[Zope-Checkins] SVN: Products.Five/trunk/zcml.py Replaced error when missing site.zcml with a warning.
Log message for revision 68410: Replaced error when missing site.zcml with a warning. Changed: U Products.Five/trunk/zcml.py -=- Modified: Products.Five/trunk/zcml.py === --- Products.Five/trunk/zcml.py 2006-05-31 13:38:24 UTC (rev 68409) +++ Products.Five/trunk/zcml.py 2006-05-31 15:12:29 UTC (rev 68410) @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ $Id$ +import warnings import os from zope.configuration import xmlconfig @@ -33,6 +34,7 @@ # load instance site configuration file site_zcml = os.path.join(INSTANCE_HOME, etc, site.zcml) skel_site_zcml = os.path.join(INSTANCE_HOME, skel, etc, site.zcml) +skel_site2_zcml = os.path.join(ZOPE_HOME, skel, etc, site.zcml) if os.path.exists(site_zcml): file = site_zcml @@ -40,11 +42,12 @@ # check for zope installation home skel during running unit tests file = skel_site_zcml else: -msg = site.zcml is now required to live at '%s', for \ - sites upgraded from Zope 2.9 please copy site.zcml \ - from your installed Zope's skel/etc directory \ - % site_zcml -raise IOError(msg) +file = skel_site2_zcml +msg = site.zcml should now live at '%s', for \ + sites upgraded from Zope 2.9 please copy '%s' \ + to '%s' \ + % (site_zcml, skel_site2_zcml, site_zcml) +warnings.warn(msg, DeprecationWarning) global _context _context = xmlconfig.file(file) ___ Zope-Checkins maillist - Zope-Checkins@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-checkins
[Zope-Checkins] SVN: Zope/trunk/lib/python/Products/ Updated reference to a Five version that turned the site.zcml error into a warning.
Log message for revision 68411: Updated reference to a Five version that turned the site.zcml error into a warning. Changed: _U Zope/trunk/lib/python/Products/ -=- Property changes on: Zope/trunk/lib/python/Products ___ Name: svn:externals - Five svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/Products.Five/tags/1.5c + Five-r 68410 svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/Products.Five/trunk ___ Zope-Checkins maillist - Zope-Checkins@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-checkins
[Zope-Checkins] SVN: Zope/branches/2.10/lib/python/Products/PageTemplates/PageTemplateFile.py There must be no warning when __name__ is supplied.
Log message for revision 68414:
There must be no warning when __name__ is supplied.
Changed:
U Zope/branches/2.10/lib/python/Products/PageTemplates/PageTemplateFile.py
-=-
Modified:
Zope/branches/2.10/lib/python/Products/PageTemplates/PageTemplateFile.py
===
--- Zope/branches/2.10/lib/python/Products/PageTemplates/PageTemplateFile.py
2006-05-31 17:36:17 UTC (rev 68413)
+++ Zope/branches/2.10/lib/python/Products/PageTemplates/PageTemplateFile.py
2006-05-31 17:59:21 UTC (rev 68414)
@@ -59,15 +59,13 @@
_default_bindings = {'name_subpath': 'traverse_subpath'}
def __init__(self, filename, _prefix=None, **kw):
-name = None
-if kw.has_key('__name__'):
-name = kw['__name__']
-del kw['__name__']
+name = kw.pop('__name__', None)
basepath, ext = os.path.splitext(filename)
if name:
self.id = self.__name__ = name
+self._need__name__ = 0
else:
self.id = self.__name__ = os.path.basename(basepath)
___
Zope-Checkins maillist - Zope-Checkins@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-checkins
[Zope-Checkins] SVN: Zope/trunk/lib/python/Products/PageTemplates/PageTemplateFile.py Merged r68414 from 2.10 branch:
Log message for revision 68415:
Merged r68414 from 2.10 branch:
There must be no warning when __name__ is supplied.
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/lib/python/Products/PageTemplates/PageTemplateFile.py
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/lib/python/Products/PageTemplates/PageTemplateFile.py
===
--- Zope/trunk/lib/python/Products/PageTemplates/PageTemplateFile.py
2006-05-31 17:59:21 UTC (rev 68414)
+++ Zope/trunk/lib/python/Products/PageTemplates/PageTemplateFile.py
2006-05-31 18:00:30 UTC (rev 68415)
@@ -59,15 +59,13 @@
_default_bindings = {'name_subpath': 'traverse_subpath'}
def __init__(self, filename, _prefix=None, **kw):
-name = None
-if kw.has_key('__name__'):
-name = kw['__name__']
-del kw['__name__']
+name = kw.pop('__name__', None)
basepath, ext = os.path.splitext(filename)
if name:
self.id = self.__name__ = name
+self._need__name__ = 0
else:
self.id = self.__name__ = os.path.basename(basepath)
___
Zope-Checkins maillist - Zope-Checkins@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-checkins
[Zope-Checkins] SVN: Zope/branches/2.10/lib/python/Products/ Updated Zope to use Five revision so copying site.zcml is no longer mandatory.
Log message for revision 68416: Updated Zope to use Five revision so copying site.zcml is no longer mandatory. Changed: _U Zope/branches/2.10/lib/python/Products/ -=- Property changes on: Zope/branches/2.10/lib/python/Products ___ Name: svn:externals - Five svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/Products.Five/tags/1.5c + Five-r 68410 svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/Products.Five/trunk ___ Zope-Checkins maillist - Zope-Checkins@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-checkins
[Zope-dev] Re: [ZODB-Dev] tempstorage to ZEO?
Fine by me. - C On May 31, 2006, at 1:22 AM, Sidnei da Silva wrote: I was looking, and trying to understand why 'tempstorage' is not included in the ZODB. Since some people might want to share sessions between ZEO clients, and that 'tempstorage' is what is mounted as '/temp_folder/session_data', why not make that easy to mount via ZEO? Does anyone see a problem with this? What I'm proposing is to move 'tempstorage' to 'ZODB', since it has no dependency on anything other than 'zLOG'. -- Sidnei da Silva Enfold Systemshttp://enfoldsystems.com Fax +1 832 201 8856 Office +1 713 942 2377 Ext 214 ___ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] tempstorage to ZEO?
Sidnei da Silva schrieb: I was looking, and trying to understand why 'tempstorage' is not included in the ZODB. Since some people might want to share sessions between ZEO clients, and that 'tempstorage' is what is mounted as '/temp_folder/session_data', why not make that easy to mount via ZEO? Does anyone see a problem with this? actually it is easy mountable via ZEO. I'm doing this already... Do you mean including the schema for zeo.conf per default? Regards Tino ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] tempstorage to ZEO?
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:53:14AM +0200, Tino Wildenhain wrote: | Sidnei da Silva schrieb: | I was looking, and trying to understand why 'tempstorage' is not | included in the ZODB. | | Since some people might want to share sessions between ZEO clients, | and that 'tempstorage' is what is mounted as | '/temp_folder/session_data', why not make that easy to mount via ZEO? | Does anyone see a problem with this? | | actually it is easy mountable via ZEO. I'm doing this already... | Do you mean including the schema for zeo.conf per default? Yeah, that too. I was actually thinking about the standalone ZODB package. Or does that not exist anymore? I was also wondering if this is the right thing to do (mounting tempstorage via ZEO) since I don't recall seeing any tutorial that recommended it. -- Sidnei da Silva Enfold Systemshttp://enfoldsystems.com Fax +1 832 201 8856 Office +1 713 942 2377 Ext 214 ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] tempstorage to ZEO?
On May 31, 2006, at 9:08 AM, Sidnei da Silva wrote: On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:53:14AM +0200, Tino Wildenhain wrote: | Sidnei da Silva schrieb: | I was looking, and trying to understand why 'tempstorage' is not | included in the ZODB. | | Since some people might want to share sessions between ZEO clients, | and that 'tempstorage' is what is mounted as | '/temp_folder/session_data', why not make that easy to mount via ZEO? | Does anyone see a problem with this? | | actually it is easy mountable via ZEO. I'm doing this already... | Do you mean including the schema for zeo.conf per default? Yeah, that too. I was actually thinking about the standalone ZODB package. Or does that not exist anymore? I was also wondering if this is the right thing to do (mounting tempstorage via ZEO) since I don't recall seeing any tutorial that recommended it. Should be OK, although if you're doing it because you want a fast storage (or one that produces fewer conflicts), ZEO takes away much hope of that intrinsically. - C ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] tempstorage to ZEO?
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:40:01AM -0400, Chris McDonough wrote: | Should be OK, although if you're doing it because you want a fast | storage (or one that produces fewer conflicts), ZEO takes away much | hope of that intrinsically. My goal was actually sharing sessions between zeo clients, without resorting to zsqlsessions or similar. -- Sidnei da Silva Enfold Systemshttp://enfoldsystems.com Fax +1 832 201 8856 Office +1 713 942 2377 Ext 214 ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] tempstorage to ZEO?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 31 May 2006, at 14:55, Sidnei da Silva wrote: On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:49:49AM -0400, Chris McDonough wrote: | I've done this (at least with FileStorage) and it's | sllo. Might be OK for low-traffic sites, but better | to implement a custom session data container that stores stuff in | SQL. I have the beginnings of one of these if you want to see it. Slow for using sessions? Why didn't you use tempstorage then? Or you are just asserting that FileStorage over ZEO is noticeably slower than directly? Tempstorage over ZEO becomes a conflict problem when things get busy. We removed it in favor of local temp storages. jens -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFEfa1uRAx5nvEhZLIRAje/AKCINcg6oR6P8rGQVSKP/Xw98hUMAwCeK9g3 aUcDnH/w9mvtCEBquKyOElU= =ONm3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] tempstorage to ZEO?
I've done this (at least with FileStorage) and it's sllo. Might be OK for low-traffic sites, but better to implement a custom session data container that stores stuff in SQL. I have the beginnings of one of these if you want to see it. - C On May 31, 2006, at 9:44 AM, Sidnei da Silva wrote: On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:40:01AM -0400, Chris McDonough wrote: | Should be OK, although if you're doing it because you want a fast | storage (or one that produces fewer conflicts), ZEO takes away much | hope of that intrinsically. My goal was actually sharing sessions between zeo clients, without resorting to zsqlsessions or similar. -- Sidnei da Silva Enfold Systemshttp://enfoldsystems.com Fax +1 832 201 8856 Office +1 713 942 2377 Ext 214 ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] tempstorage to ZEO?
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:49:49AM -0400, Chris McDonough wrote: | I've done this (at least with FileStorage) and it's | sllo. Might be OK for low-traffic sites, but better | to implement a custom session data container that stores stuff in | SQL. I have the beginnings of one of these if you want to see it. Slow for using sessions? Why didn't you use tempstorage then? Or you are just asserting that FileStorage over ZEO is noticeably slower than directly? -- Sidnei da Silva Enfold Systemshttp://enfoldsystems.com Fax +1 832 201 8856 Office +1 713 942 2377 Ext 214 ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [ZODB-Dev] Re: [Zope-dev] tempstorage to ZEO?
Hi, I have bad experence with tempstorage on ZEO (FileStorage with no undo). With site with 18000 users (300 per minutes) , the site hang because of conflict on ZEO. I am very interested by a faster tempstorage like SQLDB Cheers Eric Brun Pentila www.pentila.com Chris McDonough a écrit : I've done this (at least with FileStorage) and it's sllo. Might be OK for low-traffic sites, but better to implement a custom session data container that stores stuff in SQL. I have the beginnings of one of these if you want to see it. - C On May 31, 2006, at 9:44 AM, Sidnei da Silva wrote: On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:40:01AM -0400, Chris McDonough wrote: | Should be OK, although if you're doing it because you want a fast | storage (or one that produces fewer conflicts), ZEO takes away much | hope of that intrinsically. My goal was actually sharing sessions between zeo clients, without resorting to zsqlsessions or similar. --Sidnei da Silva Enfold Systemshttp://enfoldsystems.com Fax +1 832 201 8856 Office +1 713 942 2377 Ext 214 ___ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] tempstorage to ZEO?
On May 31, 2006, at 9:55 AM, Sidnei da Silva wrote: On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:49:49AM -0400, Chris McDonough wrote: | I've done this (at least with FileStorage) and it's | sllo. Might be OK for low-traffic sites, but better | to implement a custom session data container that stores stuff in | SQL. I have the beginnings of one of these if you want to see it. Slow for using sessions? Why didn't you use tempstorage then? I think I thought it wouldn't have mattered. The difference between using sessions against a local filestorage and one on a ZEO server was something like 20X. Or you are just asserting that FileStorage over ZEO is noticeably slower than directly? Yes, at least for writes. As I assume tempstorage would be too. And since sessions are all about writes, it's very noticeable. - C ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Re: SVN: Zope/branches/ajung-zpt-end-game/...
Tres Seaver wrote: I agree with you that there should be BBB code that provides the old behavior and I agree with Philipp that not using that old behavior is a benefit for the CMF. Sure. I just don't want to *make* people upgrade CMF when upgrading Zope, unless there is a reason which is important *to the CMF*. An interesting factoid I found while spelunking this issue: the CMF (by way of DCWorkflow) is literally the oldest consumer of the expression machinery outside of ZPT itself! Shane's earliest checkin of the 'Expression' module was nearly 5 years ago, and used an empty string as the class-level default for the 'text' attribute. FWIW the following patches gives the proper BBB behaviour. Shall I check it in? Does it need to send a deprecation warning? Florent Index: Products/PageTemplates/Expressions.py === --- Products/PageTemplates/Expressions.py (revision 68406) +++ Products/PageTemplates/Expressions.py (working copy) @@ -99,6 +99,8 @@ class ZopePathExpr(PathExpr): def __init__(self, name, expr, engine): +if name == 'standard' and not expr: +expr = 'nothing' super(ZopePathExpr, self).__init__(name, expr, engine, boboAwareZopeTraverse) Florent -- Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of RD +33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Re: SVN: Zope/branches/ajung-zpt-end-game/...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Florent Guillaume wrote: Tres Seaver wrote: I agree with you that there should be BBB code that provides the old behavior and I agree with Philipp that not using that old behavior is a benefit for the CMF. Sure. I just don't want to *make* people upgrade CMF when upgrading Zope, unless there is a reason which is important *to the CMF*. An interesting factoid I found while spelunking this issue: the CMF (by way of DCWorkflow) is literally the oldest consumer of the expression machinery outside of ZPT itself! Shane's earliest checkin of the 'Expression' module was nearly 5 years ago, and used an empty string as the class-level default for the 'text' attribute. FWIW the following patches gives the proper BBB behaviour. Shall I check it in? Does it need to send a deprecation warning? Florent Index: Products/PageTemplates/Expressions.py === --- Products/PageTemplates/Expressions.py(revision 68406) +++ Products/PageTemplates/Expressions.py(working copy) @@ -99,6 +99,8 @@ class ZopePathExpr(PathExpr): def __init__(self, name, expr, engine): +if name == 'standard' and not expr: +expr = 'nothing' super(ZopePathExpr, self).__init__(name, expr, engine, boboAwareZopeTraverse) I uploaded a similar one, except with deprecation warning, to the collector issue I added: http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/2118 My variation also creates an expression which would raise a KeyError if evaluated, rather than returning None. I don't think anybody can actually be depending on what the current code gives back if an empty expression is called, so yours should be equally fine. WRT dprecation: I would actually prefer no* to have the warning, myself; I don't think that a usage which has been workable for so long is actually in error. We should probably add a test which verifies compilability of empty expressions, plus whichever behavior we specify. Tres. - -- === Tres Seaver +1 202-558-7113 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Palladion Software Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEfdBg+gerLs4ltQ4RAv3dAJ9nupwaHlRIwjs/0x7jPjswZ8+28ACcDzJj BhQgjD0j0eobvHNhejOo2Mk= =N7uW -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Re: SVN: Zope/branches/ajung-zpt-end-game/...
On 31 May 2006, at 19:20, Tres Seaver wrote: I uploaded a similar one, except with deprecation warning, to the collector issue I added: http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/2118 Ah thanks, I missed it. My variation also creates an expression which would raise a KeyError if evaluated, rather than returning None. I don't think anybody can actually be depending on what the current code gives back if an empty expression is called, so yours should be equally fine. If you say it used to return the expression context, then I'm pretty sure nobody used the result. OTOH I'd rather return None just in case, it gives reasonable semantics. WRT dprecation: I would actually prefer no* to have the warning, myself; I don't think that a usage which has been workable for so long is actually in error. I agree, we should just decree in Zope 2, empty ZPT path expression are allowed and evaluate to None. Florent We should probably add a test which verifies compilability of empty expressions, plus whichever behavior we specify. -- Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of RD +33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Re: [ZODB-Dev] Re: tempstorage to ZEO?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Eric Brun wrote: Hi, I have bad experence with tempstorage on ZEO (FileStorage with no undo). With site with 18000 users (300 per minutes) , the site hang because of conflict on ZEO. I am very interested by a faster tempstorage like SQLDB I am working on a memcached-based shared session data container, which should be both faster than ZEO + tempstorage and conflict-free. Tres. - -- === Tres Seaver +1 202-558-7113 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Palladion Software Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEfdyg+gerLs4ltQ4RAtXIAKCTtlsM3Vz75eGsBmt2HB/e4hdsOACgxQX+ +md4NlLnybXuZFzzWyyI+3I= =xLIQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [ZODB-Dev] Re: tempstorage to ZEO?
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 02:12:48PM -0400, Tres Seaver wrote: | -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- | Hash: SHA1 | | Eric Brun wrote: | Hi, | | I have bad experence with tempstorage on ZEO (FileStorage with no undo). | With site with 18000 users (300 per minutes) , the site hang because of | conflict on ZEO. | I am very interested by a faster tempstorage like SQLDB | | I am working on a memcached-based shared session data container, which | should be both faster than ZEO + tempstorage and conflict-free. Having written a MemcacheCacheManager, I'm very interested in helping with this. How can I help you? -- Sidnei da Silva Enfold Systemshttp://enfoldsystems.com Fax +1 832 201 8856 Office +1 713 942 2377 Ext 214 ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [ZODB-Dev] Re: tempstorage to ZEO?
Sidnei da Silva wrote: On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 02:12:48PM -0400, Tres Seaver wrote: | -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- | Hash: SHA1 | | Eric Brun wrote: | Hi, | | I have bad experence with tempstorage on ZEO (FileStorage with no undo). | With site with 18000 users (300 per minutes) , the site hang because of | conflict on ZEO. | I am very interested by a faster tempstorage like SQLDB | | I am working on a memcached-based shared session data container, which | should be both faster than ZEO + tempstorage and conflict-free. Having written a MemcacheCacheManager, I'm very interested in helping with this. How can I help you? Not sure if you know it, but I guess Tres is referring to http://www.danga.com/memcached/ I was also ofthen thinking if something like that would make a good client cache - w/o blowing up pythons heap so much. Regards Tino ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Zope 2.10 deprecation warnings
Current bare Zope 2.10 sends some deprecation warnings because it itself imports things that it deprecates, this will have to be hidden. Suggestions welcome: - App/Product.py imports ZClasses which are deprecated, - Products/ZCatalog/ZCatalog.py imports TextIndex (for the Splitters) but TextIndex is deprecated. Also I've checked in a fix for the ZPT warnings such as: Init Ambiguous name for method of Products.PageTemplates.ZopePageTemplate.ZopePageTemplate: 'manage' != 'manage_main' Florent -- Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of RD +33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] tempstorage to ZEO?
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:59:36AM -0400, Chris McDonough wrote: | | On May 31, 2006, at 9:55 AM, Sidnei da Silva wrote: | | On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:49:49AM -0400, Chris McDonough wrote: | | I've done this (at least with FileStorage) and it's | | sllo. Might be OK for low-traffic sites, but better | | to implement a custom session data container that stores stuff in | | SQL. I have the beginnings of one of these if you want to see it. | | Slow for using sessions? Why didn't you use tempstorage then? | | I think I thought it wouldn't have mattered. The difference between | using sessions against a local filestorage and one on a ZEO server | was something like 20X. So, since I couldn't believe the 20X figure, I wrote a very dumb test [1] that shows [2] tempstorage to be only slightly slower than filestorage (roughly 10%) and that adding zeo to the mix makes both of them about 4X slower, which would be pretty acceptable by my standards. I'm looking forward for testing tres' memcached stuff tomorrow. In the meantime, it would be great if someone can run the script on different boxes and platforms (I've ran it on Windows on a Intel Dual Core 3.0) to see if there's any difference. [1] http://awkly.org/files/zeo-bench/bench.py [2] http://awkly.org/files/zeo-bench/bench_results.txt -- Sidnei da Silva Enfold Systemshttp://enfoldsystems.com Fax +1 832 201 8856 Office +1 713 942 2377 Ext 214 ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] tempstorage to ZEO?
Sorry, I've not run your tests but I'll note that they don't take into account any concurrency or time lost due to conflict error retries. There are many more conflicts when writing to ZEO-backed database in general when there is lots of concurrency because write transactions usually take longer. And even if MVCC bails you out, it still takes time to do the conflict resolution. There is a set of tests explicitly created to torture test session conflict rates here: http://cvs.zope.org/Packages/SessionRig/ See also: http://www.plope.com/Members/dunny/conflicts/view - C On May 31, 2006, at 10:58 PM, Sidnei da Silva wrote: On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:59:36AM -0400, Chris McDonough wrote: | | On May 31, 2006, at 9:55 AM, Sidnei da Silva wrote: | | On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:49:49AM -0400, Chris McDonough wrote: | | I've done this (at least with FileStorage) and it's | | sllo. Might be OK for low-traffic sites, but better | | to implement a custom session data container that stores stuff in | | SQL. I have the beginnings of one of these if you want to see it. | | Slow for using sessions? Why didn't you use tempstorage then? | | I think I thought it wouldn't have mattered. The difference between | using sessions against a local filestorage and one on a ZEO server | was something like 20X. So, since I couldn't believe the 20X figure, I wrote a very dumb test [1] that shows [2] tempstorage to be only slightly slower than filestorage (roughly 10%) and that adding zeo to the mix makes both of them about 4X slower, which would be pretty acceptable by my standards. I'm looking forward for testing tres' memcached stuff tomorrow. In the meantime, it would be great if someone can run the script on different boxes and platforms (I've ran it on Windows on a Intel Dual Core 3.0) to see if there's any difference. [1] http://awkly.org/files/zeo-bench/bench.py [2] http://awkly.org/files/zeo-bench/bench_results.txt -- Sidnei da Silva Enfold Systemshttp://enfoldsystems.com Fax +1 832 201 8856 Office +1 713 942 2377 Ext 214 ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope] os module on different os's
garry saddington wrote: I have a Zope application that runs on WinXP and Debian sarge without problems. I am using os.popen and popen2 to run locally installed applications and use their output in Zope (particularly aspell and diction). I'd suggest moving to the new subprocess module which packages these up in a platform independent way... problem with recent Distros and this module? Python version is 2.3 on all systems but I tried 2.4 on FC5 and that failed too. You need to be using Zope 2.9 and Python 2.4 to have access to the subprocess module, but I'd strongly recommend it in your case... Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
[Zope] What's the difference between 2.8.x and 2.9.x?
Dear all after the annoucement of Zope 2.8.7 and 2.10.0.B1, I'm a bit confused about the difference between the 2.8 and 2.9 lines? Is it mainly Python 2.4 support? Thank you, and best regards, Martin Gfeller ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] What's the difference between 2.8.x and 2.9.x?
--On 31. Mai 2006 11:21:04 +0200 Gfeller Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear all after the annoucement of Zope 2.8.7 and 2.10.0.B1, I'm a bit confused about the difference between the 2.8 and 2.9 lines? Is it mainly Python 2.4 support? doc/CHANGES.txt is your friend. -aj -- ZOPYX Ltd. Co. KG - Charlottenstr. 37/1 - 72070 Tübingen - Germany Web: www.zopyx.com - Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Phone +49 - 7071 - 793376 E-Publishing, Python, Zope Plone development, Consulting pgpnEYNx2QBKV.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] [ANN] Zope 2.10.0 beta 1 released
On 5/30/06, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all,on behalf of Zope developer community I am pleased to announce the releaseof Zope 2.10.0 beta 1.You can download Zope 2.10.0 beta 1http://www.zope.org/Products/Zope/2.10.0b1/ hi i can't configure zope. the error is as below ./configure --prefix=/tmp/zope --with-python=/usr/local/py242/bin/python Using Python interpreter at /usr/local/py242/bin/python Configuring Zope installation /usr/local/py242/bin/python: can't open file './inst/configure.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory are there files missing? thanks -- http://myzope.kedai.com.my - my-zope org ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] What's the difference between 2.8.x and 2.9.x?
On 5/31/06, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --On 31. Mai 2006 11:21:04 +0200 Gfeller Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: after the annoucement of Zope 2.8.7 and 2.10.0.B1, I'm a bit confused about the difference between the 2.8 and 2.9 lines? Is it mainly Python 2.4 support? doc/CHANGES.txt is your friend. And also, the announcements: http://zope.org/Products/Zope/2.9.0/Zope-2_9_0-released Some new features of Zope 2.9: * ZODB 3.6 * Five 1.3 * integration for Zope 3 events for object creation and deletion * Zope 3 i18n integration for page templates -- Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://www.nuxeo.com/ CPS Content Management http://www.cps-project.org/ ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
[Zope] Re: [ANN] Zope 2.10.0 beta 1 released
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bakhtiar A Hamid wrote: i can't configure zope. the error is as below ./configure --prefix=/tmp/zope --with-python=/usr/local/py242/bin/python Using Python interpreter at /usr/local/py242/bin/python Configuring Zope installation /usr/local/py242/bin/python: can't open file './inst/configure.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory I see that too. are there files missing? Yes. At least the 'inst' subdirectory and the zpkg-generated setup.py are missing. Tres. - -- === Tres Seaver +1 202-558-7113 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Palladion Software Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEfW8o+gerLs4ltQ4RApT2AKCgXmUSUTxQjAfvMEr+/mGzzQD89wCghQ09 GE+mEU0pABs4Ha/NbJv0vHw= =cWAF -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] Re: [ANN] Zope 2.10.0 beta 1 released (fwd)
Forwarded Message Date: 31. Mai 2006 12:34:01 +0200 From: Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED], zope@zope.org Subject: Re: [Zope] Re: [ANN] Zope 2.10.0 beta 1 released --On 31. Mai 2006 06:25:44 -0400 Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: are there files missing? Yes. At least the 'inst' subdirectory and the zpkg-generated setup.py are missing. *sigh* I wished zpkg would disappear in hell forever. This framework raises more problems than it is trying to solve :-/ I'll check by tomorrow for the reason. Andreas -- End Forwarded Message -- ---BeginMessage--- --On 31. Mai 2006 06:25:44 -0400 Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: are there files missing? Yes. At least the 'inst' subdirectory and the zpkg-generated setup.py are missing. *sigh* I wished zpkg would disappear in hell forever. This framework raises more problems than it is trying to solve :-/ I'll check by tomorrow for the reason. Andreas pgpxG2iaTfLKh.pgp Description: PGP signature ---End Message--- pgppKTCl8VLQM.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
[Zope] relevance ranking in ZCTextIndex or equivalent
Hi, I'm planning to implement a text search where (match against the title) ranks more highly than (match in the description) ranks more highly than (matches against the body text). Titles and descriptions are short bits of text, so results in these categories can be ranked just by the frequency that the word appears in that part of the text. Matches against the body text should ideally be ranked more like ZCTextIndex rather than plain frequency. My ideas are: - do three separate searches, and then concatenate the result sets together. problem: making sure there are no duplicates in the list without parsing all the results in their entirety. - hijack the 'scoring' part of the index, so those results with matches in the title can have their scores artificially heightened to achieve the ordering i want problem: it's compleletely opaque without a lot of study whether this would achieve what i want. i'd also need to index the items so the index knew what was in the title, which could be a problem. - index title, description and text separately, and then use dieter's AdvancedQuery product to do the query and combine results problem: is it possible to get at the scores when the documents are returned from the index to be able to order them? are the scores returned separately, or will each query overwrite the last one? Has anyone ever tried to do this - or got any pointers - at all? Thanks in advance, Miles ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] relevance ranking in ZCTextIndex or equivalent
- Original Message - From: Miles Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: zope@zope.org Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 10:59 AM Subject: [Zope] relevance ranking in ZCTextIndex or equivalent Hi, I'm planning to implement a text search where (match against the title) ranks more highly than (match in the description) ranks more highly than (matches against the body text). Titles and descriptions are short bits of text, so results in these categories can be ranked just by the frequency that the word appears in that part of the text. Matches against the body text should ideally be ranked more like ZCTextIndex rather than plain frequency. My ideas are: - do three separate searches, and then concatenate the result sets together. problem: making sure there are no duplicates in the list without parsing all the results in their entirety. - hijack the 'scoring' part of the index, so those results with matches in the title can have their scores artificially heightened to achieve the ordering i want problem: it's compleletely opaque without a lot of study whether this would achieve what i want. i'd also need to index the items so the index knew what was in the title, which could be a problem. - index title, description and text separately, and then use dieter's AdvancedQuery product to do the query and combine results problem: is it possible to get at the scores when the documents are returned from the index to be able to order them? are the scores returned separately, or will each query overwrite the last one? Has anyone ever tried to do this - or got any pointers - at all? A definitely non-trivial task, but here are some ideas to get you pointed in the right (I hope) direction: Try googling, or looking in the zope source for: data_record_normalized_score_ BaseIndex.py OkapiIndex.py SetOps.py okascore.c Good Luck! Jonathan ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] What's the difference between 2.8.x and 2.9.x?
At Wednesday 31/5/2006 07:22, Lennart Regebro wrote: after the annoucement of Zope 2.8.7 and 2.10.0.B1, I'm a bit confused about the difference between the 2.8 and 2.9 lines? Is it mainly Python 2.4 support? doc/CHANGES.txt is your friend. And also, the announcements: http://zope.org/Products/Zope/2.9.0/Zope-2_9_0-released I'm confused too. I see new releases of 2.8x, 2.9x and 2.10x, and I dont understand the differences. Gabriel Genellina Softlab SRL ___ 1GB gratis, Antivirus y Antispam Correo Yahoo!, el mejor correo web del mundo http://correo.yahoo.com.ar ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] What's the difference between 2.8.x and 2.9.x?
On 5/31/06, Gabriel Genellina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At Wednesday 31/5/2006 07:22, Lennart Regebro wrote: after the annoucement of Zope 2.8.7 and 2.10.0.B1, I'm a bit confused about the difference between the 2.8 and 2.9 lines? Is it mainly Python 2.4 support? doc/CHANGES.txt is your friend. And also, the announcements: http://zope.org/Products/Zope/2.9.0/Zope-2_9_0-released I'm confused too. I see new releases of 2.8x, 2.9x and 2.10x, and I dont understand the differences. For me the big difference between these is the underlying Zope 3/Five release, as that's where many of the exciting changes tend to be. 2.8: Zope 3.0/Five 1.1 2.9: Zope 3.2/Five1.3 2.10 Zope 3.3/Five 1.5 Additionally, Zope 2.10 has a number of new features aimed at better integrating Zope 3/Five features into Zope 2. Alec ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
[Zope] Re: What's the difference between 2.8.x and 2.9.x?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gabriel Genellina wrote: At Wednesday 31/5/2006 07:22, Lennart Regebro wrote: after the annoucement of Zope 2.8.7 and 2.10.0.B1, I'm a bit confused about the difference between the 2.8 and 2.9 lines? Is it mainly Python 2.4 support? doc/CHANGES.txt is your friend. And also, the announcements: http://zope.org/Products/Zope/2.9.0/Zope-2_9_0-released I'm confused too. I see new releases of 2.8x, 2.9x and 2.10x, and I dont understand the differences. The releases are as follows: - 2.8 is the old stable version, first released a year ago; the only changes being made there now are to fix really ugly security bugs, or to stay current with changes to underlying old stable software (Five 1.0.x, ZODB 3.4.x). This was also the last Zope version to support / require Python 2.3. Plone 2.1.x, for instance, requires a Zope 2.8.x version. - 2.9 is the stable or current version, first released in January (about a month late on our new cycle). It has newer versions of the underlying software (ZODB 3.6.x, Five 1.3.x, Zope3 3.2), and a fairly big pile of new features. It requires Python 2.4. 2.9 It will be supported as the old stable version after 2.10 releases - 2.10 is the development version, not yet released except in beta. It should be released by the end of June. It will bundle a newer Zope3 version (3.4), and removes a number of forks between Zope2 and Zope3 versions of the same features. - 2.11 (not yet in development) is scheduled for release in November, along with Zope3 3.5. Tres. - -- === Tres Seaver +1 202-558-7113 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Palladion Software Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEfdvJ+gerLs4ltQ4RAgJTAJ0ePLTuhnVoWYobOyDNRjp+vKkeZQCfbfD2 mKR4fy01FzJ2VDYh5o5Ym1o= =KaqW -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] Re: What's the difference between 2.8.x and 2.9.x?
On Wed May 31 2006 14:09, Tres Seaver wrote: - 2.10 is the development version, not yet released except in beta. It should be released by the end of June. It will bundle a newer Zope3 version (3.4), and removes a number of forks between Zope2 and Zope3 versions of the same features. Zope 3.4 by the end of June? 3.3 hasn't even been released (except as beta). Did I miss something? -- Ron ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] Internet Explorer does not follows redirect, while Firefox does
Either
dtml-call RESPONSE.setHeader('pragma','no-cache')
or
dtml-call RESPONSE.setHeader('Expires',(_.DateTime()-1).rfc822())
or both in the head section of your page will do the trick.
cb
- Original Message -
From: Marco Bizzarri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Zope Users Mailing List zope@zope.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 7:33 AM
Subject: [Zope] Internet Explorer does not follows redirect,while Firefox
does
Hi all.
I don't think this is a specific Zope problem. However, I'm
experiencing it in a Zope context, and this is why I'm here asking.
In a custom Zope application, we have a problem with Internet Explorer.
The application follows a page - submit - redirect - page cycle.
To state more clearly: the page presented to the user can have a link.
When the user clicks on the link, something is done, and eventually
the user is redirected to the same page which will display different
data based on the results of its previous click.
The problem is that when IE sees that the result page has the same URL
as the first page it does not reload the page and instead shows me
the cached version.
The problem is not shown with Firefox.
As far as I can understand, this is an HTTP header issue, but I would
like to know if anyone already has experienced this problem, and has
some solution about it.
Regards
Marco
--
Marco Bizzarri
http://notenotturne.blogspot.com/
___
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
___
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] Re: What's the difference between 2.8.x and 2.9.x?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ron Bickers wrote: On Wed May 31 2006 14:09, Tres Seaver wrote: - 2.10 is the development version, not yet released except in beta. It should be released by the end of June. It will bundle a newer Zope3 version (3.4), and removes a number of forks between Zope2 and Zope3 versions of the same features. Zope 3.4 by the end of June? 3.3 hasn't even been released (except as beta). Did I miss something? Just a typo; sorry for that. Tres. - -- === Tres Seaver +1 202-558-7113 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Palladion Software Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEfger+gerLs4ltQ4RAqlAAJ4yUnh4C+8iPo+Ihwm+X4qcM+BNBACgrlyB oJLnU9ZDVU04diSN81XdJyQ= =CKcy -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
