Re: RB- Bug: Expand to header in diff viewer page is not coming for perl file
Hi Christian, Thanks for helping me, the issue is resolved now. I didn't got file reviewboard/diffviewer/filetypes.py, but in diffviewer/diffutils.py I did added support for .thpl file and it looks to work now. '.thpl': [ re.compile(r'^\s*sub [A-Za-z0-9_]+'), ], '.thpl' extension is used for perl file here, rest every thing is perl. The .*thpl* file type is unique to storage and is used to test filers. Thanks, Satish On Friday, 23 August 2013 00:59:27 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Satish, This would have to be modified in reviewboard/diffviewer/filetypes.py. What does a thpl file represent? I'm not familiar with that extension. If that's standard, it can be added to our mapping in a release. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:23 AM, satish singh triv...@gmail.comjavascript: wrote: Hi Christian, I got the issue, actually we save a perl file with .thpl extension instead of .pl. I am attaching a screenshot where I have same file with .pl and .thpl extension, the Expand to function/class is working for file with .pl extension and it's not working for .thpl extension. Can you please let me know where to make a corresponding change so that it support .thpl files. Regards, Satish SIngh On Thursday, 22 August 2013 00:59:03 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Can you provide a sample perl file that it does not work with that you think it should? Can you also take a screenshot? - Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 5:36 AM, satish singh triv...@gmail.com wrote: Diff-viewer expansion to a function/class is not working for perl files, it working for rest of the file types, can anyone provide some pointers for this. Where to look for the issue ? Review board recently upgraded to 1.7.7.1 from 1.6.3 Thanks. On Wednesday, 21 August 2013 16:30:53 UTC+5:30, Varun Jain wrote: Hi Team, We are not able to see any expand to header button for Perl files that can be seen for all other files. Please let us know if anyone is experiencing same issue. Thanks, Varun -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/**donate/http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/**users/http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--**~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@** googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** group/reviewboard?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@**googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_outhttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out . -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript: For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: error when adding svn repository callback_ssl_client_cert_prompt required
Hi David, Thanks. I was not the same person who got the certificate it seems whoever got the certificate is the only user that can also add the repo. Many Thanks, Michaela On Thursday, 22 August 2013 23:10:46 UTC+1, David Trowbridge wrote: One thing to double-check is that the certificate file is owned and readable by whatever user your web server is running as. -David On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 5:07 AM, Michaela Newell michaela...@gmail.comjavascript: wrote: Hi, I already have repositories added that do not need certificates however when I try and add a repo with a certificate the logs show the message: ERROR - - SVN: Failed to get repository information for repo: callback_ssl_client_cert_prompt required The site also displays: A repository was not found at the specified path. Do you know what is causing this? The certificate is on the client under /path/to/site/data/.subversion -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript: For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: RBTools 0.5.2 is released!
On 08/22/2013 05:02 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote: Ah, well, I was wanting to rewrite the whole thing in Python anyway :-). (Trying to do that and skirt around where RBTools wants a deprecated optparse... now that's interesting...) optparse is deprecated, not removed. It's not going to see any new development, but last I heard it's going to remain available indefinitely. Also, as python 2.7 is the last release in the Python 2 line, it's pretty clear that it's never going to be removed from that series. That gives ReviewBoard (and anyone consuming RBTools) until at least 2015 to deal with the migration (since the Python upstream has committed to bug-fix support of Python 2.7 for five years after its release). Beyond that, I know of certain enterprise OSes that will likely extend the usable life of Python themselves. With that in mind, though: Christian, will ReviewBoard 1.8 be supporting Python 3.x? -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Error migrating and upgrading from 1.6.6 to 1.7.13
I'm trying to upgrade a REviewBoard instance from 1.6.6 to 1.7.13. I've created a dump of the existing database and am running the following script on the new server: #!/bin/sh RB_SITE=/var/www/html/rb RB_USER=admin RB_EMAIL= RB_DOMAIN= RB_PASSWORD= # Delete and create empty rb database echo drop database reviewboard; create database reviewboard; use reviewboard; grant all privileges on revieboard.* to 'rb'@'localhost' identified by '$RB_PASSWORD' with grant option; | mysql -u rb -p$RB_PASSWORD # Delete existing ReviewBoard site directory so it can be recreated /bin/rm -fr $RB_SITE # Create the new ReviewBoard site rb-site install --console --noinput --domain-name=$RB_DOMAIN --site-root=/ --db-type=mysql --db-name=reviewboard --db-host=localhost --db-user=rb --db-pass=$RB_PASSWORD --cache-type=memcached --web-server-type=apache --python-loader=wsgi --admin-user=admin --admin-password=$RB_PASSWORD --admin-email=$RB_EMAIL --cache-info=localhost:11211 $RB_SITE # Import tables from old database echo echo Importing tables from old database (please wait...) mysql -u rb -p$RB_PASSWORD $(dirname $RB_SITE)/rb_dump.sql # Upgrade ReviewBoard site (trying twice) rb-site upgrade $RB_SITE rb-site upgrade $RB_SITE rb-site manage $RB_SITE list-evolutions The full log is attached, but the gist is that the rb-site upgrade fails with the following error: Error: Error applying evolution: (1050, Table 'reviews_reviewrequest_depends_on' already exists) If I run rb-site upgrade again I get the following error: Error: Error applying evolution: (1051, Unknown table 'auth_message') The log also contains the about of the rb-site manage list-evolutions command. I would appreciate any information on how I can make this migration work. Thanks, Alfred -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. rb.log Description: Binary data
Re: RBTools 0.5.2 is released!
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com wrote: On 08/22/2013 05:02 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote: Ah, well, I was wanting to rewrite the whole thing in Python anyway :-). (Trying to do that and skirt around where RBTools wants a deprecated optparse... now that's interesting...) optparse is deprecated, not removed. It's not going to see any new development, but last I heard it's going to remain available indefinitely. Also, as python 2.7 is the last release in the Python 2 line, it's pretty clear that it's never going to be removed from that series. That gives ReviewBoard (and anyone consuming RBTools) until at least 2015 to deal with the migration (since the Python upstream has committed to bug-fix support of Python 2.7 for five years after its release). Beyond that, I know of certain enterprise OSes that will likely extend the usable life of Python themselves. With that in mind, though: Christian, will ReviewBoard 1.8 be supporting Python 3.x? Right, it should be safe to depend on RBTools with optparse and all that for some time. We have a lot of people relying on Python 2.x, and will probably support it for quite a while. Review Board 1.8 will not support Python 3.x. While Django is now starting to support it, we still have a number of dependencies we need to check on, several of which likely need work, and nobody has even begun that, let alone tested any of it with Review Board. There's going to be a lot of work needed on our codebase as well. It's going to be quite an undertaking (one that I very much want help with). I'm spending almost every waking moment of 1.8, and there's still a lot of work to do on it. I don't want to delay the release any further than it's already delayed. Maybe we can prioritize this for the next big release. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: RBTools 0.5.2 is released!
On 08/23/2013 03:32 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com mailto:step...@gallagherhome.com wrote: On 08/22/2013 05:02 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote: Ah, well, I was wanting to rewrite the whole thing in Python anyway :-). (Trying to do that and skirt around where RBTools wants a deprecated optparse... now that's interesting...) optparse is deprecated, not removed. It's not going to see any new development, but last I heard it's going to remain available indefinitely. Also, as python 2.7 is the last release in the Python 2 line, it's pretty clear that it's never going to be removed from that series. That gives ReviewBoard (and anyone consuming RBTools) until at least 2015 to deal with the migration (since the Python upstream has committed to bug-fix support of Python 2.7 for five years after its release). Beyond that, I know of certain enterprise OSes that will likely extend the usable life of Python themselves. With that in mind, though: Christian, will ReviewBoard 1.8 be supporting Python 3.x? Right, it should be safe to depend on RBTools with optparse and all that for some time. We have a lot of people relying on Python 2.x, and will probably support it for quite a while. Review Board 1.8 will not support Python 3.x. While Django is now starting to support it, we still have a number of dependencies we need to check on, several of which likely need work, and nobody has even begun that, let alone tested any of it with Review Board. There's going to be a lot of work needed on our codebase as well. It's going to be quite an undertaking (one that I very much want help with). I'm spending almost every waking moment of 1.8, and there's still a lot of work to do on it. I don't want to delay the release any further than it's already delayed. Maybe we can prioritize this for the next big release. Sorry, I should have been clear that this was a curiosity, not a request :) -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Error migrating and upgrading from 1.6.6 to 1.7.13
Alfred, What's happening is that rb-site install is creating a bunch of tables, and then you're importing in the database dump but it's ending up with a mix of old and new. I'd recommend installing 1.6.6 on the new server, importing the database dump, and then upgrading in-place. -David On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Alfred von Campe alf...@von-campe.comwrote: I'm trying to upgrade a REviewBoard instance from 1.6.6 to 1.7.13. I've created a dump of the existing database and am running the following script on the new server: #!/bin/sh RB_SITE=/var/www/html/rb RB_USER=admin RB_EMAIL= RB_DOMAIN= RB_PASSWORD= # Delete and create empty rb database echo drop database reviewboard; create database reviewboard; use reviewboard; grant all privileges on revieboard.* to 'rb'@'localhost' identified by '$RB_PASSWORD' with grant option; | mysql -u rb -p$RB_PASSWORD # Delete existing ReviewBoard site directory so it can be recreated /bin/rm -fr $RB_SITE # Create the new ReviewBoard site rb-site install --console --noinput --domain-name=$RB_DOMAIN --site-root=/ --db-type=mysql --db-name=reviewboard --db-host=localhost --db-user=rb --db-pass=$RB_PASSWORD --cache-type=memcached --web-server-type=apache --python-loader=wsgi --admin-user=admin --admin-password=$RB_PASSWORD --admin-email=$RB_EMAIL --cache-info=localhost:11211 $RB_SITE # Import tables from old database echo echo Importing tables from old database (please wait...) mysql -u rb -p$RB_PASSWORD $(dirname $RB_SITE)/rb_dump.sql # Upgrade ReviewBoard site (trying twice) rb-site upgrade $RB_SITE rb-site upgrade $RB_SITE rb-site manage $RB_SITE list-evolutions The full log is attached, but the gist is that the rb-site upgrade fails with the following error: Error: Error applying evolution: (1050, Table 'reviews_reviewrequest_depends_on' already exists) If I run rb-site upgrade again I get the following error: Error: Error applying evolution: (1051, Unknown table 'auth_message') The log also contains the about of the rb-site manage list-evolutions command. I would appreciate any information on how I can make this migration work. Thanks, Alfred -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: RBTools 0.5.2 is released!
On Friday, August 23, 2013, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On 08/23/2013 03:32 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com javascript:; mailto: step...@gallagherhome.com javascript:; wrote: On 08/22/2013 05:02 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote: Ah, well, I was wanting to rewrite the whole thing in Python anyway :-). (Trying to do that and skirt around where RBTools wants a deprecated optparse... now that's interesting...) optparse is deprecated, not removed. It's not going to see any new development, but last I heard it's going to remain available indefinitely. Also, as python 2.7 is the last release in the Python 2 line, it's pretty clear that it's never going to be removed from that series. That gives ReviewBoard (and anyone consuming RBTools) until at least 2015 to deal with the migration (since the Python upstream has committed to bug-fix support of Python 2.7 for five years after its release). Beyond that, I know of certain enterprise OSes that will likely extend the usable life of Python themselves. With that in mind, though: Christian, will ReviewBoard 1.8 be supporting Python 3.x? Right, it should be safe to depend on RBTools with optparse and all that for some time. We have a lot of people relying on Python 2.x, and will probably support it for quite a while. Review Board 1.8 will not support Python 3.x. While Django is now starting to support it, we still have a number of dependencies we need to check on, several of which likely need work, and nobody has even begun that, let alone tested any of it with Review Board. There's going to be a lot of work needed on our codebase as well. It's going to be quite an undertaking (one that I very much want help with). I'm spending almost every waking moment of 1.8, and there's still a lot of work to do on it. I don't want to delay the release any further than it's already delayed. Maybe we can prioritize this for the next big release. Sorry, I should have been clear that this was a curiosity, not a request :) Oh I know, just figured I'd talk about it a bit :) Christian -- -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Error migrating and upgrading from 1.6.6 to 1.7.13
On Aug 23, 2013, at 16:14, David Trowbridge trowb...@gmail.com wrote: What's happening is that rb-site install is creating a bunch of tables, and then you're importing in the database dump but it's ending up with a mix of old and new. I'd recommend installing 1.6.6 on the new server, importing the database dump, and then upgrading in-place. Hmm, easier said than done, I think. I neglected to mention that the old server is running CentOS 5.9 with ReviewBoard installed via easy_install, and the new server is running CentOS 6.4 with ReviewBoard installed from the peel repo. So how do Install 1.6.X on the new server? I guess I would have to: o Uninstall ReviewBoard 1.7.X via yum remove (yum remove ReviewBoard pythin-django-evolution python-django-peipeline python-djblets) o Install ReviewBoard 1.6.X via easy_install (what is the exact command I need so that 1.6.6 gets installed?) o Install ReviewBoard 1.7.X via yum I am unsure how to install 1.6.X, so the exact easy_install command would be appreciated. Also, I worry that mixing easy_install and yum installations of ReviewBoard on the same server may cause some issues down the road. Has anyone done this? My other option would be to do this on a test server, and then export the 1.7.X database to the production server so that I don't mix the two installation methods on the production server. Alfred -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Error migrating and upgrading from 1.6.6 to 1.7.13
Let's try this--after creating the new site, but before loading the database dump, delete the new database that rb-site created. -David On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Alfred von Campe alf...@von-campe.comwrote: On Aug 23, 2013, at 16:14, David Trowbridge trowb...@gmail.com wrote: What's happening is that rb-site install is creating a bunch of tables, and then you're importing in the database dump but it's ending up with a mix of old and new. I'd recommend installing 1.6.6 on the new server, importing the database dump, and then upgrading in-place. Hmm, easier said than done, I think. I neglected to mention that the old server is running CentOS 5.9 with ReviewBoard installed via easy_install, and the new server is running CentOS 6.4 with ReviewBoard installed from the peel repo. So how do Install 1.6.X on the new server? I guess I would have to: o Uninstall ReviewBoard 1.7.X via yum remove (yum remove ReviewBoard pythin-django-evolution python-django-peipeline python-djblets) o Install ReviewBoard 1.6.X via easy_install (what is the exact command I need so that 1.6.6 gets installed?) o Install ReviewBoard 1.7.X via yum I am unsure how to install 1.6.X, so the exact easy_install command would be appreciated. Also, I worry that mixing easy_install and yum installations of ReviewBoard on the same server may cause some issues down the road. Has anyone done this? My other option would be to do this on a test server, and then export the 1.7.X database to the production server so that I don't mix the two installation methods on the production server. Alfred -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Error migrating and upgrading from 1.6.6 to 1.7.13
On Aug 23, 2013, at 16:29, David Trowbridge trowb...@gmail.com wrote: Let's try this--after creating the new site, but before loading the database dump, delete the new database that rb-site created. Sigh, I started playing with installing ReviewBoard 1.6 with easy install, and seems to have broken rb-site: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/rb-site, line 5, in module from pkg_resources import load_entry_point File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 2659, in module parse_requirements(__requires__), Environment() File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 546, in resolve raise DistributionNotFound(req) pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: paramiko=1.9.0 Even after re-installing ReviewBoard and python-paramiko I keep getting this error. I will try again on Monday as I need to lave work soon. Thanks for a great product and support, Alfred -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: RBTools 0.5.2 is released!
On 2013-08-23 07:43, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On 08/22/2013 05:02 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote: Ah, well, I was wanting to rewrite the whole thing in Python anyway :-). (Trying to do that and skirt around where RBTools wants a deprecated optparse... now that's interesting...) optparse is deprecated, not removed. Sure, but (1) I'd prefer to not have any more barriers than necessary for eventually moving my code to Python 3.x (e.g. I'm also trying to respect some syntax issues with 2 vs. 3 that I know about), and honsetly (2) I like argparse better :-). Anyway, as it turns out I don't want to be calling all of rbt's option handling anyway, so it becomes more an 'issue' that I need to synthesize an 'options' object with the attributes that the pieces I'm calling expect to be there. -- Matthew -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Issue 3065 in reviewboard: cannot able to open site
Comment #4 on issue 3065 by balasubr...@gmail.com: cannot able to open site http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3065 Many thanks for the support, i fixed the issue. In the apacha-wsgi.conf file i saw some issue WSGIScriptAlias /reviews /var/www/html/reviewboard/htdocs/reviewboard.wsgi/reviews Change to WSGIScriptAlias /reviews /var/www/html/reviewboard/htdocs/reviewboard.wsgi/reviews Now i can able to access the Site. Regards Bala -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Issue 3065 in reviewboard: cannot able to open site
Updates: Status: SetupIssue Comment #5 on issue 3065 by trowb...@gmail.com: cannot able to open site http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3065 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Issue 2047 in reviewboard: UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf8' codec can't decode byte with non-utf8 characters in perforce description
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #10 on issue 2047 by trowb...@gmail.com: UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf8' codec can't decode byte with non-utf8 characters in perforce description http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2047 WebAPI encoding has changed quite a bit. I haven't seen this recently with 1.7.x versions, except in the case of database tables with incorrect encodings. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Issue 2054 in reviewboard: RBTools-0.3.2 + Perforce - failed to upload diff when source file is a new file
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #5 on issue 2054 by trowb...@gmail.com: RBTools-0.3.2 + Perforce - failed to upload diff when source file is a new file http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2054 Both the original bug and the unicode misconfiguration haven't been problems in quite some time. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Issue 3015 in reviewboard: Comment box is tiny on iPad
Comment #1 on issue 3015 by trowb...@gmail.com: Comment box is tiny on iPad http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3015 Issue 2076 has been merged into this issue. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Issue 2076 in reviewboard: Comment boxes appear in the incorrect location in Safari on an iPad
Updates: Status: Duplicate Mergedinto: 3015 Comment #2 on issue 2076 by trowb...@gmail.com: Comment boxes appear in the incorrect location in Safari on an iPad http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2076 This has changed, but not for the better. I'm going to close this bug in favor of 3015, since that one is more correct now. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Issue 2962 in reviewboard: Migrating from MySQL to PostgreSQL fails to properly initialize sequences
Updates: Status: SetupIssue Comment #1 on issue 2962 by trowb...@gmail.com: Migrating from MySQL to PostgreSQL fails to properly initialize sequences http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2962 This really isn't a common case (I think you've been the only one so far), and I'm not sure what we would do with that script. I'm going to close this for now, and hope that it's really not a general problem. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Issue 2960 in reviewboard: post-review fails to determine correct repo URI for bounded bazaar branches
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #1 on issue 2960 by trowb...@gmail.com: post-review fails to determine correct repo URI for bounded bazaar branches http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2960 Fixed in rbtools master (9eeca47). Thanks! -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
