DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposal 7993

Sorry this is late. I have finals the coming week, and have been very busy studying. As a penalty for my tardiness, I'm not going to collect a reward. I don't know if Agora could even pay for one anyway, but I'm not going to try. -Aris On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 6:03 PM, Aris Merchant

DIS: Re: BUS: Registration

On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 6:46 PM pokes wrote: > Greetings! > > I unambiguously intend to become a player at this time. > Welcome (back I believe) to Agora! -Aris

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Clork] Weekly Report

Isn't that still pending CFJ? On 2017-12-11 14:31, Aris Merchant wrote: I CoE this and the previous Clork report for not showing my standing with the Row-Reduced politicians. -Aris On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 7:27 PM Telnaior wrote: I create a new Politician with the name

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Herald] Weekly Report

I think R217 should say that every person CAN always call 2 CFJs free per week, no matter what. And get rid of AP. On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > On Mon, 2017-12-11 at 01:07 +, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > Another argument in favour of making CFJ calls less fundamentally > >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Clork] Weekly Report

I don't want it to self-ratify away. But yes, that CFJ is taking awhile. -Aris On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 7:32 PM Madeline wrote: > Isn't that still pending CFJ? > > > On 2017-12-11 14:31, Aris Merchant wrote: > > I CoE this and the previous Clork report for not showing my

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Clork] Weekly Report

HOW DID I JUST GET YOUR RESPONSE TO THIS BEFORE I GOT MY OWN MESSAGE E-mail is weird On 2017-12-11 14:34, Aris Merchant wrote: I don't want it to self-ratify away. But yes, that CFJ is taking awhile. -Aris On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 7:32 PM Madeline wrote: Isn't that still

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Clork] Weekly Report

It's just a matter of knowing who to bribe. ;) Email is indeed weird. -Aris On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 7:36 PM Madeline wrote: > HOW DID I JUST GET YOUR RESPONSE TO THIS BEFORE I GOT MY OWN MESSAGE > E-mail is weird > > > On 2017-12-11 14:34, Aris Merchant wrote: > > I don't

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Herald] Weekly Report

On Sun, Dec 10, 2017, 19:50 Alex Smith, wrote: > On Mon, 2017-12-11 at 00:17 +, Aris Merchant wrote: > > If this proposal is not already pending, I pend it for 1 AP. > This works as intended even without the conditional, under our current > rulings; you can't pay to

DIS: PAoAM v5: "Probably should be v4.1" edition

Title: Putting Agora on a Map v5 Author: Trigon Co-Authors: Aris, ATMunn, G., o, VJ Rada AI: 2.6 [ I implemented Aris's ideas and also changed a few things that were bugging me. ] [ PART I: Removing and Changing Stuff ] Repeal rules 2488 "The Surveyor", 2489 "Estates", 2490 "Estate Ballots",

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Herald] Weekly Report

This is how excess cases work, presumably for this exact reason. On Sun, Dec 10, 2017, 20:13 Alex Smith, wrote: > On Mon, 2017-12-11 at 01:07 +, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > Another argument in favour of making CFJ calls less fundamentally > > conditional. > > Perhaps we

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Herald] Weekly Report

On Mon, 2017-12-11 at 01:07 +, Alexis Hunt wrote: > Another argument in favour of making CFJ calls less fundamentally > conditional. Perhaps we should pragmatise CFJs? If you call them, they always go through unless explicitly refused by the Arbitor for not having payment. This would allow

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Herald] Weekly Report

What if the Arbitor just refused all CFJs? Or none of them? On 12/10/2017 8:12 PM, Alex Smith wrote: On Mon, 2017-12-11 at 01:07 +, Alexis Hunt wrote: Another argument in favour of making CFJ calls less fundamentally conditional. Perhaps we should pragmatise CFJs? If you call them, they

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Herald] Weekly Report

On Mon, 2017-12-11 at 00:17 +, Aris Merchant wrote: > If this proposal is not already pending, I pend it for 1 AP. This works as intended even without the conditional, under our current rulings; you can't pay to pend a proposal if it's already pending. > If I have not already done so, I call

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7989-7992

excuse me, I did vote? Something happened with my formatting and so it kind of looks like I didn't vote on 7992, but the vote is just at the end of the line instead of a newline for some reason. The vote was FOR. On 12/10/2017 7:47 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: I extend the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Herald] Weekly Report

On Sun, 2017-12-10 at 20:17 -0500, ATMunn wrote: > On 12/10/2017 8:12 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-12-11 at 01:07 +, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > > Another argument in favour of making CFJ calls less fundamentally > > > conditional. > > > > Perhaps we should pragmatise CFJs? If you call

DIS: Re: OFF: [Herald] Weekly Report

Congrats on your first report! You certainly did better than I did with my first report... Notice of Honour: I lose 1 karma because I don't feel that it's fair for me to be shogun. Corona gains one karma for a good first report. On 12/10/2017 11:47 AM, Corona wrote: As Herald

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Herald] Weekly Report

Thanks! On 12/10/17, ATMunn wrote: > Congrats on your first report! You certainly did better than I did with my > first report... > > Notice of Honour: > I lose 1 karma because I don't feel that it's fair for me to be shogun. > Corona gains one karma for a

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Herald] Weekly Report

"Number of Agora's shinies" isn't something I'm expected to know. ;_; On 2017-12-11 03:54, Corona wrote: I cause ACU to transfer to me 5-(no. of Agora's shinies) shinies, destroying ten times that number of bills. Then, I spend those shinies on gaining favor with the Party holding Economy, and

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Herald] Weekly Report

On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 4:00 PM Alex Smith wrote: > On Mon, 2017-12-11 at 10:55 +1100, Madeline wrote: > > On 2017-12-11 03:54, Corona wrote: > > > I cause ACU to transfer to me 5-(no. of Agora's shinies) shinies, > > > destroying ten times that number of bills. > >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Herald] Weekly Report

On Mon, 2017-12-11 at 10:55 +1100, Madeline wrote: > On 2017-12-11 03:54, Corona wrote: > > I cause ACU to transfer to me 5-(no. of Agora's shinies) shinies, > > destroying ten times that number of bills. > "Number of Agora's shinies" isn't something I'm expected to know. ;_; It strikes me that

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Herald] Weekly Report

What would be an example of a "basic" conditional action? On 12/10/2017 7:04 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 4:00 PM Alex Smith wrote: On Mon, 2017-12-11 at 10:55 +1100, Madeline wrote: On 2017-12-11 03:54, Corona wrote: I cause ACU to transfer to

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Herald] Weekly Report

If this proposal is not already pending, I pend it for 1 AP. If I have not already done so, I call this case for 5 shinies. If Alexis has been awarded a card, I point my finger at the Referee. -Aris On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 4:13 PM ATMunn wrote: > What would be an