Re: [AFMUG] VPN Appliance

reet Miami, FL 33155 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net > From: "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> > To: af@afmug.com > Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 2:13:22 PM > Subject: [AFMUG] VPN Appliance > I need a box. T

Re: [AFMUG] VPN Appliance

http://www.stubarea51.net/2015/10/16/10-gbps-of-layer-2-throughput-is-possible-using-mikrotiks-eoip-tunnel/ On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Chuck McCown wrote: > I need a box. TV headend VLAN stream goes in. 1000 Mbps. > > Box encapsulates it and launches it on the public

Re: [AFMUG] VPN Appliance

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] VPN Appliance O*U*C*H OK, need cheap too during experimentation (Cheap, solid, high performance, flawless easy to find, right) Will take a look at UBNT. I don’t know much about their products. From: Rory Conaway <mailto:r...@triadwireless.net> Sent:

Re: [AFMUG] VPN Appliance

------------- > *From: *"Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Sunday, July 3, 2016 6:39:27 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] VPN Appliance > > A couple of x86 routers running Mikrotik L2TP between them? > > > bp >

Re: [AFMUG] VPN Appliance

Pretty sure a CCR routerboard would do IPSEC tunnels at 1Gbps. Maybe $500 version? From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 7:11 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] VPN Appliance None of these are likely to provide the necessary encryption

Re: [AFMUG] VPN Appliance

t; <part15...@gmail.com> To: af@afmug.com Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 6:39:27 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] VPN Appliance A couple of x86 routers running Mikrotik L2TP between them? bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 7/3/2016 4:08 PM, TJ Trout wrote: Any can't you use a CCR1009 with a

Re: [AFMUG] VPN Appliance

Will a CCR1009 do 1Gbps over a secured VPN tunnel? We run a lot of them but most of our tunnels are fairly low bandwidth. Rory From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of TJ Trout Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 4:08 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] VPN Appliance Any can't you use

Re: [AFMUG] VPN Appliance

None other than my own ignorance. From: TJ Trout Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2016 5:08 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] VPN Appliance Any can't you use a CCR1009 with a EOIP, pptp, etc setup? On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: O*U*C*H OK

Re: [AFMUG] VPN Appliance

y, July 03, 2016 4:33 PM *To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] VPN Appliance The best tunneling device I’ve seen is Peplink. The catch being, you would need the 2500 to get 1Gbps but it will go up to 2Gbps and it’s not cheap, $15K on each side alth

Re: [AFMUG] VPN Appliance

at UBNT. I don’t know much about their products. > > *From:* Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net> > *Sent:* Sunday, July 03, 2016 4:33 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] VPN Appliance > > > The best tunneling device I’ve seen is Peplink. The cat

Re: [AFMUG] VPN Appliance

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] VPN Appliance Not really a firewall function. A tunneling appliance. Rock solid, low latency, high capacity. From: Craig Schmaderer Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2016 3:05 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] VPN Appliance Chuck I'm not sure what exactly you

Re: [AFMUG] VPN Appliance

: [AFMUG] VPN Appliance Not really a firewall function. A tunneling appliance. Rock solid, low latency, high capacity. From: Craig Schmaderer<mailto:cr...@skywaveconnect.com> Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2016 3:05 PM To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] VPN Applianc

Re: [AFMUG] VPN Appliance

Not really a firewall function. A tunneling appliance. Rock solid, low latency, high capacity. From: Craig Schmaderer Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2016 3:05 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] VPN Appliance Chuck I'm not sure what exactly you want be pfsense is my favorite firewall. Very

Re: [AFMUG] VPN Appliance

Chuck I'm not sure what exactly you want be pfsense is my favorite firewall. Very very stable. I have it on vms dell hardware or applience hardware rock solid for years. If you want something more name brand but expensive i still use cisco asas all the time but price for performance can be a

[AFMUG] VPN Appliance

I need a box. TV headend VLAN stream goes in. 1000 Mbps. Box encapsulates it and launches it on the public internet. At the far end, another box reverses the situation. Years ago I used Cisco PIX for this type of thing. Looking over pre-baked solutions I see lots of specs about number of