We ended up writing out own. Not because the products that are out there
aren't good, they are. We just needed something more proprietary that we could
customize. Right now it simply does billing and customer management but we
will expand it as needed. It also works with Miktrotik routers
*nods* Was just hoping to get a bunch of free awesomesauce.
Yeah, but by having interoperable gear, I miss out on optimal gear.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Rory Conaway via Af af@afmug.com
To:
Did you look at VMWare's partner program ?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af af@afmug.com
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 12:53:04 AM
Subject: Re:
It was, not anymore. What would be a good cost that you would pay for? i.e. I
was thinking of my team programming up one for WISPs J
Dennis Burgess, Link Technologies, Inc.
314-735-0270
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jason McKemie via Af
Sent: Tuesday, October 21,
Hey my Internet is getting faster...
http://www.networkworld.com/article/2836232/lan-wan/100g-ethernet-bringing-large-hadron-collider-closer-than-ever-to-us-researchers.html?google_editors_picks=true
Jaime Solorza
What's wrong with xen, on a beefy, redundant platform? on a properly
configured dom0, it can't be beat... do both PVM and HVM virtualization on
the same system.
totally free, GPL licensed.
My preferred dom0 is a debian amd64 based system. Most of amazon's back-end
runs on xen.
There are ISPs
Never been a Xen fan, don't know why. I was OpenVZ back in the day and now I'm
VMWare.
VMWare is certainly easy to install and manage.
Does Xen have something comparable to VMWare's Fault Tolerant mode where host
failure doesn't result in the guest going down?
-
Mike Hammett
openVZ is much more like a freebsd jail, all the guests have to run the
same kernel as the host.
with a xen PVM you can run any kernel you want, as long as it's recent.
in HVM mode (using QEMU for full emulation, with VT-x, etc) you can run
guest OSes totally different from the host OS. I have
https://code.google.com/p/ganeti/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ganeti
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Mike Hammett via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
Never been a Xen fan, don't know why. I was OpenVZ back in the day and now
I'm VMWare.
VMWare is certainly easy to install and manage.
Does Xen
Well... Less than what ookla wants for their thing.
The issue really boils down to the frailties of a browser-based speed
test running on questionable hardware versus a known quantity (btest or
equivalent) and having to put in hardware in inconvenient places.
bp
On 10/22/2014 5:28 AM,
What kind of data do you want? We were thinking a simple brandable speedtest
site..
Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc.
den...@linktechs.net mailto:den...@linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 –
www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On
It was, not anymore. What would be a good cost that you would pay for? i.e.
I was thinking of my team programming up one for WISPs J
Include it with towercoverage.com account
:D hehehe..
Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc.
den...@linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 – www.linktechs.net
-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt via Af
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 10:12 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest
Anybody using these yet? Results?
Paul McCall, Pres.
PDMNet / Florida Broadband
658 Old Dixie Highway
Vero Beach, FL 32962
772-564-6800 office
772-473-0352 cell
www.pdmnet.comhttp://www.pdmnet.com/
pa...@pdmnet.netmailto:pa...@pdmnet.net
Not really. For example, all my radios are now M but there was a time up until
recently where I was stuck with APs in 5.7-5.8GHz because I still had some
clients. Eventually those radios either die off or get swapped into areas
where legacy is okay. But it was much cheaper and more
Excellent.
Not as good at Wimax through obstructions (trees) but far better
throughput.
Not as good through trees as 2.4 (higher loss) but better performance
due to low noise floor. A -60 2.4 shot with a SNR of 5dB ends up -68dB
with a SNR of 15dB, with the expected performance result.
Please incorporate a limit on the number of tests a user can run in a
given period. And rule for installers/techs to bypass the limit.
I see some customers have OCD and run them in threes every three hours!
On 10/22/2014 9:47 AM, Dennis Burgess via Af wrote:
What kind of data do you want?
MOS?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Keefe John via Af af@afmug.com
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 10:53:45 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest replacements?
latency and jitter.
On
We have done a 50+ unit ePMP forklift yesterday/today and are having some
issues right at the edge of the 90 degree sector coverage. We have the sectors
installed at 0,90,180, 270 degrees - very precisely - we had great landmarks
to use for a guide at each degree)
(week signals right at
That would be nice as well. I also like the idea of limiting how many
times these can be run in a given time period, some people do have a
tendency to sit there and test until they get the result they're looking
for.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Mike Hammett via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
Nope. No wildcards. Just https://x.x.x.x
Craig
Quoting Randy Cosby via Af af@afmug.com:
Not using wildcards are you? They don't work.
On 10/21/2014 3:49 PM, Craig Baird via Af wrote:
I tried entering exceptions (as http://x.x.x.x as well as
https://x.x.x.x). No go. Still gives the
Speedtest site has to sit on our network, so we eliminate any problem on the
net and can show customer that it is performing within our network fine.
Branable is must.
This is what ookla gives:
CLIENT IP ADDRESS
,CLIENT LOCATION,
TEST DATE
SERVER
,downloadDOWNLOAD
,uploadUPLOAD
I heard somewhere at WISPApalooza that the M series does 5.2 band now? Is
that smoke and mirrors?
Sam
--
--
*Sam Lambie*
Taosnet Wireless Tech.
575-758-7598 Office
www.Taosnet.com http://www.newmex.com
I have seen this. Annoys me seeing them on the reports. Speedtest every 30
seconds lol.
-Tim
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jason McKemie via Af
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 9:01 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest replacements?
That would be nice as
Firmware 5.5.10 (actually, one of its betas was the first to offer it).
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Sam Lambie via Af af@afmug.com
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 11:30:14 AM
Subject:
I would be interested in this as well Dennis. $500 seems fair.
-Tim
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Tushar Patel via Af
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 9:20 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest replacements?
Speedtest site has to sit on our network, so we
We had a tower knocked down by a straight line wind last Monday. We got the new
tower up Saturday, temporary equipment online Sunday and the final install
Monday afternoon.
I replaced 2 5GHz feeds, 3 120* 17dBi 802.11g/10MHz sectors and one 15dBi
802.11g/5MHz omni. Had about 16 customers on
Works quite nicely. I've got a few out there. Nice to have 500+ MHz between
feeds.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett via Af
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Rocket M5 and 5.2 band?
Firmware 5.5.10 (actually, one of
Is there anything that can be done to fix the message threading (or lack
thereof) with this new list?
Prior to the move to Amazon, things *mostly* threaded nicely based on
subject, however now I'm seeing multiple separate threads related to the
same discussion.
I'm using Thunderchicken and
Works fine for me on Zimbra.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Rory McCann via Af af@afmug.com
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 11:39:16 AM
Subject: [AFMUG] List Threading
Is there
Ok, I have a radio on the bench with 5.5.10 loaded and all I see is the 5.8
band in AP mode. what am I missing?
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Glen Waldrop via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
Works quite nicely. I've got a few out there. Nice to have 500+ MHz
between feeds.
- Original
I don't know. I've got ~9 Nanobridge M5 out there feeding towers on short hops,
all listed UNII1 and half the links are running it.
Is this possibly an older unit before the UNII 2 band was enabled from factory?
I wonder if the update key has to be entered to access UNII 1.
- Original
*shrugs* I've heard a thing or two about needing to have had the DFS key
entered (for older radios) before doing 5.5.10 else it won't work... despite
not having anything to do with DFS.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message
I’ve heard of this on the forums, that some units will not allow access even
after firmware upgrade based on some type of regulatory lockdown hard coded in
them.. I would open a ticket with UBNT for more details on what might be needed
to unlock them.
Peter Kranz
Founder/CEO - Unwired Ltd
http://community.ubnt.com/t5/airMAX-General-Discussion/FCC-UNII-2-Approval-and-Label-Request-Procedure/td-p/274828
- Original Message -
From: Sam Lambie via Af
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 11:51 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Rocket M5 and 5.2 band?
Where
I was just going to get that...
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Glen Waldrop via Af af@afmug.com
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 11:52:18 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Rocket M5 and 5.2 band?
thanks guys.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Mike Hammett via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
I was just going to get that...
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL
https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb
You can't keep up with the speed of my Precision M90 1.8GHz Core 2 Duo and
SSD!!!
Muhahahaha!
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett via Af
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 11:53 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Rocket M5 and 5.2 band?
I was just going to
hehe...
As much as I'm sure many assume otherwise... I don't stare at the lists all
day. ;-)
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Glen Waldrop via Af af@afmug.com
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 22,
I've been running my butt off.
I'm installing Windows on a laptop, watching Star Trek and the list. Taking a
slow day.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett via Af
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 11:56 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Rocket M5 and 5.2 band?
Nice job. I had a similar affair the week before WISPAPALOOZA.
Regards,
Chuck
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Glen Waldrop via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
We had a tower knocked down by a straight line wind last Monday. We got
the new tower up Saturday, temporary equipment online Sunday and
So only most of the day? :P
From: Af [af-boun...@afmug.com] on behalf of Mike Hammett via Af [af@afmug.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 11:56 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Rocket M5 and 5.2 band?
hehe...
As much as I'm sure many assume
No comment. ;-)
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Mathew Howard via Af af@afmug.com
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 11:59:22 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Rocket M5 and 5.2 band?
So only most
I was hoping it might be usable to replace a UBNT 3.65 link at 18 miles that is
getting me only about 35 to 40Mbit of throughput. 60 to 70 Mbit would be a
help. Not sure if that is a reasonable expectation
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mark Radabaugh via Af
Sent:
Thanks. :)
It appears I may have overstated my new bandwidth availability... I think it is
good enough to leave alone for now though. Still more bandwidth available than
they pull.
- Original Message -
From: Chuck Hogg via Af
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 22,
Me either.
We're getting 8.9 miles with the 5 GHz version, and based on power
levels and the antennas we're using, I could see the 5 GHz going 18
miles with the right antennas. We're getting a little over 90 Mbps
aggregate with our setup as is; and only running in 256QAM 10-15 % of
the
mtr -c 10 -rw/ csv output (don't remember that command flag:])
Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com http://www.spitwspots.com
On 10/22/2014 07:53 AM, Keefe John via Af wrote:
latency and jitter.
On 10/22/2014 10:52 AM, Mike Hammett via Af wrote:
Forward and
We have a dragonwave that has latency issues that coincide with traffic peak
times. As our traffic peaks so does that latency at 180ms. Any ideas that could
cause this?
Signal is -38
Current HAAM Mode hc50_364_256qam
Thanks,
Josh Heide
Velociter Wireless
(office) 209-838-1221
(fax)
So it's a Horizon Compact?
What is the total bandwidth, and what percentage are you using? Have you
set up any QOS? 180 ms sounds like a lot; especially when ours are
typically less than 1 ms.
-38 is right in the game. What are the other parameters besides signal
level?
bp
On 10/22/2014
How much bandwidth are you pushing through it?
Mark
On 10/22/14, 2:18 PM, Joshua Heide via Af wrote:
We have a dragonwave that has latency issues that coincide with
traffic peak times. As our traffic peaks so does that latency at
180ms. Any ideas that could cause this?
Signal is -38
This would be my preference. I have an issue with paying annual license
fees for something that has a static purpose and doesn't need updating.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Bill Prince via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
Or... You could do a one-time fee with a very limited or no updates for a
I didn't know the 5GHz Power Bridges ever had the ability to go that low
(legally).
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Heith Petersen via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
I assume that this does not apply to the Power Bridges. I am scared to
update the few that are running 5.2 on older firmware to find
Could the routers at each end be the limiting factor? What is their CPU
utilization when the link is loaded? What happens to latency if you stress
the link at 200 Mbps with a speed test? Those radios should be able to do
close to 400 Mbps all day long with no latency.
PC
Blaze Broadband
I dont like that theyre not limiting power in those bands automatically, I
thought they were supposed to
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Jason McKemie via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
I didn't know the 5GHz Power Bridges ever had the ability to go that low
(legally).
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 1:44
We have a dragonwave that has latency issues that coincide with traffic peak
times. As our traffic peaks so does that latency at 180ms. Any ideas that
could cause this?
What does bridging table look like at time it occurs?
They don’t. That’s why I’m retiring them to.
Rory
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jason McKemie via Af
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 12:18 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Rocket M5 and 5.2 band?
I didn't know the 5GHz Power Bridges ever had the
I would be satisfied with them just limiting the EIRP to regulatory levels,
but ATPC would tickle my pickle
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Rory Conaway via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
They don’t. That’s why I’m retiring them to.
Rory
*From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of
No routers between, just switches.
-Tim
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Paul Conlin via Af
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 12:22 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Dragonwave latency issues
Could the routers at each end be the limiting factor? What is their CPU
I wrote in my last article that these were probably some of Ubiquiti’s best
quality products. I never had one serviced and now have a collection of them
in our back room all the way back to the original products. Right now we need
both the backhaul capacity and the PB-400’s are almost twice
Rg58u or rg58au
On Oct 22, 2014 10:06 AM, Matt via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
What version of RG-58 has a braided center conductor and foil in the
jacket?
The units have a diagnostic tool that will give you a table with
bandwidth utilization at ( I think) one second intervals. Try running
the diagnostic tool while it's having issues and you will probably see
something. I think it's called merlin.exe
Mark
On 10/22/14, 4:14 PM, Timothy D.
I had problems with water ingress on a couple power bridges. Not sure if
it was just a bad batch as I've got a few that have been up for a long time
with no issues. I was actually pretty impressed with the build quality on
the power stations, although the mounts sucked.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at
We did a 50+ ePMP customer swapout the past two days and had some customers
that were borderline. We were using Brand X dishes for most of the swapouts
with pretty good results. We have a few links that were not about -76 to -78
and decided to try Beehive Manufacturing's bigger dish with the
Thanks Paul. I guess my special gain enhancing paint really does work...
From: Paul McCall via Af
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 2:23 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] Kudus to Chuck and Beehive ePMP dishes
We did a 50+ ePMP customer swapout the past two days and had some customers
Is it really a paint? Any concern of it fading?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Oct 22, 2014 4:29 PM, Chuck McCown via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
Thanks Paul. I guess my special gain enhancing paint really does
work...
Backpressure from the switches in terms of flow-control can show as latency
on dragonwave links.
Disable any QOS features on the dragonwave if you are using them.
Email dragonwave support
Peter Kranz
Founder/CEO - Unwired Ltd
http://www.unwiredltd.com/ www.UnwiredLtd.com
Desk:
I heard it was magnets doing the magic. I’m worried they will demagnetize over
time.
PC
Blaze Broadband
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman via Af
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 4:35 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Kudus to Chuck and Beehive
Was this a Canopy 2.4 FSK pop you upgraded? How are you liking the
ePMP as a replacement?
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Paul McCall via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
We did a 50+ ePMP customer swapout the past two days and had some customers
that were borderline. We were using “Brand X” dishes
Riddle me this Batman, how to tweak 2.4 over 5 Ghz on ePMP Que?
What? Was? Quoi? Lokho? you talking about Willis?
Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems Architect
915-861-1390
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Paul McCall via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
We did a 50+ ePMP customer swapout the past
or change polarity in the next thousand years or so
Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems Architect
915-861-1390
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Paul Conlin via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
I heard it was magnets doing the magic. I’m worried they will demagnetize
over time.
PC
Blaze Broadband
never seen a braided center conductorthis one has braided jacket, foil
and solid conductor
http://www.alliedelec.com/search/productdetail.aspx?sku=70004467mkwid=mExalE1Qpcrid=48651000259gclid=Cj0KEQjwq52iBRDEvrC12Jnz6coBEiQA2otXAv9hQhqyx-JKxtlF0NMHsfVaUEz80QOz_DP-9jcqL28aAsqY8P8HAQ
Jaime
Yes, we have forklifted 5 or 6 towers now from a Canopy 100 series 2.4. In
general, we have been happy. There is a lot to learn on ePMP planning and best
practices vs. the Canopy 100 series set it and forget it. The Frequency
reuse and GPS does seem to work pretty well on ePMP.
We have
It's not paint, it's Beehive special honey.
bp
On 10/22/2014 1:35 PM, Josh Luthman via Af wrote:
Is it really a paint? Any concern of it fading?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Oct 22, 2014 4:29 PM, Chuck McCown via Af
Has anyone tried this one on for size? 2000mW and triple chain (RF ports)
using 802.11 ac?
http://i.mt.lv/routerboard/files/NetMetal_4-140917153927.pdf
maybe our International friends can shed some light on these...
Even if you could deploy here in my desert world, I believe our heat would
fry a
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Paul McCall via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
Yes, we have forklifted 5 or 6 towers now from a Canopy 100 series 2.4. In
general, we have been happy. There is a lot to learn on ePMP planning and
best practices vs. the Canopy 100 series set it and forget it. The
I have asked about that too, and I just hear cricketsthe only comment I
head was 450 had better filters but I asked for follow-up comparison data vs.
a guess and got more crickets.
-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt via Af
Sent:
Is it the SLH-24EPMP that has the 2.4 GHz gain enhancing paint? Just want to
make sure I order the right thing.
Thanks,
Dave
On Oct 22, 2014, at 4:29 PM, Chuck McCown via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
Thanks Paul. I guess my special gain enhancing paint really does work...
From: Paul McCall
I was going to post an innapropriate screenshot about the source of
special honey from xhamster, but i opted for the high road
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Bill Prince via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
It's not paint, it's Beehive special honey.
bp
On 10/22/2014 1:35 PM, Josh Luthman via Af
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HW6aG-IJ2SA
Watch closely when AF5 attached to railing...crossed hose clamps.
Guess they have no strong winds other that what I hear on the video.
Chuck's mounts would work great here
Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems Architect
915-861-1390
Gain enhancing paint snicker now I feel bad...
From: David Sovereen via Af
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 3:32 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Kudus to Chuck and Beehive ePMP dishes
Is it the SLH-24EPMP that has the 2.4 GHz gain enhancing paint? Just want to
make sure
Will it come off if you apply some rotor wash? :)
Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com http://www.spitwspots.com
On 10/22/2014 01:46 PM, Chuck McCown via Af wrote:
Gain enhancing paint snicker now I feel bad...
*From:* David Sovereen via Af
Those are the special kind of hose clamps. Kind of like your arm
holding down the mattress on top of the car while driving down the road.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Jaime Solorza via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HW6aG-IJ2SA
Watch closely when AF5 attached to
we (not me) ha a couple of 2' Radiowaves hight performance antennas on a
pipe held in place with hose clamps, but it was legit and safe because
there were also zipties
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Cameron Crum via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
Those are the special kind of hose clamps. Kind of
oh yeah that makes it kosher...super strong if you add tape
Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems Architect
915-861-1390
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:10 PM, That One Guy via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
we (not me) ha a couple of 2' Radiowaves hight performance antennas on a
pipe held in place with hose
Is it cheaper than Viagra or Cialis ? we can make a killing ...opps wait
...this is not off list?
Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems Architect
915-861-1390
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Chuck McCown via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
Gain enhancing paint snicker now I feel bad...
450 will probably win if only because of the short fragment
retransmissions. I mean they're both MIMO OFDM radios, so SNR, SNR and
more SNR. That said, whatever they've been doing with 13.2 beta so far
is awesome for throughput and maintaining sessions.
On 10/22/2014 4:24 PM, Paul McCall via
That looks... complicated. Good videos though.
On 10/22/2014 3:09 PM, Jonathan Mandziara via Af wrote:
Check out the new Force 110 Assembly Instruction Video.
http://www.cambiumnetworks.com/support/epmp/how-to-videos
Best,
Cambium Jonathan**
I like the ad copy from the cambium spam today.. sounds pretty tempting..
The More AP's You Buy redirect_url-12--
data-bislr-page=website_page_CBD02AAB-775C-49AE-8262-E3215A54CB51
style=color: #024984; text-decoration: underline;Sign up today!
Peter Kranz
Founder/CEO - Unwired Ltd
Pure poetry.
Chris Wright
Velociter Wirelesshttp://www.velociter.net/
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Peter Kranz via Af
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 3:47 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] Pretty sweet new cambium program ;)
I like the ad copy from the cambium
In the face of persistent interference, neither will do well, but the
450 will do better simply because of the small frames.
bp
On 10/22/2014 2:18 PM, Matt via Af wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Paul McCall via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
Yes, we have forklifted 5 or 6 towers now from a
It's more than filters. I would expect that the ePMP would do better
in a low-noise environment because the frames are pretty large.
However, if there is a lot of interference, I would expect the PMP450 to
get better because it can fit a bunch of ATM-like frames in between bits
of
I have a complaining customer who I’m becoming convinced is exceeding the
NAT connection table in their router. Can I trust the numbers here:
http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/lanwan/router-charts/bar/77-max-simul-conn
This would indicate a mid-range route like a typical N600 probably supports
remember they share ram in these thing with features, dlink was infamous
for this.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Ken Hohhof via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
I have a complaining customer who I’m becoming convinced is exceeding the
NAT connection table in their router. Can I trust the numbers
I actually saw an install that had a 2' dish on a 6' pipe, hoseclamped at
4' and 2' and it was still holding 3 yrs later.
Regards,
Chuck
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Jaime Solorza via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
oh yeah that makes it kosher...super strong if you add tape
Jaime Solorza
A Mikrotik will hold many, many thousands of connections. Don't know
what the limit is, but I have seen tens of thousands of connections in
the connections list.
Also, there is an option in the 13.2 (build 34) firmware that allows you
to bump up the NAT table to 8096 (not to mention that you
Also, there is an option in the 13.2 (build 34) firmware that allows you
to bump up the NAT table to 8096 (not to mention that you can now watch
it via SNMP).
I'm not doing NAT in the SM.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Prince via Af
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 7:45 PM
To:
I wanted VSA, which was reasonable for a small cluster. Then they
replaced it with vSAN and the licensing cost went to 5x more per node.
There's no way I'm giving VMware any money at all after this, I will
find another way.
On 10/22/2014 7:03 AM, Mike Hammett via Af wrote:
Did you look at
Thanks Bill !
-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Bill Prince via Af
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 7:43 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Kudus to Chuck and Beehive ePMP dishes
It's more than filters. I would expect that the ePMP would do
does anyone have firmware 13.1.4 for ptp 450?...its not on cambium support page
only beta 13.2
thanks
I'm fairly certain they didn't, legally... but they did have the ability.
From: Af [af-boun...@afmug.com] on behalf of Jason McKemie via Af [af@afmug.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 2:17 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Rocket M5 and 5.2 band?
I
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
