Re: SM 1.1.14 and Junk mail
Norman Fuchs wrote: 1. New mail messages do not have a red question mark, although all newsgroup messages do. If I click on the junk box for a mail message, the mark changes to junk status, and if I click again, it is not junk, i.e., the red mark is gone forever for that message. Since I have many hundreds (thousands?) of mail messages, this is not a practical method of removing the unwanted marks. 4. I've tried unsubscribing and then subscribing to this newsgroup. The repopulated message list still has the red question marks. junk mail status does not apply to newsgroups. -- *IMPORTANT*: Sorry folks, but I cannot provide email help Emails to me may become public Notice: This posting is protected under the Free Speech Laws, which applies everywhere in the FREE world, except for some strange reason, not to the mozilla.org newsgroup servers, where your posting may get you banned. Peter Potamus His Magic Flying Balloon: http://melaman2.com/cartoons/singles/mp3/p-potamus.mp3 http://www.toonopedia.com/potamus.htm ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
linux versus windows
I always had windows en Liux on 1 disk drive, that is possible because, linux boot from block 0 on the drive and windows on block 1... The nice thing is that you install windows on a clean new disk and after that linux... But know comes the problem, i wanted to be a clean house, like grandma's do from time to time, so i removed linux /and/ windows. But for heavens sake, what happened with block 0, finally got it together with /dd if=big file of=/dev/sda bs=10240/ wham, i worked slept from 1am to 5am, and all the time i was working on that problem. That *dd* trick is not possible on a rescue disk, that is read-only, but at least you can clean the partitions with /fdisk/, just in Linux single boot, and do it... b nice research and probably the wrong news group -- GJ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
question
I found in 1.1.12 with a Reply the was again attached, that is not usual and was not in the past... in a Fwd it makes a lot of sense sincerely -- GJ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM Crash with Flash in Linux
Dear Erwin, Thanks GJ for your replay, but let me tell you that I don't have a 64- bits machine, my machine has an AMD Sempron Processor 2500+, this is a 32-bits processor. The question is .. why FireFox loads the pages and SM crash? I'm using this flash-plugin version 10.0.12.36-release.i386 Thans for your help in advance My former machine was a Sempron 1600+ and that's a dual cpu 32/64 cpu, but that is apart from your problem... But if you have setup Fedora i686 than it is no use for 64bits of course. I really don't know what the reason can be that 1.1.12 is crashing in Fedora9, I used 1.1.11 and Fedora8 with great pleasure. Yum the seamonkey from the net, it has very many plugins, but is 64bits, now the wow computer is there, then we should get /flash/ in a few months i guess. all the best GJ http://vinkesteijn.info -- GJ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Playing streaming Windows Media video (SM 1.1.14, Kubuntu 8.10)
Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote: Rob Lindauer wrote: I'm trying to play some streaming video (Doppler radar at http://www.wfsb.com/video/9688512/index.html/index.html) via SM 1.1.14 on my Kutuntu 8.10 system. I have .wmv files associated with Kaffeine via my SM preferences, and they open right up in my browser. When I try to play the weather video above, I get a missing plugin message from SM. I suppose I need to define another filetype in my preference, but don't know what it is; or perhaps Kaffeine doesn't handle streaming video, or needs some plugin I don't know about. Can someone suggest a good way to view the video via SM? (Likely an elementary question - I'm relatively new at Linux) Thanks! The radar plays fine on SM-2.0a3pre with JavaScript enabled, MPlayer-plug-in-3.50, and Shockwave-Flash-10.0r15, on RPM-based kernel-2.6.24.7 Mandriva distribution. I'd say:- 1/ check your JavaScript settings (Edit/Preferences/Advanced/ScriptsPlugins/Enable-JavaScript-for-browser) 2/ Confirm your system's Kaffeine truly-can play a local WMV-file OK. 3/ Check that you are using a recent edition of Flash (http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/current/install_flash_player_10_linux.deb), having regard-to the libcurl-versions installed on your Ubuntu-8.10 (http://blogs.adobe.com/penguin.swf/2008/08/curl_tradeoffs.html). Aside from omitting JavaScript, that's a real-good FAQ at (http://www.wfsb.com/videofaq/index.html). Hope that helps. Thanks much for the help, will give it a shot. Regards, RL -- Rob Lindauer - Please change att to sbc for my real email address ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 1.1.14 and Junk mail
On 12/17/2008 06:26 PM, Norman Fuchs wrote: Since I installed 1.1.14 (I had 1.1.13 previously), all my messages (Mail and Newsgroup messages) have a bold red question mark in the Junk status column. (Well, all but the ones in the Inbox mail folder.) The question marks do not change when I click on them. In the Inbox mail folder, everything works normally. How can I fix this? I assume this is not a new feature of version 1.1.14. Try right-clicking on the message group/folder and select Rebuild Index. You might also try closing SM and renaming training.dat in your mozilla folder. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2 profile import issue
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 12/18/2008 3:48 PM, Ed Mullen wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 12/18/2008 12:24 AM, Ed Mullen wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 12/17/2008 1:31 AM, Ed Mullen wrote: When I installed SM 2 it imported my 1.1.13 profile. Seems to be working fine. Until a friend noted that every email has the same signature. I use a program called Pick-A-Tag to randomly generate a sig file. So I checked and the SM import changed the path for the sig file in every mail and news account I have. Original path in the SM 1.1.13 prefs.js is: G:\\My Documents\\pick_a_tag_destination.txt Path in SM 2 profile's prefs.js is: C:\\Documents and Settings\\Ed\\Application Data\\Mozilla\\SeaMonkey\\Profiles\\bxp1ogrw.default\\pick_a_tag_destination.txt And the import process copied the original file to my profile. I cannot imagine the logic behind this one. So that the SM2 profile has the actual files used... In general the file used is located in the SM1 profile, I'm not sure on the supported methods here... Well, the actual, defined, sig file is a finite path. And, in my case, the import screwed it up. It not only modified my original path for my sig file, but it also copied the file to my profile. Which totally screwed my system. Every two minutes my sig file program writes a new sig file. My SM file points to that destination file. Or should. The import totally screwed it up. For reference, can you import your SM(1) profile [hide or delete your SM2 profile temporarily] with TB3b1, and see what happens to your sig(s) in that? Huh? I installed SM 2. I let it do the default import process other than the components I did not want installed, and to point it to a different drive. How the hell did anyone decide to: 1. change the path to my sig file? 2. copy my sig file to my profile folder? 3. change the reference to my sig file in the prefs.js file? It is, at best, silly. At worst, well. I am awaiting a comment from someone who actually codes this stuff and who can explain it. To me? On the surface of it, it's just ... well ... dumb. You didn't answer my trial question either way (I'm much too tired atm to attempt to articulate my thoughts on your comments). But can you PLEASE try (without having a SM2 profile around in default location, just back it up) TB3b1 and run its importer I would welcome more info on how they treat sig file imports here. It is 100% relevant on if they do the same as our 2.0 importer, or if they do it differently. Doesn't mean either choice is right or wrong, just relevant. Sorry, Justin. It was late and I was in a grouchy mood. Mea culpa.\ Ok, I just installed TB3B1 and imported my SM1 profile. (It took much much longer than the SM2 import.) Oddly, it got the sigfile path correct for the default email account but screwed up the other 17 email and news accounts exactly the way the SM2 import did: It copied the sigfile to the TB profile and changed the path in those other 17 accounts. Can you file a bug against SeaMonkey, CC me, and cite this result? (I'm not 100% sure who is /right/ here but I can *try* and look into it, at least a bug will help us all) https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470801 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470805 Also of note is TB also has a bug here, either fix all or fix none imo. More alarmingly, it appears that it over-wrote my TB2 profile. Not that I care since I only use TB for testing. Sounds like a TB bug which may likely be worth filing. I can't confirm the over-writing of the profile although I am pretty sure that's what happened. -- Ed Mullen http://edmullen.net The Space Shuttle ends where the subway begins. There's a tear on the face of the moon - Gordon Lightfoot ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 1.1.14 and Junk mail
NoOp wrote: On 12/17/2008 06:26 PM, Norman Fuchs wrote: Since I installed 1.1.14 (I had 1.1.13 previously), all my messages (Mail and Newsgroup messages) have a bold red question mark in the Junk status column. (Well, all but the ones in the Inbox mail folder.) The question marks do not change when I click on them. In the Inbox mail folder, everything works normally. How can I fix this? I assume this is not a new feature of version 1.1.14. Try right-clicking on the message group/folder and select Rebuild Index. You might also try closing SM and renaming training.dat in your mozilla folder. Simple, turn off the column that shows Junk status ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey profile manager not loading
news.mozilla.org wrote: I have tried already all the suggestions listed. I'm a computer programmer and have been using computers since 1979, so I have experience. There are no programs in QuickLaunch relating to any browser, except having SeaMonkey launch my localhost. But I removed that and still can't get to profile. I'll upgrade to Seamonkey2 when it has all the add-on I've been using for years. news.mozilla.org wyley...@comcast.net wrote in message news:zacdny6hq_pqt9funz2dnuvz_rrin...@mozilla.org... The following 2 shortcuts are not working with SeaMonkey 1.1.4 D:\Program Files\BROWSERS\SeaMonkey\seamonkey.exe -profilemanager D:\Program Files\BROWSERS\SeaMonkey\seamonkey.exe -P Can anyone help??? is D: really the drive where Program Files directory is located? -- John Doue ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is this functionality present in SM2 ?
Ray_Net wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Jens Hatlak wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Please file an Enhancement bug for this, it sounds like a good idea. I did not know how to do it ... If someone can guide me 1. Go to https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/ 2. click Report a bug 3. select SeaMonkey 4. follow the instructions. Don't worry if you are not 100% sure about particular choices. People watching Bugzilla will correct what is wrong. The more you get right the less work for them, of course. :-) Thanks for the guidance --- Bug 470664 has been added to the database. It's not an easy modification for SM ... so i don't expect this enhancement implemented before SM3 :-) Yes but How to increase the number of votes ? (just one for the moment (mine) ) I don't know why i create this enhancement bug already done in 2002 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119977 and a lot of people have done the same request - Each one with the status: Assigned To: Nobody; OK to take it and work on it So noway . SM is not what the users want, but what the developper like to do :-) :-) :-) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 1.1.14 and Junk mail
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo: Moz Champion (Dan) wrote: Simple, turn off the column that shows Junk status if you do that for the newsgroups accounts, then that also removes them from the mail accounts Mnenhy helps. :) Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Sea Monkey and Vista
I'd like to switch from FF and maybe T-bird to Sea Monkey and have tried several times to install. It installs, I restart and try to open Sea Monkey but always get a prior installation has not finished installing nothing happens after that. Is it possible to get SM to work on Vista, I have checked XP, SP2 on the compatibility tab ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Sea Monkey and Vista
Stephan Thiele wrote: Am 22.12.2008 23:18 hat THEgrumpy one geschrieben: Is it possible to get SM to work on Vista, I have checked XP, SP2 on the compatibility tab I am and have been working with SM (1.1.x as well as 2.0a) on Vista without any problem. You don't need to choose a compatibility. Maybe you should try to simlpy download one of the zipped versions and run the seamonkey.exe. The program itself doesn't need an install. Stephan Thanks, I'll try that, if it doesn't work that means I've got a problem somewhere on this machine ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 1.1.14 and Junk mail
On 12/22/08 12:39 PM, _Norman Fuchs_ spoke thusly: Fine. But then why is there a column displayed for junk status? And how can I eliminate all the red question marks there? Displaying different columns for folders/newsgroups is a feature of Mnenhy. http://mnenhy.mozdev.org/folderstore.html If you have further questions about that, there is a Mnenhy newsgroup on the news.mozdev.org server. See http://www.mozdev.org/mailing-lists.html. -- Chris Ilias http://ilias.ca List-owner: support-firefox, support-thunderbird, test-multimedia ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 1.1.14 and Junk mail
On 12/22/2008 12:50 PM, NoOp wrote: On 12/17/2008 06:26 PM, Norman Fuchs wrote: Since I installed 1.1.14 (I had 1.1.13 previously), all my messages (Mail and Newsgroup messages) have a bold red question mark in the Junk status column. (Well, all but the ones in the Inbox mail folder.) The question marks do not change when I click on them. In the Inbox mail folder, everything works normally. How can I fix this? I assume this is not a new feature of version 1.1.14. Try right-clicking on the message group/folder and select Rebuild Index. You might also try closing SM and renaming training.dat in your mozilla folder. I just tried both of these things -- no change. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is this functionality present in SM2 ?
Ray_Net wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Jens Hatlak wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Please file an Enhancement bug for this, it sounds like a good idea. I did not know how to do it ... If someone can guide me 1. Go to https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/ 2. click Report a bug 3. select SeaMonkey 4. follow the instructions. Don't worry if you are not 100% sure about particular choices. People watching Bugzilla will correct what is wrong. The more you get right the less work for them, of course. :-) Thanks for the guidance --- Bug 470664 has been added to the database. It's not an easy modification for SM ... so i don't expect this enhancement implemented before SM3 :-) Yes but How to increase the number of votes ? (just one for the moment (mine) ) I don't know why i create this enhancement bug already done in 2002 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119977 and a lot of people have done the same request - Each one with the status: Assigned To: Nobody; OK to take it and work on it So noway . SM is not what the users want, but what the developper like to do :-) :-) :-) Ray, if there are a lot of duplicates, then you should be marking them all as duplicates, so then it would show that a lot more than just one person requesting the Enhancement. -- Daniel (using his sister's computer) (Test driving SM 2.x) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: What controls system font size?
Tony wrote: Daniel wrote: Tony wrote: Bill Davidsen wrote: That is, the fonts used to present menus, etc. The Fedora Linux releases of seamonkey have those fonts set to something very small (perhaps 4-6pt) and I can't seem to change them. Tried: - font settings in about:config - using other themes The first changes font sizes in the browser or mail text display, but not the subjects display or the grey (in classic theme) area. I'm out of ideas, where are these set? And as a side issue, shouldn't their size be in about:config? I have a related question: where can I change the default view for text from 100% to 110% on a permanent basis. I know how to change it under View -- Text Zoom --Other The reason I ask is that I recently replaced my 17 CRT (resolution set to 1280x1024 and was very readable) for a 19 LCD (resolution is 1440x990). Certain sites like Foxnews.com are relatively tiny at 100% but 110% is good. Changing the font sizes in preferences under appearance doesn't help. Tony, if you set the resolution on the LCD to the same 1280x1024 as you had on the CRT, how do things look?? or is this size not available on the LCD?? The LCD is won't do the 1024 portion. the old CRT was a square design and the LCD is wide screen design. Even setting the system (Win XP) properties to show larger icons/text doesn't cut it in SM. System looks fine, SM small. So, if you were to select any of the screen resolutions that has a vertical resolution of 1280 (like your old CRT had), how do the icon appear? Any to your liking? -- Daniel (using his sister's computer) (Test driving SM 2.x) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: What controls system font size?
Daniel wrote: Tony wrote: Daniel wrote: Tony wrote: Bill Davidsen wrote: That is, the fonts used to present menus, etc. The Fedora Linux releases of seamonkey have those fonts set to something very small (perhaps 4-6pt) and I can't seem to change them. Tried: - font settings in about:config - using other themes The first changes font sizes in the browser or mail text display, but not the subjects display or the grey (in classic theme) area. I'm out of ideas, where are these set? And as a side issue, shouldn't their size be in about:config? I have a related question: where can I change the default view for text from 100% to 110% on a permanent basis. I know how to change it under View -- Text Zoom --Other The reason I ask is that I recently replaced my 17 CRT (resolution set to 1280x1024 and was very readable) for a 19 LCD (resolution is 1440x990). Certain sites like Foxnews.com are relatively tiny at 100% but 110% is good. Changing the font sizes in preferences under appearance doesn't help. Tony, if you set the resolution on the LCD to the same 1280x1024 as you had on the CRT, how do things look?? or is this size not available on the LCD?? The LCD is won't do the 1024 portion. the old CRT was a square design and the LCD is wide screen design. Even setting the system (Win XP) properties to show larger icons/text doesn't cut it in SM. System looks fine, SM small. So, if you were to select any of the screen resolutions that has a vertical resolution of 1280 (like your old CRT had), how do the icon appear? Any to your liking? No, they appear squished. One good way to calibrate the screen is to load Google Earth and then with the globe visible, make it round. that sets a good approximation. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Wells Fargo
Hello, After updating to 1.1.14, when I go to www.wellsfargo.com, the line for the password entry box is gone! This has never happened with prior versions. Any suggestions? Thanks, ST ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
