[libreoffice-users] Re: spadmin fails to run
On 08/26/2012 08:39 PM, rcdawson wrote: Hi, In order to change the default printer language I attempted to run spadmin. Logged in as root, I located the directory containing spadmin and issued the command +./spadmin. The result was to return four lines, each reading No protocol specified. I am running Linux Mint 13 with KDE. Where can I learn more about how to use this command? I have a version of Linux Mint 12 with Mate (except that I'm running enlightenment mostly), with the following versions of LibreOffice : /home/alex/LODEV/core/padmin/Executable_spadmin.bin.mk /home/alex/LODEV/core/padmin/source/spadmin.sh The above two are files from my LO development git tree. /opt/libreoffice3.5/program/spadmin /opt/libreoffice3.5/program/spadmin.bin /opt/libreoffice3.6/program/spadmin /opt/libreoffice3.6/program/spadmin.bin /opt/lodev3.6/program/spadmin /opt/lodev3.6/program/spadmin.bin These 6 entries all correspond to daily, or development, builds of LibreOffice downloaded from the LibreOffice web site. /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/spadmin.bin /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/spadmin /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/spadmin.bin The above 3 entries represent the version of LO provided with Mint or via the Ubuntu PPA repositories. You should preferably use the full path to spadmin in order to get it to run. I don't need to be root though, for me, it runs just fine from a Terminal as a normal user and I don't need to put the dot in front of the script name. Alex -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] Re: Rel. 3.6.1 and Norton AntiVirus
Am 30.08.2012 02:21, Dan wrote: To make sure I understand: Norton deletes the LO 3.6.1 download file? Otherwise, you should not have Norton running when you install the upgrade; you should not be physically connected to the Internet either. Disconnect from Internet, turn off anti-virus program, install LO update, turn on anti-virus program. ONLY WHEN AV IS RUNNING should you reconnect to the Internet. --Dan And you do the above steps only if you are very sure that you downloaded and verified the download from libreoffice.org/download . You find the md5 hash to verifiy your download when you click the Info link besides the Torrent link on libreoffice.org/download. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: 3.6 Calc Problem / ~lock
Hi :) Ok, 2 scenarios. 1. A desperately slow machine (probably Windows). Double-clicking a file doesn't seem to open it, not entirely convinced it was a proper double-click so double-click again. At last it opens and you make a lot of changes, and go off to grab a cuppa tea. back at the computer you are not sure if you saved the document and even tho your fairly sure you closed it it still seems to be open so you save again and quit. Later you open the document to find NONE of your changes have been saved. Why? 2. On a swift machine with multiple workspaces you want 2 copies of the file open, one to edit and the other on a different workspace to copy info from or as a look-up source. After a ton of editing you get a phone call and switch workspaces to look-up stuff from various open files to deal with the call. A few distractions later and you get back to the machine and save and close the open document and shut-down the machine. Next day you find NONE of your edits were saved. Why? I'm sure you can imagine a ton of situations where something could easily occur in your own place where you might not be 100% focused and infallible on an infallible machine. Regards from Tom :) --- On Thu, 30/8/12, anne-ology lagin...@gmail.com wrote: From: anne-ology lagin...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: 3.6 Calc Problem / ~lock To: MiguelAngel mari...@miguelangel.mobi Cc: users@global.libreoffice.org Date: Thursday, 30 August, 2012, 3:17 Huh ??? Well, (1) these ~lock files do appear when the file is open - that's what's frustrating; when it begins to slow down, I check discover this inane file has appeared. (2) I do NOT understand why I should place the file away from the computer's HD before its completed?; once completed I copy it to an external HD, but still retain it on the computer's HD. (3) I do NOT understand why I, the sole user of this machine, would not have access to do whatever I wish with this machine ;-) and the more these machines change, the more I think I should pitch them out the window and return to the 'horse buggy' era ;-) A bug or not a bug ... a bug by any other name would be the same ... which reminds me of these silly acronyms - there were wasps - still are - flitting around the woods ... then there were WASPs following the AAC in WWII ... then there were WASPs - according to the '60s media - along with other groups back-then. [and that's just 1 example of how acronyms can become confusing ;-)] On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 7:05 PM, MiguelAngel mari...@miguelangel.mobiwrote: Asunto: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: 3.6 Calc Problem / ~lock Fecha: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:23:17 -0500 De: anne-ology lagin...@gmail.com A: Tom tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk CC: Steve steve.edmo...@ptglobal.com, users@global.libreoffice.org Thanks for your response - unfortunately, it does NOT go away; sometimes, I've found several of these ~lock files ;-( --**-- I've only seen this issue when the file is not closed properly. For example remove the memory stick with files opened. A program crash. Or maybe do not have rights to delete in that directory. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Rel. 3.6.1 and Norton AntiVirus
Hi :) I vaguely remember Norton updated their virus-definitions on Thursdays so i would schedule a look-for-updates for Fridays. Of course MS do their updates on Tuesdays (=Patch Tuesday) so Norton/Symantec might have changed in the last decade or so. Of course if either find a particularly nasty problem then they do sometimes push patches or whatever out on a different day but it's fairly rare. Of course an ISP might delay updates for a day or 2 so your machine might regularly get them a day or few later but i think by being regular MS and others have given ISPs a chance of knowing when they might get spikes so that those can be planned for easily. I still don't get why Windows doesn't have a package-manager that just updates everything all in one go instead of each different program being forced to set-up it's own separate method of keeping things up to date. Also i never had/have confidence in any machine having fully updated drivers and codecs and everything. Windows appears to be carefully built to be insecure. Regards from Tom :) --- On Thu, 30/8/12, Dan elderdanle...@gmail.com wrote: From: Dan elderdanle...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Rel. 3.6.1 and Norton AntiVirus To: users@global.libreoffice.org Date: Thursday, 30 August, 2012, 3:14 webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: On 08/29/2012 08:21 PM, Dan wrote: Jeff Hahn wrote: When I try to upgrade from 3.6.0 to 3.6.1 the Norton AntiVirus program keeps deleting the upgrade as an unsafe virus. This is the first release that I have had this type of problem with. Jeff To make sure I understand: Norton deletes the LO 3.6.1 download file? Otherwise, you should not have Norton running when you install the upgrade; you should not be physically connected to the Internet either. Disconnect from Internet, turn off anti-virus program, install LO update, turn on anti-virus program. ONLY WHEN AV IS RUNNING should you reconnect to the Internet. --Dan This is not the first time I have heard of Norton stating valid install files were viruses or other nasties. I never had any good luck with Norton's AV, so I use the free version of Comodo product[s] for my Windows machines. I have hooked even PC repair and selling pro's to using it. As for not having AV running when not online, well that is not what I would tell people. An anti-virus is needed if you are offline and suddenly there is a trojan or other nasty kicking in and doing a number. They can be picked up and not cleaned in a few ways other than being online. I have my Ubuntu system picking up new things from files that I have had on my system for months and suddenly it detects something the AV system does not like. If I did not have the AV system on 24/7, then those issues might not have been picked up. The real thing is that the AV systems update their data systems, mostly, after a new nasty has been detected. If your system has that nasty on it before that nasty has been added to your AV data system, then you will need to have the other parts of the AV and security system[s] on to detect the traces of it trying to work. SO do not turn your computer security off. I have had to deal with too many systems from friends and clients where they did not have their security on 24/7 and kept up-to-date. Had one system that the AV was on but not updated in over 2 years and the guy lost a lot. Perhaps I was not as clear as I should have been. I listed 5 steps that have been posted on lists like these when installing OOo. Programs like Norton will give false positives that prevent installation of a program. So, the AV program needs to be off when the installation is being done. However, the AV program should NOT be turned off until AFTER the computer is physically disconnected from the Internet. The installation should be done immediately after turning off the AV. The AV should be turned on again right after finishing the installation. At this point, verification that the AV is actually working is the next step. If it is not, steps have to be taken to get the AV working properly before doing anything else. Once this is done, reconnect to the Internet. My point was that the computer should not be connected to the Internet until AFTER the person knows that the AV is already working. Yes, anyone using an AV should weekly update it, sooner if there is a notice of an update because of a patch that is needed. --Dan -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems?
Re: [libreoffice-users] Rel. 3.6.1 and Norton AntiVirus
Hi :) Norton used to be completely awesome. Everything they did was totally amazing and extremely useful. Then they became corporate and serious. Nowadays i use AVG or something else but still when a threat is publicised as being particularly nasty and i suspect one of the machines i deal with might have fallen foul of it i still find Symantec a good place to research into it. One of the first jobs of a threat is to knock-out or dodge all known security so any of the big and famous antivirus' is likely to useless against any decent threat. Luckily most threats are fairly trivial so even the big and famous antivirus programs can probably deal with it. If it's non-trivial then there is always the option to nuke your Bios and reinstall your OS. Still now that AVG is so famous i'm starting to consider other options. Regards from Tom :) --- On Thu, 30/8/12, webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote: From: webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Rel. 3.6.1 and Norton AntiVirus To: users@global.libreoffice.org Date: Thursday, 30 August, 2012, 2:27 On 08/29/2012 08:21 PM, Dan wrote: Jeff Hahn wrote: When I try to upgrade from 3.6.0 to 3.6.1 the Norton AntiVirus program keeps deleting the upgrade as an unsafe virus. This is the first release that I have had this type of problem with. Jeff To make sure I understand: Norton deletes the LO 3.6.1 download file? Otherwise, you should not have Norton running when you install the upgrade; you should not be physically connected to the Internet either. Disconnect from Internet, turn off anti-virus program, install LO update, turn on anti-virus program. ONLY WHEN AV IS RUNNING should you reconnect to the Internet. --Dan This is not the first time I have heard of Norton stating valid install files were viruses or other nasties. I never had any good luck with Norton's AV, so I use the free version of Comodo product[s] for my Windows machines. I have hooked even PC repair and selling pro's to using it. As for not having AV running when not online, well that is not what I would tell people. An anti-virus is needed if you are offline and suddenly there is a trojan or other nasty kicking in and doing a number. They can be picked up and not cleaned in a few ways other than being online. I have my Ubuntu system picking up new things from files that I have had on my system for months and suddenly it detects something the AV system does not like. If I did not have the AV system on 24/7, then those issues might not have been picked up. The real thing is that the AV systems update their data systems, mostly, after a new nasty has been detected. If your system has that nasty on it before that nasty has been added to your AV data system, then you will need to have the other parts of the AV and security system[s] on to detect the traces of it trying to work. SO do not turn your computer security off. I have had to deal with too many systems from friends and clients where they did not have their security on 24/7 and kept up-to-date. Had one system that the AV was on but not updated in over 2 years and the guy lost a lot. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Update to 3.6.1
Hi :) Ahh, yes, most of the guide is about making sure none of the quick-starter or any other back-ground process is running. The only problem with multiple versions is nothing to do with the actual install itself, it's about running them at the same time as that 'cant' be done yet afaik. It's interesting to hear that possibly pre-3.5.x can be run at the same time as a 3.5.x or later. I wonder if a AOO can be run at the same time as a 3.5.x or later too? Regards from Tom :) --- On Thu, 30/8/12, Dan elderdanle...@gmail.com wrote: From: Dan elderdanle...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Update to 3.6.1 To: users@global.libreoffice.org Date: Thursday, 30 August, 2012, 1:06 Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) This guide might help if you want to run a few versions of LO and/or AOO alongside each other http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Installing_in_parallel Regards from Tom :) This may also be a Windows problem. My tower uses Ubuntu 11.10 (64 bit). Right now I have LO 3.4.6, 3.5.6, 3.6.1, AND AOO 3.4.1. Side note: If I want to run say 3.6.1 and 3.6.2 installing in parallel might be a good idea. I have found that I can not run 3.5.6 and 3.6.1 at the same time. Yet I can run either one of them with LO 3.4.6 or AOO 3.4.1. So I can have three different soffice instances running at the same time as long as two of them are 3.5 and 3.6. This is true even when I use these two: /opt/libreoffice3.6/program/soffice /opt/libreoffice3.5/program/soffice --Dan --- On Wed, 29/8/12, Andreas Säger ville...@t-online.de wrote: From: Andreas Säger ville...@t-online.de Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Update to 3.6.1 To: users@global.libreoffice.org Date: Wednesday, 29 August, 2012, 19:05 Am 29.08.2012 18:55, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: On 29/08/12 16:03, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: I've just updated to LibO 3.6.1 and hit the following problem when trying to access my address book Does anyone recognise it, Google doesn't? ___ The attempt to load the file resulted in the following error message (com.sun.star.lang.IllegalArgumentException): Unsupported URL file:///home/phb//AddressBook.ods ___ Ubuntu 12.04 64 bit Java 1.7_06 (and 05) All was well with LibO 3.6.0 and Java 1.7_05 just prior to the upgrade, carried out by complete removal of 3.6.0 via Synaptic and clean installation of the real product, downloaded from the LibreOffice web site via dpkg -iR Interestingly everything is fine on a 32 bit installation! Hi, Since many years I use to update my office suites without removal. All major versions (OOo 1 and 2, LibO and OOo 3) are separate applications with separated profile folders anyway. Any problems (if any) are related to the user profile which can be reset by renaming a folder. Within the profile issues, the installed extensions are the major culprit (but not the ones I use to have installed). So I extract the downloaded archive, change to the extracted directory/DEBS and run sudo dpkg -i *.deb If I want that version to be the default program with menu and everything I change to the desktop-integration subdirectory and install that package too. If I do not want that version to be the default program I add a couple of my own desktop links to the respective executables. There were times when I had OOo 1.1.5, 2.4.3, 3.4beta, LibO 3.3 and 3.5.x installed in parallel without any problem. Problems that come up quite frequently on this list are not the normal case. It is designed to be update out of the box, particularly on Linux. Just my 2 Cents, A.S. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Update to 3.6.1
Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) Ahh, yes, most of the guide is about making sure none of the quick-starter or any other back-ground process is running. The only problem with multiple versions is nothing to do with the actual install itself, it's about running them at the same time as that 'cant' be done yet afaik. It's interesting to hear that possibly pre-3.5.x can be run at the same time as a 3.5.x or later. I wonder if a AOO can be run at the same time as a 3.5.x or later too? Regards from Tom :) I do all the time. --Dan --- On *Thu, 30/8/12, Dan /elderdanle...@gmail.com/* wrote: From: Dan elderdanle...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Update to 3.6.1 To: users@global.libreoffice.org Date: Thursday, 30 August, 2012, 1:06 Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) This guide might help if you want to run a few versions of LO and/or AOO alongside each other http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Installing_in_parallel Regards from Tom :) This may also be a Windows problem. My tower uses Ubuntu 11.10 (64 bit). Right now I have LO 3.4.6, 3.5.6, 3.6.1, AND AOO 3.4.1. Side note: If I want to run say 3.6.1 and 3.6.2 installing in parallel might be a good idea. I have found that I can not run 3.5.6 and 3.6.1 at the same time. Yet I can run either one of them with LO 3.4.6 or AOO 3.4.1. So I can have three different soffice instances running at the same time as long as two of them are 3.5 and 3.6. This is true even when I use these two: /opt/libreoffice3.6/program/soffice /opt/libreoffice3.5/program/soffice --Dan --- On Wed, 29/8/12, Andreas Säger ville...@t-online.de /mc/compose?to=ville...@t-online.de wrote: From: Andreas Säger ville...@t-online.de /mc/compose?to=ville...@t-online.de Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Update to 3.6.1 To: users@global.libreoffice.org /mc/compose?to=users@global.libreoffice.org Date: Wednesday, 29 August, 2012, 19:05 Am 29.08.2012 18:55, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: On 29/08/12 16:03, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: I've just updated to LibO 3.6.1 and hit the following problem when trying to access my address book Does anyone recognise it, Google doesn't? ___ The attempt to load the file resulted in the following error message (com.sun.star.lang.IllegalArgumentException): Unsupported URL file:///home/phb//AddressBook.ods ___ Ubuntu 12.04 64 bit Java 1.7_06 (and 05) All was well with LibO 3.6.0 and Java 1.7_05 just prior to the upgrade, carried out by complete removal of 3.6.0 via Synaptic and clean installation of the real product, downloaded from the LibreOffice web site via dpkg -iR Interestingly everything is fine on a 32 bit installation! Hi, Since many years I use to update my office suites without removal. All major versions (OOo 1 and 2, LibO and OOo 3) are separate applications with separated profile folders anyway. Any problems (if any) are related to the user profile which can be reset by renaming a folder. Within the profile issues, the installed extensions are the major culprit (but not the ones I use to have installed). So I extract the downloaded archive, change to the extracted directory/DEBS and run sudo dpkg -i *.deb If I want that version to be the default program with menu and everything I change to the desktop-integration subdirectory and install that package too. If I do not want that version to be the default program I add a couple of my own desktop links to the respective executables. There were times when I had OOo 1.1.5, 2.4.3, 3.4beta, LibO 3.3 and 3.5.x installed in parallel without any problem. Problems that come up quite frequently on this list are not the normal case. It is designed to be update out of the box, particularly on Linux. Just my 2 Cents, A.S. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org /mc/compose?to=h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org /mc/compose?to=h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems?
[libreoffice-users] Re: Extension to publish Blog posts direct from Writer?
On 14/08/12 14:07, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote: Is there one, or is there a function within Writer to do that? (LO 3.5.6.2) Found it eventually. http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/project/swp -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice installed by default on recycled computers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/29/2012 03:29 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: 1] Haitian Creole - Kreyòl Ayisyen - Korektè Òtograf Kreyòl (KÒK) The file [...]is a part of the NA-DVD I noticed, however it is outdated :( That extension seemed abandoned until I got in touch with its main dev - I am trying to get him to list it on the official LibO site, update it, etc. I didn't distribute many copies of the NA-DVD as it was in English and contained too many files that were not directly relevant. I am thinking how I can contribute to improve this. 2] Good Job - going to Haiti to help out over there. Thanks! It's really easy to work there as free software in general is highly compatible with values they already have: sharing, helping, improving, re-sharing, etc. [..] Cheers, - -- Fabián Rodríguez http://libreoffice.magicfab.ca -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: PGP/Mime available upon request Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlA/UhQACgkQfUcTXFrypNWJTQCgr4XlY7B4SBBS+HPa95owyIDC 5ygAmwVrWb2fm4ylMKe7216o5HbvbIer =B+2G -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] Re: Find and replace graphics
Hey Tom! Thanks for that dirty trick! :-) But unfortunately it didn't work. I made a http://i47.tinypic.com/2ldimig.png screenshot of the contents of the zip-file. The images remain even after deleting the Thumbnails folder and a folder named imagesin the Configurations2 directory. This http://i49.tinypic.com/6e3ouu.png screenshot here shows what I'm trying to get rid of: the pesky arrow images. Thanks in advance! timecode PS: Am I able to answer via mail or do I have to post in the forum? -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Find-and-replace-graphics-tp4004270p4004490.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Rel. 3.6.1 and Norton AntiVirus
On 08/30/2012 04:39 AM, Andreas Säger wrote: Am 30.08.2012 02:21, Dan wrote: To make sure I understand: Norton deletes the LO 3.6.1 download file? Otherwise, you should not have Norton running when you install the upgrade; you should not be physically connected to the Internet either. Disconnect from Internet, turn off anti-virus program, install LO update, turn on anti-virus program. ONLY WHEN AV IS RUNNING should you reconnect to the Internet. --Dan And you do the above steps only if you are very sure that you downloaded and verified the download from libreoffice.org/download . You find the md5 hash to verifiy your download when you click the Info link besides the Torrent link on libreoffice.org/download. Are you saying projects like the NA-DVD might have a modified version of LO hiding something that should not be there? Yes, going to the main download site should be the default, but having local/regional projects where you can get LO is important. I think if you state that the only place for users to get LO is from the download site, then there might be some problems with distribution CDs/DVDs that are also listed on the download pages. If you hand out these media to people, but they are told that the only place that it is safe to get the packages is from the official download web site, then there might not be any trust in the localized projects. Hopefully this is not what you are saying. Since I do not know how to create a md5-hash for my installation files on the NA-DVD project web page and physical media, I cannot offer that. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Rel. 3.6.1 and Norton AntiVirus
I use the free versions of Comodo. They have free [and paid] anti-virus and full security packages that include firewalls. I use to use the free AVG, but then I had to add a separate firewall package, like Zonealarm. Now I use only Comodo's free package that has both types of security. Of course, that is to say that I use Comodo only on my Windows systems. When I only used Windows systems, I maintained a list of free options for packages. This link starts the section on security software. I do not update it [much] anymore, but the list does have some good options. http://www.lungstrom.com/list/#thisvirus . On 08/30/2012 06:13 AM, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) Norton used to be completely awesome. Everything they did was totally amazing and extremely useful. Then they became corporate and serious. Nowadays i use AVG or something else but still when a threat is publicised as being particularly nasty and i suspect one of the machines i deal with might have fallen foul of it i still find Symantec a good place to research into it. One of the first jobs of a threat is to knock-out or dodge all known security so any of the big and famous antivirus' is likely to useless against any decent threat. Luckily most threats are fairly trivial so even the big and famous antivirus programs can probably deal with it. If it's non-trivial then there is always the option to nuke your Bios and reinstall your OS. Still now that AVG is so famous i'm starting to consider other options. Regards from Tom :) --- On Thu, 30/8/12, webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote: From: webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Rel. 3.6.1 and Norton AntiVirus To: users@global.libreoffice.org Date: Thursday, 30 August, 2012, 2:27 On 08/29/2012 08:21 PM, Dan wrote: Jeff Hahn wrote: When I try to upgrade from 3.6.0 to 3.6.1 the Norton AntiVirus program keeps deleting the upgrade as an unsafe virus. This is the first release that I have had this type of problem with. Jeff To make sure I understand: Norton deletes the LO 3.6.1 download file? Otherwise, you should not have Norton running when you install the upgrade; you should not be physically connected to the Internet either. Disconnect from Internet, turn off anti-virus program, install LO update, turn on anti-virus program. ONLY WHEN AV IS RUNNING should you reconnect to the Internet. --Dan This is not the first time I have heard of Norton stating valid install files were viruses or other nasties. I never had any good luck with Norton's AV, so I use the free version of Comodo product[s] for my Windows machines. I have hooked even PC repair and selling pro's to using it. As for not having AV running when not online, well that is not what I would tell people. An anti-virus is needed if you are offline and suddenly there is a trojan or other nasty kicking in and doing a number. They can be picked up and not cleaned in a few ways other than being online. I have my Ubuntu system picking up new things from files that I have had on my system for months and suddenly it detects something the AV system does not like. If I did not have the AV system on 24/7, then those issues might not have been picked up. The real thing is that the AV systems update their data systems, mostly, after a new nasty has been detected. If your system has that nasty on it before that nasty has been added to your AV data system, then you will need to have the other parts of the AV and security system[s] on to detect the traces of it trying to work. SO do not turn your computer security off. I have had to deal with too many systems from friends and clients where they did not have their security on 24/7 and kept up-to-date. Had one system that the AV was on but not updated in over 2 years and the guy lost a lot. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice installed by default on recycled computers
On 08/30/2012 07:44 AM, Fabian Rodriguez wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/29/2012 03:29 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: 1] Haitian Creole - Kreyòl Ayisyen - Korektè Òtograf Kreyòl (KÒK) The file [...]is a part of the NA-DVD I noticed, however it is outdated :( That extension seemed abandoned until I got in touch with its main dev - I am trying to get him to list it on the official LibO site, update it, etc. I didn't distribute many copies of the NA-DVD as it was in English and contained too many files that were not directly relevant. I am thinking how I can contribute to improve this. How about having students in Haiti work on it? I took the basic info in the English dictionary and made it my own with taking the original word list and replacing it with one that had many, many more words in it. The local students could do the same. They could build a current spelling word list and build their own dictionary extension. As for the NA-DVD distro, I have no problems with people taking it and using it as the starting point for creating their own version. Take out the parts not needed and adding those that are. I have been told that other groups have done that over the past year or so since the NA-DVD has been online. . 2] Good Job - going to Haiti to help out over there. Thanks! It's really easy to work there as free software in general is highly compatible with values they already have: sharing, helping, improving, re-sharing, etc. [..] Cheers, - -- Fabián Rodríguez http://libreoffice.magicfab.ca -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Rel. 3.6.1 and Norton AntiVirus
Hi :) It is always possible that different locations end-up with a non-standard version of LO. Part of the ethos of OpenSource is that people can make changes. If they don't send their change in to the main development process here then they miss the chance to push their changes through a decent QA and the beta-testing that happens on millions of real-world machines around the world. However, corporate organisations might want to do things like getting their logo and branding in their on the versions their staff uses. Magazines might want to bundle LO in different ways or whatnot. So even though you might end up with a non-standard version the changes might well be trivial and even beneficial. However none of that is the problem that was alluded to. Most sources of non-standard downloads will give their own md5sum and/or Sha to deal with the main problem. The issue alluded to is that accidents might happen during download or copying and Cds/Dvds might end-up with scratches or smudges while still appearing to work. Regards from Tom :) From: webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com To: users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Thursday, 30 August 2012, 13:29 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Rel. 3.6.1 and Norton AntiVirus On 08/30/2012 04:39 AM, Andreas Säger wrote: Am 30.08.2012 02:21, Dan wrote: To make sure I understand: Norton deletes the LO 3.6.1 download file? Otherwise, you should not have Norton running when you install the upgrade; you should not be physically connected to the Internet either. Disconnect from Internet, turn off anti-virus program, install LO update, turn on anti-virus program. ONLY WHEN AV IS RUNNING should you reconnect to the Internet. --Dan And you do the above steps only if you are very sure that you downloaded and verified the download from libreoffice.org/download . You find the md5 hash to verifiy your download when you click the Info link besides the Torrent link on libreoffice.org/download. Are you saying projects like the NA-DVD might have a modified version of LO hiding something that should not be there? Yes, going to the main download site should be the default, but having local/regional projects where you can get LO is important. I think if you state that the only place for users to get LO is from the download site, then there might be some problems with distribution CDs/DVDs that are also listed on the download pages. If you hand out these media to people, but they are told that the only place that it is safe to get the packages is from the official download web site, then there might not be any trust in the localized projects. Hopefully this is not what you are saying. Since I do not know how to create a md5-hash for my installation files on the NA-DVD project web page and physical media, I cannot offer that. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] [3.5.3.2/Writer] H2 = underline until right margin?
Hello I use H1 for the document's main title, and H2 for sub-sections. To make H2 sections more obvious, I'd like to have the text underlined and have the underline go all the way to the right margin instead of just the text itself. I vaguely remember being able to do this with Word, but can LibreOffice Writer do this too? Thank you. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/3-5-3-2-Writer-H2-underline-until-right-margin-tp4004505.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Find and replace graphics
Hi :) You can answer either way. By email you need to use Reply to all instead of Reply because of a recent change to the way the lists work. Using Reply sends the message privately, as a pm, instead of to the whole list so you suddenly get dependant on one person being right and available. It's better to send to the whole list. Most OpenSource lists seem to work this way. I just gave the Nabble forum route because it's easier to upload files to Nabble but you found somewhere else anyway, which is quite cool :) I think the arrow is probably in the Thumbnails folder. If you can delete it from there it will vanish. Regards form Tom :) From: timecode i...@sokianos.de To: users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Thursday, 30 August 2012, 13:26 Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Find and replace graphics Hey Tom! Thanks for that dirty trick! :-) But unfortunately it didn't work. I made a http://i47.tinypic.com/2ldimig.png screenshot of the contents of the zip-file. The images remain even after deleting the Thumbnails folder and a folder named imagesin the Configurations2 directory. This http://i49.tinypic.com/6e3ouu.png screenshot here shows what I'm trying to get rid of: the pesky arrow images. Thanks in advance! timecode PS: Am I able to answer via mail or do I have to post in the forum? -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Find-and-replace-graphics-tp4004270p4004490.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Update to 3.6.1
On 29/08/12 23:39, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) LibreOffice doesn't have a 64bit version and allegedly needs java to be 32 bit too. Regards from Tom :) I don't know where you got that idea from, unless you haven't noticed that I'm talking about Linux, not the MS product. ;-) I've been using fully 64 bit systems for several years, firstly with OOo and then LO and, as indicated further down this thread, the combination is functioning perfectly well on another system with the same software installation(s). I'm guessing that the mal-functioning is related to the profile somewhere. Experiments continue. Peter HB -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] [3.5.3.2/Writer] H2 = underline until right margin?
Hi :) Yes. Errr, i am not sure about the variety of underlining and such but there are 10 levels of headings that, by default, are linked together so that if you change the font on one of them that change flows through to the rest so that you can easily keep things consistent. I'm not sure how smart it is, for example if changing h2 changes h1 or just the ones lower than it (h3, h4 and so on). It's easy enough to change the default. There is a chapter about styles and templates in official documentation. Chapter 3 of the Getting Started Guide. There are pre-release and older versions of official documentation on this wiki-page http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/Publications But it is fairly widely distributed already. Regards from Tom :) From: Gilles codecompl...@free.fr To: users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Thursday, 30 August 2012, 14:15 Subject: [libreoffice-users] [3.5.3.2/Writer] H2 = underline until right margin? Hello I use H1 for the document's main title, and H2 for sub-sections. To make H2 sections more obvious, I'd like to have the text underlined and have the underline go all the way to the right margin instead of just the text itself. I vaguely remember being able to do this with Word, but can LibreOffice Writer do this too? Thank you. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/3-5-3-2-Writer-H2-underline-until-right-margin-tp4004505.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] Re: [3.5.3.2/Writer] H2 = underline until right margin?
Thanks for the info. I don't have the time/courage to read the whole document just for this, though. Out of band, someone came up with this trick: [quote] Set a tab on the right margin and then insert a tab after your text, then underline the white space after the text. [/quote] It works, but it's a bit cumbersome so I ended up copy/pasting the first title and replaced all the other H2 items. Thank you. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/3-5-3-2-Writer-H2-underline-until-right-margin-tp4004505p4004512.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] [3.5.3.2/Writer] H2 = underline until right margin?
Gilles wrote: Hello I use H1 for the document's main title, and H2 for sub-sections. To make H2 sections more obvious, I'd like to have the text underlined and have the underline go all the way to the right margin instead of just the text itself. I vaguely remember being able to do this with Word, but can LibreOffice Writer do this too? Thank you. The User Guides for LO have what you want already. The answer is to use styles. Open the Styles and Formatting window (use F11 to do this). When it opens, right click Heading 2 and select Modify. Click the Border tab. You want to create a bottom border by clicking below the gray square in the User defined window. Select the thickness (width) for the line and the color you want to use. If you have a preference as to the type of line used, select that also. Click OK. This should do it. --Dan -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] [3.5.3.2/Writer] H2 = underline until right margin?
On 30/08/2012 at 15:15, Gilles codecompl...@free.fr wrote: I vaguely remember being able to do this with Word, but can LibreOffice Writer do this too? Don't use underline (in Font effects tab) but use borders (in, well, Borders tab) instead. Just add bottom border, possibly set width, style and spacing and you are done. Please note that border will underline whole header box, not line of text (check with long headings of two or more lines of text). Perhaps this is something you want anyway, but you should be aware of difference. -- Best regards Mirosław Zalewski -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] Record macro
Good evening I recently upgraded to 3.6. Formerly I used to have macros to highlight text and then remove the highlight again (important during editing) Today I noticed, that those macros were working only sometimes - when they felt like doing so. Fidling aroung in trying to figure out what is going on, I found: * the second macro had been disabled. * I get the Java Runtime Environment error that has been mentioned recently on the list * Installing a new JRE (1.7) does not work * Going back to JRE 1.6 got rig (?) of the error, but I apparently need to create new macros. (this too is a really unnecessary pain in the neck) BUT there is no Record macro button any more! It used to be unter Tools - Macros Yet, now there are only * Run macro * Organize macros - greyed out (digital signature) * Organize dialogs The documentation says: *When in Writer:* #Open the document for which you want to record a macro. 1. Choose *Tools - Macros - Record Macro*. You see the small *Recording* dialog with just one button called *Stop Recording*. So, where IS the Record macro button now??? -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
RE: [libreoffice-users] Re: Rel. 3.6.1 and Norton AntiVirus
I did the original post. I am running Windows. With this download I am following the same procedure I used when I installed 3.6.0. I click on the Main installer at the LO website, select run from the Windows popup and wait. The program is downloaded after which time Norton does a security scan. WIth 3.6.0 the security scan was done and the program then completed the installation without incident. With 3.6.1 at the completion of the security scan Norton announces that the download is a possible virus and then deletes it. Jeff Hi :) It is always possible that different locations end-up with a non-standard version of LO. Part of the ethos of OpenSource is that people can make changes. If they don't send their change in to the main development process here then they miss the chance to push their changes through a decenlkick on t QA and the beta-testing that happens on millions of real-world machines around the world. However, corporate organisations might want to do things like getting their logo and branding in their on the versions their staff uses. Magazines might want to bundle LO in different ways or whatnot. So even though you might end up with a non-standard version the changes might well be trivial and even beneficial. However none of that is the problem that was alluded to. Most sources of non-standard downloads will give their own md5sum and/or Sha to deal with the main problem. The issue alluded to is that accidents might happen during download or copying and Cds/Dvds might end-up with scratches or smudges while still appearing to work. Regards from Tom :) From: webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com To: users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Thursday, 30 August 2012, 13:29 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Rel. 3.6.1 and Norton AntiVirus On 08/30/2012 04:39 AM, Andreas Säger wrote: Am 30.08.2012 02:21, Dan wrote: To make sure I understand: Norton deletes the LO 3.6.1 download file? Otherwise, you should not have Norton running when you install the upgrade; you should not be physically connected to the Internet either. Disconnect from Internet, turn off anti-virus program, install LO update, turn on anti-virus program. ONLY WHEN AV IS RUNNING should you reconnect to the Internet. --Dan And you do the above steps only if you are very sure that you downloaded and verified the download from libreoffice.org/download . You find the md5 hash to verifiy your download when you click the Info link besides the Torrent link on libreoffice.org/download. Are you saying projects like the NA-DVD might have a modified version of LO hiding something that should not be there? Yes, going to the main download site should be the default, but having local/regional projects where you can get LO is important. I think if you state that the only place for users to get LO is from the download site, then there might be some problems with distribution CDs/DVDs that are also listed on the download pages. If you hand out these media to people, but they are told that the only place that it is safe to get the packages is from the official download web site, then there might not be any trust in the localized projects. Hopefully this is not what you are saying. Since I do not know how to create a md5-hash for my installation files on the NA-DVD project web page and physical media, I cannot offer that. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] Re: Rel. 3.6.1 and Norton AntiVirus
Am 30.08.2012 14:29, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: Are you saying projects like the NA-DVD might have a modified version of LO hiding something that should not be there? Do you trust any site like this one? http://www.bestfreewaredownload.com/freeware/k-presentation-domination-scam-t-free-libreoffice-portable-freeware-aeawdtnx.html -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
RE: [libreoffice-users] Re: Rel. 3.6.1 and Norton AntiVirus
Most likely Norton has messed up. I am trying to get through on their Online help system, without much success. Jeff To: users@global.libreoffice.org From: ville...@t-online.de Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Rel. 3.6.1 and Norton AntiVirus Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:09:49 +0200 Am 30.08.2012 14:29, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: Are you saying projects like the NA-DVD might have a modified version of LO hiding something that should not be there? Do you trust any site like this one? http://www.bestfreewaredownload.com/freeware/k-presentation-domination-scam-t-free-libreoffice-portable-freeware-aeawdtnx.html -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Rel. 3.6.1 and Norton AntiVirus
On 08/30/2012 10:03 AM, Jeff Hahn wrote: I did the original post. I am running Windows. With this download I am following the same procedure I used when I installed 3.6.0. I click on the Main installer at the LO website, select run from the Windows popup and wait. The program is downloaded after which time Norton does a security scan. WIth 3.6.0 the security scan was done and the program then completed the installation without incident. With 3.6.1 at the completion of the security scan Norton announces that the download is a possible virus and then deletes it. Jeff Hi, IMHO, Norton AV appears to be giving a false positive. Does it identify the alleged malware? I would check Norton's Quarantine and see if you can restore from there. You might contact Norton to see if they have a work around. Hi :) It is always possible that different locations end-up with a non-standard version of LO. Part of the ethos of OpenSource is that people can make changes. If they don't send their change in to the main development process here then they miss the chance to push their changes through a decenlkick on t QA and the beta-testing that happens on millions of real-world machines around the world. However, corporate organisations might want to do things like getting their logo and branding in their on the versions their staff uses. Magazines might want to bundle LO in different ways or whatnot. So even though you might end up with a non-standard version the changes might well be trivial and even beneficial. However none of that is the problem that was alluded to. Most sources of non-standard downloads will give their own md5sum and/or Sha to deal with the main problem. The issue alluded to is that accidents might happen during download or copying and Cds/Dvds might end-up with scratches or smudges while still appearing to work. Regards from Tom :) From: webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com To: users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Thursday, 30 August 2012, 13:29 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Rel. 3.6.1 and Norton AntiVirus On 08/30/2012 04:39 AM, Andreas Säger wrote: Am 30.08.2012 02:21, Dan wrote: To make sure I understand: Norton deletes the LO 3.6.1 download file? Otherwise, you should not have Norton running when you install the upgrade; you should not be physically connected to the Internet either. Disconnect from Internet, turn off anti-virus program, install LO update, turn on anti-virus program. ONLY WHEN AV IS RUNNING should you reconnect to the Internet. --Dan And you do the above steps only if you are very sure that you downloaded and verified the download from libreoffice.org/download . You find the md5 hash to verifiy your download when you click the Info link besides the Torrent link on libreoffice.org/download. Are you saying projects like the NA-DVD might have a modified version of LO hiding something that should not be there? Yes, going to the main download site should be the default, but having local/regional projects where you can get LO is important. I think if you state that the only place for users to get LO is from the download site, then there might be some problems with distribution CDs/DVDs that are also listed on the download pages. If you hand out these media to people, but they are told that the only place that it is safe to get the packages is from the official download web site, then there might not be any trust in the localized projects. Hopefully this is not what you are saying. Since I do not know how to create a md5-hash for my installation files on the NA-DVD project web page and physical media, I cannot offer that. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- Jay Lozier jsloz...@gmail.com -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived
Re: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: 3.6 Calc Problem / ~lock
HUH ??? Whenever the document is saved, it's saved ... when the file(s) are re-opened the saved document appears; if it's been saved with a different name - as adding 2 ... - then there are more than 1 copy of this document. On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: Hi :) Ok, 2 scenarios. 1. A desperately slow machine (probably Windows). Double-clicking a file doesn't seem to open it, not entirely convinced it was a proper double-click so double-click again. At last it opens and you make a lot of changes, and go off to grab a cuppa tea. back at the computer you are not sure if you saved the document and even tho your fairly sure you closed it it still seems to be open so you save again and quit. Later you open the document to find NONE of your changes have been saved. Why? 2. On a swift machine with multiple workspaces you want 2 copies of the file open, one to edit and the other on a different workspace to copy info from or as a look-up source. After a ton of editing you get a phone call and switch workspaces to look-up stuff from various open files to deal with the call. A few distractions later and you get back to the machine and save and close the open document and shut-down the machine. Next day you find NONE of your edits were saved. Why? I'm sure you can imagine a ton of situations where something could easily occur in your own place where you might not be 100% focused and infallible on an infallible machine. Regards from Tom :) From: anne-ology lagin...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: 3.6 Calc Problem / ~lock To: MiguelAngel mari...@miguelangel.mobi Cc: users@global.libreoffice.org Date: Thursday, 30 August, 2012, 3:17 Huh ??? Well, (1) these ~lock files do appear when the file is open - that's what's frustrating; when it begins to slow down, I check discover this inane file has appeared. (2) I do NOT understand why I should place the file away from the computer's HD before its completed?; once completed I copy it to an external HD, but still retain it on the computer's HD. (3) I do NOT understand why I, the sole user of this machine, would not have access to do whatever I wish with this machine ;-) and the more these machines change, the more I think I should pitch them out the window and return to the 'horse buggy' era ;-) A bug or not a bug ... a bug by any other name would be the same ... which reminds me of these silly acronyms - there were wasps - still are - flitting around the woods ... then there were WASPs following the AAC in WWII ... then there were WASPs - according to the '60s media - along with other groups back-then. [and that's just 1 example of how acronyms can become confusing ;-)] On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 7:05 PM, MiguelAngel mari...@miguelangel.mobi wrote: Asunto: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: 3.6 Calc Problem / ~lock Fecha: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:23:17 -0500 De: anne-ology lagin...@gmail.com A: Tom tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk CC: Steve steve.edmo...@ptglobal.com, users@global.libreoffice.org Thanks for your response - unfortunately, it does NOT go away; sometimes, I've found several of these ~lock files ;-( --**-- I've only seen this issue when the file is not closed properly. For example remove the memory stick with files opened. A program crash. Or maybe do not have rights to delete in that directory. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Record macro
On 30/08/2012 at 16:03, Thomas Blasejewicz tho...@s7.dion.ne.jp wrote: So, where IS the Record macro button now??? At Tools → Macros → Record macro. But first you must go Tools → Options → LibreOffice → General and check Enable macro recording. Restarting LO is not needed. This option has been disabled by default because macro recorder has never worked reliably. Users are encouraged to write macros themselves. -- Best regards Mirosław Zalewski -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Rel. 3.6.1 and Norton AntiVirus
Hi :) Yes, as other people are saying (with varying degrees of paranoia) antiviruses do have a lot of false positives. It's like having a guard dog and then grumbling because it barks. A better course is to congratulate it on succesfully blocking something from installing (ie doing it's job) and then switch it off, do the install and then switch it on again. As 1 person said it's wise to unplug the network cable or switch off your router (if at home) so that you have no internet connection while the antivirus is off but at that level of paranoia i would recommend just not using Windows in the first place. With Windows you just have to accept that your system is not secure [shrugs] and that to some extent you are always going to have to just trust to luck. It's wise to minimise that where it's reasonably possible. Unplugging a network cable might not be easy but if it is then it's worth doing. People say that Windows is easier but then forget that they have to struggle through this sort of thing. Other systems have different struggles. Regards from Tom :) From: Jeff Hahn kr...@hotmail.com To: ville...@t-online.de ville...@t-online.de; users@global.libreoffice.org users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Thursday, 30 August 2012, 15:12 Subject: RE: [libreoffice-users] Re: Rel. 3.6.1 and Norton AntiVirus Most likely Norton has messed up. I am trying to get through on their Online help system, without much success. Jeff To: users@global.libreoffice.org From: ville...@t-online.de Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Rel. 3.6.1 and Norton AntiVirus Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:09:49 +0200 Am 30.08.2012 14:29, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: Are you saying projects like the NA-DVD might have a modified version of LO hiding something that should not be there? Do you trust any site like this one? http://www.bestfreewaredownload.com/freeware/k-presentation-domination-scam-t-free-libreoffice-portable-freeware-aeawdtnx.html -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: 3.6 Calc Problem / ~lock
Hi :) The point was that if you open the same document twice and make tons of changes to 1 version but then for some reason end up saving the 2nd copy and not the one you edited then you lose all your changes. Even if there is only 1 person using the system the chances are still quite high of such a thing occuring and so OOo developed a way around it. It rarely goes wrong and if/when it does it's easy to fix and doesn't result in a loss of data. Not having a ~lock file would often result in a loss of data if a problem occurred. Regards from Tom :) From: anne-ology lagin...@gmail.com To: Tom tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk Cc: users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Thursday, 30 August 2012, 15:29 Subject: Re: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: 3.6 Calc Problem / ~lock HUH ??? Whenever the document is saved, it's saved ... when the file(s) are re-opened the saved document appears; if it's been saved with a different name - as adding 2 ... - then there are more than 1 copy of this document. On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: Hi :) Ok, 2 scenarios. 1. A desperately slow machine (probably Windows). Double-clicking a file doesn't seem to open it, not entirely convinced it was a proper double-click so double-click again. At last it opens and you make a lot of changes, and go off to grab a cuppa tea. back at the computer you are not sure if you saved the document and even tho your fairly sure you closed it it still seems to be open so you save again and quit. Later you open the document to find NONE of your changes have been saved. Why? 2. On a swift machine with multiple workspaces you want 2 copies of the file open, one to edit and the other on a different workspace to copy info from or as a look-up source. After a ton of editing you get a phone call and switch workspaces to look-up stuff from various open files to deal with the call. A few distractions later and you get back to the machine and save and close the open document and shut-down the machine. Next day you find NONE of your edits were saved. Why? I'm sure you can imagine a ton of situations where something could easily occur in your own place where you might not be 100% focused and infallible on an infallible machine. Regards from Tom :) From: anne-ology lagin...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: 3.6 Calc Problem / ~lock To: MiguelAngel mari...@miguelangel.mobi Cc: users@global.libreoffice.org Date: Thursday, 30 August, 2012, 3:17 Huh ??? Well, (1) these ~lock files do appear when the file is open - that's what's frustrating; when it begins to slow down, I check discover this inane file has appeared. (2) I do NOT understand why I should place the file away from the computer's HD before its completed?; once completed I copy it to an external HD, but still retain it on the computer's HD. (3) I do NOT understand why I, the sole user of this machine, would not have access to do whatever I wish with this machine ;-) and the more these machines change, the more I think I should pitch them out the window and return to the 'horse buggy' era ;-) A bug or not a bug ... a bug by any other name would be the same ... which reminds me of these silly acronyms - there were wasps - still are - flitting around the woods ... then there were WASPs following the AAC in WWII ... then there were WASPs - according to the '60s media - along with other groups back-then. [and that's just 1 example of how acronyms can become confusing ;-)] On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 7:05 PM, MiguelAngel mari...@miguelangel.mobi wrote: Asunto: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: 3.6 Calc Problem / ~lock Fecha: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:23:17 -0500 De: anne-ology lagin...@gmail.com A: Tom tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk CC: Steve steve.edmo...@ptglobal.com, users@global.libreoffice.org Thanks for your response - unfortunately, it does NOT go away; sometimes, I've found several of these ~lock files ;-( --**-- I've only seen this issue when the file is not closed properly. For example remove the memory stick with files opened. A program crash. Or maybe do not have rights to delete in that directory. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: [3.5.3.2/Writer] H2 = underline until right margin?
Gilles wrote: Thanks for the info. I don't have the time/courage to read the whole document just for this, though. Out of band, someone came up with this trick: [quote] Set a tab on the right margin and then insert a tab after your text, then underline the white space after the text. [/quote] It works, but it's a bit cumbersome so I ended up copy/pasting the first title and replaced all the other H2 items. Thank you. Time: let me see ... Chapter 3 is all of 24 pages long. One the top of the second page (Copyright page) is the style you seem to be wanting. Using the F11 key to open the Styles and Formatting window and change Automatic to All Styles at the bottom of it. Then click the Copyright heading. OOoHeading 1 will be highlighter. Right click it and select Modify from the context menu. You now have in front of you a dialog containing all the properties contained in the OOoHeading 1. You have 12 tabs with these properties. Now how much time would this take? Not nearly as much time as reading the whole document for this. I do have one advantage over you. I write some of the documents for LO. So, I have taken the time to learn how to do things using styles. I have a copy of the Complete Writer Guide which I use as a reference once in a while. I also look at the properties of a style once in a while to see what they are. I then put this knowledge to work for me. I now have my own personal outline numbering styles based upon the works of others. If you are going to be using Writer extensively, you might want to get the Writer Guide as well. It is a good reference book. Control+H will help you search for specifics so you don't have to read the whole document for any particular question. --Dan -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] Re: [libreoffice-accessibility] Elements of Libre Office writer document not accessible to Orca screen reader.
Hi :) Is anyone here able to get this list onto the devs list? or a discussion list or somewhere the BoD might respond? Regards from Tom :) From: Dattatray Bhat bha...@gmail.com To: accessibil...@global.libreoffice.org Cc: sagun baijal sagunbai...@gmail.com; Leena Chourey leenag...@gmail.com Sent: Thursday, 30 August 2012, 10:27 Subject: [libreoffice-accessibility] Elements of Libre Office writer document not accessible to Orca screen reader. The Navigator feature in LibreOffice is not quite convenient for visually disabled users who use the Orca screen reader. Suppose I want to navigate to previous or next heading. This is what I do. If there is an easier way, please let me know. 1. Set up Navigator to traverse headings (5-6 keybindings) Press F5 to start Navigator Press F6 4 times (or Shift+F6 once) to activate Navigator window Press Tab to go the list box section Press Right to expand Headings node Press Down to go to first heading label 2. From current heading, go to next or previous heading (4-5 key-bindings) Press F6 4 times (or Shift+F6 once) to activate Navigator window. Press Tab to go to list box section Press Up or Down to to go to previous or next heading label Press Enter to go to previous or next heading If structural navigation feature of Orca worked in LibreOffice, I would be able to navigate to previous or next heading with a single key-binding. But it doesn't work; due to some LibreOffice bugs. I submitted detailed bug reports (listed below) including screen shots to LibreOffice bug tracker in March 2011; but there is no progress so far. 35105 A heading in writer document doesn't expose ROLE_HEADING to AT-SPI. 35107 A hyperlink in writer document doesn't expose correct role and URL to AT-SPI. 35110 A list box in writer document doesn't expose correct role to AT-SPI. 35111 A combo box in writer document doesn't expose ROLE_COMBO_BOX to AT-SPI. 35112 A section in writer document is not visible to AT-SPI. 35129 A spin button in spreadsheet doesn't expose ROLE_SPIN_BUTTON to AT-SPI. 35652 AT-SPI accessible tree omits objects which are not visible on the screen. 35654 A writer document doesn't implement the Collection interface of AT-SPI. Can somebody look into these bug reports please? Regards. -- Dattatray Bhat -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to accessibility+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/accessibility/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Find and replace graphics
Howdy, I already tried deleting this folder, but to no avail. Maybe the images are in the content.xml? Am 30.08.2012 15:19, schrieb Tom Davies: Hi :) You can answer either way. By email you need to use Reply to all instead of Reply because of a recent change to the way the lists work. Using Reply sends the message privately, as a pm, instead of to the whole list so you suddenly get dependant on one person being right and available. It's better to send to the whole list. Most OpenSource lists seem to work this way. I just gave the Nabble forum route because it's easier to upload files to Nabble but you found somewhere else anyway, which is quite cool :) I think the arrow is probably in the Thumbnails folder. If you can delete it from there it will vanish. Regards form Tom :) From: timecode i...@sokianos.de To: users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Thursday, 30 August 2012, 13:26 Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Find and replace graphics Hey Tom! Thanks for that dirty trick! :-) But unfortunately it didn't work. I made a http://i47.tinypic.com/2ldimig.png screenshot of the contents of the zip-file. The images remain even after deleting the Thumbnails folder and a folder named imagesin the Configurations2 directory. This http://i49.tinypic.com/6e3ouu.png screenshot here shows what I'm trying to get rid of: the pesky arrow images. Thanks in advance! timecode PS: Am I able to answer via mail or do I have to post in the forum? -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Find-and-replace-graphics-tp4004270p4004490.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: spadmin fails to run
Hi :) Do we know if this problem has been solved yet? Has the OP been in contact? Regards from Tom :) From: Felmon Davis dav...@union.edu To: Tom tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk Cc: users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Wednesday, 29 August 2012, 18:03 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: spadmin fails to run On Wed, 29 Aug 2012, Tom wrote: Hi :) Sorry for the late response! An 'obvious' way to get a little bit more information about any unix-based command is to add the tag -h or --help after the command. In this case it would be something like: spadmin -h or spadmin --help It's just a quick-help, cheat sheet. There is a lot more info in the manual which you can access using the man command (seems a little sexist but it's really just short for manual). So, try man spadmin my understanding is that the OP (you have deleted the original post) wasn't getting it to run at all. he had a funny sign in front of the command which I thought might be an artifact produced by his email. he should be sure to invoke the command as ./spadmin assuming he is in the same directory or give the whole path (without the leading dot). Hmmm, i don't have spadmin installed on my machine so i got nothing from either of those commands. I have it but it seems to belong to openoffice in my case (on this machine) and seems to require 'sudo' to invoke it as it's owned by root. Regards from Tom :) regards to you too! F. -- Felmon Davis Everything in the world may be endured except continual prosperity. -- Johann von Goethe -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Update to 3.6.1
Hi :) Ahh, so that is not the issue then. Sorry! Does the version of java have to match the app or the OS? I would have thought it has to match the app? Sorry, i'm still curious even tho it's not the issue in this thread. Regards from Tom :) From: Dan elderdanle...@gmail.com To: users@global.libreoffice.org users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Thursday, 30 August 2012, 0:56 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Update to 3.6.1 As far as I know, only Windows does not have a 64 bit version. Linux has 64 bit version for both DEB and RPM. The following is the folder containing the installation files for LO 3.6.1.2 The Java I use is also 64 bit that I get from the Ubuntu Repository (OpenJDK Java 6) with all the patches. LibO_3.6.1.2_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US --Dan Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) LibreOffice doesn't have a 64bit version and allegedly needs java to be 32 bit too. Regards from Tom :) --- On Wed, 29/8/12, Peter Hillier-Brook p...@hbsys.plus.com wrote: From: Peter Hillier-Brook p...@hbsys.plus.com Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Update to 3.6.1 To: users@global.libreoffice.org Date: Wednesday, 29 August, 2012, 22:05 On 29/08/12 18:50, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) Errr, on the 64bit Ubuntu is the java also 64bit? If it is then can you try installing a 32 bit version of 1.6_32? LO can be told which version of java to use so it might work Tools - Options - Java Regards from Tom :) That sounds like Windows solution! :-) Peter HB -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Argument to let OO window stay on top
Hi :) Did anyone work out the problem with this Mac? Regards from Tom :) From: Mourad Hedfi mou...@bilog.fr To: users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Friday, 24 August 2012, 10:31 Subject: [libreoffice-users] Argument to let OO window stay on top Hello everyone, I'm using OO on Mac OS and I'm starting it from an other application using a command line from the terminal with arguments. I'm searching a way to let or force LO window to stay on the top of all opened application. I've not found any argument to do this. Does anyone have an idea how to do this with argument from LO or uising an another method. Many thanks in advance for your help. Best regards. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] Re: [libreoffice-accessibility] PDF UA
Hi :) Does anyone know if Pdf UA is incorporated into LO or if there are plans to do so? I think we have more fine-grained ways such as tagged and 1A and such but do they add-up to UA? Regards from Tom :) From: Jaap van de Putte i...@2useit.nl To: accessibil...@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Wednesday, 15 August 2012, 17:05 Subject: [libreoffice-accessibility] PDF UA Hi, PDF/UA has been approved as standard. It stands for Universally Accessible PDF. Are there any steps made to incorporate this format in LibreOffice and OpenOffice? It would certainly matters for governments in Europe for the European Union has stated that all countries should confirm to WCAG 2, the international accessibility guidelines. Kind regards, Jaap -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to accessibility+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/accessibility/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice installed by default on recycled computers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/30/2012 08:45 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: On 08/30/2012 07:44 AM, Fabian Rodriguez wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/29/2012 03:29 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: 1] Haitian Creole - Kreyòl Ayisyen - Korektè Òtograf Kreyòl (KÒK) The file [...]is a part of the NA-DVD I noticed, however it is outdated [...] How about having students in Haiti work on it? [...] That's the goal of LibrePlanet Haïti: get local help/exposure for such projects. Internet access is not widespread, though, so collaboration via mailing list/online is not as effective and quick as elsewhere. The same work that can be done for LibO will be happening for other projects, so I hope to get more people connected via LP Haiti and take it from there. Above all, I hope someone local leads that :) As for the NA-DVD distro, I have no problems with people taking it and using it as the starting point for creating their own version. Take out the parts not needed and adding those that are. I have been told that other groups have done that over the past year or so since the NA-DVD has been online. Of course, but given the limited resources and time, translating all of it to Creole is impractical, if even possible. Even updating the current systems and LibreOffice or having up-to-date installers will prove challenging. [...] Cheers, Fabian Rodriguez http://libreoffice.magicfab.ca -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: PGP/Mime available upon request Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlA/m9gACgkQfUcTXFrypNUbaQCfZMKX23k4PhQJNWnGmRe7NbW6 YYAAn3GUQoHEfnV3I/x4WqbcNvhlpuCs =0j82 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Find and replace graphics
Jannis Sokianos wrote: Howdy, I already tried deleting this folder, but to no avail. Maybe the images are in the content.xml? Have you checked to see if the arrow is a linked graphic? (Edit - Links) This is a possibility. But there are going to be additional problems even if the arrow is a linked graphic. Even after removing all pictures and thumbnails, the document will have a read error message. What has to be done is to open context.xml. Then remove all references to where the arrow graphic is located in the text document. --Dan Am 30.08.2012 15:19, schrieb Tom Davies: Hi :) You can answer either way. By email you need to use Reply to all instead of Reply because of a recent change to the way the lists work. Using Reply sends the message privately, as a pm, instead of to the whole list so you suddenly get dependant on one person being right and available. It's better to send to the whole list. Most OpenSource lists seem to work this way. I just gave the Nabble forum route because it's easier to upload files to Nabble but you found somewhere else anyway, which is quite cool :) I think the arrow is probably in the Thumbnails folder. If you can delete it from there it will vanish. Regards form Tom :) From: timecode i...@sokianos.de To: users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Thursday, 30 August 2012, 13:26 Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Find and replace graphics Hey Tom! Thanks for that dirty trick! :-) But unfortunately it didn't work. I made a http://i47.tinypic.com/2ldimig.png screenshot of the contents of the zip-file. The images remain even after deleting the Thumbnails folder and a folder named imagesin the Configurations2 directory. This http://i49.tinypic.com/6e3ouu.png screenshot here shows what I'm trying to get rid of: the pesky arrow images. Thanks in advance! timecode PS: Am I able to answer via mail or do I have to post in the forum? -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Find-and-replace-graphics-tp4004270p4004490.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Find and replace graphics
Hi :) Ouch! Xml is not pretty unless you can open it in a text-editor that allows you to chooose a colour-coding option. SCiTe is good and i've heard good reports of Notepad++ but normal straight Notepad would be useless. In Gedit i found something in the status-bar that said Plain text and clicking on it gave a long list of different programming languages and even included html/css. Choosing changed the colour of all the coding brackets to different colours that helps me pick-out the bits i need to focus on. Regards from Tom :) From: Dan elderdanle...@gmail.com To: users@global.libreoffice.org users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Thursday, 30 August 2012, 18:02 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Find and replace graphics Jannis Sokianos wrote: Howdy, I already tried deleting this folder, but to no avail. Maybe the images are in the content.xml? Have you checked to see if the arrow is a linked graphic? (Edit - Links) This is a possibility. But there are going to be additional problems even if the arrow is a linked graphic. Even after removing all pictures and thumbnails, the document will have a read error message. What has to be done is to open context.xml. Then remove all references to where the arrow graphic is located in the text document. --Dan Am 30.08.2012 15:19, schrieb Tom Davies: Hi :) You can answer either way. By email you need to use Reply to all instead of Reply because of a recent change to the way the lists work. Using Reply sends the message privately, as a pm, instead of to the whole list so you suddenly get dependant on one person being right and available. It's better to send to the whole list. Most OpenSource lists seem to work this way. I just gave the Nabble forum route because it's easier to upload files to Nabble but you found somewhere else anyway, which is quite cool :) I think the arrow is probably in the Thumbnails folder. If you can delete it from there it will vanish. Regards form Tom :) From: timecode i...@sokianos.de To: users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Thursday, 30 August 2012, 13:26 Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Find and replace graphics Hey Tom! Thanks for that dirty trick! :-) But unfortunately it didn't work. I made a http://i47.tinypic.com/2ldimig.png screenshot of the contents of the zip-file. The images remain even after deleting the Thumbnails folder and a folder named imagesin the Configurations2 directory. This http://i49.tinypic.com/6e3ouu.png screenshot here shows what I'm trying to get rid of: the pesky arrow images. Thanks in advance! timecode PS: Am I able to answer via mail or do I have to post in the forum? -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Find-and-replace-graphics-tp4004270p4004490.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Pivottable/Chart Compatibility in Calc 3.6 with Excel 2002
Hi :) Were you able to resolve this issue? Did you get any decent answers from the Users List? If not then it might be good to ask again now. Sometimes people just need time to mull over questions but by then they have forgotten what they were mulling over as there are constant distractions. Also new people join the lists all the time and everyone has different experience in different areas. Regards from Tom :) From: Steve Morris samor...@netspace.net.au To: users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Wednesday, 8 August 2012, 0:01 Subject: [libreoffice-users] Pivottable/Chart Compatibility in Calc 3.6 with Excel 2002 Hi, I am trying to reproduce spreadsheets created at work in Excel 2002 in Libreoffice 3.6 under Linux and can't do it because pivottables and charts are not functionally compatible. When I create the pivottable and drag the fields to the layout I have the following issues: At field add time I cannot rename the field nor can I specify the format of the field if I want a different format to the source (Excel allows both at drag time). I am not allowed to rename at any time the fields in the page section of the layout (Excel allows this at drag time). There is no pivottable toolbar, hence there is no way to add calculated fields to the pivottable (Excel provides this functionality along with additional functionality available from the toolbar). I cannot click on a column in the data portion of the pivottable and drag the column to a new location in the data portion (Excel allows this, and I have a spreadsheet where this functionality is mandatory for the data to be displayed from month to month as a new months worth of data is automatically added to the table). When I create a chart and define 2 data series to be plotted, Calc appears to not allow me to display each series as a different chart type (Excel allows this by plotting both series using the same chart type, then by clicking on the series excel allows it to be changed from say a bar chart to a line chart, and allows this to be done for any subsequently added series). What is the possibility of getting this functionality in calc so that it can be used as a functional replacement for older versions of excel. regards, Steve -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] Re: Find and replace graphics
Hello, indeed, I'm dealing with linked graphics. I also took a look at the xml file and found the correspondent references. I don't think it will be worth the effort editing all those xml files, since I got quite some essays with a zillion footnotes each. But thanks a lot for your help! timecode -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Find-and-replace-graphics-tp4004270p4004593.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] Re: Find and replace graphics
Hi timecode, Am 29.08.2012 15:25 schrieb timecode: I save copies of essays from a scientific database. This database adds a little graphic to each footnote. I want to erase all these graphics from my documents. But how can I do that? If there are no other graphic elements that you want to be shown, you can comletely disable graphic display (Tools Options LibreOffice Writer View Display) Is there an option that enables me to select all identical objects within the document after I selected one? If you want to jump from graphics to graphics for deleting, you can use the Navigator (F5). It's not ideal, but a bit quicker than manual navigation. Nino -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Ver. 3.6.1 still bad recognition date.
On 30/08/2012 at 07:57, Alex Thurgood alex.thurg...@gmail.com wrote: It is also planned to allow a user configuration option to switch on/off certain formats for date recognition, but I don't think that this has been integrated yet. Code has been contributed yesterday, but it awaits review. Eike Rathke (guy responsible for this change) hopes that it will be incorporated in 3.6.3. You can see status and patch here: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/511 Let's hope it will be in 3.6.3. Until then, users depending on this certain feature should stick with 3.5 line. By the way: there will be at least one more release of 3.5, scheduled for mid- October. -- Best regards Mirosław Zalewski -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] What is the status of Java security vs. LibreOffice?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all I saw this a few days ago, I'd like to know what should I make of it?: http://arstechnica.com/security/2012/08/critical-flaw-under-active-attack-prompts-calls-to-disable-java/ I never install Java when I install LibreOffice, but a few people end up installing it. I have seen a few threads about it in the fr-discuss list, but nothing clear/concise (although I may have missed a post or two). Thanks for any information. Cheers, Fabian Rodriguez http://libreoffice.magicfab.ca - -- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: PGP/Mime available upon request Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlA/rXIACgkQfUcTXFrypNXJOACcDs0YJHO+yhWBA2p/kMaUzRp0 W0wAnjYmH9iPtp74HZsHyglBFernR0cw =NWFH -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] [3.5.3.2/Writer] H2 = underline until right margin?
On 31/08/12 1:48 AM, Dan wrote: Gilles wrote: Hello I use H1 for the document's main title, and H2 for sub-sections. To make H2 sections more obvious, I'd like to have the text underlined and have the underline go all the way to the right margin instead of just the text itself. I vaguely remember being able to do this with Word, but can LibreOffice Writer do this too? Thank you. The User Guides for LO have what you want already. The answer is to use styles. Open the Styles and Formatting window (use F11 to do this). When it opens, right click Heading 2 and select Modify. Click the Border tab. You want to create a bottom border by clicking below the gray square in the User defined window. Select the thickness (width) for the line and the color you want to use. If you have a preference as to the type of line used, select that also. Click OK. This should do it. --Dan Can you not also highlight the H2 text, right click, edit paragraph style and then set the bottom border rather than opening the styles window (less scary for a new user). steve -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] What is the status of Java security vs. LibreOffice?
On 30/08/2012 at 20:14, Fabian Rodriguez magic...@member.fsf.org wrote: I saw this a few days ago, I'd like to know what should I make of it?: http://arstechnica.com/security/2012/08/critical-flaw-under-active-attack-p rompts-calls-to-disable-java/ This article already explains it: Those who need Java to run applications such as Open Office or Freemind can still protect themselves by disabling Java in their browser to prevent drive- by attacks on booby-trapped websites. Until patch is provided, it might be wise to not open office documents from uncertain source (that is: all but your own). Most likely it is not needed, but it won't harm. -- Best regards Mirosław Zalewski -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] What is the status of Java security vs. LibreOffice?
On 08/30/2012 02:14 PM, Fabian Rodriguez wrote: Hi all I saw this a few days ago, I'd like to know what should I make of it?: http://arstechnica.com/security/2012/08/critical-flaw-under-active-attack-prompts-calls-to-disable-java/ I never install Java when I install LibreOffice, but a few people end up installing it. I have seen a few threads about it in the fr-discuss list, but nothing clear/concise (although I may have missed a post or two). Thanks for any information. Cheers, Fabian Rodriguez http://libreoffice.magicfab.ca AFAIK Java is primarily used by the embedded Base engine and possibly some extensions. If you use a non-Java database (MySQL, Postgres, MariaDB, etc) that does not use Java you do not need Java. The security problems are Java problems and are not OS or app related and can affect any computer running the unpatched Java version(s). My understanding is the transmission is likely via rogue or corrupted websites that use Java rather than via a downloaded Java app. I do not know if this issue affects the openJRE project. -- Jay Lozier jsloz...@gmail.com -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] What is the status of Java security vs. LibreOffice?
Hi :) It's the same old story. All this has happened before and will happen again (any Battlestar Galactica fans out there?). Oracle tell us all that their new version of java is ultra safe and really is safe this time and that all their previous versions are horribly flawed and likely to cause widespread plagues and death etc to anyone that continues to use them. Then their new ultra safe one is found to also have horrible flaws in it. As it happens it seems very few people actually seem to suffer or at least we never hear of it. Still we keep advising people to update to the most recent possible version but to try avoiding it completely if they can. For us the 1.6_32 is currently the most usable as the 1.7 has never really worked well with LO. As time goes on it seems that java is compromised faster and faster. Each new release lasting less and less time until some horror story emerges. Their 1.7 branch was supposed to be their best ever taking the whole thing to a new plateau of rock solid stability and sfaety but the 1st 4 versions got compromised even before release! Meanwhile the TDF devs working on LO have removed just about all dependancy on java. There are still a few Wizards and Extensions that need it and, of course, the database program (but only if you use the internal embedded back-end) and all the Accessibility stuff. So, the User List stance is to try to get people to try not using Java at all but if they do need it to use the one that does work with LO - which i don't think has been compromised just yet although that's probably just because it hasn't reached the mainstream media yet because it's considered an 'old' version even though it was released after the latest in the 1.7 branch. Regards from Tom :) From: Fabian Rodriguez magic...@member.fsf.org To: users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Thursday, 30 August 2012, 19:14 Subject: [libreoffice-users] What is the status of Java security vs. LibreOffice? -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all I saw this a few days ago, I'd like to know what should I make of it?: http://arstechnica.com/security/2012/08/critical-flaw-under-active-attack-prompts-calls-to-disable-java/ I never install Java when I install LibreOffice, but a few people end up installing it. I have seen a few threads about it in the fr-discuss list, but nothing clear/concise (although I may have missed a post or two). Thanks for any information. Cheers, Fabian Rodriguez http://libreoffice.magicfab.ca - -- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: PGP/Mime available upon request Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlA/rXIACgkQfUcTXFrypNXJOACcDs0YJHO+yhWBA2p/kMaUzRp0 W0wAnjYmH9iPtp74HZsHyglBFernR0cw =NWFH -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] What is the status of Java security vs. LibreOffice?
On 30/08/2012 at 20:33, Jay Lozier jsloz...@gmail.com wrote: I do not know if this issue affects the openJRE project. I have not tested myself, but people say it does not. Users of openJRE are safe from this one. -- Best regards Mirosław Zalewski -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] What is the status of Java security vs. LibreOffice?
Hi :) Even though both openJRE and standard java are both run by Oracle it seems that openJRE tends to be a bit safer. Possibly something to do with running it through a community in a more OpenSource way. Regards from Tom :) From: Mirosław Zalewski mini...@poczta.onet.pl To: users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Thursday, 30 August 2012, 19:39 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] What is the status of Java security vs. LibreOffice? On 30/08/2012 at 20:33, Jay Lozier jsloz...@gmail.com wrote: I do not know if this issue affects the openJRE project. I have not tested myself, but people say it does not. Users of openJRE are safe from this one. -- Best regards Mirosław Zalewski -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Rel. 3.6.1 and Norton AntiVirus
[image: Inline image 1] yes, and I think you've just described the 'Gates' fiasco' [image: Inline image 2] On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 5:05 AM, Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: Hi :) I vaguely remember Norton updated their virus-definitions on Thursdays so i would schedule a look-for-updates for Fridays. Of course MS do their updates on Tuesdays (=Patch Tuesday) so Norton/Symantec might have changed in the last decade or so. Of course if either find a particularly nasty problem then they do sometimes push patches or whatever out on a different day but it's fairly rare. Of course an ISP might delay updates for a day or 2 so your machine might regularly get them a day or few later but i think by being regular MS and others have given ISPs a chance of knowing when they might get spikes so that those can be planned for easily. I still don't get why Windows doesn't have a package-manager that just updates everything all in one go instead of each different program being forced to set-up it's own separate method of keeping things up to date. Also i never had/have confidence in any machine having fully updated drivers and codecs and everything. Windows appears to be carefully built to be insecure. Regards from Tom :) From: Dan elderdanle...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Rel. 3.6.1 and Norton AntiVirus To: users@global.libreoffice.org Date: Thursday, 30 August, 2012, 3:14 webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: On 08/29/2012 08:21 PM, Dan wrote: Jeff Hahn wrote: When I try to upgrade from 3.6.0 to 3.6.1 the Norton AntiVirus program keeps deleting the upgrade as an unsafe virus. This is the first release that I have had this type of problem with. Jeff To make sure I understand: Norton deletes the LO 3.6.1 download file? Otherwise, you should not have Norton running when you install the upgrade; you should not be physically connected to the Internet either. Disconnect from Internet, turn off anti-virus program, install LO update, turn on anti-virus program. ONLY WHEN AV IS RUNNING should you reconnect to the Internet. --Dan This is not the first time I have heard of Norton stating valid install files were viruses or other nasties. I never had any good luck with Norton's AV, so I use the free version of Comodo product[s] for my Windows machines. I have hooked even PC repair and selling pro's to using it. As for not having AV running when not online, well that is not what I would tell people. An anti-virus is needed if you are offline and suddenly there is a trojan or other nasty kicking in and doing a number. They can be picked up and not cleaned in a few ways other than being online. I have my Ubuntu system picking up new things from files that I have had on my system for months and suddenly it detects something the AV system does not like. If I did not have the AV system on 24/7, then those issues might not have been picked up. The real thing is that the AV systems update their data systems, mostly, after a new nasty has been detected. If your system has that nasty on it before that nasty has been added to your AV data system, then you will need to have the other parts of the AV and security system[s] on to detect the traces of it trying to work. SO do not turn your computer security off. I have had to deal with too many systems from friends and clients where they did not have their security on 24/7 and kept up-to-date. Had one system that the AV was on but not updated in over 2 years and the guy lost a lot. Perhaps I was not as clear as I should have been. I listed 5 steps that have been posted on lists like these when installing OOo. Programs like Norton will give false positives that prevent installation of a program. So, the AV program needs to be off when the installation is being done. However, the AV program should NOT be turned off until AFTER the computer is physically disconnected from the Internet. The installation should be done immediately after turning off the AV. The AV should be turned on again right after finishing the installation. At this point, verification that the AV is actually working is the next step. If it is not, steps have to be taken to get the AV working properly before doing anything else. Once this is done, reconnect to the Internet. My point was that the computer should not be connected to the Internet until AFTER the person knows that the AV is already working. Yes, anyone using an AV should weekly update it, sooner if there is a notice of an update because of a patch that is needed. --Dan -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All
[libreoffice-users] help exporting to macromedia flash
I am using libreoffice 3.4.5 on linux x86-64 I am wishing to export a simple PPT to macromedia flash. All I ever see is the first slide of the PPT, the PPT plays fine in auto advances and all that. Am i not doing something right? how do I get it to output all slides and not just the first? Jerry -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Norton AntiVirus / poll
I too once used Norton - it was a great system; then I switched to AVG - ranked tops; when it slid below Avast!, I switched - it's been ranked tops for the last few years now and updates daily, or more often. Let's see some poll results - who preferred what and why?; and now who prefers what and why? Curiously wondering, On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: Hi :) Norton used to be completely awesome. Everything they did was totally amazing and extremely useful. Then they became corporate and serious. Nowadays i use AVG or something else but still when a threat is publicised as being particularly nasty and i suspect one of the machines i deal with might have fallen foul of it i still find Symantec a good place to research into it. One of the first jobs of a threat is to knock-out or dodge all known security so any of the big and famous antivirus' is likely to useless against any decent threat. Luckily most threats are fairly trivial so even the big and famous antivirus programs can probably deal with it. If it's non-trivial then there is always the option to nuke your Bios and reinstall your OS. Still now that AVG is so famous i'm starting to consider other options. Regards from Tom :) From: webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Rel. 3.6.1 and Norton AntiVirus To: users@global.libreoffice.org Date: Thursday, 30 August, 2012, 2:27 On 08/29/2012 08:21 PM, Dan wrote: Jeff Hahn wrote: When I try to upgrade from 3.6.0 to 3.6.1 the Norton AntiVirus program keeps deleting the upgrade as an unsafe virus. This is the first release that I have had this type of problem with. Jeff To make sure I understand: Norton deletes the LO 3.6.1 download file? Otherwise, you should not have Norton running when you install the upgrade; you should not be physically connected to the Internet either. Disconnect from Internet, turn off anti-virus program, install LO update, turn on anti-virus program. ONLY WHEN AV IS RUNNING should you reconnect to the Internet. --Dan This is not the first time I have heard of Norton stating valid install files were viruses or other nasties. I never had any good luck with Norton's AV, so I use the free version of Comodo product[s] for my Windows machines. I have hooked even PC repair and selling pro's to using it. As for not having AV running when not online, well that is not what I would tell people. An anti-virus is needed if you are offline and suddenly there is a trojan or other nasty kicking in and doing a number. They can be picked up and not cleaned in a few ways other than being online. I have my Ubuntu system picking up new things from files that I have had on my system for months and suddenly it detects something the AV system does not like. If I did not have the AV system on 24/7, then those issues might not have been picked up. The real thing is that the AV systems update their data systems, mostly, after a new nasty has been detected. If your system has that nasty on it before that nasty has been added to your AV data system, then you will need to have the other parts of the AV and security system[s] on to detect the traces of it trying to work. SO do not turn your computer security off. I have had to deal with too many systems from friends and clients where they did not have their security on 24/7 and kept up-to-date. Had one system that the AV was on but not updated in over 2 years and the guy lost a lot. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] Re: Update to 3.6.1
On 08/29/2012 01:19 PM, NoOp wrote: ... @Dan: I moved /libreoffice3.6/share/extensions to /libreoffice3.6/share/extensions_bak and did another install. Same errors: Errors were encountered while processing: libreoffice3.6-dict-en_3.6.1.2-2_amd64.deb libreoffice3.6-dict-es_3.6.1.2-2_amd64.deb libreoffice3.6-dict-fr_3.6.1.2-2_amd64.deb (and on 32bit deb as well). I'll test by removing 3.6 completely. Did that still encountered the errors. Seems that this is an regression: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54202 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41290 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41237 -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] help exporting to macromedia flash
Are you referring to Impress?; if so, then when you finish making the document (as I assume you have) click on the file tab (where you go to save your document) then below that option is the option to send to [various options]; click on the option you desire - the only one I've found to work without flaws is to send to e-mail; this will open up an e-mail program with your file attached - just copy that attachment and save it to your machine's folder the close the opened e-mail program. Hoping this helps, On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com wrote: I am using libreoffice 3.4.5 on linux x86-64 I am wishing to export a simple PPT to macromedia flash. All I ever see is the first slide of the PPT, the PPT plays fine in auto advances and all that. Am i not doing something right? how do I get it to output all slides and not just the first? Jerry -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Update to 3.6.1
You've been mis-informed - WIN does have 64. On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Dan elderdanle...@gmail.com wrote: As far as I know, only Windows does not have a 64 bit version. Linux has 64 bit version for both DEB and RPM. The following is the folder containing the installation files for LO 3.6.1.2 The Java I use is also 64 bit that I get from the Ubuntu Repository (OpenJDK Java 6) with all the patches. LibO_3.6.1.2_Linux_x86-64_**install-deb_en-US --Dan Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) LibreOffice doesn't have a 64bit version and allegedly needs java to be 32 bit too. Regards from Tom :) From: Peter Hillier-Brook p...@hbsys.plus.com Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Update to 3.6.1 To: users@global.libreoffice.org Date: Wednesday, 29 August, 2012, 22:05 On 29/08/12 18:50, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) Errr, on the 64bit Ubuntu is the java also 64bit? If it is then can you try installing a 32 bit version of 1.6_32? LO can be told which version of java to use so it might work Tools - Options - Java Regards from Tom :) That sounds like Windows solution! :-) Peter HB -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] 3.6.1 dictionary installs (.deb) fail bork dpkg/apt-get
Yesterday in the 'Update to 3.6.1' thread I installed 3.6.1 (debian
files) on 32bit and 64bit systems. Both experienced installations errors:
http://pastebin.com/3aKwSYP1
Errors were encountered while processing:
libreoffice3.6-dict-en_3.6.1.2-2_amd64.deb
libreoffice3.6-dict-es_3.6.1.2-2_amd64.deb
libreoffice3.6-dict-fr_3.6.1.2-2_amd64.deb
(and on 32bit deb as well).
To make things worse, when attempting to update an Opera browser today I
found out that the above were completely broken couldn't be purged in
any normal fashion. Went searching and came across this bug reports:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54202 - open
[Error while installing Dutch Linux Deb (x64) main installer with
command dpkg -i *]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41290 - closed as dupe of 41237
[dictionaries do not install in daily builds as of 28/9/2011]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41237 - closed
[Installation of dictionaries failed with
/singletons/com.sun.star.deployment.ExtensionManager: loading
component library failed]
I was finally able to clean my systems (see:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54202#c3 ), but still have
not been able to install the dictionaries. I may have found the problem:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54202#c5
$ debdiff libreoffice3.6-dict-en_3.6.0.4-104_i386.deb
libreoffice3.6-dict-en_3.6.1.2-2_i386.deb
[The following lists of changes regard files as different if they have
different names, permissions or owners.]
Files in first .deb but not in second
-
-rwxr-xr-x root/root DEBIAN/postinst
-rwxr-xr-x root/root DEBIAN/postrm
Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format)
Installed-Size: [-26208-] {+26224+}
Version: [-3.6.0.4-104-] {+3.6.1.2-2+}
Has anyone else experience the same issue with the .deb install?
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] help exporting to macromedia flash
On 08/30/2012 04:13 PM, anne-ology wrote: Are you referring to Impress?; if so, then when you finish making the document (as I assume you have) click on the file tab (where you go to save your document) then below that option is the option to send to [various options]; click on the option you desire - the only one I've found to work without flaws is to send to e-mail; this will open up an e-mail program with your file attached - just copy that attachment and save it to your machine's folder the close the opened e-mail program. Hoping this helps, On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com mailto:ge...@pagestation.com wrote: I am using libreoffice 3.4.5 on linux x86-64 I am wishing to export a simple PPT to macromedia flash. All I ever see is the first slide of the PPT, the PPT plays fine in auto advances and all that. Am i not doing something right? how do I get it to output all slides and not just the first? Jerry Yes - I am refering to Impress. That is what I did, File, Export, select Macromedia Flash, enter my filename, do save, it shows a progress bar likes it doing it, I get a file, - but when I play the file it is ONLY one slide. It never moves nothing. My slides are auto advancing at 10 seconds, I have tried 2 - 10 seconds. All the same. Never advances ot the next slide. Should would like to have this work??? Am I doing something wrong ? Thanks, Jerry -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Update to 3.6.1
I believe that Tom and I were talking about LibreOffice on Windows. I have a 64 bit computer which had VISTA running until I replace that with Ubuntu. But LO does not have a 64 bit LO version which I thought was the train of thought. --Dan anne-ology wrote: You've been mis-informed - WIN does have 64. On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Dan elderdanle...@gmail.com mailto:elderdanle...@gmail.com wrote: As far as I know, only Windows does not have a 64 bit version. Linux has 64 bit version for both DEB and RPM. The following is the folder containing the installation files for LO 3.6.1.2 The Java I use is also 64 bit that I get from the Ubuntu Repository (OpenJDK Java 6) with all the patches. LibO_3.6.1.2_Linux_x86-64___install-deb_en-US --Dan Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) LibreOffice doesn't have a 64bit version and allegedly needs java to be 32 bit too. Regards from Tom :) From: Peter Hillier-Brook p...@hbsys.plus.com mailto:p...@hbsys.plus.com Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Update to 3.6.1 To: users@global.libreoffice.org mailto:users@global.libreoffice.org Date: Wednesday, 29 August, 2012, 22:05 On 29/08/12 18:50, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) Errr, on the 64bit Ubuntu is the java also 64bit? If it is then can you try installing a 32 bit version of 1.6_32? LO can be told which version of java to use so it might work Tools - Options - Java Regards from Tom :) That sounds like Windows solution! :-) Peter HB -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] help exporting to macromedia flash
Following the steps I outlined should work; the other options have been flawed since OO so use the 'send to e-mail' then copy attachment, save this to your machine then close the e-program. On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com wrote: On 08/30/2012 04:13 PM, anne-ology wrote: Are you referring to Impress?; if so, then when you finish making the document (as I assume you have) click on the file tab (where you go to save your document) then below that option is the option to send to [various options]; click on the option you desire - the only one I've found to work without flaws is to send to e-mail; this will open up an e-mail program with your file attached - just copy that attachment and save it to your machine's folder the close the opened e-mail program. Hoping this helps, On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.commailto: ge...@pagestation.com** wrote: I am using libreoffice 3.4.5 on linux x86-64 I am wishing to export a simple PPT to macromedia flash. All I ever see is the first slide of the PPT, the PPT plays fine in auto advances and all that. Am i not doing something right? how do I get it to output all slides and not just the first? Jerry Yes - I am referring to Impress. That is what I did, File, Export, select Macromedia Flash, enter my filename, do save, it shows a progress bar like it's doing it, I get a file, - but when I play the file it is ONLY one slide. It never moves nothing. My slides are auto advancing at 10 seconds, I have tried 2 - 10 seconds. All the same. Never advances ot the next slide. Should would like to have this work??? Am I doing something wrong ? Thanks, Jerry -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Update to 3.6.1
so I'm using both 32 64 on this machine ??? ok, I believe you; now just another question - could this be the reason for so many bugs? - [seems as if this list has been listing quite a few recently, some I've never even seen ???] On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Dan elderdanle...@gmail.com wrote: I believe that Tom and I were talking about LibreOffice on Windows. I have a 64 bit computer which had VISTA running until I replace that with Ubuntu. But LO does not have a 64 bit LO version which I thought was the train of thought. --Dan anne-ology wrote: You've been mis-informed - WIN does have 64. On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Dan elderdanle...@gmail.com wrote: As far as I know, only Windows does not have a 64 bit version. Linux has 64 bit version for both DEB and RPM. The following is the folder containing the installation files for LO 3.6.1.2 The Java I use is also 64 bit that I get from the Ubuntu Repository (OpenJDK Java 6) with all the patches. LibO_3.6.1.2_Linux_x86-64___**install-deb_en-US --Dan Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) LibreOffice doesn't have a 64bit version and allegedly needs java to be 32 bit too. Regards from Tom :) From: Peter Hillier-Brook p...@hbsys.plus.com Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Update to 3.6.1 To: users@global.libreoffice.org mailto:users@global.** libreoffice.org users@global.libreoffice.org Date: Wednesday, 29 August, 2012, 22:05 On 29/08/12 18:50, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) Errr, on the 64bit Ubuntu is the java also 64bit? If it is then can you try installing a 32 bit version of 1.6_32? LO can be told which version of java to use so it might work Tools - Options - Java Regards from Tom :) That sounds like Windows solution! :-) Peter HB -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] Sun dll shlxthdl and windows explorer.exe crash
Hi, Today something strange happend to me. All of the sudden explorer.exe di Windows (in VISTA) started to crash in an intervall of approximately 20 seconds. I finally found out that the reason was a crash of shlxthdl.dll of Sun Microsystems, which I found from the program directories of LO 3.6 However, the funny or problematic issue was that this crash occured only on my main user profile and not on the other profile that I had on this machine, even changing the user to (normal) did not help. I made new clean profiles. This issue came after I had updated from 3.5.5 to 3.6 version (3.6.0.104 to be exact at least according to the SUN dll). The problem continued also sporadically in new profiles (especially with the one with admin rights). I finally had to uninstall LO 3.6 (and the leftovers of 3.5) and the problems have now gone away. I wonder what could be the reason for this since LO did not start at boot time so it could not have been that, and was not used at the time. Could it be that LO needs JAVA for some operations and those run in anycase? I did have JAVA at the time of first install of LO 3.3 something, but I uninstalled it and did not have any problems with versions prior to 3.6. Heikki Jussila -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] Re: What is the status of Java security vs. LibreOffice?
On 08/30/2012 11:14 AM, Fabian Rodriguez wrote: Hi all I saw this a few days ago, I'd like to know what should I make of it?: http://arstechnica.com/security/2012/08/critical-flaw-under-active-attack-prompts-calls-to-disable-java/ I never install Java when I install LibreOffice, but a few people end up installing it. I have seen a few threads about it in the fr-discuss list, but nothing clear/concise (although I may have missed a post or two). ... Update to Java 7u7: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/alert-cve-2012-4681-1835715.html https://www.java.com/en/download/manual.jsp and as an FYI, openjdk-6, openjdk-7 *are* vulnerable according to this: http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2012-4681 -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] Re: Sun dll shlxthdl and windows explorer.exe crash
Probably related to the LibreOffice's Windows Explorer extension Most issues fixed with 3.6.1 build. Ref these bugzilla reports: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52078 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53533 Install a current Java JRE and LO 3.6.1 and should resolve. Stuart -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Sun-dll-shlxthdl-and-windows-explorer-exe-crash-tp4004653p4004659.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Find and replace graphics
It all seems so difficult.. If you have a write document, run this macro and remove ALL graphic objects Sub RemoveAllGraphics Dim i As Integer Dim oGraphic If ThisComponent.GraphicObjects.getCount() = 0 Then Exit Sub End If For i = ThisComponent.GraphicObjects.getCount() - 1 To 0 Step -1 oGraphic = ThisComponent.GraphicObjects.getByIndex(i) oGraphic.Dispose() Next End Sub On 08/30/2012 08:26 AM, timecode wrote: Hey Tom! Thanks for that dirty trick! :-) But unfortunately it didn't work. I made a http://i47.tinypic.com/2ldimig.png screenshot of the contents of the zip-file. The images remain even after deleting the Thumbnails folder and a folder named imagesin the Configurations2 directory. This http://i49.tinypic.com/6e3ouu.png screenshot here shows what I'm trying to get rid of: the pesky arrow images. Thanks in advance! timecode PS: Am I able to answer via mail or do I have to post in the forum? -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Find-and-replace-graphics-tp4004270p4004490.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Andrew Pitonyak My Macro Document: http://www.pitonyak.org/AndrewMacro.odt Info: http://www.pitonyak.org/oo.php -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] help exporting to macromedia flash
On 08/30/2012 05:14 PM, anne-ology wrote: Following the steps I outlined should work; the other options have been flawed since OO so use the 'send to e-mail' then copy attachment, save this to your machine then close the e-program. I tried the 'send-to-email' and evolution is not installed so thats not working either. Additionally I want to batch these processes in the end, I was just trying to get something that works. I also just tried this: soffice -headless -convert-to swf animation.ppt While that converts it, I have to click on the screen to get it to advance. How can I get past that? I have auto transiltion in 5 seconds set. Jerry -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] Re: spadmin fails to run
On Thursday, August 30, 2012 09:00:40 AM you wrote: Hi :) Do we know if this problem has been solved yet? Has the OP been in contact? Regards from Tom :) This problem hasn't been solved, but I did find a work-around. The problem I was trying to address with spadmin was to change the default printing language from pdf to postscript. I didn't think reading the man page was going to solve my problem, so I didn't persue that possibility. Instead, I have just created templates with the postcript as the default. That seems to work. It would be nice to know why spadmin doesn't run, however. Richard From: Felmon Davis [hidden email] To: Tom [hidden email] Cc: [hidden email] Sent: Wednesday, 29 August 2012, 18:03 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: spadmin fails to run On Wed, 29 Aug 2012, Tom wrote: Hi :) Sorry for the late response! An 'obvious' way to get a little bit more information about any unix-based command is to add the tag -h or --help after the command. In this case it would be something like: spadmin -h or spadmin --help It's just a quick-help, cheat sheet. There is a lot more info in the manual which you can access using the man command (seems a little sexist but it's really just short for manual). So, try man spadmin my understanding is that the OP (you have deleted the original post) wasn't getting it to run at all. he had a funny sign in front of the command which I thought might be an artifact produced by his email. he should be sure to invoke the command as ./spadmin assuming he is in the same directory or give the whole path (without the leading dot). Hmmm, i don't have spadmin installed on my machine so i got nothing from either of those commands. I have it but it seems to belong to openoffice in my case (on this machine) and seems to require 'sudo' to invoke it as it's owned by root. Regards from Tom :) regards to you too! F. -- Felmon Davis Everything in the world may be endured except continual prosperity. -- Johann von Goethe -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [hidden email] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/spadmin-fails-to-run- tp4003722p4004571.html To unsubscribe from spadmin fails to run, click here. NAML -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/spadmin-fails-to-run-tp4003722p4004668.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
