Re: Computer purchase dilemma

2013-12-01 Thread Bob W
 
 There is no way for me to contact them from outside the system to even tell 
 them that I do not have access.


It's not just the army. I still get occasional sms messages telling me the 
system is down and wanting me to fix it at the place I was made redundant from 
3.5 years ago. Not so long ago one of the help desk guys phoned me to demand 
why I hadn't responded and why wasn't I fixing a SEV1. I explained to him, but 
it seems I am stuck on their support rota forever.

B

 On 1 Dec 2013, at 06:17, John johnsess...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
 I've been having my own problems with the Army's IT system.
 
 Every month since I retired, I get one or more emails from the Army lecturing 
 me for my failure to keep my profile up to date  change my password, thereby 
 jeopardizing the security of the entire free world.
 
 Unfortunately, I do not have access to a CAC card reader attached to a secure 
 Army computer on a .MIL network. And, since retirees are not issued a CAC ID 
 card, even if I had physical access to the computer I still couldn't change 
 my password or update my profile.
 
 There is no way for me to contact them from outside the system to even tell 
 them that I do not have access.
 
 Not just Catch-22, but Catch-22 squared.
 
 I'm not anti-Mac, I just prefer to build my own  I can't really do that with 
 a Mac.
 
 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Peso: Japanese Knife (17 image focus stack)

2013-12-01 Thread Bob W
That's very rich and nicely textured. Nice knife.

What type of wood is that surface? I have a cabinet in that wood, and I'd like 
some bookshelves made in it.

B

 On 1 Dec 2013, at 02:05, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Another focus stack image. This time shot with the DA100/2.8 macro.
 
 ISO 100, f/4. 17 x 2 second exposures.
 
 http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/pictures/knife2.html
 
 This is a much loved little knife that I sometimes use in my workshop.
 
 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Peso: Japanese Knife (17 image focus stack)

2013-12-01 Thread Attila Boros
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 4:05 AM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:

 Another focus stack image. This time shot with the DA100/2.8 macro.

 ISO 100, f/4. 17 x 2 second exposures.

 http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/pictures/knife2.html

 This is a much loved little knife that I sometimes use in my workshop.

 enjoy
 bill

Perfectly sharp! :)

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Peso: Japanese Knife (17 image focus stack)

2013-12-01 Thread Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne

Well done, Bill!

I'm curious to know if you move focus by hand or use some kind of device for 
it. I have been looking at several tools for the purpose, but haven't been 
able to justify the investment just yet.


Jostein

-Opprinnelig melding- 
From: Bill

Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2013 3:05 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Peso: Japanese Knife (17 image focus stack)

Another focus stack image. This time shot with the DA100/2.8 macro.

ISO 100, f/4. 17 x 2 second exposures.

http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/pictures/knife2.html

This is a much loved little knife that I sometimes use in my workshop.

enjoy
bill


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions. 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


GESO, something messier

2013-12-01 Thread Larry Colen

http://www.fluidr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157638239972733/

Even with the astrotracer 30 seconds at 500mm is too long.  
Now, I need to find stacking software for my mac.

These were photographed on Empire grade at the gate for Grey Whale ranch, 
with my Pentax K-5 II, using my O-GPS 1 in astrotracer mode.  
Some were shot with John Francis' 80-200/2.8 and some with my bigma.

I learned that using a ballhead sucks for astrophotography. It is 
impossible to make fine adjustments in just one axis.  Hell, it is 
impossible to make accurate fine adjustments period.

-- 
Larry Colen  l...@red4est.com http://red4est.com/lrc


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Peso: Japanese Knife (17 image focus stack)

2013-12-01 Thread Attila Boros
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne
p...@alunfoto.no wrote:

 Well done, Bill!

 I'm curious to know if you move focus by hand or use some kind of device for
 it. I have been looking at several tools for the purpose, but haven't been
 able to justify the investment just yet.

 Jostein

http://www.kaiser-fototechnik.de/en/produkte/2_1_produktanzeige.asp?nr=5534

Didn't try focus stack with it (yet), just setting the magnification
on the macro lens, then focusing by moving the camera.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Japanese Knife (17 image focus stack)

2013-12-01 Thread Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne
With a focus rail, you still have to move focus by hand. I was thinking 
about tools like this one:

http://www.cognisys-inc.com/stackshot/stackshot.php

Jostein

-Opprinnelig melding- 
From: Attila Boros

Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2013 2:04 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Peso: Japanese Knife (17 image focus stack)

On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne
p...@alunfoto.no wrote:


Well done, Bill!

I'm curious to know if you move focus by hand or use some kind of device 
for

it. I have been looking at several tools for the purpose, but haven't been
able to justify the investment just yet.

Jostein


http://www.kaiser-fototechnik.de/en/produkte/2_1_produktanzeige.asp?nr=5534

Didn't try focus stack with it (yet), just setting the magnification
on the macro lens, then focusing by moving the camera.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Computer purchase dilemma

2013-12-01 Thread Jan van Wijk
Hi Stan,

On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 16:14:55 -0500 Stan Halpin wrote:


And if the iMac or Apple Thunderbolt style monitor is good enough, then do I 
need a desktop at all? 

Can't really comment on your choice of desktop, no experience there.

But I went from a 24 iMac that was 6 years old, to a 15 MacBook Pro now, 16Gb 
memory en 500Gb SSD disk,
and coupled that to a Thunderbold display.

The display is certainly good enough for me!

The one drawback compared to the (old) iMac is that screen shows more 
reflections from windows, 
but I can live with that.

Otherwise that combo woks great!

And being a MacBook has the added advantage of being portable when needed of 
course :)

Regards, JvW


--
Jan van Wijk;   http://www.dfsee.com/gallery


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: GESO, something messier

2013-12-01 Thread John

You probably want something like the Vixen Polarie for that.

On 12/1/2013 7:06 AM, Larry Colen wrote:


http://www.fluidr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157638239972733/

Even with the astrotracer 30 seconds at 500mm is too long.
Now, I need to find stacking software for my mac.

These were photographed on Empire grade at the gate for Grey Whale ranch,
with my Pentax K-5 II, using my O-GPS 1 in astrotracer mode.
Some were shot with John Francis' 80-200/2.8 and some with my bigma.

I learned that using a ballhead sucks for astrophotography. It is
impossible to make fine adjustments in just one axis.  Hell, it is
impossible to make accurate fine adjustments period.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Japanese Knife (17 image focus stack)

2013-12-01 Thread John
$525 (plus tax, tags  dealer prep fees) vs $49.95 for the manual rail 
from Adorama?


I wonder what kind of lens I might find somewhere like KEH for the $475 
difference?


On 12/1/2013 8:18 AM, Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne wrote:

With a focus rail, you still have to move focus by hand. I was thinking
about tools like this one:
http://www.cognisys-inc.com/stackshot/stackshot.php

Jostein

-Opprinnelig melding- From: Attila Boros
Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2013 2:04 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Peso: Japanese Knife (17 image focus stack)

On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne
p...@alunfoto.no wrote:


Well done, Bill!

I'm curious to know if you move focus by hand or use some kind of
device for
it. I have been looking at several tools for the purpose, but haven't
been
able to justify the investment just yet.

Jostein


http://www.kaiser-fototechnik.de/en/produkte/2_1_produktanzeige.asp?nr=5534

Didn't try focus stack with it (yet), just setting the magnification
on the macro lens, then focusing by moving the camera.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Computer purchase dilemma

2013-12-01 Thread Aahz Maruch
On Sun, Dec 01, 2013, John wrote:

 I'm not anti-Mac, I just prefer to build my own  I can't really do
 that with a Mac.

Then you should be using Linux/*BSD.  If you truly need access to Windoze
software, you can do that with either Wine or a VM with a real licensed
copy of Windoze.
-- 
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6http://rule6.info/
  *   *   *
Help a hearing-impaired person: http://rule6.info/hearing.html

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Japanese Knife (17 image focus stack)

2013-12-01 Thread Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne

Ah, but that's argumentation to *avoid* the investment, John. :-)
Jotein

-Opprinnelig melding- 
From: John

Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2013 3:37 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Japanese Knife (17 image focus stack)

$525 (plus tax, tags  dealer prep fees) vs $49.95 for the manual rail
from Adorama?

I wonder what kind of lens I might find somewhere like KEH for the $475
difference?

On 12/1/2013 8:18 AM, Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne wrote:

With a focus rail, you still have to move focus by hand. I was thinking
about tools like this one:
http://www.cognisys-inc.com/stackshot/stackshot.php

Jostein

-Opprinnelig melding- From: Attila Boros
Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2013 2:04 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Peso: Japanese Knife (17 image focus stack)

On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne
p...@alunfoto.no wrote:


Well done, Bill!

I'm curious to know if you move focus by hand or use some kind of
device for
it. I have been looking at several tools for the purpose, but haven't
been
able to justify the investment just yet.

Jostein


http://www.kaiser-fototechnik.de/en/produkte/2_1_produktanzeige.asp?nr=5534

Didn't try focus stack with it (yet), just setting the magnification
on the macro lens, then focusing by moving the camera.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Peso: Japanese Knife (17 image focus stack)

2013-12-01 Thread Bill

On 30/11/2013 10:08 PM, Jack Davis wrote:

My that's a beautiful image, Bill.
What program do you use for stack focusing?


Thanks Jack. I'm not using any special software. Photoshop CS6 allows it 
to be done with a couple of mouse clicks.


bill



Jack

- Original Message -
From: Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2013 6:05 PM
Subject: Peso: Japanese Knife (17 image focus stack)

Another focus stack image. This time shot with the DA100/2.8 macro.

ISO 100, f/4. 17 x 2 second exposures.

http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/pictures/knife2.html

This is a much loved little knife that I sometimes use in my workshop.

enjoy
bill





--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Peso: Japanese Knife (17 image focus stack)

2013-12-01 Thread Bill

On 01/12/2013 2:53 AM, Bob W wrote:

That's very rich and nicely textured. Nice knife.

What type of wood is that surface? I have a cabinet in that wood, and I'd like 
some bookshelves made in it.


Thanks Bob. That is just run of the mill oak.

bill




B


On 1 Dec 2013, at 02:05, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:

Another focus stack image. This time shot with the DA100/2.8 macro.

ISO 100, f/4. 17 x 2 second exposures.

http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/pictures/knife2.html

This is a much loved little knife that I sometimes use in my workshop.







--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Peso: Japanese Knife (17 image focus stack)

2013-12-01 Thread Bill

On 01/12/2013 5:27 AM, Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne wrote:

Well done, Bill!

I'm curious to know if you move focus by hand or use some kind of device
for it. I have been looking at several tools for the purpose, but
haven't been able to justify the investment just yet.



For this, I just racked the lens focus out to layer the focus because 
the distance was pretty long. For closer macro work, it's best to have 
the camera on a focus rail and move the entire rig.
I have an old Pentax focus rail that works really well and a cheap 
Chinese focus stage that works like a cheap Chinese piece of junk. If 
one is using a bellows, then the camera body can be moved to shift focus 
as well.


bill


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Japanese Knife (17 image focus stack)

2013-12-01 Thread Toine
Manfrotto has a nice plate for this if you want to try manual micro positioning:
http://www.manfrotto.com/micro-positioning-sliding-plate

Toine

On 1 December 2013 14:18, Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne p...@alunfoto.no wrote:
 With a focus rail, you still have to move focus by hand. I was thinking
 about tools like this one:
 http://www.cognisys-inc.com/stackshot/stackshot.php

 Jostein

 -Opprinnelig melding- From: Attila Boros
 Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2013 2:04 PM
 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 Subject: Re: Peso: Japanese Knife (17 image focus stack)

 On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne
 p...@alunfoto.no wrote:

 Well done, Bill!

 I'm curious to know if you move focus by hand or use some kind of device
 for
 it. I have been looking at several tools for the purpose, but haven't been
 able to justify the investment just yet.

 Jostein


 http://www.kaiser-fototechnik.de/en/produkte/2_1_produktanzeige.asp?nr=5534

 Didn't try focus stack with it (yet), just setting the magnification
 on the macro lens, then focusing by moving the camera.

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Japanese Knife (17 image focus stack)

2013-12-01 Thread Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne

I own that plate, and in my opinion is not particularly good.
Jostein

-Opprinnelig melding- 
From: Toine

Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2013 4:49 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Japanese Knife (17 image focus stack)

Manfrotto has a nice plate for this if you want to try manual micro 
positioning:

http://www.manfrotto.com/micro-positioning-sliding-plate

Toine

On 1 December 2013 14:18, Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne p...@alunfoto.no wrote:

With a focus rail, you still have to move focus by hand. I was thinking
about tools like this one:
http://www.cognisys-inc.com/stackshot/stackshot.php

Jostein

-Opprinnelig melding- From: Attila Boros
Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2013 2:04 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Peso: Japanese Knife (17 image focus stack)

On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne
p...@alunfoto.no wrote:


Well done, Bill!

I'm curious to know if you move focus by hand or use some kind of device
for
it. I have been looking at several tools for the purpose, but haven't 
been

able to justify the investment just yet.

Jostein



http://www.kaiser-fototechnik.de/en/produkte/2_1_produktanzeige.asp?nr=5534

Didn't try focus stack with it (yet), just setting the magnification
on the macro lens, then focusing by moving the camera.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Peso: Japanese Knife (17 image focus stack)

2013-12-01 Thread Zos Xavius
I haven't done focus stacking but my general impression is that you
have to move the camera/lens to shift focus because doing so on the
lens tends to shift the magnification. So I guess its possible with
enough distance and not a lot of shift going on for this to work with
just the lens huh? For macro work I generally want to isolate a small
subject and prefer rather thin dof. Insects are the only big problems
for dof for me usually. I can see why you stacked this now. It looked
flatter to me too.

On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 01/12/2013 5:27 AM, Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne wrote:

 Well done, Bill!

 I'm curious to know if you move focus by hand or use some kind of device
 for it. I have been looking at several tools for the purpose, but
 haven't been able to justify the investment just yet.


 For this, I just racked the lens focus out to layer the focus because the
 distance was pretty long. For closer macro work, it's best to have the
 camera on a focus rail and move the entire rig.
 I have an old Pentax focus rail that works really well and a cheap Chinese
 focus stage that works like a cheap Chinese piece of junk. If one is using a
 bellows, then the camera body can be moved to shift focus as well.


 bill


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Computer purchase dilemma

2013-12-01 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
Stan, 

I use a Thunderbolt Display 27 interchangeably with MacBook Air 13 (2011 
generation), MacBook Pro 13 (2013 generation), and Mac mini. It's an excellent 
display, IMO slightly better than the one in the 2011 iMac 27 I have at the 
office. The two laptops above belong to the office too, the mini is my personal 
system (2.6Ghz quad core, 16G RAM, 1T internal drive, linked to a five disk 
array for storage and backup) which I do all my image processing with. It works 
great. 

A new Mac Pro would be neat and higher performance, but it is FAR more 
expensive and I'm not convinced I need all that processing power as yet. This 
system seems to handle everything I'm throwing at it (from 5Mpixel Olympus E-1 
raw files to 140 Mpixel raw file film scans from the Nikon Coolscan 9000ED) 
with more than adequate performance. And when I want a new cpu, even if I want 
to update to the Mac Pro, it's just a matter of plugging it in and cloning the 
contents of the mini onto it, which will reduce my system cost. 

I doubt Apple will switch to a different display connection protocol any time 
in the near future. Thunderbolt has at least the next half-dozen years 
comfortably in hand with respect to performance, I suspect. ;-)

G


On Nov 30, 2013, at 1:14 PM, Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info wrote:

 My 7-year old iMac just keeps on working, but it really struggles with large 
 image files, etc. My dilemma is not whether to buy a new computer - that is a 
 given. My dilemma is about what to buy.
 
 Note: I am well aware that I can certainly find cheaper alternatives than 
 those discussed below. However, I have had enough experience with MS-DOS and 
 Windows systems over the last few decades to be 100% certain that I have zero 
 interest in going that route. And within the Apple lineup, the Mac Mini, 
 tricked out and paired with the 27 Thunderbolt Display, is about what I 
 would get in an iMac all-in-one for about the same price. With some sacrifice 
 in expansion ports with the Mini. So the Mini is not off the table, but 
 pushed well to the side while I look at other options.
 
 Specifically, short version: 
   a. all-in-one (iMac) vs. desktop Mac Pro + display.
   b. If desktop+monitor, then Apple Thunderbolt display vs. other good 
 display vs. display with wide (Adobe RGB) color gamut.
 
 WRT the monitor - I have read several magazine articles and blog comments and 
 other material (including this interesting piece from EIZO: 
 http://www.eizo.com/global/library/basics/lcd_monitor_color_gamut/ ) and I am 
 not sure what I would gain from a wide-gamut display. If web images and 
 printers are stuck with sRGB, then for me to see a better image on my 
 desktop isn't really going to do anything except to further increase the load 
 on my credit card.
 
 And if the iMac or Apple Thunderbolt style monitor is good enough, then do I 
 need a desktop at all? 
 
 A current quad-core iMac with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M GPU with 4GB graphic 
 memory plus some system memory and drive upgrades would be about $2900. 
 
 The quad-core base version of the new Mac Pro will start at $3000, including 
 2 AMD FirePro D300 GPU's with 2GB on each. Some TBD added cost of memory 
 upgrades, cables, etc.
 
 So, is there sufficient value added with the desktop and its option to go for 
 a wide gamut display? Am I gaining other intangible benefits from the (to me) 
 inscrutable differences in processor and GPUs between the iMac and Mac Pro? 
 Should I save some money on the computer system and buy a 20-40 lens?
 
 
 I welcome any comments or opinions, informed or otherwise.
 
 stan 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Peso: Japanese Knife (17 image focus stack)

2013-12-01 Thread Bill

On 01/12/2013 9:58 AM, Zos Xavius wrote:

I haven't done focus stacking but my general impression is that you
have to move the camera/lens to shift focus because doing so on the
lens tends to shift the magnification. So I guess its possible with
enough distance and not a lot of shift going on for this to work with
just the lens huh? For macro work I generally want to isolate a small
subject and prefer rather thin dof. Insects are the only big problems
for dof for me usually. I can see why you stacked this now. It looked
flatter to me too.


Any movement, be it the lens, body or entire rig changes the 
reproduction ratio. For aligning the layers, I depend completely on 
Photoshop's auto alignment tool. It resizes as needed to bring the 
layers into alignment. Otherwise, alignment would be a very, very time 
consuming process.


bill


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Vivitar 1.4x Auto Focus Tele Converter for Pentax

2013-12-01 Thread Alan C

Has anyone tried this tele converter?

http://www.adorama.com/VV14XP.html?utm_term=Otherutm_medium=Affiliateutm_campaign=Otherutm_source=rflaid65093

Alan C 



---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
http://www.avast.com


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Vivitar 1.4x Auto Focus Tele Converter for Pentax

2013-12-01 Thread Zos Xavius
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3275911#forum-post-42633175

I think you will find that enlightening. I did.

On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Alan C c...@lantic.net wrote:
 Has anyone tried this tele converter?

 http://www.adorama.com/VV14XP.html?utm_term=Otherutm_medium=Affiliateutm_campaign=Otherutm_source=rflaid65093

 Alan C

 ---
 This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
 protection is active.
 http://www.avast.com


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Vivitar 1.4x Auto Focus Tele Converter for Pentax

2013-12-01 Thread Zos Xavius
PS read the whole thread.

On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
 http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3275911#forum-post-42633175

 I think you will find that enlightening. I did.

 On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Alan C c...@lantic.net wrote:
 Has anyone tried this tele converter?

 http://www.adorama.com/VV14XP.html?utm_term=Otherutm_medium=Affiliateutm_campaign=Otherutm_source=rflaid65093

 Alan C

 ---
 This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
 protection is active.
 http://www.avast.com


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Peso: Japanese Knife (17 image focus stack)

2013-12-01 Thread Bruce Walker
Beautifully detailed, handsome colours. That knife has a lot of character!

On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
 Another focus stack image. This time shot with the DA100/2.8 macro.

 ISO 100, f/4. 17 x 2 second exposures.

 http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/pictures/knife2.html

 This is a much loved little knife that I sometimes use in my workshop.

 enjoy
 bill


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.



-- 
-bmw

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Peso: Japanese Knife (17 image focus stack)

2013-12-01 Thread Zos Xavius
How precise does the stack have to be in terms of depth? I'm guessing
you could easily auto-align any other problems.

On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
 Beautifully detailed, handsome colours. That knife has a lot of character!

 On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
 Another focus stack image. This time shot with the DA100/2.8 macro.

 ISO 100, f/4. 17 x 2 second exposures.

 http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/pictures/knife2.html

 This is a much loved little knife that I sometimes use in my workshop.

 enjoy
 bill


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.



 --
 -bmw

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Peso: Japanese Knife (17 image focus stack)

2013-12-01 Thread Bill

On 01/12/2013 11:36 AM, Zos Xavius wrote:

How precise does the stack have to be in terms of depth? I'm guessing
you could easily auto-align any other problems.


Considering how typically lassez faire I am about technical aspects, I 
would say not very precise. All I'm doing is using the focus peaking 
option of live view to move the focus point ahead a little bit, making 
sure that there is overlap in the peaking and then taking another 
exposure, and repeating the process until I have scanned the entire subject.
After that, I let Photoshop do whatever voodoo it is doing to create the 
image.




On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:

Beautifully detailed, handsome colours. That knife has a lot of character!


Thanks Bruce. I appreciate the comments.

bill




On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:

Another focus stack image. This time shot with the DA100/2.8 macro.

ISO 100, f/4. 17 x 2 second exposures.

http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/pictures/knife2.html







--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Peso: Japanese Knife (17 image focus stack)

2013-12-01 Thread Zos Xavius
Thanks for the insight. I might try this and see how lens shift it can
compensate for. No macro rail here.

On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 01/12/2013 11:36 AM, Zos Xavius wrote:

 How precise does the stack have to be in terms of depth? I'm guessing
 you could easily auto-align any other problems.


 Considering how typically lassez faire I am about technical aspects, I would
 say not very precise. All I'm doing is using the focus peaking option of
 live view to move the focus point ahead a little bit, making sure that there
 is overlap in the peaking and then taking another exposure, and repeating
 the process until I have scanned the entire subject.
 After that, I let Photoshop do whatever voodoo it is doing to create the
 image.



 On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Beautifully detailed, handsome colours. That knife has a lot of
 character!


 Thanks Bruce. I appreciate the comments.

 bill




 On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Another focus stack image. This time shot with the DA100/2.8 macro.

 ISO 100, f/4. 17 x 2 second exposures.

 http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/pictures/knife2.html





 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Peso: Japanese Knife (17 image focus stack)

2013-12-01 Thread Zos Xavius
By the way, regardless of how you achieved it, that is a very nice image.

On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
 Thanks for the insight. I might try this and see how lens shift it can
 compensate for. No macro rail here.

 On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 01/12/2013 11:36 AM, Zos Xavius wrote:

 How precise does the stack have to be in terms of depth? I'm guessing
 you could easily auto-align any other problems.


 Considering how typically lassez faire I am about technical aspects, I would
 say not very precise. All I'm doing is using the focus peaking option of
 live view to move the focus point ahead a little bit, making sure that there
 is overlap in the peaking and then taking another exposure, and repeating
 the process until I have scanned the entire subject.
 After that, I let Photoshop do whatever voodoo it is doing to create the
 image.



 On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Beautifully detailed, handsome colours. That knife has a lot of
 character!


 Thanks Bruce. I appreciate the comments.

 bill




 On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Another focus stack image. This time shot with the DA100/2.8 macro.

 ISO 100, f/4. 17 x 2 second exposures.

 http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/pictures/knife2.html





 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


PESO - Morgan Stanley

2013-12-01 Thread Rick Womer
After my meeting in New York, I had three days at home and flew out to San 
Diego for another meeting.  What a contrast with NYC!

This was just outside my hotel:

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17616307size=lg

(K-5, DA 50-200)

Comments?

Rick
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Fw: PESO - Virgin River Canyon, AZ

2013-12-01 Thread Jan van Wijk
 Observed on my way South from Zion.
 Mostly a transport leg, but I found this little canyon quite captivating.
 It's a place I'd love to return to.

 http://alunfoto.blogspot.no/2013/11/virgin-river-canyon-az.html

Nice series!

I love that place, have been there three or four times at least. The small 
canyon, from de border-crossing in Nevada
with the big casino to the recreation area north of it in Utah is small but 
beatiful!
I remeber the hightway sign at the rec-area say 'Left: Las-Vegas and right: 
Salt-Lake-City' :)

The canyon is hard to photograph, both due to traffic conditions 
(no places to stop really, you have to get OFF the interstate) 
but also due to harsh lighting most of the day.

Regards, JvW

--
Jan van Wijk;   http://www.dfsee.com/gallery


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Morgan Stanley

2013-12-01 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
Good eye, nice composition.

Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola


On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote:
 After my meeting in New York, I had three days at home and flew out to San 
 Diego for another meeting.  What a contrast with NYC!

 This was just outside my hotel:

 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17616307size=lg

 (K-5, DA 50-200)

 Comments?

 Rick
 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Vivitar 1.4x Auto Focus Tele Converter for Pentax

2013-12-01 Thread Kenneth Waller
Max aperture 4.5 or faster would be a no go for me.


-Original Message-
From: Alan C c...@lantic.net
Subject: Vivitar 1.4x Auto Focus Tele Converter for Pentax

Has anyone tried this tele converter?

http://www.adorama.com/VV14XP.html?utm_term=Otherutm_medium=Affiliateutm_campaign=Otherutm_source=rflaid65093

Alan 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


generic battery pack for K5

2013-12-01 Thread Collin Brendemuehl
I got one of those generic K5 battery units for the K5.
Shot a party last night.
It was nice to shoot several hundred shots with the popup flash and not have
the battery power go down on me.



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Computer purchase dilemma

2013-12-01 Thread Ken Waller

It screams with Photoshop CS6 and it doesn't look like there's going to be
any reason to upgrade hardware for a Photoshop CS7 that's never going to
exist.


Not even a K-3?

Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller

- Original Message - 
From: John johnsess...@yahoo.com

Subject: Re: Computer purchase dilemma



The computer I built last year is adequate for my needs at this time. It
screams with Photoshop CS6 and it doesn't look like there's going to be
any reason to upgrade hardware for a Photoshop CS7 that's never going to
exist.

All I'm really saying is that if someone did have an interest in
exploring Windoze as an alternative, Windoze 8 isn't the version to do
it with.


On 11/30/2013 10:25 PM, John Mullan wrote:

If you want decent machines with Win 7 Pro, look at Enterprise class
machines like HP's Elitebook and Probook laptops, or similar desktops
aimed at the business user, not the typical consumer class machine.

jm


-Original Message- From: John
Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2013 9:15 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Computer purchase dilemma

This will probably be of absolutely no help whatsoever, but ...

I don't think now is a particularly good time to buy Windoze computers
anyway. Looks like everything that's available comes preloaded with
Windoze 8, which is not the best thing Micro$oft ever came up with.

I've currently got 2 build-your-own systems with XP  one with Windoze
7, along with a laptop I need to finish updating the Windoze 7 that I
replaced Vista with.

Windoze sucks, but not enough to induce me to sell my soul to Apple.

I did briefly consider going the hackentosh route, but it doesn't really
look like a viable platform for someone who doesn't enjoy spending all
their time fighting the OS. That's about the only good thing about
Windoze. You can schlep the equipment together  install the OS and it
will pretty much work without having to constantly fight with it.

On 11/30/2013 4:14 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:

My 7-year old iMac just keeps on working, but it really struggles
with large image files, etc. My dilemma is not whether to buy a new
computer - that is a given. My dilemma is about what to buy.

Note: I am well aware that I can certainly find cheaper alternatives
than those discussed below. However, I have had enough experience
with MS-DOS and Windows systems over the last few decades to be 100%
certain that I have zero interest in going that route. And within
the Apple lineup, the Mac Mini, tricked out and paired with the 27
Thunderbolt Display, is about what I would get in an iMac all-in-one
for about the same price. With some sacrifice in expansion ports
with the Mini. So the Mini is not off the table, but pushed well to
the side while I look at other options.

Specifically, short version: a. all-in-one (iMac) vs. desktop Mac
Pro + display. b. If desktop+monitor, then Apple Thunderbolt display
vs. other good display vs. display with wide (Adobe RGB) color
gamut.

WRT the monitor - I have read several magazine articles and blog
comments and other material (including this interesting piece from
EIZO:
http://www.eizo.com/global/library/basics/lcd_monitor_color_gamut/ )
and I am not sure what I would gain from a wide-gamut display. If
web images and printers are stuck with sRGB, then for me to see a
better image on my desktop isn't really going to do anything
except to further increase the load on my credit card.

And if the iMac or Apple Thunderbolt style monitor is good enough,
then do I need a desktop at all?

A current quad-core iMac with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M GPU with 4GB
graphic memory plus some system memory and drive upgrades would be
about $2900.

The quad-core base version of the new Mac Pro will start at $3000,
including 2 AMD FirePro D300 GPU's with 2GB on each. Some TBD added
cost of memory upgrades, cables, etc.

So, is there sufficient value added with the desktop and its option
to go for a wide gamut display? Am I gaining other intangible
benefits from the (to me) inscrutable differences in processor and
GPUs between the iMac and Mac Pro? Should I save some money on the
computer system and buy a 20-40 lens?


I welcome any comments or opinions, informed or otherwise.

stan



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


PESO: My Bug

2013-12-01 Thread Bill

Not a focus stack (thankfully. I'm sure)

Pentax K3 (I am really liking this camera), 18-135 zoom at 135mm, F6.3, 
1/640 second ISO800
Don't be afraid to look, it's not a real bug, either, it's just what we 
nicknamed him..


http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/pictures/bug1.html

enjoy
bill

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


That rokinon 24/1.4 is $450 on lightning deal

2013-12-01 Thread Larry Colen
Going on right now:
http://www.amazon.com/Rokinon-Aspherical-Angle-Pentax-RK24M-P/dp/B006YM9KYK

-- 
Larry Colen  l...@red4est.com http://red4est.com/lrc


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: My Bug

2013-12-01 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
That is an appealing image.  I especially like the snow on his nose.

Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola


On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
 Not a focus stack (thankfully. I'm sure)

 Pentax K3 (I am really liking this camera), 18-135 zoom at 135mm, F6.3,
 1/640 second ISO800
 Don't be afraid to look, it's not a real bug, either, it's just what we
 nicknamed him..

 http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/pictures/bug1.html

 enjoy
 bill

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: My Bug

2013-12-01 Thread Bob Sullivan
Love those two tan dots on his eyebrows.  Bob S.

On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
 Not a focus stack (thankfully. I'm sure)

 Pentax K3 (I am really liking this camera), 18-135 zoom at 135mm, F6.3,
 1/640 second ISO800
 Don't be afraid to look, it's not a real bug, either, it's just what we
 nicknamed him..

 http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/pictures/bug1.html

 enjoy
 bill

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: My Bug

2013-12-01 Thread Bruce Walker
He has so got that What?!? look on his face. :-)

On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
 Not a focus stack (thankfully. I'm sure)

 Pentax K3 (I am really liking this camera), 18-135 zoom at 135mm, F6.3,
 1/640 second ISO800
 Don't be afraid to look, it's not a real bug, either, it's just what we
 nicknamed him..

 http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/pictures/bug1.html

 enjoy
 bill

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.



-- 
-bmw

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Morgan Stanley

2013-12-01 Thread Ken Waller
Nice work - good eye.  I think it would be a stronger image if the LH side 
of the image was cropped slightly to eliminate the blue sky.




Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller

- Original Message - 
From: Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com

Subject: PESO - Morgan Stanley


After my meeting in New York, I had three days at home and flew out to San 
Diego for another meeting.  What a contrast with NYC!


This was just outside my hotel:

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17616307size=lg

(K-5, DA 50-200)

Comments?

Rick



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: My Bug

2013-12-01 Thread Ken Waller

What a great capture of a good looking animal!

I'd loose the brush in the background if it were mine.

Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller

- Original Message - 
From: Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com

Subject: PESO: My Bug



Not a focus stack (thankfully. I'm sure)

Pentax K3 (I am really liking this camera), 18-135 zoom at 135mm, F6.3, 
1/640 second ISO800
Don't be afraid to look, it's not a real bug, either, it's just what we 
nicknamed him..


http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/pictures/bug1.html

enjoy
bill



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: My Bug

2013-12-01 Thread Bruce Walker
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:

 Pentax K3 (I am really liking this camera),

Me too! Thanks for forcing me to get it. ;-)

-- 
-bmw

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Computer purchase dilemma

2013-12-01 Thread John Francis
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 10:25:24PM -0500, John Mullan wrote:
 If you want decent machines with Win 7 Pro, look at Enterprise class
 machines like HP's Elitebook and Probook laptops, or similar
 desktops aimed at the business user, not the typical consumer class
 machine.
 
 jm

Yep.  This is being written on an EliteBook 8740w (17.3 1920x1200);
it's roughly comparable to a MacBook Pro (quad i7 processors, memory
up to either 16GB or 32GB, depending on who you ask). Windows 7 Pro.

My previous two machines were both HP laptops (one XP/32, one XP/64),
and I got over 10 years of use out of them. The weak point, in each
case, was the display.

But then, what do I know?  I've also got a house full of Sony A/V kit,
some of which is over 20 years old; the only thing which is coming to
the end of its life is the projection TV, and that's got to be around
10 years old.  It could be fixed, but a new flat screen would almost
certainly cost less, and offer me more (such as HDMI, for one thing).


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Japanese Knife (17 image focus stack)

2013-12-01 Thread John
I've got a Pentax Macro Focus Rail III or some such I found in a 
discount bin at one of the local independent cameras stores that Pentax 
dumped back around the time Hoya bought them. Got it for something like 
$20 IIRC.


It doesn't have any kind of motor but it works Ok.

On 12/1/2013 10:03 AM, Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne wrote:

Ah, but that's argumentation to *avoid* the investment, John. :-)
Jotein

-Opprinnelig melding- From: John
Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2013 3:37 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Japanese Knife (17 image focus stack)

$525 (plus tax, tags  dealer prep fees) vs $49.95 for the manual rail
from Adorama?

I wonder what kind of lens I might find somewhere like KEH for the $475
difference?

On 12/1/2013 8:18 AM, Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne wrote:

With a focus rail, you still have to move focus by hand. I was thinking
about tools like this one:
http://www.cognisys-inc.com/stackshot/stackshot.php

Jostein

-Opprinnelig melding- From: Attila Boros
Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2013 2:04 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Peso: Japanese Knife (17 image focus stack)

On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne
p...@alunfoto.no wrote:


Well done, Bill!

I'm curious to know if you move focus by hand or use some kind of
device for
it. I have been looking at several tools for the purpose, but haven't
been
able to justify the investment just yet.

Jostein


http://www.kaiser-fototechnik.de/en/produkte/2_1_produktanzeige.asp?nr=5534


Didn't try focus stack with it (yet), just setting the magnification
on the macro lens, then focusing by moving the camera.





--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Computer purchase dilemma

2013-12-01 Thread John

I could, but I only build 'em so I can use 'em and all my applications
run on windoze, so why build in another, unnecessary layer of
frustration between me and the applications?

On 12/1/2013 9:37 AM, Aahz Maruch wrote:

On Sun, Dec 01, 2013, John wrote:


I'm not anti-Mac, I just prefer to build my own  I can't really do
that with a Mac.


Then you should be using Linux/*BSD.  If you truly need access to Windoze
software, you can do that with either Wine or a VM with a real licensed
copy of Windoze.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Computer purchase dilemma

2013-12-01 Thread John

On 12/1/2013 5:11 PM, Ken Waller wrote:

It screams with Photoshop CS6 and it doesn't look like there's going
to be
any reason to upgrade hardware for a Photoshop CS7 that's never going to
exist.


Not even a K-3?



K-3, is that Ricoh's new Full-Frame DSLR in Pentax K mount?


Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller

- Original Message - From: John johnsess...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Computer purchase dilemma



The computer I built last year is adequate for my needs at this time. It
screams with Photoshop CS6 and it doesn't look like there's going to be
any reason to upgrade hardware for a Photoshop CS7 that's never going to
exist.

All I'm really saying is that if someone did have an interest in
exploring Windoze as an alternative, Windoze 8 isn't the version to do
it with.


On 11/30/2013 10:25 PM, John Mullan wrote:

If you want decent machines with Win 7 Pro, look at Enterprise class
machines like HP's Elitebook and Probook laptops, or similar desktops
aimed at the business user, not the typical consumer class machine.

jm


-Original Message- From: John
Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2013 9:15 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Computer purchase dilemma

This will probably be of absolutely no help whatsoever, but ...

I don't think now is a particularly good time to buy Windoze computers
anyway. Looks like everything that's available comes preloaded with
Windoze 8, which is not the best thing Micro$oft ever came up with.

I've currently got 2 build-your-own systems with XP  one with Windoze
7, along with a laptop I need to finish updating the Windoze 7 that I
replaced Vista with.

Windoze sucks, but not enough to induce me to sell my soul to Apple.

I did briefly consider going the hackentosh route, but it doesn't really
look like a viable platform for someone who doesn't enjoy spending all
their time fighting the OS. That's about the only good thing about
Windoze. You can schlep the equipment together  install the OS and it
will pretty much work without having to constantly fight with it.

On 11/30/2013 4:14 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:

My 7-year old iMac just keeps on working, but it really struggles
with large image files, etc. My dilemma is not whether to buy a new
computer - that is a given. My dilemma is about what to buy.

Note: I am well aware that I can certainly find cheaper alternatives
than those discussed below. However, I have had enough experience
with MS-DOS and Windows systems over the last few decades to be 100%
certain that I have zero interest in going that route. And within
the Apple lineup, the Mac Mini, tricked out and paired with the 27
Thunderbolt Display, is about what I would get in an iMac all-in-one
for about the same price. With some sacrifice in expansion ports
with the Mini. So the Mini is not off the table, but pushed well to
the side while I look at other options.

Specifically, short version: a. all-in-one (iMac) vs. desktop Mac
Pro + display. b. If desktop+monitor, then Apple Thunderbolt display
vs. other good display vs. display with wide (Adobe RGB) color
gamut.

WRT the monitor - I have read several magazine articles and blog
comments and other material (including this interesting piece from
EIZO:
http://www.eizo.com/global/library/basics/lcd_monitor_color_gamut/ )
and I am not sure what I would gain from a wide-gamut display. If
web images and printers are stuck with sRGB, then for me to see a
better image on my desktop isn't really going to do anything
except to further increase the load on my credit card.

And if the iMac or Apple Thunderbolt style monitor is good enough,
then do I need a desktop at all?

A current quad-core iMac with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M GPU with 4GB
graphic memory plus some system memory and drive upgrades would be
about $2900.

The quad-core base version of the new Mac Pro will start at $3000,
including 2 AMD FirePro D300 GPU's with 2GB on each. Some TBD added
cost of memory upgrades, cables, etc.

So, is there sufficient value added with the desktop and its option
to go for a wide gamut display? Am I gaining other intangible
benefits from the (to me) inscrutable differences in processor and
GPUs between the iMac and Mac Pro? Should I save some money on the
computer system and buy a 20-40 lens?


I welcome any comments or opinions, informed or otherwise.

stan





--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


December PUG - Last Call

2013-12-01 Thread Brian Walters

G'day all

My home internet connection is down at present.  Telstra advises that  
the phone line will be fixed by 5 Dec - presumably that's 2013 but  
with Telstra, it could easily be 2014 (or later...)


Anyway, if it is repaired as promised, I'll be closing submissions on  
Thursday evening (Sydney time).


Theme:  Chaos;  13 submissions so far.

Submit here:

http://pug.komkon.org/submit/

Submission Guidelines here:

http://pug.komkon.org/general/autosubmit.html

The main requirements are:
* Max. pixel dimensions: 800 x 800 pixels
* Max file size: 300k
* Third party equipment is acceptable provided either the camera body  
or lens used is Pentax.
* If you embed a colour space in the image, it should be sRGB to  
ensure that the image is displayed correctly on line.


--
Cheers

Brian

++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Computer purchase dilemma

2013-12-01 Thread Ken Waller

K-3, is that Ricoh's new Full-Frame DSLR in Pentax K mount?


At 24mp it might as well be - especially if you've been shooting with a K10D 
or K29D.


Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller

- Original Message - 
From: John johnsess...@yahoo.com

Subject: Re: Computer purchase dilemma



On 12/1/2013 5:11 PM, Ken Waller wrote:

It screams with Photoshop CS6 and it doesn't look like there's going
to be
any reason to upgrade hardware for a Photoshop CS7 that's never going to
exist.


Not even a K-3?



K-3, is that Ricoh's new Full-Frame DSLR in Pentax K mount?


Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller

- Original Message - From: John johnsess...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Computer purchase dilemma



The computer I built last year is adequate for my needs at this time. It
screams with Photoshop CS6 and it doesn't look like there's going to be
any reason to upgrade hardware for a Photoshop CS7 that's never going to
exist.

All I'm really saying is that if someone did have an interest in
exploring Windoze as an alternative, Windoze 8 isn't the version to do
it with.


On 11/30/2013 10:25 PM, John Mullan wrote:

If you want decent machines with Win 7 Pro, look at Enterprise class
machines like HP's Elitebook and Probook laptops, or similar desktops
aimed at the business user, not the typical consumer class machine.

jm


-Original Message- From: John
Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2013 9:15 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Computer purchase dilemma

This will probably be of absolutely no help whatsoever, but ...

I don't think now is a particularly good time to buy Windoze computers
anyway. Looks like everything that's available comes preloaded with
Windoze 8, which is not the best thing Micro$oft ever came up with.

I've currently got 2 build-your-own systems with XP  one with Windoze
7, along with a laptop I need to finish updating the Windoze 7 that I
replaced Vista with.

Windoze sucks, but not enough to induce me to sell my soul to Apple.

I did briefly consider going the hackentosh route, but it doesn't 
really

look like a viable platform for someone who doesn't enjoy spending all
their time fighting the OS. That's about the only good thing about
Windoze. You can schlep the equipment together  install the OS and it
will pretty much work without having to constantly fight with it.

On 11/30/2013 4:14 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:

My 7-year old iMac just keeps on working, but it really struggles
with large image files, etc. My dilemma is not whether to buy a new
computer - that is a given. My dilemma is about what to buy.

Note: I am well aware that I can certainly find cheaper alternatives
than those discussed below. However, I have had enough experience
with MS-DOS and Windows systems over the last few decades to be 100%
certain that I have zero interest in going that route. And within
the Apple lineup, the Mac Mini, tricked out and paired with the 27
Thunderbolt Display, is about what I would get in an iMac all-in-one
for about the same price. With some sacrifice in expansion ports
with the Mini. So the Mini is not off the table, but pushed well to
the side while I look at other options.

Specifically, short version: a. all-in-one (iMac) vs. desktop Mac
Pro + display. b. If desktop+monitor, then Apple Thunderbolt display
vs. other good display vs. display with wide (Adobe RGB) color
gamut.

WRT the monitor - I have read several magazine articles and blog
comments and other material (including this interesting piece from
EIZO:
http://www.eizo.com/global/library/basics/lcd_monitor_color_gamut/ )
and I am not sure what I would gain from a wide-gamut display. If
web images and printers are stuck with sRGB, then for me to see a
better image on my desktop isn't really going to do anything
except to further increase the load on my credit card.

And if the iMac or Apple Thunderbolt style monitor is good enough,
then do I need a desktop at all?

A current quad-core iMac with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M GPU with 4GB
graphic memory plus some system memory and drive upgrades would be
about $2900.

The quad-core base version of the new Mac Pro will start at $3000,
including 2 AMD FirePro D300 GPU's with 2GB on each. Some TBD added
cost of memory upgrades, cables, etc.

So, is there sufficient value added with the desktop and its option
to go for a wide gamut display? Am I gaining other intangible
benefits from the (to me) inscrutable differences in processor and
GPUs between the iMac and Mac Pro? Should I save some money on the
computer system and buy a 20-40 lens?


I welcome any comments or opinions, informed or otherwise.

stan



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Vivitar 1.4x Auto Focus Tele Converter for Pentax

2013-12-01 Thread P.J. Alling

Probably not the best optically as well as apparently having other issues.

On 12/1/2013 11:25 AM, Alan C wrote:

Has anyone tried this tele converter?

http://www.adorama.com/VV14XP.html?utm_term=Otherutm_medium=Affiliateutm_campaign=Otherutm_source=rflaid65093 



Alan C

---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus 
protection is active.

http://www.avast.com





--
A newspaper is a device for making the ignorant more ignorant, and the crazy, 
crazier.

 - H.L.Mencken


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Vivitar 1.4x Auto Focus Tele Converter for Pentax

2013-12-01 Thread P.J. Alling
Pentax as much as says that the 1.7x auto focus adapter shouldn't be 
used with any lens slower than f2.8.  But I had good luck with it using 
the A*300 f4.0 on even such enchant film bodies as the ZX-5n.  I expect 
it depends more on the low light capabilities of the camera itself.  
However that teleconverter seems to have electrical problems that make 
it more problematic.


On 12/1/2013 3:45 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:

Max aperture 4.5 or faster would be a no go for me.


-Original Message-

From: Alan C c...@lantic.net
Subject: Vivitar 1.4x Auto Focus Tele Converter for Pentax

Has anyone tried this tele converter?

http://www.adorama.com/VV14XP.html?utm_term=Otherutm_medium=Affiliateutm_campaign=Otherutm_source=rflaid65093

Alan





--
A newspaper is a device for making the ignorant more ignorant, and the crazy, 
crazier.

 - H.L.Mencken


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


PESO: Mountain ice

2013-12-01 Thread Mark Roberts
A shot from our Friday-after-Thanksgiving hike in the White Mountains.
Kinda abstract but I like it.
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/ice.jpg


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Vivitar 1.4x Auto Focus Tele Converter for Pentax

2013-12-01 Thread Miserere
P.J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
Pentax as much as says that the 1.7x auto focus adapter shouldn't be 
used with any lens slower than f2.8.  But I had good luck with it using

the A*300 f4.0 on even such enchant film bodies as the ZX-5n.  I expect

it depends more on the low light capabilities of the camera itself.  
However that teleconverter seems to have electrical problems that make 
it more problematic.

On 12/1/2013 3:45 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
 Max aperture 4.5 or faster would be a no go for me.


 -Original Message-
 From: Alan C c...@lantic.net
 Subject: Vivitar 1.4x Auto Focus Tele Converter for Pentax

 Has anyone tried this tele converter?


http://www.adorama.com/VV14XP.html?utm_term=Otherutm_medium=Affiliateutm_campaign=Otherutm_source=rflaid65093

 Alan



I've use the Pentax 1.7x TC with a 400mm f/5.6 and, in good light, it worked 
fine. And on a K10D no less! 

I also own the Tamron 1.4x TC and it works great with screwdrive AF lenses. 
Cheers,


  —M.
  
  \/\/o/\/\ -- http://WorldOfMiserere.com
  
  http://EnticingTheLight.com
  A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: PESO: Mountain ice

2013-12-01 Thread Miserere
Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
A shot from our Friday-after-Thanksgiving hike in the White Mountains.
Kinda abstract but I like it.
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/ice.jpg


Nice. Probably makes a beautiful print, huh? 

I have a thing for abstract ice pics, though. 
Cheers,


  —M.
  
  \/\/o/\/\ -- http://WorldOfMiserere.com
  
  http://EnticingTheLight.com
  A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: PESO: Mountain ice

2013-12-01 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
Quite nice indeed.  The shapes are interesting and carry the eye
further into the image.

Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola


On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 10:29 PM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
 A shot from our Friday-after-Thanksgiving hike in the White Mountains.
 Kinda abstract but I like it.
 http://www.robertstech.com/temp/ice.jpg


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Mountain ice

2013-12-01 Thread Christine Aguila
That's very nice, Mark.  Cheers, Christine 

Sent from my iPad

 On Dec 1, 2013, at 9:29 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
 
 A shot from our Friday-after-Thanksgiving hike in the White Mountains.
 Kinda abstract but I like it.
 http://www.robertstech.com/temp/ice.jpg
 
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.
 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Test

2013-12-01 Thread Christine Aguila
Test

Sent from my iPad

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Test2

2013-12-01 Thread Christine Aguila
Test2

Sent from my iPad

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Computer purchase dilemma

2013-12-01 Thread David Mann
On Dec 1, 2013, at 9:47 pm, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:

 It's not just the army. I still get occasional sms messages telling me the 
 system is down and wanting me to fix it at the place I was made redundant 
 from 3.5 years ago. Not so long ago one of the help desk guys phoned me to 
 demand why I hadn't responded and why wasn't I fixing a SEV1. I explained to 
 him, but it seems I am stuck on their support rota forever.

Just call them when you get the next email and inform them of your hourly 
contract rate ;)

Cheers,
Dave


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Peso: Japanese Knife (17 image focus stack)

2013-12-01 Thread Christine Aguila
Wow, that's really nice, Bill.  Great detail.  Cheers, Christine 

Sent from my iPad

 On Nov 30, 2013, at 8:05 PM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Another focus stack image. This time shot with the DA100/2.8 macro.
 
 ISO 100, f/4. 17 x 2 second exposures.
 
 http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/pictures/knife2.html
 
 This is a much loved little knife that I sometimes use in my workshop.
 
 enjoy
 bill
 
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.
 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: What if Pentax made a monochrome K-3?

2013-12-01 Thread P.J. Alling
What do you think, Ricoh is Leica? There are only two manufactures 
photography that could get away with making such a special purpose 
device as a monochrome only digital camera, and only three that might 
actually try it.  Leica already makes such a beast, and will probably 
make a profit on each one sold.  Canon could make such a beast and 
afford the loss on each one sold.  Sony might make one and convince 
themselves that it wouldn't kill their camera division, but it might.


On 11/29/2013 12:01 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:

Would you buy it? There would be a lot to gain in resolution and
sensitivity by eliminating the color filter. Big bonuses if you tend
to shoot in black and white a great deal anyways. I realize the
downsides of having to use filters just like the old days, but really
I'm ok with that personally. Plus think of all the great lenses that
are not all that suitable for color, but work amazingly well in black
and white. Just some wishful thinking. Even a B/W K-5 II would be
pretty cool.




--
A newspaper is a device for making the ignorant more ignorant, and the crazy, 
crazier.

 - H.L.Mencken


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: What if Pentax made a monochrome K-3?

2013-12-01 Thread Christine Aguila
No, I don't think I would.  Too limiting.  Cheers, Christine 

Sent from my iPad

 On Nov 29, 2013, at 11:01 AM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Would you buy it? There would be a lot to gain in resolution and
 sensitivity by eliminating the color filter. Big bonuses if you tend
 to shoot in black and white a great deal anyways. I realize the
 downsides of having to use filters just like the old days, but really
 I'm ok with that personally. Plus think of all the great lenses that
 are not all that suitable for color, but work amazingly well in black
 and white. Just some wishful thinking. Even a B/W K-5 II would be
 pretty cool.
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.
 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Computer purchase dilemma

2013-12-01 Thread steve harley

on 2013-11-30 20:48 Stan Halpin wrote

Larry, Steve - thanks for your comments. In a way they are not very helpful 
because I am looking for compelling reasons why I should go with the Mac Pro 
and not the Mini or iMac.


well, that comes down to what's compelling for you; if you are doing a mountain 
of work, and the machine will make a difference, go for it; the 10x7 cylinder 
does seem very alluring, though (i keep thinking i could use one, then coming 
back down to earth)




if you are using mainly Lightroom, then those super-GPUs won't make much 
difference to your photo work


This is something I have wondered about. I have seen a few references that show 
a rapidly diminishing gain in LR performance as one moves from 2 to 4 to 6 to 
8-core processors, and I figured that LR or any other current software would be 
unable to fully take advantage of any new CPU or GPU. I have been looking at 
the Perfect Photo Suite to use as an adjunct to LR, and their set-up 
instructions go into modifications to settings based on available cache memory 
on the GPU.  And so I was thinking just maybe this time bigger would be better, 
not only for that program but also for LR...


you are mixing different questions here:

1) does Lightroom benefit from GPU on Mac?

--  no (though the basic OS support of any app does benefit)


2) does Lightroom benefit from multiple CPU cores on Mac?

--  i can't find a solid reference on this, but it sounds like your own 
research found that any benefit is limited



3) does other software benefit from these?

--  yes, Aperture gets much benefit from the GPU, and is well equipped to 
utilize multiple cores; some operations of Photoshop benefit as well; many 
video-editing tools (video being the primary market for the Mac Pro) are very 
strongly dependent on GPU performance



and i'll add 4) will these matter more to LR in the future?

--  Adobe has had several development cycles to add GPU acceleration to 
Lightroom, and hasn't, so i can only guess it's not a priority; by the time it 
does make a difference, any machine from today will have been superseded




--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: My Bug

2013-12-01 Thread Christine Aguila
Very cute!  Those brown spots above the eyes are cute too.  Cheers, Christine 

Sent from my iPad

 On Dec 1, 2013, at 4:11 PM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Not a focus stack (thankfully. I'm sure)
 
 Pentax K3 (I am really liking this camera), 18-135 zoom at 135mm, F6.3, 1/640 
 second ISO800
 Don't be afraid to look, it's not a real bug, either, it's just what we 
 nicknamed him..
 
 http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/pictures/bug1.html
 
 enjoy
 bill
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.
 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Morgan Stanley

2013-12-01 Thread Christine Aguila
That's nice geometry, Rick.  I like it.  Cheers, Christine 

Sent from my iPad

 On Dec 1, 2013, at 1:57 PM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
 After my meeting in New York, I had three days at home and flew out to San 
 Diego for another meeting.  What a contrast with NYC!
 
 This was just outside my hotel:
 
 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17616307size=lg
 
 (K-5, DA 50-200)
 
 Comments?
 
 Rick
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.
 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Virgin River Canyon, AZ

2013-12-01 Thread Christine Aguila
Very nice, Jostein.  Great composition, light, subject, et al.  It's been 
wonderful to see your work from this recent trip.  Thanks for the treat!

Cheers, Christine 

Sent from my iPad

 On Nov 30, 2013, at 3:47 PM, Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne p...@alunfoto.no 
 wrote:
 
 Observed on my way South from Zion.
 Mostly a transport leg, but I found this “little” canyon quite captivating. 
 It’s a place I’d love to return to.
 
 http://alunfoto.blogspot.no/2013/11/virgin-river-canyon-az.html
 
 Jostein 
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: GESO, something messier

2013-12-01 Thread Christine Aguila
Very nice, work, Larry!  Excellent.  Cheers, Christine 

Sent from my iPad

 On Dec 1, 2013, at 6:06 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
 
 
 http://www.fluidr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157638239972733/
 
 Even with the astrotracer 30 seconds at 500mm is too long.  
 Now, I need to find stacking software for my mac.
 
 These were photographed on Empire grade at the gate for Grey Whale ranch, 
 with my Pentax K-5 II, using my O-GPS 1 in astrotracer mode.  
 Some were shot with John Francis' 80-200/2.8 and some with my bigma.
 
 I learned that using a ballhead sucks for astrophotography. It is 
 impossible to make fine adjustments in just one axis.  Hell, it is 
 impossible to make accurate fine adjustments period.
 
 -- 
 Larry Colen  l...@red4est.com http://red4est.com/lrc
 
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.
 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Dark, Snowy Commute

2013-12-01 Thread Christine Aguila
I agree with Godfrey.  Good one, Frank.  Cheers, Christine 

Sent from my iPad

 On Nov 29, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godfreydigio...@me.com wrote:
 
 Like it! I could wish for just a pinch more exposure on the bicyclist, but 
 it's effective as is. 
 
 G
 
 HH!
 
 On Nov 29, 2013, at 2:53 AM, knarf knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Taken and originally posted several years ago, since we're having rather 
 wintry weather of late I thought I'd post it again:
 
 http://mondociclismo.blogspot.ca/2010/02/dark-snowy-commute.html?m=1
 
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.
 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Test

2013-12-01 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
Received.

Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola


On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 11:19 PM, Christine Aguila christ...@caguila.com wrote:
 Test

 Sent from my iPad

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Test2

2013-12-01 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
Received.

Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola


On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Christine Aguila christ...@caguila.com wrote:
 Test2

 Sent from my iPad

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Eye contact

2013-12-01 Thread Christine Aguila
I love this book, Derby!  I love the expressions, light, and colors!  
Australians are beautiful!  Cheers, Christine 

Sent from my iPad

 On Nov 27, 2013, at 4:24 AM, Derby Chang der...@iinet.net.au wrote:
 
 
 I made a Blurb. There are probably a few more adjustments before I order, but 
 this is essentially what it will look like.
 
 http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/13/11/eyecontact/index.html
 
 Much regret missing the TA discussion. I had some thoughts along that 
 subject while putting this together, and if some semi-cogent words form, I'll 
 add my farthings worth.
 
 -- 
 
 der...@iinet.net.au
 http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc
 
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.
 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Test

2013-12-01 Thread Christine Aguila
Thanks, Dan--had some funky email goings-on :-)  Cheers, Christine 

Sent from my iPad

 On Dec 1, 2013, at 10:46 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Received.
 
 Dan Matyola
 http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
 
 
 On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 11:19 PM, Christine Aguila christ...@caguila.com 
 wrote:
 Test
 
 Sent from my iPad
 
 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
 follow the directions.
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.
 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO 2013 - 165 - GDG

2013-12-01 Thread Christine Aguila
Wow!  You did well for not-your-type-of-thing :-).  Lovely colors!  Cheers, 
Christine 

Sent from my iPad

 On Nov 26, 2013, at 7:04 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godfreydigio...@me.com wrote:
 
 Not my usual kind of photo, but I was up early this morning, doing something 
 in the kitchen, and all of a sudden there was a light as if the buildings 
 across the way had been lit on fire. I figured I should take a snap and find 
 it interesting … 
 
 http://www.flickr.com/photos/gdgphoto/11076556733/
 
 The moment only lasted about 90 seconds or so, but that old star lit it up 
 nice out there.
 Thanks for looking. 
 
 Godfrey
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.
 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: PESO: My Bug

2013-12-01 Thread Ann Sanfedele

That's a very nice bug indeed

ann

On 12/1/2013 17:11, Bill wrote:

Not a focus stack (thankfully. I'm sure)

Pentax K3 (I am really liking this camera), 18-135 zoom at 135mm, F6.3,
1/640 second ISO800
Don't be afraid to look, it's not a real bug, either, it's just what we
nicknamed him..

http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/pictures/bug1.html

enjoy
bill



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Computer purchase dilemma

2013-12-01 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
 On Dec 1, 2013, at 8:29 PM, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
 
 2) does Lightroom benefit from multiple CPU cores on Mac?
 
 --  i can't find a solid reference on this, but it sounds like your own 
 research found that any benefit is limited

Actually, LR does benefit from multiple CPU cores as it is a fully threaded 
application, but it takes some manual effort and changes in workflow to get the 
most from it.  For instance, if you select 1000 raw files and tell LR to export 
them, it will operate mostly serially, making poor use of the multiple core 
system and it's threading. But if you instead select four batches of 250 images 
and tell LR to export each batch concurrently (say export on each batch without 
waiting for the previous one to complete), you'll see it use all the cores and 
get the job done in typically half the time, plus or minus. Same goes for other 
concurrent operations. 

I expect Adobe will automate this more as time goes on. 

G
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: GESO, something messier

2013-12-01 Thread Larry Colen
On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 10:36:13PM -0600, Christine Aguila wrote:
 Very nice, work, Larry!  Excellent.  Cheers, Christine 

Thanks Christine.  

I spent most of the day trying to get stacking programs to work and 
get a cleaner version. I finally got an image out of nebulosity, but
it looked worse than what I got from a single frame.

Meanwhile I loaded Deep Sky Stacker on the Windows laptop I use
for work, and it would just choke and crash.

At some point, I'll give it another try, and I learned some important
things.  Like, with astrotracer, it seems like focal length time 
seconds seems to need to be below 3,000 (200mm * 15 Sec) maybe a bit
less.

That's five times better than the 600 rule.


 
 Sent from my iPad
 
  On Dec 1, 2013, at 6:06 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
  
  
  http://www.fluidr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157638239972733/
  
  Even with the astrotracer 30 seconds at 500mm is too long.  
  Now, I need to find stacking software for my mac.
  
  These were photographed on Empire grade at the gate for Grey Whale ranch, 
  with my Pentax K-5 II, using my O-GPS 1 in astrotracer mode.  
  Some were shot with John Francis' 80-200/2.8 and some with my bigma.
  
  I learned that using a ballhead sucks for astrophotography. It is 
  impossible to make fine adjustments in just one axis.  Hell, it is 
  impossible to make accurate fine adjustments period.
  
  -- 
  Larry Colen  l...@red4est.com http://red4est.com/lrc
  
  
  -- 
  PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
  PDML@pdml.net
  http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
  to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
  follow the directions.
  
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.

-- 
Larry Colen  l...@red4est.com http://red4est.com/lrc


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: Computer purchase dilemma

2013-12-01 Thread John Coyle
I've always liked HP computer gear - started serious life with an HP86A, and an 
HP 4-pen plotter,
teamed with an Epson HQ1500 (?) daisy-wheel printer, which all lasted well past 
their obsolescence
date.  This email is being written on a two-year old Z200 workstation running 
an i5 CPU, and if I
print I print to either an HP1020 Laserjet  bought 4/2007 or an HP 4510 Inkjet, 
bought 4/2009 - so
I'm pretty satisfied with HP gear.  My displays are both Dell, firstly because 
the workstation came
without a display and secondly because I could pick up a used monitor for $30 
when the previous one
died.


John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia



-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of John Francis
Sent: Monday, 2 December 2013 10:21 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Computer purchase dilemma

On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 10:25:24PM -0500, John Mullan wrote:
 If you want decent machines with Win 7 Pro, look at Enterprise class 
 machines like HP's Elitebook and Probook laptops, or similar desktops 
 aimed at the business user, not the typical consumer class machine.
 
 jm

Yep.  This is being written on an EliteBook 8740w (17.3 1920x1200); it's 
roughly comparable to a
MacBook Pro (quad i7 processors, memory up to either 16GB or 32GB, depending on 
who you ask).
Windows 7 Pro.

My previous two machines were both HP laptops (one XP/32, one XP/64), and I got 
over 10 years of use
out of them. The weak point, in each case, was the display.

But then, what do I know?  I've also got a house full of Sony A/V kit, some of 
which is over 20
years old; the only thing which is coming to the end of its life is the 
projection TV, and that's
got to be around
10 years old.  It could be fixed, but a new flat screen would almost certainly 
cost less, and offer
me more (such as HDMI, for one thing).


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


New tilt-shift 24mm for Pentax

2013-12-01 Thread Igor Roshchin

I just came across a new lens for Pentax:
Rokinon Tilt-Shift 24mm f/3.5 ED AS UMC Lens for Pentax
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1012957-REG/rokinon_tsl24m_p_tilt_shift_24mm_f_3_5_ed.html

I've never used any tilt/shift lenses, but I remember people mentioning
them on PDML (and read some discussions elsewhere) which made me
interested in them.

Well, I cannot justify the price ($999) for just playing with it, as
I am not really sure I would benefit from it (for what I am using
my camera).

It is interesting, that Amazon (and the questionable-reputation 6ave)
already have them (albeit at @1300):
http://www.amazon.com/Rokinon-TSL24M-P-Shift-Pentax-Cameras/dp/B00EFS0ZMQ/
but BH still offers only preorder.
Actually, Adorama also has it in stock at $999:
http://www.adorama.com/RK24TSPX.html

Also, rather interesting is the phrase in the description on Adorama's
website:
This lens is suitable primarily for full-frame cameras but will work
just as well with an APS-C crop sensor. 
I wonder what it is based on...
(And that phrase can fuel the theories about the FF cameras. ;-)  )

Cheers,

Igor



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: My Bug

2013-12-01 Thread Attila Boros
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:

 Not a focus stack (thankfully. I'm sure)

 Pentax K3 (I am really liking this camera), 18-135 zoom at 135mm, F6.3,
 1/640 second ISO800
 Don't be afraid to look, it's not a real bug, either, it's just what we
 nicknamed him..

 http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/pictures/bug1.html

 enjoy
 bill

Very handsome dog. He seems to like the snow.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


SV: Japanese Knife (17 image focus stack)

2013-12-01 Thread Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne


That's a real bargain! I've had my eyes on one at my local pusher that is 
new in box. It's been there for a couple of decades at least, and has the 
dust layer to prove it, but no discount, alas.


My ratio of successful attempts at focus stacking is below one in ten. 
Mostly because I fail to produce evenly spaced focus shifts between each 
shot. :-(


Jostein

-Opprinnelig melding- 
Fra: John

Dato: 2. desember 2013 01:25
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: Japanese Knife (17 image focus stack)

I've got a Pentax Macro Focus Rail III or some such I found in a
discount bin at one of the local independent cameras stores that Pentax
dumped back around the time Hoya bought them. Got it for something like
$20 IIRC.

It doesn't have any kind of motor but it works Ok.

On 12/1/2013 10:03 AM, Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne wrote:

Ah, but that's argumentation to *avoid* the investment, John. :-)
Jotein

-Opprinnelig melding- From: John
Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2013 3:37 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Japanese Knife (17 image focus stack)

$525 (plus tax, tags  dealer prep fees) vs $49.95 for the manual rail
from Adorama?

I wonder what kind of lens I might find somewhere like KEH for the $475
difference?

On 12/1/2013 8:18 AM, Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne wrote:

With a focus rail, you still have to move focus by hand. I was thinking
about tools like this one:
http://www.cognisys-inc.com/stackshot/stackshot.php

Jostein

-Opprinnelig melding- From: Attila Boros
Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2013 2:04 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Peso: Japanese Knife (17 image focus stack)

On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne
p...@alunfoto.no wrote:


Well done, Bill!

I'm curious to know if you move focus by hand or use some kind of
device for
it. I have been looking at several tools for the purpose, but haven't
been
able to justify the investment just yet.

Jostein


http://www.kaiser-fototechnik.de/en/produkte/2_1_produktanzeige.asp?nr=5534


Didn't try focus stack with it (yet), just setting the magnification
on the macro lens, then focusing by moving the camera.





--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.