Re: [WISPA] Rogue Accesspoint Detection

2015-01-06 Thread Mike Hammett
A WISP doesn't own (or lease) everywhere. A company owns or leases their 
corporate space. 

If a Russian or Chinese spy snuck a MiFi into Lockheed Skunkworks and somehow 
passed their other forms of security, you'd be okay with them chugging away 
uploading whatever they found? 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Dennis Burgess"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2015 3:09:47 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rogue Accesspoint Detection 



While I understand your reasoning, I would disagree. If you could do this, for 
the security of a WISP, we will shut down all Access Points via Deauth attack 
that my Access Points can see. Also note, I am not talking for the FCC, but for 
what I believe is right, in this case, you can’t own a location or area of the 
wifi bands, therefore, you can’t cause harmful interference, and a deauth 
attack would be harmful, and interference. 

I can agree that you can detect it and shut it off on a port on your network, 
but you should not be able to interfere with other operations, regardless if it 
is your property or not. Maybe that’s not the intent from those actions, but 
it’s clear that if it’s not on your network then you can’t do much about it. 
Now, if they are on your property, sure you can tell them to turn it off or 
leave, but that’s another issue. lol 


Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc. 
den...@linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 – www.linktechs.net 



From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Mike Hammett 
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 2:02 PM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rogue Accesspoint Detection 


There is no mention of a blanket refusal. In the FCC citation, the fact that 
they're charging for Internet access is brought up every time the deauthing 
activity is. 

https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-329743A1.pdf 

https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-14-1444A1.pdf 

In reading that second one, they also keep bringing up that Marriott charged 
for Internet (and a lot at that). 

"Specifically, such employees had used this capability to prevent users from 
connecting to the Internet via their own personal Wi-Fi networks when these 
users did not pose a threat to the security of the Gaylord Opryland network or 
its guests." 

Sounds like security is a viable defense. 



- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 




- Original Message -


From: "Dennis Burgess" < dmburg...@linktechs.net > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2015 11:43:53 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rogue Accesspoint Detection 
You cannot do it at all…. 


Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc. 
den...@linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 – www.linktechs.net 



From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [ mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
Behalf Of Mike Hammett 
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 11:06 AM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rogue Accesspoint Detection 


You can do it all day long within your own company. Marriott was doing it to 
force people to give them money. A company doing it has plenty of other 
reasons. 



- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 





From: "Dennis Burgess" < dmburg...@linktechs.net > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2015 10:05:02 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rogue Accesspoint Detection 
Note that many of these systems (rather rogue AP prevention) have been deemed 
illegal by the FCC, a hotel chain was fined 600k I think due to it. 


Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc. 
den...@linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 – www.linktechs.net 



From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [ mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
Behalf Of Scott Piehn 
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 9:49 AM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: [WISPA] Rogue Accesspoint Detection 




I have a customer that is being required to get rogue access point detection. 
not a one time thing but ongoing detection. What products have people used. 




- 
Scott M Piehn 

___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 


___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Rogue Accesspoint Detection

2015-01-06 Thread Mike Hammett
There is no mention of a blanket refusal. In the FCC citation, the fact that 
they're charging for Internet access is brought up every time the deauthing 
activity is. 

https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-329743A1.pdf 

https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-14-1444A1.pdf 

In reading that second one, they also keep bringing up that Marriott charged 
for Internet (and a lot at that). 

"Specifically, such employees had used this capability to prevent users from 
connecting to the Internet via their own personal Wi-Fi networks when these 
users did not pose a threat to the security of the Gaylord Opryland network or 
its guests." 

Sounds like security is a viable defense. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Dennis Burgess"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2015 11:43:53 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rogue Accesspoint Detection 



You cannot do it at all…. 


Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc. 
den...@linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 – www.linktechs.net 



From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Mike Hammett 
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 11:06 AM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rogue Accesspoint Detection 


You can do it all day long within your own company. Marriott was doing it to 
force people to give them money. A company doing it has plenty of other 
reasons. 



- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 




- Original Message -


From: "Dennis Burgess" < dmburg...@linktechs.net > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2015 10:05:02 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rogue Accesspoint Detection 
Note that many of these systems (rather rogue AP prevention) have been deemed 
illegal by the FCC, a hotel chain was fined 600k I think due to it. 


Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc. 
den...@linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 – www.linktechs.net 



From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [ mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
Behalf Of Scott Piehn 
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 9:49 AM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: [WISPA] Rogue Accesspoint Detection 




I have a customer that is being required to get rogue access point detection. 
not a one time thing but ongoing detection. What products have people used. 




- 
Scott M Piehn 

___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Rogue Accesspoint Detection

2015-01-06 Thread Mike Hammett
If they can have prevention systems (I assume they do) for all WiFi in NSA, 
CIA, Skunkworks, etc., then you can run them in your corporate environment for 
security measures. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Tim Kerns"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2015 11:08:43 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rogue Accesspoint Detection 




Dennis, I think you are taking this to literal. I have the right to detect 
and prohibit any wireless access point that is “connected” to my network. I do 
not have the right to bar an access point that is within my area of control 
from operating as long as it is not using my network for connectivity. 

The hotel was trying to prevent guest and other business from using access 
points that were NOT connected to their network and thus avoiding paying them a 
fee. 

Big difference here. 






From: Dennis Burgess 
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 8:43 AM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rogue Accesspoint Detection 



Yep, you do not control the airwaves in your business, therefor you cannot 
interfere with any “access point” that conforms with Part-15. 

Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc. 
den...@linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 – www.linktechs.net 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Adair Winter 
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 10:10 AM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rogue Accesspoint Detection 


a public place such as a hotel chain vs my private business where I needed to 
be able to control the wifi and keep things like wifi pineapples from snooping 
on my business would be not allowed? 



On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Dennis Burgess < dmburg...@linktechs.net > 
wrote: 


Note that many of these systems (rather rogue AP prevention) have been deemed 
illegal by the FCC, a hotel chain was fined 600k I think due to it. 


Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc. 
den...@linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 – www.linktechs.net 



From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto: wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
Behalf Of Scott Piehn 
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 9:49 AM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: [WISPA] Rogue Accesspoint Detection 




I have a customer that is being required to get rogue access point detection. 
not a one time thing but ongoing detection. What products have people used. 




- 
Scott M Piehn 

___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 





-- 


Adair Winter 
VP, Network Operations / Owner 
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 
C: 806.231.7180 
http://www.amarillowireless.net 



___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Rogue Accesspoint Detection

2015-01-06 Thread Mike Hammett
I think the terms detection and prevention are fairly self explanatory. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Dennis Burgess"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2015 10:49:33 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rogue Accesspoint Detection 



There are two things that you need to think of and I’m sure different vendors 
call it different things, so let me go in depth on this. 

One method is to find a access point that has been plugged into the switching 
system of a network. Think, a business that someone plugged in a Linksys to or 
something. This is accomplished typically, by sending that access point data, 
and seeing what “swtichport” it comes in on, then turning off that switch port. 
THIS IS ALLOWED. Basically detecting that a rouge AP is on managed or switched 
infrastructure. This would NOT affect any kind of personal hotspot, such as a 
LTE hotspot, as there is no port to turn off, and there for the access point 
would operate normally, but it would also not be considered a rouge access 
point. 

The other kind, is the one most people think of, find a rouge AP that should 
not be out there, and send a deauth attack to prevent it from using up air time 
and prevent people from using it. In this manner, the access point can’t 
operator due to directed harmful interference, the deauth attack. This is NOT 
ALLOWED. This would be like me brining in a LTE hotspot setting it on the 
office desk and surfing with my cell phone or laptop on it vs the corp network. 

Eric, maybe you can fill us in on what the two features are called on Ruckus so 
that we know what their names are so that we don’t get them confused. 

Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc. 
den...@linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 – www.linktechs.net 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Eric Albert 
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 10:16 AM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rogue Accesspoint Detection 


Many commercial solutions, such as Ruckus Wireless (where I work) have Rouge AP 
Detection capability built into their APs or controllers. There is nothing 
nefarious or illegal surrounding this feature. Let me know if you'd like to 
talk further. 



Eric Albert 

MSO SE 

Ruckus Wireless 



On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Adair Winter < ada...@amarillowireless.net > 
wrote: 

a public place such as a hotel chain vs my private business where I needed to 
be able to control the wifi and keep things like wifi pineapples from snooping 
on my business would be not allowed? 





On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Dennis Burgess < dmburg...@linktechs.net > 
wrote: 






Note that many of these systems (rather rogue AP prevention) have been deemed 
illegal by the FCC, a hotel chain was fined 600k I think due to it. 


Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc. 
den...@linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 – www.linktechs.net 



From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto: wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
Behalf Of Scott Piehn 
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 9:49 AM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: [WISPA] Rogue Accesspoint Detection 




I have a customer that is being required to get rogue access point detection. 
not a one time thing but ongoing detection. What products have people used. 




- 
Scott M Piehn 

___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 







-- 


Adair Winter 
VP, Network Operations / Owner 
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 
C: 806.231.7180 
http://www.amarillowireless.net 



___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Rogue Accesspoint Detection

2015-01-06 Thread Mike Hammett
You can do it all day long within your own company. Marriott was doing it to 
force people to give them money. A company doing it has plenty of other 
reasons. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Dennis Burgess"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2015 10:05:02 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rogue Accesspoint Detection 



Note that many of these systems (rather rogue AP prevention) have been deemed 
illegal by the FCC, a hotel chain was fined 600k I think due to it. 


Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc. 
den...@linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 – www.linktechs.net 



From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Scott Piehn 
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 9:49 AM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: [WISPA] Rogue Accesspoint Detection 




I have a customer that is being required to get rogue access point detection. 
not a one time thing but ongoing detection. What products have people used. 




- 
Scott M Piehn 
___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik - MEF

2014-12-31 Thread Mike Hammett
So then what do you guys think should be the desired functionality, standards, 
etc. we'd want out of MEF\CE in a WISP "router"? 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Daniel White"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2014 7:34:45 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik - MEF 



Okay my 2 cents – and I’m largely taking my vendor hat off here. 

So something to add to the offlist discussion I had with Mike (some Latvian 
companies have heard of MEF, and already have roadmaped Y.1731 in their Integra 
radios)… there is A LOT of certifications for MEF… 

http://metroethernetforum.org/carrier-ethernet/technical-specifications 

OAM is just one part of the puzzle. I’m sure Mikrotik, just like many 
manufacturers, could say we are MEF compliant (and we (SAF) already are on 
things like 9 & 14). Certification costs A LOT of money. Just joining the 
organization is $15,000 USD annually. So for a WISP focused manufacturer (and 
Mikrotik isn’t the only router manufacturer focused on WISP’s right?) spending 
the huge sums without seeing there will be a return (how many people are 
building OAM into their networks… probably a handful here) isn’t worth the 
investment. So make it worth the investment. :-) 

Carrier Ethernet is many things, it’s not just one thing. And what it is has 
different definitions to different people. 

Metro Ethernet Forum (MEF) or ITU-T (International Telecommunications Union) or 
IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers) is not a specific 
thing… but a lot of things. Y.1731 is actually an ITU-T recommendation, similar 
to IEEE 802.1AG. MEF has an interpretation of Y.1731 included in MEF 17, 30.1, 
31, 31.0.1, 35, 35.0.1, 35.0.2, 36, 38, and 39 with test suites 21 and 25. 

SAF tends to stick to ITU and IEEE certifications. But since MEF develops their 
recommendations from them, we are usually compliant. 

An argument could be made that MEF is an organization made up to line the 
pockets of a small few by charging exorbitant rates to get equipment or 
networks certified based on standards created by ITU and IEEE. Kinda like a 
good ol’ boys club (together we set the standard, and I promise I’ll buy a lot 
after we charge you this large amount of money for “Certification” to block 
your competition)… Usually on the Tier 1 networks require certification, which 
happen to be the ones that created MEF to begin with (and also the vendors that 
tend to be heavily involved). Of course anyone can join MEF and get 
certification… but the cost barrier to entry is high. 

My point being – make sure to be specific to any manufacturer what you are 
asking for. Don’t say “you need carrier Ethernet” or “you need MEF 
compliance/certification” but instead be specific “I’d like Y.1731 compliance 
in your equipment.” Point to a specific standard… it helps a lot. Maybe tell 
them which routerboards specifically need it – some of their hardware probably 
can’t support it (or at least well). 

Anyways I promise the inner-core of Mikrotik has heard of MEF. But all 
manufacturers engineer towards demand (or perceived demand in the case of more 
visionary ideas) because that is how we make money. I can’t promise everyone in 
sales, engineering, or tech support at SAF know what MEF is… but I promise the 
people that work on our Ethernet stack, that work in Ethernet product 
development (why does an RF engineer need to know what MEF is?), and work in 
our testing department know. 



cid:image001.jpg@01CE2975.BD4B6370  
Daniel White | Managing Director 
SAF North America LLC 


Cell:   

(303) 746-3590 

Skype:  
danieldwhite 

E-mail: 
daniel.wh...@saftehnika.com 

SAF Tehnika & Integra Introduction Video – http://youtu.be/xqrXOq4Uzgg 
Spectrum Compact Introduction Video – http://youtu.be/2GoNP974B4k 



cid:40B6B97A-78D8-4322-9584-2247AEDCEC32cid:C62FF935-06DE-41B5-8D9C-6CDF5978E509cid:A57FE05F-BC56-4980-982F-1E3DA8E28EBEcid:0F4D1499-0C92-4A56-9097-3F468F84263A

SAF Tehnika JSC www.saftehnika.com 





From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Gino Villarini 
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2014 2:23 AM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik - MEF 




Not the same when you are a router manufacturer… 








Gino A. Villarini 

President 

Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 

www.aeronetpr.com 

@aeronetpr 







From: Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > 
Reply-To: WISPA General List < wireless@wispa.org > 
Date: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 at 6:05 PM 
To: WISPA General List < wireless@wispa.org > 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik - MEF 





How many WISPs have heard of MEF or CE or even VPLS? 

So... have you asked for it yet? :-p 


supp...@mikrotik.com 



- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http:

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik - MEF

2014-12-30 Thread Mike Hammett
I don't use MT wireless anymore (well, for new outdoor). Too behind the times. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Tim Way"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 4:31:35 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik - MEF 


Hands up! Now if only we had a polling engine... 


*high five* 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



From: "Adair Winter" < ada...@amarillowireless.net > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 4:07:46 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik - MEF 


*Raises hand* 
On Dec 30, 2014 4:05 PM, "Mike Hammett" < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > wrote: 




How many WISPs have heard of MEF or CE or even VPLS? 

So... have you asked for it yet? :-p 


supp...@mikrotik.com 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



From: "Gino Villarini" < g...@aeronetpr.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 4:00:41 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik - MEF 


They are a router vendor and didn't knew about MEF...??? Are you f...kng 
kidding me??? Sheesh! They do live in a bubble...I guess that's one of the 
reasons they have not grown out of the wisp market 

Gino A. Villarini 
@gvillarini 








On Dec 30, 2014, at 5:47 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > wrote: 





They had never heard of it before and I'm the only one that has ever brought it 
up to them. Trying to convince them now to do the work. At the last US MUM, 
they were saying to e-mail them with requests and enhancements. Since they said 
no one has before, I invite you all to. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



From: "Gino Villarini" < g...@aeronetpr.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 3:39:20 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik - MEF 


And they agreed? 

Gino A. Villarini 
@gvillarini 








On Dec 30, 2014, at 2:17 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > wrote: 





E-mail Mikrotik support and ask them to obtain MEF certification. 

For those that don't know what MEF is, it's what the big boys have for all of 
the gear they use. 

http://metroethernetforum.org/certification/equipment-certification-overview 
http://metroethernetforum.org/carrier-ethernet/technical-specifications 

Y.1731 is a big thing to my prospective clients to document the performance of 
circuits I provide. 

https://metroethernetforum.org/Assets/Presentation/Overview_of_the_Work_of_the_MEF_20130610.pptx
 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 





___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 






___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 


___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 




___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 


___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 


___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik - MEF

2014-12-30 Thread Mike Hammett
/me slaps Josh with a large trout. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Josh Reynolds"  
To: "WISPA General List" , "Adair Winter" 
 
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 4:28:27 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik - MEF 

Raises hand. :) 

(Does it count if I worked for a MEF Member / MEF Trainer / MEF Vendor?) 


On December 30, 2014 1:07:46 PM AKST, Adair Winter 
 wrote: 


*Raises hand* 
On Dec 30, 2014 4:05 PM, "Mike Hammett" < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > wrote: 




How many WISPs have heard of MEF or CE or even VPLS? 

So... have you asked for it yet? :-p 


supp...@mikrotik.com 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



From: "Gino Villarini&quo t; < g...@aeronetpr.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 4:00:41 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik - MEF 


They are a router vendor and didn't knew about MEF...??? Are you f...kng 
kidding me??? Sheesh! They do live in a bubble...I guess that's one of the 
reasons they have not grown out of the wisp market 

Gino A. Villarini 
@gvillarini 








On Dec 30, 2014, at 5:47 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > wrote: 





They had never heard of it before and I'm the only one that has ever brought it 
up to them. Trying to convince them now to do the work. At the last US MUM, 
they were saying to e-mail them with requests and enhancements. Since they said 
no one has before, I invite you all to. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



From: "Gino Villarini" < g...@aeronetpr.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 3:39:20 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik - MEF 


And they agreed? 

Gino A. Villarini 
@gvillarini 








On Dec 30, 2014, at 2:17 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > wrote: 





E-mail Mikrotik support and ask them to obtain MEF certification. 

For those that don't know what MEF is, it's what the big boys have for all of 
the gear they use. 

http://metroethernetforum.org/certification/equipment-certification-overview 
http://metroethernetforum.org/carrier-ethernet/technical-specifications 

Y.1731 is a big thing to my prospective clients to document the performance of 
circuits I provide. 

https://metroethernetforum.org/Assets/Presentation/Overview_of_the_Work_of_the_MEF_20130610.pptx
 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 





___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 






___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 


___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 






Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. 
___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik - MEF

2014-12-30 Thread Mike Hammett
If it takes a few years and a few more years to get working, they need all the 
time they can get! 

That said, a lot of this is standards of various types people are already doing 
all over. They aren't reinventing the wheel. Then again, CCR BGP 
performance. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Adair Winter"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 4:12:02 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik - MEF 


now to email them. I mean.. what could go wrong trying to get them to implement 
a brand new feature set they know nothing about??? 
on the plus side, it should only take a few years to get it added and a few 
more to get it working well. :) 


On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > 
wrote: 




*high five* 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



From: "Adair Winter" < ada...@amarillowireless.net > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 4:07:46 PM 


Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik - MEF 


*Raises hand* 
On Dec 30, 2014 4:05 PM, "Mike Hammett" < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > wrote: 




How many WISPs have heard of MEF or CE or even VPLS? 

So... have you asked for it yet? :-p 


supp...@mikrotik.com 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



From: "Gino Villarini" < g...@aeronetpr.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 4:00:41 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik - MEF 


They are a router vendor and didn't knew about MEF...??? Are you f...kng 
kidding me??? Sheesh! They do live in a bubble...I guess that's one of the 
reasons they have not grown out of the wisp market 

Gino A. Villarini 
@gvillarini 








On Dec 30, 2014, at 5:47 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > wrote: 





They had never heard of it before and I'm the only one that has ever brought it 
up to them. Trying to convince them now to do the work. At the last US MUM, 
they were saying to e-mail them with requests and enhancements. Since they said 
no one has before, I invite you all to. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



From: "Gino Villarini" < g...@aeronetpr.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 3:39:20 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik - MEF 


And they agreed? 

Gino A. Villarini 
@gvillarini 








On Dec 30, 2014, at 2:17 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > wrote: 





E-mail Mikrotik support and ask them to obtain MEF certification. 

For those that don't know what MEF is, it's what the big boys have for all of 
the gear they use. 

http://metroethernetforum.org/certification/equipment-certification-overview 
http://metroethernetforum.org/carrier-ethernet/technical-specifications 

Y.1731 is a big thing to my prospective clients to document the performance of 
circuits I provide. 

https://metroethernetforum.org/Assets/Presentation/Overview_of_the_Work_of_the_MEF_20130610.pptx
 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 





___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 






___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 


___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 




___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 


___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 







-- 



Adair Winter 
VP, Network Operations / Owner 
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 
C: 806.231.7180 
http://www.amarillowireless.net 


___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik - MEF

2014-12-30 Thread Mike Hammett
*high five* 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Adair Winter"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 4:07:46 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik - MEF 


*Raises hand* 
On Dec 30, 2014 4:05 PM, "Mike Hammett" < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > wrote: 




How many WISPs have heard of MEF or CE or even VPLS? 

So... have you asked for it yet? :-p 


supp...@mikrotik.com 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



From: "Gino Villarini" < g...@aeronetpr.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 4:00:41 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik - MEF 


They are a router vendor and didn't knew about MEF...??? Are you f...kng 
kidding me??? Sheesh! They do live in a bubble...I guess that's one of the 
reasons they have not grown out of the wisp market 

Gino A. Villarini 
@gvillarini 








On Dec 30, 2014, at 5:47 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > wrote: 





They had never heard of it before and I'm the only one that has ever brought it 
up to them. Trying to convince them now to do the work. At the last US MUM, 
they were saying to e-mail them with requests and enhancements. Since they said 
no one has before, I invite you all to. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



From: "Gino Villarini" < g...@aeronetpr.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 3:39:20 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik - MEF 


And they agreed? 

Gino A. Villarini 
@gvillarini 








On Dec 30, 2014, at 2:17 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > wrote: 





E-mail Mikrotik support and ask them to obtain MEF certification. 

For those that don't know what MEF is, it's what the big boys have for all of 
the gear they use. 

http://metroethernetforum.org/certification/equipment-certification-overview 
http://metroethernetforum.org/carrier-ethernet/technical-specifications 

Y.1731 is a big thing to my prospective clients to document the performance of 
circuits I provide. 

https://metroethernetforum.org/Assets/Presentation/Overview_of_the_Work_of_the_MEF_20130610.pptx
 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 





___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 






___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 


___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 




___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik - MEF

2014-12-30 Thread Mike Hammett
How many WISPs have heard of MEF or CE or even VPLS? 

So... have you asked for it yet? :-p 


supp...@mikrotik.com 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Gino Villarini"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 4:00:41 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik - MEF 


They are a router vendor and didn't knew about MEF...??? Are you f...kng 
kidding me??? Sheesh! They do live in a bubble...I guess that's one of the 
reasons they have not grown out of the wisp market 

Gino A. Villarini 
@gvillarini 








On Dec 30, 2014, at 5:47 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > wrote: 





They had never heard of it before and I'm the only one that has ever brought it 
up to them. Trying to convince them now to do the work. At the last US MUM, 
they were saying to e-mail them with requests and enhancements. Since they said 
no one has before, I invite you all to. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Gino Villarini" < g...@aeronetpr.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 3:39:20 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik - MEF 


And they agreed? 

Gino A. Villarini 
@gvillarini 








On Dec 30, 2014, at 2:17 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > wrote: 





E-mail Mikrotik support and ask them to obtain MEF certification. 

For those that don't know what MEF is, it's what the big boys have for all of 
the gear they use. 

http://metroethernetforum.org/certification/equipment-certification-overview 
http://metroethernetforum.org/carrier-ethernet/technical-specifications 

Y.1731 is a big thing to my prospective clients to document the performance of 
circuits I provide. 

https://metroethernetforum.org/Assets/Presentation/Overview_of_the_Work_of_the_MEF_20130610.pptx
 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 





___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 






___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik - MEF

2014-12-30 Thread Mike Hammett
They had never heard of it before and I'm the only one that has ever brought it 
up to them. Trying to convince them now to do the work. At the last US MUM, 
they were saying to e-mail them with requests and enhancements. Since they said 
no one has before, I invite you all to. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Gino Villarini"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 3:39:20 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik - MEF 


And they agreed? 

Gino A. Villarini 
@gvillarini 








On Dec 30, 2014, at 2:17 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > wrote: 





E-mail Mikrotik support and ask them to obtain MEF certification. 

For those that don't know what MEF is, it's what the big boys have for all of 
the gear they use. 

http://metroethernetforum.org/certification/equipment-certification-overview 
http://metroethernetforum.org/carrier-ethernet/technical-specifications 

Y.1731 is a big thing to my prospective clients to document the performance of 
circuits I provide. 

https://metroethernetforum.org/Assets/Presentation/Overview_of_the_Work_of_the_MEF_20130610.pptx
 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 





___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


[WISPA] Mikrotik - MEF

2014-12-30 Thread Mike Hammett
E-mail Mikrotik support and ask them to obtain MEF certification. 

For those that don't know what MEF is, it's what the big boys have for all of 
the gear they use. 

http://metroethernetforum.org/certification/equipment-certification-overview 
http://metroethernetforum.org/carrier-ethernet/technical-specifications 

Y.1731 is a big thing to my prospective clients to document the performance of 
circuits I provide. 

https://metroethernetforum.org/Assets/Presentation/Overview_of_the_Work_of_the_MEF_20130610.pptx
 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] AeroNetPR wants to share this story

2014-12-17 Thread Mike Hammett
The GSM carriers chose HSDPA for a while until that didn't really pan out. 

Verizon was the first to LTE, but the last to 4G, IIRC. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Darin Steffl"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 8:36:04 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AeroNetPR wants to share this story 

The only wimax phones that existed were a few phones on sprint where clearwire 
had built out coverage. No other national carrier had wimax and it was never 
fully adopted. Now every national carrier and many regional ones have LTE 
networks and have committed to that standard. This is worldwide as well with 
many carriers going LTE as their new data network. Wimax was never fully 
adopted by any industry while LTE has shown it is. 


I agree with Patrick that many people here are ignorant of the standards and 
the scalability opportunities of LTE. I myself am ignorant of the facts as well 
but I'm learning not just from Patrick but reading about the new LTE releases 
coming up so I can respond here with educated answers. I suggest other 
operators do their research as well instead of just replying with childish 
answers to this thread. It is hurting our reputation to whine and complain 
about a new product and LTE standards when we don't know what we're talking 
about. This technology is working for operators who are using it so please 
continue to do more research as we hear from more people deploying it and then 
ask fair, educated questions like adults. Thank you 

On Wednesday, December 17, 2014, Robert Andrews < nos...@avantwireless.com > 
wrote: 



Well it's the invisible 800 lb gorilla for the rest of the tech in the 
Internet... 



On 12/17/14 5:45 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: 



Uhm not sure that's the industry that would sway something like that... 
Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 
On Dec 17, 2014 8:39 PM, "Mike Hammett" < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > wrote: 




If porn chooses WiMAX will it come back? 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 





From: "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 7:37:06 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AeroNetPR wants to share this story 


Well Wimax vs LTE I think was won when Verizon decided on it. 


It's like Bluray vs HDDVD - porn chose Bluray. Or Beta vs VHS - porn chose VHS. 






Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 

On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Patrick Leary < patrick.le...@telrad.com > 
wrote: 




Really, Guys, you are sounding like silly kids. Remind about it being just like 
WiMAX as you pull that LTE phone out of your pocket. 



Patrick Leary 
M 727.501.3735 

    






From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto: wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
Behalf Of Mike Hammett 
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 8:09 PM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AeroNetPR wants to share this story 


The next idea is always a better one. 



- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

Image removed
  by sender.Image removed
  by sender.Image removed
  by sender.Image removed
  by sender.







From: "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 7:08:04 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AeroNetPR wants to share this story 
5 years ago it was WiMAX vs LTE. Didn't people say the same thing you are now 
about WiMAX? 
Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 

On Dec 17, 2014 7:06 PM, "Patrick Leary" < patrick.le...@telrad.com > wrote: 


Not sure I understand the question in the sense WiMAX does not belong in the 
discussion. WiMAX was always at best a nichey thing, embraced by almost no 
large operator, save for a variety of small country fixed operators, not a 
global standard operating across most bands and universally accepted by 
carriers. 

Just as Wi-Fi has subsumed pretty much everything else in local area wireless 
(and is now in fact synonymous with WLAN), LTE will do the same for PMP outdoor 
beyond commonly accepted Wi-Fi ranges (WISP Wi-Fi ranges are not commonly 
accepted in a macro market sense, but rather exist as a proprietary model for a 
deeply niche market). 


Patrick Leary 
M 727.501.3735 







From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto: wireless-boun

Re: [WISPA] AeroNetPR wants to share this story

2014-12-17 Thread Mike Hammett
If porn chooses WiMAX will it come back? 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Josh Luthman"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 7:37:06 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AeroNetPR wants to share this story 


Well Wimax vs LTE I think was won when Verizon decided on it. 


It's like Bluray vs HDDVD - porn chose Bluray. Or Beta vs VHS - porn chose VHS. 






Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 

On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Patrick Leary < patrick.le...@telrad.com > 
wrote: 




Really, Guys, you are sounding like silly kids. Remind about it being just like 
WiMAX as you pull that LTE phone out of your pocket. 



Patrick Leary 
M 727.501.3735 







From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto: wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
Behalf Of Mike Hammett 
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 8:09 PM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AeroNetPR wants to share this story 


The next idea is always a better one. 



- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

Image removed by sender.Image removed by sender.Image removed by sender.Image 
removed by sender.







From: "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 7:08:04 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AeroNetPR wants to share this story 
5 years ago it was WiMAX vs LTE. Didn't people say the same thing you are now 
about WiMAX? 
Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 

On Dec 17, 2014 7:06 PM, "Patrick Leary" < patrick.le...@telrad.com > wrote: 


Not sure I understand the question in the sense WiMAX does not belong in the 
discussion. WiMAX was always at best a nichey thing, embraced by almost no 
large operator, save for a variety of small country fixed operators, not a 
global standard operating across most bands and universally accepted by 
carriers. 

Just as Wi-Fi has subsumed pretty much everything else in local area wireless 
(and is now in fact synonymous with WLAN), LTE will do the same for PMP outdoor 
beyond commonly accepted Wi-Fi ranges (WISP Wi-Fi ranges are not commonly 
accepted in a macro market sense, but rather exist as a proprietary model for a 
deeply niche market). 


Patrick Leary 
M 727.501.3735 






From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto: wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
Behalf Of Josh Luthman 
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 6:22 PM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AeroNetPR wants to share this story 


5 years ago, how did it look with Wimax and LTE? 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Patrick Leary < patrick.le...@telrad.com > 
wrote: 


I'm not betting on a company at all. I'm betting on an industry. No one vendor 
is doing the LTE R&D. There's more R&D being invested in LTE ecosystem wide 
than any other telecom technology in history I suspect. 


Patrick Leary 
M 727.501.3735 






From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto: wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
Behalf Of Josh Luthman 
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 6:17 PM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AeroNetPR wants to share this story 




Well you're betting on a company that's not doing hot against Verizon and AT&T 
=P 



When they start competing against me I'll pay attention. Since I'm confident 
they're not able to make money in rural areas like Clear or Open Range 
couldn't, I doubt third time is a charm. 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Patrick Leary < patrick.le...@telrad.com > 
wrote: 


Like I've been telling folks, LTE will steam roll. So much for the "LTE can't 
deal with unlicensed." Anyone want to bet against the billions being thrown 
into LTE for R&D and the top scientific minds using those funds? I expect they 
will easily overcome (to the extent needed) what some WISPs mistakenly think 
are intractable problems. Being a WISP and being a top EE/systems engineer are 
different disciplines. 




Patrick Leary 
M 727.501.3735 







From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto: wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
Behalf Of Gino Villarini 
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 5:53 PM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: [WISPA] AeroNetPR wants to share this story 




@LTEwatch: "Confirmed: T-Mobile to launch unlicensed LTE at 5 GHz, possibly 

Re: [WISPA] AeroNetPR wants to share this story

2014-12-17 Thread Mike Hammett
But at the time it was WiMAX is taking over the world because it was a standard 
and there were tons of people showing up. Yes, I did have a WiMAX phone and it 
was pretty awesome where they built coverage. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Patrick Leary"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 7:18:14 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AeroNetPR wants to share this story 



Really, Guys, you are sounding like silly kids. Remind about it being just like 
WiMAX as you pull that LTE phone out of your pocket. 



Patrick Leary 
M 727.501.3735 







From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Mike Hammett 
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 8:09 PM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AeroNetPR wants to share this story 


The next idea is always a better one. 



- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

Image removed by sender.Image removed by sender.Image removed by sender.Image 
removed by sender.


- Original Message -


From: "Josh Luthman"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 7:08:04 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AeroNetPR wants to share this story 
5 years ago it was WiMAX vs LTE. Didn't people say the same thing you are now 
about WiMAX? 
Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 

On Dec 17, 2014 7:06 PM, "Patrick Leary" < patrick.le...@telrad.com > wrote: 


Not sure I understand the question in the sense WiMAX does not belong in the 
discussion. WiMAX was always at best a nichey thing, embraced by almost no 
large operator, save for a variety of small country fixed operators, not a 
global standard operating across most bands and universally accepted by 
carriers. 

Just as Wi-Fi has subsumed pretty much everything else in local area wireless 
(and is now in fact synonymous with WLAN), LTE will do the same for PMP outdoor 
beyond commonly accepted Wi-Fi ranges (WISP Wi-Fi ranges are not commonly 
accepted in a macro market sense, but rather exist as a proprietary model for a 
deeply niche market). 


Patrick Leary 
M 727.501.3735 






From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto: wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
Behalf Of Josh Luthman 
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 6:22 PM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AeroNetPR wants to share this story 


5 years ago, how did it look with Wimax and LTE? 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Patrick Leary < patrick.le...@telrad.com > 
wrote: 


I'm not betting on a company at all. I'm betting on an industry. No one vendor 
is doing the LTE R&D. There's more R&D being invested in LTE ecosystem wide 
than any other telecom technology in history I suspect. 


Patrick Leary 
M 727.501.3735 






From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto: wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
Behalf Of Josh Luthman 
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 6:17 PM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AeroNetPR wants to share this story 




Well you're betting on a company that's not doing hot against Verizon and AT&T 
=P 



When they start competing against me I'll pay attention. Since I'm confident 
they're not able to make money in rural areas like Clear or Open Range 
couldn't, I doubt third time is a charm. 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Patrick Leary < patrick.le...@telrad.com > 
wrote: 


Like I've been telling folks, LTE will steam roll. So much for the "LTE can't 
deal with unlicensed." Anyone want to bet against the billions being thrown 
into LTE for R&D and the top scientific minds using those funds? I expect they 
will easily overcome (to the extent needed) what some WISPs mistakenly think 
are intractable problems. Being a WISP and being a top EE/systems engineer are 
different disciplines. 




Patrick Leary 
M 727.501.3735 







From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto: wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
Behalf Of Gino Villarini 
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 5:53 PM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: [WISPA] AeroNetPR wants to share this story 




@LTEwatch: "Confirmed: T-Mobile to launch unlicensed LTE at 5 GHz, possibly 
next year" http://t.co/GyPo5iFt1y 

Original Message 

Click below to easily share or schedule to Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn: 
Easy Share Link 



Gino A. Villarini 

@gvillarini 











**

Re: [WISPA] AeroNetPR wants to share this story

2014-12-17 Thread Mike Hammett
The next idea is always a better one. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Josh Luthman"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 7:08:04 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AeroNetPR wants to share this story 


5 years ago it was WiMAX vs LTE. Didn't people say the same thing you are now 
about WiMAX? 
Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 
On Dec 17, 2014 7:06 PM, "Patrick Leary" < patrick.le...@telrad.com > wrote: 





Not sure I understand the question in the sense WiMAX does not belong in the 
discussion. WiMAX was always at best a nichey thing, embraced by almost no 
large operator, save for a variety of small country fixed operators, not a 
global standard operating across most bands and universally accepted by 
carriers. 

Just as Wi-Fi has subsumed pretty much everything else in local area wireless 
(and is now in fact synonymous with WLAN), LTE will do the same for PMP outdoor 
beyond commonly accepted Wi-Fi ranges (WISP Wi-Fi ranges are not commonly 
accepted in a macro market sense, but rather exist as a proprietary model for a 
deeply niche market). 


Patrick Leary 
M 727.501.3735 






From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto: wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
Behalf Of Josh Luthman 
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 6:22 PM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AeroNetPR wants to share this story 


5 years ago, how did it look with Wimax and LTE? 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Patrick Leary < patrick.le...@telrad.com > 
wrote: 


I'm not betting on a company at all. I'm betting on an industry. No one vendor 
is doing the LTE R&D. There's more R&D being invested in LTE ecosystem wide 
than any other telecom technology in history I suspect. 


Patrick Leary 
M 727.501.3735 






From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto: wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
Behalf Of Josh Luthman 
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 6:17 PM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AeroNetPR wants to share this story 




Well you're betting on a company that's not doing hot against Verizon and AT&T 
=P 



When they start competing against me I'll pay attention. Since I'm confident 
they're not able to make money in rural areas like Clear or Open Range 
couldn't, I doubt third time is a charm. 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Patrick Leary < patrick.le...@telrad.com > 
wrote: 


Like I've been telling folks, LTE will steam roll. So much for the "LTE can't 
deal with unlicensed." Anyone want to bet against the billions being thrown 
into LTE for R&D and the top scientific minds using those funds? I expect they 
will easily overcome (to the extent needed) what some WISPs mistakenly think 
are intractable problems. Being a WISP and being a top EE/systems engineer are 
different disciplines. 




Patrick Leary 
M 727.501.3735 







From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto: wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
Behalf Of Gino Villarini 
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 5:53 PM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: [WISPA] AeroNetPR wants to share this story 




@LTEwatch: "Confirmed: T-Mobile to launch unlicensed LTE at 5 GHz, possibly 
next year" http://t.co/GyPo5iFt1y 

Original Message 

Click below to easily share or schedule to Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn: 
Easy Share Link 



Gino A. Villarini 

@gvillarini 












 
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by 
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses. 

 





 
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by 
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses. 

 

___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 





 
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by 
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses. 
**

Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced

2014-12-17 Thread Mike Hammett
Or take you out to dinner before they... 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Mathew Howard"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 2:17:36 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced 



You would think they could've put an SFP port in there for that price... 




From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [wireless-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Mike 
Hammett [wispawirel...@ics-il.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 1:59 PM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced 




Still no SFPs. 

Would have liked to see higher QAM. 

Would have liked to see > 1 GB interface. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Gino Villarini"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 12:45:01 PM 
Subject: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced 




Just got a email from UBNT 


AF24HD announced, similar to AF24, bigger Rx dish (40db) 256 qam 1 Gbps Fdx 


http://www.ubnt.com/airfiber/airfiber24/ 


No pricing or availability info, Ben? 







Gino A. Villarini 
President 
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
www.aeronetpr.com 
@aeronetpr 




___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 


___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced

2014-12-17 Thread Mike Hammett
Your AF dropped... 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Matt Hoppes"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 1:35:27 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced 

Wait... why are you driving if you can't see past the hood of your car? 

;-) 

On 12/17/14, 2:34 PM, Adair Winter wrote: 
> SWAG. In skywarn training we were always told that if you cant see past 
> the hood of your car, that's 1" per hour or more. 
> 
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Josh Luthman 
> mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote: 
> 
> How are you guys measuring/finding the inch per hour rainfall? 
> 
> 
> Josh Luthman 
> Office: 937-552-2340  
> Direct: 937-552-2343  
> 1100 Wayne St 
> Suite 1337 
> Troy, OH 45373 
> 
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Adair Winter 
> mailto:ada...@amarillowireless.net>> 
> wrote: 
> 
> The rains that have knocked ours our were 1" per hour. 
> (certainly no less then .5"/hr) 
> 
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Jim Patient 
> mailto:jpati...@linktechs.net>> wrote: 
> 
> It takes a pretty hard rain before our 3.2 mile link fails 
> over to the backup Mikrotik link. It usually takes >.3"/hr 
> to drop it out. Light rain doesn't affect it as much as I 
> expected. Overall, I'm well pleased with it for the price. 
>  
> 
> __ __ 
> 
> I agree with Gino. $6K is a no brainer for me to jump to a 
> licensed link. 
> 
> __ __ 
> 
> __ __ 
> 
> JimPatientSignature.png 
> 
> __ __ 
> 
> _jpati...@linktechs.net <mailto:jpati...@linktechs.net>_ 
> 
> www.LinkTechs.net <http://www.linktechs.net/>*| 
> *www.TowerCoverage.com <http://www.towercoverage.com/>  
> 
> usa_flag *Phone:* 314-735-0270  *FAX*: 
> 636-660-1534  
> 
> *canada_flagPhone:*647-725-7011   
> 
> __ __ 
> 
> __ __ 
> 
> __ __ 
> 
> *From:*wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
> <mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org> 
> [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
> <mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>] *On Behalf Of *Adair Winter 
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 17, 2014 1:05 PM 
> *To:* WISPA General List 
> 
> 
> *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced 
> 
> __ __ 
> 
> in the rain? my 2.7 miles link drops in anything but a 
> drizzle.  
> 
> __ __ 
> 
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Matt Hoppes 
>  <mailto:mhop...@indigowireless.com>> wrote: 
> 
> Working great at 3 miles here in PA. 
> 
> On 12/17/14, 1:59 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: 
> > Working great at six miles here in Alaska. 
> > 
> > On December 17, 2014 9:58:58 AM AKST, Tim Reichhart 
> >  <mailto:timreichh...@hometowncable.net>> wrote: 
> > 
> > Here is my issue the af24 wouldnt work for me since I 
> live in the 
> > Midwest and we get rain etc... it would only work 
> about an mile or 
> > so not 8 mile shots when can you guys get an working 
> 24Ghz airfiber 
> > to work in these types of weather climates? 
> > 
> > Tim 
> > 
> > 
>  
> > -Original Message- 
> > From: "Ben Moore"  <mailto:ben.mo...@ubnt.com>> 
> > To: "WISPA General List"  <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>> 
> > Date: 12/17/14 01:56 PM 
> > Subject: Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced 
> > 
> > and 50% more range... 
> > 
> > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Josh Reynolds 
> > mailto:j...@spitwspots.com> 
> <mailto:j...@spitwspots.com <mailto:j...@spitwspots.com>>> 
> wrote: 
> > 
> > 500Mbps technically :) 
> > 
> > 
> > On December 17, 2014 9:52:55 AM AKST, Gino 
> Villarini 
> > mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com> 
> <mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com <mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com>>> wrote: 
> > 
> > Dang! 2x price for 250 mbps more, ouch! 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Gino A. Villarini 
> > President 
> > Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
> > www.aeronetpr.com 
> <http://www.aeronetpr.com> <http://www.aeronetpr.com> 
> > @aeronetpr 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > From: "ben.mo...@ubnt.com 
> <mailto:ben.mo...@ubnt.com> <mailto:ben.mo...@ubnt.com 
> <mailto:ben.mo...@ubnt.com>>" 
> >  <mailto:ben.mo...@ubnt.com> <mailto:ben.mo...@ubnt.com 
> <mailto:ben.mo...@ubnt.com>>> 
> > Reply-To: WISPA General List 
> mailto:wireless@wisp

Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced

2014-12-17 Thread Mike Hammett
ITU rain rate isn't reliable, at least not here. Storms are much more intense, 
so it goes down deeper (or down completely). 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Josh Reynolds"  
To: "WISPA General List" , "Tim Reichhart" 
 
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 1:05:42 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced 

We have quite a few links, depends on which one. Many shoot over the ocean a 
few miles. Alaska weather plus bay fog. 

Look at your ITU rain zone and do the math. 


On December 17, 2014 10:02:35 AM AKST, Tim Reichhart 
 wrote: 


Josh 
but is it snowing all the time? if so what kind of speeds are you getting out 
of them. 

Tim 





-Original Message- 
From: "Josh Reynolds"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Date: 12/17/14 02:00 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced 

Working great at six miles here in Alaska. 


On December 17, 2014 9:58:58 AM AKST, Tim Reichhart 
 wrote: 


Here is my issue the af24 wouldnt work for me since I live in the Midwest and 
we get rain etc... it would only work about an mile or so not 8 mile shots when 
can you guys get an working 24Ghz airfiber to work in these types of weather 
climates? 

Tim 





-Original Message- 
From: "Ben Moore"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Date: 12/17/14 01:56 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced 


and 50% more range... 


On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Josh Reynolds < j...@spitwspots.com > wrote: 


500Mbps technically :) 




On December 17, 2014 9:52:55 AM AKST, Gino Villarini < g...@aeronetpr.com > 
wrote: 




Dang! 2x price for 250 mbps more, ouch! 







Gino A. Villarini 
President 
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
www.aeronetpr.com 
@aeronetpr 






From: " ben.mo...@ubnt.com " < ben.mo...@ubnt.com > 
Reply-To: WISPA General List < wireless@wispa.org > 
Date: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 at 2:48 PM 
To: WISPA General List < wireless@wispa.org > 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced 






Hi Gino - 

Initial shipments are in transit to distributors so units will be received in 
early to mid January. 


MSRP is $6k/link. 


Thanks, 
Ben 


On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Gino Villarini < g...@aeronetpr.com > wrote: 





Just got a email from UBNT 


AF24HD announced, similar to AF24, bigger Rx dish (40db) 256 qam 1 Gbps Fdx 


http://www.ubnt.com/airfiber/airfiber24/ 


No pricing or availability info, Ben? 







Gino A. Villarini 
President 
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
www.aeronetpr.com 
@aeronetpr 




___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 






Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. 
___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 




___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 





Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. 
___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 





Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. 
___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced

2014-12-17 Thread Mike Hammett
By 2 dB 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Josh Luthman"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 1:12:51 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced 


Uh ya exactly. Everyone is skipping over the BIGGER DISH!!! 






Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 

On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Ben Moore < ben.mo...@ubnt.com > wrote: 



and 50% more range... 




On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Josh Reynolds < j...@spitwspots.com > wrote: 


500Mbps technically :) 




On December 17, 2014 9:52:55 AM AKST, Gino Villarini < g...@aeronetpr.com > 
wrote: 




Dang! 2x price for 250 mbps more, ouch! 







Gino A. Villarini 
President 
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
www.aeronetpr.com 
@aeronetpr 






From: " ben.mo...@ubnt.com " < ben.mo...@ubnt.com > 
Reply-To: WISPA General List < wireless@wispa.org > 
Date: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 at 2:48 PM 
To: WISPA General List < wireless@wispa.org > 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced 






Hi Gino - 

Initial shipments are in transit to distributors so units will be received in 
early to mid January. 


MSRP is $6k/link. 


Thanks, 
Ben 


On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Gino Villarini < g...@aeronetpr.com > wrote: 





Just got a email from UBNT 


AF24HD announced, similar to AF24, bigger Rx dish (40db) 256 qam 1 Gbps Fdx 


http://www.ubnt.com/airfiber/airfiber24/ 


No pricing or availability info, Ben? 







Gino A. Villarini 
President 
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
www.aeronetpr.com 
@aeronetpr 




___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 






Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. 
___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 




___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 





___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced

2014-12-17 Thread Mike Hammett
*nods* faster than similarly priced licensed gear, but does go further. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Gino Villarini"  
To: "Ben Moore" , "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 1:05:14 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced 




I think its out of market… $4k would be more reasonable 


$6k is in the licensed band range 







Gino A. Villarini 
President 
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
www.aeronetpr.com 
@aeronetpr 






From: " ben.mo...@ubnt.com " < ben.mo...@ubnt.com > 
Date: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 at 2:56 PM 
To: WISPA General List < wireless@wispa.org > 
Cc: Gino Villarini < g...@aeronetpr.com > 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced 





and 50% more range... 


On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Josh Reynolds < j...@spitwspots.com > wrote: 


500Mbps technically :) 




On December 17, 2014 9:52:55 AM AKST, Gino Villarini < g...@aeronetpr.com > 
wrote: 




Dang! 2x price for 250 mbps more, ouch! 







Gino A. Villarini 
President 
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
www.aeronetpr.com 
@aeronetpr 






From: " ben.mo...@ubnt.com " < ben.mo...@ubnt.com > 
Reply-To: WISPA General List < wireless@wispa.org > 
Date: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 at 2:48 PM 
To: WISPA General List < wireless@wispa.org > 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced 






Hi Gino - 

Initial shipments are in transit to distributors so units will be received in 
early to mid January. 


MSRP is $6k/link. 


Thanks, 
Ben 


On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Gino Villarini < g...@aeronetpr.com > wrote: 





Just got a email from UBNT 


AF24HD announced, similar to AF24, bigger Rx dish (40db) 256 qam 1 Gbps Fdx 


http://www.ubnt.com/airfiber/airfiber24/ 


No pricing or availability info, Ben? 







Gino A. Villarini 
President 
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
www.aeronetpr.com 
@aeronetpr 




___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 






Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. 
___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 




___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced

2014-12-17 Thread Mike Hammett
It'll work at 2 miles in Chicago. It'll still drop, but rare. Maybe it'll stay 
up with this 2 dB additional gain? 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Tim Reichhart"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 12:58:58 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced 


Here is my issue the af24 wouldnt work for me since I live in the Midwest and 
we get rain etc... it would only work about an mile or so not 8 mile shots when 
can you guys get an working 24Ghz airfiber to work in these types of weather 
climates? 

Tim 





-Original Message- 
From: "Ben Moore"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Date: 12/17/14 01:56 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced 


and 50% more range... 


On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Josh Reynolds < j...@spitwspots.com > wrote: 


500Mbps technically :) 




On December 17, 2014 9:52:55 AM AKST, Gino Villarini < g...@aeronetpr.com > 
wrote: 




Dang! 2x price for 250 mbps more, ouch! 







Gino A. Villarini 
President 
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
www.aeronetpr.com 
@aeronetpr 






From: " ben.mo...@ubnt.com " < ben.mo...@ubnt.com > 
Reply-To: WISPA General List < wireless@wispa.org > 
Date: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 at 2:48 PM 
To: WISPA General List < wireless@wispa.org > 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced 






Hi Gino - 

Initial shipments are in transit to distributors so units will be received in 
early to mid January. 


MSRP is $6k/link. 


Thanks, 
Ben 


On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Gino Villarini < g...@aeronetpr.com > wrote: 





Just got a email from UBNT 


AF24HD announced, similar to AF24, bigger Rx dish (40db) 256 qam 1 Gbps Fdx 


http://www.ubnt.com/airfiber/airfiber24/ 


No pricing or availability info, Ben? 







Gino A. Villarini 
President 
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
www.aeronetpr.com 
@aeronetpr 




___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 






Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. 
___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 




___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced

2014-12-17 Thread Mike Hammett
Can I put two side by side and get twice the bandwidth for twice the price? 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Ben Moore"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 12:48:55 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced 



Hi Gino - 

Initial shipments are in transit to distributors so units will be received in 
early to mid January. 


MSRP is $6k/link. 


Thanks, 
Ben 


On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Gino Villarini < g...@aeronetpr.com > wrote: 





Just got a email from UBNT 


AF24HD announced, similar to AF24, bigger Rx dish (40db) 256 qam 1 Gbps Fdx 


http://www.ubnt.com/airfiber/airfiber24/ 


No pricing or availability info, Ben? 







Gino A. Villarini 
President 
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
www.aeronetpr.com 
@aeronetpr 




___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 




___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced

2014-12-17 Thread Mike Hammett
Still no SFPs. 

Would have liked to see higher QAM. 

Would have liked to see > 1 GB interface. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Gino Villarini"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 12:45:01 PM 
Subject: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced 




Just got a email from UBNT 


AF24HD announced, similar to AF24, bigger Rx dish (40db) 256 qam 1 Gbps Fdx 


http://www.ubnt.com/airfiber/airfiber24/ 


No pricing or availability info, Ben? 







Gino A. Villarini 
President 
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
www.aeronetpr.com 
@aeronetpr 




___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Nokia achieves 4.2 Gbps LTE speeds using TDD and FDD Carrier Aggregation #GettingCloserTo10G

2014-12-10 Thread Mike Hammett
Also only my opinion, but I believe: 

The licenses are 10 MHz wide, but unlicensed operations can do whatever they 
want regarding channel size (well, and device certification). 
An operator can only have three licenses in a given area (block, tract, I 
forget what). 
50 MHz will remain for unlicensed operations. 
All channels are dynamically allocated by the SAS database (even licensed). 
Your license isn't for a specific 10 Mhz (3550 - 3560), but just 10 MHz 
anywhere in the space. 


I think that's about all that i would add or redirect from your post. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Patrick Leary"  
To: "paolo difrancesco" , "WISPA General List" 
 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 9:27:16 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Nokia achieves 4.2 Gbps LTE speeds using TDD and FDD 
Carrier Aggregation #GettingCloserTo10G 

Paolo, 

As Mike notes, WISPA has had a number of webinars on the topic. Here is my 
understanding of what's to be expected, in part, of the emerging rules. NOTE: 
THIS MAY NOT BE WHAT ACTUALLY EMERGES AS THE RULES, it comprises MY educated 
expectation. None have a better understanding though than Steve Coran and it is 
well worth a consultation fee for any U.S.-based operator to have a dedicated 
call with him. 

I will offer some international perspective here as well for your benefit there 
in Italy. 

- 100 MHz of spectrum, divided in 10 MHz channels per census blocks (tricky) 
- Of this, 30-50% MAY be auctioned off, though "auction" process is likely not 
to follow traditional cumbersome process, but some low burden streamlined 
method 
- remaining 70% (7 10 MHz channels) will be open for free, opportunistic use 
- Of this, it seems FCC may limit any individual operator from acquiring more 
that 30% (3 channels) 
- "ownership" likely to be purchased in yearly blocks, up to 3 years max 
perhaps 
- HOWEVER...even if one "owns" some of this spectrum, others can use it IF the 
owners have not built in the spectrum. And then, once and if the owners DO 
build, the borg (as I call it) like Google or Spectrum Bridge who'll be 
dynamically managing base station channels (all connected to the cloud) will 
relocate the opportunistic user to open spectrum, returning back the exclusive 
spectrum to the owner now actively using it 
- this borg will have the government contract to manage the spectrum following 
a methodology akin to how TVWS works currently, though management may be more 
granular (if Google has its way, and I think more granularity is better, as it 
would open use more broadly) 
- potential power seems undetermined at this point, but may exceed current 3.65 
for hyper rural areas, similar to the Canadian model (could be huge) 
- there will likely be a prioritization scheme whereby certain defined sets of 
users will granted use priority, meaning the borg moves other users away from 
their active channels, moving them to open channels 

I understand some of this sounds impossible, but that's because many of us 
don't yet understand what's meant by "dynamic" as it relates to machines 
talking to machines in real time. 

A reason I submit this all matters internationally is that U.S. adoption of 
this band for commercial use will help drive scale, further reducing cost 
globally and encouraging lots of device makers to build devices (what the LTE 
world calls "UEs" for the band -- a cell phone is a UE, as is a fixed wireless 
CPE). I fully expect things like IP cameras, traffic systems, parking meters, 
etc. to have embedded 3.5x LTE chipsets, not to mention gobs of traditional 
fixed wireless "UE" options. 

Over the years, I've been pretty spot on with my market predictions re fixed 
wireless -- which companies survive, which spectrum comes along, use uptake, 
etc. -- and in some cases I've played a literal direct role in enabling it (see 
my comments in this FCC transcript re advised rules for 3.65 band way back in 
2002, 3 years before it was released 
http://transition.fcc.gov/sptf/files/0801fcc.pdf). I am hoping my streak 
continues. 


Patrick Leary 
M 727.501.3735 






-Original Message- 
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Paolo Di Francesco 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 9:18 AM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Nokia achieves 4.2 Gbps LTE speeds using TDD and FDD 
Carrier Aggregation #GettingCloserTo10G 

will that spectrum be licensed? 


> Those are good points Mike, and it explains one reason I'm so excited 
> over 3.550-3.650 MHz. I think the coming spectrum is a game changer 
> for many reasons, this among them. 
> 
> *Patrick Leary* 
> 
> ***M*727.501.3735 
> 
> <http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet> 
> 
> 
> *From:*wireless-boun...@wispa.org [

Re: [WISPA] Nokia achieves 4.2 Gbps LTE speeds using TDD and FDD Carrier Aggregation #GettingCloserTo10G

2014-12-10 Thread Mike Hammett
Yes and no. 

WISPA has had several webinars and e-mails about the 3550 - 3700 band. Perhaps 
one of hte admins can direct you to one of them. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Paolo Di Francesco"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 8:17:50 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Nokia achieves 4.2 Gbps LTE speeds using TDD and FDD 
Carrier Aggregation #GettingCloserTo10G 

will that spectrum be licensed? 


> Those are good points Mike, and it explains one reason I'm so excited 
> over 3.550-3.650 MHz. I think the coming spectrum is a game changer 
> for many reasons, this among them. 
> 
> *Patrick Leary* 
> 
> ***M*727.501.3735 
> 
> <http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet> 
> 
> 
> *From:*wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] 
> *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett 
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 10, 2014 8:26 AM 
> *To:* WISPA General List 
> *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Nokia achieves 4.2 Gbps LTE speeds using TDD 
> and FDD Carrier Aggregation #GettingCloserTo10G 
> 
> I know of eICIC. It's still increasing efficiency as you're now doing 
> this all in one channel everywhere vs. one channel per radio or a 
> couple channels per tower. 
> 
> That said, in unlicensed spectrum that is busy like 5 GHz or 2.4, 
> you're not going to use the same channel everywhere as it would be 
> impossible to do so due to external interferers. 
> 
> 
> 
> - 
> Mike Hammett 
> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
> http://www.ics-il.com 
> 
> Image removed by sender. <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>Image removed 
> by sender. 
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>Image 
> removed by sender. 
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>Image 
> removed 
> by sender. <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> 
> 
>  
> 
> *From: *"Patrick Leary"  
> *To: *"WISPA General List"  
> *Sent: *Wednesday, December 10, 2014 7:22:36 AM 
> *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] Nokia achieves 4.2 Gbps LTE speeds using TDD 
> and FDD Carrier Aggregation #GettingCloserTo10G 
> 
> It is beyond basic concepts like increased efficiency. LTE goes much 
> further. See my last post. 
> 
> *Patrick Leary* 
> 
> *M*727.501.3735 
> 
> <http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet> 
> 
> 
> *From:*wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] 
> *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett 
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 10, 2014 7:41 AM 
> *To:* WISPA General List 
> *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Nokia achieves 4.2 Gbps LTE speeds using TDD 
> and FDD Carrier Aggregation #GettingCloserTo10G 
> 
> Why not allow both? 
> 
> I think every vendor is releasing equipment with better spectral 
> efficiency. 
> 
> 
> 
> - 
> Mike Hammett 
> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
> http://www.ics-il.com 
> 
> Image removed by sender. <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>Image removed 
> by sender. 
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>Image 
> removed by sender. 
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>Image 
> removed 
> by sender. <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> 
> 
>  
> 
> *From: *"daniel mullen"  
> *To: *"WISPA General List"  
> *Sent: *Wednesday, December 10, 2014 6:36:58 AM 
> *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] Nokia achieves 4.2 Gbps LTE speeds using TDD 
> and FDD Carrier Aggregation #GettingCloserTo10G 
> 
> It is a better idea we get higher throughput with better modulations 
> instead of simply grabbing larger pieces of spectrum. We cannot make 
> ever larger channel sizes without running into problems! 
> 
> 
> Daniel 
> 
> 
> Gino Villarini  wrote .. 
> > How is that going to make a difference? 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Gino A. Villarini 
> > President 
> > Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
> > www.aeronetpr.com 
> > @aeronetpr 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On 12/9/14, 11:11 PM, "daniel.mul...@metrocom.ca" 
> >  wrote: 
> > 
> > >Using 200 MHz of bandwidth - just wait until Ubiquiti decides to do 10x 
> > >channel sizes! 
> > > 
> > >Daniel 
> > > 
> > >Gino Villarini  wrote .. 
> > >> 
> > >> ow.ly/FBFcX 
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> Gino A. Villarini 
> > 

Re: [WISPA] Nokia achieves 4.2 Gbps LTE speeds using TDD and FDD Carrier Aggregation #GettingCloserTo10G

2014-12-10 Thread Mike Hammett
I know of eICIC. It's still increasing efficiency as you're now doing this all 
in one channel everywhere vs. one channel per radio or a couple channels per 
tower. 

That said, in unlicensed spectrum that is busy like 5 GHz or 2.4, you're not 
going to use the same channel everywhere as it would be impossible to do so due 
to external interferers. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Patrick Leary"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 7:22:36 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Nokia achieves 4.2 Gbps LTE speeds using TDD and FDD 
Carrier Aggregation #GettingCloserTo10G 



It is beyond basic concepts like increased efficiency. LTE goes much further. 
See my last post. 



Patrick Leary 
M 727.501.3735 







From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Mike Hammett 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 7:41 AM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Nokia achieves 4.2 Gbps LTE speeds using TDD and FDD 
Carrier Aggregation #GettingCloserTo10G 


Why not allow both? 

I think every vendor is releasing equipment with better spectral efficiency. 



- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

Image removed by sender.Image removed by sender.Image removed by sender.Image 
removed by sender.


- Original Message -


From: "daniel mullen"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 6:36:58 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Nokia achieves 4.2 Gbps LTE speeds using TDD and FDD 
Carrier Aggregation #GettingCloserTo10G 

It is a better idea we get higher throughput with better modulations instead of 
simply grabbing larger pieces of spectrum. We cannot make ever larger channel 
sizes without running into problems! 


Daniel 


Gino Villarini  wrote .. 
> How is that going to make a difference? 
> 
> 
> 
> Gino A. Villarini 
> President 
> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
> www.aeronetpr.com 
> @aeronetpr 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 12/9/14, 11:11 PM, "daniel.mul...@metrocom.ca" 
>  wrote: 
> 
> >Using 200 MHz of bandwidth - just wait until Ubiquiti decides to do 10x 
> >channel sizes! 
> > 
> >Daniel 
> > 
> >Gino Villarini  wrote .. 
> >> 
> >> ow.ly/FBFcX 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Gino A. Villarini 
> >> President 
> >> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
> >> www.aeronetpr.com 
> >> @aeronetpr 
> >> 
> 
> ___ 
> Wireless mailing list 
> Wireless@wispa.org 
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 






 
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by 
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses. 

 




 
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by 
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses. 

 


___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Nokia achieves 4.2 Gbps LTE speeds using TDD and FDD Carrier Aggregation #GettingCloserTo10G

2014-12-10 Thread Mike Hammett
Why not allow both? 

I think every vendor is releasing equipment with better spectral efficiency. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "daniel mullen"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 6:36:58 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Nokia achieves 4.2 Gbps LTE speeds using TDD and FDD 
Carrier Aggregation #GettingCloserTo10G 

It is a better idea we get higher throughput with better modulations instead of 
simply grabbing larger pieces of spectrum. We cannot make ever larger channel 
sizes without running into problems! 


Daniel 


Gino Villarini  wrote .. 
> How is that going to make a difference? 
> 
> 
> 
> Gino A. Villarini 
> President 
> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
> www.aeronetpr.com 
> @aeronetpr 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 12/9/14, 11:11 PM, "daniel.mul...@metrocom.ca" 
>  wrote: 
> 
> >Using 200 MHz of bandwidth - just wait until Ubiquiti decides to do 10x 
> >channel sizes! 
> > 
> >Daniel 
> > 
> >Gino Villarini  wrote .. 
> >> 
> >> ow.ly/FBFcX 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Gino A. Villarini 
> >> President 
> >> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
> >> www.aeronetpr.com 
> >> @aeronetpr 
> >> 
> 
> ___ 
> Wireless mailing list 
> Wireless@wispa.org 
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] New Ubiquiti Rocket5ac PtP

2014-12-10 Thread Mike Hammett
The non-airPrism isn't going to be any better and probably worse in noisy 
areas. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Paolo Di Francesco"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 3:07:38 AM 
Subject: [WISPA] New Ubiquiti Rocket5ac PtP 

Hi All 

I am curious to hear from you what is your feedback about the new 
Ubiquiti point-to-point link in noisy environments 

Did you already swapped old link with the new technology with the same 
channel width? 

Regards 

-- 


Ing. Paolo Di Francesco 

Level7 s.r.l. unipersonale 

Sede operativa: Largo Montalto, 5 - 90144 Palermo 

C.F. e P.IVA 05940050825 
Fax : +39-091-8772072 
assistenza: (+39) 091-8776432 
web: http://www.level7.it 



___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


[WISPA] Fwd: [Observium] Wireless Support (Aruba, Ruckus, Trapeze, Cisco, etc)

2014-12-08 Thread Mike Hammett
It looks like Observium is expanding a bit. In what direction, I'm not certain. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Forwarded Message -

From: ad...@observium.org 
To: "Observium Network Observation System"  
Sent: Monday, December 8, 2014 4:35:44 AM 
Subject: [Observium] Wireless Support (Aruba, Ruckus, Trapeze, Cisco, etc) 

Hi All, 

Could those of you who are interested in wireless support email me 
off-list? 

I've totally lost track of who has offered to financially sponsor 
development and/or provide access to test hardware. 

Please include the following information : 

Contact/Company/Subscriber information 
What type of support you'd be willing to provide 
What type of hardware you use 
What you use the hardware for (WISP, Enterprise, etc) 

Additionally if you already use some other platform with your wireless 
kit, perhaps some screenshots and description of how you use the 
platform would be useful, as would any suggestions on how a wifi 
infrastructure management interface might be structured. 

We're not wireless infrastructure experts, but you guys might be! :) 

Depending upon the level of interest when everyone is accounted for, we 
might consider building specific wireless support into Observium. 

Please reply to this mail but change the "to" field to 
ad...@observium.org. If you use a different subject, your mail might be 
lost forever :) 

Thanks, 
adam. 

___ 
observium mailing list 
observ...@observium.org 
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] groundcontrol project

2014-12-03 Thread Mike Hammett
They don't seem to care at all what we want if it isn't in their vision. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Randy Cosby"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2014 2:09:33 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] groundcontrol project 

Would it pay to see if UBNT would allow us to continue to use some of the 
provisioning mechanisms built into the radios for aircontrol? It's nice to have 
subscriber units "phone home." 



On 12/3/2014 12:39 PM, Jay Weekley wrote: 


I was wondering if that might come about. Maybe another wisp that uses 
their own software might offer something.

Mike Hammett wrote: 

Further driven by today's post that summed up says, "We don't care 
what you want. This is what you get."



-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com 

*From: *"Josh Reynolds"  *To: *"WISPA General List" 
 , "Ubiquiti Users 
Group"  , a...@afmug.com *Sent: *Wednesday, December 3, 
2014 1:19:23 PM
*Subject: *[WISPA] groundcontrol project

For those of you who haven't heard, several of us started a new 
project yesterday. https://github.com/esseph/groundcontrol Licensing is 
tentatively set as falling under GPLv2.

We have already been offered code snippets, a dev box, a db server, 
and several people have decided to volunteer time to make this happen.

The initial idea is that the system itself will be free, with a 
possibly paid support/features option, or maybe a model similar to 
observium where the is a "community" (free as in beer) version that 
comes out every 6mo or so, and a "paid" version with newer features 
and direct support. We're not sure yet, but we want to make this 
project accessible and fairly vendor-neutral.

If any of you could volunteer time, support, code, documentation, 
ideas, etc.it would be greatly appreciated. This is a project by and 
for the WISP community. Thank you!
-- 
josh reynolds :: chief information officer
spitwspots ::www.spitwspots.com

___
Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
___
Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



-- 
signature 


Randy Cosby 
InfoWest, Inc 
435-674-0165 x 2010 
infowest.com 

This e-mail message contains information from InfoWest, Inc 
and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may 
contain privileged, proprietary or confidential information.  

Unauthorized use, distribution, review or disclosure is 
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact rco...@infowest.com by reply email and destroy 
the original message, all attachments and copies. 
___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] groundcontrol project

2014-12-03 Thread Mike Hammett
Further driven by today's post that summed up says, "We don't care what you 
want. This is what you get." 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Josh Reynolds"  
To: "WISPA General List" , "Ubiquiti Users Group" 
, a...@afmug.com 
Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2014 1:19:23 PM 
Subject: [WISPA] groundcontrol project 

For thos e of you who haven't heard, several of us started a new project 
yesterday. 

https://github.com/esseph/groundcontrol 

Licensing is tentatively set as falling under GPLv2. 

We have already been offered code snip pets, a dev box, a db server, and 
several peop le have decided to volunteer time to make this happen. 

The initial idea is that the system itself will be free, with a possibly paid 
support/features option, or maybe a model similar to obs ervium where the is a 
"community" (free as in beer) version that comes out every 6mo or so, and a 
"paid" version with newer features and direct support. We're not sure yet, b ut 
we want to make this project accessible and fairly vendor-neutral. 

If any of you could v olunteer time, support, code, documentation, ideas, etc. 
it would be greatly appreciated. This is a project by and for the WISP 
community. Thank you! 
-- 
josh reynolds :: chief information officer
spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com 
___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] I need to monitor bandwidth usage

2014-12-01 Thread Mike Hammett
Well, does the UBNT system expose all of the OIDs you're wanting to monitor? 
:-p 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Josh Reynolds"  
To: wireless@wispa.org 
Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 4:26:36 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] I need to monitor bandwidth usage 


Money compensates for alot. 

Also, I'd like them to support SAF =] 
josh reynolds :: chief information officer
spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/01/2014 01:18 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: 



It was my understanding that he required the vendors to fix their broken 
systems before he invested much time into extended his product's capabilities. 
He'll just do it anyway if you paid him? 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Josh Reynolds"  
To: wireless@wispa.org 
Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 4:16:42 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] I need to monitor bandwidth usage 


Yes, Adam can be a douche :) 

I'd like for a bunch of us to get together and shell out $ 2 00 or so each . If 
10 or 20 WISPs do it that pays for the development of the feature. 
josh reynolds :: chief information officer
spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/01/2014 01:10 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: 



Correct. The guy in charge can be a bit of a dick, but usually he's just 
pointing out where others failed to do their job. IE: crappy SNMP 
implementations. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Josh Reynolds"  
To: wireless@wispa.org 
Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 3:27:10 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] I need to monitor bandwidth usage 


Only supports certain things Mike. You can't specify custom OIDs to monitor or 
an yt hing like that, which is why a little over a year ago I was trying to get 
support from the UBNT community to correctly graph mikrotik and ubiquiti 
devices. 

I ended up getting busy with it so I haven't sent the request and cash to Adam, 
but it should be a couple grand to get everything supported ( AirFibers, etc.) 

Other than that, we have been using it here at SPITwSPOTS for over a year for 
switches and routers, and I've been using it myself for a little over 2. 
josh reynolds :: chief information officer
spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/01/2014 11:59 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: 



If we're going to start talking about graphing systems, I suggest you all look 
at Observium. Justin Miller's blog has some great articles on setting it up. 

http://dynstatic.net/ 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Sean Heskett"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 2:51:10 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] I need to monitor bandwidth usage 

Cacti 


Cactiez is a easy install cd that will format the drive, install Linux and all 
the cacti software etc 

On Monday, December 1, 2014, ~NGL~ < n...@ngl.net > wrote: 




I need an inexpensive means to keep track of under 100 clients bandwidth usage. 
Any suggestions? 
Thanx 
NGL 
If you can read this Thank A Teacher. 
And if it's in English Thank A Soldier! 


___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



___
Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



___
Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



___
Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] I need to monitor bandwidth usage

2014-12-01 Thread Mike Hammett
It was my understanding that he required the vendors to fix their broken 
systems before he invested much time into extended his product's capabilities. 
He'll just do it anyway if you paid him? 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Josh Reynolds"  
To: wireless@wispa.org 
Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 4:16:42 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] I need to monitor bandwidth usage 


Yes, Adam can be a douche :) 

I'd like for a bunch of us to get together and shell out $ 2 00 or so each . If 
10 or 20 WISPs do it that pays for the development of the feature. 
josh reynolds :: chief information officer
spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/01/2014 01:10 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: 



Correct. The guy in charge can be a bit of a dick, but usually he's just 
pointing out where others failed to do their job. IE: crappy SNMP 
implementations. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Josh Reynolds"  
To: wireless@wispa.org 
Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 3:27:10 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] I need to monitor bandwidth usage 


Only supports certain things Mike. You can't specify custom OIDs to monitor or 
an yt hing like that, which is why a little over a year ago I was trying to get 
support from the UBNT community to correctly graph mikrotik and ubiquiti 
devices. 

I ended up getting busy with it so I haven't sent the request and cash to Adam, 
but it should be a couple grand to get everything supported ( AirFibers, etc.) 

Other than that, we have been using it here at SPITwSPOTS for over a year for 
switches and routers, and I've been using it myself for a little over 2. 
josh reynolds :: chief information officer
spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/01/2014 11:59 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: 



If we're going to start talking about graphing systems, I suggest you all look 
at Observium. Justin Miller's blog has some great articles on setting it up. 

http://dynstatic.net/ 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Sean Heskett"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 2:51:10 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] I need to monitor bandwidth usage 

Cacti 


Cactiez is a easy install cd that will format the drive, install Linux and all 
the cacti software etc 

On Monday, December 1, 2014, ~NGL~ < n...@ngl.net > wrote: 




I need an inexpensive means to keep track of under 100 clients bandwidth usage. 
Any suggestions? 
Thanx 
NGL 
If you can read this Thank A Teacher. 
And if it's in English Thank A Soldier! 


___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



___
Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



___
Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] I need to monitor bandwidth usage

2014-12-01 Thread Mike Hammett
Your billing system. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Akinlolu C. Ajayi-Obe"  
To: wireless@wispa.org, "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 3:38:17 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] I need to monitor bandwidth usage 


How do you create individual data caps for users? 


Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone. 

From: Josh Luthman 
Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 21:54 
To: WISPA General List 
Reply To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] I need to monitor bandwidth usage 



Mikrotik is waaay easier and will be cheaper than Mikrotik + cacti assuming >0 
cost of server. 






Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 

On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Sean Heskett < af...@zirkel.us > wrote: 


Cacti 


Cactiez is a easy install cd that will format the drive, install Linux and all 
the cacti software etc 



On Monday, December 1, 2014, ~NGL~ < n...@ngl.net > wrote: 




I need an inexpensive means to keep track of under 100 clients bandwidth usage. 
Any suggestions? 
Thanx 
NGL 
If you can read this Thank A Teacher. 
And if it's in English Thank A Soldier! 


___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 







[Text File:ATT001.txt] 


[image/gif:flag.gif] 

___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] I need to monitor bandwidth usage

2014-12-01 Thread Mike Hammett
Correct. The guy in charge can be a bit of a dick, but usually he's just 
pointing out where others failed to do their job. IE: crappy SNMP 
implementations. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Josh Reynolds"  
To: wireless@wispa.org 
Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 3:27:10 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] I need to monitor bandwidth usage 


Only supports certain things Mike. You can't specify custom OIDs to monitor or 
an yt hing like that, which is why a little over a year ago I was trying to get 
support from the UBNT community to correctly graph mikrotik and ubiquiti 
devices. 

I ended up getting busy with it so I haven't sent the request and cash to Adam, 
but it should be a couple grand to get everything supported ( AirFibers, etc.) 

Other than that, we have been using it here at SPITwSPOTS for over a year for 
switches and routers, and I've been using it myself for a little over 2. 
josh reynolds :: chief information officer
spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/01/2014 11:59 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: 



If we're going to start talking about graphing systems, I suggest you all look 
at Observium. Justin Miller's blog has some great articles on setting it up. 

http://dynstatic.net/ 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Sean Heskett"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 2:51:10 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] I need to monitor bandwidth usage 

Cacti 


Cactiez is a easy install cd that will format the drive, install Linux and all 
the cacti software etc 

On Monday, December 1, 2014, ~NGL~ < n...@ngl.net > wrote: 




I need an inexpensive means to keep track of under 100 clients bandwidth usage. 
Any suggestions? 
Thanx 
NGL 
If you can read this Thank A Teacher. 
And if it's in English Thank A Soldier! 


___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



___
Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] I need to monitor bandwidth usage

2014-12-01 Thread Mike Hammett
Where else would you do it? 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Matt Hoppes"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 3:00:54 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] I need to monitor bandwidth usage 

On a router 

On 12/1/14, 4:00 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: 
> Create 100 simple queues. Done. 
> 
> 
> Josh Luthman 
> Office: 937-552-2340 
> Direct: 937-552-2343 
> 1100 Wayne St 
> Suite 1337 
> Troy, OH 45373 
> 
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Matt Hoppes  <mailto:mhop...@indigowireless.com>> wrote: 
> 
> You want to run MRTG on a router? 
> 
> On 12/1/14, 3:53 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: 
> > Mikrotik is waaay easier and will be cheaper than Mikrotik + cacti 
> > assuming >0 cost of server. 
> > 
> > 
> > Josh Luthman 
> > Office: 937-552-2340  
> > Direct: 937-552-2343  
> > 1100 Wayne St 
> > Suite 1337 
> > Troy, OH 45373 
> > 
> > On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Sean Heskett  > <mailto:af...@zirkel.us> 
> > <mailto:af...@zirkel.us <mailto:af...@zirkel.us>>> wrote: 
> > 
> > Cacti 
> > 
> > Cactiez is a easy install cd that will format the drive, install 
> > Linux and all the cacti software etc 
> > 
> > 
> > On Monday, December 1, 2014, ~NGL~ mailto:n...@ngl.net> 
> > <mailto:n...@ngl.net <mailto:n...@ngl.net>>> wrote: 
> > 
> > __ 
> > I need an inexpensive means to keep track of under 100 clients 
> > bandwidth usage. 
> > Any suggestions? 
> > Thanx 
> > NGL 
> > If you can read this Thank A Teacher. 
> > And if it's in English Thank A Soldier! 
> > 
> > 
> > ___ 
> > Wireless mailing list 
> > Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org> 
> <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>> 
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ___ 
> > Wireless mailing list 
> > Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org> 
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
> > 
> ___ 
> Wireless mailing list 
> Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org> 
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___ 
> Wireless mailing list 
> Wireless@wispa.org 
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
> 
___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] I need to monitor bandwidth usage

2014-12-01 Thread Mike Hammett
If we're going to start talking about graphing systems, I suggest you all look 
at Observium. Justin Miller's blog has some great articles on setting it up. 

http://dynstatic.net/ 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Sean Heskett"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 2:51:10 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] I need to monitor bandwidth usage 

Cacti 


Cactiez is a easy install cd that will format the drive, install Linux and all 
the cacti software etc 

On Monday, December 1, 2014, ~NGL~ < n...@ngl.net > wrote: 




I need an inexpensive means to keep track of under 100 clients bandwidth usage. 
Any suggestions? 
Thanx 
NGL 
If you can read this Thank A Teacher. 
And if it's in English Thank A Soldier! 


___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] I need to monitor bandwidth usage

2014-12-01 Thread Mike Hammett
Ask your billing system. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "~NGL~"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 2:49:56 PM 
Subject: [WISPA] I need to monitor bandwidth usage 


I need an inexpensive means to keep track of under 100 clients bandwidth usage. 
Any suggestions? 
Thanx 
NGL 
If you can read this Thank A Teacher. 
And if it's in English Thank A Soldier! 
___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Solar setup recommendations...

2014-12-01 Thread Mike Hammett
Wrong thread, Bob. ;-) 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Bob M"  
To: "WISPA General List" , sc...@brevardwireless.com 
Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 2:30:52 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Solar setup recommendations... 


guys. I'm not looking for solar system. I'm not looking for d_c power plant. I 
know all about those I'm not looking for that. I'm looking for a stupid simple 
economical u_p_s with an snmp card to power this radio for maybe 5 minutes. 
Just long enoigh to send me an SNMP command to say "Hey the ac power is gone 
...don't bother driving out here." That's all I'm looking for. 


Now does anyone have any thoughts. These are not CPE locations. They are 
commercial hubs. 




Bob 





Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone 


 Original message  
From: Sean Heskett  
Date:12/01/2014 1:48 PM (GMT-05:00) 
To: sc...@brevardwireless.com, WISPA General List  
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Solar setup recommendations... 

You'll need to do some math first. 


How many watts of power do you need, multiply by 24 to get your daily usage. 
Add in some buffer if you think this site will expand (it probably will). For 
instance say your draw is 100watts * 24 = 2400watts. In Florida on dec 21st you 
should have 5 hours sunlight available (there are government charts that can 
tell you exactly what to expect) 2400/5=480watts this is your array size (solar 
panels) 


Once you have your daily usage, how many days do you want to run with no 
sunlight?? 
in Florida you will probably only need a couple days. 2400 * 2 = 4800watt hours 
( you need to double this since you don't want the batteries to go below 50%) 
4800*2= 9600watt hours. This is your storage capacity (batteries) 


So for panels you want to shop for 500-600watts of panels. Three 200watt 24vdc 
panels should be fine or two 250watt panels. It all depends on how much 
expansion you want this site to be able to handle. 


For batteries we us UB4D sealed batts. They are 210amp 12vdc = 2,520 watt 
hours. So you'll need 4. Connect 2 in series, 2 others in series and then those 
2 banks in parallel (to get to 24vdc) 


For charge controllers I really like the Morningstar tri-star MPPT chargers. 
But any MPPT controller is fine. 


Be sure to fuse and breaker everything!!! 


We usually buy from wholesalesolar.com they have decent prices and they will 
answer all your questions and find you all the right parts etc. 


Good luck! 


Sean 


p.s. The above calculations were based on assumptions like 100watts of draw, 2 
days of runtime in Florida etc. you'll need to adjust accordingly to your 
needs. 





On Monday, December 1, 2014, Scott Carullo < sc...@brevardwireless.com > wrote: 



I have a new site that needs to be powered by solar. Needs to run a MT 2011 
router and 4 UBNT rocket 5Ghz radios. Would like it to be 24v based since that 
is what all the equipment requires. Also a battery recommendation would be 
super, controller etc. Its all being mounted outside on a pipe which is chain 
mounted to a monopole tower at 60ft. Just need the shopping list to make this 
happen. I appreciate your input and your time, thanks. 

Scott Carullo 
Technical Operations 
855-FLSPEED x102 




___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Need UPS recommendations

2014-12-01 Thread Mike Hammett
Something like that for a CPE setup would be nice. Powers the radio, router and 
ATA (preferably at least some of those units are integrated) for a few hours. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Bob M"  
To: "Wispa"  
Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 12:06:14 PM 
Subject: [WISPA] Need UPS recommendations 


Looking for a UPS with SNMP that can send me a loss of AC power alert and power 
up the backhand radio for maybe 5-10 minutes. Worse case scenario on the radio 
will 80 watts of draw at 110 vac. 


Other option would be a basic ups and an external monitoring device. Need 
something economical because I need to do about 50 sites. 


Tnx 


Bob 





Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone 

___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] 5 ghz backhaul sanity check

2014-12-01 Thread Mike Hammett
5150 != DFS. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Fred Goldstein"  
To: wireless@wispa.org 
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 11:23:35 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5 ghz backhaul sanity check 

On 11/30/2014 11:55 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: 
> I have a link at 6.6 miles with a pair of Rocket M5. It's at 5765 and 
> has worked beautifully for a couple of years now. It is -55 on each 
> side with 2' dishes. 
> 
> I'm looking at doing another link that's almost identical (one similar 
> tower) and my calculations are showing if I use 5660 at 14dbm tx power 
> I should see -56. Does this sound right at all? 6.6 miles seems far 
> off the top of my head for the DFS band. 

The ERP limit there is +30, so if you're using +14 tx power, then the 
antenna gain is only 16 dB or you're noncompliant. That's what a 
NanoStation does on DFS. A big dish (like the 2 footer, around 30 dB 
gain) would still help with receive gain but you would have to turn down 
the Rocket to something lower (0 dBm). 

UBNT DFS stuff is approved for +41 dBm EIRP or so on the 5150 band, though. 

-- 
Fred R. Goldstein k1io fred "at" interisle.net 
Interisle Consulting Group 
+1 617 795 2701 

___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] 5 ghz backhaul sanity check

2014-12-01 Thread Mike Hammett
If you're using 2' dishes, you should be using a Tx power of around 0 dB. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Josh Luthman"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 10:55:02 PM 
Subject: [WISPA] 5 ghz backhaul sanity check 


I have a link at 6.6 miles with a pair of Rocket M5. It's at 5765 and has 
worked beautifully for a couple of years now. It is -55 on each side with 2' 
dishes. 


I'm looking at doing another link that's almost identical (one similar tower) 
and my calculations are showing if I use 5660 at 14dbm tx power I should see 
-56. Does this sound right at all? 6.6 miles seems far off the top of my head 
for the DFS band. 





Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 
___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts

2014-11-25 Thread Mike Hammett
I haven't had ACH fraud before, but my bank has always worked quickly to 
restore debit card fraud. 

Cost to electronic payments? Mine only cost the time it takes to enter it. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Fred Goldstein"  
To: wireless@wispa.org 
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 10:02:07 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 


On 11/25/2014 2:18 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: 



Who are you writing checks to and why aren't you doing something better? 

I haven't written a check in years. 






One of my Interisle partners is a financial-IT expert, and knows the banking 
system inside and out. He designed the network for Wall Street twice, most 
recently after a rather sudden massive failure event in September of 2001... 
but he doesn't do much finance work any more. The industry has gotten too 
distasteful. We prefer that our major clients pay by check. The partnership 
distributes member payments (e.g., my pay) by check. Why not electronically? 
Because he knows the system too well. It turns out that if you open your 
account to make ACH payments, it's trivially easy for someone to take an 
unauthorized payment. A personal account has 30 or 60 days to catch it and undo 
it, but a business account has two days. So if somebody literally robs you via 
ACH, you're out the money if you're not checking it daily. Corporations with 
dedicated finance staffs can do that; small businesses like us (four partners, 
no staff) can't. Similarly, the cost of electronic payroll-type payments is way 
too high for a small business. 

It is insane that the major automation to the US banking system (Europe is 
ahead of us) is to use scanners to pass around pictures of checks 
electronically. But the system works pretty well for handling checks, so once 
you leave that paradigm, it gets funky fast. So we print checks. And I then 
write checks out of my own business account, both to pay myself and to pay rent 
and a few other business expenses. 
-- 
 Fred R. Goldstein  k1iofred "at" interisle.net
 Interisle Consulting Group 
 +1 617 795 2701 
___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts

2014-11-25 Thread Mike Hammett
Corporation. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "CBB - Jay Fuller"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 2:12:36 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 

 

ah - we are a corporation. who owns the credit card? 

if you're a sole, it's much easier 



- Original Message - 
From: Mike Hammett 
To: WISPA General List 
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 1:34 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 


I couldn't care less when they deposit it. If it's over 30 days, my bank 
e-mails me. 

For many things, it will direct deposit them. 

bill the CC anything that I can, autopay the CC, bank's billpay the rest. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "CBB - Jay Fuller" < par...@cyberbroadband.net > 
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 1:31:03 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 

 

all our tower rent tenents 
any bill that comes in 
paychecks 
i'm happy with it. 
for one, if i have the bank write the check the money comes out instantly and i 
can't see when the other party cashed it. 
we write nearly 100 checks a month 



- Original Message - 
From: Mike Hammett 
To: WISPA General List 
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 1:18 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 


Who are you writing checks to and why aren't you doing something better? 

I haven't written a check in years. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "CBB - Jay Fuller" < par...@cyberbroadband.net > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 1:05:31 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 

 

i wouldn't know what to do if we DIDN'T print checks 



- Original Message - 
From: Mike Hammett 
To: WISPA General List 
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 10:20 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 


Who prints checks? 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "James Howard" < ja...@litewire.net > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 10:12:48 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 



Are you printing checks from QB? If you use a 3 rd party program to print 
checks using blank check stock, you aren’t going to have much luck with QB 
online. There were a bunch of other issues too but the conversion process did 
not go smoothly either. Then when we converted back, we lost something like 6 
months of bank account information and had to re-enter it all. 




From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Josh Luthman 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 4:57 PM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 


That never ends well on Windows servers =( 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > 
wrote: 




Windows will automatically install most updates on its own at a schedule you 
specify... since at least XP. 



- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 




From: "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 4:54:06 PM 



Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 

You need to update the thing every week, of course. Don't necessarily use 
Quickbooks every day. 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > 
wrote: 




So if you don't use it on a continual basis, who cares how long it takes to 
update? 



- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 




From: "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:46:19 PM 



Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 

Updating on Linux is so much faster and cleaner than Windows. Once it is done 
you don't even have to reboot unless you want the new kernel...which is a 
simple reboot and isn't an extended reboot doing more installing before and 
after halt... 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > 
wrote: 




Do you even Linux updates, bro? 

I didn't fin

Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts

2014-11-25 Thread Mike Hammett
I couldn't care less when they deposit it. If it's over 30 days, my bank 
e-mails me. 

For many things, it will direct deposit them. 

bill the CC anything that I can, autopay the CC, bank's billpay the rest. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "CBB - Jay Fuller"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 1:31:03 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 

 

all our tower rent tenents 
any bill that comes in 
paychecks 
i'm happy with it. 
for one, if i have the bank write the check the money comes out instantly and i 
can't see when the other party cashed it. 
we write nearly 100 checks a month 



----- Original Message - 
From: Mike Hammett 
To: WISPA General List 
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 1:18 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 


Who are you writing checks to and why aren't you doing something better? 

I haven't written a check in years. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "CBB - Jay Fuller" < par...@cyberbroadband.net > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 1:05:31 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 

 

i wouldn't know what to do if we DIDN'T print checks 



- Original Message - 
From: Mike Hammett 
To: WISPA General List 
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 10:20 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 


Who prints checks? 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "James Howard" < ja...@litewire.net > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 10:12:48 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 



Are you printing checks from QB? If you use a 3 rd party program to print 
checks using blank check stock, you aren’t going to have much luck with QB 
online. There were a bunch of other issues too but the conversion process did 
not go smoothly either. Then when we converted back, we lost something like 6 
months of bank account information and had to re-enter it all. 




From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Josh Luthman 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 4:57 PM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 


That never ends well on Windows servers =( 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > 
wrote: 




Windows will automatically install most updates on its own at a schedule you 
specify... since at least XP. 



- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 




From: "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 4:54:06 PM 



Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 

You need to update the thing every week, of course. Don't necessarily use 
Quickbooks every day. 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > 
wrote: 




So if you don't use it on a continual basis, who cares how long it takes to 
update? 



- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 




From: "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:46:19 PM 



Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 

Updating on Linux is so much faster and cleaner than Windows. Once it is done 
you don't even have to reboot unless you want the new kernel...which is a 
simple reboot and isn't an extended reboot doing more installing before and 
after halt... 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > 
wrote: 




Do you even Linux updates, bro? 

I didn't find the resource usage excessive, but maybe my environment is larger 
than yours? 



- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 




From: "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:40:54 PM 



Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 

I am now. I want to get away from it. If it was Linux it wouldn't be a big deal 
but the Windows updates and excessive resources make it a pain. 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 93

Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts

2014-11-25 Thread Mike Hammett
Who are you writing checks to and why aren't you doing something better? 

I haven't written a check in years. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "CBB - Jay Fuller"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 1:05:31 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 

 

i wouldn't know what to do if we DIDN'T print checks 



- Original Message - 
From: Mike Hammett 
To: WISPA General List 
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 10:20 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 


Who prints checks? 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "James Howard" < ja...@litewire.net > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 10:12:48 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 



Are you printing checks from QB? If you use a 3 rd party program to print 
checks using blank check stock, you aren’t going to have much luck with QB 
online. There were a bunch of other issues too but the conversion process did 
not go smoothly either. Then when we converted back, we lost something like 6 
months of bank account information and had to re-enter it all. 




From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Josh Luthman 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 4:57 PM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 


That never ends well on Windows servers =( 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > 
wrote: 




Windows will automatically install most updates on its own at a schedule you 
specify... since at least XP. 



- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 




From: "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 4:54:06 PM 



Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 

You need to update the thing every week, of course. Don't necessarily use 
Quickbooks every day. 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > 
wrote: 




So if you don't use it on a continual basis, who cares how long it takes to 
update? 



- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 




From: "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:46:19 PM 



Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 

Updating on Linux is so much faster and cleaner than Windows. Once it is done 
you don't even have to reboot unless you want the new kernel...which is a 
simple reboot and isn't an extended reboot doing more installing before and 
after halt... 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > 
wrote: 




Do you even Linux updates, bro? 

I didn't find the resource usage excessive, but maybe my environment is larger 
than yours? 



- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 




From: "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:40:54 PM 



Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 

I am now. I want to get away from it. If it was Linux it wouldn't be a big deal 
but the Windows updates and excessive resources make it a pain. 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > 
wrote: 




I used to have it running on a Windows server in my virtual environment... 
until that server (Windows 2003) finally died. 

Run it in your existing virtual environment? 



- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 




From: "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:38:13 PM 



Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 

Think that could end up being noticeably less than $50 a month? 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Sean Heskett < af...@zirkel.us > wrote: 



pretty much as fast as you can click the check box 





On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:21 P

Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts

2014-11-25 Thread Mike Hammett
*grumble* FB has been rough on me today. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "James Howard"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 10:48:47 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 



You’re losing your touch Mike. It should have been: 

Friends don’t let friends print checks. 



From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Mike Hammett 
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 10:20 AM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 


Who prints checks? 



- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -


From: "James Howard" < ja...@litewire.net > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 10:12:48 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 
Are you printing checks from QB? If you use a 3 rd party program to print 
checks using blank check stock, you aren’t going to have much luck with QB 
online. There were a bunch of other issues too but the conversion process did 
not go smoothly either. Then when we converted back, we lost something like 6 
months of bank account information and had to re-enter it all. 




From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [ mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
Behalf Of Josh Luthman 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 4:57 PM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 


That never ends well on Windows servers =( 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > 
wrote: 




Windows will automatically install most updates on its own at a schedule you 
specify... since at least XP. 



- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 




From: "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 4:54:06 PM 



Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 

You need to update the thing every week, of course. Don't necessarily use 
Quickbooks every day. 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > 
wrote: 




So if you don't use it on a continual basis, who cares how long it takes to 
update? 



- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 




From: "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:46:19 PM 



Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 

Updating on Linux is so much faster and cleaner than Windows. Once it is done 
you don't even have to reboot unless you want the new kernel...which is a 
simple reboot and isn't an extended reboot doing more installing before and 
after halt... 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > 
wrote: 




Do you even Linux updates, bro? 

I didn't find the resource usage excessive, but maybe my environment is larger 
than yours? 



- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 




From: "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:40:54 PM 



Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 

I am now. I want to get away from it. If it was Linux it wouldn't be a big deal 
but the Windows updates and excessive resources make it a pain. 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > 
wrote: 




I used to have it running on a Windows server in my virtual environment... 
until that server (Windows 2003) finally died. 

Run it in your existing virtual environment? 



- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 




From: "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:38:13 PM 



Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 

Think that could end up being noticeably less than $50 a month? 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Sean Heskett < af...@zirkel.us > wrote: 



pretty much as fast as you can click the check box 





On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Josh

Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts

2014-11-25 Thread Mike Hammett
Their AP must be ran by old people, gosh, at least 40. ;-) 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Josh Luthman"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 10:32:55 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 


Nearly every one of my business customers. 






Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > 
wrote: 




Who prints checks? 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



From: "James Howard" < ja...@litewire.net > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 10:12:48 AM 


Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 



Are you printing checks from QB? If you use a 3 rd party program to print 
checks using blank check stock, you aren’t going to have much luck with QB 
online. There were a bunch of other issues too but the conversion process did 
not go smoothly either. Then when we converted back, we lost something like 6 
months of bank account information and had to re-enter it all. 




From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto: wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
Behalf Of Josh Luthman 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 4:57 PM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 


That never ends well on Windows servers =( 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > 
wrote: 




Windows will automatically install most updates on its own at a schedule you 
specify... since at least XP. 



- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 




From: "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 4:54:06 PM 



Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 

You need to update the thing every week, of course. Don't necessarily use 
Quickbooks every day. 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > 
wrote: 




So if you don't use it on a continual basis, who cares how long it takes to 
update? 



- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 




From: "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:46:19 PM 



Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 

Updating on Linux is so much faster and cleaner than Windows. Once it is done 
you don't even have to reboot unless you want the new kernel...which is a 
simple reboot and isn't an extended reboot doing more installing before and 
after halt... 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > 
wrote: 




Do you even Linux updates, bro? 

I didn't find the resource usage excessive, but maybe my environment is larger 
than yours? 



- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 




From: "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:40:54 PM 



Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 

I am now. I want to get away from it. If it was Linux it wouldn't be a big deal 
but the Windows updates and excessive resources make it a pain. 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > 
wrote: 




I used to have it running on a Windows server in my virtual environment... 
until that server (Windows 2003) finally died. 

Run it in your existing virtual environment? 



- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 




From: "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:38:13 PM 



Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 

Think that could end up being noticeably less than $50 a month? 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Sean Heskett < af...@zirkel.us > wrote: 



pretty much as fast as you can click the check box 





On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Josh Luthman < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
wrote: 



Inst

Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts

2014-11-25 Thread Mike Hammett
Who prints checks? 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "James Howard"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 10:12:48 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 



Are you printing checks from QB? If you use a 3 rd party program to print 
checks using blank check stock, you aren’t going to have much luck with QB 
online. There were a bunch of other issues too but the conversion process did 
not go smoothly either. Then when we converted back, we lost something like 6 
months of bank account information and had to re-enter it all. 




From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Josh Luthman 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 4:57 PM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 


That never ends well on Windows servers =( 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > 
wrote: 




Windows will automatically install most updates on its own at a schedule you 
specify... since at least XP. 



- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 




From: "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 4:54:06 PM 



Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 

You need to update the thing every week, of course. Don't necessarily use 
Quickbooks every day. 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > 
wrote: 




So if you don't use it on a continual basis, who cares how long it takes to 
update? 



- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 




From: "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:46:19 PM 



Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 

Updating on Linux is so much faster and cleaner than Windows. Once it is done 
you don't even have to reboot unless you want the new kernel...which is a 
simple reboot and isn't an extended reboot doing more installing before and 
after halt... 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > 
wrote: 




Do you even Linux updates, bro? 

I didn't find the resource usage excessive, but maybe my environment is larger 
than yours? 



- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 




From: "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:40:54 PM 



Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 

I am now. I want to get away from it. If it was Linux it wouldn't be a big deal 
but the Windows updates and excessive resources make it a pain. 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > 
wrote: 




I used to have it running on a Windows server in my virtual environment... 
until that server (Windows 2003) finally died. 

Run it in your existing virtual environment? 



- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 




From: "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:38:13 PM 



Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 

Think that could end up being noticeably less than $50 a month? 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Sean Heskett < af...@zirkel.us > wrote: 



pretty much as fast as you can click the check box 





On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Josh Luthman < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
wrote: 



Instant on being genuinely instant? 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 




On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Sean Heskett < af...@zirkel.us > wrote: 


You can turn aws on and off as needed. You just click a button on a web page 
and it's instant on. You can also schedule it to turn on and off 




On Monday, November 24, 2014, Josh Luthman < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
wrote: 



Any idea what AWS would cost for something like this? I feel like it would eat 
lots of resources all day every day and I'd only u

Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts

2014-11-24 Thread Mike Hammett
Windows will automatically install most updates on its own at a schedule you 
specify... since at least XP. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Josh Luthman"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 4:54:06 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 


You need to update the thing every week, of course. Don't necessarily use 
Quickbooks every day. 






Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > 
wrote: 




So if you don't use it on a continual basis, who cares how long it takes to 
update? 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



From: "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:46:19 PM 


Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 


Updating on Linux is so much faster and cleaner than Windows. Once it is done 
you don't even have to reboot unless you want the new kernel...which is a 
simple reboot and isn't an extended reboot doing more installing before and 
after halt... 






Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > 
wrote: 




Do you even Linux updates, bro? 

I didn't find the resource usage excessive, but maybe my environment is larger 
than yours? 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



From: "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:40:54 PM 


Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 


I am now. I want to get away from it. If it was Linux it wouldn't be a big deal 
but the Windows updates and excessive resources make it a pain. 






Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > 
wrote: 




I used to have it running on a Windows server in my virtual environment... 
until that server (Windows 2003) finally died. 

Run it in your existing virtual environment? 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



From: "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:38:13 PM 


Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 


Think that could end up being noticeably less than $50 a month? 






Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Sean Heskett < af...@zirkel.us > wrote: 



pretty much as fast as you can click the check box 




On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Josh Luthman < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
wrote: 



Instant on being genuinely instant? 






Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 



On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Sean Heskett < af...@zirkel.us > wrote: 


You can turn aws on and off as needed. You just click a button on a web page 
and it's instant on. You can also schedule it to turn on and off 



On Monday, November 24, 2014, Josh Luthman < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
wrote: 



Any idea what AWS would cost for something like this? I feel like it would eat 
lots of resources all day every day and I'd only use it a couple of hours a 
week tops. It would be annoying to shut it down to save resources, too. 






Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Carlos Alcantar < car...@race.com > wrote: 






You could also go the vm route using aws / rackspace / ect. I’ve heard from 
some people that the online quickbooks is not as full featured as the 
application version. 





Carlos Alcantar 
Race Communications / Race Team Member 
1325 Howard Ave. #604, Burlingame, CA. 94010 
Phone: +1 415 376 3314 / car...@race.com / http://www.race.com 


From: Josh Luthman < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
Reply-To: WISPA General List < wireless@wispa.org > 
Date: Monday, November 24, 2014 at 12:24 PM 
To: WISPA General List < wireless@wispa.org > 


Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 







Well I guess $50/month to drop the one Windows server seems worth it to me. 
Hopefully it's an easy transition (lol I know it's Intuit). 






Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 

On Mon, Nov

Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts

2014-11-24 Thread Mike Hammett
So if you don't use it on a continual basis, who cares how long it takes to 
update? 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Josh Luthman"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:46:19 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 


Updating on Linux is so much faster and cleaner than Windows. Once it is done 
you don't even have to reboot unless you want the new kernel...which is a 
simple reboot and isn't an extended reboot doing more installing before and 
after halt... 






Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > 
wrote: 




Do you even Linux updates, bro? 

I didn't find the resource usage excessive, but maybe my environment is larger 
than yours? 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



From: "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:40:54 PM 


Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 


I am now. I want to get away from it. If it was Linux it wouldn't be a big deal 
but the Windows updates and excessive resources make it a pain. 






Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > 
wrote: 




I used to have it running on a Windows server in my virtual environment... 
until that server (Windows 2003) finally died. 

Run it in your existing virtual environment? 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



From: "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:38:13 PM 


Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 


Think that could end up being noticeably less than $50 a month? 






Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Sean Heskett < af...@zirkel.us > wrote: 



pretty much as fast as you can click the check box 




On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Josh Luthman < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
wrote: 



Instant on being genuinely instant? 






Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 



On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Sean Heskett < af...@zirkel.us > wrote: 


You can turn aws on and off as needed. You just click a button on a web page 
and it's instant on. You can also schedule it to turn on and off 



On Monday, November 24, 2014, Josh Luthman < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
wrote: 



Any idea what AWS would cost for something like this? I feel like it would eat 
lots of resources all day every day and I'd only use it a couple of hours a 
week tops. It would be annoying to shut it down to save resources, too. 






Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Carlos Alcantar < car...@race.com > wrote: 






You could also go the vm route using aws / rackspace / ect. I’ve heard from 
some people that the online quickbooks is not as full featured as the 
application version. 





Carlos Alcantar 
Race Communications / Race Team Member 
1325 Howard Ave. #604, Burlingame, CA. 94010 
Phone: +1 415 376 3314 / car...@race.com / http://www.race.com 


From: Josh Luthman < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
Reply-To: WISPA General List < wireless@wispa.org > 
Date: Monday, November 24, 2014 at 12:24 PM 
To: WISPA General List < wireless@wispa.org > 


Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 







Well I guess $50/month to drop the one Windows server seems worth it to me. 
Hopefully it's an easy transition (lol I know it's Intuit). 






Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Steve Barnes < st...@pcswin.com > wrote: 





I have 3 clients that use it. They love it. Able to access it from any web 
device anywhere. 

I use the Enterprise Edition any I love my windows servers. 

Steven Barnes 
GM 
PCSWIN.com 
Howard LLC. 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto: wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
Behalf Of Josh Luthman 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:19 PM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 




I saw that in a quick search, but I'm curious if you or anyone is using it. 
Happy? 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Stev

Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts

2014-11-24 Thread Mike Hammett
Do you even Linux updates, bro? 

I didn't find the resource usage excessive, but maybe my environment is larger 
than yours? 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Josh Luthman"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:40:54 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 


I am now. I want to get away from it. If it was Linux it wouldn't be a big deal 
but the Windows updates and excessive resources make it a pain. 






Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > 
wrote: 




I used to have it running on a Windows server in my virtual environment... 
until that server (Windows 2003) finally died. 

Run it in your existing virtual environment? 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



From: "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:38:13 PM 


Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 


Think that could end up being noticeably less than $50 a month? 






Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Sean Heskett < af...@zirkel.us > wrote: 



pretty much as fast as you can click the check box 




On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Josh Luthman < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
wrote: 



Instant on being genuinely instant? 






Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 



On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Sean Heskett < af...@zirkel.us > wrote: 


You can turn aws on and off as needed. You just click a button on a web page 
and it's instant on. You can also schedule it to turn on and off 



On Monday, November 24, 2014, Josh Luthman < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
wrote: 



Any idea what AWS would cost for something like this? I feel like it would eat 
lots of resources all day every day and I'd only use it a couple of hours a 
week tops. It would be annoying to shut it down to save resources, too. 






Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Carlos Alcantar < car...@race.com > wrote: 






You could also go the vm route using aws / rackspace / ect. I’ve heard from 
some people that the online quickbooks is not as full featured as the 
application version. 





Carlos Alcantar 
Race Communications / Race Team Member 
1325 Howard Ave. #604, Burlingame, CA. 94010 
Phone: +1 415 376 3314 / car...@race.com / http://www.race.com 


From: Josh Luthman < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
Reply-To: WISPA General List < wireless@wispa.org > 
Date: Monday, November 24, 2014 at 12:24 PM 
To: WISPA General List < wireless@wispa.org > 


Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 







Well I guess $50/month to drop the one Windows server seems worth it to me. 
Hopefully it's an easy transition (lol I know it's Intuit). 






Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Steve Barnes < st...@pcswin.com > wrote: 





I have 3 clients that use it. They love it. Able to access it from any web 
device anywhere. 

I use the Enterprise Edition any I love my windows servers. 

Steven Barnes 
GM 
PCSWIN.com 
Howard LLC. 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto: wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
Behalf Of Josh Luthman 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:19 PM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 




I saw that in a quick search, but I'm curious if you or anyone is using it. 
Happy? 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Steve Barnes < st...@pcswin.com > wrote: 




http://quickbooks.intuit.com/online/ 


Steven Barnes 
GM 
PCSWIN.com 
Howard LLC. 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto: wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
Behalf Of Josh Luthman 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:12 PM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 




Does anyone have a good source to host Quickbooks? I'm tired of hosting it 
myself and I would love to drop that Windows server like a bad habit. 



I'm currently using Quickbooks Pro 2014 on a Windows terminal server. I would 
like to be able to have 2 active concurrent users unless there's an additional 
recurring cost to this - in that case just 1 user is sufficient. 






Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
S

Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts

2014-11-24 Thread Mike Hammett
I used to have it running on a Windows server in my virtual environment... 
until that server (Windows 2003) finally died. 

Run it in your existing virtual environment? 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Josh Luthman"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:38:13 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 


Think that could end up being noticeably less than $50 a month? 






Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Sean Heskett < af...@zirkel.us > wrote: 



pretty much as fast as you can click the check box 




On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Josh Luthman < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
wrote: 



Instant on being genuinely instant? 






Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 



On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Sean Heskett < af...@zirkel.us > wrote: 


You can turn aws on and off as needed. You just click a button on a web page 
and it's instant on. You can also schedule it to turn on and off 



On Monday, November 24, 2014, Josh Luthman < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
wrote: 



Any idea what AWS would cost for something like this? I feel like it would eat 
lots of resources all day every day and I'd only use it a couple of hours a 
week tops. It would be annoying to shut it down to save resources, too. 






Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Carlos Alcantar < car...@race.com > wrote: 






You could also go the vm route using aws / rackspace / ect. I’ve heard from 
some people that the online quickbooks is not as full featured as the 
application version. 





Carlos Alcantar 
Race Communications / Race Team Member 
1325 Howard Ave. #604, Burlingame, CA. 94010 
Phone: +1 415 376 3314 / car...@race.com / http://www.race.com 


From: Josh Luthman < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
Reply-To: WISPA General List < wireless@wispa.org > 
Date: Monday, November 24, 2014 at 12:24 PM 
To: WISPA General List < wireless@wispa.org > 


Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 







Well I guess $50/month to drop the one Windows server seems worth it to me. 
Hopefully it's an easy transition (lol I know it's Intuit). 






Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Steve Barnes < st...@pcswin.com > wrote: 





I have 3 clients that use it. They love it. Able to access it from any web 
device anywhere. 

I use the Enterprise Edition any I love my windows servers. 

Steven Barnes 
GM 
PCSWIN.com 
Howard LLC. 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto: wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
Behalf Of Josh Luthman 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:19 PM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 




I saw that in a quick search, but I'm curious if you or anyone is using it. 
Happy? 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Steve Barnes < st...@pcswin.com > wrote: 




http://quickbooks.intuit.com/online/ 


Steven Barnes 
GM 
PCSWIN.com 
Howard LLC. 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto: wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
Behalf Of Josh Luthman 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:12 PM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: [WISPA] Quickbooks hosts 




Does anyone have a good source to host Quickbooks? I'm tired of hosting it 
myself and I would love to drop that Windows server like a bad habit. 



I'm currently using Quickbooks Pro 2014 on a Windows terminal server. I would 
like to be able to have 2 active concurrent users unless there's an additional 
recurring cost to this - in that case just 1 user is sufficient. 






Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 

___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 





___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 







___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 





___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 






Re: [WISPA] Quick Question: Title II, for or against?

2014-11-19 Thread Mike Hammett
" Future FCCs would not be bound by this FCC’s decisions. " 

For good and bad. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Jeff Broadwick"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 8:55:28 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quick Question: Title II, for or against? 



Title ll has a ton of regulations…some which could reasonably apply, but most 
that have no bearing whatsoever or would be incredibly damaging to our 
industry. The question…and the problem, is that we don’t know what the FCC 
would enforce and what they would forebear from enforcing…and for how long. 
Future FCCs would not be bound by this FCC’s decisions. 


Regards, 

Jeff 


Jeff Broadwick 
Senior Account Manager, Convergence Technologies, Inc. 
jbroadw...@converge-tech.com 
312-205-2519 Office 
574-220-7826 Cell 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Rubens Kuhl 
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 7:40 PM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quick Question: Title II, for or against? 








The real problem is that consumers have only the CableCo and TelCo as options 
for purchasing internet. The government instead of regulating should encourage 
competition in the free market. WISPs are one such competitor. 







WISPs are prevented by laws of Electromagnetism and Communications to direct 
compete with CableCo and TelCo for most customers, so this argument actually 
justifies Title II treatment since CableCo and TelCo are the only ones most US 
citizens can choose from. 



Rubens 


___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Quick Question: Title II, for or against?

2014-11-19 Thread Mike Hammett
I can't imagine why anyone other than a blind consumer would love it. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Drew Lentz"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 7:49:20 AM 
Subject: [WISPA] Quick Question: Title II, for or against? 


I put up a quick poll, results will be shared and are anonymous. 


https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/3R6YTH9 


I'm curious to see what the percentages are between those that support and 
those that don't support the Title II argument. I've been trying to get a good 
feel for who would and wouldn't like it (mostly it seems carriers love it, web 
services hate it.) I have a feeling WISPs might be on the "hate it" side, but 
I'm interested to find out. Thanks for your answer and have a fantastic day! 


-d 
___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Need Java 7

2014-11-16 Thread Mike Hammett
Java's web site? 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "~NGL~"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2014 7:53:47 PM 
Subject: [WISPA] Need Java 7 


I need a ecutable copy of Java 7 for XP. I cannot find one on the net. It has 
to be a offline version 
Anyone have one to share or know where to get one let me know off line. 
n...@ngl.net 
Thanx 
NGL 
If you can read this Thank A Teacher. 
And if it's in English Thank A Soldier! 
___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] 2dbi vs 3dbi vs 5 dbi vs 100mw vs 400mw

2014-11-13 Thread Mike Hammett
Hell, you could use an SXT and go as high as you want. ;-) 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Fred Goldstein"  
To: wireless@wispa.org 
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 1:07:20 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 2dbi vs 3dbi vs 5 dbi vs 100mw vs 400mw 


On 11/13/2014 1:26 PM, Jason Bailey wrote: 




Higher gain,lower power works best,in almost any situation. 





But not necessarily in-home. Higher gain only comes from a more directive 
antenna. An "omni" gain antenna has a pancake pattern. If it's a one-story 
building, fine. But I ran into the opposite situation -- at my house, the AP is 
in the basement, and WiFi reception was poor on the second floor. So I ended up 
getting one of MikroTik's 951 high-power routers, and pump out maybe +21 (not 
its maximum -- I sit near it too much), and it reaches the upstairs much better 
than the lower-powered 951 (+17, maybe, with a tailwind) could do. And I've run 
into a lot of other people having trouble with whole-house coverage using 
standard-power WiFi APs. Sure, the laptop or cell phone won't have much power 
in it, but in general the upstream signal gets through okay. 








On Thursday, November 13, 2014 1:15 PM, Colton Conor  
wrote: 





We are comparing multiple SOHO routers and modems that have the same Broadcom 
chipsets. All of them have 802.11N 2x2 configuration. The only differences 
between them are if they have internal or external antennas and the gain of the 
antennas (either 2, 3, or 5dbi ratings). In addition, some sell a high powered 
wifi radio (400mw) while others have the basic (100mw). 


How much a difference does each of these hardware features make in overall wifi 
performance? 



-- 
 Fred R. Goldstein  k1iofred "at" interisle.net
 Interisle Consulting Group 
 +1 617 795 2701 
___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] chilly tower climb

2014-11-12 Thread Mike Hammett
Ski goggles that are glasses friendly? :-p 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Josh Luthman"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 7:30:50 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] chilly tower climb 


What if you wear glasses? 






Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Justin Wilson < li...@mtin.net > wrote: 




Get some ski goggles. Keep your eyes warm and your body won’t be so cold. 
Proven scientific fact. 


Justin 







-- Justin Wilson < j...@mtin.net > 
http://www.mtin.net 
Managed Services – xISP Solutions – Data Centers 
http://www.thebrotherswisp.com 
Podcast about xISP topics 
http://www.midwest-ix.com 
Peering – Transit – Internet Exchange 




From: Marco Coelho < coelh...@gmail.com > 
Reply-To: WISPA General List < wireless@wispa.org > 
Date: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 at 6:15 PM 
To: WISPA General List < wireless@wispa.org > 
Subject: [WISPA] chilly tower climb 





Amazing how much faster I climb when it's cold outside! 


-- 

Marco C. Coelho 
Argon Technologies Inc. 
POB 875 
Greenville, TX 75403-0875 
903-455-5036 ___ Wireless mailing 
list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 





___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] [SPAM] "FCC Confirms Delay of New Net Neutrality Rules Until 2015"

2014-11-12 Thread Mike Hammett
Who is they? 

I think the only person that really would have an issue with this is Josh 
Reynolds up in Alaska... and I'm not even sure that would happen. 

Too much competition in the transit world for that ever to be an issue. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Tim Kerns"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 9:29:14 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] [SPAM] "FCC Confirms Delay of New Net Neutrality Rules 
Until 2015" 

Don't you think they will throttle us also... 

Make us pay for fast lane just like their other customers... only worst for 
us.. think ESPN 

Don't misunderstand me... I don't like the net neutrality as its being 
proposed, but I also don't want some services favored over others and forced 
to pay more the get them equal. 

-Original Message- 
From: Matt Hoppes 
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 4:05 AM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] [SPAM] "FCC Confirms Delay of New Net Neutrality Rules 
Until 2015" 

Is there any more information on what exactly the FCC is proposing to 
propose? I know there was Title II thrown around 

How would that impact us, or any other carrier? Net neutrality is about 
giving all packets equal access -- if I already do that, do I have 
anything to fear? 

I for one would love to see Net neutrality fall on its face, the big 
ISPs start throtteling traffic, and just have customers driven to us 
little guys who don't throttle. 

On 11/11/14, 8:33 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: 
> from: 
> http://tech.slashdot.org/story/14/11/11/2345213/fcc-confirms-delay-of-new-net-neutrality-rules-until-2015
>  
> 
> "/The Federal Communications Commission will abandon 
> <http://www.dailydot.com/politics/net-neutrality-fcc-tom-wheeler-delayed-obama/>
>  
> its earlier 
> promise 
> <https://www.fcc.gov/blog/setting-record-straight-fcc-s-open-internet-rules> 
> to 
> make a decision on new net neutrality rules this year. Instead, FCC 
> Press Secretary Kim Hart said, "there will not be a vote on open 
> internet rules on the December meeting agenda. That would mean rules 
> would now be finalized in 2015." The FCC's confirmation of the delay 
> came just as President Barack Obama launched a campaign 
> <http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/11/10/statement-president-net-neutrality>
>  
> to 
> persuade the agency to reclassify broadband Internet service as a public 
> utility./Opensource.com is also running an interview with a legal 
> advisor at the FCC 
> <http://opensource.com/government/14/11/fcc-advisor-talks-net-neutrality>. 
> He says, "There will be a burden on providers. The question is, 'Is that 
> burden justified?' And I think our answer is 'Yes.'"" 
> -- 
> 
> Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer 
> SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___ 
> Wireless mailing list 
> Wireless@wispa.org 
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
> 
___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] When the power goes off

2014-11-10 Thread Mike Hammett
Nobody wants a phone call. ;-) 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Josh Luthman"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 10:37:42 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] When the power goes off 


He wants a phone call... 






Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 

On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Tim Way < t...@way.vg > wrote: 



Using a UPS that maintains Internet access it can be setup to send an SNMP trap 
that a monitoring system (ZenOSS/SolarWinss/etc) can generate an EMAIL or text 
message from. 


On Nov 10, 2014 9:21 AM, "OOLLC-Support" < supp...@oregononline.net > wrote: 


Does anyone have a simple solution for when the circuit-breaker gets 
kicked? I would very much like to have the system call me on the phone 
to let me know when the server has lost power. Does anyone have a cheap 
way to solve this? 
___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 





___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] AC Voltage Regulator??

2014-11-10 Thread Mike Hammett
Would going to a DC site with a fixed output voltage fix this? 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Gino Villarini"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 8:30:09 AM 
Subject: [WISPA] AC Voltage Regulator?? 




We are having some issues lately on a couple of sites. AC mains is dropping 
below 90 vac, anyone recommends a good Voltage Regulator? 







Gino A. Villarini 
President 
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
www.aeronetpr.com 
@aeronetpr 




___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Water in your radios? Know your IP rating.

2014-11-08 Thread Mike Hammett
It's only a concern if they're manually writing checks. Auto-pay that shit! ;-) 


(As this is public... I'm obviously JK.) 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Matt Hoppes"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Saturday, November 8, 2014 1:15:38 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Water in your radios? Know your IP rating. 


If my subscribers homes are underwater their internet is the least of my 
worries. 


Ok. I'm playing hardball - but seriously. Sell us on why having a waterproof 
CPE is necessary? 

On Nov 8, 2014, at 11:54 AM, Patrick Leary < patrick.le...@telrad.com > wrote: 






...links have 2 sides 



- Patrick 






From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [ mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
Behalf Of Matt Hoppes 
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2014 9:36 PM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Water in your radios? Know your IP rating. 


My towers do not flood 80 feet in the air. 


On Nov 7, 2014, at 9:22 PM, Patrick Leary < patrick.le...@telrad.com > wrote: 



Conversations over the past several weeks make clear many are not aware of the 
meaning of the environmental specifications, in particular the IP rating. It 
matters, as the nature of your environment informs you about the gear you need 
to use. Do you have broad temperature swings? Thermal expansion can cause 
cracking around connector housings in some levels of gear. Ice storms? Nothing 
exploits a crack like freezing water. Operate near the desert? Dust protection 
matters. Near the coast? Salt is highly corrosive. Are you complaining about 
water getting into your boxes? If you don't know the IP rating, you really 
can't complain becuase you may be using the gear beyond its specs. As in the 
law, ignorance is no defense, so in the interest of dispelling ignorance, 
here's a quick tutorial on the "IP rating." 

First, it's not sequential. I mean, the two digits have no relation to each 
other. In that sense it is NOT a number: IP55 does not mean IP "fifty-five," 
but rather is more appropriately thought of as IP "five five." Come again?!? 

Well, the first number refers to protection level from particulate matter -- 
solids -- like dust and sand. The second number deals with protection from 
liquid incursion. (There can be a third number, usually left out, that deals 
with mechanical tolerance.) In any event, here's the key to crack the code: 

 

 

Know the rating of your equipment, at both ends. Environmental truck rolls are 
almost 100% avoidable. Environmental failure at the base station impacts the 
whole sector. Failures at the CPE level can cause repeated truck rolls and is a 
time sink trying to identify root cause before the truck rolls. Outdoor devices 
with a first digit of 5 or less, will take in dust. Similarly, anything with a 
second number of 6 or below will take on water because it was not designed not 
to. 

These are consequential specifications. You'd better believe your telco or 
cable competition has minimum environmental requirements as a rule. Are you any 
less serious a player in your market? Control those variables within your 
control. 

Regards, 


Patrick Leary 
National Sales Director | Telrad Networks Ltd . 
M 727.501.3735 | Skype pleary 
 
See us on  










 
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by 
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses. 

 





___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 







 
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by 
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses. 

 




 
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by 
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses. 

 






___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Anyone serving Pompey NY? PR for WISPA

2014-11-08 Thread Mike Hammett
In their defense, in some areas, it is quite a bitch to cross a road. A nearby 
county requires steel conduit 6' below the road surface, only perpendicular, 
etc. etc. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Mike Lyon"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Saturday, November 8, 2014 11:15:32 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anyone serving Pompey NY? PR for WISPA 


Yeah, it is pathetic. 
On Nov 8, 2014 8:39 AM, "John Thomas" < jtho...@quarnet.com > wrote: 




And I know someone in San Ramon that the business complex is across the street 
from Comcast. They want $10,000 to cross the street. 


Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID 

Mike Lyon < mike.l...@gmail.com > wrote: 


That would be awesome if someone could shoot him a wireless link. 
Though, i have customers out here in silicon valley where Comcast has quoted 
them $120k in construction costs to pull coax a single mile up a road... 
-Mike 
On Nov 7, 2014 9:13 AM, "Gino Villarini" < g...@aeronetpr.com > wrote: 




This would be a huge PR stunt foe WISPs and WISPA! Lets give this guy free 
service for couple of months! 


http://consumerist.com/2014/11/06/time-warner-wants-2-to-connect-rural-customer-to-broadband/?
 











Gino A. Villarini 
President 
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
www.aeronetpr.com 
@aeronetpr 




___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 




___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 




___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Anyone serving Pompey NY? PR for WISPA

2014-11-08 Thread Mike Hammett
WISPA Member http://www.cnywireless.com/ 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Gino Villarini"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Friday, November 7, 2014 7:28:27 AM 
Subject: [WISPA] Anyone serving Pompey NY? PR for WISPA 


This would be a huge PR stunt foe WISPs and WISPA! Lets give this guy free 
service for couple of months! 


http://consumerist.com/2014/11/06/time-warner-wants-2-to-connect-rural-customer-to-broadband/?
 











Gino A. Villarini 
President 
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
www.aeronetpr.com 
@aeronetpr 




___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Water in your radios? Know your IP rating.

2014-11-08 Thread Mike Hammett
Better use the connection while you can to bring up Noah's designs. 

BTW: Thanks for the post, Patrick! 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Tim Way"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Friday, November 7, 2014 8:46:39 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Water in your radios? Know your IP rating. 


Rather you hope the don't. I don't think you will be worried out network access 
if that were to happen though lol 
On Nov 7, 2014 8:36 PM, "Matt Hoppes" < mhop...@indigowireless.com > wrote: 




My towers do not flood 80 feet in the air. 

On Nov 7, 2014, at 9:22 PM, Patrick Leary < patrick.le...@telrad.com > wrote: 






Conversations over the past several weeks make clear many are not aware of the 
meaning of the environmental specifications, in particular the IP rating. It 
matters, as the nature of your environment informs you about the gear you need 
to use. Do you have broad temperature swings? Thermal expansion can cause 
cracking around connector housings in some levels of gear. Ice storms? Nothing 
exploits a crack like freezing water. Operate near the desert? Dust protection 
matters. Near the coast? Salt is highly corrosive. Are you complaining about 
water getting into your boxes? If you don't know the IP rating, you really 
can't complain becuase you may be using the gear beyond its specs. As in the 
law, ignorance is no defense, so in the interest of dispelling ignorance, 
here's a quick tutorial on the "IP rating." 

First, it's not sequential. I mean, the two digits have no relation to each 
other. In that sense it is NOT a number: IP55 does not mean IP "fifty-five," 
but rather is more appropriately thought of as IP "five five." Come again?!? 

Well, the first number refers to protection level from particulate matter -- 
solids -- like dust and sand. The second number deals with protection from 
liquid incursion. (There can be a third number, usually left out, that deals 
with mechanical tolerance.) In any event, here's the key to crack the code: 

 

 

Know the rating of your equipment, at both ends. Environmental truck rolls are 
almost 100% avoidable. Environmental failure at the base station impacts the 
whole sector. Failures at the CPE level can cause repeated truck rolls and is a 
time sink trying to identify root cause before the truck rolls. Outdoor devices 
with a first digit of 5 or less, will take in dust. Similarly, anything with a 
second number of 6 or below will take on water because it was not designed not 
to. 

These are consequential specifications. You'd better believe your telco or 
cable competition has minimum environmental requirements as a rule. Are you any 
less serious a player in your market? Control those variables within your 
control. 

Regards, 


Patrick Leary 
National Sales Director | Telrad Networks Ltd . 
M 727.501.3735 | Skype pleary 
 
See us on  









 
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by 
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses. 

 






___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 




___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Source for used Smart UPS XL

2014-11-06 Thread Mike Hammett
I got some from (I think) Coastal Business Machines... somewhere near New 
Jersey. It's been a while. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Josh Luthman"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 10:11:28 AM 
Subject: [WISPA] Source for used Smart UPS XL 


Looking for another rack mountable unit and I want to throw in some bigger 
batteries. The old unit just doesn't have the battery capacity and I'm afraid 
of asking too much of the little charger. 




Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 
___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik AC for PtP

2014-11-05 Thread Mike Hammett
None are DFS certified, therefore I won't use any of them. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Chris Fabien"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Saturday, November 1, 2014 3:01:40 PM 
Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik AC for PtP 



Ordered a couple of the NetMetal5 which have the RB/922UAGS-5HPacD in them. 
Anyone used these yet? Is there a version of RouterOS known to work well? Are 
they stable yet software wise on the AC stuff? 



___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product

2014-10-30 Thread Mike Hammett
So if they're that old... how many toolbars are using up how much bandwidth on 
your network? 

http://www.gamereplays.org/community/uploads/post-98762-1215487350.jpg 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Josh Reynolds"  
To: wireless@wispa.org 
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 6:10:23 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product 


Most of our clients are on computers that are like 8+ year old desktop pcs 
running windows XP and win98. :/ 

I looked at our traffic to apple servers and it's something like 1.5% (via 
IPOQUE). 

Apple caching is probably more important in some areas than others. 


Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer 
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com On 10/30/2014 01:40 PM, Paul Conlin wrote: 


Because management of Apple iOS updates is one big thing that Procera can do to 
help optimize a WISPs network. But if you are running a low cost low overhead 
Apple update caching server you could very easily do this without an expensive 
Procera box. 

PC 
Blaze Broadband 


On October 30, 2014 5:33:59 PM EDT, Josh Reynolds  wrote: 


Quick question, 

Maybe I missed something, but how did we go from traffic shaping and DPI 
devices to something that does caching for apple stuff? T hose are two entirely 
different classes of products. 


Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer 
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com On 10/30/2014 01:30 PM, Chris Wright wrote: 




It can work on networks not behind a NAT. 
http://help.apple.com/serverapp/mac/4.0/#/apd6015d9573 



Chris Wright 
Velociter Wireless 




From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [ mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
Behalf Of Mike Hammett 
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 1:38 PM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product 


Okay, so it would be for networks behind a NAT. 



- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 





From: "Chris Wright" < ch...@velociter.net > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 3:22:16 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product 
Disregard my “AFAIK” answer. This is the real answer per 
http://www.nbalonso.com/os-x-server-caching/ 

“ The cache server registers online with Apple and provides it’s public IP, 
your servers local IP, internal DNS name? (not sure of the dns)” 


Chris Wright 
Velociter Wireless 



From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [ mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
Behalf Of Mike Hammett 
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 1:12 PM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product 


I couldn't see how other people are supposed to know you have one of these 
caches running. 



- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 




From: "Chris Wright" < ch...@velociter.net > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 3:10:36 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product 
OSX Server is a $19.99 add-on to OSX Yosemite. You can virtualize OSX in ESXi 
(of course it won’t be supported by Apple unless it’s Apple hardware.) 


Chris Wright 
Velociter Wireless 



From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [ mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
Behalf Of Paul Conlin 
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 10:57 AM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product 

Unless the caching server is free. Under what conditions does Apple put one of 
these in? 

PC 
Blaze Broadband 

On October 28, 2014 1:41:41 PM EDT, Josh Luthman < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com 
> wrote: 



I don't think many people care about caching servers in this regard. The issue 
isn't the upstream pipe filling up, it's all the APs. 







Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Timothy Way < t...@way.lc > wrote: 



For those that are unaware of it you should take a look at Apple's Caching 
Server 2. It is pretty cool, it provides Apple software updates, iTunes content 
and basically anything Apple in a local cache that is transparent to the 
client. Apple looks at the source IP of the device asking for content and tells 
it to hit the local IP of your caching server. My day job is a Network 
Administrator at a technical college. This has prevented the "APPLE DAYS OF 
DOOM" when they release updates in regards to our open (public) wireless 
network. 



Tim Way 






On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Paolo Di Francesco < 
paolo.difrance...@level7.it > wrote: 


Hello, 

it depends on what you want/can achieve and how much bandwidth you have 
(and the experince you want to give to the users) 

In few words: those boxes do not invent bandwidth they (all) try to 
improve how you manage it. So those bo

Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product

2014-10-30 Thread Mike Hammett
http://bit.ly/1G0aJzk 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Josh Reynolds"  
To: wireless@wispa.org 
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 4:33:59 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product 


Quick question, 

Maybe I missed something, but how did we go from traffic shaping and DPI 
devices to something that does caching for apple stuff? T hose are two entirely 
different classes of products. 


Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer 
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com On 10/30/2014 01:30 PM, Chris Wright wrote: 




It can work on networks not behind a NAT. 
http://help.apple.com/serverapp/mac/4.0/#/apd6015d9573 


Chris Wright 
Velociter Wireless 



From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [ mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
Behalf Of Mike Hammett 
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 1:38 PM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product 


Okay, so it would be for networks behind a NAT. 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 




From: "Chris Wright" < ch...@velociter.net > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 3:22:16 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product 
Disregard my “AFAIK” answer. This is the real answer per 
http://www.nbalonso.com/os-x-server-caching/ 

“ The cache server registers online with Apple and provides it’s public IP, 
your servers local IP, internal DNS name? (not sure of the dns)” 


Chris Wright 
Velociter Wireless 



From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [ mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
Behalf Of Mike Hammett 
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 1:12 PM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product 


I couldn't see how other people are supposed to know you have one of these 
caches running. 



- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 




From: "Chris Wright" < ch...@velociter.net > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 3:10:36 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product 
OSX Server is a $19.99 add-on to OSX Yosemite. You can virtualize OSX in ESXi 
(of course it won’t be supported by Apple unless it’s Apple hardware.) 


Chris Wright 
Velociter Wireless 



From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [ mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
Behalf Of Paul Conlin 
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 10:57 AM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product 

Unless the caching server is free. Under what conditions does Apple put one of 
these in? 

PC 
Blaze Broadband 

On October 28, 2014 1:41:41 PM EDT, Josh Luthman < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com 
> wrote: 



I don't think many people care about caching servers in this regard. The issue 
isn't the upstream pipe filling up, it's all the APs. 







Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Timothy Way < t...@way.lc > wrote: 



For those that are unaware of it you should take a look at Apple's Caching 
Server 2. It is pretty cool, it provides Apple software updates, iTunes content 
and basically anything Apple in a local cache that is transparent to the 
client. Apple looks at the source IP of the device asking for content and tells 
it to hit the local IP of your caching server. My day job is a Network 
Administrator at a technical college. This has prevented the "APPLE DAYS OF 
DOOM" when they release updates in regards to our open (public) wireless 
network. 



Tim Way 






On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Paolo Di Francesco < 
paolo.difrance...@level7.it > wrote: 


Hello, 

it depends on what you want/can achieve and how much bandwidth you have 
(and the experince you want to give to the users) 

In few words: those boxes do not invent bandwidth they (all) try to 
improve how you manage it. So those boxes are managing the bandwidth 
with their policies that could or could not fit your policies. 

Some simple tricks will help you to move the traffic locally (e.g. 
Implementing local web-caching, local DNS, etc) but for sure you have to 
work on the infrastructure to optimize the traffic. The nice thing, in 
that case, is that you will be more aware of what your users are doing 
and how to make them happy; the bad part of the story is that you have 
to spend time (or consultants) to get it. For the hardware, many are 
using Mikrotik CCR or even slower/cheaper Mikrotik models. 

For sure investing more in infrastructure will help a lot :) 

Just my 2 cents 



> Having used Allot NetEnforcer for years, then moved to Exinda for 
> years, we are now considering removing bandwidth managers altogether 
> and relying solely on policing on radios, QoS polic

Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product

2014-10-30 Thread Mike Hammett
Okay, so it would be for networks behind a NAT. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Chris Wright"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 3:22:16 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product 



Disregard my “AFAIK” answer. This is the real answer per 
http://www.nbalonso.com/os-x-server-caching/ 

“ The cache server registers online with Apple and provides it’s public IP, 
your servers local IP, internal DNS name? (not sure of the dns)” 


Chris Wright 
Velociter Wireless 



From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Mike Hammett 
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 1:12 PM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product 


I couldn't see how other people are supposed to know you have one of these 
caches running. 



- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -


From: "Chris Wright" < ch...@velociter.net > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 3:10:36 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product 
OSX Server is a $19.99 add-on to OSX Yosemite. You can virtualize OSX in ESXi 
(of course it won’t be supported by Apple unless it’s Apple hardware.) 


Chris Wright 
Velociter Wireless 



From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [ mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
Behalf Of Paul Conlin 
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 10:57 AM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product 

Unless the caching server is free. Under what conditions does Apple put one of 
these in? 

PC 
Blaze Broadband 

On October 28, 2014 1:41:41 PM EDT, Josh Luthman < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com 
> wrote: 



I don't think many people care about caching servers in this regard. The issue 
isn't the upstream pipe filling up, it's all the APs. 







Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Timothy Way < t...@way.lc > wrote: 



For those that are unaware of it you should take a look at Apple's Caching 
Server 2. It is pretty cool, it provides Apple software updates, iTunes content 
and basically anything Apple in a local cache that is transparent to the 
client. Apple looks at the source IP of the device asking for content and tells 
it to hit the local IP of your caching server. My day job is a Network 
Administrator at a technical college. This has prevented the "APPLE DAYS OF 
DOOM" when they release updates in regards to our open (public) wireless 
network. 



Tim Way 






On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Paolo Di Francesco < 
paolo.difrance...@level7.it > wrote: 


Hello, 

it depends on what you want/can achieve and how much bandwidth you have 
(and the experince you want to give to the users) 

In few words: those boxes do not invent bandwidth they (all) try to 
improve how you manage it. So those boxes are managing the bandwidth 
with their policies that could or could not fit your policies. 

Some simple tricks will help you to move the traffic locally (e.g. 
Implementing local web-caching, local DNS, etc) but for sure you have to 
work on the infrastructure to optimize the traffic. The nice thing, in 
that case, is that you will be more aware of what your users are doing 
and how to make them happy; the bad part of the story is that you have 
to spend time (or consultants) to get it. For the hardware, many are 
using Mikrotik CCR or even slower/cheaper Mikrotik models. 

For sure investing more in infrastructure will help a lot :) 

Just my 2 cents 



> Having used Allot NetEnforcer for years, then moved to Exinda for 
> years, we are now considering removing bandwidth managers altogether 
> and relying solely on policing on radios, QoS policies on core routers 
> & layer 3 switches, and monitoring flows using Netflow. 
> 
> More work, but much less $$. Allows us to invest in infrastructure 
> rather than extraordinarily expensive bandwidth management devices. 
> 
> *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto: wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] 
> *On Behalf Of *Larry A. Weidig 
> *Sent:* Friday, October 24, 2014 10:17 PM 
> *To:* WISPA General List 
> *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product 
> 
> Very interesting, thanks for the lead. Seems they have a product and a 
> library available. Have contacted them for additional information. 
> 
>  
> 
> Larry A. Weidig ( lwei...@excel.net ) 
> Excel.Net, Inc. – http://www.excel.net/ 
> (920) 452-0455 – Sheboygan/Plymouth area 
> (888) 489-9995 – Other areas, toll-free 
> 
> 

Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product

2014-10-30 Thread Mike Hammett
I couldn't see how other people are supposed to know you have one of these 
caches running. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Chris Wright"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 3:10:36 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product 



OSX Server is a $19.99 add-on to OSX Yosemite. You can virtualize OSX in ESXi 
(of course it won’t be supported by Apple unless it’s Apple hardware.) 


Chris Wright 
Velociter Wireless 



From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Paul Conlin 
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 10:57 AM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product 

Unless the caching server is free. Under what conditions does Apple put one of 
these in? 

PC 
Blaze Broadband 

On October 28, 2014 1:41:41 PM EDT, Josh Luthman < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com 
> wrote: 



I don't think many people care about caching servers in this regard. The issue 
isn't the upstream pipe filling up, it's all the APs. 







Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Timothy Way < t...@way.lc > wrote: 



For those that are unaware of it you should take a look at Apple's Caching 
Server 2. It is pretty cool, it provides Apple software updates, iTunes content 
and basically anything Apple in a local cache that is transparent to the 
client. Apple looks at the source IP of the device asking for content and tells 
it to hit the local IP of your caching server. My day job is a Network 
Administrator at a technical college. This has prevented the "APPLE DAYS OF 
DOOM" when they release updates in regards to our open (public) wireless 
network. 



Tim Way 






On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Paolo Di Francesco < 
paolo.difrance...@level7.it > wrote: 


Hello, 

it depends on what you want/can achieve and how much bandwidth you have 
(and the experince you want to give to the users) 

In few words: those boxes do not invent bandwidth they (all) try to 
improve how you manage it. So those boxes are managing the bandwidth 
with their policies that could or could not fit your policies. 

Some simple tricks will help you to move the traffic locally (e.g. 
Implementing local web-caching, local DNS, etc) but for sure you have to 
work on the infrastructure to optimize the traffic. The nice thing, in 
that case, is that you will be more aware of what your users are doing 
and how to make them happy; the bad part of the story is that you have 
to spend time (or consultants) to get it. For the hardware, many are 
using Mikrotik CCR or even slower/cheaper Mikrotik models. 

For sure investing more in infrastructure will help a lot :) 

Just my 2 cents 



> Having used Allot NetEnforcer for years, then moved to Exinda for 
> years, we are now considering removing bandwidth managers altogether 
> and relying solely on policing on radios, QoS policies on core routers 
> & layer 3 switches, and monitoring flows using Netflow. 
> 
> More work, but much less $$. Allows us to invest in infrastructure 
> rather than extraordinarily expensive bandwidth management devices. 
> 
> *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto: wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] 
> *On Behalf Of *Larry A. Weidig 
> *Sent:* Friday, October 24, 2014 10:17 PM 
> *To:* WISPA General List 
> *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product 
> 
> Very interesting, thanks for the lead. Seems they have a product and a 
> library available. Have contacted them for additional information. 
> 
>  
> 
> Larry A. Weidig ( lwei...@excel.net ) 
> Excel.Net, Inc. – http://www.excel.net/ 
> (920) 452-0455 – Sheboygan/Plymouth area 
> (888) 489-9995 – Other areas, toll-free 
> 
>  
> 
> *From: *"Josh Reynolds" < j...@spitwspots.com > 
> *To: * wireless@wispa.org  
> *Sent: *Friday, October 24, 2014 7:15:20 PM 
> *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product 
> 
> should check out ipoque and their PACE engine 
> 
> Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer 
> SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com < http://www.spitwspots.com > 
> 
> On 10/24/2014 03:40 PM, Larry A. Weidig wrote: 
> 
> We have done some searching in this arena and have only found a 
> couple of what seem to be similar products available: 
> 
> Allot Communications - NetEnforcer (does a lot, costs a lot so 
> they live up to their name :) ) 
> 
> Netaxcel - Found it, did not dig far into it 
> 
> NetEqualizer - Reasonable, but not as featured as Procera / Allot 
> 
> Eme

Re: [WISPA] Ruckus launches Small Biz WiFI solution spin off Xclaim Wireless

2014-10-29 Thread Mike Hammett
Now will we see Ruckus quality\features at Ubiquiti prices? 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Gino Villarini"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 7:24:02 AM 
Subject: [WISPA] Ruckus launches Small Biz WiFI solution spin off Xclaim 
Wireless 




New player vs UBNT 


Outdoor 11AC AP for $299 


http://www.xclaimwireless.com/ 











Gino A. Villarini 
President 
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
www.aeronetpr.com 
@aeronetpr 




___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] here comes 100 Gpon

2014-10-28 Thread Mike Hammett
Stolen from? :-p 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Gino Villarini"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 8:58:42 AM 
Subject: [WISPA] here comes 100 Gpon 




http://bbpmag.com/wordpress2/2014/10/huawei-announces-100g-pon-optical-access-technology/
 







Gino A. Villarini 
President 
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
www.aeronetpr.com 
@aeronetpr 




___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] small 24GHz radio

2014-10-23 Thread Mike Hammett
Once you're outside of the AF and Trango 24s, the pricing gets similar. Check 
Siklu. Baltic, Winncom and others carry them. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Bryce Duchcherer"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 2:39:35 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] small 24GHz radio 



Is the SAF that small? 
The only specs I see are 9” but I think that may be just the radio itself, but 
I am not sure. 

60GHz may work, but price is also a concern. 


Bryce D 
NETAGO 



From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Gino Villarini 
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 13:17 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] small 24GHz radio 



Saf free mile is small, maybe a 6” antenna 








Gino A. Villarini 

President 

Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 

www.aeronetpr.com 

@aeronetpr 







From: Bryce Duchcherer < bduc...@netago.ca > 
Reply-To: WISPA General List < wireless@wispa.org > 
Date: Thursday, October 23, 2014 at 3:00 PM 
To: "WISPA General List ( wireless@wispa.org )" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Subject: [WISPA] small 24GHz radio 




Does anybody know of a 24GHz radio that is smaller than 1’? 
It doesn’t have to go very far, but we are wanting 24GHz. 

Bryce D 
NETAGO 

___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] small 24GHz radio

2014-10-23 Thread Mike Hammett
I'm not sure many are. If a short range, why not 60 GHz? 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Bryce Duchcherer"  
To: "WISPA General List (wireless@wispa.org)"  
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 2:00:07 PM 
Subject: [WISPA] small 24GHz radio 



Does anybody know of a 24GHz radio that is smaller than 1’? 
It doesn’t have to go very far, but we are wanting 24GHz. 

Bryce D 
NETAGO 

___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] 32 Cities Want To Challenge Big Telecom, Build Their Own Gigabit Networks

2014-10-21 Thread Mike Hammett
Don't you know that Slashdot is bad for your health. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Josh Reynolds"  
To: "WISPA General List" , a...@afmug.com 
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 2:51:37 AM 
Subject: [WISPA] 32 Cities Want To Challenge Big Telecom, Build Their Own 
Gigabit Networks 

http://tech.slashdot.org/story/14/10/21/0018201/32-cities-want-to-challenge-big-telecom-build-their-own-gigabit-networks
 


-- 

Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer 
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com 
___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] 32 Cities Want To Challenge Big Telecom, Build Their Own Gigabit Networks

2014-10-21 Thread Mike Hammett
32 cities don't have a clue as to what it actually costs to do this. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Josh Reynolds"  
To: "WISPA General List" , a...@afmug.com 
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 2:51:37 AM 
Subject: [WISPA] 32 Cities Want To Challenge Big Telecom, Build Their Own 
Gigabit Networks 

http://tech.slashdot.org/story/14/10/21/0018201/32-cities-want-to-challenge-big-telecom-build-their-own-gigabit-networks
 


-- 

Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer 
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com 
___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] FCC NOI for Cellular 24GHz (and a note about 5GHz...)

2014-10-20 Thread Mike Hammett
I suspect that would only be used in small cells. It would be useless at the 
macro level, even with various smart antenna techniques. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Josh Reynolds"  
To: "WISPA General List" , a...@afmug.com 
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2014 5:50:44 PM 
Subject: [WISPA] FCC NOI for Cellular 24GHz (and a note about 5GHz...) 

http://tech.slashdot.org/story/14/10/19/34/gigabit-cellular-networks-could-happen-with-24ghz-spectrum
 


-- 

Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer 
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com 
___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] security certificate

2014-10-19 Thread Mike Hammett
My multi-year wildcard was under $300 total. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Josh Luthman"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2014 11:11:27 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] security certificate 


Few hundred? I remember them being crazy expensive. 
Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 
On Oct 19, 2014 10:08 AM, "John Thomas" < jtho...@quarnet.com > wrote: 




Or you can buy a wildcard for a few hundred dollars and use it on all your 
devices. 


Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID 

Josh Luthman < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > wrote: 


Pay for a certified SSL cert for each host. That's 50/device/year. 
Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 
On Oct 17, 2014 5:43 PM, "Mike Hammett" < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > wrote: 




Ignore it. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



From: "~NGL~" < n...@ngl.net > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2014 7:18:08 PM 
Subject: [WISPA] security certificate 


There is a problem with this website's security certificate. 


How do I correct this problem? I get this almost every time I log in to a 
Ubiquiti radio. 
NGL 

If you can read this Thank A Teacher. 
And if it's in English Thank A Soldier! 
___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 


___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 




___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 




___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] security certificate

2014-10-17 Thread Mike Hammett
Ignore it. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "~NGL~"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2014 7:18:08 PM 
Subject: [WISPA] security certificate 


There is a problem with this website's security certificate. 


How do I correct this problem? I get this almost every time I log in to a 
Ubiquiti radio. 
NGL 

If you can read this Thank A Teacher. 
And if it's in English Thank A Soldier! 
___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Vegas ... anyone not staying at South Pointe?

2014-10-11 Thread Mike Hammett
Oh, lol, no. This is the public list, so I didn't want to be too specific. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Adair Winter"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2014 9:15:07 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Vegas ... anyone not staying at South Pointe? 


I think he meant Mike Tyson 
On Oct 11, 2014 8:21 AM, "Mike Hammett" < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > wrote: 




I'll be at the South Pointe. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



From: "Gino Villarini" < g...@aeronetpr.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 11:26:52 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Vegas ... anyone not staying at South Pointe? 




Mike? 







Gino A. Villarini 
President 
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
www.aeronetpr.com 
@aeronetpr 






From: Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > 
Reply-To: WISPA General List < wireless@wispa.org > 
Date: Friday, October 10, 2014 at 11:55 PM 
To: WISPA General List < wireless@wispa.org > 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Vegas ... anyone not staying at South Pointe? 





Tyson is at the MGM. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



From: "Gino Villarini" < g...@aeronetpr.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 10:46:17 PM 
Subject: [WISPA] Vegas ... anyone not staying at South Pointe? 




??? 







Gino A. Villarini 
President 
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
www.aeronetpr.com 
@aeronetpr 




___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 


___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 


___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 




___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Vegas ... anyone not staying at South Pointe?

2014-10-11 Thread Mike Hammett
I'll be at the South Pointe. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Gino Villarini"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 11:26:52 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Vegas ... anyone not staying at South Pointe? 




Mike? 







Gino A. Villarini 
President 
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
www.aeronetpr.com 
@aeronetpr 






From: Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > 
Reply-To: WISPA General List < wireless@wispa.org > 
Date: Friday, October 10, 2014 at 11:55 PM 
To: WISPA General List < wireless@wispa.org > 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Vegas ... anyone not staying at South Pointe? 





Tyson is at the MGM. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Gino Villarini" < g...@aeronetpr.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 10:46:17 PM 
Subject: [WISPA] Vegas ... anyone not staying at South Pointe? 




??? 







Gino A. Villarini 
President 
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
www.aeronetpr.com 
@aeronetpr 




___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 


___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Vegas ... anyone not staying at South Pointe?

2014-10-10 Thread Mike Hammett
Tyson is at the MGM. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Gino Villarini"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 10:46:17 PM 
Subject: [WISPA] Vegas ... anyone not staying at South Pointe? 




??? 







Gino A. Villarini 
President 
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
www.aeronetpr.com 
@aeronetpr 




___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Cambium OEMs Ceragon for PTP

2014-10-07 Thread Mike Hammett
No clue if this is true in this case, but possibilities include software 
enhancements, different interfaces, different form factors, etc. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Matt Hoppes"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2014 7:57:51 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cambium OEMs Ceragon for PTP 


Interesting. I've never understood this. Why would I buy the Cambium product 
instead of the Ceragon product? 

On Oct 7, 2014, at 8:44 AM, Gino Villarini < g...@aeronetpr.com > wrote: 







http://www.cambiumnetworks.com/products/ptp/ptp-820 


NO mention of Mimo though.. 







Gino A. Villarini 
President 
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
www.aeronetpr.com 
@aeronetpr 








___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Wifi Outdoor Cams

2014-09-26 Thread Mike Hammett
I could see why some would want it, but it was a useless feature to me. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Ryan McKenzie"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2014 9:26:17 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wifi Outdoor Cams 


Chris, 

Wow that is good info. I had no idea they had removed the RTSP. And I was just 
about to spec UBNT cams in a project using RTSP. 

Have you found a good alternative? 

Someone else in this thread mentioned Arecont cams. Are they cheap and provide 
RTSP? 


Thanks, 
Ryan McKenzie 
385-215-WIFI 

On 9/25/14, 10:34 PM, Chris Ruschmann wrote: 



The newer UVC cams apparently don't have it at all. And the aircam beta is 
currently set to remove it for good. So your good if you never update. But what 
do you do if you need another or RMA? SOL I guess... 
I started a thread in the beta forums and called on UBNT to answer for there 
crime and got crickets. 


sent from my phone! 
On Sep 25, 2014 8:18 PM, "Blair Davis" < the...@wmwisp.net > wrote: 



Do you know what firmware version lost RSTP? 

Can the newer cams be rolled back to the old firmware or do I need to return 
them to my supplier? 

If I can't do RSTP directly from the cam, they are mostly useless to me. 

-- 



On 9/25/2014 5:57 PM, Chris Ruschmann wrote: 




Be careful with UBNT cameras now. They are/have disabled RSTP completly. So 
what you have to do now is backhaul your feed to a Unifi Video server then get 
your RTSP stream from there. It changed the game in how we are going to be 
doing cameras now as we were taking RTSP streams selectively and directly from 
the camera when we wanted the info so we didn’t have to waste 5Mbps per stream 
at all times to our head ends. Plus they will only work with Unifi Video which 
is lame as well. 



From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto: wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
Behalf Of LTI - Dennis Burgess 
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 1:37 PM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wifi Outdoor Cams 


We use UBNT cameras and MT backhauls, SXTs are cheap: ) 



On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 3:54 PM, TJ Trout < t...@pcguys.us > wrote: 



I use geovision IP cameras, they work great but no wifi options. 





On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Gino Villarini < g...@aeronetpr.com > wrote: 








Got a project that requires 10-12 outdoor cams, prefer wifi units so we can 
backhaul them in 5 ghz 



Any ideas? 








Gino A. Villarini 

President 

Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 

www.aeronetpr.com 

@aeronetpr 





___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 




___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 







-- 

Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer Author of " Learn RouterOS- Second 
Edition ” 
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services 
Office : 314-735-0270 Website : http://www.linktechs.net – Skype : linktechs 
-- Create Wireless Coverage’s with www.towercoverage.com – 900Mhz – LTE – 3G – 
3.65 – TV Whitespace 

___
Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 


-- 
West Michigan Wireless ISP
Allegan, Michigan  49010 269-686-8648 A Division of:
Camp Communication Services, INC 
___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 





___
Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Wifi Outdoor Cams

2014-09-26 Thread Mike Hammett
The cameras will do motion detect on the camera. As it saves server load, I 
assume it saves network load as well. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Chris Ruschmann"  
To: gmsm...@gmail.com, "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 4:57:50 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wifi Outdoor Cams 



Be careful with UBNT cameras now. They are/have disabled RSTP completly. So 
what you have to do now is backhaul your feed to a Unifi Video server then get 
your RTSP stream from there. It changed the game in how we are going to be 
doing cameras now as we were taking RTSP streams selectively and directly from 
the camera when we wanted the info so we didn’t have to waste 5Mbps per stream 
at all times to our head ends. Plus they will only work with Unifi Video which 
is lame as well. 



From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto: wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
Behalf Of LTI - Dennis Burgess 
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 1:37 PM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wifi Outdoor Cams 


We use UBNT cameras and MT backhauls, SXTs are cheap: ) 



On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 3:54 PM, TJ Trout < t...@pcguys.us > wrote: 



I use geovision IP cameras, they work great but no wifi options. 





On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Gino Villarini < g...@aeronetpr.com > wrote: 








Got a project that requires 10-12 outdoor cams, prefer wifi units so we can 
backhaul them in 5 ghz 



Any ideas? 








Gino A. Villarini 

President 

Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 

www.aeronetpr.com 

@aeronetpr 





___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 




___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 







-- 

Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer Author of " Learn RouterOS- Second 
Edition ” 
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services 
Office : 314-735-0270 Website : http://www.linktechs.net – Skype : linktechs 
-- Create Wireless Coverage’s with www.towercoverage.com – 900Mhz – LTE – 3G – 
3.65 – TV Whitespace 
___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas

2014-08-28 Thread Mike Hammett
Yeah, most of my towers aren't going anywhere unless hit directly by a tornado. 
Even most of the ones that aren't that strong are still decent. 

That's part of why I cringe when I hear of people using much less than Rohn 65 
for towers. Ya just can't put enough useful stuff up there. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Josh Reynolds"  
To: wireless@wispa.org 
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 5:59:56 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas 


We avoid sissy towers :P 


Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer 
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com On 08/28/2014 02:48 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: 



Not so simple - massive wind load increase. 
Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 
On Aug 28, 2014 6:40 PM, "Josh Reynolds" < j...@spitwspots.com > wrote: 




Surprised more antenna manufacturers aren't using that "one simple trick to 
increase your  by several " :) 



Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer 
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com On 08/28/2014 02:06 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: 



It is hard to beat 1/4" of aluminum. ;-) 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 





From: "Josh Reynolds"  
To: wireless@wispa.org 
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 4:12:55 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas 


I have seen the reports from various people doing direct comparison of signal 
levels on the tower between kp/ubnt+rfarmor. The ubnt+rfarmor won in the 
isolation test, by far. 


Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer 
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com On 08/28/2014 01:09 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: 



You don't need shield kits, they ship with a metal case to go around a Rocket. 
It's just one part instead of two. 
Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 
On Aug 28, 2014 5:04 PM, "Josh Reynolds" < j...@spitwspots.com > wrote: 




To be honest, I've never used a KP antenna. I've heard about them, but we could 
never use them. No shield kit makes them unusable to us. 

The regular unbiquiti antennas with Chris's shield kits make pretty much 
everything else obsolete, except for 45-120deg Ti sectors with RF Armor. 


Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer 
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com On 08/28/2014 06:47 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: 



KP hands down. Better antennas. 
Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 
On Aug 28, 2014 10:29 AM, "Sam" < w...@csilogan.com > wrote: 


That's a great point. Thank you Andy. How about differences in 
performance between the two? Big difference? Negligible? 

Thanks 
Sam 



On 8/28/2014 09:18, Andy Trimmell wrote: 
> I think the big plus with the KP antennas is they come with a cover for 
> the rocket. You'll have to buy a RF Elements cover if you're using stock 
> Rockets with stock UBNT antennas. 
> 
> -Original Message- 
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto: wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
> Behalf Of Sam 
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 9:29 AM 
> To: WISPA General List 
> Subject: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas 
> 
> I am hoping to find someone who has used both UBNT and KP Performance 
> antennas (with Rockets) who would be willing to share their experiences 
> of one vs the other. For this project I'm specifically looking at 13 dBi 
> omni antennas, but am curious about how the sector antennas compare as 
> well. 
> 
> Thanks 
> Sam 
> ___ 
> Wireless mailing list 
> Wireless@wispa.org 
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
> ___ 
> Wireless mailing list 
> Wireless@wispa.org 
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
> 

___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 




___
Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 





___
Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



___
Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 




Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas

2014-08-28 Thread Mike Hammett
It is hard to beat 1/4" of aluminum. ;-) 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Josh Reynolds"  
To: wireless@wispa.org 
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 4:12:55 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas 


I have seen the reports from various people doing direct comparison of signal 
levels on the tower between kp/ubnt+rfarmor. The ubnt+rfarmor won in the 
isolation test, by far. 


Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer 
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com On 08/28/2014 01:09 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: 



You don't need shield kits, they ship with a metal case to go around a Rocket. 
It's just one part instead of two. 
Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 
On Aug 28, 2014 5:04 PM, "Josh Reynolds" < j...@spitwspots.com > wrote: 




To be honest, I've never used a KP antenna. I've heard about them, but we could 
never use them. No shield kit makes them unusable to us. 

The regular unbiquiti antennas with Chris's shield kits make pretty much 
everything else obsolete, except for 45-120deg Ti sectors with RF Armor. 


Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer 
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com On 08/28/2014 06:47 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: 



KP hands down. Better antennas. 
Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 
On Aug 28, 2014 10:29 AM, "Sam" < w...@csilogan.com > wrote: 


That's a great point. Thank you Andy. How about differences in 
performance between the two? Big difference? Negligible? 

Thanks 
Sam 



On 8/28/2014 09:18, Andy Trimmell wrote: 
> I think the big plus with the KP antennas is they come with a cover for 
> the rocket. You'll have to buy a RF Elements cover if you're using stock 
> Rockets with stock UBNT antennas. 
> 
> -Original Message- 
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto: wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
> Behalf Of Sam 
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 9:29 AM 
> To: WISPA General List 
> Subject: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas 
> 
> I am hoping to find someone who has used both UBNT and KP Performance 
> antennas (with Rockets) who would be willing to share their experiences 
> of one vs the other. For this project I'm specifically looking at 13 dBi 
> omni antennas, but am curious about how the sector antennas compare as 
> well. 
> 
> Thanks 
> Sam 
> ___ 
> Wireless mailing list 
> Wireless@wispa.org 
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
> ___ 
> Wireless mailing list 
> Wireless@wispa.org 
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
> 

___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 




___
Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 





___
Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas

2014-08-28 Thread Mike Hammett
That is of course assuming that you don't get it the day you need it. ;-) 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Randy Cosby"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 3:30:43 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas 

Just open up all boxes and check all your parts before you go out. Nuts. 
Brackets. Cables. 

I've never had a problem with missing parts on UBNT sectors. 


On 8/28/2014 2:07 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: 




Not only should you have spares, you should also make sure you have the right 
parts before you go to the job... 

even if you do have the right parts, it's still a nuisance to deal with getting 
sent the wrong stuff... it can happen with anything though - for instance, I 
once got sent a 5ghz UBNT omni instead of 2.4ghz... I'm pretty sure I would've 
been better off with the wrong pigtails ;-) 




From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [ wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] on behalf of 
Jim Patient [ jpati...@linktechs.net ] 
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 3:01 PM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas 




If you get out to the job and don't have the right pigtail because the vendor 
didn't ship the right one, it's not the vendors fault. You should have several 
spares of every flavor in your truck. If not, it's a safe bet Murphy will show 
up throwing his laws around :-) 


Jim Patient 
Office: 314-735-0270 
linktechs.net 
towercoverage.com 
ispradio.com 




From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [ mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
Behalf Of Josh Luthman 
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 2:30 PM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas 


Which is a problem when they ship you N male to N male by mistake... =P 





Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Matt Brendle < 
mattagator.mailingli...@gmail.com > wrote: 


KPP if for nothing else it comes with better jumpers. KPP has N connectors on 
antenna and jumper to match up to RP-SMA on Rocket. YMMV 
-Matt 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto: wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
Behalf Of Josh Luthman 
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 12:23 PM 



To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas 




Same radios but I had the opposite experience. I had one at -35, maybe the RF 
armor requires both of those dumb machine screws to work. 





Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Greg Osborn < gregwosb...@gmail.com > wrote: 


UBNT to KPP straight up, kpp. UBNT with armor vs KPP, we prefer UBNT 
because of the extra horizontal separation required with KPP. On a grainleg 
platform, we've seen kpp sectors see one another at -30 or below, where UBNT 
see one another in the -50's. On a tower without standoffs and KPP, forget 
it, you will have problems. 

2.4 in 10mhz cw. 


-Original Message- 
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto: wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 


Behalf Of Mathew Howard 
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 11:33 AM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas 

one obvious advantage with the KPP is that the connectors or all covered by 
the shielding, so you eliminate any potential issues with water in the 
connectors, and you can throw away that annoying cover on the Rocket over 
the ethernet port. 
 
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [ wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] on behalf of 
Sam [ w...@csilogan.com ] 
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 10:07 AM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas 

Mathew, these are for 2. GHz Rockets. 

I was wondering about the shielding as well. Unless you're in an area with a 
ton of interference... But as was mentioned, the KP omni with the shielding 
is the same price basically as the same UBNT model without it. I'm all about 
using stuff that's included at no additional charge :) 


On 8/28/2014 10:00, Mathew Howard wrote: 
> I haven't used any KPP omnis, but I have used several different brands of 
dual polarity omnis and I haven't really seen any notable difference in 
performance between any of them. 
> 
> Are you looking at 2.4ghz or 5ghz? 
> 
> Is there really a lot of benefit to shielding the radio with an omni? it 
seems somewhat pointless to me... 
>  
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [ wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] on 
> behalf of Sam [ w...@csilogan.com ] 
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 9:29 AM 
> To: WISPA General List 
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas 
&g

Re: [WISPA] Ticketing software

2014-08-17 Thread Mike Hammett
Indeed they do, I just don't have hands-on experience with them. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Scott Reed"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 11:49:54 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ticketing software 

As do most of the other billing systems that are WISPA members. 


On 8/17/2014 10:01 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: 



WISPMon does it all. No need to go anywhere else. ;-) 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Brian Wilson"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 9:00:11 AM 
Subject: [WISPA] Ticketing software 



What are people using for customer support ticketing software? 

We currently use a combination of pink notes and email. 
(and I wish I was joking.) 



-- 


Brian Wilson 
CDS Wireless, Santa Rosa CA 

___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



___
Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 


No virus found in this message. 
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 2014.0.4716 / Virus Database: 4007/8052 - Release Date: 08/17/14 


-- 
Scott Reed
Owner
NewWays Networking, LLC
Wireless Networking
Network Design, Installation and Administration
Mikrotik Advanced Certified www.nwwnet.net (765) 855-1060  (765) 439-4253  
Toll-free (855) 231-6239 
___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Ticketing software

2014-08-17 Thread Mike Hammett
WISPMon does it all. No need to go anywhere else. ;-) 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Brian Wilson"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 9:00:11 AM 
Subject: [WISPA] Ticketing software 



What are people using for customer support ticketing software? 

We currently use a combination of pink notes and email. 
(and I wish I was joking.) 



-- 


Brian Wilson 
CDS Wireless, Santa Rosa CA 

___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Download of Copyrighted Material - What do you do?

2014-08-14 Thread Mike Hammett
That would be funny... 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Roger Howard"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 1:03:37 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Download of Copyrighted Material - What do you do? 


We should all report them as spammers to the blacklists :) 



On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Blake Covarrubias < bl...@beamspeed.com > 
wrote: 


We simply forward them to the customer. 

We wrote an in-house application to assist with managing these notices. It 
automatically downloads the messages, correlates the IP to a customer, and 
forwards the emails to the customer through our ticketing system. 

It comes in handy when we receive 200+ DMCA infringement notices in a single 
day. 

-- 
Blake Covarrubias 



On Aug 14, 2014, at 7:48 AM, Russ Van Vlack < rvanvl...@freedomnet.com > wrote: 

> WISPA Colleagues, 
> 
> We are fighting the neverending battle of dealing with the IP-Echelon notices 
> of copyright infringement and need a more firm policy in place. Our 
> acceptable use policy and account terms and conditions clearly state that 
> these actions are illegal and/or against company policy, however we do not 
> have a firm course of action in place in dealing with customers in violation. 
> 
> Would anyone be willing to share what their company policy is in regards to 
> these notices? Especially, if you do anything further than passing the notice 
> on to the customer? 
> 
> Thanks. 
> 
> --Russell Van Vlack 
> 


> ___ 
> Wireless mailing list 
> Wireless@wispa.org 
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 




___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Where to buy Rohn 55?

2014-08-13 Thread Mike Hammett
The best pricing I've seen on Rohn stuff is at http://hillradio.net/, but I'd 
imagine the shipping is what would kill getting it to you. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Gino Villarini"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 8:34:26 AM 
Subject: [WISPA] Where to buy Rohn 55? 




Any place with great price? 







Gino A. Villarini 
President 
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
www.aeronetpr.com 
@aeronetpr 




___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth brokers

2014-08-12 Thread Mike Hammett
I don't think anyone gets "deals" on Verizon. ;-) 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Josh Luthman"  
To: "Justin Wilson"  
Cc: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 10:38:38 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth brokers 


I'm looking for a few people that have deals with "multiple carriers" like 
Level 3, Cogent, Verizon, etc. 



Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Justin Wilson < li...@mtin.net > wrote: 




I guess part of it depends on where and what. If you are going into a co-lo 
then ethernet is much easier to sell separate from transport. 


Justin 




-- Justin Wilson < j...@mtin.net > 
http://www.mtin.net 
Managed Services – xISP Solutions – Data Centers 
http://www.thebrotherswisp.com 
Podcast about xISP topics 






From: Josh Luthman < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
Reply-To: WISPA General List < wireless@wispa.org > 
Date: Monday, August 11, 2014 at 7:14 PM 

To: WISPA General List < wireless@wispa.org > 
Subject: [WISPA] Bandwidth brokers 





Does anyone have some contacts? 
Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 ___ Wireless mailing 
list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth brokers

2014-08-12 Thread Mike Hammett
That's what I did. Well, I ruled out vendors that I know what they did or their 
name lended itself to a certain type of service... like BillMax. Pretty sure 
they do billing, so I don't need to check there. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Josh Luthman"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 9:24:00 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth brokers 


I'm sure there is, however short of going through every vendor member I don't 
know who to look at. 



Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:46 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > 
wrote: 




There's a few WISPA members that perform those services. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 





From: "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 6:14:51 PM 
Subject: [WISPA] Bandwidth brokers 




Does anyone have some contacts? 
Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 

___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 


___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 





___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth brokers

2014-08-11 Thread Mike Hammett
There's a few WISPA members that perform those services. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Josh Luthman"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 6:14:51 PM 
Subject: [WISPA] Bandwidth brokers 


Does anyone have some contacts? 
Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 
___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Cencus block to Google Earth?

2014-08-11 Thread Mike Hammett
This is the folder name for tracts in Illinois. Look for the same thing, but 
with your state's number. 

tl_2010_17_tract10 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Sam Tetherow"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 12:46:02 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cencus block to Google Earth? 

Related note, does anyone know where I can get shape files for census 
tract? Seems like everything I find is only down to the block level. 

On 08/11/2014 12:02 PM, Bill Schoolfield wrote: 
> What specifically do you need to do? We have been working a lot in this 
> area for the new FCC 477 report requirements. 
> 
> Bill 
> 
> On 8/11/2014 10:24 AM, Gino Villarini wrote: 
>> Anyone has a way to convert files for google earth evaluation? 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Gino A. Villarini 
>> President 
>> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
>> www.aeronetpr.com 
>> @aeronetpr 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___ 
>> Wireless mailing list 
>> Wireless@wispa.org 
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
>> 
> ___ 
> Wireless mailing list 
> Wireless@wispa.org 
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Mimosa B5-160 v UBNT AF5-US Chart (working)

2014-08-08 Thread Mike Hammett
Is bit.ly really based in Libya? 

It's just people being cute with CCLTDs 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: "Josh Luthman"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Friday, August 8, 2014 9:37:11 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mimosa B5-160 v UBNT AF5-US Chart (working) 


Their domain is .co which is the country TLD for Columbia. 
Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 
On Aug 8, 2014 10:26 AM, "Mike Hammett" < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > wrote: 




Colombia? 

http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.1766737.1398290195!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/gallery_1200/sofia-vergara-1998.jpg
 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 





From: "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Friday, August 8, 2014 9:23:29 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mimosa B5-160 v UBNT AF5-US Chart (working) 


Off topic, are you guys based in Columbia? 
Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 
On Aug 8, 2014 10:19 AM, "Jaime Fink" < ja...@mimosa.co > wrote: 


Different sync settings need to be on a different channel set to avoid 
interference. 

But that does not limit the use of differing configurations beyond a single 
group. 

> On Aug 8, 2014, at 7:14 AM, "Matt Hoppes" < mhop...@indigowireless.com > 
> wrote: 
> 
> How does sync work if I have a 50/50 and a 75/25 radio on the same tower? 
> 
> 
> Matt Hoppes 
> Director of Information Technology 
> Indigo Wireless 
> +1 (570) 723-7312 
> 
>> On 8/8/14, 10:12 AM, Jaime Fink wrote: 
>> GPS and GLONASS receiver are hard integrated in every product, the 
>> addition of the 2nd satellite network significantly increases reception, 
>> and the receiver is strategically places at the top of the enclosure for 
>> clearest reception. 
>> 
>> The implementation is integrated with an advanced custom GPSDO for 1PPS 
>> high precision, and radio groups A/B across the network of Mimosa radios 
>> switch TX/RX on the GPS epoch rise and fall. 
>> 
>> TDMA sync modes allow 50/50 split or 75/25 split for enhanced 
>> downstream, and window size adjustability from 2-8ms to optimize speed 
>> versus latency choices. 
>> 
>> For non sync modes, auto TDMA adjusts up/down dynamically and avoids 
>> fixing the bandwidth. 
>> 
>> Cheers, 
>> 
>> Jaime 
>> 
>> On Aug 8, 2014, at 7:02 AM, "Kurt Fankhauser" < li...@wavelinc.com 
>> > wrote: 
>> 
>>> How does Mimosa get GPS Sync? Does it have a GPS receiver built into 
>>> every radio or is there an external source? 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Kurt Fankhauser 
>>> 
>>> Wavelinc Communications 
>>> 
>>> P.O. Box 126 
>>> 
>>> Bucyrus, OH 44820 
>>> 
>>> http://www.wavelinc.com < http://www.wavelinc.com/ > 
>>> 
>>> tel. 419-562-6405 
>>> 
>>> fax. 419-617-0110 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Matt Hoppes 
>>> < mhop...@indigowireless.com > wrote: 
>>> 
>>> I totally understand, Steve. 
>>> 
>>> What I'm saying is now you have folks throwing up 5GHz 40MHz 
>>> backhauls ew. I guess we'll say. It's nice the options 
>>> are out 
>>> there, but I wish they could be saved for use in the hands of 
>>> WISPs only. 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 8/6/14, 2:17 PM, Steve Barnes wrote: 
>>>> Matt, nausea can be fixed with realism. I have used nothing but 
>>> 5GHz backhauls for 8 years. Only in the last 2 years have we gone 
>>> to any 5 GHz Client other than business. I have 15 towers and 
>>> each has at least 2 paths in and out for redundancy. So that is 
>>> 35+ Links. Most are 5 miles or more so not an AF24 candidate in 
>>> my rain zone. I can't afford to just go out and buy $175,000 
>>> worth of licensed backhauls. But for the price of one Licensed 
>>> link I can buy 2.5- 5GHz links (AF5, Mimosa, or whoever) saving 
>>> me $100,000 when all is said and done. 
>>>> 
>>>> Would I prefer to do all licensed and save all the 5GHz for 
>>> Customer? Heck Yes!! But that is not the reality I live in. 
>>>> 
>>>> Steve Barnes 
>>>> General Manager 
>>>> PCSWIN.com < http

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >