[WISPA] xbox 360 issues

2008-12-02 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
Hi All,

I've had calls from a number of xbox 360 customers that are having trouble 
with game play etc.  Very long lags, poor pings etc.

These calls are coming from customers off of multiple towers and even in 
different towns.

No calls coming from Wii or playstation.  Just xbox 360.

Anyone else seeing these issues in the last few months?

thanks,
marlon 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] Trango Giga Link - Lowering MSE

2008-12-02 Thread Gino Villarini
Hey Guys

I got a .7 mile 23 ghz Trango Giga Link that Im provisioning
 
Antennas are peaked at -26, using 50 mhz channles 256 qam.  Tx power is
at 15 db
 
MSE in one end is arround -11, the other end is around -22
 
How can I improve the MSE? Lowering Tx power just worsens it
 

Gino A. Villarini 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145 

 



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Trango Giga Link - Lowering MSE

2008-12-02 Thread Brad Belton
-26 RSSI is too hot.  Check the manual or call Trango to make sure you
haven't damaged the RX side of the radios.

Targetrssi and cableloss settings are very important to GigaLINK radios.
What type of cable do you have running between the IDU  ODU?

Brad

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 7:16 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Trango Giga Link - Lowering MSE

Hey Guys

I got a .7 mile 23 ghz Trango Giga Link that Im provisioning
 
Antennas are peaked at -26, using 50 mhz channles 256 qam.  Tx power is
at 15 db
 
MSE in one end is arround -11, the other end is around -22
 
How can I improve the MSE? Lowering Tx power just worsens it
 

Gino A. Villarini 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145 

 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Trango Giga Link - Lowering MSE

2008-12-02 Thread Travis Johnson
I would continue to turn the power down (probably to 0) and see if that 
helps. We had a -35 on our link (at +20db power) and had to turn it down 
to +13db to get a -42 and then the MSE went from -20ish to -33ish.

I would do it on the local side first, to see what happens in case the 
link completely drops out.

Travis
Microserv

Gino Villarini wrote:
 Hey Guys

 I got a .7 mile 23 ghz Trango Giga Link that Im provisioning
  
 Antennas are peaked at -26, using 50 mhz channles 256 qam.  Tx power is
 at 15 db
  
 MSE in one end is arround -11, the other end is around -22
  
 How can I improve the MSE? Lowering Tx power just worsens it
  

 Gino A. Villarini 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
 tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145 

  


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

2008-12-02 Thread Josh Luthman
The games on those consoles are hosted (network wise) by other
players.  The server for a 16 player game could very well be a person
in Nowhere, ID with a 1/384 DSL connection.

On 12/2/08, Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi All,

 I've had calls from a number of xbox 360 customers that are having trouble
 with game play etc.  Very long lags, poor pings etc.

 These calls are coming from customers off of multiple towers and even in
 different towns.

 No calls coming from Wii or playstation.  Just xbox 360.

 Anyone else seeing these issues in the last few months?

 thanks,
 marlon



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


-- 
Sent from my mobile device

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
--- Henry Spencer



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Trango Giga Link - Lowering MSE

2008-12-02 Thread Gino Villarini
Thanks, ull lower it more  Belden 9913 between the radios 


Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brad Belton
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:14 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Trango Giga Link - Lowering MSE

-26 RSSI is too hot.  Check the manual or call Trango to make sure you
haven't damaged the RX side of the radios.

Targetrssi and cableloss settings are very important to GigaLINK radios.
What type of cable do you have running between the IDU  ODU?

Brad

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 7:16 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Trango Giga Link - Lowering MSE

Hey Guys

I got a .7 mile 23 ghz Trango Giga Link that Im provisioning
 
Antennas are peaked at -26, using 50 mhz channles 256 qam.  Tx power is
at 15 db
 
MSE in one end is arround -11, the other end is around -22
 
How can I improve the MSE? Lowering Tx power just worsens it
 

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145 

 





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] motorola bpl

2008-12-02 Thread RC
Anyone have any success using Motorola BPL system?



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

2008-12-02 Thread Travis Johnson




Hey now Nowhere, ID is really close to me 

Josh Luthman wrote:

  The games on those consoles are hosted (network wise) by other
players.  The server for a 16 player game could very well be a person
in Nowhere, ID with a 1/384 DSL connection.

On 12/2/08, Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  
Hi All,

I've had calls from a number of xbox 360 customers that are having trouble
with game play etc.  Very long lags, poor pings etc.

These calls are coming from customers off of multiple towers and even in
different towns.

No calls coming from Wii or playstation.  Just xbox 360.

Anyone else seeing these issues in the last few months?

thanks,
marlon




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


  
  
  






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

[WISPA] 3650 Foliage

2008-12-02 Thread Mike Hammett
Have we gotten any reports how 3650 works with foliage?

Would MIMO have any affect on foliage penetration ability?


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

2008-12-02 Thread Wes James
Xbox live service has been up and down since Black Friday. It is
possible that the host machine is also causing problems, but my guess is
that the million new subscribers over the weekend gave the service a
pounding. See if they are still having the issues today, as it seems
things have smoothed out a bit.

 

-Wes

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:04 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

 

Hey now Nowhere, ID is really close to me 

Josh Luthman wrote: 

The games on those consoles are hosted (network wise) by other
players.  The server for a 16 player game could very well be a person
in Nowhere, ID with a 1/384 DSL connection.
 
On 12/2/08, Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:
  

Hi All,
 
I've had calls from a number of xbox 360 customers that are
having trouble
with game play etc.  Very long lags, poor pings etc.
 
These calls are coming from customers off of multiple towers and
even in
different towns.
 
No calls coming from Wii or playstation.  Just xbox 360.
 
Anyone else seeing these issues in the last few months?
 
thanks,
marlon
 
 
 



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 


 
  



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage

2008-12-02 Thread Matt Liotta

On Dec 2, 2008, at 10:08 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:

 Have we gotten any reports how 3650 works with foliage?

3650 sucks with foliage and more power doesn't help. Yeah it is that  
bad.

-Matt




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

2008-12-02 Thread Jeff Broadwick
Can you see it from there?  ducking  :-)

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:04 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues


Hey now Nowhere, ID is really close to me 

Josh Luthman wrote: 

The games on those consoles are hosted (network wise) by other

players.  The server for a 16 player game could very well be a person

in Nowhere, ID with a 1/384 DSL connection.



On 12/2/08, Marlon K. Schafer  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  

Hi All,



I've had calls from a number of xbox 360 customers that are having trouble

with game play etc.  Very long lags, poor pings etc.



These calls are coming from customers off of multiple towers and even in

different towns.



No calls coming from Wii or playstation.  Just xbox 360.



Anyone else seeing these issues in the last few months?



thanks,

marlon










WISPA Wants You! Join today!

http://signup.wispa.org/






WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org



Subscribe/Unsubscribe:

http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/







  




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage

2008-12-02 Thread Charles Wu (CTI)
Have we gotten any reports how 3650 works with foliage?

It doesn't

Would MIMO have any affect on foliage penetration ability?

Sure, it might help, but 700 would help more

-Charles

This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which 
it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential 
and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message 
is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for 
delivery of the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us 
immediately by telephone at 630-344-1586.



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage

2008-12-02 Thread Mike Hammett
Well right.

I could only assume that 3650 is better than 5.x GHz, but sometimes you 
match something's...  I think natural frequency is the term I'm looking for. 
Like how 70 - 80 GHz gear goes farther than 60 GHz, because 60 GHz is the 
natural frequency of oxygen.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: Charles Wu (CTI) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 9:53 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage

Have we gotten any reports how 3650 works with foliage?

 It doesn't

Would MIMO have any affect on foliage penetration ability?

 Sure, it might help, but 700 would help more

 -Charles

 This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to 
 which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, 
 confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the 
 reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or 
 agent responsible for delivery of the message to the intended recipient, 
 you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of 
 this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
 communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone at 
 630-344-1586.


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage

2008-12-02 Thread Patrick Shoemaker
http://www.phys.hawaii.edu/~anita/web/paperwork/currently%20organizing/Military%20EW%20%20Handbook%20Excerpt/rf_absor.pdf

http://www.rfcafe.com/references/electrical/atm-absorption.htm


Patrick Shoemaker
Vector Data Systems LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
office: (301) 358-1690 x36
http://www.vectordatasystems.com


Mike Hammett wrote:
 Well right.
 
 I could only assume that 3650 is better than 5.x GHz, but sometimes you 
 match something's...  I think natural frequency is the term I'm looking for. 
 Like how 70 - 80 GHz gear goes farther than 60 GHz, because 60 GHz is the 
 natural frequency of oxygen.
 
 
 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com
 
 
 
 --
 From: Charles Wu (CTI) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 9:53 AM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage
 
 Have we gotten any reports how 3650 works with foliage?
 It doesn't

 Would MIMO have any affect on foliage penetration ability?
 Sure, it might help, but 700 would help more

 -Charles

 This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to 
 which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, 
 confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the 
 reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or 
 agent responsible for delivery of the message to the intended recipient, 
 you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of 
 this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
 communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone at 
 630-344-1586.


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Trango Giga Link - Lowering MSE

2008-12-02 Thread Gino Villarini
Brad and Travis, Thanks for your help

I turned down both ends to 0 power.  I have -41 on the local end and -46
on the remote.

MSE went to -31 on the local, -20 on the remote.

Changing power on the local unit from 0 to 15 don't affect the remote
MSE at all, it stays in the 15-20 range.

Checked cable loss settings, and changed if from lmr400 to belden 9913,
(no big change on numbers, no chenge on MSE)

ATPC is off, targerrssi is still in -26 

Any other ideas???


Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:27 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Trango Giga Link - Lowering MSE

I would continue to turn the power down (probably to 0) and see if that
helps. We had a -35 on our link (at +20db power) and had to turn it down
to +13db to get a -42 and then the MSE went from -20ish to -33ish.

I would do it on the local side first, to see what happens in case the
link completely drops out.

Travis
Microserv

Gino Villarini wrote:
 Hey Guys

 I got a .7 mile 23 ghz Trango Giga Link that Im provisioning
  
 Antennas are peaked at -26, using 50 mhz channles 256 qam.  Tx power 
 is at 15 db
  
 MSE in one end is arround -11, the other end is around -22
  
 How can I improve the MSE? Lowering Tx power just worsens it
  

 Gino A. Villarini
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
 tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145 

  


 --
 --
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 --
 --
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


   




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

2008-12-02 Thread Josh Luthman
I believe the Tuesday before or a week before that they launched a bew
firmware for the console (100 megs or more IIRC) which could be
related, but my stance has always faulted with lousy servers.  It
explains how it goes good and bad from game to game all day every day.

On 12/2/08, Jeff Broadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Can you see it from there?  ducking  :-)

   _

 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Travis Johnson
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:04 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues


 Hey now Nowhere, ID is really close to me

 Josh Luthman wrote:

 The games on those consoles are hosted (network wise) by other

 players.  The server for a 16 player game could very well be a person

 in Nowhere, ID with a 1/384 DSL connection.



 On 12/2/08, Marlon K. Schafer  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 Hi All,



 I've had calls from a number of xbox 360 customers that are having trouble

 with game play etc.  Very long lags, poor pings etc.



 These calls are coming from customers off of multiple towers and even in

 different towns.



 No calls coming from Wii or playstation.  Just xbox 360.



 Anyone else seeing these issues in the last few months?



 thanks,

 marlon







 
 

 WISPA Wants You! Join today!

 http://signup.wispa.org/

 
 



 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org



 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:

 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/











 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


-- 
Sent from my mobile device

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
--- Henry Spencer



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

2008-12-02 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
We've seen trouble for months out here.

Even with customers on connections that run 1 to 2 megs.  Heck, I've got 
customers that pull 8 megs both ways that are having trouble with xbox 360 
games.

- Original Message - 
From: Wes James [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 7:23 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues


 Xbox live service has been up and down since Black Friday. It is
 possible that the host machine is also causing problems, but my guess is
 that the million new subscribers over the weekend gave the service a
 pounding. See if they are still having the issues today, as it seems
 things have smoothed out a bit.



 -Wes



 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Travis Johnson
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:04 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues



 Hey now Nowhere, ID is really close to me

 Josh Luthman wrote:

 The games on those consoles are hosted (network wise) by other
 players.  The server for a 16 player game could very well be a person
 in Nowhere, ID with a 1/384 DSL connection.

 On 12/2/08, Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:


 Hi All,

 I've had calls from a number of xbox 360 customers that are
 having trouble
 with game play etc.  Very long lags, poor pings etc.

 These calls are coming from customers off of multiple towers and
 even in
 different towns.

 No calls coming from Wii or playstation.  Just xbox 360.

 Anyone else seeing these issues in the last few months?

 thanks,
 marlon




 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/







 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage

2008-12-02 Thread Mike Hammett
So according to the document from Hawaii, 3.6 GHz should have lower 
atmospheric attenuation (I'm assuming this is similar or the same to free 
space loss) than 2.4 GHz.  I'm not at sea level, but I am by no means at 
9150 meters!

Because water is the molecule at play here, that would also show a 
difference in foliage penetration.  Not trying to go through a forest or 
anything, but wondering how it would handle a tree or two.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: Patrick Shoemaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:10 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage

 http://www.phys.hawaii.edu/~anita/web/paperwork/currently%20organizing/Military%20EW%20%20Handbook%20Excerpt/rf_absor.pdf

 http://www.rfcafe.com/references/electrical/atm-absorption.htm


 Patrick Shoemaker
 Vector Data Systems LLC
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 office: (301) 358-1690 x36
 http://www.vectordatasystems.com


 Mike Hammett wrote:
 Well right.

 I could only assume that 3650 is better than 5.x GHz, but sometimes you
 match something's...  I think natural frequency is the term I'm looking 
 for.
 Like how 70 - 80 GHz gear goes farther than 60 GHz, because 60 GHz is the
 natural frequency of oxygen.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Charles Wu (CTI) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 9:53 AM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage

 Have we gotten any reports how 3650 works with foliage?
 It doesn't

 Would MIMO have any affect on foliage penetration ability?
 Sure, it might help, but 700 would help more

 -Charles

 This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to
 which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged,
 confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
 reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or
 agent responsible for delivery of the message to the intended recipient,
 you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying 
 of
 this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
 communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone at
 630-344-1586.


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

2008-12-02 Thread Mike Hammett
The update was released on the 19th and requires 128 MB of storage space.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: Josh Luthman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:25 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

 I believe the Tuesday before or a week before that they launched a bew
 firmware for the console (100 megs or more IIRC) which could be
 related, but my stance has always faulted with lousy servers.  It
 explains how it goes good and bad from game to game all day every day.

 On 12/2/08, Jeff Broadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Can you see it from there?  ducking  :-)

   _

 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Travis Johnson
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:04 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues


 Hey now Nowhere, ID is really close to me

 Josh Luthman wrote:

 The games on those consoles are hosted (network wise) by other

 players.  The server for a 16 player game could very well be a person

 in Nowhere, ID with a 1/384 DSL connection.



 On 12/2/08, Marlon K. Schafer  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 Hi All,



 I've had calls from a number of xbox 360 customers that are having 
 trouble

 with game play etc.  Very long lags, poor pings etc.



 These calls are coming from customers off of multiple towers and even in

 different towns.



 No calls coming from Wii or playstation.  Just xbox 360.



 Anyone else seeing these issues in the last few months?



 thanks,

 marlon







 
 

 WISPA Wants You! Join today!

 http://signup.wispa.org/

 
 



 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org



 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:

 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/











 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 -- 
 Sent from my mobile device

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
 --- Henry Spencer


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Trango Giga Link - Lowering MSE

2008-12-02 Thread Brad Belton
We ran into a problem with noise being picked up by the IDU/ODU cable due to
less than adequate shielding.  Once we replaced the cable with LMR400 the
MSE's came right up to where they were supposed to be.

The Belden 9913 cable has similar loss characteristics, but how does the
shielding compare to LMR400?

We have also found that some Giga radios prefer higher than calculated
cableloss settings.  For example we have one radio's cableloss settings
nearly double what is calculated for the cable run.

Brad






-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:16 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Trango Giga Link - Lowering MSE

Brad and Travis, Thanks for your help

I turned down both ends to 0 power.  I have -41 on the local end and -46
on the remote.

MSE went to -31 on the local, -20 on the remote.

Changing power on the local unit from 0 to 15 don't affect the remote
MSE at all, it stays in the 15-20 range.

Checked cable loss settings, and changed if from lmr400 to belden 9913,
(no big change on numbers, no chenge on MSE)

ATPC is off, targerrssi is still in -26 

Any other ideas???


Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:27 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Trango Giga Link - Lowering MSE

I would continue to turn the power down (probably to 0) and see if that
helps. We had a -35 on our link (at +20db power) and had to turn it down
to +13db to get a -42 and then the MSE went from -20ish to -33ish.

I would do it on the local side first, to see what happens in case the
link completely drops out.

Travis
Microserv

Gino Villarini wrote:
 Hey Guys

 I got a .7 mile 23 ghz Trango Giga Link that Im provisioning
  
 Antennas are peaked at -26, using 50 mhz channles 256 qam.  Tx power 
 is at 15 db
  
 MSE in one end is arround -11, the other end is around -22
  
 How can I improve the MSE? Lowering Tx power just worsens it
  

 Gino A. Villarini
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
 tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145 

  


 --
 --
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 --
 --
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


   




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage

2008-12-02 Thread John Scrivner
Our coverage looks like 2.4 GHz coverage in the same environment with the
exception of much lower noise floor which helps extend link budgets slightly
and help increase reliability at the edge of the coverage area.
Scriv


On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:

 So according to the document from Hawaii, 3.6 GHz should have lower
 atmospheric attenuation (I'm assuming this is similar or the same to free
 space loss) than 2.4 GHz.  I'm not at sea level, but I am by no means at
 9150 meters!

 Because water is the molecule at play here, that would also show a
 difference in foliage penetration.  Not trying to go through a forest or
 anything, but wondering how it would handle a tree or two.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Patrick Shoemaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:10 AM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage

 
 http://www.phys.hawaii.edu/~anita/web/paperwork/currently%20organizing/Military%20EW%20%20Handbook%20Excerpt/rf_absor.pdfhttp://www.phys.hawaii.edu/%7Eanita/web/paperwork/currently%20organizing/Military%20EW%20%20Handbook%20Excerpt/rf_absor.pdf
 
  http://www.rfcafe.com/references/electrical/atm-absorption.htm
 
 
  Patrick Shoemaker
  Vector Data Systems LLC
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  office: (301) 358-1690 x36
  http://www.vectordatasystems.com
 
 
  Mike Hammett wrote:
  Well right.
 
  I could only assume that 3650 is better than 5.x GHz, but sometimes you
  match something's...  I think natural frequency is the term I'm looking
  for.
  Like how 70 - 80 GHz gear goes farther than 60 GHz, because 60 GHz is
 the
  natural frequency of oxygen.
 
 
  -
  Mike Hammett
  Intelligent Computing Solutions
  http://www.ics-il.com
 
 
 
  --
  From: Charles Wu (CTI) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 9:53 AM
  To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage
 
  Have we gotten any reports how 3650 works with foliage?
  It doesn't
 
  Would MIMO have any affect on foliage penetration ability?
  Sure, it might help, but 700 would help more
 
  -Charles
 
  This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity
 to
  which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged,
  confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
  reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee
 or
  agent responsible for delivery of the message to the intended
 recipient,
  you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying
  of
  this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
  communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone at
  630-344-1586.
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

2008-12-02 Thread Mike Hammett
Problems with PC games?

I believe the vast majority, if not all XBox games are hosted by the users 
in the game instead of a central server (as mentioned earlier).  It's 
entirely dependant on how good or bad everyone's connection is.  Could be 
your connection quality back to MS central.  Speed isn't the only indicator 
of connection quality.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:25 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

 We've seen trouble for months out here.

 Even with customers on connections that run 1 to 2 megs.  Heck, I've got
 customers that pull 8 megs both ways that are having trouble with xbox 360
 games.

 - Original Message - 
 From: Wes James [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 7:23 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues


 Xbox live service has been up and down since Black Friday. It is
 possible that the host machine is also causing problems, but my guess is
 that the million new subscribers over the weekend gave the service a
 pounding. See if they are still having the issues today, as it seems
 things have smoothed out a bit.



 -Wes



 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Travis Johnson
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:04 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues



 Hey now Nowhere, ID is really close to me

 Josh Luthman wrote:

 The games on those consoles are hosted (network wise) by other
 players.  The server for a 16 player game could very well be a person
 in Nowhere, ID with a 1/384 DSL connection.

 On 12/2/08, Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:


 Hi All,

 I've had calls from a number of xbox 360 customers that are
 having trouble
 with game play etc.  Very long lags, poor pings etc.

 These calls are coming from customers off of multiple towers and
 even in
 different towns.

 No calls coming from Wii or playstation.  Just xbox 360.

 Anyone else seeing these issues in the last few months?

 thanks,
 marlon




 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/







 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Trango Giga Link - Lowering MSE

2008-12-02 Thread Gino Villarini
I'll try the the larger calbe loss numbers  AFAIK I just need to
input the cable loss for a 100' run or is the actual calbe loss number
needed ( cable loss per ft * cable run) 


Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brad Belton
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 12:34 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Trango Giga Link - Lowering MSE

We ran into a problem with noise being picked up by the IDU/ODU cable
due to less than adequate shielding.  Once we replaced the cable with
LMR400 the MSE's came right up to where they were supposed to be.

The Belden 9913 cable has similar loss characteristics, but how does the
shielding compare to LMR400?

We have also found that some Giga radios prefer higher than calculated
cableloss settings.  For example we have one radio's cableloss settings
nearly double what is calculated for the cable run.

Brad






-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:16 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Trango Giga Link - Lowering MSE

Brad and Travis, Thanks for your help

I turned down both ends to 0 power.  I have -41 on the local end and -46
on the remote.

MSE went to -31 on the local, -20 on the remote.

Changing power on the local unit from 0 to 15 don't affect the remote
MSE at all, it stays in the 15-20 range.

Checked cable loss settings, and changed if from lmr400 to belden 9913,
(no big change on numbers, no chenge on MSE)

ATPC is off, targerrssi is still in -26 

Any other ideas???


Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:27 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Trango Giga Link - Lowering MSE

I would continue to turn the power down (probably to 0) and see if that
helps. We had a -35 on our link (at +20db power) and had to turn it down
to +13db to get a -42 and then the MSE went from -20ish to -33ish.

I would do it on the local side first, to see what happens in case the
link completely drops out.

Travis
Microserv

Gino Villarini wrote:
 Hey Guys

 I got a .7 mile 23 ghz Trango Giga Link that Im provisioning
  
 Antennas are peaked at -26, using 50 mhz channles 256 qam.  Tx power 
 is at 15 db
  
 MSE in one end is arround -11, the other end is around -22
  
 How can I improve the MSE? Lowering Tx power just worsens it
  

 Gino A. Villarini
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
 tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145 

  


 --
 --
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 --
 --
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


   




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage

2008-12-02 Thread Matt
 Our coverage looks like 2.4 GHz coverage in the same environment with the
 exception of much lower noise floor which helps extend link budgets slightly
 and help increase reliability at the edge of the coverage area.
 Scriv

We do get some tree penetration with Canopy 2.4 and reflectors.  We
get virtually no tree penetration with 5.7 though.  I was thinking
3.6x with higher power might punch through some trees as well.  900
definitely goes through trees but the band is just so trashed.

Matt



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage

2008-12-02 Thread Matt Liotta
We see on average 9dB less signal with 3650 than 2400 NLOS with all  
things being equal.

-Matt

On Dec 2, 2008, at 11:42 AM, John Scrivner wrote:

 Our coverage looks like 2.4 GHz coverage in the same environment  
 with the
 exception of much lower noise floor which helps extend link budgets  
 slightly
 and help increase reliability at the edge of the coverage area.
 Scriv


 On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:

 So according to the document from Hawaii, 3.6 GHz should have lower
 atmospheric attenuation (I'm assuming this is similar or the same  
 to free
 space loss) than 2.4 GHz.  I'm not at sea level, but I am by no  
 means at
 9150 meters!

 Because water is the molecule at play here, that would also show a
 difference in foliage penetration.  Not trying to go through a  
 forest or
 anything, but wondering how it would handle a tree or two.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Patrick Shoemaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:10 AM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage


 http://www.phys.hawaii.edu/~anita/web/paperwork/currently%20organizing/Military%20EW%20%20Handbook%20Excerpt/rf_absor.pdf
  
 http://www.phys.hawaii.edu/%7Eanita/web/paperwork/currently%20organizing/Military%20EW%20%20Handbook%20Excerpt/rf_absor.pdf
  
 

 http://www.rfcafe.com/references/electrical/atm-absorption.htm


 Patrick Shoemaker
 Vector Data Systems LLC
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 office: (301) 358-1690 x36
 http://www.vectordatasystems.com


 Mike Hammett wrote:
 Well right.

 I could only assume that 3650 is better than 5.x GHz, but  
 sometimes you
 match something's...  I think natural frequency is the term I'm  
 looking
 for.
 Like how 70 - 80 GHz gear goes farther than 60 GHz, because 60  
 GHz is
 the
 natural frequency of oxygen.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Charles Wu (CTI) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 9:53 AM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage

 Have we gotten any reports how 3650 works with foliage?
 It doesn't

 Would MIMO have any affect on foliage penetration ability?
 Sure, it might help, but 700 would help more

 -Charles

 This message is intended only for the use of the individual or  
 entity
 to
 which it is addressed and may contain information that is  
 privileged,
 confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If  
 the
 reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the  
 employee
 or
 agent responsible for delivery of the message to the intended
 recipient,
 you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or  
 copying
 of
 this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received  
 this
 communication in error, please notify us immediately by  
 telephone at
 630-344-1586.



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: 

Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

2008-12-02 Thread Josh Luthman
I know Halo 2 and 3 does use the peers as gaming hosts.  Can't say for
other games.   To my knowledge Halo is the dominate Xbox game.

On 12/2/08, Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Problems with PC games?

 I believe the vast majority, if not all XBox games are hosted by the users
 in the game instead of a central server (as mentioned earlier).  It's
 entirely dependant on how good or bad everyone's connection is.  Could be
 your connection quality back to MS central.  Speed isn't the only indicator
 of connection quality.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:25 AM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

 We've seen trouble for months out here.

 Even with customers on connections that run 1 to 2 megs.  Heck, I've got
 customers that pull 8 megs both ways that are having trouble with xbox 360
 games.

 - Original Message -
 From: Wes James [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 7:23 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues


 Xbox live service has been up and down since Black Friday. It is
 possible that the host machine is also causing problems, but my guess is
 that the million new subscribers over the weekend gave the service a
 pounding. See if they are still having the issues today, as it seems
 things have smoothed out a bit.



 -Wes



 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Travis Johnson
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:04 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues



 Hey now Nowhere, ID is really close to me

 Josh Luthman wrote:

 The games on those consoles are hosted (network wise) by other
 players.  The server for a 16 player game could very well be a person
 in Nowhere, ID with a 1/384 DSL connection.

 On 12/2/08, Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:


 Hi All,

 I've had calls from a number of xbox 360 customers that are
 having trouble
 with game play etc.  Very long lags, poor pings etc.

 These calls are coming from customers off of multiple towers and
 even in
 different towns.

 No calls coming from Wii or playstation.  Just xbox 360.

 Anyone else seeing these issues in the last few months?

 thanks,
 marlon




 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/







 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


-- 
Sent from my mobile device

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
--- Henry Spencer



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Trango Giga Link - Lowering MSE

2008-12-02 Thread Brad Belton
Right, if you have LMR400 and the cable run is 100' then you would enter:

cableloss 1.5 2.3 3.9

For 200' you would enter:

cableloss 3.0 4.6 7.8

Here is an online calculator where you can enter specific cable lengths:

http://www.timesmicrowave.com/cgi-bin/calculate.pl


The targetrssi also plays into the MSE reading.  I typically start with what
RSSI is expected and then take into account any variables that may attenuate
the RSSI (eg. Building glass etc.).

Brad




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:44 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Trango Giga Link - Lowering MSE

I'll try the the larger calbe loss numbers  AFAIK I just need to
input the cable loss for a 100' run or is the actual calbe loss number
needed ( cable loss per ft * cable run) 


Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brad Belton
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 12:34 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Trango Giga Link - Lowering MSE

We ran into a problem with noise being picked up by the IDU/ODU cable
due to less than adequate shielding.  Once we replaced the cable with
LMR400 the MSE's came right up to where they were supposed to be.

The Belden 9913 cable has similar loss characteristics, but how does the
shielding compare to LMR400?

We have also found that some Giga radios prefer higher than calculated
cableloss settings.  For example we have one radio's cableloss settings
nearly double what is calculated for the cable run.

Brad






-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:16 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Trango Giga Link - Lowering MSE

Brad and Travis, Thanks for your help

I turned down both ends to 0 power.  I have -41 on the local end and -46
on the remote.

MSE went to -31 on the local, -20 on the remote.

Changing power on the local unit from 0 to 15 don't affect the remote
MSE at all, it stays in the 15-20 range.

Checked cable loss settings, and changed if from lmr400 to belden 9913,
(no big change on numbers, no chenge on MSE)

ATPC is off, targerrssi is still in -26 

Any other ideas???


Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:27 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Trango Giga Link - Lowering MSE

I would continue to turn the power down (probably to 0) and see if that
helps. We had a -35 on our link (at +20db power) and had to turn it down
to +13db to get a -42 and then the MSE went from -20ish to -33ish.

I would do it on the local side first, to see what happens in case the
link completely drops out.

Travis
Microserv

Gino Villarini wrote:
 Hey Guys

 I got a .7 mile 23 ghz Trango Giga Link that Im provisioning
  
 Antennas are peaked at -26, using 50 mhz channles 256 qam.  Tx power 
 is at 15 db
  
 MSE in one end is arround -11, the other end is around -22
  
 How can I improve the MSE? Lowering Tx power just worsens it
  

 Gino A. Villarini
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
 tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145 

  


 --
 --
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 --
 --
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


   




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:

Re: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage

2008-12-02 Thread Josh Luthman
With Trango and MT (compex and ubnt) I get minimal tree penetration.

On 12/2/08, Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 We see on average 9dB less signal with 3650 than 2400 NLOS with all
 things being equal.

 -Matt

 On Dec 2, 2008, at 11:42 AM, John Scrivner wrote:

 Our coverage looks like 2.4 GHz coverage in the same environment
 with the
 exception of much lower noise floor which helps extend link budgets
 slightly
 and help increase reliability at the edge of the coverage area.
 Scriv


 On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

 So according to the document from Hawaii, 3.6 GHz should have lower
 atmospheric attenuation (I'm assuming this is similar or the same
 to free
 space loss) than 2.4 GHz.  I'm not at sea level, but I am by no
 means at
 9150 meters!

 Because water is the molecule at play here, that would also show a
 difference in foliage penetration.  Not trying to go through a
 forest or
 anything, but wondering how it would handle a tree or two.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Patrick Shoemaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:10 AM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage


 http://www.phys.hawaii.edu/~anita/web/paperwork/currently%20organizing/Military%20EW%20%20Handbook%20Excerpt/rf_absor.pdf

 http://www.phys.hawaii.edu/%7Eanita/web/paperwork/currently%20organizing/Military%20EW%20%20Handbook%20Excerpt/rf_absor.pdf

 

 http://www.rfcafe.com/references/electrical/atm-absorption.htm


 Patrick Shoemaker
 Vector Data Systems LLC
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 office: (301) 358-1690 x36
 http://www.vectordatasystems.com


 Mike Hammett wrote:
 Well right.

 I could only assume that 3650 is better than 5.x GHz, but
 sometimes you
 match something's...  I think natural frequency is the term I'm
 looking
 for.
 Like how 70 - 80 GHz gear goes farther than 60 GHz, because 60
 GHz is
 the
 natural frequency of oxygen.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Charles Wu (CTI) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 9:53 AM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage

 Have we gotten any reports how 3650 works with foliage?
 It doesn't

 Would MIMO have any affect on foliage penetration ability?
 Sure, it might help, but 700 would help more

 -Charles

 This message is intended only for the use of the individual or
 entity
 to
 which it is addressed and may contain information that is
 privileged,
 confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
 the
 reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
 employee
 or
 agent responsible for delivery of the message to the intended
 recipient,
 you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
 copying
 of
 this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received
 this
 communication in error, please notify us immediately by
 telephone at
 630-344-1586.



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 

Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

2008-12-02 Thread Mike Hammett
*nods*  The Halo and Call of Duty series operate that way.  I haven't played 
many other games online.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: Josh Luthman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 11:06 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

 I know Halo 2 and 3 does use the peers as gaming hosts.  Can't say for
 other games.   To my knowledge Halo is the dominate Xbox game.

 On 12/2/08, Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Problems with PC games?

 I believe the vast majority, if not all XBox games are hosted by the 
 users
 in the game instead of a central server (as mentioned earlier).  It's
 entirely dependant on how good or bad everyone's connection is.  Could be
 your connection quality back to MS central.  Speed isn't the only 
 indicator
 of connection quality.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:25 AM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

 We've seen trouble for months out here.

 Even with customers on connections that run 1 to 2 megs.  Heck, I've got
 customers that pull 8 megs both ways that are having trouble with xbox 
 360
 games.

 - Original Message -
 From: Wes James [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 7:23 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues


 Xbox live service has been up and down since Black Friday. It is
 possible that the host machine is also causing problems, but my guess 
 is
 that the million new subscribers over the weekend gave the service a
 pounding. See if they are still having the issues today, as it seems
 things have smoothed out a bit.



 -Wes



 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Travis Johnson
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:04 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues



 Hey now Nowhere, ID is really close to me

 Josh Luthman wrote:

 The games on those consoles are hosted (network wise) by other
 players.  The server for a 16 player game could very well be a person
 in Nowhere, ID with a 1/384 DSL connection.

 On 12/2/08, Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:


 Hi All,

 I've had calls from a number of xbox 360 customers that are
 having trouble
 with game play etc.  Very long lags, poor pings etc.

 These calls are coming from customers off of multiple towers and
 even in
 different towns.

 No calls coming from Wii or playstation.  Just xbox 360.

 Anyone else seeing these issues in the last few months?

 thanks,
 marlon




 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/







 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 -- 
 Sent from my mobile device

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
 --- Henry Spencer


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 

[WISPA] Welcome SecurAlign as a new WISPA Vendor Member

2008-12-02 Thread John Scrivner
Layne Christensen with SecurAlign is the newest Vendor Member in WISPA. I am
sure I speak for us all when I say welcome to you Layne. We appreciate your
company's investment in our future with your membership in WISPA. We look
forward to working with you to help your business and our industry to grow
and prosper. I have included some introductory information about SecurAlign
below in Layne's own words. Thank you for supporting WISPA.

*SecurAlign* began building the *LT-18* solid reflector for Canopy radios in
early 2003 under the name Layne Tool Company.

Layne Tool was building the LT-18 reflector as a high quality, low priced
alternative to the Canopy 27RD. Motorola engineers liked features of the
LT-18 design and considered switching from the 27RD. After two months of
testing Motorola decided to continue with the 27RD because of the lower gain
of the LT-18 and costs and effort associated with FCC compliance for a new
product. Layne Tool then began selling the LT-18 exclusively through
distributors. The LT-18 sold well for about three years. Sales began to slow
down due to the large markup by the distributors and the availability of
other competing reflectors. In mid-2007 the decision was make to sell
directly to WISPs under the new name *SecurAlign*. Along with the new
company name came an improved design for the LT-18. Early in 2008 the *MAX
Dish *was introduced as a *higher gain* alternative to the LT-18 as well as
the more expensive 27RD. The MAX Dish also has additional features not found
on any other solid dish antenna. See the SecurAlign website
www.securalign.com for product features and ordering info.

By selling directly to WISPs SecurAlign can offer the best products at the
lowest wholesale pricing. SecurAlign's mission is to build products of the
highest quality and performance and sell at the lowest prices possible.
**  *SecurAlign* *1575 W 2550 S* *Ogden, UT 84310* *USA* *+1 (801) 791-4069
voice* *+1 (801) 745-1808 fax* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage

2008-12-02 Thread John Scrivner
Matt,
Would you not agree that you probably have at least 9 db better noise
figures than 2.4 at the same distance where you are seeing 9 db less signal?
That is what I was trying to illustrate in my post. Even though the signal
drops a little more in the 3650 coverage area than 2.4 we see roughly
equivalent coverage areas due to lower noise floor and hence better SNR at
the edge of the coverage area.

Matt, I seem to remember a post from you recently where you were touting a
link through 4 miles of tress with 3650. Was I not reading that correctly?
Scriv


On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 We see on average 9dB less signal with 3650 than 2400 NLOS with all
 things being equal.

 -Matt

 On Dec 2, 2008, at 11:42 AM, John Scrivner wrote:

  Our coverage looks like 2.4 GHz coverage in the same environment
  with the
  exception of much lower noise floor which helps extend link budgets
  slightly
  and help increase reliability at the edge of the coverage area.
  Scriv
 
 
  On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  wrote:
 
  So according to the document from Hawaii, 3.6 GHz should have lower
  atmospheric attenuation (I'm assuming this is similar or the same
  to free
  space loss) than 2.4 GHz.  I'm not at sea level, but I am by no
  means at
  9150 meters!
 
  Because water is the molecule at play here, that would also show a
  difference in foliage penetration.  Not trying to go through a
  forest or
  anything, but wondering how it would handle a tree or two.
 
 
  -
  Mike Hammett
  Intelligent Computing Solutions
  http://www.ics-il.com
 
 
 
  --
  From: Patrick Shoemaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:10 AM
  To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage
 
 
 
 http://www.phys.hawaii.edu/~anita/web/paperwork/currently%20organizing/Military%20EW%20%20Handbook%20Excerpt/rf_absor.pdfhttp://www.phys.hawaii.edu/%7Eanita/web/paperwork/currently%20organizing/Military%20EW%20%20Handbook%20Excerpt/rf_absor.pdf
  
 http://www.phys.hawaii.edu/%7Eanita/web/paperwork/currently%20organizing/Military%20EW%20%20Handbook%20Excerpt/rf_absor.pdf
  
 
  http://www.rfcafe.com/references/electrical/atm-absorption.htm
 
 
  Patrick Shoemaker
  Vector Data Systems LLC
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  office: (301) 358-1690 x36
  http://www.vectordatasystems.com
 
 
  Mike Hammett wrote:
  Well right.
 
  I could only assume that 3650 is better than 5.x GHz, but
  sometimes you
  match something's...  I think natural frequency is the term I'm
  looking
  for.
  Like how 70 - 80 GHz gear goes farther than 60 GHz, because 60
  GHz is
  the
  natural frequency of oxygen.
 
 
  -
  Mike Hammett
  Intelligent Computing Solutions
  http://www.ics-il.com
 
 
 
  --
  From: Charles Wu (CTI) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 9:53 AM
  To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage
 
  Have we gotten any reports how 3650 works with foliage?
  It doesn't
 
  Would MIMO have any affect on foliage penetration ability?
  Sure, it might help, but 700 would help more
 
  -Charles
 
  This message is intended only for the use of the individual or
  entity
  to
  which it is addressed and may contain information that is
  privileged,
  confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
  the
  reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
  employee
  or
  agent responsible for delivery of the message to the intended
  recipient,
  you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
  copying
  of
  this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received
  this
  communication in error, please notify us immediately by
  telephone at
  630-344-1586.
 
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  

Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

2008-12-02 Thread Josh Luthman
Call of Duty has to be another big one - those WW2 games have dominated the
market for a while.

Odd I can't find a ranking for Xbox live games.  I am confident Halo and
Call of Duty have the majority of games.  I can't verify that Call of Duty
does games p2p versus client-server, though.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
--- Henry Spencer


On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:

 *nods*  The Halo and Call of Duty series operate that way.  I haven't
 played
 many other games online.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Josh Luthman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 11:06 AM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

  I know Halo 2 and 3 does use the peers as gaming hosts.  Can't say for
  other games.   To my knowledge Halo is the dominate Xbox game.
 
  On 12/2/08, Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Problems with PC games?
 
  I believe the vast majority, if not all XBox games are hosted by the
  users
  in the game instead of a central server (as mentioned earlier).  It's
  entirely dependant on how good or bad everyone's connection is.  Could
 be
  your connection quality back to MS central.  Speed isn't the only
  indicator
  of connection quality.
 
 
  -
  Mike Hammett
  Intelligent Computing Solutions
  http://www.ics-il.com
 
 
 
  --
  From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:25 AM
  To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues
 
  We've seen trouble for months out here.
 
  Even with customers on connections that run 1 to 2 megs.  Heck, I've
 got
  customers that pull 8 megs both ways that are having trouble with xbox
  360
  games.
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Wes James [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
  Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 7:23 AM
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues
 
 
  Xbox live service has been up and down since Black Friday. It is
  possible that the host machine is also causing problems, but my guess
  is
  that the million new subscribers over the weekend gave the service a
  pounding. See if they are still having the issues today, as it seems
  things have smoothed out a bit.
 
 
 
  -Wes
 
 
 
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On
  Behalf Of Travis Johnson
  Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:04 AM
  To: WISPA General List
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues
 
 
 
  Hey now Nowhere, ID is really close to me
 
  Josh Luthman wrote:
 
  The games on those consoles are hosted (network wise) by other
  players.  The server for a 16 player game could very well be a person
  in Nowhere, ID with a 1/384 DSL connection.
 
  On 12/2/08, Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:
 
 
  Hi All,
 
  I've had calls from a number of xbox 360 customers that are
  having trouble
  with game play etc.  Very long lags, poor pings etc.
 
  These calls are coming from customers off of multiple towers and
  even in
  different towns.
 
  No calls coming from Wii or playstation.  Just xbox 360.
 
  Anyone else seeing these issues in the last few months?
 
  thanks,
  marlon
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
  
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
  WISPA 

Re: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage

2008-12-02 Thread John Rock
We have many 3.65GHz WiMAX Base Stations deployed and propagation has been
real positive even through some foliage.
Picture1 -
http://www.wirelessconnections.net/index.php?option=com_shared_private_space
task=showfilefileid=117
Picture2 - 
http://www.wirelessconnections.net/index.php?option=com_shared_private_space
task=showfilefileid=118
Picture3 -
http://www.wirelessconnections.net/index.php?option=com_shared_private_space
task=showfilefileid=119

The above pictures are from a shot we had in Texas to a 3.65 Base Station, I
have more tree pictures.
The customer had an older original Alvarion VL CPE at 5.8GHz. They installed
the VL on a 40 ft guyed mast pole, to get good SNR. At 3.65 GHz from street
level(12ft AGL) beside the house we had -75 dBm and downlink/uplink at
64QAM/16QAM respectively we pulled 6Mb/3Mb and perfect Voice calls from the
truck. The WISP is thrilled with their coverage in the small town even
through foliage.

As you can see we shot between two pine trees and through the other trees.
At this site we were almost 1.1 Miles away. I would classify the foliage as
light.

The key to everything is defining the word foliage. How dense is the
foliage? How tall? How much power at the Base Station and CPE? Diversity?
How far away are you from the Base Station?

MIMO or second/fourth order diversity at 3.65Ghz is not being done at the
CPE level yet and only on select type of Base Stations. At the Base Stations
with Second or Fourth order diversity we see greatly improved uplink
capabilities and a lot better connectivity in NLOS environments because of
the improved Uplinks. Passing reliable data at -85 to -92dBm is obtainable,
although I highly recommend only installing clients with good signal
strength. Most systems require -74 to -78dBm or better to achieve reliable
full burst rates(64QAM3/4)...When CPE become available with MIMO we can
expect even better sensitivity in the Downlink also. It becomes a question
on how long it takes the vendors to implement 802.16e flavored in 3.65GHz.,
Mid/Late 2009 is my bet.

We can build an RF system at any frequency that can get through foliage, it
comes down to how much do you want to spend to get that type of coverage
within your areas terrain.

Thinking 3.65GHz can cover through foliage at long range is a myth. And I
understand that most operators want to cover 50 miles NLOS from a single
tower site at 75' AGL...

700 MHZ can work better if you own that spectrum for use? 3.65GHz is open to
about anyone.

Thanks,
John Rock
Director of Operations - Senior Engineer
Wireless Connections
166 Milan Ave., Norwalk, Oh. 44857 
ACCessing the Future Today!!
ofc. 419.660.6100
cell 419-706-7356
fax  419-668-4077
http://www.wirelessconnections.net
This transmission and any files attached to it, may contain confidential
and/or privileged information and intended only for the named recipient. If
you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, reproduction, retransmission, dissemination, disclosure, copying
or any use of the information or files contained is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by
reply transmission and delete this electronic mail.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:09 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage

Have we gotten any reports how 3650 works with foliage?

Would MIMO have any affect on foliage penetration ability?


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage

2008-12-02 Thread Mike Hammett
Who said anything about using 802.16?  ;-)

I generally don't install a customer that has signal worse than -80.  I want 
to maintain full modulation as best as possible.  Can't expect to service 
too many customers if everyone has -88 signal.

I'm just looking to be able to go through a single tree row of trees on a 
fence line or maybe a small cluster...  no forests.  ;-)


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: John Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 11:21 AM
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage

 We have many 3.65GHz WiMAX Base Stations deployed and propagation has been
 real positive even through some foliage.
 Picture1 -
 http://www.wirelessconnections.net/index.php?option=com_shared_private_space
 task=showfilefileid=117
 Picture2 -
 http://www.wirelessconnections.net/index.php?option=com_shared_private_space
 task=showfilefileid=118
 Picture3 -
 http://www.wirelessconnections.net/index.php?option=com_shared_private_space
 task=showfilefileid=119

 The above pictures are from a shot we had in Texas to a 3.65 Base Station, 
 I
 have more tree pictures.
 The customer had an older original Alvarion VL CPE at 5.8GHz. They 
 installed
 the VL on a 40 ft guyed mast pole, to get good SNR. At 3.65 GHz from 
 street
 level(12ft AGL) beside the house we had -75 dBm and downlink/uplink at
 64QAM/16QAM respectively we pulled 6Mb/3Mb and perfect Voice calls from 
 the
 truck. The WISP is thrilled with their coverage in the small town even
 through foliage.

 As you can see we shot between two pine trees and through the other 
 trees.
 At this site we were almost 1.1 Miles away. I would classify the foliage 
 as
 light.

 The key to everything is defining the word foliage. How dense is the
 foliage? How tall? How much power at the Base Station and CPE? Diversity?
 How far away are you from the Base Station?

 MIMO or second/fourth order diversity at 3.65Ghz is not being done at the
 CPE level yet and only on select type of Base Stations. At the Base 
 Stations
 with Second or Fourth order diversity we see greatly improved uplink
 capabilities and a lot better connectivity in NLOS environments because of
 the improved Uplinks. Passing reliable data at -85 to -92dBm is 
 obtainable,
 although I highly recommend only installing clients with good signal
 strength. Most systems require -74 to -78dBm or better to achieve reliable
 full burst rates(64QAM3/4)...When CPE become available with MIMO we can
 expect even better sensitivity in the Downlink also. It becomes a question
 on how long it takes the vendors to implement 802.16e flavored in 
 3.65GHz.,
 Mid/Late 2009 is my bet.

 We can build an RF system at any frequency that can get through foliage, 
 it
 comes down to how much do you want to spend to get that type of coverage
 within your areas terrain.

 Thinking 3.65GHz can cover through foliage at long range is a myth. And I
 understand that most operators want to cover 50 miles NLOS from a single
 tower site at 75' AGL...

 700 MHZ can work better if you own that spectrum for use? 3.65GHz is open 
 to
 about anyone.

 Thanks,
 John Rock
 Director of Operations - Senior Engineer
 Wireless Connections
 166 Milan Ave., Norwalk, Oh. 44857
 ACCessing the Future Today!!
 ofc. 419.660.6100
 cell 419-706-7356
 fax 419-668-4077
 http://www.wirelessconnections.net
 This transmission and any files attached to it, may contain confidential
 and/or privileged information and intended only for the named recipient. 
 If
 you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
 disclosure, reproduction, retransmission, dissemination, disclosure, 
 copying
 or any use of the information or files contained is strictly prohibited. 
 If
 you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by
 reply transmission and delete this electronic mail.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Mike Hammett
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:09 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage

 Have we gotten any reports how 3650 works with foliage?

 Would MIMO have any affect on foliage penetration ability?


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

2008-12-02 Thread Matt
 Call of Duty has to be another big one - those WW2 games have dominated the
 market for a while.

 Odd I can't find a ranking for Xbox live games.  I am confident Halo and
 Call of Duty have the majority of games.  I can't verify that Call of Duty
 does games p2p versus client-server, though.

One player in the match will be selected as the server based on the
quality of there connection with COD4 and COD5.  Its too bad they did
not allow dedicated linux game servers for these games.

I always tell custommers that if all the players in the given match
have a crappy connection its the server.  If its just them then it
'might' be a problem with there connection.  I have seen a number of
users with NAT issues on there router though.  Also, many times they
connect to there router wireless with the xbox or ps3 and that
connection goes crappy.

Matt



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

2008-12-02 Thread Josh Luthman
The few games I play I always hear everyone or no one lagging.  Of course
everyone says they're lagging when they're losing, so...

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
--- Henry Spencer


On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Call of Duty has to be another big one - those WW2 games have dominated
 the
  market for a while.
 
  Odd I can't find a ranking for Xbox live games.  I am confident Halo and
  Call of Duty have the majority of games.  I can't verify that Call of
 Duty
  does games p2p versus client-server, though.

 One player in the match will be selected as the server based on the
 quality of there connection with COD4 and COD5.  Its too bad they did
 not allow dedicated linux game servers for these games.

 I always tell custommers that if all the players in the given match
 have a crappy connection its the server.  If its just them then it
 'might' be a problem with there connection.  I have seen a number of
 users with NAT issues on there router though.  Also, many times they
 connect to there router wireless with the xbox or ps3 and that
 connection goes crappy.

 Matt



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage

2008-12-02 Thread Matt Liotta
There is the rub of course. In Atlanta, we see on average about -65  
for noise in 2400, while there is no noise in 3650. SNR is important,  
but for the purposes of helping other WISPs understand how 3650 does  
through foliage I thought it better to limit the discussion to signal  
as noise varies by market.

We have done longer links NLOS with 3650, but I would say .5 miles is  
the average we can get away with.

-Matt

On Dec 2, 2008, at 12:18 PM, John Scrivner wrote:

 Matt,
 Would you not agree that you probably have at least 9 db better noise
 figures than 2.4 at the same distance where you are seeing 9 db less  
 signal?
 That is what I was trying to illustrate in my post. Even though the  
 signal
 drops a little more in the 3650 coverage area than 2.4 we see roughly
 equivalent coverage areas due to lower noise floor and hence better  
 SNR at
 the edge of the coverage area.

 Matt, I seem to remember a post from you recently where you were  
 touting a
 link through 4 miles of tress with 3650. Was I not reading that  
 correctly?
 Scriv


 On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 We see on average 9dB less signal with 3650 than 2400 NLOS with all
 things being equal.

 -Matt

 On Dec 2, 2008, at 11:42 AM, John Scrivner wrote:

 Our coverage looks like 2.4 GHz coverage in the same environment
 with the
 exception of much lower noise floor which helps extend link budgets
 slightly
 and help increase reliability at the edge of the coverage area.
 Scriv


 On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

 So according to the document from Hawaii, 3.6 GHz should have lower
 atmospheric attenuation (I'm assuming this is similar or the same
 to free
 space loss) than 2.4 GHz.  I'm not at sea level, but I am by no
 means at
 9150 meters!

 Because water is the molecule at play here, that would also show a
 difference in foliage penetration.  Not trying to go through a
 forest or
 anything, but wondering how it would handle a tree or two.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Patrick Shoemaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:10 AM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage



 http://www.phys.hawaii.edu/~anita/web/paperwork/currently%20organizing/Military%20EW%20%20Handbook%20Excerpt/rf_absor.pdf
  
 http://www.phys.hawaii.edu/%7Eanita/web/paperwork/currently%20organizing/Military%20EW%20%20Handbook%20Excerpt/rf_absor.pdf
  
 
 
 http://www.phys.hawaii.edu/%7Eanita/web/paperwork/currently%20organizing/Military%20EW%20%20Handbook%20Excerpt/rf_absor.pdf


 http://www.rfcafe.com/references/electrical/atm-absorption.htm


 Patrick Shoemaker
 Vector Data Systems LLC
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 office: (301) 358-1690 x36
 http://www.vectordatasystems.com


 Mike Hammett wrote:
 Well right.

 I could only assume that 3650 is better than 5.x GHz, but
 sometimes you
 match something's...  I think natural frequency is the term I'm
 looking
 for.
 Like how 70 - 80 GHz gear goes farther than 60 GHz, because 60
 GHz is
 the
 natural frequency of oxygen.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Charles Wu (CTI) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 9:53 AM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage

 Have we gotten any reports how 3650 works with foliage?
 It doesn't

 Would MIMO have any affect on foliage penetration ability?
 Sure, it might help, but 700 would help more

 -Charles

 This message is intended only for the use of the individual or
 entity
 to
 which it is addressed and may contain information that is
 privileged,
 confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
 the
 reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
 employee
 or
 agent responsible for delivery of the message to the intended
 recipient,
 you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
 copying
 of
 this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received
 this
 communication in error, please notify us immediately by
 telephone at
 630-344-1586.




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/


 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/


 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 

Re: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage

2008-12-02 Thread Matt Liotta

On Dec 2, 2008, at 12:33 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:

 Who said anything about using 802.16?  ;-)

 I generally don't install a customer that has signal worse than  
 -80.  I want
 to maintain full modulation as best as possible.  Can't expect to  
 service
 too many customers if everyone has -88 signal.

With WiMAX you can. We see full modulation at -86.

-Matt




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

2008-12-02 Thread Mike Hammett
Indeed.  Make sure the NAT settings are correct so they have the best pick 
of people to connect with.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 11:36 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

 Call of Duty has to be another big one - those WW2 games have dominated 
 the
 market for a while.

 Odd I can't find a ranking for Xbox live games.  I am confident Halo and
 Call of Duty have the majority of games.  I can't verify that Call of 
 Duty
 does games p2p versus client-server, though.

 One player in the match will be selected as the server based on the
 quality of there connection with COD4 and COD5.  Its too bad they did
 not allow dedicated linux game servers for these games.

 I always tell custommers that if all the players in the given match
 have a crappy connection its the server.  If its just them then it
 'might' be a problem with there connection.  I have seen a number of
 users with NAT issues on there router though.  Also, many times they
 connect to there router wireless with the xbox or ps3 and that
 connection goes crappy.

 Matt


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage

2008-12-02 Thread Mike Hammett
okay, that is better than the manufacturers were telling me, or maybe they 
just didn't understand what I was getting at...   or maybe I discounted 
something they said because they were telling me 75 miles at 75 megabit... 
okay, no one said that, but they exagerated.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 11:56 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage


 On Dec 2, 2008, at 12:33 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:

 Who said anything about using 802.16?  ;-)

 I generally don't install a customer that has signal worse than
 -80.  I want
 to maintain full modulation as best as possible.  Can't expect to
 service
 too many customers if everyone has -88 signal.

 With WiMAX you can. We see full modulation at -86.

 -Matt



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

2008-12-02 Thread Scottie Arnett
...bew firmware for the console (100 megs or more IIRC)

What's that if you do not mind me asking?

Scottie

-- Original Message --
From: Josh Luthman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date:  Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:25:09 -0500

I believe the Tuesday before or a week before that they launched a bew
firmware for the console (100 megs or more IIRC) which could be
related, but my stance has always faulted with lousy servers.  It
explains how it goes good and bad from game to game all day every day.

On 12/2/08, Jeff Broadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Can you see it from there?  ducking  :-)

   _

 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Travis Johnson
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:04 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues


 Hey now Nowhere, ID is really close to me

 Josh Luthman wrote:

 The games on those consoles are hosted (network wise) by other

 players.  The server for a 16 player game could very well be a person

 in Nowhere, ID with a 1/384 DSL connection.



 On 12/2/08, Marlon K. Schafer  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 Hi All,



 I've had calls from a number of xbox 360 customers that are having trouble

 with game play etc.  Very long lags, poor pings etc.



 These calls are coming from customers off of multiple towers and even in

 different towns.



 No calls coming from Wii or playstation.  Just xbox 360.



 Anyone else seeing these issues in the last few months?



 thanks,

 marlon







 
 

 WISPA Wants You! Join today!

 http://signup.wispa.org/

 
 



 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org



 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:

 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/











 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


-- 
Sent from my mobile device

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
--- Henry Spencer



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]



Wireless High Speed Broadband service from Info-Ed, Inc. as low as $30.00/mth.
Check out www.info-ed.com/wireless.html for information.



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

2008-12-02 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
So, if the host of the game is on a bad connection that would screw up 
everyone?

I've got people with 8 and 9 meg connections having trouble.  Found out 
about a play station customer that's having some trouble too.

I think that there must be something on our network(s) that is at least 
adding to the problem.  I just can't figure out what to test for.
marlon

- Original Message - 
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 9:08 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues


 *nods*  The Halo and Call of Duty series operate that way.  I haven't 
 played
 many other games online.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Josh Luthman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 11:06 AM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

 I know Halo 2 and 3 does use the peers as gaming hosts.  Can't say for
 other games.   To my knowledge Halo is the dominate Xbox game.

 On 12/2/08, Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Problems with PC games?

 I believe the vast majority, if not all XBox games are hosted by the
 users
 in the game instead of a central server (as mentioned earlier).  It's
 entirely dependant on how good or bad everyone's connection is.  Could 
 be
 your connection quality back to MS central.  Speed isn't the only
 indicator
 of connection quality.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:25 AM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

 We've seen trouble for months out here.

 Even with customers on connections that run 1 to 2 megs.  Heck, I've 
 got
 customers that pull 8 megs both ways that are having trouble with xbox
 360
 games.

 - Original Message -
 From: Wes James [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 7:23 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues


 Xbox live service has been up and down since Black Friday. It is
 possible that the host machine is also causing problems, but my guess
 is
 that the million new subscribers over the weekend gave the service a
 pounding. See if they are still having the issues today, as it seems
 things have smoothed out a bit.



 -Wes



 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 On
 Behalf Of Travis Johnson
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:04 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues



 Hey now Nowhere, ID is really close to me

 Josh Luthman wrote:

 The games on those consoles are hosted (network wise) by other
 players.  The server for a 16 player game could very well be a person
 in Nowhere, ID with a 1/384 DSL connection.

 On 12/2/08, Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:


 Hi All,

 I've had calls from a number of xbox 360 customers that are
 having trouble
 with game play etc.  Very long lags, poor pings etc.

 These calls are coming from customers off of multiple towers and
 even in
 different towns.

 No calls coming from Wii or playstation.  Just xbox 360.

 Anyone else seeing these issues in the last few months?

 thanks,
 marlon




 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/







 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: 

Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

2008-12-02 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
What setting would that be?  I've never changed the NAT settings in a router 
that I set up for a customer.
marlon

- Original Message - 
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:32 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues


 Indeed.  Make sure the NAT settings are correct so they have the best pick
 of people to connect with.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 11:36 AM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

 Call of Duty has to be another big one - those WW2 games have dominated
 the
 market for a while.

 Odd I can't find a ranking for Xbox live games.  I am confident Halo and
 Call of Duty have the majority of games.  I can't verify that Call of
 Duty
 does games p2p versus client-server, though.

 One player in the match will be selected as the server based on the
 quality of there connection with COD4 and COD5.  Its too bad they did
 not allow dedicated linux game servers for these games.

 I always tell custommers that if all the players in the given match
 have a crappy connection its the server.  If its just them then it
 'might' be a problem with there connection.  I have seen a number of
 users with NAT issues on there router though.  Also, many times they
 connect to there router wireless with the xbox or ps3 and that
 connection goes crappy.

 Matt


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

2008-12-02 Thread Mike Hammett
Usually uPNP takes care of it, but they need a specific port forwarded to 
the box to work.  If they have more than one console inside...  I dunno what 
to do about that.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 5:51 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

 What setting would that be?  I've never changed the NAT settings in a 
 router
 that I set up for a customer.
 marlon

 - Original Message - 
 From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:32 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues


 Indeed.  Make sure the NAT settings are correct so they have the best 
 pick
 of people to connect with.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 11:36 AM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

 Call of Duty has to be another big one - those WW2 games have dominated
 the
 market for a while.

 Odd I can't find a ranking for Xbox live games.  I am confident Halo 
 and
 Call of Duty have the majority of games.  I can't verify that Call of
 Duty
 does games p2p versus client-server, though.

 One player in the match will be selected as the server based on the
 quality of there connection with COD4 and COD5.  Its too bad they did
 not allow dedicated linux game servers for these games.

 I always tell custommers that if all the players in the given match
 have a crappy connection its the server.  If its just them then it
 'might' be a problem with there connection.  I have seen a number of
 users with NAT issues on there router though.  Also, many times they
 connect to there router wireless with the xbox or ps3 and that
 connection goes crappy.

 Matt


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

2008-12-02 Thread Mike Hammett
Indeed.  If someone's connection is crap and they're the host, everyone 
else's will be crap as well for the duration of that game.

Previously an upstream of mine had a bad router that would decide on its own 
what traffic it would or would not pass without issue.  The issue was most 
noticeable on World of Warcraft, but downloads from various companies didn't 
work either.  All I could do was to have someone play that game at a hop and 
see if it worked or not.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 5:45 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

 So, if the host of the game is on a bad connection that would screw up
 everyone?

 I've got people with 8 and 9 meg connections having trouble.  Found out
 about a play station customer that's having some trouble too.

 I think that there must be something on our network(s) that is at least
 adding to the problem.  I just can't figure out what to test for.
 marlon

 - Original Message - 
 From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 9:08 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues


 *nods*  The Halo and Call of Duty series operate that way.  I haven't
 played
 many other games online.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Josh Luthman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 11:06 AM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

 I know Halo 2 and 3 does use the peers as gaming hosts.  Can't say for
 other games.   To my knowledge Halo is the dominate Xbox game.

 On 12/2/08, Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Problems with PC games?

 I believe the vast majority, if not all XBox games are hosted by the
 users
 in the game instead of a central server (as mentioned earlier).  It's
 entirely dependant on how good or bad everyone's connection is.  Could
 be
 your connection quality back to MS central.  Speed isn't the only
 indicator
 of connection quality.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:25 AM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

 We've seen trouble for months out here.

 Even with customers on connections that run 1 to 2 megs.  Heck, I've
 got
 customers that pull 8 megs both ways that are having trouble with xbox
 360
 games.

 - Original Message -
 From: Wes James [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 7:23 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues


 Xbox live service has been up and down since Black Friday. It is
 possible that the host machine is also causing problems, but my guess
 is
 that the million new subscribers over the weekend gave the service a
 pounding. See if they are still having the issues today, as it seems
 things have smoothed out a bit.



 -Wes



 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On
 Behalf Of Travis Johnson
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:04 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues



 Hey now Nowhere, ID is really close to me

 Josh Luthman wrote:

 The games on those consoles are hosted (network wise) by other
 players.  The server for a 16 player game could very well be a person
 in Nowhere, ID with a 1/384 DSL connection.

 On 12/2/08, Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:


 Hi All,

 I've had calls from a number of xbox 360 customers that are
 having trouble
 with game play etc.  Very long lags, poor pings etc.

 These calls are coming from customers off of multiple towers and
 even in
 different towns.

 No calls coming from Wii or playstation.  Just xbox 360.

 Anyone else seeing these issues in the last few months?

 thanks,
 marlon




 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/







 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 

Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

2008-12-02 Thread Josh Luthman
The inability for the 50 dollar router to do the NAT would be the only
thing I could imagine.

On 12/2/08, Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 What setting would that be?  I've never changed the NAT settings in a router
 that I set up for a customer.
 marlon

 - Original Message -
 From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:32 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues


 Indeed.  Make sure the NAT settings are correct so they have the best pick
 of people to connect with.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 11:36 AM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

 Call of Duty has to be another big one - those WW2 games have dominated
 the
 market for a while.

 Odd I can't find a ranking for Xbox live games.  I am confident Halo and
 Call of Duty have the majority of games.  I can't verify that Call of
 Duty
 does games p2p versus client-server, though.

 One player in the match will be selected as the server based on the
 quality of there connection with COD4 and COD5.  Its too bad they did
 not allow dedicated linux game servers for these games.

 I always tell custommers that if all the players in the given match
 have a crappy connection its the server.  If its just them then it
 'might' be a problem with there connection.  I have seen a number of
 users with NAT issues on there router though.  Also, many times they
 connect to there router wireless with the xbox or ps3 and that
 connection goes crappy.

 Matt


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



-- 
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
--- Henry Spencer



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

2008-12-02 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
upnp?  We ALWAYS turn that off.  What do you do with it?

- Original Message - 
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 3:59 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues


 Usually uPNP takes care of it, but they need a specific port forwarded to
 the box to work.  If they have more than one console inside...  I dunno 
 what
 to do about that.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 5:51 PM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

 What setting would that be?  I've never changed the NAT settings in a
 router
 that I set up for a customer.
 marlon

 - Original Message - 
 From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:32 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues


 Indeed.  Make sure the NAT settings are correct so they have the best
 pick
 of people to connect with.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 11:36 AM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

 Call of Duty has to be another big one - those WW2 games have 
 dominated
 the
 market for a while.

 Odd I can't find a ranking for Xbox live games.  I am confident Halo
 and
 Call of Duty have the majority of games.  I can't verify that Call of
 Duty
 does games p2p versus client-server, though.

 One player in the match will be selected as the server based on the
 quality of there connection with COD4 and COD5.  Its too bad they did
 not allow dedicated linux game servers for these games.

 I always tell custommers that if all the players in the given match
 have a crappy connection its the server.  If its just them then it
 'might' be a problem with there connection.  I have seen a number of
 users with NAT issues on there router though.  Also, many times they
 connect to there router wireless with the xbox or ps3 and that
 connection goes crappy.

 Matt


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

2008-12-02 Thread Mike Hammett
If uPNP is on, it should work as it's supposed to and the XBox requests the 
port forwarding from the router without manual intervention.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 6:23 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

 upnp?  We ALWAYS turn that off.  What do you do with it?

 - Original Message - 
 From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 3:59 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues


 Usually uPNP takes care of it, but they need a specific port forwarded to
 the box to work.  If they have more than one console inside...  I dunno
 what
 to do about that.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 5:51 PM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

 What setting would that be?  I've never changed the NAT settings in a
 router
 that I set up for a customer.
 marlon

 - Original Message - 
 From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:32 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues


 Indeed.  Make sure the NAT settings are correct so they have the best
 pick
 of people to connect with.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 11:36 AM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

 Call of Duty has to be another big one - those WW2 games have
 dominated
 the
 market for a while.

 Odd I can't find a ranking for Xbox live games.  I am confident Halo
 and
 Call of Duty have the majority of games.  I can't verify that Call of
 Duty
 does games p2p versus client-server, though.

 One player in the match will be selected as the server based on the
 quality of there connection with COD4 and COD5.  Its too bad they did
 not allow dedicated linux game servers for these games.

 I always tell custommers that if all the players in the given match
 have a crappy connection its the server.  If its just them then it
 'might' be a problem with there connection.  I have seen a number of
 users with NAT issues on there router though.  Also, many times they
 connect to there router wireless with the xbox or ps3 and that
 connection goes crappy.

 Matt


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:

Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

2008-12-02 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs
yeppers.  MT all the way!  :) Works great!

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
314-735-0270
http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



Mike Hammett wrote:
 If uPNP is on, it should work as it's supposed to and the XBox requests the 
 port forwarding from the router without manual intervention.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 6:23 PM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

   
 upnp?  We ALWAYS turn that off.  What do you do with it?

 - Original Message - 
 From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 3:59 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues


 
 Usually uPNP takes care of it, but they need a specific port forwarded to
 the box to work.  If they have more than one console inside...  I dunno
 what
 to do about that.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 5:51 PM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

   
 What setting would that be?  I've never changed the NAT settings in a
 router
 that I set up for a customer.
 marlon

 - Original Message - 
 From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:32 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues


 
 Indeed.  Make sure the NAT settings are correct so they have the best
 pick
 of people to connect with.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 11:36 AM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

   
 Call of Duty has to be another big one - those WW2 games have
 dominated
 the
 market for a while.

 Odd I can't find a ranking for Xbox live games.  I am confident Halo
 and
 Call of Duty have the majority of games.  I can't verify that Call of
 Duty
 does games p2p versus client-server, though.
   
 One player in the match will be selected as the server based on the
 quality of there connection with COD4 and COD5.  Its too bad they did
 not allow dedicated linux game servers for these games.

 I always tell custommers that if all the players in the given match
 have a crappy connection its the server.  If its just them then it
 'might' be a problem with there connection.  I have seen a number of
 users with NAT issues on there router though.  Also, many times they
 connect to there router wireless with the xbox or ps3 and that
 connection goes crappy.

 Matt


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   

 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   

 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

2008-12-02 Thread Josh Luthman
I believe what Dennis is saying is MT CPEs are EXCELLENT :)

Arc are my favorite enclosures but Roottennas are good too, just short
on looks.

On 12/2/08, Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 yeppers.  MT all the way!  :) Works great!

 --
 * Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
 Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
 314-735-0270
 http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/

 */ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training
 http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



 Mike Hammett wrote:
 If uPNP is on, it should work as it's supposed to and the XBox requests
 the
 port forwarding from the router without manual intervention.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 6:23 PM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues


 upnp?  We ALWAYS turn that off.  What do you do with it?

 - Original Message -
 From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 3:59 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues



 Usually uPNP takes care of it, but they need a specific port forwarded
 to
 the box to work.  If they have more than one console inside...  I dunno
 what
 to do about that.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 5:51 PM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues


 What setting would that be?  I've never changed the NAT settings in a
 router
 that I set up for a customer.
 marlon

 - Original Message -
 From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:32 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues



 Indeed.  Make sure the NAT settings are correct so they have the best
 pick
 of people to connect with.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 11:36 AM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues


 Call of Duty has to be another big one - those WW2 games have
 dominated
 the
 market for a while.

 Odd I can't find a ranking for Xbox live games.  I am confident Halo
 and
 Call of Duty have the majority of games.  I can't verify that Call
 of
 Duty
 does games p2p versus client-server, though.

 One player in the match will be selected as the server based on the
 quality of there connection with COD4 and COD5.  Its too bad they did
 not allow dedicated linux game servers for these games.

 I always tell custommers that if all the players in the given match
 have a crappy connection its the server.  If its just them then it
 'might' be a problem with there connection.  I have seen a number of
 users with NAT issues on there router though.  Also, many times they
 connect to there router wireless with the xbox or ps3 and that
 connection goes crappy.

 Matt


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 

Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

2008-12-02 Thread Mike Hammett
Maybe the RooTennas have personality.  :-p


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: Josh Luthman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 8:01 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues

 I believe what Dennis is saying is MT CPEs are EXCELLENT :)

 Arc are my favorite enclosures but Roottennas are good too, just short
 on looks.

 On 12/2/08, Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 yeppers.  MT all the way!  :) Works great!

 --
 * Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
 Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
 314-735-0270
 http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/

 */ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training
 http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



 Mike Hammett wrote:
 If uPNP is on, it should work as it's supposed to and the XBox requests
 the
 port forwarding from the router without manual intervention.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 6:23 PM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues


 upnp?  We ALWAYS turn that off.  What do you do with it?

 - Original Message -
 From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 3:59 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues



 Usually uPNP takes care of it, but they need a specific port forwarded
 to
 the box to work.  If they have more than one console inside...  I 
 dunno
 what
 to do about that.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 5:51 PM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues


 What setting would that be?  I've never changed the NAT settings in a
 router
 that I set up for a customer.
 marlon

 - Original Message -
 From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:32 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues



 Indeed.  Make sure the NAT settings are correct so they have the 
 best
 pick
 of people to connect with.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 11:36 AM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] xbox 360 issues


 Call of Duty has to be another big one - those WW2 games have
 dominated
 the
 market for a while.

 Odd I can't find a ranking for Xbox live games.  I am confident 
 Halo
 and
 Call of Duty have the majority of games.  I can't verify that Call
 of
 Duty
 does games p2p versus client-server, though.

 One player in the match will be selected as the server based on the
 quality of there connection with COD4 and COD5.  Its too bad they 
 did
 not allow dedicated linux game servers for these games.

 I always tell custommers that if all the players in the given match
 have a crappy connection its the server.  If its just them then it
 'might' be a problem with there connection.  I have seen a number 
 of
 users with NAT issues on there router though.  Also, many times 
 they
 connect to there router wireless with the xbox or ps3 and that
 connection goes crappy.

 Matt


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join 

Re: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage

2008-12-02 Thread Tom DeReggi
John,

Interesting data. However, any data on how those links performed on rainy 
days?

The deal with Foliage is that wet foliage causes a lot more loss than dry 
foliage or wet air.

I can give an example of 5.8Ghz that might have 1db of loss in a rain storm, 
but in a heavy rain 900Mhz might have had 15 db more of loss through foliage 
than when its dry.
(obviously I do not have an apples to apples comparision since we use 900 
where we have foliage and 5.8 where we do not.)

So Sure 3650 does OK  when its dry, but in rain?

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: John Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 12:21 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage


We have many 3.65GHz WiMAX Base Stations deployed and propagation has been
real positive even through some foliage.
Picture1 -
http://www.wirelessconnections.net/index.php?option=com_shared_private_space
task=showfilefileid=117
Picture2 -
http://www.wirelessconnections.net/index.php?option=com_shared_private_space
task=showfilefileid=118
Picture3 -
http://www.wirelessconnections.net/index.php?option=com_shared_private_space
task=showfilefileid=119

The above pictures are from a shot we had in Texas to a 3.65 Base Station, I
have more tree pictures.
The customer had an older original Alvarion VL CPE at 5.8GHz. They installed
the VL on a 40 ft guyed mast pole, to get good SNR. At 3.65 GHz from street
level(12ft AGL) beside the house we had -75 dBm and downlink/uplink at
64QAM/16QAM respectively we pulled 6Mb/3Mb and perfect Voice calls from the
truck. The WISP is thrilled with their coverage in the small town even
through foliage.

As you can see we shot between two pine trees and through the other trees.
At this site we were almost 1.1 Miles away. I would classify the foliage as
light.

The key to everything is defining the word foliage. How dense is the
foliage? How tall? How much power at the Base Station and CPE? Diversity?
How far away are you from the Base Station?

MIMO or second/fourth order diversity at 3.65Ghz is not being done at the
CPE level yet and only on select type of Base Stations. At the Base Stations
with Second or Fourth order diversity we see greatly improved uplink
capabilities and a lot better connectivity in NLOS environments because of
the improved Uplinks. Passing reliable data at -85 to -92dBm is obtainable,
although I highly recommend only installing clients with good signal
strength. Most systems require -74 to -78dBm or better to achieve reliable
full burst rates(64QAM3/4)...When CPE become available with MIMO we can
expect even better sensitivity in the Downlink also. It becomes a question
on how long it takes the vendors to implement 802.16e flavored in 3.65GHz.,
Mid/Late 2009 is my bet.

We can build an RF system at any frequency that can get through foliage, it
comes down to how much do you want to spend to get that type of coverage
within your areas terrain.

Thinking 3.65GHz can cover through foliage at long range is a myth. And I
understand that most operators want to cover 50 miles NLOS from a single
tower site at 75' AGL...

700 MHZ can work better if you own that spectrum for use? 3.65GHz is open to
about anyone.

Thanks,
John Rock
Director of Operations - Senior Engineer
Wireless Connections
166 Milan Ave., Norwalk, Oh. 44857
ACCessing the Future Today!!
ofc. 419.660.6100
cell 419-706-7356
fax 419-668-4077
http://www.wirelessconnections.net
This transmission and any files attached to it, may contain confidential
and/or privileged information and intended only for the named recipient. If
you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, reproduction, retransmission, dissemination, disclosure, copying
or any use of the information or files contained is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by
reply transmission and delete this electronic mail.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:09 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage

Have we gotten any reports how 3650 works with foliage?

Would MIMO have any affect on foliage penetration ability?


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

[WISPA] The fastest ISPs in America.. And only WildBlue was mentioned as wireless???

2008-12-02 Thread Drew Lentz
I just ran across this article from PC Magazine about the fastest ISPs in
America and nowhere on there, other than WildBlue, does it mention wireless!
That sucks!

Here¹s the article:
http://www.pcmag.com/print_article2/0,1217,a%253D234501,00.asp

Boycott PCMag or what? :-)

-drew



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Trango Giga Link - Lowering MSE

2008-12-02 Thread Tom DeReggi
Gino,

Also note... Trangos have automatic gain control. For troubleshooting, I 
recommend turning off ODURXAGC as well as ATPC.
This will allow you to experiment with manual TX values that you can count 
on occuring.

We generally saw better mse at -40 than we did -28 because of -28 being an 
overload situation. But in 23Ghz, long term you would not want to leave all 
the auto features off, and TX power reduced to reach the -40, because when 
it rains there would be lots of loss, potentially requiring the increase in 
tx power again.  But taking the Auto off for testing is helpful. I'd also 
recommend running that way for a period of time to make sure its stable that 
way, when you get a good link.  I have not confirmed any flaws with GIGA 
auto features on new firmware, but I still wonder whether auto features 
will work well or not.  The thought is... What will firmware do when it sees 
a lowered MSE? Raise or lower the tx power? Raising power is not always the 
best answer.  For example, if interference occurs, increase power to get 
over the interference or obstruction is appropriate, however, if that 
resulted in an overload situation, it could then create worse MSE, creating 
a loop to distruction, and the process would then need to choose to lower 
power to correct. Now I'm sure Trango's ATPC/AGC control considers all the 
intelligent type things that need to be considered, but my thought is 
that it may take customization based on the specific deployment. One neat 
thing about Trango's firmware is it does allow some customization of 
threshholds for those features.

Also make sure you have the newer firmwares. (If you don;t know what they 
are, ask Trango, as they are not on the public website, jsut on a provate 
login FTP server). Some of the older ones still had some issue where you'd 
get a low MSE after configuration changes until both sides of the link were 
rebooted.

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: Brad Belton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 12:08 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Trango Giga Link - Lowering MSE


 Right, if you have LMR400 and the cable run is 100' then you would enter:

 cableloss 1.5 2.3 3.9

 For 200' you would enter:

 cableloss 3.0 4.6 7.8

 Here is an online calculator where you can enter specific cable lengths:

 http://www.timesmicrowave.com/cgi-bin/calculate.pl


 The targetrssi also plays into the MSE reading.  I typically start with 
 what
 RSSI is expected and then take into account any variables that may 
 attenuate
 the RSSI (eg. Building glass etc.).

 Brad




 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Gino Villarini
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:44 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Trango Giga Link - Lowering MSE

 I'll try the the larger calbe loss numbers  AFAIK I just need to
 input the cable loss for a 100' run or is the actual calbe loss number
 needed ( cable loss per ft * cable run)


 Gino A. Villarini
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Brad Belton
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 12:34 PM
 To: 'WISPA General List'
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Trango Giga Link - Lowering MSE

 We ran into a problem with noise being picked up by the IDU/ODU cable
 due to less than adequate shielding.  Once we replaced the cable with
 LMR400 the MSE's came right up to where they were supposed to be.

 The Belden 9913 cable has similar loss characteristics, but how does the
 shielding compare to LMR400?

 We have also found that some Giga radios prefer higher than calculated
 cableloss settings.  For example we have one radio's cableloss settings
 nearly double what is calculated for the cable run.

 Brad






 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Gino Villarini
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:16 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Trango Giga Link - Lowering MSE

 Brad and Travis, Thanks for your help

 I turned down both ends to 0 power.  I have -41 on the local end and -46
 on the remote.

 MSE went to -31 on the local, -20 on the remote.

 Changing power on the local unit from 0 to 15 don't affect the remote
 MSE at all, it stays in the 15-20 range.

 Checked cable loss settings, and changed if from lmr400 to belden 9913,
 (no big change on numbers, no chenge on MSE)

 ATPC is off, targerrssi is still in -26

 Any other ideas???


 Gino A. Villarini
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Travis Johnson
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:27 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 

Re: [WISPA] The fastest ISPs in America.. And only WildBlue wasmentioned as wireless???

2008-12-02 Thread Scottie Arnett

Hiya Drew,

Remember, their are only two ISP's based places in America... Cable Co's and 
Large Telcos. They are the only ISP's that matter. Forget the small places that 
cover where they would never founder thier hard earned investor dollars. Wait a 
sec, I am getting polical on WISPA, sorry guys and gals. Let's hope this get's 
changed under the new admin.

Scott

-- Original Message --
From: Drew Lentz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date:  Tue, 02 Dec 2008 21:55:52 -0600

I just ran across this article from PC Magazine about the fastest ISPs in
America and nowhere on there, other than WildBlue, does it mention wireless!
That sucks!

Here¹s the article:
http://www.pcmag.com/print_article2/0,1217,a%253D234501,00.asp

Boycott PCMag or what? :-)

-drew



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]




Wireless High Speed Broadband service from Info-Ed, Inc. as low as $30.00/mth.
Check out www.info-ed.com/wireless.html for information.



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] The fastest ISPs in America.. And only WildBlue wasmentioned as wireless???

2008-12-02 Thread Josh Luthman
I'm with Scottie on this one...

Small businesses don't run the country, governments bail out large
businesses that run the country.  We do get the promises, though!

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
--- Henry Spencer


On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Scottie Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Hiya Drew,

 Remember, their are only two ISP's based places in America... Cable Co's
 and Large Telcos. They are the only ISP's that matter. Forget the small
 places that cover where they would never founder thier hard earned investor
 dollars. Wait a sec, I am getting polical on WISPA, sorry guys and gals.
 Let's hope this get's changed under the new admin.

 Scott

 -- Original Message --
 From: Drew Lentz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Date:  Tue, 02 Dec 2008 21:55:52 -0600

 I just ran across this article from PC Magazine about the fastest ISPs in
 America and nowhere on there, other than WildBlue, does it mention
 wireless!
 That sucks!
 
 Here¹s the article:
 http://www.pcmag.com/print_article2/0,1217,a%253D234501,00.asp
 
 Boycott PCMag or what? :-)
 
 -drew
 
 

 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
 
 


 Wireless High Speed Broadband service from Info-Ed, Inc. as low as
 $30.00/mth.
 Check out www.info-ed.com/wireless.html for information.



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] The fastest ISPs in America.. And only WildBlue was mentioned as wireless???

2008-12-02 Thread Jack Unger
Come on, Drewthat article wins First Prize for Most Wasted Internet 
Electrons this week. Why would wireless be included? Wireless will 
never compete with copper or fiber. Shsh.

Drew Lentz wrote:
 I just ran across this article from PC Magazine about the fastest ISPs in
 America and nowhere on there, other than WildBlue, does it mention wireless!
 That sucks!

 Here¹s the article:
 http://www.pcmag.com/print_article2/0,1217,a%253D234501,00.asp

 Boycott PCMag or what? :-)

 -drew


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


   

-- 
Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
Serving the Broadband Wireless Industry Since 1993
Cisco Press Author - Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs
WISPs - Do you know where your customers are?
For wireless coverage mapping see http://www.ask-wi.com/mapping
FCC Lic. #PG-12-25133 LinkedIn Profile http://www.linkedin.com/in/jackunger
Phone 818-227-4220  Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] The fastest ISPs in America.. And only WildBlue was mentioned as wireless???

2008-12-02 Thread Josh Luthman
Should I take a picture of the 1500ft tower with a dozen antennas that Time
Warner *Cable* has a mile from our office?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
--- Henry Spencer


On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 12:09 AM, Jack Unger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Come on, Drewthat article wins First Prize for Most Wasted Internet
 Electrons this week. Why would wireless be included? Wireless will
 never compete with copper or fiber. Shsh.

 Drew Lentz wrote:
  I just ran across this article from PC Magazine about the fastest ISPs in
  America and nowhere on there, other than WildBlue, does it mention
 wireless!
  That sucks!
 
  Here¹s the article:
  http://www.pcmag.com/print_article2/0,1217,a%253D234501,00.asp
 
  Boycott PCMag or what? :-)
 
  -drew
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 

 --
 Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
 Serving the Broadband Wireless Industry Since 1993
 Cisco Press Author - Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs
 WISPs - Do you know where your customers are?
 For wireless coverage mapping see http://www.ask-wi.com/mapping
 FCC Lic. #PG-12-25133 LinkedIn Profile 
 http://www.linkedin.com/in/jackunger
 Phone 818-227-4220  Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]






 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] The fastest ISPs in America.. And only WildBlue wasmentioned as wireless???

2008-12-02 Thread Scottie Arnett

LOL, I have been to Vegas a few timesSaw SOME BIG movie stars, I didn't 
take pictures, They are just like me and you, only hyped up!. I think that is 
relative to you TW towers! I could be wrong, I have once before, LOL.

Scottie

-- Original Message --
From: Josh Luthman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date:  Wed, 3 Dec 2008 00:19:42 -0500

Should I take a picture of the 1500ft tower with a dozen antennas that Time
Warner *Cable* has a mile from our office?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
--- Henry Spencer


On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 12:09 AM, Jack Unger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Come on, Drewthat article wins First Prize for Most Wasted Internet
 Electrons this week. Why would wireless be included? Wireless will
 never compete with copper or fiber. Shsh.

 Drew Lentz wrote:
  I just ran across this article from PC Magazine about the fastest ISPs in
  America and nowhere on there, other than WildBlue, does it mention
 wireless!
  That sucks!
 
  Here¹s the article:
  http://www.pcmag.com/print_article2/0,1217,a%253D234501,00.asp
 
  Boycott PCMag or what? :-)
 
  -drew
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 

 --
 Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
 Serving the Broadband Wireless Industry Since 1993
 Cisco Press Author - Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs
 WISPs - Do you know where your customers are?
 For wireless coverage mapping see http://www.ask-wi.com/mapping
 FCC Lic. #PG-12-25133 LinkedIn Profile 
 http://www.linkedin.com/in/jackunger
 Phone 818-227-4220  Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]






 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]




Wireless High Speed Broadband service from Info-Ed, Inc. as low as $30.00/mth.
Check out www.info-ed.com/wireless.html for information.



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] The fastest ISPs in America.. And only WildBlue wasmentioned as wireless???

2008-12-02 Thread Josh Luthman
My point is that companies like Time Warner Cable, Verizon, ATT, etc boast
that their service is reliable because it is wired, which is not the case.

Kind of like Verizon's FiOS versus Comcast - Comcast fought back saying
their network is fiber just as Verizon's FiOS is.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
--- Henry Spencer


On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 12:37 AM, Scottie Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 LOL, I have been to Vegas a few timesSaw SOME BIG movie stars, I didn't
 take pictures, They are just like me and you, only hyped up!. I think that
 is relative to you TW towers! I could be wrong, I have once before, LOL.

 Scottie

 -- Original Message --
 From: Josh Luthman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Date:  Wed, 3 Dec 2008 00:19:42 -0500

 Should I take a picture of the 1500ft tower with a dozen antennas that
 Time
 Warner *Cable* has a mile from our office?
 
 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373
 
 Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
 --- Henry Spencer
 
 
 On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 12:09 AM, Jack Unger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Come on, Drewthat article wins First Prize for Most Wasted Internet
  Electrons this week. Why would wireless be included? Wireless will
  never compete with copper or fiber. Shsh.
 
  Drew Lentz wrote:
   I just ran across this article from PC Magazine about the fastest ISPs
 in
   America and nowhere on there, other than WildBlue, does it mention
  wireless!
   That sucks!
  
   Here¹s the article:
   http://www.pcmag.com/print_article2/0,1217,a%253D234501,00.asp
  
   Boycott PCMag or what? :-)
  
   -drew
  
  
  
 
 
   WISPA Wants You! Join today!
   http://signup.wispa.org/
  
 
 
  
   WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
  
   Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
   http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
  
   Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
  
  
  
 
  --
  Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
  Serving the Broadband Wireless Industry Since 1993
  Cisco Press Author - Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs
  WISPs - Do you know where your customers are?
  For wireless coverage mapping see http://www.ask-wi.com/mapping
  FCC Lic. #PG-12-25133 LinkedIn Profile 
  http://www.linkedin.com/in/jackunger
  Phone 818-227-4220  Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 

 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
 
 


 Wireless High Speed Broadband service from Info-Ed, Inc. as low as
 $30.00/mth.
 Check out www.info-ed.com/wireless.html for information.



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] The fastest ISPs in America.. And only WildBluewasmentioned as wireless???

2008-12-02 Thread Chuck McCown - 3
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


This is the guy that compiled the article.  Write him and educate him.  I 
did.

- Original Message - 
From: Josh Luthman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:40 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] The fastest ISPs in America.. And only 
WildBluewasmentioned as wireless???


My point is that companies like Time Warner Cable, Verizon, ATT, etc boast
that their service is reliable because it is wired, which is not the case.

Kind of like Verizon's FiOS versus Comcast - Comcast fought back saying
their network is fiber just as Verizon's FiOS is.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
--- Henry Spencer


On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 12:37 AM, Scottie Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 LOL, I have been to Vegas a few timesSaw SOME BIG movie stars, I 
 didn't
 take pictures, They are just like me and you, only hyped up!. I think that
 is relative to you TW towers! I could be wrong, I have once before, LOL.

 Scottie

 -- Original Message --
 From: Josh Luthman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Date:  Wed, 3 Dec 2008 00:19:42 -0500

 Should I take a picture of the 1500ft tower with a dozen antennas that
 Time
 Warner *Cable* has a mile from our office?
 
 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373
 
 Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
 --- Henry Spencer
 
 
 On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 12:09 AM, Jack Unger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Come on, Drewthat article wins First Prize for Most Wasted 
  Internet
  Electrons this week. Why would wireless be included? Wireless will
  never compete with copper or fiber. Shsh.
 
  Drew Lentz wrote:
   I just ran across this article from PC Magazine about the fastest 
   ISPs
 in
   America and nowhere on there, other than WildBlue, does it mention
  wireless!
   That sucks!
  
   Here¹s the article:
   http://www.pcmag.com/print_article2/0,1217,a%253D234501,00.asp
  
   Boycott PCMag or what? :-)
  
   -drew
  
  
  
 
 
   WISPA Wants You! Join today!
   http://signup.wispa.org/
  
 
 
  
   WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
  
   Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
   http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
  
   Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
  
  
  
 
  --
  Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
  Serving the Broadband Wireless Industry Since 1993
  Cisco Press Author - Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs
  WISPs - Do you know where your customers are?
  For wireless coverage mapping see http://www.ask-wi.com/mapping
  FCC Lic. #PG-12-25133 LinkedIn Profile 
  http://www.linkedin.com/in/jackunger
  Phone 818-227-4220  Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 

 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
 
 


 Wireless High Speed Broadband service from Info-Ed, Inc. as low as
 $30.00/mth.
 Check out www.info-ed.com/wireless.html for information.



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA 

Re: [WISPA] The fastest ISPs in America.. And onlyWildBluewasmentioned as wireless???

2008-12-02 Thread Chuck McCown - 3
This is what his autoresponder sent.  So, email both of them.



I will be out of the office December 3rd - 5th, returning Monday December 
8th. For answers to any questions regarding PCMag.com content, talk to Vicki 
Jacobson: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

- Original Message - 
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:42 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] The fastest ISPs in America.. And 
onlyWildBluewasmentioned as wireless???


[EMAIL PROTECTED]


This is the guy that compiled the article.  Write him and educate him.  I
did.

- Original Message - 
From: Josh Luthman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:40 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] The fastest ISPs in America.. And only
WildBluewasmentioned as wireless???


My point is that companies like Time Warner Cable, Verizon, ATT, etc boast
that their service is reliable because it is wired, which is not the case.

Kind of like Verizon's FiOS versus Comcast - Comcast fought back saying
their network is fiber just as Verizon's FiOS is.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
--- Henry Spencer


On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 12:37 AM, Scottie Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 LOL, I have been to Vegas a few timesSaw SOME BIG movie stars, I
 didn't
 take pictures, They are just like me and you, only hyped up!. I think that
 is relative to you TW towers! I could be wrong, I have once before, LOL.

 Scottie

 -- Original Message --
 From: Josh Luthman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Date:  Wed, 3 Dec 2008 00:19:42 -0500

 Should I take a picture of the 1500ft tower with a dozen antennas that
 Time
 Warner *Cable* has a mile from our office?
 
 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373
 
 Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
 --- Henry Spencer
 
 
 On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 12:09 AM, Jack Unger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Come on, Drewthat article wins First Prize for Most Wasted
  Internet
  Electrons this week. Why would wireless be included? Wireless will
  never compete with copper or fiber. Shsh.
 
  Drew Lentz wrote:
   I just ran across this article from PC Magazine about the fastest
   ISPs
 in
   America and nowhere on there, other than WildBlue, does it mention
  wireless!
   That sucks!
  
   Here¹s the article:
   http://www.pcmag.com/print_article2/0,1217,a%253D234501,00.asp
  
   Boycott PCMag or what? :-)
  
   -drew
  
  
  
 
 
   WISPA Wants You! Join today!
   http://signup.wispa.org/
  
 
 
  
   WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
  
   Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
   http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
  
   Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
  
  
  
 
  --
  Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
  Serving the Broadband Wireless Industry Since 1993
  Cisco Press Author - Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs
  WISPs - Do you know where your customers are?
  For wireless coverage mapping see http://www.ask-wi.com/mapping
  FCC Lic. #PG-12-25133 LinkedIn Profile 
  http://www.linkedin.com/in/jackunger
  Phone 818-227-4220  Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 

 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
 
 


 Wireless High Speed Broadband service from Info-Ed, Inc. as low as
 $30.00/mth.
 Check out www.info-ed.com/wireless.html for information.



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: 

Re: [WISPA] The fastest ISPs in America.. And only WildBluewasmentioned as wireless???

2008-12-02 Thread Jack Unger
You're a good man, C.M !!

Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 This is the guy that compiled the article.  Write him and educate him.  I 
 did.

 - Original Message - 
 From: Josh Luthman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:40 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] The fastest ISPs in America.. And only 
 WildBluewasmentioned as wireless???


 My point is that companies like Time Warner Cable, Verizon, ATT, etc boast
 that their service is reliable because it is wired, which is not the case.

 Kind of like Verizon's FiOS versus Comcast - Comcast fought back saying
 their network is fiber just as Verizon's FiOS is.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 Those who don't understand Wireless are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
 --- Henry Spencer


   
(pruned, to save electrons)


-- 
Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
Serving the Broadband Wireless Industry Since 1993
Cisco Press Author - Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs
WISPs - Do you know where your customers are?
For wireless coverage mapping see http://www.ask-wi.com/mapping
FCC Lic. #PG-12-25133 LinkedIn Profile http://www.linkedin.com/in/jackunger
Phone 818-227-4220  Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/