[Ugnet] The #1 House Negro Anti-African Lies of the BBC

2005-01-01 Thread Edward Mulindwa



Arrogant Powell And Lying BBCOpinion by Owei Lakemfa, Vanguard, 7 
June 2001COLIN Powell, retired American general and hiscountry's 
Secretary of State was visiting Africa whenthe continent on May 26 declared 
the African Union. Onthe day of the Union, the British 
BroadcastingCorporation (BBC) made two pointed pieces of falsehoodits 
lead report. The evolution of the African Union could not beignored. 
Yet it was an unsettling event for those whohave for decades used us as 
their footmats, as theirsources of cheap raw materials, free labour 
andplayground. So the event had to be reported and the BBC found 
away around it; to misrepresent it and hopefully leadthe attack on the 
African Union. The BBC reported thatan African Union is being created but 
that it is thebrain child of Libya's Mouamar Ghaddafi who is tryingto 
pass himself off as a Pan Africanist. The Britonsadded that the African 
Union is loosely structured onthe European Union (EU) model. These 
are pieces of falsehood and I shall proceed toexpose them as such. But it is 
necessary to point outthat the attempt here is first to portray Africans 
asidiots incapable of arriving at the need for unity andare therefore 
being pushed by Ghaddafi a man the Westand U.S have strenuously tried over 
the years todemonise. The hope of the BBC propagators is that oncethe 
Union is linked with Ghaddafi, many Africans willoppose it and the new unity 
will therefore collapse. Is the African Union a Ghaddafi project? Of 
coursenot! The calls for a Union of Africa dates back to the19th century 
when Britain and its European Firstcousins despoiled Africa and continuously 
raped her,stripping the continent of her gold and naturalresources, her 
priceless lands and precious humanlabour. As it happened in all 
cases of greed and banditry, theEuropeans started fighting amongst 
themselves over theloot that was Africa. To bring some order and 
honourin the looting, the Europeans met in Berlin, Germanyfrom 1884 to 
1885 to agree on how best to despoilAfrica without the bandits going to war 
amongstthemselves. One of the most strident voices against this 
wasMarcus Garvey who worked for the establishment of aunion of African 
States with a central government,economy, social services and defence. That 
was back inthe 1920s, long before Ghaddaffi was born. Two decades 
before this, moves for Africanindependence and union was made by the Pan 
AfricanCongresses which began in 1900. In the 1950s when Ghaddafi 
was a teenager, KwameNkrumah had already become known as the champion 
ofAfrican Union. Nkrumah suggested that an African Union capital 
beestablished either in Bangui, Central African Republicor in 
Leopoldville in Congo. He also offered to stepdown as Ghana's president and 
serve under any leaderor leaders the African Union government throws up. 
Neither Ghadaffi nor any African leader has gone atenth as far as 
Nkrumah did. So it is an insult foranybody to claim that the African Union 
is a brainchild of Ghaddafi. So is the new African Union modelled 
after the EU? Ofcourse not! Again, men like Nkrumah had in the 
early1960s suggested both a Union Government and apresidium to run it, a 
common Market for Africa, AnAfrican Currency, African Monetary Zone, 
AfricanCentral Bank, a continental communication system,common Foreign 
Policy and Diplomacy, Common Defenceand Common African Citizenship. The 
danger Africansface is not so much that the BBC and other tools ofworld 
control would continue to misinform our people,the real danger is in 
allowing these radio andtelevision stations direct access to our FM bands 
andlocal television stations. We cannot have AfricanUnion without 
addressing this cultural recolonisationof our continental airwaves. 
Powell is a lesser issue. He was in Africa visitingSouth Africa, 
Uganda, Kenya and Mali. In South Africahe targeted two African presidents 
for attack. Heinsulted Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe accusing him ofstaying 
too long in power and threatened him. Mugabewith a 21-year stay in power can 
trully be said to beoverstaying but Powell's attack is based on 
Americanperception that Mugabe is an enemy. This can be borneout of the 
fact that he did not make a similarcriticism of president Arap Moi when he 
visited Kenya,yet Moi who had been Kenyan Vice President has 
beenpresident since 1978, two years before Mugabe waselected prime 
Minister. Secondly Powell did notsimilarly attack Yoweri Museveni when he 
visitedUganda despite the fact that the former has beenpresident since 
January 1986. What is more, unlikeMugabe who presides in a multiparty 
Zimbabwe, Musevenidoes not allow a single political party to function 
inUganda. In any case, what are the democratic credentials 
ofPowell? That he is serving in a government that riggedthe American 
elections? Powell attacked President Thabo Mbeki of South Africafor 
linking AIDS and poverty. But the truth is thatAIDS is attacking pour 
countries more. Our AIDSpatients are denied 

[Ugnet] A SISTER WHO IS USELESS FOR AFRICA

2005-01-01 Thread Edward Mulindwa



Netters, If this remarkable Saddam-slamming, 
war-mongering,Soviet-defeating, German-Unifying sister ever saysanything 
intelligent, or of any significancewhatsoever, about Africa...I will be 
grateful ifsomeone could then wake me up immediately to informme. I am 
still waiting for that day...with greatanticipation...in the meantime, she 
is as useful toAfrica, as ant-piss is in putting out a forest fire. 
CONDI's BIOGRAPHYRice was born in Birmingham, Alabama, as an 
only childto Angelena Rice and the Reverend John Wesley Rice,Jr. Her 
father became a minister at WestminsterPresbyterian Church and her mother 
was a musicteacher. Both her parents were university professors.In 1967, 
the family moved to Denver when her fatheraccepted the position of Vice 
Chancellor at theUnivesity of Denver. Her name is a variation on 
theItalian musical term "con dolcezza" which is adirection to play "with 
sweetness". She was born the same year as the landmark Brown v.Board 
of Education decision. Rice was eight when herschoolmate Denise McNair was 
killed in the bombing ofthe Black Sixteenth Street Baptist Church by 
whitesupremacists on September 15, 1963. Rice states herchildhood during 
segregation taught her determinationagainst adversity, and the need to be 
"twice as good"as non-minorities Education:After studying 
piano at an Aspen music camp, Riceenrolled and at 15, began attending 
classes at theUniversity of Denver with the goal of becoming aconcert 
pianist. Her plans changed when she attended acourse on international 
politics taught by JosefKorbel, the father of former Secretary of 
State,Madeleine Albright, that sparked her interest in theSoviet Union 
and international relations, leading herto call Korbel "one of the most 
central figures in mylife".At 19, Rice earned her bachelor's degree 
in politicalscience, cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa, from theUniversity of 
Denver in 1974. In 1975, she obtainedher master's degree from the University 
of Notre Dame,and in 1981 she received her Ph.D. from the GraduateSchool 
of International Studies at the University ofDenver. In addition to English, 
she speaks Russian,French, and Spanish.Academic career:At 
Stanford University, Rice is a tenured Professor ofPolitical Science, Senior 
Fellow of the Institute forInternational Studies, and a Fellow (by courtesy) 
ofthe Hoover Institution. From 1993 to 1999 she servedas the Stanford 
Provost. Rice held the position ofprovost before stepping down on July 1, 
1999. In June2003, Rice delivered the commencement address 
atStanford.Rice is a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts 
andSciences and has been awarded honorary doctorates fromMorehouse 
College in 1991, the University of Alabamain 1994, the University of Notre 
Dame in 1995, theMississippi College School of Law in 2003, 
theUniversity of Louisville and Michigan State Universityin 
2004.Political career:From 1989 through March 1991 (the period 
of the fallof Berlin wall and the final days of the SovietUnion), she 
served in the George H. W. BushAdministration as Director, and then Senior 
Director,of Soviet and East European Affairs in the NationalSecurity 
Council, and a Special Assistant to thePresident for National Security 
Affairs. In thisfunction, Condoleezza Rice was part of developing 
thestrategy of President Bush and Secretary of StateJames Baker in favor 
of German reunification. She soimpressed President Bush that he introduced 
her toSoviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev as the one who "tellsme everything 
I know about the Soviet Union."In 1996, while an international affairs 
fellow of theCouncil on Foreign Relations, she served as 
SpecialAssistant to the Director of the Joint Chiefs ofStaff. In 1997, 
she served on the Federal AdvisoryCommittee on Gender-Integrated Training in 
theMilitary.Rice was a member of the board of directors for 
theChevron Corporation (which named an oil tankerCondoleezza Rice after 
her, later renamed AltairVoyager due to controversy) and headed its 
committeeon public policy until she resigned on January 15,2001, to 
become National Security Advisor.During George W. Bush's election 
campaign in 2000,Rice took a one-year leave of absence from universityto 
work as George W. Bush's foreign policy advisor. OnDecember 17, 2000, Rice 
was picked to serve asNational Security Advisor and stepped down from 
herposition at Stanford.Business career:Rice has served on 
the board of directors for theChevron Corporation, the Charles Schwab 
Corporation,the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, theUniversity of 
Notre Dame, the International AdvisoryCouncil of J.P. Morgan and the San 
Francisco SymphonyBoard of Governors. She was a Founding Board member 
ofthe Center for a New Generation, an educationalsupport fund for 
schools in East Palo Alto and EastMenlo Park and was Vice President of the 
Boys andGirls Club of the Peninsula. In addition, her pastboard service 
has encompassed such organizations asTransamerica Corporation, Hewlett 

[Ugnet] Susan Rice: Then and Now.

2005-01-01 Thread Edward Mulindwa



Netters,Just keeping tabs on our confused sister, 
whodesignated the famous "New Breed of African Leaders"...and on her 
watch Africa caught on fire, while she fiddled and drew her 
check.Here is her short biography. Susan E. RiceSenior 
FellowBrookings InstitutionDr. Rice joined the Board of Directors 
for InternewsNetwork in 2002. She has a distinguished career inboth the 
public and private sector and brings a wealthof foreign policy experience to 
Internews. Dr. Rice is a senior fellow at the BrookingsInstitution 
jointly affiliated with the Foreign Policyand Governance Studies programs. 
Her projects atBrookings involve transnational security threats, 
thesecurity implications of globalization, and corporatesocial 
responsibility investments. She is also anindependent consultant and 
speaker.Under President Clinton, Dr. Rice served as 
AssistantSecretary of State for African Affairs. Prior to that,she 
served on the National Security Council staff atthe White House as Special 
Assistant to the Presidentand Senior Director for African Affairs, and 
earlierwas Director for International Organizations andPeacekeeping at 
the NSC.Her private sector experience includes work as amanagement 
consultant at McKinsey and Company inToronto and serving as Managing 
Director and Principalof Intellibridge International in Washington, D.C., 
aninternet-based information and analytical firm. Dr. Rice was the 
co-recipient of the White House's2000 Samuel Nelson Drew Memorial Award 
fordistinguished contributions to the formation ofpeaceful, cooperative 
relationships between states.Susan E. Rice also brings impressive 
scholarly andpractical accomplishments to Internews. A RhodesScholar, 
Dr. Rice was awarded the ChathamHouse-British International Studies 
Association Prizefor the most distinguished doctoral dissertation inthe 
United Kingdom in the field of 
InternationalRelations.END=Dan Kashagamawww.africanfront.com
The Mulindwas Communication Group"With 
Yoweri Museveni, Uganda is in 
anarchy" 
Groupe de communication Mulindwas "avec Yoweri Museveni, l'Ouganda est dans 
l'anarchie"
___
Ugandanet mailing list
Ugandanet@kym.net
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

[Ugnet] WITCHCRAFT BOOMS IN BUGANDA THANKS TO MENGO CREATION

2005-01-01 Thread Edward Mulindwa







  
  


  


  

  
  

  Cock refuses to be slaughtered, talks 
  MUKONO — Shock gripped residents of Misindye village, Goma 
  sub-county when a cock spoke and refused to be slaughtered, 
  writes Joel Ogwang. An unknown resident 
  reportedly abandoned the cock at the sub-county headquarters 
  where it stayed for four days before Sekagya picked it and 
  kept it at his home. He allegedly sold it to another 
  resident at sh5,000 on Friday before Christmas day. The 
  resident returned the cock, saying he was scared of 
  slaughtering a cock possed by evil spirits. Sekagya refunded 
  the money but was not satisfied with the man’s explanation. 
  On Monday evening, Sekagya tried to slaughter the cock 
  but was scared even more by a strange human voice coming from 
  its throat. This time, it threatened to kill any one who 
  killed or ate its flesh. “The cock spoke in Luganda, 
  saying any one who slaughtered or ate its flesh would die,” 
  Sekagya said at his home. He said the cock had refused 
  to leave his home and that whenever he took it and dumped it 
  far away from his home, it came back. He also said it 
  kept following him wherever he went. Sekagya has reportedly 
  contacted leading traditional healers in the village but they 
  failed to kill the cock. By press time, the strange 
  cock was still tied to a long rope in Sekagya’s home. 
  
The Mulindwas Communication Group"With 
Yoweri Museveni, Uganda is in 
anarchy" 
Groupe de communication Mulindwas "avec Yoweri Museveni, l'Ouganda est dans 
l'anarchie"
___
Ugandanet mailing list
Ugandanet@kym.net
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

[Ugnet] The Brits and the Norweigian are NEVER to be trusted!!!!!

2005-01-01 Thread Matek Opoko
Bigombe told journalists, religious leaders and politicians that a new date and venue would be communicated soon.Meanwhile hundreds of children and civil society members poured on Kitgum streets yesterday in a peace march that culminated into a peace prayer at Boma grounds The UPDF brass band led the march. The Army Commander, Maj. Gen. Aronda Nyakairima and the acting head of the Chieftaincy of Military Intelligence (CMI), Col James Mugira attended the prayers. 





YOU SEE: Army Commander Maj. Gen. Aronda Nyakairima (left), with State Minister for Security Ms Bety Akech at Pece Stadium on Monday. Centre is Col. Nathan Mugisha of UPDF 4th Division. (Photo by M Odongkara).
The United Nations, the Norwegian government, the Netherlands and the British government are some of the sponsors of the talks. The agreement 
One cannot trust any talks in which the British Government is involved. The Brits are pretty much a double mouth snake. The Brits have been the very party which have constantly promoted the war in Northern Uganda by rendering unwaivering Military and diplomatic support to NRM military dictatorship. As for the Norwegians, citizens, you heard what the Norwergian Ambassoder stated recently...some thing to the effect that Norway does not care about Museveni move to seek the so called third termthat is to say Norway does not really care about Museveni's policy of promoting wars in Uganda. And if Museveni is given more years to promote wars in the great lakes region of Africa, then so be it. ..and now it is the some norway turning around and trying to initiate talks with the "rebels"...can the real Norway stand up and let us know it's position as it pertains to Yoweri Museveni of Uganda?
		Do you Yahoo!? 
Jazz up your holiday email with celebrity designs. Learn more.___
Ugandanet mailing list
Ugandanet@kym.net
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

Re: [Ugnet] The Brits and the Norweigian are NEVER to be trusted!!!!!

2005-01-01 Thread Edward Mulindwa



Matek

This is the same Museveni who was in Nairobi peace 
talks, and we all full well know how they ended. The population in Northern 
Uganda is now a property of NRM to be used and at will, same as the population 
in DRC to Paul Kagame.

It is very sad indeed.

EM
Auckland
The Mulindwas Communication Group"With Yoweri Museveni, Uganda is 
in 
anarchy" 
Groupe de communication Mulindwas "avec Yoweri Museveni, l'Ouganda est dans 
l'anarchie"

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Matek 
  Opoko 
  To: ugandanet@kym.net ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2005 7:46 
  AM
  Subject: [Ugnet] The Brits and the 
  Norweigian are NEVER to be trusted!
  
  Bigombe told journalists, religious leaders and 
  politicians that a new date and venue would be communicated soon.Meanwhile 
  hundreds of children and civil society members poured on Kitgum streets 
  yesterday in a peace march that culminated into a peace prayer at Boma grounds 
  The UPDF brass band led the march. The Army Commander, Maj. Gen. Aronda 
  Nyakairima and the acting head of the Chieftaincy of Military Intelligence 
  (CMI), Col James Mugira attended the prayers. 
  


  

  YOU SEE: Army Commander Maj. Gen. 
Aronda Nyakairima (left), with State Minister for Security Ms Bety Akech 
at Pece Stadium on Monday. Centre is Col. Nathan Mugisha of UPDF 4th 
Division. (Photo by M Odongkara).
  The United 
  Nations, the Norwegian government, the Netherlands and the British government 
  are some of the sponsors of the talks. The agreement 
  One cannot trust any talks in which the British 
  Government is involved. The Brits are pretty much a double mouth snake. The 
  Brits have been the very party which have constantly 
  promoted the war in Northern Uganda by rendering unwaivering Military 
  and diplomatic support to NRM military dictatorship. As for the Norwegians, 
  citizens, you heard what the Norwergian Ambassoder stated recently...some 
  thing to the effect that Norway does not care about Museveni move to seek the 
  so called third termthat is to say Norway does not really care about 
  Museveni's policy of promoting wars in Uganda. And if Museveni is given more 
  years to promote wars in the great lakes region of Africa, then so be 
  it. ..and now it is the some norway turning around and trying to 
  initiate talks with the "rebels"...can the real Norway stand up and let us 
  know it's position as it pertains to Yoweri Museveni of 
  Uganda?
  
  
  Do you Yahoo!?Jazz up your holiday email with celebrity designs. Learn 
  more.
  
  

  ___Ugandanet mailing 
  listUgandanet@kym.nethttp://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet% 
  UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM 
http://www.infocom.co.ug/
___
Ugandanet mailing list
Ugandanet@kym.net
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

[Ugnet] THANKS TO MENGO CREATION

2005-01-01 Thread Edward Mulindwa







  
Father dumps son in Forest  




  
By Samuel 
  Matekha 

  

  
Saturday, 01 January 
  2005An 
  unidentified father has dumped his 8-year-old son in Namanve Forest, Kira 
  Town Council. 
  
  The father is thought to have dumped the son 
  before the New Year with fears that his son was possessed with evil 
  spirits. 
  
  The child whose identities could not be 
  established by press time was found near a brick making pond by Kileku 
  Zone LC Officials who found a letter dumped next to the child. 
  
  Radio 
  Simba talked to the child’s grandfather Lawrence Lwanga who said he was 
  not able to take care of the boy.
  
  
The Mulindwas Communication Group"With 
Yoweri Museveni, Uganda is in 
anarchy" 
Groupe de communication Mulindwas "avec Yoweri Museveni, l'Ouganda est dans 
l'anarchie"
___
Ugandanet mailing list
Ugandanet@kym.net
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

[Ugnet] debunking (2)

2005-01-01 Thread Edward Mulindwa




Where did Gallo's new virus come from? In the prestigious 
journal Science (Jan 4, 1985) it was reported that Gallo's AIDS virus was most 
closely related to "slow viruses" (lentiviruses) found in sheep and goats, 
particularly the visna virus in sheep, which causes pneumonia, neurologic 
changes, and wasting. However, Gallo declared that his virus was not visna 
virus, but might be "another animal viruses coming into man...and this means we 
have to look more closely at these animals as models and these types of animal 
viruses. No one knows if the viruses could have stemmed from a common viral 
ancestor hundreds or thousands of years ago, or if a virus moved between species 
only decades ago from human exposure to the virus of sheep or goats." 
 
The idea that HIV was "closely related" to the sheep visna 
virus did not last long. The idea of a sheep virus infecting gay men would have 
undoubtedly aroused suspicion because the only place one could find visna was in 
research labs where visna virus had been seeded and "adapted" into various 
animal species, as well as into human cells, for the two decades prior to the 
"gay plague." 
 
Gallo, with the help of veterinarian Max Essex of Harvard, 
convinced the AIDS experts and the adoring media that AIDS came from green 
monkeys. In Gallo's book Virus Hunting [1991], he claims that in 1983 (a year 
before his discovery) Ann Giudici Fettner, a free-lance journalist who had lived 
in Africa, told him that the virus came from green monkeys in central Africa. In 
1983 the African connection to AIDS was tenuous, and in Fettner's 1984 book, The 
Truth About AIDS, she never mentioned green monkeys and the African origin of 
AIDS. In fact, on page 44, she emphatically states: "AIDS started as an American 
disease." 
 
There are no scientific papers which uphold the green monkey 
theory. The monkey out of Africa theory lasted until the late 1990s when another 
group of American scientists claimed the virus definitely originated in a 
specific species of chimpanzee found in Africa. 
 
The green monkey theory was scientifically doomed from the 
very start, although that apparently did not phase the scientists who 
undoubtedly wanted to place the blame on the dark continent -- and take the 
origin of HIV out of Manhattan, where the first cases were discovered in 1979, 
and push the origin to the other side of the world. 
 
 
The Marriage of Cancer Research and Biowarfare in 
1971 
 
Whatever the theoretical origin of HIV/AIDS, there is no doubt 
that the epidemic started a decade after scientists began "adapting" massive 
numbers of cancer-causing and immunosuppressive animal viruses and transferring 
them between various animal species in an attempt to experimentally produce 
cancer in the laboratory. In the process of these "species-jumping" experiments, 
the scientists mixed viruses together, seeded them into the bodies of various 
animal species, and planted them into animal and human cell cultures. In the 
process myriads of new, laboratory-created mutant, hybrid and recombinant 
viruses were created, some of which were exceedingly dangerous. 
 
These engineered and deadly viruses were obviously of interest 
to biowarfare scientists. Donald A MacArthur stated in Congressional testimony 
in 1969 that "molecular biology is a field that is advancing very rapidly and 
eminent biologists believe that within a period of 5 to 10 years it would be 
possible to produce a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not exist 
naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been 
acquired." 
 
The dangers provoked by all these laboratory-created new virus 
were well known. At a symposium on leukemia research in 1973, Danish pathologist 
J Clemmesen warned that the transmissibility of these genetically -altered viral 
agents could cause a world epidemic of cancer if they escaped from the 
laboratory. (Gallo has publicly stated AIDS is an epidemic of cancer.) That same 
year cancer virologists convened at a conference entitled "Biohazards in 
Biological Research" at Asilomar, California. Despite the risks, it was decided 
to continue perilous animal cancer virus experimentation. 
 
People are often surprised to find there is a close 
relationship between traditional cancer virus research and biological warfare 
programs and experimentation. However, it is a fact that in 1971 President 
Richard Nixon, as part of his War On Cancer, combined the U.S. Army's biowarfare 
department at Ft. Detrick, Maryland, with the National Cancer Institute. The 
army's DNA and genetic engineering programs were coordinated into anti-cancer 
research and molecular biology programs. This marriage also cemented the 
governmental ties of cancer research to the CIA, the CDC, the World Health 
Organization, and private industry. 
 
During this same period the Special Virus Cancer Program 
(1968-1980), now largely and conveniently forgotten, was established to 
coordinate the search 

[Ugnet] DEBUNKING 5 (The End)

2005-01-01 Thread Edward Mulindwa




The Origin of AIDS Conference, London, 2000 
 
In October 2000 the Royal Society of London held a two-day 
conference on the origins of HIV. Needless to say, the man-made theory was not 
discussed. One professor emphatically declared: "All human infectious diseases 
have an animal origin." Hooper's polio theory was totally discredited; and 
Hahn's new chimp theory, dating HIV back to the 1930s, was acclaimed. 
 
The "Last Word" at the conference was that "all human viral 
infections were initially zoonotic (animal) in origin. Animals will always 
provide a reservoir for viruses that could threaten human populations in the 
future." The scientists predicted: "There is still a myriad of current unknown 
viruses in animal populations on land, sea, and air with the potential to cause 
human disease." But what about the millions of dangerous virus created in animal 
laboratories? That was never considered. 
 
A person cannot contract AIDS from a monkey or chimp 
 
In the July 2000 issue of Lancet, virologist and primatologist 
Preston Marx states: "There is no evidence that a person can contract AIDS from 
a monkey or chimpanzee". According to Marx, research shows humans were infected 
with SIV (simian immunodeficiency virus) in Africa and that these SIV infections 
were the root origin of HIV. Therefore SIV is the monkey ancestor virus of HIV. 
And Marx has no doubt that HIV originated from SIV in African non-human 
primates. 
 
AIDS educators often claim that AIDS is a "zoonosis", meaning 
a disease of animals that can be transmitted to humans, but Marx says this 
assumption is incorrect. AIDS as a zoonosis would mean that humans had 
contracted not only an SIV infection from a monkey or a chimp, but that they 
also eventually became sick with AIDS from the monkey virus infection. We have 
not established that AIDS is a zoonosis (meaning a disease people catch from 
monkeys). He further declares "We do not know what launches animal viruses to 
become epidemic in humans. There may be a social, viral-genetic or immunologic 
basis for new epidemics. We do not have this answer for the AIDS epidemic, but 
we do know that HIV originated from simian species." 
 
In a more recent October 2004 article "AIDS as a zoonosis? 
Confusion over the origin of the virus and the origin of the epidemic", Marx and 
his colleagues further speculate that HIV (derived from a primate) in the 1950s 
in Africa could have been made more dangerous and transmissible by dirty needles 
used in vaccine programs, as well as contaminated blood transfusions. The 
repeated passage from human-to-human (so called "serial passage") via SIV 
virus-contaminated needles could have transformed a harmless SIV in humans to 
the deadly and genetically-changed HIV virus causing AIDS. 
 
Human exposure to SIV is thousands of years old, but AIDS 
merged only in the 20th century. Marx never suggests that contaminated vaccines, 
rather than needles, could have initiated the African epidemic. However, if AIDS 
does not qualify as a zoonosis, I interpret this to mean that Hahn's "cut hunter 
theory" could not account for the explosion of HIV/AIDS in Africa in the 1980s. 
Finally, Marx's team suggests that more "research is needed to understand the 
processes by which animal viruses cause sustained human-to-human transmission, 
epidemics and even pandemics. Much is known about emerging viruses, but almost 
nothing is known about emerging viral diseases." 
 
 
WHO Murdered Africa? 
 
Apparently forgotten, ignored, or unknown by Marx was a 
similar vaccine and needle scenario reported on May 11, 1987, on the front-page 
of The London Times, entitled "Smallpox vaccine triggered AIDS virus." Science 
editor Pierce Wright suggested that African AIDS was a direct result of the 
World Health Organization's smallpox eradication program conducted in the 1970s. 
The smallpox vaccine allegedly awakened a "dormant" AIDS virus infection in the 
black population. Gallo was quoted as saying, "The link between the WHO program 
and the epidemic is an interesting and important hypothesis. I cannot say that 
it actually happened, but I have been saying for some years that the use of live 
vaccines such as that used for smallpox can activate a dormant infection such as 
HIV (the AIDS virus)." 
 
The Times report is one of the most important stories ever 
printed on the AIDS epidemic; yet the story was killed and never appeared in any 
major U.S. newspaper or magazine. However, the report is widely circulated on 
the internet as evidence to suggest that AIDS appeared in Africa via accidental 
or deliberate vaccine contamination with the AIDS virus. (Google: WHO murdered 
Africa). 
 
Kenyan ecologist and biologist Wangari Maathai was obviously 
aware of this vaccine connection when she won the Nobel Peace Prize in October 
2004, and shocked reporters by claiming the AIDS virus was a deliberately 
created biological agent developed by evil-minded scientists and released in 
Africa 

[Ugnet] DEBUNKING THE AIDS OUT OF AFRICA CRAP (ONE)

2005-01-01 Thread Edward Mulindwa




Debunking The Out Of Africa Origin Of HIV  AIDS 
The Greatest 
Conspiracy Story Ever ToldBy Alan Cantwell © 2005 Alan Cantwell, M.D. 
1-1-5 






  
  

  
AIDS is now more than a quarter-century old. The 
disease has killed 20 million people worldwide, and it is estimated that 
40 million more are infected with HIV (human immunodeficiency virus), 
the virus that causes AIDS. 

Ask your physician where AIDS came from and he or she 
will probably tell you the epidemic started when monkeys or chimps in 
the African bush transferred the AIDS virus (HIV) to a person while 
butchering primate meat for food or through an animal bite. For the 
first two decades of the epidemic the green monkey theory of AIDS was 
widely heralded in the major media, and was accepted without question by 
leading AIDS experts and educators. The theory was so universally 
popular (except in Africa) that it easily became fact in the minds of 
most people. 


Robert Gallo, M.D., and the Green Monkey 
Theory 

The AIDS virus was first discovered by Robert Gallo at 
the National Cancer Institute in April 1984. Shortly thereafter Luc 
Montagnier of the Pasteur Institute in Paris claimed that he (and not 
Gallo) had first discovered the AIDS virus. A bitter lawsuit followed, 
which was finally settled privately in 1987 through the intervention of 
the French Premier and President Ronald Reagan. To this day, the two 
'co-discoverers' of HIV continue to disagree about the origin of HIV and 
the birthplace of AIDS. 

In Montagnier's book, Virus (2000), he states: "The 
origin of the epidemic remains a mystery, and the virus seems older than 
the epidemic" and "it is important to distinguish between the origins of 
the virus and that of the (AIDS) epidemic." 

The scientific scandal provoked by Gallo's "stealing" 
the virus from the French, as well as the ensuing government 
investigations into allegations of scientific irregularities and 
falsification of data in Gallo's lab, undoubtedly is the reason both 
scientists have never received a Nobel Prize for their discovery of HIV. 
A highly unsympathetic account of this scientific mess is provided by 
Pulitzer prize-winning author John Crewdson in, Science Fictions; A 
Scientific Mystery, A Massive Cover-Up, and the Dark Legacy of Robert 
Gallo (2002). 

Because Gallo is the most powerful and influential 
AIDS scientist, his views on the origin of HIV/AIDS have become gospel. 
He first called his AIDS virus the "human T-cell leukemia/lymphoma 
virus" because he believed it was closely related to newly discovered 
cancer-causing retroviruses. The virus was quickly renamed human T-cell 
lymphotropic virus-3 (HTLV-3), perhaps to obscure the connection of the 
AIDS virus to laboratory cancer viruses, and to downplay any association 
between cancer (which is thought to be non-contagious) and AIDS (which 
is definitely a sexually-transmitted disease). 







  
  
Cancer Bacteria in Kaposi's sarcoma. 
  Arrows point to cancer microbes magnified 1000 times in a skin 
  tumor of AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma in a 52 year-old, black, 
  bisexual man. The tissue section is stained with Giemsa stain. In 
  the insert are bacteria cultured from the KS tumor and identified 
  as Staphylococcus epidermidis (same magnification). Note how the 
  size and shape of the variably-sized round (coccus) forms of the 
  bacteria are identical in size and shape to the bacteria seen in 
  the KS cancer tumor. These bacteria in Kaposi's are similar to 
  bacteria reported in enlarged lymph nodes in AIDS, as well as in 
  other AIDS-damaged tissue. Similar bacteria have also been 
  observed and reported in other forms of cancer, such as lymphoma, 
  breast cancer, prostate cancer, and others. The finding of similar 
  bacteria in both cancer and AIDS suggest a close relationship 
  between these two diseases. Robert Gallo, M.D. says AIDS is an 
  epidemic of cancer. In the 1970s the knowledge achieved by the 
  study of cancer retroviruses helped lead to the discovery of the 
  AIDS virus in 1984. Unfortunately, the presence of "cancer 
  microbes" in cancer and AIDS has been totally ignored by the 
  medical establishment.

The Mulindwas Communication Group"With 
Yoweri Museveni, 

[Ugnet] DEBUNKING 3

2005-01-01 Thread Edward Mulindwa






Is it "conspiracy theory" to question whether a virus "closely 
related" to HIV was created in any of the many laboratories contributing to the 
Special Virus Cancer Program and its connection to biowarfare research during 
the 1970s? Could covert human testing of classified biowarfare agents explain 
the exclusive "introduction" of HIV into gay men, the most hated minority in 
America, via the government-sponsored experimental hepatitis B experiments that 
began in Manhattan in New York City in 1978 -- the year before the onset of the 
"gay plague." 


The American Origin of AIDS in 1979 

In 1979 the first young white gay men to come down with 
"gay-related immunodeficiency disease" was reported to the CDC. For the first 
year of the epidemic all the men were from Manhattan. They were all defined as 
young, predominantly white, previously healthy, well-educated and 
promiscuous. 

The Manhattan men were similar in profile to the 1,083 gay men 
who signed up for the hepatitis B experiment conducted at the New York Blood 
Center, also located in Manhattan. The experimental vaccine was developed in 
chimpanzees. The injections began in November 1978, and were concluded a year 
later. Similar vaccine experiments in gay men were undertaken in San Francisco, 
Los Angeles, Denver, St. Louis and Chicago, beginning in March 1980 and 
continued until October 1981, a few months after the epidemic had become 
"official." (For more details, google: the hepatitis B vaccine 
experiment.) 

AIDS became official in the U.S. in June 1981. At the time 
AIDS was unknown in Africa, and the epidemic did not begin there until autumn 
1982 at the earliest. After Gallo discovered HIV in April 1984, an HIV blood 
test was developed and was used on the stored gay blood specimens deposited at 
the Center as part of the ongoing experiment and follow-up. In 1980, a year 
before the epidemic became official, already 20% of the men's blood in the 
experiment were HIV-positive. By 1983, 30% of the men were positive; by 1984, 
40%. 

AIDS scientists repeatedly claim HIV was lurking in Africa for 
decades, centuries, even millennia, before the epidemic. But there was no 
"incubation period" in America. 

As soon as large numbers of gay people came out of the closet 
and signed up for government experiments, the gay community was doomed. Not only 
was one virus (HIV) "introduced" into the homosexual population, but two 
additional "mycoplasma" bacteria-like agents and a new herpes virus as well. In 
addition, I wrote in books and medical journals that "cancer-causing bacteria" 
were also operative in AIDS, but all my research linking AIDS to cancer remains 
ignored by the AIDS establishment. (For full details and 458 citations: google: 
"alan cantwell" +bacteria +AIDS.) 


"Gay Cancer": A mystery wrapped in an 
enigma 

Three years before HIV was discovered, my research uncovering 
bacteria in Kaposi's sarcoma was published. KS became widely known as the "gay 
cancer" associated with AIDS. In the late 1970s, as a dermatologist, I studied 
the cancerous tissue of three elderly, presumably straight married men with KS, 
a very rare skin cancer that few physicians had ever seen. I identified bacteria 
in the cancerous tissue; and bacteria were cultured from skin biopsies. When the 
first gay men with KS appeared in my office, I studied their skin tumors for 
bacteria. A PUBMED computer search lists 7 of my research papers published in 
medical journals between the years 1981-1986 showing bacteria in the KS lesions 
of straight and gay men with KS and AIDS, in the enlarged lymph nodes of 
"AIDS-related complex", and in two autopsy studies showing bacteria in the 
internal organs of a straight man who died of KS before the epidemic, and a gay 
man who died of KS and AIDS. 

My bacterial research showed a close relationship of AIDS to 
cancer. This research is included in my books, AIDS:The Mystery  the 
Solution (1984), and The Cancer Microbe (1990). When Gallo was asked about my KS 
research in a published interview by James D'Eramo in 1984, he ignored the 
question. When asked why only homosexuals were the first victims of AIDS, he 
replied: "Because they were exposed." To this day Gallo and Montagnier refuse to 
acknowledge any aspect of this research. 

In 1993, Shyh-Ching Lo of the Armed Forces Institute of 
Pathology reported the finding of 2 different infectious agents in the blood, 
urine and KS tumors of AIDS patients. At first, he thought the microbes were 
viruses, but later determined they were actually very small forms of bacteria 
called "mycoplasmas." After Lo's discovery, the Army quickly took out patents on 
his infectious agents, which he calls Mycoplasma fermentens and M. penetrans. My 
KS research was never mentioned in any of his papers. 
The Mulindwas Communication Group"With 
Yoweri Museveni, Uganda is in 
anarchy" 
Groupe de communication Mulindwas "avec Yoweri Museveni, l'Ouganda est dans 
l'anarchie"

[Ugnet] DEBUNKING 4

2005-01-01 Thread Edward Mulindwa






In 1994, a new infectious and sexually-transmitted herpes 
virus called "human herpes virus-8" was proclaimed to be the agent causing all 
pre-AIDS and AIDS-related KS. This virus is now widely accepted as the sole 
cause. I thought it rather strange that there was never any evidence that KS was 
transmissible before AIDS, and that a "new" virus could cause a rare cancerous 
disease that has been around since the 1870s. 

Montagnier thinks mycoplasmas might be a necessary "co-factor" 
which accelerates the progression of HIV infection in AIDS patients. He also 
believes antibiotic therapy along with antiviral therapy is better treatment for 
AIDS. Where did these new mycoplasmas come from? Where did HIV come from? 
Offering homophobic explanations and no evidence in his Virus book, the French 
virologist theorizes that American gay tourists brought back these agents from 
Africa to the U.S. 

Evidence of blood infection with the new KS human herpes 
virus-8 is now present in as many as 40% of men with prostate cancer. In Texas, 
15% of normal blood donors now test positive for the virus. This means the virus 
is in the American blood supply; and blood is not screened for the virus. Where 
did the "new" herpes virus come from? A "close relative" is the Herpes saimiri 
virus of squirrel monkeys, a virus that was extensively passed around in the 
Special Virus Cancer Program. 


Chimpanzees and the Polio Vaccine Theory of AIDS 


In 1999 the publication of The River: A Journey to the Source 
of HIV and AIDS, by journalist Edward Hooper, received widespread media 
attention. Hooper theorizes that HIV was introduced into Africans via chimp 
virus-contaminated polio vaccine programs in the late 1950s. His massive book 
does not adequately explain why it took 30 years for the epidemic to appear in 
Africa, nor how a sexually-transmitted disease in black Africans in the early 
1980s could have transformed itself into a white gay man's disease in New York 
City in the late 1970s. Furthermore, there are no HIV-positive tissue or blood 
specimens from Africa from the 1960s and 1970s, and no proven cases of AIDS 
either, to indicate HIV was "incubating" in the African population. Hooper 
quickly dismisses the claims of Robert Strecker, the first physician 
whistle-blower of man-made AIDS, as well as the man-made research in my own two 
books on the man-made origin: AIDS  The Doctors of Death, and Queer 
Blood. 

By predating his polio vaccine theory back to the late 1950s, 
Hooper greatly simplified his theory of AIDS origin. He ignores all the 
primate/simian viruses that were placed into human tissue in the 60s and 70s, 
and all those genetically altered viruses for cancer research, vaccine research, 
and secret biological warfare. 


The chimp in the freezer at Fort Detrick 

On February 1, 1999 Lawrence K Altman, M.D, longtime 
AIDS-writer for The New York Times, dutifully reported "the riddle of the origin 
of the AIDS virus has apparently been solved." A team of researchers, headed by 
Beatrice Hahn at the University of Alabama, performed viral studies on three 
chimps in the African wild and studied the frozen remains of a chimp, discovered 
by accident in a freezer at the Army's biowarfare center at Fort Detrick. The 
chimp had tested positive for HIV in 1985. On the basis of this research, Hahn 
declared that a common subspecies of chimp (Pan troglodytes troglodytes) was the 
animal source of the virus "most closely" related to HIV. In a media blitz U.S. 
government scientists presented a phylogenetic ancestral "family tree" of 
primate viruses (which few people could understand) to prove that HIV was 
genetically descended from a chimp virus in the African bush. 

Hahn theorizes the epidemic could have started when a hunter 
became infected by cutting himself while butchering chimp meat. Back in the 
1980s Hahn worked in Gallo's lab, and like Gallo she ignores the entire history 
of animal cancer virus laboratory transfers in the decades preceding AIDS, as 
well as the fact that chimp kidneys were transplanted into humans back in the 
1960s in New York City. Another big problem is that after scientists pump 
viruses into captive lab chimps in laboratories in the U.S. and Africa, they 
sometimes release them back into the wild. Obviously, the mix of lab animal 
viruses with viruses in the wild make the determination of viral "ancestry" 
somewhat iffy. 

AIDS scientists totally accepted Hahn's notion that HIV jumped 
species from chimps to humans back in the 1930s to start the epidemic. The media 
again explained this was the first time that primate viruses had jumped species 
"naturally," again failing to mention all the millions of people around the 
world who had the primate/simian SV40 virus injected into them along with their 
polio shot. 

How accurate and meaningful is the ancestry of all these 
animal retroviruses? Do words used by scientists to compare different viruses, 
such as "closely 

[Ugnet] Fwd: President's speech that undid the latest peace initiative

2005-01-01 Thread Ochan Otim


This
is vintage Museveni. Just as everything is going so well, whoops. He
yanks out the rug from underneath the peace initiative.
__
Too much foreign aid not good, says President Museveni
By Emma Mutaizibwa, Jude Lugya
 Solomon Muyita 
Jan 2,
2005 
KAMPALA — Politicians yesterday
exppressed varied feelings about President Museveni's New Year address to
the nation, with most faulting him on his hard stance toward the peace
effort in northern Uganda and failure to rein in poverty.
In his Friday night speech, Museveni ordered the Lord's Resistance Army
rebels to quit the bush or face a full-scale attack by the army.

The operations will not cease
ever again until the Kony group irreversibly commit themselves to coming
out of the bush, Museveni said.

The President's statement came as
efforts to sign a ceasefire agreement between the rebels and the
government failed, with the rebels saying they needed more time to
consult.

Museveni's speech also painted a
glittering picture of the economy, his pet subject. He said Uganda had
received about $990 million in export earnings in the last year, and the
Gross Domestic Product had grown by 6 percent.

While Forum for Democratic Change
Co-chairman Sam Njuba commended both government and the LRA on the peace
effort, he said it is a pity that [the rebels] did not turn
up to sign the ceasefire agreement. 

On the economy, Njuba said the
statistics the President trotted out were not reflective of what is on
the ground.

People are getting poorer,
he said. If Mukwano and Madhvani are doing well, not every citizen
is doing well. The money is in the hands of the few. 

Agago MP Ogenga Latigo said that the
transfer of the National Social Security Fund from the ministry of labour
to the ministry of finance was not a remedy to corruption.

Museveni transferred the NSSF to the
ministry of finance last year after top officials in NSSF were accused of
corruption.

In his address, Museveni said NSSF
will stay in finance, because that ministry has experts at managing
money.

The chairman of the UPC Presidential
Policy Commission, Dr James Rwanyarare, said Museveni's order to resume
war is disastrous.

''I don't think the President is
realistic to dictate the contents of the peace agreement without allowing
the other party to scrutinise it however weak it could be,
Rwanyarare said, making a case that rebels should have been allowed more
time to consult.

He said the President should not rush
back into fighting because the few days or months of further negotiations
are not a big price to pay.
But presidential political assistant Moses Byaruhanga does not see it
that way. ''For how long should the government extend the ceasefire
period? he said. We have played our part but it's unfortunate
that the rebels are not committed to the peace process because they don't
even make their terms clear to us.''

The President also warned against
reliance on donor aid. He said too many dollars from the donors could
stifle economic growth.
We shall accept very limited money for our budget support. We shall
even limit dollar inflows to NGO's, he said.

He said he has never liked aid,
anyway. Aid also means excessive interference in our internal
matters. It shall not be tolerated.

Added Museveni: People should
not tell us to run the country this way or that way because we don't run
other people's countries.

Ochan Otim
NB: I hope you will find time to read and sign a petition to stop
the Northern Uganda carnage at:
http://www.petitiononline.com/savacoli/petition.html

___
Ugandanet mailing list
Ugandanet@kym.net
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

[Ugnet] Fw: DEBUNKING 3

2005-01-01 Thread Edward Mulindwa








Is it "conspiracy theory" to question whether a virus "closely 
related" to HIV was created in any of the many laboratories contributing to the 
Special Virus Cancer Program and its connection to biowarfare research during 
the 1970s? Could covert human testing of classified biowarfare agents explain 
the exclusive "introduction" of HIV into gay men, the most hated minority in 
America, via the government-sponsored experimental hepatitis B experiments that 
began in Manhattan in New York City in 1978 -- the year before the onset of the 
"gay plague." 


The American Origin of AIDS in 1979 

In 1979 the first young white gay men to come down with 
"gay-related immunodeficiency disease" was reported to the CDC. For the first 
year of the epidemic all the men were from Manhattan. They were all defined as 
young, predominantly white, previously healthy, well-educated and 
promiscuous. 

The Manhattan men were similar in profile to the 1,083 gay men 
who signed up for the hepatitis B experiment conducted at the New York Blood 
Center, also located in Manhattan. The experimental vaccine was developed in 
chimpanzees. The injections began in November 1978, and were concluded a year 
later. Similar vaccine experiments in gay men were undertaken in San Francisco, 
Los Angeles, Denver, St. Louis and Chicago, beginning in March 1980 and 
continued until October 1981, a few months after the epidemic had become 
"official." (For more details, google: the hepatitis B vaccine 
experiment.) 

AIDS became official in the U.S. in June 1981. At the time 
AIDS was unknown in Africa, and the epidemic did not begin there until autumn 
1982 at the earliest. After Gallo discovered HIV in April 1984, an HIV blood 
test was developed and was used on the stored gay blood specimens deposited at 
the Center as part of the ongoing experiment and follow-up. In 1980, a year 
before the epidemic became official, already 20% of the men's blood in the 
experiment were HIV-positive. By 1983, 30% of the men were positive; by 1984, 
40%. 

AIDS scientists repeatedly claim HIV was lurking in Africa for 
decades, centuries, even millennia, before the epidemic. But there was no 
"incubation period" in America. 

As soon as large numbers of gay people came out of the closet 
and signed up for government experiments, the gay community was doomed. Not only 
was one virus (HIV) "introduced" into the homosexual population, but two 
additional "mycoplasma" bacteria-like agents and a new herpes virus as well. In 
addition, I wrote in books and medical journals that "cancer-causing bacteria" 
were also operative in AIDS, but all my research linking AIDS to cancer remains 
ignored by the AIDS establishment. (For full details and 458 citations: google: 
"alan cantwell" +bacteria +AIDS.) 


"Gay Cancer": A mystery wrapped in an 
enigma 

Three years before HIV was discovered, my research uncovering 
bacteria in Kaposi's sarcoma was published. KS became widely known as the "gay 
cancer" associated with AIDS. In the late 1970s, as a dermatologist, I studied 
the cancerous tissue of three elderly, presumably straight married men with KS, 
a very rare skin cancer that few physicians had ever seen. I identified bacteria 
in the cancerous tissue; and bacteria were cultured from skin biopsies. When the 
first gay men with KS appeared in my office, I studied their skin tumors for 
bacteria. A PUBMED computer search lists 7 of my research papers published in 
medical journals between the years 1981-1986 showing bacteria in the KS lesions 
of straight and gay men with KS and AIDS, in the enlarged lymph nodes of 
"AIDS-related complex", and in two autopsy studies showing bacteria in the 
internal organs of a straight man who died of KS before the epidemic, and a gay 
man who died of KS and AIDS. 

My bacterial research showed a close relationship of AIDS to 
cancer. This research is included in my books, AIDS:The Mystery  the 
Solution (1984), and The Cancer Microbe (1990). When Gallo was asked about my KS 
research in a published interview by James D'Eramo in 1984, he ignored the 
question. When asked why only homosexuals were the first victims of AIDS, he 
replied: "Because they were exposed." To this day Gallo and Montagnier refuse to 
acknowledge any aspect of this research. 

In 1993, Shyh-Ching Lo of the Armed Forces Institute of 
Pathology reported the finding of 2 different infectious agents in the blood, 
urine and KS tumors of AIDS patients. At first, he thought the microbes were 
viruses, but later determined they were actually very small forms of bacteria 
called "mycoplasmas." After Lo's discovery, the Army quickly took out patents on 
his infectious agents, which he calls Mycoplasma fermentens and M. penetrans. My 
KS research was never mentioned in any of his papers. 
The Mulindwas Communication Group"With 
Yoweri Museveni, Uganda is in 
anarchy" 
Groupe de communication Mulindwas "avec Yoweri Museveni, l'Ouganda est dans 
l'anarchie"

[Ugnet] Fw: DEBUNKING 4

2005-01-01 Thread Edward Mulindwa





In 1994, a new infectious and sexually-transmitted herpes 
virus called "human herpes virus-8" was proclaimed to be the agent causing all 
pre-AIDS and AIDS-related KS. This virus is now widely accepted as the sole 
cause. I thought it rather strange that there was never any evidence that KS was 
transmissible before AIDS, and that a "new" virus could cause a rare cancerous 
disease that has been around since the 1870s. 

Montagnier thinks mycoplasmas might be a necessary "co-factor" 
which accelerates the progression of HIV infection in AIDS patients. He also 
believes antibiotic therapy along with antiviral therapy is better treatment for 
AIDS. Where did these new mycoplasmas come from? Where did HIV come from? 
Offering homophobic explanations and no evidence in his Virus book, the French 
virologist theorizes that American gay tourists brought back these agents from 
Africa to the U.S. 

Evidence of blood infection with the new KS human herpes 
virus-8 is now present in as many as 40% of men with prostate cancer. In Texas, 
15% of normal blood donors now test positive for the virus. This means the virus 
is in the American blood supply; and blood is not screened for the virus. Where 
did the "new" herpes virus come from? A "close relative" is the Herpes saimiri 
virus of squirrel monkeys, a virus that was extensively passed around in the 
Special Virus Cancer Program. 


Chimpanzees and the Polio Vaccine Theory of AIDS 


In 1999 the publication of The River: A Journey to the Source 
of HIV and AIDS, by journalist Edward Hooper, received widespread media 
attention. Hooper theorizes that HIV was introduced into Africans via chimp 
virus-contaminated polio vaccine programs in the late 1950s. His massive book 
does not adequately explain why it took 30 years for the epidemic to appear in 
Africa, nor how a sexually-transmitted disease in black Africans in the early 
1980s could have transformed itself into a white gay man's disease in New York 
City in the late 1970s. Furthermore, there are no HIV-positive tissue or blood 
specimens from Africa from the 1960s and 1970s, and no proven cases of AIDS 
either, to indicate HIV was "incubating" in the African population. Hooper 
quickly dismisses the claims of Robert Strecker, the first physician 
whistle-blower of man-made AIDS, as well as the man-made research in my own two 
books on the man-made origin: AIDS  The Doctors of Death, and Queer 
Blood. 

By predating his polio vaccine theory back to the late 1950s, 
Hooper greatly simplified his theory of AIDS origin. He ignores all the 
primate/simian viruses that were placed into human tissue in the 60s and 70s, 
and all those genetically altered viruses for cancer research, vaccine research, 
and secret biological warfare. 


The chimp in the freezer at Fort Detrick 

On February 1, 1999 Lawrence K Altman, M.D, longtime 
AIDS-writer for The New York Times, dutifully reported "the riddle of the origin 
of the AIDS virus has apparently been solved." A team of researchers, headed by 
Beatrice Hahn at the University of Alabama, performed viral studies on three 
chimps in the African wild and studied the frozen remains of a chimp, discovered 
by accident in a freezer at the Army's biowarfare center at Fort Detrick. The 
chimp had tested positive for HIV in 1985. On the basis of this research, Hahn 
declared that a common subspecies of chimp (Pan troglodytes troglodytes) was the 
animal source of the virus "most closely" related to HIV. In a media blitz U.S. 
government scientists presented a phylogenetic ancestral "family tree" of 
primate viruses (which few people could understand) to prove that HIV was 
genetically descended from a chimp virus in the African bush. 

Hahn theorizes the epidemic could have started when a hunter 
became infected by cutting himself while butchering chimp meat. Back in the 
1980s Hahn worked in Gallo's lab, and like Gallo she ignores the entire history 
of animal cancer virus laboratory transfers in the decades preceding AIDS, as 
well as the fact that chimp kidneys were transplanted into humans back in the 
1960s in New York City. Another big problem is that after scientists pump 
viruses into captive lab chimps in laboratories in the U.S. and Africa, they 
sometimes release them back into the wild. Obviously, the mix of lab animal 
viruses with viruses in the wild make the determination of viral "ancestry" 
somewhat iffy. 

AIDS scientists totally accepted Hahn's notion that HIV jumped 
species from chimps to humans back in the 1930s to start the epidemic. The media 
again explained this was the first time that primate viruses had jumped species 
"naturally," again failing to mention all the millions of people around the 
world who had the primate/simian SV40 virus injected into them along with their 
polio shot. 

How accurate and meaningful is the ancestry of all these 
animal retroviruses? Do words used by scientists to compare different viruses, 
such as "closely 

[Ugnet] Kenyan Hospitality at its' Best

2005-01-01 Thread Owor Kipenji

Following the Tsunami disaster that has ravaged rural homes and whole towns in South East Asia, claiming thousands of lives, Nick Maina hopes that our government officials are "already putting together our usual tea donation for disaster victims". Nick adds: "This has always been a good humanitarian gesture on the part of Kenya to those suffering anywhere in the world. Let's do it again." 
		 How much mail storage do you get for free? Yahoo! Mail gives you 250MB! Get Yahoo! Mail___
Ugandanet mailing list
Ugandanet@kym.net
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

[Ugnet] Did You Know????

2005-01-01 Thread Owor Kipenji
That which has been believed by everyone, always and everywhere, has every chance of being false.He who considers too much will perform little.They must change who would be constant in happiness and wisdom.
Do not give in too much to feelings. A overly sensitive heart is an unhappy 
possession on this shaky earth.
I'm not a genius. I'm just a tremendous bundle of experience.
Soft words are hard arguments.Great men are not always wise.There is no sinner like a young saint.

Law is a bottomless pit.
Thinking is easy, acting is difficult, and to put one's thoughts into action is the most difficult thing in the world.The Republicans have their splits right after election and Democrats have theirs just before an election.
Setting goals for your game is an art. The trick is in setting them at the right level neither too low nor too high.
A human being is a single being. Unique and unrepeatable.
What ever purifies the heart also fortifies it.Cured yesterday of my disease, I died last night of my physician.Unbridled gratification produces unbridled desire. That's the way things come clear. All of a sudden. And then you realize how obvious they've been all along. 
		Does your mail provider give you a FREE online calendar? Yahoo! does. Get Yahoo! Mail___
Ugandanet mailing list
Ugandanet@kym.net
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

[Ugnet] THE ANARCHY KAGAME AND MUSEVENI HAVE BUILT IN GREAT LAKES

2005-01-01 Thread Edward Mulindwa



From: Edward Mulindwa 

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; rwanda ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; Congo ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; CameroonNet ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2005 10:31 PM
Subject: THE ANARCHY KAGAME AND MUSEVENI HAVE BUILT IN GREAT 
LAKES


Netters
There 
are some very serious issues that we as human beings must address, this is on 
top of the line. Yes I know the people I am talking about are all Hutus and I am 
not going to play games here so I am going to cut the crap. We all as residents 
of Great Lakes must raise up and oppose these human right violations, because 
common sense which is no longer common here demands so. Look in these people's 
eyes, how can you as a Tutsi sleep well tonight? Yes that is a direct question 
and I demand an answer for tomorrow it will be you, or your 
wife/husband/kid/sister/son.
Something is wrong here and 
very wrong and we as human beings must publicly state so and on top of our 
voices. Hutus have a right to live in great lakes if not let us state so and we 
can deport all of them out of great lakes. For I am sick and tired to see this 
fucking crap on my screen day after day. And before you tell me these are not 
Hutus list me the names of Tutsis you know who are raped in 2004/5. This is 
exactly what is happening in Northern Uganda, a problem we complained about in 
the early 80's and we were told, Ffe kasita Twebaka, to today 2005 The 
population is under attack. How dare you sleep in peace with your heart? Explain 
that !!!
EM
Auckland
Congo militiamen 
wreak havoc with rape as a weaponBy David Blair in Goma
Every agonising movement sends a tremor through Vumiliya 
Tembeyaona's body. She winces while walking a few steps, making the deep lines 
of pain etched on her face seem deeper still.
She is the victim of a crime that occurs every day in the 
Democratic Republic of Congo, where the world's deadliest war rages in the 
rainforests of central Africa.

  
  

  
  

  Civilians in Congo live in constant fear of the militia groups, 
  which carry out atrocities almost daily
Miss Tembeyaona, 23, was gang-raped by 15 soldiers. Afterwards, 
they mutilated her and left her bleeding beside a jungle track. She suffered 
injuries that six corrective operations have failed to heal.
She lives in Docs Hospital in the town of Goma in eastern Congo, 
surrounded by 125 other women who have suffered rape and often mutilation. All 
escaped from Congo's lawless forests, where countless militiamen prey on 
terrified villagers.
"I was taken while going to Birava village to sell beans," said 
Miss Tembeyaona. "The soldiers stopped me on the road.
"They had guns and knives. I don't know which group they were 
from. They were just in uniform."
She was captured with two other villagers who were walking to 
market: a man of about 20 and his 18-year-old sister. The soldiers turned on the 
siblings first, holding knives to their throats.
"They ordered the man to rape his sister," said Miss Tembeyaona. 
"When he refused, they killed him with their knives."
After being forced to watch her brother's death, the girl was 
mutilated.
Then the gang turned on Miss Tembeyaona. She was thrown to the 
ground and pinned down beside the bodies of the murdered siblings. Each of the 
15 men raped her. Afterwards, one stood over her and drew his knife.
"He made me suffer with a knife in the womb", she said.
Miss Tembeyaona was left unconscious. Passers-by took her to a 
local clinic and she eventually reached Docs Hospital. After enduring six 
operations, the last in November, she still suffers incontinence and 
bleeding.
The Congo has descended into a Hobbesian state of nature in which 
the strong prey upon the weak.
Beyond a few enclaves of order, established in Goma and a handful 
of other towns by 11,000 United Nations peacekeepers, anarchy reigns and the 
only law grows from the barrel of a gun.
On paper, the killing should have stopped when a peace agreement 
was signed two years ago.
This deal came after Rwanda and Uganda started the war in August 
1998 by invading their giant neighbour. They claimed to be hunting down rebels 
responsible for the genocide of 800,000 Rwandan Tutsis in 1994.
But the war dragged in five other countries and escalated into 
Africa's largest conflict. A survey by the International Rescue Committee, a New 
York-based relief agency, found that 3.8 million people have died, the highest 
toll claimed by any conflict since the Second World War.
War-induced starvation and disease were the biggest killers.
Rwanda still launches regular strikes into eastern Congo, the 
latest last week. The other foreign armies have withdrawn, but each left behind 
a motley collection of militia groups.
These armed gangs continue to inflict misery on the innocent, 
waging a war that long ago lost any pretence of purpose.
Dr Kalume Mushabaa, 39, and two other surgeons specialise in 
corrective fistula operations for the victims of rape.

[Ugnet] War resumes

2005-01-01 Thread Matek Opoko
War resumes By Frank Nyakairu Jan 2, 2005 



Kony ambushes army as talks collapse
GULU —Things seem to be falling apart in northern Uganda once again, with the rebels injuring four UPDF soldiers in a morning ambush in Gulu yesterday. 
One soldier is missing in action.
The rebels ambushed and burnt up a UPDF pick-up truck on its way from Gulu to Alero. The truck, which was hit using a rocket-propelled grenade at 9:30 a.m., was loaded with meat for soldiers in Alero to feast on as part of their New Year's Day celebrations.
"This shows their New Year resolution," Lt. Paddy Ankunda, the army's spokesman in northern Uganda, said of the Lord's Resistance Army rebels.Alero is 16km outside Gulu town.
The ambush came as the government announced a resumption of its campaign against the rebels following the failure to sign a ceasefire agreement on Friday. 
"We have begun operations today [Saturday] at 7 a.m.," defence and military spokesman Shaban Bantariza told Sunday Monitor earlier yesterday before news of the ambush broke.
The government and the LRA rebels failed to sign a ceasefire deal on Friday, the day when the government's latest period of unilateral cessation of hostilities was slated to expire. The rebels said they were still consulting amongst themselves, although Maj. Bantariza said the failure was because of "disagreements among [the rebels.]" Had the ceasefire agreement been signed, it would have been a landmark step toward ending the brutal 18-year rebellion in north-central Uganda. President Museveni had warned in his New Year national address that failure to sign the deal by the rebels would lead to a resumption of the UPDF campaign within hours. 
It now happens that Kony took to the President;s message seriously and swung into action before the UPDF.
"If Kony's group do not irreversibly commit themselves to coming out of the bush by the 31st of December 2004, then UPDF will start full-scale operations, beginning 0700 hours, the 1st of January 2005," the President said in his written address.
The cessation of hostilities deal had been reached during meetings between the government team led by Internal Affairs Minister Ruhakana Rugunda and the LRA team led by rebel publicist Sam Kolo on Wednesday in Paloda, Palabek ceasefire zone in Kitgum district. 
The government says the talks can continue but from "abroad not in Uganda not in southern Sudan".
A source close to the peace process said yesterday that "the spirit of negotiations is still high", though Dr Rugunda was returning to Kampala from Kitgum, where he had been since Tuesday. 
© 2005 The Monitor Publications.__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___
Ugandanet mailing list
Ugandanet@kym.net
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

[Ugnet] Middle of the line or Yellow line middle of the road politics will not help UK interest in Uganda..preiod

2005-01-01 Thread Matek Opoko
presidential term limits.
This "yellow of line Middle of the road politics" conducted the British in Uganda, will not serve British interest. The Brits are advised to take a position now. 
You are either with Museveni against the people of Uganda or you are with Ugandans and against Military dictatorship in what ever form or shape.
Talking like a double mouth/headed snake is simple wasting the time of the people of Uganda.

Opoko Matek

UK wants fair politics By Ibrahim Kasita Jan 2, 2005 





KAMPALA - The United Kingdom, like other development partners, has no position on Uganda’s presidential term limits.
It is however concerned that in the process of taking decisions on this issue and other aspects of political transition, legitimacy should be the catch word - both on the local and international scene.
In a statement issued Friday by High Commissioner Adam Wood, he said they would monitor Uganda’s political transition to ensure that there are rules for multi party competition.
He said Uganda’s continued stability would depend on having a legitimate process of political and constitutional change. He said proof of UK’s position was the pegging of its budgetary support to reforms - as detailed in the Poverty Eradication Action Plan (PEAP), including macro-economic management and governance.
“Britain remains keen to support Uganda’s continued development and progress in reducing poverty. The High Commissioner signed a new budget support arrangement this month for a grant of up to £145 million over the next 3-years to support implementation of the Poverty PEAP,” he said. Mr Wood also called for separation of the organs of state from the Movement in law and practice.

© 2005 The Monitor Publications.__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___
Ugandanet mailing list
Ugandanet@kym.net
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

RE: [Ugnet] War resumes

2005-01-01 Thread Y Yaobang

What peace jokes! We knew all along that dictator Museveni was not committed to the talks. 
yFrom: Matek Opoko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: ugandanet@kym.net
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], ugandanet@kym.net
Subject: [Ugnet] War resumes
Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 20:56:46 -0800 (PST)

War resumes
By Frank Nyakairu
Jan 2, 2005

Kony ambushes army as talks collapse

GULU —Things seem to be falling apart in northern Uganda once again, with the rebels injuring four UPDF soldiers in a morning ambush in Gulu yesterday.

One soldier is missing in action.

The rebels ambushed and burnt up a UPDF pick-up truck on its way from Gulu to Alero. The truck, which was hit using a rocket-propelled grenade at 9:30 a.m., was loaded with meat for soldiers in Alero to feast on as part of their New Year's Day celebrations.

"This shows their New Year resolution," Lt. Paddy Ankunda, the army's spokesman in northern Uganda, said of the Lord's Resistance Army rebels.
Alero is 16km outside Gulu town.

The ambush came as the government announced a resumption of its campaign against the rebels following the failure to sign a ceasefire agreement on Friday.

"We have begun operations today [Saturday] at 7 a.m.," defence and military spokesman Shaban Bantariza told Sunday Monitor earlier yesterday before news of the ambush broke.

The government and the LRA rebels failed to sign a ceasefire deal on Friday, the day when the government's latest period of unilateral cessation of hostilities was slated to expire. The rebels said they were still consulting amongst themselves, although Maj. Bantariza said the failure was because of "disagreements among [the rebels.]"

Had the ceasefire agreement been signed, it would have been a landmark step toward ending the brutal 18-year rebellion in north-central Uganda.
President Museveni had warned in his New Year national address that failure to sign the deal by the rebels would lead to a resumption of the UPDF campaign within hours.

It now happens that Kony took to the President;s message seriously and swung into action before the UPDF.

"If Kony's group do not irreversibly commit themselves to coming out of the bush by the 31st of December 2004, then UPDF will start full-scale operations, beginning 0700 hours, the 1st of January 2005," the President said in his written address.

The cessation of hostilities deal had been reached during meetings between the government team led by Internal Affairs Minister Ruhakana Rugunda and the LRA team led by rebel publicist Sam Kolo on Wednesday in Paloda, Palabek ceasefire zone in Kitgum district.

The government says the talks can continue but from "abroad not in Uganda not in southern Sudan".

A source close to the peace process said yesterday that "the spirit of negotiations is still high", though Dr Rugunda was returning to Kampala from Kitgum, where he had been since Tuesday.



© 2005 The Monitor Publications.


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
___
Ugandanet mailing list
Ugandanet@kym.net
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! MSN Messenger Download today it's FREE!

___
Ugandanet mailing list
Ugandanet@kym.net
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/