Re: [AFMUG] Pipe mounts

2017-01-19 Thread Keefe John

The Mimosa Fleximount is good for that.


On 1/17/2017 10:09 AM, Mathew Howard wrote:

Since the biggest tower we have is 5", I would like that.

On a somewhat related note, would anyone else be interested in a 
smaller/lighter duty version of the M-TOW? they're overkill for a lot 
of stuff we do... I'm thinking something like 3" max pipe and thinner 
steel. I guess there wouldn't really be a lot of point unless it was a 
fair amount cheaper... having lighter stuff to take up towers would be 
nice in some cases, but that's probably not a good enough reason on 
it's own.


On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 8:05 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com 
<mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>> wrote:


Thanks.
One of my distributors is asking that I go from 4.5” to 5” pipe
ability on all my stuff.  That is a pretty minor change and I will
probably do that.
*From:* George Skorup
*Sent:* Monday, January 16, 2017 6:02 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
    *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Pipe mounts
That was me. The angle-iron leg deal I was talking about, I don't
actually need anything specifically designed for angle-iron, we
simply turn the back clamp inwards. Works perfectly fine. However,
like I said, the back side of the angle is about 5-3/4" if I
remember. That's the tower where we order clamp halves that are 7"
hole to hole center. A couple other examples that I can give...
Angle iron leg, 6-3/4", sloped. Round leg, 8-1/4", sloped. Angle
leg, 12-3/4", sloped. (old AT Long-Lines sites, big
mothertruckers from ground to 125 feet)

We're on so much different shit, we pretty much have to order what
we need for the particular site we'll be working at. And most of
the time on free-standers, the legs get smaller as you go up. So
we might need to put dishes at 100-140 feet and sectors at
240-260, which means two completely different sets of mounts for
one site.

I would say a model that can accommodate up to 4.5" OD and another
for 4.5 to 9" OD, sloped or not. For your 1-to-2 pipe arrangement,
most towers will fall in one of those two. For the big leg sites,
I'm not as worried since, as I mentioned, that's mostly for
mounting dishes lower.

We ordered I don't even know how many of these kits last year. 3'
HP dishes on 4.5" pipes adapted to 6" to 8" legs. Some angle, some
round. Some sloped, some not.

http://www.ciwireless.com/product/welded-pipe-to-pipe-adaptor-set-for-tapered-round-members-2-38-in-5-in-od-pipe-to-4-in-9-in-od-pipe/

<http://www.ciwireless.com/product/welded-pipe-to-pipe-adaptor-set-for-tapered-round-members-2-38-in-5-in-od-pipe-to-4-in-9-in-od-pipe/>

On 1/16/2017 2:38 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:

I have been asked to spin versions of my tower mounts that work
on angle iron legs.  OK, done.  Will be released soon for general
availability.
Now I am getting request for larger units that will fit a 5”
pipe.  We currently will fit a 4.5” pipe.
If I spin a larger version, shall I go 6” or???  Someone recently
suggested 7” center to center on the bolts which would fit over a
6.5” pipe.
Are there some standard tower leg and mounting pipe increments I
need to look at?







Re: [AFMUG] Pipe mounts

2017-01-19 Thread Ken Hohhof
Sinclair CLAMP111 works well on 90 degree angle legs (they also hav e 60 degree 
versions), but at $250 per pair are hideously expensive, also they don’t have 
provisions for sloping legs.

https://www.tessco.com/products/displayProductInfo.do?sku=77637

 

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of George Skorup
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2017 7:02 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Pipe mounts

 

That was me. The angle-iron leg deal I was talking about, I don't actually need 
anything specifically designed for angle-iron, we simply turn the back clamp 
inwards. Works perfectly fine. However, like I said, the back side of the angle 
is about 5-3/4" if I remember. That's the tower where we order clamp halves 
that are 7" hole to hole center. A couple other examples that I can give... 
Angle iron leg, 6-3/4", sloped. Round leg, 8-1/4", sloped. Angle leg, 12-3/4", 
sloped. (old AT Long-Lines sites, big mothertruckers from ground to 125 feet)

We're on so much different shit, we pretty much have to order what we need for 
the particular site we'll be working at. And most of the time on free-standers, 
the legs get smaller as you go up. So we might need to put dishes at 100-140 
feet and sectors at 240-260, which means two completely different sets of 
mounts for one site.

I would say a model that can accommodate up to 4.5" OD and another for 4.5 to 
9" OD, sloped or not. For your 1-to-2 pipe arrangement, most towers will fall 
in one of those two. For the big leg sites, I'm not as worried since, as I 
mentioned, that's mostly for mounting dishes lower.

We ordered I don't even know how many of these kits last year. 3' HP dishes on 
4.5" pipes adapted to 6" to 8" legs. Some angle, some round. Some sloped, some 
not. 
http://www.ciwireless.com/product/welded-pipe-to-pipe-adaptor-set-for-tapered-round-members-2-38-in-5-in-od-pipe-to-4-in-9-in-od-pipe/

On 1/16/2017 2:38 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:

I have been asked to spin versions of my tower mounts that work on angle iron 
legs.  OK, done.  Will be released soon for general availability.  

 

Now I am getting request for larger units that will fit a 5” pipe.  We 
currently will fit a 4.5” pipe.

 

If I spin a larger version, shall I go 6” or???  Someone recently suggested 7” 
center to center on the bolts which would fit over a 6.5” pipe.

 

Are there some standard tower leg and mounting pipe increments I need to look 
at?

 



Re: [AFMUG] Pipe mounts

2017-01-17 Thread Mathew Howard
I have done that in the past... I was thinking something a little heavier
than that, kind of halfway between, but I'm not sure there's really enough
market for it. I guess generally if the satellite feet aren't good enough
it's not a big deal to go all the way to an M-TOW.

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

> I could do a powder coated zinc electroplate version that is made out of
> the same stuff satellite tv antenna mounts are made out of.  Actually, why
> not just use satellite feet with U bolts?
>
> *From:* Mathew Howard
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 17, 2017 9:09 AM
> *To:* af
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Pipe mounts
>
> Since the biggest tower we have is 5", I would like that.
>
> On a somewhat related note, would anyone else be interested in a
> smaller/lighter duty version of the M-TOW? they're overkill for a lot of
> stuff we do... I'm thinking something like 3" max pipe and thinner steel. I
> guess there wouldn't really be a lot of point unless it was a fair amount
> cheaper... having lighter stuff to take up towers would be nice in some
> cases, but that's probably not a good enough reason on it's own.
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 8:05 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks.
>> One of my distributors is asking that I go from 4.5” to 5” pipe ability
>> on all my stuff.  That is a pretty minor change and I will probably do
>> that.
>>
>> *From:* George Skorup
>> *Sent:* Monday, January 16, 2017 6:02 PM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Pipe mounts
>>
>> That was me. The angle-iron leg deal I was talking about, I don't
>> actually need anything specifically designed for angle-iron, we simply turn
>> the back clamp inwards. Works perfectly fine. However, like I said, the
>> back side of the angle is about 5-3/4" if I remember. That's the tower
>> where we order clamp halves that are 7" hole to hole center. A couple other
>> examples that I can give... Angle iron leg, 6-3/4", sloped. Round leg,
>> 8-1/4", sloped. Angle leg, 12-3/4", sloped. (old AT Long-Lines sites, big
>> mothertruckers from ground to 125 feet)
>>
>> We're on so much different shit, we pretty much have to order what we
>> need for the particular site we'll be working at. And most of the time on
>> free-standers, the legs get smaller as you go up. So we might need to put
>> dishes at 100-140 feet and sectors at 240-260, which means two completely
>> different sets of mounts for one site.
>>
>> I would say a model that can accommodate up to 4.5" OD and another for
>> 4.5 to 9" OD, sloped or not. For your 1-to-2 pipe arrangement, most towers
>> will fall in one of those two. For the big leg sites, I'm not as worried
>> since, as I mentioned, that's mostly for mounting dishes lower.
>>
>> We ordered I don't even know how many of these kits last year. 3' HP
>> dishes on 4.5" pipes adapted to 6" to 8" legs. Some angle, some round. Some
>> sloped, some not. http://www.ciwireless.com/prod
>> uct/welded-pipe-to-pipe-adaptor-set-for-tapered-round-member
>> s-2-38-in-5-in-od-pipe-to-4-in-9-in-od-pipe/
>>
>> On 1/16/2017 2:38 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>>
>> I have been asked to spin versions of my tower mounts that work on angle
>> iron legs.  OK, done.  Will be released soon for general availability.
>>
>> Now I am getting request for larger units that will fit a 5” pipe.  We
>> currently will fit a 4.5” pipe.
>>
>> If I spin a larger version, shall I go 6” or???  Someone recently
>> suggested 7” center to center on the bolts which would fit over a 6.5” pipe.
>>
>> Are there some standard tower leg and mounting pipe increments I need to
>> look at?
>>
>>
>>
>


Re: [AFMUG] Pipe mounts

2017-01-17 Thread Chuck McCown
I could do a powder coated zinc electroplate version that is made out of the 
same stuff satellite tv antenna mounts are made out of.  Actually, why not just 
use satellite feet with U bolts?

From: Mathew Howard 
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 9:09 AM
To: af 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Pipe mounts

Since the biggest tower we have is 5", I would like that. 

On a somewhat related note, would anyone else be interested in a 
smaller/lighter duty version of the M-TOW? they're overkill for a lot of stuff 
we do... I'm thinking something like 3" max pipe and thinner steel. I guess 
there wouldn't really be a lot of point unless it was a fair amount cheaper... 
having lighter stuff to take up towers would be nice in some cases, but that's 
probably not a good enough reason on it's own.


On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 8:05 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

  Thanks.
  One of my distributors is asking that I go from 4.5” to 5” pipe ability on 
all my stuff.  That is a pretty minor change and I will probably do that.  

  From: George Skorup 
  Sent: Monday, January 16, 2017 6:02 PM
  To: af@afmug.com 
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Pipe mounts

  That was me. The angle-iron leg deal I was talking about, I don't actually 
need anything specifically designed for angle-iron, we simply turn the back 
clamp inwards. Works perfectly fine. However, like I said, the back side of the 
angle is about 5-3/4" if I remember. That's the tower where we order clamp 
halves that are 7" hole to hole center. A couple other examples that I can 
give... Angle iron leg, 6-3/4", sloped. Round leg, 8-1/4", sloped. Angle leg, 
12-3/4", sloped. (old AT Long-Lines sites, big mothertruckers from ground to 
125 feet)

  We're on so much different shit, we pretty much have to order what we need 
for the particular site we'll be working at. And most of the time on 
free-standers, the legs get smaller as you go up. So we might need to put 
dishes at 100-140 feet and sectors at 240-260, which means two completely 
different sets of mounts for one site.

  I would say a model that can accommodate up to 4.5" OD and another for 4.5 to 
9" OD, sloped or not. For your 1-to-2 pipe arrangement, most towers will fall 
in one of those two. For the big leg sites, I'm not as worried since, as I 
mentioned, that's mostly for mounting dishes lower.

  We ordered I don't even know how many of these kits last year. 3' HP dishes 
on 4.5" pipes adapted to 6" to 8" legs. Some angle, some round. Some sloped, 
some not. 
http://www.ciwireless.com/product/welded-pipe-to-pipe-adaptor-set-for-tapered-round-members-2-38-in-5-in-od-pipe-to-4-in-9-in-od-pipe/


  On 1/16/2017 2:38 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:

I have been asked to spin versions of my tower mounts that work on angle 
iron legs.  OK, done.  Will be released soon for general availability.  

Now I am getting request for larger units that will fit a 5” pipe.  We 
currently will fit a 4.5” pipe.

If I spin a larger version, shall I go 6” or???  Someone recently suggested 
7” center to center on the bolts which would fit over a 6.5” pipe.

Are there some standard tower leg and mounting pipe increments I need to 
look at?




Re: [AFMUG] Pipe mounts

2017-01-17 Thread Mathew Howard
Since the biggest tower we have is 5", I would like that.

On a somewhat related note, would anyone else be interested in a
smaller/lighter duty version of the M-TOW? they're overkill for a lot of
stuff we do... I'm thinking something like 3" max pipe and thinner steel. I
guess there wouldn't really be a lot of point unless it was a fair amount
cheaper... having lighter stuff to take up towers would be nice in some
cases, but that's probably not a good enough reason on it's own.

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 8:05 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

> Thanks.
> One of my distributors is asking that I go from 4.5” to 5” pipe ability on
> all my stuff.  That is a pretty minor change and I will probably do that.
>
> *From:* George Skorup
> *Sent:* Monday, January 16, 2017 6:02 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Pipe mounts
>
> That was me. The angle-iron leg deal I was talking about, I don't actually
> need anything specifically designed for angle-iron, we simply turn the back
> clamp inwards. Works perfectly fine. However, like I said, the back side of
> the angle is about 5-3/4" if I remember. That's the tower where we order
> clamp halves that are 7" hole to hole center. A couple other examples that
> I can give... Angle iron leg, 6-3/4", sloped. Round leg, 8-1/4", sloped.
> Angle leg, 12-3/4", sloped. (old AT Long-Lines sites, big mothertruckers
> from ground to 125 feet)
>
> We're on so much different shit, we pretty much have to order what we need
> for the particular site we'll be working at. And most of the time on
> free-standers, the legs get smaller as you go up. So we might need to put
> dishes at 100-140 feet and sectors at 240-260, which means two completely
> different sets of mounts for one site.
>
> I would say a model that can accommodate up to 4.5" OD and another for 4.5
> to 9" OD, sloped or not. For your 1-to-2 pipe arrangement, most towers will
> fall in one of those two. For the big leg sites, I'm not as worried since,
> as I mentioned, that's mostly for mounting dishes lower.
>
> We ordered I don't even know how many of these kits last year. 3' HP
> dishes on 4.5" pipes adapted to 6" to 8" legs. Some angle, some round. Some
> sloped, some not. http://www.ciwireless.com/product/welded-pipe-to-pipe-
> adaptor-set-for-tapered-round-members-2-38-in-5-in-od-pipe-
> to-4-in-9-in-od-pipe/
>
> On 1/16/2017 2:38 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>
> I have been asked to spin versions of my tower mounts that work on angle
> iron legs.  OK, done.  Will be released soon for general availability.
>
> Now I am getting request for larger units that will fit a 5” pipe.  We
> currently will fit a 4.5” pipe.
>
> If I spin a larger version, shall I go 6” or???  Someone recently
> suggested 7” center to center on the bolts which would fit over a 6.5” pipe.
>
> Are there some standard tower leg and mounting pipe increments I need to
> look at?
>
>
>


Re: [AFMUG] Pipe mounts

2017-01-17 Thread Chuck McCown
Thanks

From: Adam Moffett 
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 5:28 AM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Pipe mounts

We bought a gazillion of these things last year for a project with 10" diameter 
poles:
http://www.commscope.com/catalog/wireless/product_details.aspx?id=2234
It says there the small side is 4-9", but it's waaay smaller than that.  Like 
2-4" maybe.

I see 6" round legs all the time.  Bigger than that I've only seen maybe once 
or twice on a tower leg.  This pole thing was kind of a unique project.



-- Original Message --
From: "George Skorup" <geo...@cbcast.com>
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: 1/16/2017 8:02:11 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Pipe mounts

  That was me. The angle-iron leg deal I was talking about, I don't actually 
need anything specifically designed for angle-iron, we simply turn the back 
clamp inwards. Works perfectly fine. However, like I said, the back side of the 
angle is about 5-3/4" if I remember. That's the tower where we order clamp 
halves that are 7" hole to hole center. A couple other examples that I can 
give... Angle iron leg, 6-3/4", sloped. Round leg, 8-1/4", sloped. Angle leg, 
12-3/4", sloped. (old AT Long-Lines sites, big mothertruckers from ground to 
125 feet)

  We're on so much different shit, we pretty much have to order what we need 
for the particular site we'll be working at. And most of the time on 
free-standers, the legs get smaller as you go up. So we might need to put 
dishes at 100-140 feet and sectors at 240-260, which means two completely 
different sets of mounts for one site.

  I would say a model that can accommodate up to 4.5" OD and another for 4.5 to 
9" OD, sloped or not. For your 1-to-2 pipe arrangement, most towers will fall 
in one of those two. For the big leg sites, I'm not as worried since, as I 
mentioned, that's mostly for mounting dishes lower.

  We ordered I don't even know how many of these kits last year. 3' HP dishes 
on 4.5" pipes adapted to 6" to 8" legs. Some angle, some round. Some sloped, 
some not. 
http://www.ciwireless.com/product/welded-pipe-to-pipe-adaptor-set-for-tapered-round-members-2-38-in-5-in-od-pipe-to-4-in-9-in-od-pipe/


  On 1/16/2017 2:38 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:

I have been asked to spin versions of my tower mounts that work on angle 
iron legs.  OK, done.  Will be released soon for general availability.  

Now I am getting request for larger units that will fit a 5” pipe.  We 
currently will fit a 4.5” pipe.

If I spin a larger version, shall I go 6” or???  Someone recently suggested 
7” center to center on the bolts which would fit over a 6.5” pipe.

Are there some standard tower leg and mounting pipe increments I need to 
look at?



Re: [AFMUG] Pipe mounts

2017-01-17 Thread Chuck McCown
Thanks.
One of my distributors is asking that I go from 4.5” to 5” pipe ability on all 
my stuff.  That is a pretty minor change and I will probably do that.  

From: George Skorup 
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2017 6:02 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Pipe mounts

That was me. The angle-iron leg deal I was talking about, I don't actually need 
anything specifically designed for angle-iron, we simply turn the back clamp 
inwards. Works perfectly fine. However, like I said, the back side of the angle 
is about 5-3/4" if I remember. That's the tower where we order clamp halves 
that are 7" hole to hole center. A couple other examples that I can give... 
Angle iron leg, 6-3/4", sloped. Round leg, 8-1/4", sloped. Angle leg, 12-3/4", 
sloped. (old AT Long-Lines sites, big mothertruckers from ground to 125 feet)

We're on so much different shit, we pretty much have to order what we need for 
the particular site we'll be working at. And most of the time on free-standers, 
the legs get smaller as you go up. So we might need to put dishes at 100-140 
feet and sectors at 240-260, which means two completely different sets of 
mounts for one site.

I would say a model that can accommodate up to 4.5" OD and another for 4.5 to 
9" OD, sloped or not. For your 1-to-2 pipe arrangement, most towers will fall 
in one of those two. For the big leg sites, I'm not as worried since, as I 
mentioned, that's mostly for mounting dishes lower.

We ordered I don't even know how many of these kits last year. 3' HP dishes on 
4.5" pipes adapted to 6" to 8" legs. Some angle, some round. Some sloped, some 
not. 
http://www.ciwireless.com/product/welded-pipe-to-pipe-adaptor-set-for-tapered-round-members-2-38-in-5-in-od-pipe-to-4-in-9-in-od-pipe/


On 1/16/2017 2:38 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:

  I have been asked to spin versions of my tower mounts that work on angle iron 
legs.  OK, done.  Will be released soon for general availability.  

  Now I am getting request for larger units that will fit a 5” pipe.  We 
currently will fit a 4.5” pipe.

  If I spin a larger version, shall I go 6” or???  Someone recently suggested 
7” center to center on the bolts which would fit over a 6.5” pipe.

  Are there some standard tower leg and mounting pipe increments I need to look 
at?



Re: [AFMUG] Pipe mounts

2017-01-17 Thread Adam Moffett
We bought a gazillion of these things last year for a project with 10" 
diameter poles:

http://www.commscope.com/catalog/wireless/product_details.aspx?id=2234
It says there the small side is 4-9", but it's waaay smaller than that.  
Like 2-4" maybe.


I see 6" round legs all the time.  Bigger than that I've only seen maybe 
once or twice on a tower leg.  This pole thing was kind of a unique 
project.




-- Original Message --
From: "George Skorup" <geo...@cbcast.com>
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: 1/16/2017 8:02:11 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Pipe mounts

That was me. The angle-iron leg deal I was talking about, I don't 
actually need anything specifically designed for angle-iron, we simply 
turn the back clamp inwards. Works perfectly fine. However, like I 
said, the back side of the angle is about 5-3/4" if I remember. That's 
the tower where we order clamp halves that are 7" hole to hole center. 
A couple other examples that I can give... Angle iron leg, 6-3/4", 
sloped. Round leg, 8-1/4", sloped. Angle leg, 12-3/4", sloped. (old 
AT Long-Lines sites, big mothertruckers from ground to 125 feet)


We're on so much different shit, we pretty much have to order what we 
need for the particular site we'll be working at. And most of the time 
on free-standers, the legs get smaller as you go up. So we might need 
to put dishes at 100-140 feet and sectors at 240-260, which means two 
completely different sets of mounts for one site.


I would say a model that can accommodate up to 4.5" OD and another for 
4.5 to 9" OD, sloped or not. For your 1-to-2 pipe arrangement, most 
towers will fall in one of those two. For the big leg sites, I'm not as 
worried since, as I mentioned, that's mostly for mounting dishes lower.


We ordered I don't even know how many of these kits last year. 3' HP 
dishes on 4.5" pipes adapted to 6" to 8" legs. Some angle, some round. 
Some sloped, some not. 
http://www.ciwireless.com/product/welded-pipe-to-pipe-adaptor-set-for-tapered-round-members-2-38-in-5-in-od-pipe-to-4-in-9-in-od-pipe/


On 1/16/2017 2:38 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
I have been asked to spin versions of my tower mounts that work on 
angle iron legs.  OK, done.  Will be released soon for general 
availability.


Now I am getting request for larger units that will fit a 5” pipe.  We 
currently will fit a 4.5” pipe.


If I spin a larger version, shall I go 6” or???  Someone recently 
suggested 7” center to center on the bolts which would fit over a 6.5” 
pipe.


Are there some standard tower leg and mounting pipe increments I need 
to look at?


Re: [AFMUG] Pipe mounts

2017-01-16 Thread George Skorup
That was me. The angle-iron leg deal I was talking about, I don't 
actually need anything specifically designed for angle-iron, we simply 
turn the back clamp inwards. Works perfectly fine. However, like I said, 
the back side of the angle is about 5-3/4" if I remember. That's the 
tower where we order clamp halves that are 7" hole to hole center. A 
couple other examples that I can give... Angle iron leg, 6-3/4", sloped. 
Round leg, 8-1/4", sloped. Angle leg, 12-3/4", sloped. (old AT 
Long-Lines sites, big mothertruckers from ground to 125 feet)


We're on so much different shit, we pretty much have to order what we 
need for the particular site we'll be working at. And most of the time 
on free-standers, the legs get smaller as you go up. So we might need to 
put dishes at 100-140 feet and sectors at 240-260, which means two 
completely different sets of mounts for one site.


I would say a model that can accommodate up to 4.5" OD and another for 
4.5 to 9" OD, sloped or not. For your 1-to-2 pipe arrangement, most 
towers will fall in one of those two. For the big leg sites, I'm not as 
worried since, as I mentioned, that's mostly for mounting dishes lower.


We ordered I don't even know how many of these kits last year. 3' HP 
dishes on 4.5" pipes adapted to 6" to 8" legs. Some angle, some round. 
Some sloped, some not. 
http://www.ciwireless.com/product/welded-pipe-to-pipe-adaptor-set-for-tapered-round-members-2-38-in-5-in-od-pipe-to-4-in-9-in-od-pipe/


On 1/16/2017 2:38 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
I have been asked to spin versions of my tower mounts that work on 
angle iron legs.  OK, done.  Will be released soon for general 
availability.
Now I am getting request for larger units that will fit a 5” pipe.  We 
currently will fit a 4.5” pipe.
If I spin a larger version, shall I go 6” or???  Someone recently 
suggested 7” center to center on the bolts which would fit over a 6.5” 
pipe.
Are there some standard tower leg and mounting pipe increments I need 
to look at?




Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

2015-02-16 Thread Chuck McCown
M-TOW-A

From: Bill Prince 
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2015 7:54 AM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

Well yeah.  There are bunches of those depending on pipe sizes.

We select from these: 
http://www.sitepro1.com/store/cart.php?m=search_resultssp_search_group=exactsearch=pipe+to+pipex=0y=0

bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com

On 2/14/2015 4:53 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:

  This is what I normally use:

  http://www.commscope.com/catalog/andrew/product_details.aspx?id=2188




  -
  Mike Hammett
  Intelligent Computing Solutions
  http://www.ics-il.com





--

  From: Jaime Solorza mailto:losguyswirel...@gmail.com
  To: Animal Farm mailto:af@afmug.com
  Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 5:32:24 PM
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts


  These 

  Jaime Solorza

  On Feb 13, 2015 2:28 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) 
geo...@cbcast.com wrote:

2-3/8 OD rigid. No reason to go larger. If we're putting up a 3' or 4' 
licensed dish, then it will be with heavy-duty pipe-to-pipe kits with 5/8 
all-thread and probably 4-1/2 rigid pipe.

Just my opinion.

On 2/13/2015 1:46 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

  I am doing this universal pipe mount that will allow a larger dish on a 
Rohn type or crappy sheet metal freestanding type.  

  And doing the larger version of the M-TOW-P

  The question is, what size pipe?
  I had initially designed it with 3 inch pipe which is actually 3.5” OD.
  Looking at the pipe chart, 2.5” has an OD of 2.875”.  

  The smaller pipe would be noticeably lighter to heft.  Is that large 
enough to make SAF type mounts happy?
  Or would y’all rather have the larger pipe.  






Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

2015-02-14 Thread Mike Hammett
This is what I normally use: 

http://www.commscope.com/catalog/andrew/product_details.aspx?id=2188 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com 
To: Animal Farm af@afmug.com 
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 5:32:24 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts 


These 
Jaime Solorza 
On Feb 13, 2015 2:28 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting)  
geo...@cbcast.com  wrote: 




2-3/8 OD rigid. No reason to go larger. If we're putting up a 3' or 4' 
licensed dish, then it will be with heavy-duty pipe-to-pipe kits with 5/8 
all-thread and probably 4-1/2 rigid pipe. 

Just my opinion. 

On 2/13/2015 1:46 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote: 

blockquote



I am doing this universal pipe mount that will allow a larger dish on a Rohn 
type or crappy sheet metal freestanding type. 

And doing the larger version of the M-TOW-P 

The question is, what size pipe? 
I had initially designed it with 3 inch pipe which is actually 3.5” OD. 
Looking at the pipe chart, 2.5” has an OD of 2.875”. 

The smaller pipe would be noticeably lighter to heft. Is that large enough to 
make SAF type mounts happy? 
Or would y’all rather have the larger pipe. 



/blockquote



Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

2015-02-14 Thread Bill Prince

Well yeah.  There are bunches of those depending on pipe sizes.

We select from these: 
http://www.sitepro1.com/store/cart.php?m=search_resultssp_search_group=exactsearch=pipe+to+pipex=0y=0


bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com

On 2/14/2015 4:53 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:

This is what I normally use:

http://www.commscope.com/catalog/andrew/product_details.aspx?id=2188



-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL


*From: *Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com
*To: *Animal Farm af@afmug.com
*Sent: *Friday, February 13, 2015 5:32:24 PM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

These

Jaime Solorza

On Feb 13, 2015 2:28 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) 
geo...@cbcast.com mailto:geo...@cbcast.com wrote:


2-3/8 OD rigid. No reason to go larger. If we're putting up a 3'
or 4' licensed dish, then it will be with heavy-duty pipe-to-pipe
kits with 5/8 all-thread and probably 4-1/2 rigid pipe.

Just my opinion.

On 2/13/2015 1:46 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

I am doing this universal pipe mount that will allow a larger
dish on a Rohn type or crappy sheet metal freestanding type.
And doing the larger version of the M-TOW-P
The question is, what size pipe?
I had initially designed it with 3 inch pipe which is actually
3.5” OD.
Looking at the pipe chart, 2.5” has an OD of 2.875”.
The smaller pipe would be noticeably lighter to heft.  Is that
large enough to make SAF type mounts happy?
Or would y’all rather have the larger pipe.







Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

2015-02-13 Thread SmarterBroadband
3.5 would be good.  Maybe a thinner wall?  Or even better aluminum.

Adam

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of ch...@wbmfg.com
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 11:46 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

 

I am doing this universal pipe mount that will allow a larger dish on a Rohn 
type or crappy sheet metal freestanding type.  

 

And doing the larger version of the M-TOW-P

 

The question is, what size pipe?

I had initially designed it with 3 inch pipe which is actually 3.5” OD.

Looking at the pipe chart, 2.5” has an OD of 2.875”.  

 

The smaller pipe would be noticeably lighter to heft.  Is that large enough to 
make SAF type mounts happy?

Or would y’all rather have the larger pipe.  



Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

2015-02-13 Thread Josh Luthman
3 is too big IMO

I think SAF mounts call for 2.25 minimum?


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 2:46 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

   I am doing this universal pipe mount that will allow a larger dish on a
 Rohn type or crappy sheet metal freestanding type.

 And doing the larger version of the M-TOW-P

 The question is, what size pipe?
 I had initially designed it with 3 inch pipe which is actually 3.5” OD.
 Looking at the pipe chart, 2.5” has an OD of 2.875”.

 The smaller pipe would be noticeably lighter to heft.  Is that large
 enough to make SAF type mounts happy?
 Or would y’all rather have the larger pipe.



Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

2015-02-13 Thread chuck
Aluminum will really drive the cost up.  

From: SmarterBroadband 
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 12:51 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

3.5 would be good.  Maybe a thinner wall?  Or even better aluminum.

Adam

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of ch...@wbmfg.com
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 11:46 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

 

I am doing this universal pipe mount that will allow a larger dish on a Rohn 
type or crappy sheet metal freestanding type.  

 

And doing the larger version of the M-TOW-P

 

The question is, what size pipe?

I had initially designed it with 3 inch pipe which is actually 3.5” OD.

Looking at the pipe chart, 2.5” has an OD of 2.875”.  

 

The smaller pipe would be noticeably lighter to heft.  Is that large enough to 
make SAF type mounts happy?

Or would y’all rather have the larger pipe.  


Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

2015-02-13 Thread Mathew Howard
I agree, 3 is a bit too big. If I remember correctly, when we put up our
SAF 3' dishes, we were told to use 2.375 - that seems like a good size to
me.

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
wrote:

 3 is too big IMO

 I think SAF mounts call for 2.25 minimum?


 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 2:46 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

   I am doing this universal pipe mount that will allow a larger dish on
 a Rohn type or crappy sheet metal freestanding type.

 And doing the larger version of the M-TOW-P

 The question is, what size pipe?
 I had initially designed it with 3 inch pipe which is actually 3.5” OD.
 Looking at the pipe chart, 2.5” has an OD of 2.875”.

 The smaller pipe would be noticeably lighter to heft.  Is that large
 enough to make SAF type mounts happy?
 Or would y’all rather have the larger pipe.





Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

2015-02-13 Thread Jaime Solorza
I am using two pipe to pipe clamps today or tomorrow for 30 dB Rocket Dish
install .   Will share pic when done.  Andrew or Decibel.

Jaime Solorza
On Feb 13, 2015 12:46 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

   I am doing this universal pipe mount that will allow a larger dish on a
 Rohn type or crappy sheet metal freestanding type.

 And doing the larger version of the M-TOW-P

 The question is, what size pipe?
 I had initially designed it with 3 inch pipe which is actually 3.5” OD.
 Looking at the pipe chart, 2.5” has an OD of 2.875”.

 The smaller pipe would be noticeably lighter to heft.  Is that large
 enough to make SAF type mounts happy?
 Or would y’all rather have the larger pipe.



Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

2015-02-13 Thread Ken Hohhof
Many 3 ft and larger dishes, especially high performance and licensed, specify 
a 3.5” diameter pipe.  In fact some specify 4.5”, but that’s a bit excessive 
IMHO, at least for a 3 ft dish.

The next size down is probably 2.375 which I use a lot of.

The other thing once you start needing a 3.5 or 4.5 inch pipe, is support 
struts or stiff arms.  I find it annoying that Radiowaves doesn’t have a tab to 
attach a stiff arm on their 3 ft licensed dishes.  And no lift hook either.  
Grrr.


From: Josh Luthman 
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 1:51 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

3 is too big IMO 

I think SAF mounts call for 2.25 minimum?


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 2:46 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

  I am doing this universal pipe mount that will allow a larger dish on a Rohn 
type or crappy sheet metal freestanding type.  

  And doing the larger version of the M-TOW-P

  The question is, what size pipe?
  I had initially designed it with 3 inch pipe which is actually 3.5” OD.
  Looking at the pipe chart, 2.5” has an OD of 2.875”.  

  The smaller pipe would be noticeably lighter to heft.  Is that large enough 
to make SAF type mounts happy?
  Or would y’all rather have the larger pipe.  


Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

2015-02-13 Thread Ken Hohhof
If you are talking about the mast, aluminum doesn’t work well, too bendy.  If 
you want lower weight, use IMC conduit.  The forming process work hardens the 
steel and it is actually stiffer than rigid pipe.  It does have a welded seam 
which you might worry would rust, I haven’t experienced that though.


From: ch...@wbmfg.com 
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 1:53 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

Aluminum will really drive the cost up.  

From: SmarterBroadband 
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 12:51 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

3.5 would be good.  Maybe a thinner wall?  Or even better aluminum.

Adam

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of ch...@wbmfg.com
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 11:46 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

 

I am doing this universal pipe mount that will allow a larger dish on a Rohn 
type or crappy sheet metal freestanding type.  

 

And doing the larger version of the M-TOW-P

 

The question is, what size pipe?

I had initially designed it with 3 inch pipe which is actually 3.5” OD.

Looking at the pipe chart, 2.5” has an OD of 2.875”.  

 

The smaller pipe would be noticeably lighter to heft.  Is that large enough to 
make SAF type mounts happy?

Or would y’all rather have the larger pipe.  


Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

2015-02-13 Thread Josh Luthman
Rocket Dish is Ubnt.  Not Andrew or Decibel...?


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com
wrote:

 I am using two pipe to pipe clamps today or tomorrow for 30 dB Rocket Dish
 install .   Will share pic when done.  Andrew or Decibel.

 Jaime Solorza
 On Feb 13, 2015 12:46 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

   I am doing this universal pipe mount that will allow a larger dish on
 a Rohn type or crappy sheet metal freestanding type.

 And doing the larger version of the M-TOW-P

 The question is, what size pipe?
 I had initially designed it with 3 inch pipe which is actually 3.5” OD.
 Looking at the pipe chart, 2.5” has an OD of 2.875”.

 The smaller pipe would be noticeably lighter to heft.  Is that large
 enough to make SAF type mounts happy?
 Or would y’all rather have the larger pipe.




Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

2015-02-13 Thread Jaime Solorza
Mounts are Andrew or Decibel.   Hot dipped galvanized

Jaime Solorza
On Feb 13, 2015 1:10 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:

 Rocket Dish is Ubnt.  Not Andrew or Decibel...?


 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 I am using two pipe to pipe clamps today or tomorrow for 30 dB Rocket
 Dish install .   Will share pic when done.  Andrew or Decibel.

 Jaime Solorza
 On Feb 13, 2015 12:46 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

   I am doing this universal pipe mount that will allow a larger dish on
 a Rohn type or crappy sheet metal freestanding type.

 And doing the larger version of the M-TOW-P

 The question is, what size pipe?
 I had initially designed it with 3 inch pipe which is actually 3.5” OD.
 Looking at the pipe chart, 2.5” has an OD of 2.875”.

 The smaller pipe would be noticeably lighter to heft.  Is that large
 enough to make SAF type mounts happy?
 Or would y’all rather have the larger pipe.





Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

2015-02-13 Thread Jeremy
I always use 3 on backhauls, smaller on AP sectors.

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Mathew Howard mhoward...@gmail.com wrote:

 I agree, 3 is a bit too big. If I remember correctly, when we put up our
 SAF 3' dishes, we were told to use 2.375 - that seems like a good size to
 me.

 On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
  wrote:

 3 is too big IMO

 I think SAF mounts call for 2.25 minimum?


 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 2:46 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

   I am doing this universal pipe mount that will allow a larger dish on
 a Rohn type or crappy sheet metal freestanding type.

 And doing the larger version of the M-TOW-P

 The question is, what size pipe?
 I had initially designed it with 3 inch pipe which is actually 3.5” OD.
 Looking at the pipe chart, 2.5” has an OD of 2.875”.

 The smaller pipe would be noticeably lighter to heft.  Is that large
 enough to make SAF type mounts happy?
 Or would y’all rather have the larger pipe.






Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

2015-02-13 Thread Josh Luthman
Used to use those.  Much happier with Mtow!

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Feb 13, 2015 6:32 PM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote:

 These

 Jaime Solorza
 On Feb 13, 2015 2:28 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) 
 geo...@cbcast.com wrote:

  2-3/8 OD rigid. No reason to go larger. If we're putting up a 3' or 4'
 licensed dish, then it will be with heavy-duty pipe-to-pipe kits with 5/8
 all-thread and probably 4-1/2 rigid pipe.

 Just my opinion.

 On 2/13/2015 1:46 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

  I am doing this universal pipe mount that will allow a larger dish on a
 Rohn type or crappy sheet metal freestanding type.

 And doing the larger version of the M-TOW-P

 The question is, what size pipe?
 I had initially designed it with 3 inch pipe which is actually 3.5” OD.
 Looking at the pipe chart, 2.5” has an OD of 2.875”.

 The smaller pipe would be noticeably lighter to heft.  Is that large
 enough to make SAF type mounts happy?
 Or would y’all rather have the larger pipe.





Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

2015-02-13 Thread George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting)
2-3/8 OD rigid. No reason to go larger. If we're putting up a 3' or 4' 
licensed dish, then it will be with heavy-duty pipe-to-pipe kits with 
5/8 all-thread and probably 4-1/2 rigid pipe.


Just my opinion.

On 2/13/2015 1:46 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
I am doing this universal pipe mount that will allow a larger dish on 
a Rohn type or crappy sheet metal freestanding type.

And doing the larger version of the M-TOW-P
The question is, what size pipe?
I had initially designed it with 3 inch pipe which is actually 3.5” OD.
Looking at the pipe chart, 2.5” has an OD of 2.875”.
The smaller pipe would be noticeably lighter to heft.  Is that large 
enough to make SAF type mounts happy?

Or would y’all rather have the larger pipe.




Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

2015-02-13 Thread Seth Mattinen

On 2/13/15 11:46, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

I am doing this universal pipe mount that will allow a larger dish on a
Rohn type or crappy sheet metal freestanding type.
And doing the larger version of the M-TOW-P
The question is, what size pipe?
I had initially designed it with 3 inch pipe which is actually 3.5” OD.
Looking at the pipe chart, 2.5” has an OD of 2.875”.
The smaller pipe would be noticeably lighter to heft.  Is that large
enough to make SAF type mounts happy?
Or would y’all rather have the larger pipe.



I like 2-3/8 OD pipe for small MW antennas.

~Seth


Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

2015-02-13 Thread Vince West
We use a fair amount of UBNT RD-5G30 dishes, and I prefer to mount them
with M-TOW-P-36. I don't know what size the pipe is, but I find that it is
useful for just about everything we do. If we are doing something like a
PTP-800 or SAF links, I use a larger pipe with a different type of mount.

For smaller links using ARC IE kits, we use the M-TOW-10. Again, the pipe
diameter is perfect.

For a tower mount with a larger pipe, do you plan to still use the same
design for fixing it to the tower (ie. saddle to saddle with bolts)? Or
will something more heavy duty be used with u-bolts to a mount that holds a
pipe? To clarify, this CommScope kit
https://www.tessco.com/products/displayProductInfo.do?sku=500401eventGroup=4eventPage=1
uses brackets that mount to the tower and separate brackets to hold the
pipe.

I ask because one of the things I like the most about the M-TOW mounts,
especially the 36 mounts is that I can mount the dish to it and then have
sent up the tower. For larger dishes, I like to have the pipe mounted to
the dish, but have the hardware for mounting to the tower sent up
separately. Depending on the tower, sometimes I have to loosen other cables
to get my mounts fixed and doing this with a large dish and mount at the
same time can be a pain.

Vince West
Tower Hand
Technical Support
Shelby Broadband
148 Citizens Blvd
Simpsonville, KY 40067
Phone: 1-888-364-4232

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 4:27 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) 
geo...@cbcast.com wrote:

  2-3/8 OD rigid. No reason to go larger. If we're putting up a 3' or 4'
 licensed dish, then it will be with heavy-duty pipe-to-pipe kits with 5/8
 all-thread and probably 4-1/2 rigid pipe.

 Just my opinion.

 On 2/13/2015 1:46 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

  I am doing this universal pipe mount that will allow a larger dish on a
 Rohn type or crappy sheet metal freestanding type.

 And doing the larger version of the M-TOW-P

 The question is, what size pipe?
 I had initially designed it with 3 inch pipe which is actually 3.5” OD.
 Looking at the pipe chart, 2.5” has an OD of 2.875”.

 The smaller pipe would be noticeably lighter to heft.  Is that large
 enough to make SAF type mounts happy?
 Or would y’all rather have the larger pipe.





Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

2015-02-13 Thread Vince West
I guess I should have looked at another M-TOW. It isn't listed on the
M-TOW-P-36 spec sheet. Thanks!!

Vince West
Tower Hand
Technical Support
Shelby Broadband
148 Citizens Blvd
Simpsonville, KY 40067
Phone: 1-888-364-4232

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
wrote:

 Pipe is currently 1.685 OD
 http://wbmfg.com/specs/M-TOW-P.PDF

 Normal MTOWP is 24 tall, but there's a 36 and 48 inch option.


 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Vince West vi...@shelbybb.com wrote:

 We use a fair amount of UBNT RD-5G30 dishes, and I prefer to mount them
 with M-TOW-P-36. I don't know what size the pipe is, but I find that it is
 useful for just about everything we do. If we are doing something like a
 PTP-800 or SAF links, I use a larger pipe with a different type of mount.

 For smaller links using ARC IE kits, we use the M-TOW-10. Again, the pipe
 diameter is perfect.

 For a tower mount with a larger pipe, do you plan to still use the same
 design for fixing it to the tower (ie. saddle to saddle with bolts)? Or
 will something more heavy duty be used with u-bolts to a mount that holds a
 pipe? To clarify, this CommScope kit
 https://www.tessco.com/products/displayProductInfo.do?sku=500401eventGroup=4eventPage=1
 uses brackets that mount to the tower and separate brackets to hold the
 pipe.

 I ask because one of the things I like the most about the M-TOW mounts,
 especially the 36 mounts is that I can mount the dish to it and then have
 sent up the tower. For larger dishes, I like to have the pipe mounted to
 the dish, but have the hardware for mounting to the tower sent up
 separately. Depending on the tower, sometimes I have to loosen other cables
 to get my mounts fixed and doing this with a large dish and mount at the
 same time can be a pain.

 Vince West
 Tower Hand
 Technical Support
 Shelby Broadband
 148 Citizens Blvd
 Simpsonville, KY 40067
 Phone: 1-888-364-4232

 On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 4:27 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) 
 geo...@cbcast.com wrote:

  2-3/8 OD rigid. No reason to go larger. If we're putting up a 3' or
 4' licensed dish, then it will be with heavy-duty pipe-to-pipe kits with
 5/8 all-thread and probably 4-1/2 rigid pipe.

 Just my opinion.

 On 2/13/2015 1:46 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

  I am doing this universal pipe mount that will allow a larger dish on
 a Rohn type or crappy sheet metal freestanding type.

 And doing the larger version of the M-TOW-P

 The question is, what size pipe?
 I had initially designed it with 3 inch pipe which is actually 3.5” OD.
 Looking at the pipe chart, 2.5” has an OD of 2.875”.

 The smaller pipe would be noticeably lighter to heft.  Is that large
 enough to make SAF type mounts happy?
 Or would y’all rather have the larger pipe.







Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

2015-02-13 Thread Jaime Solorza
Thata what I am working on

Jaime Solorza
On Feb 13, 2015 4:47 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:

 Stock mtow instead :)

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373
 On Feb 13, 2015 6:44 PM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 I am working on getting them disturbed by epcom locally.

 This box is last we have in stock..

 Jaime Solorza
 On Feb 13, 2015 4:33 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
 wrote:

 Used to use those.  Much happier with Mtow!

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373
 On Feb 13, 2015 6:32 PM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 These

 Jaime Solorza
 On Feb 13, 2015 2:28 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) 
 geo...@cbcast.com wrote:

  2-3/8 OD rigid. No reason to go larger. If we're putting up a 3' or
 4' licensed dish, then it will be with heavy-duty pipe-to-pipe kits with
 5/8 all-thread and probably 4-1/2 rigid pipe.

 Just my opinion.

 On 2/13/2015 1:46 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

  I am doing this universal pipe mount that will allow a larger dish
 on a Rohn type or crappy sheet metal freestanding type.

 And doing the larger version of the M-TOW-P

 The question is, what size pipe?
 I had initially designed it with 3 inch pipe which is actually 3.5” OD.
 Looking at the pipe chart, 2.5” has an OD of 2.875”.

 The smaller pipe would be noticeably lighter to heft.  Is that large
 enough to make SAF type mounts happy?
 Or would y’all rather have the larger pipe.





Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

2015-02-13 Thread Jaime Solorza
I am working on getting them disturbed by epcom locally.

This box is last we have in stock..

Jaime Solorza
On Feb 13, 2015 4:33 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:

 Used to use those.  Much happier with Mtow!

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373
 On Feb 13, 2015 6:32 PM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 These

 Jaime Solorza
 On Feb 13, 2015 2:28 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) 
 geo...@cbcast.com wrote:

  2-3/8 OD rigid. No reason to go larger. If we're putting up a 3' or
 4' licensed dish, then it will be with heavy-duty pipe-to-pipe kits with
 5/8 all-thread and probably 4-1/2 rigid pipe.

 Just my opinion.

 On 2/13/2015 1:46 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

  I am doing this universal pipe mount that will allow a larger dish on
 a Rohn type or crappy sheet metal freestanding type.

 And doing the larger version of the M-TOW-P

 The question is, what size pipe?
 I had initially designed it with 3 inch pipe which is actually 3.5” OD.
 Looking at the pipe chart, 2.5” has an OD of 2.875”.

 The smaller pipe would be noticeably lighter to heft.  Is that large
 enough to make SAF type mounts happy?
 Or would y’all rather have the larger pipe.





Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

2015-02-13 Thread Bill Prince
If I need something bigger than what is on the MTOW-P, I would want 3 
sizes, 2.875 OD, 3.5 OD, and 4.5 OD.  Depends on the dish/sector.


bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com

On 2/13/2015 11:46 AM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
I am doing this universal pipe mount that will allow a larger dish on 
a Rohn type or crappy sheet metal freestanding type.

And doing the larger version of the M-TOW-P
The question is, what size pipe?
I had initially designed it with 3 inch pipe which is actually 3.5” OD.
Looking at the pipe chart, 2.5” has an OD of 2.875”.
The smaller pipe would be noticeably lighter to heft.  Is that large 
enough to make SAF type mounts happy?

Or would y’all rather have the larger pipe.




Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

2015-02-13 Thread Chuck McCown
I’ll post some photos of the beta units.

From: Erich Kaiser 
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 8:40 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

With Rohn type tower, it seems there is a ton of bending/flexing with any 
weight, maybe a  welded smaller diameter for leg side specific up to Rohn 55G 
with larger pipe side up to around 2 3/8?  Maybe a welded spacer from small 
side to large side (To get it away from the leg), kinda like MTow style but a 
solid piece? 

Erich Kaiser 
North Central Tower Consulting
er...@northcentraltower.com
Office: 630-621-4804
Cell: 630-777-9291

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Chuck McCown ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

  We have a similar product to those now.  But my new stuff is totally 
different.

  From: Erich Kaiser 
  Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 8:28 PM
  To: af@afmug.com 
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

  Probably something similar to this 

  
http://www.ciwireless.com/product/pipe-to-pipe-clamp-set-for-1-12-in-3-12-in-od-pipes-14-in-thick-set-of-2/


  They also work great for Grain legs.

  Erich Kaiser 
  North Central Tower Consulting
  er...@northcentraltower.com
  Office: 630-621-4804
  Cell: 630-777-9291

  On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Chuck McCown ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

OK, but for the first product out the door, I am trying to pick the best 
size.  I can later offer the different size but we gotta get the product out 
there on beta test.  I am leaning strongly towards 2.875” as you really don’t 
want larger dishes on small towers.  A dish large enough to want 4.5” is not 
going to be too happy hanging off the side of a 45G.

From: Bill Prince 
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 5:44 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

If I need something bigger than what is on the MTOW-P, I would want 3 
sizes, 2.875 OD, 3.5 OD, and 4.5 OD.  Depends on the dish/sector.


bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com

On 2/13/2015 11:46 AM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

  I am doing this universal pipe mount that will allow a larger dish on a 
Rohn type or crappy sheet metal freestanding type.  

  And doing the larger version of the M-TOW-P

  The question is, what size pipe?
  I had initially designed it with 3 inch pipe which is actually 3.5” OD.
  Looking at the pipe chart, 2.5” has an OD of 2.875”.  

  The smaller pipe would be noticeably lighter to heft.  Is that large 
enough to make SAF type mounts happy?
  Or would y’all rather have the larger pipe.  





Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

2015-02-13 Thread Jeremy
These are what I've used.  They are heavy duty and inexpensive and work
with a large range of pipe sizes.  Also, you can replace the bolts with
allthread to build a mount on two sides for clusters (for example, on a
single pole on top of a tower).

http://www.ciwireless.com/product/pipe-to-pipe-clamp-set-for-1-12-in-3-12-in-od-pipes-12-in-thick-set-of-2/

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Jaime Solorza
   I am doing this universal pipe mount that will allow a larger dish on a
 Rohn type or crappy sheet metal freestanding type.

 And doing the larger version of the M-TOW-P

 The question is, what size pipe?
 I had initially designed it with 3 inch pipe which is actually 3.5” OD.
 Looking at the pipe chart, 2.5” has an OD of 2.875”.

 The smaller pipe would be noticeably lighter to heft.  Is that large
 enough to make SAF type mounts happy?
 Or would y’all rather have the larger pipe.



Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

2015-02-13 Thread Chuck McCown
I appreciate all the opinions.  Thanks.

From: George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) 
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 2:27 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

2-3/8 OD rigid. No reason to go larger. If we're putting up a 3' or 4' 
licensed dish, then it will be with heavy-duty pipe-to-pipe kits with 5/8 
all-thread and probably 4-1/2 rigid pipe.

Just my opinion.

On 2/13/2015 1:46 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

  I am doing this universal pipe mount that will allow a larger dish on a Rohn 
type or crappy sheet metal freestanding type.  

  And doing the larger version of the M-TOW-P

  The question is, what size pipe?
  I had initially designed it with 3 inch pipe which is actually 3.5” OD.
  Looking at the pipe chart, 2.5” has an OD of 2.875”.  

  The smaller pipe would be noticeably lighter to heft.  Is that large enough 
to make SAF type mounts happy?
  Or would y’all rather have the larger pipe.  



Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

2015-02-13 Thread Chuck McCown
Thanks

From: Vince West 
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 3:07 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

We use a fair amount of UBNT RD-5G30 dishes, and I prefer to mount them with 
M-TOW-P-36. I don't know what size the pipe is, but I find that it is useful 
for just about everything we do. If we are doing something like a PTP-800 or 
SAF links, I use a larger pipe with a different type of mount. 

For smaller links using ARC IE kits, we use the M-TOW-10. Again, the pipe 
diameter is perfect.


For a tower mount with a larger pipe, do you plan to still use the same design 
for fixing it to the tower (ie. saddle to saddle with bolts)? Or will something 
more heavy duty be used with u-bolts to a mount that holds a pipe? To clarify, 
this CommScope kit uses brackets that mount to the tower and separate brackets 
to hold the pipe.

I ask because one of the things I like the most about the M-TOW mounts, 
especially the 36 mounts is that I can mount the dish to it and then have sent 
up the tower. For larger dishes, I like to have the pipe mounted to the dish, 
but have the hardware for mounting to the tower sent up separately. Depending 
on the tower, sometimes I have to loosen other cables to get my mounts fixed 
and doing this with a large dish and mount at the same time can be a pain.

Vince West 
Tower Hand

Technical Support
Shelby Broadband
148 Citizens Blvd
Simpsonville, KY 40067
Phone: 1-888-364-4232

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 4:27 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) 
geo...@cbcast.com wrote:

  2-3/8 OD rigid. No reason to go larger. If we're putting up a 3' or 4' 
licensed dish, then it will be with heavy-duty pipe-to-pipe kits with 5/8 
all-thread and probably 4-1/2 rigid pipe.

  Just my opinion.

  On 2/13/2015 1:46 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

I am doing this universal pipe mount that will allow a larger dish on a 
Rohn type or crappy sheet metal freestanding type.  

And doing the larger version of the M-TOW-P

The question is, what size pipe?
I had initially designed it with 3 inch pipe which is actually 3.5” OD.
Looking at the pipe chart, 2.5” has an OD of 2.875”.  

The smaller pipe would be noticeably lighter to heft.  Is that large enough 
to make SAF type mounts happy?
Or would y’all rather have the larger pipe.  




Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

2015-02-13 Thread Erich Kaiser
Probably something similar to this

http://www.ciwireless.com/product/pipe-to-pipe-clamp-set-for-1-12-in-3-12-in-od-pipes-14-in-thick-set-of-2/

They also work great for Grain legs.

Erich Kaiser
North Central Tower Consulting
er...@northcentraltower.com
Office: 630-621-4804
Cell: 630-777-9291

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Chuck McCown ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

   OK, but for the first product out the door, I am trying to pick the
 best size.  I can later offer the different size but we gotta get the
 product out there on beta test.  I am leaning strongly towards 2.875” as
 you really don’t want larger dishes on small towers.  A dish large enough
 to want 4.5” is not going to be too happy hanging off the side of a 45G.

  *From:* Bill Prince part15...@gmail.com
 *Sent:* Friday, February 13, 2015 5:44 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

  If I need something bigger than what is on the MTOW-P, I would want 3
 sizes, 2.875 OD, 3.5 OD, and 4.5 OD.  Depends on the dish/sector.

 bp
 part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com


 On 2/13/2015 11:46 AM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

  I am doing this universal pipe mount that will allow a larger dish on a
 Rohn type or crappy sheet metal freestanding type.

 And doing the larger version of the M-TOW-P

 The question is, what size pipe?
 I had initially designed it with 3 inch pipe which is actually 3.5” OD.
 Looking at the pipe chart, 2.5” has an OD of 2.875”.

 The smaller pipe would be noticeably lighter to heft.  Is that large
 enough to make SAF type mounts happy?
 Or would y’all rather have the larger pipe.





Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

2015-02-13 Thread Erich Kaiser
ConnectIt is great, we use the PC30 and PC35 all the time. FYI a PC35 will
work with a 2 Heavywall Conduit (Rigid).


Erich Kaiser
North Central Tower Consulting
er...@northcentraltower.com
Office: 630-621-4804
Cell: 630-777-9291

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Jeremy jeremysmi...@gmail.com wrote:

 These are what I've used.  They are heavy duty and inexpensive and work
 with a large range of pipe sizes.  Also, you can replace the bolts with
 allthread to build a mount on two sides for clusters (for example, on a
 single pole on top of a tower).


 http://www.ciwireless.com/product/pipe-to-pipe-clamp-set-for-1-12-in-3-12-in-od-pipes-12-in-thick-set-of-2/

 On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Jaime Solorza
   I am doing this universal pipe mount that will allow a larger dish on
 a Rohn type or crappy sheet metal freestanding type.

 And doing the larger version of the M-TOW-P

 The question is, what size pipe?
 I had initially designed it with 3 inch pipe which is actually 3.5” OD.
 Looking at the pipe chart, 2.5” has an OD of 2.875”.

 The smaller pipe would be noticeably lighter to heft.  Is that large
 enough to make SAF type mounts happy?
 Or would y’all rather have the larger pipe.





Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

2015-02-13 Thread Chuck McCown
OK, but for the first product out the door, I am trying to pick the best size.  
I can later offer the different size but we gotta get the product out there on 
beta test.  I am leaning strongly towards 2.875” as you really don’t want 
larger dishes on small towers.  A dish large enough to want 4.5” is not going 
to be too happy hanging off the side of a 45G.

From: Bill Prince 
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 5:44 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

If I need something bigger than what is on the MTOW-P, I would want 3 sizes, 
2.875 OD, 3.5 OD, and 4.5 OD.  Depends on the dish/sector.


bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com

On 2/13/2015 11:46 AM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

  I am doing this universal pipe mount that will allow a larger dish on a Rohn 
type or crappy sheet metal freestanding type.  

  And doing the larger version of the M-TOW-P

  The question is, what size pipe?
  I had initially designed it with 3 inch pipe which is actually 3.5” OD.
  Looking at the pipe chart, 2.5” has an OD of 2.875”.  

  The smaller pipe would be noticeably lighter to heft.  Is that large enough 
to make SAF type mounts happy?
  Or would y’all rather have the larger pipe.  



Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

2015-02-13 Thread Chuck McCown
We have a similar product to those now.  But my new stuff is totally different.

From: Erich Kaiser 
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 8:28 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

Probably something similar to this 

http://www.ciwireless.com/product/pipe-to-pipe-clamp-set-for-1-12-in-3-12-in-od-pipes-14-in-thick-set-of-2/


They also work great for Grain legs.

Erich Kaiser 
North Central Tower Consulting
er...@northcentraltower.com
Office: 630-621-4804
Cell: 630-777-9291

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Chuck McCown ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

  OK, but for the first product out the door, I am trying to pick the best 
size.  I can later offer the different size but we gotta get the product out 
there on beta test.  I am leaning strongly towards 2.875” as you really don’t 
want larger dishes on small towers.  A dish large enough to want 4.5” is not 
going to be too happy hanging off the side of a 45G.

  From: Bill Prince 
  Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 5:44 PM
  To: af@afmug.com 
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

  If I need something bigger than what is on the MTOW-P, I would want 3 sizes, 
2.875 OD, 3.5 OD, and 4.5 OD.  Depends on the dish/sector.


bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com

On 2/13/2015 11:46 AM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

I am doing this universal pipe mount that will allow a larger dish on a 
Rohn type or crappy sheet metal freestanding type.  

And doing the larger version of the M-TOW-P

The question is, what size pipe?
I had initially designed it with 3 inch pipe which is actually 3.5” OD.
Looking at the pipe chart, 2.5” has an OD of 2.875”.  

The smaller pipe would be noticeably lighter to heft.  Is that large enough 
to make SAF type mounts happy?
Or would y’all rather have the larger pipe.  




Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

2015-02-13 Thread Erich Kaiser
With Rohn type tower, it seems there is a ton of bending/flexing with any
weight, maybe a  welded smaller diameter for leg side specific up to Rohn
55G with larger pipe side up to around 2 3/8?  Maybe a welded spacer from
small side to large side (To get it away from the leg), kinda like MTow
style but a solid piece?

Erich Kaiser
North Central Tower Consulting
er...@northcentraltower.com
Office: 630-621-4804
Cell: 630-777-9291

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Chuck McCown ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

   We have a similar product to those now.  But my new stuff is totally
 different.

  *From:* Erich Kaiser er...@northcentraltower.com
 *Sent:* Friday, February 13, 2015 8:28 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

  Probably something similar to this


 http://www.ciwireless.com/product/pipe-to-pipe-clamp-set-for-1-12-in-3-12-in-od-pipes-14-in-thick-set-of-2/

 They also work great for Grain legs.

  Erich Kaiser
 North Central Tower Consulting
 er...@northcentraltower.com
 Office: 630-621-4804
 Cell: 630-777-9291

 On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Chuck McCown ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

   OK, but for the first product out the door, I am trying to pick the
 best size.  I can later offer the different size but we gotta get the
 product out there on beta test.  I am leaning strongly towards 2.875” as
 you really don’t want larger dishes on small towers.  A dish large enough
 to want 4.5” is not going to be too happy hanging off the side of a 45G.

  *From:* Bill Prince part15...@gmail.com
 *Sent:* Friday, February 13, 2015 5:44 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

  If I need something bigger than what is on the MTOW-P, I would want 3
 sizes, 2.875 OD, 3.5 OD, and 4.5 OD.  Depends on the dish/sector.

 bp
 part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com


 On 2/13/2015 11:46 AM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

  I am doing this universal pipe mount that will allow a larger dish on a
 Rohn type or crappy sheet metal freestanding type.

 And doing the larger version of the M-TOW-P

 The question is, what size pipe?
 I had initially designed it with 3 inch pipe which is actually 3.5” OD.
 Looking at the pipe chart, 2.5” has an OD of 2.875”.

 The smaller pipe would be noticeably lighter to heft.  Is that large
 enough to make SAF type mounts happy?
 Or would y’all rather have the larger pipe.






Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

2015-02-13 Thread Erich Kaiser
Maybe offer a stiff-arm option for vendor specific dishes?

Erich Kaiser
North Central Tower Consulting
er...@northcentraltower.com
Office: 630-621-4804
Cell: 630-777-9291

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Erich Kaiser er...@northcentraltower.com
wrote:

 With Rohn type tower, it seems there is a ton of bending/flexing with any
 weight, maybe a  welded smaller diameter for leg side specific up to Rohn
 55G with larger pipe side up to around 2 3/8?  Maybe a welded spacer from
 small side to large side (To get it away from the leg), kinda like MTow
 style but a solid piece?

 Erich Kaiser
 North Central Tower Consulting
 er...@northcentraltower.com
 Office: 630-621-4804
 Cell: 630-777-9291

 On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Chuck McCown ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

   We have a similar product to those now.  But my new stuff is totally
 different.

  *From:* Erich Kaiser er...@northcentraltower.com
 *Sent:* Friday, February 13, 2015 8:28 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

  Probably something similar to this


 http://www.ciwireless.com/product/pipe-to-pipe-clamp-set-for-1-12-in-3-12-in-od-pipes-14-in-thick-set-of-2/

 They also work great for Grain legs.

  Erich Kaiser
 North Central Tower Consulting
 er...@northcentraltower.com
 Office: 630-621-4804
 Cell: 630-777-9291

 On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Chuck McCown ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

   OK, but for the first product out the door, I am trying to pick the
 best size.  I can later offer the different size but we gotta get the
 product out there on beta test.  I am leaning strongly towards 2.875” as
 you really don’t want larger dishes on small towers.  A dish large enough
 to want 4.5” is not going to be too happy hanging off the side of a 45G.

  *From:* Bill Prince part15...@gmail.com
 *Sent:* Friday, February 13, 2015 5:44 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Pipe Mounts

  If I need something bigger than what is on the MTOW-P, I would want 3
 sizes, 2.875 OD, 3.5 OD, and 4.5 OD.  Depends on the dish/sector.

 bp
 part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com


 On 2/13/2015 11:46 AM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

  I am doing this universal pipe mount that will allow a larger dish on
 a Rohn type or crappy sheet metal freestanding type.

 And doing the larger version of the M-TOW-P

 The question is, what size pipe?
 I had initially designed it with 3 inch pipe which is actually 3.5” OD.
 Looking at the pipe chart, 2.5” has an OD of 2.875”.

 The smaller pipe would be noticeably lighter to heft.  Is that large
 enough to make SAF type mounts happy?
 Or would y’all rather have the larger pipe.