From my log:
Jan 18 14:01:35 mail amavis[23844]: (23844-03) ESMTP::10025
/var/amavis/amavis-20110118T140128-23844-f7tP1VEM:
t...@vds28.bmt-gbr.de - eurap.germ...@charite.de SIZE=4461
Received: from mail.charite.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost
(mail.charite.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025)
Ralf,
Jan 18 14:01:35 mail amavis[23844]: (23844-03) Negative SMTP response
to data-dot (eurap.germ...@charite.de): 550 5.7.1 ph27\n5.7.1
Contact postmas...@charite.de for assistance
My recent main.cf change:
smtpd_reject_footer = Contact postmas...@charite.de for assistance
seems to be
Ralf,
Jan 18 14:01:35 mail amavis[23844]: (23844-03) Negative SMTP response
to data-dot (eurap.germ...@charite.de): 550 5.7.1 ph27\n5.7.1
Contact postmas...@charite.de for assistance
My recent main.cf change:
smtpd_reject_footer = Contact postmas...@charite.de for assistance
seems to be
Christian Roessner reported:
Amavis does not remove existing X-Scanned-headers
My header is twice there.
amavisd.conf:
$remove_existing_x_scanned_headers = 1;
Indeed. Here is a fix:
--- amavisd.orig2010-12-19 23:09:58.579956779 +0100
+++ amavisd 2010-12-21 17:20:08.575585307
On 11/16/2010 8:14 PM, Jay Mobile wrote:
Dear Noel,
How can I find if the message is defanging ?
check the logs.
--
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG
Dear all,
I recently encountered an issue where my clients tell that they see the e-mail
body but the attachment Is not present. I checked the mail.log and saw Passed
BAD-HEADER , quarantine: H/badh for the suspecting mails. This is only
encountered from a specific sender only. can u pls help
On 11/16/2010 3:49 AM, Jay Mobile wrote:
Dear all,
I recently encountered an issue where my clients tell that they see the
e-mail body but the attachment Is not present. I checked the mail.log and saw
Passed BAD-HEADER , quarantine: H/badh for the suspecting mails. This is only
Jay,
I recently encountered an issue where my clients tell that they see the
e-mail body but the attachment Is not present. I checked the mail.log
and saw Passed BAD-HEADER , quarantine: H/badh for the suspecting
mails. This is only encountered from a specific sender only. can u pls
help me
Rok,
Finally figured out what was the problem - penpals. Apparently that part
of the code isn't optimised for my kind of usage usage (pgsql backend,
table partitions, ...), I'm not quite sure why, but after disabling
penpals on all the gateways (~8 server) the load on the SQL server
dropped
Armin,
Could somebody help me to understand/direct why checks is working
as designed with more than internal envelope address.
Using this with a combination of in-/external envelope
dynamic_altermime_disclaimer is called for internal email as well.
sub checks {
my($self, $conn,
Armin,
Mark,
it should say something like:
# don't bother with inbound or internal-to-internal mail
(or the condition should be changed)
Changed.
Using this with a combination of in-/external envelope
dynamic_altermime_disclaimer is called for internal email as well.
That's it! But, I
Dear Noel,
How can I find if the message is defanging ?
On 11/16/2010 3:49 AM, Jay Mobile wrote:
Dear all,
I recently encountered an issue where my clients tell that they see
the e-mail body but the attachment Is not present. I checked the
mail.log and saw Passed BAD-HEADER ,
Finally figured out what was the problem - penpals. Apparently that part
of the code isn't optimised for my kind of usage usage (pgsql backend,
table partitions, ...), I'm not quite sure why, but after disabling
penpals on all the gateways (~8 server) the load on the SQL server
dropped from 6
List,
Could somebody help me to understand/direct why checks is working as
designed with more than internal envelope address.
Using this with a combination of in-/external envelope
dynamic_altermime_disclaimer is called for internal email as well.
sub checks {
my($self, $conn, $msginfo) =
Rok,
Well... that didn't work out as planned... the smtp server keeps
deferring the email even though the system load is quite low and
according to zabbix, an average of 99.24 instances of amavis is free in
the last 12 hours (min is 95 and max is 100), the system load is 0.70...
[...]
I've
Rok,
Oct 28 15:30:26 smtp-1 postfix/smtpd[3215]: warning: timeout talking
to proxy 127.0.0.1:10024
Oct 28 15:30:26 smtp-1 postfix/smtpd[3215]: proxy-reject:
END-OF-MESSAGE: 451 4.3.0 Error: queue file write error;
... on the other hand, it may just be that amavisd (SpamAssassin) took
On 29.10.2010 17:02, Rok Potočnik wrote:
On 29.10.2010 16:16, Mark Martinec wrote:
100 instances is probably better for such a setup than 50.
Did you enable the:
-o smtpd_proxy_options=speed_adjust
on the postfix smtpd service on port 25? (Postfix 2.7.0 or later
is required). This is
Rok,
I'm using postfix 2.7.1 with amavis 2.7.0 as a proxy. After some clients
reported errors sending email, I've noticed postfix is sometimes unable
to relay email to amavis due to 'queue file write error'. I'm kinda
clueless, why... Unfortunately I can't see no logs at that time in the
On 29.10.2010 16:16, Mark Martinec wrote:
100 instances is probably better for such a setup than 50.
Did you enable the:
-o smtpd_proxy_options=speed_adjust
on the postfix smtpd service on port 25? (Postfix 2.7.0 or later
is required). This is practically a must for a pre-queue setup
I'm using postfix 2.7.1 with amavis 2.7.0 as a proxy. After some clients
reported errors sending email, I've noticed postfix is sometimes unable
to relay email to amavis due to 'queue file write error'. I'm kinda
clueless, why... Unfortunately I can't see no logs at that time in the
maillog.
Bastian,
[? [:header_field|Subject] ||, Subject:
[:dquote|[:header_field|Subject]]]#
and get strange encodings on subjects, most german mails with äöü,
sometimes with or , and the following appears in the amavis logfiles:
Subject:
(re-sending, previous posting had long lines wrapped, sorry)
Bastian,
[? [:header_field|Subject] ||, Subject:
[:dquote|[:header_field|Subject]]]#
and get strange encodings on subjects, most german mails with äöü,
sometimes with or , and the following appears in the amavis logfiles:
Hi
I found the cause but I do not know the solution. If postfix will send more
than X emails to amavisd, amavisd is to reject it as deferred message.
Are these restrictions of amavisd? How can I change it?
--
Start
* Bartosz Aninowski barto...@gmail.com:
I found the cause but I do not know the solution. If postfix will send more
than X emails to amavisd, amavisd is to reject it as deferred message. Are
these restrictions of amavisd? How can I change it?
Hello Mark,
On 09/13/10 15:42, Ihsan Dogan wrote:
A detailed log may narrow down the problem area. If the crash
occurs within SpamAssassin, that would be: $sa_debug=1;
along with $log_level 3 or more (preferably 5).
Ok, I'll try that.
I've changed sa_debug to 1 and log_level to 5. This are
Hello all,
I'm running amavisd-new-2.6.3-r2 with clamav-0.96.1 on a 64bit hardened
Gentoo Base System release 1.12.13 (without SELinux) and going through
postfix-2.6.6.
Amavisd-new however is unable to connect to clamav's socket, according
to the logs.
Sep 14 13:03:30 7of9 amavis[16718]:
Hello list,
we are using the following log_template:
$log_templ = 'EOD';
[?%#D|#|Passed #
[? [:ccat|major]
|OTHER|CLEAN|MTA-BLOCKED|OVERSIZED|BAD-HEADER|SPAMMY|SPAM|\
UNCHECKED|BANNED (%F)|INFECTED (%V)]#
, [? %p ||%p ][?%a||[?%l||LOCAL ]\[%a\] ][?%e||\[%e\] ]%s - [%D|,]#
[? %q ||, quarantine:
On 9/14/10 8:07 AM, Oliver Schinagl wrote:
Hello all,
I'm running amavisd-new-2.6.3-r2 with clamav-0.96.1 on a 64bit hardened
Gentoo Base System release 1.12.13 (without SELinux) and going through
postfix-2.6.6.
Amavisd-new however is unable to connect to clamav's socket, according
to
On 09/14/10 15:38, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 9/14/10 8:07 AM, Oliver Schinagl wrote:
Hello all,
I'm running amavisd-new-2.6.3-r2 with clamav-0.96.1 on a 64bit hardened
Gentoo Base System release 1.12.13 (without SELinux) and going through
postfix-2.6.6.
Amavisd-new however is unable
On 9/14/10 9:58 AM, Oliver Schinagl wrote:
clamdscan -V
ERROR: Can't connect to clamd: Connection refused
ClamAV 0.96.1
After that, the rest fails obviously too.
Initially, I started at the clamav mailing list. The reason was because
freshclam failed to access the daemon aswell.
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Schinagl [mailto:oli...@schinagl.nl]
Amavis obvious is part of the correct group,
7of9 tmp # grep amavis /etc/group
amavis:x:10021:clamav
clamav:x:10024:amavis
It seems to me that amavis is running in the clamav group, while clamav is
running in the
Ihsan,
I've changed sa_debug to 1 and log_level to 5. This are the last log
entries before the crash: [...]
If needed, I could also provide the complete log file.
Thanks. The 03003-02 is the only one whose log starts early enough
to be informative. A grep on '03003-02' yields the most
Bastian,
[? [:header_field|Subject] ||, Subject: [:dquote|[:header_field|Subject]]]#
[...]
and get strange encodings on subjects, most german mails with äöü,
sometimes with or , and the following appears in the amavis logfiles:
Subject:
Hello Mark,
On 09/07/10 15:49, Mark Martinec wrote:
Is this reproducible by submitting the same problematic message?
Better still, reproducible using a command line spamassassin?
No, unfortunately not.
A detailed log may narrow down the problem area. If the crash
occurs within
Ihsan,
I've got a problem on a Solaris x86 host (running within VmWare).
Recently, Amavis crashes very (core dumps) very offen and I can't find a
reason why.
A backtrace of the core dump:
#0 0xfeb25302 in t_splay () from /lib/libc.so.1
#1 0x09a21d30 in ?? ()
#2 0xfebfe000 in
this helps!
Phil
- Original Message -
From: Ihsan Dogan ih...@dogan.ch
To: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Sunday, September 5, 2010 4:37:05 PM
Subject: [AMaViS-user] Amavis Crashes on Solaris x86
Hello,
I've got a problem on a Solaris x86 host (running within VmWare).
Recently
Hello,
I've got a problem on a Solaris x86 host (running within VmWare).
Recently, Amavis crashes very (core dumps) very offen and I can't find a
reason why.
A backtrace of the core dump:
#0 0xfeb25302 in t_splay () from /lib/libc.so.1
#1 0x09a21d30 in ?? ()
#2 0xfebfe000 in _sys_cldlist ()
Rich,
Change $final_spam_destiny in amavisd confguration to:
$final_spam_destiny = D_REJECT;
Tune these to suit your needs:
$sa_tag_level_deflt = 0.0; # add spam info headers if at, or above that
level $sa_tag2_level_deflt = 6.31; # add 'spam detected' headers at that
Colin,
Sorry for delay, I hope you were able to resolve the problem by now.
It seems that Amavis gives up at the 'CALLING SA check' stage, and skips
to the final part to save and destroy the process in hand.
Indeed, so it seems. Apparently something sinister happens during
a SpamAssassin call
Donald,
Making progress...SuSE's uname is part of the problem...
uname -n reports only the short hostname, i.e. 'domain-name' instead of the
fqdn.
Temporary work around is to add the fqdn using the hostname command, then
amavis will start.
I thought that amvis was supposed to use what
Donald,
The fqdn IS specified in /etc/ amavisd.conf -BUT amavis seems to ignore it.
$myhostname=host-name.com
Syntax error, should be a string (quoted), not a bareword/expression.
$myhostname='host-name.com';
Mark
Donald,
The fqdn IS specified in /etc/ amavisd.conf -BUT amavis seems to ignore it.
$myhostname=host-name.com
It IS in single quotesi accidentally deleted the quotes when I edited
out my real domain name.
| Starting virus-scanner (amavisd-new): The value of variable $myhostname
| is
-user] amavis hostname problem
Donald,
The fqdn IS specified in /etc/ amavisd.conf -BUT amavis seems to ignore
it.
$myhostname=host-name.com
Syntax error, should be a string (quoted), not a bareword/expression.
$myhostname='host-name.com';
Mark
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] amavis hostname problem
Donald,
The fqdn IS specified in /etc/ amavisd.conf -BUT amavis seems to ignore
it.
$myhostname='host-name.com'
It IS in single quotesi accidentally deleted the quotes when I edited
out my real domain name.
| Starting virus
My system uses SuSE 11.2. It is running the latest SuSE rpms.
I had this working then the server rebooted and now amavis won't start.
In fact I seem to remember bothering one of the authors about the hostname
bug.
(There was a bug that hostnames with a hyphen weren't recognized as valid).
I
On 8/9/2010 11:52 AM, Donald G. Knecht wrote:
My system uses SuSE 11.2. It is running the latest SuSE rpms.
I had this working then the server rebooted and now amavis won't start.
In fact I seem to remember bothering one of the authors about the hostname
bug.
(There was a bug that
From our logs ISee
Jul 15 16:39:25 doctor doctor[28]: amavis[29246]: (29246-06-2)
check_mail_begin_task: task_count=13
Jul 15 16:39:25 doctor doctor[28]: amavis[29246]: (29246-06-2) lookup_ip_acl:
key=216.26.162.138, no match
Jul 15 16:39:25 doctor doctor[28]: amavis[29246]: (29246-06-2)
On 7/16/10 1:45 PM, The Doctor wrote:
Hits: 134.025
Because it scored 134 points?
in ALL of my life, I have NEVER seen a legit email score so high.
did you BLACKLIST them?
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
Phone: 561-999-5000, x 1259
*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Certified SNORT
On 7/16/10 1:45 PM, The Doctor wrote:
From our logs ISee
the problem is, you mucked with the default spamassassin scores.
[BAD_ENC_HEADER=1.81,BAYES_99=100,BOTNET=30,FREEM
100 points for bayes_99 is NOT default.
BOTNET isn't a default spamassassin rule either.
--
Michael Scheidell,
Sorry to answer my own posts, problem hasn't gone away. I've set log =
level 5 and this is what I've found.
It seems that Amavis gives up at the 'CALLING SA check' stage, and skips
to the final part to save and destroy the process in hand.
Does anyone have any advice how I can trace this
On 6/29/2010 10:38 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 06/29/2010 02:50 AM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
* Rich Walesri...@richw.org:
I'm using Postfix 2.6.5, with AMaViSd-new 2.6.4 as an after-queue
content filter. Messages scoring above 5 are being quarantined for
later examination using MailZu.
Dear all,
I'm running amavisd-new on a server and it has been working ok, until the
last few days.
I'm getting a lot of queuing of emails, looking at the log files I get a
few of these:
postfix/smtp[1556]: DCDE21270BAE: to=hid...@email.com,
relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=300,
I'm using Postfix 2.6.5, with AMaViSd-new 2.6.4 as an after-queue
content filter. Messages scoring above 5 are being quarantined for
later examination using MailZu.
I would like to reconfigure my setup to use AMaViS as a before-queue
content filter -- rejecting messages scoring above 25 (or
I would like to reconfigure my setup to use AMaViS as a before-queue
content filter -- rejecting messages scoring above 25 (or maybe 30),
accepting (and quarantining) messages scoring between 5 and 25 (or
30), and delivering mail scoring below 5.
I guess before queue filtering and quarantine
* Rich Wales ri...@richw.org:
I'm using Postfix 2.6.5, with AMaViSd-new 2.6.4 as an after-queue
content filter. Messages scoring above 5 are being quarantined for
later examination using MailZu.
I would like to reconfigure my setup to use AMaViS as a before-queue
content filter --
On 6/29/2010 2:05 AM, Kiss Gabor (Bitman) wrote:
I would like to reconfigure my setup to use AMaViS as a before-queue
content filter -- rejecting messages scoring above 25 (or maybe 30),
accepting (and quarantining) messages scoring between 5 and 25 (or
30), and delivering mail scoring below
Change $final_spam_destiny in amavisd confguration to:
$final_spam_destiny = D_REJECT;
Tune these to suit your needs:
$sa_tag_level_deflt = 0.0; # add spam info headers if at, or above that
level
$sa_tag2_level_deflt = 6.31; # add 'spam detected' headers at that level
On 06/29/2010 02:50 AM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
* Rich Walesri...@richw.org:
I'm using Postfix 2.6.5, with AMaViSd-new 2.6.4 as an after-queue
content filter. Messages scoring above 5 are being quarantined for
later examination using MailZu.
I would like to reconfigure my setup to use
On 6/19/10 6:49 PM, Jason Klotzer wrote:
Hello,
The purpose of the plugin is to replace a large email attachment with a link
to the file that was originally attached- that way the messages won't be
bounced from larger providers who support smaller email messages (10MB). I
realize sending
Jason,
I am interested in creating a plugin that works with Amavis.
The purpose of the plugin is to replace a large email attachment with a link
to the file that was originally attached- that way the messages won't be
bounced from larger providers who support smaller email messages (10MB).
Andy,
So, I have an interesting situation.
A customer is posting to a mailing list...thus sending to one address,
which is different to the Return-Path on emails coming from that list.
This is triggering the bounce killer on his post, when it comes back to
him. So, he will get all emails
So, I have an interesting situation.
A customer is posting to a mailing list...thus sending to one address,
which is different to the Return-Path on emails coming from that list.
This is triggering the bounce killer on his post, when it comes back to
him. So, he will get all emails on the
Besides, is there any specific reason why you use spamd with amavis?
'cause we already have a spamd running.
Anyway, is there any *real* performance difference in running
spamassassin rather than spamc from amavis?
Or, better question, why should I use spamassassin instead of spamc?
Hello *,
using spamassassin from amavisd-new, in the header X-Spam-Status (the
one added by amavis) I always have autolearn=unavailable, but SA works
correctly with autolearn!
In SA logs I found that the autolearn variable is correctly set to
ham|spam|no|whatever.
In Example:
Mail header,
Hi Giampaolo,
2010/6/13 Giampaolo Tomassoni giampa...@tomassoni.biz:
FWIK amavis doesn't even attempt to read the autolearn variable from
local.cf, having nothing to do with it. So, your question is a bit OT here
and you'd better ask to the SA maillist.
I'm not talking about reading autolearn
Hi Giampaolo,
2010/6/13 Giampaolo Tomassoni giampa...@tomassoni.biz:
FWIK amavis doesn't even attempt to read the autolearn variable from
local.cf, having nothing to do with it. So, your question is a bit OT
here
and you'd better ask to the SA maillist.
I'm not talking about reading
2010/6/13 Giampaolo Tomassoni giampa...@tomassoni.biz:
Attempting to run a sample message through the spamd channel, you only get
something like this back:
SPAMD/1.1 0 EX_OK
Content-length: 43
Spam: False ; -8.0 / 5.0
ALL_TRUSTED,LOCAL_AUTH_RCVD,TVD_SPACE_RATIO
Besides, is there any specific reason why you use spamd with amavis?
'cause we already have a spamd running.
Anyway, is there any *real* performance difference in running
spamassassin rather than spamc from amavis?
Or, better question, why should I use spamassassin instead of spamc? :)
d h,
The problem seems to be solved! I did not see one error message
the last couple of days. If somebody else runs into this issue,
I did the following things:
- Added smtp_connection_cache_enable = 0
- Added smtp_connection_cache_on_demand = 0 (this gave me
error messages, removed it
The problem seems to be solved! I did not see one error message
the last couple of days. If somebody else runs into this issue, I
did the following things:
- Added smtp_connection_cache_enable = 0
- Added smtp_connection_cache_on_demand = 0 (this gave me
error messages, removed it
d h,
We are using FreeBSD 7, Postfix 2.5.1, Amavis 2.6.1
May 4 18:11:14 amavis[54714]: (54714-08-2)
smtp resp to NOOP (idle 113.5 s): 220 you.got.mail ESMTP Postfix
May 4 18:11:14 amavis[54714]: (54714-08-2)
Negative SMTP resp. to DATA: 250 2.1.5 Ok
May 4 18:11:14
d h,
We are using FreeBSD 7, Postfix 2.5.1, Amavis 2.6.1
May 4 18:11:14 amavis[54714]: (54714-08-2)
smtp resp to NOOP (idle 113.5 s): 220 you.got.mail ESMTP Postfix
May 4 18:11:14 amavis[54714]: (54714-08-2)
Negative SMTP resp. to DATA: 250 2.1.5 Ok
May 4 18:11:14
--
___
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
--
___
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
--
___
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
Thanks for the prompt response Noel.
You are correct, I am referring to amavis-new.
The systems I am running have 4Gb of RAM and usage seems to sit
--
___
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
--
___
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS
--
___
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
.
--
___
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
://gnuforever.homelinux.com
--
___
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org
://gnuforever.homelinux.com
--
___
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
--
___
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
://gnuforever.homelinux.com
--
___
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http
--
___
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
--
___
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS
@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
___
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS
]
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 10:03 PM
To: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] amavis Delivery status notification(DSN) failing
Ashish,
I have a postfix mail server over which I have deployed a custom content
filter written in java.
Now I introduced amavisd
for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
___
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http
Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
___
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http
.
Is it because postfix is little lax in enforcing smtp for content filter?
Thanks in advance
Ashish Sharma
-Original Message-
From: Mark Martinec [mailto:mark.martinec+ama...@ijs.si]
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 6:05 PM
To: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] amavis
-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
___
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
/intel-sw-dev
___
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
___
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto
-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
1 - 100 of 911 matches
Mail list logo
