Re: TB lagging?
Hello MFPA, This is based on the method suggested to me on this list 2 or 3 years ago by MAU. Thanks for the acknowledgement, but I got the idea (if not the exact method) from someone else. It's too bad I don't remember who from, though. :-( -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v4.2.9.1 My photos at: http://www.Rancho-K.com My photoblog: http://mau.aminus3.com Current version is 4.2.10.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB lagging?
Hi On Saturday 29 August 2009 at 8:46:36 PM, in mid:1048071054.20090829124...@gmail.com, Susanne wrote: So far everything works beautifully (thanks so much! TB is fast again!), Cool. Just passing on info others passed to me on this list, along with a little of my own experience. (-; except the Sent Mail part. For some reason my common filter doesn't work, but I'm sure it's just me missing a condition, or something. Any ideas? :) My All Outgoing - Archive it filter has the condition Any message and the action Copy to the folder \\Archived_Messages\Sent Mail (You should not need to tick Automatically create if necessary if you are copying to the Sent Mail folder in the Archive account as that folder will have been created when you created the new account.) On the Options tab, it is ticked as active On the Share with tab in the sorting office, all the accounts I wish to archive sent messages from are ticked And just to make sure I understand this correctly: I don't have to be signed in to the Archive account, for all these settings to work, right? Correct. The messages will still be moved/copied to the Archive account but TB! will not waste time and resources loading the message base for the folders in that account unless you sign into it. For the setting up process, I did have to sign in. Otherwise the account didn't show up as an option in the list to copy messages to. If you are not signed into a password-protected account, it does not show up in the list to copy to. You can just type into the box but why introduce the possibility of error for the sake of signing into an account? (-; -- Best regards MFPA Life is a holiday. In the same way that glass is a liquid Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current version is 4.2.10.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB lagging?
Hi On Saturday 29 August 2009 at 7:39:12 PM, in mid:1885051887.20090829133...@fastmail.fm, Dwight Corrin wrote: just random info. my servers are set as notone.com, Mine is just all blank except the account name (-; might make sure check mail on start up is NOT checked, and also tick IGNORE 'CHECK ALL ACCOUNTS' REQUEST Good shout. -- Best regards MFPA A bird in the hand makes it awfully hard to blow your nose Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current version is 4.2.10.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB lagging?
- In Properties/Deletion, I tick the 'Use folder specific deletion settings' option. - Then, for 'Alternative deletion' I select 'Move to the specified folder' and, of course, I browse to select the corresponding folder in the 'Archived_Messages account'. Thanks for setting it out so clearly, but why tick both Use folder specific deletion settings whic leads to the folder in the Archives and 'Alternative deletion' 'Move to the specified folder' ? I don't understand that. -- Regards, Adriana. [ put out the rubbish if you need to reach me by e-mail ] www.spinsister.nl Current version is 4.2.10.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB lagging?
Hi On Sunday 30 August 2009 at 12:55:18 PM, in mid:mn.f3437d985f53495b.33...@bigfoot.com, A.Translator wrote: Thanks for setting it out so clearly, but why tick both Use folder specific deletion settings whic leads to the folder in the Archives and 'Alternative deletion' 'Move to the specified folder' ? I don't understand that. Ticking Use folder specific deletion settings is needed so that the deletion options are available to use. You then specify what those settings are. The messages more than your stated number of days old will be purged from the folder and you want them moved to an archive folder, not put in trash or simply deleted. You could put the destination folder for your archived messages under normal deletion instead of under alternative deletion and not tick Use alternative deletion for purging this folder. Then any message you selected and hit DELETE (without SHIFT) would be archived as well. Depends on what behaviour you want - I probably would forget to press SHIFT when deleting, so I'd end up archiving some spam as well. -- Best regards MFPA Volvo, Video, Velcro. (I came, I saw, I stuck around.) Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current version is 4.2.10.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB lagging?
You could put the destination folder for your archived messages under normal deletion instead of under alternative deletion and not tick Use alternative deletion for purging this folder. Then any message you selected and hit DELETE (without SHIFT) would be archived as well. Depends on what behaviour you want - I probably would forget to press SHIFT when deleting, so I'd end up archiving some spam as well. Thanks for clarifying that. I have it all set up now. -- Regards, Adriana. [ put out the rubbish if you need to reach me by e-mail ] www.spinsister.nl Current version is 4.2.10.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB lagging?
Hi, Sunday, August 30, 2009, 3:14:22 AM,expires2...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: Cool. Just passing on info others passed to me on this list, along with a little of my own experience. (-; This really made my week, as I was seriously thinking I would have to migrate to a different email program and didn't really want to after being so used the TB for ages. So, huge thanks for taking the time to explain the whole process! :) My All Outgoing - Archive it filter has the condition Any message and the action Copy to the folder \\Archived_Messages\Sent Mail Got that working too, now! Thanks again! Correct. The messages will still be moved/copied to the Archive account but TB! will not waste time and resources loading the message base for the folders in that account unless you sign into it. Perfect! :) -- Best regards, Susannemailto:sisk...@gmail.com Using The Bat! 4.2.6 OS: Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.10.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB lagging?
On Saturday, August 29, 2009, 2:59:55, Susanne wrote: Is there actually a limit to how many messages TB can hold without getting slowed down? My experience is to keep under 15.000 messages in folders I regularly use. I've got deletion for these folders set up to move the messages to an Archive subfolder, which keeps TB fast, and I still get to keep my history. -- Jernej Simončič http://eternallybored.org/ There is a solution to every problem; the only difficulty is finding it. -- Nef's Law Current version is 4.2.10.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB lagging?
Hello Susanne, Saturday, August 29, 2009, at 1:46:01 AM, Susanne wrote: S S Hi, S Friday, August 28, 2009, 10:42:36 AM,jernej.listso...@ena.si wrote: I suggest you first look at disk activity while TB is switching between messages, and also try compressing the message base through Folder - Maintainance Centre. S I do this every time I close TB. Also, how many messages do you have in folders? S Many, about 100.000. S What I just noticed is that TB doesn't show up in S the Windows Task Manager as a running process, and S when I click on anything in TB, *that* process S then shows up as Not responding in the task S manager during the lag time. S CPU usage is at 3-5% at that time, then briefly S jumps to around 20% when TB finally reponds. DO you need to have access all the time to 10 msg's??? I would recommend exporting what's not needed normally and put the rest in a program not getting email's every day. Essentially with many messages involved you are asking for a crash which will also solve your problem -- tracer Using The Bat! v4.2.9.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 with AntiSpamSniper Version FREE Current version is 4.2.10.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB lagging?
Guten Tag Susanne, am Samstag, 29. August 2009 um 02:59 schrieben Sie: Is there actually a limit to how many messages TB can hold without getting slowed down? This depens on the Performance of the System, in earlier times i once imported 65000 Mails which has been famous this time and TB worked slow but still working. Today i see that in the Virtual Machine i should not have more than 1000 Mails in one Folder, specially the Inbox should be very small. I move and sort all Messages to Folders and the most slow Folder ist the OLDmail Folder with 5000 Mails (Backup every some month). I think you could play around with it, if your System is a newer one i would expect it to work without breaks with around 1 Mails in one Folder (i am talking about an actual Core-Duo 2000/3000 MHz with 3 Gb RAM) -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Jens Franik mailto:je...@gmx.de The Bat! 4.2.10.7 + AntiSpamSniper 3.2.1.1 + Gaijin XMP Makro Plugin 1.2 Language-File-Checksum: E8E56F88 Windows XP 5.1 build 2600 Service Pack 2 AMD Athlon Dual Core 4850e 2,50 GHz, 4 GB RAM Debian Lenny + Windows XP @VirtualBox 3.0.4 r50677 non-OSE 8 POP3 Accounts - 1 IMAP - 170 (Common) Folders - about 10 Messages Current version is 4.2.10.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB lagging?
Hi On Saturday 29 August 2009 at 3:35:39 PM, in mid:931636849.20090829213...@gmail.com, tracer wrote: DO you need to have access all the time to 10 msg's??? I would recommend exporting what's not needed normally and put the rest in a program not getting email's every day. I would suggest instead to archive them within TB! in a password-protected archive account(s). That way, they are always easily to hand when you are using TB! but never actually get loaded unless you enter the password to go into the archive account. This is based on the method suggested to me on this list 2 or 3 years ago by MAU. - Archived_Messages account duplicates the folder tree structure of my main account. Actually, it just duplicates the folder I want to archive. - In the Properties/General of each of the folders of my main account that I want to archive, I tick the option 'Keep messages in the base for (days)' and enter the number of days. - In Properties/Deletion, I tick the 'Use folder specific deletion settings' option. - Then, for 'Alternative deletion' I select 'Move to the specified folder' and, of course, I browse to select the corresponding folder in the 'Archived_Messages account'. - And also tick the box for 'Use alternative deletion for purging this folder'. - And in the Properties/Additional tab under on exit I tick both Remove old messages and compress the folder. As I have said, I do this for each the folder I want to archive. Now, when every night I close down TB!, the 'old messages' in each folder are automagically moved to the corresponding folder in the Archived_Messages account. What's the benefit of doing this? Well, as I said at the beginning, the Archived_Messages account is password protected. When you start TB, it will not open any password protected account and 'waste time' in opening each of it folders. Only when I need to find an archived message will I select my Archived_Messages account, enter the password and open it. One other thing I do to easily remember which folders I have set up for 'automatic archiving' is to assign these folders to an 'Archive Colour Group' (blue in my case). This way, I can easily see in my folder tree which folders have an corresponding archive one. If your sent messages live in the default Sent Mail folders, a slightly different strategy is needed because the Sent Mail folders don't have half of the required options available in their Properties dialogue. To get around this, I simply have a common outgoing filter that copies all outgoing messages to the Sent Mail folder in my Archived_Messages account. The original account sent mail folders are set to keep messages for N days and to remove old messages and compress on exit. My Archived_Messages account contains over 120,000 messages and sits at 2.15 GB with no performance hit on TB! -- Best regards MFPA A nod is as good as a wink to a blind bat! Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current version is 4.2.10.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB lagging?
On Saturday, August 29, 2009, 11:52:44 AM, MFPA wrote: I would suggest instead to archive them within TB! in a password-protected archive account(s). That way, they are always easily to hand when you are using TB! but never actually get loaded unless you enter the password to go into the archive account. This is working for me as well. I just checked, and have nearly 300,000 messages in my archive account. -- Dwight A. Corrin 316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax dcorrin at fastmail.fm photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com photo blog at http://dcorrin.aminus3.com http://photos.vfxy.com/photoblogs/5882 Using IMAP with The Bat! 4.2.10.7 on Windows Vista version 6,0 (Service Pack 1) Current version is 4.2.10.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB lagging?
Hi, Saturday, August 29, 2009, 9:52:44 AM,expires2...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: I would suggest instead to archive them within TB! in a password-protected archive account(s). That way, they are always easily to hand when you are using TB! but never actually get loaded unless you enter the password to go into the archive account. Thanks so much for the detailed instructions! It sounds like the perfect solution for me! I just have a question how to create the Archived Messages account: Do you just use the same data you use for setting up the main account when going through the set-up process? Or some random information? -- Best regards, Susannemailto:sisk...@gmail.com Using The Bat! 4.2.6 OS: Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.10.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB lagging?
Hi, Saturday, August 29, 2009, 3:24:14 AM,jernej.listso...@ena.si wrote: to move the messages to an Archive subfolder Archiving in some way sounds like the solution! Thanks. -- Best regards, Susannemailto:sisk...@gmail.com Using The Bat! 4.2.6 OS: Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.10.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB lagging?
On Saturday, August 29, 2009, 12:54:21 PM, Susanne wrote: Do you just use the same data you use for setting up the main account when going through the set-up process? Or some random information? just random info. my servers are set as notone.com, might make sure check mail on start up is NOT checked, and also tick IGNORE 'CHECK ALL ACCOUNTS' REQUEST -- Dwight A. Corrin 316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax dcorrin at fastmail.fm photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com photo blog at http://dcorrin.aminus3.com http://photos.vfxy.com/photoblogs/5882 Using IMAP with The Bat! 4.2.10.7 on Windows Vista version 6,0 (Service Pack 1) Current version is 4.2.10.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB lagging?
Hi, Saturday, August 29, 2009, 9:52:44 AM,expires2...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: To get around this, I simply have a common outgoing filter that copies all outgoing messages to the Sent Mail folder in my Archived_Messages account. The original account sent mail folders are set to keep messages for N days and to remove old messages and compress on exit. So far everything works beautifully (thanks so much! TB is fast again!), except the Sent Mail part. For some reason my common filter doesn't work, but I'm sure it's just me missing a condition, or something. Any ideas? :) And just to make sure I understand this correctly: I don't have to be signed in to the Archive account, for all these settings to work, right? For the setting up process, I did have to sign in. Otherwise the account didn't show up as an option in the list to copy messages to. -- Best regards, Susannemailto:sisk...@gmail.com Using The Bat! 4.2.6 OS: Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.10.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB lagging?
Hi, Saturday, August 29, 2009, 11:39:12 AM,dcor...@fastmail.fm wrote: just random info. my servers are set as notone.com, might make sure check mail on start up is NOT checked, and also tick IGNORE 'CHECK ALL ACCOUNTS' REQUEST Thanks! Have done that and set up the main folders I want to archive. -- Best regards, Susannemailto:sisk...@gmail.com Using The Bat! 4.2.6 OS: Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.10.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB lagging?
Hello Tbudl, I use normally one of the amber abc programs to store unwanted or at least not immediately wanted email's. There are 2 programs (one is free) for the Bat. And many many others. just stick amber abc in google, its nr 1... -- tracer Using The Bat! v4.2.9.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 with AntiSpamSniper Version FREE Current version is 4.2.10.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
TB lagging?
Hi, I've noticed this ever since I upgraded to version 4 and it's not a constant problem, but often enough that it's really annoying. When I switch from one message to the next, or from one folder to another, or hit delete (or pretty much any command), it can take up to 10 seconds before TB responds. It's gotten to the point where I'm so frustrated with this, that I'm contemplating another email client, and I've been happy with TB for ages (since version 1). No other programs on my pc are affected, this can happen even when cpu usage is at 2%, and I have no other programs open. Could it be a software conflict, and if it is, how do I track it down without uninstalling everything else? -- Best regards, Susannemailto:sisk...@gmail.com Using The Bat! 4.2.6 OS: Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.10.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB lagging?
On Friday, August 28, 2009, 19:28:48, Susanne wrote: Could it be a software conflict, and if it is, how do I track it down without uninstalling everything else? I suggest you first look at disk activity while TB is switching between messages, and also try compressing the message base through Folder - Maintainance Centre. Also, how many messages do you have in folders? -- Jernej Simončič http://eternallybored.org/ Buttered bread tends to fall with the buttered side down. -- Bernstein's First Law Current version is 4.2.10.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB lagging?
Hi, Friday, August 28, 2009, 10:42:36 AM,jernej.listso...@ena.si wrote: I suggest you first look at disk activity while TB is switching between messages, and also try compressing the message base through Folder - Maintainance Centre. I do this every time I close TB. Also, how many messages do you have in folders? Many, about 100.000. What I just noticed is that TB doesn't show up in the Windows Task Manager as a running process, and when I click on anything in TB, *that* process then shows up as Not responding in the task manager during the lag time. CPU usage is at 3-5% at that time, then briefly jumps to around 20% when TB finally reponds. -- Best regards, Susannemailto:sisk...@gmail.com Using The Bat! 4.2.6 OS: Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.10.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB lagging?
On Friday, August 28, 2009, 20:46:01, Susanne wrote: Many, about 100.000. This might be a problem, especially if you use any kind of threading. I noticed that TB gets significantly slower (from almost instantly to over 2 seconds) when switching to folders that contain more than ~15.000 messages, although at least for me, once the folder is displayed, TB switched between messages instantly. How fragmented are your message bases? When you have this many messages in a folder, disk fragmentation becomes an important factor, too. -- Jernej Simončič http://eternallybored.org/ Experience varies directly with the equipment ruined. -- RB's Five-Thumbs Postulate Current version is 4.2.10.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB lagging?
Guten Tag Susanne, am Freitag, 28. August 2009 um 19:28 schrieben Sie: it can take up to 10 seconds before TB responds. I have The Bat! inside a virtualBox Machine and i see this more than detailed - it happens, if the Folder has more than some tousands of eMails stored, if you try the same in a Folder with some hundreds of emails it should not happen like this - can you confirm? -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Jens Franik mailto:je...@gmx.de The Bat! 4.2.10.7 + AntiSpamSniper 3.2.1.1 + Gaijin XMP Makro Plugin 1.2 Language-File-Checksum: E8E56F88 Windows XP 5.1 build 2600 Service Pack 2 AMD Athlon Dual Core 4850e 2,50 GHz, 4 GB RAM Debian Lenny + Windows XP @VirtualBox 3.0.4 r50677 non-OSE 8 POP3 Accounts - 1 IMAP - 170 (Common) Folders - about 10 Messages Current version is 4.2.10.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB lagging?
Hi, Friday, August 28, 2009, 12:01:27 PM,jernej.listso...@ena.si wrote: This might be a problem, especially if you use any kind of threading. I noticed that TB gets significantly slower (from almost instantly to over 2 seconds) when switching to folders that contain more than ~15.000 messages, although at least for me, once the folder is displayed, TB switched between messages instantly. I don't use threading at all, and when the lag happens, it doesn't matter what I try to do. What makes me wonder is why TB doesn't show up as a running program in the Task Manager anymore. I know it used to. Is this something the newer version does, or is it part of the problem. How fragmented are your message bases? When you have this many messages in a folder, disk fragmentation becomes an important factor, too. No idea how fragmented they are. I do regular defrag on the hard drive, but am not sure if that's what you mean. -- Best regards, Susannemailto:sisk...@gmail.com Using The Bat! 4.2.6 OS: Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.10.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB lagging?
Hi On Saturday 29 August 2009 at 1:37:20 AM, in mid:146451243.20090828173...@gmail.com, Susanne wrote: What makes me wonder is why TB doesn't show up as a running program in the Task Manager anymore. Shows up twice in mine. You want to borrow one? -- Best regards MFPA Nothing a Pan-Galactic Gargle Blaster won't cure! Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current version is 4.2.10.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB lagging?
Hi, Friday, August 28, 2009, 5:46:56 PM,expires2...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: Shows up twice in mine. You want to borrow one? Sure! Send it on over! *g* I've ruthlessly thrown out a bunch of mail that I'll most likely never miss (am an email pack rat, apparently) and things seem a bit speedier. Or maybe it's just one of the good phases right now. Is there actually a limit to how many messages TB can hold without getting slowed down? -- Best regards, Susannemailto:sisk...@gmail.com Using The Bat! 4.2.6 OS: Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.10.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB lagging?
Test for On--- On Friday, August 28, 2009, at 7:59:55 PM, Susanne wrote: I've ruthlessly thrown out a bunch of mail that I'll most likely never miss (am an email pack rat, apparently) and things seem a bit speedier. FWIW, when you get that (not responding) tag in the Task Manager, it means that that specific process isn't processing events the way that Windows is designed to do. I encounter it from time to time on my old Win98SE systems, usually from my browser (Opera 9), but I believe that the actual culprit is the o/s itself, which is attempting to do a disk read and has disabled interruption during what's supposed to be a very short time but which is actually stretching out to several minutes instead of only a few microseconds. The large number of reads required by your huge mail folders can certainly increase the odds of this happening, but it's also possible that your hard disk is preparing for forced retirement in the not too distant future! -- Jim Kyle Using The Bat! v4.0.34 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 on VMWare Server 2 under Xubuntu 8.04.3 with AntiSpamSniper Version 3.0.1.2 Current version is 4.2.10.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB lagging?
Hello Susanne, On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:59:55 -0700 GMT (29/Aug/09, 7:59 AM +0700 GMT), Susanne wrote: S Is there actually a limit to how many messages TB S can hold without getting slowed down? It's not the number of messages but the size, if I am not mistaken. Also I had the same problem with one folder, and no amount of deleting and compacting worked. I created another folder, copied all messages over from within TB!, exited TB! and deleted the messages.tbb and .tbi, and reopend TB!. Then copied the messages back. Another problem might be cause by your anti-virus scanner: When you access a big file (like messages.tbb) it gets scanned on-access and that takes time. So, you can exclude the mail folder from the on-access scan. Oh, and the limit for messages.tbb is 2 GB. TB! will send you a warning when you come close to that size. There should be no reason to have 2 GB worth of mail in one folder. -- Cheers, Thomas. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.2.10.6 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.10.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB lagging?
Hi, Friday, August 28, 2009, 7:47:05 PM,j...@jimkyle.com wrote: but it's also possible that your hard disk is preparing for forced retirement in the not too distant future! I sure hope not, since this is a fairly new computer, but if it happens, I'll have daily back-ups. Since it's only TB that is having problems, I suspect it has more to do with the large number of mails I keep. I'll see if my clean-up action has a lasting effect! -- Best regards, Susannemailto:sisk...@gmail.com Using The Bat! 4.2.6 OS: Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.10.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB lagging?
Hi, Friday, August 28, 2009, 8:11:03 PM,thomas.gm...@gmx.net wrote: So, you can exclude the mail folder from the on-access scan. I'll check into that and see if my free AVG has advanced settings for that! Oh, and the limit for messages.tbb is 2 GB. TB! will send you a warning when you come close to that size. No warnings yet, but I've whittled things down quite a bit and will watch how it goes. -- Best regards, Susannemailto:sisk...@gmail.com Using The Bat! 4.2.6 OS: Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.10.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
