how to ged rid of attachments from message base ?

2003-01-02 Thread ZdroYY
Hello tbudl,

  Let's assume, we have an account with extremly big sent mail folder
  The option Bind attachments only while sending out mail wasn't
  active - so my suspection is all the attachments are stored in
  MESSAGES.TBB file.
  Is there any program/trick/way I could use to get rid all the
  attachments stored in message bodies ? As an effect I expect a
  clean MESSAGES.TBB file with clean messages in it without any
  attachments ...


  
-- 
Best regards,
 ZdroYY  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--

Promocja Grudniowa
Serwery www, konta e-mail
www.oferta.alpha.pl



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: retrieving message headers - slow

2003-01-02 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Thomas

TF When the headers are retrieved before the actual download begins, it
TF means that TB needs to look at them first. This will be the case when
TF you have Selective Download filters (at least one).

Ah! I think you may have it, Thomas. When I look at the filters for
this account, there is an unnamed selective filter defined with no
filtering parameters.

I've deleted it and will report back after I next connect.

Regards

-- 
Clive Taylor
Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: retrieving message headers - slow

2003-01-02 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Thomas

TF When the headers are retrieved before the actual download begins,
TF it means that TB needs to look at them first. This will be the
TF case when you have Selective Download filters (at least one).

You were right, Thomas. That odd filter was causing that behaviour.
Many thanks


-- 
Clive Taylor
Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: The Bat! choosing authentication method

2003-01-02 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hi CEEJOE,

First let me please you to _NOT_ CC me when replying to a mail of mine
on this list.
I am, as everybody else who writes to this list, subscribed here and do
get all the mail via this list. I don't need a private carbon copy.
Second I want to ask why you do change the subject in such a strange
manner? Neither the square brackets are useful to keep an overview, nor
does any arbitrary time appended to the subject make any sence to me. Is
there a special reason why we should have an eye on this time?

On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 04:08:06 +
CEEJOE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 A  lot of theory.

That's the basics of e-mail working in practice.

 However, TheBat cant handle secure IMAP4/secure
 POP3  connections flawlessly

It can handle SSL-secured POP3 and SMTP connections.
With some SSL versions on server side there still are problems, but in
general The Bat! can handle SSL for SMTP and POP3.
The only thing it still ain't capable to do is: IMAP-over-SSL.

 That's what counts to me.

AFAIR this thread wasn't about what counts to you, neither was my
response. My mail was about what authentication and security mechanism
are present in The Bat! and how are they chosen to be used.
If you don't like The Bat! not fully supporting some functions you'd
need that's a different story. _I_ just wanted to clear the confusion
about CRAM-MD5 vs. SSL.

 In fact, I am not sure whether they will ever waste their time again
 on this matter.

If even _you_ call this waste of time they surely will not.
If IMAP and IMAP-over-SSL are implemented and working (according to what
Beta-testers and daily use brings to daylight) they wouldn't waste
time, IMHO ...

 TB  is  still  the  best  mailer  I have ever seen. It is (IMO) a
 result  of  brilliant  programmers - but hey, 

 we need this secure thing to fly flawlessly: just click here to
 exchange certificates and all is done automatically.

There's a big difference between SSL working flawless and
automatition of certificate exchange.
The former statement is correct: it _has_ to work flawless, _absolutely_
flawless. Into this category belongs the fixing of unable to connect
errors that are coused by a specific SSL-version on server side (which
works with every other MUA).
The latter postulation can open a big security hole if not handled
carefully. These Click here once and everything is done automatically
buttons are always possible intruders of security issues.
I don't even know how to exchange certificates could be done, but the
whole certificate problem has a two step solution:

Step one requires RITLabs to provide a generic interface for an
institution / system administrator to add a Trusted Root CA to the
appropriate AB automatically.
Either by being able to put the Trusted Root CA AB on a server for
a central administrator being able to modify it (and _only_ the admin
being able to do so) and import an own Root-certificate into this AB; or
by providing an automatic post installation import of a Trusted Root
Certificate into this AB. This could, just for being sure, expanded to
Trusted Intermediate CA AB. No user would have problems anymore
connecting to a server using a certificate signed by this Root
certficate or any derived intermediate certificate.

Step two would be to introduce a new dialog box: 

,-[ ]
| Accept this self signed certificate?
|
| Fingerprint: XXX
| Please compare the fingerprint with information the servers
| administrator provided to the used certificate to make sure this is
| the correct server
|
| [ ] Always accept (import to Trusted Root CA)
|   DetailsOK   Cancel
`-

Which pops up if a connection is established and the used certificate is
a self singed not yet in Trusted Root CA AB.
Details could reveal more details about the certificate for the user
being able to compare this with information provided e.g. on a web site,
to make sure there's no man in the middle attack.

All this are semi-automatic solutions, but from a Security POV this
should be preferred over one of these Click here once to do it all
without you even knowing _what_ is done buttons.

But all this stuff wasn't topic of this thread and therefore should be
discussed in a different one. Even better it should be discussed on
TBTECH or TBBETA, it's nothing that's yet implemented and therefore
these basic discussion of possible solutions is not a problem of The
Bat! Users but a How to improve future use? problem.

 [Original message, 31/12/2002, 21:39]
 
 Peter Palmreuther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 PP 1.)  The Bat! uses the authentication method it is configured
 PP to  us ...

Three quesions still left:

1.) Why did you quote this paragraph of my mail? I can't see the
correlation to your response.
2.) Why did you quote if _below_ your response? If you refer to it in
your post it's more wise to quote it at top, if you don't refer to
it it should be left out to avoid confusion.
3.) Is there a special reason for you not 

Re: Blank lines in template

2003-01-02 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Adam [A] wrote:'

A How would you see blank space?

A Could you load a character set that turns spaces into dots?

I select the text with the mouse.

You can try it with my signature delimiter. You'll see the extra
space after the double dash is preserved.

- -- 
  -=] allie_M [=-  {List Moderator}

MUA: TB! v1.62 Christmas Edition ___ OS: WinXP Pro (SP1)
 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: My Public Keys - http://www.ac-martin.com/pgpkeys.html

iD8DBQE+FB6QV8nrYCsHF+IRAtw7AKDZN+1SvA0GglDP7CcSN8hB5+mEcQCg3zjf
si8fESqFK1gwp2XqICG4wE0=
=fR5u
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: PGP Signing and Encryption

2003-01-02 Thread Graeme J Hosking
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Marck,

 Only encrypted signed messages will result in a decrypted version.

  Ah, so it does. I was keying CTRL-SHIFT-D for signed messages,
  instead of CTRL-SHIFT-C.

 If it were decrypted in-line then you really would lose that
 opportunity since the original message would be replaced with the
 decrypted version.

  By in-line what I was really trying to say is on-the-fly - TB!
  should always store the message as it was received. So if I received
  a signed message and want it displayed in the viewer TB! would do
  it's best to check the signature automatically. Similarly with
  encrypted messages, if I have a cached passphrase in PGP then there
  is nothing to stop TB! decrypting the message for me when I open it in
the
  viewer. There should, of course, always be a way to view the message
  as it was originally transmitted if you are interested in that. For
  me it's the manual intervention on every message that is signed or
  encrypted that makes it feel less integrated.

 BTW, if unattended security is of concern to you then you should
 seriously consider using SecureBat!

  It's not a major concern for me, just an example of why I'm not so
  keen on the decrypted copies of messages. If TB! was decrypting as
  it went the PGP passphrase caching would alleviate this problem to
  some degree.

  Thanks for your response, I will give that example Read filter a
  try.

  Regards,

  Graeme.

- --
Graeme J Hosking
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.hosking-online.com/

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt http://www.ipgpp.com/
Comment: KeyID: 0xCA4E46C2

iQA/AwUBPhQizWG9Y2LKTkbCEQIKPwCg+U7/k8df/Tbla6CcLyVjwEoulcMAoKzs
/mHBcxXsjXJ0Qw9cVIJh2J4h
=WFf9
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: how to ged rid of attachments from message base ?

2003-01-02 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo ZdroYY,

On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 09:31:44 +0100GMT (2-1-03, 9:31 +0100GMT, where I
live), you wrote:

Z Let's assume, we have an account with extremly big sent mail folder
Z The option Bind attachments only while sending out mail wasn't
Z active - so my suspection is all the attachments are stored in
Z MESSAGES.TBB file.

That's a correct assumption. ;-)

Z Is there any program/trick/way I could use to get rid all the
Z attachments stored in message bodies ?

Don't know about a trick or a separate program, but you can do that
with TB. First select the message, then select the attachment, then
delete the attachment (by pressing Delete)

Z As an effect I expect a clean MESSAGES.TBB file with clean messages
Z in it without any attachments ...

To get that you must compress the sent mail folder after you've
deleted all attachments. Just tried it and I got 3 MB free after
deleting three digital photos.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: how to ged rid of attachments from message base ?

2003-01-02 Thread Gerard

ON Thursday, January 2, 2003, 12:36:49 PM, you wrote:
RO but you can do that
RO with TB. First select the message, then select the attachment, then
RO delete the attachment (by pressing Delete)

It might help to know that there is View|Display|only msg with
attachments

-- 
Best regards,
 Gerard 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Confidence is crucial to good golf. Confidence is simply the aggregate
of the thoughts you have about yourself.

Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Dictionary question

2003-01-02 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Daniel,

On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 at 12:12:55[GMT -0400](which was 16:12 where I
live) you wrote:

 I don't think it's a bug.  It is working for me when selecting the French
 dictionary.  When you look in Spell Checker - Dictionaries, it only
 shows the American English and User dictionaries.  I had to add the
 French dictionary file to the list, and I did the same for the British
 English dictionary and 

I've only just realised why I was having the same problems as John as
regards the English dictionary. When the international Bat is
installed there is no mention that the english dictionary has to be
actually selected and why should it be done in the Edit Message window
rather than in the main toolbar?

Anyway it is now installed and working thanks.

-- 

Best regards,

Richard

Using The Bat! version 1.62 Beta/17
Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3
and using the best browser: Opera



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: how to ged rid of attachments from message base ?

2003-01-02 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Gerard,

On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 13:00:59 +0100GMT (2-1-03, 13:00 +0100GMT, where I
live), you wrote:

RO but you can do that with TB. First select the message, then
RO select the attachment, then delete the attachment (by pressing

G It might help to know that there is View|Display|only msg with
G attachments

That might make it easy to find the messages with attachments. The
same could be said about sorting on attachments. ;-)

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: Email Download Aborted - Solved!

2003-01-02 Thread Lawrence Johnson
Hello Richard,

Wednesday, January 1, 2003, 11:51:25 PM, you wrote:

RW Well, I joined the list just before going to bed and woke to find that
RW TB! had hung on the first connection to the list and that was only to
RW receive the joining confirmation so something is certainly seriously
RW wrong because, as soon as I disabled ZA, the message and all others
RW came through straight away. I couldn't see anything strange in the
RW headers but that means nothing as I'm not particularly literate as far
RW as understanding them goes.

RW Now that's strange. Whilst typing this message the list unsubscribe
RW mail acceptance has just come through with ZA working.

Thank you for confirming that I am not nuts.

Any message from that source caused the message download to hang with
ZA Mailsafe enabled, not just the digests.

There were a handful of other messages from other sources that also
hung the download since I encountered this problem, but this was the
main culprit.

Once again, just to exonerate TB!, I see similar hangs/timeouts with
Netscape Messenger and Outlook Express.

Now that the holidays are officially over, I'll follow up with ZoneLabs
and see if they received my bug report.

-- 
Best regards,
 Lawrencemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: XML Address Book Format

2003-01-02 Thread Spike
Hello M. Evans,

On or about Tuesday, December 31, 2002 at 08:15:20GMT -0700
(which was 10:15 AM in the tropics where I live) M. Evans
rambled:

ME A common problem with address books is that people want to enter data
ME in one program only, and then use it in many other programs, on other
ME computers, and on their Palm pilots.

A major reason why virus code works so well!

ME XML is really beautiful in that it ensures longevity and migration
ME capability for arbitrary data.  It eliminates the need for custom
ME file formats that are readable by only one program.  This type of
ME flexibility is ideal for address books that should be usable by
ME multiple programs.

Including virus engines!  I like the fact that the address book
in TB! is a bit non-standard and hope it stays that way, or
even becomes LESS standard!  Be careful what you wish for, you
may get it!

-- 
Warmest tropical wishes,
Spike

Tagline theft should be a capital offense!

--
Flying in the stratosphere with The Bat! V1.61 on 
Windows 2000 Vers. 5 0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3
--



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Email Download Aborted - Solved!

2003-01-02 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Lawrence,

On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 at 06:43:01[GMT -0600](which was 12:43 where I
live) you wrote:

 Now that the holidays are officially over, I'll follow up with ZoneLabs
 and see if they received my bug report.

I'd be interested to hear what they have to say. In the meantime I'll
continue with ZA, partly because un installing it is such a terrible
hassle, although I've had a good look at the Kerio site and even
downloaded the programme just in case!

-- 

Best regards,

Richard

Using The Bat! version 1.62 Beta/17
Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3
and using the best browser: Opera



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



2 Questions: Thread Views PGP messing with -- signature

2003-01-02 Thread Victor B. Gonzalez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello tbudl,

  Sometimes thread view works fine but other times it works
  in reverse... I mean upon opening the tbudl folder all
  threads are collapsed and when I click on a new subject I
  realize I clicked on a response. Being I have a filter
  that sorts read messages for my tbudl folder the second
  that reply loses focus, its gone.

  The actual thread starter is buried within the thread and
  I have to work my way up (Open the thread, scroll to the
  bottom, start there). This is beginning to happen to me
  most of the time I open my tbudl folder to read messages.

  --

  I also noticed (thanks to my Mozilla e-mail client) that
  my signatures get broken up... What I mean is the dash,
  dash, space (-- ) gets converted to a (- -- ) and it then
  allows for my entire signature to be caught up in a reply.
  Is this a bug? Is there a fix? Is there a work around?

  Happy 2003, Day 2! :)

- -- 
Best regards,
 Victor B. Gonzalez  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Request My PGP Public Keys - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

iQA/AwUBPhQ4cl3LB35+TCg0EQKzjQCcDOveK8vZ+E7hfRoEvYiIwKij57kAoN9x
dd47rAiqq+n2QKL/tugrRKwP
=/NaO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Chagning word-wrap margin for a single message?

2003-01-02 Thread Gavin Sinclair
Hi all,

I'm communicating with one particular person who wraps everything at
about 50 characters, it seems, so her quotations of my replies (at 70
characters) get ugly.

The simplest way to prevent this is to wrap my stuff at about 50
characters also.  Can I do this for a single message?

If, as I suspect, the answer is no, then here's one more reason to
allow editing in an external editor.

Cheers,
Gavin



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: 2 Questions: Thread Views PGP messing with -- signature

2003-01-02 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Victor,

On Thursday, January 02, 2003, 7:03 AM, you wrote:

big snip

V   I also noticed (thanks to my Mozilla e-mail client) that
V   my signatures get broken up... What I mean is the dash,
V   dash, space (-- ) gets converted to a (- -- ) and it then
V   allows for my entire signature to be caught up in a reply.

This is what my exchange of Posts with Jonathan Angliss was all
about. And it is a characteristic of The Bat!, as I finally came to
understand at the end of that conversation.

V   Is this a bug? Is there a fix? ...

V ... Is there a work around?

Yes. It's a template.

http://silverstones.com/www.silverstones.com/thebat/library.html

V   Happy 2003, Day 2! :)

And to you, too!

-- 

Mary



-- 
Mary

The Bat! 1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1




--

Mary Bull

The Bat 1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: how to ged rid of attachments from message base ?

2003-01-02 Thread Markus Gloede
Hi,

Gerard wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :

 It might help to know that there is View|Display|only msg with
 attachments

There is also another quick way to filter what you see. Click on any
item (read/unread, attachment, parked, flagged, name, subject, date)
in the summary view while keeping the Alt key depressed and only
similar messages will be displayed. This display filter is kept active
in all folders until you press the Esc key.

Regards,

Markus
-- 
Using The Bat! 1.62 Beta/17 under Windows NT 4.0 Build
1381 Service Pack 6 



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: 2 Questions: Thread Views PGP messing with -- signature

2003-01-02 Thread Marcus Ohlstrm

On Thursday, January 2, 2003, 14:18, Mary Bull wrote:

V   I also noticed (thanks to my Mozilla e-mail client) that my
V   signatures get broken up... What I mean is the dash, dash, space
V   (-- ) gets converted to a (- -- ) and it then allows for my entire
V   signature to be caught up in a reply.

 This is what my exchange of Posts with Jonathan Angliss was all
 about. And it is a characteristic of The Bat!, as I finally came to
 understand at the end of that conversation.

It depends on what you are referring to. How other programs handle
- --  as a signature delimiter I do not know, but it's not TB!'s fault
that the extra -  is inserted before the correct delimiter. Try
signing a text with --  at an otherwise empty line in any other
program if you want to verify.

-- 
Regards,
Marcus Ohlström

Using The Bat! v1.62/Beta7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3
PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Bug importing from Outlook Express

2003-01-02 Thread Gavin Sinclair
I just thought I'd let the list know that when I imported my messages
from Outlook Express, two characters were missing from the end of each
message!  Fortunately, the last two characters of any given message
are usually predicatable sign-off material, but still...

Gavin



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: how to ged rid of attachments from message base ?

2003-01-02 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Markus,

On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 at 14:18:22[GMT +0100](which was 13:18 where I
live) you wrote:

 There is also another quick way to filter what you see. Click on any
 item (read/unread, attachment, parked, flagged, name, subject, date)
 in the summary view while keeping the Alt key depressed and only
 similar messages will be displayed. This display filter is kept active
 in all folders until you press the Esc key.

Gosh, the things you learn from this list. How very useful. Thanks.

-- 

Best regards,

Richard

Using The Bat! version 1.62 Beta/17
Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3
and using the best browser: Opera



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: 2 Questions: Thread Views PGP messing with -- signature

2003-01-02 Thread A . Kleiser
Hi,

 On Thursday, January 2, 2003, 14:18, Mary Bull wrote:

V   I also noticed (thanks to my Mozilla e-mail client) that my
V   signatures get broken up... What I mean is the dash, dash, space
V   (-- ) gets converted to a (- -- ) and it then allows for my entire
V   signature to be caught up in a reply.

 It depends on what you are referring to. How other programs handle
 - --  as a signature delimiter I do not know, but it's not TB!'s fault
 that the extra -  is inserted before the correct delimiter. Try
 signing a text with --  at an otherwise empty line in any other
 program if you want to verify.

The problem is, that The Bat! displays the message is has
received, not the output of PGP.
During the process of signing the message lines starting with --
are replaced with - --.  This replacement ist undone when
verifying the message (Try signing and verifying a text using
PGP itself).
Some time ago I sent a message to Ritlabs and to Imad R. Faiad, but
never received an answer.

Bis demnaechst.
Alex
-- 
A . Kleiser   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

The Bat! 1.62 Christmas Edition (Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600) 
Was macht die kahle Saengerin? - Sie traegt immer noch die
gleiche Frisur.



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: 2 Questions: Thread Views PGP messing with -- signature

2003-01-02 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Marcus,

On Thursday, January 02, 2003, 7:42 AM, you wrote:

 snip 

M It depends on what you are referring to. How other programs handle
M - --  as a signature delimiter I do not know, but it's not TB!'s fault
M that the extra -  is inserted before the correct delimiter. Try
M signing a text with --  at an otherwise empty line in any other
M program if you want to verify.

I did not mean to imply that it is The Bat!'s fault. PGP does this,
and The Bat! of course can no longer recognize it as a 'cut' line. For
two months I had been manually deleting everything that got imported
into the Reply text editor window, in an effort to comply with TBUDL'S
quote protocol, with which protocol I am in complete agreement.

(And I am not against PGP. Have keys myself. Just have a %NOUSEPGP in
most of my templates, including TBUDL's address book Reply entry.)

Now I find that those in the know have a template--either in the
default Reply Template in Accounts, or in individual address book
entry templates, or--not really good--in folder templates.

This template has to be in the settings of the recipient. So far as I
know, the sender cannot provide a work-around, if he/she is signing
with PGP.

But it's a godsend. I have only been using The Bat! for about two
months, and there's much I don't know. But I regard this template that
I discovered, only yesterday, with the help of a few listers and a
couple of moderators, with the zeal of a missionary. ;)

I am not going to bother checking out other e-mail clients. I am sure
they are just as discombobulated with this as TB!

The Bat! as e-mail client Forever!  Yay. Three cheers for its
templates!


-- 


Mary

The Bat! 1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1




--

Mary Bull

The Bat 1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Autocompleting

2003-01-02 Thread Adam

In the message Finder, I did a search. Then I decide to do another
search, and just type over a couple letters from the phrase of the first
search. It deletes the whole phrase, and I have to type it over again.

I try typing again, and a long email address suddenly pops up!

Hmmm, I check out Preferences/System Autocomplete. The checkbox is
unchecked.

I'm running Windows XP.

-- 
Best regards,
 Adam



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Bug importing from Outlook Express

2003-01-02 Thread jwayne
On Thursday, January 2, 2003, 8:54:36 AM, Gavin Sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

GS I just thought I'd let the list know that when I imported my messages
GS from Outlook Express, two characters were missing from the end of each
GS message!  Fortunately, the last two characters of any given message
GS are usually predicatable sign-off material, but still...

You're lucky.  When I did this way back when, MANY messages were majorly
corrupted. I had to use Eudora's import/export tools as an intermediary between
OE and TB!

jon
-- 
 jwayne  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Bug importing from Outlook Express

2003-01-02 Thread Thomas Martin
Hello jwayne,

On  Thursday, 2. January 2003, at 09:38:30 [GMT -0500] you wrote:

 On Thursday, January 2, 2003, 8:54:36 AM, Gavin Sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

GS I just thought I'd let the list know that when I imported my messages
GS from Outlook Express, two characters were missing from the end of each
GS message!  Fortunately, the last two characters of any given message
GS are usually predicatable sign-off material, but still...

 You're lucky.  When I did this way back when, MANY messages were majorly
 corrupted. I had to use Eudora's import/export tools as an intermediary between
 OE and TB!

have a look at: http://fkeeps.com/fmorph/fmindex.htm


-- 
Ciao

Thomas

Mailer: TheBat! 1.62 Christmas Edition
System: Windows XP Service Pack 1
PGP:PGP 6.58ckt Build 08 | Key: 0xABBB7287
ICQ:121117424 (hardly ever there)
HP: http://mirror.at/thebat



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Email Download Aborted - Solved!

2003-01-02 Thread Gerard

ON Thursday, January 2, 2003, 2:02:39 PM, you wrote:
RW Hello Lawrence,

RW On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 at 06:43:01[GMT -0600](which was 12:43 where I
RW live) you wrote:

 Now that the holidays are officially over, I'll follow up with ZoneLabs
 and see if they received my bug report.

RW I'd be interested to hear what they have to say. In the meantime I'll
RW continue with ZA, partly because un installing it is such a terrible
RW hassle, although I've had a good look at the Kerio site and even
RW downloaded the programme just in case!


Hi Richard,

Un-installing ZA USED to be a hassle. No just go to add/remove programs
and ZA will disappear, after which you can install Kerio.
I did it a month ago and had no problems.

-- 
Best regards,
 Gerard 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Sudden success at golf is like the sudden acquisition of wealth. It is
apt to unsettle and deteriorate the character. And, as it comes almost
miraculously, so only a miracle can effect a cure. ==P.G Wodehouse - THE
MAGIC PLUS FOURS ==

Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Deleting threads

2003-01-02 Thread Sharon Stiles


Monday, December 30, 2002, 8:06:03 PM, you wrote:

 I've just started using the Bat and am impressed although occasionally
 I stumble slightly.  One of the things I have stumbled on is how to
 delete a thread.  In mailing lists there are often threads that I am
 not interested in and so I want to delete all the messages in the
 thread.

 Even if the thread is collapsed it only deletes the first message in
 the thread.  Can someone help me out?

 Best Wishes

 Sharon
Oops yes - so obvious I didn't think to look there.  Thanks everyone.


Best Wishes

Sharon



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Bug, or just odd RFC behaviour?

2003-01-02 Thread Dave Crocker
Jonathan,

Wednesday, January 1, 2003, 2:16:35 PM, you wrote:
Jonathan Hi All,

Jonathan   I've noticed this a lot recently, but having worked with the SMTP
Jonathan   RFC a bit, I don't remember if it is part of required behaviour, or
Jonathan   if it is just something that TB is doing.  If you start a new line
Jonathan   with the word From, it'll make it appear as a reply,

The right angle-bracket is inserted at the beginning of a line that starts
with From by Sendmail.  It does this in order to ensure that email with line
starting with From are not confused with the start-of-message line that
Sendmail uses for internal storage.

The fact that this behavior is visible in mail being relayed through SMTP is
a bug in Sendmail.

d/
-- 
 Dave mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Brandenburg InternetWorking http://www.brandenburg.com
 t +1.408.246.8253; f +1.408.850.1850



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Email Download Aborted - Solved!

2003-01-02 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Gerard,

On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 at 16:16:50[GMT +0100](which was 15:16 where I
live) you wrote:

 Un-installing ZA USED to be a hassle. No just go to add/remove programs
 and ZA will disappear, after which you can install Kerio.

Are you sure? I remember not that long ago being pointed to a well
hidden page on the ZA site which took you through a long rigmarole of
removing various items from the registry to completely remove it. I've
had a look but can't find it at the moment.

-- 

Best regards,

Richard

Using The Bat! version 1.62 Beta/17
Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3
and using the best browser: Opera



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: XML Address Book Format

2003-01-02 Thread Dave Crocker
M.,

Xml encodings of vcard have been specified separately by the W3C and the
jabber instant messaging community:

  http://www.w3.org/TR/vcard-rdf

and

  http://www.jabber.org/jeps/jep-0054.html



  
Tuesday, December 31, 2002, 7:15:20 AM, you wrote:
M. Neither Bat nor PhoneDeck support what I really want, which is an XML
M. address book. I am sure such formats have already been defined.  What

d/
-- 
 Dave mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Brandenburg InternetWorking http://www.brandenburg.com
 t +1.408.246.8253; f +1.408.850.1850



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: retrieving message headers - slow

2003-01-02 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Clive,

On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 09:30:45 + GMT (02/01/03, 16:30 +0700 GMT),
Clive Taylor wrote:

 You were right, Thomas. That odd filter was causing that behaviour.
 Many thanks

You're welcome. :-)

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

Unsere Autos prallten genau in dem Augenblick zusammen, als sie sich
begegneten.

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.62 Christmas Edition
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: how to ged rid of attachments from message base ?

2003-01-02 Thread Geoff Lane
On 02 January 2003, 11:36, Roelof Otten wrote:

 Don't know about a trick or a separate program, but you can do that
 with TB. First select the message, then select the attachment, then
 delete the attachment (by pressing Delete)
~~~

I haven't tried this, but it could be worth an experiment. In Account
Properties / Files  Directories, there is an option to store
attachments in a separate directory (that is, outside the message
base). Would TB apply this to existing messages? If so, could you then
use the TBB file apart from the attachment directory?

HTH,

-- 
Geoff Lane
Cornwall, UK
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
--
Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1

Psychoceramics ... the study of crackpots.



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: how to ged rid of attachments from message base ?

2003-01-02 Thread Gerard

ON Thursday, January 2, 2003, 5:32:30 PM, you wrote:
GL I haven't tried this, but it could be worth an experiment. In Account
GL Properties / Files  Directories, there is an option to store
GL attachments in a separate directory (that is, outside the message
GL base). Would TB apply this to existing messages? If so, could you then
GL use the TBB file apart from the attachment directory?

Even if it doesn't, what I would expect, coping the complete msg base
with a purge+compress in betwen should do the trick.

-- 
Best regards,
 Gerard 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Break - 1.The shifting or changing of the direction of a putt caused by
the slope or slant of a green. 2. The splitting or shattering of the
shaft of a putter caused by the rage or wrath of a player who misread
the break.

Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Email Download Aborted - Solved!

2003-01-02 Thread Gerard

ON Thursday, January 2, 2003, 5:19:35 PM, you wrote:
RW Are you sure? I remember not that long ago being pointed to a well
RW hidden page on the ZA site which took you through a long rigmarole of
RW removing various items from the registry to completely remove it. I've
RW had a look but can't find it at the moment.

Hi Richard,

You right, that is what I thought to including some registry editing but
I did neither it everything works as it should.

-- 
Best regards,
 Gerard 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Universal Laws of Golf: Your best round of golf will be followed almost
immediately by your worst round ever.

Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: how to ged rid of attachments from message base ?

2003-01-02 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Geoff,

On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 16:32:30 +GMT (2-1-03, 17:32 +0100GMT, where I
live), you wrote:

GL I haven't tried this, but it could be worth an experiment. In
GL Account Properties / Files  Directories, there is an option to
GL store attachments in a separate directory (that is, outside the
GL message base). Would TB apply this to existing messages?

No.


-- 
Groetjes, Roelof



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



I wish to unsubscribe

2003-01-02 Thread Databug
Hello
I've been trying to unsub from this list for days now. I've been to the site 
and unsubbed every EMail address I can think of that i may have used to 
subscribe. But I'm still here. Can anyone help!?

-- 
__ _  _  __  _  _  __ __  _ _
_ //\/ _  /\/_  __/\/ _  /\/ _  /\/ // /\/ ___/\_
 / // / / _  / /\/ /\_\/ _  / / _  / / // / / /_-,\/_
// /_//_/ / /_/ / /_//_/ // // // ,__
\\/\_\\_\/  \_\/  \_\\_\/\\/\\/\\/___
.this Email has been brought to you by the Databug ©.

Other EMail:-   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ Nr:-  87314826 IRC Nicks:-  Databug, MadMango
Homepage:- http://www.arkofnoah.co.uk




Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Chagning word-wrap margin for a single message?

2003-01-02 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Gavin,

On Fri, 3 Jan 2003 00:06:06 +1100GMT (2-1-03, 14:06 +0100GMT, where I
live), you wrote:

GS The simplest way to prevent this is to wrap my stuff at about 50
GS characters also.  Can I do this for a single message?

Don't think so, unless you change your editor preferences before and
after writing the message. It's not that difficult and seems to upset
you quite bit, so you could consider it:
 Options-Editor Preferences-General-Wrap text at ... characters.

GS If, as I suspect, the answer is no, then here's one more reason to
GS allow editing in an external editor.

Why? Somebody sends you crap, so you store it as crap.

If it really, really bothers you, you could wrap everything at 50.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: I wish to unsubscribe

2003-01-02 Thread Gerard

ON Thursday, January 2, 2003, 7:06:11 PM, you wrote:
D Hello
D I've been trying to unsub from this list for days now. I've been to the site 
D and unsubbed every EMail address I can think of that i may have used to 
D subscribe. But I'm still here. Can anyone help!?


Hi Databug,

Didn't anyone tell you?
Subscriptions are for life!

Oke there is a way out.
While reading this email go to Special|mailinglist|unsubscribe

Sorry to see you leave.

-- 
Best regards,
 Gerard 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
You’re a golfaholic… if You think that some day you'll shoot your age,
when a more realistic goal would be to shoot your weight!

Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Chagning word-wrap margin for a single message?

2003-01-02 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Roelof,
and Gavin,

On Thursday, January 02, 2003, 12:23 PM, you wrote:

GS The simplest way to prevent this is to wrap my stuff at about 50
GS characters also.  Can I do this for a single message?

Gavin, if I'm not misunderstanding you, it's the appearance of the
message in your Reply text editor window that is bothering you. If
that's not it, you should just ignore the rest of what I'm saying
here.

To straighten up the line appearance, you could (keeping your 70 or 72
line auto-wrap) click on Utilities on the Reply window toolbar. Choose
Format Block. Position the cursor within the paragraph you want to fix
(it only works with adjacent lines of text) and choose Align left.

In other words, instead of conforming to the 50-wrap line, conform the
quoted message to your line-length preference.

I just learned about this a couple of days ago. Before that, I had been
laboriously moving text which had come in from friends using Outlook
Express, just in order not to send back such a long, ugly page.

What you see in the Reply window, as you no doubt know, is what should
arrive on the other end of cyberspace. :)

People were complaining about the Format Block choice--they wanted to
format the entire message with one click--but I am grateful for even
this much, after having sat on Delete and Backspace and Enter for two
months. Which was both time-consuming and annoying.

A little over two months is the time I have had The Bat! and have been
subscribed to this list.

-- 

Best regards,
Mary



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: I wish to unsubscribe

2003-01-02 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Databug,

on Thu, 2 Jan 2003 18:06:11 +GMT (02.01.03, 19:06 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :

D I've been trying to unsub from this list for days now.

Perhaps a few days aren't enough, especially during holiday season.

If you`re in a hurry:

,- [ from the FAQ ]
| If you are still having problems with adjusting your subscription,
| please send a message to the moderation team where your change may
| be done manually.
`-

(where the address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]) - just in case
Marck hasn't done it already. :-)

-- 
Cheers
Peter

When I was a boy of fourteen, my father was so ignorant, I could
hardly stand to have the old man around.
When I was 21, I was amazed at how much he had learned in seven years.
 Mark Twain

Winamp currently playing: Oscar Peterson with Milt Jackson - Willow Weep For Me
  



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: I wish to unsubscribe

2003-01-02 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Gerard,

on Thu, 2 Jan 2003 19:34:45 +0100GMT (02.01.03, 19:34 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :

G While reading this email go to Special|mailinglist|unsubscribe

I'm afraid this won't work with KMail... ;-)

-- 
Cheers
Peter

Just that you're paranoid doesn't mean they are NOT after you.

Winamp currently playing: Keith Jarrett - Stella By Starlight  
  



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Chagning word-wrap margin for a single message?

2003-01-02 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Melissa,

On Thursday, January 02, 2003, 1:18 PM, you wrote:

snip

M ... alternative to using the mouse menus...
Alt+L.

snip

M There actually is a way to re-format multiple paragraphs at once.
M Yes...you guessed it...a regex macro in a Quick Template! :-)  Allie
M pointed this out to me recently:

snip

Thank you so much, Melissa. I am going to do this now!

-- 

Best regards,
Mary



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: XML Address Book Format

2003-01-02 Thread M. Evans
Spike,

That strikes me as pretty preposterous.  XML files are ASCII files and
it would be awfully hard for a virus to hide in one.

Regards.
Mark



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Problems with GnuPG 1.2.1-1 and decryption

2003-01-02 Thread CArmeanu
Hi @all there,

I installed gnuPG 1.2.1-1 and everything seems to be fine. I can send
an encrypted message to myself and read(decrypt) it. But if I get a
message from some linux/evolution user (same GnuPG version) The Bat!
refuses to decrypt the message.

The incoming message consists of 3 files:

message.htm  with a text like Version 1
signature.asccontaining the signature
encrypted.ascwell, that's the part not working!!!

I can verify the signature, but as soon as I try to decrypt the
message text, I get this:

-

gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
gpg: decrypt_message failed: eof

-

Please HELP!!!

Chris



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Chagning word-wrap margin for a single message?

2003-01-02 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Melissa,

On Thursday, January 02, 2003, 1:35 PM, you wrote:

snip

M Eek!  I forgot to mention a couple of things...

M I forgot to mention that after selecting the multiple paragraphs, hit
M Ctrl+C to copy it to the clipboard.  Then invoke the wc Quick
M Template.

Okay. I can do that. :)

M Also...no need unwrap the regex macro pasted into my previous message.
M Just copy/paste it into your QT as is.

Thanks a bunch!

-- 

Best regards,
Mary



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: I wish to unsubscribe

2003-01-02 Thread Gerard

ON Thursday, January 2, 2003, 8:06:38 PM, you wrote:
PM I'm afraid this won't work with KMail... ;-)


 Peter,

 I just assumed that he was using TB!.

 He could reinstall it to unsubscribe ;-)

-- 
Best regards,
 Gerard 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Things That Sound Dirty At Golf But Aren't: Nuts...my shaft is bent

Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Problems with GnuPG 1.2.1-1 and decryption

2003-01-02 Thread CArmeanu
CiPd Hi @all there,

CiPd I installed gnuPG 1.2.1-1 and everything seems to be fine. I can send
CiPd an encrypted message to myself and read(decrypt) it. But if I get a
CiPd message from some linux/evolution user (same GnuPG version) The Bat!
CiPd refuses to decrypt the message.

I use The Bat 1.62 Christmas edition and GnuPG decrypts the message if
I launch it manually (commandline).

CiPd The incoming message consists of 3 files:

CiPd message.htm  with a text like Version 1
CiPd signature.asccontaining the signature
CiPd encrypted.ascwell, that's the part not working!!!

CiPd I can verify the signature, but as soon as I try to decrypt the
CiPd message text, I get this:

-

CiPd gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
CiPd gpg: decrypt_message failed: eof

-

CiPd Please HELP!!!

CiPd Chris


CiPd 
CiPd Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
CiPd http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



-- 
Best regards,
 CArmeanumailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Email Download Aborted - Solved!

2003-01-02 Thread Allie Martin
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Richard Wakeford [RW] wrote:'

RW Are you sure? I remember not that long ago being pointed to a
RW well hidden page on the ZA site which took you through a long
RW rigmarole of removing various items from the registry to
RW completely remove it. I've had a look but can't find it at the
RW moment.

It would seem from what I read that if you reboot with it disabled
so that the true vector engine isn't started then you can uninstall
it without hassle.

-- 
  -=] allie_M [=-  {List Moderator}

MUA: TB! v1.62 Christmas Edition ___ OS: WinXP Pro (SP1)



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: 2 Questions: Thread Views PGP messing with -- signature

2003-01-02 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Mary Bull [MB] wrote:'

MB I did not mean to imply that it is The Bat!'s fault. PGP does
MB this, and The Bat! of course can no longer recognize it as a
MB 'cut' line.

- From some testing I did some time ago, I noted that if you sign with
the PGP or GnuPG plugins, --  is converted to - --.  The altered
delimiter is therefore not recognised by TB!. However, if you sign
with PGP Tray or GPG Shell/WinPT, --  is converted to - -- . The
space after the double dash is preserved and TB! will recognise that
delimiter, even with the added dash-space.

You can try replying to my message here without using just %quotes
in your template and my signature should be cut out.

- -- 
  -=] allie_M [=-  {List Moderator}

MUA: TB! v1.62 Christmas Edition ___ OS: WinXP Pro (SP1)
 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: My Public Keys - http://www.ac-martin.com/pgpkeys.html

iD8DBQE+FKhyV8nrYCsHF+IRAlqoAJ9kXu+eNR8GJUOdrLH8vSIsGTFOtACgpYWs
6Am42Gcix6YSK2pTR8scAYQ=
=gsb5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: I wish to unsubscribe

2003-01-02 Thread Allie Martin
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Databug [D] wrote:'

D I've been trying to unsub from this list for days now. I've been
D to the site and unsubbed every EMail address I can think of that
D i may have used to subscribe. But I'm still here. Can anyone
D help!?

Yes. I just did so manually.


-- 
  -=] allie_M [=-  {List Moderator}

MUA: TB! v1.62 Christmas Edition ___ OS: WinXP Pro (SP1)



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Problems with GnuPG 1.2.1-1 and decryption

2003-01-02 Thread Allie Martin
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Carmeanu [C] wrote:'

C The incoming message consists of 3 files:

C message.htm  with a text like Version 1
C signature.asccontaining the signature
C encrypted.ascwell, that's the part not working!!!

C I can verify the signature, but as soon as I try to decrypt the
C message text, I get this:

C -

C gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
C gpg: decrypt_message failed: eof

C -

It would seem that an unsupported method of encrypting the message
was used. It would seem that PGP/MIME was used and TB! doesn't
support this. I'm surprised you could verify the signature if it
arrived as an attachment.

-- 
  -=] allie_M [=-  {List Moderator}

MUA: TB! v1.62 Christmas Edition ___ OS: WinXP Pro (SP1)



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: 2 Questions: Thread Views PGP messing with -- signature

2003-01-02 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Allie,

on Thu, 2 Jan 2003 16:00:44 -0500GMT (02.01.03, 22:00 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :

AM - From some testing I did some time ago, I noted that if you sign with
AM the PGP or GnuPG plugins, --  is converted to - --.  The altered
AM delimiter is therefore not recognised by TB!. However, if you sign
AM with PGP Tray or GPG Shell/WinPT, --  is converted to - -- . The
AM space after the double dash is preserved and TB! will recognise that
AM delimiter, even with the added dash-space.

AM You can try replying to my message here without using just %quotes
AM in your template and my signature should be cut out.

I didn't test the effect on replying, as all my current templates contain
the sig etc. cutter regex for %Quotes, but in the RTV preview pane, your
signature is not recognized as such.

- -- 
Cheers
Peter

He who hesitates is probably right.

Winamp currently playing: Underworld - Born Slippy


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt *PGP signed for better authentication*
Comment: Key available at http://www.meynsweb.com/public-key.txt

iQA/AwUBPhShugM2UgbhB3TOEQJ/1gCgxsbz708Lq2x2P+GNlGbvzHdwSFQAoMw9
yhndUY2VlPkGkCV6ImZi6I7G
=5aAb
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: Problems with GnuPG 1.2.1-1 and decryption

2003-01-02 Thread CArmeanu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Allie,

Thursday, January 2, 2003, 10:13:39 PM, you wrote:

AM In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
AM Carmeanu [C] wrote:'

C The incoming message consists of 3 files:

C message.htm  with a text like Version 1
C signature.asccontaining the signature
C encrypted.ascwell, that's the part not working!!!

C I can verify the signature, but as soon as I try to decrypt the
C message text, I get this:

C -

C gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
C gpg: decrypt_message failed: eof

C -

AM It would seem that an unsupported method of encrypting the message
AM was used. It would seem that PGP/MIME was used and TB! doesn't
AM support this. I'm surprised you could verify the signature if it
AM arrived as an attachment.

Well, the signin works just fine ... just the message body itself :-(
doesn't work ...
I must admit I'm not very pleased about this. Is this a fault of
evolution (mailer) or TB?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)

iD8DBQE+FLIDYTfQI7+Ck0ARAjKMAKDo61SR7l+EpmoXtauEy1KoBWydqQCfS6AS
+HbmvyKWBlVihhz815ibb3c=
=C8+z
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: 2 Questions: Thread Views PGP messing with -- signature

2003-01-02 Thread Victor B. Gonzalez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Allie,

AM - From some testing I did some time ago, I noted that if you sign with
AM the PGP or GnuPG plugins, --  is converted to - --.  The altered
AM delimiter is therefore not recognised by TB!. However, if you sign
AM with PGP Tray or GPG Shell/WinPT, --  is converted to - -- . The
AM space after the double dash is preserved and TB! will recognise that
AM delimiter, even with the added dash-space.

AM You can try replying to my message here without using just %quotes
AM in your template and my signature should be cut out.

It is, and so is mines but other clients which usually
understand the --  as to be the cut off point don't. I am
also signing my messages direct from the tray. Is there a
work around?

- -- 
Best regards,
 Victor B. Gonzalez  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Request My PGP Public Keys - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

iQA/AwUBPhS1RV3LB35+TCg0EQLiEwCghYKQKUeg+T95/8H9FQrXy/4B4I0An3GS
vkvjXdfzLfEAlx8DvfxchbhV
=lNe9
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: 2 Questions: Thread Views PGP messing with -- signature

2003-01-02 Thread Allie Martin
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Peter Meyns [PM] wrote:'

PM I didn't test the effect on replying, as all my current
PM templates contain the sig etc. cutter regex for %Quotes, but in
PM the RTV preview pane, your signature is not recognized as such.

I don't know about it being recognised a signature in the RTV. I do
know that TB! will cut text after - --  but not after - --.

I checked just now.

-- 
  -=] allie_M [=-  {List Moderator}

MUA: TB! v1.62 Christmas Edition ___ OS: WinXP Pro (SP1)



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Problems with GnuPG 1.2.1-1 and decryption

2003-01-02 Thread Allie Martin
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Carmeanu [C] wrote:'

C Well, the signin works just fine ... just the message body itself
C :-( doesn't work ... I must admit I'm not very pleased about
C this. Is this a fault of evolution (mailer) or TB?

I suspect that it may not be a fault of either MUA.

What's in the text body? Encrypted text?

Do you have GPG Shell installed? If so, can you decrypt the text
with it?

-- 
  -=] allie_M [=-  {List Moderator}

MUA: TB! v1.62 Christmas Edition ___ OS: WinXP Pro (SP1)



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: 2 Questions: Thread Views PGP messing with -- signature

2003-01-02 Thread Allie Martin
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Victor B. Gonzalez [VBG] wrote:'

VBG It is, and so is mines but other clients which usually
VBG understand the --  as to be the cut off point don't. I am
VBG also signing my messages direct from the tray. Is there a work
VBG around?

Unfortunately no. PGP in its current state needs to add the - 
escape to any dash that starts a line.

The only thing to do would be to expand support for PGP by
recognising delimiters which have been altered by PGP.

-- 
  -=] allie_M [=-  {List Moderator}

MUA: TB! v1.62 Christmas Edition ___ OS: WinXP Pro (SP1)



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Read filters

2003-01-02 Thread Ricardo M. Reyes
I'm starting to use the read-filters and noticed that the ctrl-M
shortcut doesn't trigger them (I have to open the msg in a new window
to execute the filter).

I think I'll add it to the bugtrack site, but before I'd like to know
if I'm the only one seeing this. Maybe it's fixed the last builds
(I'm still using 1.60c). Do you see the same?

-- 
Ricardo M. Reyes  | (Mar del Plata - Argentina)
  | Usando The Bat! 1.60c

Help ... I can't find my Any key!



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Comments in templates?

2003-01-02 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi all,

is there a way to add comments in message templates?

I'd like to disable parts of some of my templates temporarily without
having to delete them, for testing purposes.

-- 
Cheers
Peter

Who the  is General Failure and what's he doing on my computer?

Winamp currently playing: Chi Coltrane - Go like Elijah



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: 2 Questions: Thread Views PGP messing with -- signature

2003-01-02 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Allie!

On Thursday, January 02, 2003, 3:00 PM, you wrote:

A  ... if you sign with PGP Tray or GPG Shell/WinPT, --  is converted to - -- .
A The space after the double dash is preserved and TB! will recognise
A that delimiter, even with the added dash-space.

A You can try replying to my message here without using just %quotes
A in your template and my signature should be cut out.

Thanks a bunch, Allie! So as not to have to redo the TBUDL address
book template, I set up a private reply to this message. Worked
perfectly. But I didn't send it. Just deleted it and came back here.

(I temporarily took out the Reply default template that Marck had
given me, in order to test this. Shorter code, easier to put back in.
:) )

So this is the answer, if I wanted to sign a message to TBUDL or TBOT.
Sender controls, and it's not dependent on the Receiver having a
template MACRO.

I believe it answers Victor Gonzalez's second question, also, to
perfection.

Please see now for me if my 'cut' line works, with only one Enter
(line space) below it. I am a true doubting Thomas.  :)

--

Mary

The Bat 1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: 2 Questions: Thread Views PGP messing with -- signature

2003-01-02 Thread Allie Martin
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Mary Bull [MB] wrote:'

MB Please see now for me if my 'cut' line works, with only one
MB Enter (line space) below it. I am a true doubting Thomas. :)

Very strangely it wasn't cut.

I can't say why either since I've checked many signatures which all
have been cut. These sigs included ones with the text just under the
delimiter as mine and  that of most other members, sigs with only
one line space below the delimiter (Thomas Fernandez's sigs) and
sigs with two empty lines below the delimiter.

Your delimiter also has the space after the dashes. I don't know
why it doesn't cut.

-- 
  -=] allie_M [=-  {List Moderator}

MUA: TB! v1.62 Christmas Edition ___ OS: WinXP Pro (SP1)



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: 2 Questions: Thread Views PGP messing with -- signature

2003-01-02 Thread Victor B. Gonzalez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Allie,

Thursday, January 2, 2003, 5:29:15 PM, you wrote:
AM In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
AM Mary Bull [MB] wrote:'

MB Please see now for me if my 'cut' line works, with only one
MB Enter (line space) below it. I am a true doubting Thomas. :)

AM Very strangely it wasn't cut.

AM I can't say why either since I've checked many signatures which all
AM have been cut. These sigs included ones with the text just under the
AM delimiter as mine and  that of most other members, sigs with only
AM one line space below the delimiter (Thomas Fernandez's sigs) and
AM sigs with two empty lines below the delimiter.

AM Your delimiter also has the space after the dashes. I don't know
AM why it doesn't cut.


It cuts perfectly ok with the bat but I also use Mozillas
news client to work with some newsgroups. As I forwarded
something from TB into Mozilla, I noticed Mozilla doesn't
recognize - --  as a delimiter.

- -- 
Best regards,
 Victor B. Gonzalez  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Request My PGP Public Keys - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

iQA/AwUBPhTAj13LB35+TCg0EQLIbQCeLzyxPRd/K5nz1MwJ6BElfhM4eccAoLHE
QJ+lIS/dLWPKdzEtTfJvFstY
=ASlt
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: 2 Questions: Thread Views PGP messing with -- signature

2003-01-02 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Allie!

On Thursday, January 02, 2003, 4:29 PM, you wrote:

MB Please see now for me if my 'cut' line works, with only one
MB Enter (line space) below it. I am a true doubting Thomas. :)

A Very strangely it wasn't cut.

When he taught me to do this, back in October 2002, moderator Leif
Gregory emphasized the two empty lines. This is why I have been so
stubborn about it. BTW, how is Leif? Haven't seen him on TBUDL or
TBOT in a long time.

A I can't say why either since I've checked many signatures which all
A have been cut. These sigs included ones with the text just under the
A delimiter as mine and  that of most other members, sigs with only
A one line space below the delimiter (Thomas Fernandez's sigs) and
A sigs with two empty lines below the delimiter.

Are all the ones where it works PGP tray signed? I have a %NOUSEPGP in
all my templates, ever since I obtained my keys. Took it out of one
or two templates, temporarily, for people who wanted to sign my keys,
and for awhile out of the PGP-Basics template for people who wanted to
check my signature.

I just wanted the encryption-decryption function for possible
emergency situations.

And I had had such a hard time manually erasing many long PGP sigs
over the past few weeks, that I didn't want to wish a PGP signature on
any of my Batty friends, even the ones who were sending the uncuttable
versions to me! :)

So, is it possible that this delimiter works in your fashion for
PGP-tray-signed messages, but not for plain cut line and signature
like mine?

Given Leif's early tutorial to me, before I even knew there was such a
thing as PGP?

A Your delimiter also has the space after the dashes. I don't know
A why it doesn't cut.

See if this does.


-- 


Mary

The Bat! 1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: XML Address Book Format

2003-01-02 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo M.,

On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 12:17:36 -0700GMT (2-1-03, 20:17 +0100GMT, where I
live), you wrote:

ME That strikes me as pretty preposterous.  XML files are ASCII files and
ME it would be awfully hard for a virus to hide in one.

Yep, but awfully easy to read them.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Comments in templates?

2003-01-02 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Peter,

@2-Jan-2003, 23:09 +0100 (22:09 UK time) Peter Meyns [PM] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

PM is there a way to add comments in message templates?

Yes - use the %REM macro ... like this:

%REM=

 This bit is a comment



PM I'd like to disable parts of some of my templates temporarily
PM without having to delete them, for testing purposes.

That will do it for you then.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1rc1-nr1 (Windows 2000)

iD8DBQE+FMbgOeQkq5KdzaARAvz8AKDxKY/S/DPtEI+JX8u0z+1U66QOJQCfX8BV
4bq2a2vcZL1mHJOcQGjdcBM=
=xqtn
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: 2 Questions: Thread Views PGP messing with -- signature

2003-01-02 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Mary,

@2-Jan-2003, 16:43 -0600 (22:43 UK time) Mary Bull [MB] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

MB When he taught me to do this, back in October 2002, moderator
MB Leif Gregory emphasized the two empty lines.

He was mistaken. Or misunderstood. One of the two ;-).

Here is the technical specification of a cut mark:

.returndashdashspacereturn.

Yes, there are two returns, but neither of them denote a blank line.
No blank lines are needed at all for a cut mark to work.

 ... snip

A Your delimiter also has the space after the dashes. I don't know
A why it doesn't cut.

When I looked, the message in question did not have a space after
the dash-dash.

MB See if this does.

Worked like a charm :-).

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1rc1-nr1 (Windows 2000)

iD8DBQE+FMfYOeQkq5KdzaARAi73AJ43HWozKvLhQPZS6R+j9TkPv4cTzwCg5xpR
noVBYSxQpbhjyD6HMaE+p5g=
=ss4+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: 2 Questions: Thread Views PGP messing with -- signature

2003-01-02 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Marck,

On Thursday, January 02, 2003, 5:14 PM, you wrote:

MB ... back in October 2002, moderator Leif Gregory emphasized the
MB two empty lines.

M He was mistaken. Or misunderstood. One of the two ;-).

Most likely misunderstood. :)

M Here is the technical specification of a cut mark:

M .returndashdashspacereturn.

M Yes, there are two returns, but neither of them denote a blank line.
M No blank lines are needed at all for a cut mark to work.

M  ... snip

snip

MB See if this does.

M Worked like a charm :-).

Okay. Try this. :)

-- 
Mary

The Bat! 1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1




--

Mary Bull

The Bat 1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: 2 Questions: Thread Views PGP messing with -- signature

2003-01-02 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday, January 02, 2003, Mary Bull wrote...

M Here is the technical specification of a cut mark:
M .returndashdashspacereturn.
M Yes, there are two returns, but neither of them denote a blank line.
M No blank lines are needed at all for a cut mark to work.

M Worked like a charm :-).

 Okay. Try this. :)

Seems to work just fine and dandy over here ;)

- --
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iQA/AwUBPhTSmSuD6BT4/R9zEQLOdwCg4RiJXOqLjTz8uRHCyf2eyQdmLToAoMAw
mzv19JKhWxymtlttItgpg698
=glMM
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Email Download Aborted - Solved!

2003-01-02 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Tom,

On Fri, 3 Jan 2003 at 06:45:25[GMT +1100](which was 19:45 where I
live) you wrote:

 Here's  a link at the Outpost site that probably will assist. I also used
 to  use  ZA  pro,  had  all  sorts of weird problems, but since moving to
 Outpost Pro haven't looked back.

Yup. that's the information I meant, thanks.

-- 

Best regards,

Richard

Using The Bat! version 1.62 Beta/17
Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3
and using the best browser: Opera



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Email Download Aborted - Solved!

2003-01-02 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Allie,

On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 at 15:49:19[GMT -0500](which was 20:49 where I
live) you wrote:

 It would seem from what I read that if you reboot with it disabled
 so that the true vector engine isn't started then you can uninstall
 it without hassle.

Still lots of work needed with regedit to get the remaining spurious
files off the system I think but it seems that it is the way to go as
there appear to be no problems with Kerio and lots with ZA. Even
though ZA have recently posted an upgrade there may well be another
forthcoming so I might just wait and see.

--

Best regards,

Richard

Using The Bat! version 1.62 Beta/17
Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3
and using the best browser: Opera



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: XML Address Book Format

2003-01-02 Thread marek jedlinski


On Friday, January 3, 2003, 12:09:31 AM, 
Roelof Otten ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

ME That strikes me as pretty preposterous.  XML files are ASCII files and
ME it would be awfully hard for a virus to hide in one.

 Yep, but awfully easy to read them.

Outlook addressbooks are *hard* to read, yet virus/trojan writers have
no problem with it, never had. The format of the addressbook isn't an
issue; the insecure automation protocols built into Outlook are.

(All the same, as the author of PhoneDeck, I feel called on the carpet
here. It's off-topic for this list, though, so I'll just say that
while XML is certainly the buzzword of the day, it doesn't make things
as easy as the hype would have us believe. What good would be
XML-enabled PhoneDeck *and* TheBat, if PhoneDeck had a name-first
tag and TheBat! had first-name? No good at all. Second, reading XML,
whether through DOM or SAX, is a very complex process. PhoneDeck's
addressbook format, while technically proprietary, is perfectly
readable to human eye, and is very easy to parse, much easier than XML
will ever be. So is CSV export. Can't say that about TheBat's
addressbook, though ;)

Best regards,
.marek jedlinski


-- 
No ads, no nags freeware: http://keynote.prv.pl
(KeyNote, PhoneDeck, KookieJar, Oubliette)

The media finally figured out that their paying customers 
(i.e. advertisers) don't WANT an intelligent, thoughtful 
audience.  And they no longer have one. (Rich Tietjens)



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: Problems with GnuPG 1.2.1-1 and decryption

2003-01-02 Thread CArmeanu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Allie,

Thursday, January 2, 2003, 10:59:12 PM, you wrote:

AM In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
AM Carmeanu [C] wrote:'

C Well, the signin works just fine ... just the message body itself
C :-( doesn't work ... I must admit I'm not very pleased about
C this. Is this a fault of evolution (mailer) or TB?

AM I suspect that it may not be a fault of either MUA.

AM What's in the text body? Encrypted text?

AM Do you have GPG Shell installed? If so, can you decrypt the text
AM with it?


Yes, I do have GPGshell installed and I can decrypt the message body
(encrypted.asc attachment) with it. I also can decrypt it using gpg
command line. TB just doesn't seem to recognize the encrypted.asc
attachment as the message body.

- --
Best regards,
 CArmeanumailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)

iD8DBQE+FN2PYTfQI7+Ck0ARAsxfAJwOtJXpTGwRiNbs1Cq36oxIVOWw3QCg09F4
2/wdml0nmhziUv5zTQxM/Xk=
=e7vF
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Problems with GnuPG 1.2.1-1 and decryption

2003-01-02 Thread Allie Martin
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Carmeanu [C] wrote:'

C Yes, I do have GPGshell installed and I can decrypt the message
C body (encrypted.asc attachment) with it. I also can decrypt it
C using gpg command line. TB just doesn't seem to recognize the
C encrypted.asc attachment as the message body.

Yes. AFAIK, the TB! plug-in will not decrypt encrypted text within
an attachment. It will decrypt only encrypted text that's in the
message body, i.e., text that appears within the message viewer
(without the headers display option enabled).

-- 
  -=] allie_M [=-  {List Moderator}

MUA: TB! v1.62 Christmas Edition ___ OS: WinXP Pro (SP1)



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Ticker shortcoming?

2003-01-02 Thread Victor B. Gonzalez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello tbudl,

  I've seen some people talk about that they can't live
  without the ticker and I just hid it away as one of the
  first options I came across.

  Today however, I sparked with I need the ticker too so I
  enabled it. I tried docking it at the top and bottom of my
  screen but it interferes with my open windows.

  If I have it at the top I cant get to a full screens
  minimize, maximize and close buttons and if its docked at
  the bottom it usually interferes with my windows status
  bars, etc...

  Is that how it is supposed to work and if the answer is
  yes is their a registry tweak that can suppress any window
  from going beneath it, yet still show on my desktop?

- -- 
Best regards,
 Victor B. Gonzalez  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Request My PGP Public Keys - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

iQA/AwUBPhTe3V3LB35+TCg0EQJNXQCgrrXNRPsuO2GjIAxlJpsLi1lAeBQAn05y
EcM3MCVmdIgvK26or2zxhVPG
=YFth
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Ticker shortcoming?

2003-01-02 Thread Anthony Xin Chen
Hi All,

On 2 Jan 2003 19:52:53  (my local time 16:52:53), Victor B. Gonzalez
wrote
(in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED])

 If I have it at the top I cant get to a full screens minimize,
 maximize and close buttons and if its docked at the bottom it
 usually interferes with my windows status bars, etc...

You can adjust the length of the ticker with mouse. Move the mouse
towards the left or right edge of the ticker till the mouse turn into
a double arrow, and drag the mouse to adjust the length.








-- 
Regards, Anthony



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: Ticker shortcoming?

2003-01-02 Thread Victor B. Gonzalez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Anthony,

 If I have it at the top I cant get to a full screens minimize,
 maximize and close buttons and if its docked at the bottom it
 usually interferes with my windows status bars, etc...

AXC You can adjust the length of the ticker with mouse. Move the mouse
AXC towards the left or right edge of the ticker till the mouse turn into
AXC a double arrow, and drag the mouse to adjust the length.

Thanks, I didn't know that :) I am really after docking
it without interference, is it possible?

Thanks Anthony because if the answer is no I guess I am left
with no option but to resize it :)

- -- 
Best regards,
 Victor B. Gonzalez  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Request My PGP Public Keys - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

iQA/AwUBPhTh913LB35+TCg0EQLCGQCg9g2hQvoC7Utq2sQm9iQWN1eVi44AoKfU
yytP5cYOZ4cbYDpnziHsiXjX
=dSzV
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: XML Address Book Format

2003-01-02 Thread M. Evans
Well, suppose I have two XML files, one using name-first and the
other using first-name. An XSL script can convert between them. Or I
can convert the data manually using any text editor. Fifteen years
from now, when the original programs are long dead, I will still have
my address data in a format I can read and use.

More to the point, I should slap the developers for not coordinating
on a standard. That is what committees like W3C are for. The vcard XML
format sounds like a winner to me.

We have email standards, and all email clients support them: POP, SMTP,
etc. Why not some W3C-approved XML address format?

XML is more than a buzzword, it's an important new standard. The
reading of XML files via SAX or DOM is facilitated by open-source
parsers and is not complex at all. XML is a machine-ready format. I
can't see how proprietary formats are any less work.

Mark


 (All the same, as the author of PhoneDeck, I feel called on the carpet
 here. It's off-topic for this list, though, so I'll just say that
 while XML is certainly the buzzword of the day, it doesn't make things
 as easy as the hype would have us believe. What good would be
 XML-enabled PhoneDeck *and* TheBat, if PhoneDeck had a name-first
 tag and TheBat! had first-name? No good at all. Second, reading XML,
 whether through DOM or SAX, is a very complex process. PhoneDeck's
 addressbook format, while technically proprietary, is perfectly
 readable to human eye, and is very easy to parse, much easier than XML
 will ever be. So is CSV export. Can't say that about TheBat's
 addressbook, though ;)

 Best regards,
 .marek jedlinski



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Ticker shortcoming?

2003-01-02 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Victor,

@2-Jan-2003, 19:52 -0500 (00:52 UK time) Victor B. Gonzalez said:

   I tried docking it at the top and bottom of my screen but it
   interferes with my open windows.

I don't dock the ticker at all. I leave it unzoomed, shortened to
the smallest possible size and then dragged off beyond the left edge
of the screen about 3cm above the Start button with about 1cm of the
thing left showing.

Why?

1) I have turned off old flappy. I got tired of unread Spam in my
   Anti-Spam account triggering the wings and I let the minimal
   ticker serve as my You have mail notification.

2) I have access to one of the real gems of the TB system - the
   Browse Ticker Messages virtual folder. There, in a simple and
   easy folder, are all of my unread messages. If I want to zoom in
   to see the rest of a thread, double click a message in the folder
   message list to open the message in the specific folder context.
   A quick Esc will take me back out and I resume browsing the new
   mail I have enabled the Folder column so I can see where the
   message resides to start wide. I also colour code important
   unread messages so they stand out in the list.

3) Using System wide hotkeys in conjunction with PowerPro and
   Stroke-it, a couple of mouse gestures opens the ticker mail,
   jumps me to the first message and opens all threads. Boy, do I
   make this baby work for me or what? ;-)

The biggest downside about the virtual ticker folder is that it is
created in the moment of opening and is a snapshot of the ticker
content at that moment. New messages that come in after it was
opened will appear on the ticker but not in the virtual folder.

Still, if more come in, I can just close the view and a fresh view
is just a couple of mouse gestures away g.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1rc1-nr1 (Windows 2000)

iD8DBQE+FOVwOeQkq5KdzaARAuo5AJ9ioqE/ggLj8jwcRpUhANjvqksTygCeImsA
zRUvH8YFpfKYcfhdf8mRoFI=
=X+Ly
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: Ticker shortcoming?

2003-01-02 Thread Victor B. Gonzalez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Marck,

   I tried docking it at the top and bottom of my screen but it
   interferes with my open windows.

MDP I don't dock the ticker at all. I leave it unzoomed, shortened to
MDP the smallest possible size and then dragged off beyond the left edge
MDP of the screen about 3cm above the Start button with about 1cm of the
MDP thing left showing.

MDP Why?

MDP 1) I have turned off old flappy. I got tired of unread Spam in my
MDPAnti-Spam account triggering the wings and I let the minimal
MDPticker serve as my You have mail notification.

This is what made me turn on the ticker. It wasn't spam
exactly but I get lower than normal priority mail and I
thought I would like to keep an eye on it...

1 new shortcoming, there isn't a way to handle mail through
the ticker but to have to go through the client. Maybe not a
shortcoming but a definite feature request along with window
docking side by side.

MDP 2) I have access to one of the real gems of the TB system - the
MDPBrowse Ticker Messages virtual folder.

I didn't know about this virtual folder but looked it up in
the bat... It is a pretty cool feature with a time saving
benefit attached... Thanks :)

MDP 3) Using System wide hotkeys in conjunction with PowerPro and
MDPStroke-it

I've used power pro, never tried stroke it but am curious as
to what exactly is system wide hotkeys? I ask because all
keyboard shortcuts I make in my system are only active if
applied to a shortcut on either my desktop or start menu.

Thanks for your answer Marck, I am still on the tutorial you
suggested I look over and that macro tool is just really
cool.

Thanks for all the input :)

- -- 
Best regards,
 Victor B. Gonzalez  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Request My PGP Public Keys - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

iQA/AwUBPhTqc13LB35+TCg0EQKojgCgwlmzVWbkQaipfuUKz0/k+87PSkUAniWF
jgtx1dA1EEhInnTeLfD2nwFz
=EaqF
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: 2 Questions: Thread Views PGP messing with -- signature

2003-01-02 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Allie,

On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 17:29:15 -0500 GMT (03/01/03, 05:29 +0700 GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:

 Your delimiter also has the space after the dashes. I don't know
 why it doesn't cut.

Mary's sig delimiter arrived here without the space after the dashes.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

Mental backup in progress - Do Not Disturb!

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.62 Christmas Edition
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Ticker shortcoming?

2003-01-02 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Victor,

@2-Jan-2003, 20:42 -0500 (01:42 UK time) Victor B. Gonzalez said:

MDP 3) Using System wide hotkeys in conjunction with PowerPro
MDP andStroke-it

 I've used power pro, never tried stroke it but am curious as to
 what exactly is system wide hotkeys?

These are part of TB and in Options | Define system hot keys. I
think I need say no more ;-). As for Strokeit, see
http://www.tcbmi.com/strokeit/

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1rc1-nr1 (Windows 2000)

iD8DBQE+FPSYOeQkq5KdzaARAjpRAKC4orG0hYpN6c9fi2Tnufc6z0HOngCeNciV
EWtmIN5ZzqOuQJDpu1GzdnY=
=/YCo
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: 2 Questions: Thread Views PGP messing with -- signature

2003-01-02 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Allie,

On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 16:00:44 -0500 GMT (03/01/03, 04:00 +0700 GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:

 - From some testing I did some time ago, I noted that if you sign with
 the PGP or GnuPG plugins, --  is converted to - --.  The altered
 delimiter is therefore not recognised by TB!. However, if you sign
 with PGP Tray or GPG Shell/WinPT, --  is converted to - -- .

I would think that this is a problem with the plug-in. It should
convert the sig delimiter to - -- , as the tray version does.

 The space after the double dash is preserved and TB! will recognise
 that delimiter, even with the added dash-space.

But then, if TB's plug-in does not preserve the last space, TB's reply
function should recognise excaped delimiter as created by its twin on
the sender's machine. ;-)

How do other programs handle - --  and - --?

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

Just because you're not paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get
you.

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.62 Christmas Edition
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: Ticker shortcoming?

2003-01-02 Thread Victor B. Gonzalez
Hello Marck,

 I've used power pro, never tried stroke it but am curious as to
 what exactly is system wide hotkeys?

MDP These are part of TB and in Options | Define system hot keys. I
MDP think I need say no more ;-). As for Strokeit, see
MDP http://www.tcbmi.com/strokeit/

Damn, goes to show how you use something everyday and
everyday you learn something new about it... It was right
under my nose and I ain't see it... :)

Thanks for today I learn about the mail ticker folder and
system wide hotkeys... haha... I love you guys :)

-- 
Best regards,
 Victor B. Gonzalez  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: 2 Questions: Thread Views PGP messing with -- signature

2003-01-02 Thread Victor B. Gonzalez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Thomas,

 The space after the double dash is preserved and TB! will recognise
 that delimiter, even with the added dash-space.

TF But then, if TB's plug-in does not preserve the last space, TB's reply
TF function should recognise excaped delimiter as created by its twin on
TF the sender's machine. ;-)

TF How do other programs handle - --  and - --?

That is my point exactly... Most mail programs recognize
--  as the cut off point but when you throw in - -- 
Mozilla at least just doesn't understand :(

It's ok, I use the bat!

- - -- 
Best regards,
 Victor B. Gonzalez  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Request My PGP Public Keys - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

iQA/AwUBPhT3yV3LB35+TCg0EQLJ7ACgv0O2xZiSe5ACqncqEKqdhsBdPEwAnihJ
P28WymLBMz9O1LGRFAafVOnK
=akax
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Chagning word-wrap margin for a single message?

2003-01-02 Thread Gavin Sinclair
On Friday, January 3, 2003, 5:52:20 AM, Mary wrote:

 Hello Roelof,
 and Gavin,

 On Thursday, January 02, 2003, 12:23 PM, you wrote:

GS The simplest way to prevent this is to wrap my stuff at about 50
GS characters also.  Can I do this for a single message?

 Gavin, if I'm not misunderstanding you, it's the appearance of the
 message in your Reply text editor window that is bothering you. If
 that's not it, you should just ignore the rest of what I'm saying
 here.

Thanks a lot, Mary.  I've been happily using ALT-L to format my own
blocks (even quoted replies).  It just never occurred to me that it
might work for a doubly-quoted block.  Excellent software indeed.

Regards,
Gavin



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Chagning word-wrap margin for a single message?

2003-01-02 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Gavin,

On Thursday, January 02, 2003, 9:09 PM, you wrote:

snip

G Thanks a lot, Mary. ...

My pleasure. But you already knew more than I did. I just learned
about Alt L today. :)

G ...  Excellent software indeed.

Yes, excellent. Did you see Melissa Reese's post to me in this thread,
regarding a regular expression making it possible to format the entire
message in one click? (She had that from moderator Allie Martin.)

-- 
Best regards,
Mary

The Bat! 1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: 2 Questions: Thread Views PGP messing with -- signature

2003-01-02 Thread Allie Martin
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Marck D Pearlstone [MDP] wrote:'

A Your delimiter also has the space after the dashes. I don't know
A why it doesn't cut.

MDP When I looked, the message in question did not have a space
MDP after the dash-dash.

I used the mouse to swipe select her delimiter and saw a space. You
don't see one. Hmmm.

I decided to switch viewers. With the fixed width viewer, I don't
see the space. With the rich text viewer, it seems like a space is
there when you swipe select the delimiter with the mouse. This is
what confused me.

-- 
  -=] allie_M [=-  {List Moderator}

MUA: TB! v1.62 Christmas Edition ___ OS: WinXP Pro (SP1)



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: 2 Questions: Thread Views PGP messing with -- signature

2003-01-02 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Jonathan,

On Thursday, January 02, 2003, 6:00 PM, you wrote:

snip

 Okay. Try this. :)

J Seems to work just fine and dandy over here ;)

Did for me too, when I set up a test Reply window for myself just now.
I stand properly instructed now. :)

My apologies and thanks to all those friends on this list with whom I
have been so stubbornly arguing. :)

Thanks for your patience, Jonathan.

-- 
Mary

The Bat! 1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1




--

Mary Bull

The Bat 1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html