Re: Since 1.1.16: single mouse clicks seen as double-clicks?
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:07:49 -0700 From: Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo peter.potamus.the.purple.hi...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Since 1.1.16: single mouse clicks seen as double-clicks? To: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org Mark Hansen wrote: I realize this sounds strange, but I'm really just wondering if anyone else is seeing it. [...] are you using the same box for both windows and linux? If so, then get a new mouse. If not, then what have you got running in the background of both computers? I had that once and it turned out to be a hidden windows program running in the background. I disabled it and things went back to normal. I've noticed the same thing since 1.1.7 (and before). Well almost. I'm running on a SPARC boxen w/Solaris 9. When I try and scroll down using the scroll bar, most times a single click goes 'down' two screens worth... (I HAVE a good mouse...) Regards, Gregory Hicks - Gregory Hicks | Principal Systems Engineer | Direct: 408.569.7928 People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf -- George Orwell The price of freedom is eternal vigilance. -- Thomas Jefferson The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed. --Alexander Hamilton ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Does anyone care about this?
furthermore, there is a 2 gig limit for windows. Perhaps that is the reason for the problem That's a memory limit per application, not the file limit on the drive. I don't think SM stores all mails into RAM at a time...? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Does anyone care about this?
ad...@mmri.us wrote: We have been through this to death. Please see previous threads. I as well as others top post as in my opinion it is outdated. Post as you wish. Moz Champion (Dan) wrote: ad...@mmri.us wrote: snip Sorryyou top post because top posting, in your opinion, is outdated!! Gee, I didn't realise that! Daniel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: 1.1.15/16 and fr language pack
Le 14 avril 2009, Robert Kaiser a écrit : Did you try switching back to English, restarting SeaMonkey, to French again, and restarting again? We unfortunately have an old Bug in SeaMonkey 1.x that makes us need that sometimes. SeaMonkey 2 should work better there. That worked! Thanks a lot. -- LL ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Does anyone care about this?
Whatever pleases you. Moz Champion (Dan) wrote: In that case, begone. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Does anyone care about this?
Martin Feitag wrote: furthermore, there is a 2 gig limit for windows. Perhaps that is the reason for the problem That's a memory limit per application, not the file limit on the drive. I don't think SM stores all mails into RAM at a time...? no, each folder has a 2 gig limit: http://seamonkey.ilias.ca/mailnewsfaq/SizeLimit -- *IMPORTANT*: Sorry folks, but I cannot provide email help Emails to me may become public Notice: This posting is protected under the Free Speech Laws, which applies everywhere in the FREE world, except for some strange reason, not to the mozilla.org newsgroup servers, where your posting may get you banned. Peter Potamus His Magic Flying Balloon: http://melaman2.com/cartoons/singles/mp3/p-potamus.mp3 http://www.toonopedia.com/potamus.htm ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Does anyone care about this?
ad...@mmri.us wrote: We have been through this to death. Please see previous threads. I as well as others top post as in my opinion it is outdated. Post as you wish. If you wish to make your messages difficult for others to read, they may oblige you and not read them. B/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Does anyone care about this?
That is perfectly fine, and in order with me if they don't read my posts. Everyone is entitled to their choice. Brian Mailman wrote: If you wish to make your messages difficult for others to read, they may oblige you and not read them. B/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Does anyone care about this?
Martin Feitag wrote: Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo schrieb: Martin Feitag wrote: furthermore, there is a 2 gig limit for windows. Perhaps that is the reason for the problem That's a memory limit per application, not the file limit on the drive. I don't think SM stores all mails into RAM at a time...? no, each folder has a 2 gig limit: http://seamonkey.ilias.ca/mailnewsfaq/SizeLimit uh interesting, does anyone know why this limit exists on windows? Are you interested by initiating a very large thread ? :-) You may read this: http://www.codeguru.com/forum/showthread.php?t=451334 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Saving web sites
Thanks for the advice. Both methods worked, but I like the scrapbook system a bit more because of the bookmarking. I should have asked earlier and saved myself a lot of time. n...@home wrote: I'm new to having a laptop, and we travel a lot. I do my research and planning on the internet, and have a number of sites I would like to be able to review when I don't have web access. Its not important that the sites be updated, nor that their links work, I just want the information. I've been taking screenshots of each page, making them into a jpeg file, and storing that, but it is a lot of work as many sites I like have multiple pages. I use Vista and Seamonkey 1.1.16. Internet explorer is on the machine, but I don't use it enough to be familiar with it. Is there some way to save web-sites so I can read them when off-line, or would this use too much of the limited storage on the typical laptop? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Does anyone care about this?
POP, The server is Exim4 and dovecote I don't expect to do this often. I have one partner who keeps her messages on the sever for a long time, as a sort of safety mechanism. She downloads them constantly. I was setting up a new computer for her and downloading the messages happened as a part of setting up a new account. As others have noted it isn't a big deal and doesn't affect getting messages.but I wondered is anyone had ever seen this before. Chris Ilias wrote: On 22/04/09 12:57 PM, Rob Steinmetz wrote: Email Rob Steinmetz wrote: That is you download more than 39,897 messages the counter runs backwards? It reads; Downloading 1 of 40767 Downloading 1 of 40766 Downloading 1 of 40765 Until you get to 38,897 then it reads properly, except the maximum value is 39,897 I wonder if this is a server thing? POP or IMAP? In other words, would you say that the amount of messages you expect to download is in the tens of thousands? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Does anyone care about this?
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Martin Feitag wrote: furthermore, there is a 2 gig limit for windows. Perhaps that is the reason for the problem I don't think so since each message is transferred and then appended to the folder(file) individually. How would the file size limit affect the first email added to a folder? I don't think the size of the download is ever calculated or transmitted to the client. The whole this is more of a curiosity than anything. BTW thank you for pointing out the files size limit, I do hope that is is going to be removed, There seems no sensible reason to have a limit not imposed by the filessystem. If large files cause performance problems the user should have to option of accepting the hit or administering the system. That's a memory limit per application, not the file limit on the drive. I don't think SM stores all mails into RAM at a time...? no, each folder has a 2 gig limit: http://seamonkey.ilias.ca/mailnewsfaq/SizeLimit ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
[OT] crash reports - was Re: slow speed of newsreader
On 04/22/2009 10:21 PM, Philip Chee wrote: On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:46:47 -0400, Leonidas Jones wrote: Martin Feitag wrote: Be patient, it's still an alpha-version ;-) (though I have to say it doesn't crash often here) Oh not often at all, maybe once or twice a week. Still, its more then I ever saw with 1.1.x. I do hope that you guys running 2.0a/b have turned on the crash reporter AND are filing crash bugs. Because if you aren't nobody is going to fix those bugs (unless it's in code shared with either Thunderbird or Firefox and someone there has already filed some crash bugs) because the developers aren't aware of those. Also it's better to file a crash bug and have it marked as a duplicate than to suffer in silence in case nobody else has filed a bug. Phil Explain please why it is necessary to *also* file a bug in addition to the crash report. For example, my 2.0b1pre crashed about an hour ago. The crash reporter files this: http://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/index/121cf58e-7098-4d62-8511-35d5c2090423 Crash-stats (http://crash-stats.mozilla.com/) search shows all of these for a libc-2.7.so crash in 2.0b1pre: http://crash-stats.mozilla.com/query/query?do_query=1product=SeaMonkeyversion=SeaMonkey%3A2.0b1preplatform=linuxdate=range_value=4range_unit=weeksquery_search=signaturequery_type=containsquery=libc-2.7.so [SeaMonkey 2.0b1pre Crash Report [@ libc-2.7...@0x73463 ]] Isn't there sufficient information in the crash reports (including raw dumps) to work on the issues? The crash report shows the build, branch, version, OS version, OS, reason (SIGSEGV in this case), signature, etc. Further, when submitting the crash report I've always ticked the box to include my email address so that I can be contacted for additional information/testing. However I yet to receive an email back regarding any of the 32 crash reports that I've sent. Note: it would also be *very* helpful if the 'submitted' file actually contained the full url to the crash report... it gets to be a pain pasting in http://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/index/ then going back and pasting in '121cf58e-7098-4d62-8511-35d5c2090423' (mind you that you need to leave off the preceeding 'bp-' in Crash ID: bp-121cf58e-7098-4d62-8511-35d5c2090423 for the url to work. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Does anyone care about this?
ad...@mmri.us wrote: Brian Mailman wrote: If you wish to make your messages difficult for others to read, they may oblige you and not read them. That is perfectly fine, and in order with me if they don't read my posts. Everyone is entitled to their choice. In cyberspace, no one can hear you scream. B/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Does anyone care about this?
On 04/23/2009 06:59 PM, Brian Mailman wrote: ad...@mmri.us wrote: Brian Mailman wrote: If you wish to make your messages difficult for others to read, they may oblige you and not read them. That is perfectly fine, and in order with me if they don't read my posts. Everyone is entitled to their choice. In cyberspace, no one can hear you scream. B/ The trees can. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: [OT] crash reports - was Re: slow speed of newsreader
Leonidas Jones wrote: NoOp wrote: On 04/22/2009 10:21 PM, Philip Chee wrote: On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:46:47 -0400, Leonidas Jones wrote: Martin Feitag wrote: Be patient, it's still an alpha-version ;-) (though I have to say it doesn't crash often here) Oh not often at all, maybe once or twice a week. Still, its more then I ever saw with 1.1.x. I do hope that you guys running 2.0a/b have turned on the crash reporter AND are filing crash bugs. Because if you aren't nobody is going to fix those bugs (unless it's in code shared with either Thunderbird or Firefox and someone there has already filed some crash bugs) because the developers aren't aware of those. Also it's better to file a crash bug and have it marked as a duplicate than to suffer in silence in case nobody else has filed a bug. Phil Explain please why it is necessary to *also* file a bug in addition to the crash report. For example, my 2.0b1pre crashed about an hour ago. The crash reporter files this: http://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/index/121cf58e-7098-4d62-8511-35d5c2090423 Crash-stats (http://crash-stats.mozilla.com/) search shows all of these for a libc-2.7.so crash in 2.0b1pre: http://crash-stats.mozilla.com/query/query?do_query=1product=SeaMonkeyversion=SeaMonkey%3A2.0b1preplatform=linuxdate=range_value=4range_unit=weeksquery_search=signaturequery_type=containsquery=libc-2.7.so [SeaMonkey 2.0b1pre Crash Report [@ libc-2.7...@0x73463 ]] Isn't there sufficient information in the crash reports (including raw dumps) to work on the issues? The crash report shows the build, branch, version, OS version, OS, reason (SIGSEGV in this case), signature, etc. Further, when submitting the crash report I've always ticked the box to include my email address so that I can be contacted for additional information/testing. However I yet to receive an email back regarding any of the 32 crash reports that I've sent. Note: it would also be *very* helpful if the 'submitted' file actually contained the full url to the crash report... it gets to be a pain pasting in http://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/index/ then going back and pasting in '121cf58e-7098-4d62-8511-35d5c2090423' (mind you that you need to leave off the preceeding 'bp-' in Crash ID: bp-121cf58e-7098-4d62-8511-35d5c2090423 for the url to work. My apologies for the blank post, LAN error. I am interested in the answer to NoOP's question though. I had thought that sending the crssh reports was a part of the testing. ee Lee s ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Wandering Bookmarks in SeaMonkey
Garrett Czmor wrote: $irVivor §ireßird wrote: Some two thirds of my bookmarks suddenly vanished last night for no apparent reason. I'd been looking at a site I've used dozens of times before (IMDB), closed SeaMonkey, opened it again a few minutes later to check another regular site (BBC News) - and suddenly realised that most of my bookmarks weren't there any more. I had hoped they'd be back this morning when I booted up but no such luck :(( Any quick and easy way to get them back short of reinstalling SeaMonkey or changing to Firefox, please? Ever since downloading the new version of SeaMonkey, I have had problems . The other day, SeaMonkey completely re-installed itself and all my saved websites were gone. In fact, I had to set up a new account as if this was my first time. My addresses were still there. This morning everything was working good. A few hours later, I checked my mail and a box pops up and say connection refused. I kept trying then I got connection timed out. I could send mail but not get any. That was a Verizon problem. We had the same problem a few days ago in SE Washington State. Sorry, can't help with the other problems! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
