Fermi's Paradox ...
Once upon a time, a 10 year old child became addicted to Super Mario Land.
He played so much that he forgot that he was a child among millions of
other children and kept asking himself "Where are all the other Marios?
There must be many more Marios? I will call this Fermi's
I stopped reading at "your consciousness is capable of communicating with
gazillions of other entities from outside this physical realm/plane
anytime."
G
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:51 AM, just camel via AGI
wrote:
>
> Fermi's Paradox ...
>
> Once upon a time, a 10 year old child became
Look, I'm trying to follow the train of thought here with regards AGI. It would
be significant to AGI architecture if the contention was made that first,
existed consciousness, and then matter. It would probably invert the life-cycle
approaches we tend to follow in software development. But all
And you are the only one to know the truth because...?
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 5:08 PM, just camel via AGI
wrote:
> So what really prevents us from discovering and interacting with "aliens"
> (or rather individuated forms of consciousness) isn't a lack of technology
> but a lack of mastery of
In a nutshell: Consciousness came up with virtual 3D worlds as a way to
enhance evolution of consciousness. Not-so-evolved consciousness follows
and identifies with avatars (human beings) in order to learn fundamental
lessons. (Just like children do when they play computer games.) By using
human
So what really prevents us from discovering and interacting with "aliens"
(or rather individuated forms of consciousness) isn't a lack of technology
but a lack of mastery of ourselves. The singular gateway to the entire
universe is "inside" of us and not external. Once you operate outside of
just camel via AGI wrote:
>
> There are literally thousands of enlightened beings who will tell you
> the same thing using different (maybe less technical) words.
So what?
That just means that there are thousands of people with a neurological
abnormality that causes them to have a weak sense of
Alan
Given your prednet example; In a 2-layer network, if the camera recording the
R0 update frame was turned away for the update, the prediction made prior to
the frame update would obviously be incorrect. Would the machine know - without
referring to benchmarked footage - that the
Alan, with regards your absolute view on consciousness, I give you Solipsism as
an alternative to your razor. Still, I appreciate you including the concept as
relevant to DL-based AI.
Rob
From: Matt Mahoney via AGI
Sent: Wednesday, 11 July 2018 7:58 PM
To: AGI
See, even not so narrow minded people from this very list understand that
consciousness is non-local and more fundamental than body and brain ...
http://multiverseaccordingtoben.blogspot.com/2015/03/paranormal-phenomena-nonlocal-mind-and.html
Or Tom's book starting at page 113 ...
In a nutshell, are we saying that - first, there was consciousness?
From: just camel via AGI
Sent: Wednesday, 11 July 2018 2:48 PM
To: agi@agi.topicbox.com
Subject: Re: [agi] New Paper - Temporal Singularity and the Fermi Paradox
See, even not so narrow minded
Alan, what is it about prednet that makes you think it’s conscious? What signs
is it showing? What’s it doing that makes you think this?
From what I see, it’s something that predicts the next video frame from the one
it has been presented. There’s an NN for representation but... that’s it.
12 matches
Mail list logo
