I had an exchange with a vendor who was planning on a similar approach:
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.windows.server.active_
directory/browse_frm/thread/83248bf50f9f76ec/2aac67203f612e2a
my summary, see the end of the archived thread, was that they
should talk to Microsoft
List,
I have been looking at several options to restore a failed DC from the ground
up. ADS seems to look promising, but its hard to get one SYSPREP image for all
of my DCs even though they are all flavors of Dell PowerEdge, it has proven
difficult. Does anyone know of a good solution to
PXE Boot into an unattended install?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bahta, Nathaniel V CTR USAF
NASIC/SCNA
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 8:11 AM
To:
That’s what I have been trying to do, but using one image for all of my
different hardware types has not worked. Specifically I can get the image to
apply via PXE, but once it boots up to go through the SYSPREP mini-setup, the
splash screen appears and it reboots, it just keeps doing that.
Why do you need one sysprep image of all you DCs? Can't you just make one
sysprep image in total (and just add all the necessary drivers for each
model?). Alternatively there is an ADS image mounting tool you can use if you
need to make slight modifications to a captured image to cater for
Have you tried giving a test user traverse
folder or other benign rights at the level where Outlook gets stuck?
Andrew Fidel
Dan DeStefano
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10/04/2006 09:01 PM
Please respond to
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
To
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Can you post the error?
Make sure those users are not hidden in the GAL, if you
hide them it will not work.
Rezuma
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Noah
EigerSent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 8:20 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] OT:
I don’t need one sysprep image OF all my DCs, it’s one sysprep image in total,
just as you said. I added the necessary drivers for each model and used
imgmount /mount to modify the sysprep.inf [SysprepMassStorage] section and to
add the drivers for the different RAID controllers.
Nathaniel
If you're using a transform file to deploy, you should be able to define the default file location, either as a variable (%homedrive%) or alternatively, you can install the GPO extensions for MS Office and set the item via GPO and stop worrying, as long as you test it a little bit before deploying
Sorry, didn't read thoroughly first (oops). Yeah, it sounds like a perms issue, I usually set the root of my user shares directory to have Read/Traverse perms for users in case of an emergency and/or troubleshooting. It's an administrative share anyway, I can understand the paranoia of also
Some of the subjects have that OT preceding the subject, what's that?
Thanks
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
Unattended install doesn't require an image ... it automates windows setup.
You're probably missing something in your MassStorageControllers section.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir-
[EMAIL
Off Topic?
Ramon Linan wrote:
Some of the subjects have that OT preceding the subject, what's that?
Thanks
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
List info :
OT = Off Topic
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Off-topic
;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ramon Linan
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 15:40
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] what is the meaning of OT in front
Off topic. You should have used it for this thread :-^
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ramon Linan
Sent: 05 October 2006 14:40
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] what is the meaning of OT in front of the
subject
See I thought that as well, but if I were missing something in my
MassStorageControllers section, then it would not even boot up to the splash
screen, it would just BSOD with inaccessible boot device.
Nathaniel V Bahta
Sr. Systems Administrator
General Dynamics Information Technology
Off Track?
Original Message
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] what is the meaning of OT in front of the
subject
From: Ramon Linan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, October 05, 2006 6:39 am
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Some of the subjects have that OT preceding the subject,
Off Topic i.e. the people on the list might know the answer but it's nothing to
do with Active Directory.
e.g. What are the recommended Anti-Virus exclusions for a Domain Controller?
Mark
Mark Parris
Base IT Ltd
Active Directory Consultancy
Tel +44(0)7801 690596
-Original Message-
Look on the Altiris website for Hardware idependent installs v2 - you can
disect all the info out of this document.
Mark Parris
Base IT Ltd
Active Directory Consultancy
Tel +44(0)7801 690596
-Original Message-
From: Bahta, Nathaniel V CTR USAF NASIC/SCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu,
Off-topic.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Daniel Gilbert
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 10:14 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] what is the meaning of OT in front
of the subject
Off Track?
It's funny how we quote wikis as definitive sources of information, when
they can be edited by anyone and everyone :)
Who vets the edits and how much does that person know about the subject
matter??
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Almeida
I have been spending a little more time on this.
RPC Dump wouldnt run before and gave me an error (see earlier post).
I now managed to get it working.
To summarize it all:
Exchange 2003 SP2 throws an error in the Eventlog (Event ID 9176) which
seems to indicate that
the GC it is contacting
I'm not getting emails from this list at my work email, starting last
Thursday. Has anyone else experienced the same thing?
Alex
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
The constant reboot is often a different HAL, multiproc, singleproc, damn
hyperthreading, or APCI non APCI,
Mark Parris
Base IT Ltd
Active Directory Consultancy
Tel +44(0)7801 690596
-Original Message-
From: Mark Parris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 14:30:35
Funnily enough, there's a wiki entry about this... :-)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Introduction
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 11:08 AM
To:
Yeah that’s what I used to make my sysprep.inf file. It is very informative,
better than MS's stuff by all means.
Nathaniel V Bahta
Sr. Systems Administrator
General Dynamics Information Technology
(937)257-4757
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Youre exactly right Mark, hyperthreading is enabled on the hardware that
reboots and not enabled on the hardware that does not. Is there a best
practice for a situation like this?
Nathaniel V Bahta
Sr. Systems Administrator
General Dynamics Information Technology
(937)257-4757
I get some; but many are blank (sometimes blank from Brian Desmond, always from Mark Parris).
On 10/5/06, Alex Alborzfard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not getting emails from this list at my work email, starting lastThursday. Has anyone else experienced the same thing?
AlexList info :
Huh, I would've considered that on-topic ... esp. when threads start How
do I configure a Exchange mailbox blah blah ... right like we know about
Exchange?
Cheers,
-BrettSh
no warranties, yada, yada ...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Mark Parris wrote:
Off Topic i.e. the people on the list might know
I was not receiving them until I realized that it was our sonicwall
antispam...I have had no problem since then.
Rezuma
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex Alborzfard
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 11:34 AM
To:
Right, and remember there is not absolute truth!! :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Nims
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 11:49 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: wikis
It's funny how we quote wikis as
999,998 + 2 = 1,000,000, not 100,000. ;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Nims
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 11:49 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: wikis
It's funny how we quote wikis as
Argh! On one of our file servers, there is a
"public" directory that allows any authenticated user to do anything within it
(minus changing permissions). MP3 files and folders appear there every so
often and are removed soon thereafter. Is there some way for me to tell
who has created these
While this thread is OT, I'd actually consider your example to be right
on-topic ;-)
/Guido
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Parris
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 4:28 PM
To: ActiveDir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] what is the
Except when 99% of the common wisdom about something is wrong, like in the
case of ESE / JET Blue ... ;-)
Cheers,
-BrettSh
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Greg Nims wrote:
It's funny how we quote wikis as definitive sources of information, when
they can be edited by anyone and everyone :)
Who
The DomainB that you want to split off still needs the root domain (DomainA) to
work.
So you can't just say screw DomainA and cut it off. You'll need at least 1 (2
for redundancy) DCs of DomainA to remain in the site you wish to split off. No
problems to get rid of DomainB in the site that
It will, but it is a solvable problem. You'll also have some headaches for the
trust itself, but that's where the nifty Win2003 features such as Name Suffix
Routing and Top Level Name Restrictions come into play.
/Guido
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Scenario:
Two domains.
Domain A is a child of Forest A.
Domain B is the Root of Forest B.
Domain B trusts Domain A
Domain A selectively Trusts Domain B.
Trying to setup so that Group policies for the users from Domain
B will apply on a
What is do here is usually enable hyperthreading or disable it if applicable or
swap the hal out, a KB article is available on microsoft to do this.
Mark Parris
Base IT Ltd
Active Directory Consultancy
Tel +44(0)7801 690596
-Original Message-
From: Bahta, Nathaniel V CTR USAF
What brand of hardware is it? Maybe disable it as part of your imaging process
and enable it when complete?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bahta, Nathaniel V CTR
A hybrid approach to storing it on EFS would be to use a laptop specific protection program. Something that encrypts the harddrive and prevents the laptop from being hacked via off-line means. This may or may not mitigate the legal concerns, but it would help to protect the data on a laptop that's
What's funny is that actual encyclopedias have almost the same level of accuracy as Wikipedia on any particular subject. Part of that is the fact that they're always 1-3+ years out of date when they are published and the other part is that many 'facts' are actually just theories and there are
Set some auditing on the folder that this is happening in and
watch the security log for the relevant audits
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c - 312.731.3132
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J B
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006
999,998 + 2 = 1,000,000, not 100,000. ;-)
good thing there are 998 on the list to correct me. :)
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
Drop filemon on the box with a filter for mp3 and just let it stay running in a disconnected ts window would probably be one method.
Kurt Falde
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of J B
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 12:57 PM
To:
Audit the folder.
J B wrote:
Argh! On one of our file servers,
there is a "public" directory that allows any authenticated user to do
anything within it (minus changing permissions). MP3 files and folders
appear there every so often and are removed soon thereafter. Is there
some
Try this
http://www.watchdirectory.net/wdhelp/plugins/wdopAuditInfo.html
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of J B
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006
12:57 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Who keeps
creating this folder files?!
Won't the ownership show up under the Security tab?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of J B
Sent: Thu 10/5/2006 9:57 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Who keeps creating this folder files?!
Argh! On one of our file servers, there is a
I like to introduce debate ;-) whilst also highlighting the correct usage of
i.e. and e.g.
Mark Parris
Base IT Ltd
Active Directory Consultancy
Tel +44(0)7801 690596
-Original Message-
From: Grillenmeier, Guido [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 13:03:23
You mean Jet Blue doesn't have TV on their flights???
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Shirley
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 10:12 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: wikis
Except when 99% of the
http://list.windowsitpro.com/t?ctl=3B222:40CB7
Calling all Linux Gurus; UNIX Ninjas; Windows Masters and rubber chicken lovers
Just got this in my SPAM inbox.
Mark Parris
Base IT Ltd
Active Directory Consultancy
Tel +44(0)7801 690596
List info :
Sure, but is that because the common wisdom is wrong or is it because there is not a definitive source of truthful information (such as decent documentation?) Could it be that a wiki is as good as it gets? Or could there be blog
entries that would give better information? Or perhaps accurate
I thought it was 9A:DOn 10/5/06, Laura A. Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
999,998 + 2 = 1,000,000, not 100,000. ;-) -Original Message- From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Greg Nims
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 11:49 AM To:
Well here it is Correct away. :)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extensible_Storage_Engine
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition -
http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Shirley
Sent:
1.
Check the owner of the files
2. You
may want to look at FSRMin Win2K3 R2; it allows you to restrict creation
of files based on type, among other things.
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/R2/storage/default.mspx
Laura
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Other than directly testing the 636 port on each DC,
can anyone suggest a method for an unprivledged client
to discover whether or not LDAPS should be available
on a specific DC?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
OT
As I said before there is not universal truth , that is only truth if
you are using decimal system ;)
999,998 + 2 = 9b
;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura A.
Robinson
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 12:55 PM
To:
Thanks for your reply. I understand what you say and I accept that
migrating DomainB is the only correct way forward.
After I have migrated DomainB to a new forest, I will collapse DomainB so
that only DomainA is left standing and therefore leave my original forest in
good shape.
Thanks and
I forgot tomention that we run an "rsync" on
this directory that overwrites the file owner's name with the user under which
this process runs...
- Original Message -
From:
J
B
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 9:57
AM
Subject:
Turn on security auditing.On 10/5/06, J B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Argh! On one of our file servers, there is a
public directory that allows any authenticated user to do anything within it
(minus changing permissions). MP3 files and folders appear there every so
often and are removed
Install R2 and filter MP3s. ;)
Thanks,
Anthony Scott
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kurt Falde
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 2:19 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Who keeps creating this folder files?!
I was hoping that there was some way to see who
created it rather than wait until it happened again, or wait until someone
accessed it...
I'll have to settle for the auditing
though.
Thanks!
- Original Message -
From:
Brian
Desmond
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Mark Parris
Base IT Ltd
Active Directory Consultancy
Tel +44(0)7801 690596
-Original Message-
From: Tim Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 09:24:25
To:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Not receiving email from this list
I get some; but many are blank
only 10 types of people understand binary...
one type does understand and the other type does not understand
Met vriendelijke groeten / Kind regards,
Ing. Jorge de Almeida Pinto
Senior Infrastructure Consultant
MVP Windows Server - Directory Services
LogicaCMG Nederland B.V. (BU RTINC
Try FileNotify
freeware at http://www.xtware.com/
Mike Thommes
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kurt Falde
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006
1:19 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Who keeps
creating this folder files?!
OT still
The next version of Sharepoint includes wikis and blogs
.. how many are internalizing all this good AD/ESE/Jetblue stuff in your
own internal orgs and wiki/blogging/podcasting this stuff internally?
Al Mulnick wrote:
Sure, but is that because the common wisdom is wrong or is it
Diffie-qs ptooey ptooey
How come everybody's so loopy today, anyway?
Laura
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 2:22 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: wikis
From: http://www.jimloy.com/algebra/two.htm
a = x[true for some a's and x's]
a+a = a+x [add a to both sides]
2a = a+x [a+a = 2a]
2a-2x = a+x-2x [subtract 2x from both sides]
2(a-x) = a+x-2x [2a-2x = 2(a-x)]
2(a-x) = a-x [x-2x = -x]
Okay,
then I'd recommend item #2 in my last response- rather than spending a bunch of
time trying to figure out who's doing it (which could be multiple people), why
not just prevent it in the first place? :-)
Laura
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J
We use Exchange 2003 running on Win2k3 server Standard Edition strictly
for distribution groups where all user objects have external SMTP
addresses - no Exchange mailboxes, etc. We have a simple single forest,
single site AD Win2k R2 domain.
A message addressed to one of our AD distribution
Sorry, Mark - but that was blank!
On 10/5/06, Mark Parris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay,
this is now my third time recommending FSRM in response to this query; are my
replies not getting through to the list? *Seriously*, just address the
issueby using FSRM and not allowing .mp3 files to be saved on the server
in the first place. If anybody complains, you'll have your
There isn't really a way to do it without attempting to connect. Also,
remember that SSL has to be negotiated between the client and server. The
server may be perfectly capable of doing SSL, but if the client doesn't
trust the server's certificate or attempts to contact the server with a name
Which do you want to know about - the internalizing it or sharing it? And of course, since we don't have it (as noted earlier by Mr Shirley (aka former garage door operator of building 7), anything internalized is suspect anyway right?
A perfectionist would say that the information should be
My first instinct is to say please step away from the keyboard but that's just to make me chuckle. :)
It looks like the old server, FTP1 was configured as a time server? Or was it an AD domain controller?
The answer to that guides the rest of the conversation, but the best thing to do
are you by any chance trying to promote a R2 DC? If yes, use ADPREP from the
SECOND CD from the R2 distribution set
Met vriendelijke groeten / Kind regards,
Ing. Jorge de Almeida Pinto
Senior Infrastructure Consultant
MVP Windows Server - Directory Services
LogicaCMG Nederland B.V. (BU RTINC
There are two types of people in the world- those who understand binary and
those who don't.
That's what the t-shirt I got for my birthday says, anyway. :-)
Laura
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Almeida Pinto,
Jorge de
Sent: Thursday, October 05,
AAARGH! TEN types! TEN!
I need a nap.
_
From: Laura A. Robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 8:34 PM
To: 'ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] MORE OT OT: wikis
There are two types of people in the world- those who understand binary
TRIPLE AAARGH!!!
10! 10!
I give up; I'm dain bramaged today.
_
From: Laura A. Robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 8:34 PM
To: 'ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] MORE OT OT: wikis
There are two types of people in the world-
LDAPS records aren't published by DCs, only LDAP records. I can assure you
if it were that easy, David wouldn't have had an issue. From what I have
seen, if a secure LDAP connection is required, the internal routines from
MSFT simply locate a DC and go to the port. If LDAPS isn't hot, the
You Had Me At EHLO... : New Exchange fixes may disrupt Blackberry,
Goodlink and other services:
http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2006/04/28/426707.aspx
Users cannot send e-mail messages from a mobile device or from a shared
mailbox in Exchange 2000 Server and in Exchange Server 2003:
Magic 8 ball?Security event logs are great things, learning how to search them for the right data can be invaluable and increase the security at your company drastically. It will mean that instead of saying Who did this?, you will know who did it. Instead of going When did that happen?, you'll
There are three types of mathematicians, those who
can count, and those who can't.
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Laura A. Robinson wrote:
TRIPLE AAARGH!!!
10! 10!
I give up; I'm dain bramaged today.
_
From: Laura A. Robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Oh crap! Brian Puhl, you reading? Tony says E2k7 is a beta product, I
hope you didn't load that schema on our main forest? Too late to get it
backed out (via forest restore)?
Thanks for the heads up Tony,
BrettSh [msft]
P.S. - Does anyone think I'm as funny as I think I am ... probably not
I can completely understand Microsoft's point, don't get me wrong.I guess it just kinda gets my goat that they're so tired of people using VLE keys as the new favorite of license violators that they're going to put the onus on the business owners to pay for a new server just to manage Microsoft's
No Way! Nobody told us E2k7 is beta! When did that happen? Well, we're
supposed to do a forest recovery periodically to exercise the doc's anyways
(usually in a lab) - We can just roll back CORP this weekend...
We should see how long it's going to take to move the ~20K mailboxes back to
Ti
OEMs pre-activate.
(off topic)
Matt Hargraves wrote:
I can completely understand Microsoft's point, don't get me wrong.
I guess it just kinda gets my goat that they're so tired of people
using VLE keys as the new favorite of license violators that they're
going to put the onus on the
87 matches
Mail list logo
