Re: support-seamonkey Digest, Vol 57, Issue 104
From: Mark Hansen m...@nospamwinfirst.com To: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org Date: 27/09/10 09:22:38 Subject: Re: Windows XP Pro. SP3's screen saver and monitor sleep not startingwith SeaMonkey v2? On 9/26/2010 11:10 PM, Ant wrote: On 9/26/2010 1:19 PM PT, Bill Spikowski typed: Is it me or does Windows XP Pro. SP3's screen saver and monitor sleep sometimes not start with SeaMonkey v2 running? Has anyone else noticed this too? Not unusual at all. With both of these services...screen saver and either monitor "sleep" or system "sleep", ANY system activity in general will tick off, or more precisely, trigger ON/OFF the aforementioned items. In days gone past, it used to be only mouse movement or a keyboard key being pressed would trigger screen saver and either monitor "sleep" or system "sleep" to disable and allow the system to come back to life. However, in the case of browsers, there's enough code or thread background activity to sometimes NOT allow screen saver and either monitor "sleep" or system "sleep" to enable, or to come on, as we would expect them to, when the alloted time has been reached. As far as browsers are concerned, this observed activity is and has been seen in SeaMonkey, Internet Explorer, Firefox, and others...and sometimes in other applications as well. I will say one thing, though, when users or we updated to XP SP3, we frankly never had so many quirks, problems, or even sudden failures of systems... certainly not seen in XP SP2. It's our humble opinion that XP SP3 leaves something tangible to be desired. Joe ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: There are several Names...
As ELO said in a song, What's in a name... With a name like Joe...we can get Joe, Joey, Josephine, Joseph and who knows what else from that one. And that's only counting English. As far as Beverly is concerned, via travels in Britain, Bev is the general masculine name, and Beverly the usual feminine. Ahh, those plucky British...always able to get most out of one thing...:)... Joe From: Paul B. Gallagher pau...@pbgdashtranslations.com Phillip Jones wrote: There are several Names Beverly being one that can be used as Man's name or a Woman's Name. Some though have different spellings. Example: Gale, Gayle, and Gail all sound exactly like. But Only Gale can be used as a Man's Name. Gene and Jean (Gene being male) Jamie can be either Male or female There are others I can't think of right now. The two most commonly used on Saturday Night Live to take advantage of this are Pat (Patrick/Patricia) and Chris (Christopher/Christine). And of course many foreign names, because we don't recognize them, could be anything. A Korean will know instantly that Daehan and Minguk are masculine and Miran and Obok are feminine, but no American would know... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: seamonkey.exe launches itself and the XP problem
Attention Beverly and Others I have killed the process (making sure it was the LAST one). One time I just stared hard at it - and SM started! Re: seamonkey.exe and the XP problem I have killed the process (making sure it was the LAST one). One time I just stared hard at it - and SM started! Not sure if the affected person is running XP or not, but the following has been seen in a few SM and other applications, AND can be occasionally seen in Vista and rarely but still seen in Win 7: The XP problem - "Launch Folder Windows in a Separate Process" In Windows XP SP1 through SP3: Control Panel Folder Options View tab Clear or make sure that in the drop-down list, that the "Launch Folder Windows in a Separate Process" check-box is cleared (aka unchecked), especially IF one seems to be having a problem with applications mysteriously showing up multiple times in Task Manager or other third-party utilities that do task manager-like affairs. If the above IS a problem, it can mean hours of head-scratching and operational problems with what appear to be multiple copies of SM, and as a primary root cause of the mysterious "it just launches itself..." as well. Joe 29/07/10 20:55:15, support-seamonkey-requ...@lists.mozilla.org: From: Beverly Howard b...@bevhoward.com To: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org Date: 29/07/10 15:03:35 Subject: Re: seamonkey.exe I have killed the process (making sure it was the LAST one). One time I just stared hard at it - and SM started! Several thoughts... Make sure that SM's edit/pref/advanced/quicklaunch is off Make sure that Task Managers "All Processes" is checked Click Task Managers image name column header to sort alphabetically which will group multiple SM instances together if that does not narrow things down, drop to DOS and issue; netstat -ano This will show all current network connections as well as the PID of the app or service that created the connection. If there is something bogus going on, doing this will allow you to pin down who's doing what... tip, use the up arrow to reissue this command at short intervals which will help spot processes that are "phoning home" then quickly disconnecting. If SM is still reloading by itself, I would then strongly suspect that something malicious is launching it. Beverly Howard ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: can't get mail
L.D. wrote: NoOp My port incoming was 25 and SSL/TLS was none My outgoing port was 110 I made your recommended changes, it now works. Did my settings change. If they did I didn't change them and it has been working for several years. Thanks very much L.D. More likely, we all find that the various services we use are and have changed their server settings such as ports, Email settings, et al quite a bit. Hence, it may not always be that our local computer settings or the local software settings have worked for sometimes years, then suddenly no more; it may well be that the remote Email and other servers have and are changing their settings, usually in response to changing standards, server attacks or general security, etc, etc. Joe WindowGroup/Knoxville TN ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re:HTML Email and Signature file - graphic possible ?
To Mark Hansen and others... Sending or receiving HTML Email does not mean, and should not imply getting spam, virulli, and all manner of problems. In clear fact, one could say that the vast a\majority of Emails may well be HTML or at least sent to those capable of seeing both HTML and Text messages -- and the world clearly has not collapsed. Although that's not to say as a blanket statement that no ill comes from either Text or HTML Email's, they in general work fine, and the various routes they take can be scanned for any offensive nasty codes for the most part...be it at your end before they are sent, at the various web-servers / email servers or on your end of the line when they are received by you. There may well be times that HTML Email may be the best way to impart information that Text Email simply can not accomplish, or you may find Text Email well suited to ones lifestyle. But totally condemning HTML Email may mean that you or others may be missing out on new agenda or needs, then again, maybe not. Joe === Message Immediate Trail === From: Phillip Jones pjon...@kimbanet.com To: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org Date: 04/07/10 20:36:42 Subject: Re: Signature file - graphic possible ? Manuel Reimer wrote: DoctorBill wrote: Actually - I did not mean for this News Group, but for General E-Mail messages. You shouldn't do this there, either. But it's up to you. If you send HTML to one of my accounts, you'll never get answer, as plain HTML is automatically marked as junk mail. Yours Manuel I always use a Plain text Signature file even in html File. I am one of these people that can actually read email formatted with HTML as opposed to Plain text. But since so many people profess to hate html mail I use plain text except for those people I know don't mind it. and You cannot insert pictures into plain-text messages. Plain text is plain text. You can do ASCII art, but I realize that is not what you're asking about. If you want to send HTML, you should make sure your recipient is OK with it. Those that understand the danger in HTML e-mail simply won't even look at it. Of course there are a lot of people out there that just don't know any better. They're the ones always complaining about getting viruses, etc. :-\ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Address book + Get rid of SM email or I et rid of browser!
Firefox does not have an address book, in fact Firefox has no email features. If you are accessing email through Firefox, any email features will be part of the email service that you are using and not Firefox. You need to check with the email service or application for the email service. JR From: Ray_Net tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be To: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org Date: 15/04/10 16:41:17 Subject: Re: Get rid of SM email or I et rid of browser! Philip Chee wrote: On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:27:05 +0200, Ray_Net wrote: Daniel wrote: Jane, I think the problem here *might* be that Firefox uses the same format addressbook as SeaMonkey, so there is no need to import it, just open the Firefox Address Book, select Manage Address book (or similar) and point Firefox to the location of the SeaMonkey Address Book. Why not copying the SM adressbook in the place of the FF one ? Uh? Firefox has an addressbook? Since when? And how do you access it in Firefox? I have used the same word ..but they certainly speaked about bookmark ? ! isn't it ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Vista and Windows 7 are the same
Hmm... First of all, Vista and Windows 7 are the same. ... What??? They may share some common features for a particular purpose, but they are most certainly NOT the same! end of snippet Well, yes and no. Strictly speaking, Windows 7 is a partial re-write -- a rather small one -- of the near disaster that Vista became. There are somewhat major changes in Win 7 as far as how XP level calls and applications are run, hence the need to have XP Mode, etc. However, there's a yes in there, as other than the above and a few terribly minuscule other codes, Win 7 and Vista are remarkably the same. Another way to put it, did people really think that MS could bring out a totally new and improved OS such as Win 7 a mere relatively few months after bringing out the all new Vista... ?? Not hardly. Some say that Win 7 is Vista with a new face on it...well, that rings more true than not, but there are also some material changes in there, mostly to solve the problems and dead-ends that plagued Vista users and those coming over from XP. Joe - Original Message --- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:30:54 -0500 Message-ID: wfodnfco-cw_8-hwnz2dnuvz_jvi4...@mozilla.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Subject: Re: SM1 and SM2 config/profile locations with Windows Vista Message: 4 David Wilkinson wrote: Ray_Net wrote: I expected SM1 and SM2 config/profile locations with Windows Vista not the two places of a mozilla directory in Windows7. In other words,and in short, after remove SM1 and install SM2 in a Vista machine Where is the directory(ies)(profile stuff) of the old SM1 that i can delete ? superb if i have the directories(profile stuff) of SM1 and SM2 explained. Ray: First of all, Vista and Windows 7 are the same. ... What??? They may share some common features for a particular purpose, but they are most certainly NOT the same! --===1327943419==-- ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Email can't be sent errors on SM, others
RE: Potential item to check: Problems with SM, Thunderbird and other Email systems Generally seen Error: Emails can't be sent, receives seem to work OK This happened to us using both SM 2.0.3 (and older SM), and also using Thunderbird 3.x, as the Email tools of choice. Ditto for a few other Email tools that we periodically test The STMP port used to send Email may need to be changed to correct this... this being the error message regarding Email can't be sent or similar messages that we see. One prime example is that when we changed from Comcast to Knology as our broadband supplier, our normally working Email was: smtp.1and1.com Port: 25 This has worked for years. But with Knology as the broadband suppler, no Email worked...could not send at all, but receiving Email worked OK. After a bit of head scratching -- and half a pizza later -- we changed the smtp.1and1.com port to 587 (a commonly used port for Email apps and the email services and servers), and from that point onwards, everything worked properly and has continued to do so. Moral: Check it out, as it might help others. Port 25 CAN be set to 587 and a lot of things work better for a lot of people. The need to try out port 587 may or may not be linked only to Comcast, Knology, Cox or any number of broadband suppliers, but it appears linked to SM, Thunderbird and a few other Email tools having send problems. Re-porting to 587 may just solve the problems. Joe ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
RE: URL needed again For SeaMonkey 2.0.3
Re: Testing For SeaMonkey 2.0.3 Now that The Great Move to the Newer Older Home -- and new home and technical office -- has been effected... What is the URL for SeaMonkey 2.0.3, or at least the nightly test Builds ? I ask again, as we changed broadband suppliers, and the last SM URL we had does not seem to be working -- hopefully it's just my settings on this end. Thanking one and all in advance... Joe - Original Message --- Today's Topics: 1. Re: Testing For SeaMonkey 2.0.3 - help wanted! (Robert Kaiser) --===1467057768==-- ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
RE: Suggested look at as SM Macro Recorder / Player
RE:Suggested to look at as a SM Macro Recorder / Player vTask Web: www.vtaskstudio.com Contact: sa...@vtaskstudio.com Obviously can be applied to far more than SeaMonkey 2, but has so far been effective and intuitive to use with SM2. Currently being tested and used here as Windows-only in vTask version 7.63. There's some word that cross-platform being considered at some stage. A very capable tool for macro-izing and speeding up simple-to-complex SM tasks. Am testing in the various SM modules, appears to work and communicate with all. Would not yet call this a wholesale endorsement, but it's making friends here:) Joe ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2 Composer Preview links need to be made active
Leonidas Jones leonidasjo...@netscape.net put forth: The Composer component is probably the lowest priority for the volunteer Take a look at KompoZer: http://www.kompozer.net/ Does it do what you want it to do? If so, that is said to be the basis for SM Composer as of 2.1, if all goes well. Hopefully no, and here are the humble reasons: 1. Kompozer as it exists right now, is just a glorified and too-limited NVU. It may well be overkill for SM 2.01 and maybe even SM 2.1, as NVU can't begin to hold a candle to the really fair-to-good HTML editors. SM might need too much to compete with them, too. SM 2 users need something nice as far as HTML editing and quick composition, and perhaps Composer 2.01 in SM 2 is the better answer. 2. We don't need a small, underpowered HTML editor (essentially a modified NVU) IN SM 2, but yes, SM 2.01 needs a slight bit more than what the initial SM 2 Composer has. Again, the Preview links not working is one of THE please-fix-sooner needs for SM 2.01 3. We DO need a SM 2.01... because it's going to take too long to do SM 2.1. And do we really want to wait that long ?? Even the one or two SM 2 volunteer programmers (God bless them, one and both or all!) themselves...would they want to wait that long? More needed is to get the few nagging SM 2.0 things fixed in a 2.01 and get 2.01 out to the users. THEN turn efforts to a SM 2.1 perhaps in 1ST quarter 2010. IF NVU can add a little more power and automated features, then yes, it might make it into SM 2.1, and be a fair contender for a low-end HTML editor with some pretty good muscles, I will grant it that potential. But not at the expense of ignoring a needed SM 2.01, one with the Composer Preview links optioned to make them globally active or not. Joe -- message trail -- Subject: Re: Follow-up, SM2 Composer Preview mode not activating links Message: 8 JR WG wrote: Follow-up... RE: SM2 Composer Preview mode not activating links, thus not allowing them to be clicked on to test and/or cause a browser to be automatically opened to the link. I. SM2 and Composer Introduction in Workshops Well, after two Workshops (we give quite a few), I introduced SM2 to a total of 42 users of both fairly neophyte and, we can safely say, intermediate and advanced users. To a one, well, with one wavering, all stated that SM2 Composer Preview mode not activating links is either a programming error or a bug. I politely explained how links were expected to be used and tested in SM2 Composer, and received a resounding series of replies that boiled down to: 1. Who would want to do all that work, just to test a link? 2. None of the other HTML editors does it that way, why change it now ? 3. There has to be something wrong in Composer, no matter what the explanation. 4. Any Windows, Mac, and Linux editors and tools seen always activate the links in their respective Preview modes. Ditto for the now old Windows Outlook and Outlook Express Preview modes. I humbly agree with the above, maybe all four of the most heard responses. II. The Acid Test So, in light of the above, we as a group used three or four common HTML editors and one dedicated web-design tool, and compared the workload, steps, intuitiveness and time it took to do simple link work in those tools versus SM 2 Composer NOT having links activated in Preview mode. Frankly, SM 2 Composer took far more steps to achieve the same results, and that's a sin. The extra steps and work that not having links active in Preview is simply not acceptable nor needed to be done that way. ALL the other editors and tools activate links in their respective Preview modes, and that activity has long been considered proper and correct activity or option, for a great many years. SM2 Composer Preview mode not activating links is NOT correct, and should be considered an oversight if not a programmer's bug in SM Composer 2.0...and fixed as soon as prudently possible in a 2.01, or 2.1, providing that a 2.1 would not be too long in forthcoming. Joe The Composer component is probably the lowest priority for the volunteer Take a look at KompoZer: http://www.kompozer.net/ Does it do what you want it to do? If so, that is said to be the basis for SM Coposer as of 2.1, if all goes well. Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2 Modal window - password manager - Vol 46, Issue 129
RE: SM 2 modal windows and that password manager... e...@edmullen.net wrote: Well, except for the totally ill-conceived trashing of the modal windows. If I have multiple accounts for a single site (say, American Express, which I do, and many many other sites), and the reason I stored that account info in SeaMonkey in the first place was because I can't and don't want to have to recall the arcane login info, then, no, the new paradigm doesn't work. snipped for brevity For Pete's sake, just return or do SM 2's modal windows and SM's password manager to how it's done in Firefox 3.5x. Frankly, NONE of the browsers methods seem perfect -- as we all have somewhat interesting and special needs in that area -- but so far, this observer feels, and I am hopeful others do, that Firefix 3.5x got it nearer to better or right than SM2 ever will, judging from how SM 2.0 has it done...or not done. Right now, SM 2 is a modal window password mangler...not a manager. As good overall that SM 2 has turned out, does it really deserve a mangler ? Joe ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2 needs - Navigation Toolbar
SM 2 needs as seen... 1. Navigation Toolbar needs more icons and choices. Especially: - Open a New Tab - Open a New Window These would be in addition to, NOT replacing, the Open a new tab mini-icon that by default sits under and to the left of the navigation toolbar in the Tabs bar. Clearly, there need to be more Navigation Toolbar icons and choices than the above two, but they seem initially most needed. Joe ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM RC2 Build 3 Win location
Atten: Robert Kasiser Robert, the latest SM RC2 Build 3 that is the Build we need to be Windows testing, that is the 13MB file at: Index of /pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/2.0rc2-candidates/build3/update/win32/en-US http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/2.0rc2-candidates/build3/win32/en-US/SeaMonkey%20Setup%202.0%20RC%202.exe ?? Just making sure, as at this time, I see a file dated Oct 17th: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/2.0rc2-candidates/build3/win32/en-US/SeaMonkey%20Setup%202.0%20RC%202.exe and then the above one dated Oct 17th: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/2.0rc2-candidates/build3/update/win32/en-US/seamonkey-2.0rc2.complete.mar so I will wait a while, then go for the latest and largest Win file. Not SURE what the .mar file suffix means -- UNLESS it means that the server is currently updating (will wait a while to be sure), but I will sort that out. Joe ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Lightning with SM 2 RC and TBird 3
To: Robert Kaiser RE: Webdude wrote: I had lighting running in Seamonkey 2.0 Beta, however when I try to install it to RC1, it breaks everything. Any ideas? You need to use a nightly from tomorrow or later, those work in RC1 and later. Robert Kaiser I am of course checking as Lightning Updates the nightly code, but any word if or does the after Saturday Oct 17 (?) improved Lightning not only work with the newest SM 2 RC's, but also it still works (doesn't break anything) on say TBird 2.x or the 3.x TBird Beta or RC's ? That's all going to be tested here of course, but never hurts to ask around. Also, the nightly server URL for Lightning (Windows) is: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning/nightly/latest-comm-1.9.1/win32-xpi/ Thank you. Joe - Original Message --- Webdude wrote: I had lighting running in Seamonkey 2.0 Beta, however when I try to install it to RC1, it breaks everything. Any ideas? You need to use a nightly from tomorrow or later, those work in RC1 and later. Robert Kaiser --===0080700271== Content-Type: message/rfc822 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jim S j...@jimxscott.co.uk Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 To: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org References: 4f34d654-b463-4a14-bd5d-be93d6923...@g19g2000yqo.googlegroups.com Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:48:59 +0100 Reply-To: j...@jimxscott.co.uk Message-ID: 17ly2avjekku3$@id-104726.news.individual.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Lighting in Seamonkey 2.0 RC1 Message: 6 On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Webdude wrote: I had lighting running in Seamonkey 2.0 Beta, however when I try to install it to RC1, it breaks everything. Any ideas? I guess you mean Lightning and I too have tried to install the newest nightly in RC1 without success. -- Jim S --===0080700271== Content-Type: message/rfc822 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net.invalid Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 To: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org References: 4f34d654-b463-4a14-bd5d-be93d6923...@g19g2000yqo.googlegroups.com 17ly2avjekku3$@id-104726.news.individual.net In-Reply-To: 17ly2avjekku3$@id-104726.news.individual.net Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:15:06 -0700 Message-ID: zomdntnwn4khverxnz2dnuvz_g2dn...@mozilla.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: Lighting in Seamonkey 2.0 RC1 Message: 7 On 10/15/2009 04:48 PM, Jim S wrote: On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Webdude wrote: I had lighting running in Seamonkey 2.0 Beta, however when I try to install it to RC1, it breaks everything. Any ideas? I guess you mean Lightning and I too have tried to install the newest nightly in RC1 without success. Bookmark this link if you are using linux: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning/nightly/latest-comm-1.9.1/linux-xpi/ or for Windows: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning/nightly/latest-comm-1.9.1/win32-xpi/ Actually, drag it to your Navigation toolbar so you'll be able to easily find it. From the browser: about:config add (right click in the Preference name area click New|Boolean) extensions.checkCompatibility Set it to false. Now go to the above and and double-click the lightning.xpi - you should then be able to install. --===0080700271== Content-Type: message/rfc822 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Russell ple...@nospam.com Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 To: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org References: hb3smo$r7...@news.albasani.net j2obd5dpdlhckhanprel03iq1uutsv5...@4ax.com nqqdnanyci3qd0jxnz2dnuvz_gxi4...@mozilla.org ukydnrpudybecejxnz2dnuvz_hsdn...@mozilla.org eyudndu88dmkvkvxnz2dnuvz_tti4...@mozilla.org h29cd51l7e71t0cn18d3q3pco94r6q8...@4ax.com akqdnrw0_tr-yuvxnz2dnuvz_ocdn...@mozilla.org 0v3dd5h3mg9hj7geul4k48kckav3eq2...@4ax.com kp-dnbkyxvbgo0vxnz2dnuvz_qodn...@mozilla.org idednrziyvoq3krxnz2dnuvz_oidn...@mozilla.org Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:11:39 -0400 Reply-To: ple...@nospam.com Message-ID: phlfd5p24ac85e22hsgkf9rkub1hfg5...@4ax.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Seamonkey v2 RC - How to disable email feature? Message: 8 On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:43:07 -0700, David E. Ross nob...@nowhere.invalid wrote: If user.js still works with SM 2 Did a search of the Seamonkey install folder and user.js does not exist R --===0080700271== Content-Type: message/rfc822 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Mark Hansen m...@nospamwinfirst.com Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 To: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org References: hb3smo$r7...@news.albasani.net j2obd5dpdlhckhanprel03iq1uutsv5...@4ax.com nqqdnanyci3qd0jxnz2dnuvz_gxi4...@mozilla.org ukydnrpudybecejxnz2dnuvz_hsdn...@mozilla.org
Re:SM 2.x Convert emails to plain text
Re: Convert emails to plain text Thank you, Stanimir... Extensions once more to the rescue. My comments were more pertaining to the depth of the do it manually instructions that I read...but a good extension like ImportExportTools (MboxImport enhanced) sounds like just the answer needed. Joe With instructions that simple it would take users, neophyte to computing or to SM, hours to master. Why not have an SM 2.x option to Export some, one mail box, selected or all messages to standard text files, knowing that those files with HTML (graphics and/or RTF level content) or attachments would of course have to be handeled. That's stupid. Why I haven't thought of the ImportExportTools (MboxImport enhanced) extension (I'm using myself), earlier: http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#importexporttools It provides context menu options like: Export all messages in a folder as Plain text format (one file) and more. -- Stanimir --===1117302718==-- ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Exact URL for the SM 2.0 Nightly Builds directory
RE: Nightly Builds Seamonkey 2.0 and: 1. In this case it was an obvious (JavaScript Debugger FTW) oversight so chances are the fix will still make 2.0. 2. That's fixed for the next nightly (and consequently RC2) already. I keep looking for it, but the last SM 2.0 Nightly Build for the RC's server location keeps on not coming up -- from here, nothing happens, no server error dialog. Have already flushed the browser cache as well, just to be sure. What is the exact URL for the SM 2.0 Nightly Builds directory again ? Thanks to all. Joe ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Testing Thunderbird 3.0b3...
Daniel wrote... What's this doing in the SeaMonkey group?? Sure we're waiting on TB 3.0 to be finalized before SM 2.0 will be outed, but really!! Daniel Daniel... SeaMonkey 2 and Thunderbird 3 are essentially inexorably linked, like it or not. Knowing at least the status of TBird 3 overall means also knowing more the status of SeaMonkey 2, even though a great many of us may prefer SM 2 to TB 3. This linkage as also seen in SM messages will likely cease pretty fast, especially as SM's features and unique capabilities really shine through. Joe - Original Message --- To: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org In-Reply-To: mailman.3174.1247051144..support-seamon...@lists.mozilla.org Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:31:45 +1000 Subject: Re: Testing Thunderbird 3.0b3... Message: 3 JR WG wrote: Also sending separate Email to you, Ludovic... RE: Testing Thunderbird 3.0b3 starting Thursday July 9th 2009 Can you verify that we can test Thunderbird 3 without overwriting or losing our existing TBird 2 access or installation, in case we need to revert back to TBird 2 for some reason. We should know that answer beforehand. Thank you, Joe What's this doing in the SeaMonkey group?? Sure we're waiting on TB 3.0 to be finalized before SM 2.0 will be outed, but really!! Daniel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
To Robert Kaiser - What's latest SM 2 nightly Build page
Robert... What's the main page that leads or directly shows the latest nightly builds for SeaMonkey 2 ? Neither: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-trunk/ nor http://home.kairo.at/blog/2009-07/changes_to_seamonkey_nightlies_and_tinde seem to either work or show the very latest... Thank you... Joe === Robert Kaiser wrote: On 07/04/2009 11:20 PM: If it happens repeatedly for a few days, please file a bug report. We switched to creating nightlies differently, see http://home.kairo.at/blog/2009-07/changes_to_seamonkey_nightlies_and_tinde Problems are always possible with such switches. Robert Kaiser Yes Robert, saw your switch !! it seems though that the symlinks are not fully in place, or broken http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-trunk/ shows old versions... --===1410894979==-- ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Java JVM Ver6 Build 14 not run or install on SeaMonkey
One should also note that the Sun Java installer error is seen (at least until Sun staffers fix it and re-issue a 100% working installer) in XP SP1, SP2 level machines more than seen somewhat more rarely in SP3 level XP machines, and is very rarely seen in Vista machines. Information and discussions with both MS insiders and InstallShield staffers so far brings more finger pointing than anything else, but again, IF you or other users see the problem, it appears to have an easy workaround: http://forums.sun.com/thread.jspa?messageID=10747256#10747256 The importance of mentioning all this in many Forums, SeaMonkey included, is that it affects most all updating Java users, or systems or applications that depend on Java for certain proper operations or browser or Email display, etc, etc. Joe - Original Message --- From: James res07...@gte.net To: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org Subject: Re: Java JVM Ver6 Build 14 not run or install on SeaMonkey FYI: . . Sun Forums The specified thread [0] was not found. . . I upgraded to the latest Java a few days ago and it did not work on SM 116. Then I upgraded to SM 117 and now Java works fine. James . INFO WG wrote: RE: Sun Java JVM Ver6 Build 14 not running / installing on SeaMonkey Be advised that Sun has a major Installer problem on their hands with this JVM version, aka JRE update 14, aka . Seems to affect XP machines much more than Vista machines. The problem has a GOOD EASY fix, so Some of the communications + fix RE: this problem is at: http://forums.sun.com/thread.jspa?messageID=10747256#10747256 as the problem affects the users, systems, and if you can't solve the Installer problem as above, the JVM is usually not installed at all and you are and will remain Java-less and SOL. Joe ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
RE: Java JVM Ver6 Build 14 not run or install on SeaMonkey
RE: Sun Java JVM Ver6 Build 14 not running / installing on SeaMonkey Be advised that Sun has a major Installer problem on their hands with this JVM version, aka JRE update 14, aka . Seems to affect XP machines much more than Vista machines. The problem has a GOOD EASY fix, so Some of the communications + fix RE: this problem is at: http://forums.sun.com/thread.jspa?messageID=10747256#10747256 as the problem affects the users, systems, and if you can't solve the Installer problem as above, the JVM is usually not installed at all and you are and will remain Java-less and SOL. Joe - Original Message --- Ain't have none. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: support-seamonkey Digest, Vol 39, Issue 93
Attention to HeavyDuty and moz.champ...@sympatico.ca... et al... RE: Just curious about error 4.1.2 There's a few software and software / hardware units that can generate their version of what a error 4.1.2 is... PHP, AMX, host server not found or not responding, sometimes related to Linux (and many times not) etc., etc. Would help to know the ENTIRE content and as much of the audit trail you are talking about or were doing... I can send a Copernic Agent search report that lists the 50+ accurate search hits that mention error 4.1.2 and appears to be some detailed useful information in almost all hits.. Joe - Original Message --- Subject: support-seamonkey Digest, Vol 39, Issue 93 From: support-seamonkey-requ...@lists.mozilla.org Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:17:28 -0700 To: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org Send support-seamonkey mailing list submissions to support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to support-seamonkey-requ...@lists.mozilla.org You can reach the person managing the list at support-seamonkey-ow...@lists.mozilla.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of support-seamonkey digest... --===1013467182== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: Today's Topics (10 messages) Today's Topics: 1. Re: Sick windows machine (JeffM) 2. Just curious about error 4.1.2 (HeavyDuty) 3. Re: Sick windows machine (Lester Caine) 4. Re: Sick windows machine (JeffM) 5. Re: Just curious about error 4.1.2 (Moz Champion (Dan)) 6. Re: Request for Seamonkey 2.0 (googl...@kwcpa.com) 7. Re: Just curious about error 4.1.2 (HeavyDuty) 8. Re: Just curious about error 4.1.2 (Moz Champion (Dan)) 9. Re: HTML and text (Daniel) 10. Re: Just curious about error 4.1.2 (Gregory Hicks) --===1013467182== Content-Type: multipart/digest; boundary1129517510== MIME-Version: 1.0 --===1129517510== Content-Type: message/rfc822 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: JeffM jef...@email.com Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 To: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org References: vridnumltqhz-ltunz2dnuvz_hawn...@mozilla.org jagdnqr2w6n591tunz2dnuvz_jgwn...@mozilla.org 07kdnzquxkwt9ltunz2dnuvz_jmwn...@mozilla.org Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:31:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: 594d6f88-24c4-451a-acd5-898713c83...@x1g2000prh.googlegroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: Sick windows machine Message: 1 Lester Caine wrote: [...]It's only the one machine that is NOT seeing these sites. Just discovered that it does not like microsoft.com either so I can't run windows update :( Raise your right hand and repeat this: I know that these sites use the LEAST-SECURE mechanism on the planet yet I am willing to expose my Windoze install to any infections they might want to shove down my throat. http://google.com/search?q=cache:ZXpao3MnY7wJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Update+c+gnu+501+ActiveX+requires.Internet.Explorer+MSHTMLstrip=1 --===1129517510== Content-Type: message/rfc822 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: HeavyDuty heavyd...@nospamdomain.com Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 To: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:50:06 -0500 Message-ID: cpednrnqj_lc4ltunz2dnuvz_qvin...@mozilla.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Subject: Just curious about error 4.1.2 Message: 2 SM 1.1.15, WinXP Pro SP3 Just curious, I was sending a simple very small text e-mail. After a minute of sending but no completion, I got an error message that said the smtp server replied error 4.1.2, and recipient domain not found. Since I was replying to a known sender, I neither mistyped nor missent. I called my ISP to find out what error 4.1.2 was. The support guy said he had no idea and besides it was an error code generated by my e-mail client, not the isp. So, did seamonkey generate this error code or did it get it from my isp and patch it into the error window? After closing the error window, I just hit send again in the compose window and, after some hesitation, it went through. I am still wanting know what error code 4.1.2 is all about. I /think/ it comes from an internet code protocol standard, but I could not find it. Thanks. --===1129517510== Content-Type: message/rfc822 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 To: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org References: vridnumltqhz-ltunz2dnuvz_hawn...@mozilla.org jagdnqr2w6n591tunz2dnuvz_jgwn...@mozilla.org
