Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-15 Thread Lance Muir



Each generation must apprehend then apply the truth 
in a manner appropriate to its time. This is but one reason IFO favour newer 
translations of all sacred texts, including the text of scripture. Some recent 
christian teaching/writing is an asset to the believing community. FWIW, I'd 
dance to that tune.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Dean 
  Moore 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: March 14, 2006 15:46
  Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly 
  departed
  
  
  cd: No, it was not honest. But then again since when did this 
  dancing brotherhood ever worry about honesty-or truth-orThe Truth? They 
  are a fine testimony for their group thinking religion-which they claim is 
  ongoing revelation given by the decision of the majority of the group. They 
  claim to decide if God is Male / Female or whatever- I asked them : What if 
  the majority decided that God is a calf and to date have gotten no reply to 
  this question..
  
  
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
ShieldsFamily 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 3/14/2006 11:58:47 AM 
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly 
departed




So why 
did jd inquire of you about 
them? Was that honest??? iz



On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 
20:22:45 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

  
  
  cd; They have been 
  in contact with Miller- Blain, DH ,John, Gary- and believe it or not 
  Glen tabor.All in one group e-Mail-of which I seem to be the 
  topic.
  
  
  
  
  

From: ShieldsFamily 



Why dont you 
contact them directly? You have their email addresses, as do the rest of 
us. iz





From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

By the way -- are we allowed to ask 
as to the status of Gary and DH? They are missed on this 
forum by some. 



jd
  
  


Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-15 Thread Judy Taylor



Not so Lance; Truth is fixed and eternal in every 
generation. God does not change and neither does His Word
which is forever sealed in heaven. As Dean 
warns - better be sure you are not dancing around a calf.

On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 05:42:17 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Each generation must apprehend then apply the 
  truth in a manner appropriate to its time. This is but one reason IFO favour 
  newer translations of all sacred texts, including the text of scripture. Some 
  recent christian teaching/writing is an asset to the believing community. 
  FWIW, I'd dance to that tune.
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Dean 
Moore 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 

Sent: March 14, 2006 15:46
    Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly 
    departed


cd: No, it was not honest. But then again since when did this 
dancing brotherhood ever worry about honesty-or truth-orThe Truth? 
They are a fine testimony for their group thinking religion-which they claim 
is ongoing revelation given by the decision of the majority of the group. 
They claim to decide if God is Male / Female or whatever- I asked them : 
What if the majority decided that God is a calf and to date have gotten no 
reply to this question..




  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  ShieldsFamily 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
  Sent: 3/14/2006 11:58:47 AM 
  Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly 
  departed
  
  
  
  
  So why 
  did jd inquire of you about 
  them? Was that honest??? iz
  
  
  
  On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 
  20:22:45 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  


cd; They have been 
in contact with Miller- Blain, DH ,John, Gary- and believe it or 
not Glen tabor.All in one group e-Mail-of which I seem to be the 
topic.





  
  From: 
  ShieldsFamily 
  
  
  
  Why dont you 
  contact them directly? You have their email addresses, as do the rest 
  of us. iz
  
  
  
  
  
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  By the way -- are we allowed to 
  ask as to the status of Gary and DH? They are missed on 
  this forum by some. 
  
  
  
  jd


  


Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-15 Thread Lance Muir



Would you be so kind Judy, as to restate 'apprehend 
and apply' so as to demonstrate to me that therein lies the meaning 'truth is 
NOT fixed and eternal..'?

Further Judy, should we actually be attempting to 
exhibit a 'new and improved' TT, was the last 'shot' necessary? ('dancing around 
a calf'). 

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Judy 
  Taylor 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: March 15, 2006 06:50
  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly 
  departed
  
  Not so Lance; Truth is fixed and eternal in every 
  generation. God does not change and neither does His Word
  which is forever sealed in heaven. As Dean 
  warns - better be sure you are not dancing around a calf.
  
  On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 05:42:17 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:
  
Each generation must apprehend then apply the 
truth in a manner appropriate to its time. This is but one reason IFO favour 
newer translations of all sacred texts, including the text of scripture. 
Some recent christian teaching/writing is an asset to the believing 
community. FWIW, I'd dance to that tune.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Dean 
  Moore 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: March 14, 2006 15:46
  Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly 
  departed
  
  
  cd: No, it was not honest. But then again since when did this 
  dancing brotherhood ever worry about honesty-or truth-orThe Truth? 
  They are a fine testimony for their group thinking religion-which they 
  claim is ongoing revelation given by the decision of the majority of the 
  group. They claim to decide if God is Male / Female or whatever- I asked 
  them : What if the majority decided that God is a calf and to date have 
  gotten no reply to this question..
  
  
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
ShieldsFamily 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 3/14/2006 11:58:47 AM 
    Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly 
    departed




So 
why did jd inquire of you 
about them? Was that honest??? iz



On Mon, 13 Mar 
2006 20:22:45 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

  
  
  cd; They have 
  been in contact with Miller- Blain, DH ,John, Gary- and believe 
  it or not Glen tabor.All in one group e-Mail-of which I seem to be the 
  topic.
  
  
  
  
  

From: 
ShieldsFamily 



Why dont 
you contact them directly? You have their email addresses, as do the 
rest of us. iz





From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

By the way -- are we allowed to 
ask as to the status of Gary and DH? They are missed on 
this forum by some. 



jd
  
  



Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-15 Thread Judy Taylor





On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:02:02 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Would you be so kind Judy, as to restate 'apprehend and apply' so as to demonstrate to 
  me that therein lies the meaning 'truth is NOT 
  fixed and eternal..'?
  
  I say that truth IS 
  fixed and eternal so would you pleaseexplain what you mean by 
  the above ...
  
  Further Judy, should we actually be attempting to 
  exhibit a 'new and improved' TT, was the last 'shot' necessary? ('dancing 
  around a calf'). 
  
  I think so Lance, and BTW it is not a 
  "shot" We all come into this world with hearts full of idolatry, I 
  examine my own daily. Remember, we are all "by nature" children of wrath. That 
  is unless we walk after the "new nature"
  
  
From: Judy Taylor 

Not so Lance; Truth is fixed and eternal in 
every generation. God does not change and neither does His 
Word
which is forever sealed in heaven. As 
Dean warns - better be sure you are not dancing around a 
calf.

On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 05:42:17 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

  Each generation must apprehend then apply the 
  truth in a manner appropriate to its time. This is but one reason IFO 
  favour newer translations of all sacred texts, including the text of 
  scripture. Some recent christian teaching/writing is an asset to the 
  believing community. FWIW, I'd dance to that tune.
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Dean Moore 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 

        Sent: March 14, 2006 15:46
    Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly 
departed


cd: No, it was not honest. But then again since when did 
this dancing brotherhood ever worry about honesty-or truth-orThe 
Truth? They are a fine testimony for their group thinking religion-which 
they claim is ongoing revelation given by the decision of the majority 
of the group. They claim to decide if God is Male / Female or whatever- 
I asked them : What if the majority decided that God is a calf and to 
date have gotten no reply to this question..




  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  ShieldsFamily 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
  Sent: 3/14/2006 11:58:47 AM 

      Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The 
  dearly departed
  
  
  
  
  So 
  why did jd inquire of you about them? Was that 
  honest??? iz
  
  
  
  On Mon, 13 Mar 
  2006 20:22:45 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  


cd; They have 
been in contact with Miller- Blain, DH ,John, Gary- and 
believe it or not Glen tabor.All in one group e-Mail-of which I seem 
to be the topic.





  
  From: ShieldsFamily 
  
  
  
  Why dont 
  you contact them directly? You have their email addresses, as do 
  the rest of us. iz
  
  
  
  
  
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  By the way -- are we allowed 
  to ask as to the status of Gary and DH? They are 
  missed on this forum by some. 
  
  
  
  
  jd


  
  


Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-15 Thread Lance Muir



When you answer my question then, I'll 'give it a 
shot' as it were.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Judy 
  Taylor 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: March 15, 2006 07:22
  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly 
  departed
  
  
  
  On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:02:02 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:
  
Would you be so kind Judy, as to restate 'apprehend and apply' so as to demonstrate 
to me that therein lies the meaning 'truth is NOT 
fixed and eternal..'?

I say that truth IS 
fixed and eternal so would you pleaseexplain what you mean by 
the above ...

Further Judy, should we actually be attempting 
to exhibit a 'new and improved' TT, was the last 'shot' necessary? ('dancing 
around a calf'). 

I think so Lance, and BTW it is not 
a "shot" We all come into this world with hearts full of idolatry, I 
examine my own daily. Remember, we are all "by nature" children of wrath. 
That is unless we walk after the "new nature"


  From: Judy Taylor 
  
  Not so Lance; Truth is fixed and eternal in 
  every generation. God does not change and neither does His 
  Word
  which is forever sealed in heaven. As 
  Dean warns - better be sure you are not dancing around a 
  calf.
  
  On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 05:42:17 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  
Each generation must apprehend then apply 
the truth in a manner appropriate to its time. This is but one reason 
IFO favour newer translations of all sacred texts, including the text of 
scripture. Some recent christian teaching/writing is an asset to the 
believing community. FWIW, I'd dance to that tune.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Dean Moore 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
      Sent: March 14, 2006 15:46
      Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The 
  dearly departed
  
  
  cd: No, it was not honest. But then again since when did 
  this dancing brotherhood ever worry about honesty-or truth-orThe 
  Truth? They are a fine testimony for their group thinking 
  religion-which they claim is ongoing revelation given by the decision 
  of the majority of the group. They claim to decide if God is Male / 
  Female or whatever- I asked them : What if the majority decided that 
  God is a calf and to date have gotten no reply to this 
  question..
  
  
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
ShieldsFamily 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 3/14/2006 11:58:47 AM 

    Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The 
dearly departed




So 
why did jd inquire of you about them? Was that 
honest??? iz



On Mon, 13 Mar 
2006 20:22:45 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

  
  
  cd; They 
  have been in contact with Miller- Blain, DH ,John, Gary- and 
  believe it or not Glen tabor.All in one group e-Mail-of which I 
  seem to be the topic.
  
  
  
  
  

From: ShieldsFamily 



Why 
dont you contact them directly? You have their email addresses, 
as do the rest of us. iz





From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

By the way -- are we allowed 
to ask as to the status of Gary and DH? They are 
missed on this forum by some. 




jd
  
  




Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-15 Thread Judy Taylor



I am saying that I don't understand your question 
Lance - so it looks likeyou have excused yourself again.
Why are you so full of conditions - is it really 
that difficult to say what you mean?

On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:31:49 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  When you answer my question then, I'll 'give it a 
  shot' as it were.
  
From: Judy Taylor 

On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:02:02 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

  Would you be so kind Judy, as to restate 'apprehend and apply' so as to demonstrate 
  to me that therein lies the meaning 'truth is 
  NOT fixed and eternal..'?
  
  I say that truth IS 
  fixed and eternal so would you pleaseexplain what you mean 
  by the above ...
  
  Further Judy, should we actually be 
  attempting to exhibit a 'new and improved' TT, was the last 'shot' 
  necessary? ('dancing around a calf'). 
  
  I think so Lance, and BTW it is 
  not a "shot" We all come into this world with hearts full of 
  idolatry, I examine my own daily. Remember, we are all "by nature" 
  children of wrath. That is unless we walk after the "new 
  nature"
  
  
From: Judy 
Taylor 

Not so Lance; Truth is fixed and eternal in 
every generation. God does not change and neither does His 
Word
which is forever sealed in heaven. As 
Dean warns - better be sure you are not dancing around a 
calf.

On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 05:42:17 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

  Each generation must apprehend then apply 
  the truth in a manner appropriate to its time. This is but one reason 
  IFO favour newer translations of all sacred texts, including the text 
  of scripture. Some recent christian teaching/writing is an asset to 
  the believing community. FWIW, I'd dance to that tune.
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Dean Moore 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 

        Sent: March 14, 2006 
15:46
    Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The 
dearly departed


cd: No, it was not honest. But then again since when 
did this dancing brotherhood ever worry about honesty-or 
truth-orThe Truth? They are a fine testimony for their group 
thinking religion-which they claim is ongoing revelation given by 
the decision of the majority of the group. They claim to decide if 
God is Male / Female or whatever- I asked them : What if the 
majority decided that God is a calf and to date have gotten no reply 
to this question..




  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  ShieldsFamily 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
  Sent: 3/14/2006 11:58:47 AM 
  
  Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The 
  dearly departed
  
  
  
  
  So 
  why did jd inquire of you about them? Was that 
  honest??? iz
  
  
  
  On Mon, 13 
  Mar 2006 20:22:45 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  


cd; They 
have been in contact with Miller- Blain, DH ,John, Gary- 
and believe it or not Glen tabor.All in one group e-Mail-of 
which I seem to be the topic.





  
  From: ShieldsFamily 
  
  
  
  Why 
  dont you contact them directly? You have their email 
  addresses, as do the rest of us. 
  iz
  
  
  
  
  
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  By the way -- are we 
  allowed to ask as to the status of Gary and DH? 
  They are missed on this forum by some. 
  
  
  
  
  jd


  
  
  


Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-15 Thread Lance Muir



I've no problem acknowledging the 'fixity and 
eternality' of truth. I do, however, have a problem with some persons 
interpretations. I'd say to you that which I said to Kevin: Once you (Judy) are 
convinced that your statements concerning the truth (Scriptural quotations on 
any subject) are themselves the truth then, even the possibility of conversation 
is over.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Judy 
  Taylor 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: March 15, 2006 07:36
  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly 
  departed
  
  I am saying that I don't understand your question 
  Lance - so it looks likeyou have excused yourself 
  again.
  Why are you so full of conditions - is it really 
  that difficult to say what you mean?
  
  On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:31:49 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:
  
When you answer my question then, I'll 'give it 
a shot' as it were.

  From: Judy Taylor 
  
  On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:02:02 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  
Would you be so kind Judy, as to restate 'apprehend and apply' so as to 
demonstrate to me that therein lies the meaning 'truth is NOT fixed and eternal..'?

I say that truth IS 
fixed and eternal so would you pleaseexplain what you 
mean by the above ...

Further Judy, should we actually be 
attempting to exhibit a 'new and improved' TT, was the last 'shot' 
necessary? ('dancing around a calf'). 

I think so Lance, and BTW it is 
not a "shot" We all come into this world with hearts full of 
idolatry, I examine my own daily. Remember, we are all "by nature" 
children of wrath. That is unless we walk after the "new 
nature"


  From: Judy 
  Taylor 
  
  Not so Lance; Truth is fixed and eternal 
  in every generation. God does not change and neither does His 
  Word
  which is forever sealed in heaven. 
  As Dean warns - better be sure you are not dancing around a 
  calf.
  
  On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 05:42:17 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  
Each generation must apprehend then 
apply the truth in a manner appropriate to its time. This is but one 
reason IFO favour newer translations of all sacred texts, including 
the text of scripture. Some recent christian teaching/writing is an 
asset to the believing community. FWIW, I'd dance to that 
tune.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Dean Moore 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: March 14, 2006 
  15:46
  Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The 
  dearly departed
  
  
  cd: No, it was not honest. But then again since when 
  did this dancing brotherhood ever worry about honesty-or 
  truth-orThe Truth? They are a fine testimony for their group 
  thinking religion-which they claim is ongoing revelation given by 
  the decision of the majority of the group. They claim to decide if 
  God is Male / Female or whatever- I asked them : What if the 
  majority decided that God is a calf and to date have gotten no 
  reply to this question..
  
  
  
  
- Original Message - 

From: 
ShieldsFamily 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 3/14/2006 11:58:47 AM 

        Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] 
The dearly departed




So 
why did jd inquire of you about them? Was that 
honest??? iz



On Mon, 13 
Mar 2006 20:22:45 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

  
  
  cd; They 
  have been in contact with Miller- Blain, DH ,John, Gary- 
  and believe it or not Glen tabor.All in one group e-Mail-of 
  which I seem to be the topic.
  
  
  
  
  

From: ShieldsFamily 



Why 
dont you contact them directly? You have their email 
  

Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-15 Thread Kevin Deegan
Do you think that you could change the mind of one who might fit the description of Acts 15:26? Men that have hazarded their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.Would you say that men that put their own lives in hazard are not somewaht DOGMATIC?  Would you admit that some (not all) you claim to follow had strong beliefs and were thenas you say, Dogmatic?Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  I've no problem acknowledging the 'fixity and eternality' of truth. I do, however, have a problem with some persons interpretations. I'd say to you that which I said to Kevin: Once you (Judy) are convinced that your statements concerning the truth (Scriptural quotations on any subject) are themselves the truth then, even the possibility of conversation is over.- Original Message -   From: Judy Taylor   To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org   Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org   Sent: March 15, 2006 07:36  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departedI am saying that I don't understand your question Lance - so it looks likeyou have excused yourself again.  Why are you so full of conditions - is it really that difficult to say what you mean?On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:31:49 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:When you answer my question then, I'll 'give it a shot' as it were.From: Judy Taylor On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:02:02 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:Would you be so kind Judy, as to restate 'apprehend and apply' so as to demonstrate to me that therein lies the meaning 'truth is NOT fixed and eternal..'?I say that truth IS fixed and eternal so would you pleaseexplain what you mean by the above ...Further Judy, should we actually be attempting to exhibit a 'new and improved' TT, was the last 'shot' necessary? ('dancing around a calf'). I think so Lance, and BTW it is not a "shot" We all come into this world with hearts full of idolatry, I examine my own daily. Remember, we are all "by nature" children of wrath. That is unless we walk after the "new nature"  From: Judy Taylor Not so Lance; Truth is fixed and eternal in every generation. God does not change and neither does His Word  which is forever sealed in heaven. As Dean warns - better be sure you are not dancing around a calf.On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 05:42:17 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:Each generation must apprehend then apply the truth in a manner appropriate to its time. This is but one reason IFO favour newer translations of all sacred texts, including the text of scripture. Some recent christian teaching/writing is an
 asset to the believing community. FWIW, I'd dance to that tune.- Original Message -   From: Dean Moore   To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org   Sent: March 14, 2006 15:46  Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed  cd: No, it was not honest. But then again since when did this dancing brotherhood ever worry about honesty-or truth-orThe Truth? They are a fine testimony for their group
 thinking religion-which they claim is ongoing revelation given by the decision of the majority of the group. They claim to decide if God is Male / Female or whatever- I asked them : What if the majority decided that God is a calf and to date have gotten no reply to this question..  - Original Message -   From: ShieldsFamily   To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org  Sent: 3/14/2006 11:58:47 AM   Subject: RE:
 [TruthTalk] The dearly departed  So why did jd inquire of you about them? Was that honest??? izOn Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:22:45 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:cd; They have been in contact with Miller- Blain, DH ,John, Gary- and believe it or not Glen tabor.All in one group e-Mail-of which I seem to be the topic.  From: ShieldsFamily   Why dont you contact them directly? You have their email addresses, as do the rest of us. izFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]By the way -- are we allowed to ask as to the status of Gary and DH? They are missed on this forum by some. jd 
 
		Yahoo! Mail
Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail  makes sharing a breeze. 


Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-15 Thread Judy Taylor



So what you are saying Lance is that there is no 
"objective truth?" That in fact if I say dog, you could be 
hearing cat? which means there is no such 
thing as a dog because this is just my interpretation? 
And if I write exactly what is written in 
scripture - because IYO truth changes generationally and according to culture 
then it really isn't truth because they could be saying dog and I might be 
hearing cat. Is this what you are saying Lance?

On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:47:08 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  I've no problem acknowledging the 'fixity and 
  eternality' of truth. I do, however, have a problem with some persons 
  interpretations. I'd say to you that which I said to Kevin: Once you (Judy) 
  are convinced that your statements concerning the truth (Scriptural quotations 
  on any subject) are themselves the truth then, even the possibility of 
  conversation is over.
  
From: Judy Taylor 

I am saying that I don't understand your 
question Lance - so it looks likeyou have excused yourself 
again.
Why are you so full of conditions - is it 
really that difficult to say what you mean?

On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:31:49 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

  When you answer my question then, I'll 'give 
  it a shot' as it were.
  
From: Judy 
Taylor 

On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:02:02 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

  Would you be so kind Judy, as to restate 'apprehend and apply' so as to 
  demonstrate to me that therein lies the meaning 'truth is NOT fixed and eternal..'?
  
  I say that truth IS 
  fixed and eternal so would you pleaseexplain what you 
  mean by the above ...
  
  Further Judy, should we actually be 
  attempting to exhibit a 'new and improved' TT, was the last 'shot' 
  necessary? ('dancing around a calf'). 
  
  I think so Lance, and BTW it 
  is not a "shot" We all come into this world with hearts full of 
  idolatry, I examine my own daily. Remember, we are all "by nature" 
  children of wrath. That is unless we walk after the "new 
  nature"
  
  
From: Judy 
Taylor 

Not so Lance; Truth is fixed and 
eternal in every generation. God does not change and neither does 
His Word
which is forever sealed in 
heaven. As Dean warns - better be sure you are not dancing 
around a calf.

On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 05:42:17 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

  Each generation must apprehend then 
  apply the truth in a manner appropriate to its time. This is but 
  one reason IFO favour newer translations of all sacred texts, 
  including the text of scripture. Some recent christian 
  teaching/writing is an asset to the believing community. FWIW, I'd 
  dance to that tune.
  
- Original Message - 

From: 
Dean Moore 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 

        Sent: March 14, 2006 
    15:46
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] 
The dearly departed


cd: No, it was not honest. But then again since 
when did this dancing brotherhood ever worry about honesty-or 
truth-orThe Truth? They are a fine testimony for their 
group thinking religion-which they claim is ongoing revelation 
given by the decision of the majority of the group. They claim 
to decide if God is Male / Female or whatever- I asked them : 
What if the majority decided that God is a calf and to date have 
gotten no reply to this question..




  - Original Message - 
  
  From: 
  ShieldsFamily 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
      Sent: 3/14/2006 11:58:47 
      AM 
  Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] 
  The dearly departed
  
  
  
  
  So 
  why did jd inquire of you about them? Was that 
  honest??? iz
  
  
  
  On Mon, 
  13 Mar 2006 20:22:45 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  
   

Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-15 Thread Lance Muir



There is objective truth, Judy. Some of that which 
you say is.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Judy 
  Taylor 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: March 15, 2006 07:59
  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly 
  departed
  
  So what you are saying Lance is that there is no 
  "objective truth?" That in fact if I say dog, you could be 
  hearing cat? which means there is no such 
  thing as a dog because this is just my interpretation? 
  And if I write exactly what is written in 
  scripture - because IYO truth changes generationally and according to culture 
  then it really isn't truth because they could be saying dog and I might be 
  hearing cat. Is this what you are saying Lance?
  
  On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:47:08 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:
  
I've no problem acknowledging the 'fixity and 
eternality' of truth. I do, however, have a problem with some persons 
interpretations. I'd say to you that which I said to Kevin: Once you (Judy) 
are convinced that your statements concerning the truth (Scriptural 
quotations on any subject) are themselves the truth then, even the 
possibility of conversation is over.

  From: Judy Taylor 
  
  I am saying that I don't understand your 
  question Lance - so it looks likeyou have excused yourself 
  again.
  Why are you so full of conditions - is it 
  really that difficult to say what you mean?
  
  On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:31:49 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  
When you answer my question then, I'll 
'give it a shot' as it were.

  From: Judy 
  Taylor 
  
  On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:02:02 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  
Would you be so kind Judy, as to restate 'apprehend and apply' so as to 
demonstrate to me that therein lies the meaning 'truth is NOT fixed and eternal..'?

I say that truth IS 
fixed and eternal so would you pleaseexplain what you 
mean by the above ...

Further Judy, should we actually be 
attempting to exhibit a 'new and improved' TT, was the last 'shot' 
necessary? ('dancing around a calf'). 

I think so Lance, and BTW it 
is not a "shot" We all come into this world with hearts full 
of idolatry, I examine my own daily. Remember, we are all "by 
nature" children of wrath. That is unless we walk after the "new 
nature"


  From: Judy Taylor 
  
  Not so Lance; Truth is fixed and 
  eternal in every generation. God does not change and neither does 
  His Word
  which is forever sealed in 
  heaven. As Dean warns - better be sure you are not dancing 
  around a calf.
  
  On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 05:42:17 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  
Each generation must apprehend then 
apply the truth in a manner appropriate to its time. This is but 
one reason IFO favour newer translations of all sacred texts, 
including the text of scripture. Some recent christian 
teaching/writing is an asset to the believing community. FWIW, 
I'd dance to that tune.

  - Original Message - 
  
  From: 
  Dean Moore 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
          Sent: March 14, 2006 
      15:46
  Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] 
  The dearly departed
  
  
  cd: No, it was not honest. But then again since 
  when did this dancing brotherhood ever worry about honesty-or 
  truth-orThe Truth? They are a fine testimony for their 
  group thinking religion-which they claim is ongoing revelation 
  given by the decision of the majority of the group. They claim 
  to decide if God is Male / Female or whatever- I asked them : 
  What if the majority decided that God is a calf and to date 
  have gotten no reply to this question..
  
  
  
  
- Original Message - 

From: 
ShieldsFamily 

To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
    Sent: 3/14/2006 
    11:58:47 AM 
 

Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-15 Thread Judy Taylor



You haven't answered my question Lance

On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 08:03:01 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  There is objective truth, Judy. Some of that 
  which you say is.
  
From: Judy Taylor 

So what you are saying Lance is that there is 
no "objective truth?" That in fact if I say dog, you could be 
hearing cat? which means there is no 
such thing as a dog because this is just my interpretation? 
And if I write exactly what is written 
in scripture - because IYO truth changes generationally and according to 
culture then it really isn't truth because they could be saying dog and I 
might be hearing cat. Is this what you are saying 
Lance?

On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:47:08 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

  I've no problem acknowledging the 'fixity and 
  eternality' of truth. I do, however, have a problem with some persons 
  interpretations. I'd say to you that which I said to Kevin: Once you 
  (Judy) are convinced that your statements concerning the truth (Scriptural 
  quotations on any subject) are themselves the truth then, even the 
  possibility of conversation is over.
  
From: Judy 
Taylor 

I am saying that I don't understand your 
question Lance - so it looks likeyou have excused yourself 
again.
Why are you so full of conditions - is it 
really that difficult to say what you mean?

On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:31:49 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

  When you answer my question then, I'll 
  'give it a shot' as it were.
  
From: Judy 
Taylor 

On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:02:02 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

  Would you be so kind Judy, as to restate 'apprehend and apply' so as to 
  demonstrate to me that therein lies the meaning 'truth is NOT fixed and eternal..'?
  
  I say that truth 
  IS fixed and eternal so would you 
  pleaseexplain what you mean by the above 
  ...
  
  Further Judy, should we actually be 
  attempting to exhibit a 'new and improved' TT, was the last 'shot' 
  necessary? ('dancing around a calf'). 
  
  I think so Lance, and BTW 
  it is not a "shot" We all come into this world with hearts 
  full of idolatry, I examine my own daily. Remember, we are all "by 
  nature" children of wrath. That is unless we walk after the "new 
  nature"
  
  
From: Judy Taylor 

Not so Lance; Truth is fixed and 
eternal in every generation. God does not change and neither 
does His Word
which is forever sealed in 
heaven. As Dean warns - better be sure you are not dancing 
around a calf.

On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 05:42:17 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

  Each generation must apprehend 
  then apply the truth in a manner appropriate to its time. This 
  is but one reason IFO favour newer translations of all sacred 
  texts, including the text of scripture. Some recent christian 
  teaching/writing is an asset to the believing community. FWIW, 
  I'd dance to that tune.
  
- Original Message - 

From: 
Dean Moore 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 

        Sent: March 14, 2006 
        15:46
Subject: RE: 
[TruthTalk] The dearly departed


cd: No, it was not honest. But then again since 
when did this dancing brotherhood ever worry about 
honesty-or truth-orThe Truth? They are a fine 
testimony for their group thinking religion-which they claim 
is ongoing revelation given by the decision of the majority 
of the group. They claim to decide if God is Male / Female 
or whatever- I asked them : What if the majority decided 
that God is a calf and to date have gotten no reply to this 
question..




  - Original Message 

Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-15 Thread Lance Muir



I believe that I have answered your question, Judy. 
As you believe that I have not then, we are at an impasse. I've gone beyond the 
suggested quota for they day (number of posts) so, for the time being, I'll 
leave it there.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Judy 
  Taylor 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: March 15, 2006 08:17
  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly 
  departed
  
  You haven't answered my question Lance
  
  On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 08:03:01 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:
  
There is objective truth, Judy. Some of that 
which you say is.

  From: Judy Taylor 
  
  So what you are saying Lance is that there is 
  no "objective truth?" That in fact if I say dog, you could be 
  hearing cat? which means there is no 
  such thing as a dog because this is just my interpretation? 
  And if I write exactly what is written 
  in scripture - because IYO truth changes generationally and according to 
  culture then it really isn't truth because they could be saying dog and I 
  might be hearing cat. Is this what you are saying 
  Lance?
  
  On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:47:08 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  
I've no problem acknowledging the 'fixity 
and eternality' of truth. I do, however, have a problem with some 
persons interpretations. I'd say to you that which I said to Kevin: Once 
you (Judy) are convinced that your statements concerning the truth 
(Scriptural quotations on any subject) are themselves the truth then, 
even the possibility of conversation is over.

  From: Judy 
  Taylor 
  
  I am saying that I don't understand your 
  question Lance - so it looks likeyou have excused yourself 
  again.
  Why are you so full of conditions - is it 
  really that difficult to say what you mean?
  
  On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:31:49 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  
When you answer my question then, I'll 
'give it a shot' as it were.

  From: Judy Taylor 
  
  On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:02:02 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  
Would you be so kind Judy, as to restate 'apprehend and apply' so as to 
demonstrate to me that therein lies the meaning 'truth is NOT fixed and eternal..'?

I say that truth 
IS fixed and eternal so would you 
pleaseexplain what you mean by the above 
...

Further Judy, should we actually be 
attempting to exhibit a 'new and improved' TT, was the last 
'shot' necessary? ('dancing around a calf'). 

I think so Lance, and 
BTW it is not a "shot" We all come into this world with 
hearts full of idolatry, I examine my own daily. Remember, we 
are all "by nature" children of wrath. That is unless we walk 
after the "new nature"


  From: Judy Taylor 
  
  Not so Lance; Truth is fixed and 
  eternal in every generation. God does not change and neither 
  does His Word
  which is forever sealed in 
  heaven. As Dean warns - better be sure you are not 
  dancing around a calf.
  
  On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 05:42:17 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  
Each generation must apprehend 
then apply the truth in a manner appropriate to its time. 
This is but one reason IFO favour newer translations of all 
sacred texts, including the text of scripture. Some recent 
christian teaching/writing is an asset to the believing 
community. FWIW, I'd dance to that tune.

  - Original Message - 
  
  From: 
  Dean Moore 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
      Sent: March 14, 2006 
          15:46
  Subject: RE: 
  [TruthTalk] The dearly departed
  
  
  cd: No, it was not honest. But then again 
  since when did this dancing brotherhood ever worry about 
  

Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-15 Thread knpraise

Along these same lines, I view the biblical message as "truth" with the belief that such is absolute. My interpretation of same can never be considered [by me] as absolute. Paul's word of caution, "when you think to know something, you do not yet know it as you should," is always in order.But,, to my simple way of thinking, I take courage in knowing that Iam trying to apprehend that which is true. At the same time, perhaps we make too much of the abstract and not enough of the person of God, Himself, in our lives. I Cor 8:1ff does contrast the knowing to the loving. 

jd

-- Original message -- From: "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 





I've no problem acknowledging the 'fixity and eternality' of truth. I do, however, have a problem with some persons interpretations. I'd say to you that which I said to Kevin: Once you (Judy) are convinced that your statements concerning the truth (Scriptural quotations on any subject) are themselves the truth then, even the possibility of conversation is over.

- Original Message - 
From: Judy Taylor 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
Sent: March 15, 2006 07:36
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

I am saying that I don't understand your question Lance - so it looks likeyou have excused yourself again.
Why are you so full of conditions - is it really that difficult to say what you mean?

On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:31:49 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

When you answer my question then, I'll 'give it a shot' as it were.

From: Judy Taylor 

On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:02:02 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Would you be so kind Judy, as to restate 'apprehend and apply' so as to demonstrate to me that therein lies the meaning 'truth is NOT fixed and eternal..'?

I say that truth IS fixed and eternal so would you pleaseexplain what you mean by the above ...

Further Judy, should we actually be attempting to exhibit a 'new and improved' TT, was the last 'shot' necessary? ('dancing around a calf'). 

I think so Lance, and BTW it is not a "shot" We all come into this world with hearts full of idolatry, I examine my own daily. Remember, we are all "by nature" children of wrath. That is unless we walk after the "new nature"


From: Judy Taylor 

Not so Lance; Truth is fixed and eternal in every generation. God does not change and neither does His Word
which is forever sealed in heaven. As Dean warns - better be sure you are not dancing around a calf.

On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 05:42:17 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Each generation must apprehend then apply the truth in a manner appropriate to its time. This is but one reason IFO favour newer translations of all sacred texts, including the text of scripture. Some recent christian teaching/writing is an asset to the believing community. FWIW, I'd dance to that tune.

- Original Message - 
From: Dean Moore 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
Sent: March 14, 2006 15:46
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed


cd: No, it was not honest. But then again since when did this dancing brotherhood ever worry about honesty-or truth-orThe Truth? They are a fine testimony for their group thinking religion-which they claim is ongoing revelation given by the decision of the majority of the group. They claim to decide if God is Male / Female or whatever- I asked them : What if the majority decided that God is a calf and to date have gotten no reply to this question..




- Original Message - 
From: ShieldsFamily 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 3/14/2006 11:58:47 AM 
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed




So why did jd inquire of you about them? Was that honest??? iz



On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:22:45 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:



cd; They have been in contact with Miller- Blain, DH ,John, Gary- and believe it or not Glen tabor.All in one group e-Mail-of which I seem to be the topic.






From: ShieldsFamily 


Why dont you contact them directly? You have their email addresses, as do the rest of us. iz





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]

By the way -- are we allowed to ask as to the status of Gary and DH? They are missed on this forum by some. 



jd







RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-15 Thread ShieldsFamily








Wrong, Lance. I can be sure I am right and
still discuss it with someone else who (a) also thinks I am right, (b) thinks I
am wrong and wants to debate the issue. I cannot, however, have a conversation
with someone who is sure HE, also, is right, and does not want to discuss it with me if I think I
am right, OR if HE thinks NO ONE can EVER be right, OR if HE cannot figure out
WHAT he thinks is right, OR how to defend what he thinks is right because there
is NO LOGIC TO IT AT ALL! iz











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006
6:47 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The
dearly departed







I've no problem acknowledging the 'fixity and eternality' of
truth. I do, however, have a problem with some persons interpretations. I'd say
to you that which I said to Kevin: Once you
(Judy) are convinced that your statements concerning the truth (Scriptural
quotations on any subject) are themselves the truth then, even the possibility
of conversation is over.







- Original Message - 





From: Judy Taylor






To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org






Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org






Sent: March 15, 2006
07:36





Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
The dearly departed











I am saying
that I don't understand your question Lance - so it looks likeyou have
excused yourself again.





Why are you
so full of conditions - is it really that difficult to say what you mean?











On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:31:49 -0500
Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:







When you answer my question then, I'll 'give it a shot' as
it were.







From: Judy Taylor












On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:02:02 -0500
Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:







Would you be so kind Judy, as to restate 'apprehend and apply' so as to demonstrate
to me that therein lies the meaning 'truth is NOT fixed and eternal..'?











I say that truth IS fixed and
eternal so would you pleaseexplain what you mean by the above ...











Further Judy, should we actually be attempting to exhibit a
'new and improved' TT, was the last 'shot' necessary? ('dancing around a
calf'). 











I think so Lance, and
BTW it is not a shot We all come into this world with hearts
full of idolatry, I examine my own daily. Remember, we are all by
nature children of wrath. That is unless we walk after the new
nature













From: Judy Taylor












Not so
Lance; Truth is fixed and eternal in every generation. God does not change and
neither does His Word





which is
forever sealed in heaven. As Dean warns - better be sure you are not
dancing around a calf.











On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 05:42:17 -0500
Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:







Each generation must apprehend then apply the truth in a
manner appropriate to its time. This is but one reason IFO favour newer
translations of all sacred texts, including the text of scripture. Some recent
christian teaching/writing is an asset to the believing community. FWIW, I'd
dance to that tune.







- Original Message - 





From: Dean Moore






To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org






Sent: March 14, 2006
15:46





Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
The dearly departed













cd: No, it was not honest.
But then again since when did this dancing brotherhood ever worry about
honesty-or truth-orThe Truth? They are a fine testimony for their group
thinking religion-which they claim is ongoing revelation given by the decision
of the majority of the group. They claim to decide if God is Male / Female or
whatever- I asked them : What if the majority decided that God is a calf and to
date have gotten no reply to this question..





















- Original Message - 





From: ShieldsFamily






To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org





Sent: 3/14/2006 11:58:47
AM 





Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
The dearly departed













So why did jd
inquire of you about them? Was
that honest??? iz











On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:22:45 -0500
Dean Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:









cd; They have been in
contact with Miller- Blain, DH ,John, Gary- and believe it or not Glen
tabor.All in one group e-Mail-of which I seem to be the topic.





















From: ShieldsFamily










Why dont you contact them directly?
You have their email addresses, as do the rest of us. iz











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]





By the way -- are we allowed to ask as to the status of
Gary and DH? They are missed on this forum by some. 











jd






















































Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-14 Thread Dean Moore



cd: Does the foolish need a reason to be foolish? I alsoreason to believethat they have spoken behind my back on the phone- Wickedness whispering in Millers ear lies and half-truth-put a little truth-show a little emotionin the mix and there you have it. This is what happened with John-butI refused till he show signs of remorse. He hung around so long in private that he reminded me of that stray dog that refused to leave my house. After a while I started feeding it out of pity-Turned out to be a worthless dog in the end-didn't have no appreciation for the food, me ,or the pity.Just a worthless dog-that bites the hand that feeds it.Sound familiar?




- Original Message - 
From: Judy Taylor 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 3/14/2006 1:02:48 AM 
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

Why do ppl so love darkness and gossip and one upping the next guy??
Along with stirring the pot - where's the love??


On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:22:45 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


cd; They have been in contact with Miller- Blain, DH ,John, Gary- and believe it or not Glen tabor.All in one group e-Mail-of which I seem to be the topic.




From: ShieldsFamily 


Why dont you contact them directly? You have their email addresses, as do the rest of us. iz





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]

By the way -- are we allowed to ask as to the status of Gary and DH? They are missed on this forum by some. 



jd


RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-14 Thread ShieldsFamily








Why would you prefer to ask of our
moderator, unless you are attempting to stir up public strife? iz











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 4:21
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The
dearly departed







I have no reason to do it your way, Linda. But thanks for the
well meaning advice. 











jd























-- Original message -- 
From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Why dont you contact them directly?
You have their email addresses, as do the rest of us. iz











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 1:52
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The
dearly departed







By the way -- are we allowed to ask as to the status of
Gary and DH? They are missed on this forum by some. 











jd












Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-14 Thread Lance Muir



Unless I missed some announcement, we're 
'moderatorless' at the moment. 

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  ShieldsFamily 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: March 14, 2006 11:42
  Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly 
  departed
  
  
  Why would you prefer 
  to ask of our moderator, unless you are attempting to stir up public strife? 
  iz
  
  
  
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 4:21 
  PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org; 
  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly 
  departed
  
  
  I have no reason to do it your way, Linda. But 
  thanks for the well meaning advice. 
  
  
  
  jd
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
-- Original message -- 
From: "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Why don’t you 
contact them directly? You have their email addresses, as do the rest of us. 
iz





From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 1:52 
PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org; 
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org; 
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly 
    departed


By the way -- are we allowed to ask as 
to the status of Gary and DH? They are missed on this forum by 
some. 



jd


RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-14 Thread ShieldsFamily












So why did jd
inquire of you about them? Was
that honest??? iz











On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:22:45 -0500
Dean Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:









cd; They have been in
contact with Miller- Blain, DH ,John, Gary- and believe it or not Glen
tabor.All in one group e-Mail-of which I seem to be the topic.





















From: ShieldsFamily










Why dont you contact them directly?
You have their email addresses, as do the rest of us. iz











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]





By the way -- are we allowed to ask as to the status of
Gary and DH? They are missed on this forum by some. 











jd




















RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-14 Thread knpraise

Linda, how is it troublesome to ask about those who are on temporary leave?
I have been with TT for over two years, now, and no one to my memory has ever been permanently removed. 

Plus -- the last time I wrote to Dean on the side - my mail came back. 

So , maybe you are not as fully imformed as you pretend to be. 

jd 

-- Original message -- From: "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 








Why would you prefer to ask of our moderator, unless you are attempting to stir up public strife? iz





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 4:21 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed


I have no reason to do it your way, Linda. But thanks for the well meaning advice. 



jd







-- Original message -- From: "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Why don’t you contact them directly? You have their email addresses, as do the rest of us. iz





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 1:52 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed


By the way -- are we allowed to ask as to the status of Gary and DH? They are missed on this forum by some. 



jd


RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-14 Thread knpraise

Linda -- you do not know what you are talking about. See my previous post (written just before this post.) 

As far as Dean is concerned, I addressed only one comment to David after coming back this last time .. and that was a presentation of Dean calling himself "Judge Dean." That same comment was posted on this site and was ignored by Dean as he continued to criticize DH for using the same language Dean used on himself. Secondly -- G is terminated and I missed the reason for that. None of my business? Perhaps. But , with the changing rules, it would be nice to know of G's violation so that we who remain will have a fighting chance of continuing on this forum. Sounds reasonable to me. At least, that was my reasoning before Dean resigned. 


jd

-- Original message -- From: "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 








So why did jd inquire of you about them? Was that honest??? iz



On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:22:45 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:



cd; They have been in contact with Miller- Blain, DH ,John, Gary- and believe it or not Glen tabor.All in one group e-Mail-of which I seem to be the topic.






From: ShieldsFamily 


Why dont you contact them directly? You have their email addresses, as do the rest of us. iz





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]

By the way -- are we allowed to ask as to the status of Gary and DH? They are missed on this forum by some. 



jd




Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-14 Thread David Miller
These comments are out of line.  The only person I have been on the phone 
with is Ruben.  He called me just this morning, after Dean had decided to 
step down from being moderator.  As for e-mail exchange, it has been very 
minimal, with some attempts to include Dean to resolve problems off the 
list.  This is entirely appropriate.  The evil surmisings about this 
activity below are inappropriate.

For what it's worth, I have not received or sent email to Gary at all and 
did not even know he was taken off the list.  I would not have known that 
Dave Hansen was taken off the list except that he wrote me privately asking 
me if that was the situation because the list was rejecting his submissions. 
I told him that I was unaware of this and that I would investigate and let 
him know.

David Miller


- Original Message - 
From: Dean Moore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 7:03 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

cd: Does the foolish need a reason to be foolish? I also reason to believe 
that they have spoken behind my back on the phone- Wickedness whispering in 
Millers ear lies and half-truth-put a little truth-show a little emotion in 
the mix and there you have it. This is what happened with John-but I refused 
till he show signs of remorse. He hung around so long in private that he 
reminded me of that stray dog that refused to leave my house. After a while 
I started feeding it out of pity-Turned out to be a worthless dog in the 
end-didn't have no appreciation for the food, me ,or the pity.Just a 
worthless dog-that bites the hand that feeds it.Sound familiar?

- Original Message - 
From: Judy Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 3/14/2006 1:02:48 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

Why do ppl so love darkness and gossip and one upping the next guy??
Along with stirring the pot - where's the love??

On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:22:45 -0500 Dean Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:
cd; They have been in contact with Miller - Blain, DH ,John, Gary- and 
believe it or not Glen tabor.All in one group e-Mail-of which I seem to be 
the topic.

From: ShieldsFamily

Why dont you contact them directly? You have their email addresses, as do 
the rest of us. iz

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]

By the way  --  are we allowed to ask as to the status of Gary and DH? 
They are missed on this forum by some.

jd 

--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-14 Thread knpraise

Dean has assured us that he will continue with TT in order to give his defense. Assuming that is still the case - explain this: "This is what happened with John-but I refused till he show signs of remorse. He hung around so long in private that he reminded me of that stray dog that refused to leave my house. After a while I started feeding it out of pity-Turned out to be a worthless dog in the end-didn't have no appreciation for the food," 

Didn't have "no appreciation?" Really --Just for the record -- when Dean suddenly cut me off this last time, he did not contact me a single timenot even to tell me I was removed.  I even offered my phone number to him with no response. Off hiding somewhere, apparently. There was nothing offered by Dean that could have been remotely similar to something for which I should be appreciative -- nothing. His troubles are of his own doing. Calling me childish namesas he tries to escape personal responsibility for his own actions is ridiculous. Why he was installed as Moderator is a mystery to me -- but Dean is responsible for Dean, that I know. And I will leave it at that. 

jd

-- Original message -- From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]  These comments are out of line. The only person I have been on the phone  with is Ruben. He called me just this morning, after Dean had decided to  step down from being moderator. As for e-mail exchange, it has been very  minimal, with some attempts to include Dean to resolve problems off the  list. This is entirely appropriate. The evil surmisings about this  activity below are inappropriate.   For what it's worth, I have not received or sent email to Gary at all and  did not even know he was taken off the list. I would not have known that  Dave Hansen was taken off the list except that he wrote me privately asking  me if that was the situation because the list was rejecting his submissions.  I told him that I was unaware of this and that I would i
nvestigate and let  him know.   David Miller- Original Message -  From: Dean Moore  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org  Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 7:03 AM  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed   cd: Does the foolish need a reason to be foolish? I also reason to believe  that they have spoken behind my back on the phone- Wickedness whispering in  Millers ear lies and half-truth-put a little truth-show a little emotion in  the mix and there you have it. This is what happened with John-but I refused  till he show signs of remorse. He hung around so long in private that he  reminded me of that stray dog that refused to leave my house. After a while  I started feeding it out of pity-Turned out to be a worthless dog in the  end-didn't have no appreciation for the food, me ,or the pity.Just a  worthless dog-that bites the hand that feeds it.Sound familiar? &
gt;  - Original Message -  From: Judy Taylor  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org  Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org  Sent: 3/14/2006 1:02:48 AM  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed   Why do ppl so love darkness and gossip and one upping the next guy??  Along with stirring the pot - where's the love??   On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:22:45 -0500 "Dean Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:  cd; They have been in contact with Miller - Blain, DH ,John, Gary- and  believe it or not Glen tabor.All in one group e-Mail-of which I seem to be  the topic.   From: ShieldsFamily   Why dont you contact them directly? You have their email addresses, as do  the rest of us. iz   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]   By the way -- are we allowed to ask as to the sta
tus of Gary and DH?  They are missed on this forum by some.   jd   --  "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how  you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org   If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to  [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend  who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and  he will be subscribed. 


Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-14 Thread Lance Muir



'Why he was installed as Moderator' is a mystery to 
me also. This is a task that was simply beyond his abilities and, IMO, DM either 
knew or, should have known that.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org ; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: March 14, 2006 13:07
  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly 
  departed
  
  Dean has assured us that he will continue with TT in order to give his 
  defense. Assuming that is still the case - explain 
  this: "This is what happened with John-but I refused till he show 
  signs of remorse. He hung around so long in private that he reminded me of 
  that stray dog that refused to leave my house. After a while I started 
  feeding it out of pity-Turned out to be a worthless dog in the end-didn't 
  have no appreciation for the food," 
  
  Didn't have "no appreciation?" Really 
  --Just for the record -- when Dean suddenly cut me off 
  this last time, he did not contact me a single timenot even to 
  tell me I was removed.  I even offered my phone number to 
  him with no response. Off hiding somewhere, 
  apparently. There was nothing offered by Dean that could have been 
  remotely similar to something for which I should be appreciative 
  -- nothing. His troubles are of his own doing. 
  Calling me childish namesas he tries to escape personal responsibility 
  for his own actions is ridiculous. Why he was installed as 
  Moderator is a mystery to me -- but Dean is responsible for Dean, 
  that I know. And I will leave it at that. 
  
  jd
  
  -- 
Original message -- From: "David Miller" 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  These comments are out of line. The 
only person I have been on the phone  with is Ruben. He called me 
just this morning, after Dean had decided to  step down from being 
moderator. As for e-mail exchange, it has been very  minimal, with 
some attempts to include Dean to resolve problems off the  list. 
This is entirely appropriate. The evil surmisings about this  
activity below are inappropriate.   For what it's worth, I 
have not received or sent email to Gary at all and  did not even 
know he was taken off the list. I would not have known that  Dave 
Hansen was taken off the list except that he wrote me privately asking 
 me if that was the situation because the list was rejecting his 
submissions.  I told him that I was unaware of this and that I would 
i nvestigate and let  him know.   David Miller 
   - Original Message -  From: Dean 
Moore  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org  Sent: Tuesday, March 
    14, 2006 7:03 AM  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed 
  cd: Does the foolish need a reason to be foolish? I also 
reason to believe  that they have spoken behind my back on the 
phone- Wickedness whispering in  Millers ear lies and half-truth-put 
a little truth-show a little emotion in  the mix and there you have 
it. This is what happened with John-but I refused  till he show 
signs of remorse. He hung around so long in private that he  
reminded me of that stray dog that refused to leave my house. After a while 
 I started feeding it out of pity-Turned out to be a worthless dog 
in the  end-didn't have no appreciation for the food, me ,or the 
pity.Just a  worthless dog-that bites the hand that feeds it.Sound 
familiar?  gt;  - Original Message -  From: 
Judy Taylor  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org  Cc: 
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org  Sent: 3/14/2006 1:02:48 AM  
    Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed   Why do ppl so 
love darkness and gossip and one upping the next guy??  Along with 
stirring the pot - where's the love??   On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 
20:22:45 -0500 "Dean Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: 
 cd; They have been in contact with Miller - Blain, DH ,John, Gary- 
and  believe it or not Glen tabor.All in one group e-Mail-of which I 
seem to be  the topic.   From: ShieldsFamily 
  Why dont you contact them directly? You have their email 
addresses, as do  the rest of us. iz   From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  By the way -- are we allowed to ask as to the sta tus of 
Gary and DH?  They are missed on this forum by some.  
 jd   --  "Let your speech be always 
with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how  you ought to 
answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org  
 If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email 
to  [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you 
have a friend  who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and  he will be subscribed. 



RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-14 Thread Kevin Deegan
You are transparent even though you do not believe it.[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  Linda, how is it troublesome to ask about those who are on temporary leave? I have been with TT for over two years, now, and no one to my memory has ever been permanently removed.   Plus -- the last time I wrote to Dean on the side - my mail came back.   So , maybe you are not as fully imformed as you pretend to be.   jd   -- Original message -- From: "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Why would you prefer to ask of our moderator, unless you are attempting to stir up public strife? iz  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 4:21 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed   I have no reason to do it your way, Linda. But thanks for the well meaning advice. jd-- Original message -- From: "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Why don’t you contact them directly? You have their email addresses, as do the rest of us. iz  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 1:52 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed   By the way -- are we allowed to ask as to the status of Gary and DH? They are missed on this forum by some. jd
		 Yahoo! Mail 
Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.

Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-14 Thread Kevin Deegan
Vote for JDLance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   'Why he was installed as Moderator' is a mystery to  me also. This is a task that was simply beyond his abilities and, IMO, DM either  knew or, should have known that.- Original Message -From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org ; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org   Sent: March 14, 2006 13:07   Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The dearlydeparted  Dean has assured us that he will continue with TT in order to give hisdefense. Assuming that is still the case - explainthis: "This is what happened with John-but I refused till he showsigns of remorse. He hung around so long in private that he reminded me ofthat stray dog that refused to leave my house. After a while I startedfeeding it out of pity-Turned out to be a worthless dog in the end-didn'thave no appreciation for the food,"   Didn't have "no appreciation?" Really--Just for the record -- when Dean
 suddenly cut me offthis last time, he did not contact me a single timenot even totell me I was removed.  I even offered my phone number tohim with no response. Off hiding somewhere,apparently. There was nothing offered by Dean that could have beenremotely similar to something for which I should be appreciative-- nothing. His troubles are of his own doing.Calling me childish namesas he tries to escape personal responsibilityfor his own actions is ridiculous. Why he was installed asModerator is a mystery to me -- but Dean is responsible for Dean,that I know. And I will leave it at that.   jd  --  Original message
 -- From: "David Miller"  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  These comments are out of line. The  only person I have been on the phone  with is Ruben. He called me  just this morning, after Dean had decided to  step down from being  moderator. As for e-mail exchange, it has been very  minimal, with  some attempts to include Dean to resolve problems off the  list.  This is entirely appropriate. The evil surmisings about this   activity below are inappropriate.   For what it's worth, I  have not received or sent email to Gary at all and  did not even  know he was taken off the list. I would not have known that  Dave  Hansen was taken off the list except that he wrote me privately asking   me if that was the situation because the list was rejecting his  submissions.  I told him that I was unaware of this and that I would  i
 nvestigate and let  him know.   David Miller - Original Message -  From: Dean  Moore  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org  Sent: Tuesday, March      14, 2006 7:03 AM  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departedcd: Does the foolish need a reason to be foolish? I also  reason to believe  that they have spoken behind my back on the  phone- Wickedness whispering in  Millers ear lies and half-truth-put  a little truth-show a little emotion in  the mix and there you have  it. This is what happened with John-but I refused  till he show  signs of remorse. He hung around so long in private that he   reminded me of that stray dog that refused to leave my house. After a while   I started feeding it out of pity-Turned out to be a worthless dog  in the  end-didn't have no appreciation for
 the food, me ,or the  pity.Just a  worthless dog-that bites the hand that feeds it.Sound  familiar?  gt;  - Original Message -  From:  Judy Taylor  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org  Cc:  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org  Sent: 3/14/2006 1:02:48 AM   Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed   Why do ppl so  love darkness and gossip and one upping the next guy??  Along with  stirring the pot - where's the love??   On Mon, 13 Mar 2006  20:22:45 -0500 "Dean Moore"  writes:   cd; They have been in contact with Miller - Blain, DH ,John, Gary-  and  believe it or not Glen tabor.All in one group e-Mail-of which I  seem to be  the topic.   From: ShieldsFamilyWhy dont you contact them directly? You have their email  addresses, as do
  the rest of us. iz   From:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]By the way -- are we allowed to ask as to the sta tus of  Gary and DH?  They are missed on this forum by some.jd   --  "Let your speech be always  with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how  you ought to  answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.orgIf you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email  to  [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you  have a friend  who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to  [EMAIL PROTECTED] and  he will be subscribed.  
		Relax. Yahoo! Mail 
virus scanning helps detect nasty viruses!

RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-14 Thread Kevin Deegan
Dean was joking "judge Dean" DH took oportunity to use it against Dean[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  Linda -- you do not know what you are talking about. See my previous post (written just before this post.)   As far as Dean is concerned, I addressed only one comment to David after coming back this last time .. and that was a presentation of Dean calling himself "Judge Dean." That same comment was posted on this site and was ignored by Dean as he continued to criticize DH for using the same language Dean used on himself. Secondly -- G is terminated and I missed the reason for that. None of my business? Perhaps. But , with the changing rules, it would be nice to know of G's
 violation so that we who remain will have a fighting chance of continuing on this forum. Sounds reasonable to me. At least, that was my reasoning before Dean resigned.jd  -- Original message -- From: "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  So why did jd inquire of you about them? Was that honest??? izOn Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:22:45 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:cd; They have been in contact with Miller- Blain, DH ,John, Gary- and believe it or not Glen tabor.All in one group e-Mail-of which I seem to be the topic.   From: ShieldsFamilyWhy dont you contact them directly? You have their email addresses, as do the rest of us. iz  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]  By the way -- are we allowed to ask as to the status of Gary and DH?
 They are missed on this forum by some. jd  __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com 

RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-14 Thread knpraise

Dean was joking (?) So was DH. One can do it and another can't??? 
This is why Pat Robertson will never get my vote for Pres.

jd


-- Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dean was joking "judge Dean"DH took oportunity to use it against Dean[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Linda -- you do not know what you are talking about. See my previous post (written just before this post.) 

As far as Dean is concerned, I addressed only one comment to David after coming back this last time .. and that was a presentation of Dean calling himself "Judge Dean." That same comment was posted on this site and was ignored by Dean as he continued to criticize DH for using the same language Dean used on himself. Secondly -- G is terminated and I missed the reason for that. None of my business? Perhaps. But , with the changing rules, it would be nice to know of G's violation so that we who remain will have a fighting chance of continuing on this forum. Sounds reasonable to me. At least, that was my reasoning before Dean resigned. 


jd

-- Original message -- From: "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 








So why did jd inquire of you about them? Was that honest??? iz



On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:22:45 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:



cd; They have been in contact with Miller- Blain, DH ,John, Gary- and believe it or not Glen tabor.All in one group e-Mail-of which I seem to be the topic.






From: ShieldsFamily 


Why dont you contact them directly? You have their email addresses, as do the rest of us. iz





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]

By the way -- are we allowed to ask as to the status of Gary and DH? They are missed on this forum by some. 



jd


__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com 


RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-14 Thread Dean Moore



cd: I have not removed you from my list John-but it is a thought. I suggest you check and see where you sent the mail-If it went to the Mormon Church then open it slowly with Armour on.




- Original Message - 
From: 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 3/14/2006 12:02:25 PM 
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

Linda, how is it troublesome to ask about those who are on temporary leave?
I have been with TT for over two years, now, and no one to my memory has ever been permanently removed. 

Plus -- the last time I wrote to Dean on the side - my mail came back. 

So , maybe you are not as fully imformed as you pretend to be. 

jd 

-- Original message -- From: "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 








Why would you prefer to ask of our moderator, unless you are attempting to stir up public strife? iz





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 4:21 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed


I have no reason to do it your way, Linda. But thanks for the well meaning advice. 



jd







-- Original message -- From: "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Why don’t you contact them directly? You have their email addresses, as do the rest of us. iz





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 1:52 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed


By the way -- are we allowed to ask as to the status of Gary and DH? They are missed on this forum by some. 



jd

RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-14 Thread knpraise

I wrote from aol, just now, and it came back. Whatever. 


-- Original message -- From: "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


cd: I have not removed you from my list John-but it is a thought. I suggest you check and see where you sent the mail-If it went to the Mormon Church then open it slowly with Armour on.




- Original Message - 
From: 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 3/14/2006 12:02:25 PM 
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

Linda, how is it troublesome to ask about those who are on temporary leave?
I have been with TT for over two years, now, and no one to my memory has ever been permanently removed. 

Plus -- the last time I wrote to Dean on the side - my mail came back. 

So , maybe you are not as fully imformed as you pretend to be. 

jd 

-- Original message -- From: "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 








Why would you prefer to ask of our moderator, unless you are attempting to stir up public strife? iz





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 4:21 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed


I have no reason to do it your way, Linda. But thanks for the well meaning advice. 



jd







-- Original message -- From: "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Why don’t you contact them directly? You have their email addresses, as do the rest of us. iz





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 1:52 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed


By the way -- are we allowed to ask as to the status of Gary and DH? They are missed on this forum by some. 



jd


RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-14 Thread Dean Moore



cd: No, it was not honest. But then again since when did this dancing brotherhood ever worry about honesty-or truth-orThe Truth? They are a fine testimony for their group thinking religion-which they claim is ongoing revelation given by the decision of the majority of the group. They claim to decide if God is Male / Female or whatever- I asked them : What if the majority decided that God is a calf and to date have gotten no reply to this question..




- Original Message - 
From: ShieldsFamily 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 3/14/2006 11:58:47 AM 
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed




So why did jd inquire of you about them? Was that honest??? iz



On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:22:45 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:



cd; They have been in contact with Miller- Blain, DH ,John, Gary- and believe it or not Glen tabor.All in one group e-Mail-of which I seem to be the topic.






From: ShieldsFamily 


Why dont you contact them directly? You have their email addresses, as do the rest of us. iz





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]

By the way -- are we allowed to ask as to the status of Gary and DH? They are missed on this forum by some. 



jd



Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-14 Thread Dean Moore



cd: Come off it John you were warmed many times - andI contacted you many times and told you how to get back on the list. What more could I do-You refused to apologize.. You told me to "Go to h---". In a public forum- You portrayed David as being evil and you threatened to call Judy's pastor and report her for things you claim she said on TT. Gary called Judy a liar (refused to stop or apologize)and stated using Foul language on TT The (a) word,and DavH continued showing me disrespect after many warnings. I guess I should have just let all this pass-and then I would be liked on TT. I can go to my grave with a clear conscious on this subject-can you?




- Original Message - 
From: 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 3/14/2006 1:07:24 PM 
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

Dean has assured us that he will continue with TT in order to give his defense. Assuming that is still the case - explain this: "This is what happened with John-but I refused till he show signs of remorse. He hung around so long in private that he reminded me of that stray dog that refused to leave my house. After a while I started feeding it out of pity-Turned out to be a worthless dog in the end-didn't have no appreciation for the food," 

Didn't have "no appreciation?" Really --Just for the record -- when Dean suddenly cut me off this last time, he did not contact me a single timenot even to tell me I was removed.  I even offered my phone number to him with no response. Off hiding somewhere, apparently. There was nothing offered by Dean that could have been remotely similar to something for which I should be appreciative -- nothing. His troubles are of his own doing. Calling me childish namesas he tries to escape personal responsibility for his own actions is ridiculous. Why he was installed as Moderator is a mystery to me -- but Dean is responsible for Dean, that I know. And I will leave it at that. 

jd

-- Original message -- From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]  These comments are out of line. The only person I have been on the phone  with is Ruben. He called me just this morning, after Dean had decided to  step down from being moderator. As for e-mail exchange, it has been very  minimal, with some attempts to include Dean to resolve problems off the  list. This is entirely appropriate. The evil surmisings about this  activity below are inappropriate.   For what it's worth, I have not received or sent email to Gary at all and  did not even know he was taken off the list. I would not have known that  Dave Hansen was taken off the list except that he wrote me privately asking  me if that was the situation because the list was rejecting his submissions.  I told him that I was unaware of this and that I would i
 nvestigate and let  him know.   David Miller- Original Message -  From: Dean Moore  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org  Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 7:03 AM  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed   cd: Does the foolish need a reason to be foolish? I also reason to believe  that they have spoken behind my back on the phone- Wickedness whispering in  Millers ear lies and half-truth-put a little truth-show a little emotion in  the mix and there you have it. This is what happened with John-but I refused  till he show signs of remorse. He hung around so long in private that he  reminded me of that stray dog that refused to leave my house. After a while  I started feeding it out of pity-Turned out to be a worthless dog in the  end-didn't have no appreciation for the food, me ,or the pity.Just a  worthless dog-that bites the hand that feeds it.Sound familiar? 
 gt;  - Original Message -  From: Judy Taylor  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org  Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org  Sent: 3/14/2006 1:02:48 AM  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed   Why do ppl so love darkness and gossip and one upping the next guy??  Along with stirring the pot - where's the love??   On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:22:45 -0500 "Dean Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:  cd; They have been in contact with Miller - Blain, DH ,John, Gary- and  believe it or not Glen tabor.All in one group e-Mail-of which I seem to be  the topic.   From: ShieldsFamily   Why dont you contact them directly? You have their email addresses, as do  the rest of us. iz   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]   By the way -- are we allowed to ask as to t
he sta tus of Gary and DH?  They are missed on this forum by some.   jd   --  "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how  you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org   If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to  [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend  who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and  he will be subscribed. 

RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-14 Thread Dean Moore



cd: Twisting the facts again John. DaveH was warned many time that I did not like being called this name but continued in doing. In my opinion he was doing this knowing that I would only take it so far and suspend him -He then could claim I called him names and when He called me names in return he got suspended. I see this as aneffort to cause problem between David and myself.My reply to this is :I have proved that Mormons are Pagans with many facts and examples- Dave has yet to prove I am " Judge Dean or apologize.I gave him the opportunity to do such and he did not do so.I contacted him in private -explaining to him how to get back on the site and he refused to apologize so I did not let him back on. If you are going to be an expert on the subject get the facts right or shut upas you do not know what you are talking about. Know that God can forgive this.




- Original Message - 
From: 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 3/14/2006 3:09:26 PM 
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

Dean was joking (?) So was DH. One can do it and another can't??? 
This is why Pat Robertson will never get my vote for Pres.

jd


-- Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dean was joking "judge Dean"DH took oportunity to use it against Dean[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 

Linda -- you do not know what you are talking about. See my previous post (written just before this post.) 

As far as Dean is concerned, I addressed only one comment to David after coming back this last time .. and that was a presentation of Dean calling himself "Judge Dean." That same comment was posted on this site and was ignored by Dean as he continued to criticize DH for using the same language Dean used on himself. Secondly -- G is terminated and I missed the reason for that. None of my business? Perhaps. But , with the changing rules, it would be nice to know of G's violation so that we who remain will have a fighting chance of continuing on this forum. Sounds reasonable to me. At least, that was my reasoning before Dean resigned. 


jd

-- Original message -- From: "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 








So why did jd inquire of you about them? Was that honest??? iz



On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:22:45 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:



cd; They have been in contact with Miller- Blain, DH ,John, Gary- and believe it or not Glen tabor.All in one group e-Mail-of which I seem to be the topic.






From: ShieldsFamily 


Why dont you contact them directly? You have their email addresses, as do the rest of us. iz





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]

By the way -- are we allowed to ask as to the status of Gary and DH? They are missed on this forum by some. 



jd


__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com 

RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-14 Thread knpraise

Easy to call a man a liar and a worthless dog when you hide somewhere near the Ozarks, isn't it.  The fact of the matter is that I was straight up with you and you have been anything but that with me. 

The "calf" question, Carroll, who did you ask. The fact is that you and those of your ilk have run and hide from so many questions over the past year that we have lost count. 

You cannot hang withareal discussion so you go with "worthless dog," "liar," and "Satan's messenger boys"and pretend that you werebetrayed byMiller and backstabbed by who knows who. Just cannot accept personal responsiblity at all. And David knows you personally !!! Your stay as SPing moderator is clear evidence of the importance of keeping folks like you out of serious leadership. We see what fundamental Islam is like. I see little difference in your administration. At one time, not too long agao in fact, I was perfectly willing to give you the benefit of the doubt. I was wrong. 

You will get the last word , on this public forum, Dean. Sense we are self-moderatored, for the time being, well, it would be best if I make this my last response ... you have my e-mail address and my phone number. 

I am in full agreement with Lance. You are a walking time-bomb. But this was not a secret, even before David appointed you. I do think David was thinking something good just might come of your appointment -- but your appointment to any similar position of leadership is a head-scratcher for sure. 

jd









-- Original message -- From: "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 






cd: No, it was not honest. But then again since when did this dancing brotherhood ever worry about honesty-or truth-orThe Truth? They are a fine testimony for their group thinking religion-which they claim is ongoing revelation given by the decision of the majority of the group. They claim to decide if God is Male / Female or whatever- I asked them : What if the majority decided that God is a calf and to date have gotten no reply to this question..




- Original Message - 
From: ShieldsFamily 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 3/14/2006 11:58:47 AM 
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed




So why did jd inquire of you about them? Was that honest??? iz



On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:22:45 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:



cd; They have been in contact with Miller- Blain, DH ,John, Gary- and believe it or not Glen tabor.All in one group e-Mail-of which I seem to be the topic.






From: ShieldsFamily 


Why dont you contact them directly? You have their email addresses, as do the rest of us. iz





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]

By the way -- are we allowed to ask as to the status of Gary and DH? They are missed on this forum by some. 



jd




Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-14 Thread knpraise

Dean -- I did not tell you to go to hell. And you did not contact me, as I said. In fact, both times I was excluded by you, I was unaware that it had happened until I sent a post that was returned. And this was your M.O. as moderator. Others were elimninated in the same fashion. You couldn't sustain your false accusation against me concerning Judy and here I am. 

By the way - I was not going to say anything about "your passing" as moderator . but your continued whinning, lies and name calling have made it necessary to a point. One or two responses from me and then I will give it up. I do not think you should be allowed to continue your rant for much longer. What is the purpose? 

jd

Off-line anytime , Dean. 


-- Original message -- From: "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


cd: Come off it John you were warmed many times - andI contacted you many times and told you how to get back on the list. What more could I do-You refused to apologize.. You told me to "Go to h---". In a public forum- You portrayed David as being evil and you threatened to call Judy's pastor and report her for things you claim she said on TT. Gary called Judy a liar (refused to stop or apologize)and stated using Foul language on TT The (a) word,and DavH continued showing me disrespect after many warnings. I guess I should have just let all this pass-and then I would be liked on TT. I can go to my grave with a clear conscious on this subject-can you?




- Original Message - 
From: 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 3/14/2006 1:07:24 PM 
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

Dean has assured us that he will continue with TT in order to give his defense. Assuming that is still the case - explain this: "This is what happened with John-but I refused till he show signs of remorse. He hung around so long in private that he reminded me of that stray dog that refused to leave my house. After a while I started feeding it out of pity-Turned out to be a worthless dog in the end-didn't have no appreciation for the food," 

Didn't have "no appreciation?" Really --Just for the record -- when Dean suddenly cut me off this last time, he did not contact me a single timenot even to tell me I was removed.  I even offered my phone number to him with no response. Off hiding somewhere, apparently. There was nothing offered by Dean that could have been remotely similar to something for which I should be appreciative -- nothing. His troubles are of his own doing. Calling me childish namesas he tries to escape personal responsibility for his own actions is ridiculous. Why he was installed as Moderator is a mystery to me -- but Dean is responsible for Dean, that I know. And I will leave it at that. 

jd

-- Original message -- From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]  These comments are out of line. The only person I have been on the phone  with is Ruben. He called me just this morning, after Dean had decided to  step down from being moderator. As for e-mail exchange, it has been very  minimal, with some attempts to include Dean to resolve problems off the  list. This is entirely appropriate. The evil surmisings about this  activity below are inappropriate.   For what it's worth, I have not received or sent email to Gary at all and  did not even know he was taken off the list. I would not have known that  Dave Hansen was taken off the list except that he wrote me privately asking  me if that was the situation because the list was rejecting his submissions.  I told him that I was unaware of this and that I would i
 nvestigate and let  him know.   David Miller- Original Message -  From: Dean Moore  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org  Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 7:03 AM  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed   cd: Does the foolish need a reason to be foolish? I also reason to believe  that they have spoken behind my back on the phone- Wickedness whispering in  Millers ear lies and half-truth-put a little truth-show a little emotion in  the mix and there you have it. This is what happened with John-but I refused  till he show signs of remorse. He hung around so long in private that he  reminded me of that stray dog that refused to leave my house. After a while  I started feeding it out of pity-Turned out to be a worthless dog in the  end-didn't have no appreciation for the food, me ,or the pity.Just a  worthless dog-that bites the hand that feeds it.Sound familiar? 
 gt;  - Original Message -  From: Judy Taylor  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org  Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org  Sent: 3/14/2006 1:02:48 AM  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed   Why do ppl so love darkness and gossip and one upping the next guy??  Along with stirring the pot - where's the love??   On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:22:45 -0500 "Dean Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:  cd;

RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-14 Thread Kevin Deegan
I do not believe DH was joking You were not even on line at the time. Did you read the posts?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  Dean was joking (?) So was DH. One can do it and another can't???  This is why Pat Robertson will never get my vote for Pres.  jd   -- Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dean was joking "judge Dean"DH took oportunity to use it against Dean[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  Linda -- you do not know what you are
 talking about. See my previous post (written just before this post.)   As far as Dean is concerned, I addressed only one comment to David after coming back this last time .. and that was a presentation of Dean calling himself "Judge Dean." That same comment was posted on this site and was ignored by Dean as he continued to criticize DH for using the same language Dean used on himself. Secondly -- G is terminated and I missed the reason for that. None of my business? Perhaps. But , with the changing rules, it would be nice to know of G's violation so that we who remain will have a fighting chance of continuing on this forum. Sounds reasonable to me. At least, that was my reasoning before Dean resigned.jd  -- Original message -- From: "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED]  So why did jd inquire of you about them? Was that honest???
 izOn Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:22:45 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:cd; They have been
 in contact with Miller- Blain, DH ,John, Gary- and believe it or not Glen tabor.All in one group e-Mail-of which I seem to be the topic.   From: ShieldsFamilyWhy dont you contact them directly? You have their email addresses, as do the rest of us. iz  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]  By the way -- are we allowed to ask as to the status of Gary and DH? They are missed on this forum by some. jd
   __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com 
		 Yahoo! Mail 
Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.

RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-14 Thread Kevin Deegan
LOL there's your problem  AOL maybe they should change the name to LOL[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  I wrote from aol, just now, and it came back. Whatever.-- Original message -- From: "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]cd: I have not removed you from my list John-but it is a thought. I suggest you check and see where you sent the mail-If it went to the Mormon Church then open it slowly with Armour on. - Original Message -  From:  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: 3/14/2006 12:02:25 PM  Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed  Linda, how is it troublesome to ask about those who are on temporary leave? I have been with TT for over two years, now, and no one to my memory has ever been permanently removed.   Plus -- the last time I wrote to Dean on the side - my mail came back.   So , maybe you
 are not as fully imformed as you pretend to be.   jd   -- Original message -- From: "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Why would you prefer to ask of our moderator, unless you are attempting to stir up public strife?
 iz  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 4:21 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed   I have no reason to do it your way, Linda. But thanks for the well meaning advice. jd-- Original message -- From: "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Why don’t you contact them directly? You have their email addresses, as do the rest of us. iz  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 1:52
 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed   By the way -- are we allowed to ask as to the status of Gary and DH? They are missed on this forum by some. jd
		Yahoo! Travel 
Find  
great deals to the top 10 hottest destinations!

Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-14 Thread Dean Moore



 [Original Message]
 From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
 Date: 3/14/2006 12:45:46 PM
 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]The dearly departed

 These comments are out of line.  The only person I have been on the phone 
 with is Ruben.  He called me just this morning, after Dean had decided to 
 step down from being moderator.  As for e-mail exchange, it has been very 
 minimal, with some attempts to include Dean to resolve problems off the 
 list.  This is entirely appropriate.  The evil surmisings about this 
 activity below are inappropriate.


--
cd: Back to the evil surmising again I see- I said I had reason to believe
DavH had called you. Here is my reason for that belief: Note that Perry
gave me permission to use this letter.

  [Original Message]
 From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: 3/12/2006 8:49:39 PM
 Subject: RE: Perry

 Dean,

 If they deserved to go, then so be it. When I put DaveH off the list, he 
 entered into a big private email conversation with myself and David M
over 
 his getting banned. He and david M even chatted by phone. He never really 
 understood why I banned him. The reason he said he was banned was not the 
 reason I banned him, yet after I explained the real reason to him several 
 times, he continued to quote his imagined reason, I suspect because he
felt 
 it better supported his argument for a double standard on TT.

 I say all of this to let you know that he will bend the story to support 
 his own argument, even when the truth is presented plainly to him.

 Perry
cd: More below.
--

 From: Dean Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: Perry
 Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 16:33:11 -0500
 
 Perry- I just put Daveh and Gary off the list-Things should get
interesting
 now;-)
cd: More Below.

 
 
   [Original Message]
   From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Date: 3/12/2006 3:57:56 PM
   Subject: RE: Perry
  
   Dean,
  
   Moderating TT is definitely a difficult task. As you know I have
   unsubscribed from TruthTalk, and to be honest, Dean, I do not have any
   intentions of rejoining, or being moderator again. I think that truth
 talk
   actually did more to weaken my faith than to encourage it, and I don't
 need
   that. Now that it is clear to me that TT is actually a secular group
   intended to discuss whatever anyone thinks is their personal truth,
not
   necessarily Christian truth, I see why it operates as it does. Not
only
 is
   there no fellowship among the Christians on the group, there is
division
 and
   strife among the would-be bretheren. It is truly a secular group, and
it
   behaves as such.
  
   When I was moderator the best I could do was to watch only for the 
 most
   blatant ad-hominem references. Many of the people on TT are so
   self-deceiving and disrespectful of one another that they use 
 ad-hominems
   and do so slyly that when it is pointed out they have 101 reasons and
   rationalizations why it was not an ad-hominem, why it was justified,
or
 why
   didn't you correct do-and-so when he said such-and-such about me?
  
   So, the only advice I have, if you choose to remain the moderator, is
 to
   continue to point out ad-hominems, continue to disallow public
responses
 or
   discussions about moderator comments, and ignore the petty wining and
   sniping. Moderating worked well for me when I had the time to follow
 every
   post, but when the traffic became heavy, I lagged behind and appeared
to
 not
   be moderating at all. And most of all, do not expect to see brotherly
 love
   in a secular group.
  
   Hope this helps, Dean.
   Perry


-

 For what it's worth, I have not received or sent email to Gary at all and 
 did not even know he was taken off the list.  I would not have known that 
 Dave Hansen was taken off the list except that he wrote me privately
asking 
 me if that was the situation because the list was rejecting his
submissions. 
 I told him that I was unaware of this and that I would investigate and
let 
 him know.

 David Miller


 - Original Message - 
 From: Dean Moore
 To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
 Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 7:03 AM
 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

 cd: Does the foolish need a reason to be foolish? I also reason to
believe 
 that they have spoken behind my back on the phone- Wickedness whispering
in 
 Millers ear lies and half-truth-put a little truth-show a little emotion
in 
 the mix and there you have it. This is what happened

RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-14 Thread Dean Moore



cd: John take some more of the medication and relax. I do have access to the letter you sent honoring me for taking the Job. Calm down with that medication or I will have to use it.




- Original Message - 
From: 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 3/14/2006 4:41:54 PM 
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

Easy to call a man a liar and a worthless dog when you hide somewhere near the Ozarks, isn't it.  The fact of the matter is that I was straight up with you and you have been anything but that with me. 

The "calf" question, Carroll, who did you ask. The fact is that you and those of your ilk have run and hide from so many questions over the past year that we have lost count. 

You cannot hang withareal discussion so you go with "worthless dog," "liar," and "Satan's messenger boys"and pretend that you werebetrayed byMiller and backstabbed by who knows who. Just cannot accept personal responsiblity at all. And David knows you personally !!! Your stay as SPing moderator is clear evidence of the importance of keeping folks like you out of serious leadership. We see what fundamental Islam is like. I see little difference in your administration. At one time, not too long agao in fact, I was perfectly willing to give you the benefit of the doubt. I was wrong. 

You will get the last word , on this public forum, Dean. Sense we are self-moderatored, for the time being, well, it would be best if I make this my last response ... you have my e-mail address and my phone number. 

I am in full agreement with Lance. You are a walking time-bomb. But this was not a secret, even before David appointed you. I do think David was thinking something good just might come of your appointment -- but your appointment to any similar position of leadership is a head-scratcher for sure. 

jd









-- Original message -- From: "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 






cd: No, it was not honest. But then again since when did this dancing brotherhood ever worry about honesty-or truth-orThe Truth? They are a fine testimony for their group thinking religion-which they claim is ongoing revelation given by the decision of the majority of the group. They claim to decide if God is Male / Female or whatever- I asked them : What if the majority decided that God is a calf and to date have gotten no reply to this question..




- Original Message - 
From: ShieldsFamily 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 3/14/2006 11:58:47 AM 
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed




So why did jd inquire of you about them? Was that honest??? iz



On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:22:45 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:



cd; They have been in contact with Miller- Blain, DH ,John, Gary- and believe it or not Glen tabor.All in one group e-Mail-of which I seem to be the topic.






From: ShieldsFamily 


Why dont you contact them directly? You have their email addresses, as do the rest of us. iz





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]

By the way -- are we allowed to ask as to the status of Gary and DH? They are missed on this forum by some. 



jd



RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-14 Thread Kevin Deegan
Don't you just love folks that offer EXPERT Testimony about events that transpired in their absence?   Lance, where were you when the LDS HI Priest attacked? Dean Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:cd: Twisting the facts again John. DaveH was warned many time that I did not like being called this name but continued in doing. In my opinion he was doing this knowing that I would only take it so far and suspend him -He then could claim I called him names and when He called me names in return he got suspended. I see this as aneffort to cause problem between David and myself.My reply to this is :I have proved that Mormons are Pagans with many facts and examples- Dave has yet to prove I
 am " Judge Dean or apologize.I gave him the opportunity to do such and he did not do so.I contacted him in private -explaining to him how to get back on the site and he refused to apologize so I did not let him back on. If you are going to be an expert on the subject get the facts right or shut upas you do not know what you are talking about. Know that God can forgive this. - Original Message -  From:  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: 3/14/2006 3:09:26 PM  Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed  Dean was joking (?) So was DH. One can do it and another can't???  This is why Pat Robertson will never get my vote for Pres.  jd   -- Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dean was joking "judge Dean"DH took oportunity to use it against Dean[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   Linda -- you do not know what you are talking about. See my
 previous post (written just before this post.)   As far as Dean is concerned, I addressed only one comment to David after coming back this last time .. and that was a presentation of Dean calling himself "Judge Dean." That same comment was posted on this site and was ignored by Dean as he continued to criticize DH for using the same language Dean used on himself. Secondly -- G is terminated and I missed the reason for that. None of my business? Perhaps. But , with the changing rules, it would be nice to know of G's violation so that we who remain will have a fighting chance of continuing on this forum. Sounds reasonable to me. At least, that was my reasoning before Dean resigned.jd  -- Original message -- From: "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED]  So why did jd inquire of you about them? Was that honest??? izOn Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:22:45 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:cd; They have been in contact with Miller- Blain, DH ,John, Gary- and
 believe it or not Glen tabor.All in one group e-Mail-of which I seem to be the topic.   From: ShieldsFamilyWhy dont you contact them directly? You have their email addresses, as do the rest of us. iz  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]  By the way -- are we allowed to ask as to the status of Gary and DH? They are missed on this forum by some. jd   __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com 
		Yahoo! Mail
Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail  makes sharing a breeze. 


Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-14 Thread Kevin Deegan
This is one of the problems with the ADHOM rule it will never be administered fairly There has been name calling on this list for as long as I can remember. Some of it flies by seemingly missed by the moderator.  BTW NICE dissertation on how much strife the ADHOM rule brings with it Way to go Perry!Dean Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  [Original Message] From: David Miller  To:  Date: 3/14/2006 12:45:46 PM Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]The dearly departed These comments are out of line. The only person I have been on the phone with is Ruben. He called me just this morning, after Dean had decided to step down from being moderator. As for e-mail exchange, it has been very minimal, with some attempts to
 include Dean to resolve problems off the list. This is entirely appropriate. The evil surmisings about this activity below are inappropriate.--cd: Back to the evil surmising again I see- I said I had "reason to believeDavH had called you". Here is my reason for that belief: Note that Perrygave me permission to use this letter.  [Original Message] From: Charles Perry Locke  To:  Date: 3/12/2006 8:49:39 PM Subject: RE: Perry Dean, If they deserved to go, then so be it. When I put DaveH off the list, he  entered into a big private email conversation with myself and David Mover  his getting banned. He and david M even chatted by phone.
 He never really  understood why I banned him. The reason he said he was banned was not the  reason I banned him, yet after I explained the real reason to him several  times, he continued to quote his imagined reason, I suspect because he felt  it better supported his argument for a double standard on TT. I say all of this to let you know that he will bend the story to support  his own argument, even when the truth is presented plainly to him. Perrycd: More below.-- From: "Dean Moore"  Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Charles Perry Locke"  Subject: RE: Perry Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 16:33:11 -0500  Perry- I just put Daveh and Gary off the list-Things should getinteresting now;-)cd: More Below. 
[Original Message]   From: Charles Perry LockeTo:Date: 3/12/2006 3:57:56 PM   Subject: RE: Perry Dean, Moderating TT is definitely a difficult task. As you know I have   unsubscribed from TruthTalk, and to be honest, Dean, I do not have any   intentions of rejoining, or being moderator again. I think that truth talk   actually did more to weaken my faith than to encourage it, and I don't need   that. Now that it is clear to me that TT is actually a secular group   intended to discuss whatever anyone thinks is their personal truth,not   necessarily Christian truth, I see why it operates as it does. Notonly is   there no fellowship among the
 Christians on the group, there isdivision and   strife among the would-be bretheren. It is truly a secular group, andit   behaves as such. When I was moderator the best I could do was to watch only for the  most   blatant ad-hominem references. Many of the people on TT are so   self-deceiving and disrespectful of one another that they use  ad-hominems   and do so slyly that when it is pointed out they have 101 reasons and   rationalizations why it was not an ad-hominem, why it was justified,or "why   didn't you correct do-and-so when he said such-and-such about me"? So, the only advice I have, if you choose to remain the moderator, is to   continue to point out ad-hominems, continue to disallow publicresponses or   discussions about moderator comments, and
 ignore the petty wining and   sniping. Moderating worked well for me when I had the time to follow every   post, but when the traffic became heavy, I lagged behind and appearedto not   be moderating at all. And most of all, do not expect to see brotherly love   in a secular group. Hope this helps, Dean.   Perry- For what it's worth, I have not received or sent email to Gary at all and  did not even know he was taken off the list. I would not have known that  Dave Hansen was taken off the list except that he wrote me privatelyasking  me if that was the situation because the list was rejecting hissubmissions.  I told him that I was unaware
 of this and that I would investigate andlet  him know. David Miller - Original Message -  From: Dean Moore To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 7:03 AM Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed cd: Does the foolish need a reason to be foolish? I also reason tobelieve  that they have spoken behind my back on the phone- Wickedness whisperingin  Millers ear lies and half-truth-put a littl

RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-14 Thread knpraise

First, I was on line at the time. This all happened after I came back. 
Secondly, Dean most definitely functioned as a Judge AND a jury -- at least with me. He did play the role of Judge. No question. Plus , he used the same language on himself. 

jd

-- Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] I do not believe DH was jokingYou were not even on line at the time. Did you read the posts?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Dean was joking (?) So was DH. One can do it and another can't??? 
This is why Pat Robertson will never get my vote for Pres.

jd


-- Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dean was joking "judge Dean"DH took oportunity to use it against Dean[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 

Linda -- you do not know what you are talking about. See my previous post (written just before this post.) 

As far as Dean is concerned, I addressed only one comment to David after coming back this last time .. and that was a presentation of Dean calling himself "Judge Dean." That same comment was posted on this site and was ignored by Dean as he continued to criticize DH for using the same language Dean used on himself. Secondly -- G is terminated and I missed the reason for that. None of my business? Perhaps. But , with the changing rules, it would be nice to know of G's violation so that we who remain will have a fighting chance of continuing on this forum. Sounds reasonable to me. At least, that was my reasoning before Dean resigned. 


jd

-- Original message -- From: "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 








So why did jd inquire of you about them? Was that honest??? iz



On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:22:45 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:



cd; They have been in contact with Miller- Blain, DH ,John, Gary- and believe it or not Glen tabor.All in one group e-Mail-of which I seem to be the topic.






From: ShieldsFamily 


Why dont you contact them directly? You have their email addresses, as do the rest of us. iz





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]

By the way -- are we allowed to ask as to the status of Gary and DH? They are missed on this forum by some. 



jd


__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com 


Yahoo! MailUse Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments. 


RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-13 Thread ShieldsFamily








Why dont you contact them directly?
You have their email addresses, as do the rest of us. iz











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 1:52
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The
dearly departed







By the way -- are we allowed to ask as to the status of
Gary and DH? They are missed on this forum by some. 











jd










Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-13 Thread knpraise

By the way -- are we allowed to ask as to the status of Gary and DH? They are missed on this forum by some. 

jd


RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-13 Thread knpraise

I have no reason to do it your way, Linda. But thanks for the well meaning advice. 

jd



-- Original message -- From: "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 








Why don’t you contact them directly? You have their email addresses, as do the rest of us. iz





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 1:52 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed


By the way -- are we allowed to ask as to the status of Gary and DH? They are missed on this forum by some. 



jd


RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-13 Thread Dean Moore



cd; They have been in contact with Miller- Blain, DH ,John, Gary- and believe it or not Glen tabor.All in one group e-Mail-of which I seem to be the topic.




- Original Message - 
From: ShieldsFamily 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 3/13/2006 3:55:01 PM 
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed


Why don’t you contact them directly? You have their email addresses, as do the rest of us. iz





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 1:52 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed


By the way -- are we allowed to ask as to the status of Gary and DH? They are missed on this forum by some. 



jd

RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-13 Thread Kevin Deegan
John?  I knew he wasrunning for MODERATerr!Thats OK DeanI thought it was way overboard GT' statement about my Mother!  Nothing should surprise with this crowd.Dean Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:cd; They have been in contact with Miller- Blain, DH ,John, Gary- and believe it or not Glen tabor.All in one group e-Mail-of which I seem to be the topic.  - Original Message -   From: ShieldsFamily   To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org  Sent: 3/13/2006 3:55:01 PM   Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed  Why don’t you contact them directly? You have their email addresses, as do the rest of us. izFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 1:52 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;
 TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed  By the way -- are we allowed to ask as to the status of Gary and DH? They are missed on this forum by some. jd
		 Yahoo! Mail 
Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.

Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly departed

2006-03-13 Thread Judy Taylor



Why do ppl so love darkness and gossip and one 
upping the next guy??
Along with stirring the pot - where's the 
love??


On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:22:45 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

  
  cd; They have been in contact with Miller- Blain, DH ,John, 
  Gary- and believe it or not Glen tabor.All in one group e-Mail-of which I seem 
  to be the topic.
  
  
  
  
From: ShieldsFamily 


Why dont you 
contact them directly? You have their email addresses, as do the rest of us. 
iz





From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

By the way -- are we allowed to ask as 
to the status of Gary and DH? They are missed on this forum by 
some. 



jd