Re: Chrome Extension: Review Board Notifier

[David Dibben]

I also have just a spinner
 

When I fist tried your suggestion it gave an authentication error. But I 
noticed a double // in the URL. Removing the trailing backslash from the base 
URL made the authentication error go away. But I still get the spinner. Now 
trying location.reload(true) gives no error at all. It just causes the pop up 
to flash and continue spinning. 

I can see reviewboard in the browser fine. Also, if I put the base URL + 
api/session in the browser directly I get an XML document showing that I am 
correctly authenticated. 


On 26 Apr 2013, at 14:40, Kirollos Risk  wrote:

> Could definitely be the case.
> 
> Just in case, can you definitely access RB by putting http://: in 
> the address bar?
> 
> Additionally, could you right-click on the extension icon --> inspect popup, 
> and in the console, write "location.reload(true)", and see any error that 
> occur?
> 
> Sorry about all this!
> 
> - Kiro
> 
> On Wednesday, 24 April 2013 22:04:30 UTC-7, kvr wrote:
>> 
>> I have tried with http:// and my port is a default port(80).
>> I am running behind proxy,is this the cause?
>> 
>> On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 4:28:28 PM UTC+5:30, kvr wrote:
>>> 
>>> My server's IP address,xxx.xxx.xx.xx.
>>> Tried with prefixing http:// also, but no use.
>>> 
>>> On Tuesday, April 23, 2013 7:26:42 PM UTC+5:30, Kirollos Risk wrote:
 
 That's odd...
 
 In the settings, what do you have as the Review Board base URL?
 
 - Kiro
 
 On Apr 23, 2013, at 4:35 AM, kvr  wrote:
 
> I am also getting just spinning icon.
> 
> On Tuesday, April 23, 2013 4:50:55 PM UTC+5:30, kvr wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks Kiro, it worked.
>> 
>> On Tuesday, April 23, 2013 1:50:04 AM UTC+5:30, Kirollos Risk wrote:
>>> 
>>> It's not in the Chrome Web store yet.
>>> 
>>> But, you can install it by downloading the .crx file at 
>>> https://github.com/krisk/rbn/blob/master/package/rbn.crx, open 
>>> chrome://extensions on your browser, and drag the .crx file into it.
>>> 
>>> Let me know if you encounter any problems.
>>> 
>>> - Kiro
>>> 
>>> On Monday, 22 April 2013 03:58:14 UTC-7, kvr wrote:
 
 How to get it?
 I Could not find it in Chrome Web store.
 
 On Saturday, April 20, 2013 6:05:49 AM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge 
 wrote:
> 
> Kiro,
> 
> Very cool!
> 
> What are the icons in the upper right?
> 
> -David
> 
> 
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Kirollos Risk  
> wrote:
>> Hey everyone!
>> 
>> Here's a Chrome extension, Review Board Notifier:
>> 
>> Features:
>> Quick glance on an review board requests assigned to you, whether 
>> they are waiting for ship it, or have been given ship it
>> Click on an item to quickly get to the details
>> Notifies you when there are new RB requests assigned to you
>> Configurable via the settings page
>> 
>> Screenshots:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> You can install it for free, via https://github.com/krisk/rbn
>> 
>> - Kiro
>> 
>> -- 
>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> Groups "reviewboard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop re

Re: Chrome Extension: Review Board Notifier

[Kirollos Risk]

Could definitely be the case.

Just in case, can you definitely access RB by putting http://: in 
the address bar?

Additionally, could you right-click on the extension icon --> inspect 
popup, and in the console, write "location.reload(true)", and see any error 
that occur?

Sorry about all this!

- Kiro

On Wednesday, 24 April 2013 22:04:30 UTC-7, kvr wrote:
>
> I have tried with http:// and my port is a default port(80).
> I am running behind proxy,is this the cause?
>
> On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 4:28:28 PM UTC+5:30, kvr wrote:
>>
>> My server's IP address,xxx.xxx.xx.xx.
>> Tried with prefixing http:// also, but no use.
>>
>> On Tuesday, April 23, 2013 7:26:42 PM UTC+5:30, Kirollos Risk wrote:
>>>
>>> That's odd...
>>>
>>> In the settings, what do you have as the Review Board base URL?
>>>
>>> - Kiro
>>>
>>> On Apr 23, 2013, at 4:35 AM, kvr  wrote:
>>>
>>> I am also getting just spinning icon.
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, April 23, 2013 4:50:55 PM UTC+5:30, kvr wrote:

 Thanks Kiro, it worked.

 On Tuesday, April 23, 2013 1:50:04 AM UTC+5:30, Kirollos Risk wrote:
>
> It's not in the Chrome Web store yet.
>
> But, you can install it by downloading the *.crx* file at 
> https://github.com/krisk/rbn/blob/master/package/rbn.crx, open 
> chrome://extensions on your browser, and drag the *.crx* file into it.
>
> Let me know if you encounter any problems.
>
> - Kiro
>
> On Monday, 22 April 2013 03:58:14 UTC-7, kvr wrote:
>>
>> How to get it?
>> I Could not find it in Chrome Web store.
>>
>> On Saturday, April 20, 2013 6:05:49 AM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Kiro,
>>>
>>> Very cool!
>>>
>>> What are the icons in the upper right?
>>>
>>> -David
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Kirollos Risk wrote:
>>>
 Hey everyone!

 Here's a Chrome extension, *Review Board Notifie*r:

  *Features:*

- Quick glance on an review board requests assigned to you, 
whether they are waiting for *ship it*, or have been given *ship 
it*
- Click on an item to quickly get to the details
- Notifies you when there are new RB requests assigned to you
- Configurable via the settings page


 *Screenshots:*


 





























  














  

 










































 You can install it for free, via https://github.com/krisk/rbn

 - Kiro

  -- 
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 reviewboard...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
 --- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
 Groups "reviewboard" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
 send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
  
  

>>>
>>>  -- 
>>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>>> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>>> --- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
>>> Google Groups "reviewboard" group.
>>> To

Re: Problems migrating ReviewBoard from MySQL to PostgreSQL

[David Lee]

I've put together a quick script to fixup sequences in PostgreSQL. It seems 
to work fine.

psql -t ${DB} -c "SELECT E'select setval(\'' || c.relname || E'\',  (select 
max(id)+1 from ' || replace(c.relname, '_id_seq', '') || '), false);' FROM 
pg_class c WHERE c.relkind = 'S';" | psql ${DB}

dave
<><

On Thursday, April 25, 2013 8:56:41 AM UTC-5, David Lee wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 3:05:05 PM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> How did you attempt the migration? Converting raw SQL, or using the 
>> dumpdb/loaddb management commands?
>>
>
> dumpdb/loaddb.
>
> Here's the process we're using:
>
> root@old-machine# rb-site manage /var/www/reviewboard dumpdb > dumpdb.json
> root@old-machine# scp dumpdb.json new-machine:
>
> root@new-machine# rb-site install /var/www/reviewboard
> root@new-machine# rb-site manage /var/www/reviewboard syncdb
> root@new-machine# rb-site manage /var/www/reviewboard dbshell
> > TRUNCATE django_content_type CASCADE
> > TRUNCATE scmtools_tool CASCADE
> root@new-machine# rb-site manage /var/www/reviewboard loaddb dumpdb.json
>  
>
>> Migrating from MySQL to PostgreSQL is not something I've ever tried. I 
>> know some people have had success going from sqlite to MySQL using 
>> dumpdb/loaddb.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Local sites, private groups, or multiple review board instances?

[Steve]

Thanks for the insight Chris.  I really appreciate your work and 
responsiveness.

--Steve


On Tuesday, April 23, 2013 4:07:18 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi Steve,
>
> Local sites aren't something that are deeply exposed. They're usable, 
> certainly, but my feeling is that you may really want two instances.
>
> With Local Sites, you can basically have a path that goes to a specific 
> site, which certain people will have access to. However, in your case, 
> everything that already exists on the server will be independent of  a 
> Local Site, so you'd be in this weird setup where some things are at, 
> /r/123, and some are at /s/sitename/r/456.
>
> We built Local Sites originally for RBCommons.com, our Review Board SaaS. 
> I don't know if anyone out there has used them for any other installations. 
> Possibly, and you could certainly try it, but there may be some gotchas.
>
> Christian
>
> -- 
> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com 
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Steve  >wrote:
>
>> We currently have 2 review board servers  running 1.7.6 on 2 different 
>> CenotOS 6 hosts.  We set up 2 servers way back in the 1.0 days to restrict 
>> visibility of some portions of our perforce repository.  I'm now tasked 
>> with setting up a third server with even greater restrictions.   All 3 
>> servers point to a single perforce repository. I don't want to tie up a 3rd 
>> box for this, so I'm looking to run 2 sites on 1 machine.  My first thought 
>> was to set up a second IP and try to get 2 different instances of RB 
>> running on the same box, but with distinct databases and directories.  But 
>> I see that 1.7 has private groups and the concept of 'local sites' which 
>> look like they may be another way to solve the problem.  However, I haven't 
>> been able to find enough detail on local sites to determine if I should go 
>> down that road. I was hoping others out there may have some hard-earned 
>> experience on which of these approaches is the most viable.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> --Steve
>>
>>  -- 
>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com 
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "reviewboard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>  
>>  
>>
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: GitHub Enterprise Raw file URL mask

[Christian Hammond]

On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Stephen Gallagher <
step...@gallagherhome.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Wednesday, April 24, 2013, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
>> Hi Ian,
>>
>> We have this mostly ironed out, but it may not become part of the
>> standard Review Board install.
>>
>> We're putting together a for-pay add-on package for Review Board to
>> improve support in enterprises. Things like enhanced scalability and some
>> deeper integration with more Enterprise-level services. We may end up
>> putting the GitHub Enterprise support into that bundle. It's something
>> we're still figuring out, but if this is of interest to you, we can add you
>> to a beta list.
>>
>>
>
> I would be interested in participating in such a beta as well. What
> other features are you looking at including in a premium add-on?
>
>
I'll get a signup form going when we're closer and make sure to let you
know!

The primary bits being worked on right now are improved scalability. Review
Board works pretty well on a single server, but if you want to scale out
beyond that, there's a bunch of work that needs to be done. Work we've done
for RBCommons.

One bit of this that we have in the enterprise package today is automatic
SSH key scale-out, so you don't have to do any custom sync of SSH keys
across servers. Also looking into adding support for multiple SSH keys, and
down the road, diff generation/parsing scale out.

Of course, we're also putting GitHub Enterprise support in there, and
possibly support for other enterprise systems, if we see demand.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Dashboard: Support request "posted time" does not handle timezone properly

[Shaffick Joomratty]

This solved my issue.

Thank you David.

On Thursday, 25 April 2013 13:39:55 UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
> Time zones are now user preferences. Probably what you need to do is go 
> into "My Account" and fix the timezone setting there.
>
> -David
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Shaffick Joomratty 
> 
> > wrote:
>
>> Forgot to mention,
>>
>> the time posted for the review request is also not the same as the time 
>> on the server.  It is giving me server time+7 hours.
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, 25 April 2013 12:01:48 UTC-7, Shaffick Joomratty wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey gents,
>>>
>>> I upgraded to ReviewBoard 1.7.7.1 from 1.6.14
>>>
>>> On the dashboard, the "Posted time" for the review requests are not 
>>> showing up properly.
>>>
>>>  When I go into the review requests, the "Update 1 hour ago" portion is 
>>> working fine.
>>>
>>> Timezone is set as Canada/Pacific
>>>
>>> Any ideas?
>>>
>>  -- 
>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com 
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "reviewboard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>  
>>  
>>
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Dashboard: Support request "posted time" does not handle timezone properly

[David Trowbridge]

Time zones are now user preferences. Probably what you need to do is go
into "My Account" and fix the timezone setting there.

-David


On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Shaffick Joomratty wrote:

> Forgot to mention,
>
> the time posted for the review request is also not the same as the time on
> the server.  It is giving me server time+7 hours.
>
>
> On Thursday, 25 April 2013 12:01:48 UTC-7, Shaffick Joomratty wrote:
>>
>> Hey gents,
>>
>> I upgraded to ReviewBoard 1.7.7.1 from 1.6.14
>>
>> On the dashboard, the "Posted time" for the review requests are not
>> showing up properly.
>>
>> When I go into the review requests, the "Update 1 hour ago" portion is
>> working fine.
>>
>> Timezone is set as Canada/Pacific
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>  --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Patch file viewer

[tecReviewBrd]

Hi,

Reviewboard allows you to download patch file. Is there an application that 
I can use to view the merged output using the patch file, graphically on 
Win 7.

Regards
tec

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Instructions for upgrading and migrating to new server?

[Christian Hammond]

Sorry Alfred. Been kind of sporadically responding to e-mails (been out a lot 
the past few days and away from home at the moment). Didn't mean to drop yours 
on the floor.


On Apr 25, 2013, at 1:01 PM, Alfred von Campe  wrote:

> On Apr 24, 2013, at 10:55, I wrote:
> 
>> We are running ReviewBoard 1.6.6 installed via easy-install on an old CentOS 
>> 5.9 server with apache-modpython, and I would like to migrate this to a new 
>> server running CentOS 6.4 and apache-wsgi and the latest ReviewBoard version 
>> installed via yum from epel-testing repo.
> 
> Am I asking for something unusual here?  Has anyone migrated a RB instance 
> from one server to another while upgrading RB at the same time?  I don't 
> quite understand how all the moving parts fit together, and want to ensure a 
> smooth transition.

It should be doable. If you transplant the old database to the new server 
without modifying it, and then do an rb-site upgrade on  the new site, it 
should perform the upgrade just as it would if you left it on the first server.

> 
>> Are the steps to do this documented anywhere?  Will the following steps work 
>> (we are using MySQL)?
>> 
>> 0. Ensure nobody is using the old server during the migration
>> 1. Dump old database
>> 2. Tar up site directory from old server (contains .ssh and .subversion 
>> directories with needed config data)
>> 3. Install ReviewBoard via yum
>> 4. Create reviewboard database and user
>> 5. Create new site with rb-site install (need to get new apache config file)
>> 6. Update apache configuration file with conf file generated in previous step
>> 7. Delete reviewboard database and load database from old server (after 
>> re-creating database and user)
>> 8. Delete new site and replace with tar file from old server (possible 
>> preserving apache conf file)
>> 9. Run rb-site upgrade
>> 
>> Did I miss something or am I adding any unnecessary steps?

That seems like it should work fine. If there are issues, at least you have the 
old server to fall back on.

>> 
>> Also, how do I install and configure memcached on additional CentOS 6.4 
>> servers?  What is the recommended amount of memory to allocate to memcached 
>> for ReviewBoard?

I like to give it 1GB, which seems to be more than enough for most deployments.

I have it running on 2 servers right now for one setup, and I just have the 
memcached servers listed in the General Settings page as host:part, separated 
by semicolons. So, "host1:11211;host2:11211"

Christian

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Instructions for upgrading and migrating to new server?

[Alfred von Campe]

On Apr 24, 2013, at 10:55, I wrote:

> We are running ReviewBoard 1.6.6 installed via easy-install on an old CentOS 
> 5.9 server with apache-modpython, and I would like to migrate this to a new 
> server running CentOS 6.4 and apache-wsgi and the latest ReviewBoard version 
> installed via yum from epel-testing repo.

Am I asking for something unusual here?  Has anyone migrated a RB instance from 
one server to another while upgrading RB at the same time?  I don't quite 
understand how all the moving parts fit together, and want to ensure a smooth 
transition.

> Are the steps to do this documented anywhere?  Will the following steps work 
> (we are using MySQL)?
> 
>  0. Ensure nobody is using the old server during the migration
>  1. Dump old database
>  2. Tar up site directory from old server (contains .ssh and .subversion 
> directories with needed config data)
>  3. Install ReviewBoard via yum
>  4. Create reviewboard database and user
>  5. Create new site with rb-site install (need to get new apache config file)
>  6. Update apache configuration file with conf file generated in previous step
>  7. Delete reviewboard database and load database from old server (after 
> re-creating database and user)
>  8. Delete new site and replace with tar file from old server (possible 
> preserving apache conf file)
>  9. Run rb-site upgrade
> 
> Did I miss something or am I adding any unnecessary steps?
> 
> Also, how do I install and configure memcached on additional CentOS 6.4 
> servers?  What is the recommended amount of memory to allocate to memcached 
> for ReviewBoard?

I'm also interested in installing additional memcached servers, which I haven't 
done before (only automatically as part of the RB installation).

Thanks,
ALfred

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: can't add comments

[Christian Hammond]

On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Matthew Woehlke
wrote:

> On 2013-04-25 15:16, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
>> Very strange. It'd be one thing if I saw any reports of this back when the
>> related feature was shipped (1 year ago!), but to just start seeing them
>> now...
>>
>
> Well, I also probably have not logged in for that long :-).
>
> Maybe it is only affecting users that last logged into RB ≤ X and never
> logged into RB version ≤ Y (with X < Y < 1.7.4)? That might make sense; I
> can imagine something that is not present in such old profiles that would
> have been automatically updated for some version(s) but is no longer
> correctly auto-updated...


Possibly. Still, the evolution rule says they should be defaulted to True.
Strange. Wonder how many people have hit this and not talked to us.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: can't add comments

[Matthew Woehlke]

On 2013-04-25 15:16, Christian Hammond wrote:

Very strange. It'd be one thing if I saw any reports of this back when the
related feature was shipped (1 year ago!), but to just start seeing them
now...


Well, I also probably have not logged in for that long :-).

Maybe it is only affecting users that last logged into RB ≤ X and never 
logged into RB version ≤ Y (with X < Y < 1.7.4)? That might make sense; 
I can imagine something that is not present in such old profiles that 
would have been automatically updated for some version(s) but is no 
longer correctly auto-updated...



In the meantime, go into My Account, uncheck the Open An Issue, save,
re-check, save. Should fix it.


That fixed it; thanks!

--
Matthew

--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: can't add comments

[Christian Hammond]

On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Matthew Woehlke
wrote:

> On 2013-04-25 15:03, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
>> There was a report just a few days ago about this. What's odd is that
>> nothing around these lines have changed in about 6 months.
>>
>> I do, however, see why it's causing a javascript error. The code to set
>> the
>> default for gOpenAnIssue is not being set. Why this is suddenly happening,
>> I cannot say.
>>
>> I'll work on making this more bullet-proof. Maybe something in a new
>> version of Django changed that broke our behavior. I can get a release out
>> by tonight. KDE will need to upgrade for this to be fixed.
>>
>> Do you have any idea when this started?
>>
>
> Unfortunately, no, just that I first noticed it about a week ago (and
> given others are commenting, presumably it only affects some users of a
> given RB instance).
>
>
Very strange. It'd be one thing if I saw any reports of this back when the
related feature was shipped (1 year ago!), but to just start seeing them
now...

I'll work on a patch.

I think what's happening is that somehow, accessing the profile's
openAnIssue is failing. That can only happen if there is no profile,
though, which... shouldn't be able to happen. That or it's null by default,
which also shouldn't be able to happen. Anyway, it's I suppose never
getting to the filter that turns it into true/false, and just failing.

In the meantime, go into My Account, uncheck the Open An Issue, save,
re-check, save. Should fix it.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: can't add comments

[Matthew Woehlke]

On 2013-04-25 15:03, Christian Hammond wrote:

There was a report just a few days ago about this. What's odd is that
nothing around these lines have changed in about 6 months.

I do, however, see why it's causing a javascript error. The code to set the
default for gOpenAnIssue is not being set. Why this is suddenly happening,
I cannot say.

I'll work on making this more bullet-proof. Maybe something in a new
version of Django changed that broke our behavior. I can get a release out
by tonight. KDE will need to upgrade for this to be fixed.

Do you have any idea when this started?


Unfortunately, no, just that I first noticed it about a week ago (and 
given others are commenting, presumably it only affects some users of a 
given RB instance).


--
Matthew

--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: can't add comments

[Christian Hammond]

Hi Matthew,

There was a report just a few days ago about this. What's odd is that
nothing around these lines have changed in about 6 months.

I do, however, see why it's causing a javascript error. The code to set the
default for gOpenAnIssue is not being set. Why this is suddenly happening,
I cannot say.

I'll work on making this more bullet-proof. Maybe something in a new
version of Django changed that broke our behavior. I can get a release out
by tonight. KDE will need to upgrade for this to be fixed.

Do you have any idea when this started?

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com


On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 7:13 AM, Matthew Woehlke
wrote:

> When I go to 
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.**org/r/110059/and
>  click 'review' or 'add comment', nothing happens.
>
> Looking at a web console, I see:
>
> SyntaxError: Unexpected token ';' /r/110059/:40
> ReferenceError: Can't find variable: gReviewRequestId
> /static/rb/js/reviews.min.**8dcc237657b9.js:112
> TypeError: 'undefined' is not a function (evaluating
> 'RB.setFileAttachmentComments(**{
>
> })')
>
> ...and indeed it seems there is something wrong with the page content.
>
> Has anyone seen this before, or have an idea what might be wrong?
>
> --
> Matthew
>
> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/**donate/ 
> Happy user? Let us know at 
> http://www.reviewboard.org/**users/
> -~--~~~~--**~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscribe@**
> googlegroups.com 
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**
> group/reviewboard?hl=en 
> --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to 
> reviewboard+unsubscribe@**googlegroups.com
> .
> For more options, visit 
> https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out
> .
>
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Dashboard: Support request "posted time" does not handle timezone properly

[Shaffick Joomratty]

Forgot to mention,

the time posted for the review request is also not the same as the time on 
the server.  It is giving me server time+7 hours.

On Thursday, 25 April 2013 12:01:48 UTC-7, Shaffick Joomratty wrote:
>
> Hey gents,
>
> I upgraded to ReviewBoard 1.7.7.1 from 1.6.14
>
> On the dashboard, the "Posted time" for the review requests are not 
> showing up properly.
>
> When I go into the review requests, the "Update 1 hour ago" portion is 
> working fine.
>
> Timezone is set as Canada/Pacific
>
> Any ideas?
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Dashboard: Support request "posted time" does not handle timezone properly

[Shaffick Joomratty]

Hey gents,

I upgraded to ReviewBoard 1.7.7.1 from 1.6.14

On the dashboard, the "Posted time" for the review requests are not showing 
up properly.

When I go into the review requests, the "Update 1 hour ago" portion is 
working fine.

Timezone is set as Canada/Pacific

Any ideas?

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Installed reviewboard 1.7.7.1 - getting error while accessing admin page

[Christian Hammond]

Seems like you may not have included a port when configuring your caching
sever. I'll make this more resilient.

Can you provide the output of:

rb-site manage /path/to/site list-siteconfig

And strip any information that you need confidential.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com


On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Prashima  wrote:

> Please find attached the extended error log. Note that the server also has
> other virtual hosts configured, so there will be some noise in between the
> meaningful data.
>
> Hope this helps!!
>
>
> On Thursday, 25 April 2013 12:38:37 UTC+8, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
>> So the contents of the log that you included are the right spot, except
>> you cut it off too early. Can you include everything down to the bottom of
>> the traceback?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -David
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Prashima  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> I have recently installed reviewboard 1.7.7.1 on my server. Things were
>>> looking fine, with my reviewboard site up and running. I was even able to
>>> do some of the admin configurations, but very soon I started getting
>>> standard "Error 500 something is broke!" whenever I try to go to the admin
>>> page. Since then I haven't been able to access admin again. I am able to
>>> access all other review request and support related pages.
>>>
>>>
>>> OS: CentOS 6.3
>>> Browsers : Firefox, Chrome IE
>>> Reviewboard : 1.7.7.1
>>> Python : 2.6.6
>>> Django : 1.4.5
>>>
>>> Attaching the relevant error log. Please let me know if any other
>>> information is required.
>>>
>>>
>>> Partial trace -
>>>
>>> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error] too many values to unpack
>>> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error] Traceback (most recent call last):
>>> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error]   File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-**
>>> packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.**egg/django/core/handlers/base.**py", line
>>> 111, in get_response
>>> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error] response = callback(request,
>>> *callback_args, **callback_kwargs)
>>> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error]   File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-**
>>> packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.**egg/django/contrib/admin/**views/decorators.py",
>>> line 16, in _checklogin
>>> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error] return view_func(request, *args,
>>> **kwargs)
>>> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error]   File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-**
>>> packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.7.1-**py2.6.egg/reviewboard/admin/**views.py",
>>> line 33, in dashboard
>>> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error] 'secondary_widgets':
>>> secondary_widgets,
>>> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error]   File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-**
>>> packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.**egg/django/shortcuts/__init__.**py", line
>>> 20, in render_to_response
>>> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error] return
>>> HttpResponse(loader.render_to_**string(*args, **kwargs),
>>> **httpresponse_kwargs)
>>> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error]   File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-**
>>> packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.**egg/django/template/loader.py"**, line
>>> 171, in render_to_string
>>> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error] return
>>> t.render(Context(dictionary))
>>> .
>>> .
>>> .
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Prashima
>>>
>>> --
>>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/**donate/
>>> Happy user? Let us know at 
>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/**users/
>>> -~--~~~~--**~~--~--~---
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@**
>>> googlegroups.com
>>>
>>> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**
>>> group/reviewboard?hl=en
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "reviewboard" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to reviewboard...@**googlegroups.com.
>>>
>>> For more options, visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out
>>> .
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>  --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www

can't add comments

[Matthew Woehlke]

When I go to https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110059/ and click 
'review' or 'add comment', nothing happens.


Looking at a web console, I see:

SyntaxError: Unexpected token ';' /r/110059/:40
ReferenceError: Can't find variable: gReviewRequestId 
/static/rb/js/reviews.min.8dcc237657b9.js:112
TypeError: 'undefined' is not a function (evaluating 
'RB.setFileAttachmentComments({


})')

...and indeed it seems there is something wrong with the page content.

Has anyone seen this before, or have an idea what might be wrong?

--
Matthew

--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Problems migrating ReviewBoard from MySQL to PostgreSQL

[David Lee]

On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 3:05:05 PM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> How did you attempt the migration? Converting raw SQL, or using the 
> dumpdb/loaddb management commands?
>

dumpdb/loaddb.

Here's the process we're using:

root@old-machine# rb-site manage /var/www/reviewboard dumpdb > dumpdb.json
root@old-machine# scp dumpdb.json new-machine:

root@new-machine# rb-site install /var/www/reviewboard
root@new-machine# rb-site manage /var/www/reviewboard syncdb
root@new-machine# rb-site manage /var/www/reviewboard dbshell
> TRUNCATE django_content_type CASCADE
> TRUNCATE scmtools_tool CASCADE
root@new-machine# rb-site manage /var/www/reviewboard loaddb dumpdb.json
 

> Migrating from MySQL to PostgreSQL is not something I've ever tried. I 
> know some people have had success going from sqlite to MySQL using 
> dumpdb/loaddb.
>
> Christian
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Reviewboard 1.7.7.1 - getting error while accessing admin page

[kvr]

Try commenting widgets at admin/widgets.py

On Thursday, April 25, 2013 8:10:16 AM UTC+5:30, Prashima wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> (Apologies if this is duplicate post, I don't see my previous post on the 
> group)
>
> I have recently installed reviewboard. Things were going fine, with my 
> site up and running. I was even able to make some admin configurations, but 
> soon I started getting the standard "Error 500 somehting is broken!" error 
> while accessing the admin page. Since then I haven't been able to access 
> the admin page. I am able to access all other pages.
>
>
> OS : CentOS 6.3
> Python : 2.6.6
> Django : 1.4.5
> Browser : tested with Firefox, Chrome, IE
>
>
> Attached the relevant error log. Please let me know if any other 
> information is required. 
>
> Partial trace:
>
> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error] too many values to unpack
> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error] Traceback (most recent call last):
> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error]   File 
> "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/core/handlers/base.py",
>  
> line 111, in get_response
> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error] response = callback(request, 
> *callback_args, **callback_kwargs)
> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error]   File 
> "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/contrib/admin/views/decorators.py",
>  
> line 16, in _checklogin
> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error] return view_func(request, *args, 
> **kwargs)
> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error]   File 
> "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.7.1-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/admin/views.py",
>  
> line 33, in dashboard
> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error] 'secondary_widgets': 
> secondary_widgets,
> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error]   File 
> "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/shortcuts/__init__.py",
>  
> line 20, in render_to_response
> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error] return 
> HttpResponse(loader.render_to_string(*args, **kwargs), 
> **httpresponse_kwargs)
> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error]   File 
> "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/template/loader.py",
>  
> line 171, in render_to_string
> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error] return t.render(Context(dictionary))
> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error]   File 
> "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/template/base.py",
>  
> line 140, in render
> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error] return self._render(context)
>
>
> Thanks,
> Prashima
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Review Board 1.7.7.1 is released

[victoria]

On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Stephen Gallagher
 wrote:
> On Sun 21 Apr 2013 05:05:19 PM EDT, Christian Hammond wrote:
>> We had a regression when creating new site installations. While
>> unfortunate, it gave us the opportunity for a cool version number. So
>> it all works out in the end.
>>
>> Review Board 1.7.7.1 is out. If you already have a working site, then
>> no need to upgrade, but if you had trouble creating a site, get it.
>>
>> Release notes are
>> available: http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/reviewboard/1.7.7.1/
>>
>
>
> Packages for Fedora 18, 19 and RHEL/CentOS 6 have been built and will be
> showing up in the updates-testing or epel-testing repositories within 48
> hours. Please remember that you will need to run 'rb-site upgrade
> /path/to/site' after installing these new packages.
>
> Fedora:
> yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing ReviewBoard
>
> RHEL:
> yum update --enablerepo=epel-testing ReviewBoard
>
>
> The Bodhi update links can be found at:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/ReviewBoard
>
> If you install these testing packages and find issues or they work
> properly, please note this on the Web UI so I can know when it's safe to
> submit them for the stable repositories.


Hi,

Just wanted to let you know that the BitNami installers, virtual
machine and cloud images for ReviewBoard have been also updated.

http://bitnami.com/stack/reviewboard

Best regards,

Victoria.
>
> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.