Re: [PEDA] position dialog

2002-11-22 Thread John Haddy
It's not on my menu either, so it's not an isolated case!

John Haddy

 -Original Message-
 From: Tony Karavidas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, 22 November 2002 6:23 PM
 To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
 Subject: Re: [PEDA] position dialog
 
 
 Not necessarily. Since all the menus are configurable, someone possibly
 could have removed it from your setup. It also could have been wiped out
 on its own. I've seen this with a custom menu item I've added. At some
 point it just 'went away' and I had to add it again. (I remember it was
 Measure/SelectedObjects)
 
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Tim Exley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 7:59 PM
  To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
  Subject: Re: [PEDA] position dialog
  
  
  Hmmm ... interesting, because it isn't on my menus, and 
  before anyone asks ... yes, I have service pack 6.  I can get 
  to Tools/InteractivePlacement, but there's no 
  PositionComponentText.  You guys have obviously installed 
  something which I haven't, that sets up that option.
  
  Tim Exley
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Dennis Saputelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Friday, 22 November 2002 3:25 p.m.
  To: Protel EDA Forum
  Subject: Re: [PEDA] position dialog
  
  
  ah
  so those are the keys i hit!
  
  thanks
  Dennis Saputelli
  
  
  Tony Karavidas wrote:
   
   Try:
   
   Tools/InteractivePlacement/PositionComponentText. (TIP for short)
   
   Tony
   
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Saputelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 5:22 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] position dialog
   
   
i was proteling (PCB) and flailing away at the keyboard
   
i looked up to see a dialog i had never seen before!
i don't know the key sequence was anymore
   
it was a kind of cool looking _graphical representation_ 
  of the the 
autopositioning options for the designator and comment
   
ok, it's only slightly cool looking
   
i couldn't recreate the keys or find it on a menu but the process 
may be invoked by:
   
PCB:AutopositionComponentTexts
   
when called without parameters it appears to operate on selected 
objects
   
i know this capability is in the drop lists of the edit comp 
dialogs, but i never saw this window before wiring it to hot key 
looks faster and friendlier than the other method
   
have i missed it somewhere?
   
wonder what else is in there under the hood?
   
Dennis Saputelli
   
   
  
  -- 
  __
  _
  www.integratedcontrolsinc.comIntegrated Controls, Inc.
 tel: 415-647-04802851 21st Street  
fax: 415-647-3003San Francisco, CA 94110
  
  
 
 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] position dialog

2002-11-22 Thread HxEngr
I keep receiving this message about every 5 minutes. Are others seeing it as 
well (a stuck router somewhere, perhaps?) or am i the only one?

Steve Hendrix

In a message dated 11/22/2002 5:20:51 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


 It's not on my menu either, so it's not an isolated case!
 
 John Haddy
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Tony Karavidas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Friday, 22 November 2002 6:23 PM
  To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
  Subject: Re: [PEDA] position dialog
  
 



* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



[PEDA] SV: position dialog - Is it repeating on you, too?

2002-11-22 Thread Peder K. Hellegaard
Me too. Damn annoying..

Peder

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Stephen Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sendt: 22. november 2002 11:08
Til: Protel EDA Forum
Emne: Re: [PEDA] position dialog - Is it repeating on you, too?


Hi,

Is anybody else seeing repeated messages from Mr. Haddy?
I get one about every ten minutes!

Steve

-Original Message-
From: John Haddy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 November 2002 08:00
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] position dialog


It's not on my menu either, so it's not an isolated case!

John Haddy

 -Original Message-
 From: Tony Karavidas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, 22 November 2002 6:23 PM
 To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
 Subject: Re: [PEDA] position dialog
 
 
 Not necessarily. Since all the menus are configurable, someone possibly
 could have removed it from your setup. It also could have been wiped out
 on its own. I've seen this with a custom menu item I've added. At some
 point it just 'went away' and I had to add it again. (I remember it was
 Measure/SelectedObjects)
 
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Tim Exley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 7:59 PM
  To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
  Subject: Re: [PEDA] position dialog
  
  
  Hmmm ... interesting, because it isn't on my menus, and 
  before anyone asks ... yes, I have service pack 6.  I can get 
  to Tools/InteractivePlacement, but there's no 
  PositionComponentText.  You guys have obviously installed 
  something which I haven't, that sets up that option.
  
  Tim Exley
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Dennis Saputelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Friday, 22 November 2002 3:25 p.m.
  To: Protel EDA Forum
  Subject: Re: [PEDA] position dialog
  
  
  ah
  so those are the keys i hit!
  
  thanks
  Dennis Saputelli
  
  
  Tony Karavidas wrote:
   
   Try:
   
   Tools/InteractivePlacement/PositionComponentText. (TIP for short)
   
   Tony
   
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Saputelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 5:22 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] position dialog
   
   
i was proteling (PCB) and flailing away at the keyboard
   
i looked up to see a dialog i had never seen before!
i don't know the key sequence was anymore
   
it was a kind of cool looking _graphical representation_ 
  of the the 
autopositioning options for the designator and comment
   
ok, it's only slightly cool looking
   
i couldn't recreate the keys or find it on a menu but the process 
may be invoked by:
   
PCB:AutopositionComponentTexts
   
when called without parameters it appears to operate on selected 
objects
   
i know this capability is in the drop lists of the edit comp 
dialogs, but i never saw this window before wiring it to hot key 
looks faster and friendlier than the other method
   
have i missed it somewhere?
   
wonder what else is in there under the hood?
   
Dennis Saputelli
   
   
  
  -- 
  __
  _
  www.integratedcontrolsinc.comIntegrated Controls, Inc.
 tel: 415-647-04802851 21st Street  
fax: 415-647-3003San Francisco, CA 94110
  
  
 
 


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] position dialog - Is it repeating on you, too?

2002-11-22 Thread Paul Holland
Oh yes! It's not just you :-)

-Original Message-
From: Stephen Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 November 2002 10:08
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] position dialog - Is it repeating on you, too?


Hi,

Is anybody else seeing repeated messages from Mr. Haddy?
I get one about every ten minutes!

Steve

-Original Message-
From: John Haddy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 November 2002 08:00
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] position dialog


It's not on my menu either, so it's not an isolated case!

John Haddy

 -Original Message-
 From: Tony Karavidas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, 22 November 2002 6:23 PM
 To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
 Subject: Re: [PEDA] position dialog
 
 
 Not necessarily. Since all the menus are configurable, someone possibly
 could have removed it from your setup. It also could have been wiped out
 on its own. I've seen this with a custom menu item I've added. At some
 point it just 'went away' and I had to add it again. (I remember it was
 Measure/SelectedObjects)
 
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Tim Exley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 7:59 PM
  To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
  Subject: Re: [PEDA] position dialog
  
  
  Hmmm ... interesting, because it isn't on my menus, and 
  before anyone asks ... yes, I have service pack 6.  I can get 
  to Tools/InteractivePlacement, but there's no 
  PositionComponentText.  You guys have obviously installed 
  something which I haven't, that sets up that option.
  
  Tim Exley
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Dennis Saputelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Friday, 22 November 2002 3:25 p.m.
  To: Protel EDA Forum
  Subject: Re: [PEDA] position dialog
  
  
  ah
  so those are the keys i hit!
  
  thanks
  Dennis Saputelli
  
  
  Tony Karavidas wrote:
   
   Try:
   
   Tools/InteractivePlacement/PositionComponentText. (TIP for short)
   
   Tony
   
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Saputelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 5:22 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] position dialog
   
   
i was proteling (PCB) and flailing away at the keyboard
   
i looked up to see a dialog i had never seen before!
i don't know the key sequence was anymore
   
it was a kind of cool looking _graphical representation_ 
  of the the 
autopositioning options for the designator and comment
   
ok, it's only slightly cool looking
   
i couldn't recreate the keys or find it on a menu but the process 
may be invoked by:
   
PCB:AutopositionComponentTexts
   
when called without parameters it appears to operate on selected 
objects
   
i know this capability is in the drop lists of the edit comp 
dialogs, but i never saw this window before wiring it to hot key 
looks faster and friendlier than the other method
   
have i missed it somewhere?
   
wonder what else is in there under the hood?
   
Dennis Saputelli
   
   
  
  -- 
  __
  _
  www.integratedcontrolsinc.comIntegrated Controls, Inc.
 tel: 415-647-04802851 21st Street  
fax: 415-647-3003San Francisco, CA 94110
  
  
 
 



* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] position dialog

2002-11-22 Thread Rolf Molitor
No, you are not the only one.

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 22. November 2002 11:22
Betreff: Re: [PEDA] position dialog


 I keep receiving this message about every 5 minutes. Are others seeing it
as
 well (a stuck router somewhere, perhaps?) or am i the only one?

 Steve Hendrix

 In a message dated 11/22/2002 5:20:51 AM Eastern Standard Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


  It's not on my menu either, so it's not an isolated case!
 
  John Haddy
 
   -Original Message-
   From: Tony Karavidas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Friday, 22 November 2002 6:23 PM
   To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
   Subject: Re: [PEDA] position dialog
  
 



 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
 * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 *
 * To leave this list visit:
 * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
 *
 * Contact the list manager:
 * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 *
 * Forum Guidelines Rules:
 * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
 *
 * Browse or Search previous postings:
 * http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



[PEDA] Gold embrittlement in solder joints

2002-11-22 Thread Mark witherite


Hi Everyone,
Does anyone know the maximum recommended plating thickness you can 
use for gold with out causing gold embrittlement  in the solder joint.  My 
application is for BGAs.   I attended a class and PCB east a few years ago 
and was introduced to a new term Sacrificial Gold platting .  I 
interpreted it to mean the minimum  thickness required to prevent oxidation 
and not cause embrittlement of the solder joint.   So does anyone know what 
thickness I should speck for my boards?
Thanks
Mark


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Re: [PEDA] shorted planes due to alignment pin holes with no plane expansion

2002-11-22 Thread Mike Reagan
Dave,
My recommendation to make this fool proof  ( which is the method I use
because, I  have volunteered to be the fool before) ... use a split plane ,
to isolate your  channel ,  then use a 0 ohm device,  to act as the power
feed into that isolated plane area.The DRC s will work,  as long as you
don't place the plane directly over a pin associated with the nets used on
the plane.Always  Print your gerber files  and view the split planes.

Abdul:   I know the drcs are supposed to catch  split planes on vias  but I
have one  instance where  the drc didn't catch it.  As I mentioned it was
the only board in my Protel history that showed up with a problem. So I
remember it well. I sent that one to Protel several years ago.

Mike Reagan
EDSI
Frederick MD




- Original Message -
From: Dave Eloranta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Protel EDA Forum' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 1:43 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] shorted planes due to alignment pin holes with no plane
expansion



 Mike
 I have no split planes passing thru the hole. I do have traces drawn in
the
 planes that channel currents.

 Dave

 -Original Message-
 From: Mike Reagan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 11:25 AM
 To: Protel EDA Forum
 Subject: Re: [PEDA] shorted planes due to alignment pin holes with no
 plane expansion


 Dave,

 You didnt mention if this was a result of  a split plane passing thru the
 hole.This  is the only time I have ever encountered a short in which
the
 DRC did not catch it.  Actually it is the only DRC that has ever failed
for
 me.

 Mike

 - Original Message -
 From: Dave Eloranta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'Protel EDA Forum' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 10:07 AM
 Subject: [PEDA] shorted planes due to alignment pin holes with no plane
 expansion


  Hi
  I just got a 10 layer board back with the +3.3 plane shorted to the
ground
  plane at 2 alignment pins. The design rules were set for a 14 mil power
  plane clearance. The alignment holes are plated but do not electically
  connected to any net. The DRC found no problem and the gerber generator
 did
  not flash a plane clearout in the plane layers for these 2 holes.
  We were able to remove the connector and ream the holes to isolate the
  planes.
The other feature of the rules that are different on this board from
  others that I have done is that I have 3 additional plane clearance
rules
  that apply to regions of the board under BGAs that require a smaller
plane
  clearance of 12mils.
  I am surprized that I have not run into this problem before.
 
  Dave Eloranta
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Locus Inc.
  5540 Research Park Dr.
  Madison, WI
 
 




* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] position dialog

2002-11-22 Thread ajenkins
I concur. By default (on a clean, full install and sp6) only the following
entries are avaiable from (Tools-Interactive Placement-) within Protel
99SE w/SP6
-
Align...
-
align left
align right
align top
align bottom
center horizontal
center vertical
-
horizontal spacing
make equal
increase
decrease
vertical spacing
make equal
increase
decrease
-
Arrange within room
Arrange within rectangle
Arrange outside board
-
Move to grid
--
aj

 From: Tim Exley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 
 Hmmm ... interesting, because it isn't on my menus, and 
 before anyone asks
 ... yes, I have service pack 6.  I can get to 
 Tools/InteractivePlacement,
 but there's no PositionComponentText.  You guys have 
 obviously installed
 something which I haven't, that sets up that option.
 
 Tim Exley

 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] shorted planes due to alignment pin holes with no plane expansion

2002-11-22 Thread Dave Eloranta
Mr. Lomax
Bingo
You identified my problem. The pads are top Layer with a hole specified.
Does DXP have this fixed?

thank you

Dave Eloranta
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
5540 Research Park Dr.
Madison, WI

-Original Message-
From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:40 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] shorted planes due to alignment pin holes with no
plane expansion


At 12:25 PM 11/21/2002, Mike Reagan wrote:
You didnt mention if this was a result of  a split plane passing thru the
hole.This  is the only time I have ever encountered a short in which
the
DRC did not catch it.  Actually it is the only DRC that has ever failed for
me.

If I am correct, such a split plane will generate a warning; since most
such warnings are spurious, 'tis easy to ignore

There are other aspects to the problem that were not mentioned. In
particular, what were the exact specifications of the alignment pin holes
that caused the short. I can reproduce the problem if I make them surface
pads with holes.

The left hand of Protel assumes that a surface pad has no hole nor any
other presence on inner layers, therefore no blowout is generated in
planes. The right hand cheerfully generates the hole in a drill file, with
the nuisance results reported. Usually it can be fixed by drilling out the
hole a bit.

It's a bug, albeit a well-known one. (Protel should either lock out holes
from surface pads or properly treat them. In general and in the long run,
holes as primitives should become logically separate from pads, so that
off-center holes become easy. That is, a pad may have a hole associated
with it but holes could also exist independently, plated or non-plated. And
a plated hole is essentially a padless via)



* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] virus WAS: What else is under the hood

2002-11-22 Thread Bagotronix Tech Support
 were generally flawless.The reason I did this reinstall is because I
had
 virus and after spending some time hunting it down,  it was quicker for me
 to reformat my drive,  then re load software .

Mike:

1) What virus did your PC get?
2) What were the symptoms?
3) How did you get it?

Just curious.  I want to know if it's something to watch out for.

If it's the latest gaping security hole in IE (trojan signed ActiveX
controls), then I recommend you switch to some other browser, such as
Mozilla.  I started using Mozilla about 4 months ago and it rocks, I haven't
used IE since.  Mozilla doesn't do ActiveX, so it is not at risk.  I still
haven't switched e-mail from OE to Mozilla yet.  I tried, but there is a bug
in the e-mail import that can't seem to handle 1000's of messages without
crashing.  I have heard others advocate Eudora for e-mail, but I also heard
that Eudora still uses IE to render HTML e-mail (evil!), so the IE security
risk would still remain.

Other Mozilla advantages:  tabbed browsing, pop-up ad blocker.  Great
features!

How did computers get so unsecure?  It seems like the software advances of
the last decade were all about making computers less secure!  What's next,
unsecure hardware?  I can see it now:  Announcing LawnPC, the first PC that
doesn't clutter your house!  You can just leave it in the yard.  Solar
powered see-through case, wireless networking, no messy cables!  And forget
passwords - you don't need them with LawnPC!  No installation required -
weighs only 30 lbs., just place it in a wide open sunny spot in your front
yard and you're done!  Available in these bright showy colors: orange,
yellow, red, green, purple, blue.

Sorry for OT, but this is crucial.  I don't want to have to re-format and
re-install Protel either!

Best regards,
Ivan Baggett
Bagotronix Inc.
website:  www.bagotronix.com

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] Gold embrittlement in solder joints

2002-11-22 Thread Brad Velander
Mark,
this is something that I had looked into closely over the years. We
have posted previously about this on the PEDA group so you may be able to
search the PEDA Yahoo archives and find more but here are my comments from a
previous thread on this issue.

April 23 2002,
Re: [PEDA] Gold is not evil, it just has a mischievous side to it .
Linden,
here is the study that I have found to be the best available for
quantifying the gold embrittlement issue. According to the findings of this
study, if you gold is less then 30 micro inches thick then there should not
be any solder joint embrittlement using only regular Lead-Tin solder. This
equates to the gold being less then 3% by weight of the solder joint, if
this volume is not exceeded then there should be no embrittlement problem.

The article was titled Effect of AU on the Reliability of
Fine Pitch Surface Mount Solder Joints by Judith Glazer, HP, Palo Alto,
California. It was published in Proceedings, Surface Mount International
Conference, Aug 25 - 29 (1991), San Jose, CA. It was republished in Circuit
World 18, pg 41-46 1992 and Surface Mount Technology 4, pgs 15 - 28 (1992).

There are also several books by John Lau which deal with this issue,
sorry can't recall the titles but the issue is dealt with just as an issue
within various books of his.
I got my copy of the HP article directly from HP, possibly if you
ask real nice you can find someone at HP who will also find it for you.

Sincerely,
Brad Velander.

Lead PCB Designer
Norsat International Inc.
Microwave Products
Tel   (604) 292-9089 (direct line)
Fax  (604) 292-9010
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.norsat.com

Check out our fall promotion at www.norsat.com. Limited quantities. Sale
ends December 24, 2002.
Contact your Account Manager or call 1-800-NII-4LNB or email
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 -Original Message-
 From: Mark witherite [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 3:56 AM
 To: Protel EDA Forum
 Subject: [PEDA] Gold embrittlement in solder joints
 
 
 
 
 Hi Everyone,
  Does anyone know the maximum recommended plating 
 thickness you can 
 use for gold with out causing gold embrittlement  in the 
 solder joint.  My 
 application is for BGAs.   I attended a class and PCB east a 
 few years ago 
 and was introduced to a new term Sacrificial Gold platting .  I 
 interpreted it to mean the minimum  thickness required to 
 prevent oxidation 
 and not cause embrittlement of the solder joint.   So does 
 anyone know what 
 thickness I should speck for my boards?
 Thanks
 Mark

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] virus WAS: What else is under the hood

2002-11-22 Thread Matt Pobursky
Ivan, 

Mozilla user here too. Actually, I just switched to Phoenix, which is a
browser-only branch on the Mozilla tree. Amazingly fast and very stable 
for a 0.4 release! 

As far as email goes, you might look at Pegasus Mail or PocoMail (which 
is what I use). I'm not sure about Pegasus, but I know PocoMail uses 
it's own HTML engine and *cannot* execute ANY active HTML scripts of 
any kind. There has never been a script related virus infection 
reported with PocoMail. PocoMail also lets you turn off any external
links in HTML email, so no snoopy spam tracking gets by it either. In
fact, I have a couple email accounts that get no spam -- amazing in
this day and age.

Pegasus Mail is freeware, PocoMail is shareware but reasonably priced.

Matt Pobursky 
Maximum Performance Systems 

On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:18:46 -0500, Bagotronix Tech Support wrote:
 If it's the latest gaping security hole in IE (trojan signed ActiveX 
 controls), then I recommend you switch to some other browser, such as
 Mozilla.  I started using Mozilla about 4 months ago and it rocks, I 
 haven't used IE since.  Mozilla doesn't do ActiveX, so it is not at 
 risk.  I still haven't switched e-mail from OE to Mozilla yet.  I 
 tried, but there is a bug in the e-mail import that can't seem to 
 handle 1000's of messages without crashing.  I have heard others 
 advocate Eudora for e-mail, but I also heard that Eudora still uses 
 IE to render HTML e-mail (evil!), so the IE security risk would still 
 remain.



* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] Gold embrittlement in solder joints

2002-11-22 Thread Harry Selfridge
Hi Mark,

Here are two links to papers that discuss the subject of soldering to gold 
plated PCB's.  The first is theoretical, and the second is practical (they 
agree with one another).  The guidelines you are looking for are on the 
last page of the second paper.

http://www.npl.co.uk/ei/documents/gold.pdf

http://www.alphametals.com/products/solder_solutions/pdf/soldergld.pdf

Regards - Harry

At 06:56 AM 11/22/02 -0500, you wrote:


Hi Everyone,
Does anyone know the maximum recommended plating thickness you 
can use for gold with out causing gold embrittlement  in the solder 
joint.  My application is for BGAs.   I attended a class and PCB east a 
few years ago and was introduced to a new term Sacrificial Gold 
platting .  I interpreted it to mean the minimum  thickness required to 
prevent oxidation and not cause embrittlement of the solder joint.   So 
does anyone know what thickness I should speck for my boards?
Thanks
Mark



* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] virus WAS: What else is under the hood

2002-11-22 Thread Michael Reagan




 Mike:

 1) What virus did your PC get?
 2) What were the symptoms?
 3) How did you get it?

 Just curious.  I want to know if it's something to watch out for.



it was a klien  (my  spelling could be wrong)  worm virus,  I had received
months ago from an email.   I thought I had disposed of it several months
ago.  The symptoms were creating dll files in many subdirectories then
embedding itself in other email including zipped emailI had stored on my
machine.It was dormant for a while until I found a file called LOAD.exe
in my windows/system. If couldn't get rid of it so I said screw it , I
dot have time for this,  reformat the drive and reload again,  I was up and
running in an hour.

Subsequently,   I have my IPS service scrub and sanitize all of my files
before they reach my system now.  It is amazing how many files sent to me
have macros embedded in them.  They get stopped at the front door now

Mike Reagan
EDSI

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



[PEDA] Viewing gerber files

2002-11-22 Thread Alfonso Baz
Hi all

On several occasions I've seen postings here, that suggest checking Gerber
files for nefarious errors.
I've examined these files and found them to be text files full of data (a
lot like EPS files).
I'm hoping that checking Gerber files doesn't mean understanding the data!
8-)

My question is how do you view and/or check the gerber? Is there some gerber
viewer program out there that I need to know about, or perhaps a feature in
protel99se that I'm not aware of.

Regrads

Alfonso Baz



* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] Viewing gerber files

2002-11-22 Thread Bevan Weiss
 Hi all

 On several occasions I've seen postings here, that suggest checking Gerber
 files for nefarious errors.
 I've examined these files and found them to be text files full of data (a
 lot like EPS files).
 I'm hoping that checking Gerber files doesn't mean understanding the data!
 8-)

 My question is how do you view and/or check the gerber? Is there some
gerber
 viewer program out there that I need to know about, or perhaps a feature
in
 protel99se that I'm not aware of.

I think that this is one feature that Protel is really missing.  The ability
to preview (in a graphical sense) the produced gerber file.  There are free
downloadable gerber previewers available just by doing a google search.  The
one I've got on my machine here is PentaLogic ViewMate.  Although I don't
really use it as much as I should...

I think that perhaps the print(ing) in Protel should be done using the
Gerber interface as this way it will force a correct Gerber interpreter into
the program, as well as correct Gerber creation. :)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *