OPENJPA-222 tests clean and then go forward with another vote... But, I am open to other suggestions. Kevin On 4/19/07, Kevin Sutter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Craig and others, Here's the scoop with OPENJPA-222... A couple of weeks ago, DaveW committed some changes to OPENJPA-182. Patrick reviewed the changes and through discussions on the dev mailing list and the Issue itself, re-worked and re-committed the changes. We dropped the ball and didn't sufficiently test these new changes against DB2 until recently. We are finding that basically any sub-selects will not work with DB2 with the changes for OPENJPA-182. The changes for OPENJPA-222 will resolve these issues. This problem (no sub-selects with DB2) seems severe enough to warrant a re-spin of the release. I know this pushes us out another couple of days, but I think from a customer perspective, it's worth the effort. As far as this 0.9.7 being bundled with some significant release... We (IBM) were planning to use the 0.9.7 release with a refresh of the EJB3 Feature Pack. Our plans have since changed, so the urgency is no longer present. I just want any OpenJPA release to be usable and not regress expected function. Thanks, Kevin On 4/18/07, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This isn't the last release of openjpa. What is the urgency for fixing this before our major event (the last release before exiting the incubator)? Is this release planned to be bundled with some other significant release? Craig On Apr 18, 2007, at 4:40 PM, Michael Dick wrote: I probably should have worded that differently since I haven't run the tests against DB2. I believe Dave's team has. Dave, can you comment on how big the impact of OpenJPA-222 is? On 4/18/07, Patrick Linskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm a little nervous about OpenJPA-222. From talking with Dave it sounds like it has a large effect on DB2. I'd like to get that issue resolved if possible. I'm a little nervous about scope creep. Is there some good reason why OPENJPA-222 needs to be resolved now vs. later? -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. _ __ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. -Original Message- From: Michael Dick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 2:24 PM To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release On 4/18/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael- On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:27 PM, Michael Dick wrote: I'd rather not cut another release, but I think we do need to resolve the issue with the docbook jar. If we can live with the extra jar then the vote can proceed. Personally, I think it is sufficiently ugly to release with the docbook jar to justify starting another release. However, if others disagree, I'll happily accede to the majority. For now, my vote changes to +0. I agree but like you I can be talked out of it. I'll take another look over everything and start another release tonight / tomorrow. I'm a little nervous about OpenJPA-222. From talking with Dave it sounds like it has a large effect on DB2. I'd like to get that issue resolved if possible. -- -Michael Dick Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. -- -Michael Dick Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/ products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto
Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
The release is looking good with two items that should be addressed and some nits. :) Major issues: - Mike's GPG key is present in site/docs/KEYS but this file needs to be copied to http://incubator.apache.org/openjpa/KEYS as well. This will make it easier to verify releases and matches the instructions on the download page. - The binary distribution contains a new JAR file whose license is unclear; this is: binary-dist/lib/docbook-xsl-1.67.2.zip Minor issues: - The Maven2 repo contains two directories that probably shouldn't be part of the release -- examples/ and tck/ - The .rsrc files don't have licenses -- we've discussed this before (even in this thread!). This isn't a big deal, just expect the iPMC to bring it up again. - The JPA XSDs are CDDL licensed and are included in the distribution. IMHO, these should be cleanroom'ed so that the question just goes away. Like the .rsrc files, this has come up before and not been an issue. - The .zip distribution contains .asc files for the .md5 and .sha1 files, which are unnecessary. - The source distribution contains a derby.log file at: source-dist/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/derby.log Comments welcome, but let's work on addressing the first two. Eddie On 4/17/07, Kevin Sutter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 for the 0.9.7 release. On 4/16/07, Patrick Linskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-jdbc/src/main/ resources/org/apache/openjpa/jdbc/schema/schemas-doctype.rsrc don't know: This is a dtd describing document type schemas. It doesn't appear to be generated and certainly has some IP in it. I think that our parser doesn't deal with comments for this type. openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/ derby.log ok: This should be cleaned up for future releases but has no IP We should just move this to the target directory. I'm anxiously awaiting the day that Apache decides that it really is sufficient to describe licensing terms at the packaging unit level, rather than the individual file level. -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. ___ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 11:40 AM To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release +1 for release I ran Robert's Donkin's RAT program on the release, and it reported a few anomalies: No license: openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/CHANGES.txt ok: No IP here openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/RELEASE-NOTES.html don't know: I'd approve it but others in the Incubator PMC might feel otherwise. openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-integration/tck/ windows-replacefilter.properties ok: No IP here openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-jdbc/src/main/ resources/org/apache/openjpa/jdbc/meta/java-keywords.rsrc ok: No IP here openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-jdbc/src/main/ resources/org/apache/openjpa/jdbc/schema/schemas-doctype.rsrc don't know: This is a dtd describing document type schemas. It doesn't appear to be generated and certainly has some IP in it. openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-jdbc/src/main/ resources/org/apache/openjpa/jdbc/sql/sql-keywords.rsrc ok: No IP here openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-persistence/src/main/ resources/META-INF/services/javax.persistence.spi.PersistenceProvider ok: No IP here openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-persistence/src/main/ resources/org/apache/openjpa/persistence/orm-xsd.rsrc ok: This is a copy of the official JPA schema under CDDL that is properly attributed in LICENSE.txt openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-persistence/src/main/ resources/org/apache/openjpa/persistence/persistence-xsd.rsrc ok: This is a copy of the official JPA schema under CDDL that is properly attributed in LICENSE.txt openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/ derby.log ok: This should be cleaned up for future releases but has no IP openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/src/ test/resources/org/apache/openjpa/persistence/xml/orm.xml ok: This is a test case orm.xml file that probably should have license notice in it for next time. But I won't vote to hold up the release for it. Craig
Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
Hi Eddie, On Apr 18, 2007, at 8:46 AM, Eddie O'Neil wrote: The release is looking good with two items that should be addressed and some nits. :) Major issues: - Mike's GPG key is present in site/docs/KEYS but this file needs to be copied to http://incubator.apache.org/openjpa/KEYS as well. This will make it easier to verify releases and matches the instructions on the download page. I agree. This doesn't hold up the release since it's a parallel activity. ... Minor issues: - The Maven2 repo contains two directories that probably shouldn't be part of the release -- examples/ and tck/ If you're using maven, it's unlikely that these will be of interest, but I don't have any problem with including these in the maven repo, regardless of how useful (or not) they might be there. - The .rsrc files don't have licenses -- we've discussed this before (even in this thread!). This isn't a big deal, just expect the iPMC to bring it up again. It might be well to post the results of our discussion with the VOTE for IPMC to approve release, just so people are aware that we know about it and have discussed it and our mentors agree that it's going to be fixed but not today. - The JPA XSDs are CDDL licensed and are included in the distribution. IMHO, these should be cleanroom'ed so that the question just goes away. Like the .rsrc files, this has come up before and not been an issue. I don't believe that it's possible to clean room these files. They have a perfectly compatible license. These are specified reference files, not an implementation that can have independent IP. So I don't think it's worthwhile to try to clean room them. ... Comments welcome, but let's work on addressing the first two. Eddie On 4/17/07, Kevin Sutter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 for the 0.9.7 release. On 4/16/07, Patrick Linskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-jdbc/src/main/ resources/org/apache/openjpa/jdbc/schema/schemas-doctype.rsrc don't know: This is a dtd describing document type schemas. It doesn't appear to be generated and certainly has some IP in it. I think that our parser doesn't deal with comments for this type. openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/ derby.log ok: This should be cleaned up for future releases but has no IP We should just move this to the target directory. I'm anxiously awaiting the day that Apache decides that it really is sufficient to describe licensing terms at the packaging unit level, rather than the individual file level. -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. _ __ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 11:40 AM To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release +1 for release I ran Robert's Donkin's RAT program on the release, and it reported a few anomalies: No license: openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/CHANGES.txt ok: No IP here openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/RELEASE-NOTES.html don't know: I'd approve it but others in the Incubator PMC might feel otherwise. openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-integration/tck/ windows-replacefilter.properties ok: No IP here openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-jdbc/src/main/ resources/org/apache/openjpa/jdbc/meta/java-keywords.rsrc ok: No IP here openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-jdbc/src/main/ resources/org/apache/openjpa/jdbc/schema/schemas-doctype.rsrc don't know: This is a dtd describing document type schemas. It doesn't appear to be generated and certainly has some IP in it. openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-jdbc/src/main/ resources/org/apache/openjpa/jdbc/sql/sql-keywords.rsrc ok: No IP here openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-persistence/ src/main/ resources/META-INF/services/ javax.persistence.spi.PersistenceProvider ok: No IP here openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-persistence/ src/main/ resources/org/apache/openjpa/persistence/orm-xsd.rsrc ok: This is a copy of the official JPA schema under CDDL that is properly attributed in LICENSE.txt openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-persistence/ src/main/ resources/org/apache/openjpa/persistence
RE: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
[eko] Yeah, you're right that neithre of these are big deals -- just empty directories. I did wonder if the TCK directory had anything that TCK-related that shouldn't be public (like how to run it), but I'll defer to you and Geir here. The TCK dir only contains the bootstrap / glue to invoke the TCK from within our build system, and not the TCK itself. -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. ___ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. -Original Message- From: Eddie O'Neil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 9:49 AM To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release Craig-- Thanks for the comments -- comments on comments below. :) Eddie On 4/18/07, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Eddie, On Apr 18, 2007, at 8:46 AM, Eddie O'Neil wrote: The release is looking good with two items that should be addressed and some nits. :) Major issues: - Mike's GPG key is present in site/docs/KEYS but this file needs to be copied to http://incubator.apache.org/openjpa/KEYS as well. This will make it easier to verify releases and matches the instructions on the download page. I agree. This doesn't hold up the release since it's a parallel activity. [eko] Agreed -- this is just a file copy that should just be done before calling for an iPMC vote. ... Minor issues: - The Maven2 repo contains two directories that probably shouldn't be part of the release -- examples/ and tck/ If you're using maven, it's unlikely that these will be of interest, but I don't have any problem with including these in the maven repo, regardless of how useful (or not) they might be there. [eko] Yeah, you're right that neithre of these are big deals -- just empty directories. I did wonder if the TCK directory had anything that TCK-related that shouldn't be public (like how to run it), but I'll defer to you and Geir here. - The .rsrc files don't have licenses -- we've discussed this before (even in this thread!). This isn't a big deal, just expect the iPMC to bring it up again. It might be well to post the results of our discussion with the VOTE for IPMC to approve release, just so people are aware that we know about it and have discussed it and our mentors agree that it's going to be fixed but not today. [eko] Agreed -- we can also just send IDs from the last vote where we addressed this. - The JPA XSDs are CDDL licensed and are included in the distribution. IMHO, these should be cleanroom'ed so that the question just goes away. Like the .rsrc files, this has come up before and not been an issue. I don't believe that it's possible to clean room these files. They have a perfectly compatible license. These are specified reference files, not an implementation that can have independent IP. So I don't think it's worthwhile to try to clean room them. [eko] Okay -- the reason I keep bringing these up is because of Cliff's 3rd party licensing site and how it makes a distinction between src / binary wrt CDDL: http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html We're definitely compliant with the NOTICE part of this. ... Comments welcome, but let's work on addressing the first two. Eddie On 4/17/07, Kevin Sutter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 for the 0.9.7 release. On 4/16/07, Patrick Linskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-jdbc/src/main/ resources/org/apache/openjpa/jdbc/schema/schemas-doctype.rsrc don't know: This is a dtd describing document type schemas. It doesn't appear to be generated and certainly has some IP in it. I think that our parser doesn't deal with comments for this type. openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-persistence-jdb c/ derby.log ok: This should be cleaned up for future releases but has no IP We should just move this to the target directory. I'm anxiously awaiting the day that Apache decides that it really is sufficient to describe licensing terms at the packaging unit level, rather than the individual file level. -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc
RE: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
- The binary distribution contains a new JAR file whose license is unclear; this is: binary-dist/lib/docbook-xsl-1.67.2.zip That dependency is unnecessary -- it's needed to build the docs, but not by the runtime. -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. ___ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. -Original Message- From: Eddie O'Neil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 8:46 AM To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release The release is looking good with two items that should be addressed and some nits. :) Major issues: - Mike's GPG key is present in site/docs/KEYS but this file needs to be copied to http://incubator.apache.org/openjpa/KEYS as well. This will make it easier to verify releases and matches the instructions on the download page. - The binary distribution contains a new JAR file whose license is unclear; this is: binary-dist/lib/docbook-xsl-1.67.2.zip Minor issues: - The Maven2 repo contains two directories that probably shouldn't be part of the release -- examples/ and tck/ - The .rsrc files don't have licenses -- we've discussed this before (even in this thread!). This isn't a big deal, just expect the iPMC to bring it up again. - The JPA XSDs are CDDL licensed and are included in the distribution. IMHO, these should be cleanroom'ed so that the question just goes away. Like the .rsrc files, this has come up before and not been an issue. - The .zip distribution contains .asc files for the .md5 and .sha1 files, which are unnecessary. - The source distribution contains a derby.log file at: source-dist/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/derby.log Comments welcome, but let's work on addressing the first two. Eddie On 4/17/07, Kevin Sutter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 for the 0.9.7 release. On 4/16/07, Patrick Linskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-jdbc/src/main/ resources/org/apache/openjpa/jdbc/schema/schemas-doctype.rsrc don't know: This is a dtd describing document type schemas. It doesn't appear to be generated and certainly has some IP in it. I think that our parser doesn't deal with comments for this type. openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/ derby.log ok: This should be cleaned up for future releases but has no IP We should just move this to the target directory. I'm anxiously awaiting the day that Apache decides that it really is sufficient to describe licensing terms at the packaging unit level, rather than the individual file level. -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. ___ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 11:40 AM To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release +1 for release I ran Robert's Donkin's RAT program on the release, and it reported a few anomalies: No license: openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/CHANGES.txt ok: No IP here openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/RELEASE-NOTES.html don't know: I'd approve it but others in the Incubator PMC might feel otherwise. openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-integration/tck/ windows-replacefilter.properties ok: No IP here openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-jdbc/src/main/ resources/org/apache/openjpa/jdbc/meta/java-keywords.rsrc ok: No IP here openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-jdbc/src/main/ resources/org/apache/openjpa/jdbc/schema/schemas-doctype.rsrc don't know: This is a dtd describing document type schemas. It doesn't appear to be generated and certainly has some IP
Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
The TCK dir only contains the bootstrap / glue to invoke the TCK from within our build system, and not the TCK itself. [eko] Yeah -- I noticed. Just didn't know how paranoid folks tend to be about this sort of stuff since TCK details seem to be kept under wraps. - The binary distribution contains a new JAR file whose license is unclear; this is: binary-dist/lib/docbook-xsl-1.67.2.zip That dependency is unnecessary -- it's needed to build the docs, but not by the runtime. [eko] Cool, maybe it's easier to delete than to figure out how it's licensed. ;) On 4/18/07, Patrick Linskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - The binary distribution contains a new JAR file whose license is unclear; this is: binary-dist/lib/docbook-xsl-1.67.2.zip That dependency is unnecessary -- it's needed to build the docs, but not by the runtime. -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. ___ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. -Original Message- From: Eddie O'Neil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 8:46 AM To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release The release is looking good with two items that should be addressed and some nits. :) Major issues: - Mike's GPG key is present in site/docs/KEYS but this file needs to be copied to http://incubator.apache.org/openjpa/KEYS as well. This will make it easier to verify releases and matches the instructions on the download page. - The binary distribution contains a new JAR file whose license is unclear; this is: binary-dist/lib/docbook-xsl-1.67.2.zip Minor issues: - The Maven2 repo contains two directories that probably shouldn't be part of the release -- examples/ and tck/ - The .rsrc files don't have licenses -- we've discussed this before (even in this thread!). This isn't a big deal, just expect the iPMC to bring it up again. - The JPA XSDs are CDDL licensed and are included in the distribution. IMHO, these should be cleanroom'ed so that the question just goes away. Like the .rsrc files, this has come up before and not been an issue. - The .zip distribution contains .asc files for the .md5 and .sha1 files, which are unnecessary. - The source distribution contains a derby.log file at: source-dist/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/derby.log Comments welcome, but let's work on addressing the first two. Eddie On 4/17/07, Kevin Sutter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 for the 0.9.7 release. On 4/16/07, Patrick Linskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-jdbc/src/main/ resources/org/apache/openjpa/jdbc/schema/schemas-doctype.rsrc don't know: This is a dtd describing document type schemas. It doesn't appear to be generated and certainly has some IP in it. I think that our parser doesn't deal with comments for this type. openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/ derby.log ok: This should be cleaned up for future releases but has no IP We should just move this to the target directory. I'm anxiously awaiting the day that Apache decides that it really is sufficient to describe licensing terms at the packaging unit level, rather than the individual file level. -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. ___ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 11:40 AM To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release +1 for release I ran Robert's Donkin's RAT program on the release, and it reported a few anomalies: No license: openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/CHANGES.txt ok: No IP here openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/RELEASE-NOTES.html don't know: I'd approve it but others
RE: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
[eko] Yeah -- I noticed. Just didn't know how paranoid folks tend to be about this sort of stuff since TCK details seem to be kept under wraps. None of this IP comes from the TCK itself. I don't think that the TCK license bans people from putting IP that they create while running the TCK into the open source. -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. ___ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. -Original Message- From: Eddie O'Neil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 10:17 AM To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release The TCK dir only contains the bootstrap / glue to invoke the TCK from within our build system, and not the TCK itself. [eko] Yeah -- I noticed. Just didn't know how paranoid folks tend to be about this sort of stuff since TCK details seem to be kept under wraps. - The binary distribution contains a new JAR file whose license is unclear; this is: binary-dist/lib/docbook-xsl-1.67.2.zip That dependency is unnecessary -- it's needed to build the docs, but not by the runtime. [eko] Cool, maybe it's easier to delete than to figure out how it's licensed. ;) On 4/18/07, Patrick Linskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - The binary distribution contains a new JAR file whose license is unclear; this is: binary-dist/lib/docbook-xsl-1.67.2.zip That dependency is unnecessary -- it's needed to build the docs, but not by the runtime. -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. __ _ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. -Original Message- From: Eddie O'Neil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 8:46 AM To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release The release is looking good with two items that should be addressed and some nits. :) Major issues: - Mike's GPG key is present in site/docs/KEYS but this file needs to be copied to http://incubator.apache.org/openjpa/KEYS as well. This will make it easier to verify releases and matches the instructions on the download page. - The binary distribution contains a new JAR file whose license is unclear; this is: binary-dist/lib/docbook-xsl-1.67.2.zip Minor issues: - The Maven2 repo contains two directories that probably shouldn't be part of the release -- examples/ and tck/ - The .rsrc files don't have licenses -- we've discussed this before (even in this thread!). This isn't a big deal, just expect the iPMC to bring it up again. - The JPA XSDs are CDDL licensed and are included in the distribution. IMHO, these should be cleanroom'ed so that the question just goes away. Like the .rsrc files, this has come up before and not been an issue. - The .zip distribution contains .asc files for the .md5 and .sha1 files, which are unnecessary. - The source distribution contains a derby.log file at: source-dist/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/derby.log Comments welcome, but let's work on addressing the first two. Eddie On 4/17/07, Kevin Sutter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 for the 0.9.7 release. On 4/16/07, Patrick Linskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-jdbc/src/main/ resources/org/apache/openjpa/jdbc/schema/schemas-doctype.rsrc don't know: This is a dtd describing document type schemas. It doesn't appear to be generated and certainly has some IP in it. I think that our parser doesn't deal with comments for this type. openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/ derby.log ok: This should be cleaned up for future releases but has no IP We should just move this to the target directory. I'm
RE: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
This is there because we draw in all the dependencies that we don't explicitly exclude in the openjpa-project/assembly.xml, and at some point, someone (probably me) added docbook-xsl as a dependency so as to ensure that the docbook processing phase had access to the stylesheets. Is it possible to invert that, so that we only include certain dependencies? -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. ___ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. -Original Message- From: Marc Prud'hommeaux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Prud'hommeaux Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 10:23 AM To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:11 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote: - The binary distribution contains a new JAR file whose license is unclear; this is: binary-dist/lib/docbook-xsl-1.67.2.zip That dependency is unnecessary -- it's needed to build the docs, but not by the runtime. This is there because we draw in all the dependencies that we don't explicitly exclude in the openjpa-project/assembly.xml, and at some point, someone (probably me) added docbook-xsl as a dependency so as to ensure that the docbook processing phase had access to the stylesheets. I've gone ahead and fixed this in the trunk by adding it to the exclude list (revision 530094). Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.
Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
Good idea ... I've gone ahead and done that. It should make things a little easier to manage. On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:45 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote: This is there because we draw in all the dependencies that we don't explicitly exclude in the openjpa-project/assembly.xml, and at some point, someone (probably me) added docbook-xsl as a dependency so as to ensure that the docbook processing phase had access to the stylesheets. Is it possible to invert that, so that we only include certain dependencies? -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. __ _ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. -Original Message- From: Marc Prud'hommeaux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Prud'hommeaux Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 10:23 AM To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:11 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote: - The binary distribution contains a new JAR file whose license is unclear; this is: binary-dist/lib/docbook-xsl-1.67.2.zip That dependency is unnecessary -- it's needed to build the docs, but not by the runtime. This is there because we draw in all the dependencies that we don't explicitly exclude in the openjpa-project/assembly.xml, and at some point, someone (probably me) added docbook-xsl as a dependency so as to ensure that the docbook processing phase had access to the stylesheets. I've gone ahead and fixed this in the trunk by adding it to the exclude list (revision 530094). Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.
Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
Thanks Marc, How do I upload my key to http://incubator.apache.org/openjpa/KEYS ? The only documentation I've found indicates that I need to upload it, but not where the key needs to go. Before I create another release candidate (to remove the docbook jar), should we try to address the other minor issues? Craig and Patrick have responded to most of them, but there are a few others. Minor issues: - The .zip distribution contains .asc files for the .md5 and .sha1 files, which are unnecessary. They're unnecessary, but I've been ignoring them since they aren't hurting anything. It isn't too hard to get rid of them though. I think the gpg plugin for maven signs the .md5 and sha1 files too (I'd have to check though). - The source distribution contains a derby.log file at: source-dist/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/derby.log This is pretty easy to clean up, and I'll do that before I create another release candidate. The other issues Craig and Patrick have responded to. If any of them can be fixed quickly then we can include them in the new release candidate. On 4/18/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good idea ... I've gone ahead and done that. It should make things a little easier to manage. On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:45 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote: This is there because we draw in all the dependencies that we don't explicitly exclude in the openjpa-project/assembly.xml, and at some point, someone (probably me) added docbook-xsl as a dependency so as to ensure that the docbook processing phase had access to the stylesheets. Is it possible to invert that, so that we only include certain dependencies? -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. __ _ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. -Original Message- From: Marc Prud'hommeaux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Prud'hommeaux Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 10:23 AM To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:11 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote: - The binary distribution contains a new JAR file whose license is unclear; this is: binary-dist/lib/docbook-xsl-1.67.2.zip That dependency is unnecessary -- it's needed to build the docs, but not by the runtime. This is there because we draw in all the dependencies that we don't explicitly exclude in the openjpa-project/assembly.xml, and at some point, someone (probably me) added docbook-xsl as a dependency so as to ensure that the docbook processing phase had access to the stylesheets. I've gone ahead and fixed this in the trunk by adding it to the exclude list (revision 530094). Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. -- -Michael Dick
Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
Mike-- RE the KEYS file, you can just ssh to people.apache.org and check the KEYS file out directly into /www/incubator.apache.org/openjpa/ directory. No uploading necessary! :) To be sure -- the rest of the items are just nits which could mostly be cleaned up just by deleting the directories / files after they're uploaded. I don't have strong feelings about them, so just do whatever the community feels is best. Certainly, it's fine to ship them for 0.9.7. Cheers, Eddie On 4/18/07, Michael Dick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Marc, How do I upload my key to http://incubator.apache.org/openjpa/KEYS ? The only documentation I've found indicates that I need to upload it, but not where the key needs to go. Before I create another release candidate (to remove the docbook jar), should we try to address the other minor issues? Craig and Patrick have responded to most of them, but there are a few others. Minor issues: - The .zip distribution contains .asc files for the .md5 and .sha1 files, which are unnecessary. They're unnecessary, but I've been ignoring them since they aren't hurting anything. It isn't too hard to get rid of them though. I think the gpg plugin for maven signs the .md5 and sha1 files too (I'd have to check though). - The source distribution contains a derby.log file at: source-dist/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/derby.log This is pretty easy to clean up, and I'll do that before I create another release candidate. The other issues Craig and Patrick have responded to. If any of them can be fixed quickly then we can include them in the new release candidate. On 4/18/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good idea ... I've gone ahead and done that. It should make things a little easier to manage. On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:45 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote: This is there because we draw in all the dependencies that we don't explicitly exclude in the openjpa-project/assembly.xml, and at some point, someone (probably me) added docbook-xsl as a dependency so as to ensure that the docbook processing phase had access to the stylesheets. Is it possible to invert that, so that we only include certain dependencies? -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. __ _ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. -Original Message- From: Marc Prud'hommeaux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Prud'hommeaux Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 10:23 AM To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:11 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote: - The binary distribution contains a new JAR file whose license is unclear; this is: binary-dist/lib/docbook-xsl-1.67.2.zip That dependency is unnecessary -- it's needed to build the docs, but not by the runtime. This is there because we draw in all the dependencies that we don't explicitly exclude in the openjpa-project/assembly.xml, and at some point, someone (probably me) added docbook-xsl as a dependency so as to ensure that the docbook processing phase had access to the stylesheets. I've gone ahead and fixed this in the trunk by adding it to the exclude list (revision 530094). Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. -- -Michael Dick
Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
Michael- On Apr 18, 2007, at 11:35 AM, Michael Dick wrote: Thanks Marc, How do I upload my key to http://incubator.apache.org/openjpa/ KEYS ? The only documentation I've found indicates that I need to upload it, but not where the key needs to go. As Eddie mentioned, you should be able to ssh into people.apache.org and edit /www/incubator.apache.org/openjpa/KEYS directly (and then check it in). After that is done, there is a delay (maybe around an hour) before it will be mirrored and start showing up at http:// incubator.apache.org/openjpa/KEYS You could also check out https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ openjpa/site/docs/ locally, edit the KEYS file, check it in, and then ssh to people.apache.org and 'svn up KEYS', but it's probably easier to just do it on people.apache.org. - The source distribution contains a derby.log file at: source-dist/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/derby.log This is pretty easy to clean up, and I'll do that before I create another release candidate. I think I noticed a commit from Patrick that fixes this for the future (I believe he set a derby property to tell it to put the log in target/).
RE: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
- The source distribution contains a derby.log file at: source-dist/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/derby.log This is pretty easy to clean up, and I'll do that before I create another release candidate. I think I noticed a commit from Patrick that fixes this for the future (I believe he set a derby property to tell it to put the log in target/). Actually, it was Mike that made the change. -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. ___ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. -Original Message- From: Marc Prud'hommeaux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Prud'hommeaux Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 11:49 AM To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release Michael- On Apr 18, 2007, at 11:35 AM, Michael Dick wrote: Thanks Marc, How do I upload my key to http://incubator.apache.org/openjpa/ KEYS ? The only documentation I've found indicates that I need to upload it, but not where the key needs to go. As Eddie mentioned, you should be able to ssh into people.apache.org and edit /www/incubator.apache.org/openjpa/KEYS directly (and then check it in). After that is done, there is a delay (maybe around an hour) before it will be mirrored and start showing up at http:// incubator.apache.org/openjpa/KEYS You could also check out https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ openjpa/site/docs/ locally, edit the KEYS file, check it in, and then ssh to people.apache.org and 'svn up KEYS', but it's probably easier to just do it on people.apache.org. - The source distribution contains a derby.log file at: source-dist/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/derby.log This is pretty easy to clean up, and I'll do that before I create another release candidate. I think I noticed a commit from Patrick that fixes this for the future (I believe he set a derby property to tell it to put the log in target/). Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.
Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:19 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote: [eko] Yeah -- I noticed. Just didn't know how paranoid folks tend to be about this sort of stuff since TCK details seem to be kept under wraps. None of this IP comes from the TCK itself. I don't think that the TCK license bans people from putting IP that they create while running the TCK into the open source. Right. The only thing that we need to worry about is leaking TCK IP. Which this project does not. Craig -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. __ _ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. -Original Message- From: Eddie O'Neil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 10:17 AM To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release The TCK dir only contains the bootstrap / glue to invoke the TCK from within our build system, and not the TCK itself. [eko] Yeah -- I noticed. Just didn't know how paranoid folks tend to be about this sort of stuff since TCK details seem to be kept under wraps. - The binary distribution contains a new JAR file whose license is unclear; this is: binary-dist/lib/docbook-xsl-1.67.2.zip That dependency is unnecessary -- it's needed to build the docs, but not by the runtime. [eko] Cool, maybe it's easier to delete than to figure out how it's licensed. ;) On 4/18/07, Patrick Linskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - The binary distribution contains a new JAR file whose license is unclear; this is: binary-dist/lib/docbook-xsl-1.67.2.zip That dependency is unnecessary -- it's needed to build the docs, but not by the runtime. -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. _ _ _ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. -Original Message- From: Eddie O'Neil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 8:46 AM To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release The release is looking good with two items that should be addressed and some nits. :) Major issues: - Mike's GPG key is present in site/docs/KEYS but this file needs to be copied to http://incubator.apache.org/openjpa/KEYS as well. This will make it easier to verify releases and matches the instructions on the download page. - The binary distribution contains a new JAR file whose license is unclear; this is: binary-dist/lib/docbook-xsl-1.67.2.zip Minor issues: - The Maven2 repo contains two directories that probably shouldn't be part of the release -- examples/ and tck/ - The .rsrc files don't have licenses -- we've discussed this before (even in this thread!). This isn't a big deal, just expect the iPMC to bring it up again. - The JPA XSDs are CDDL licensed and are included in the distribution. IMHO, these should be cleanroom'ed so that the question just goes away. Like the .rsrc files, this has come up before and not been an issue. - The .zip distribution contains .asc files for the .md5 and .sha1 files, which are unnecessary. - The source distribution contains a derby.log file at: source-dist/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/derby.log Comments welcome, but let's work on addressing the first two. Eddie On 4/17/07, Kevin Sutter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 for the 0.9.7 release. On 4/16/07, Patrick Linskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-jdbc/src/main/ resources/org/apache/openjpa/jdbc/schema/schemas-doctype.rsrc don't know: This is a dtd describing document type schemas. It doesn't appear to be generated and certainly has some IP in it. I think that our parser doesn't deal with comments for this type. openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/ derby.log ok: This should be cleaned up for future releases but has no IP We should just move this to the target directory. I'm anxiously awaiting the day that Apache decides that it really is sufficient to describe licensing terms
Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
For the record, I'm still +1 for release. But if you want to cut another to fix the minor items that have been surfaced, it's ok with me. Craig On Apr 18, 2007, at 11:42 AM, Eddie O'Neil wrote: Mike-- RE the KEYS file, you can just ssh to people.apache.org and check the KEYS file out directly into /www/incubator.apache.org/openjpa/ directory. No uploading necessary! :) To be sure -- the rest of the items are just nits which could mostly be cleaned up just by deleting the directories / files after they're uploaded. I don't have strong feelings about them, so just do whatever the community feels is best. Certainly, it's fine to ship them for 0.9.7. Cheers, Eddie On 4/18/07, Michael Dick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Marc, How do I upload my key to http://incubator.apache.org/openjpa/ KEYS ? The only documentation I've found indicates that I need to upload it, but not where the key needs to go. Before I create another release candidate (to remove the docbook jar), should we try to address the other minor issues? Craig and Patrick have responded to most of them, but there are a few others. Minor issues: - The .zip distribution contains .asc files for the .md5 and .sha1 files, which are unnecessary. They're unnecessary, but I've been ignoring them since they aren't hurting anything. It isn't too hard to get rid of them though. I think the gpg plugin for maven signs the .md5 and sha1 files too (I'd have to check though). - The source distribution contains a derby.log file at: source-dist/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/derby.log This is pretty easy to clean up, and I'll do that before I create another release candidate. The other issues Craig and Patrick have responded to. If any of them can be fixed quickly then we can include them in the new release candidate. On 4/18/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good idea ... I've gone ahead and done that. It should make things a little easier to manage. On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:45 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote: This is there because we draw in all the dependencies that we don't explicitly exclude in the openjpa-project/assembly.xml, and at some point, someone (probably me) added docbook-xsl as a dependency so as to ensure that the docbook processing phase had access to the stylesheets. Is it possible to invert that, so that we only include certain dependencies? -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. _ _ _ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. -Original Message- From: Marc Prud'hommeaux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Prud'hommeaux Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 10:23 AM To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:11 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote: - The binary distribution contains a new JAR file whose license is unclear; this is: binary-dist/lib/docbook-xsl-1.67.2.zip That dependency is unnecessary -- it's needed to build the docs, but not by the runtime. This is there because we draw in all the dependencies that we don't explicitly exclude in the openjpa-project/assembly.xml, and at some point, someone (probably me) added docbook-xsl as a dependency so as to ensure that the docbook processing phase had access to the stylesheets. I've gone ahead and fixed this in the trunk by adding it to the exclude list (revision 530094). Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. -- -Michael Dick Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
I'd rather not cut another release, but I think we do need to resolve the issue with the docbook jar. If we can live with the extra jar then the vote can proceed. If I go back and remove the jar, republish etc. I'm assuming we'll have to restart the clock on the vote, correct me if I'm wrong in this regard. On 4/18/07, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For the record, I'm still +1 for release. But if you want to cut another to fix the minor items that have been surfaced, it's ok with me. Craig On Apr 18, 2007, at 11:42 AM, Eddie O'Neil wrote: Mike-- RE the KEYS file, you can just ssh to people.apache.org and check the KEYS file out directly into /www/incubator.apache.org/openjpa/ directory. No uploading necessary! :) To be sure -- the rest of the items are just nits which could mostly be cleaned up just by deleting the directories / files after they're uploaded. I don't have strong feelings about them, so just do whatever the community feels is best. Certainly, it's fine to ship them for 0.9.7. Cheers, Eddie On 4/18/07, Michael Dick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Marc, How do I upload my key to http://incubator.apache.org/openjpa/ KEYS ? The only documentation I've found indicates that I need to upload it, but not where the key needs to go. Before I create another release candidate (to remove the docbook jar), should we try to address the other minor issues? Craig and Patrick have responded to most of them, but there are a few others. Minor issues: - The .zip distribution contains .asc files for the .md5 and .sha1 files, which are unnecessary. They're unnecessary, but I've been ignoring them since they aren't hurting anything. It isn't too hard to get rid of them though. I think the gpg plugin for maven signs the .md5 and sha1 files too (I'd have to check though). - The source distribution contains a derby.log file at: source-dist/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/derby.log This is pretty easy to clean up, and I'll do that before I create another release candidate. The other issues Craig and Patrick have responded to. If any of them can be fixed quickly then we can include them in the new release candidate. On 4/18/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good idea ... I've gone ahead and done that. It should make things a little easier to manage. On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:45 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote: This is there because we draw in all the dependencies that we don't explicitly exclude in the openjpa-project/assembly.xml, and at some point, someone (probably me) added docbook-xsl as a dependency so as to ensure that the docbook processing phase had access to the stylesheets. Is it possible to invert that, so that we only include certain dependencies? -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. _ _ _ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. -Original Message- From: Marc Prud'hommeaux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Prud'hommeaux Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 10:23 AM To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:11 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote: - The binary distribution contains a new JAR file whose license is unclear; this is: binary-dist/lib/docbook-xsl-1.67.2.zip That dependency is unnecessary -- it's needed to build the docs, but not by the runtime. This is there because we draw in all the dependencies that we don't explicitly exclude in the openjpa-project/assembly.xml, and at some point, someone (probably me) added docbook-xsl as a dependency so as to ensure that the docbook processing phase had access to the stylesheets. I've gone ahead and fixed this in the trunk by adding it to the exclude list (revision 530094). Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. -- -Michael Dick Craig Russell
RE: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
... but we can run the incubator and the openjpa votes in parallel, right? If we're pretty sure that with the removal of that jar, we'll be happy, then we could rebuild and start off those two votes at the same time. -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. ___ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 12:30 PM To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release Hi Mike, On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:27 PM, Michael Dick wrote: I'd rather not cut another release, but I think we do need to resolve the issue with the docbook jar. If we can live with the extra jar then the vote can proceed. If I go back and remove the jar, republish etc. I'm assuming we'll have to restart the clock on the vote, correct me if I'm wrong in this regard. Yes, changing the bits restarts the clock. Craig On 4/18/07, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For the record, I'm still +1 for release. But if you want to cut another to fix the minor items that have been surfaced, it's ok with me. Craig On Apr 18, 2007, at 11:42 AM, Eddie O'Neil wrote: Mike-- RE the KEYS file, you can just ssh to people.apache.org and check the KEYS file out directly into /www/incubator.apache.org/openjpa/ directory. No uploading necessary! :) To be sure -- the rest of the items are just nits which could mostly be cleaned up just by deleting the directories / files after they're uploaded. I don't have strong feelings about them, so just do whatever the community feels is best. Certainly, it's fine to ship them for 0.9.7. Cheers, Eddie On 4/18/07, Michael Dick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Marc, How do I upload my key to http://incubator.apache.org/openjpa/ KEYS ? The only documentation I've found indicates that I need to upload it, but not where the key needs to go. Before I create another release candidate (to remove the docbook jar), should we try to address the other minor issues? Craig and Patrick have responded to most of them, but there are a few others. Minor issues: - The .zip distribution contains .asc files for the .md5 and .sha1 files, which are unnecessary. They're unnecessary, but I've been ignoring them since they aren't hurting anything. It isn't too hard to get rid of them though. I think the gpg plugin for maven signs the .md5 and sha1 files too (I'd have to check though). - The source distribution contains a derby.log file at: source-dist/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/derby.log This is pretty easy to clean up, and I'll do that before I create another release candidate. The other issues Craig and Patrick have responded to. If any of them can be fixed quickly then we can include them in the new release candidate. On 4/18/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good idea ... I've gone ahead and done that. It should make things a little easier to manage. On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:45 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote: This is there because we draw in all the dependencies that we don't explicitly exclude in the openjpa-project/assembly.xml, and at some point, someone (probably me) added docbook-xsl as a dependency so as to ensure that the docbook processing phase had access to the stylesheets. Is it possible to invert that, so that we only include certain dependencies? -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. _ _ _ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. -Original Message- From: Marc Prud'hommeaux
Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:53 PM, Patrick Linskey wrote: ... but we can run the incubator and the openjpa votes in parallel, right? If we're pretty sure that with the removal of that jar, we'll be happy, then we could rebuild and start off those two votes at the same time. Yes, this is true. Craig -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. __ _ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 12:30 PM To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release Hi Mike, On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:27 PM, Michael Dick wrote: I'd rather not cut another release, but I think we do need to resolve the issue with the docbook jar. If we can live with the extra jar then the vote can proceed. If I go back and remove the jar, republish etc. I'm assuming we'll have to restart the clock on the vote, correct me if I'm wrong in this regard. Yes, changing the bits restarts the clock. Craig On 4/18/07, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For the record, I'm still +1 for release. But if you want to cut another to fix the minor items that have been surfaced, it's ok with me. Craig On Apr 18, 2007, at 11:42 AM, Eddie O'Neil wrote: Mike-- RE the KEYS file, you can just ssh to people.apache.org and check the KEYS file out directly into /www/incubator.apache.org/openjpa/ directory. No uploading necessary! :) To be sure -- the rest of the items are just nits which could mostly be cleaned up just by deleting the directories / files after they're uploaded. I don't have strong feelings about them, so just do whatever the community feels is best. Certainly, it's fine to ship them for 0.9.7. Cheers, Eddie On 4/18/07, Michael Dick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Marc, How do I upload my key to http://incubator.apache.org/openjpa/ KEYS ? The only documentation I've found indicates that I need to upload it, but not where the key needs to go. Before I create another release candidate (to remove the docbook jar), should we try to address the other minor issues? Craig and Patrick have responded to most of them, but there are a few others. Minor issues: - The .zip distribution contains .asc files for the .md5 and .sha1 files, which are unnecessary. They're unnecessary, but I've been ignoring them since they aren't hurting anything. It isn't too hard to get rid of them though. I think the gpg plugin for maven signs the .md5 and sha1 files too (I'd have to check though). - The source distribution contains a derby.log file at: source-dist/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/derby.log This is pretty easy to clean up, and I'll do that before I create another release candidate. The other issues Craig and Patrick have responded to. If any of them can be fixed quickly then we can include them in the new release candidate. On 4/18/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good idea ... I've gone ahead and done that. It should make things a little easier to manage. On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:45 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote: This is there because we draw in all the dependencies that we don't explicitly exclude in the openjpa-project/assembly.xml, and at some point, someone (probably me) added docbook-xsl as a dependency so as to ensure that the docbook processing phase had access to the stylesheets. Is it possible to invert that, so that we only include certain dependencies? -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. _ _ _ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. -Original Message- From: Marc Prud'hommeaux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Prud'hommeaux Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 10:23 AM To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:11 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote: - The binary distribution contains a new
Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
Michael- On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:27 PM, Michael Dick wrote: I'd rather not cut another release, but I think we do need to resolve the issue with the docbook jar. If we can live with the extra jar then the vote can proceed. Personally, I think it is sufficiently ugly to release with the docbook jar to justify starting another release. However, if others disagree, I'll happily accede to the majority. For now, my vote changes to +0.
Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
I probably should have worded that differently since I haven't run the tests against DB2. I believe Dave's team has. Dave, can you comment on how big the impact of OpenJPA-222 is? On 4/18/07, Patrick Linskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm a little nervous about OpenJPA-222. From talking with Dave it sounds like it has a large effect on DB2. I'd like to get that issue resolved if possible. I'm a little nervous about scope creep. Is there some good reason why OPENJPA-222 needs to be resolved now vs. later? -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. ___ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. -Original Message- From: Michael Dick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 2:24 PM To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release On 4/18/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael- On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:27 PM, Michael Dick wrote: I'd rather not cut another release, but I think we do need to resolve the issue with the docbook jar. If we can live with the extra jar then the vote can proceed. Personally, I think it is sufficiently ugly to release with the docbook jar to justify starting another release. However, if others disagree, I'll happily accede to the majority. For now, my vote changes to +0. I agree but like you I can be talked out of it. I'll take another look over everything and start another release tonight / tomorrow. I'm a little nervous about OpenJPA-222. From talking with Dave it sounds like it has a large effect on DB2. I'd like to get that issue resolved if possible. -- -Michael Dick Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. -- -Michael Dick
Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
This isn't the last release of openjpa. What is the urgency for fixing this before our major event (the last release before exiting the incubator)? Is this release planned to be bundled with some other significant release? Craig On Apr 18, 2007, at 4:40 PM, Michael Dick wrote: I probably should have worded that differently since I haven't run the tests against DB2. I believe Dave's team has. Dave, can you comment on how big the impact of OpenJPA-222 is? On 4/18/07, Patrick Linskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm a little nervous about OpenJPA-222. From talking with Dave it sounds like it has a large effect on DB2. I'd like to get that issue resolved if possible. I'm a little nervous about scope creep. Is there some good reason why OPENJPA-222 needs to be resolved now vs. later? -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. _ __ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. -Original Message- From: Michael Dick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 2:24 PM To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release On 4/18/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael- On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:27 PM, Michael Dick wrote: I'd rather not cut another release, but I think we do need to resolve the issue with the docbook jar. If we can live with the extra jar then the vote can proceed. Personally, I think it is sufficiently ugly to release with the docbook jar to justify starting another release. However, if others disagree, I'll happily accede to the majority. For now, my vote changes to +0. I agree but like you I can be talked out of it. I'll take another look over everything and start another release tonight / tomorrow. I'm a little nervous about OpenJPA-222. From talking with Dave it sounds like it has a large effect on DB2. I'd like to get that issue resolved if possible. -- -Michael Dick Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. -- -Michael Dick Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
+1 for the 0.9.7 release. On 4/16/07, Patrick Linskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-jdbc/src/main/ resources/org/apache/openjpa/jdbc/schema/schemas-doctype.rsrc don't know: This is a dtd describing document type schemas. It doesn't appear to be generated and certainly has some IP in it. I think that our parser doesn't deal with comments for this type. openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/ derby.log ok: This should be cleaned up for future releases but has no IP We should just move this to the target directory. I'm anxiously awaiting the day that Apache decides that it really is sufficient to describe licensing terms at the packaging unit level, rather than the individual file level. -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. ___ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 11:40 AM To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release +1 for release I ran Robert's Donkin's RAT program on the release, and it reported a few anomalies: No license: openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/CHANGES.txt ok: No IP here openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/RELEASE-NOTES.html don't know: I'd approve it but others in the Incubator PMC might feel otherwise. openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-integration/tck/ windows-replacefilter.properties ok: No IP here openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-jdbc/src/main/ resources/org/apache/openjpa/jdbc/meta/java-keywords.rsrc ok: No IP here openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-jdbc/src/main/ resources/org/apache/openjpa/jdbc/schema/schemas-doctype.rsrc don't know: This is a dtd describing document type schemas. It doesn't appear to be generated and certainly has some IP in it. openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-jdbc/src/main/ resources/org/apache/openjpa/jdbc/sql/sql-keywords.rsrc ok: No IP here openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-persistence/src/main/ resources/META-INF/services/javax.persistence.spi.PersistenceProvider ok: No IP here openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-persistence/src/main/ resources/org/apache/openjpa/persistence/orm-xsd.rsrc ok: This is a copy of the official JPA schema under CDDL that is properly attributed in LICENSE.txt openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-persistence/src/main/ resources/org/apache/openjpa/persistence/persistence-xsd.rsrc ok: This is a copy of the official JPA schema under CDDL that is properly attributed in LICENSE.txt openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/ derby.log ok: This should be cleaned up for future releases but has no IP openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/src/ test/resources/org/apache/openjpa/persistence/xml/orm.xml ok: This is a test case orm.xml file that probably should have license notice in it for next time. But I won't vote to hold up the release for it. Craig On Apr 16, 2007, at 9:10 AM, Michael Dick wrote: OpenJPA People- In accordance with the Incubating Releases guidelines at http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases , I've taken another shot at making a release and start a vote on publishing a 0.9.7-incubating release of OpenJPA. The release candidate is at: http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-binary.ziphttp://people.apache.org/%7Emikedd/staging- repository/org/apache/openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/ openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-binary.zip The GPG signature and MD5 checksums are at: http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-binary.zip.aschttp://people.apache.org/%7Emikedd/ staging-repository/org/apache/openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7- incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-binary.zip.asc http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-binary.zip.md5http://people.apache.org/%7Emikedd/ staging-repository/org/apache/openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7- incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-binary.zip.md5 The sources
RE: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
+1 -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. ___ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. -Original Message- From: Marc Prud'hommeaux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Prud'hommeaux Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 9:18 AM To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release +1 On Apr 16, 2007, at 9:10 AM, Michael Dick wrote: OpenJPA People- In accordance with the Incubating Releases guidelines at http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases , I've taken another shot at making a release and start a vote on publishing a 0.9.7-incubating release of OpenJPA. The release candidate is at: http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-binary.ziphttp://people.apache.org/%7Emikedd/staging- repository/org/apache/openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/ openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-binary.zip The GPG signature and MD5 checksums are at: http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-binary.zip.aschttp://people.apache.org/%7Emikedd/ staging-repository/org/apache/openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7- incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-binary.zip.asc http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-binary.zip.md5http://people.apache.org/%7Emikedd/ staging-repository/org/apache/openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7- incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-binary.zip.md5 The sources, sources GPG signature and sources MD5 checksum are available at: http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-source.zip http://people.apache.org/%7Emikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-source.zip http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-source.zip.asc http://people.apache.org/%7Emikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-source.zip.asc http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-source.zip.md5 http://people.apache.org/%7Emikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-source.zip.md5 A branch for this release candidate has been created at : https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openjpa/branches/0.9.7- incubating-RC2 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openjpa/tags/0.9.7- incubating/ The release has been published to a staging repository on people.apache.org. The staging repository may be used in a maven 2 build file by adding the following information : . . . repositories repository idstaging-repository/id namemikedd's staging repository/name url http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository /url /repository . . . /repositories . . . dependencies dependency groupIdorg.apache.openjpa/groupId artifactIdopenjpa-all/artifactId version0.9.7-incubating/version /dependency . . . /dependencies Please vote to publish this incubating release on the project Web page: http://cwiki.apache.org/openjpa/downloads.html This vote will remain open until 11:15 CST on Thursday April 19th A +1 indicates that you approve of the release, a -1 indicates a vote against making a release -- -Michael Dick Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately
RE: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
+1 -Original Message- From: Michael Dick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: April 16, 2007 12:10 PM To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release OpenJPA People- In accordance with the Incubating Releases guidelines at http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases , I've taken another shot at making a release and start a vote on publishing a 0.9.7-incubating release of OpenJPA. The release candidate is at: http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/openjpa/openjpa-p roject/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-binary.ziphttp://peopl e.apache.org/%7Emikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9 .7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-binary.zip The GPG signature and MD5 checksums are at: http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/openjpa/openjpa-p roject/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-binary.zip.aschttp://p eople.apache.org/%7Emikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/openjpa/openjpa-project /0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-binary.zip.asc http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/openjpa/openjpa-p roject/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-binary.zip.md5http://p eople.apache.org/%7Emikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/openjpa/openjpa-project /0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-binary.zip.md5 The sources, sources GPG signature and sources MD5 checksum are available at: http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/openjpa/openjpa-p roject/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source.zip http://people.apache.org/%7Emikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/openjpa/openjp a-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source.zip http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/openjpa/openjpa-p roject/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source.zip.asc http://people.apache.org/%7Emikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/openjpa/openjp a-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source.zip.asc http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/openjpa/openjpa-p roject/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source.zip.md5 http://people.apache.org/%7Emikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/openjpa/openjp a-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source.zip.md5 A branch for this release candidate has been created at : https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openjpa/branches/0.9.7-incubating-RC2 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openjpa/tags/0.9.7-incubating/ The release has been published to a staging repository on people.apache.org. The staging repository may be used in a maven 2 build file by adding the following information : . . . repositories repository idstaging-repository/id namemikedd's staging repository/name url http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository /url /repository . . . /repositories . . . dependencies dependency groupIdorg.apache.openjpa/groupId artifactIdopenjpa-all/artifactId version0.9.7-incubating/version /dependency . . . /dependencies Please vote to publish this incubating release on the project Web page: http://cwiki.apache.org/openjpa/downloads.html This vote will remain open until 11:15 CST on Thursday April 19th A +1 indicates that you approve of the release, a -1 indicates a vote against making a release -- -Michael Dick
Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
+1 for release I ran Robert's Donkin's RAT program on the release, and it reported a few anomalies: No license: openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/CHANGES.txt ok: No IP here openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/RELEASE-NOTES.html don't know: I'd approve it but others in the Incubator PMC might feel otherwise. openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-integration/tck/ windows-replacefilter.properties ok: No IP here openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-jdbc/src/main/ resources/org/apache/openjpa/jdbc/meta/java-keywords.rsrc ok: No IP here openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-jdbc/src/main/ resources/org/apache/openjpa/jdbc/schema/schemas-doctype.rsrc don't know: This is a dtd describing document type schemas. It doesn't appear to be generated and certainly has some IP in it. openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-jdbc/src/main/ resources/org/apache/openjpa/jdbc/sql/sql-keywords.rsrc ok: No IP here openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-persistence/src/main/ resources/META-INF/services/javax.persistence.spi.PersistenceProvider ok: No IP here openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-persistence/src/main/ resources/org/apache/openjpa/persistence/orm-xsd.rsrc ok: This is a copy of the official JPA schema under CDDL that is properly attributed in LICENSE.txt openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-persistence/src/main/ resources/org/apache/openjpa/persistence/persistence-xsd.rsrc ok: This is a copy of the official JPA schema under CDDL that is properly attributed in LICENSE.txt openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/ derby.log ok: This should be cleaned up for future releases but has no IP openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/src/ test/resources/org/apache/openjpa/persistence/xml/orm.xml ok: This is a test case orm.xml file that probably should have license notice in it for next time. But I won't vote to hold up the release for it. Craig On Apr 16, 2007, at 9:10 AM, Michael Dick wrote: OpenJPA People- In accordance with the Incubating Releases guidelines at http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases , I've taken another shot at making a release and start a vote on publishing a 0.9.7-incubating release of OpenJPA. The release candidate is at: http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-binary.ziphttp://people.apache.org/%7Emikedd/staging- repository/org/apache/openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/ openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-binary.zip The GPG signature and MD5 checksums are at: http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-binary.zip.aschttp://people.apache.org/%7Emikedd/ staging-repository/org/apache/openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7- incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-binary.zip.asc http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-binary.zip.md5http://people.apache.org/%7Emikedd/ staging-repository/org/apache/openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7- incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-binary.zip.md5 The sources, sources GPG signature and sources MD5 checksum are available at: http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-source.zip http://people.apache.org/%7Emikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-source.zip http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-source.zip.asc http://people.apache.org/%7Emikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-source.zip.asc http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-source.zip.md5 http://people.apache.org/%7Emikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-source.zip.md5 A branch for this release candidate has been created at : https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openjpa/branches/0.9.7- incubating-RC2 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openjpa/tags/0.9.7- incubating/ The release has been published to a staging repository on people.apache.org. The staging repository may be used in a maven 2 build file by adding the following information : . . . repositories repository idstaging-repository/id namemikedd's staging repository/name url http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository /url
RE: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-jdbc/src/main/ resources/org/apache/openjpa/jdbc/schema/schemas-doctype.rsrc don't know: This is a dtd describing document type schemas. It doesn't appear to be generated and certainly has some IP in it. I think that our parser doesn't deal with comments for this type. openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/ derby.log ok: This should be cleaned up for future releases but has no IP We should just move this to the target directory. I'm anxiously awaiting the day that Apache decides that it really is sufficient to describe licensing terms at the packaging unit level, rather than the individual file level. -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. ___ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 11:40 AM To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release +1 for release I ran Robert's Donkin's RAT program on the release, and it reported a few anomalies: No license: openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/CHANGES.txt ok: No IP here openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/RELEASE-NOTES.html don't know: I'd approve it but others in the Incubator PMC might feel otherwise. openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-integration/tck/ windows-replacefilter.properties ok: No IP here openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-jdbc/src/main/ resources/org/apache/openjpa/jdbc/meta/java-keywords.rsrc ok: No IP here openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-jdbc/src/main/ resources/org/apache/openjpa/jdbc/schema/schemas-doctype.rsrc don't know: This is a dtd describing document type schemas. It doesn't appear to be generated and certainly has some IP in it. openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-jdbc/src/main/ resources/org/apache/openjpa/jdbc/sql/sql-keywords.rsrc ok: No IP here openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-persistence/src/main/ resources/META-INF/services/javax.persistence.spi.PersistenceProvider ok: No IP here openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-persistence/src/main/ resources/org/apache/openjpa/persistence/orm-xsd.rsrc ok: This is a copy of the official JPA schema under CDDL that is properly attributed in LICENSE.txt openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-persistence/src/main/ resources/org/apache/openjpa/persistence/persistence-xsd.rsrc ok: This is a copy of the official JPA schema under CDDL that is properly attributed in LICENSE.txt openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/ derby.log ok: This should be cleaned up for future releases but has no IP openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-source/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/src/ test/resources/org/apache/openjpa/persistence/xml/orm.xml ok: This is a test case orm.xml file that probably should have license notice in it for next time. But I won't vote to hold up the release for it. Craig On Apr 16, 2007, at 9:10 AM, Michael Dick wrote: OpenJPA People- In accordance with the Incubating Releases guidelines at http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases , I've taken another shot at making a release and start a vote on publishing a 0.9.7-incubating release of OpenJPA. The release candidate is at: http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-binary.ziphttp://people.apache.org/%7Emikedd/staging- repository/org/apache/openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/ openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-binary.zip The GPG signature and MD5 checksums are at: http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-binary.zip.aschttp://people.apache.org/%7Emikedd/ staging-repository/org/apache/openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7- incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-binary.zip.asc http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-binary.zip.md5http://people.apache.org/%7Emikedd/ staging-repository/org/apache/openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7- incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-binary.zip.md5 The sources, sources GPG
Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
Craig- I thought we were going to also release a maven download for the jar file containing all the openjpa stuff and a pom that contains the dependencies. This would enable folks using maven to simply put the five lines of code naming the dependency into their pom and put the incubating repository into their maven repositories list and they would be done. Note that they can do that already with the existing artifacts, since Maven downloads transitive dependencies. For example, this pom.xml works fine for me in that it downloads and uses all of the OpenJPA libraries and dependencies: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? project modelVersion4.0.0/modelVersion groupIdsome-project/groupId artifactIdsome-artifact/artifactId packagingjar/packaging nameMy Project/name version1.0.0/version repositories repository idapache-snapshots/id urlhttp://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating- repository/url /repository /repositories dependencies dependency groupIdorg.apache.openjpa/groupId artifactIdopenjpa-all/artifactId version0.9.6-incubating/version /dependency /dependencies /project There might be some other good reasons to make a separate distribution that bundles all of the jars into a single uber-jar, but, as I mentioned before, I personally don't think it is worth the effort, especially for a project that is so component-oriented. On Apr 13, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Craig L Russell wrote: Hi Michael, Thanks for all the work. I thought we were going to also release a maven download for the jar file containing all the openjpa stuff and a pom that contains the dependencies. This would enable folks using maven to simply put the five lines of code naming the dependency into their pom and put the incubating repository into their maven repositories list and they would be done. Was I just dreaming this up? Thanks, Craig On Apr 12, 2007, at 3:20 PM, Michael Dick wrote: OpenJPA People- In accordance with the Incubating Releases guidelines at http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/ Incubation_Policy.html#Releases , I've taken a shot at making a release and start a vote on publishing a 0.9.7-incubating release of OpenJPA. The release candidate is at: http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-binary.zip The GPG signature and MD5 checksums are at: http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-binary.zip.asc http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-binary.zip.md5 The sources, sources GPG signature and sources MD5 checksum are available at: http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-source.zip http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-source.zip.asc http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-source.zip.md5 I have tagged the sources at: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openjpa/tags/0.9.7- incubating/ Please vote to publish this incubating release on the project Web page: http://cwiki.apache.org/openjpa/downloads.html This vote will remain open until 5:20 CST on Tuesday April 17th (three business days). A +1 indicates that you approve of the release, a -1 indicates a vote against making a release -- -Michael Dick Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
Hi Marc, Artifacts need to be approved (voted on by the PMC) before they are put into repositories. The 0.9.6 release was put into the incubating repository only after it was approved by the IPMC. I'm really asking that the 0.9.7 release that we plan to put into the incubating repository needs to be put to a vote at the same time as we release the other artifacts. The pom.xml and the openjpa-all.0.9.7- incubating.jar should be part of the vote and available in the staging repository. Craig On Apr 13, 2007, at 12:09 PM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote: Craig- I thought we were going to also release a maven download for the jar file containing all the openjpa stuff and a pom that contains the dependencies. This would enable folks using maven to simply put the five lines of code naming the dependency into their pom and put the incubating repository into their maven repositories list and they would be done. Note that they can do that already with the existing artifacts, since Maven downloads transitive dependencies. For example, this pom.xml works fine for me in that it downloads and uses all of the OpenJPA libraries and dependencies: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? project modelVersion4.0.0/modelVersion groupIdsome-project/groupId artifactIdsome-artifact/artifactId packagingjar/packaging nameMy Project/name version1.0.0/version repositories repository idapache-snapshots/id urlhttp://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating- repository/url /repository /repositories dependencies dependency groupIdorg.apache.openjpa/groupId artifactIdopenjpa-all/artifactId version0.9.6-incubating/version /dependency /dependencies /project There might be some other good reasons to make a separate distribution that bundles all of the jars into a single uber-jar, but, as I mentioned before, I personally don't think it is worth the effort, especially for a project that is so component-oriented. On Apr 13, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Craig L Russell wrote: Hi Michael, Thanks for all the work. I thought we were going to also release a maven download for the jar file containing all the openjpa stuff and a pom that contains the dependencies. This would enable folks using maven to simply put the five lines of code naming the dependency into their pom and put the incubating repository into their maven repositories list and they would be done. Was I just dreaming this up? Thanks, Craig On Apr 12, 2007, at 3:20 PM, Michael Dick wrote: OpenJPA People- In accordance with the Incubating Releases guidelines at http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/ Incubation_Policy.html#Releases , I've taken a shot at making a release and start a vote on publishing a 0.9.7-incubating release of OpenJPA. The release candidate is at: http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-binary.zip The GPG signature and MD5 checksums are at: http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-binary.zip.asc http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-binary.zip.md5 The sources, sources GPG signature and sources MD5 checksum are available at: http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-source.zip http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-source.zip.asc http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-source.zip.md5 I have tagged the sources at: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openjpa/tags/0.9.7- incubating/ Please vote to publish this incubating release on the project Web page: http://cwiki.apache.org/openjpa/downloads.html This vote will remain open until 5:20 CST on Tuesday April 17th (three business days). A +1 indicates that you approve of the release, a -1 indicates a vote against making a release -- -Michael Dick Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/ jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
Craig- I'm really asking that the 0.9.7 release that we plan to put into the incubating repository needs to be put to a vote at the same time as we release the other artifacts. The pom.xml and the openjpa- all.0.9.7-incubating.jar should be part of the vote and available in the staging repository. I'm not sure I completely understand your issue, but I am guessing you are either asking whether other maven-friendly jar artifacts were created for the release, or else whether those jar artifacts need to be listed and voted on. In the previous release, we just voted on the final binary (http:// people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/openjpa/ openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating- binary.zip). The deploy process does also deploy the other module jars (e.g., see http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/ org/apache/openjpa/openjpa-all/0.9.7-incubating/), so you should be able access them in a pom.xml just like any repository. AFAIK, this is how all the other projects that use Maven have done it (e.g., ActiveMQ). Since the other deployed artifacts are either identical to, or derivative from, the binary assembly, it seems to me that listing every uploaded artifact might be needlessly cumbersome. Please let me know if I have mis-understood your issue. On Apr 13, 2007, at 12:40 PM, Craig L Russell wrote: Hi Marc, Artifacts need to be approved (voted on by the PMC) before they are put into repositories. The 0.9.6 release was put into the incubating repository only after it was approved by the IPMC. I'm really asking that the 0.9.7 release that we plan to put into the incubating repository needs to be put to a vote at the same time as we release the other artifacts. The pom.xml and the openjpa- all.0.9.7-incubating.jar should be part of the vote and available in the staging repository. Craig On Apr 13, 2007, at 12:09 PM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote: Craig- I thought we were going to also release a maven download for the jar file containing all the openjpa stuff and a pom that contains the dependencies. This would enable folks using maven to simply put the five lines of code naming the dependency into their pom and put the incubating repository into their maven repositories list and they would be done. Note that they can do that already with the existing artifacts, since Maven downloads transitive dependencies. For example, this pom.xml works fine for me in that it downloads and uses all of the OpenJPA libraries and dependencies: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? project modelVersion4.0.0/modelVersion groupIdsome-project/groupId artifactIdsome-artifact/artifactId packagingjar/packaging nameMy Project/name version1.0.0/version repositories repository idapache-snapshots/id urlhttp://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating- repository/url /repository /repositories dependencies dependency groupIdorg.apache.openjpa/groupId artifactIdopenjpa-all/artifactId version0.9.6-incubating/version /dependency /dependencies /project There might be some other good reasons to make a separate distribution that bundles all of the jars into a single uber-jar, but, as I mentioned before, I personally don't think it is worth the effort, especially for a project that is so component-oriented. On Apr 13, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Craig L Russell wrote: Hi Michael, Thanks for all the work. I thought we were going to also release a maven download for the jar file containing all the openjpa stuff and a pom that contains the dependencies. This would enable folks using maven to simply put the five lines of code naming the dependency into their pom and put the incubating repository into their maven repositories list and they would be done. Was I just dreaming this up? Thanks, Craig On Apr 12, 2007, at 3:20 PM, Michael Dick wrote: OpenJPA People- In accordance with the Incubating Releases guidelines at http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/ Incubation_Policy.html#Releases , I've taken a shot at making a release and start a vote on publishing a 0.9.7-incubating release of OpenJPA. The release candidate is at: http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-binary.zip The GPG signature and MD5 checksums are at: http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-binary.zip.asc http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-binary.zip.md5 The sources, sources GPG signature and sources MD5 checksum are available at: http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/
Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
Hi Mike, I now understand that your message only mentioned a subset of the artifacts that we're planning on publishing for the release of 0.9.7. On Apr 13, 2007, at 1:54 PM, Michael Dick wrote: Marc beat me to it, but in case this helps here's the xml that can be used to access the staging repository : repositories repository idstaging-repository/id namemikedd's staging repository/name url http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repositoryhttp:// people.apache.org/%7Emikedd/staging-repository /url /repository . . . /repositories All the OpenJPA artifacts can be accessed this way (at least I was able to download them). If there are other artifacts that we need to publish then I'll go ahead and put them on people.apache.org/~mikedd too. Maybe we just need to include these instructions in the email that we send out for the vote? Yes, I think this would make it clear that we're not releasing just the binary and source zip files but the binary maven jar and pom artifacts as well. It was the message not the staging of the artifacts that threw me off. Thanks! Craig Thanks, On 4/13/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Craig- I'm really asking that the 0.9.7 release that we plan to put into the incubating repository needs to be put to a vote at the same time as we release the other artifacts. The pom.xml and the openjpa- all.0.9.7-incubating.jar should be part of the vote and available in the staging repository. I'm not sure I completely understand your issue, but I am guessing you are either asking whether other maven-friendly jar artifacts were created for the release, or else whether those jar artifacts need to be listed and voted on. In the previous release, we just voted on the final binary (http:// people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/openjpa/ openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating- binary.zip). The deploy process does also deploy the other module jars (e.g., see http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/ org/apache/openjpa/openjpa-all/0.9.7-incubating/), so you should be able access them in a pom.xml just like any repository. AFAIK, this is how all the other projects that use Maven have done it (e.g., ActiveMQ). Since the other deployed artifacts are either identical to, or derivative from, the binary assembly, it seems to me that listing every uploaded artifact might be needlessly cumbersome. Please let me know if I have mis-understood your issue. On Apr 13, 2007, at 12:40 PM, Craig L Russell wrote: Hi Marc, Artifacts need to be approved (voted on by the PMC) before they are put into repositories. The 0.9.6 release was put into the incubating repository only after it was approved by the IPMC. I'm really asking that the 0.9.7 release that we plan to put into the incubating repository needs to be put to a vote at the same time as we release the other artifacts. The pom.xml and the openjpa- all.0.9.7-incubating.jar should be part of the vote and available in the staging repository. Craig On Apr 13, 2007, at 12:09 PM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote: Craig- I thought we were going to also release a maven download for the jar file containing all the openjpa stuff and a pom that contains the dependencies. This would enable folks using maven to simply put the five lines of code naming the dependency into their pom and put the incubating repository into their maven repositories list and they would be done. Note that they can do that already with the existing artifacts, since Maven downloads transitive dependencies. For example, this pom.xml works fine for me in that it downloads and uses all of the OpenJPA libraries and dependencies: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? project modelVersion4.0.0/modelVersion groupIdsome-project/groupId artifactIdsome-artifact/artifactId packagingjar/packaging nameMy Project/name version1.0.0/version repositories repository idapache-snapshots/id urlhttp://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating- repository/url /repository /repositories dependencies dependency groupIdorg.apache.openjpa/groupId artifactIdopenjpa-all/artifactId version0.9.6-incubating/version /dependency /dependencies /project There might be some other good reasons to make a separate distribution that bundles all of the jars into a single uber-jar, but, as I mentioned before, I personally don't think it is worth the effort, especially for a project that is so component- oriented. On Apr 13, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Craig L Russell wrote: Hi Michael, Thanks for all the work. I thought we were going to also release a maven download for the jar file containing all the openjpa stuff and a pom that contains the dependencies. This would
Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
Docs seem OK and the examples all run. Looks good to me! +1 for the release. On Apr 12, 2007, at 3:20 PM, Michael Dick wrote: OpenJPA People- In accordance with the Incubating Releases guidelines at http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/ Incubation_Policy.html#Releases , I've taken a shot at making a release and start a vote on publishing a 0.9.7-incubating release of OpenJPA. The release candidate is at: http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-binary.zip The GPG signature and MD5 checksums are at: http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-binary.zip.asc http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-binary.zip.md5 The sources, sources GPG signature and sources MD5 checksum are available at: http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-source.zip http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-source.zip.asc http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7- incubating-source.zip.md5 I have tagged the sources at: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openjpa/tags/0.9.7- incubating/ Please vote to publish this incubating release on the project Web page: http://cwiki.apache.org/openjpa/downloads.html This vote will remain open until 5:20 CST on Tuesday April 17th (three business days). A +1 indicates that you approve of the release, a -1 indicates a vote against making a release -- -Michael Dick
