Re: [RBW] Re: Soma/Riv Bike

2011-04-08 Thread Steve Palincsar
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 21:10 -0700, William wrote:
 I'd buy one of those Rivendells, if they didn't all need one of those
 'signature' drivetrains.  Drivetrains just act as a shelf to collect
 mud.  I'm going to order one of those drivetrainless bikes, so I can
 remain mud free when I slog through the mud.

Like this,
http://media.dwell.com/images/314*314/ReForm-School-Amish-scooter.jpg  
you mean?



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Soma/Riv Bike

2011-04-07 Thread Aaron Thomas
I wish the Riv/Soma frame didn't have Riv's new signature kickstand plate. 
I recall seeing a photo of someone's Hilsen (maybe Cyclofiend's?) that had 
been CX-raced in the mud. And the kickstand plate acted as a mud shelf, 
piling it up high behind the seat tube.

The kickstand plate seems to limit the versatility of the frame, without 
really giving you any significant benefits. After all, you can always add a 
kickstand to a frame without a plate. But you can't take a plate off a frame 
without labors that would require a re-paint. Other than convenience for 
those who use kickstands, what's to be gained by having the built-in plate? 
I just don't get it.

I've often been tempted by the Hillborne, but I balk because of that darned 
kickstand plate, which is entirely useless to me, and would likely only be a 
liability given the sometimes-mucky off-roading I'd want to do on it.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: Soma/Riv Bike

2011-04-07 Thread Steve Palincsar
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 15:08 -0700, Aaron Thomas wrote:
 
 The kickstand plate seems to limit the versatility of the frame,
 without really giving you any significant benefits. After all, you can
 always add a kickstand to a frame without a plate.

Yes, sure, if you're willing to risk the chance of crushing or crimping
the chain stays when you bolt the kickstand on.  I've seen more than one
bike damaged that way.  No chance of doing that with a chainstay
plate.  

Other than cyclocross, which I would rather be flayed and have my flesh
salted than consider, what other possible bicycling activity could be
hampered or harmed by the presence of a kickstand plate?  

I have two Kogswell P/Rs.  One is set up as a porteur, and it has a
double-legged kickstand, bolted to the kickstand plate.  The other is my
touring bike (and used to be my commuter).  It has no kickstand, but it
does have a kickstand plate.  I've used that second P/R for every type
of riding I do, with and without a touring load, including riding on
gravel roads, and have never had one moment's inconvenience from the
kickstand plate.




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Soma/Riv Bike

2011-04-07 Thread William
If you are in the market for a $1000 range cyclocross frameset with
optimal mud clearance, I agree that the Soma San Marcos is not your
best choice.  Nor is the Hillborne.

On Apr 7, 3:08 pm, Aaron Thomas aaron.a.tho...@gmail.com wrote:
 I wish the Riv/Soma frame didn't have Riv's new signature kickstand plate.
 I recall seeing a photo of someone's Hilsen (maybe Cyclofiend's?) that had
 been CX-raced in the mud. And the kickstand plate acted as a mud shelf,
 piling it up high behind the seat tube.

 The kickstand plate seems to limit the versatility of the frame, without
 really giving you any significant benefits. After all, you can always add a
 kickstand to a frame without a plate. But you can't take a plate off a frame
 without labors that would require a re-paint. Other than convenience for
 those who use kickstands, what's to be gained by having the built-in plate?
 I just don't get it.

 I've often been tempted by the Hillborne, but I balk because of that darned
 kickstand plate, which is entirely useless to me, and would likely only be a
 liability given the sometimes-mucky off-roading I'd want to do on it.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Soma/Riv Bike

2011-04-07 Thread EricP
Winter riding.  Even with full coverage fenders, snow/salt/slush
accumulate on a plate.  I still argue this can lead to early corrosion
of the stays when it builds up over a few winters.  (A similar
argument was recently conducted on the Surly LHT list.  Someone there
indicated to me a powdercoat frame will not rust.  Silly me.  Need to
tell my barely one year old LHT that has two winters on it the rust on
the frame is fictional.)

Eric Platt
St. Paul, MN

On Apr 7, 5:28 pm, Steve Palincsar palin...@his.com wrote:
 On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 15:08 -0700, Aaron Thomas wrote:

  The kickstand plate seems to limit the versatility of the frame,
  without really giving you any significant benefits. After all, you can
  always add a kickstand to a frame without a plate.

 Yes, sure, if you're willing to risk the chance of crushing or crimping
 the chain stays when you bolt the kickstand on.  I've seen more than one
 bike damaged that way.  No chance of doing that with a chainstay
 plate.  

 Other than cyclocross, which I would rather be flayed and have my flesh
 salted than consider, what other possible bicycling activity could be
 hampered or harmed by the presence of a kickstand plate?  

 I have two Kogswell P/Rs.  One is set up as a porteur, and it has a
 double-legged kickstand, bolted to the kickstand plate.  The other is my
 touring bike (and used to be my commuter).  It has no kickstand, but it
 does have a kickstand plate.  I've used that second P/R for every type
 of riding I do, with and without a touring load, including riding on
 gravel roads, and have never had one moment's inconvenience from the
 kickstand plate.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: Soma/Riv Bike

2011-04-07 Thread Steve Palincsar
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 18:14 -0700, EricP wrote:
 Winter riding.  Even with full coverage fenders, snow/salt/slush
 accumulate on a plate.  I still argue this can lead to early corrosion
 of the stays when it builds up over a few winters.  

Certainly not a problem here in Northern Virginia.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Soma/Riv Bike

2011-04-07 Thread Jason Hansen
Lucky!  Did you get any information regarding pricing and release date?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: Soma/Riv Bike

2011-04-07 Thread CycloFiend
on 4/7/11 3:08 PM, Aaron Thomas at aaron.a.tho...@gmail.com wrote:

I wish the Riv/Soma frame didn't have Riv's new signature kickstand plate.
I recall seeing a photo of someone's Hilsen (maybe Cyclofiend's?) that had
been CX-raced in the mud. And the kickstand plate acted as a mud shelf,
piling it up high behind the seat tube.

The kickstand plate seems to limit the versatility of the frame, without
really giving you any significant benefits. After all, you can always add a
kickstand to a frame without a plate. But you can't take a plate off a frame
without labors that would require a re-paint. Other than convenience for
those who use kickstands, what's to be gained by having the built-in plate?
I just don't get it.

I've often been tempted by the Hillborne, but I balk because of that darned
kickstand plate, which is entirely useless to me, and would likely only be a
liability given the sometimes-mucky off-roading I'd want to do on it.

Yep.  That was mine.  And just to be clear, that was SERIOUS mud.

Slip-sliding-strictly-sticky-significantly-saucy-spirit-sucking SERIOUS
mud

http://vimeo.com/3387689

Yeah, it stacked up on the kickstand plate,

http://www.flickr.com/photos/gzahnd/3285145851/in/set-72157613897340235

but it stuck to the drivetrain pretty seriously as well.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/gzahnd/3285966758

There were full-bore chainstay-bridgeless CX frames that bogged down that
day.  IIRC, someone took images of all the goobered-over brakes that day -
it's somewhere on flickr.


In short, I've not had that type of results before or since - and I've
covered a pretty good assortment of conditions, both fendered and non.If
I were getting a CX-specific frame, I wouldn't ask for it, but as far as a
mixed-terrain monster, its significance could be overstated...

- Jim

-- 
Jim Edgar
cyclofi...@earthlink.net

Cyclofiend Bicycle Photo Galleries - http://www.cyclofiend.com
Current Classics - Cross Bikes
Singlespeed - Working Bikes

Gallery updates now appear here - http://cyclofiend.blogspot.com

There were messengers who named their bikes, but Chevette never would have
done that, and somehow because she did think about it like it was something
alive.

William Gibson - Virtual Light


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Soma/Riv Bike

2011-04-07 Thread velomann
I'm more intrigued by this bike all the time. I agree with others that
1.125 stems are an improvement, headset adjustment wise. But I still
prefer 1-inch quill stems, aesthetically, so that's a plus to me. And
downtube shifter bosses - hella yes! And if you don't like em, see if
your LBS has some of those old-school sweet Dura-Ace barrel adjusters
or get some on the 'Bay. But I also agree that the kickstand plate is
a bummer. Practical sure. My wife would say a plus. But no way would I
personally put a kickstand on this bike, so aesthetically It's just
hangin' there picking up muck. And I'm no fan of sloping downtubes
which I understand this has a bit.

Other than lugs, what do folks see as the main differences between the
(maybe) San Marcos and the Sam?

And finally, if I get one, am I a Rivendell Owner, or a tolerated
bastard cousin?

Mike

On Apr 1, 12:08 pm, Richard Merkin samcoal...@gmail.com wrote:
 Has anybody heard the lastest about the release of the bike they are
 working on together?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Soma/Riv Bike

2011-04-06 Thread RoadieRyan
I was in SF on business and lucked into enough time to take Bart out
to Walnut Creek to visit Riv.  I was fortunate enough to be able to
ride the very Soma pictured in the Riv PDF.  When I came back after a
spin my face was hurting...from smiling so much.  I would order one in
a heartbeat if I had the $$.  of course the Sam was very fun to ride
as well...hmmm

Picture here
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryans_rando/5361986632/in/set-72157625714000291/

Ryan
W.Seattle

On Apr 5, 2:32 pm, rperks perks@gmail.com wrote:
 I would specualate that since the bike is using Riv style lugs that it
 dictates the steerer size.  Same thing with the Roadeo.  Somewhere in
 Grants style of blogging there was a more recent post on the upcoming
 bike.  Ok found 
 ithttps://www.rivbike.com/assets/payloads/364/original_oct1visus.pdf

 Kind of like a poor man's roadeo or Ramb I think

 Rob

  On Apr 5, 11:33 am, bfd bfd...@gmail.com wrote:







  On Apr 4, 2:03 pm, davidfrench nydavidfo...@gmail.com wrote: maybe here :

  http://somafab.blogspot.com/2010/01/rivendell-collaborates-with-soma-...

  I agree with one of the commenters, I don't understand why it will
  have 1 threaded fork/headset. Sorry, but in today's market THREADLESS
  headset should be standard.  They could still stay with 1 as there
  are shims to fit 1.25 stems. Good Luck!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Soma/Riv Bike

2011-04-05 Thread davidfrench
maybe here :

http://somafab.blogspot.com/2010/01/rivendell-collaborates-with-soma-on.html



On Apr 1, 4:59 pm, rcnute rcn...@hotmail.com wrote:
 True, but I figured summer 2011--maybe?

 Ryan

 On Apr 1, 1:53 pm, William tapebu...@gmail.com wrote:



  Hopefully March 19,2010 is not really the latest.  :)

  Calling Merry Sales is probably the best way to get that info.

  On Apr 1, 1:40 pm, rcnute rcn...@hotmail.com wrote:

  http://www.rivbike.com/blogs/news_post/216

   Ryan

   On Apr 1, 12:08 pm, Richard Merkin samcoal...@gmail.com wrote:

Has anybody heard the lastest about the release of the bike they are
working on together?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Soma/Riv Bike

2011-04-05 Thread bfd


On Apr 4, 2:03 pm, davidfrench nydavidfo...@gmail.com wrote:
 maybe here :

 http://somafab.blogspot.com/2010/01/rivendell-collaborates-with-soma-...

I agree with one of the commenters, I don't understand why it will
have 1 threaded fork/headset. Sorry, but in today's market THREADLESS
headset should be standard.  They could still stay with 1 as there
are shims to fit 1.25 stems. Good Luck!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Soma/Riv Bike

2011-04-05 Thread William
They could still stay with 1 as there
are shims to fit 1.25 stems.

and there are adapters so they can stay with 1 threaded and still
fit threadless stems.

Also I presume you mean 1.125.

On Apr 5, 11:33 am, bfd bfd...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Apr 4, 2:03 pm, davidfrench nydavidfo...@gmail.com wrote: maybe here :

 http://somafab.blogspot.com/2010/01/rivendell-collaborates-with-soma-...

 I agree with one of the commenters, I don't understand why it will
 have 1 threaded fork/headset. Sorry, but in today's market THREADLESS
 headset should be standard.  They could still stay with 1 as there
 are shims to fit 1.25 stems. Good Luck!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: Soma/Riv Bike

2011-04-05 Thread PATRICK MOORE
Does anyone know how much it will cost? And, second, what current or recent
Rivendell model will this most closely approximate? Tange Prestige: I
remember when that was really high end stuff, at least in the marketing
literature. The tubing had a nice, clear ping when you flicked it with
your fingernail, unlike the dull thud of lesser steels.

(Wish they didn't have those ugly and useless dt shifter bosses, tho' ...)

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 3:03 PM, davidfrench nydavidfo...@gmail.com wrote:

 maybe here :


 http://somafab.blogspot.com/2010/01/rivendell-collaborates-with-soma-on.html



 On Apr 1, 4:59 pm, rcnute rcn...@hotmail.com wrote:
  True, but I figured summer 2011--maybe?
 
  Ryan
 
  On Apr 1, 1:53 pm, William tapebu...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 
 
   Hopefully March 19,2010 is not really the latest.  :)
 
   Calling Merry Sales is probably the best way to get that info.
 
   On Apr 1, 1:40 pm, rcnute rcn...@hotmail.com wrote:
 
   http://www.rivbike.com/blogs/news_post/216
 
Ryan
 
On Apr 1, 12:08 pm, Richard Merkin samcoal...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Has anybody heard the lastest about the release of the bike they
 are
 working on together?

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.




-- 
Patrick Moore
Albuquerque, NM
For professional resumes, contact
Patrick Moore, ACRW at patrickmo...@resumespecialties.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Soma/Riv Bike

2011-04-05 Thread bfd


On Apr 5, 1:41 pm, William tapebu...@gmail.com wrote:
 They could still stay with 1 as there
 are shims to fit 1.25 stems.

 and there are adapters so they can stay with 1 threaded and still
 fit threadless stems.

That's true, but those adapters are alot more bulky than incorporating
a threadless stem in the design.  Further, if you want this frame to
attract more riders, threadless is more modern and will be more
familiar to younger riders.

 Also I presume you mean 1.125.

Thanks, that's right. Good Luck!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Soma/Riv Bike

2011-04-05 Thread William
1.125 threadless is certainly the MOST mainstream, but I don't think
I'd advise Riv or even Soma to grow their business by becoming more
mainstream.  1 threaded is flat out better for reasons that Riv
thinks are important.  1.125 threadless is flat out better for
reasons that Riv thinks are entirely unimportant.


On Apr 5, 1:54 pm, bfd bfd...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Apr 5, 1:41 pm, William tapebu...@gmail.com wrote: They could still 
 stay with 1 as there
  are shims to fit 1.25 stems.

  and there are adapters so they can stay with 1 threaded and still
  fit threadless stems.

 That's true, but those adapters are alot more bulky than incorporating
 a threadless stem in the design.  Further, if you want this frame to
 attract more riders, threadless is more modern and will be more
 familiar to younger riders.

  Also I presume you mean 1.125.

 Thanks, that's right. Good Luck!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: Soma/Riv Bike

2011-04-05 Thread Seth Vidal
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:09 PM, William tapebu...@gmail.com wrote:
 1.125 threadless is certainly the MOST mainstream, but I don't think
 I'd advise Riv or even Soma to grow their business by becoming more
 mainstream.  1 threaded is flat out better for reasons that Riv
 thinks are important.  1.125 threadless is flat out better for
 reasons that Riv thinks are entirely unimportant.


Well said.

Getting them bars up is much simpler on a quill stem (and much simpler
to play with later)

-sv

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Soma/Riv Bike

2011-04-05 Thread rperks
I would specualate that since the bike is using Riv style lugs that it
dictates the steerer size.  Same thing with the Roadeo.  Somewhere in
Grants style of blogging there was a more recent post on the upcoming
bike.  Ok found it
https://www.rivbike.com/assets/payloads/364/original_oct1visus.pdf

Kind of like a poor man's roadeo or Ramb I think

Rob

 On Apr 5, 11:33 am, bfd bfd...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Apr 4, 2:03 pm, davidfrench nydavidfo...@gmail.com wrote: maybe here :

 http://somafab.blogspot.com/2010/01/rivendell-collaborates-with-soma-...

 I agree with one of the commenters, I don't understand why it will
 have 1 threaded fork/headset. Sorry, but in today's market THREADLESS
 headset should be standard.  They could still stay with 1 as there
 are shims to fit 1.25 stems. Good Luck!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Soma/Riv Bike

2011-04-05 Thread bfd


On Apr 5, 2:09 pm, William tapebu...@gmail.com wrote:
 1.125 threadless is certainly the MOST mainstream, but I don't think
 I'd advise Riv or even Soma to grow their business by becoming more
 mainstream.  

Why not? If you offer things familiar to what people want, it will
sell. Further, Riv does offer or once offered a threadless version on
at least a couple of its bikes:

Roadeo:
http://assets.rivbike.com/images/products/full//3108/mark_s_roadeo.jpg

Legolas (currently not offered):
http://tandemhearts.com/coppermine/albums/legolas/legolas_03.jpg

And I'm sure there are more than one Riv Custom frameset that use
threadless.

I'm not the only one who likes threadless. One of the original
retrogrouches himself, Jobst Brandt (hope he recovers from his
accident soon!) believes they are an *improvement* over threaded
headsets and quill stems:

http://www.sheldonbrown.com/brandt/threadless-headset.html

1 threaded is flat out better for reasons that Riv
 thinks are important.  1.125 threadless is flat out better for
 reasons that Riv thinks are entirely unimportant.

I didn't just suggest 1.125 threadless, as I did state that 1
threadless with a shim could be an option.  Further, how many people
really adjust their stems up and down once they've been set? Moreover,
unless you cut the steerer tube too short, spacers can be added or
removed. Finally, there are stems that rise.

Again, these are just suggestion to *attract* people to this new
frameset. Good Luck!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Soma/Riv Bike

2011-04-05 Thread bfd


On Apr 5, 2:32 pm, rperks perks@gmail.com wrote:
 I would specualate that since the bike is using Riv style lugs that it
 dictates the steerer size.  Same thing with the Roadeo.  Somewhere in
 Grants style of blogging there was a more recent post on the upcoming
 bike.  Ok found 
 ithttps://www.rivbike.com/assets/payloads/364/original_oct1visus.pdf

 Kind of like a poor man's roadeo or Ramb I think

But the Roadeo can be ordered with a threadless stem:
http://www.adventurecorps.com/corpscamp/2010/dvshow2/images/DSC03393.jpg

You can also get Rivendell Custom bikes with threadless stems too:
http://assets.rivbike.com/images/products/full//2715/rc7.jpg

Finally, more than one staffer at Riv uses threadless:

Vaughn:
http://www.rivbike.com/products/show/staff-bikes/50-998

and of course, both of Mark's bikes have them too:
http://assets.rivbike.com/images/products/full//3603/staff19.jpg
http://assets.rivbike.com/images/products/full//3690/staffbike6.jpg

Good Luck!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: Soma/Riv Bike

2011-04-05 Thread cyclotourist
I've come to appreciate threadless.  The ease of setting them is
fantastic.  If I were going to get a new bike, I would prefer it.   I
don't know of any downside to them, other than they don't look good
with high bars on a too-small frame.  I think they look nicer than the
big 7 of a quill stem sticking way up there though.  Plus I don't
like a big hung of pointy steel aimed at my genitals when I'm trail
riding.  As bfd mentioned, once you have the position set, presuming
you don't cut the steerer you have lots of adjustability.  You have to
get a new stem to adjust for reach, but you have to do that with a
quill stem as well.  And the open face plate for bar changes is
wonderful, although used rarely.

My $.02

On 4/5/11, bfd bfd...@gmail.com wrote:


 On Apr 5, 2:09 pm, William tapebu...@gmail.com wrote:
 1.125 threadless is certainly the MOST mainstream, but I don't think
 I'd advise Riv or even Soma to grow their business by becoming more
 mainstream.

 Why not? If you offer things familiar to what people want, it will
 sell. Further, Riv does offer or once offered a threadless version on
 at least a couple of its bikes:

 Roadeo:
 http://assets.rivbike.com/images/products/full//3108/mark_s_roadeo.jpg

 Legolas (currently not offered):
 http://tandemhearts.com/coppermine/albums/legolas/legolas_03.jpg

 And I'm sure there are more than one Riv Custom frameset that use
 threadless.

 I'm not the only one who likes threadless. One of the original
 retrogrouches himself, Jobst Brandt (hope he recovers from his
 accident soon!) believes they are an *improvement* over threaded
 headsets and quill stems:

 http://www.sheldonbrown.com/brandt/threadless-headset.html

1 threaded is flat out better for reasons that Riv
 thinks are important.  1.125 threadless is flat out better for
 reasons that Riv thinks are entirely unimportant.

 I didn't just suggest 1.125 threadless, as I did state that 1
 threadless with a shim could be an option.  Further, how many people
 really adjust their stems up and down once they've been set? Moreover,
 unless you cut the steerer tube too short, spacers can be added or
 removed. Finally, there are stems that rise.

 Again, these are just suggestion to *attract* people to this new
 frameset. Good Luck!

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.




-- 
Cheers,
David
Redlands, CA

*...in terms of recreational cycling there are many riders who would
probably benefit more from
improving their taste than from improving their performance.* - RTMS

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Soma/Riv Bike

2011-04-05 Thread EricP
Don't know the answers, but from what I can gather, present Prestige
has little to no relation to the old Prestige tubing.  That was light,
heat treated tubing that had some serious restrictions on it for frame
builders. (This is all from 25 year old memories, so take with a grain
of salt.)  If remembering correctly, the old Prestige actually had a
weight limit for riders.  Never threw a leg over a bike built by one
for that reason.

Even though today's Prestige doesn't have that weight limit, still
won't buy a bike built with it.  Mental block on my part.

Eric Platt
St. Paul, MN

On Apr 5, 3:46 pm, PATRICK MOORE bertin...@gmail.com wrote:
 Does anyone know how much it will cost? And, second, what current or recent
 Rivendell model will this most closely approximate? Tange Prestige: I
 remember when that was really high end stuff, at least in the marketing
 literature. The tubing had a nice, clear ping when you flicked it with
 your fingernail, unlike the dull thud of lesser steels.

 (Wish they didn't have those ugly and useless dt shifter bosses, tho' ...)





 On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 3:03 PM, davidfrench nydavidfo...@gmail.com wrote:
  maybe here :

 http://somafab.blogspot.com/2010/01/rivendell-collaborates-with-soma-...

  On Apr 1, 4:59 pm, rcnute rcn...@hotmail.com wrote:
   True, but I figured summer 2011--maybe?

   Ryan

   On Apr 1, 1:53 pm, William tapebu...@gmail.com wrote:

Hopefully March 19,2010 is not really the latest.  :)

Calling Merry Sales is probably the best way to get that info.

On Apr 1, 1:40 pm, rcnute rcn...@hotmail.com wrote:

http://www.rivbike.com/blogs/news_post/216

 Ryan

 On Apr 1, 12:08 pm, Richard Merkin samcoal...@gmail.com wrote:

  Has anybody heard the lastest about the release of the bike they
  are
  working on together?

  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
  RBW Owners Bunch group.
  To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
  rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

 --
 Patrick Moore
 Albuquerque, NM
 For professional resumes, contact
 Patrick Moore, ACRW at patrickmo...@resumespecialties.com- Hide quoted text -

 - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: Soma/Riv Bike

2011-04-05 Thread PATRICK MOORE
Thanks. Do you know if the new Prestige is still thinwall heat treated? My
1991 Specialized Stumpjumper Team was the old Prestige and it was a very
nice frame indeed; I don't remember hearing of any weight limit -- my
brother Peter, a good 40-50 lb heavier than my 170, had no problem beating
up similar frames.

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:39 PM, EricP ericpl...@aol.com wrote:

 Don't know the answers, but from what I can gather, present Prestige
 has little to no relation to the old Prestige tubing.  That was light,
 heat treated tubing that had some serious restrictions on it for frame
 builders. (This is all from 25 year old memories, so take with a grain
 of salt.)  If remembering correctly, the old Prestige actually had a
 weight limit for riders.  Never threw a leg over a bike built by one
 for that reason.

 Even though today's Prestige doesn't have that weight limit, still
 won't buy a bike built with it.  Mental block on my part.

 Eric Platt
 St. Paul, MN

 On Apr 5, 3:46 pm, PATRICK MOORE bertin...@gmail.com wrote:
  Does anyone know how much it will cost? And, second, what current or
 recent
  Rivendell model will this most closely approximate? Tange Prestige: I
  remember when that was really high end stuff, at least in the marketing
  literature. The tubing had a nice, clear ping when you flicked it with
  your fingernail, unlike the dull thud of lesser steels.
 
  (Wish they didn't have those ugly and useless dt shifter bosses, tho'
 ...)
 
 
 
 
 
  On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 3:03 PM, davidfrench nydavidfo...@gmail.com
 wrote:
   maybe here :
 
  http://somafab.blogspot.com/2010/01/rivendell-collaborates-with-soma-.
 ..
 
   On Apr 1, 4:59 pm, rcnute rcn...@hotmail.com wrote:
True, but I figured summer 2011--maybe?
 
Ryan
 
On Apr 1, 1:53 pm, William tapebu...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hopefully March 19,2010 is not really the latest.  :)
 
 Calling Merry Sales is probably the best way to get that info.
 
 On Apr 1, 1:40 pm, rcnute rcn...@hotmail.com wrote:
 
 http://www.rivbike.com/blogs/news_post/216
 
  Ryan
 
  On Apr 1, 12:08 pm, Richard Merkin samcoal...@gmail.com wrote:
 
   Has anybody heard the lastest about the release of the bike
 they
   are
   working on together?
 
   --
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups
   RBW Owners Bunch group.
   To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
 .
   To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
   rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
   For more options, visit this group at
  http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
 
  --
  Patrick Moore
  Albuquerque, NM
  For professional resumes, contact
  Patrick Moore, ACRW at patrickmo...@resumespecialties.com- Hide quoted
 text -
 
  - Show quoted text -

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.




-- 
Patrick Moore
Albuquerque, NM
For professional resumes, contact
Patrick Moore, ACRW at patrickmo...@resumespecialties.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Soma/Riv Bike

2011-04-05 Thread rcnute
Hmm, crotchal safety and unimportant differentiators in the same
sentence...

Ryan

On Apr 5, 5:39 pm, William tapebu...@gmail.com wrote:
 I don't believe anybody is handwringing over whatever their front end
 format is.  Both threaded and threadless work and work well.  bfd's
 assertion was that more Soma San Marcos framesets would be sold if it
 were spec'd with a 1 threadless fork, because threadless is
 mainstream even though 1 threadless is not mainstream.  I don't think
 there are many potential buyers who would tell you that 1 threadless
 is their first choice.  The point that bfd didn't make was that from a
 business standpoint, if I was Merry Sales, and if I wanted to keep the
 price as low as possible, I'd seriously consider offering only one
 fork for all sizes and drop the price of the frameset.  That, I think,
 would generate more sales, and could only be done with...wait for
 it...threadless.  There's already a precedent for one fork rake across
 lots of sizes for the budget Rivendell frames.  If Soma wanted to
 offer the San Marcos at a lower price, and wanted to get there with a
 threadless fork, then I could definitely believe that might yield more
 sales.  I doubt there are a lot of buyers who say this frameset right
 here is perfect for me, but I don't like the headset type so I won't
 buy it.  They'll disqualify on price, weight, fit, even color, but
 headset?  I don't think so.  I could be wrong.

 FWIW, I've had all the headset formats and all of them worked fine,
 including 1-1/4 threaded and 1 threadless.  When it comes down to
 looks and how nervous you are about crotchal safety, I'd say we're
 into the unimportant differentiators.

 On Apr 5, 3:34 pm, cyclotourist cyclotour...@gmail.com wrote:

  I've come to appreciate threadless.  The ease of setting them is
  fantastic.  If I were going to get a new bike, I would prefer it.   I
  don't know of any downside to them, other than they don't look good
  with high bars on a too-small frame.  I think they look nicer than the
  big 7 of a quill stem sticking way up there though.  Plus I don't
  like a big hung of pointy steel aimed at my genitals when I'm trail
  riding.  As bfd mentioned, once you have the position set, presuming
  you don't cut the steerer you have lots of adjustability.  You have to
  get a new stem to adjust for reach, but you have to do that with a
  quill stem as well.  And the open face plate for bar changes is
  wonderful, although used rarely.

  My $.02

  On 4/5/11, bfd bfd...@gmail.com wrote:

   On Apr 5, 2:09 pm, William tapebu...@gmail.com wrote:
   1.125 threadless is certainly the MOST mainstream, but I don't think
   I'd advise Riv or even Soma to grow their business by becoming more
   mainstream.

   Why not? If you offer things familiar to what people want, it will
   sell. Further, Riv does offer or once offered a threadless version on
   at least a couple of its bikes:

   Roadeo:
  http://assets.rivbike.com/images/products/full//3108/mark_s_roade...

   Legolas (currently not offered):
  http://tandemhearts.com/coppermine/albums/legolas/legolas_03.jpg

   And I'm sure there are more than one Riv Custom frameset that use
   threadless.

   I'm not the only one who likes threadless. One of the original
   retrogrouches himself, Jobst Brandt (hope he recovers from his
   accident soon!) believes they are an *improvement* over threaded
   headsets and quill stems:

  http://www.sheldonbrown.com/brandt/threadless-headset.html

  1 threaded is flat out better for reasons that Riv
   thinks are important.  1.125 threadless is flat out better for
   reasons that Riv thinks are entirely unimportant.

   I didn't just suggest 1.125 threadless, as I did state that 1
   threadless with a shim could be an option.  Further, how many people
   really adjust their stems up and down once they've been set? Moreover,
   unless you cut the steerer tube too short, spacers can be added or
   removed. Finally, there are stems that rise.

   Again, these are just suggestion to *attract* people to this new
   frameset. Good Luck!

   --
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
   RBW Owners Bunch group.
   To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
   To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
   rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
   For more options, visit this group at
  http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

  --
  Cheers,
  David
  Redlands, CA

  *...in terms of recreational cycling there are many riders who would
  probably benefit more from
  improving their taste than from improving their performance.* - RTMS



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group 

Re: [RBW] Re: Soma/Riv Bike

2011-04-05 Thread cyclotourist
I've got three kids, so have done my part to perpetuate the species...
it's all extranious bits now I suppose.

On 4/5/11, rcnute rcn...@hotmail.com wrote:
 Hmm, crotchal safety and unimportant differentiators in the same
 sentence...

 Ryan

 On Apr 5, 5:39 pm, William tapebu...@gmail.com wrote:
 I don't believe anybody is handwringing over whatever their front end
 format is.  Both threaded and threadless work and work well.  bfd's
 assertion was that more Soma San Marcos framesets would be sold if it
 were spec'd with a 1 threadless fork, because threadless is
 mainstream even though 1 threadless is not mainstream.  I don't think
 there are many potential buyers who would tell you that 1 threadless
 is their first choice.  The point that bfd didn't make was that from a
 business standpoint, if I was Merry Sales, and if I wanted to keep the
 price as low as possible, I'd seriously consider offering only one
 fork for all sizes and drop the price of the frameset.  That, I think,
 would generate more sales, and could only be done with...wait for
 it...threadless.  There's already a precedent for one fork rake across
 lots of sizes for the budget Rivendell frames.  If Soma wanted to
 offer the San Marcos at a lower price, and wanted to get there with a
 threadless fork, then I could definitely believe that might yield more
 sales.  I doubt there are a lot of buyers who say this frameset right
 here is perfect for me, but I don't like the headset type so I won't
 buy it.  They'll disqualify on price, weight, fit, even color, but
 headset?  I don't think so.  I could be wrong.

 FWIW, I've had all the headset formats and all of them worked fine,
 including 1-1/4 threaded and 1 threadless.  When it comes down to
 looks and how nervous you are about crotchal safety, I'd say we're
 into the unimportant differentiators.

 On Apr 5, 3:34 pm, cyclotourist cyclotour...@gmail.com wrote:

  I've come to appreciate threadless.  The ease of setting them is
  fantastic.  If I were going to get a new bike, I would prefer it.   I
  don't know of any downside to them, other than they don't look good
  with high bars on a too-small frame.  I think they look nicer than the
  big 7 of a quill stem sticking way up there though.  Plus I don't
  like a big hung of pointy steel aimed at my genitals when I'm trail
  riding.  As bfd mentioned, once you have the position set, presuming
  you don't cut the steerer you have lots of adjustability.  You have to
  get a new stem to adjust for reach, but you have to do that with a
  quill stem as well.  And the open face plate for bar changes is
  wonderful, although used rarely.

  My $.02

  On 4/5/11, bfd bfd...@gmail.com wrote:

   On Apr 5, 2:09 pm, William tapebu...@gmail.com wrote:
   1.125 threadless is certainly the MOST mainstream, but I don't think
   I'd advise Riv or even Soma to grow their business by becoming more
   mainstream.

   Why not? If you offer things familiar to what people want, it will
   sell. Further, Riv does offer or once offered a threadless version on
   at least a couple of its bikes:

   Roadeo:
  http://assets.rivbike.com/images/products/full//3108/mark_s_roade...

   Legolas (currently not offered):
  http://tandemhearts.com/coppermine/albums/legolas/legolas_03.jpg

   And I'm sure there are more than one Riv Custom frameset that use
   threadless.

   I'm not the only one who likes threadless. One of the original
   retrogrouches himself, Jobst Brandt (hope he recovers from his
   accident soon!) believes they are an *improvement* over threaded
   headsets and quill stems:

  http://www.sheldonbrown.com/brandt/threadless-headset.html

  1 threaded is flat out better for reasons that Riv
   thinks are important.  1.125 threadless is flat out better for
   reasons that Riv thinks are entirely unimportant.

   I didn't just suggest 1.125 threadless, as I did state that 1
   threadless with a shim could be an option.  Further, how many people
   really adjust their stems up and down once they've been set? Moreover,
   unless you cut the steerer tube too short, spacers can be added or
   removed. Finally, there are stems that rise.

   Again, these are just suggestion to *attract* people to this new
   frameset. Good Luck!

   --
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
   Groups
   RBW Owners Bunch group.
   To post to this group, send email to
   rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
   To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
   rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
   For more options, visit this group at
  http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

  --
  Cheers,
  David
  Redlands, CA

  *...in terms of recreational cycling there are many riders who would
  probably benefit more from
  improving their taste than from improving their performance.* - RTMS



 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email 

[RBW] Re: Soma/Riv Bike

2011-04-05 Thread bfd


On Apr 5, 6:38 pm, PATRICK MOORE bertin...@gmail.com wrote:
 Thanks. Do you know if the new Prestige is still thinwall heat treated? My
 1991 Specialized Stumpjumper Team was the old Prestige and it was a very
 nice frame indeed; I don't remember hearing of any weight limit -- my
 brother Peter, a good 40-50 lb heavier than my 170, had no problem beating
 up similar frames.

Patrick,

Here are some specs to help you decide.

The specs for the current Prestige tubing:
http://www.tange-design.com/products_detail.php?sn=161

Here's the specs on the older Prestige tubing:
http://www.equusbicycle.com/bike/tange/Tange-road-tubing-I.jpg

As you can see the old Prestige came in several different forms. The
current Prestige only in one with an Ultimate tubing be the lightest/
top of the line. Good Luck!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: Soma/Riv Bike

2011-04-05 Thread PATRICK MOORE
Interesting; thanks for posting that. I wonder what my frame was made from:
certainly oversized and quite light, but doubtless not as thinwall as tubing
for light road racers. Actually, I think a good part of the bike's appeal
was the frame design: IIRC, it was well balanced: not to twitchy, not too
slow and, in particular, the front end seemed easier to keep straight over
soft surfaces than some other mtbs I have owned.

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 8:51 PM, bfd bfd...@gmail.com wrote:



 On Apr 5, 6:38 pm, PATRICK MOORE bertin...@gmail.com wrote:
  Thanks. Do you know if the new Prestige is still thinwall heat treated?
 My
  1991 Specialized Stumpjumper Team was the old Prestige and it was a very
  nice frame indeed; I don't remember hearing of any weight limit -- my
  brother Peter, a good 40-50 lb heavier than my 170, had no problem
 beating
  up similar frames.
 
 Patrick,

 Here are some specs to help you decide.

 The specs for the current Prestige tubing:
 http://www.tange-design.com/products_detail.php?sn=161

 Here's the specs on the older Prestige tubing:
 http://www.equusbicycle.com/bike/tange/Tange-road-tubing-I.jpg

 As you can see the old Prestige came in several different forms. The
 current Prestige only in one with an Ultimate tubing be the lightest/
 top of the line. Good Luck!

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.




-- 
Patrick Moore
Albuquerque, NM
For professional resumes, contact
Patrick Moore, ACRW at patrickmo...@resumespecialties.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Soma/Riv Bike

2011-04-01 Thread rcnute
http://www.rivbike.com/blogs/news_post/216

Ryan

On Apr 1, 12:08 pm, Richard Merkin samcoal...@gmail.com wrote:
 Has anybody heard the lastest about the release of the bike they are
 working on together?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Soma/Riv Bike

2011-04-01 Thread William
Hopefully March 19,2010 is not really the latest.  :)

Calling Merry Sales is probably the best way to get that info.


On Apr 1, 1:40 pm, rcnute rcn...@hotmail.com wrote:
 http://www.rivbike.com/blogs/news_post/216

 Ryan

 On Apr 1, 12:08 pm, Richard Merkin samcoal...@gmail.com wrote:

  Has anybody heard the lastest about the release of the bike they are
  working on together?



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: Soma/Riv Bike

2011-04-01 Thread Eric Daume
I asked Soma about this, and they said they will do a blog post when they
have more information. Nothing as of yet.

Eric


On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:53 PM, William tapebu...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hopefully March 19,2010 is not really the latest.  :)

 Calling Merry Sales is probably the best way to get that info.


 On Apr 1, 1:40 pm, rcnute rcn...@hotmail.com wrote:
  http://www.rivbike.com/blogs/news_post/216
 
  Ryan
 
  On Apr 1, 12:08 pm, Richard Merkin samcoal...@gmail.com wrote:
 
   Has anybody heard the lastest about the release of the bike they are
   working on together?
 
 

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Soma/Riv Bike

2011-04-01 Thread rcnute
True, but I figured summer 2011--maybe?

Ryan

On Apr 1, 1:53 pm, William tapebu...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hopefully March 19,2010 is not really the latest.  :)

 Calling Merry Sales is probably the best way to get that info.

 On Apr 1, 1:40 pm, rcnute rcn...@hotmail.com wrote:

 http://www.rivbike.com/blogs/news_post/216

  Ryan

  On Apr 1, 12:08 pm, Richard Merkin samcoal...@gmail.com wrote:

   Has anybody heard the lastest about the release of the bike they are
   working on together?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.