you are sorting the String, convert to Date object first :
//return piece
return function(records, from, to) {
var fromDate = new Date (from )
var toDate = new Date( to )
return records.filter(function(record) {
return new
Sounds like it's related to these issues with new angular router:
https://github.com/angular/router/issues/258
https://github.com/angular/router/issues/192
On Friday, June 12, 2015 at 3:59:41 PM UTC-6, Daniela Meneses wrote:
Hi guys, just trying to figure out how can I have services in
Yeah, this is hard to decrypt. You might want to use a plunkr to
illustrate. That said... it be easier to have separate watches and a new
local variable to know the difference.
directive.link = function($scope, element, attributes) {
var makepubpriHidden = false;
... sort of thing to display it. If
one of the entries had HTML elements in it, they wouldn't render, which I
gather is a very reasonable security precaution; but it looks like this
approach circumvents that nicely.
Thanks for unsticking me!
Bartholomew
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 12:34 AM Luke
First of all, I'd work on one directive concept at a time and then build up
to complexity as appropriate. Your ng-repeat does not have to be outside
the directive but can be in the directive's template, and instead pass in
the data to the table's directive. You can then have custom directives
There should only be one config(). You can mass multiple dependencies into
it... that's what the Array[] syntax is. Notice the array passed into
config() has many string-names to reference each provider needed, then the
variable names are passed as arguments into the function. So anytime you
config blocks for code clarity.
Regards
sob., 2.05.2015 o 20:44 użytkownik Luke Kende luke.ke...@gmail.com
napisał:
There should only be one config(). You can mass multiple dependencies
into it... that's what the Array[] syntax is. Notice the array passed into
config() has many string-names
You don't, it will make the connection for you. Just put ng-view somewhere
in the html below the navbar, the link click will be caught by angular,
then look at your config and decide what template/controller to load at the
point of ng-view element. (consider using
html5mode:
If you are using Angular UI Bootstrap there is a disabled attribute which
you can set for each tab you want disabled:
http://angular-ui.github.io/bootstrap/#/tabs
On Wednesday, April 15, 2015 at 6:22:37 AM UTC-6, yogesh natu wrote:
HI,
I am having 3 tabs, having forms in each. I am looking
I'd say start small and then build up to the more complex directives.
Here's the simplest one I've built. It only requires a returning an
object with a linking function. Following the syntax pattern, all you have
to worry about is that the linking function is called when angular compiles
Could also be due to the primitive reference... try putting your boolean on
an object:
scope.picker = {
value: '',
opened: false
}
input type=text class=form-control datepicker-popup=dd.MM.
ng-model=picker.value
is-open=picker.opened min-date=minDate max-date='2015-12-31'
Just as plain-ol-javascript would use window.document.title... angular has
a safe reference to $window
$window.document.title
Just inject it into your controller to use it.
BUT... you're example looks like a different question. You just need to
keep up with a reference to the current nav's
Are you trying to replace complete blocks of html? Then yes, use ng-include
as Caitlin recommends. For ng-src is interpolated not, bound to a
variable... the proper way to change the source in your case should be:
img ng-src={{imagevar}}
This is advantageous because you can change, parts of
Well, you could bind each form field to a scope object and $watch the
object for changes
scope.myForm = {
field1: 'initial_value',
field2: null,
field3: false
}
scope.$watch('myForm', function(newFields, oldFields) {
if (newFields.field2.length) {
scope.buttonDisabled = true;
}
Personally use Codekit (Mac) for both minification and sass compilation.
It may be simpler to start with for you, maybe not, but throwing out
something else to offer.
On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 at 5:13:30 AM UTC-6, Volodymyr Stolyarchuk wrote:
yes, it is possible and tools like gulp or grunt
I almost know enough to answer this, but can at least point out some
direction.
First, have you tried a JSON string as opposed to sending an object.
conditions: '{age: { $gt: 30 } }'
Second, are you sure the server cannot decoded the escaped characters? I
have been able to handle both cases
) for future DB requests (via REST) from my factories.
On Thursday, August 28, 2014 2:06:03 AM UTC-4, Luke Kende wrote:
$watch in app.run and broadcast event to controllers, you'll need some
loading screen. It's timing, you control that by not letting things
execute until they are ready. You can also
$watch in app.run and broadcast event to controllers, you'll need some
loading screen. It's timing, you control that by not letting things
execute until they are ready. You can also wait until the value is present
before bootstrapping angular if you prefer.
On Wednesday, August 27, 2014
For these sort of tasks I'd recommend underscore.js. Either diff() or
filter() http://underscorejs.org/. Even if you use a directive, you have
to write the logic to perform the task, but no, don't use a directive,
write smart functions and use cool tools like underscore.
Then if you are using
How about loading a script tag in your html head that points to a remote
javascript file? If you need something before angular bootstraps, then
you'll need to accomplish it outside of angular.
On Thursday, May 29, 2014 8:46:30 AM UTC-6, Joberto Diniz wrote:
In my project, I need several
Don't try to mix jquery in like this. Learn how to use directives.
On Thursday, May 29, 2014 3:23:06 AM UTC-6, Daniel Lopez wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to to use some jquery inside a partial. what I want to do is a
.slideToggle() of a div, inside a partial.
this is my script
If you are using $locationProvider.html5Mode(true) then you don't need to
put the anchor tag in there... still it seems that {{lang}} is not
interpolating so you may have a scope issue.
On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 3:57:20 PM UTC-6, Joberto Diniz wrote:
I don't follow..
Tried:
ng-repeat just acts on the scope array (or object) so to overwrite values,
just update the scope reference.
On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 6:50:50 AM UTC-6, Stathis Gaknis wrote:
I have an ng-select.
Initially the select - options are populated from the server with a
foreach.
Then on an event
So, here's what I am understanding about your order of events, simplest
scenario...
1. User comes to home page and is not logged in therefore sees Login form.
2. User enters credentials and clicks login, which let's say is successful,
so factory method sets it's local isLoggedIn value to true and
()
});
On Sunday, April 20, 2014 11:02:00 PM UTC-4, Luke Kende wrote:
So, here's what I am understanding about your order of events, simplest
scenario...
1. User comes to home page and is not logged in therefore sees Login form.
2. User enters credentials and clicks login, which let's say is
successful
Change to:
$scope.Items = []; //no curly braces - this is an empty array, no need to
define an empty object
On Friday, April 18, 2014 3:09:42 PM UTC-6, Leonardo Alfonso Tapia Delgado
wrote:
Hi, i have a problem with *ng-repeat*, in the view is rendered a default
value {}, ¿How I can
Yeah, have not heard of bound form before, but it make sense whatever you
want to call it. More abstractly, I'd call it maintaining state... for
your form.
I have a similar case where a user selects values, can go away and come
back to the same page. I use a service to maintain state
Angular works in the browser, not on the server, so you aren't going to be
able to use angular to get the generated html going into your email.
But yes, you can post the input data from the input form by using ajax via
$http in your controller to asp.net page that simply captures the data,
I've seen this before on other browsers (IE). For me, it meant a
javascript resource is failing to load, or is generating an error that
worked in other browsers. You need the equivalent of the developer console
on that browser in Android to see what's happening if this is the case.
I could
Don't know simpleSamL but I know that since we already used an old-school
post form in drupal, we just redirect users who are not logged in there.
Then php sets the cookie, then we redirect back to the angular app if need
be (a url param determines this). Once Angular is loaded we can verify
Sounds like you are chasing your tail :} I don't see that the $scope
identifies it's controller. The fact that your example doesn't use the dot
syntax like item.value, makes it more likely to be the immediate
controller.
You can access the scope
variable:
http://rabidgadfly.com/2013/02/angular-and-xml-no-problem/
On Thursday, April 17, 2014 8:04:10 AM UTC-6, Dude wrote:
Hi All,
I have an xml file like this :
Response
StatusOK/Status
Books
Book
id1/id
/Book
Book
id2/id
/Book
/Books
/Response
it is
=preview
I can't get the AuthFactory to work. I tried to add a button to
console.log when I click but it doesnt do anything
On Friday, April 18, 2014 1:45:29 AM UTC-4, Luke Kende wrote:
This could be a timing thing. Are you sure your listener ($scope.$on) in
client controller is loaded
this will solve the issue...I HOPE!
On Friday, April 18, 2014 4:39:41 PM UTC-4, Luke Kende wrote:
Well, without seeing the code, it was an option that the broadcast was
happening before the child controller had registered the listener. Now
that I see the code, that is not the case.
So I added
I had a similar experience to Billy. I tried backbone and many other
frameworks (http://todomvc.com/) out there and then Angular was like magic
with it's 2-way data-binding. Imagine having to go back to managing your
memory in C from Java, backbone is a lot of grunt work.
I agree if you
- You could use dynamic patterns:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18900308/angularjs-dynamic-ng-pattern-validation
- You could define your patterns in the directive template and then
specify by another attribute like type:
editable type=username value=userr.name/editable
I agree to separate them out into separate directives, which makes then
easier to manage and makes them portable. Making them all work together
may be a bit trickier, but it can be done. I have several directives used
for inputs to add the functionality I need, like:
select-on-focus (selects
Sounds like you need to ensure that jquery and autocomplete plugin are
loaded in your index file before angular script refernces. Why lazy load?
Also, check that iElement is the full jquery reference you think it is at
the time the directive loads:
app.directive('ngAutoComplete',
Personally, I would approach the problem a different way all together.
Trying to intercept the click and stop propagation sees hack-ish. No?
Other approach ideas:
- put a flag on rootScope defining whether the user is logged in or not and
reference it in the logic functions like ng-click or
This could be a timing thing. Are you sure your listener ($scope.$on) in
client controller is loaded at the time of the broadcast? Another
console.log just before the registration may help you see if that's the
case. I don't believe that main as parent would override the child
controllers
I have a degree in CS (not that comparing penis sizes here matters :), but
Javascript is a different beast. If you want to use arrays like
dictionaries (which we don't call them that in js - sounds like python), be
sure to understand that an email address as an index is not a great idea.
Here's
Yes you can use another directive to do it, but timing of the wijmo
directive's rendering is the challenge. You'd have to create a $watch
function do you know when their directive has created the element and then
modify it with jquery in your directive. Does that make sense?
On Thu, Apr 3,
I was able to get it done with a solution on
SO: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16202254/ng-options-with-disabled-rows
On Thursday, April 3, 2014 10:31:28 PM UTC-6, Sander Elias wrote:
Hi Santiago,
Sure!. If you build a plunk, I will take a look at it. I don't believe it
can be done
Not sure why you are using type=submit here since ultimately your are
going to authenticate via $http but, that issue aside, you are setting your
login to the result of calling the authenticate function hence as soon as
the controller is loaded it is executing the function.
Try this:
I have to admit, it's hard to follow what you are trying to do. Have you
spent much time understand Javascript object notation (JSON)? It looks
like the core of your difficulty is understanding effective data structures.
Also, if you can create a plunker to demonstrate, that makes it easier
Any time you use for in you will get every property including prototype
methods and properties of an object (arrays are still objects). To avoid
this, use hasOwnProperty:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Object/hasOwnProperty
for (var item in
They are called promises.
http://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng/service/$q
On Thursday, March 27, 2014 4:33:56 AM UTC-6, Deeksha Sharma wrote:
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
AngularJS group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
I agree with Antonio. You are going to shoot yourself in the foot putting
everything on $rootScope even though it will seem easier to start.
Services are the way to go, period. It took me awhile to realize what
Antonio and others are saying: your model should be in your services not on
the
Actually, I've had similar issues. In my case, if your 404 page also loads
a template that still requests the same ng-include reference, then it gets
stuck in a loop and will crash the browser. It's not necessarily the fault
of angular but it would be nice if the ng-include directive knew
I agree with ev, that your problem is that you are creating a new scope
for each button. Using the Controller As syntax should help with scoping.
Ev, maybe you could be a little more tactful in your replies? Some
questions are simple enough to not require plnkrs and being an open forum
That works to... just be aware of for-in and prototype properties. toJson
uses the hasOwnProperty or similar in converting.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Deeksha Sharma
deeksha.sharma2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Luke Kende,
thanks for your suggestion ,I did it by using angular.toJson
Yes, this is one of the challenges I ran into with routing and angular.
Anytime the route changes, the controller and the template are loaded
anew. I think we expect angular to behave like cached pages when users hit
the back button and it's just there, but it's not the same context with
Why wouldnt you just call the url with the artist name using the replace
function? It won't affect the original value.
$http.get('http://ws.audioscrobbler.com/2.0/?method=album.getinfoapi_key=e8aefa857fc74255570c1ee62b01cdbaartist='
+ $scope.artist.name.replace(',the', '') + 'album
On
wrote:
Il giorno 19/mar/2014, alle ore 06:29, Luke Kende
luke@gmail.comjavascript:
ha scritto:
Ok, so you've got selected_item bound to ng-model and it is an object with
a property of Tags that points to an array. Instead of trying
interpolation on the value attribute of the input
Yes, I suppose there are some tricks:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15813850/detect-history-back-using-angular
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 12:43:37 PM UTC-6, Sander Elias wrote:
Luke, Pushpendra,
If you switch to html5mode, you gain (some) control over the back-button.
This enables
I'd use Angular UI Bootsrap's Typeahead (same thing as autocomplete) plus
you get the other ui tools that go with it.
http://angular-ui.github.io/bootstrap/#/typeahead
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 10:32:51 AM UTC-6, Michel Morelli wrote:
Hi all, I have see that there are 10+ way to manage an
If you have so many services/factories being injected, I have to wonder
what the controller looks like, meaning, are you doing too much in one
controller where somethings could exist in a directive (like elements you
use elsewhere)?
Also, if you some of these services (not resolves) are so
Well, there's probably be a better way (and I was typing this as Sander
answered), but the first thing that comes to mind is to inject $filter
service into your controller and set person.BirthDate to the formatted
value (or use another field altogether if you need to keep reference to the
Yep, javascript has a learning curve when coming from other programming
languages. I'm not claiming to be an expert but I understand a thing or
two, so maybe can offer some direction. It's hard to follow what you are
after completely, but I'll try.
First, you are reading and trying things
Well, based on how the question points are posed, it doesn't sound like you
quite have a grasp of angular, but I will offer some direction.
- First, go through the main tutorial if you have not done
so: http://docs.angularjs.org/tutorial
- Used as a single page app, angular uses partials
And for the sake of consistency/readability why not use ng-style instead of
interpolation on style attribute? (Forgive me since I have not seen this
syntax before { [ { } ] } )
i ng-click=showHideGroup(row)
ng-class=getToggleIcon(row)
class=treeToggle
*ng-style=getPadding(row)*
It doesn't sound like the directive is the issue, but the object data in
the array bound to ng-repeat. I have a page that uses
angular-ui-bootstrap's pager and the only items on the scope are the ones
for the current page, hence I do not have this issue.
What is the checkbox binding
Ok, so you've got selected_item bound to ng-model and it is an object with
a property of Tags that points to an array. Instead of trying
interpolation on the value attribute of the input, make the input use
ng-model and update the value when the selected item changes with
ng-change. This is
(
{
redirectTo: '/view1'
});
});
So basically I need to change the route in HTTP protocol. How to do that,
if you can help me out.
Thanks,
Rupam.
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Luke Kende luke@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
So if you load
Based on what I am hearing, yes, it is fact of life that you can't force
execution to wait on the promise from an async call. Resolve is doing this
for you anyway. If createCustomer() is returning a promise, then you can
do the assignment and use the then() function:
var newCust =
This may have to do with the fact the the browser will first make an
OPTIONS http request without the basic auth credentials. If your api
doesn't handle OPTIONS without the credentials, then the request fails. I
ran into this issue (not with Angular but with a jQuery page where we
needed
Not sure about rails, but one gotcha to look out for is the dot rule.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17178943/does-my-ng-model-really-need-to-have-a-dot-to-avoid-child-scope-problems
On Sunday, March 16, 2014 7:10:55 AM UTC-6, bertly_the_coder wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm using AngularJS with
I'm going to take a stab at this since not exactly sure what you are
asking, and say yes: websockets. If something changes on the server side
you can push a socket message down to the client which can react and change
the view.
On Monday, March 17, 2014 6:11:43 PM UTC-6, ali normukhamedov
Did you use ng-view in your index.html file? Then you can see the XHR call
in the browser's developer tools to verify the path being called to load
the template.
On Saturday, March 15, 2014 10:35:59 PM UTC-6, Rupam Dutta wrote:
Hi folks,
I am stuck in a very basic area. I was just
Yep, you'd have to loop through to determine which was changed $watching an
array. (I don't think you want to $watch each object in array, bad idea)
Comparing objects isn't too difficult with
angular.equals: http://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng/function/angular.equals
But, I have to ask what
a
try.
But just to reconfirm about the template path, I tried with hard-coded
absolute url (just for testing) instead of relative path in my templateUrl,
that also did not work.
Thanks,
Rupam.
On Mar 16, 2014 12:56 PM, Luke Kende luke.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
Did you use ng-view in your
I had a similar issue. What I did was to take the logic out of ng-class.
In other words, my final ng-class only ever checked booleans, never a
function:
{
selDate: col.isSelected,
selCompDate: col.isCompSelected,
available: col.isValid,
inRange: col.isinRange,
inCompRange:
You are mixing angular scope with dom manipulation. They are two different
things so not surprised you are having trouble. $scope values should point
to javascript literals, objects, arrays, but not to dom elements. You
can't call a jquery method without wrapping it first Try this:
of functions and I was
hoping to be able to manipulate the associated element node in the same
function.
Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 1:40 AM, Luke Kende luke.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
$scope is not associated with just one element if it's in a controller,
and if you were using a directive, I do not think
You might look at ng-grid. Of course, I'm assuming it's implemented with
scroll bars there because I know jqGrid is. Otherwise, you'll need to wrap
the table in a div with set dimensions and overflow:auto. You will not
keep your header a the top as the user scrolls... you can't add scroll
Ignore the div ng-provider forgot to remove it before changing my example.
On Wednesday, March 5, 2014 8:10:28 PM UTC-7, Luke Kende wrote:
It's better practice I believe to pass in data as attributes than just
expecting the scope data to be there, but just use interpolation in your
template
Just reference it from the the userData array:
tr ng-repeat=emp in employees
td{{ emp.name }}/td
td{{ emp.city }}/td
td{{ emp.date }}/td
td{{ dateConvert(emp.date, -4) | date:'MM/dd/ HH:mm:ss' }}/td
tddiv{{ userData[0].offset }}/div/td
/tr
On Tuesday, March 4, 2014
No, you can use it for a widget, does not have to be a SPA. Just realize
that the context of the angular's javascript where you set your ng-app
directive and the context of javascript everywhere else on the page are not
the same thing. If they interact at all, you may want the whole page done
I really don't know enough about WebRTC but you got me checking it out.
I will say that if a library is being used outside of angular, but a
reference is inside angular controller, you will have to use $scope.$apply
function to keep within the digest loop of Angular. That may be part of it.
Not sure exactly what you are trying to do, but agree with Witold that
services are injected into controllers and then they can handle using
$location.
Another option, not that it's a good one, but just to pose it for thought
is that you can inject $rootScope into the service and $broadcast
Sounds like you are on the right path. Having a SPA is good for once a
user is logged in. We actually redirect the user to a login page outside
of angular that handles the session and creates the cookie. The app only
offers functionality once logged. Of course, you've already programmed a
around which mirrors my experience exactly.
Question asked on
StackOverFlowhttp://stackoverflow.com/questions/22046170/explanation-on-window-getcomputedstyle-and-why-chrome-handles-it-differentlywhich
also mirrors my experience.
On Sunday, March 2, 2014 2:37:28 AM UTC-5, Luke Kende wrote
to attempt something similar into a ckeditor target
as well.
Unfortunately, there are few examples in this space..
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Luke Kende luke.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
I think we get used to frameworks having wide coverage like jQuery or
ROR, but these things take time
yes, but restful api is a little off. Meaning your save, update, and
delete methods should not have to specific the action in the url since the
HTTP method defines that for you. Also, the path should be consistent, not
persons plural and then person singular:
GET /persons--- show all person
Cool. Looks like a lot of work went into this. Will check it out if when
I start another project with Node and Angular.
On Saturday, March 1, 2014 9:53:21 AM UTC-7, Peter Širka wrote:
*TOTALSTACK*
Hello, total.js is web application framework for node.js and new version
supports great
A little unsure what you are asking. Are you saying you want to build
forms that also have options like tooltips and tabs and the like?
Why not just use the two in conjunction for your project. If you want to
make a tool that uses both, they are open source, so fork them and dig
in you
I think we get used to frameworks having wide coverage like jQuery or ROR,
but these things take time and there's a lot of competition right now for
what will be the next javascripting tool. I chose angular js because out
of all the emerging libraries, frameworks, what-have-you, it seems the
Can you demonstrate it in a plunker or similar? I'm not having any trouble
with Chrome 33 and manipulating classes in directives.
Have you debugged your directive to see where it fails? What kind of error
are you seeing other than that it just doesn't work?
On Saturday, March 1, 2014 4:19:45
You'll need to keep your objects referenced in a service, then use some id
that maps to the $routeParam. Something like this:
function MyService(){
var objects = [
{ id: 1, data: 'the data'},
{ id: 2, data: 'more data'}
]
return objects;
}
//in new route controller - this not
Use ng-bind-html
http://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng/directive/ngBindHtml
On Thursday, February 27, 2014 7:35:33 AM UTC-7, Yonatan Kra wrote:
Hi,
I have a simple bound data such that:
div ng-repeat=item in items ng-bind=item/div
*items *exist in the scope and hold several text and/or HTML
The general practice is to put it in a service, which exists in a file
named services.js. I have my api for many assets all in one service and
the file contains many services in addition to the API $resource. If you
want it to be somewhat modular to share between different angular apps,
then
($tooltipProvider) {
$tooltipProvider.setTriggers({ 'keypress': 'mouseleave', 'never':
'keydown' });}])*
*I think its the time delay of calling popover trigger?*
*Can u solve it?*
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 12:13:39 UTC+5:30, Luke Kende wrote:
what do you mean? pretty much all directives
If you need nested views where parent view needs to maintain state after
going from /admin to /admin/user/cf23df2207d99a7, and you are going to
have a lot of these, or multiple nestings, then I suggest
ui-router: https://github.com/angular-ui/ui-router
Personally, it was more than I needed so
Angular does support IE8: http://docs.angularjs.org/guide/ie
We have it tested and working for IE8+. There were a couple of tweaks and
polyfills that had to be done in the initial testing phase for our own
implementation. It's your choice, but it's not a lost cause.
We've been running
what do you mean? pretty much all directives are immediate.
ng-bind
ng-include
ng-show/hide
ng-switch
and so on
On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 8:19:04 AM UTC-7, Sowmiya wrote:
*Hi,*
* Is there any directive to affect immediately between controller and
view except ng-model?*
--
You
Nope. Each of us programs a little differently. Personally, I'd probably
transform the data before sending to storage so that each todo is a single
object that references the lists it belongs to. That way upon retrieving
them you just rebuild your lists' arrays pointing to a single object that
Reiterating what Sander is saying, you are referencing one object initially
in both arrays, but after parsing, you have two separate objects. You'll
need to manage this either upon saving or retrieving (or both) to get the
intended results.
On Monday, February 24, 2014 1:52:22 PM UTC-7,
You'll need to create a plnkr or similar to demonstrate this issue.
Angular doesn't just convert a float to an object like this. It looks
like the value is being split() with no delimiter to get an array and
then converted to an object. That's the only way to get there that I can
tell.
On
If you just need to see that the value is updating on the $scope, use an
ng-click on a button to call a function and console.log() the value after
you've changed it in the view.
div ng-controller=myCtrl
input ng-model=item.text
button ng-click=logTextLog it/button
/div
function myCtrl(){
You can create a directive to do this and add it to the body tag if you
want just one catch for any 'transitionend event. Event handling in
Angular and say jQuery are very different systems, so the $on events are
only for built-in angular events or where you $broadcast or $emit an event
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
