Re: [TruthTalk] Person

2006-03-09 Thread Blainerb473




Hey you guys, all you do is argue and do put-downs, or so it seems at 
least. I am giving up TT for a while, since all I have been doing lately 
is delete, delete, delete! Also, I am changing my web server, so I may be 
back, but I seriously have to ask myself, "For What?" Been nice arguing 
with you guys, especially Kevin, and I see he's back, so maybe I will make it 
back too. Take Care,
Blainerb


In a message dated 3/9/2006 9:23:47 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Coming 
  from a Master Cryptologist I thought you really enjoyed the cryptic messages 
  passed from within the deep dark caverns of the "community of real 
  crypto believers" Incidently, is Gary the high priest and pinnacle of 
  community communication?Kevin Deegan 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
  
MayI quote?
"This seems 
to be a real problem for you. All kidding aside would you attempt to help me 
understand you better on this? Do you believe that one cannot be a believer 
yet convinced that the right is wrong?"

Part 2
Please fill us in on your enjoyment of 
GT
Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

  
  I should have know better than to suggest 
  thinking. Shame on me! Do you enjoy saying nothing about 
  something?
  
- 
Original Message - 
From: 
Kevin Deegan 
To: 
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 

Sent: 
March 09, 2006 08:42
Subject: 
Re: [TruthTalk] Person

There you go refering us to your "bibLe" again

Why would I not find such import displayed in the HOLY BIBLE?
Why do I need to go to those that ( IYO ) may or 
may not have REAL TRUTH
Your philosophy is SELF-REFUTINGLance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

  
  

  It is apparent to all that I'm no match 
  for such as Dean, Kevin and, Judy. I'm just not in their league. 
  Therefore.NO, I'm not leaving! I'd only suggest that 
  you look up the discussion on the above as it took place in the 
  history of the 'believing community'. You needn't and, probably won't, 
  agree. It might however, give you some sense of the import attached to 
  it vis a vis 
  Jesus.




Re: [TruthTalk] Behind the scenes conversations re:David Miller

2006-02-17 Thread Blainerb473





cd wrote:2. The power which 
celestial bodies are supposed to exert on terrestrial; as the influence 
of the planets on the birth and fortunes of men; an exploded doctrine of 
astrology.

Blainerb: The heavens do not compel or even 
influence, they symbolize--they are the handwriting of God, showing us 
his glory and his wisdom. Some ancient people actually worshipped planets, 
stars, constellations, as if they were gods--but the truly wise, such as the 
wise men who followed the star to find the Messiah and worship him, will find 
the heavens all testify of the truths of Christ--as do all things. Your 
wisdom, cd, is from what you perceive as being popular and widely 
accepted. The truth is seldom that. 
Blainerb

In a message dated 2/15/2006 4:37:11 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  cd: David my 
  advice- for what its worth- is to leave this astrology garbage alone -as God 
  said to do.
  
  2. The power which celestial bodies are 
  supposed to exert on terrestrial; as the influence of the planets on the birth 
  and fortunes of men; an exploded doctrine of astrology.
  
  a 46:9 Remember the former things of old: for I am God, and there is none else; I am God, and 
  there is none like me, 
  Isa 46:10 Declaring 
  the end from 
  the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not 
  yet 
  done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure: 
  
  Deu 4:19 And lest thou lift up thine eyes unto heaven, and when thou seest the 
  sun, and the moon, and the stars, 
  even all the 
  host of heaven, shouldest be driven to worship them, and serve them, which the 
  LORD thy God hath divided unto all nations under the whole heaven. 
  
  




Re: [TruthTalk] Behind the scenes conversations re:David Miller

2006-02-17 Thread Blainerb473




In a message dated 2/15/2006 6:23:13 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
cd: I am 
  surprised and disappointed that you would be any part of this 
  sinDavid.

cd, 
If what you say is correct, the wise men of the east who used astrological 
symbolism to locate the birth place of Christ were sinners. Maybe 
you need to review what the Bible really says--between the lines, at 
least.
Blainerb


Re: [TruthTalk] Behind the scenes conversations re:David Miller

2006-02-15 Thread Blainerb473



In a message dated 2/13/2006 3:55:37 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Funny. I just don't see David as ever having been young. 
  :-)
  
  jd
  
  -- 
Original message -- From: "David Miller" 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  You guys are just upset you didn't 
get ahold of me when I was young and  ignorant. Maybe if you had 
encountered me when I was 8, you could have  played me like 
playdough.   Surely you both understand that if I appear 
incorrect and immoveable to you,  then you likely appear incorrect 
and immoveable to me. It works both ways.  It is the nature of one 
who studies and forms opinions. The godly will  consider such 
comments as a compliment concerning integrity, so thank you  for the 
compliment. :-)   David Miller   p.s. Blaine... my astrological sign is pices. I guess that 
astrology isn't  helping you be too predictive after all. 
:-) 

Thank you David, I have wondered about that. Pisces 
is my opposite sign, and, being the sign of transition 
from Winter to Spring, is next to Aries,the sign that ushers in Springtime 
(1st degree Aries is also the first day of Spring). I believe all things are written in the stars--the 
trick is in reading them accurately.:) I try, and 
sometimes get pretty close to people by doing so. But humans are so 
complex!! Astrology helps, but is not, of course, infallible. But 
thanks for being open--lots of people will not divulge their birth info to me, 
probably think by doing so I might form unjustified opinions of them. 
:)

One thing, though, without precise birth info--date, time of day, and place 
of birth--you can't tell too much beyond generalities. The beauty of precise 
astrological analysis is that no two personalities can ever be the same--not 
even identical twins--which is a reality check for astrology few people 
understand.
Blainer


 - Original Message -  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] il.innglory.org  Sent: Monday, February 13, 
2006 2:07 PM  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Behind the scenes conversations 
re:David Miller   In a message dated 2/13/2006 12:02:28 P.M. 
Mountain Standard Time,  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:   
I've not forgotten you, David. IMO, you are both incorrect and immoveable on 
 at least a portion of that which is under discussion. What I've got to 
 determine is whether or not it is worth the 'ink' to engage further 
with you  given what I've just said. I'm checking around with some 
who've read you  over time.   Lance.   
Yes, David is pretty fixed--he was probably born under one of the four fixed 
 signs--Leo, Taurus, Scorpio, or Aquarius. Or, he's one of those highly 
 independent Aries characters, who never admit to being wrong!! If I 
knew  for sure, I could read him better.  Blainerb  
 --  "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned 
with salt, that you may know how  you ought to answer every man." 
(Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org   If you do not want to 
receive posts from this list, send an email to  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend 
 who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and  he will be subscribed. 




Re: [TruthTalk] Behind the scenes conversations re:David Miller

2006-02-13 Thread Blainerb473




In a message dated 2/13/2006 12:02:28 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  I've not forgotten you, David. IMO, you are both 
  incorrect and immoveable on at least a portion of that which is under 
  discussion. What I've got to determine is whether or not it is worth the 'ink' 
  to engage further with you given what I've just said. I'm checking around with 
  some who've read you over time.
  
  Lance. 

Yes, David is pretty fixed--he was probably born underone of the four 
fixed signs--Leo, Taurus, Scorpio, or Aquarius.Or, he's one of those 
highly independent Aries characters, who never admit to being wrong!! If I 
knew for sure, I could read him better. 
Blainerb


Re: [TruthTalk] Something to think about

2006-01-19 Thread Blainerb473




In a message dated 1/19/2006 8:13:01 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Isn't this a form of what the Mormon Church teaches 
  Lance? 
  Theirs is a flesh religion and 
  theyhave noproblems with purity and holiness
  Same with the so called "Church fathers" or 
  patriarchs who came up with the pronouncements
  this generation mindlessly 
  parrots.

Judy, what are you trying to say, here, as you carelessly toss your 
half-formed ideas around? Flesh religion? What does that mean? 
And what does it mean we have "no problems with purity and 
holiness?" If you are speaking as an authority on Mormon religious 
thought,aren't you just a little out of your field?
Blainerb
 


Re: [TruthTalk] Something to think about

2006-01-19 Thread Blainerb473




In a message dated 1/19/2006 8:34:35 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  They do, their stance is that man is progressing 
  toward godhood as they do what the church says and 
  
  that basically God is a man from the planet 
  Kolob. Where in the Bible are we told 
that

Nowhere in the Bible, norare we toldthat in any Mormon 
scripture. Judy, you're totally out of it! Your ignorance is bliss, 
maybe, huh? No Mormon believes God is a man from 
Kolob.No one lives on Kolob, as far as anyone knows, since it 
revolves on its axis only once per 1000 years.It is NEAR where God 
resides, not WHERE he resides. Its function as 
a huge, controlling planet was revealed to Abraham, as he sought to understand 
the workings of the universe. You do not give us much 
credit for smarts, is all I can say:( 
By the way, were you aware the Milky Way Galaxyrevolves, spins, like 
a giant, 4th of Julypin wheel? Around what, can you tell 
us?What causes it to spin? Maybe your Bible can tell 
us--or maybe you can do that . . . Obviously, the Bible does not have the 
answer to everything, and I doubt you do either. 
Blainerb


Re: [TruthTalk] TT's ??

2006-01-18 Thread Blainerb473



In a message dated 1/18/2006 4:24:50 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
  Sent: 1/17/2006 8:05:17 PM 
  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] TT's ??
  
  Soo, Dean, you believe in a pre-existence after all, at least for 
  Jesus Christ. What about the rest of us, do you think we were there too, 
  looking on , wide-eyed and open mouthed at what was taking place? What 
  about this part of your quote?:
  
  :Pro 8:31 Rejoicing in the habitable part of his earth; 
  and my delights 
  were with the sons of men.
  
  Blainerb
  
  cd: Yes Christ pre-existed but man was created after 
  the earth. Rejoicing in 
  the habitable part of his earth; and my delights 
  were with the sons of 
  men

Dean, the gist of your entire set of quotes is talking about 
the pre-existence--why would just that one depart from the rest of them in 
meaning?
Blainerb 




Re: [TruthTalk] TT's ??

2006-01-18 Thread Blainerb473




In a message dated 1/18/2006 3:29:27 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Thanks for your input Dean;
  I have no problem with Jesus having a human flesh 
  body... but I havea "huge" insurmountable problem 
  with the idea that Mary's child, the one called by 
  the angel "the holy pure sinless offspring" born of her 
  and called the Son of God" (Luke 1:36 Amp) 
  ATSThad a "fallen" Adamic nature. Make no mistake 
this
  is nothing more than speculation by religious men who 
  have no understanding about spiritual 
realities.

Don't mean to butt in, but what about the passage that describes Christ as 
being "tempted in all things, yet sinless?" How can a man be tempted, if 
he has none of the fallen nature within himself to be tempted? Also, 
before he began his ministry, Jesus was commanded to go into the wilderness to 
fast for forty days and nights (the same as with Moses on the mountain of 
revelation). Why the need to purify himself, if there was not a fallen 
nature to purify? 


Re: [TruthTalk] I've sent an email to 'Wonder Woman'. I await her replay.

2006-01-17 Thread Blainerb473



In a message dated 1/17/2006 8:23:02 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Don't hold your breath. I'm also checking for the 
  Bat signal should WW be unavailable.
Ha! Good oner, Lancer.

Blainer


Re: [TruthTalk] TT's ??

2006-01-17 Thread Blainerb473




Soo, Dean, you believe in a pre-existence after all, at least for 
Jesus Christ. What about the rest of us, do you think we were there too, 
looking on , wide-eyed and open mouthed at what was taking place? What 
about this part of your quote?:

:Pro 8:31 Rejoicing in the habitable part of his earth; 
and my delights 
were with the sons of men.

Blainerb


In a message dated 1/17/2006 6:00:29 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  cd: Maybe to better understand Christ in the flesh-Maybe we 
  should focus on whatHe was before the Flesh?For that I offer 
  Proverbs 8:22-36
  
  
  Pro 8:22 The LORD possessed me in the beginning of his 
  way, before his works of old. 
  Pro 8:23 I was set up from everlasting, from the 
  beginning, or ever the earth was. 
  Pro 8:24 When there were no depths, I was brought forth; when 
  there 
  were no fountains 
  abounding with water. 
  Pro 8:25 Before the mountains were settled, before the 
  hills was I brought forth: 
  Pro 8:26 While as yet he had not made the earth, nor 
  the fields, nor the highest part of the dust of the world. 
  Pro 8:27 When he prepared the heavens, I 
  was there: when 
  he set a compass upon the face of the depth: 
  Pro 8:28 When he established the clouds above: when he 
  strengthened the fountains of the deep: 
  Pro 8:29 When he gave to the sea his decree, that the 
  waters should not pass his commandment: when he appointed the foundations of 
  the earth: 
  Pro 8:30 Then I was by him, as one brought up with him: and I was daily 
  his delight, 
  rejoicing always before him; 
  Pro 8:31 Rejoicing in the habitable part of his earth; 
  and my delights were with the sons of men. 
  Pro 8:32 Now therefore hearken unto me, O ye children: 
  for blessed are 
  they 
  that keep my 
  ways. 
  Pro 8:33 Hear instruction, and be wise, and refuse it 
  not. 
  Pro 8:34 Blessed is the man that heareth me, watching daily at 
  my gates, waiting at the posts of my doors. 
  Pro 8:35 For whoso findeth me findeth life, and shall 
  obtain favor of the LORD. 
  Pro 8:36 But he that sinneth against me wrongeth his 
  own soul: all they that hate me love death. 
  




Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Mormon doctrine (of atonement)

2006-01-12 Thread Blainerb473




Generally, your message is not too far off, I think, but a little 
over-simplified. :)
Blainerb

In a message dated 1/12/2006 5:45:55 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  cd: Blaine-in my opinion-AE were failures who allowed a 
  Horrible monster loose on this world and uncountable billions are suffering in 
  torment-even the verycreatures on the earthitself are suffering 
  also. Jesus Christ came and bound the horrible Monster by allowing the sin to 
  come upon him and then paid the price the Father demanded for that sin. Note a 
  bad thing got loose-Jesus caught the bad thing and now we have a chance to 
  fellowship with God. The sin or bad thing is not or every will be good and no 
  good will ever come from this bad thing(sin)-to think so is to think foolishly 
  as all have done soat one time, but now this foolishness can be laid aside for 
  righteousness (ie. right by God's law or the Law Christ brought if you 
  prefer.).
  
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: 

To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/11/2006 11:21:06 PM 
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] 
Mormon doctrine (of atonement)



Blainerb:Below 
are all more or less Mormon doctrines relating to the Atonement--but you 
will have to think/contemplate on these things to understand them: 


Here's 
the deal as I understand it: Although Adam and Eve were real 
people, Adamwas a type or similitudeof Christ--the Bridegroom, 
and Evewas a type or similitudeof the Church--the 
Bride.Adam and Evehad together entered into a covenant 
relationship of marriage, and just as Adam took upon himself sin in order 
thathe might not be separated from Eve, so Christ took upon himself 
the sins of the Church, in order that the Church (the Bride) might not 
become separated from Him.
This symbolism/reasoning tells us that the atonement 
was primarily to bring abouta reconciliation between Christ, the 
Bridegroom,and the Bride, or members of the Church, who are in a covenant relationship with Christ, similar to 
marriage.(See the parable of the ten virgins 
also.) 
Others 
outside the covenant relationship will benefit from the grace or, in other words, good 
will of Christ, but may not reap full benefits from the atonement, 
simply because they are not in a covenant relationship with 
him. Christ may well give them side-benefits, one of 
which is immortality, but since they have no promise, only his good will 
operates in their behalf. There is no, "If you will keep my 
commandments, then I will give you glory, immortality, and eternal 
lives." There is only his good will, and his love, and his desire to 
see all justly and mercifully dealt with.
Simply 
put, in the very words of Christ, "Greater love hath no 
man than this--that he give his life for his 
friends. Ye are my friends, if you keep my 
commandments." 
Only those who have kept his commandments, and 
fulfilled the terms of the covenant/contract (have kept their lamps trimmed 
and filled with the oil of obedience), will reap full 
benefits. Baptism by one having authority, by the way, is 
believed by Mormons to be one of these terms. :)



From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org ; 
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 

Sent: January 10, 2006 08:04
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Mormon 
doctrine

Yes I have. And, over the years, your contribution has not help 
. For example -- what is the official Mormon teaching on the 
atonement of Christ? I have asked that question before, here on 
TT. The answer? Must be under the pickle!! 

I am beginning to believe that there is no Mormon teaching on the 
atonement of Christ save for the claim that the price was paid in the Garden 
!! 

Help.

jd

  
  
  
  
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Lance Muir 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/10/2006 8:30:56 AM 
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] 
Mormon doctrine

If the 'Mormon Jesus' is comparable to 
Rudolph the red nosed reindeer who 'saved' the day for Santa one dark 
night then belief in such an one is pointless. DM appears to perceive 
little difference between his Jesus and DH's Jesus? 
CD: They are as both are Idols.

  - Original Message - 







Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Mormon doctrine (of atonement)

2006-01-11 Thread Blainerb473





Blainerb:Below 
are all more or less Mormon doctrines relating to the Atonement--but you will 
have to think/contemplate on these things to understand them: 

Here's 
the deal as I understand it: Although Adam and Eve were real 
people, Adamwas a type or similitudeof Christ--the Bridegroom, and 
Evewas a type or similitudeof the Church--the 
Bride.Adam and Evehad together entered into a covenant 
relationship of marriage, and just as Adam took upon himself sin in order 
thathe might not be separated from Eve, so Christ took upon himself the 
sins of the Church, in order that the Church (the Bride) might not become 
separated from Him.
This symbolism/reasoning tells us that the atonement was 
primarily to bring abouta reconciliation between Christ, the 
Bridegroom,and the Bride, or members of the Church, who 
are in a covenant relationship with Christ, similar to 
marriage.(See the parable of the ten virgins 
also.) 
Others 
outside the covenant relationship will benefit from the grace or, in other words, good 
will of Christ, but may not reap full benefits from the atonement, simply 
because they are not in a covenant relationship with him. 
Christ may well give them side-benefits, one of which is immortality, 
but since they have no promise, only his good will operates in their 
behalf. There is no, "If you will keep my commandments, then I will give 
you glory, immortality, and eternal lives." There is only his good will, 
and his love, and his desire to see all justly and mercifully dealt 
with.
Simply 
put, in the very words of Christ, "Greater love hath no man 
than this--that he give his life for his friends. Ye 
are my friends, if you keep my 
commandments." 
Only those who have kept his commandments, and fulfilled 
the terms of the covenant/contract (have kept their lamps trimmed and filled 
with the oil of obedience), will reap full benefits. Baptism 
by one having authority, by the way, is believed by Mormons to be one of 
these terms. :)



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org ; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
Sent: January 10, 2006 08:04
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Mormon 
doctrine

Yes I have. And, over the years, your contribution has not help 
. For example -- what is the official Mormon teaching on the 
atonement of Christ? I have asked that question before, here on TT. 
The answer? Must be under the pickle!! 

I am beginning to believe that there is no Mormon teaching on the atonement 
of Christ save for the claim that the price was paid in the Garden !! 


Help.

jd

  
  
  
  
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Lance Muir 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/10/2006 8:30:56 AM 
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] 
Mormon doctrine

If the 'Mormon Jesus' is comparable to Rudolph 
the red nosed reindeer who 'saved' the day for Santa one dark night then 
belief in such an one is pointless. DM appears to perceive little difference 
between his Jesus and DH's Jesus? 
CD: They are as both are Idols.

  - Original Message - 





Re: [TruthTalk] Mormon doctrine

2006-01-11 Thread Blainerb473






In a message dated 1/11/2006 6:48:15 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  OK Go to the corner for some down 
  time, David.


  Ha Ha! I love 
  it!! Blainerb
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Judy Taylor 
To: truthtalk@mail.innglory.org 

Sent: January 11, 2006 08:40
Subject: [TruthTalk] Mormon 
doctrine

Why not give David a rest Lance; you know as well 
as me that we have
been over and over Greek verbs and present/passive 
tense ad nauseam
and a lot of what I have written has been either 
rejected or made suspect
by someone's perception ofGreek.

David's _expression_ 'personally, I'm not so sure that...' is one he 
employs often. He does so rather than simply say 'Judy's position is my 
position'. I'm not so sure that this is not the case

.From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Judy wrote: ... they can not know God or His Word 
unless they are Greek scholars and know every little 
translational nuance. John wrote: More ad hom 
and in this case a flasehood Please try to leave some of the 
moderation to the moderator. This is not  an ad 
hominem argument. Discuss it in private if you disagree. Judy is 
 simply communicating what she perceives how some of the 
intellectuals on this  forum come across to her. If 
her perception is faulty, please try to correct it without attacking 
her. Teach her in meekness and humility. Personally,  
I'm not so sure she is too far off base with this 
characterization. We will know the truth of it by how the 
intellectuals respond. David 
Miller.




Re: [TruthTalk] Mormon doctrine

2006-01-11 Thread Blainerb473




In a message dated 1/11/2006 6:49:14 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The majority of your questions reflect a great deal of 
  'absence of forethought', Judy.

LOL This is good!! TT is the 
greatest!!
Blainerb


Re: [TruthTalk] Mormonism Freemasonry

2006-01-08 Thread Blainerb473





Er, uh no, as a matter of fact, I was wondering why you were passing 
judgement on poor ol' Dylan? :) Maybe you are wrong about the 
poor fella. He might have his faults, but don't we all? 
Blaine

In a message dated 1/8/2006 3:11:57 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Judge not according to the appearance, but 
  judge righteous judgment"
   Jesus the Christ (John 
  7:24)
  
  Blaine are you saying that Dylan's pointing 
  the finger at others is righteous?
  
  On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 01:32:37 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  

Judge not that ye be not judged--
Blainerb


In a message dated 1/7/2006 3:23:17 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Hmmm! Dylan ought to be much 
  more concerned about being him on that day.
  




Re: [TruthTalk] Kevin Deegan??

2006-01-08 Thread Blainerb473





Thanks--that answers my question, but raises some also-- :)
Blaine

In a message dated 1/8/2006 7:22:44 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  cd: Kevin is still around but 
  got tired of the insults and doesn't contribute much.Shame as he had a lot to 
  offer.
  
  
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: 

To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/8/2006 12:48:08 AM 
Subject: [TruthTalk] Kevin 
Deegan??

I guess I missed something--whatever happened to Deegan, my ol' 
sparring buddy? I got really far behind, so instead of reading a lot 
of the posts, I deleted like crazy--probably did not answer some posts as 
well as missing out on what happened to him.
Blainerb




Re: [TruthTalk] Mormonism Freemasonry(update on remnant of Jacob)

2006-01-08 Thread Blainerb473





Blainerb: The Lord'swords never cease--he is 
the same yesterday, today and forever. Look in your Bible. The 
words of the Lord never ceased, except to fulfill the prophecy of Amos 
8:11
"Behold, the days come, saith the Lord 
God, that I will send a famine in the land, not a famine of bread, nor a thirst 
for water, but of hearing the words of the Lord."

This happened during the dark ages, when even the written word 
was in a dead language--Latin--and the only prophecies heard were those made by 
astrologers and the like--from uninspired lips. But as the scriptures were 
translated into native languages and were printed for the masses, the famine 
began to come to an end. 

But when more of the word of the Lord than whathad been 
theretofore printed came to light, the preachers of the day rejected 
it--"A Bible, A Bible, we have a Bible and we need 
no more Bible," they said, and they continue to say it 
today. They say it for gain. The Lord's 
work, which like his word never ceases, does not pay well if the clergy are 
laymen, which they are in the Lord's church, and which they were in the original 
church. They went out without purse or script--no money, no big 
salaries.You are a deceived people. You are 
deceived by your ministers, who preach for gain. 


In a message dated 1/8/2006 8:07:44 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  cd: Certainly not greater than what Christ has given- from the mouth of 
  another?
  
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: 

To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/7/2006 6:10:42 PM 
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mormonism 
 Freemasonry(update on remnant of Jacob)


Blainerb: What John 
andbrother Moore have written belowis the crux of what God 
meant when he told Joseph Smith that the Protestant ministers of the day 
taught doctrines of men, which had a form of Godliness, but denied the Power 
thereof. In other words, they denied the "greater revelation," or the 
possibility of "greater revelation" than that contained in the 
Bible. 
This will turn to their ultimate 
condemnation, in the great hereafter, because God has all power--and is the 
same today, yesterday, and forever--including having the right and ability 
to give forth "greater revelation."






Re: [TruthTalk] Mormonism Freemasonry

2006-01-08 Thread Blainerb473




In a message dated 1/8/2006 8:30:42 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hey 
  Judy, I've got a question for you: When Street Preachers point their fingers 
  at Blaine and say 'Repent or you're going to hell!" is that 
righteous?

Blainerb: Answer, but from Blaine, not 
Judy: NO!! :) Street Preachers do more harm than 
good--that is the consensus of opinion, at least among the more righteous 
preachers of traditional Christianity. Even Rocky Anderson, Salt 
Lake City Mayor, a former ACLU Attorney, was turned off by the insolent behavior 
of the street preachers. He finally sided with the LDS Church on the Plaza 
issue, mainly because of the SPs.


Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Mormonism Freemasonry

2006-01-08 Thread Blainerb473




In a message dated 1/8/2006 11:29:43 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Blaine are you saying that Dylan's pointing 
  the finger at others is 
righteous?

No. I was saying your doing that was, ahem, a little suspect, is 
all.
Blainerb


Re: [TruthTalk] Mormonism Freemasonry(update on remnant of Jacob)

2006-01-08 Thread Blainerb473





Blainerb: The decision to allow Blacks the PH 
was made afterweeks and evenmonths of agonizing prayer and 
discussion, which prayer and discussion followed the great success Mormon 
missionaries were having in Africa. The decision was made solely on the 
basis of desire to include worthy Black malesfrom that continent in the 
on-going work of the Lord--mostly missionary work, but other aspects as 
well. The Mormon Priesthood has always been a lay priesthood, and it was 
necessary to get those Blacks busy taking care of their own, rather than having 
White men exercisingdominion over them.

In a message dated 1/8/2006 12:51:44 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Blaine: I have an audio tape, surreptitiously obtained, of the 
  thenprophet (1978)describing the 'revelation' (political decision) 
  to permit non-whites into the priesthood.
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 

Sent: January 07, 2006 18:10
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mormonism 
 Freemasonry(update on remnant of Jacob)


Blainerb: What John 
andbrother Moore have written belowis the crux of what God 
meant when he told Joseph Smith that the Protestant ministers of the day 
taught doctrines of men, which had a form of Godliness, but denied the Power 
thereof. In other words, they denied the "greater revelation," or the 
possibility of "greater revelation" than that contained in the 
Bible. 
This will turn to their ultimate 
condemnation, in the great hereafter, because God has all power--and is the 
same today, yesterday, and forever--including having the right and ability 
to give forth "greater revelation." 
If the ministers of Protestant 
religiondo not repent of this prideful stubbornness, then I am 
thinking one of the most immediate consequences will be for God to 
empower the Remnant of Jacob to go through, and destroy the wonderful 
civilizationthat hasbeen built upover the past two 
hundred years called the US of A. Those Mexicans, most of whom are 
descendants of the Aztecs, who by the way worshipped 
Quetzalquatl,who was described as being aWhite God who wore a 
white robe and a beard, just keep coming over the border, don't they? 
Despite efforts to stay them, and the prophecy contained in 3 Nephi of the 
BoM creeps closer and closer to being fulfilled every day. I hope when 
it happens, the "Remnant"will by then have recognized the LDS Church 
as something other than a "White Guy's" church. 
There is already evidence this is 
true. The Navajo language has two words for White men: Biligana, 
which is a derisive term, meaning something like, "White Enemy," and another 
term which simply means "White brother."The 
latterisusually applied to members of the LDS 
Church. 
I spent three years teaching Dine' 
(Navajos) in Southern Utah, and I know that among them are many who have 
adopted the Black man's symbol for Black Power--a raised, gloved 
hand--except the fingers of the glove have been cut off, allowing the red 
man's fingers to show through at the end of the glove, apparently 
symbolizing the Red Power Movement that has grown from the Black Power 
Movement.
You Protestant cowboysmight do 
well tostrap on your six-shooters, 'cause I believe the day will soon 
come when the game we played as little kids--Cowboys and Indians--may become 
a nightmarish reality .. 
  .




Re: [TruthTalk] Mormonism Freemasonry(update on remnant of Jacob)

2006-01-08 Thread Blainerb473




In a message dated 1/8/2006 12:51:44 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Blaine: 
  I have an audio tape, surreptitiously obtained, of the thenprophet 
  (1978)describing the 'revelation' (political decision) to permit 
  non-whites into the priesthood.

I was present in a hospital waiting room when the announcement was made, 
and I remember it well. But thanks anyway. 
Blainer


Re: [TruthTalk] FW: January 6 - The Delusions of 2005 (deny the power thereo...

2006-01-08 Thread Blainerb473




Blainerb: Where is smoke, there is usually a little fire. What 
these "outsiders" are saying is probably based on truth to some extent--whether 
perceived by outsiders or no. I had a German exchange student living with 
me for a year--he said the Germans seldom go to church, and when they do, they 
wear casual clothing and cutoffs, sometimes even flip-flops. 
As his dad told me once, "Nobody in Germany believes in the 'Yesus' story 
anymore."

In a message dated 1/8/2006 12:52:28 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  EVERY REFORM MOVEMENT utilizes less than lauditory speech concerning 
  those not themselves part of the 'reform'.
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 

Sent: January 07, 2006 18:47
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] FW: January 6 
- The Delusions of 2005 ("deny the power thereof")


Blainerb: Rev Jan Markell has 
it right (see below)--more evidence of truth of the warning from God to 
Joseph Smith: "They teach for doctrine the commandments of men, having 
a form of Godliness, but denying the power thereof."


In a message dated 1/7/2006 2:18:10 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

  
  


  

  

  

  

  
  
  


  

  

  
January 
6 - The Delusions of 2005 
  

  
  
  


  

  

  
  

  

  · 
  The church will save the world and make it perfect for 
  Christ's return (Dominion/Kingdom Now Theology). Reality 
  check: Many churches are not even preaching a sound gospel. 
  They are preaching a bloodless gospel to 
  fill up the pews and false doctrine is exploding as 
  predicted.
  · 
  We're in the "last days" and churches are encouraging their 
  flock to get right with God while there is still time. Reality 
  check: Visit most any church in 
  America and you 
  will not hear the wonderful news that Jesus is coming 
  soon.




Re: [TruthTalk] Mormonism Freemasonry

2006-01-08 Thread Blainerb473




In a message dated 1/8/2006 2:06:16 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Someone walking in the fear of God would be 
  aware that he needs to clean up his own backyard
  before lamenting the fate of 
  others.Excluding ministry gifts of course- but I 
  don't seetravelling 
  minstrels listedamong 
  them.

Blainerb: "If any ofye lack 
wisdom, let him ask of God, who giveth to all men liberally . . . 
" 


Re: [TruthTalk] Mormonism Freemasonry

2006-01-08 Thread Blainerb473





Blainerb: You may have a point there, David--the value of the 
propertybeing offered to the city by the LDS Church was no small amount 
(but it is conjectural only). Rocky gave his reasons, which appeared 
in print and on TV several times, and included were his personal experiences 
watching SPs on the Plaza--he also expressed fears that such would get worse, 
not better. His interest was mainly in bringing the divergent groups in 
the city together in a compromise situation, and the fact that the LDS Church 
sweetened thatsituation was only part of the deal. He maintained 
that the bottom line was the behavior of the SPs--he wasclearly afraid of 
that sort of thing creating more divisiveness, which, more than anything,would 
posea threat to his continuance as Mayor of the city--so, it had political 
overtones, I guess you might say, as well.Let's face it, SPs were 
not popular even among those opposed to thePlaza.  



In a message dated 1/8/2006 6:02:24 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Blaine, 
  if money were not involved, don't you think the outcome would have been a 
  bit different? Follow the money, Blaine. The love of money is the 
  root of all evil. The Mormons supplied the money. The city 
  leaders took it. Think about it.Peace be with you.David 
  Miller.- Original Message - From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sunday, 
  January 08, 2006 7:48 PMSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mormonism  
  FreemasonryIn a message dated 1/8/2006 8:30:42 A.M. Mountain 
  Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:Hey Judy, I've got a 
  question for you: When Street Preachers point their fingers at Blaine and 
  say 'Repent or you're going to hell!" is that 
  righteous?Blainerb: Answer, but from Blaine, not Judy: 
  NO!! :) Street Preachers do more harm than good--that is 
  the consensus of opinion, at least among the more righteous preachers 
  of traditional Christianity. Even Rocky Anderson, Salt Lake 
  City Mayor, a former ACLU Attorney, was turned off by the insolent 
  behavior of the street preachers. He finally sided with the LDS 
  Church on the Plaza issue, mainly because of the 
  SPs.--"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with 
  salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 
  4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org




Re: [TruthTalk] Mormonism Freemasonry(update on remnant of Jacob)

2006-01-07 Thread Blainerb473




Blainerb: What John 
andbrother Moore have written belowis the crux of what God 
meant when he told Joseph Smith that the Protestant ministers of the day taught 
doctrines of men, which had a form of Godliness, but denied the Power 
thereof. In other words, they denied the "greater revelation," or the 
possibility of "greater revelation" than that contained in the 
Bible. 
This will turn to their ultimate 
condemnation, in the great hereafter, because God has all power--and is the same 
today, yesterday, and forever--including having the right and ability to give 
forth "greater revelation." 
If the ministers of Protestant 
religiondo not repent of this prideful stubbornness, then I am thinking 
one of the most immediate consequences will be for God to empower the 
Remnant of Jacob to go through, and destroy the wonderful civilizationthat 
hasbeen built upover the past two hundred years called the US 
of A. Those Mexicans, most of whom are descendants of the Aztecs, 
who by the way worshipped Quetzalquatl,who was described as being 
aWhite God who wore a white robe and a beard, just keep coming over 
the border, don't they? Despite efforts to stay them, and the prophecy contained 
in 3 Nephi of the BoM creeps closer and closer to being fulfilled every 
day. I hope when it happens, the "Remnant"will by then have 
recognized the LDS Church as something other than a "White Guy's" church. 

There is already evidence this is 
true. The Navajo language has two words for White men: Biligana, 
which is a derisive term, meaning something like, "White Enemy," and another 
term which simply means "White brother."The 
latterisusually applied to members of the LDS Church. 

I spent three years teaching Dine' 
(Navajos) in Southern Utah, and I know that among them are many who have adopted 
the Black man's symbol for Black Power--a raised, gloved hand--except the 
fingers of the glove have been cut off, allowing the red man's fingers to show 
through at the end of the glove, apparently symbolizing the Red Power Movement 
that has grown from the Black Power Movement.
You Protestant cowboysmight do 
well tostrap on your six-shooters, 'cause I believe the day will soon come 
when the game we played as little kids--Cowboys and Indians--may become a 
nightmarish reality .. .




In a message dated 1/7/2006 12:55:32 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  
  
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: 

To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/6/2006 9:56:15 PM 
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mormonism 
 Freemasonry

kidding, of course. Actually, I am going to use the 
bat at the local batting cages. The closest thing to physical 
excercise that I really want to get, in my old age. 

jd
cd: How old are you John? I am 44 now and kinda like this age. 
Splitting firewood is enough exercise for me.

-- 
  Original message -- From: "Dean Moore" 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: 

To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/6/2006 3:44:03 AM 
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mormonism 
 Freemasonry

G, let me know when you get my check for the bat. 
That's right, Dean !! I'm buying a bat !!

jd
cd: What type of bat and what do you plan to do with this 
bat-shouldI be concernedof answering my door? I Should have 
kept the wolf/ dog.

-- 
  Original message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  ..what 
  if, perhaps. elemental to BTs commentary, there genuinely appears to 
  bea qualitatively greater revelation thanyour 'greater 
  revelation'? 
  
  
  On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 20:18:48 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  
e.g., 
let's say BT (of TT)confidently commentscreatively 
onnecessities (also, germane to Protestant thought, i 
suspect)disclosed discreetly from certain 
revelation per se and 
all that you(two cult-apostles 
like DavidM)would have to say about it is that he 
(too)rejects 'greater revelation'?


On Wed, 04 Jan 2006 22:02:45 -0800 Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

  DAVEH: Certainly, none on TT.[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 

  

what Protestants would say they need 
it?

On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 21:07:00 
EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

  
  ||
  ..Protestants ..have rejected the greater revelation, 
  

Re: [TruthTalk] FW: January 6 - The Delusions of 2005 (deny the power thereof)

2006-01-07 Thread Blainerb473




Blainerb: Rev Jan Markell has it 
right (see below)--more evidence of truth of the warning from God to Joseph 
Smith: "They teach for doctrine the commandments of men, having a form of 
Godliness, but denying the power thereof."


In a message dated 1/7/2006 2:18:10 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  


  

  

  

  

  
  
  


  

  

  
January 
6 - The Delusions of 2005 
  

  
  
  


  

  

  
  

  

  · 
  The church will save the world and make it perfect for Christ's 
  return (Dominion/Kingdom Now Theology). Reality check: Many 
  churches are not even preaching a sound gospel. They are preaching a bloodless gospel to fill up the pews 
  and false doctrine is exploding as 
  predicted.
  · 
  We're in the "last days" and churches are encouraging their flock 
  to get right with God while there is still time. Reality check: 
  Visit most any church in America and you will 
  not hear the wonderful news that Jesus is coming 
  soon.
  ·.
  · 
  




[TruthTalk] Kevin Deegan??

2006-01-07 Thread Blainerb473



I guess I missed something--whatever happened to Deegan, my ol' sparring 
buddy? I got really far behind, so instead of reading a lot of the posts, 
I deleted like crazy--probably did not answer some posts as well as missing out 
on what happened to him.
Blainerb


Re: [TruthTalk] Mormonism Freemasonry

2006-01-07 Thread Blainerb473




AMEN to Dylan's insightful song--liked especially the part about sweatin' . 
. . maybe like in the Garden of G? :)
Blainerb


In a message dated 1/7/2006 6:29:13 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Actually, the G man has given us one of Dylan's better quotes. 
  
  
  
  -- 
Original message -- From: Judy Taylor 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Hmmm! Dylan ought to be much 
more concerned about being him on that day.

On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 21:25:35 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Well, your clock is gonna stopAt Saint 
  Peter's gate.Ya gonna ask him what time it is,He's gonna say, 
  "It's too late."Hey, hey!_I'd sure hate to be youOn that 
  dreadful day._
  
  You're gonna start to sweatAnd you ain't 
  gonna stop.You're gonna have a nightmareAnd never wake up.Hey, 
  hey, hey!I'd sure hate to be youOn that dreadful 
  day.
  
  You're gonna cry for pillsAnd your head's 
  gonna be in a knot,But the pills are gonna cost moreThan what 
  you've got.Hey, hey!I'd sure hate to be youOn that dreadful 
  day.
  
  You're gonna have to walk naked,Can't ride 
  in no car.You're gonna let ev'rybody seeJust what you are.Hey, 
  hey!I'd sure hate to be youOn that dreadful 
  day.
  
  Well, the good wine's a-flowin'For five 
  cents a quart.You're gonna look in your moneybagsAnd find you're 
  one cent short.Hey, hey, hey!I'd sure hate to be youOn that 
  dreadful day.
  
  You're gonna yell and scream,"Don't anybody 
  care?"You're gonna hear out a voice say,"Shoulda listened when 
  you heard the word down there."Hey, hey!I'd sure hate to be 
  youOn that dreadful day.Bob Dylan :: 
  Copyright © 
1964




Re: [TruthTalk] Mormonism Freemasonry

2006-01-07 Thread Blainerb473




Judge not that ye be not judged--
Blainerb


In a message dated 1/7/2006 3:23:17 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Hmmm! Dylan ought to be much more 
  concerned about being him on that day.
  
  On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 21:25:35 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  
Well, your clock is gonna stopAt Saint 
Peter's gate.Ya gonna ask him what time it is,He's gonna say, "It's 
too late."Hey, hey!_I'd sure hate to be youOn that dreadful 
day._

You're gonna start to sweatAnd you ain't gonna 
stop.You're gonna have a nightmareAnd never wake up.Hey, hey, 

hey!I'd sure hate to be youOn that dreadful 
day.

You're gonna cry for pillsAnd your head's 
gonna be in a knot,But the pills are gonna cost moreThan what you've 
got.Hey, hey!I'd sure hate to be youOn that dreadful 
day.

You're gonna have to walk naked,Can't ride in 
no car.You're gonna let ev'rybody seeJust what you are.Hey, 
hey!I'd sure hate to be youOn that dreadful 
day.

Well, the good wine's a-flowin'For five cents 
a quart.You're gonna look in your moneybagsAnd find you're one cent 
short.Hey, hey, hey!I'd sure hate to be youOn that dreadful 
day.

You're gonna yell and scream,"Don't anybody 
care?"You're gonna hear out a voice say,"Shoulda listened when 
you heard the word down there."Hey, hey!I'd sure hate to be 
youOn that dreadful day.Bob Dylan :: 
Copyright © 1964

On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 20:18:48 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  e.g., let's 
  say BT (of TT)confidently commentscreatively 
  onnecessities (also, germane to Protestant thought, i 
  suspect)disclosed discreetly from certain 
  revelation per se and all that you(two 
  cult-apostles like DavidM)would have to say about it is 
  that he (too)rejects 'greater revelation'?
  
  
  On Wed, 04 Jan 2006 22:02:45 -0800 Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  
DAVEH: Certainly, none on TT.[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 

  
  what Protestants would say they need 
  it?
  
  On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 21:07:00 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  

||
..Protestants ..have rejected the greater revelation, 

||
  




Re: [TruthTalk] Saturday Sabbath/Other lost Israelite sheep

2006-01-05 Thread Blainerb473





Blainerb: There were many Jews throughout the Roman Empire. It 
doesn't really say whether this fellow with the unclean spirit was a Gentile or 
a Jew. More than likely he was considered by the Lord to be an 
Israelite, however, consideringHe had already explicitly stated his 
ministry was "but to the Lost Sheep of the House of Israel." 
Regards the caveman from Geresa?? I would need a source for that 
one. 



In a message dated 1/4/2006 11:50:33 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Blaine writes  Jesus himself never went to the Gentiles. 
  He never spoke to them except on one occasion thatwas an exception 
  to his rule. 
  
  
  
  
NKJ Mark 5:1 Then they came to the 
other side of the sea, to the country of the Gadarenes. 2 And when He had 
come out of the boat, immediately there met Him out of the tombs a man with 
an unclean spirit, ... 18 And when He got into the boat, he who had been 
demon-possessed begged Him that he might be with Him. 19 However, Jesus did 
not permit him, but said to him, "Go home to your friends, and tell them 
what great things the Lord has done for you, and how He has had compassion 
on you." 20 And he departed and began to proclaim in Decapolis all that 
Jesus had done for him; and all marveled.
  You might want to ruminate on this 
  passage a while, Blaine. Only one of the "ten cities"which together made 
  up the Decapolis was located to the west of the River Jordan (it was called 
  Scythopolis, a.k.a. Bethshaen). The rest weresituated beyond the banks 
  ofthe "promised land," in what could only be classified Gentile 
  territory (the other nine cities were Hippos, Gadara, Pella, Philadelphia, 
  Gerasa [home of the "Garasenes," a.k.a. "Gadarenes"], Dion, Canatha, Raphana, 
  and Damascus).Indeed Jesus sent this duly impressed Gentile into 
  the far country to "publish" (GR. karussein) his story until 
  throughout Decapolis "all kept on marveling(imperfect tense) at what 
  Jesus had done." 
  And, Blaine, I find it quite 
  noteworthy that Jesus did this without first proselytizing himin 
  thedoctrines and duties of the Jewish people. IF I had a complaint, it 
  would be that many Christians get bogged done in the minutiae of their 
  peculiar forms of legalism and fail to realize this subtle but profound point. 
  To their shame, the astonishing truthremains that Jesus sent this brand 
  new Gentile convert out withoutany discipling at all,not 
  permitting him tostay on with them and learn through the traditions of 
  his peoplethe proper way of holiness.The truth is he sent him out 
  without so much as a whisper from the lawand prophets, offwithout 
  a word on thedo's and don'ts of godly living. No law. No commandments. 
  No holy days. No feasts orordinances -- justa simple request: 
  "Tell them what great things the Lord has done for you, and how He has had 
  compassion on you." 
  In your post you claim that Peter was 
  the first to introduce the Gospel to the Gentiles. In 
  fact,Blaine,he was not. A caveman from Gerasa gets credit for that 
  one. What Peter was was the first JEW to go to the Gentiles. Ah yes, but 
  before he was fit to go, he had to come to grips with the fact that what Jesus 
  had done under law for the Jews, he had accomplished as well for the Gentiles 
  -- and this he did for them apart from the law! Indeed before he could go, 
  Peter had to grasp the fact that he dare not foist upon Greeks his Jewish 
  customs: for who washe tocall unholy what God in Christhad 
  cleansed?
  Bill




Re: [TruthTalk] Saturday Sabbath/Other lost Israelite sheep

2006-01-04 Thread Blainerb473




The Gentiles first received the gospel by way of the Apostles--Peter 
first received the command to carry the message to those whom God had cleansed 
as he saw the sheet lowered with the unclean animals on it, and was commanded to 
"Rise, Peter, Kill and eat."
This was the introduction of any Gentile to a gospel message. 
Paul was then commissioned to carry the message to Gentiles, and was deemed the 
apostle to the Gentiles. 
Jesus himself never went to the Gentiles. He never spoke to them 
except on one occasion thatwas an exception to his rule. They 
never heard his voice, yet he says, "Other sheep I have which are not of this 
fold, and they too must Hear My 
Voice!" His personal appearances were 
ALWAYS reserved for the House of Israel, ONLY!!



In a message dated 1/4/2006 6:33:16 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  
  
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: 

To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/3/2006 7:39:32 PM 
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Saturday 
Sabbath/Other lost Israelite sheep


What about 
this? 

Matthew 15:22-26 

"And behold a woman of Canaan came . . . but he answered and 
said, I am not sent but to the lost 
sheep of the House of Israel . . . It is not meet to take the 
children's bread, and cast it to the dogs."

Do you not believe your Bible? Here He 
actually stated in so many words his mission was to the HOUSE OF ISRAEL 
only. The woman from Caanan, 
although a Gentile, was an exception because of 
her great faith. 
cd: Then does that mean that gentiles cannot 
be saved? If his words were for the "House of Israel" only then why are we 
told to live by those same words that Jesus spoke to the Jews? If so then 
the message that Jesus carried were for all men-this was foretold as the 
Jews had to first be offered the truth with the understanding that they 
would reject that truth-it was also foretold that Jesus would die for the 
sins of the whole world-so he was also here for the whole world not just the 
Jews. We then are grafted intothe tribes-and in a sense become a 
part of the promise given to Abraham and are actually grafted into Israel 
(ie. Romans 11:17)

His mission to the Samaritans was due to the 
largeamount of the bloodof Israel in that group of people. 
The Samaritans were a mixture of Israelite bloodlines and Babylonian 
bloodlines--they were descendants ofthose Jews who were not taken 
captive in the Babylonian Captivity, and who intermarried with the 
Babylonians who were sent from Babylon to occupy the land. Because the 
Jews would not recognize their Israelite heritage, they even had a separate 
temple, alter, priests, etc. But Jesus, knowing all things, 
knewmany of themwere also Israelites. This 
was not a contradiction to his stance that he was sent "but to the House of 
Israel."
cd: The Samaritans were more 
correctly termed half-Jews (ie mixture of gentile and Jewish blood) as such 
they were outcasts to which the Jews would have no part of-nor any dealing 
with-as a half Jew is regarded as a gentiles-It is my view that Jesus helped 
those whom asked for help-Jew or Gentile.After the Babylonian 
captivityEzra separated those that inner married with those Gentiles 
mentioned and the Jewish blood line remained pure (ie. see Ezra 10: 6-17). 

Not only that, but if his mission was 
"but to the House of Israel," what about those Israelites--ten tribes of 
them--who had already been taken captive many years earlier into the 
"Northlands" by Assyria? How was he to minister to 
them? The Jews were basically two tribes only--Judah and Benjamin--and 
parts of a third tribe, Levi. The other ten tribes had been 
takencaptive years earlier and were never heard from again. They 
are even today referred to as the "Lost Ten tribes." So what 
about them? Did THE SAVIOR NOT CARE ABOUT THEM? 
cd: In Bible prophecy we are told to look 
for Israel to become a nation again as a sign of the last days of the 
Gentile world rule-to wit the Messianic Jews and the converted Gentiles will 
rule the worldunder the leadership of Jesus Christ (ie. King of Kings) 
at this same time there is a seven year time of testing and the outpouring 
of Gods wrath-within this same time period God seals 12,000 from each tribe 
of Israel equaling 144,000 and each tribe is mentioned as being present in 
Israel (ie. Rev.7,14). The nation of Israel came into existence May 14,1947 
and was ratified in 1969-This has never happened in the history of the 
world-no nation has ever ceased to exist for 2,000 years and returned-yet 
Israel has done so. The Jews have returned and all the tribes are present-so 
therefore logic would dictate there are no "lost tribes".The sheep of 

Re: [TruthTalk] Mormonism Freemasonry

2006-01-04 Thread Blainerb473




In a message dated 1/3/2006 9:51:55 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Blaine, do you consider protestants to be pagans?


Blainerb: No, I consider Protestants to be the Gentiles spoken of in 
the BoM who had the Bible, which was God's word, and upon whom the Spirit of God 
rested because they were righteous and sought to serve Jesus Christ as their 
Lord. They were given great power over the unrighteousseed of Jacob 
living in the Americasto the extent of scattering them, 
anddecimating their populations. I consider the Protestant movement 
to have been of God, as it furnished a prelude to the restoration of the full 
gospel through the Prophet Joseph Smith and others. Unfortunately, most present-day Protestants have rejected 
the greater revelation, and are presently under 
condemnation. The time will come when those 
Gentileswho reject thislatter-day message will be judged of God, 
however, and the power of the remnant of Jacob will be unleashed upon 
them.

The BoM predicts 
that,
"My people who are a remnant of 
Jacob (Lamanites, mostly) shall be among the Gentiles, yea, in the midst of 
them, as a young lion among the flocks of sheep, who, if he go through 
both treadeth down, and teareth in pieces, and none can deliver. 
Their hand shall be lifted up upon their adversaries, and all their 
enemies shall be cut off. Yea, wo be unto the Gentiles, except they 
repent. . . . And I will execute judgement and fury upon them, 
even as upon the Heathen, such as they have not 
heard."
3 Nephi 21: 12-22


In a message dated 1/3/2006 9:51:55 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Blaine, do you consider protestants to be 
  pagans?From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Reply-To: 
  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgTo: 
  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mormonism  
  FreemasonryDate: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 23:06:52 
  ESTNo doubt about it, those ancient groups were doing 
  bad stuff, fertilitycultism included. But what I am saying is 
  documenting something from ancienttimes is always hard, 
  and I seriously doubt tracing Freemasonry back to 
  thosetimes could be done with so much confidence in the 
  findings as to be able tosay confidently that such and 
  such is true, or such and such is not true. 
  Infact, that would be true of almost anything. 
  Even Mormonism, which is barelytwo hundred years old, 
  despite an abundance of records on the subject, stillhas 
  much that cannot be said for certain about it. What it boils down 
  to intoo many cases is that basically, we express our 
  opinions, pro and con, andthat's about the best we can 
  do.But I can say with a high degree of confidence, that although there 
  are somesimilarities between free Masonry and the temple 
  Endowment ceremony, thereare far too many fundamental differences 
  to conclude that one came from theother. I 
  have, believe it or not, studied Free Masonry, and I am 
  intimatelyfamiliar with the ceremony in the 
  temple. There are just too many 
  otherpossibilities.In a message dated 12/31/2005 
  4:00:12 P.M. Mountain Standard Time,[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:No it is way before that; the ancient fertility 
  cults were practised inCanaan before God destroyed the 
  Amorites.On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:01:12 EST 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED](mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
  writes:Blainerb: Freemasonry is obviously 
  descended from the time when the Jewsreturned from the 
  Babylonian captivity to Jerusalem to rebuild their temple 
  andthe walls of the city. It is one thing to say 
  such as you have statedbelow, but quite another to show beyond 
  reasonable doubt that your assertions arecorrect. If you 
  wouldn't mind, I would like to double-check your 
  sources.In a message dated 12/27/2005 8:04:59 A.M. 
  Mountain Standard Time,[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:I 
  have read the same Blaine and the Freemasonry rituals are based on the 
  oldFertility Cult mystery religions which isthe 
  same kind of paganism that got the Canaanite Nations exiled from 
  thePromised Land and destroyed. There is asexual aspect 
  to both. jtOn Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:06:14 EST 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED](mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
  writes:I am not aware of one, except to say, as 
  JS did, that he joined theFreemasons to obtain whatever 
  friendship and support they might offer in times 
  ofduress--as you are probably aware, he was arrested on false 
  charges manytimes--0ver 40 times, as I recall--and abused both 
  physically and verbally a lotof times by antis of his 
  day.But I am sure if there is any official commentary from 
  Church authorities,Kevin would know where it would be 
  found. Especially if it could be usedagainst the 
  Church. :)BlainerbIn a message dated 
  12/26/2005 10:08:36 P.M. Mountain Standard Time,[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:Does the Mormon Church have an expressed opinion 
  regarding freemasonary?




Re: [TruthTalk] Saturday Sabbath/Other lost Israelite sheep

2006-01-03 Thread Blainerb473




What about this? 


Matthew 15:22-26 

"And behold a woman of Canaan came . . . but he answered and 
said, I am not sent but to the lost 
sheep of the House of Israel . . . It is not meet to take the children's 
bread, and cast it to the dogs."

Do you not believe your Bible? Here He 
actually stated in so many words his mission was to the HOUSE OF ISRAEL 
only. The woman from Caanan, although a 
Gentile, was an exception because of her great 
faith. 

His mission to the Samaritans was due to the 
largeamount of the bloodof Israel in that group of people. The 
Samaritans were a mixture of Israelite bloodlines and Babylonian 
bloodlines--they were descendants ofthose Jews who were not taken captive 
in the Babylonian Captivity, and who intermarried with the Babylonians who were 
sent from Babylon to occupy the land. Because the Jews would not recognize 
their Israelite heritage, they even had a separate temple, alter, priests, 
etc. But Jesus, knowing all things, knewmany of themwere also 
Israelites. This was not a contradiction to his stance that 
he was sent "but to the House of Israel." 
Not only that, but if his mission was "but 
to the House of Israel," what about those Israelites--ten tribes of them--who 
had already been taken captive many years earlier into the "Northlands" by 
Assyria? How was he to minister to them? The Jews were 
basically two tribes only--Judah and Benjamin--and parts of a third tribe, 
Levi. The other ten tribes had been takencaptive years earlier and 
were never heard from again. They are even today referred to as the "Lost 
Ten tribes." So what about them? Did THE SAVIOR NOT CARE ABOUT 
THEM? 

In a message dated 1/1/2006 8:48:23 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  cd: I see no contradictions of my original 
  statement Blain-The Gospel was first preached to the Jews and later given to 
  the sheep of another fold(gentiles). You also failed to explain the gospel 
  being given to the Samaritan women-please do so??
  
  
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: 

To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 12/24/2005 4:14:58 PM 
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Saturday 
Sabbath/Other lost Israelite sheep


In a message dated 12/20/2005 4:18:51 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
cd: Jesus didn't stay he wasn't here for the Gentiles-He 
  said that he was here first for the Jews-and later the gentiles upon the 
  Jews rejection. Jew spoke to and healed many gentiles. The Samaritan woman 
  at the well was one of those he preached to-there were many others.The 
  other sheep mentioned were gentiles

Your total lack of understanding of the NT record is showing Deano, 
buddy. 


Jesus sent ONLY to the House 
of Israel-- see Matthew 15:22-26 

"And behold a woman of Canaan came . . . but he answered and 
said, I am not sent but to the lost sheep of the House 
of Israel . . . It is not meet to take the 
children's bread, and cast it to the dogs."

Gentiles given the 
gospel
Peter receivesa visionto preach to the Gentiles:(Read 
entire chapter 11 in Acts) "
When they heard these things, they held their peace, , and glorified 
god, saying, Then hath God also to the Gentiles granted 
repentance unto life." Acts 
11:18

The Jews were to actually hear his voice, but the Gentiles were to 
receive the gospel via the Holy ghost and the preaching of the 
Apostles--





Re: [TruthTalk] Mormonism Freemasonry

2006-01-03 Thread Blainerb473




Blainerb: "Supposed to have?" Judging from the 
"plethora" of records about the Tower of Babel, and what went on then, can you 
even say "supposed" with any degree of assurance? :) I mean, 
let's face it, what we have on the Tower of Babel, is vry scant, 
indeed. The BoM gives a fairly detailed record of one group leaving the 
Tower . . . called the Book of Ether. But I have 
not read anything else that I would place much confidence in--perhaps you are 
aware of some very ancient documents


In a message dated 12/31/2005 5:17:31 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually, it is supposed to have started with the tower of Babel, and 
  the master builders who were to construct it.TerryJudy 
  Taylor wrote: 
  

No it is way 
before that; the ancient fertility cults were practised in Canaan before God 
destroyed the Amorites.

On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:01:12 EST 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

  
  Blainerb: 
  Freemasonry is obviously descended from the time when the Jews returned 
  from the Babylonian captivity to Jerusalem to rebuild their temple and the 
  walls of the city. It is one thing to say such as you have 
  stated below, but quite another to show beyond reasonable doubt that your 
  assertions are correct. If you wouldn't mind, I would like to 
  double-check your sources. 
  
  
  In a message dated 12/27/2005 
  8:04:59 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  
I have read the same Blaine and the 
Freemasonry rituals are based on the old Fertility Cult mystery 
religions which is 
the same kind of paganism that got the Canaanite Nations exiled from 
the Promised Land and destroyed. There is a
sexual aspect to both. 
jt

On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:06:14 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  I am not aware of one, except to say, as JS did, that he 
  joined the Freemasons to obtain whatever friendship and support they 
  might offer in times of duress--as you are probably aware, he was 
  arrested on false charges many times--0ver 40 times, as I recall--and 
  abused both physically and verballya 
  lot of times by antis of his day. 
  But I am sure if there is any official commentary from Church 
  authorities, Kevin would know where it would be found. 
  Especially if it could be used against the 
  Church. :)
  Blainerb
  
  In a message dated 12/26/2005 10:08:36 P.M. Mountain Standard 
  Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  
Does the Mormon Church have an expressed opinion regarding 
freemasonary? 

  
   
judyt 
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His 
Commandments 
is a liar (1 John 2:4)




[TruthTalk] Fwd: THE PASTOR'S CAT

2006-01-03 Thread Blainerb473




In a message dated 12/31/2005 5:10:55 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Funniest 
  thing I've read for a while. "Laughter does good like 
  medicine."JoanTHE PASTOR'S CATThis particular story 
  just made me laugh. Every time I think about it,the vision of that 
  poor cat just amuses me. Hope the story leaves a brightspot in your 
  day. Who says the Creator doesn't have a sense 
  ofhumor?Dwight Nelson tells a true story about the pastor of his 
  church.He had a kitten that had climbed up a tree in his backyard and then 
  wasafraid to come down. The pastor coaxed, offered warm milk, etc., 
  but thekitty just would not come down.The tree was not sturdy 
  enough to climb, so the pastor decided that if hetied a rope to his car 
  and drove away so that the tree bent down, hecould then reach up and get 
  the kitten.So that's what he did, all the while checking his progress 
  in the car.He then figured if he went just a little bit further, the tree 
  would bebent sufficiently for him to reach the kitten. But as he 
  moved the car alittle further forward, the rope broke.The tree 
  went "boing!" and the kitten went sailing through the air and out of 
  sight! The pastor felt terrible. He walked all over the 
  neighborhood asking people if they'd seen a little kitten. No, 
  nobody had seen a stray kitten. So he prayed, "Lord, I just commit 
  this kitten to your keeping," and went on about his 
  business.A few days later he was at the grocery store and met one of 
  his church members. He happened to look into her shopping cart and 
  was amazed to see cat food. This woman was a cat hater and everyone 
  knew it, so he asked her, "Why are you buying cat food when you hate 
  cats so much?"She replied, "You won't believe this, Pastor." And 
  then told him how her littel girl had been begging her for a cat, 
  but she kept refusing. Then, a few days before, the child had 
  begged again, so Mom finally told her little girl, "Well, if God 
  gives you a cat, I'll let you keep it."She told the pastor, "I watched 
  my child go out in the yard, get on her knees, and ask God for 
  a cat. And really, Pastor, you won't believe this, but I 
  saw it with my own eyes. A kitten suddenly came flying out of the 
  blue sky, with its paws outspread, and landed right in front of 
  her." Never underestimate the Power of God and His unique sense 
  of humor.JoanA candle loses nothing by lighting another 
  candle.From: NED MEACHAM 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: THE 
  PASTOR'S CAT [also from a year ago]Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 02:00:56 
  -0500


---BeginMessage---

Funniest thing I've read for a while. Laughter does good like medicine.
Joan


THE PASTOR'S CAT

This particular story just made me laugh.  Every time I think about it,
the vision of that poor cat just amuses me.  Hope the story leaves a bright
spot in your day.  Who says the Creator doesn't have a sense of
humor?

Dwight Nelson tells a true story about the pastor of his church.
He had a kitten that had climbed up a tree in his backyard and then was
afraid to come down.  The pastor coaxed, offered warm milk, etc., but the
kitty just would not come down.

The tree was not sturdy enough to climb, so the pastor decided that if he
tied a rope to his car and drove away so that the tree bent down, he
could then reach up and get the kitten.

So that's what he did, all the while checking his progress in the car.
He then figured if he went just a little bit further, the tree would be
bent sufficiently for him to reach the kitten.  But as he moved the car a
little further forward, the rope broke.

The tree went boing! and the kitten went sailing through the air and out 
of sight!  The pastor felt terrible.  He walked all over the  neighborhood 
asking people if they'd seen a little kitten.  No, nobody had seen a stray 
kitten.  So he prayed, Lord, I just commit this kitten to your keeping,  
and went on about his business.


A few days later he was at the grocery store and met one of his church 
members.  He happened to look into her shopping cart and was amazed to see 
cat food.  This woman was a cat hater and everyone knew it, so he  asked 
her, Why are you buying cat food when you hate cats so much?


She replied, You won't believe this, Pastor.  And then told him how her  
littel girl had been begging her for a cat, but she kept refusing.  Then, a  
few days before, the child had begged again, so Mom finally told her  little 
girl, Well, if God gives you a cat, I'll let you keep it.


She told the pastor, I watched my child go out in the yard, get on  her  
knees, and ask God for a cat.  And really, Pastor, you won't  believe  this, 
but I saw it with my own eyes.  A kitten suddenly came flying out  of the 
blue sky, with its paws outspread, and landed right in front of  her.


 Never underestimate the Power of God and His unique sense of humor.


Joan
A candle loses nothing by lighting another candle.






From: 

Re: [TruthTalk] Mormonism Freemasonry

2006-01-03 Thread Blainerb473




No doubt about it, those ancient groups were doing bad stuff, fertility 
cultism included. But what I am saying is documenting something from 
ancient times is always hard, and I seriously doubt tracing Freemasonry back to 
those times could be done with so much confidence in the findingsas to be 
able to say confidently that such and such is true, or such and such is not 
true. In fact, that would be true of almost anything. Even 
Mormonism, which is barely two hundred years old, despite an abundance of 
records on the subject, still has much that cannot be said for certain about 
it. What it boils down to in too many cases is that basically, we express 
our opinions, pro and con, and that's about the best we can do.
But I can say with a high degree of confidence, that although there are some similarities between free Masonry 
and the temple Endowment ceremony, there are far too many fundamental differences to 
concludethat one came from the other. I have, 
believe it or not, studiedFree Masonry, and I am intimately familiar with 
the ceremony in the temple. There are just too many other 
possibilities.

In a message dated 12/31/2005 4:00:12 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  No it is way before that; the ancient fertility cults 
  were practised in Canaan before God destroyed the Amorites.
  
  On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:01:12 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  

Blainerb: Freemasonry is obviously descended from 
the time when the Jews returned from the Babylonian captivity to Jerusalem 
to rebuild their temple and the walls of the city. It is one thing 
to say such as you have stated below, but quite another to show beyond 
reasonable doubt that your assertions are correct. If you wouldn't 
mind, I would like to double-check your sources. 


In a message dated 12/27/2005 8:04:59 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  I have read the same Blaine and the 
  Freemasonry rituals are based on the old Fertility Cult mystery religions 
  which is 
  the same kind of paganism that got the Canaanite Nations exiled from 
  the Promised Land and destroyed. There is a
  sexual aspect to both. 
  jt
  
  On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:06:14 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  

I am not aware of one, except to say, as JS did, that he 
joined the Freemasons to obtain whatever friendship and support they 
might offer in times of duress--as you are probably aware, he was 
arrested on false charges many times--0ver 40 times, as I recall--and 
abused both physically and verballya 
lot of times by antis of his day. 
But I am sure if there is any official commentary from Church 
authorities, Kevin would know where it would be found. 
Especially if it could be used against the 
Church. :)
Blainerb

In a message dated 12/26/2005 10:08:36 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Does the Mormon Church have an expressed opinion regarding 
  freemasonary? 
  






[TruthTalk] Church Plaza Fight Ends With a Whimper

2005-12-30 Thread Blainerb473



ACLU throws in the towel . . 
.


"..."I can't imagine 
perpetuating the situation where street preachers were standing on the plaza, 
hurling insults and even profanities at newly married brides," Anderson said. 
"There are plenty of areas [nearby] for freedom of speech." 


 
Mayor Rocky Anderson, former ACLU Lawyer

see http://www.sltrib.com/utah/ci_3356230 
for complete article . . .


[TruthTalk] Fwd: Praise the Lord

2005-12-29 Thread Blainerb473




In a message dated 12/29/2005 10:56:31 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There 
  was a little old lady, who every morning stepped onto her frontporch, 
  raised her arms to the sky, and shouted: "PRAISE THE LORD!"One 
  day an atheist moved into the house next door.He became irritated at the 
  little old lady.Every morning he'd step onto his front porch after her 
  and yell:"THERE IS NO LORD!"Time passed with the two of them 
  carrying on this way every day.One morning, in the middle of winter, 
  the little old lady stepped ontoher front porch and shouted: "PRAISE 
  THE LORD! Please Lord, I have nofood and I am starving, provide for 
  me, oh Lord!The next morning she stepped onto her porch and there were 
  two hugebags of groceries sitting there."PRAISE THE LORD!" 
  she cried out. "HE HAS PROVIDED GROCERIES FOR ME!"The atheist 
  neighbor jumped out of the hedges and shouted:"THERE IS NO LORD! I 
  BOUGHT THOSE GROCERIES!!"The little old lady threw her arms into the 
  air and shouted: "PRAISETHE LORD! HE HAS PROVIDED ME WITH 
  GROCERIES AND MADE THE DEVIL PAY FOR THEM!JoanA candle 
  loses nothing by lighting another candle.


---BeginMessage---


There was a little old lady, who every morning stepped onto her front
porch, raised her arms to the sky, and shouted:  PRAISE THE LORD!

One day an atheist moved into the house next door.
He became irritated at the little old lady.

Every morning he'd step onto his front porch after her and yell:
THERE IS NO LORD!

Time passed with the two of them carrying on this way every day.

One morning, in the middle of winter, the little old lady stepped onto
her front porch and shouted:  PRAISE THE LORD!  Please Lord, I have no
food and I am starving, provide for me, oh Lord!

The next morning she stepped onto her porch and there were two huge
bags of groceries sitting there.

PRAISE THE LORD!  she cried out.  HE HAS PROVIDED GROCERIES FOR ME!

The atheist neighbor jumped out of the hedges and shouted:
THERE IS NO LORD!  I BOUGHT THOSE GROCERIES!!

The little old lady threw her arms into the air and shouted:  PRAISE
THE LORD!  HE HAS PROVIDED ME WITH GROCERIES AND MADE THE DEVIL PAY FOR 
THEM!



Joan
A candle loses nothing by lighting another candle.


---End Message---


Re: [TruthTalk] Mormonism Freemasonry

2005-12-27 Thread Blainerb473




In a message dated 12/26/2005 11:52:23 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Add to 
  this the fact that JS was himself a mason of at least the 32nd 
  degree,

Blainerb: I assure you there are not anywhere near 32 degrees 
in Mormon temple ceremonies. There are NO degrees in the 
ceremonies. :)
There are three degrees of glory in the resurrection, in LDS 
theology, could this be whatLance was referring to?



In a message dated 12/26/2005 5:14:52 A.M. Mountain Standard 
Time,[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:..are one and the same 'spirit'. The 'degrees' in 
Mormonism correspond tothe 'degrees' in freemasonry. DANGEROUS 
STUFF!There is no provable 
relationship. If there was, you would do more thanmake a 
blanket statement.Blainerb


Re: [TruthTalk] Mormonism Freemasonry

2005-12-27 Thread Blainerb473






I am not aware of one, except to say, as JS did, that he joined the 
Freemasons to obtain whatever friendship and support they might offer in times 
of duress--as you are probably aware, he was arrested on false charges many 
times--0ver 40 times, as I recall--and abused both physically and 
verballya lot of times by antis of 
his day. 
But I am sure if there is any official commentary from Church authorities, 
Kevin would know where it would be found. Especially 
if it could be used against the Church. :)
Blainerb

In a message dated 12/26/2005 10:08:36 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Does the Mormon Church have an expressed opinion regarding 
  freemasonary? 
  
  jd
  
  -- 
Original message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


In a message dated 12/26/2005 5:14:52 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  ..are one and the same 'spirit'. The 
  'degrees' in Mormonism correspond to the 'degrees' in freemasonry. 
  DANGEROUS STUFF!

There is no provable relationship. If there was, you would do 
more than make a blanket statement. 
Blainerb




Re: [TruthTalk] Mormonism Freemasonry

2005-12-27 Thread Blainerb473



In a message dated 12/26/2005 11:52:23 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Blaine, 
  I beg to differ. I have read two books, side by side, one 
  of the Mormon temple endowment, and one of Freemasonry, and the 
  similarities are unmistakable, from the the clothing and anointing to the 
  secret grips, tokens, and penalties. Add to this the fact that JS 
  was himself a mason of at least the 32nd degree, and it is quite obvious 
  that JS adopted and adapted the Freemason ceremonies for his own use in 
  the LDS temple endowments.

Blainerb: I don't think the LDS 
Church has ever denied what you are saying, so it seems unnecessary to even 
point it out. The similarities are just that, however, and there are other 
aspects of the LDS ceremonies that are highly dissimilar.Your conclusions 
thatJS just went in and adapted/borrowed stuff seems a little rash, it 
seems to me. A charitable attitude towards JS and Mormons in general 
would suggest to me that his claims to have received the temple ceremonies by 
revelation should be given first priority. As in all dreams and other 
revelations, the Lord often makes use of symbols and etc familiar to the 
recipient-- I see nothing amiss in this happening with regards to JS's 
revelations, whether regarding temple ceremonies or 
otherwise. The 
Key word here is CHARITY. 






Re: [TruthTalk] Mormonism Freemasonry

2005-12-27 Thread Blainerb473




In a message dated 12/26/2005 11:52:23 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 Lets add to this some new information...the Freemasons, in 
  their ceremonies, pay homage to several Egyptian gods. Now, you have told 
  us that JS writes in the PoGP that one of hte names of god is Amun, or 
  Ammon, an Egyptian god. See the siilarity. I am anxious to research if JS 
  got that name fromt he pages fromt eh book of the dead he purchased and 
  pretended to translate as the Book of Abraham, or if he learned it in his 
  Masonic lodge.



Blainerb: I simply stated that some words from 
the language of Adam had been revealed to Joseph Smith, among them the word 
Ahman, for God the Father. In pointing out the similarities between that 
word and some Egyptian names for deity, I was suggesting that perhaps the 
Egyptianshad throughtime corrupted the concept of God, but had 
retained the name to some extent. It is a well known fact that languages 
change, but still retain words or similar words to the original. An 
example is the Algonquin Indian word for father--Abba. The same word in 
Hebrew has the same meaning. I am not an expert on languages, but it seems 
pretty clear there had to be a linguistic/cultural sameness at some point in 
time. Again, CHARITYmight help you reach different 
conclusionsfrom the ones you draw. 



Re: [TruthTalk] Mormonism Freemasonry

2005-12-27 Thread Blainerb473




Blainerb: Freemasonry is obviously descended from the 
time when the Jews returned from the Babylonian captivity to Jerusalem to 
rebuild their temple and the walls of the city. It is one thing to 
say such as you have stated below, but quite another to show beyond reasonable 
doubt that your assertions are correct. If you wouldn't mind, I would like 
to double-check your sources. 


In a message dated 12/27/2005 8:04:59 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  I have read the same Blaine and the 
  Freemasonry rituals are based on the old Fertility Cult mystery religions 
  which is 
  the same kind of paganism that got the Canaanite Nations exiled from the Promised Land 
  and destroyed. There is a
  sexual aspect to both. jt
  
  On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:06:14 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  

I am not aware of one, except to say, as JS did, that he joined 
the Freemasons to obtain whatever friendship and support they might offer in 
times of duress--as you are probably aware, he was arrested on false charges 
many times--0ver 40 times, as I recall--and abused both physically and 
verballya lot of times by antis 
of his day. 
But I am sure if there is any official commentary from Church 
authorities, Kevin would know where it would be found. Especially if it could be used against the Church. 
:)
Blainerb

In a message dated 12/26/2005 10:08:36 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Does the Mormon Church have an expressed opinion regarding 
  freemasonary? 
  




Re: [TruthTalk] Merry Christmas!

2005-12-27 Thread Blainerb473




My thinking, too, jd. In fact, I wonder if Marlin 
collects antiques. Marlin, do you hold onto the past in other ways, 
too? 

Blainerb


In a message dated 12/25/2005 9:57:09 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Hello Marlin. Christmas has a very different definition 
  around our house. I am not one who cares about the 
  history or even the etimology of words and events that have taken on 
  definitions of their own. It is a blessed time of year. 
  We think of and even celebrate the birth of Christ, knowing that His 
  presense was all about emanuel.
  
  jd
  
  
  
  -- 
Original message -- From: "Marlin halverson" 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 



1.) Christ 2.) Mass I 
think we all know that "Christ" refers to God's Son Jesus. The word "Mass" 
comes from Old English mæsse, 
a modification of (assumed) Vulgar Latin messa from the Late Latin 
missa, literally meaning "dismissal"; as in at the end of a 
religious service. The Middle English Christemasse, 
comes from Old English Cristes mæsse, 
literally, Christ's mass - shortened to "Christ-mas". Meaning the 
"dismissal" or passing away of Christ; or more directly, the death of 
Christ.. Those who understand a bit about the Catholic religion 
realize that the "Mass" always refers to the sacrificial death of Christ. 
The word "Christmas" comes from the Roman Catholic ritual. 
Folks walk around this time of year saying "Merry Christmas!" to each other. 
I wonder if it occurs to anyone they are saying "Merry Death of Christ." 

www.truthontheweb.org/NwsClpz/122405.htm-
Maranatha




Re: [TruthTalk] Perhaps YOU can 'share', David!

2005-12-27 Thread Blainerb473




Blainerb: I believe most people, being children of God, experience 
spiritual experiences, possibly termed miracles, at some time or other in 
their lives.I read of such accounts in crediblesources quite 
often. I have no real reason to doubt the sincerity of these people, who 
are not even Mormons, usually. However, the type of miracles 
mentioned in the scriptures, such as casting out devils, instantaneous 
healing by the laying on of hands, being healed by spiritual means, and doing 
such in the name of Jesus Christ, even raising the dead, are much 
rarer. They do appear in Mormon literature quite often. My own 
grandfather, while he was on missions (2) to Norway, reports such events 
happening. Hewrites a detailed account ofcasting out devils by 
the laying on of hands, and in the name of Jesus Christ. He reports 
healing people, also by the laying on hands, by authority of the priesthood 
after the order of the Son of God (Melchizedek PH), which he had received 
beforedeparting for his mission.He reports being healed, by 
the laying on of hands--hands that were felt tangibly but unseen. He 
reports seeing other Elders do these things also. As I said, Mormon 
literature is full of these things. As for me, my miracles have been 
restricted to personal spiritual experiences, of which I have had many--some 
confirming the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints to be true, and the 
BoM to be true. I have not healed anyone, nor cast out devils. 
Perhaps my faith needs to be strengthened before doing these things. 

In a message dated 12/26/2005 3:38:48 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
IFO 
  would appreciate hearing from you on this.- Original Message 
  - From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: 
  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: December 25, 2005 
  15:23Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Who decides 
  Blainerb: Just for the record, I believe the Lord was 
  speaking to his apostles, but was speaking concerning all 
  whom they taught. That's how I read it too, but I 
  will continue to consider Perry's  comments. Blaine 
  wrote: As Jesus said to Joseph Smith, concerning the 
  Christians of that day, "They teach for doctrines the 
  commandments of men, having a form of Godliness, but denying the 
  power thereof." (Speaking of the power of God to 
  perform miracles) The problem is, there is an almost universal 
  disbelief in God's power to perform miraculous acts. 
  Miracles are commonly reported among Mormon believers--I have 
  experienced a number of them myself--almost always in connection 
  with work in the church. Miracles are common among many of the 
  Christian communities that operate  in faith, but this 
  unfortunately is a minority among all the Christians of  the 
  world. Most of the Mormons I have known and spoken to do not have 
  direct experience with miracles. Perhaps you can share some of 
  your testimony  with us concerning how God has worked 
  miraculously in your Mormon community. I watched a movie not 
  too long ago about a Mormon missonary named John Groberg whose 
  assignment was Tonga. It was called, "The Other Side of 
  Heaven." Have you seen it? What do you think of it? It 
  seemed a bit skimpy on the kind of miracles that I hear from most 
  Christian  missionaries. Peace be with you. 
  David Miller.




Re: [TruthTalk] Mormonism Freemasonry

2005-12-26 Thread Blainerb473




In a message dated 12/26/2005 5:14:52 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  ..are one and the same 'spirit'. The 'degrees' in 
  Mormonism correspond to the 'degrees' in freemasonry. DANGEROUS 
  STUFF!

There is no provable relationship. If there was, you would do more 
than make a blanket statement. 
Blainerb


Re: [TruthTalk] Saturday Sabbath

2005-12-24 Thread Blainerb473





Be careful what you pray for, Dean--and I have not felt any rebukes except 
from some of theTT witches and warlocks putting hex's on me. 
:) 

Blainerb


In a message dated 12/20/2005 4:00:56 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  
  
  
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: 

To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 12/19/2005 10:08:24 PM 
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Saturday 
Sabbath



I love the Bible! In 
church, we are currently studying the DC, but will begin the Old 
Testament in January, for a year. Last year we studied the BoM, the 
year before, the New Testament. It is all scripture to us. 
We do not see the problems you see with the BoM. It is 100% compatible 
with the Bible--you just have to have the perspective we have. You 
have to first believe, even if just a 
little bit, and faith will grow within you, to take over you whole soul, 
Dean.

cd: The Lord rebuke you Blain for such a evil 
suggestion. May God kill me before something that dark takes over my 
soul.





Re: [TruthTalk] Saturday Sabbath/Other lost Israelite sheep

2005-12-24 Thread Blainerb473




In a message dated 12/20/2005 4:18:51 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
cd: Jesus didn't stay he wasn't here for the Gentiles-He said 
  that he was here first for the Jews-and later the gentiles upon the Jews 
  rejection. Jew spoke to and healed many gentiles. The Samaritan woman at the 
  well was one of those he preached to-there were many others.The other sheep 
  mentioned were gentiles

Your total lack of understanding of the NT record is showing Deano, 
buddy. 


Jesus sent ONLY to the House of 
Israel-- see Matthew 15:22-26 

"And behold a woman of Canaan came . . . but he answered and 
said, I am not sent but to the lost sheep of the House of 
Israel . . . It is not meet to take the children's 
bread, and cast it to the dogs."

Gentiles given the 
gospel
Peter receivesa visionto preach to the Gentiles:(Read 
entire chapter 11 in Acts) "
When they heard these things, they held their peace, , and glorified god, 
saying, Then hath God also to the Gentiles granted 
repentance unto life." Acts 11:18

The Jews were to actually hear his voice, but the Gentiles were to receive 
the gospel via the Holy ghost and the preaching of the Apostles--






Re: [TruthTalk] Bats and the Blainer connection

2005-12-24 Thread Blainerb473





Is this a good day for "bashing' Mormons? I don't need a 
bat to defend myself, guys, the truth cuts to the center of the heart, does it 
not?
The full text, bros, reads, "And the 
person who addressed me said that all their creeds were an abomination in his 
sight; that those professors were all corrupt: they draw near to me with 
their lips, but their hearts are far from me, they teach for doctrine the 
commandments of men, having a form of Godliness, but they deny the power 
thereof."

In a message dated 12/24/2005 12:11:56 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  ok--i was hopin' 
  maybe BB'd buy a bat too--to defend his honor as a devotee of JS to whom JC so 
  wisely spaketh..say, do youknow why JC doesn'tspeak to DavidM 
  partic so wisely?
  
  On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 06:56:09 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  
Let's do ahs. Get me a price and I will exchange cash card 
info.

Also -- I think you misundstand the purpose for my 
purchase (lol -- really)

-- 
  Original message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Maple or ash, 
  Bro--hickory is way too heavy and Blaine bein' light on his feet and 
  lightheaded too probably runs faster than 
  youthink
  
  On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 05:36:27 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  

G

I want a bat. Small diameter grip. Signiture 
"Pops-- 2006" Hickory ??? 

Long and light -- is there such a thing? 

jd

-- 
  Original message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  true; 
  JCdoesn't see Mormans as Christians--neither do I, 
  Bro
  
  
  On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 23:49:48 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:
  

As Jesus said to Joseph Smith, concerning 
the Christians of that day, "They teach for 
doctrines the commandments of men, having a form of Godliness, but 
denying the power 
  thereof."




Re: [TruthTalk] sweat

2005-12-24 Thread Blainerb473



In a message dated 12/23/2005 10:31:01 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Blainerb:Pe le El--from the language of Adam and 
  Eve--sacred words that pertain specifically to the ceremony, so cannot 
  discuss further. Sorry--
  
  You lost me on this 
  one. are you saying that Mormonism knows the language spoken by A 
  and E?

I may have been mistaken--the words Pe le El seem to be Hebrew, which reads 
from right to left. I will check it out next time I go to the 
temple.

However, some clues regards the language of Adam were revealed to 
JS.
Adam-Ondi-Ahman,which seems to mean "land of God, where Adam 
dwelt;" 
Ahman A name for God, means, Man of Holiness (see Egyptian name 
of God, Ammon, or Amon, or Amen--similar?)
Son Ahman, means the Son of God
sons Ahman, means "men"
angloman, means angel
and Moses, chap 6, PofGP, where it speaks of the language of Adam being 
a pure and undefiled written language.




Re: [TruthTalk] With Thankful Hearts

2005-12-24 Thread Blainerb473




What I have concluded from intensive study concerning the life of Jesus 
Christ:

Jesus Christ, the Lamb of God, was born in the Spring, in a lambing 
cave, in a manger, on the outskirts of Bethlehem, in the Land of Jerusalem, in 
the year 1 AD. He was born in the Meridian of Time, probably at Midnight, 
on the eve of the Passover. The sun was in 
theconstellationAries, the first sign of the zodiac, sign of the 
young ram, and in medical astrology, representing the head; the moon would 
have been in the opposite sign Libra, the scales of justice--the great star was 
likely in the constellation Leo, the sign of the King, and the tribe of 
Judah. Heexpired on a cross 33 years, almost to a day, later, on a 
hill called Calvary, on the North end of the hill. It was the same hill 
upon which Abraham undertook to sacrifice Isaac, his only son, wherein God 
provided his own ram. 
Merry Christmas . . . 

Blainerb



In a message dated 12/24/2005 1:17:01 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  Christmas blessings 
  to you, Judy, and everyone on TT. 
Izzy
  
  
  
  
  
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of Judy 
  TaylorSent: Saturday, 
  December 24, 2005 7:39 AMTo: 
  truthtalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: [TruthTalk] With Thankful 
  Hearts
  
  
  
  
  Hey 
  Everyone,
  
  
  
  Please pray for us - If I'm not 
  available for a while it's because I have a houseful of needy people; I 
  hope
  
  everyoneeveryone has a peaceful 
  and joyous Christmasthat is focusedon the one true light during 
  these 
  
  diffficult times. In His 
  Love, judyt
  
  
  
  P.S. Just a wee testimony to the 
  Lord's faithfulness, love and grace. It appears as though the marriage 
  of
  
  our TX daughter is not going to make 
  it which is really sad for everyone involved and she is presently 
  travelling
  
  a lot of miles from Austin TX to 
  Norf VA with four kids, a dog, a rabbit, and a 
  hamster in her minivan to be with
  
  us over Christmas. Yesterday 
  while she was talking with me on the phone her van began to shudder and make 
  
  
  a funny noise.They looked 
  and she hadn't blown a tire. Her dad talked her thru what to do and helped her 
  to 
  
  figure out the mileage marker so she 
  would know where she was at. She then called USAA and gotsome 
  phone
  
  numbers anda man met them at a 
  Wendys and drove them to a repair place. It turned out there was a 
  big
  
  chunk out of one of her tires and he 
  said they had seen this beforeand if she had been doing 70 mph and 
  had
  
  a blowout it would havecaused 
  her van to overturn -how we rejoiced in the Lords mercy and saving grace 
  - 
  
  and how we thanked him for that 
  warning. The tires are just 6 months 
  old.




Re: [TruthTalk] sweat

2005-12-23 Thread Blainerb473





I don't see that I was wrong--I was simply saying that 
there are other Christians besides myself who considered the possibility of 
tremendous blood loss in Gethsemane. 

I was also suggesting that perhaps my post as a Mormon 
was not being given the same due consideration it might have been if I had been 
just another traditional Christian with a different opinion. :) 

Blainerb


In a message dated 12/21/2005 5:15:24 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Congratulations, 
  Blaine. 
  So you are not the first to be wrong. iz
  
  
  
  
  
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 6:40 
  PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] 
  sweat
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Blainerb: 
  Apparently I am not the first to wonder if the loss of blood at Gethsemane was considerable. See 
  below:
  
  
  
  In a message dated 
  12/19/2005 8:53:15 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  
Although some authors 
have suggested that hematidrosis produced 
hypovolemia, we agree with Bucklin5 that Jesus 
actual blood loss probably was minimal.
  
  


  


   

  
  
 
   search help
  
  

  

  
Printer-Friendly Format 

  
|
  
Email to a Friend 

  

  


  

  

  

  
  

  
  


  
  

   

   

  
  

  

  
  Definition of Hypovolemia 
  
  Hypovolemia: An abnormal decrease in blood 
  volume or, strictly speaking, an abnormal decrease in the volume 
  of blood plasma. 
  From hypo- 
  + volume + emia 
  (blood).




Re: [TruthTalk] Mormons and Christ

2005-12-23 Thread Blainerb473




 
With paerry's permission, I would appreciate it if you would 
list the characteristics descriptive of Jesus in Mormon scripture -- 
not including the KJ Mormon bible. Just your scriptures. 
Speak as a Mormon, please and not with merely personal conviction. 


Thanks, 

jd


Blainerb: Listing all His characteristics as indicated in 
"Mormon" scriptures would be difficult, time-wise at least. But will defer 
to your request as much as I have time to do so . . . The following are from the 
Doctrine and Covenants--they are either his words directly, or spoken under the 
influence of his Holy Spirit.
I will try to go to the Book of Mormon tomorrow, or as soon as I 
find time.

He is the only Savior of 
Mankind:
"Hear, oh ye heavens, and give ear, oh earth, and rejoice ye inhabitants 
thereof, for the Lord is God, and besides him, there is no Savior."

"I am Alpha and Omega, Christ the Lord; yea, even I am he, the beginning 
and the end, the Redeemer of the world."

Heis themost wise:
"Great is his wisdom, marvelous are his ways, and the extent of his doings, 
nonecan find out."

He is the most powerful:
"His purposes fail not, neither are there any who can stay his hand."

He lives!!
"And now, after the many testimonies which have been given of him, this is 
the testimony, last of all, that we give of him: that he lives. For we saw 
him, even on the right hand of God; (Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery 
speaking)

He is the only begotten Son of the 
Father:
And we heard the voice bearing record that he is the only begotten of the 
Father . . .

He is the creator:
That by him, and through him, and of him, the worlds are and were created, 
and the inhabitants thereof are begotten sons and daughters unto God.


He is subject to the will of the 
Father:
"And we beheld the glory of the Son, on the right hand of the Father, 



(The following are all continuous, Jesus Christ speaking) "I, having 
accomplished and finished the will of Him whose I am, even the Father, 
concerning me--having done this that I might subdue all things unto myself . . 
.
He will destroy Satan and his works at the last 
day:
"retaining all power, even to the destroying of Satan and his works at the 
end of the world, and the last great day of judgement . . .
He will reward men according to their deeds, good or 
evil
"which I shall pass upon the inhabitants thereof, judging every man 
according to his works and the deeds which he has done."

I fully believe these wordsareeither those ofthe 
living Christ, or were spoken under the influence of his spirit--either way, 
they are divine scripture, and therefore are binding on all who read them.
Blainerb

In a message dated 12/21/2005 6:39:36 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  
  -- 
Original message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


The Jesus of the Bible is the same 
as the one in the BoM and the DC--if you knew the one in the Bible 
better, you would recognize him in the BoM and DC--unfortunately, your 
concepts of him come from your traditions, which are largely of men. 
The Mormon Jesus is one who still has power to perform miracles, and to do a new thing--the traditions you teach have 
emasculated him beyond recognition--your Jesus is impotent--unable to work 
or act without the approval of your confused ministers or your 
stand-in-your-own-light, self-appointed preachers.
Blainerb




Re: [TruthTalk] Who decides

2005-12-23 Thread Blainerb473




jd wrote:
  How many Christians have believed and been baptized but have 
not seen anyof  these signs follow them? 
Again, we either have to conclude that theconcept  of faith 
as taught by Jesus is something greater than the popular 
conceptof  it, or that Jesus was bearing false 
testimony here, or perhaps that this  passage only applies to the 
immediate believers to whom he spoke. I take  the 
position that faith is something more than what most people 
thinkfaith  is.

Blainerb: Just for the record, I believe the 
Lord was speaking to his apostles, but was speaking concerning all whom they 
taught. As Jesus said to Joseph Smith, concerning the Christians of that 
day, "They teach for doctrines the commandments of men, 
having a form of Godliness, but denying the power thereof." (Speaking of the power of God to perform miracles)
The problem is, there is an almost 
universal disbelief in God's power to perform miraculous acts. Miracles 
are commonly reported among Mormon believers--I have experienced a number of 
them myself--almost always in connection with work in the church. 


In a message dated 12/21/2005 8:24:24 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I stated that I do in 
  my original post below.From: "ShieldsFamily" 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Reply-To: 
  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgTo: 
  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: RE: [TruthTalk] Who 
  decidesDate: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:46:19 -0600Perry, so 
  do you think the "He" in verse 16 refers only to the apostles,too? 
  izzy-Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of Dean MooreSent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 5:54 
  PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Who 
  decidescd: I agree Perry.  
  [Original Message]  From: Charles Perry Locke 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  To: 
  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org  Date: 12/21/2005 5:00:05 
  PM  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Who decides   
  David,Regarding your item 2, we might 
  also conclude that Jesus was speaking  specifically to the 
  apostles, and that this does not apply to allbelievers.  
  The key is to identify the antecedent of "He" in verse 16, which 
  Ibelieve  to exclusively be the apostles. 
Perry   David wrote: 
2. Mark 16:16-20  (16) He that believeth 
  and is baptized shall be saved; but he thatbelieveth  not 
  shall be damned.  (17) And these signs shall follow them that 
  believe; In my name shall they  cast out devils; they 
  shall speak with new tongues;  (18) They shall take up serpents; 
  and if they drink any deadly thing, it  shall not hurt them; they 
  shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall  recover.  
  (19) So then after the Lord had spoken unto them, he was received up 
  into  heaven, and sat on the right hand of God. 
   (20) And they went forth, and preached every where, the Lord working 
  with  them, and confirming the word with signs following. 
  Amen.   How many Christians have believed and been 
  baptized but have not seen anyof  these signs 
  follow them? Again, we either have to conclude that 
  theconcept  of faith as taught by Jesus is something 
  greater than the popular conceptof  it, or that 
  Jesus was bearing false testimony here, or perhaps that this  
  passage only applies to the immediate believers to whom he spoke. I 
  take  the position that faith is something more than what 
  most people thinkfaith  is.




Re: [TruthTalk] Back tot he garden

2005-12-23 Thread Blainerb473




In a message dated 12/21/2005 9:22:01 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Excuse me, but were 
  you actually under the impression that your opinion matters to me??? 
  iz
  Blainer: Ha Ha! That's Iz, huh?
  
  
  
  
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 8:57 
  PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Back tot he 
  garden
  
  
  Iz, Here's 
  a suggestion. Sometime this Christmas season, try putting this sauce on your 
  own goose:
  
  '..you derive your opinions from false 
  premises, not God’s Word' 
  
  
  
  One reason 
  for it? Evidence suggests that legalism so consumes  overwhelms your 
  belief/sthat you really can't help being trapped in its ridiculous 
  interpretations  
  contradiction/s:
  
  
  
  On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 07:17:21 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  
||
a)..we [must] 
keep the Commandments of God throughout scripture, from Genesis to 
Revelations that apply to everyone... 

b) Jesus ..make[s] 
it possible.. to KEEP His 
Commandments..something that [only a]Believer..can.. 
do...




Re: [TruthTalk] sweat

2005-12-23 Thread Blainerb473




In a message dated 12/22/2005 4:41:28 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Congratulations, 
  Blaine. 
  So you are not the first to be wrong. iz
  cd: Yes amen-Truth is 
  having her perfect way Blain.

Blainerb: Opinions . . .


Re: [TruthTalk] sweat

2005-12-23 Thread Blainerb473



In a message dated 12/22/2005 5:04:21 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  I am always happy to publish the great 
  truths of Mormonism on TT or anywhere. :)
  Blainerb
  cd: Then please tell us of this Pay-Lay-Ale 
  ceremony



  Blainerb:Pe le El--from the language of Adam and 
  Eve--sacred words that pertain specifically to the ceremony, so cannot 
  discuss further. Sorry--
The present-day ceremony is all in English, however. Pe le El is no 
longer used.



Re: [TruthTalk] DOCTRINAL DISPUTES SELDOM (DEFINE PLEASE) HAPPEN

2005-12-21 Thread Blainerb473




In a message dated 12/20/2005 3:35:36 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
LDS 
  history, Blainer.

So, what is it you are concerned about? 
Blainerb


Re: [TruthTalk] SO THEN it is safe to assume that NO MORMON RESPONSE TO THE ...

2005-12-21 Thread Blainerb473



In a message dated 12/20/2005 4:35:53 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  
  
  
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: 

To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 12/18/2005 11:24:57 PM 
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] SO THEN it is 
safe to assume that NO MORMON RESPONSE TO THE "...

In a message dated 12/17/2005 5:09:12 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  Blainerb: To "be perfect," it seems one would first have to 
  become perfect--which may take more time for some than 
  others.I do OK in following the admonitions of Jesus Christ, 
  and I believe I do better each day--but I am after all a son of Adam and 
  Eve, from whom I inherited imperfections.
  1 Cor 15:44-52
  
  cd:Christians are son of Christ -the lost are sons of AE 
  and will have no 
inheritance.

Where does it say that, Dean? We are all sons and daughters of 
Adam and Eve, who inherit the conditions of the fall. Are you an 
exception? 

ICor 15:22:"For as in Adam all die so in Christ shall all 
be made alive". I no longer have eternal death as I am of Christ not Adam. 
Also read 1 Cor 15:44-52-because of Christ I am restored-that makes me an 
exception.

Ooooh!! I see. An exception!! Hmmm, :)
Iam guessingyou are trying to interpret this passage to 
mean youhave becomeabove temptation, and the 
other conditions of fallen humanity. Is this 
correct?
Blainerb


  






Re: [TruthTalk] Cross

2005-12-21 Thread Blainerb473




The Jesus of the Bible is the same as 
the one in the BoM and the DC--if you knew the one in the Bible better, you 
would recognize him in the BoM and DC--unfortunately, your concepts of him 
come from your traditions, which are largely of men. The Mormon Jesus is 
one who still has power to perform miracles, and to 
do a new thing--the traditions you teach have emasculated him beyond 
recognition--your Jesus is impotent--unable to work or act without the approval 
of your confused ministers or your stand-in-your-own-light, self-appointed 
preachers.
Blainerb

In a message dated 12/20/2005 4:36:13 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  
  
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: 

To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 12/17/2005 5:18:02 PM 
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Cross

In a message dated 12/16/2005 8:59:42 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  discerning the difference . . .
  
  cd: And the sad part is you actually believe a man who said there 
  were 6 ft quaker like people living on the moon-as a prophet of God-very 
  sad indeed.

He may have said that, but he also testified of 
the reality of Jesus Christ. Would you count that as being 
uninspired?
Blainerb
cd: You and DaveH both mention Jesus Christ but it 
is not the Christ on the Bible-as was Smiths Christ not of God.If he was 
inspired then Smiths word would reflect Christ words they do not do 
so.Therefore the only conclusion I can draw from that is Smith is 
speaking of another Christ.Simular to the Jesus that RCC teachs-They made 
unto themselves a Christ that allows for Idol worship and sell him to people 
for attendance to their Church.

  
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: 

To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 12/16/2005 4:08:55 PM 
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] 
Cross


In a message dated 12/14/2005 5:00:06 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
cd: The why don't Mormons live by 
  Jesus's words instead of Smith's words.

Blainerb: . Smith lived and died for his testimony of 
Jesus Christ, whom he saw and spoke with on several occasions. 
Smith was His prophet, just as Moses was his prophet.There are 
exciting parallels between the two, in fact. If JS ever 
spoke anything contrary to the mind and will of the Lord, he spoke of 
himself. Being a man, having the weaknesses of a man, he may have done 
that on occasion. But that did not mean he was not a prophet who 
revealed the mind and will of Jesus Christ to man in these last 
days. Use the Holy Spirit, and the spirit of charity to be your 
guide in discerning the difference . . .

cd: And the sad part is you actually believe a man who said there 
were 6 ft quaker like people living on the moon-as a prophet of God-very 
sad 
indeed.




Re: [TruthTalk] Cross

2005-12-21 Thread Blainerb473




Blainerb: Hmm, well, at least you are able to spell out why the RCC 
Jesus is the same as the Evangelical Jesus. Also, asI said in 
another post, if Dean knew the Biblical Jesus as well as he purports to, he 
would recognize him in the BoM and the DC. He is the same 
as you have indicated below for the RCC  :) 



In a message dated 12/20/2005 8:14:16 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  My Jesus, Dean, IS NOT DEFINED by the traditons of men. Was 
  Jesus born of a virgin. Was He , at the same time, the Son of God? 
  Is He the Creator of the worlds. Was he reased from the dead 
  ? Is it His sacrifice that presents us with the forgiveness of 
  sins? Yes to all this -- and the RCC is fully agreed on 
  these ppoints. The RCC differs from my theology on two general 
  levels - the importances of works and the place in worship for the 
  traditions of the Church. A third consideration is the role of the 
  Church as the revelator of God in Christ. But our God is the same. 
  
  
  jd




Re: [TruthTalk] Sweat SHMEAT!! Let's move onto something important shall we?

2005-12-21 Thread Blainerb473





Blainerb: Lance, haven't you learned yet 
that if it is advocated by myself or DaveH, it is automatically either 
denigrated or in some way discredited. :) You are right, this 
topic should have been left alone and chalked up to being just another Christian 
interpretation of some Biblical passages dealing with events leading up to the 
crucifixion--but since it was "Mormon," it had to be discounted and put down, 
lest anyone believe--the last thing the anti's want, and the one thing they are 
most fearful of happening. 

In a message dated 12/21/2005 5:13:11 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Blainer:I'VE NO IDEA WHAT THE ANTI'S CONSIDER IMPORTANT!! IFO would 
  prefer to keep the conversation between the MC and myself on WHO IS 
  JESUS! IMO, signs/symbols/practices, though not without significance, 
  lead us on a rabbit trail of little import.
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 

Sent: December 20, 2005 19:39
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] sweat





Blainerb: Apparently I am not the first to 
wonder if the loss of blood at Gethsemane was considerable. See 
below:

In a message dated 12/19/2005 8:53:15 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Although some authors have suggested that hematidrosis 
  produced hypovolemia, we agree 
  with Bucklin5 that Jesus actual blood loss probably was 
  minimal.



  
  



  


search 
help

  

  
  
Printer-Friendly Format 
  
|
Email to a Friend 



  
  


  
  
  

  

  
  




  

Definition of Hypovolemia 
Hypovolemia: An abnormal decrease in blood volume 
or, strictly speaking, an abnormal decrease in the volume of 
blood plasma. 
From hypo- 
+ volume + emia




Fwd: [TruthTalk] sweat

2005-12-21 Thread Blainerb473




I am always happy to publish the great 
truths of Mormonism on TT or anywhere. :)
Blainerb


In a message dated 12/21/2005 5:57:26 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  Thank you for proving 
  my point. You are in error because you derive your opinions from false 
  premises, not God’s Word. Please discuss this further on TT rather than 
  private posts, thank you. izzy
  
  
  
  
  
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 6:14 
  PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] 
  sweat
  
  
  
  In a message dated 
  12/19/2005 10:06:28 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  
Blaine, there is NOTHING in scripture to back 
up what you are saying. It is entirely your speculation. Where 
did you get that idea? Is that another mormon doctrine thingy? So what was 
the anecdote that convinced you of this regarding Jesus Himself? 
iz
  
  Blainerb: 
  Kevin posted some of the Mormon doctrine 
  sources for this belief--guess you did not read them--definitely Mormon 
  doctrines:
  
  
  
  
  Encyclopedia 
  of Mormonism
  
  ... For Latter-day 
  Saints, Gethsemane was the scene of Jesus' greatest agony, even surpassing 
  that which he suffered on the cross, an understanding supported by Mark's 
  description of Jesus' experience (Mark 
  14:33-39). 
  
  
  
  
  ... 
  The evidence for Jesus' extreme agony in Gethsemane is buttressed by a 
  prophecy in the Book of Mormon and a statement by the resurrected Savior 
  recorded in the Doctrine and Covenants. About 
  125 B.C., a Book of Mormon king, Benjamin, recounted in an important address a 
  prophecy of the coming messiah spoken to him by an angel during the previous 
  night. Concerning the Messiah's mortal 
  experience, 
  the 
  angel declared that "he shall 
  suffer temptations, and pain of body, hunger, thirst, and fatigue, even more 
  than man can suffer, except it be unto death; for behold, blood cometh from 
  every pore, so great shall be his anguish for the wickedness and the 
  abominations of his people" (Mosiah 3:7). 
  The Doctrine and Covenants gives the 
  following poignant words of the resurrected Jesus: 
  "Behold, I, God, have 
  suffered these things for all, that they might not suffer if they would 
  repent; …which suffering caused myself, even God, the greatest of all, to 
  tremble because of pain, and to bleed at every pore, and to suffer both body 
  and spirit" (DC 19:16, 
  18). 
  
  
  Modern 
  LDS leaders have emphasized that Jesus' most challenging experience came in 
  Gethsemane. Speaking in a general conference of the 
  Church in 1982, Marion G. Romney, a member of the First Presidency, observed 
  that Jesus suffered "the pains of all men, which he did, principally, in Gethsemane, the scene of his great agony" 
  (Ensign 12 [May 1982]:6). 
  Church President Ezra 
  Taft Benson wrote that "it was in Gethsemane 
  that Jesus took on Himself the sins of the 
  world, in 
  Gethsemane that His pain was equivalent to the cumulative burden of all men, 
  in Gethsemane that He descended below all things so that all could repent and 
  come to Him" 
  (Benson, p. 7). (Encyclopedia of 
  Mormonism, edited by Daniel H. Ludlow, New York: Macmillan 
  Publishing Company, 1992, p. 542) 



---BeginMessage---








Thank you for proving my point. You are
in error because you derive your opinions from false premises, not Gods Word.
Please discuss this further on TT rather than private posts, thank you. izzy











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005
6:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] sweat









In a message dated 12/19/2005 10:06:28
P.M. Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:





Blaine, there is NOTHING in scripture to back up
what you are saying. It is entirely your speculation. Where did you
get that idea? Is that another mormon doctrine thingy? So what was the anecdote
that convinced you of this regarding Jesus Himself? iz







Blainerb:
Kevin posted some of the Mormon doctrine
sources for this belief--guess you did not read them--definitely Mormon
doctrines:













Encyclopedia
of Mormonism





... For Latter-day
Saints, Gethsemane was the scene of Jesus' greatest agony, even surpassing
that which he suffered on the cross, an understanding supported by Mark's
description of Jesus' experience (Mark 14:33-39). 











... The evidence
for Jesus' extreme agony in Gethsemane is buttressed by a prophecy in the
Book of Mormon and a statement by the resurrected Savior recorded in the
Doctrine and Covenants. About 125 B.C., a Book of Mormon king,
Benjamin, recounted in an important address a prophecy of the coming messiah
spoken to him by an angel during the previous night. Concerning the Messiah's
mortal experience, the angel declared that
he shall suffer temptations, and pain of body, hunger, thirst, and

Re: [TruthTalk] sweat

2005-12-20 Thread Blainerb473







Blainerb: Apparently I am not the first to 
wonder if the loss of blood at Gethsemane was considerable. See 
below:

In a message dated 12/19/2005 8:53:15 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Although some authors have suggested that hematidrosis produced 
  hypovolemia, we agree with Bucklin5 
  that Jesus actual blood loss probably was 
minimal.



  
  



  



search 
help

  

  
  
Printer-Friendly Format 

|
Email to a Friend 


  
  


  
  
  

  

  
  




  

Definition of Hypovolemia 
Hypovolemia: An abnormal decrease in blood volume or, 
strictly speaking, an abnormal decrease in the volume of blood plasma. 
From hypo- 
+ volume + emia 
(blood).


Re: [TruthTalk] Saturday Sabbath

2005-12-19 Thread Blainerb473





I love the Bible! In church, 
we are currently studying the DC, but will begin the Old Testament in 
January, for a year. Last year we studied the BoM, the year before, the 
New Testament. It is all scripture to us. We do not see the 
problems you see with the BoM. It is 100% compatible with the Bible--you 
just have to have the perspective we have. You have to first believe, even if just a little bit, and faith will 
grow within you, to take over you whole soul, Dean.


In a message dated 12/19/2005 4:40:06 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  
  
  
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: 

To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 12/18/2005 11:05:09 PM 
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Saturday 
Sabbath


Just another little disagreement as to what conclusions can be reached 
in reading a particular passage in the Bible. 

Blainerb
cd: The bible say to study to show thyself approved. Some 
passages must be studied-I see no problem here-you bias against the Bible is 
showing Blain-better cover it.





Re: [TruthTalk] DOCTRINAL DISPUTES SELDOM (DEFINE PLEASE) HAPPEN

2005-12-19 Thread Blainerb473





Are we talking about my personal history, or the history of the LDS 
Church? I have volumes on the latter. Only one autobiog on 
myself.
Blainerb

In a message dated 12/19/2005 5:04:54 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Blainer: Just how well (seriously) do you know your own history?
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 

Sent: December 19, 2005 00:06
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] SO THEN it is 
safe to assume that NO MORMON RESPONSE TO THE "...



Most Bishops have so much to do that they have little time to answer 
petty questions to resolve doctrinal disputes. I would not take a 
problem of that nature to my Bishop. No one I know would. 
Doctrinal disputes seldom happen, since the BoM and the DC are very 
clear. I know this sounds weird, but it happens to be true. If I 
have a doctrinal misunderstanding, I just study it out in my own mind, and 
the answer usually presents itself via the Spirit of the Lord. 
Blainerb


In a message dated 12/18/2005 9:36:36 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Blaine, if you and a fellow mormon disagreed on the meaning of a 
  verse, you would go to your Bishop, he would tell you what it means, 
  and regardless of the answer, you both would acceot that, am I right? 
  If not, how would you resolve 
  it?




Re: [TruthTalk] Saturday Sabbath/Other lost Israelite sheep

2005-12-19 Thread Blainerb473




JD was just stating a biblical truth, Dean. Jesus said 
several times he was sent to the house of Israel ONLY!!! He never went to 
the Gentiles. His apostles did that. But he did visit the Israelite 
branches in the Americas and the isles of the sea--these werehis "other 
sheep." And because the visit was in person, they heard his 
voice.
Blainerb


In a message dated 12/19/2005 4:42:06 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Blainerb: VERY GOOD, 
  jd!! 
  
  Jesus said several times he was sentonly to the House of Israel, 
  which is why he even went to the Samaritans, many of whom had Jewish 
  bloodlines. 
  That being concluded, what do you think when he said,
  "Other sheep I have which are not of 
  this fold, and they too I must visit, and they too must Hear My 
  Voice!" 
  cd: Is John and the LDS in agreement now?
  
  
  In a message dated 12/17/2005 3:25:29 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  
Christ's physical ministry was to the Jew, only. He lived 
under the law and was the fulfillment of that law. In Him is the end 
of the law. 




Re: [TruthTalk] sweat

2005-12-19 Thread Blainerb473




In a message dated 12/18/2005 7:28:12 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
13And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and 
  his name is called The Word of God. 

I have trodden the winepress alone, . . . 

Sure seems to be a strong emphasis on lots of 
blood--Gethsemane?
Blainer


Re: [TruthTalk] sweat

2005-12-19 Thread Blainerb473





Thank you Iz, this is talking about none other than the Lord Jesus Christ, 
right? John also calls him "the Word." 
Blainerb

In a message dated 12/18/2005 1:33:45 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  rev.11And I saw heaven opened, and 
  behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, 
  and in righteousness he doth judge and make war. 
  12His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on his head were 
  many crowns; and he had a name written, that no man knew, but he himself. 
  
  13And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and 
  his name is called The Word of God. 
  14And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon 
  white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean. 
  
  iz
  




Re: [TruthTalk] sweat

2005-12-19 Thread Blainerb473




Oh, well, at least we have agreed he bled in Gethsemane, is that a 
conclusion I can count on? :) Maybe not so much as I thought tho, 
huh? 

Blainerb


In a message dated 12/19/2005 8:14:29 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Although this is a very rare phenomenon, bloody sweat 
  (hematidrosis or hemihidrosis) may occur in highly emotional states or in 
  persons with bleeding disorders. (18,20) As a result of hemorrhage into the 
  sweat glands, the skin becomes fragile and tender. (2,11) Luke's description 
  supports the diagnosis of hematidrosis rather than eccrine chromidrosis (brown 
  or yellow-green sweat) or stigmatization (blood oozing from the palms or 
  elsewhere). (18-21) Although some authors have suggested that hematidrosis 
  produced hypovolemia, we agree with Bucklin5 that Jesus actual blood loss 
  probably was minimal.
  
  http://www.holytrinity.ok.goarch.org/Interesting%20Stuff/Special%20Communication%20Plus%20Picture.html 
  
  A 
  Physician Looks at the Crucifixion of Jesus 
  Christ
  
  izzy




Re: [TruthTalk] Condition of heart of unregenerate gentiles

2005-12-18 Thread Blainerb473




In a message dated 12/17/2005 12:41:17 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  you manipulate it 
  too, as clearly proven
  
  On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 14:28:17 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:
  
||
I quote..scripture as written in the KJV 
Bible

I think it was Lance who asked DaveH and/or I what our perception of 
traditional Christianity was. Please forgive me for not having the post 
ready at hand--I think it got lost somewhere, but I recall it well enough to 
talk about it, anyway, I believe.
The short but sweet discussion above about covers my perception of one of 
the main characteristics of Traditional Christianity--lots 
of disagreement, even when it comes to the same passages in the Bible. 


Mainstream Christians talk about the "Church" as if it were one, but this 
appears to be more lip service than reality. The hard reality, as I see 
it, is that although we have been blessed with a bible, we can't agree on what 
it says.

I am very much impressed with the work of the great reformers, especially 
Tyndale, who had eight different languages at his disposal, 
but I see his work and the works of most other reformers as being a prelude to 
the restoration of the Gospel as contained in the Book of Mormon and other 
books, not an end in 
itself. To my view, the Protestant reformation was 
of God--most definitely!! Unfortunately, most Protestants 
reached the unjustified conclusion that making the Bible available to the common 
man, which again I believe was clearly one of God's great works, meant it was OK 
to say "lo here," and "lo there," as every man and his brother then became 
self-styled experts on what it all meant. 
Fortunately, God saw the confusion, and called upon 
his servant Joseph Smith and others to rectify the condition--thus the coming 
forth of the Book of Mormon!! End of first installment. More later, 
if I do not get submerged in one of TT's endless 
controversies!


Re: [TruthTalk] Cross

2005-12-18 Thread Blainerb473



In a message dated 12/17/2005 2:18:03 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Blaine, DaveH kicked himself off.
  The Moderator told him that it was his last 
  warning - that's all... because they kept ignoring him and went on with a 
  thread
  he told them to take offline. Who told 
  you he was kicked off?? judyt

I got it that he was actually kicked off after discussion with DaveM and 
Perry, with conditions being set to get back on. DaveH sent me 
a private e-mail.




Re: [TruthTalk] Cross

2005-12-18 Thread Blainerb473




In a message dated 12/17/2005 2:26:31 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
IFO have 
  thought of DaveH as one of the more discrimitating contributors to 
  TT.Should he be invited back with an accompanying apology and full 
  complicity?

I enjoy his insights, altho lately he has not been pulling punches as he 
usually does. 
Blainerb


Re: [TruthTalk] Cross

2005-12-18 Thread Blainerb473




I think they know who they are, too, but that doesn't seem to faze 
them. 
Blainerb

In a message dated 12/17/2005 2:53:13 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  He is certainly not nearly as disruptive as at least two others on this 
  forum. I jwill tnot refer kto them by dname but they probably know who 
  they are? 
  
  jd
  
  -- 
Original message -- From: "Lance Muir" 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 



IFO have thought of DaveH as one of the more discrimitating 
contributors to TT.Should he be invited back with an accompanying 
apology and full complicity?

  - Original Message - 





Re: [TruthTalk] Saturday Sabbath

2005-12-18 Thread Blainerb473




Just another little disagreement as to what conclusions can be reached in 
reading a particular passage in the Bible. 

Blainerb


In a message dated 12/17/2005 3:10:10 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  Dean, the words of Romans 14 eliminates all holy days. To escape 
  this conclusion, one must add some sort of contextual 
  consideration.Such is perfectedly permissible ... the 
  larger context of a passage is always an important 
  consideration. But, your conclusions regarding the 
  observance of the sabbath is based upon this contextual consideration and not 
  upon the literal wording of the passage. You could be 
  right BUT not necessarily. Agreed? So there is room 
  for disagreement on this issue (?)
  
  jd
  cd:If Romans 14 eliminates all Holy Days why then did 
  Christ and Paul keep those Holy Days? Why did the early Christians keep the 
  Sat. Sabb. and honor the first day?On considering the Contextual meaning 
  relating of the passage in Question one must insert the passage into the 
  context of the entirechapter or the meaning of the passage will be 
  lost-and once that is done insert the chapter into the entire Bible. The 
  context of thechapter deals with eating herbs or meats on Holy days and 
  to not judge ones brother if they eat herbs or eat other foods. No where in 
  the context of this passage does it mention the Sabbath-it is speaking of the 
  Feasts of Israel (ie called Holy Days). Is there not a Commentary available 
  for you or Terry to research?If not E-Sword is a good starting place.Your 
  argument would be better fought using Col 2:6. Romans 14:5 Is teaching us to 
  be fully persuaded that there is not sin involved-breaking a commandment is 
  sin therefore the Sabbath is obligatory.
  




Re: [TruthTalk] Saturday Sabbath

2005-12-18 Thread Blainerb473




Blainerb: VERY GOOD, jd!! 


Jesus said several times he was sentonly to the House of Israel, 
which is why he even went to the Samaritans, many of whom had Jewish 
bloodlines. 
That being concluded, what do you think when he said,
"Other sheep I have which are not of 
this fold, and they too I must visit, and they too must Hear My 
Voice!" 


In a message dated 12/17/2005 3:25:29 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Christ's physical ministry was to the Jew, only. He lived 
  under the law and was the fulfillment of that law. In Him is the end of 
  the law. 
  
  
  As to Paul, it is Paul who writes against holy 
  days. Why did he continue to keep them (and I believe he 
  kept ALL of them) : he became all things to all men that by all 
  means he might save some. He was a Jew to the Jews, and a 
  Gentile to the Gentiles. 
  
  jd




Re: [TruthTalk] sweat

2005-12-18 Thread Blainerb473



In a message dated 12/17/2005 4:03:10 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
English nuancecaptures the 
  foregoingNT concept in the compounded wording, blood shed, or, shed 
  blood, which, as is obvious,isproperly associatedwith 
  Golgotha, not 
  Gethsemane

Then you must not really believe everything the Bible says--he sweated 
great drops of blood in Gethsemane--recall the officers of the High Priest, who 
came to take him? When he identified himself as the one they wanted, they 
fell backwards. Ever wonder why? Probably because he was so 
bloodied--even his clothes probably had blood on them. His hair was 
probably matted with blood at that point. Also, what about his forty 
stripes? You think he she blood there and then? Probably lots of 
it. I am amazed he wasn't so dehydrated and weak from loss of blood, by 
the time he picked up his cross, that he was even alive. 




Re: [TruthTalk] Condition of heart of unregenerate gentiles

2005-12-18 Thread Blainerb473





Note please, disagreement on the meaning of Matt 7-11? More Christian 
disagreement? 
Blainerb :)

In a message dated 12/17/2005 4:25:33 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Read what I said again JD and stop putting words in 
  my mouth
  I was not interpreting Matt 7:11 to mean this; I 
  merely said that ppl in churches that believe in the spiritual
  gifts use this verse to encourage people to seek the 
  baptism in the Holy Spirit. This is not my view, it is
  theirs... You sure don't read too accurately do 
  you JD?
  
  On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:48:10 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  
Your view that Mattt 7:11 is talking about the reception of the baptism 
of the Holy spirit is the most recent case in 
  point.




Re: [TruthTalk] SO THEN it is safe to assume that NO MORMON RESPONSE TO THE ...

2005-12-18 Thread Blainerb473



In a message dated 12/17/2005 5:09:12 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  Blainerb: To "be perfect," it seems one would first have to become 
  perfect--which may take more time for some than others.I do OK in 
  following the admonitions of Jesus Christ, and I believe I do better each 
  day--but I am after all a son of Adam and Eve, from whom I inherited 
  imperfections.
  
  cd:Christians are son of Christ -the lost are sons of AE and 
  will have no inheritance.

Where does it say that, Dean? We are all sons and daughters of Adam 
and Eve, who inherit the conditions of the fall. Are you an 
exception? 




Re: [TruthTalk] Mormonism: some important differences

2005-12-18 Thread Blainerb473





You raise far too many issues for me to take time with--one of the rules of 
TT as I have understood them is to keep it simple--so, choose whatever, and I 
will try to deal with it. But the shotgun approach is too time consuming, 
OK? Thanks for you reply and your interest
Blainerb 

In a message dated 12/17/2005 6:30:41 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  BLOOD is the key word, I think--which he shed 
  in large quantitiesin Gethsemane--apparently more than he actually shed 
  on Calvary
  
  Sweat AS IF drops of blood.Isn't this thewording of 
  the biblical text? I don't know that there was any blood in 
  Gethsemaneexcept by thehand ofPeter. But, if there was 
  , it was "drops." After the garden, He was beaten nearly to death 
  and on the cross, we have the wounds in his hands and feet, the blood from the 
  thorny crown and the wound to His side. Blaine, really, you 
  couldn't be more mistaken on this one. But more than this, the 
  First Scriptures do not attach atonement significance to Gethsemane.
  
  So, for me, I have learned from the Mormon representatives several issues 
  that separate us :
  
  1. They have a "right church" view of the Christian assembly and 
  membership in the "right church" is critical to what happens in the next 
  life. 
  
  2. The grace that saves is neither separated from works of 
  law, nor is it unmerited in that sense. Mormonism is a works 
  salvationist religion. 
  
  3 The Mormon view of Jewish history is vastly different from 
  the Jewish view of Jewish history - especially as it applies to 
  the "lost tribes," but, also as it applies to the Jewish teachings of 
  blood sacrifice for sin, the failings of a 
  law-basedrelationship with God and the importance of the death of 
  Christ from a Jewish point of view ... 
  crtical differences, all.
  
  4.Mormon scripture cannot be verified by anyone other than 
  the Mormon faithful.
  
  5. The biblical doctrine (the "Frist 
  Scriptures") teaches a very different Jesus than that of the Mormon 
  religion.
  
  6. The "atonement" doctrine between Christianity and 
  Mormonism is markedly different. This difference can be most 
  easily seen as one Faith gives emphasis to the crossand the shedding of 
  blood while the other does not. If the two 
  representatives of Mormonism are typical, those in the Christian 
  Faith may assume that the notion of the shedding of blood is not understood as 
  it relates to the Law, to the cross or to the continuing forgiveness of the 
  saint. 
  
  7. They cannot answer questions as to the differences between the 
  First Scriptures (written and given to a church the Mormons believe to be in 
  good standing - before the "apostasy") and the those scriptures given some 
  1800 years later. The differences are remarkablein 
  termsquanity and substance. TheMormon notion 
  that the First Chruch wasthe Right Church demands that the teaching of 
  that first church is both completely revealed and 
  correct. There should be no difference between the First 
  Scriptures and the Mormon seconds. 
  
  8. Mormon organization and church terminology is markedly different 
  from the biblical church or the pre-apostate church of history. If 
  we beleive that God "did it right" the first time, in regards to the 
  church, there should be no reason for any differences between the Mormon 
  church and scripture and that of the First Church and the First 
  Scriptures. 
  
  
  Note: it is not my intention to outline all of the difference, only those 
  that are of significance to me, those that make the Mormon Faith an 
  impossible religion to defend as "Christian" from my point of 
  view. I would love the opportunity to share in a public discussion 
  of these issues. 
  
  How does this affect their place in the sight of God? 
  My personal view is this: Joe Smith knew full well that he was an 
  imposture. Few others would have this knowledge. I do 
  believe that God will take this into consideration as the 
  judge of such things. Only because of the truth of the 
  incarnation and the unmerited nature of grace do any of us have a chance at 
  all. God is bigger than any of our failings and the name of Jesus 
  need not be uttered to have redeeming value. 
  
  jd
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  -- 
Original message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 



BLOOD is the key word, I think--which he 
shed in large quantitiesin Gethsemane--apparently more than he 
actually shed on Calvary. When he returns he will be wearing 
red--right? This is a symbol of his blood drenching his entire 
body, which it did not do on the cross. In fact, other than the 
wounds in his hands, feet, and sides, little blood was shed on the Calvary 
cross. 
Blainerb





Re: [TruthTalk] ** Moderator comment **

2005-12-18 Thread Blainerb473




In a message dated 12/17/2005 11:21:23 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Well, Dean, we are in full agreement on this one. 

  
  jd
  
  -- 
Original message -- From: "Dean Moore" 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


Kevin, Blain-while I am not the 
Moderator I would like to remind you guys that according to the Holy Spirit 
we are suppose to be subject to authority-Here Perry is that 
authority.







Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: The tree

2005-12-18 Thread Blainerb473






Lots of confusion, huh?
Blainerb


In a message dated 12/18/2005 10:51:21 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Confusion only comes 
  from questioning God words. We only do that when we prefer the snake’s 
  words. Confusion is the result of attempted compromise. Compromise is 
  simply disobedience wearing grey. Iz
  
  PS The snake offers 
  immediate gratification. The result is inevitable degradation. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 9:51 
  AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: The 
  tree
  
  
  One other thought: it seems to me that Eve 
  is first confused by outside influences (the snake) and then 
  - out of this confusion -- she commits the sin. I 
  mean, she is created in the image of God and , yet, the temptation 
  is "you will become like God." Can it be said that sin springs from this 
  same confusion? If we all share in the same sin (Ro 5:12), 
  do we not share in the same confusion? And, so 
  what??
  
  
  
  
  
  jd




Re: [TruthTalk] SO THEN it is safe to assume that NO MORMON RESPONSE TO THE ...

2005-12-18 Thread Blainerb473





Most Bishops have so much to do that they have little time to answer petty 
questions to resolve doctrinal disputes. I would not take a problem of 
that nature to my Bishop. No one I know would. Doctrinal disputes 
seldom happen, since the BoM and the DC are very clear. I know this 
sounds weird, but it happens to be true. If I have a doctrinal 
misunderstanding, I just study it out in my own mind, and the answer usually 
presents itself via the Spirit of the Lord. 
Blainerb


In a message dated 12/18/2005 9:36:36 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Blaine, 
  if you and a fellow mormon disagreed on the meaning of a verse, you would 
  go to your Bishop, he would tell you what it means, and regardless of the 
  answer, you both would acceot that, am I right? If not, how would you 
  resolve it?From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Reply-To: 
  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgTo: 
  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] SO THEN it is safe 
  to assume that NO MORMON RESPONSE TO THE "...Date: Sun, 18 Dec 
  2005 23:24:46 ESTIn a message dated 12/17/2005 5:09:12 P.M. 
  Mountain Standard Time,[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:Blainerb: To "be perfect," it 
  seems one would first have to becomeperfect--which may take more time 
  for some than others. I do OK in following 
  theadmonitions of Jesus Christ, and I believe I do better each 
  day--but I am afterall a son of Adam and Eve, from whom I 
  inherited imperfections.cd:Christians are son of Christ 
  -the lost are sons of AE and will have 
  noinheritance.Where does it say that, 
  Dean? We are all sons and daughters of Adam andEve, who 
  inherit the conditions of the fall. Are you an 
  exception?




Re: [TruthTalk] sweat

2005-12-18 Thread Blainerb473




In a message dated 12/18/2005 10:00:08 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Blaine that is SO 
  ridiculous. Where do you get this stuff?? 
  iz

Sorry my thinking does not jive with yours--Actually, this is not 
necessarily Mormon doctrine, just my own thinking out loud. But the blood 
of Gethsemane was a reality. And it WAS there that the sins of mankind 
were atoned for. The cross was where he died, in order that he might be 
resurrected and over come death, brought into the world by the fall of 
Adam--

As in Adam all men die, even so in Christ shall all be 
made alive.


Re: [TruthTalk] LDS Restoration - BAAL Worship/ Kevin projecting evil

2005-12-17 Thread Blainerb473




Blainerb: A true angel of light is 
just that--an angel of light.Not all angels of light are Satan 
masquerading as such. Most are real. Moroni was real, but when Satan 
appeared on the banks of the Susquehanna River masquerading as an angel of 
light, he was detected by Michael, the archangel (of light). That is the 
only account I know where Satan tried to pass himself off as an angel of 
light. 

In a message dated 12/15/2005 6:08:21 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  IT was the DC that said Moroni was an Angel of light thus 
  SATAN
  By the way he was not "posing" he was Transformed like your false 
  apostles are transformed. Remember this "heavenly" messenger came on the 
  occult Autumn Equinox and told joe to observe the same for the next few 
  years.
  
  Moroni APPEARS as an angel of Light
  JSH 2:30I discovered a light appearing 
  in my room, which continued to increase until the room was lighter than at 
  noonday
  
  Autumn Equinox Visitations
  Introductory page of the DC, 3rd paragraph says; “This 
  took place in the early spring of 1820. 
  In September, 1823, and at later times, Joseph Smith received 
  visitations from Moroni, an angel of 
  light"
  
  
  For such are false apostles, 
  deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. 
  And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of 
  light.
  
  http://www.lifeafter.org/angel.asp
  
  Angel of 
  LightAggelos; 
  a messenger. Phos; face, luminous, fire, light
  It is one of Satan’s most blatant exposé’s of the whole Mormon 
  legend. The sad thing about it is 
  that the Mormon won’t see it because he believes that he’s untouchable 
  in his garments. Don’t 
  be fooled my friend, Satan is indeed an angel of light, just like Moroni. Think about it, he even took 
  the place of the cross on top of the temples. He’s there trumpeting to the whole 
  world that he’s in charge. He’s 
  not there to proclaim the return of Jesus, guaranteed.
  
  Don't think you can be 
  deceived?
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Is this your Jesus?
  
  Occultists look for Angels of light
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  


Blainerb: "RIDLED?" You mean "RIDDLED?" 
You and your street preacher friends have eyes but are blind to the 
truth. You see occult stuff all over, I suppose, even in American 
flags, American war planes, medals of honor, etc. If an angel appeared 
to you, you would say it was Satan posing as an angel of light. By the 
way, when are you going to tell us more about the beat up star you showed, 
with 666 on it? We want a URL on that please. 



In a message dated 12/13/2005 4:18:43 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Your 
  religion is RIDLED with occult Themes and you want to 
  joke?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
  


Blainerb: LOL The maintenance people in and around the 
temple wear ordinary work clothing--no red suits or pitchforks. 
Have you been having nightmares, or, worse yet, hallucinations? Don't 
let these things get to you, Kevin. You must get a hold of 
yourself!


In a message dated 12/13/2005 4:38:11 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
LOL and the guy with the red suit  
  pitchfork is just the maintenance 
  man[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
  


Blainerb: If Kevin were honest 
with TT'rs, he would tell you the truth--the stars"plastered 
all over" the Salt Lake Temple, altho all five-sided, are not all inverted. Some are, some are 
not. They were placed there for decorative purposes, as 
well as symbolizing the North Star, the Morning star, the Star of 
Bethlehem, the Telestial Kingdom, the creations of God, 
etc. 







Re: [TruthTalk] Cross

2005-12-17 Thread Blainerb473




Blainerb: Yeah, Kevin, I 
repeat Dave's question--will Jesus be wearing a chain around his neck with a 
cross dangling on it when he comes? I always understood he would be 
dressed in red, symbol of the blood he spilt in the Garden of 
Gethsemene. 
And, if he is not wearing his cross, 
what then? 


In a message dated 12/15/2005 6:16:56 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  LDS buildings have a Golden Angel on top pointing east just another 
  coincident?
  Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Do 
you hate the cross also?DAVEH: No Kevin..I do 
not hate the cross. I just find it peculiarly interesting that many 
Christians seem so attached to the device used to torture and kill our 
Lord. When Jesus returns to the earth, do you think it likely he 
will be wearing a chain around his neck with a cross attached? 
 Furthermore, why do you feel the implied need to 
categorize people as cross lovers or cross haters? Is it not possible 
that one can look upon the cross in its historical context, by recognizing 
what it did to our Savior without categorizing him (not referring to Jesus) 
as a cross hater? How would you categorize Jesus.is he a cross 
lover or hater?




Re: [TruthTalk] SO THEN it is safe to assume that NO MORMON RESPONSE TO THE ...

2005-12-17 Thread Blainerb473




In a message dated 12/16/2005 8:59:46 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  So a Satanist is on vacation in Utah
  he decides to take a tour of the temple.
  What do you think his thoughts would be when he sees his symbol for his 
  god on your buildings?

Blainerb: Actually, that is not 
outside the realm of possibility--a lot of people vacationing in Utah see the 
stars and etc. on the temples. Most are not concerned, unless they have 
been brainwashed by the Street Preachers. 
But, in answer to your question, I hope 
he would investigate the LDS religion and become enlightened as we are--he would 
have to give up his Satan worship, however, to be baptized into the 
Church.


Re: [TruthTalk] SO THEN it is safe to assume that NO MORMON RESPONSE TO THE ...

2005-12-17 Thread Blainerb473




Blainerb: To "be perfect," it seems one would first have to become 
perfect--which may take more time for some than others.I do OK in 
following the admonitions of Jesus Christ, and I believe I do better each 
day--but I am after all a son of Adam and Eve, from whom I inherited 
imperfections.


In a message dated 12/16/2005 9:03:41 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  "Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father in heaven is 
  perfect." 
  
  Notice it does not say become perfect it says BE - Present TENSE
  How are you doing?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  



You are entitled to your opinion, Lance, however, I do not see that 
such Mormon beliefs as you have outlined detract from traditional 
Christianity--they do go beyond it, but I see no reason this should be an 
arrow in the side of Christians who are trying to live Christianity as they 
understand it.I see nothing unhallowed in the 
God-was-a-man-who-became-perfect beliefs of the Mormon Church--in fact, it 
seems to be quite a lofty idea, aimed at improving one's motivationto 
become perfect and more god-like. As Jesus said, "Be ye 
therefore perfect, even as your Father in heaven is perfect." Do you 
not intend to keep this commandment, Lance? 
Blainerb




Re: [TruthTalk] ** Moderator comment **

2005-12-17 Thread Blainerb473




Oh, yeah, now I remember writing that. I should have just said I was 
holding my breath, huh? :)
Blainerb



In a message dated 12/16/2005 8:54:01 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  Can you print the entire context, please? 
  
  Blainerb
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 1:00 
  PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Izzy's sex 
  lifeHi Izzy, I was looking through some of my old e-mails and 
  came upon one with the above subject title--jus' thought I'd let you know 
  I am still waiting with 'bated breath for your more complete 
  description . . 
  .Blainerb[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  wrote: 
  

In a message dated 12/16/2005 2:03:37 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Sinceyou have been asked to stop stirring the pot
  And some subjects have been identified as OFF LIMITS
  I have declined to comment
  But since you guys can not leave it alone
  
  I was refering to your PRIVATE email off list to a member of this 
  list stating you were
  "waiting with 'bated breath for your more complete description . . 
  ."

First of all, I don't recall writing to anyone in 
private. If I did, it may have been becauseI had not noticed it 
was private. Who was it that got the letter in private, Kevin? 
Are you the one? It must have been you, or Dean--both of you have 
brought this up--and if it was private why did you post it contrary to the 
rules?.

Secondly, I vaguely remember making 
that comment, but I don't recall the context in whichI made it. 
Can you print the entire context, please? 
Blainerb




Re: [TruthTalk] Cross

2005-12-17 Thread Blainerb473



In a message dated 12/16/2005 8:59:42 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  discerning the difference . . .
  
  cd: And the sad part is you actually believe a man who said there were 6 
  ft quaker like people living on the moon-as a prophet of God-very sad 
  indeed.

He may have said that, but he also testified of the 
reality of Jesus Christ. Would you count that as being 
uninspired?
Blainerb

  
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: 

To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 12/16/2005 4:08:55 PM 
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Cross


In a message dated 12/14/2005 5:00:06 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
cd: The why don't Mormons live by Jesus's 
  words instead of Smith's words.

Blainerb: . Smith lived and died for his testimony of Jesus 
Christ, whom he saw and spoke with on several occasions. Smith was His 
prophet, just as Moses was his prophet.There are exciting parallels 
between the two, in fact. If JS ever spoke anything contrary to 
the mind and will of the Lord, he spoke of himself. Being a man, having the 
weaknesses of a man, he may have done that on occasion. But that did 
not mean he was not a prophet who revealed the mind and will of Jesus Christ 
to man in these last days. Use the Holy Spirit, and the spirit of 
charity to be your guide in discerning the difference . . .

cd: And the sad part is you actually believe a man who said there were 
6 ft quaker like people living on the moon-as a prophet of God-very sad 
indeed.




Re: [TruthTalk] sweat

2005-12-17 Thread Blainerb473




A good reason, but there had to be a more profound reason, huh?


In a message dated 12/16/2005 8:59:46 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  

How about to fulfill prophecy? Is that a good reason?

Blainer wrote

  
   I am not sure why dying had to take place on the cross, 
  eventually, unless it has something to do with overcoming death--which had 
  to be done in order to overcome the effects of Adam's transgression and 
  fall, wherein death was brought into the world. 
  




Re: [TruthTalk] sweat

2005-12-17 Thread Blainerb473






Then what do youthink Gethsemane was all about? He shed blood 
then, as well as on the cross, and was in such an agony as to almost 
die. Dying was not the only sacrifice he made. He 
suffered for sin in Gethsemane,he died on Calvary, in order to overcome 
death, and made it possible for us to do the same. He had to die, but I am 
not so sure it had to be on the cross.

In a message dated 12/16/2005 8:59:53 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  
  
  
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: 

To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 12/16/2005 6:17:55 PM 
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] sweat


Hmm, good points, Kevin, but I doubt there is really a discrepancy or 
contradiction, otherwise how are you going to explain the agony of 
Gethsemene? What he suffered on the cross was more physical, which 
lead to his death--but there obviously was the agony of Gethsemene, wherein 
he suffered for the sins of mankind, to such an extent as to come 
justshort of dying. I am not sure why dying had to take place on 
the cross, eventually, unless it has something to do with overcoming 
death--which had to be done in order to overcome the effects of Adam's 
transgression and fall, wherein death was brought into the world. That 
would make sense to me--but let's face it, the entire matter of his being 
able to reconcile man with God after the fall of Adam which brought sin and death into the world 
was a great miracle. I am not sure any man fully comprehends it. 
We see in part through the glass darkly now, but someday we will see more 
clearly, hopefully.nbs p;

cd: The simple fact that Jesus walked out of the 
garden and failed to walk away from the cross (yes,I Know He rose 3 
days later) but he had to be carried from the cross should prove the 
crosswas life threaten not the garden-In the Garden he was praying 
hard for the believers and the world-so hard that blood fell as drops of 
sweat would fall.John chapter 17 is the prayer he prayed in the Garden -you 
should read it-good stuff. There have been other Believers-through out 
history-who have also prayedin this mannerhard and had 
blood also come out of their pours as sweat would.

In a message dated 12/16/2005 1:29:55 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 





Re: [TruthTalk] sweat

2005-12-17 Thread Blainerb473





BLOOD is the key word, I think--which he shed 
in large quantitiesin Gethsemane--apparently more than he actually shed on 
Calvary. When he returns he will be wearing red--right? This is a 
symbol of his blood drenching his entire body, which it did not do on the 
cross. In fact, other than the wounds in his hands, feet, and sides, 
little blood was shed on the Calvary cross. 
Blainerb

In a message dated 12/16/2005 9:06:53 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Blaine, your 
  question reveals why you don’t understand Christian reverence for the 
  Cross. Jesus had to die on the cross as the payment for our sins. 
  He was the innocent, perfect sacrificial Passover lamb, slain for the sins of 
  the world. Just as the Jews, who were slaves to Pharaoh in Egypt, had to 
  paint the blood of the Passover lamb on their doorposts to make the Destroyer 
  pass by them during judgment on that horrible night in Egypt when all the 
  firstborn were slain, Jesus serves as our blood sacrifice, that we might 
  be spared death for our slavery to sin, and deliverance from sin—just as the 
  Jews were delivered from Egypt. Jesus, the Firstborn, who was without 
  sin, was the only one qualified to be that perfect holy sacrifice for our 
  sins. It was His Blood, shed on the Cross (nowhere else, because THAT is 
  where He actually was slain), that redeems all those who take cover under it, 
  just as the Jews did under their doorposts. THAT is why satan HATES the 
  mention of THE BLOOD OF CHRIST—because THAT is what OVERCAME his evil devices 
  and has sealed his eternal doom, as well as the Believer’s eternal deliverance 
  from damnation. May God help you to understand this. 
  Izzy




Re: ***Moderator Comment** Re: [TruthTalk] Cross

2005-12-16 Thread Blainerb473




Blainerb: There are none so blind as he who will 
not see. Ad libbing, flapping the gums, rationalizing the truth, 
gainsaying, etc., sets up a snow storm intended to do but one 
thing--deceive.Whenthat fails, one resorts to being 
unreasonable--it always 
comes down to stubborn, obstinate refusal to be reasonable. So goes 
it on TT, and Kevin? Whew! Is this the epitome of this tactic 
or what? 

In a message dated 12/15/2005 8:23:40 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  You have 
  turned the "flapping of the gums" into a vocation, Kevin. 
  This is not completely true, however, if you still have that one 
  tooth. I suspect that Terry is a full-time 
  Christian. I met your challenge and what did we get for 
  that -- yet another challenge of someone else. You are a 
  lazy Christian, Kevin, doing those things that so often do not count 
  for much but take a considerable amount of time.nothing to 
  be proud of. You get no more tired of the 
  senseless than do the rest of us. 
jd




Re: [TruthTalk] sweat

2005-12-16 Thread Blainerb473




Blainerb: Kevin, you quoted the passage in the DC where the doctrine of the garden 
is taught. Now you are asking where it was taught? It all began in the garden. He suffered there , "even unto 
death." Did you miss that part or something? 


In a message dated 12/15/2005 5:45:54 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  The Holy Bible is the authority.
  The bible does not teach any such thing
  
  As a Matter of fact where does the BoM or DC 
  teach such?
  

In a message dated 12/15/2005 8:47:52 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jesus Christ did not ATONE for 
  our sins by suffering in the Garden

Thanks Kevin, we were waiting for the final word from your Royal 
Highness . . . Now we know the truth because you said it--What 
greater authority can we have, than Kevin of TT?

Blainerb 






Re: [TruthTalk] sweat

2005-12-16 Thread Blainerb473




Blainerb: Here's your quote, 
Kevin. This is where the doctrine of the garden is 
taught. But it is also 
taught in the Bible. Luke 22:41-44; Mark 14:33-36; Matt 26: 
37-39


In a message dated 12/15/2005 5:44:10 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DC 19:15-19 
  Therefore I command you to repent,”repent, lest I 
  smite you by the rod of my mouth, and by my wrath, and by my anger, and your sufferings be sore,”how sore 
  you know not, how exquisite you know not, yea, how hard to bear you know 
  not. For behold, I, God, have suffered these things for all, that they 
  might not suffer if they would repent;But if they 
  would not repent they must suffer even as 
  I;Which suffering caused myself, even 
  God, the greatest of all, to tremble because of pain, and to bleed at every pore, and to suffer 
  both body and spirit”and would that I might not drink the bitter cup, and 
  shrink.” Nevertheless, glory be to the Father, and I partook and 
  finished my preparations unto the children of men.




[TruthTalk] URL on beat up star with 666 on it

2005-12-16 Thread Blainerb473



Kevin, we still need a URL on the star with 666--you were obviously 
suggesting it is from a Mormon building---I have not been able to find it in any 
way associated with any building built or owned by the Church of Jesus Christ of 
Latter-day Saints.

Blainerb 



  



Re: ***Moderator Comment** Re: [TruthTalk] Cross

2005-12-16 Thread Blainerb473



In a message dated 12/16/2005 12:26:25 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Blaine, 
  please don't stir up the pot. You contribute nothing with your 
  comments. Also, you say below, "[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:", but 
  you have not included anything I wrote! You must have removed the part I 
  wrote without removing the attribution. I doubt 
  it was intentional, but please be careful to properly 
  attribute comments to the original authors.Perry

This happens to me all the time, especially on Kevin's posts. But you 
are right, I did not even notice it until you pointed it out. Sorry.
Blainerb
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Reply-To: 
  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgTo: 
  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: ***Moderator Comment** Re: 
  [TruthTalk] CrossDate: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 13:50:03 
  ESTBlainerb: There are none so blind as he who 
  will not see. Ad libbing,flapping the gums, rationalizing 
  the truth, gainsaying, etc., sets up a snowstorm 
  intended to do but one thing--deceive. When that fails, one 
  resorts tobeing unreasonable--it always comes down 
  to stubborn, obstinate refusal to bereasonable. So 
  goes it on TT, and Kevin? Whew! Is this the epitome 
  ofthis tactic or what?




[TruthTalk] Fwd: Alpha Trooper Speaks Out

2005-12-16 Thread Blainerb473




In a message dated 12/16/2005 10:28:20 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  Home from Iraq--temporarily 
  One of Minnesota's Finest: Minnesota's LTC Joe Repya volunteered to return 
  to active duty for service in Iraq at age 59. Joe's previous service includes 
  command of a rifle platoon in Vietnam and flying helicopters in the first Gulf 
  War.
  
  Joe is a classic citizen patriot and activist. He first came to public 
  attention in March 2003 when, disturbed by the anti-war campaign mounted by 
  Minnesota liberals, he arranged for the production of lawn signs saying 
  "Liberate Iraq -- Support Our Troops." His effort garnered a lot of publicity, 
  and Joe eventually distributed 30,000 signs.
  -
  Today he writes:
  
  Two weeks ago, as I was starting my sixth month of duty in Iraq, I was 
  forced to return to the USA for surgery for an injury I sustained prior to my 
  deployment. With luck, I'll return to Iraq in January to finish my tour.
  I left Baghdad and a war that has every indication that we are winning, to 
  return to a demoralized country much like the one I returned to in
  1971 after my tour in Vietnam.
  
  Maybe it's because I'll turn 60 years old in just four months, but I'm 
  tired:
  
  I'm tired of spineless politicians, both Democrat and Republican who lack 
  the courage, fortitude, and character to see these difficult tasks 
through.
  
  I'm tired of the hypocrisy of politicians who want to rewrite history when 
  the going gets tough.
  
  I'm tired of the disingenuous clamor from those that claim they "Support 
  the Troops" by wanting them to "Cut and Run" before victory is achieved.
  
  I'm tired of a mainstream media that can only focus on car bombs and 
  casualty reports because they are too afraid to leave the safety of their 
  hotels to report on the courage and success our brave men and women are having 
  on the battlefield.
  
  I'm tired that so many American's think you can rebuild a dictatorship into 
  a democracy over night.
  
  I'm tired that so many ignore the bravery of the Iraqi people to go to the 
  voting booth and freely elect a Constitution and soon a permanent 
  Parliament.
  
  I'm tired of the so called "Elite Left" that prolongs this war by giving 
  aid and comfort to our enemy, just as they did during the Vietnam War.
  
  I'm tired of anti-war protesters showing up at the funerals of our fallen 
  in a just and noble cause, only to be cruelly tormented on the funeral day by 
  cowardly protesters is beyond shameful.
  
  I'm tired that my generation, the Baby Boom - Vietnam generation, who have 
  such a weak backbone that they can't stomach seeing the difficult tasks 
  through to victory.
  
  I'm tired that some are more concerned about the treatment of captives then 
  they are the slaughter and beheading of our citizens and allies.
  
  I'm tired that when we find mass graves it is seldom reported by the press, 
  but mistreat a prisoner and it is front page news.
  
  Mostly, I'm tired that the people of this great nation didn't learn from 
  history that there is no substitute for Victory.
  
  Sincerely, Joe Repya Lieutenant Colonel U. S. Army
  101st Airborne Division 


---BeginMessage---




Home from Iraq--temporarily 
One of Minnesota's Finest: Minnesota's LTC Joe Repya volunteered to return to 
active duty for service in Iraq at age 59. Joe's previous service includes 
command of a rifle platoon in Vietnam and flying helicopters in the first Gulf 
War.

Joe is a classic citizen patriot and activist. He first came to public 
attention in March 2003 when, disturbed by the anti-war campaign mounted by 
Minnesota liberals, he arranged for the production of lawn signs saying 
"Liberate Iraq -- Support Our Troops." His effort garnered a lot of publicity, 
and Joe eventually distributed 30,000 signs.
-
Today he writes:

Two weeks ago, as I was starting my sixth month of duty in Iraq, I was forced 
to return to the USA for surgery for an injury I sustained prior to my 
deployment. With luck, I'll return to Iraq in January to finish my tour.
I left Baghdad and a war that has every indication that we are winning, to 
return to a demoralized country much like the one I returned to in
1971 after my tour in Vietnam.

Maybe it's because I'll turn 60 years old in just four months, but I'm 
tired:

I'm tired of spineless politicians, both Democrat and Republican who lack the 
courage, fortitude, and character to see these difficult tasks through.

I'm tired of the hypocrisy of politicians who want to rewrite history when 
the going gets tough.

I'm tired of the disingenuous clamor from those that claim they "Support the 
Troops" by wanting them to "Cut and Run" before victory is achieved.

I'm tired of a mainstream media that can only focus on car bombs and casualty 
reports because they are too afraid to 

  1   2   3   4   5   >