22, 2018 4:10 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Raspberry PI
Find a 555 timer ... I used many in the olden day when radioshacks
were king LOL!
On 02/22/2018 05:05 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
I am thinking of using some shift registers instead of using the PI
output directly
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Raspberry PI
Your other option would be to find a way to setup an internal DMA controller to
trigger off of an external input. From your clock source, you would trigger
individual DMAs from a static buffer to GPIO connected to some sort of circuit
to invert the Mark bits
Your other option would be to find a way to setup an internal DMA
controller to trigger off of an external input. From your clock source, you
would trigger individual DMAs from a static buffer to GPIO connected to
some sort of circuit to invert the Mark bits. The DMA controller would loop
over the
1/4 microsecond is too much jitter?
I don't think the pi is going to be your solution.
bp
On 2/22/2018 5:22 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
I have about 250 nS of jitter on my output signal.
: Re: [AFMUG] OT Raspberry PI
This calls out for an FPGA solution.
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 10:45 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account)
<li...@packetflux.com> wrote:
You can get a fpga board which might be suitable for this project (after
adding appropriate clocks) for around $20 anymore.
2018 7:48:19 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Raspberry PI
Yes, and one would think that Metaswitch would have a 10 MHz input.
From: Lewis Bergman
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 6:44 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Raspberry PI
Every Rubidium GPS timing piece of gear
Yes, and one would think that Metaswitch would have a 10 MHz input.
From: Lewis Bergman
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 6:44 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Raspberry PI
Every Rubidium GPS timing piece of gear I have ever seen outputs 10MHz. Every
device that I have ever seen
O, I was googling for cheap fpga but did not find anything that cheap.
From: Forrest Christian (List Account)
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 9:45 PM
To: af
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Raspberry PI
You can get a fpga board which might be suitable for this project (after adding
appropriate
wrote:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECos
>
> On 2/22/18 5:52 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
> > That looks great. Did not find a cost anywhere.
> > *From:* Bill Prince
> > *Sent:* Thursday, February 22, 2018 6:47 PM
> > *To:* Motorola III
> > *Subject:* R
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECos
On 2/22/18 5:52 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
That looks great. Did not find a cost anywhere.
*From:* Bill Prince
*Sent:* Thursday, February 22, 2018 6:47 PM
*To:* Motorola III
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Raspberry PI
Try this: http://www.ecoscentric.com/news/press
1 will be
>>>> a D flip flop and a few AND/NAND gates. So that ought to get me super low
>>>> jitter.
>>>>
>>>> Trying for stratum I with rubidium hold-over isochronous performance at
>>>> the end of the day. For cheap.
>>>>
I with rubidium hold-over isochronous performance at
>>> the end of the day. For cheap.
>>>
>>> *From:* Forrest Christian (List Account)
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 22, 2018 6:27 PM
>>> *To:* af
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Raspberry PI
>>
.
>>
>> Trying for stratum I with rubidium hold-over isochronous performance at
>> the end of the day. For cheap.
>>
>> *From:* Forrest Christian (List Account)
>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 22, 2018 6:27 PM
>> *To:* af
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG]
th rubidium hold-over isochronous performance at
> the end of the day. For cheap.
>
> *From:* Forrest Christian (List Account)
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 22, 2018 6:27 PM
> *To:* af
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Raspberry PI
>
> Ok, I think you missed this portion of my e
t;> the end of the day. For cheap.
>>
>> *From:* Forrest Christian (List Account)
>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 22, 2018 6:27 PM
>> *To:* af
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Raspberry PI
>>
>> Ok, I think you missed this portion of my email last time:
>>
to work. Have to sudo if you use negative nice numbers.
> It made zero difference in my jitter. I went from 19 to –20 on nice
> and no change.
> *From:* ch...@wbmfg.com
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 22, 2018 4:29 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subje
That looks great. Did not find a cost anywhere.
From: Bill Prince
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 6:47 PM
To: Motorola III
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Raspberry PI
Try this: http://www.ecoscentric.com/news/press-170314.shtml
--bp
--
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018
er. I went from 19 to –20 on nice and
>> no change.
>>
>> *From:* ch...@wbmfg.com
>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 22, 2018 4:29 PM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Raspberry PI
>>
>> The problem is there is a crap ton of stuff out ther
Trying for stratum I with rubidium hold-over isochronous performance at
> the end of the day. For cheap.
>
> *From:* Forrest Christian (List Account)
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 22, 2018 6:27 PM
> *To:* af
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Raspberry PI
>
> Ok, I think you missed
To: af
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Raspberry PI
Ok, I think you missed this portion of my email last time:
"I'm skeptical that you'll be able to generate a bitstream with enough accuracy
under Linux, without extreme programming measures.
I'd suggest a digilent chipkit wifire and the arduin
Ok, I think you missed this portion of my email last time:
*"I'm skeptical that you'll be able to generate a bitstream with enough
accuracy under Linux, without extreme programming measures.I'd suggest a
digilent chipkit wifire and the arduino ide for this. You should be able
to bitbang at
, February 22, 2018 5:58 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Raspberry PI
On 2/22/18 3:36 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
Had the command syntax wrong.
But got nice to work. Have to sudo if you use negative nice numbers.
It made zero difference in my jitter. I went from 19 to –20 on nice
Pi is not that fast when you talk about the gpio. While trying to measure
some ac signals i was amazed i could only measure 4 inputs and still get a
resolution of .5 amps on each one.
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018, 6:59 PM Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 2/22/18 3:36 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com
On 2/22/18 3:36 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
Had the command syntax wrong.
But got nice to work. Have to sudo if you use negative nice numbers.
It made zero difference in my jitter. I went from 19 to –20 on nice and
no change.
nice really only helps prioritize (or not) compared to other
2018 4:29 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Raspberry PI
The problem is there is a crap ton of stuff out there that needs
network sync. And it all has a T1 as an input.
But most T1 trunking circuits are getting replaced with SIP.
So, I am building a cheap and dir
How much?
From: Colin Stanners
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 5:21 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Raspberry PI
I found these devices that do what you want, but they look fancy and expensive,
I'm guessing that you wish to get around the latter.
https://www.engageinc.com
up and running
>
> Where is Exar when you need them
>
> *From:* Adam Moffett
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 22, 2018 4:21 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Raspberry PI
>
> Tell whoever's got the T1 that 1967 is way behind us and get a new
>
22, 2018 4:58 PM
To: Motorola III
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Raspberry PI
Pretty sure you need RTOS to accomplish this.That will get pretty close to
bare metal.
-bp
--
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 3:36 PM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
Had the command syn
nice numbers.
>
> It made zero difference in my jitter. I went from 19 to –20 on nice and
> no change.
>
> *From:* ch...@wbmfg.com
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 22, 2018 4:29 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Raspberry PI
>
> The problem is there is a crap
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 4:21 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Raspberry PI
Tell whoever's got the T1 that 1967 is way behind us and get a new interface.
Problem eliminated LOL
-- Original Message --
From: ch...@wbmfg.com
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: 2/22/2018 6:16:45 PM
: Thursday, February 22, 2018 4:21 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Raspberry PI
Tell whoever's got the T1 that 1967 is way behind us and get a new interface.
Problem eliminated LOL
-- Original Message --
From: ch...@wbmfg.com
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: 2/22/2018 6:16:45 PM
Subject: Re
C
I just ran
nice ./blink -20
and it did not seem to change the jitter at all.
-Original Message-
From: Josh Reynolds
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 4:19 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Raspberry PI
Well, first of all what is your program written in?
On Thu, Feb 22
Tell whoever's got the T1 that 1967 is way behind us and get a new
interface.
Problem eliminated LOL
-- Original Message --
From: ch...@wbmfg.com
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: 2/22/2018 6:16:45 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Raspberry PI
I have to generate an alternate mark inversion signal
Well, first of all what is your program written in?
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 4:48 PM, wrote:
> Anyone know how to get my program to run on bare metal?
>
> Or at the very least tell Linux that my program is the most important thing
> in the world and service it above all other
I have to generate an alternate mark inversion signal on 1.544 MHz with every
193rd bit following a t1 framing sequence.
Sure wish a 555 could do that.
From: Dave
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 4:10 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Raspberry PI
Find a 555 timer ... I used many
anyhow
*From:* Colin Stanners
*Sent:* Thursday, February 22, 2018 3:59 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Raspberry PI
Other than setting the process priority, you may need a custom kernel.
See
https://medium.com/@metebalci/latency-of-raspberry-pi-3-on-standard-and-real-time-linux
I am thinking of using some shift registers instead of using the PI output
directly as the timing signal.
Use the PI to load them.
I love me some hardware design anyhow
From: Colin Stanners
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 3:59 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Raspberry
Other than setting the process priority, you may need a custom kernel. See
https://medium.com/@metebalci/latency-of-raspberry-pi-3-on-standard-and-real-time-linux-4-9-kernel-2d9c20704495
On Feb 22, 2018 4:48 PM, wrote:
> Anyone know how to get my program to run on bare metal?
You can change the niceness of the process with the "nice" command.
There's preemption in the Linux kernel, but I don't know how to make it
happen.
-- Original Message --
From: ch...@wbmfg.com
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: 2/22/2018 5:48:11 PM
Subject: [AFMUG] OT Raspberry PI
A
Anyone know how to get my program to run on bare metal?
Or at the very least tell Linux that my program is the most important thing in
the world and service it above all other things.
I am trying to create a timing signal with the Pi. It is doing it but the
jitter is pretty bad.
I have
40 matches
Mail list logo