Re: Reviews for Files not in Source Control

[john levin]

Hello david,

Thanks for ur response. I'd like to know is this is possible via rbt 
commands.



On Wednesday, February 8, 2017 at 11:16:20 PM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge 
wrote:
>
> I'm sorry, I had some trouble understanding what you were trying to say in 
> your last e-mail. Here's the procedure I'd recommend:
>
> - Click on "New Review Request" at the top
> - For the repository, choose "(None - File attachments only)"
> - Click "Create Review Request"
> - Use "Update > Add File" to add each file you want to review.
> - Set summary/description/reviewers/etc. and publish
>
> -David
>
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 9:39 AM john levin <smart...@gmail.com 
> > wrote:
>
>> Appreciate the response on this !
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, February 7, 2017 at 12:07:15 PM UTC+5:30, john levin wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello David,
>>>
>>> Im aware that we can upload files for an existing review. But We need to 
>>> create reviews instead of updating the existing one. 
>>>
>>> Actually we have integrated the rbt command in tortoise svn client, 
>>> where we are performing operations via client side hooks. Now, we are in a 
>>> situation to create review for files that are not under source code (new 
>>> review request only).
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, February 7, 2017 at 1:18:03 AM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge 
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> John,
>>>>
>>>> You can attach any kind of file to a review request (Update > Add File 
>>>> or just drag-and-drop). Many file types (such as text and images) can be 
>>>> reviewed directly and all can be downloaded and have comments attached to 
>>>> them.
>>>>
>>>> -David
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 7:38 AM john levin <smart...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello Team,
>>>>>
>>>>> How to create reviews for files that is not in (or) not part of 
>>>>> commits. 
>>>>>
>>>>> What i mean is i need to create reviews without performing diffs for 
>>>>> files and will not be committed to source control tools. We have a 
>>>>> scenario 
>>>>> like that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Appreciate the response !
>>>>>
>>>>> /BR
>>>>> John
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
>>>>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>>>>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
>>>>> https://rbcommons.com/
>>>>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>>>>> --- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "reviewboard" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>> an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>> -- 
>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
>> https://rbcommons.com/
>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "reviewboard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Reviews for Files not in Source Control

[john levin]

Appreciate the response on this !

On Tuesday, February 7, 2017 at 12:07:15 PM UTC+5:30, john levin wrote:
>
> Hello David,
>
> Im aware that we can upload files for an existing review. But We need to 
> create reviews instead of updating the existing one. 
>
> Actually we have integrated the rbt command in tortoise svn client, where 
> we are performing operations via client side hooks. Now, we are in a 
> situation to create review for files that are not under source code (new 
> review request only).
>
>
> On Tuesday, February 7, 2017 at 1:18:03 AM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge 
> wrote:
>>
>> John,
>>
>> You can attach any kind of file to a review request (Update > Add File or 
>> just drag-and-drop). Many file types (such as text and images) can be 
>> reviewed directly and all can be downloaded and have comments attached to 
>> them.
>>
>> -David
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 7:38 AM john levin <smart...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Team,
>>>
>>> How to create reviews for files that is not in (or) not part of commits. 
>>>
>>> What i mean is i need to create reviews without performing diffs for 
>>> files and will not be committed to source control tools. We have a scenario 
>>> like that.
>>>
>>> Appreciate the response !
>>>
>>> /BR
>>> John
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
>>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
>>> https://rbcommons.com/
>>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>>> --- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "reviewboard" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Reviews for Files not in Source Control

[john levin]

Hello David,

Im aware that we can upload files for an existing review. But We need to 
create reviews instead of updating the existing one. 

Actually we have integrated the rbt command in tortoise svn client, where 
we are performing operations via client side hooks. Now, we are in a 
situation to create review for files that are not under source code (new 
review request only).


On Tuesday, February 7, 2017 at 1:18:03 AM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
> John,
>
> You can attach any kind of file to a review request (Update > Add File or 
> just drag-and-drop). Many file types (such as text and images) can be 
> reviewed directly and all can be downloaded and have comments attached to 
> them.
>
> -David
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 7:38 AM john levin <smart...@gmail.com 
> > wrote:
>
>> Hello Team,
>>
>> How to create reviews for files that is not in (or) not part of commits. 
>>
>> What i mean is i need to create reviews without performing diffs for 
>> files and will not be committed to source control tools. We have a scenario 
>> like that.
>>
>> Appreciate the response !
>>
>> /BR
>> John
>>
>> -- 
>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
>> https://rbcommons.com/
>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "reviewboard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reviews for Files not in Source Control

[john levin]

Hello Team,

How to create reviews for files that is not in (or) not part of commits. 

What i mean is i need to create reviews without performing diffs for files 
and will not be committed to source control tools. We have a scenario like 
that.

Appreciate the response !

/BR
John

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Diff not proper for xml files

[john levin]

Hello,

I could see the diffs are not proper for xml files (No line breaks, spaces 
etc). Can you please let us know whether we have any solution for this.
I'm using the reviewboard version -2.5.3-1.

/BR
~John

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Building RBTools 0.7.6 into a single-file exe for Windows

[john levin]

I did.. and i was successful..

On Sep 23, 2016 12:30 AM, "Daniel Kuecker"  wrote:

> Has anyone been successful building RBTools 0.7.6 into a single-file exe
> for distribution on windows?
>
> I'm trying to wrap rbt post functionality into an exe file and both py2exe
> and pyinstaller built exes are having issues when pkg_resources tries to
> resolve the rbtools package.
>
> The exe builds fine, but when I run it, I get a 
> "pkg_resources.distributionnotfound:
> the 'rbtools' distribution was not found and is required by the
> application" error.
>
> I've tried listing rbtools as hidden imports and importing an egg
> (although the egg import was never successful), to no avail.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> --Daniel
>
>
>
>
> --
> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
> https://rbcommons.com/
> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: rbt post for committed files in SVN

[john levin]

David,

For my Second question. I could understand that there is no option to 
update reviews in post-commit model (If not, pls help me to find out), then 
how can developers will fix the Open Issues ? You mean for Open Issues 
again a new review gets created ?  

On Saturday, July 16, 2016 at 10:42:26 PM UTC+5:30, john levin wrote:
>
> Ahhh.. Actually i was parsing like 
>
> rbt post REV --summary "TEST" --descriptions "TEST" (i looked the doc, it 
> says rbt post %REV% for committed files).
> and getting Error: Too many revision.
>
> But i didnt noted that summary and descriptions should be passed before 
> the revisions ( Havent gone through the doc fully just looking on the 
> syntax alone). So this worked.
> rbt post --summary "TEST" --descriptions "TEST" REV.
>
> Thank You David !
>
>
> On Saturday, July 16, 2016 at 9:56:42 PM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote:
>>
>> What doc are you referring to that says "%rev%"?
>>
>> rbt post does have --summary and --description parameters.
>>
>> -David
>> On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 1:57 AM john levin <smart...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi David,
>>> Actually I was validating both pre and post-commits.
>>> OK coming to question number 1.
>>> I'm running "rbt post" after the commits using revision number.  In 
>>> rbtools doc it was mentioned only "rbt post %rev%". I couldn't  capture the 
>>> svn commit message to pick it for reviews summary and descriptions (I 
>>> couldn't find rbt command options to do so). Even it is not considering if 
>>> I mention the summary and descriptions in .reviewboardrc file (it works 
>>> perfectly for pre-commits rbt commands) .  Do we have any options for 
>>> posting reviews with descriptions and summary in post-commits.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
>>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
>>> https://rbcommons.com/
>>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "reviewboard" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: rbt post for committed files in SVN

[john levin]

Ahhh.. Actually i was parsing like 

rbt post REV --summary "TEST" --descriptions "TEST" (i looked the doc, it 
says rbt post %REV% for committed files).
and getting Error: Too many revision.

But i didnt noted that summary and descriptions should be passed before the 
revisions ( Havent gone through the doc fully just looking on the syntax 
alone). So this worked.
rbt post --summary "TEST" --descriptions "TEST" REV.

Thank You David !


On Saturday, July 16, 2016 at 9:56:42 PM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
> What doc are you referring to that says "%rev%"?
>
> rbt post does have --summary and --description parameters.
>
> -David
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 1:57 AM john levin <smart...@gmail.com 
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi David,
>> Actually I was validating both pre and post-commits.
>> OK coming to question number 1.
>> I'm running "rbt post" after the commits using revision number.  In 
>> rbtools doc it was mentioned only "rbt post %rev%". I couldn't  capture the 
>> svn commit message to pick it for reviews summary and descriptions (I 
>> couldn't find rbt command options to do so). Even it is not considering if 
>> I mention the summary and descriptions in .reviewboardrc file (it works 
>> perfectly for pre-commits rbt commands) .  Do we have any options for 
>> posting reviews with descriptions and summary in post-commits.
>>
>> --
>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
>> https://rbcommons.com/
>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "reviewboard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: rbt post for committed files in SVN

[john levin]

Hi David, 
Actually I was validating both pre and post-commits.  
OK coming to question number 1.
I'm running "rbt post" after the commits using revision number.  In rbtools doc 
it was mentioned only "rbt post %rev%". I couldn't  capture the svn commit 
message to pick it for reviews summary and descriptions (I couldn't find rbt 
command options to do so). Even it is not considering if I mention the summary 
and descriptions in .reviewboardrc file (it works perfectly for pre-commits rbt 
commands) .  Do we have any options for posting reviews with descriptions and 
summary in post-commits.

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

rbt post for committed files in SVN

[john levin]

 Hi,

I have two queries.

1. rbt post for committed files in SVN, as per guidelines "rbt post 
%SVNREVISION%" this works, but i'm unable to parse summary and descriptions 
along with this command it fails. Also it didnt considered if i write the 
summary and descriptions in .reviewboardrc file. Can you suggest any other 
alternatives if any?
2. Do we have a rbt command to update the reviews for committed revisions.
Example :- i have created a review with post-commit hook in svn. Now, i 
need to update the review. Again i'm gonna commit (which should update my 
review too). For this process i'm identifying with commit message comments. 
If Keyword "New" found then i will run "rbt post %SVNREVISION%". but for 
updating the reviews i couldnt find command that will update the reviews by 
taking the committed revisions.

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: rbt command for post-commit in SVN

[john levin]

Now, its keep on telling me to "ERROR: The current directory does not 
contain a checkout from a supported source code repository".

I have installed rbtools 0.7.6 version in RHEL. I have checkedout a file 
for testing and running the rbt commands inside the checkout (where .svn 
folder exists). it fails with the above said error.

Chris/David Any Suggestions

~John

Also i tried creating .reviewboardrc file but the same error appears.

On Thursday, July 14, 2016 at 4:51:01 PM UTC+5:30, john levin wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I found some post-commit hook for svn to auto create reviews via rbt 
> command. To my understanding rbt command runs only on checkout working 
> copy. So to automate this do i need to perform checkout, create 
> .reviewboardrc and then submit as user ?. Do we have any possibilities to 
> create reviews based on revisions ? 
> Anyways we can create reviews in GUI for committed revisions. Will it be 
> done via rbt commands too ? if so, please let me know.
>
> Thanks !
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

rbt command for post-commit in SVN

[john levin]

Hello,

I found some post-commit hook for svn to auto create reviews via rbt 
command. To my understanding rbt command runs only on checkout working 
copy. So to automate this do i need to perform checkout, create 
.reviewboardrc and then submit as user ?. Do we have any possibilities to 
create reviews based on revisions ? 
Anyways we can create reviews in GUI for committed revisions. Will it be 
done via rbt commands too ? if so, please let me know.

Thanks !

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: diff content information in ReviewBoard Database

[john levin]

Hi Chris,

I'm trying to download the diffs in my linux server (where svn server 
installed to validate in pre-commit) via wget but i'm getting the html 
files only. Any suggestions ?

Also i guess i should try the API's. Can you please let me know how to 
utilize the API's. I have no idea about it.
It will be helpful if you explain me how to setup the API to communicate 
and get the results from RB.The Docs was explaining about the Resources 
etc, but no clue about the setup.

Thanks Alot !

~John

On Wednesday, July 13, 2016 at 3:25:54 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
> We fetch the files from the repository, which may be slightly different 
> from what you have in your tree locally (many repositories alter things 
> like encodings/line endings to match the local environment when checking 
> out files). We may then make other changes (our own encoding/line ending 
> normalization). The results of these are what we generate SHAs for.
>
> Given that, you might see entirely different SHAs on your system. What you 
> probably want to do instead is download the patches from Review Board, 
> apply them, and compare those resulting files against the full files being 
> checked in. You may also need to deal with some normalization, like we do, 
> depending on your setup.
>
> Christian
>
> -- 
> Christian Hammond
> President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/>
> Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/>
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:43 PM, john levin <smart...@gmail.com 
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> Thanks. Now, i'm trying to validate with the stored diffs. I could see 
>> there are two sha's available for each file in a review id 1. "orig_sha1" 
>> 2. patched_sha1.
>> may i know how it was generated? I tried with sha1sum in linux but the 
>> values mismatch. 
>> Appreciate your response.
>> Thanks.
>>
>> ~John
>>
>> On Saturday, July 9, 2016 at 2:05:11 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi John,
>>>
>>> This will only be available for diffs that have been viewed since 
>>> upgrading to (I believe) Review Board 2.0.9. Older diffs won't contain 
>>> this, but viewing the diff again should generate the information. All new 
>>> diffs should have it.
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Christian Hammond
>>> President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/>
>>> Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 6:41 AM, john levin <smart...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Chris,
>>>>
>>>> The extra_data column in diffviewer_filediff table has the info but not 
>>>> for all. for some rows it has "patched_sha1" and for some rows it has info 
>>>> like{"raw_insert_count": 0, "raw_delete_count": 1}. Unfortunately it 
>>>> doesnt 
>>>> helps. anywhere it stores the "patched_sha1" info for each files for the 
>>>> review id ?
>>>>
>>>> Thank You 
>>>>
>>>> ~John
>>>>
>>>> On Thursday, July 7, 2016 at 12:05:56 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> We don't support database access outside of using the API or through 
>>>>> our Python modules in Review Board (as part of our extensions). It's 
>>>>> doable, but it's not something we want to encourage.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you absolutely need to, it's stored as serialized JSON data in the 
>>>>> diffviewer_filediff table. You'll need to tie that in with the 
>>>>> diffviewer_diffset table, which is associated with a 
>>>>> diffviewer_diffsethistory, which is associated with a 
>>>>> reviews_reviewrequest. We don't guarantee any form of stability for the 
>>>>> data in these.
>>>>>
>>>>> The API is your best choice for this. It'll be more straight-forward 
>>>>> and more future-proof.
>>>>>
>>>>> Christian
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Christian Hammond
>>>>> President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/>
>>>>> Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 11:25 PM, john levin <smart...@gmail.com> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Chris,
>>>>>>
>>

Re: diff content information in ReviewBoard Database

[john levin]

Hello Team,

Could someone reply if you have gone through the below issue.

~John

On Tuesday, July 12, 2016 at 12:13:46 PM UTC+5:30, john levin wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> Thanks. Now, i'm trying to validate with the stored diffs. I could see 
> there are two sha's available for each file in a review id 1. "orig_sha1" 
> 2. patched_sha1.
> may i know how it was generated? I tried with sha1sum in linux but the 
> values mismatch. 
> Appreciate your response.
> Thanks.
>
> ~John
>
> On Saturday, July 9, 2016 at 2:05:11 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> This will only be available for diffs that have been viewed since 
>> upgrading to (I believe) Review Board 2.0.9. Older diffs won't contain 
>> this, but viewing the diff again should generate the information. All new 
>> diffs should have it.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> -- 
>> Christian Hammond
>> President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/>
>> Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 6:41 AM, john levin <smart...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Chris,
>>>
>>> The extra_data column in diffviewer_filediff table has the info but not 
>>> for all. for some rows it has "patched_sha1" and for some rows it has info 
>>> like{"raw_insert_count": 0, "raw_delete_count": 1}. Unfortunately it doesnt 
>>> helps. anywhere it stores the "patched_sha1" info for each files for the 
>>> review id ?
>>>
>>> Thank You 
>>>
>>> ~John
>>>
>>> On Thursday, July 7, 2016 at 12:05:56 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond 
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> We don't support database access outside of using the API or through 
>>>> our Python modules in Review Board (as part of our extensions). It's 
>>>> doable, but it's not something we want to encourage.
>>>>
>>>> If you absolutely need to, it's stored as serialized JSON data in the 
>>>> diffviewer_filediff table. You'll need to tie that in with the 
>>>> diffviewer_diffset table, which is associated with a 
>>>> diffviewer_diffsethistory, which is associated with a 
>>>> reviews_reviewrequest. We don't guarantee any form of stability for the 
>>>> data in these.
>>>>
>>>> The API is your best choice for this. It'll be more straight-forward 
>>>> and more future-proof.
>>>>
>>>> Christian
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Christian Hammond
>>>> President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/>
>>>> Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 11:25 PM, john levin <smart...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Chris,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks ! So far i'm not using the API's (i'm not Familiar with it) and 
>>>>> communicating directly to the Database. Hence can you please let me know 
>>>>> where these SHA"s stored in Database (In which Table). 
>>>>>
>>>>> ~John
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:42 AM, Christian Hammond <
>>>>> chri...@beanbaginc.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi John,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Easiest way, if it works for you, might be to just fetch the uploaded 
>>>>>> diff and compare. If you look at the URL for Download Diff on a review 
>>>>>> request, you'll see the kind of URL you'd need to compose. Generate a 
>>>>>> diff 
>>>>>> locally and compare that to the diff going in.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alternatively, you can compare the SHAs of the files. To do this, you 
>>>>>> need to loop over all files in the diff on the review request using the 
>>>>>> API. You can see this resource for info:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/2.5/webapi/2.0/resources/file-diff-list/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Note in the example payloads the "extra_data.patched_sha1" key. This 
>>>>>> is the SHA1 of the patched file, the one going into the commit. If you 
>>>>>> want 
>>>>>> to compare file contents and not the diff, you can get all these for the 
>>>>>> latest diff revision on the review request

Re: diff content information in ReviewBoard Database

[john levin]

Hi Chris,

Thanks. Now, i'm trying to validate with the stored diffs. I could see 
there are two sha's available for each file in a review id 1. "orig_sha1" 
2. patched_sha1.
may i know how it was generated? I tried with sha1sum in linux but the 
values mismatch. 
Appreciate your response.
Thanks.

~John

On Saturday, July 9, 2016 at 2:05:11 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
> This will only be available for diffs that have been viewed since 
> upgrading to (I believe) Review Board 2.0.9. Older diffs won't contain 
> this, but viewing the diff again should generate the information. All new 
> diffs should have it.
>
> Christian
>
> -- 
> Christian Hammond
> President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/>
> Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/>
>
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 6:41 AM, john levin <smart...@gmail.com 
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> The extra_data column in diffviewer_filediff table has the info but not 
>> for all. for some rows it has "patched_sha1" and for some rows it has info 
>> like{"raw_insert_count": 0, "raw_delete_count": 1}. Unfortunately it doesnt 
>> helps. anywhere it stores the "patched_sha1" info for each files for the 
>> review id ?
>>
>> Thank You 
>>
>> ~John
>>
>> On Thursday, July 7, 2016 at 12:05:56 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> We don't support database access outside of using the API or through our 
>>> Python modules in Review Board (as part of our extensions). It's doable, 
>>> but it's not something we want to encourage.
>>>
>>> If you absolutely need to, it's stored as serialized JSON data in the 
>>> diffviewer_filediff table. You'll need to tie that in with the 
>>> diffviewer_diffset table, which is associated with a 
>>> diffviewer_diffsethistory, which is associated with a 
>>> reviews_reviewrequest. We don't guarantee any form of stability for the 
>>> data in these.
>>>
>>> The API is your best choice for this. It'll be more straight-forward and 
>>> more future-proof.
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Christian Hammond
>>> President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/>
>>> Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 11:25 PM, john levin <smart...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Chris,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks ! So far i'm not using the API's (i'm not Familiar with it) and 
>>>> communicating directly to the Database. Hence can you please let me know 
>>>> where these SHA"s stored in Database (In which Table). 
>>>>
>>>> ~John
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:42 AM, Christian Hammond <
>>>> chri...@beanbaginc.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi John,
>>>>>
>>>>> Easiest way, if it works for you, might be to just fetch the uploaded 
>>>>> diff and compare. If you look at the URL for Download Diff on a review 
>>>>> request, you'll see the kind of URL you'd need to compose. Generate a 
>>>>> diff 
>>>>> locally and compare that to the diff going in.
>>>>>
>>>>> Alternatively, you can compare the SHAs of the files. To do this, you 
>>>>> need to loop over all files in the diff on the review request using the 
>>>>> API. You can see this resource for info:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/2.5/webapi/2.0/resources/file-diff-list/
>>>>>
>>>>> Note in the example payloads the "extra_data.patched_sha1" key. This 
>>>>> is the SHA1 of the patched file, the one going into the commit. If you 
>>>>> want 
>>>>> to compare file contents and not the diff, you can get all these for the 
>>>>> latest diff revision on the review request, and compare those. Something 
>>>>> to 
>>>>> note is that the file contents may be altered at some point in ways that 
>>>>> would affect the checksum (newlines normalized, file encodings being 
>>>>> applied on our end or the repository end to get contents to match up). So 
>>>>> depending on your setup, that may come into play.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hope that helps!
>>>>>
>>>>> Christian
>>>>>
>&

Re: diff content information in ReviewBoard Database

[john levin]

Hi Chris,

The extra_data column in diffviewer_filediff table has the info but not for 
all. for some rows it has "patched_sha1" and for some rows it has info 
like{"raw_insert_count": 0, "raw_delete_count": 1}. Unfortunately it doesnt 
helps. anywhere it stores the "patched_sha1" info for each files for the 
review id ?

Thank You 

~John

On Thursday, July 7, 2016 at 12:05:56 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> We don't support database access outside of using the API or through our 
> Python modules in Review Board (as part of our extensions). It's doable, 
> but it's not something we want to encourage.
>
> If you absolutely need to, it's stored as serialized JSON data in the 
> diffviewer_filediff table. You'll need to tie that in with the 
> diffviewer_diffset table, which is associated with a 
> diffviewer_diffsethistory, which is associated with a 
> reviews_reviewrequest. We don't guarantee any form of stability for the 
> data in these.
>
> The API is your best choice for this. It'll be more straight-forward and 
> more future-proof.
>
> Christian
>
> -- 
> Christian Hammond
> President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/>
> Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/>
>
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 11:25 PM, john levin <smart...@gmail.com 
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> Thanks ! So far i'm not using the API's (i'm not Familiar with it) and 
>> communicating directly to the Database. Hence can you please let me know 
>> where these SHA"s stored in Database (In which Table). 
>>
>> ~John
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:42 AM, Christian Hammond <chri...@beanbaginc.com 
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Hi John,
>>>
>>> Easiest way, if it works for you, might be to just fetch the uploaded 
>>> diff and compare. If you look at the URL for Download Diff on a review 
>>> request, you'll see the kind of URL you'd need to compose. Generate a diff 
>>> locally and compare that to the diff going in.
>>>
>>> Alternatively, you can compare the SHAs of the files. To do this, you 
>>> need to loop over all files in the diff on the review request using the 
>>> API. You can see this resource for info:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/2.5/webapi/2.0/resources/file-diff-list/
>>>
>>> Note in the example payloads the "extra_data.patched_sha1" key. This is 
>>> the SHA1 of the patched file, the one going into the commit. If you want to 
>>> compare file contents and not the diff, you can get all these for the 
>>> latest diff revision on the review request, and compare those. Something to 
>>> note is that the file contents may be altered at some point in ways that 
>>> would affect the checksum (newlines normalized, file encodings being 
>>> applied on our end or the repository end to get contents to match up). So 
>>> depending on your setup, that may come into play.
>>>
>>> Hope that helps!
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Christian Hammond
>>> President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/>
>>> Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 9:44 AM, john levin <smart...@gmail.com 
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Chris,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your reply !
>>>>
>>>> We are validating the list of files in a review id and the files trying 
>>>> to commit in SVN (using precommit hook). But it is not a proper 
>>>> way.problem 
>>>> here is People can use the same review id and can make changes and commit 
>>>> to svn without updating the review. So we are trying to validate with diff 
>>>> or (some sort of CRC for that particular review id).
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
>>>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>>>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
>>>> https://rbcommons.com/
>>>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>>>> ---
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "reviewboard" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com .
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>&

Re: diff content information in ReviewBoard Database

[john levin]

Hi Chris,

Thanks for your reply !

We are validating the list of files in a review id and the files trying to 
commit in SVN (using precommit hook). But it is not a proper way.problem here 
is People can use the same review id and can make changes and commit to svn 
without updating the review. So we are trying to validate with diff or (some 
sort of CRC for that particular review id).

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

diff content information in ReviewBoard Database

[john levin]

Could someone pls reply.

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Table to view svn logs in reviewboard

[john levin]

Hi Chris,

For Creating a New review in GUI for existing commits, we could able to get 
the svn commit details in GUI (Chossing the repo will list the branches and 
logs). I just want to know how it stores the details in Reviewboard.

Thanks
John

On Tuesday, May 31, 2016 at 2:13:27 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
> I'm not sure exactly what you're looking for. We don't replicate the 
> results of `svn log`, if that's what you're looking for.
>
> Christian
>
> -- 
> Christian Hammond
> President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/>
> Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/>
>
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 11:53 PM, john levin <smart...@gmail.com 
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> May i know which table stores the svn logs in reviewboard DB ? 
>>
>> Thanks
>> John
>>
>> -- 
>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
>> https://rbcommons.com/
>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "reviewboard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Table to view svn logs in reviewboard

[john levin]

Hi,

May i know which table stores the svn logs in reviewboard DB ? 

Thanks
John

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: diffviewer_filediff Table in DB

[john levin]

Thanks Alot David. You Saved my Time.

A colleague of mine wrote a sql quicky based on your input and we achieved 
the result.

select D.id,D.status,A.source_file from diffviewer_filediff A , 
diffviewer_diffset B , diffviewer_diffsethistory C,reviews_reviewrequest D 
where A.diffset_id = B.id and B.history_id = C.ID and  D.diffset_history_id 
= C.id and D.id = 57; (57 is the review id)




On Thursday, May 5, 2016 at 5:59:06 AM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
> There are many different tables that have foreign key relations to each 
> other.
>
> The FileDiff has a foreign key to DiffSet, which represents a single 
> revision of a diff on a review request. DiffSet in turn has a foreign key 
> to DiffSetHistory, which is all revisions. The ReviewRequest model has a 
> foreign key to DiffSetHistory (a 1:1 relationship).
>
> Therefore, if you want to relate a FileDiff to its ReviewRequest, you'll 
> have to join all the relevant tables together.
>
> -David
>
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 6:37 AM john levin <smart...@gmail.com 
> > wrote:
>
>> Could Someone answer my question please ?
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, May 4, 2016 at 12:39:54 PM UTC+5:30, john levin wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I could see that diffviewer_filediff Table doesnt Holds the review id 
>>> rather the id is incremental mode whenever the change is happens. So i'm 
>>> Wondering how to Map the Filelist with particular review ID. Any Idea ?
>>>
>>> Note :- I dont have an idea about django, so connecting the DB directly 
>>> to validate some informations.
>>>
>>> Thanks !
>>>
>>> /BR
>>> John
>>>
>> -- 
>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
>> https://rbcommons.com/
>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "reviewboard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: diffviewer_filediff Table in DB

[john levin]

Could Someone answer my question please ?

On Wednesday, May 4, 2016 at 12:39:54 PM UTC+5:30, john levin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I could see that diffviewer_filediff Table doesnt Holds the review id 
> rather the id is incremental mode whenever the change is happens. So i'm 
> Wondering how to Map the Filelist with particular review ID. Any Idea ?
>
> Note :- I dont have an idea about django, so connecting the DB directly to 
> validate some informations.
>
> Thanks !
>
> /BR
> John
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

diffviewer_filediff Table in DB

[john levin]

Hi,

I could see that diffviewer_filediff Table doesnt Holds the review id 
rather the id is incremental mode whenever the change is happens. So i'm 
Wondering how to Map the Filelist with particular review ID. Any Idea ?

Note :- I dont have an idea about django, so connecting the DB directly to 
validate some informations.

Thanks !

/BR
John

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Exyending Characters in Username Field

[john levin]

Ok. I have altered the field first_name in the DB directly. Now i could 
able to login with more than 30 characters. 

Now, the GUI i could see it is not including the characters more than 30 in 
the Username field. But that couldn't be a trouble at all for us (since 
users are able to login). 

However, i'm going to try to extend that too. Seems like i have to work on 
Django stuffs.. Any Idea about this ?

Thanks !

/BR
John

On Thursday, April 28, 2016 at 5:07:07 PM UTC+5:30, john levin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It was allowing 30 characters in username field. We have some ids which 
> goes beyond 30 characters (We use LDAP authentication).
> Can you please let me know how to increase the length of username field ?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards
> John
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Exyending Characters in Username Field

[john levin]

Hi Terry,

Thanks for your reply. Unfortunately we are in a situation to proceed only 
with e-mail id's (Due to some audit formalities in our org). Do we have 
anyother way to alter this ?

/BR
John

On Thursday, April 28, 2016 at 9:22:57 PM UTC+5:30, Dunnigan, Terrence J 
wrote:
>
> If you are using LDAP, are there any other LDAP fields that you can use 
> for username?  Email may be too long but perhaps there’s an employee number 
> or something else that’s shorter?
>
>  
>
> Terry
>
>  
>
> *From:* revie...@googlegroups.com  [mailto:
> revie...@googlegroups.com ] *On Behalf Of *john levin
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 28, 2016 6:37 AM
> *To:* reviewboard <revie...@googlegroups.com >
> *Subject:* Exyending Characters in Username Field
>
>  
>
> Hi,
>
> It was allowing 30 characters in username field. We have some ids which 
> goes beyond 30 characters (We use LDAP authentication).
> Can you please let me know how to increase the length of username field ?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards
> John
>
> -- 
> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
> https://rbcommons.com/
> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Exyending Characters in Username Field

[john levin]

Hi,

It was allowing 30 characters in username field. We have some ids which 
goes beyond 30 characters (We use LDAP authentication).
Can you please let me know how to increase the length of username field ?

Thanks.

Regards
John

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Integrated ReviewBoard in TortoiseSVN 1.8.X

[john levin]

Hi,

Wow. Infact i was trying the same (integrating with Tortoise-svn to create 
reviews automatically). I would like to see ur code. Could you please share 
it in public?

Thanks !
John

On Friday, May 9, 2014 at 3:32:39 AM UTC+5:30, Tamer Afify wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have made few changes in TortoiseSVN 1.8.X release to allow for;
> 1. Send a pre-commit review request from File Explorer menu
> 2. Send a post-commit review request from Tortoise Show Logs dialog
> 3. Review & Commit source in one step, that would add the review URL in 
> the commit log message
> 4. Setup a user local .reviewboardrc configuration file from TortoiseSVN 
> settings dialog
>
> I'm new to the open source world. Is that change of any value to the 
> ReviewBoard community? If so how can I share source and binaries?
> and maybe hopefully get a code review for my changes :)
>
>
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Table Name that Holds Filenames and diff

[john levin]

Hello,

Could anyone let me know the DB Table name that holds the file 
informations. I could able to get the file informations for modified files 
(source_file & dest_file ). But for new file i couldn't able to find the 
information's. 

Thanks
John

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

SVN hook for Checking Reviews before commit

[john levin]

Hi,

Could someone let me know how to integrate ReviewBoard with SVN using 
pre-commit. I googled and got some info that API's can be useful but i dont 
know how to use those API's.

Any Documentations on this ?

/BR
John

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

RBTools SSL Disable Option Doesnt Work For Windows

[john levin]

Hello,

We have noted that the latest version of rbtools doesnt work with option 
--disable-ssl-verifications. 

Looks like the inbuilt python version is not supported. So we have compiled 
with python 2.7.11 and it works. Will this be fixed ?

/BR
John

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Connecting Reviewboard DB

[john levin]

Hi David,

Thanks, Can this be utilized for SVN ?

/BR
John

On Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 3:58:19 AM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge 
wrote:
>
> John,
>
> I'd suggest making use of the "approval" state. This is available through 
> the API, and can be checked by a pre-commit hook. An example hook for git 
> can be found at 
> https://github.com/reviewboard/rbtools/blob/master/contrib/tools/git-hook-check-approval
>
> By default, a review request is "approved" if there's at least one "Ship 
> It" and no open issues. That logic can be changed by creating an extension 
> that uses the ReviewRequestApprovalHook: 
> https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/2.5/extending/extensions/hooks/review-request-approval-hook/
>
> If you choose to do it through some other mechanism, I'd highly recommend 
> making use of the API rather than trying to query the database directly.
>
> -David
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 2:23 AM john levin <smart...@gmail.com 
> > wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm pretty new to ReviewBoard. The Motive of us to Create a Pre-commit 
>> hook and block users whose review havent approved. 
>> So is this possible to connect ReviewBoard DB in backend ? So that we can 
>> give query and make a check in pre-commit hooks.
>> Or any other way to achieve this ?
>>
>> /BR
>> John
>>
>> -- 
>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
>> https://rbcommons.com/
>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "reviewboard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
> -- 
> -David
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: RBtools Compilation Error

[john levin]

Ok. I have ignored ICE60 with -sice option.. and it went through. However, 
the issue i'm facing (SSL Handshake Failure is still happening). 

Was Trying the solution from https://github.com/reviewboard/rbtools/pull/53 

but didnt workedout. Can any one help me out solve this ssl handshake 
failure issue.

Thanks in Advance !

/BR
John

On Thursday, March 17, 2016 at 4:40:16 PM UTC+5:30, john levin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm compiling rbtools in windows and i'm stuck with he below errors. Any 
> help apprciated. 
>
> "D:\ReviewBoard\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\contrib\installers\windows\wix\rbtools.sln"
>  
> (default target) (1) ->
> "D:\ReviewBoard\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\contrib\installers\windows\wix\rbtools.wixproj"
>  
> (default target) (2) ->
> (Link target) ->
>   
> D:\ReviewBoard\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\build\windows-pkg\stage\rbtools.wxs(41586):
>  
> error LGHT1076: ICE60: The file fil5B9BF04AEE68F07D
> FE56B078DB7FB24D is not a Font, and its version is not a companion file 
> reference. It should have a language specified in the Language column. 
> [D:\ReviewBoar
>
> d\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\contrib\installers\windows\wix\rbtools.wixproj]
>   
> D:\ReviewBoard\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\build\windows-pkg\stage\rbtools.wxs(41592):
>  
> error LGHT1076: ICE60: The file filA286A9D53EEC122F
> E98CE2CA63189DA6 is not a Font, and its version is not a companion file 
> reference. It should have a language specified in the Language column. 
> [D:\ReviewBoar
>
> d\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\contrib\installers\windows\wix\rbtools.wixproj]
>   
> D:\ReviewBoard\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\build\windows-pkg\stage\rbtools.wxs(44838):
>  
> error LGHT1076: ICE60: The file fil2631307FE9B6EE05
> FBDBA2BECCBC90C4 is not a Font, and its version is not a companion file 
> reference. It should have a language specified in the Language column. 
> [D:\ReviewBoar
>
> d\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\contrib\installers\windows\wix\rbtools.wixproj]
>   
> D:\ReviewBoard\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\build\windows-pkg\stage\rbtools.wxs(44841):
>  
> error LGHT1076: ICE60: The file filA52608E0F7014D85
> E52877B55E1ED412 is not a Font, and its version is not a companion file 
> reference. It should have a language specified in the Language column. 
> [D:\ReviewBoar
>
> d\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\contrib\installers\windows\wix\rbtools.wixproj]
>   
> D:\ReviewBoard\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\build\windows-pkg\stage\rbtools.wxs(44844):
>  
> error LGHT1076: ICE60: The file filF682E3180E827B9A
> 9D4AB7DFC036813D is not a Font, and its version is not a companion file 
> reference. It should have a language specified in the Language column. 
> [D:\ReviewBoar
>
> d\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\contrib\installers\windows\wix\rbtools.wixproj]
>   
> D:\ReviewBoard\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\build\windows-pkg\stage\rbtools.wxs(44847):
>  
> error LGHT1076: ICE60: The file filBEF3D1DA496B9078
> 2FFAC475F5E450E6 is not a Font, and its version is not a companion file 
> reference. It should have a language specified in the Language column. 
> [D:\ReviewBoar
>
> d\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\contrib\installers\windows\wix\rbtools.wixproj]
>   
> D:\ReviewBoard\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\build\windows-pkg\stage\rbtools.wxs(44850):
>  
> error LGHT1076: ICE60: The file fil500E7DEADAEB5ED6
> 3201167B153E994A is not a Font, and its version is not a companion file 
> reference. It should have a language specified in the Language column. 
> [D:\ReviewBoar
>
> d\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\contrib\installers\windows\wix\rbtools.wixproj]
>   
> D:\ReviewBoard\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\build\windows-pkg\stage\rbtools.wxs(44853):
>  
> error LGHT1076: ICE60: The file fil129F623871E94093
> A14C206A7C0A8C9D is not a Font, and its version is not a companion file 
> reference. It should have a language specified in the Language column. 
> [D:\ReviewBoar
>
> d\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\contrib\installers\windows\wix\rbtools.wixproj]
>   
> D:\ReviewBoard\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\build\windows-pkg\stage\rbtools.wxs(44856):
>  
> error LGHT1076: ICE60: The file filE54047363C75F291
> C5381D78931F4A44 is not a Font, and its version is not a companion file 
> reference. It should have a language specified in the Language column. 
> [D:\ReviewBoar
>
> d\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\contrib\

RBtools Compilation Error

[john levin]

Hi,

I'm compiling rbtools in windows and i'm stuck with he below errors. Any 
help apprciated. 

"D:\ReviewBoard\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\contrib\installers\windows\wix\rbtools.sln"
 
(default target) (1) ->
"D:\ReviewBoard\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\contrib\installers\windows\wix\rbtools.wixproj"
 
(default target) (2) ->
(Link target) ->
  
D:\ReviewBoard\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\build\windows-pkg\stage\rbtools.wxs(41586):
 
error LGHT1076: ICE60: The file fil5B9BF04AEE68F07D
FE56B078DB7FB24D is not a Font, and its version is not a companion file 
reference. It should have a language specified in the Language column. 
[D:\ReviewBoar
d\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\contrib\installers\windows\wix\rbtools.wixproj]
  
D:\ReviewBoard\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\build\windows-pkg\stage\rbtools.wxs(41592):
 
error LGHT1076: ICE60: The file filA286A9D53EEC122F
E98CE2CA63189DA6 is not a Font, and its version is not a companion file 
reference. It should have a language specified in the Language column. 
[D:\ReviewBoar
d\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\contrib\installers\windows\wix\rbtools.wixproj]
  
D:\ReviewBoard\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\build\windows-pkg\stage\rbtools.wxs(44838):
 
error LGHT1076: ICE60: The file fil2631307FE9B6EE05
FBDBA2BECCBC90C4 is not a Font, and its version is not a companion file 
reference. It should have a language specified in the Language column. 
[D:\ReviewBoar
d\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\contrib\installers\windows\wix\rbtools.wixproj]
  
D:\ReviewBoard\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\build\windows-pkg\stage\rbtools.wxs(44841):
 
error LGHT1076: ICE60: The file filA52608E0F7014D85
E52877B55E1ED412 is not a Font, and its version is not a companion file 
reference. It should have a language specified in the Language column. 
[D:\ReviewBoar
d\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\contrib\installers\windows\wix\rbtools.wixproj]
  
D:\ReviewBoard\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\build\windows-pkg\stage\rbtools.wxs(44844):
 
error LGHT1076: ICE60: The file filF682E3180E827B9A
9D4AB7DFC036813D is not a Font, and its version is not a companion file 
reference. It should have a language specified in the Language column. 
[D:\ReviewBoar
d\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\contrib\installers\windows\wix\rbtools.wixproj]
  
D:\ReviewBoard\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\build\windows-pkg\stage\rbtools.wxs(44847):
 
error LGHT1076: ICE60: The file filBEF3D1DA496B9078
2FFAC475F5E450E6 is not a Font, and its version is not a companion file 
reference. It should have a language specified in the Language column. 
[D:\ReviewBoar
d\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\contrib\installers\windows\wix\rbtools.wixproj]
  
D:\ReviewBoard\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\build\windows-pkg\stage\rbtools.wxs(44850):
 
error LGHT1076: ICE60: The file fil500E7DEADAEB5ED6
3201167B153E994A is not a Font, and its version is not a companion file 
reference. It should have a language specified in the Language column. 
[D:\ReviewBoar
d\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\contrib\installers\windows\wix\rbtools.wixproj]
  
D:\ReviewBoard\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\build\windows-pkg\stage\rbtools.wxs(44853):
 
error LGHT1076: ICE60: The file fil129F623871E94093
A14C206A7C0A8C9D is not a Font, and its version is not a companion file 
reference. It should have a language specified in the Language column. 
[D:\ReviewBoar
d\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\contrib\installers\windows\wix\rbtools.wixproj]
  
D:\ReviewBoard\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\build\windows-pkg\stage\rbtools.wxs(44856):
 
error LGHT1076: ICE60: The file filE54047363C75F291
C5381D78931F4A44 is not a Font, and its version is not a companion file 
reference. It should have a language specified in the Language column. 
[D:\ReviewBoar
d\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\contrib\installers\windows\wix\rbtools.wixproj]
  
D:\ReviewBoard\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\build\windows-pkg\stage\rbtools.wxs(44871):
 
error LGHT1076: ICE60: The file filEA9C8654826628B9
3CDC8E834CCE4700 is not a Font, and its version is not a companion file 
reference. It should have a language specified in the Language column. 
[D:\ReviewBoar
d\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\contrib\installers\windows\wix\rbtools.wixproj]
  
D:\ReviewBoard\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\build\windows-pkg\stage\rbtools.wxs(44874):
 
error LGHT1076: ICE60: The file fil9A9AFB7AEE1143D5
538FBA3D4BE71732 is not a Font, and its version is not a companion file 
reference. It should have a language specified in the Language column. 
[D:\ReviewBoar
d\RBTOOLS_SOURCE\rbtools-master\rbtools-master\contrib\installers\windows\wix\rbtools.wixproj]
  

E-mail Settings & https

[john levin]

Hi,

Now i'm ended up with smtp errors eventhough we have given the right 
configurations. Error details below. Also please let me know how to enable 
https for reviewboard site instead of http.

2016-02-18 11:30:50,809 - ERROR -  - Error sending e-mail notification with 
subject 'Review Request 5: Testing Review Board' on behalf of 
'john.le...@oracle.com' to 'SCM john.le...@oracle.com'
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File 
"/opt/reviewboard-2.5.2-1/apps/reviewboard/htdocs/reviewboard/notifications/email.py",
 
line 649, in send_review_mail
message.send()
  File 
"/opt/reviewboard-2.5.2-1/apps/reviewboard/htdocs/venv/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/mail/message.py",
 
line 276, in send
return self.get_connection(fail_silently).send_messages([self])
  File 
"/opt/reviewboard-2.5.2-1/apps/reviewboard/htdocs/venv/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/mail/backends/smtp.py",
 
line 87, in send_messages
new_conn_created = self.open()
  File 
"/opt/reviewboard-2.5.2-1/apps/reviewboard/htdocs/venv/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/mail/backends/smtp.py",
 
line 48, in open
local_hostname=DNS_NAME.get_fqdn())
  File "/opt/reviewboard-2.5.2-1/python/lib/python2.7/smtplib.py", line 
256, in __init__
(code, msg) = self.connect(host, port)
  File "/opt/reviewboard-2.5.2-1/python/lib/python2.7/smtplib.py", line 
317, in connect
(code, msg) = self.getreply()
  File "/opt/reviewboard-2.5.2-1/python/lib/python2.7/smtplib.py", line 
365, in getreply
+ str(e))
SMTPServerDisconnected: Connection unexpectedly closed: [Errno 104] 
Connection reset by peer

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Connecting Reviewboard DB

[john levin]

Hello,

I'm pretty new to ReviewBoard. The Motive of us to Create a Pre-commit hook 
and block users whose review havent approved. 
So is this possible to connect ReviewBoard DB in backend ? So that we can 
give query and make a check in pre-commit hooks.
Or any other way to achieve this ?

/BR
John

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

rbt set-repo retruns error

[john levin]

Hi,

I have installed Bitnami ReviewBoard in RHEL and now trying to setup rbt 
setup-repo in my local checkout but it returns error after providing the 
URL, username & password.

CRITICAL: [Errno 1] _ssl.c:507: error:14077410:SSL 
routines:SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO:sslv3 alert handshake failure

Any Help Appreciated !

Thanks

/BR
John


-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: RBTool config

[john levin]

Hi,

rbt should be used in the checked-out directory. In case of SVN it should 
be in place where .svn exists.

/BR
John

On Friday, February 12, 2016 at 10:34:20 AM UTC+5:30, thanga durai wrote:
>
> Hi, 
>
> I have recently installed bitnami-reviewboard-2.5.2-1, which is working 
> fine. 
>
> But I'm not able to us RBtool to post a review...When I use a RBtool 
>
> ERROR: The current directory does not contain a checkout from a supported 
> source code repository.
>
>
> Looking for support...
>  
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.