[Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti commitment to WISPs
This is again another time that UBNT eyes have moved off the WISP target and moved to the Retail space. The reason for 2 in a box is simple if you’re selling to retail small businesses. You would sell these as a link for 2 buildings. Therefor you need a 2 pack. If you were selling them on Amazon or B a 2 pack is perfect. I know that the 5 packs are coming back eventually. Ben Moore and James Craig. This is my request to Ubiquity to make a BOLD statement in some way that shows your commitment to the WISP community and your appreciation to those of us that have stuck by your side through years of "soon GPS", Elevate, 2-pack CPEs, poor supply chain planning and many other goofy decisions you have made over the years that have made us defend out position to stay with UBNT as our Primary Vendor. It is time for a little appreciation. Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager New Lisbon Broadband NLBC.COM PCSWIN.COM 765-584-2288 ext:1101 -Original Message- From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org On Behalf Of Kees H. Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2018 8:42 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti Sues Cambium then he should fire the guy who came up with the 2 packs. -Original Message- From: G. Nicholas Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2018 3:19 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti Sues Cambium Troy, Regarding personnel change at the top highly unlikely. Robert Pera still owns about 70% of the stock and if you look at the 600 Million in stock repurchases the company recently did so he could sell back some of his shares to Treasury stock without diluting his ownership control to get the cash he needs to buy up the minority shares of Grizzlies BB team, Robert is still clearly in control. - Original Message - From: Troy Gibson, Byhalia.net,LLC Sent: 8/12/2018 3:50:36 PM To: ubnt_users@wispa.org Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti Sues Cambium > Lots of things in play when you miss the $20 million call for expected quarter results.  Investors want answers and blood for lost value, so timing is perfect, but I bet there may be some personal change at the top of UBNT too. Troy Gibson Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: Mathew Howard Date: 8/12/18 2:42 PM (GMT-05:00) To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti Sues Cambium The fact that they did this just a couple weeks before their next report makes me suspect that service provider revenue fell even more this quarter. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Seth Mattinen [se...@rollernet.us] Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2018 1:14 PM To: ubnt_users@wispa.org Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti Sues Cambium On 8/12/18 11:01 AM, Matt Hoppes wrote: > People didn’t buy. Move on. Good months and bad. Don’t like it? > Stop investing. Any other questions? > Previous quarter: We'll see at least $20 million in this sector by next quarter! This quarter: Uh, actually we didn't see any of that money, but it was our competitor's fault so we sued them. ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
[Ubnt_users] CDP
I just realized today that CDP is tuned off by default on all UBNT AC devices. That means that MikroTik Neighbor List does not show up a single AC device. Other than the loss of this functionality what other purpose does the CDP do in the network. I know it can be rather chatty as well. Pside and Down side to turning it on? Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager New Lisbon Broadband NLBC.COM PCSWIN.COM 765-584-2288 ext:1101 ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] best reliable firmware for m clients?
We are running the latest. No issues. Steve Barnes Wireless Ops Manager NLBC.com From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org <ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> On Behalf Of CBB - Jay Fuller Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2018 7:06 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] best reliable firmware for m clients? i see what you did there... - Original Message - From: Josh Luthman<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> To: Ubiquiti Users Group<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2018 4:24 PM Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] best reliable firmware for m clients? 566 is all I'll do. Makes it easier to ahem upgrade Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mar 10, 2018 4:17 PM, "CBB - Jay Fuller" <par...@cyberbroadband.net<mailto:par...@cyberbroadband.net>> wrote: We had quite a few on 5.6.3 but as we're moving to the AC platform we have quite a few now on 6.0.4 I know 6.0.4 has trouble with aircontrol discovery. Whats the most current *reliable* firmware without any issues? What are you running? :) Thanks. It's a cold and rainy weekend here in Alabama and a good time to play in aircontrol... ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
[Ubnt_users] MTU
I am trying to get every last drop out of our internet. Most towers have a MikroTik Routing, Netonix doing POE and Switching, Fed by AF5x, and Rockets or Prism for AP's. Sometimes seeing some slow downs I cant account for. Wondering if MTU or Flow control needs adjusted. The MTU settings are as follows: MikroTik MTU: 1500 L2 MTU: 1598 Flow Disabled Netonix MTU: 1528 Both AF5x Up to 9600 Auto Flow Disabled Rocket MTU: 1500 Flow Disabled Prism MTU: 1500 Flow Disabled In your experience should any of these be adjusted? Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager New Lisbon Broadband NLBC.COM PCSWIN.COM 765-584-2288 ext:1101 ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] 8.5.0 problem
We also found that upgrading clients to 6.14 on 2GHz band killed channel 2464 in 10 MHz width. We have had sectors on that channel for years and the other day we upgraded a bunch of sector clients to 6.14 and on 2 different sectors the clients did not come back online. After messing with it. We finally changed channel and they come back. Finally had to set those sector to 2462 MHz since 2464 would not work. Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager New Lisbon Broadband NLBC.COM PCSWIN.COM 765-584-2288 ext:1101 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of James Craig via Ubnt_users Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 3:11 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 8.5.0 problem What freq was the AP (and channel width) set to, Forbes? Please keep in mind that the XM units operate under a different DFS grant VS XW and AC radios. On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 12:50 PM, Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net<mailto:r...@triadwireless.net>> wrote: 6.13 or 6.14. Might be a legacy upgrade thing. -Original Message- From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org>] On Behalf Of Roy Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 10:48 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 8.5.0 problem Actually they can. It depends on what OS you used when you activated DFS. I have a number of M5s running in that range On 1/25/2018 8:58 AM, Rory Conaway wrote: > The M radios don't support 5585-5655GHz. AC radios do. > > Rory > > -Original Message- > From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> > [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org>] On > Behalf Of Forbes Mercy > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 9:29 PM > To: Ubiquiti Users Group > Subject: [Ubnt_users] 8.5.0 problem > > Did I miss a memo, I upgraded a Prism 5AC Gen2 to firmware 8.50 and the > 6 radios with 6.14XM Loco and Nanobridges dropped offline and no longer > worked on any UNII frequency. I had to move the radio down to a clogged > non-UNII spectrum channel? > > Forbes Mercy > Washington Broadband, Inc. > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Spam:*******, Test
Temperatures dropping 40* in the next few days. Getting everything done we can so we don't have to be out in it. Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager New Lisbon Broadband NLBC.COM PCSWIN.COM 765-584-2288 ext:1101 -Original Message- From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Kees H. Sent: Monday, December 04, 2017 3:00 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Spam:***, Test All is quiet at the western front -Original Message- From: Sam Tetherow Sent: Monday, December 04, 2017 9:25 AM To: ubnt_users@wispa.org Subject: Spam:***, [Ubnt_users] Test ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket M2 ethernet link problem.
Was the new radio setup in the office or was it an on-site setup? Could be bad radio. Water in the line, cable not plugged in well at top. No matter what I would expect a climb. Setup a new one in office and make sure it is good. Climb swap it first see what you get. Re-terminate. And rerun if nothing else. Any spare cables? Steve Barnes Wireless Ops Manager NLBC.com From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of RickG Sent: Monday, November 6, 2017 11:59 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket M2 ethernet link problem. Jay, It sounds like you've done everything except test the cable end to end with a good tester which is the first thing I'd do. After that, I'd swap out the RM2. On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 8:36 PM, Jay Weekley <par...@cyberbroadband.net<mailto:par...@cyberbroadband.net>> wrote: We lost a Ubiquiti Rocket M2 during a storm. We replaced it with a "new" out of box M2 but it won't link with the 10/100/1000 switch. When the techs bypass the switch they get a 10 megabit link but not 100 megabit and can access the radio on their laptop but moving the radio back to the switch and nothing. For trouble shooting they tried the following but nothing gave them a link to the switch: - swapping the switch with another 10/100/1000 unit. - swapping patch cords - replacing the power supply. - forcing the radio to 10 megabit full. - resetting and reprogramming the radio. - re-terminating the lower end of the cable run. Is this a cable issue? It's a 2 month old Shireen Cat 6 run so I hate to think it's bad already. The weather isn't going to make another tower climb likely for the next few days so we need to get it to link with the switch for a little while. Any suggestions on how to do that? Find an old 10/100 switch? ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users -- -RickG ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x radio on dishes
Zip Strips Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager New Lisbon Broadband NLBC.COM PCSWIN.COM 765-584-2288 ext:1101 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 1:36 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x radio on dishes Until the wind wiggles that cat5 out of the connector :( Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340<tel:(937)%20552-2340> Direct: 937-552-2343<tel:(937)%20552-2343> 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Aaron McKillip <aaron.mckil...@hamiltontel.com<mailto:aaron.mckil...@hamiltontel.com>> wrote: We had the dishes on hand or they are upgrades. Without the slant adapters we had to move radio down so only 2 clips are holding to the dish rather than 4. The radio is solid doing that and we have not had any issues with it. Aaron McKillip | Hamilton Telecommunications O: 402-694-6655<tel:(402)%20694-6655> | aaron.mckil...@hamiltontel.com<mailto:aaron.mckil...@hamiltontel.com> | www.hamilton.net<http://www.hamilton.net> [http://hamilton-link.ccs.local/images/social-media-icons/images_fb-icon.png]<http://facebook.com/HamiltonTelecom> Hamilton Telecom<http://facebook.com/HamiltonTelecom> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org>] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 11:57 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x radio on dishes If memory serves without the slant feed you can't fit the GPS and the vertical at the same time. That looks ok the pictures, but why not go with the newer dish? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340<tel:(937)%20552-2340> Direct: 937-552-2343<tel:(937)%20552-2343> 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Oct 19, 2017 12:48 PM, "Aaron McKillip" <aaron.mckil...@hamiltontel.com<mailto:aaron.mckil...@hamiltontel.com>> wrote: The RD-5G 30 Do work for the AF5x See attached. We have used them with and without the 45 deg Slant. No modifcations needed on the dish or radios. See Attached Aaron McKillip | Hamilton Telecommunications O: 402-694-6655<tel:(402)%20694-6655> | aaron.mckil...@hamiltontel.com<mailto:aaron.mckil...@hamiltontel.com> | www.hamilton.net<http://www.hamilton.net> [http://hamilton-link.ccs.local/images/social-media-icons/images_fb-icon.png]<http://facebook.com/HamiltonTelecom> Hamilton Telecom<http://facebook.com/HamiltonTelecom> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org>] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 11:20 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x radio on dishes Think I'll just go with the newer dish before doing that kind of stuff. Thanks for the heads up! Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340<tel:(937)%20552-2340> Direct: 937-552-2343<tel:(937)%20552-2343> 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Oct 19, 2017 12:17 PM, "Phil Curnutt" <pcurn...@gmail.com<mailto:pcurn...@gmail.com>> wrote: AirFibers do not fit the RD-5G30 mount, but a velcro strap works just fine. Ubiquiti makes a conversion kit for the RD-5G30 to make it a slant 45 orientation. Not sure of the AC dish as I haven't put an AirFiber on one Phil On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote: Electrically I can't imagine why it wouldn't, do you have any ideas? Mechanically is the better question to ask and what I should have stated. Not sure if Ubiquiti went through and made one uniform mounting for the af5x/AC/prism/M type attachment. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340<tel:(937)%20552-2340> Direct: 937-552-2343<tel:(937)%20552-2343> 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Mike Hammett <wispaubntus...@ics-il.net<mailto:wispaubntus...@ics-il.net>> wrote: Electrically or mechanically? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions<http://www.ics-il.com/> [http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png]<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/ICSIL> Midwest Internet Exchange<http://www.midwest-ix.com/> [http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://ww
Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket rebooting on own
netonix Steve Barnes Wireless Ops Manager NLBC.com From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Brian - Winters Broadband Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 10:22 PM To: 'Ubiquiti Users Group' <ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket rebooting on own Kees, What are you using to power the RM5’s? Brian Horn [Winters Broadband] From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Kees H. Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 11:54 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket rebooting on own These are all XW RM5 From: Lane Hodge Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 4:07 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket rebooting on own 6.0.4 is clean, couldbe a bug fix in there for it. We saw some issues with a lot of the XW line too. Lane Hodge ADT Systems Inc. Rural Texas Broadband 112 CR 3000 Pearsall, TX 78061 Lead Technician & Tower Climber Office: 877-825-1170 Personal: 210-854-1343 On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote: Just leave them up there or replaced and fixed? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340<tel:(937)%20552-2340> Direct: 937-552-2343<tel:(937)%20552-2343> 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Sep 13, 2017 6:49 PM, "Kees H." <wispau...@calbroadband.net<mailto:wispau...@calbroadband.net>> wrote: We have several that do that. Never been able to figure out why. From: Josh Luthman Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 7:07 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: [Ubnt_users] Rocket rebooting on own Is there any possibility besides a bad Rocket? It's rebooted a couple of times over the past few months. <0>[52749.372000] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! <4>[52749.372000] Call Trace: <4>[52749.372000] [[8000ac94]] dump_stack+0x8/0x34 <4>[52749.373000] [[80024680]] panic+0x68/0x140 <4>[52749.373000] [[80027de8]] do_exit+0x27c/0x5f4 <4>[52749.373000] [[8000aaa8]] nmi_exception_handler+0x0/0x34 <4>[52749.373000] Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340<tel:(937)%20552-2340> Direct: 937-552-2343<tel:(937)%20552-2343> 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Any updates on Speed test fix in AC2
I gave up. I installed a Titanium at my edge with the wireless turned off, a ping watchdog set to reboot it every 6 hours and set a very generic IP. All my staff do speed tests to it from stations instead of using AC. Gives them a better feeling of what the customer can see speed wise to our edge. Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager New Lisbon Broadband NLBC.COM PCSWIN.COM 765-584-2288 ext:1101 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of alex phillips Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 3:35 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: [Ubnt_users] Any updates on Speed test fix in AC2 I am still having to use Air Control for speed testing Power Beams because AC2 still is not working correctly, Any updates on this getting fixed? Alex Phillips CEO and General Manager RBNS.net HighSpeedLink.net Member WISPA.org 540-908-3993 ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
[Ubnt_users] prism
What is the difference between the R5AC-prism and the RP-5AC-GEN2 Steve Barnes Wireless Ops Manager NLBC.com <>___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] aircontrol won't find 6.0.4 devices
Using a 2.0 ga we set a schedule to run every night at 2am on the 3 address ranges we use All new are picked up no issue.6.0.2-6.0.6 no issue. Steve Barnes Wireless Ops Manager NLBC.com From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of RickG Sent: Saturday, September 2, 2017 6:23 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] aircontrol won't find 6.0.4 devices What version of AC2 are you using? On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 11:59 AM, CBB - Jay Fuller <par...@cyberbroadband.net<mailto:par...@cyberbroadband.net>> wrote: having to add each radio manually. - Original Message - From: Jeremy Smith<mailto:jsm...@bluespring.me> To: Ubiquiti Users Group<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org> Sent: Friday, September 1, 2017 10:18 PM Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] aircontrol won't find 6.0.4 devices If you run a scan on the entire /8 subnet that you are using it should find them all. Assuming that you are only using one /8, of not then scan all of them. It isn't speedy. From: "CBB - Jay Fuller" <par...@cyberbroadband.net<mailto:par...@cyberbroadband.net>> To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 12:09:34 PM Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] aircontrol won't find 6.0.4 devices I may be putting our techs to work... lol - Original Message - From: Aaron McKillip<mailto:aaron.mckil...@hamiltontel.com> To: Ubiquiti Users Group<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 1:07 PM Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] aircontrol won't find 6.0.4 devices We just manually add all new radios at the end of the day. easier than downgrading and upgrading firmware. Really hope they get the discovery working on the new firmware soon Aaron McKillip Hamilton Telecommunications 402-694-6655 On Aug 31, 2017, at 1:05 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller <par...@cyberbroadband.net<mailto:par...@cyberbroadband.net>> wrote: My understanding is it is a code change in 6.0.4, and waiting for future versions of aircontrol probably won't fix it. I just don't want to login to 300+ radios / access points to change firmware. Ugh! I did notice you can do a broadcast from a manually entered device - but that does not appear to work - or it does not find the equipment... - Original Message - From: Troy Gibson, Byhalia.net,LLC<mailto:t...@byhalia.net> To: Ubiquiti Users Group<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 12:58 PM Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] aircontrol won't find 6.0.4 devices I'm on AC2.1 beta 7 and it won't find any 6.0.4 radios, XW or XM. I had some being monitored on beta 6, so those are still monitored, but show in devices not found column of discovery. TCP scan only showed prism radios too. I downgraded to 5.6.15 and it was discovered. I had to downgrade AP and CPE for it to discover the devices on AC. Now to search for the missing radios!! Troy Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: CBB - Jay Fuller <par...@cyberbroadband.net<mailto:par...@cyberbroadband.net>> Date: 8/31/17 1:25 PM (GMT-05:00) To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>> Subject: [Ubnt_users] aircontrol won't find 6.0.4 devices Been reading all about it in the ubnt forums - but anyone have any suggestions around this? Thought I'd post it here too - Haven't run aircontrol since about 18 months ago. About nine months ago I attempted to upgrade to the then current beta but it basically corrupted my database and would not even start the server service. Last night late I started over again from scratch. Ran into the 6.0.4 problem as one of my network segments (from a recent purchase) we have manually changed the ip addresses and put them all on 6.0.4 A different segment is still running 5.6.3. I was planning to move them all to 6.0.4 and also make a mass change of the username / password. Left discovering overnight, found all the devices on 5.6.3 on that particular network segment but did not find any 6.0.4 Today once googling and discovering this issue I downgraded an AP from 6.0.4 to 5.6.3 and discovery found it immediately. I don't want to do this to 300 devices. Aircontrol v.2.0.2.2874.170719.18353 is running on a public IP within our network. I tried to new feature tcp scan but no luck (probably because the server is in public ip space). I thought about temporarily changing the IP but then radios would be reporting to the wrong IP. I can manually add the device but have not found a way to do that in bulk. I don't know if it is easier for me to upgrade to something higher than 6.0.4 on all of my devices and use discovery or to manually add 300+ devices. I am hoping for another option.
[Ubnt_users] Unifi mesh
I am installing my first Unifi Mesh units for an outdoor event. I have a single fiber feeding one end. I am planning to use the wireless uplink to connect 3 AP's. Am I going to be in trouble if everyone gets a 5Meg connection and I have up to 100 clients? Steve Barnes Wireless Ops Manager NLBC.com <>___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Erratic downloads and uploads, PBE-M5-400
Sam Why only Egress? We use Egress and Ingress both and have no issue. Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager New Lisbon Broadband NLBC.COM PCSWIN.COM 765-584-2288 ext:1101 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Sam Tetherow Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 10:37 AM To: ubnt_users@wispa.org Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Erratic downloads and uploads, PBE-M5-400 Use egress only. LAN egress is download, WLAN egress is upload. On 08/22/2017 08:59 AM, Troy Gibson, Byhalia.net wrote: Steve, Thats a good idea to test. Never set one up on the CPE. I see the area on the network tab, but not 100% how to set up and down limits on it. Is there a protocol to use so the settings function correctly? Thanks, Troy Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: Steve Barnes <st...@pcswin.com><mailto:st...@pcswin.com> Date: 8/21/17 10:40 PM (GMT-05:00) To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org><mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Erratic downloads and uploads, PBE-M5-400 Try taking the queue off the Mtik and settIng it on the cpe Steve Barnes -Original Message- From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of t...@byhalia.net<mailto:t...@byhalia.net> Sent: Monday, August 21, 2017 2:33 PM To: ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: [Ubnt_users] Erratic downloads and uploads, PBE-M5-400 Time to ask the experts as I cannot figure out this issue!! This CPE worked perfect until a recent storm, but I have replaced the AP and CPE radios at this point too. I have one customer that reports erratic download and uploads. Actually sometimes going above the set rate in my Tik router, CCR1009-7G-1C+PC, Firmware Bugfix 6.38.7. This CPE is connected to an AP that is feed from routers that are directly connected to my fiber line in my Data Center in this area, so everything is at the base of the tower that feeds this AP directly, no jumps to other towers first. I spent a lot of time connected to this CPE at the customers house testing with and without airmax, changing radio firmware, decreasing and increasing power, but get the same erratic behavior. I changed the POE, M5 cone tested the cable (tested good), but still the same. I finally tested multiple channels at the AP and found a stable solution/temp fix, not perfect, but stable. I had to leave the CPE unlimited as it was still not behaving correctly so for the trouble I left it unlimited to buy time to figure this out. I even stopped at some other customers on that same road and AP and those tested like it should at the rate it was set to in the Tik router. Customer has been great during this time and sending me samples of speedtests at different times in the day. Still getting big swings in speeds that vary and when I check AirControl it does not even match the speeds they are reporting. I'm using AC 2.1 beta 7. I realize the unlimited setup could impact their tests, but why is AC2 not showing anything even close to their speedtests? Below are the radio stats for this CPE. I attached a word file of the M5 radio stats as the copied image would not paste correctly on this email. Signal: -56dBm H/V: -59/-58 dBm Transmit CCQ: 93% TX/RX: 72.222mbps/72.222mbps Firmware 5.6.15 XW Airmax is enabled and shows 96% for both. Channel Width: 10mhz Channel Freq: 5805 Distance is 1.7 miles TX power 26 Access Point is on 5.6.15 XW firmware Thank you for your support!! Troy Gibson Byhalia.net, LLC ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Erratic downloads and uploads, PBE-M5-400
Try taking the queue off the Mtik and settIng it on the cpe Steve Barnes -Original Message- From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of t...@byhalia.net Sent: Monday, August 21, 2017 2:33 PM To: ubnt_users@wispa.org Subject: [Ubnt_users] Erratic downloads and uploads, PBE-M5-400 Time to ask the experts as I cannot figure out this issue!! This CPE worked perfect until a recent storm, but I have replaced the AP and CPE radios at this point too. I have one customer that reports erratic download and uploads. Actually sometimes going above the set rate in my Tik router, CCR1009-7G-1C+PC, Firmware Bugfix 6.38.7. This CPE is connected to an AP that is feed from routers that are directly connected to my fiber line in my Data Center in this area, so everything is at the base of the tower that feeds this AP directly, no jumps to other towers first. I spent a lot of time connected to this CPE at the customers house testing with and without airmax, changing radio firmware, decreasing and increasing power, but get the same erratic behavior. I changed the POE, M5 cone tested the cable (tested good), but still the same. I finally tested multiple channels at the AP and found a stable solution/temp fix, not perfect, but stable. I had to leave the CPE unlimited as it was still not behaving correctly so for the trouble I left it unlimited to buy time to figure this out. I even stopped at some other customers on that same road and AP and those tested like it should at the rate it was set to in the Tik router. Customer has been great during this time and sending me samples of speedtests at different times in the day. Still getting big swings in speeds that vary and when I check AirControl it does not even match the speeds they are reporting. I'm using AC 2.1 beta 7. I realize the unlimited setup could impact their tests, but why is AC2 not showing anything even close to their speedtests? Below are the radio stats for this CPE. I attached a word file of the M5 radio stats as the copied image would not paste correctly on this email. Signal: -56dBm H/V: -59/-58 dBm Transmit CCQ: 93% TX/RX: 72.222mbps/72.222mbps Firmware 5.6.15 XW Airmax is enabled and shows 96% for both. Channel Width: 10mhz Channel Freq: 5805 Distance is 1.7 miles TX power 26 Access Point is on 5.6.15 XW firmware Thank you for your support!! Troy Gibson Byhalia.net, LLC ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
[Ubnt_users] Unifi
I am putting up a Unifi system in a city. They have decorative light poles that have space for radio and AC power at the top. I want to use the UNIFI outdoor units but I am not sure what to use as a POE to power then outdoors. I cant put a box with poe and a AP up at the top they would freak out. Ideas? [cid:image001.jpg@01D31A6C.665DF4A0] Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager New Lisbon Broadband NLBC.COM PCSWIN.COM 765-584-2288 ext:1101 <>___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
[Ubnt_users] Rocket Prism 5AC Gen 2
Rocket Prism 5AC Gen 2 is still backward compatible with the M radios with right firmware Correct? Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager New Lisbon Broadband NLBC.COM PCSWIN.COM 765-584-2288 ext:1101 <>___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Cambium cnPilot r201p
What cheater adapter. I have not seen one in the market. Anyone got a part number Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager New Lisbon Broadband NLBC.COM PCSWIN.COM 765-584-2288 ext:1101 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 12:19 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Cambium cnPilot r201p Switch to ePMP. Also why can't you just swap polarity? There are cheater adapters out there. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Steve Barnes <st...@pcswin.com<mailto:st...@pcswin.com>> wrote: Is there a way to power UBNT CPEs from the Cambium cnPilot r201p. Looks like to me the power is wrong polarity. Is there any adapters to make it work. I like all the features of the router but would love to power my CPE's. ** Josh don't say switch to ePMP** Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager New Lisbon Broadband NLBC.COM<http://NLBC.COM> PCSWIN.COM<http://PCSWIN.COM> 765-584-2288 ext:1101<tel:765-584-2288%20ext%3A1101> ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
[Ubnt_users] Cambium cnPilot r201p
Is there a way to power UBNT CPEs from the Cambium cnPilot r201p. Looks like to me the power is wrong polarity. Is there any adapters to make it work. I like all the features of the router but would love to power my CPE's. ** Josh don't say switch to ePMP** Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager New Lisbon Broadband NLBC.COM PCSWIN.COM 765-584-2288 ext:1101 <>___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] AF24 and -48VDC input?
Caution Hijacking thread. I need to power the Edgepoint 6 with a 24 VDC POE. Is there such a beast to do it. I have a Texas WiFi injector but pins 1236 are reversed pol from what UBNT supplies.. Steve Barnes Wireless Ops Manager New Lisbon Broadband and Comunications NLBC.com From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Mimbres Communications Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 2:15 PM To: Salvador Bertenbreiter <salva...@ubnt.com>; Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AF24 and -48VDC input? More info, yummy! Thank you. On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Salvador Bertenbreiter via Ubnt_users <ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>> wrote: Hi guys, Just updated the KB article to include more information about power input options for airFiber radios: https://help.ubnt.com/hc/en-us/articles/215999457?flash_digest=39fe6fbf92d2e372f6764eb4ac73ac471636e8d5 On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 1:42 PM Kristian Hoffmann <kh...@fire2wire.com<mailto:kh...@fire2wire.com>> wrote: Perfect. Thanks Alex. -Kristian On 06/28/2017 05:19 PM, Alex Pavlos via Ubnt_users wrote: The AF-24 and AF-24HD WILL support -48VDC since its supply is isolated. AF-5(not X the large full duplex radio) also will support -48VDC. AF-5X, AF-4X, AF-3X, AF-2X and AF-11FX WILL NOT ACCEPT -48VDC (positive on Earth/chassis/tower ground) AT ALL! If an “X” radio has been powered by -48VDC with respect to case (tower ground) it will surely be damaged! Regards, Alex On Jun 28, 2017, at 6:30 PM, Kristian Hoffmann <kh...@fire2wire.com<mailto:kh...@fire2wire.com>> wrote: Can someone from Ubnt answer this question? I'm getting yes, no, and maybe in even numbers. To complicate matters, I did actually power one up with -48V and it didn't explode. And that wasn't on a bench, isolated from ground. That's on a metal tower with other -48V non-isolated radios. Thanks, -Kristian On 06/27/2017 11:47 AM, Kristian Hoffmann wrote: I'm reading that as "yes, you can power it with -48VDC." Thanks, -Kristian On 06/27/2017 11:00 AM, jul...@netonix.com<mailto:jul...@netonix.com> wrote: Input 48v is transformer isolated, individual on-board voltage converters have DC negative directly coupled to chassis ground. AF24 reads 0 ohms from board DC- (also digital ground) to chassis plate, “no” path between input DC- and chassis plate. 24HD shares the same PCB, so the same applies for that. From: Kristian Hoffmann<mailto:kh...@fire2wire.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 1:52 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org> Hi, Is the AF24's internal power supply isolated in such a way that it can be powered with -48VDC, like other telco equipment with a positive ground, or will this cause a short when mixed with other -48VDC equipment on the same ground plane? Thanks, -- Kristian Hoffmann Fire2Wire kh...@fire2wire.com<mailto:kh...@fire2wire.com> http://www.fire2wire.com Office - 209-543-1800<tel:(209)%20543-1800> | Fax - 209-545-1469<tel:(209)%20545-1469> | Toll Free - 800-905-FIRE ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users -- Kurt Albershardt | Mimbres Communications, LLC | 575-342-0042 ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
[Ubnt_users] Need to change network settings
I have 1000 devices that I need to quickly add several Network setting changes. DNS. DHCP, Traffic Shaping. and of course AC2 is of no help. I AM NOT A SCRIPT writer. Is there any other tools out there to do this. Is there a way to load only a partial config file and overwrite only what has changed? Need something better than my staff spending the next 3 days doing only reconfiguring of 1000 subs. Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager New Lisbon Broadband NLBC.COM PCSWIN.COM 765-584-2288 ext:1101 <>___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Af5x chain problems
Wow that sucks looks like moisture in pigtail or antenna. Guess could be a radio went deaf as well. Nothing you can do. Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager New Lisbon Broadband NLBC.COM PCSWIN.COM 765-584-2288 ext:1101 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 1:11 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: [Ubnt_users] Af5x chain problems Any guesses? I replaced one side and jumpers. Can't do anything in this heavy rain on the other side :( Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] USG Alternatives
Never used a UBNT Unifi Security Gateway. Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager New Lisbon Broadband NLBC.COM PCSWIN.COM 765-584-2288 ext:1101 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Ethan E. Dee Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 4:31 PM To: ubnt_users@wispa.org Subject: [Ubnt_users] USG Alternatives I love the USG for what it offers as far as visibility on user traffic. However, we have bought 2 and both could not keep their config for more than a few days after we put it up. We constantly were driving almost an hour out to reset it and it was driving us and our customers crazy. Anyone found a comparable product that is more stable/reliable? I suppose it wouldn't have to be ubiquiti. On 05/24/2017 03:33 PM, Tom Fadgen wrote: They have different versions R5AC-PTMP, R5AC-PRISM and RP-5AC-GEN2. I am having problems with R5AC-PRISM and XM Nanobridges and XW Powerbeams. Tom Fadgen On Wednesday 24/05/2017 at 11:49 am, Jesse DuPont wrote: Mostly. Some are PTMP-Lite, but most are Prism. I should note on our 6.0.3 M subs, some are XM NanoBridge and some are XW Powerbeam. Jesse DuPont Network Architect email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net<mailto:jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net> Celerity Networks LLC Celerity Broadband LLC Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband [ Image ] On 5/24/17 12:44 PM, Tom Fadgen wrote: are you using 5ac-prism AP's Tom Fadgen On Wednesday 24/05/2017 at 11:41 am, Jesse DuPont wrote: We are doing quite a bit of 8.0.2 AC AP in mixed mode with both 8.0.2 AC subs and 6.0.3 M subs. We are not having random disconnect issues and performance has been what we'd expect. Jesse DuPont Network Architect email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net<mailto:jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net> Celerity Networks LLC Celerity Broadband LLC Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband [ Image ] On 5/24/17 11:53 AM, Steve Barnes wrote: No haven’t replaced any AP side yet. Still doing AC to AC and Airmax to Airmax. Waiting for some of you to workout the bugs and then start 1 tower at a time. Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager New Lisbon Broadband NLBC.COM PCSWIN.COM 765-584-2288 ext:1101 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Steve Barnes Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 1:00 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org><mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] v6 opinions I have 1000 subs on 6.01 and 100 on 6.04. I am now starting the upgrade to 6.04 after the towers I have upgraded have been stable and no issues. Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager New Lisbon Broadband NLBC.COM PCSWIN.COM 765-584-2288 ext:1101 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of ty...@wigi.us<mailto:ty...@wigi.us> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 12:38 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] v6 opinions airos. i saw your ipv6 comment and was looking at release notes on firmware when i stopped to read mail so my mind was on airos and just responded without thinking. :-) - Original Message - Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] v6 opinions From: "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> Date: 5/24/17 12:35 pm To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>> Ipv6 or Airos v6? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On May 24, 2017 12:29 PM, <ty...@wigi.us<mailto:ty...@wigi.us>> wrote: So, now that its been brought up is anyone having good luck with any v6 in ptmp? I've put very little on v6 yet honestly. - Original Message - Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] test From: "Mathew Howard" <mat...@litewire.net<mailto:mat...@litewire.net>> Date: 5/24/17 12:21 pm To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>> or they're all just done complaining about bugs in v6... :p From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org>] on behalf of Josh Luthman [j...@imaginenetworksllc.com<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>] Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 9:00 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] test Everyone's busy updating to v6 Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340<tel:%28937%29%20552-2340> Direct: 937-552-2343<tel:%28937%29%20552-2343> 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On May 24, 2017 9:55 AM, "Kevin Melson" <e...@e1w.com<mailto:e...@e1w.com>> w
Re: [Ubnt_users] v6 opinions
No haven’t replaced any AP side yet. Still doing AC to AC and Airmax to Airmax. Waiting for some of you to workout the bugs and then start 1 tower at a time. Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager New Lisbon Broadband NLBC.COM PCSWIN.COM 765-584-2288 ext:1101 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Steve Barnes Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 1:00 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] v6 opinions I have 1000 subs on 6.01 and 100 on 6.04. I am now starting the upgrade to 6.04 after the towers I have upgraded have been stable and no issues. Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager New Lisbon Broadband NLBC.COM PCSWIN.COM 765-584-2288 ext:1101 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of ty...@wigi.us<mailto:ty...@wigi.us> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 12:38 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] v6 opinions airos. i saw your ipv6 comment and was looking at release notes on firmware when i stopped to read mail so my mind was on airos and just responded without thinking. :-) - Original Message - Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] v6 opinions From: "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> Date: 5/24/17 12:35 pm To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>> Ipv6 or Airos v6? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On May 24, 2017 12:29 PM, <ty...@wigi.us<mailto:ty...@wigi.us>> wrote: So, now that its been brought up is anyone having good luck with any v6 in ptmp? I've put very little on v6 yet honestly. - Original Message - Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] test From: "Mathew Howard" <mat...@litewire.net<mailto:mat...@litewire.net>> Date: 5/24/17 12:21 pm To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>> or they're all just done complaining about bugs in v6... :p From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org>] on behalf of Josh Luthman [j...@imaginenetworksllc.com<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>] Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 9:00 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] test Everyone's busy updating to v6 Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340<tel:(937)%20552-2340> Direct: 937-552-2343<tel:(937)%20552-2343> 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On May 24, 2017 9:55 AM, "Kevin Melson" <e...@e1w.com<mailto:e...@e1w.com>> wrote: yeah it appears to be workingloli thought it was just me since i havent seen anything in several days Thanks, Kevin Melson Eagle One Wireless\PC Station 2007 Hwy 72 E Corinth, MS 38834 662-287-1722<tel:(662)%20287-1722> e...@e1w.com<http://e...@e1w.com> www.e1w.com<http://www.e1w.com> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org>] On Behalf Of ty...@wigi.us<mailto:ty...@wigi.us> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 8:52 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] test Im just glad to see mine is working. I thought my lists seemed pretty inactive. - Original Message - Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] test From: "Bob Greene" <bgre...@columbiarea.coop<mailto:bgre...@columbiarea.coop>> Date: 5/24/17 9:47 am To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>> I think it is working. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Melson Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 6:45 AM To: ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: [Ubnt_users] test test havent gotten any emails from this group in like a week just making sure it works Thanks, Kevin Melson Eagle One Wireless\PC Station 2007 Hwy 72 E Corinth, MS 38834 662-287-1722<tel:(662)%20287-1722> e...@e1w.com<https://email13.godaddy.com/e...@e1w.com> www.e1w.com<https://email13.godaddy.com/www.e1w.com> ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] v6 opinions
I have 1000 subs on 6.01 and 100 on 6.04. I am now starting the upgrade to 6.04 after the towers I have upgraded have been stable and no issues. Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager New Lisbon Broadband NLBC.COM PCSWIN.COM 765-584-2288 ext:1101 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of ty...@wigi.us Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 12:38 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] v6 opinions airos. i saw your ipv6 comment and was looking at release notes on firmware when i stopped to read mail so my mind was on airos and just responded without thinking. :-) - Original Message - Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] v6 opinions From: "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> Date: 5/24/17 12:35 pm To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>> Ipv6 or Airos v6? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On May 24, 2017 12:29 PM, <ty...@wigi.us<mailto:ty...@wigi.us>> wrote: So, now that its been brought up is anyone having good luck with any v6 in ptmp? I've put very little on v6 yet honestly. - Original Message - Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] test From: "Mathew Howard" <mat...@litewire.net<mailto:mat...@litewire.net>> Date: 5/24/17 12:21 pm To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>> or they're all just done complaining about bugs in v6... :p From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org>] on behalf of Josh Luthman [j...@imaginenetworksllc.com<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>] Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 9:00 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] test Everyone's busy updating to v6 Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340<tel:(937)%20552-2340> Direct: 937-552-2343<tel:(937)%20552-2343> 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On May 24, 2017 9:55 AM, "Kevin Melson" <e...@e1w.com<mailto:e...@e1w.com>> wrote: yeah it appears to be workingloli thought it was just me since i havent seen anything in several days Thanks, Kevin Melson Eagle One Wireless\PC Station 2007 Hwy 72 E Corinth, MS 38834 662-287-1722<tel:(662)%20287-1722> e...@e1w.com<http://e...@e1w.com> www.e1w.com<http://www.e1w.com> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org>] On Behalf Of ty...@wigi.us<mailto:ty...@wigi.us> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 8:52 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] test Im just glad to see mine is working. I thought my lists seemed pretty inactive. - Original Message - Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] test From: "Bob Greene" <bgre...@columbiarea.coop<mailto:bgre...@columbiarea.coop>> Date: 5/24/17 9:47 am To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>> I think it is working. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Melson Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 6:45 AM To: ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: [Ubnt_users] test test havent gotten any emails from this group in like a week just making sure it works Thanks, Kevin Melson Eagle One Wireless\PC Station 2007 Hwy 72 E Corinth, MS 38834 662-287-1722<tel:(662)%20287-1722> e...@e1w.com<https://email13.godaddy.com/e...@e1w.com> www.e1w.com<https://email13.godaddy.com/www.e1w.com> ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] 10Gb router and OLT?
You need to know Matt is no longer with UBNT. Ben may be able to help. Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager New Lisbon Broadband NLBC.COM PCSWIN.COM 765-584-2288 ext:1101 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Brett A Mansfield Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2017 9:43 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 10Gb router and OLT? I would if this was a technical question, but it's not. The beta forum is also an open forum for those that have access to the beta, which can be anyone. This is more of a one one question for their management team. Does anyone have a contact for them? I know a lot of the guys over there, but I'm not sure who is in charge of edgeMax. Perhaps Ben or Matt can direct me to the right person? Thank you, Brett A Mansfield On May 3, 2017, at 5:29 AM, Mike Hammett <wispaubntus...@ics-il.net<mailto:wispaubntus...@ics-il.net>> wrote: Maybe use their beta forum? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions<http://www.ics-il.com/> [http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png]<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/ICSIL> Midwest Internet Exchange<http://www.midwest-ix.com/> [http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/mdwestix> The Brothers WISP<http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> [http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/youtubeicon.png]<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> From: "Brett A Mansfield" <li...@silverlakeinternet.com<mailto:li...@silverlakeinternet.com>> To: "ubnt users" <ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>> Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2017 10:35:01 PM Subject: [Ubnt_users] 10Gb router and OLT? Is there anyone on here from UBNT edgeMax team? I have some questions on some beta hardware but don't want to discuss in this open forum. Thank you, Brett A Mansfield ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.03 firmware still has some bugs
Can I get a verification what does the -cs allow? Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager New Lisbon Broadband NLBC.COM PCSWIN.COM 765-584-2288 ext:1101 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of James Craig via Ubnt_users Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 12:54 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.03 firmware still has some bugs Hi Mitch, You can find the -cs and non -cs (custom script) CPU400 versions HERE<https://community.ubnt.com/t5/airOS-Software-Configuration/airOS-5-6-with-Custom-Script-Support/m-p/1624488#U1624488>. On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Mitch <mi...@abetterwireless.com<mailto:mi...@abetterwireless.com>> wrote: yup, Have that one Looking to get back to 5.6.9 (400) on APs down from 6.0.3 On 03/31/2017 11:13 AM, Mimbres Communications wrote: 5.6.15 is out, and includes the recent airOS vulnerability fix. There's a CPU400 version as well.. Never saw an announcement. https://www.ubnt.com/download/airmax-m On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Mitch <mi...@abetterwireless.com<mailto:mi...@abetterwireless.com>> wrote: Anyone have the 5.6.9 (400) the verizon fix firmware? Mitch On 03/31/2017 09:13 AM, Chris Soiles wrote: I haven't upgraded any of my APs higher then 5.6.9, it seems when I do my clients start calling about buffering or slowness All my clients are 6.0.2, haven't done .3 yet I wish we could figure out what's up with the AP slowness Sent from iPhone 6S Plus Chris Soiles Owner Rio Cities csoi...@riocities.net<mailto:csoi...@riocities.net> 505-966-6389 On Mar 30, 2017, at 10:55 PM, Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net<mailto:r...@triadwireless.net>> wrote: Started updating APs and backhauls to 6.03. Started getting calls, users dropping, NetFlix buffering, etc… Found out throughput on backhauls went way down. Checked the first backhaul which was Powerbeam M5 and PowerBeam 400, xm and xw firmware, it went from 130Mbps to 54Mbps on the backhaul even though signal levels were the same, -54/-55dBm. Even worse, throughput went to 1Mbps or less. We change it back to 6.0 and wham, everything goes back to normal. Not sure what’s going on be we are going back to 6.0 on all APs and backhauls. Rory Conaway • Triad Wireless • CEO 4226 S. 37th Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040 602-426-0542<tel:%28602%29%20426-0542> r...@triadwireless.net<mailto:r...@triadwireless.net> www.triadwireless.net<http://www.triadwireless.net/> “An optimist will tell you the glass is half-full; the pessimist, half-empty; and the engineer will tell you the glass is twice the size it needs to be” ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users -- Mitch Koep A Better Wireless 218-851-8689<tel:%28218%29%20851-8689> cell ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users -- Kurt Albershardt | Mimbres Communications, LLC | 575-342-0042<tel:(575)%20342-0042> ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users -- Mitch Koep A Better Wireless 218-851-8689<tel:(218)%20851-8689> cell ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Damn AF5X ports
I have to reverse what I said. We have been having this issue and my climber found that and have been using zip ties on every AF5x, Rocket and Prism since last October. Guess that’s what happens when the boss stays on the ground. He doesn’t know the little things our guys do to make the job be a 1 time climb. Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager New Lisbon Broadband NLBC.COM PCSWIN.COM 765-584-2288 ext:1101 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2017 8:22 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Damn AF5X ports I went up the tower myself and simply wiggled the cable with the slightest of effort. That's a factual problem. Ubnt admitted there's an issue. You're just very lucky, hopefully it stays that way or you zip tie like hell. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mar 9, 2017 8:09 AM, "Steve Barnes" <st...@pcswin.com<mailto:st...@pcswin.com>> wrote: I can say that I have at least 40 AF5x in the field. I have never had a single bad Ethernet connection at the radio. We use the UBNT Tough Connectors and Shireen cable. We used to have this issue all the time due to a crimper that was OVER crimping the connectors. It was actually mashing the pins too far into the connector and mashing the clip on the back. Client radios would fail to have a Ethernet connection but the radio was connected. We went to the: Ideal 33-396 Data/Voice Crimp Tool Remember you don’t have to mass the ends to make the crimp better. Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager New Lisbon Broadband NLBC.COM<http://NLBC.COM> PCSWIN.COM<http://PCSWIN.COM> 765-584-2288 ext:1101<tel:(765)%20584-2288> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org>] On Behalf Of Jeremy Smith Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2017 12:44 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Damn AF5X ports I coil up the drain wire and stuff it in the end before I crimp the strain relief down on it. I've been using this method for years. From: "James Wilson" <ja...@ridgecomms.com<mailto:ja...@ridgecomms.com>> To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>> Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2017 6:34:42 PM Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Damn AF5X ports My question exactly, how do they make positive contact with the drain wire... On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:33 PM, Kees H <wi...@calbroadband.com<mailto:wi...@calbroadband.com>> wrote: do they take a drain wire? From: Jeremy Smith Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2017 2:41 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Damn AF5X ports I use the Panduit connectors. They have a spring-loaded clip, and high quality offset gold crimps. We stopped having issues when I switched to these. They aren't cheap, and this is the cheapest place online to buy them that I have found. https://www.anixter.com/en_us/products/MPS588-C/PANDUIT/Copper-Connectors/p/355197?utm_source=google_term=_campaign=_medium=cpc_content=s_dc~106968659190~~=CMDcmPH8x9ICFUq5wAodHu8Fvg From: "Kees H" <wi...@calbroadband.com<mailto:wi...@calbroadband.com>> To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>> Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2017 2:24:12 PM Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Damn AF5X ports For us the toughconnectors seem to work better than other brands From: Josh Luthman Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2017 1:14 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Damn AF5X ports The cable? ToughCable (Ubnt) with ToughConnectors (Ubnt) going to AF5x (Ubnt). Is that what you're asking or are you talking about the AF5X unit? I haven't opened any of them up. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340<tel:(937)%20552-2340> Direct: 937-552-2343<tel:(937)%20552-2343> 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Kees H <wi...@calbroadband.com<mailto:wi...@calbroadband.com>> wrote: What brand are you using? From: Josh Luthman Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2017 12:39 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Damn AF5X ports Well ya that's the whole issue here... Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340<tel:(937)%20552-2340> Direct: 937-552-2343<tel:(937)%20552-2343> 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Kees H <wi...@calbroadband.com<mailto:wi...@calbroadband.com>> wrote: Sometimes I wonder about the quality of the connectors. From: Josh Luthman Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2017 12:20 PM To: Ubiquiti Users
Re: [Ubnt_users] ISSUE AirRouter
We are seeing Older AirGrids lose ½ their power after going to 6.0 and also seeing many more Crash reports with XM radios. Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager New Lisbon Broadband NLBC.COM PCSWIN.COM 765-584-2288 ext:1101 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Clay Stewart Sent: Friday, March 03, 2017 3:22 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: [Ubnt_users] ISSUE AirRouter We had a major issue today with 17 installs today where as the AirRouter stops working after a minute or so after (or before) upgraded 6.00 firmware. If we down grade, it works. If we setup below 6.00 it works, then upgrade it fails. We do not have this happening on hundreds of wireless static IP customers. This is happening on one of our fiber networks which is private IP DHCP. Clueless here, have any clues that is? ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket recommendation?
5AC Prisim. Move forward. Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager New Lisbon Broadband NLBC.COM PCSWIN.COM 765-584-2288 ext:1101 -Original Message- From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Roy Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2017 12:13 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: [Ubnt_users] Rocket recommendation? We will be putting up a new tower to split the current customer base. My thinking right now is two 90 degree sectors. The other 180 degrees is hillside so no need to radiate in that direction The clients are all Nanobridge/Powerbeams non-AC radios but we want to add AC into the mix. The environment is 5Ghz with lots of other radios out there. Looking at the bewildering array of Rocket radios, I am looking for some recommendations on what equipment to use. ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
[Ubnt_users] FW: Https:
From UBNT support see below. Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager New Lisbon Broadband NLBC.COM PCSWIN.COM 765-584-2288 ext:1101 Hi Steve, As you probably know the only way to avoid the certificate warnings is to install a valid SSL certificate, but there's no easy way to do so on all devices. If you were referring to the controllers themselves (UniFi, AC2, etc); that's relatively simple. Chrome used to offer the option to ignore/bypass warnings, but that option has since been removed due to the obvious security implications involved. Thanks, Cody Bishko Support Engineer [https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download=0B11eQBq-Sfi5N3MxbTVTYVpod0E=0B11eQBq-Sfi5dnJ4QUc5RW04QVlDbGcyTlE5NGxFOFdocElRPQ] <>___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
[Ubnt_users] Https:
Having several thousand UBNT devices that use HTTPS, is there any way to get around the: Your Connection is not private, then clicking advanced and then Proceed to 10.0.0.1 (unsafe). Some I have turned the HTTPS off but would like the extra security when doing updates and the like. I have 6 techs and 10 systems that access all these and wanted to know if there was a work around. Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager New Lisbon Broadband NLBC.COM PCSWIN.COM 765-584-2288 ext:1101 <>___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] replacing rocket w/sector antenna AP
They may monitor the list but Multiple SSID is not something they even hear the need for when you talk to them in person. I personally have asked the staff for this feature on and off for 6 years. Even watch Matt Hardy write it down with an explanation as to how it could be helpful. He either lost the paper or he threw it away when he left UBNT. Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager New Lisbon Broadband NLBC.COM PCSWIN.COM 765-584-2288 ext:1101 -Original Message- From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Kees H Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 9:58 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] replacing rocket w/sector antenna AP Not in my book. We use frequency scan list to prevent any undesired connection to the wrong AP. Now dual SSID would be of great advantage. The one thing I miss that the ole Alvarion equipment had. You think UBNT is monitoring this list? -Original Message- From: Jay Weekley Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 8:11 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] replacing rocket w/sector antenna AP Is there ever any advantage to using the "Lock to AP MAC" feature? Darin Steffl wrote: > Don't ever use lock to ap Mac. Seen too many wisps roll trucks when > they replace the ap. Every ssid should be different for every sector. > > Also for the client connecting to a weaker signal. That would be fixed > as well if you connected to a specific ssid. > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 6:21 PM Jan-OOLLC <j.vank...@oregononline.net > <mailto:j.vank...@oregononline.net>> wrote: > > Update, trying to balance the Rx dbm's at the AP first, by > decreasing transmit power at the CPE. Noticed that one of the > trouble CPEs was connecting to another tower with same name SSID > even the the signal was 10 dbm weaker. So I figured if all the > CPEs were configured to lock to the AP mac, they would transfer > over to a new name for SSID. Ended up doing a lot of driving for > orphans. Not one of them accepted the new name, all were set to > "lock to AP" mac. I'm pretty sure with older firmware this used > to work, is this a bug? > > Have tried airControl2 in the past, could not figure out how to > add new CPEs after initial install. Dude is much easier to use. > > Jan > > On 01/30/2017 12:03 PM, Nick Bright wrote: >> On 1/28/2017 11:43 AM, Chris Soiles wrote: >>> I have replaced APs and just named them the same with same >>> security and they just connect >>> >>> I.E.: had rocket with Omni named SSID: radio WPA2: 1234 >>> >>> Added a new section, installed 4 APs at New top, named all APs >>> SSID: radio same WPA2 >>> >>> Turned off Omni AP >>> >>> As each CPE connected to new AP >>> Login to CPE change SSID to New name for the radio >>> >>> Once all CPEs gone, change name of AP to New name, they all >>> reconnect >> That's what I do too. If things are working well, you could also >> use airControl2 to do it by batch, but you need to ensure that >> all the CPE have reliable connections and are responding properly >> first, or they'll get orphaned. >> >> -- >> --- >> - Nick Bright- >> - Vice President of Technology - >> - Valnet -=- We Connect You -=- - >> - Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789 - >> - Webhttp://www.valnet.net/ - >> --- >> - Are your files safe?- >> - Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup - >> - More information & 30 day free trial at - >> -http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault - >> --- >> >> This email message and any attachments are intended solely for the >> use of the addressees hereof. This message and any attachments may >> contain information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from >> disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient of >> this message, you are prohibited from reading, disclosing, reproducing, >> distributing, disseminating or otherwise using this transmission. If you >> have received this message in error, please promptly notify the sender by >> reply E-mail and immediately delete this message from your system. >> >> >> ___
Re: [Ubnt_users] Random users keep dropping off with 6.0
We had this exact same issue on 1 tower. But we have upgraded 5 identical towers. Only difference we could find was that the one tower that failed did not have WPA turned on. (It’s a shared tower with another company and did not want to show them our Pass key for the rest of our network). As soon as we took our APs back to 5.6.9 the problems vanished. I am thinking it is a difference between the security. All the rest of our towers are secured. And we had a mix of XM and XW APs and stations. We did see that it was primarily the XM stations that went away. XW stations seemed to stay working when other went off-line. Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager New Lisbon Broadband NLBC.COM PCSWIN.COM 765-584-2288 ext:1101 -Original Message- From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Shawn C. Peppers Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2017 6:07 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Random users keep dropping off with 6.0 I am chiming in a little late. What exactly is the problem? Mixed mode? 5ghz stuff excluded from the issues?' Shawn C. Peppers Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment 866-680-8433 Toll Free 480-287-9960 Fax http://www.video-direct.tv > On Jan 15, 2017, at 4:48 PM, Stuart Pierce <spie...@avolve.net> wrote: > > lol, yea they are all test networks. I will have to admit that 6.0 was > probably the worst official release. Now as I've said before, 8.0 to > 6.0 has been solid.and therein I believe is the problem. > >> On Sun, January 15, 2017 5:26 pm, Mike Hammett wrote: >> We all have test networks. Some of us are lucky enough to have a >> totally separate production network. >> >> >> >> >> - >> Mike Hammett >> >> >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> >> >> >> Midwest Internet Exchange >> >> >> >> The Brothers WISP >> >> >> - Original Message - >> >> >> From: "Tommy Adams" <tomm...@digitex.net> >> To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org> >> Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2017 1:43:33 PM >> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Random users keep dropping off with 6.0 >> >> >> >> I am shocked how many people keep installing new firmwares from UBNT >> and expecting them to work. Before installing any new firmware from >> any manufacturer check the forums. We use Mikrotik, UBNT, Mimosa, and >> Cambium. Never do I apply a newly released "upgrade" without a quick >> perusal all of the forums. We are all network admins here and should >> remember never test on a live network. >> >> >> Everyone is acting all shocked a UBNT firmware is not working. From >> my experience over the last five years that is modus operandi for them. >> Please stop acting shocked when you receive the same weird results as >> 100's of others. And why in gods name does UBNT not pull the firmware >> when they find issues. UBNT uses its purchasers to find the bugs. >> Drives me nuts. >> >> >> Not trying to enrage people and I am not picking on anyone really >> except UBNT. >> >> >> >> We are all in this together, >> >> >> >> Tommy >> >> >> >> >> >> Tommy A. >> Digitex.com >> >> >> >> 817.558.6230 V >> 817.558.1204 F >> >> >> On Jan 15, 2017, at 1:30 PM, RickG < rgunder...@gmail.com > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I'd like to think fork lifting for anything would help but looking at >> the forums it appears any brand has it's own share of issues. >> >> >> On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Daniel Peoples < dpe...@gmail.com > >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> One of many reasons to fork lift for mimosa. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Jan 15, 2017 10:58 AM, "Rory Conaway" < r...@triadwireless.net > >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Just had to replace 3 Nanostation Locos because 6.0 wouldn’t connect >> between them for some unknown reason. Throwing in a Nanobeam-19 >> didn’t help. Now I have 30 users that randomly dropped off a Rocket >> 5M although >> 10 people are still connected. Frequency doesn’t matter. On the NSM >> Locos, going back to 5.5.9 didn’t help. Trying that now but this sucks. >> >> >> Rory Conaway • Triad Wireless •
Re: [Ubnt_users] FW 6.0 on LocoM900
We have now started to see M5 NanoStations having some issues as well. We have not rolled any of them back but have a truck roll to go fix one tomorrow. Some NanoBridges too. Funny part is our M2 tower we did is working fine. Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager New Lisbon Broadband NLBC.COM PCSWIN.COM 765-584-2288 ext:1101 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Mitch Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2017 2:13 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org>; James Craig <ja...@ubnt.com> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] FW 6.0 on LocoM900 We are seeing the same thing but includes 2.4 nano and some AG2's (not all and not xm or xw specific) also the 2.4 clients will work for awhile then stop passing traffic until truck roll reboot Also RM9 upgraded to 6.0 one client works fine second client will not pass traffic no matter the firmware. This did NOT change when RM9 down graded back to 5.5.10 not 5.6.9 Also use care in upgrading 5Ghz and AC see strange issues as well down grading everything back to 5.6.9 and some to 5.5.10 to get things working again 6.0 got bloody Wierd! Mitch On 01/05/2017 11:25 AM, David Kunat wrote: Very similar issue here. Just bricked two m900's On Jan 5, 2017, at 7:59 AM, James Craig via Ubnt_users <ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>> wrote: Hey Steve, Thanks for the report. Sending you an message offline. On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Steve Barnes <st...@pcswin.com<mailto:st...@pcswin.com>> wrote: Yesterday we started doing more testing on 6.0. We decided to test a Loco M900 upgrade here in the office before rolling out to customers. Glad we did. Upgraded first radio from 5.6.9 to 6.0. upgraded directly plugged into radio not wirelessly. Upgrade applied and the radio Bricked. No matter what we would do could not get back into radio. Tried factory reset with button on radio, No luck. Gave up and tried 2nd radio. Same scenario, upgrade proceeded as before. Was able to get back into radio. Decided to factory reset from GUI to make sure no issues. Then this device Bricked. Tried more times to get back in and finally got a login. Interesting thing was LAN light on radio would not show connection. Only sporadic blinking. Flashed unit back to 5.6.9 and restarted. Same issue. No Lan light, and unit takes minutes to be able to get a login and then is 10 Mbps on the LAN connection and is not stable. Tried other computers and POE same issue. Have upgraded lots of M5 devices with this same system and no issues. Ideas Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager New Lisbon Broadband NLBC.COM<http://NLBC.COM> PCSWIN.COM<http://PCSWIN.COM> 765-584-2288 ext:1101<tel:765-584-2288%20ext%3A1101> ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
[Ubnt_users] FW 6.0 on LocoM900
Yesterday we started doing more testing on 6.0. We decided to test a Loco M900 upgrade here in the office before rolling out to customers. Glad we did. Upgraded first radio from 5.6.9 to 6.0. upgraded directly plugged into radio not wirelessly. Upgrade applied and the radio Bricked. No matter what we would do could not get back into radio. Tried factory reset with button on radio, No luck. Gave up and tried 2nd radio. Same scenario, upgrade proceeded as before. Was able to get back into radio. Decided to factory reset from GUI to make sure no issues. Then this device Bricked. Tried more times to get back in and finally got a login. Interesting thing was LAN light on radio would not show connection. Only sporadic blinking. Flashed unit back to 5.6.9 and restarted. Same issue. No Lan light, and unit takes minutes to be able to get a login and then is 10 Mbps on the LAN connection and is not stable. Tried other computers and POE same issue. Have upgraded lots of M5 devices with this same system and no issues. Ideas Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager New Lisbon Broadband NLBC.COM PCSWIN.COM 765-584-2288 ext:1101 <>___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Great CCQ, AMC, AMQ, etc. shit throughput
Mike you don’t have a firewall script that add the radio IP or router onto a block list for DDoS attack or something like that. Steve Barnes Wireless Ops Manager NLBC.com PCSWIN.com From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2016 8:02 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Great CCQ, AMC, AMQ, etc. shit throughput I did. -87 or so at the worst. I get 1 ms pings from the radios to Ethernet devices on their respective sides. The low throughput and high latency only seems to affect traffic going over the wireless link. The near side of the link is fairly new. The other side is probably five years old. Unknown on the voltage. No other reported issues in that area. PCs, VoIP phones, etc. working as expected. Well, other than network issues. I think they start work at 7:30, so I would guess that it was fine for at least some time until then. Didn't get What's Up notifications of issues until nearly 10, so it wasn't dog shit terrible until then. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions<http://www.ics-il.com/> [http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png]<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/ICSIL> Midwest Internet Exchange<http://www.midwest-ix.com/> [http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/mdwestix> The Brothers WISP<http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> [http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/youtubeicon.png]<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> From: "Scott Lambert" <lamb...@lambertfam.org<mailto:lamb...@lambertfam.org>> To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>> Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2016 12:12:49 AM Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Great CCQ, AMC, AMQ, etc. shit throughput On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 08:18:45PM -0600, Mike Hammett wrote: > It worked until 8 AM this morning deployed. > I know you said noise was unlikely. Can you run an AirView anyway to make sure? I suspect your air rates would be in the toilet if there was anything making enough noise to slow your throughput this much. Unless maybe, WAG, it's really narrow band FHSS? You didn't mention it, but I assume you've checked that the ethernet negotiation is correct at both ends? Any possibility voltage is down into brownout range? It was like someone flipped a switch and throughput went to heck at 8:00? Or customer came in at 8 and throughput was bad, problem may have come about between 5pm yesterday and this morning? How old is the gear? > - Original Message - > > From: "Kees H" <wi...@calbroadband.com<mailto:wi...@calbroadband.com>> > To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>> > Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 5:17:58 PM > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Great CCQ, AMC, AMQ, etc. shit throughput > > > > Did the link work in the office? > > From: Mike Hammett > Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 9:47 AM > To: Ubiquiti Users Group > Subject: [Ubnt_users] Great CCQ, AMC, AMQ, etc. shit throughput > > > I have a link that's a couple hundred feet. -57 or so signal with > balanced chains. CCQ, AMC and AMQ are all above 95%. I only can get > double digit KILObit throughput one direction. I've rebooted, upgraded > to 5.6.9, sent in support files, checked CPU usage, etc. Modulations > are 130/130 on 20 MHz (was at least 240/240, usually 270/300 on 40 > MHz). The worst noise in the area is probably -87. > > > I have no clue. -- Scott LambertKC5MLE Unix SysAdmin lamb...@lambertfam.org<mailto:lamb...@lambertfam.org> ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Great CCQ, AMC, AMQ, etc. shit throughput
Dud that sucks I just talked to all my techs. Really sounds like on end. Are they bridged? Don’t have a duplicate IP do you? How about some goofy traffic shaping on one end. Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager New Lisbon Broadband NLBC.COM PCSWIN.COM 765-584-2288 ext:1101 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 1:52 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Great CCQ, AMC, AMQ, etc. shit throughput Probably not noise here. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions<http://www.ics-il.com/> [http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png]<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/ICSIL> Midwest Internet Exchange<http://www.midwest-ix.com/> [http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/mdwestix> The Brothers WISP<http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> [http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/youtubeicon.png]<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> From: "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>> Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 12:38:09 PM Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Great CCQ, AMC, AMQ, etc. shit throughput When I had this it was noise. Replaced with force 110 (maybe ptp). Fixed it in a day. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Nov 23, 2016 1:34 PM, "Mike Hammett" <wispaubntus...@ics-il.net<mailto:wispaubntus...@ics-il.net>> wrote: I ran a test from one unit to the other, but I didn't need to. Just spurious network traffic should be pushing more than 100 kilobit. Latency is usually in the hundreds or thousands of ms. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions<http://www.ics-il.com/> [http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png]<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/ICSIL> Midwest Internet Exchange<http://www.midwest-ix.com/> [http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/mdwestix> The Brothers WISP<http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> [http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/youtubeicon.png]<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> From: "Christian Palecek" <christ...@cybernet1.com<mailto:christ...@cybernet1.com>> To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>> Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 12:25:59 PM Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Great CCQ, AMC, AMQ, etc. shit throughput How are you running the bandwidth tests? Have you tried iperf between radios to single out the rf? Is there any variation in speed when changing the channels? i've seen this with a ub when there is an mtu crunch, otherwise i would jjst blame the units. Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: alex phillips <highspeedl...@gmail.com<mailto:highspeedl...@gmail.com>> Date: 11/23/16 10:49 AM (GMT-07:00) To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Great CCQ, AMC, AMQ, etc. shit throughput Have you tried the Alt Modulation yet? Alex Phillips CEO and General Manager RBNS.net HighSpeedLink.net WISPA.org Board of Directors (2011-2017) WISPA President (2015-2017) 540-908-3993 On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Mike Hammett <wispaubntus...@ics-il.net<mailto:wispaubntus...@ics-il.net>> wrote: I have a link that's a couple hundred feet. -57 or so signal with balanced chains. CCQ, AMC and AMQ are
[Ubnt_users] Edgepoint
Is there a way to see the supply voltage on a Edgepoint 6.I have 2 Rockets connected to one that keeps rebooting. No errors and no log. Only radios rebooting. I think I need more UMPH up the tower. But I am not able to see what power is getting there. Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager New Lisbon Broadband NLBC.COM PCSWIN.COM 765-584-2288 ext:1101 <>___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
[Ubnt_users] AC products
What can you use as a station with the 5ACPrism that is in stock and bigger than the AC19s? The PB5AC-400 are backordered FOREVER. Is there other cheaper Dish and radio combos that would work. Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager PCSWIN.COM NLBC.COM <>___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
[Ubnt_users] M2 Rockets Not liking 5.6.9
We are up to 3 rockets that were working perfectly on 5.6.5 that now have flash memory failures after trying to upgrade to 5.6.9. Anyone else seeing this. Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager PCSWIN.COM NLBC.COM <>___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Does the UVC Pro camera have an external audio port
I have not seen that in any documentation can you point to that. Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager PCSWIN.COM NLBC.COM From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Brandon Gilles via Ubnt_users Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2016 10:16 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Does the UVC Pro camera have an external audio port Yes, it does. There's a harness connector with the port exposed. On Wednesday, August 3, 2016, Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net<mailto:r...@triadwireless.net>> wrote: I can’t find this answer anywhere. I need to add a microphone farther away. Rory From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org');> [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org');>] On Behalf Of Steve Barnes Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 4:49 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Does the UVC Pro camera have an external audio port No not sure why you would want one. Its all IP based Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager PCSWIN.COM<http://PCSWIN.COM> NLBC.COM<http://NLBC.COM> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org');> [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org');>] On Behalf Of Rory Conaway Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2016 10:13 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ubnt_users@wispa.org');>> Subject: [Ubnt_users] Does the UVC Pro camera have an external audio port Rory Conaway • Triad Wireless • CEO 4226 S. 37th Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040 602-426-0542 r...@triadwireless.net<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','r...@triadwireless.net');> www.triadwireless.net<http://www.triadwireless.net/> “There are only two seasons - winter and Baseball.” - Bill Veeck ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
[Ubnt_users] Unifi
Those of you who use Unifi. I am about to do an outdoor event for 1 week. Going to use Unifi to provide Wi-Fi. Question: How much bandwidth do you lose per AP if you use the Wireless link ability of the AUP-Outdoor+ Aps (2.4 Only). I will have 1GB fiber to the location. 3 Buildings and a large outside area to cover so I have 4 outdoor Aps. Should I setup a 5.8 Omni 40Mhz wide with a Nanobeam 19 at each AP and building to feed each APs or will the wireless link of the Unifi suffice? Going to give 5MB per connection and don’t want to kill the main Unifi AP. TThoughts Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager PCSWIN.COM NLBC.COM ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] discover not finding device
Try changing your wds. If its on turn it off if on turn it off. Steve Barnes PCSWIN.com -Original Message- From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Jan Van Kort Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 8:27 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: [Ubnt_users] discover not finding device Anyone run into this before? I have a 900Loco set as bridge and device on other side stays invisible to Mikrotik router. Cannot ping device. Device is an airrouter working quite well for customer, just stays invisible to network controlled by Mikrotik router. Both units are running 5.6.7 firmware and are connected via ethernet cable. ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] NTP
In process setting one up but have several devices Going to their NTP just wondering what others have been seeing. Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager PCSWIN.COM NLBC.COM From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of can...@believewireless.net Sent: Monday, July 11, 2016 1:31 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] NTP Why not setup your own NTP server? Super easy. On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Steve Barnes <st...@pcswin.com<mailto:st...@pcswin.com>> wrote: Is 0.ubnt.pool.ntp.org<http://0.ubnt.pool.ntp.org> set right and working. I have lots of stuff pointed to that and its off an hour at least. Time zone set correctly but still off an hour. Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager PCSWIN.COM<http://PCSWIN.COM> NLBC.COM<http://NLBC.COM> ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
[Ubnt_users] NTP
Is 0.ubnt.pool.ntp.org set right and working. I have lots of stuff pointed to that and its off an hour at least. Time zone set correctly but still off an hour. Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager PCSWIN.COM NLBC.COM <>___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
[Ubnt_users] AC2 Move
I will need to be moving my AC2 server in the near future to a new IP address. Anyone have an idea what the correct steps are for not having the devices broadcasting to the old / wrong IP. I don't want to have 1000 cpe's sending out heartbeat to the old IP. And I want to keep my history. Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager PCSWIN.COM NLBC.COM <>___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Stuck Beacon
Thanks Matt. Looked like to quick an answer from support to not get more input. Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager PCSWIN.COM NLBC.COM From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Matt Hardy via Ubnt_users Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 2:23 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Stuck Beacon Hi Steve, I just took a look ... it doesn't actually look like ping watchdog is causing it. Let me ask the devs a few questions; I'll post an update in the ticket ;) -Matt On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Steve Barnes <st...@pcswin.com<mailto:st...@pcswin.com>> wrote: So I have turned in a support ticket to UBNT with SUP files due to me having 15- M5 Rockets throughout our network that reboot randomly due to Ping Watchdog. They got back to me and say that the issue is that I am having Stuck Beacons on the wireless interface causing the Ethernet interface to not be able to ping the gateway. WHAT??? How does RF noise cause a Ethernet loss of communication? Also on one tower I have 3- M5 sectors that are randomly ping watchdog rebooting (once a week to once a day) and on the same tower is 4- M2 sectors that has a -80 Noise floor. Now if Interference is the issue why do the M2 never reboot with horrible noise and the M5 do all the time with little noise. Don't start preaching about turning off Ping Watchdog. Other than this issue, I have only found benefits to using Ping Watchdog. Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager PCSWIN.COM<http://PCSWIN.COM> NLBC.COM<http://NLBC.COM> ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
[Ubnt_users] Stuck Beacon
So I have turned in a support ticket to UBNT with SUP files due to me having 15- M5 Rockets throughout our network that reboot randomly due to Ping Watchdog. They got back to me and say that the issue is that I am having Stuck Beacons on the wireless interface causing the Ethernet interface to not be able to ping the gateway. WHAT??? How does RF noise cause a Ethernet loss of communication? Also on one tower I have 3- M5 sectors that are randomly ping watchdog rebooting (once a week to once a day) and on the same tower is 4- M2 sectors that has a -80 Noise floor. Now if Interference is the issue why do the M2 never reboot with horrible noise and the M5 do all the time with little noise. Don't start preaching about turning off Ping Watchdog. Other than this issue, I have only found benefits to using Ping Watchdog. Steve Barnes Wireless Operations Manager PCSWIN.COM NLBC.COM <>___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] DFS for NanoBeams
Yean some of the NanoBeams are like hens tooth. Last Nanobeam M5 400 I got I bought of Amazon hope they aren’t knock offs. Steven Barnes GM PCSWIN.com Howard LLC. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Tim Reichhart Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 4:27 PM To: 'Ubiquiti Users Group' Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] DFS for NanoBeams Ben I cant find any nanobridges at all from streakwave,scansource,ingrammicro and cant find any nanobeams in M2 ( always getting sometime in 2015) that cant work. So looks like I am going have go all miktroik so can you please tell me where I can get them at. Tim From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Ben Moore Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 4:12 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] DFS for NanoBeams Thanks Ty. Agreed it is used too much. On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.commailto:tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Ben, just a friendly suggestion based on experience here and on the forum.. All Ubiquiti persons interracting with the public should remove the word soon from their vocabulary. If you can't give even a gross over-estimation of the timeframe then just say so. Soon has become cliche. We are hoping for 1st quarter 2015 is much better. If you miss a window that big, then soon wouldn't have been any more truthful and a lot more vague. -Ty On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Ben Moore benjahmo...@gmail.commailto:benjahmo...@gmail.com wrote: Yes Forbes it is getting closer. While I don't know exact, I would expect it to be soon. Which distributors are no longer stocking NanoBridges? We have thousands in stock as well in USA to help offset any increase in demand. Thanks, Ben On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Forbes Mercy wi...@wabroadband.commailto:wi...@wabroadband.com wrote: I admittedly don't keep up as I should on this list so I'm probably bringing something up that has been talked about a lot, sorry. I am out of NanoBridges and while I'd dearly like to move to NanoBeams because they are a much nicer radio, they are boat anchors without DFS capabilities. Why it's taken longer to get this certification is beyond me but before I buy another few hundred NanoBridges (when I am lucky enough to find a supplier that still carries them) I'd like to know if the certification is any closer? Thanks, Forbes Mercy Washington Broadband, Inc. ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.orgmailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.orgmailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.orgmailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs
of the Powerbeam/Nanobeam DFS like end of the first quarter of 2015? I’m really trying to schedule stuff but this issue is hanging me up. rory From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of RickG Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 11:56 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs Ben Moore via wispa.orghttp://wispa.org 3:17 PM (10 hours ago) We already have these in transit. I would expect DFS to be available on these early next year. The NanoBeams do not have DFS yet...but they will. On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 1:12 AM, Rory Conaway r...@triadwireless.netmailto:r...@triadwireless.net wrote: I might have missed this but does the AC product line support U-NII 1 and DFS? Rory From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Ben Moore Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 5:42 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs Yeah, performance with AC is priority # 1. You can see current performance with PTMP from Chuck's post. Another should be posted shortly. There are some really cool enhancements/features with 7.1/AC. On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Kees H wi...@calbroadband.commailto:wi...@calbroadband.com wrote: Some here, don't look back a new day is breakin'. I assume the backward compatibility will result in a performance hit. Thank you Ben! I know a lot of people want backwards compatibility... but I for one want forwards movement! Even if it ultimately means no backwards compatibility. On 12/9/14, 3:21 PM, Ben Moore wrote: Backwards compatibility is planned, but will be some time before being implemented (will ask team for update on timeline). There are a lot of features/products that will go into AC prior to adding backwards compatibility (making sure these are solid first before adding more variables). On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Steve Barnes st...@pcswin.commailto:st...@pcswin.com mailto:st...@pcswin.commailto:st...@pcswin.com wrote: Ben, I asked before but haven’t gotten word, can you speak to the Backwards compatibility of the new units? __ __ *Steven Barnes* GM PCSWIN.comhttp://PCSWIN.com Howard LLC. __ __ *From:*ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Ben Moore *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2014 3:14 PM *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs __ __ Yes, difference is airprism...and the fact that this one is PTP locked (the lite will do both PTMP and PTP). __ __ On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.netmailto:mat...@litewire.net mailto:mat...@litewire.netmailto:mat...@litewire.net wrote: Yes, the spectrum analyzer is quite nice... even if the only Rocket I have that it works on is sitting on my desk. :p So is the only difference with this new Rocket AirPrism, or are there other changes as well? --- - *From:*ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Ben Moore [ben.mo...@ubnt.commailto:ben.mo...@ubnt.com mailto:ben.mo...@ubnt.commailto:ben.mo...@ubnt.com] *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2014 1:27 PM *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs __ __ ;-) I think you guys will really like the new SW tools being added (especially the persistent spectrum analyzer...lots that can be done with that). Will send out some details shortly on PTMP networks in the wild ;) __ __ On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.netmailto:mat...@litewire.net mailto:mat...@litewire.netmailto:mat...@litewire.net wrote: ha... I just Rocket and PowerBeam and assumed they were the same ones. I guess I should actually read stuff. This is what happens when you don't make new stuff look different :p
Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs
Any word about backwards compatibility with Airmax products? Steven Barnes GM PCSWIN.com Howard LLC. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 2:08 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs For those of you that have them... are they working well? Was there anything new in their announcement today? It didn't seem like it. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com [http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL[http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png]https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]https://twitter.com/ICSIL ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs
+1000 Steve Barnes PCSWIN.com From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 5:27 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs Some of us need 2.4ghz... there's no way we could get to at least half our customers with 5ghz only... AirPrism in 2.4ghz would be a nice start. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of j...@spitwspots.commailto:j...@spitwspots.com [j...@spitwspots.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 4:24 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs Ac is only designed around 5ghz. What's it with you and 2ghz? :) On December 9, 2014 1:15:29 PM AKST, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.commailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: The ac stuff is 5 GHz only? I'm still kind of cautious as the old NS didn't work too well on Airmax APs (RM2 for example). Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.netmailto:mat...@litewire.net wrote: Well, an NSM2 wouldn't since AC doesn't come in the M2 variety... but I assume you meant NSM5, which according to what been just said should work fine. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Josh Luthman [j...@imaginenetworksllc.commailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 4:07 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs So NSM2 and Nanobeam-400 will work with the new 802.11ac Rockets, correct? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340tel:937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343tel:937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Ben Moore ben.mo...@ubnt.commailto:ben.mo...@ubnt.com wrote: 11n CPE's will have ability to work with 11AC AP's...This will allow you to transition a tower. Note that 11ac speeds will not be as good as 100% AC network, but 11ac CPE's that you deploy will still be better than 11n. On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.netmailto:mat...@litewire.net wrote: That's what I've been assuming too... Ben, can you tell us whether it's going to be backwards compatibility added to the AC series, or forward compatibility added to the M series? From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Mike Hammett [wispaubntus...@ics-il.netmailto:wispaubntus...@ics-il.net] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 2:36 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs I'm guessing it'll be like M series vs. legacy. Eventually V6 will be the M-series connection to the AC. I'm guessing... - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com [http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL[http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png]https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]https://twitter.com/ICSIL From: Steve Barnes st...@pcswin.commailto:st...@pcswin.com To: Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.orgmailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 2:16:24 PM Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs Ben, I asked before but haven't gotten word, can you speak to the Backwards compatibility of the new units? Steven Barnes GM PCSWIN.com Howard LLC. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Ben Moore Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 3:14 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs Yes, difference is airprism...and the fact that this one is PTP locked (the lite will do both PTMP and PTP). On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.netmailto:mat...@litewire.net wrote: Yes, the spectrum analyzer is quite nice... even if the only Rocket I have that it works on is sitting on my desk. :p So is the only difference with this new Rocket AirPrism, or are there other changes as well? From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Ben Moore [ben.mo...@ubnt.commailto:ben.mo...@ubnt.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 1:27 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs ;-) I think you guys will really like the new SW tools being added (especially the persistent
Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl
Thank you Justin for such a well written and insightful write up. You buried the nail not just hit it on the head. Great Job. Steven Barnes GM PCSWIN.com Howard LLC. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Justin Wilson Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 6:38 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl Part of it for me is the perception of UBNT as a company. We aren't like Apple consumers. For the most part, most of us are not buying these products to jack with them at Starbucks and drink Coffee. We are out on towers, in all kinds of weather, deploying these. No matter the driving factor, the majority of these networks are here to make money. I, for one, have bet my house and my future on UBNT products in the past. It was no different than betting on another vendor, but I chose UBNT for several reasons. Price was a factor but not the only one. Robert and Staff, please don't misunderstand the passion for these folks being fanboys. Sure, the inner geek in everyone wants the shiny new gadget. But at the end of the day we all want to go home and be able to set our thermostat at 71 instead of 50. :-) This is about providing a service and being in business. Tools like AirControl means we can do that extra install instead of having the programmer spend their time figuring out how to pull data from the radio or dump into some 3rd party app. We all know monitoring and proactive solutions are essential in this business. I want to know if my business customers are getting what they pay for. If I have SLA customers I want to prove to them we are living up to expectations. Having that data might mean keeping them or not. A complete product family means we have a lower TCO. Now, back to perception. If I am putting my house on the line would I continue to do so for a company that hasn't finished a key product like AC in how many years? Version 1 never was completed. V2 is now dead. What about the Mfi cloud? I want to be able to trust a company with my livelihood. Sure, a software product isn't the same as a working AP, but it should be a key component. In today's ISP world information is King. If I have information I know when to upgrade, what customers to proactively fix, and how the overall health of the network is. This is what makes me different than Comcast. I should be able to know everything about what I have. If you want to make it cloud based, how about an appliance we can install locally? Just an idea, in a sea of thousands. But more importantly, help us focus on automating our businesses and being kick butt at it. Give us the tools we actually need. That way we can buy more units from you. Simple. Justin -- Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net http://www.mtin.nethttp://www.mtin.net/blog Managed Services - xISP Solutions - Data Centers http://www.thebrotherswisp.com Podcast about xISP topics http://www.midwest-ix.com Peering - Transit - Internet Exchange ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT SILENCE ?? was New airControl
Well that is a great step in the right direction. Steven Barnes GM PCSWIN.com Howard LLC. -Original Message- From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of G. Nicholas Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:57 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT SILENCE ?? was New airControl Kees, I do not think Robert Pera follows this list, but he did respond to AirCRM concerns on the Ubiquiti forum: Hi Guys -- Thanks for all the feedback. Here are some quick thoughts from our side: 1. The goal behind our CRM solution is to level the playing field between Tier 1 operators and you guys. We have invested significant RD resources over the past couple years towards providing powerful business software technology which would allow your businesses and networks to scale faster and more efficiently. Our goal has always been to accelerate the growth of our entire Industry and make you guys more successful. 2. We have some powerful features planned that take advantage of the centralized hosting and that is why we decided on a cloud framework 3. A significant piece of Ubiquiti's DNA is about listening to our community. We hear the message about the local hosting requirement loud and clear. We have started on it now and will have solution for local hosting Consider what we have available now as an option to try out. For those of you that will hold off until the local hosting option is available, please feel free to try out the UI and direction and let us know what you think. Thanks, Robert - Original Message - From: Kees H Sent: 12/4/2014 10:41:53 AM To: ubnt_users@wispa.org Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT SILENCE ?? was New airControl Matt @ UBNT I do believe it is time for you to go to the upper management and have them make a comment. The issues that have been so elequently stated in this and other posts in this last week need to be addressed. The silence from UBNT is deafening and shakes my confidence in UBNT. Please keep us informed. Guys, you have good points. I believe though, the problem here isn't just the product, it's the message. The reality is that it wouldn't take that many more resources to finish and update AC2. I thought it had a bunch of bells and whistles I could have lived without and that functionality was more important but that wasn't my call. We fudged through its inadequacies with the hope that upgrades were coming. Unfortunately, the Cone of Silence from Ubiquiti on this issue after more than a year caused me anghst. I can see where this product works for newcomers to the industry as a billing and CRM product. But I do agree that those operators that have more than a few hundred users are going to have serious qualms about opening up their network to an outside attack or even the possibility that there is some aspect of security that is out of their control. We pay a lot of money every year for security products to protect our customers and although we are going to test and probably startup WISPs to this product, I don't see it as a large operational management tool specifically because of the unknown control issue. If Russia can hack our SCADA system, probably the North Koreans can hack Sony, the Chinese pretty much anything they want to including our most secured military and technical secrets, I'm a little nervous letting some outside entity control my network. Here is my question, if the cloud gets hacked and someone takes down my network causing me great financial harm (kind of like Green toughcable), who am I suing? I know the same argument can be made for AirControl now but that device should be behind a firewall with security at the operating system level managed by the WISP. The exposure is far lower. Rory -Original Message- From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Robert Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2014 6:25 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl Hmmm, I think someone is really trying hard to emulate Steve Jobs... He always knew what his customers _really_ needed... Sometimes he was spot on... Sometimes he tried to float bricks... Didn't hear about those products... On 12/03/2014 05:14 PM, Chris Ruschmann wrote: Well said. In the alpha forums we gave them every possible combination of onsite hosting that you could think of that we would be happy to use for this project. Virtual appliances and an actual hardware appliances that they sell were 2 that I thought would be the easiest. Fell on deaf ears though. *From:*ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Justin Wilson *Sent:* Wednesday, December 3, 2014 2:38 PM
Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl
I want to first go on record as saying I to dislike the idea of a cloud based management tool. However, I also remember all of us bitching about AC being a Java app and not having a web UI for our phones and other devices. When Ben Moore said that we would not have to worry about that in the next version I kind of thought about a hosted solution, but thought “Oh surly not”. Another point that I want to make is that US WISPs are not their largest market. I am sure that it is a large market for them but not the largest. I expect they are trying to be uniform across all their platforms worldwide. I assume we will see Unifi and Mfi eventually go ALL Cloud based. Everything from AP, CPE, Router, WiFi, Lights, Phones, Cameras, and even thermostat controlled from the cloud. The hacking possibility of all this is huge. But everything I see is moving this way. The local school Corp in our area just released 2 techs and converted ever thing they could to virtual off-site with remote monitoring and control of all equipment from WiFi Aps and Net Switches to Servers and workstations. The IT Manager says he loves the reduced work load but sees now he has handed the keys to someone else and has a lot less control. All he does now is move wires and swap equipment. All the NEST products, personal IP Security Cameras all are already in the cloud. The general techy populous are starting to except it. I think lots of WISPs will be less likely since they feel less in control of their networks and we are all about control. But I don’t think we are going to stop this trend. Steven Barnes GM PCSWIN.com Howard LLC. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 10:37 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl Well right. That's why I said few and not none. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com [http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL[http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png]https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]https://twitter.com/ICSIL From: Josh Reynolds j...@spitwspots.commailto:j...@spitwspots.com To: ubnt users ubnt_users@wispa.orgmailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 9:36:33 PM Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl It was in alpha for 7-8 months before it hit the public beta today. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.comhttp://www.spitwspots.com On 12/01/2014 06:25 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: It was announced today, so few are familiar. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com [http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL[http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png]https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]https://twitter.com/ICSIL From: Robert Andrews nos...@avantwireless.commailto:nos...@avantwireless.com To: Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.orgmailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 9:22:29 PM Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl Ok, but when the device contacts the cloud why can't the cloud at that point start the update? I'm not really familiar with the product but what is the frequency of the cloud to ground discharge ( or the other way around )... On 12/1/14 7:10 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: The cloud doesn't contact the devices, the devices initiate connection to the cloud. (to be fair) josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.comhttp://www.spitwspots.com On 12/01/2014 06:08 PM, Robert Andrews wrote: Kinda hard to point to a bunch of wavy hand WISPs about the size of your management adoption for the investors, but nuts dead simple if they are on your cloud system... And if the FCC changes the rules Guess what can be forced to update for compliance with or without your say so... Hm On 12/1/14 4:45 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote: On 12/1/14, 16:44, Kees H wrote: Why would I waste public ips on my radios, so ubnt can have control of my radios? Don't they know ARIN is running out of IPv4 addresses? But it's CLOUD. ~Seth ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.orgmailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.orgmailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Scrap the Unifi Phones - I want a signal readout on my watch
That is a fabulous idea. Steven Barnes GM PCSWIN.com Howard LLC. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 12:45 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: [Ubnt_users] Scrap the Unifi Phones - I want a signal readout on my watch Has anyone tried to get into this project? I'd love to have an Android watch connected to my phone which would go to the backhaul or CPE for a signal readout to display on the watch. Hopefully someone can make this as easy as buying a watch! =) Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
