Re: [U2] callHTTP creating Header for Host,

2012-08-23 Thread regalitare
More troubleshooting ... on 7.3 the code


  CMD.STATUS = setRequestHeader(RHANDLE,"Host",HOST.AND.PORT)


adds a second entry to the host header instead of replacing it, such as:


Host: www.myplace.com, www.myplace.com


So I am putting in a conditional to only add the Host header for UniData 7.2, 
hoping that all 7.2 builds do not include it and all 7.3+ will!  I'm open to 
better way to handle the situation :-)


Thanks,


Steve...


-Original Message-
From: regalitare 
To: u2-users 
Sent: Wed, Aug 22, 2012 9:10 pm
Subject: [U2]  callHTTP creating Header for Host,


Greetings

I am working on an issue with UniData but I suspect it possibly affects both 
flavors.  I am making a callHTTP GET request to a server that has virtual 
hosts.  
Basically, one server on a single IP address has multiple named web sites.  On 
UniData 7.3.0 Personal Edition on Windows I tested my code and it works fine.  
On UniData 7.2.10 on Windows it came up with the "default" web site (same as if 
I just use the IP address instead of the FQDN) instead of mine that was named 
in 
the URL.  I suspected the "Host" header that is required to be sent for 
HTTP/1.1 
protocol might be missing on UniData 7.2.

So, I added this line to the code to set the header:

CMD.STATUS = setRequestHeader(RHANDLE,"Host",HOST.AND.PORT)

And voila!  On 7.2 it started working properly!  But it broke 7.3!  On 7.3 it 
brings up the default web site if I explicitly set that header.

Is this a known bug/issue?  Is there something I should do to work around it 
now 
so that a UniData upgrade won't bite me?  I've thought about reverting to the 
old socket interface but I'd like to use callHTTP if it is "stable" since it is 
so convenient.

Thanks,

Steve...

--
Steve Kneizys

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

 

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] callHTTP creating Header

2011-08-25 Thread Boydell, Stuart
Karl,
I have used both setrequestheader and addrequestparameter without issues.

Add 3 parameters using AddRequestParameter:
   sub httpPostXML
   h = '';rh = '';rd = '';rs = '';sh = ''; pd = ''; sch = '';cf=''
   URL = 'http://myuri'
   boundary = '--':system(99)
   z = createRequest(URL,'POST:multipart/form-data; boundary=':boundary,h)
   z = addRequestParameter(h,'user_id','999','Content-Disposition: 
form-data; name="user_id"')
   z = addRequestParameter(h,'pwd','*pa55*','Content-Disposition: form-data; 
name="pwd"')
   ct = 'Content-Disposition: form-data; name="invoice_xml"; 
filename="test.xml"':@am:'Content-Type: text/xml'
   cv = 'http://xml.cXML.org/schemas/cXML/1.2.009/InvoiceDetail.dtd";>mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno
Sent: Friday, 26 August 2011 08:53
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] callHTTP creating Header (Karl-Heinz Winter)

Karl - your original request said:
"How can I create the correct header?"

My mental response was "stop bothering with CallHTTP and use cURL".  I 
refrained from posting that because of the inevitable retribution from people 
who prefer to bang their heads against flaky software rather than just looking 
outside of the box for a "real" solution.  (<<< oh he is sooo asking for it...)

But now that you've moved from CallHTTP to sockets. Mein Gott, Mann! Nein Nein! 
Tun Sie nicht das!  Sockets are much lower-level than what you need to do HTTP 
calls.

If you have a good solution to your problem, OK, sockets are great for doing 
many things.  And it's nice if you found free code that does exactly what you 
need.  But if you don't actually need complex software at that level, then for 
maintainability later, you should consider a higher-level solution.  Well, 
that's my opinion anyway - use the right tools for the job, and all that...

Viel Erfolg!
T


> From: Karl-Heinz Winter
> The second example shows how to do a request with OPENSOCKET, 
> WRITESOCKET and READSOCKET. These classes are posting the data without 
> any change.
> 
> I tried it and the webserver response ist OK!

>> When creating it with "setRequestHeader" or with "addRequestParamete" 
>> I will receive the error 415 (Unsupported media type) from the 
>> server. How can I create the correct header?

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users



___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] callHTTP creating Header (Karl-Heinz Winter)

2011-08-25 Thread Tony Gravagno
Karl - your original request said:
"How can I create the correct header?"

My mental response was "stop bothering with CallHTTP and use
cURL".  I refrained from posting that because of the inevitable
retribution from people who prefer to bang their heads against
flaky software rather than just looking outside of the box for a
"real" solution.  (<<< oh he is sooo asking for it...)

But now that you've moved from CallHTTP to sockets. Mein Gott,
Mann! Nein Nein! Tun Sie nicht das!  Sockets are much lower-level
than what you need to do HTTP calls.

If you have a good solution to your problem, OK, sockets are
great for doing many things.  And it's nice if you found free
code that does exactly what you need.  But if you don't actually
need complex software at that level, then for maintainability
later, you should consider a higher-level solution.  Well, that's
my opinion anyway - use the right tools for the job, and all
that...

Viel Erfolg!
T


> From: Karl-Heinz Winter
> The second example shows how to do a request with 
> OPENSOCKET, WRITESOCKET and READSOCKET. These classes 
> are posting the data without any change.
> 
> I tried it and the webserver response ist OK!

>> When creating it with "setRequestHeader" or with 
>> "addRequestParamete" I will receive the error 415 
>> (Unsupported media type) from the server. How can I 
>> create the correct header?

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] callHTTP creating Header (Karl-Heinz Winter)

2011-08-25 Thread Karl-Heinz Winter

I found the solution by myself!

The problem could be, that the functions 'setRequestHeader' und 
addRequestParameter' are formatting the data in any way, that the 
webserver doesn`t understand the request. When I logged the outgoing 
traffic to port 80, I have seen valuemarks in the header information.


On Pickwiki there is a good example of calling a web service: 
http://www.pickwiki.com/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?CallHTTP. The second example 
shows how to do a request with OPENSOCKET, WRITESOCKET and READSOCKET. 
These classes are posting the data without any change.


I tried it and the webserver response ist OK!

Karl-Heinz

old message was:
Message: 1 Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 21:03:31 +0200 From: Karl-Heinz Winter 
 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: 
[U2] callHTTP creating Header Message-ID: <4e53f983.10...@freenet.de> 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed in a header 
with post-data I have to create the header-information like this: 
Content-type: text/xml;charset="UTF-8" Accept: text/xml, 
multipart/related, text/html, image/gif, image/jpeg, *; q=.2, */*; q=.2 
When creating it with "setRequestHeader" or with "addRequestParamete" I 
will receive the error 415 (Unsupported media type) from the server. How 
can I create the correct header? Thanks in advance Karl-Heinz














___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] callHTTP creating Header

2011-08-24 Thread Glenn Sallis

Hello Karl-Heinz,

It could be that the issue is not with UniVerse, rather at the web 
server end. If you can share the source code with us which you are using 
to build up the request this may help us to trace the problem. Also, are 
you running UniVerse or UniData and on which OS?


I would suggest turning on protocol logging which should help in 
locating the cause of the problem. To do this use the protocolLogging() 
function which requires three parameters

1. The name of the file to which you want to save the logs.
2. ON
3. 10 (level 10 should give you enough info to help you with debugging).

The function returns true or false depending on whether or not logging 
has started successfully.


Other than that, try searching the mailing list. I would bet that you 
are not the only one who has had this problem. Otherwise check the BASIC 
Extensions documentation at the Rocket website.


Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Glenn Sallis
Glenn Sallis Softwareentwicklung und Beratung



Am 23.08.2011 21:03, schrieb Karl-Heinz Winter:
in a header with post-data I have to create the header-information 
like this:


Content-type: text/xml;charset="UTF-8"
Accept: text/xml, multipart/related, text/html, image/gif, image/jpeg, 
*; q=.2, */*; q=.2


When creating it with "setRequestHeader" or with "addRequestParamete" 
I will receive the error 415 (Unsupported media type) from the server. 
How can I create the correct header?


Thanks in advance
Karl-Heinz

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] callHTTP - disconnect?

2009-09-03 Thread Kevin King
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Symeon Breen  wrote:

> Actually TIME_WAIT is normal - when you close a connection, it goes to
> timewait for a set amount of time and then is closed, this stops any
> delayed
> packets being accepted by a later connection. There are kernel/tcp params
> to
> determine how long it should be in timewait. If you have too many at
> timewait this is called TIME_WAIT loading and can have implications on
> server performance as each of these has a memory stack.
>

Yeah, I know it's normal, but when we get a couple hundred of these out here
we usually get a comparable number of httpd children and the server just
stops accepting new connections.  We have only one Unidata instance sending
these things so there shouldn't be any reason why the Apache server would
stop allowing connections if each one gets disconnected in a timely manner.
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] callHTTP - disconnect?

2009-09-03 Thread Symeon Breen
Actually TIME_WAIT is normal - when you close a connection, it goes to
timewait for a set amount of time and then is closed, this stops any delayed
packets being accepted by a later connection. There are kernel/tcp params to
determine how long it should be in timewait. If you have too many at
timewait this is called TIME_WAIT loading and can have implications on
server performance as each of these has a memory stack.




-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Kevin King
Sent: 02 September 2009 19:07
To: U2 Users List
Subject: [U2] callHTTP - disconnect?

I have a Unidata (6.1/AIX) program using the callHTTP API to move data out
to an Apache server on a transaction by transaction basis.  When the
transactions get dropped into the queue slowly all is well.  When the
transactions get flooded in, Apache gets overwhelmed.  It appears like
Unidata isn't sending a disconnect after the submitRequest because the
TIME_WAIT in netstat is showing excessively long disconnect times for these
connections.  I don't see anything in the API documentation that mentions
disconnecting from the Unidata side; is there a header or option that I can
set to make sure Unidata sends a disconnect after the request?

-Kevin
http://www.PrecisOnline.com
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] callHTTP - disconnect?

2009-09-03 Thread Glen Batchelor

 You can always run apache in debug mode (-X) as a single process and run it
under strace to see what's going on.


Glen Batchelor
IT Director
All-Spec Industries
 phone: (910) 332-0424
   fax: (910) 763-5664
E-mail: webmas...@all-spec.com
   Web: http://www.all-spec.com
  Blog: http://blog.all-spec.com


> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-
> boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Kevin King
> Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 11:17 AM
> To: U2 Users List
> Subject: Re: [U2] callHTTP - disconnect?
> 
> The "Connection: close" header had zero impact.  Checking other Apache
> configuration options now.
> ___
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] callHTTP - disconnect?

2009-09-03 Thread Kevin King
The "Connection: close" header had zero impact.  Checking other Apache
configuration options now.
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] callHTTP - disconnect?

2009-09-02 Thread Symeon Breen
In your apache app set the http response header 'Connection' to 'Close'




-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Kevin King
Sent: 02 September 2009 19:07
To: U2 Users List
Subject: [U2] callHTTP - disconnect?

I have a Unidata (6.1/AIX) program using the callHTTP API to move data out
to an Apache server on a transaction by transaction basis.  When the
transactions get dropped into the queue slowly all is well.  When the
transactions get flooded in, Apache gets overwhelmed.  It appears like
Unidata isn't sending a disconnect after the submitRequest because the
TIME_WAIT in netstat is showing excessively long disconnect times for these
connections.  I don't see anything in the API documentation that mentions
disconnecting from the Unidata side; is there a header or option that I can
set to make sure Unidata sends a disconnect after the request?

-Kevin
http://www.PrecisOnline.com
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] callHTTP - disconnect?

2009-09-02 Thread Glen Batchelor

 I don't suppose it's keep-alives going bad?


Glen Batchelor
IT Director
All-Spec Industries
 phone: (910) 332-0424
   fax: (910) 763-5664
E-mail: webmas...@all-spec.com
   Web: http://www.all-spec.com
  Blog: http://blog.all-spec.com


> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-
> boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Kevin King
> Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 2:07 PM
> To: U2 Users List
> Subject: [U2] callHTTP - disconnect?
> 
> I have a Unidata (6.1/AIX) program using the callHTTP API to move data out
> to an Apache server on a transaction by transaction basis.  When the
> transactions get dropped into the queue slowly all is well.  When the
> transactions get flooded in, Apache gets overwhelmed.  It appears like
> Unidata isn't sending a disconnect after the submitRequest because the
> TIME_WAIT in netstat is showing excessively long disconnect times for
> these
> connections.  I don't see anything in the API documentation that mentions
> disconnecting from the Unidata side; is there a header or option that I
> can
> set to make sure Unidata sends a disconnect after the request?
> 
> -Kevin
> http://www.PrecisOnline.com
> ___
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


RE: [U2] CallHTTP vs cURL...

2009-04-19 Thread Tony G
David, buried in my point was that you may be able to get other
phantoms to be more effective, thus reducing your requirement for
phantoms for other tasks.  So with luck, when you do need a new
one for CallHTTP your total phantom usage won't be any more than
it is now.  Like anything, especially in this economy, eliminate
existing waste before attempting to avoid new expenses.

But be careful about making your existing ports more effective.
In it's strictest technical sense IBM licensing would prohibit
even these sorts of optimizations - have your lawyers do lunch
with their lawyers...

Tony Gravagno
Nebula Research and Development
TG@ remove.pleaseNebula-RnD.com

Visit PickWiki.com.   Contribute!

> From: David Wolverton 
> BUT -- right now, regardless of how it gets executed, 
> using CallHTTP (or anything 'socket') would go 
> iPhantom, even if just for a moment on a 'called' or 
> 'executed' sub-sub-phantom -- and if there are no 
> seats free for the phantom to 'grab' then it's dead in 
> the water...
> 
> The issue isn't the 'method' used to execute CallHTTP 
> - it's the CallHTTP wanting to grab a seat that is the 
> issue.
> 
> Thanks!
> David W. 
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] CallHTTP vs cURL...

2009-04-18 Thread Bill Haskett
   Tony:
   I have a simple master phantom service that runs and does exactly what you
   say.  It starts when the UD dbms machine is booted and checks a service file
   for specific information.  This service file contains various things the
   service needs to know like:
   Command => sort
   DTASERVICES
18:36:05 Apr 18 2009
   Service Dbms Acct...ACCOUNT...
   COMMAND(S) OK Cron Schedule..
   BACKUP   RUN DTABP
   DM.FS 0 45 23 * * *
   CABFTPE:\DataTrust\Demo  RUN DTABP
   TRINFO.CAB FTP0 55 23 * * 6
   LICENSE.CNT   E:\DataTrust\Demo  RUN DTABP
   LICENSE.CHECK 0 15 * * * *
   CLEANUP  ASI  E:\Advantos\Intel  RUN DTABP
   CLEANUP.DAILY 1 00 22 * * *
   CLEANUP  DEMO E:\DataTrust\Demo  RUN DTABP
   CLEANUP.DAILY 1 00 22 * * *
   CLEANUP  DEV  E:\DataTrust\Dev   RUN DTABP
   CLEANUP.DAILY 1 00 22 * * *
   6 records listed
   It runs all kinds of stuff including firing off sftp uploads/downloads,
   backups, etc.
   I'd be happy to publish this if anyone's interested.
   Bill
   __

   From: Tony G <1tlx6h...@sneakemail.com>
   Sent: 4/18/2009 1:23 PM
   To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
   Subject: Re: [U2] CallHTTP vs cURL...

Responding in general to a few notes here.
[AD] follows code and comments.

As to phantom operations, I find it surprising that most sites
don't use a plugin process, where you have a single phantom that
loops to process any tasks that are required.  It's like a
checkout person at the store, the same person will ring up
whatever you bring to the counter, you don't have one person to
ring up milk, another one for butter...  You provide the required
operations through a polled file.  For example:

LOOP
  NOTASKS=0
  SELECT TASKS
  LOOP
READNEXT TASKID ELSE NOTASKS=1
  UNTIL NOTASKS DO
READ TASK FROM TASKS,TASKID THEN
  BEGIN CASE
CASE TASK<1>="CALL WEB SERVICE"
  CALL WEBSERVICE.CLIENT(TASK)
CASE TASK<1>="SYNC OUTLOOK WITH CUSTFILE"
  CALL SYNC.OUTLOOK(TASK)
CASE TASK<1>="RUN DAY END REPORTS"
  CALL DAY.END(TASK)
CALL TASK<1>="RESET PHANTOM"
  DONE=1
CASE 1
  CALL INVALID.PHANTOM.REQUEST(TASK)
  END CASE
END ELSE NULL
  REPEAT
  * Refresh phantoms every 10 hours
  IF TIME()> START.TIME+600 THEN DONE=1
UNTIL DONE DO REPEAT
EXECUTE "START.NEW.PHANTOM" ; * kick off a replacement
END

Each of those subroutines can process in-line if they are
guaranteed to be short-lived, or they can kick off other phantoms
to handle more lengthy tasks or certain categories of tasks (as
with checkout people at a department store who ring up clothes,
tools, etc).  The idea here is that you may not need to start a
license-consuming phantom to do every task Now, but by deferring
the task for a few seconds you can do a lot with just one
process.

Each process is also responsible for removing the task from the
queue.  If that's not done some other process will get it.  If
you have more than one of these processes running to get the same
category of tasks, you'll need to ensure there are no contentions
and that tasks aren't dropped.

That whole process could be simplified with something like this:
  PROG=TASK<1>
  CALL @PROG(TASK)
That opens many possibilities but isn't perfect for all
situations either.

For the [AD]: Many people want to call external web pages or web
services, and turn to tools like CallHTTP and cURL.  I use cURL a
lot myself, but if you need to create structured requests or
parse the responses then you have a lot of work to do,
particularly with XML.  Most people don't know that mv.NET can be
used to call a web service remote from MV, and return results
with no protocol-related formatting whatsoever.  You just write
an item to a file and read back the results.  I won't get into
another technical HowTo here but this solution does consume a U2
license and may not be suitable for all applications.  If you
already have mv.NET then you can call a web service from BASIC
very easily at no extra cost.  If you don't have mv.NET, let me
know.

For people wondering "why should I buy a tool when I have free
tools in U2", just think about how many tools you use to solve
different problems.  Then think about how many times you've seen
me say "you can do that with mv.NET".  It's one tool, in many
ways better than the free tools - isn't that better than going
through the learning curve for a new tool every time you want to

RE: [U2] CallHTTP vs cURL...

2009-04-18 Thread David Wolverton
BUT -- right now, regardless of how it gets executed, using CallHTTP (or
anything 'socket') would go iPhantom, even if just for a moment on a
'called' or 'executed' sub-sub-phantom -- and if there are no seats free for
the phantom to 'grab' then it's dead in the water...

The issue isn't the 'method' used to execute CallHTTP - it's the CallHTTP
wanting to grab a seat that is the issue.

Thanks!
David W. 

> -Original Message-
> From: owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org 
> [mailto:owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Butera
> Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2009 7:39 PM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: RE: [U2] CallHTTP vs cURL...
> 
> On Sat, 18 Apr 2009, Tony G wrote:
> 
> > As to phantom operations, I find it surprising that most 
> sites don't 
> > use a plugin process, where you have a single phantom that loops to 
> > process any tasks that are required.
> 
> Ding, ding - I'm with Tony.I've long used what Tony 
> mentions here. 
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] CallHTTP vs cURL...

2009-04-18 Thread Jeff Butera

On Sat, 18 Apr 2009, Tony G wrote:


As to phantom operations, I find it surprising that most sites
don't use a plugin process, where you have a single phantom that
loops to process any tasks that are required.


Ding, ding - I'm with Tony.I've long used what Tony mentions here. 
You can also get more sophistocated with this by having the background 
looping process spawn other processes should the queue begin to get too 
long (eg: add a new checkout clerk).  It works well and it's not terribly 
hard to accomplish.


Jeff Butera, Ph.D.
Administrative Systems
Hampshire College
jbut...@hampshire.edu
413-559-5556

"Dad, you're talking in grown-up and need to stop."
 Catherine Butera
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] CallHTTP vs cURL...

2009-04-18 Thread Tony G
Responding in general to a few notes here.
[AD] follows code and comments.

As to phantom operations, I find it surprising that most sites
don't use a plugin process, where you have a single phantom that
loops to process any tasks that are required.  It's like a
checkout person at the store, the same person will ring up
whatever you bring to the counter, you don't have one person to
ring up milk, another one for butter...  You provide the required
operations through a polled file.  For example:

LOOP
  NOTASKS=0
  SELECT TASKS  
  LOOP
READNEXT TASKID ELSE NOTASKS=1
  UNTIL NOTASKS DO
READ TASK FROM TASKS,TASKID THEN
  BEGIN CASE
CASE TASK<1>="CALL WEB SERVICE"
  CALL WEBSERVICE.CLIENT(TASK)
CASE TASK<1>="SYNC OUTLOOK WITH CUSTFILE"
  CALL SYNC.OUTLOOK(TASK)
CASE TASK<1>="RUN DAY END REPORTS"
  CALL DAY.END(TASK)
CALL TASK<1>="RESET PHANTOM"
  DONE=1
CASE 1
  CALL INVALID.PHANTOM.REQUEST(TASK)
  END CASE
END ELSE NULL
  REPEAT
  * Refresh phantoms every 10 hours
  IF TIME()> START.TIME+600 THEN DONE=1
UNTIL DONE DO REPEAT
EXECUTE "START.NEW.PHANTOM" ; * kick off a replacement
END

Each of those subroutines can process in-line if they are
guaranteed to be short-lived, or they can kick off other phantoms
to handle more lengthy tasks or certain categories of tasks (as
with checkout people at a department store who ring up clothes,
tools, etc).  The idea here is that you may not need to start a
license-consuming phantom to do every task Now, but by deferring
the task for a few seconds you can do a lot with just one
process.

Each process is also responsible for removing the task from the
queue.  If that's not done some other process will get it.  If
you have more than one of these processes running to get the same
category of tasks, you'll need to ensure there are no contentions
and that tasks aren't dropped.

That whole process could be simplified with something like this:
  PROG=TASK<1>
  CALL @PROG(TASK)
That opens many possibilities but isn't perfect for all
situations either.

For the [AD]: Many people want to call external web pages or web
services, and turn to tools like CallHTTP and cURL.  I use cURL a
lot myself, but if you need to create structured requests or
parse the responses then you have a lot of work to do,
particularly with XML.  Most people don't know that mv.NET can be
used to call a web service remote from MV, and return results
with no protocol-related formatting whatsoever.  You just write
an item to a file and read back the results.  I won't get into
another technical HowTo here but this solution does consume a U2
license and may not be suitable for all applications.  If you
already have mv.NET then you can call a web service from BASIC
very easily at no extra cost.  If you don't have mv.NET, let me
know.

For people wondering "why should I buy a tool when I have free
tools in U2", just think about how many tools you use to solve
different problems.  Then think about how many times you've seen
me say "you can do that with mv.NET".  It's one tool, in many
ways better than the free tools - isn't that better than going
through the learning curve for a new tool every time you want to
do something different?  People also think anything other than
"free" is "expensive".  mv.NET licenses are only a few hundred
dollars - much less than the cost of developing almost any of
these "free" solutions on your own.  Feel free to contact me for
estimates.

Tony Gravagno
Nebula Research and Development
TG@ remove.pleaseNebula-RnD.com
Nebula R&D sells mv.NET and other Pick/MultiValue products
worldwide, and provides related development services
nospamNebula-RnD.com/blog
nospamNebula-RnD.com/forum

Use PickWiki.com!  Contribute!
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] CallHTTP vs cURL...

2009-04-18 Thread Ross Ferris
If only 5-6 times a day, why not just kill logoff the existing phantom,
immediately after spawning a replacement immediately after the CallHTTP
--> I assume new process would initialize what it needs to, and start
over, so you would have an iPhantom issue for a second or 2 at most.

The other "more interesting" grab for money is the question of "What
constitutes a connection pool", as IBM have been chasing this chestnut
here in Australia recently.

Situations we haven't received an un-ambiguous answer for to date
include polling files deposited by, say, an external POS register,
inter-acting with time clocks or even processing emails & attachments.
Until recently I thought these kind of interactions were relatively
innocuous & AOK, but it now a murky mess

Ross Ferris
Stamina Software
Visage > Better by Design!

>-Original Message-
>From: owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:owner-u2-
>us...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of David Wolverton
>Sent: Saturday, 18 April 2009 3:01 AM
>To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>Subject: RE: [U2] CallHTTP vs cURL...
>
>It's situational, so it would be tough to execute via 'cron' - it has
to
>execute or at least be 'triggered' from 'within' the phantom with data
>the
>phantom provides -- I guess I could write a Scheduled process that runs
>every  6 seconds to see if there is a 'file to execute' - but that
seems
>to
>be even more overhead -- I'm just trying to figure out how to avoid
>turning
>the phantom into an iPhantom... And losing a valuable 'real' seat in
the
>process!
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org
>> [mailto:owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Schasny
>> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 11:44 AM
>> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>> Subject: Re: [U2] CallHTTP vs cURL...
>>
>> How about running a shell script from a cron job that
>> retrieves whatever via cURL.
>---
>u2-users mailing list
>u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] CallHTTP vs cURL...

2009-04-17 Thread Symeon Breen
I have used EXECUTE "!curl ..." in  a number of  apps and it definitely does
not take an iphantom licence.

However i use it not to get round licencing (as this is usually from a
uniobjects call anyway) but because for some reason curl is many times more
efficient than callhttp. I presume the udt process has to load some library
to run the callhttp, whereas the execute is just the normal *nix process
spawn overhead. Anyway we did it as we had occurrences of the callhttp
taking say 6 or 7 hundred milliseconds but the execute curl took 2 or 3
hundred and in a very heavily used web service (between 5 and 50 calls per
second) this adds up to quite a difference.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] CallHTTP vs cURL...

2009-04-17 Thread John Hester
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org 
> [mailto:owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of 
> David Wolverton
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 8:12 AM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: [U2] CallHTTP vs cURL...

[snip]

> 2) Find a way to 'trick' the application - like EXECUTE 
> "!cURL..." -- has
> anyone done this inside of a phantom? Does it work?  More 
> importantly, does
> it go "iPhantom" in the process?

Like Glen, we also use cURL for shipping rates and address validation
with UPS and Fedex web services.  We haven't had issues with missing
data, but have with timeouts.  If you don't tell cURL to time out, it
will wait for a response for a very lng time.  Very bad when the
whole order desk is hung due to UPS or Fedex having a problem with their
site.  We learned that one the hard way.  This is what we execute now:

EXECUTE 'SH -c "curl --connect-timeout 10 --max-time 10 -d
@/tmp/':REQ.ID:' -k ':URL:'"', OUT > XML.TXT

The XML request is written to a sequential temp file, then deleted after
the execute.  The curl calls are made from user or UOJ sessions, so I
can't say with certainty if there is any affect on the phantom
licensing.

-John
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] CallHTTP vs cURL...

2009-04-17 Thread George Gallen
I use wget (unix).

create dirlink - a directory link (<1>F <2>/directory <3>D_SOURCE)
execute 'sh -c "cd directory ; wget -O outfile URL"'
ed dirlink outfile

Make outfile, the PID/USERNO for uniqueness and multiuser ability

George

> -Original Message-
> From: owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:owner-u2-
> us...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Schasny
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 12:44 PM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: Re: [U2] CallHTTP vs cURL...
>
> How about running a shell script from a cron job that retrieves
> whatever
> via cURL.
>
> David Wolverton wrote:
> > I have a phantom that does a CallHTTP to 'call back' to our RedBack
> server
> > to run a Java Method that returns some data.  Essentially, it's doing
> a
> > 'data read' - but with IBM's new 'drive for revenue', this command
> now makes
> > the Phantom into an iPhantom -- which defeats the reason we made it a
> > phantom in the first place!  It's a background 'monitor' process yet
> now
> > it's sucking up a 'full pay' seat...
> >
> > This CallHTTP is done 3 - 5x a day - but once it execute, the seat is
> then
> > gone until the phantom dies.
> >
> > This is just plain wrong -- if I could read this data locally, I
> would - but
> > since I cannot... I'm trying to weigh options on how to 'work around'
> this
> > issue and thought I'd see what others have done.
> >
> > 1) I could have the phantom 'PHANTOM' out another process to do ONLY
> the
> > CallHTTP, write the answer to a local 'file' and then 'die' - the
> first
> > phantom would just 'watch' that file for the result.  The only
> downside,
> > we'd have to have a 'free seat' for the 3x a day it runs, and that's
> not
> > always going to be true. Hence the problem in the first place!
> >
> > 2) Find a way to 'trick' the application - like EXECUTE "!cURL..." --
> has
> > anyone done this inside of a phantom? Does it work?  More
> importantly, does
> > it go "iPhantom" in the process?
> >
> > I'm sort of perplexed on the iPhantom thing -- CallHTTP is just
> another way
> > to 'read data' from somewhere. I'm just not sure why they decided
> this
> > should ding a license. I could see if it was SERVING data - but
> CallHTTP is
> > 'getting' data - not 'serving' it...  It just is an odd decision. If
> we were
> > opening a socket for read/write, again, I could *sort of* understand
> making
> > it iPhantom - but can CallHTTP really do 'server' work??
> >
> > Thanks for any thoughts ... It's only $500, but it's the principle of
> the
> > thing here!! I'm trying to do something that to me LEGITIMATELY
> should not
> > consume a seat.
> >
> > David W.
> > ---
> > u2-users mailing list
> > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
> >
> >
>
> --
> ---
> -
> Jeff Schasny - Denver, Co, USA
> jschasny at gmail dot com
> ---
> -
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] CallHTTP vs cURL...

2009-04-17 Thread Jeff Schasny
How about having the phantom do (Universe syntax here):

EXECUTE 'SH -c "ShellScriptWithcURLStuff >> /dev/null 2>&1 &"'

That way you execute the curl command as a background process with all 
I/O redirected





David Wolverton wrote:
> It's situational, so it would be tough to execute via 'cron' - it has to
> execute or at least be 'triggered' from 'within' the phantom with data the
> phantom provides -- I guess I could write a Scheduled process that runs
> every  6 seconds to see if there is a 'file to execute' - but that seems to
> be even more overhead -- I'm just trying to figure out how to avoid turning
> the phantom into an iPhantom... And losing a valuable 'real' seat in the
> process! 
>
>   
>> -Original Message-
>> From: owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org 
>> [mailto:owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Schasny
>> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 11:44 AM
>> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>> Subject: Re: [U2] CallHTTP vs cURL...
>>
>> How about running a shell script from a cron job that 
>> retrieves whatever via cURL.
>> 
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
>
>   

-- 

Jeff Schasny - Denver, Co, USA
jschasny at gmail dot com

---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] CallHTTP vs cURL...

2009-04-17 Thread Glen Batchelor
  I utilize cURL for shipping tracking updates, among other automated tasks,
that run bi-hourly. Since the data is not critical, I don't perform any
connectivity or results checking. If you do decide to shell a cURL process,
make sure that you verify the response is well-formed. You will need to
implement the timeout switch too. Your better off putting raw data into a
wrapper of some kind so that you can verify the start/end of the
transaction(formation checking). I've seen cURL dump only the first 2-3
lines of an entire XML document back to me without complaining about
connection errors. Timeout handling should also be done, so if your current
CallHTTP code doesn't do all of that then you have some design work to do.


Glen Batchelor
IT Director
All-Spec Industries
 phone: (910) 332-0424
   fax: (910) 763-5664
E-mail: webmas...@all-spec.com
   Web: http://www.all-spec.com
  Blog: http://blog.all-spec.com


> -Original Message-
> From: owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:owner-u2-
> us...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of David Wolverton
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 1:01 PM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: RE: [U2] CallHTTP vs cURL...
> 
> It's situational, so it would be tough to execute via 'cron' - it has to
> execute or at least be 'triggered' from 'within' the phantom with data the
> phantom provides -- I guess I could write a Scheduled process that runs
> every  6 seconds to see if there is a 'file to execute' - but that seems
> to
> be even more overhead -- I'm just trying to figure out how to avoid
> turning
> the phantom into an iPhantom... And losing a valuable 'real' seat in the
> process!
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org
> > [mailto:owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Schasny
> > Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 11:44 AM
> > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> > Subject: Re: [U2] CallHTTP vs cURL...
> >
> > How about running a shell script from a cron job that
> > retrieves whatever via cURL.
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] CallHTTP vs cURL...

2009-04-17 Thread David Wolverton
It's situational, so it would be tough to execute via 'cron' - it has to
execute or at least be 'triggered' from 'within' the phantom with data the
phantom provides -- I guess I could write a Scheduled process that runs
every  6 seconds to see if there is a 'file to execute' - but that seems to
be even more overhead -- I'm just trying to figure out how to avoid turning
the phantom into an iPhantom... And losing a valuable 'real' seat in the
process! 

> -Original Message-
> From: owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org 
> [mailto:owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Schasny
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 11:44 AM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: Re: [U2] CallHTTP vs cURL...
> 
> How about running a shell script from a cron job that 
> retrieves whatever via cURL.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] CallHTTP vs cURL...

2009-04-17 Thread Jeff Schasny
How about running a shell script from a cron job that retrieves whatever 
via cURL.

David Wolverton wrote:
> I have a phantom that does a CallHTTP to 'call back' to our RedBack server
> to run a Java Method that returns some data.  Essentially, it's doing a
> 'data read' - but with IBM's new 'drive for revenue', this command now makes
> the Phantom into an iPhantom -- which defeats the reason we made it a
> phantom in the first place!  It's a background 'monitor' process yet now
> it's sucking up a 'full pay' seat...
>
> This CallHTTP is done 3 - 5x a day - but once it execute, the seat is then
> gone until the phantom dies. 
>
> This is just plain wrong -- if I could read this data locally, I would - but
> since I cannot... I'm trying to weigh options on how to 'work around' this
> issue and thought I'd see what others have done.
>
> 1) I could have the phantom 'PHANTOM' out another process to do ONLY the
> CallHTTP, write the answer to a local 'file' and then 'die' - the first
> phantom would just 'watch' that file for the result.  The only downside,
> we'd have to have a 'free seat' for the 3x a day it runs, and that's not
> always going to be true. Hence the problem in the first place!
>
> 2) Find a way to 'trick' the application - like EXECUTE "!cURL..." -- has
> anyone done this inside of a phantom? Does it work?  More importantly, does
> it go "iPhantom" in the process?
>
> I'm sort of perplexed on the iPhantom thing -- CallHTTP is just another way
> to 'read data' from somewhere. I'm just not sure why they decided this
> should ding a license. I could see if it was SERVING data - but CallHTTP is
> 'getting' data - not 'serving' it...  It just is an odd decision. If we were
> opening a socket for read/write, again, I could *sort of* understand making
> it iPhantom - but can CallHTTP really do 'server' work??
>
> Thanks for any thoughts ... It's only $500, but it's the principle of the
> thing here!! I'm trying to do something that to me LEGITIMATELY should not
> consume a seat.
>
> David W.
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
>
>   

-- 

Jeff Schasny - Denver, Co, USA
jschasny at gmail dot com

---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] callHTTP using a Proxy Server

2007-01-25 Thread Anthony Caufield
I used ISA and have had very little issue. I am not sure based on this
email what OS level or version of ISA is running. There is also no
indication of how this server is published. Is the client in the network
that has ISA and trying to hit a server exposed to the web or the other
way around. What are the details of the ISA rule. I am also not that
familiar with SB+ I am unclear on its authentication methods but if it
requires network access then you may need to have the request come from
the ISA server as opposed to from the original client.

Tony

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott
Richardson
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 6:59 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] callHTTP using a Proxy Server

Microsoft ISA Server. What a PITA.
Configure it exactly correctly - or better yet - Remove it.
Error barks pretty clearly on permission & authorization to access to
the
service, so clearly something isn't right in ISA.
Typically it denies any processes running as user "local System" access
to
anything outside the box.

- Original Message - 
From: "Mike Dallaire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 9:09 AM
Subject: [U2] callHTTP using a Proxy Server


> UniVerse 10.1
>
> SB+ 5.3.4 and SBClient 5.3.4
>
> We are running many interfaces using callHTTP from Windows and Linux
servers
> at our customer sites and they have been working fine.  We now have a
> customer who needs to run some of these interface through an ISA Proxy
> server.  Their UniVerse box is Windows 2000 sp4.  They have set the
ISA
> server to allow all communication to go through without authentication
and
> they have other vendors using .NET applications that are working fine,
yet
> no matter what we have tried we cannot get the request through.  The
> protocol logging shows the following:
>
>
>
> proxy response: HTTP/1.1 407 Proxy Authentication Required ( The ISA
Server
> requires authorization to fulfill the request. Access to the Web Proxy
> service is denied.  )Via:1.1
>
>
>
> Does anyone have any experience, ideas, suggestions that they can
offer on
> this problem?
>
> Any help is greatly appreciated.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> Mike Dallaire
>
> Programmer
>
> IBM Certified Solutions Expert - U2 UniVerse V9.6 Administrator for
Unix
and
> Windows
>
> Mortgage Builder Software Inc.
>
> (248) 304-0600 x 103
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] callHTTP using a Proxy Server

2007-01-25 Thread Scott Richardson
 Original Message - 
From: "Mike Dallaire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 9:09 AM
Subject: [U2] callHTTP using a Proxy Serve
> UniVerse 10.1
> SB+ 5.3.4 and SBClient 5.3.4
> We are running many interfaces using callHTTP from Windows and Linux
servers
> at our customer sites and they have been working fine.  We now have a
> customer who needs to run some of these interface through an ISA Proxy
> server.  Their UniVerse box is Windows 2000 sp4.  They have set the ISA
> server to allow all communication to go through without authentication and
> they have other vendors using .NET applications that are working fine, yet
> no matter what we have tried we cannot get the request through.  The
> protocol logging shows the following:

> proxy response: HTTP/1.1 407 Proxy Authentication Required ( The ISA
Server
> requires authorization to fulfill the request. Access to the Web Proxy
> service is denied.  )Via:1.1

> Does anyone have any experience, ideas, suggestions that they can offer on
> this problem?  Any help is greatly appreciated   Thank you,
> Mike Dallaire, Programmer

Remember, Google is your friend, and the next best thing to having "no
documentation".

"iexplore google.com" on the following:
HTTP/1.1 407 Proxy Authentication Required ( The ISA Server
requires authorization to fulfill the request. Access to the Web Proxy
service is denied.  )

Also,  check browser  "Internet Options >> Security" settings for particular
settings to ensure they're configured properly on Client systems
accessing/calling the Server, (or whatever "process" is being used to
access/call), and also on the Server providing the "service", or the
Web-Server, for that particular port, as compared to standard usage ports..
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] callHTTP using a Proxy Server

2007-01-25 Thread Scott Richardson
Microsoft ISA Server. What a PITA.
Configure it exactly correctly - or better yet - Remove it.
Error barks pretty clearly on permission & authorization to access to the
service, so clearly something isn't right in ISA.
Typically it denies any processes running as user "local System" access to
anything outside the box.

- Original Message - 
From: "Mike Dallaire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 9:09 AM
Subject: [U2] callHTTP using a Proxy Server


> UniVerse 10.1
>
> SB+ 5.3.4 and SBClient 5.3.4
>
> We are running many interfaces using callHTTP from Windows and Linux
servers
> at our customer sites and they have been working fine.  We now have a
> customer who needs to run some of these interface through an ISA Proxy
> server.  Their UniVerse box is Windows 2000 sp4.  They have set the ISA
> server to allow all communication to go through without authentication and
> they have other vendors using .NET applications that are working fine, yet
> no matter what we have tried we cannot get the request through.  The
> protocol logging shows the following:
>
>
>
> proxy response: HTTP/1.1 407 Proxy Authentication Required ( The ISA
Server
> requires authorization to fulfill the request. Access to the Web Proxy
> service is denied.  )Via:1.1
>
>
>
> Does anyone have any experience, ideas, suggestions that they can offer on
> this problem?
>
> Any help is greatly appreciated.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> Mike Dallaire
>
> Programmer
>
> IBM Certified Solutions Expert - U2 UniVerse V9.6 Administrator for Unix
and
> Windows
>
> Mortgage Builder Software Inc.
>
> (248) 304-0600 x 103
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] callHTTP

2006-11-21 Thread Stuart . Boydell
Stu,
I forgot to mention what you might expect back in the response and headers 
fields. The response will
contain whatever the web service you are posting to/requesting from is 
programmed to respond with.
In the case of a web service, for example, it will probably return an XML 
document. In the case of a
web site it may return whatever exists at that URL eg html or possibly a zip or 
doc file for
example. If you get something like this in your response, the http Headers 
should contain the mime
type and other info about the document.
Generally, it will then be up to you to handle and process the file with 
whichever tools you
determine are appropriate. Generally I think most web protocols will do some 
form of ascii encoding
(b64/uucp/etc) to ensure that the file is web safe. If you receive the file in 
this way then you
have to uncompress/uuucp/b64 it. Otherwise, if the file is potentially binary 
then you need to
handle it more delicately with UV as writes, for example, can munge the file. 
Also, the potential
size of a file could be an issue.
HTH
Stuart Boydell



From: Stuart.Boydell
This shows how to post a simple (xml) purchase order to a web service -
response contained in 'response'.

program TEST.POST
equ E.THIS.PROG to 'TEST.POST'
equ E.URL to 'http://10.1.1.123/eprocurement.aspx'
equ E.POST to 'POST:text/xml' ;*// note mime type is possibly optional
sessionHandle = ''
httpHeaders = ''
httpStatus = ''
postData = '< ns0:PO xmlns:ns0="http://HTTPRequestResponse.POSchema";>< 
Item>Item01< /Item><
Price>500< /Price>< /ns0:PO>'
if not(createRequest(E.URL,E.POST,sessionHandle)) then
crt 'return
status=':submitRequest(sessionHandle,6,postData,httpHeaders,response 
,httpStatus)
end
crt 'httpStatus=':httpStatus
crt 'httpHeaders=':httpHeaders
crt 'response=':response
the:end

Stuart Boydell
___
From: Stu Glancy
Does anyone have any examples of using callHTTP to GET and/or POST.
I'm in the early stages of figuring out how to use callHTTP and have had
some success in being able to GET but it's only html that comes back. I
need examples of GETting a file or POSTing a file. Any help would be
appreciated.


 
**
This email message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of addressed recipient(s). If you have received 
this communication in error, please reply to this e-mail to notify the sender 
of its incorrect delivery and then delete it and your reply.  It is your 
responsibility to check this email and any attachments for viruses and defects 
before opening or sending them on. Spotless collects information about you to 
provide and market our services. For information about use, disclosure and 
access, see our privacy policy at http://www.spotless.com.au 
Please consider our environment before printing this email. 
** 
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] CALLHTTP....UV 10

2006-07-07 Thread George Gallen
thanks. I'll look through them.
Although it appears it's easier to use wget to read the https:// page than
  to set it up in UV, but I'll play with the codes just to get it to work :)

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Wendy Smoak
> Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 2:19 PM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: Re: [U2] CALLHTTPUV 10
> 
> 
> On 7/5/06, George Gallen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > OK. Adding in the setHTTPDefault and the setRequestHeader 
> got it working.
> >
> > Now...I need to read an https:// URL
> 
> Not reading for content, but see if anything here helps:
> 
>http://www.pickwiki.com/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?CallHTTPWithSSL
> 
> also:http://www.pickwiki.com/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?CallHTTP
> 
> -- 
> Wendy
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] CALLHTTP....UV 10

2006-07-05 Thread Wendy Smoak

On 7/5/06, George Gallen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


OK. Adding in the setHTTPDefault and the setRequestHeader got it working.

Now...I need to read an https:// URL


Not reading for content, but see if anything here helps:

  http://www.pickwiki.com/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?CallHTTPWithSSL

also:http://www.pickwiki.com/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?CallHTTP

--
Wendy
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] CALLHTTP....UV 10

2006-07-05 Thread George Gallen
OK. Adding in the setHTTPDefault and the setRequestHeader got it working.

Now...I need to read an https:// URL

I changed my createrequest to createsecurerequest, and now I have my security 
handle.

The data isn't being read, I have getting a 400 page error instead.

I didn't see a submitsecurerequest() command..

George

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Peter Veenhof
> Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 8:48 AM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: RE: [U2] CALLHTTPUV 10
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I think I had similar problems, but eventually got it working 
> with this
> code:
> 
> HTTP.METHOD = 'GET'
> REQ.HANDLE = '' ; POST.DATA = '' ; TIME.OUT = '' ; RESP.HEADERS = '' ;
> RESP.DATA = '' ; HTTP.STATUS = ''
> Ret = setHTTPDefault('VERSION','1.1')
> Ret = createRequest(URL,HTTP.METHOD,REQ.HANDLE)
> Ret = setRequestHeader(REQ.HANDLE,'Connection','Keep-Alive')
> RET.STATUS =
> SubmitRequest(REQ.HANDLE,TIME.OUT,POST.DATA,RESP.HEADERS,RESP.
> DATA,HTTP.
> STATUS)
> 
> 
> Where RESP.DATA will contain the downloaded data
> 
> Setting the HTTP Version to 1.1 is what fixed mine to get the data to
> come down, I do recall only getting headers previous to that.
> 
> Hope that helps
> 
> Peter
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Gallen
> Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 4:15 PM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: [U2] CALLHTTPUV 10
> 
> I'm trying to setup a very simple web call.
> 
> STATUS1=CREATEREQUEST(URL,"GET",SHANDLE)
> STATUS2=SUBMITREQUEST(SHANDLE,1000,"",HEADERS,RDAT,HSTATUS)
> 
> OK. From what I gather, the above two lines, "should" download the
> webpage
> specified in URL.
> 
> I'm getting strange information in HEADERS and RDAT but the 
> HSTATUS says
> 200
> (ok)
> 
> What I want to do is access a URL and get the resulting information.
> 
> I was using wget, but it keeps hanging. I just want to use something
> else, and
> thought I'd
> try to go UV native.
> 
> In actuality, I will really need to use 
> CREATESECUREREQUEST(), But I'll
> tackle
> that one
> when I get the non-secure working first...:)
> 
> Any examples would be very helpful
> 
> Thanks
> George
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] CALLHTTP....UV 10

2006-07-04 Thread Peter Veenhof
Hi,

I think I had similar problems, but eventually got it working with this
code:

HTTP.METHOD = 'GET'
REQ.HANDLE = '' ; POST.DATA = '' ; TIME.OUT = '' ; RESP.HEADERS = '' ;
RESP.DATA = '' ; HTTP.STATUS = ''
Ret = setHTTPDefault('VERSION','1.1')
Ret = createRequest(URL,HTTP.METHOD,REQ.HANDLE)
Ret = setRequestHeader(REQ.HANDLE,'Connection','Keep-Alive')
RET.STATUS =
SubmitRequest(REQ.HANDLE,TIME.OUT,POST.DATA,RESP.HEADERS,RESP.DATA,HTTP.
STATUS)


Where RESP.DATA will contain the downloaded data

Setting the HTTP Version to 1.1 is what fixed mine to get the data to
come down, I do recall only getting headers previous to that.

Hope that helps

Peter



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Gallen
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 4:15 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] CALLHTTPUV 10

I'm trying to setup a very simple web call.

STATUS1=CREATEREQUEST(URL,"GET",SHANDLE)
STATUS2=SUBMITREQUEST(SHANDLE,1000,"",HEADERS,RDAT,HSTATUS)

OK. From what I gather, the above two lines, "should" download the
webpage
specified in URL.

I'm getting strange information in HEADERS and RDAT but the HSTATUS says
200
(ok)

What I want to do is access a URL and get the resulting information.

I was using wget, but it keeps hanging. I just want to use something
else, and
thought I'd
try to go UV native.

In actuality, I will really need to use CREATESECUREREQUEST(), But I'll
tackle
that one
when I get the non-secure working first...:)

Any examples would be very helpful

Thanks
George

George Gallen
Senior Programmer/Analyst
Accounting/Data Division
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ph:856.848.1000 Ext 220

SLACK Incorporated - Delivering the best in health care information and
education worldwide.
http://www.slackinc.com
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] CallHTTP

2006-01-09 Thread Tony Gravagno
If CallHTTP doesn't do what you need, look into cURL.  It's open source and
free, well supported, very stable, very popular, and it's quite capable of
doing HTTP post w/wo SSL as well as many other tricks.

HTH
T

Wendy Smoak wsmoak-at-gmail.com |U2UG| wrote:
> On 1/9/06, Peter Veenhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> Does anyone have a simple example of doing a HTTP POST
>> from within Universe Basic? The documentation doesn't
>> have any example code and I've failed to get it to work.
> 
> The Pick Wiki has:
>http://www.pickwiki.com/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?CallHTTP
> and
>http://www.pickwiki.com/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?CallHTTPWithSSL
> 
> There might be something here as well: 
> http://www.picksource.com/ 
> 
> HTH,
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] CallHTTP

2006-01-09 Thread Peter Veenhof
Thanks to all who gave me tips, I got it working! I had problems with
AM's being inside my posted data as well is a wrong encoding type, once
I solved those issues it works perfect.

Thanks again
Peter


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Perry Taylor
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 11:40 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] CallHTTP

Peter,

Here are a couple of local subroutines I use for synchronizing records
to other servers using a CGI post.  The corresponding CGI program on the
hosts generates a return value structured like...

SG: NUMBER.OF.ERRORS: SG: ERROR.MESSAGES

Where SG is EQUATEd to CHAR(255), ERROR.MESSAGES is an
attribute-delimited array of error messages and NUMBER.OF.ERRORS =
DCOUNT(ERROR.MESSAGES, @AM).  It makes it simple to make sure we got
something legitimate back from the POST without having to interpret all
the various http status codes.

Hope this helps.

Perry Taylor
Zirmed, Inc.


!
POST:
  
  POST.ERRMSG = NUL
 
  URL = 'http://': HOSTNAME:
'/~http/cgi-bin/chglog.mirror.update.cgi'
 
  RV = createRequest(URL, 'POST', HDL)
 
  IF RV THEN

 POST.ERRMSG<-1> = 'creeateRequest() failure, retval=': RV: '.'
 POST.ERRMSG<-1> = 'URL=': URL

 RETURN

  END
 
  PARAM.NAME  = 'ACTION'
  PARAM.VALUE = ACTION

  GOSUB POST.ADD.PARAM
  IF LEN(POST.ERRMSG) THEN RETURN

  PARAM.NAME  = 'CHGLOGID'
  PARAM.VALUE = CHGLOG.ID

  GOSUB POST.ADD.PARAM
  IF LEN(POST.ERRMSG) THEN RETURN

  PARAM.NAME  = 'CHGLOGREC'
  PARAM.VALUE = CHGLOG.REC

  GOSUB POST.ADD.PARAM
  IF LEN(POST.ERRMSG) THEN RETURN

  RESP.HDRS   = NUL
  RESP.DATA   = NUL
  HTTP.STATUS = NUL

  RV = submitRequest(HDL, NUL, NUL, RESP.HDRS, RESP.DATA,
HTTP.STATUS)
 
  IF RV THEN

 POST.ERRMSG<-1> = 'submitRequest() failure, retval=': RV: '.'

 RETURN

  END
 
  IF RESP.DATA MATCHES '"': SG: '"1N0N"': SG: '"0X' THEN

 IF FIELD(RESP.DATA, SG, 2) THEN

POST.ERRMSG<-1> = FIELD(RESP.DATA, SG, 3)
   
 END

  END ELSE

 POST.ERRMSG<-1> = 'Unexpected response from HTTP post.'
 POST.ERRMSG<-1> = STR('-', 79)
 POST.ERRMSG<-1> = RESP.DATA
 POST.ERRMSG<-1> = STR('-', 79)
 POST.ERRMSG<-1> = 'http status=': HTTP.STATUS

  END
  
  RETURN
!
POST.ADD.PARAM:

  
  IF LEN(PARAM.NAME) ELSE

 POST.ERRMSG<-1> = 'No parameter name specified.'

 RETURN

  END

  RV = addRequestParameter(HDL, PARAM.NAME, PARAM.VALUE, NUL)
 
  IF RV THEN

 POST.ERRMSG<-1> = 'addRequestParameter() failure to added '
 POST.ERRMSG:= PARAM.NAME: ', retval=': RV: '.'

  END

  RETURN

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Veenhof
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 7:38 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] CallHTTP

Hi all,

Does anyone have a simple example of doing a HTTP POST from within
Universe Basic? The documentation doesn't have any example code and I've
failed to get it to work.

Thanks
Peter
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure or distribution is prohibited. ZirMed, Inc. has strict
policies regarding the content of e-mail communications, specifically
Protected Health Information, any communications containing such
material will be returned to the originating party with such advisement
noted. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender
by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] CallHTTP

2006-01-09 Thread Perry Taylor
Peter,

Here are a couple of local subroutines I use for synchronizing records
to other servers using a CGI post.  The corresponding CGI program on the
hosts generates a return value structured like...

SG: NUMBER.OF.ERRORS: SG: ERROR.MESSAGES

Where SG is EQUATEd to CHAR(255), ERROR.MESSAGES is an
attribute-delimited array of error messages and NUMBER.OF.ERRORS =
DCOUNT(ERROR.MESSAGES, @AM).  It makes it simple to make sure we got
something legitimate back from the POST without having to interpret all
the various http status codes.

Hope this helps.

Perry Taylor
Zirmed, Inc.


!
POST:
  
  POST.ERRMSG = NUL
 
  URL = 'http://': HOSTNAME:
'/~http/cgi-bin/chglog.mirror.update.cgi'
 
  RV = createRequest(URL, 'POST', HDL)
 
  IF RV THEN

 POST.ERRMSG<-1> = 'creeateRequest() failure, retval=': RV: '.'
 POST.ERRMSG<-1> = 'URL=': URL

 RETURN

  END
 
  PARAM.NAME  = 'ACTION'
  PARAM.VALUE = ACTION

  GOSUB POST.ADD.PARAM
  IF LEN(POST.ERRMSG) THEN RETURN

  PARAM.NAME  = 'CHGLOGID'
  PARAM.VALUE = CHGLOG.ID

  GOSUB POST.ADD.PARAM
  IF LEN(POST.ERRMSG) THEN RETURN

  PARAM.NAME  = 'CHGLOGREC'
  PARAM.VALUE = CHGLOG.REC

  GOSUB POST.ADD.PARAM
  IF LEN(POST.ERRMSG) THEN RETURN

  RESP.HDRS   = NUL
  RESP.DATA   = NUL
  HTTP.STATUS = NUL

  RV = submitRequest(HDL, NUL, NUL, RESP.HDRS, RESP.DATA,
HTTP.STATUS)
 
  IF RV THEN

 POST.ERRMSG<-1> = 'submitRequest() failure, retval=': RV: '.'

 RETURN

  END
 
  IF RESP.DATA MATCHES '"': SG: '"1N0N"': SG: '"0X' THEN

 IF FIELD(RESP.DATA, SG, 2) THEN

POST.ERRMSG<-1> = FIELD(RESP.DATA, SG, 3)
   
 END

  END ELSE

 POST.ERRMSG<-1> = 'Unexpected response from HTTP post.'
 POST.ERRMSG<-1> = STR('-', 79)
 POST.ERRMSG<-1> = RESP.DATA
 POST.ERRMSG<-1> = STR('-', 79)
 POST.ERRMSG<-1> = 'http status=': HTTP.STATUS

  END
  
  RETURN
!
POST.ADD.PARAM:

  
  IF LEN(PARAM.NAME) ELSE

 POST.ERRMSG<-1> = 'No parameter name specified.'

 RETURN

  END

  RV = addRequestParameter(HDL, PARAM.NAME, PARAM.VALUE, NUL)
 
  IF RV THEN

 POST.ERRMSG<-1> = 'addRequestParameter() failure to added '
 POST.ERRMSG:= PARAM.NAME: ', retval=': RV: '.'

  END

  RETURN

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Veenhof
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 7:38 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] CallHTTP

Hi all,

Does anyone have a simple example of doing a HTTP POST from within
Universe Basic? The documentation doesn't have any example code and I've
failed to get it to work.

Thanks
Peter
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or 
distribution is prohibited. ZirMed, Inc. has strict policies regarding the 
content of e-mail communications, specifically Protected Health Information, 
any communications containing such material will be returned to the originating 
party with such advisement noted. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original 
message.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] CallHTTP

2006-01-09 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 1/9/06, Peter Veenhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Does anyone have a simple example of doing a HTTP POST from within
> Universe Basic? The documentation doesn't have any example code and I've
> failed to get it to work.

The Pick Wiki has:
   http://www.pickwiki.com/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?CallHTTP
and
   http://www.pickwiki.com/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?CallHTTPWithSSL

There might be something here as well:  http://www.picksource.com/

HTH,
--
Wendy
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] CALLHTTP/SOAP

2005-11-01 Thread Harry Hambrick
Thanks, I found this paper just before receiving a reply and it solved
the problem.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Karjala Koponen
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 9:50 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] CALLHTTP/SOAP

Nik Kesic of IBM  wrote a paper about the U2 SOAP API at

http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/db2/library/techarticle/dm-0508kes
ic/ ?

The link came from the U2UG site.

Karjala


>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/01/2005 8:43:07 AM >>>
We are trying to do an interface using HTTP and SOAP from Unidata. We
can hit the site using CALLHTTP, but the SOAP actions are not working.



We have a sample VB App that the state provided and if we use a network
sniffer while that is running, we see the SOAP actions being sent across
to the state. However, if we run our UniBasic app while the sniffer is
running, we do not see anything SOAP related at all.



Does anyone have any working examples they can share, or any other facts
of enlightenment?



Thanks in advance,

Harry Hambrick

Geac Public Safety
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] CALLHTTP/SOAP

2005-11-01 Thread Karjala Koponen
Nik Kesic of IBM  wrote a paper about the U2 SOAP API at

http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/db2/library/techarticle/dm-0508kesic/ ?

The link came from the U2UG site.

Karjala


>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/01/2005 8:43:07 AM >>>
We are trying to do an interface using HTTP and SOAP from Unidata. We
can hit the site using CALLHTTP, but the SOAP actions are not working.



We have a sample VB App that the state provided and if we use a network
sniffer while that is running, we see the SOAP actions being sent across
to the state. However, if we run our UniBasic app while the sniffer is
running, we do not see anything SOAP related at all.



Does anyone have any working examples they can share, or any other facts
of enlightenment?



Thanks in advance,

Harry Hambrick

Geac Public Safety
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] CallHTTP

2004-07-22 Thread Wendy Smoak
Lee Bacall wrote:
> Anyone know offhand what the limit may be on a GET?

Sorry, I have to retract that.  As Tony mentioned, it's not in the HTTP
specification.

There is a practical limit, though depending on what's on the receiving
end of your GET, there may be a limit on the number of characters it can
handle.  Google turns up mention of a limit of 1024 for Apache, no idea
if that's old info or not.  I almost always POST, as I don't want people
bookmarking the links.

-- 
Wendy Smoak
Application Systems Analyst, Sr.
ASU IA Information Resources Management 
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] CallHTTP

2004-07-22 Thread Michael Spencer
It is the same limit as the length of a url which I think is 2083. 
 
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lee Bacall
Sent: July 22, 2004 11:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [U2] CallHTTP

Anyone know offhand what the limit may be on a GET?

Thanks
Lee Bacall
http://www.binarystar.com
Phone: +1 (954) 791-8575
Cell:  +1 (954) 655-6581

- Original Message -
From: "Wendy Smoak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Nick Cipollina"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 6:24 PM
Subject: RE: [U2] CallHTTP




> Are you doing a GET or a POST?  There is a limit on GET, but it comes
> from the HTTP specification, not UniVerse.  (And exceeding it is no
> excuse for it dying like that!)
>
> -- 
> Wendy Smoak
> (Sent at 3:25 PM)
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] CallHTTP

2004-07-22 Thread Lee Bacall
Anyone know offhand what the limit may be on a GET?

Thanks
Lee Bacall
http://www.binarystar.com
Phone: +1 (954) 791-8575
Cell:  +1 (954) 655-6581

- Original Message - 
From: "Wendy Smoak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Nick Cipollina"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 6:24 PM
Subject: RE: [U2] CallHTTP




> Are you doing a GET or a POST?  There is a limit on GET, but it comes
> from the HTTP specification, not UniVerse.  (And exceeding it is no
> excuse for it dying like that!)
>
> -- 
> Wendy Smoak
> (Sent at 3:25 PM)
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] CallHTTP

2004-07-22 Thread Nick Cipollina
Any chance you could dig this code up?  I'd love to see it.

Thanks,

Nick Cipollina
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Bennett
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 9:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [U2] CallHTTP

Nick,

I have previously posted UV code which uses sockets to do HTTP rather
than CallHTTP -- this might solve your problem in the short term.


Craig
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Nick 
Cipollina.vcf]
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] CallHTTP

2004-07-21 Thread djordan
The type of error message is typical from a variable growing beyond the
memory size.  If it is not the program, is their a log file or como file or
something in the backgroud that could be getting large.  Otherwise it might
be a limitation in the C routine that is parsing the HTTP.  I would get on
to IBM support.

Regards

David Jordan

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Cipollina
Sent: Thursday, 22 July 2004 11:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] CallHTTP


It's not.  The error doesn't occur until I try to submit my http request.
And it happens the first time through.  I am sending multiple transactions
as an XML string.  I can send 3 in a single string, but when I get to 4 it
causes this to happen.

Nick
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] CallHTTP

2004-07-21 Thread Craig Bennett
Nick,
I have previously posted UV code which uses sockets to do HTTP rather 
than CallHTTP -- this might solve your problem in the short term.

Craig
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] CallHTTP

2004-07-21 Thread Nick Cipollina
This is happening once the variable goes beyond about 4k.  It is happening when I 
submit the  http request.

Nick

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kevin King
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 4:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] CallHTTP


Any idea about how long your parameter is that's causing the abort? 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick
Cipollina
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 2:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [U2] CallHTTP

Is anyone aware of any limitations to the length of parameter_value in
the
addRequestParameter(request_handle,parameter_name,parameter_value,cont
en
t_handling) function.  We are trying to sent XML data to a web
service, and the longer parameter_value gets I get the following error
message:



CRITICAL ERROR! Notify the system administrator.


Abnormal termination of UniVerse.


Fault type is 11.  Layer type is BASIC run machine.


Fault occurred in BASIC program WS.TESTER at address 3ba.


Segmentation Fault(coredump)



I tried increasing BUFSIZE to no avail.  Has anyone else run into this
problem as well?  Thanks in advance.



Nick Cipollina



Pick Programmer

ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc.

2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210

Richmond, VA 23294

(804)644-8707 x 314

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a
name of Nick Cipollina.vcf]
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] CallHTTP

2004-07-21 Thread Nick Cipollina
I'm doing a post when I get this error message.

Nick

-Original Message-
From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 5:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Nick Cipollina
Subject: RE: [U2] CallHTTP


Nick Cipollina wrote:
> Is anyone aware of any limitations to the length of parameter_value in
> the addRequestParameter(request_handle,parameter_name,parameter_va
> lue,conten t_handling) function.

> CRITICAL ERROR! Notify the system administrator.
> Abnormal termination of UniVerse.
> Fault type is 11.  Layer type is BASIC run machine.
> Fault occurred in BASIC program WS.TESTER at address 3ba.
> Segmentation Fault(coredump)

Are you doing a GET or a POST?  There is a limit on GET, but it comes
from the HTTP specification, not UniVerse.  (And exceeding it is no
excuse for it dying like that!)

-- 
Wendy Smoak
(Sent at 3:25 PM)
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] CallHTTP

2004-07-21 Thread Nick Cipollina
Our initial design was to send one transaction at a time, which works just fine.  But 
there is a desire to send multiple transactions at one time.  I was thinking along the 
same lines, that someone put a limit to the length UniVerse will allow for the 
parameters because they never imagined that someone would try to put the entire 
record(s) in one XML string.  I think that it was designed to send one field at time.

Nick

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tony Gravagno
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 7:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] CallHTTP


Wendy Smoak wrote:

> Nick Cipollina wrote:
>> Is anyone aware of any limitations to the length of parameter_value
>> in the addRequestParameter(request_handle,parameter_name,parameter_va
>> lue,conten t_handling) function.
> 
>> CRITICAL ERROR! Notify the system administrator.
>> Abnormal termination of UniVerse.
>> Fault type is 11.  Layer type is BASIC run machine.
>> Fault occurred in BASIC program WS.TESTER at address 3ba.
>> Segmentation Fault(coredump)
> 
> Are you doing a GET or a POST?  There is a limit on GET, but it comes
> from the HTTP specification, not UniVerse.  (And exceeding it is no
> excuse for it dying like that!)

I was waiting to see a post along these lines.  You're right that there's no
excuse for it dying like that, but I actually don't think there is a defined
limit for a GET or query string.  Here are some related factors.  Some or
none may be relevant here, but it's good to consider these things:

- The length of the query string in total is generally agreed to limit at
1024 bytes, but I don't think that's a part of the spec.
- There are occasionally limits on the size of the domain name, which is
included in the total for the query string.
- There may be no defined client side limit, but some browsers do limit
their upload byte count, and that changes with releases.
- Some web servers and browsers have a specific limit on the total amount of
data submitted in the header parameters for any given form, whether GET or
POST.  This may be release-dependent.  For example, (from (bad) memory) IIS4
allowed up to 2MB for headers, IIS5 brought that down to a default of 1MB
(?), IIS6 even further down to 2K (?).  I've seen individual utilities limit
this after data comes into a web server so that the application doesn't get
crashed by too much data.
- Some browsers have yet another limit on the size of the FORM ACTION
parameter.

Since the original inquiry is dealing with CallHTTP, this isn't a browser,
and since the error is coming from Universe the issue is not with the
server.  In this case it seems addRequestParameter has yet another limit
which the authors felt reasonable, but they didn't code a nice error for
anyone who tries to exceed that value.

One way around this sort of thing relies on you having access to the server
side of the Web Service: Code it so that data can be posted in pieces rather
than megabytes at a time.  One of the parameters passed to the input can be
"block X of Y" and the last block sent to the Web Service should get a
confirmation for all blocks in the return values.

HTH,
Tony
Nebula R&D
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] CallHTTP

2004-07-21 Thread Nick Cipollina
It's not.  The error doesn't occur until I try to submit my http request.  And it 
happens the first time through.  I am sending multiple transactions as an XML string.  
I can send 3 in a single string, but when I get to 4 it causes this to happen.

Nick

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Jordan
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 4:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] CallHTTP


That may not be related to CallHTTP, that may be a variable in your program
that has not been cleared and is continually being appended to till it
overflows memory. Check the program for that typeof bug.

Regards

David Jordan
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] CallHTTP

2004-07-21 Thread Tony Gravagno
Another good bit of esotherica, thanks!

All of these limits remind me of Dirty Harry:
"A man's got to know his limitations..."

What surprises me is that you admit to reading RFC's.  :)

Tony Le Geek

Craig Bennett wrote:

> Tony,
>> - There are occasionally limits on the size of the domain name,
>> which is included in the total for the query string.
> 
> RFC3696 (which collates information from other RFCs) places the
> following limitations on a hostname from DNS:
> 
> A DNS label (the parts of a domain name delimited by '.') may not be
> longer than 63 octets.
> 
> A complete fully qualified domain name cannot be longer than 255
> octets. 
> 
> Probably nothing to do with the CallHTTP  problem, but useful to know.
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] CallHTTP

2004-07-21 Thread Craig Bennett
Tony,
- There are occasionally limits on the size of the domain name, which is
included in the total for the query string.
RFC3696 (which collates information from other RFCs) places the 
following limitations on a hostname from DNS:

A DNS label (the parts of a domain name delimited by '.') may not be 
longer than 63 octets.

A complete fully qualified domain name cannot be longer than 255 octets.
Probably nothing to do with the CallHTTP  problem, but useful to know.

Craig
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] CallHTTP

2004-07-21 Thread Tony Gravagno
Wendy Smoak wrote:

> Nick Cipollina wrote:
>> Is anyone aware of any limitations to the length of parameter_value
>> in the addRequestParameter(request_handle,parameter_name,parameter_va
>> lue,conten t_handling) function.
> 
>> CRITICAL ERROR! Notify the system administrator.
>> Abnormal termination of UniVerse.
>> Fault type is 11.  Layer type is BASIC run machine.
>> Fault occurred in BASIC program WS.TESTER at address 3ba.
>> Segmentation Fault(coredump)
> 
> Are you doing a GET or a POST?  There is a limit on GET, but it comes
> from the HTTP specification, not UniVerse.  (And exceeding it is no
> excuse for it dying like that!)

I was waiting to see a post along these lines.  You're right that there's no
excuse for it dying like that, but I actually don't think there is a defined
limit for a GET or query string.  Here are some related factors.  Some or
none may be relevant here, but it's good to consider these things:

- The length of the query string in total is generally agreed to limit at
1024 bytes, but I don't think that's a part of the spec.
- There are occasionally limits on the size of the domain name, which is
included in the total for the query string.
- There may be no defined client side limit, but some browsers do limit
their upload byte count, and that changes with releases.
- Some web servers and browsers have a specific limit on the total amount of
data submitted in the header parameters for any given form, whether GET or
POST.  This may be release-dependent.  For example, (from (bad) memory) IIS4
allowed up to 2MB for headers, IIS5 brought that down to a default of 1MB
(?), IIS6 even further down to 2K (?).  I've seen individual utilities limit
this after data comes into a web server so that the application doesn't get
crashed by too much data.
- Some browsers have yet another limit on the size of the FORM ACTION
parameter.

Since the original inquiry is dealing with CallHTTP, this isn't a browser,
and since the error is coming from Universe the issue is not with the
server.  In this case it seems addRequestParameter has yet another limit
which the authors felt reasonable, but they didn't code a nice error for
anyone who tries to exceed that value.

One way around this sort of thing relies on you having access to the server
side of the Web Service: Code it so that data can be posted in pieces rather
than megabytes at a time.  One of the parameters passed to the input can be
"block X of Y" and the last block sent to the Web Service should get a
confirmation for all blocks in the return values.

HTH,
Tony
Nebula R&D
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] CallHTTP

2004-07-21 Thread Wendy Smoak
Nick Cipollina wrote:
> Is anyone aware of any limitations to the length of parameter_value in
> the addRequestParameter(request_handle,parameter_name,parameter_va
> lue,conten t_handling) function.

> CRITICAL ERROR! Notify the system administrator.
> Abnormal termination of UniVerse.
> Fault type is 11.  Layer type is BASIC run machine.
> Fault occurred in BASIC program WS.TESTER at address 3ba.
> Segmentation Fault(coredump)

Are you doing a GET or a POST?  There is a limit on GET, but it comes
from the HTTP specification, not UniVerse.  (And exceeding it is no
excuse for it dying like that!)

-- 
Wendy Smoak
(Sent at 3:25 PM)
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] CallHTTP

2004-07-21 Thread David Jordan
That may not be related to CallHTTP, that may be a variable in your program
that has not been cleared and is continually being appended to till it
overflows memory. Check the program for that typeof bug.

Regards

David Jordan
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] CallHTTP

2004-07-21 Thread Kevin King
Any idea about how long your parameter is that's causing the abort? 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick
Cipollina
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 2:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [U2] CallHTTP

Is anyone aware of any limitations to the length of parameter_value in
the
addRequestParameter(request_handle,parameter_name,parameter_value,cont
en
t_handling) function.  We are trying to sent XML data to a web
service, and the longer parameter_value gets I get the following error
message:



CRITICAL ERROR! Notify the system administrator.


Abnormal termination of UniVerse.


Fault type is 11.  Layer type is BASIC run machine.


Fault occurred in BASIC program WS.TESTER at address 3ba.


Segmentation Fault(coredump)



I tried increasing BUFSIZE to no avail.  Has anyone else run into this
problem as well?  Thanks in advance.



Nick Cipollina



Pick Programmer

ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc.

2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210

Richmond, VA 23294

(804)644-8707 x 314

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a
name of Nick Cipollina.vcf]
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] CallHttp and SSL

2004-05-20 Thread Hanwell, David
I agree wholeheartedly with Stephen; he says it all. I couldn't have
said it better myself.   ;-)

"Behold I am become Death,
the shatterer of worlds." - Vishnu,
in the Hindu "Bhagavad Gita".
David Hanwell

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen
Krauklis
Sent:  Thursday, May 20, 2004 1:15 AM EDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [U2] CallHttp and SSL

---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.u2ug.org/listinfo/u2-users





CONFIDENTIALITY
This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and also may be privileged.
If you are not the named recipient, or have otherwise received this
communication in error, please delete it from your inbox, notify the sender
immediately, and do not disclose its contents to any other person,
use them for any purpose, or store or copy them in any medium.
Thank you for your cooperation.

---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.u2ug.org/listinfo/u2-users