On 08/14/2012 08:53 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:55 AM, David Benfell
benf...@parts-unknown.org wrote:
Does systemd not use the standard
mount program and follow /etc/fstab?
It does. Though it does not use
On 08/15/2012 03:39 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I see absolutely no evidence of such an analysis, so consider me
a skeptic.
That's ok. We are not in the PR business, we are not selling anything.
You are
On 08/15/2012 09:30 AM, Christoph Vigano wrote:
I could not fix the systems as I could not get
a recovery bash prompt. I had to use a boot live CD to edit the fstab
and then all was well. On all my sysvinit systems a bad mount point
would just give me an error and continue booting.
Wouldn't
On 08/15/2012 11:01 AM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
On 08/14/2012 08:53 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:55 AM, David Benfell
benf
On 08/15/2012 01:27 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
Hi guys,
As most devs have done already, I'm going to change my relationship
with arch-general. This probably does not matter to most of you, so
sorry for the noise. Then again, it might be a useful reminder about
how most devs interact with the list
On 08/14/2012 03:17 AM, Tom Rand wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 08:59:07AM +0200, Lukas Jirkovsky wrote:
On 13 August 2012 21:36, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 21:26 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Some chips work better at e.g. 96KHz, it doesn't depend to
On 08/14/2012 08:45 AM, Paul Gideon Dann wrote:
On Monday 13 Aug 2012 12:34:26 Joakim Hernberg wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:50:16 +0530
Alternatively we will all be running systemd one day whether we
want to or not :( I suspect that this has been the game plan all the
time though. OK,
On 08/09/2012 03:13 PM, Anthony ''Ishpeck'' Tedjamulia wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 08:58:41AM -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
Yes looks like I will need to migrate to BSD
I've already begun using FreeBSD. Only real complaint I have is that my
notmuch database isn't backwards compatible
On 08/14/2012 08:59 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 13:45 +0100, Paul Gideon Dann wrote:
and easier for most users to maintain
USERS? I'm a stupid user. I guess you're talking about experts. For
USERS it's hard to follow changes every half year. We stupid users
simply want to use
On 08/14/2012 09:05 AM, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
On 08/14/12 14:59, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 13:45 +0100, Paul Gideon Dann wrote:
and easier for most users to maintain
USERS? I'm a stupid user. I guess you're talking about experts. For
USERS it's hard to follow changes every
On 08/14/2012 09:23 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 09:13 -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
On 08/14/2012 08:59 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 13:45 +0100, Paul Gideon Dann wrote:
and easier for most users to maintain
USERS? I'm a stupid user. I guess you're talking about
On 08/09/2012 04:02 PM, Anthony ''Ishpeck'' Tedjamulia wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 09:12:30AM -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
I have stopped using arch except for one server that does mail and DNS.
It is presently being moved to my own linux distro based on LFS and
using pacman for the package
On 08/14/2012 09:25 AM, Paul Gideon Dann wrote:
On Tuesday 14 Aug 2012 09:12:30 Baho Utot wrote:
I think Arch was good back in the day.
Now not so good.
This sounds a bit inflammatory and over-generalised. Presumably what you don't
like about Arch now is the fact that it will potentially
On 08/14/2012 09:32 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 14.08.2012 15:08, schrieb Baho Utot:
Wow, this sounds so much like a conspiracy theory. The fact is that the
people who write the code inevitably dictate which software is
maintained,
based on their interests and convictions, and they're pretty
On 08/09/2012 04:23 PM, Anthony ''Ishpeck'' Tedjamulia wrote:
[putolin]
As explained in this and other threads, it may not be a decision we,
in the Arch world, get to make. Too much of upstream may actually be
dictated by what a comercially-backed distro does.
That is why I just may end up
On 08/14/2012 09:58 AM, Calvin Morrison wrote:
[putolin]
When did offering an opposing opinion to what ever is popular become
tolling? what is this? /r/politics? I frankly have seen arguments both
ways for systemd and initscripts, and the fact that many users do not
want to switch is enough
On 08/14/2012 10:32 AM, Brandon Watkins wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Jelle van der Waa je...@vdwaa.nl wrote:
On 08/09/12 22:00, Anthony ''Ishpeck'' Tedjamulia wrote:
I think what he was saying wasn't that systemd is hard but switching is
hard irrespectively of what you're
On 08/14/2012 06:35 PM, David Benfell wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/14/2012 07:32 AM, Brandon Watkins wrote:
For example I find systemd's .service files so
much cleaner and easier to understand than initscripts, they are
also portable and can be included in
On 08/14/2012 06:56 PM, David Benfell wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/14/2012 03:46 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
Can you do a mount and post the result here I am curious if you see
the same thing as I do when systemd is running I have full systemd
running under fedora 15/17
On 08/14/2012 07:17 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:11 AM, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
Have a look at this and notice the /dev/sda2 lines
Never seen anything like this, so I'd be tempted to say this is not
systemd related. findmnt is usually a better source
On 08/13/2012 02:12 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Aug 13, 2012 3:17 AM, Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
I've been wondering lately whether there is a good reason why even udev
violates the one thing and do it well principle set forth by the
co worker of the designer of C and Unix as
On 08/13/2012 07:50 AM, Gour wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 12:34:26 +0200
Joakim Hernberg j...@alchemy.lu wrote:
Alternatively we will all be running systemd one day whether we want
to or not :( I suspect that this has been the game plan all the time
though. OK, flames away I guess :)
Nobody
On 08/13/2012 07:56 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Aug 13, 2012 3:17 AM, Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
I've been wondering lately whether
On 08/12/2012 10:00 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
[putolin]
Clearly, PA is not meant for professional audio work. And it might be
that for a professional all the PA logic is both unnecessary and maybe
even detrimental (so you'd use jack or pure ALSA instead, that should
not be a problem).
On 08/11/2012 09:30 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
[putolin]
I think there is no interest (upstream) in trying to make systemd
optional forever, so this is a concern you are probably right about.
However, the suggestions of what might be merged show that you are
either joking or don't know these
On 08/11/2012 11:51 AM, Joakim Hernberg wrote:
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 15:30:09 +0200
Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
This is a misrepresentation. Udev and systemd were merged I think
mainly because they belong together, but also because they had
cyclic build dependencies as they are very
On 08/11/2012 12:22 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
One thing that the folks/upstream that are merging all these things together
is missing is that the future of user computer is moving to phones and
ipad type devices. PC
On 08/11/2012 01:41 PM, Brandon Watkins wrote:
I think people are really exaggerating how bloated systemd is. I fail to
see how systemd would have issues running on mobile devices, if anything
its more optimized for embedded devices.
You didn't understand my point
On 08/11/2012 02:11 PM, Lukas Jirkovsky wrote:
On 11 August 2012 19:14, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
On 08/11/2012 12:22 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
I would be surprised if a systemd-based system requires more resources
than a sysvinit-based one, but that is of course something one
On 08/09/2012 10:42 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
[putolin]
but the easier it is to follow the trail, the better.
That's what bread crumbs are for
On 08/10/2012 08:11 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
OT: Btw. it would be nice if everybody has got the choice to use or not
to use systemd. IMO there's no need to talk about pros and cons,
Poettering again and again. I suspect we use different mail clients,
daemons etc. too.
Sadly, I don't think in
On 08/10/2012 08:54 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
On 08/10/2012 08:11 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
OT: Btw. it would be nice if everybody has got the choice to use or not
to use systemd. IMO there's no need to talk about pros
On 08/10/2012 11:50 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
On 10 Aug 2012 22:52, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
. PA until today is pure crap for MOST
computer users (including those who try to switch to Linux), I don't
like to hear again and again, that it does work for most Linux users, I
even
On 08/10/2012 08:03 PM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
[putolin]
Look, you don't _have_ to use pacman to manage software. As I said
elsewhere, dependencies on pulse, lirc, etc. are there for a reason.
If you disagree with this reason, file a bugreport. But using dummy
packages is just cheating.
Then
On 08/09/2012 11:27 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 09.08.2012 17:12, schrieb Jonathan:
In the past I have seen ext2 saves time during boot vs ext3.Having a
journal is no use since the files are rarely changed and the
filesystem is mostly opened read only. The journal takes up some
space. These
On 08/09/2012 11:45 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 09.08.2012 17:34, schrieb Baho Utot:
On 08/09/2012 11:27 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 09.08.2012 17:12, schrieb Jonathan:
In the past I have seen ext2 saves time during boot vs ext3.Having a
journal is no use since the files are rarely changed
On 08/09/2012 12:08 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 09.08.2012 17:58, schrieb Baho Utot:
It is not 10 year old information it was published just after ext4 came out
google is your friend.
It is still outdated information. After ext4 came out, it took a few
months until Google started
On 08/09/2012 12:12 PM, Manolo Martínez wrote:
[putolin]
... and another enthralling battle of wits brought to you by
arch-general!
I think that it's general archcommander and chief
On 08/09/2012 03:54 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
On 08/08/2012 03:20 PM, PyroPeter wrote:
flame
Thunderbird really is a big pile of crap. There are bugs everywhere! I
havn't seen something this bad since KDE 4.0. The only reason I didn't
switch to mutt yet is that I don't know how to replace the
On 08/08/2012 05:50 AM, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
On 08/08/12 10:52, Jayesh Badwaik wrote:
On Wednesday 08 Aug 2012 09:38:40 Lukas Jirkovsky wrote:
Works fine here with the nearly Poettering-free system. I'm using
KDE networkmanager applet. I tested a system-wide wifi connection and
it worked
On 08/08/2012 08:30 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
what if one wants a system not unlike a Unix system?
Might be too late, but you could try contacting: http://sco.com/.
-t
They just filed chapter7
Maybe I can pick up
On 08/08/2012 08:34 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
I have watched this in top for the past week or so. Thunderbird and
Firefox are causing X cpu usage to shoot upt to between 80-100% on
simple tasks like scrolling a message list in tbird or simply opening
css menus in firefox. All of
On 08/08/2012 09:33 AM, Adam Sparks wrote:
I saw an email just like this like week and made a switch to chromium.
There is a difference. Especially when opening a new window, Firefox has
some very large spikes. Don't use Thunderbird so I cannot say anything
about that.
On Aug 8, 2012 6:30 AM,
On Thursday, July 26, 2012 04:48:30 PM Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Jayesh Badwaik
jayesh.badwai...@gmail.com wrote:
[putolin]
Actually, re-reading that, I'm not sure you understand too much about
how initscripts work (and what they do) either. Not that I'm an expert
On Thursday, July 26, 2012 10:56:37 AM Rodrigo Rivas wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Jayesh Badwaik jayesh.badwai...@gmail.com
wrote:
Well, then:
/opt - /usr/opt
And everyone will be happy :)
No, I guess not, /usr is for vendor-supplied stuff. /opt is for personal
On Thursday, July 26, 2012 05:22:09 PM Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 16:48 +0800, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
those are bash scripts
Exactly, but what is better when we need to use irrational cryptic text
On Thursday, July 26, 2012 11:31:49 AM Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 17:22 +0800, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 16:48 +0800, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
those are bash scripts
Exactly,
On Thursday, July 26, 2012 11:57:26 AM Dennis Herbrich wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:52:49AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 12:43 +0300, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Jayesh Badwaik
jayesh.badwai...@gmail.com wrote:
[putolin]
On Thursday, July 26, 2012 12:07:02 PM Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 11:57 +0200, Dennis Herbrich wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:52:49AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 12:43 +0300, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Jayesh Badwaik
On Thursday, July 26, 2012 12:50:47 PM Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Jayesh Badwaik
jayesh.badwai...@gmail.com wrote:
Why will /opt have to go?
I don't think we will ever manage to get rid of /opt. However, if we
were to follow brainworker's renaming scheme I'd
On Thursday, July 26, 2012 11:13:42 AM Nicholas MIller wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Mike mkgma...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26/07/12 16:35, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
The 26/07/12, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 11:57 +0200, Dennis Herbrich wrote:
By the way ...
...
On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 11:57:02 AM Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Jul 25, 2012 2:45 AM, David Benfell benf...@parts-unknown.org wrote:
rc.d start network #successfully gets some address and a route
for i in 74.207.225.79/32 74.207.227.150/32 173.230.137.73/32
173.230.137.76/32
do
On 07/24/2012 08:37 AM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
[2012-07-24 13:27:50 +0100] Kevin Chadwick:
you may not see my points if you haven't done any research on
the foundations of UNIX and/or security.
How more ridiculous can you get?
He is not being ridiculous.
He is stating his opinion and that
On 07/24/2012 09:09 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Systemd is
larger than init, so for embedded it may well quadruple boot time.
What utter bullshit. Please, Kevin, if you are going to throw around
numbers, do some
I have seen some comments here about LSB init scripts.
Anyone know where I might obtain an example LSB script template?
On 07/24/2012 11:05 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
I have seen some comments here about LSB init scripts.
Anyone know where I might obtain an example LSB script template?
Most distros who use sysvinit (not Arch though) use
On 07/21/2012 11:24 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 4:57 PM, D. R. Evans doc.ev...@gmail.com wrote:
I *think* that this means that in fact glibc owns all the files.
It means that no other package owns any files. It might still be that
there are files in /lib that are not owned
On 07/20/2012 10:27 AM, D. R. Evans wrote:
Norbert Zeh said the following at 07/19/2012 06:08 PM :
Well, the filesystem instructions are older and applied at the time the glibc
upgrade was not an issue yet. Combining the two instructions, I would guess the
following should work:
pacman -Syu
On 07/20/2012 10:47 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 4:21 PM, D. R. Evans doc.ev...@gmail.com wrote:
There's nothing on this system that hasn't come from either AUR or the
official arch repositories, so I don't know why I'm having any problems at all
:-(
I have seen people
On 07/20/2012 12:46 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Jul 20, 2012 6:08 PM, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
On 07/20/2012 10:47 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 4:21 PM, D. R. Evans doc.ev...@gmail.com wrote:
There's nothing on this system that hasn't come from either AUR
On 07/15/2012 06:25 PM, Daniel Wallace wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 05:20:03PM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
On 07/15/2012 04:52 PM, Daniel Wallace wrote:
I missed your part about rebuilding before doing pacman -Syu --ignore
glibc, that should be unnecessary as the files will be available in
On 06/10/2012 05:23 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Javier Vasquez j.e.vasque...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've been using the original cdrecord (cdrtools) for more than 10
years now, however I hadn't burned anything in the last 3 months (or
even more). With the current linux kernel image from Arch:
rc.sysinit call mountpoint but that package soes not exist in a new install.
what package contains mountpoint?
On 04/27/2012 01:12 PM, Christoph Vigano wrote:
On 04/27/2012 01:42 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
rc.sysinit call mountpoint but that package soes not exist in a new
install.
what package contains mountpoint?
util-linux contains this program, but if util-linux does seem to be not
installed
On 04/13/2012 08:51 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
On 04/13/2012 07:40 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
On 04/05/2012 03:43 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
On 04/05/2012 03:36 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
Is there any way to revert my chroot for building back to gcc46 immediately
prior to this last gcc47
On 04/05/2012 03:36 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
Is there any way to revert my chroot for building back to gcc46
immediately prior to this last gcc47 update? Obvious reasons - bug
fixes required due to new gcc47 C11 C11++ extension implementation,
etc..., but I would like to continue
On 03/25/2012 12:44 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
I need to know if makepkg/PKGBUILD can handle a check to see whether the same
files provided by two different packages (which are not dependencies of each
other) exist in the file system to prevent an installation failure due to
On 03/25/2012 04:09 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Sun, 25 Mar 2012 22:08:43 +0200
schrieb Heiko Baumsli...@baums-on-web.de:
AUR still doesn't support split packages, and split packages can't be
handled by the AUR wrappers. So this is really the worst ideas for
AUR, and should only be used for
On 03/25/2012 02:00 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/25/2012 12:30 PM, Jesse Juhani Jaara wrote:
In tdesdk's PKGBUILD do somthing like this
build () {
pach -Np -i patches
sed 's|clause|fix|' file.c
.configure --prefix
}
package_tdesdk ()
{
make
On 03/25/2012 01:24 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
On 03/25/2012 06:55 AM, Matthew Monaco wrote:
On 03/24/2012 10:44 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
I need to know if makepkg/PKGBUILD can handle a check to see whether the same
files provided by two different packages (which are not
On 03/25/2012 07:29 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/25/2012 05:01 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
You may have a bigger problem then, you may/will have to put them into
unrelated directories so they do not conflict with each other.
I originally thought you
On 03/22/2012 06:54 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
I have followed the DeveloperWiki:Building in a Clean Chroot page closely for
the trinity build and it has worked fine. For major rebuilds it has you create a
local.db.tar.gz in /root/repo as a local repo. However, I was experimenting with
On 03/03/2012 06:34 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
On 03/03/2012 04:39 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
I'm not sure what makepkg needs to tell it to put the packages in the $pkgdir
from within the Makefile. Anyone else been bitten by this? Any quick fix?
make INSTALL_ROOT=$pkdir install
What
On 02/21/2012 12:24 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
All,
I am having trouble building the new shadow (4.1.5) from ABS so that
libshadow.so.0 is created and installed. I have tried modifying
lib/Makefile.am like was done in 4.1.4:
#Ugh, force this to build shared libraries, for god's sake
On 02/15/2012 01:04 PM, jwbirdsong wrote:
On 02/15/2012 10:18 AM, Madhurya Kakati wrote:
On 02/14/12 at 11:49pm, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
The pacman upgrade didn't cause trouble here. When I run pacman -Syu the
first time, only pacman was shown. Directly after installing it I run
pacman -Syu again
On Friday 20 January 2012 07:30:53 am Allan McRae wrote:
On 20/01/12 22:11, Magnus Therning wrote:
In ArchHaskell we are heavy users of mkarchroot/makechrootpkg for
building packages. When setting up the root chroot pacman is
configured with a local db located at `/repo`, this makes
On Thursday 29 December 2011 11:35:52 pm Calvin Morrison wrote:
On 29 December 2011 20:55, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
On Thursday 29 December 2011 08:45:11 pm Karol Blazewicz wrote:
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 2:33 AM, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com
wrote:
http
I would like to setup a local repository for my trinity packages
I have a server with apache installed and a virtual host is configured.
I copied all the files to the server and did a repo-add trinity.db.gz *.pkg.*
I put this into the server pacman.conf
[trinity]
Server =
On Thursday 29 December 2011 08:45:11 pm Karol Blazewicz wrote:
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 2:33 AM, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com
wrote:
http:///trinity.bildanet.com/i686
Have you tried with 2 '/' (slashes) after 'http:' instead of 3?
No I have not.
I tried that and it now works
On Thursday, July 07, 2011 02:36:10 AM Allan McRae wrote:
On 07/07/11 10:02, Baho Utot wrote:
On Wednesday, July 06, 2011 05:59:33 PM Paul Ezvan wrote:
As a temporary work around, just add a link in /usr/lib from
/usr/lib/libdb-5.1.so - libdb-5.2.so:
13:14 providence:~ sudo ln -sf
On 06/15/2011 02:41 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys
When installing packages into an archroot with the '-I' option to
makechrootpkg is there any way to also pass the '--noconfirm' option
to pacman? I have tried a couple of different ways to pass it after
the -I option, but so far it is a
On 05/08/2011 04:21 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
Heiko Baums wrote:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Start_X_at_boot
Thats the worst wiki page i've ever seen, on any wiki.
You have not seen mine then!
On Sunday 10 April 2011 10:09:25 am Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
[putolin]
No, because that's not how Arch works. Gnome3 is not broken, nor will
it break anyone's computer. Arch is bleeding-edge, it said so on the
sticker when you installed it =)
Hey wait I didn't get any sticker when I installed it.
On 03/10/2011 07:38 PM, Linas wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
This gives me an error
/build/PKGBUILD: line 25: cd: /trinity.source/kdepim: Too many levels
of symbolic links
I want to symlink the svn repo to inside the chroot so when
makechrootpkg -c -rchrootdir creates the clean copy it doesn't have
I have a chroot devel environment like this
/home+build/
/ root/ - srch chroot build
made with mkarchroot
//trinity.source - a symlink ie ln -s
../trinity.source
/ copy- made by
On Monday, March 07, 2011 07:08:52 AM Madhurya Kakati wrote:
Hi all,
Got hold of a cheap laptop. I want to use it as my download rig. It
will be on most of the time downloading torrents.
The laptop actually came with Windows XP installed. I setup the laptop
ip as 192.168.1.5 and my desktop
On Tuesday, February 22, 2011 07:41:53 PM Allan McRae wrote:
That prelink patch is very, very unlikely to cause the issue. It was
also the only change between 2.13-3 and 2.13-4... As I pointed out,
there are other distros using that patch without reported issue and it
is now in glibc
I want to change the resulting package name in the PKGBUILD so I can support
different sites on a server hosting many virtual websites using joomla.
Example:
Stock PKGBUILD
pkgname=joomla
pkgver=1.5.22
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc=A PHP-based content management platform
arch=('any')
On Monday, January 03, 2011 11:17:46 am Ray Rashif wrote:
On 3 January 2011 23:29, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
joomla-1.5.22-1-any-sitename.pkg.tar.xz
Is this possible?
No.
joomla-$sitename-1.55.22-1-any.pkg.tar.xz is possible:
_sitename=foo
pkgname=joomla
On Monday, January 03, 2011 11:38:52 am Guillaume ALAUX wrote:
On 3 January 2011 16:52, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
On Monday, January 03, 2011 11:17:46 am Ray Rashif wrote:
On 3 January 2011 23:29, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
joomla-1.5.22-1-any
On 10/25/10 18:18, David C. Rankin wrote:
On 10/24/2010 05:06 AM, János Illés wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 14:54, Thomas Jostschno...@schnouki.net wrote:
Hope this helps.
I removed openntpd completely and disabled time sync. The vm still
freezes eventually.
Also, I cannot set clocksource
Following Building in a clean chroot I have encountered the following
issue, which is related to using sudo mkarchroot
The full path is not included (code posted from mkarchroot) should this
be fixed?
After patching mkarchroot it works with sudo.
BUILD=/home/devtools
$ sudo mkdir -vp ${BUILD}
On 10/24/10 11:20, Johannes Held wrote:
Christianchristia...@runbox.com:
I know that I have to use piping for this, but I want to output the
errors I get while compiling a program into atext file.
What to type after make then?
You could try tee. man tee.
your_command | tee file_1 file_2
On 10/19/10 10:35, Dan McGee wrote:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Jan Steffensjan.steff...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Dan McGeedpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
Community feedback welcome as well, but this is now in testing now
that the Python rebuild has moved on. Please
On 08/26/2010 10:51 PM, jewelshaw wrote:
Nice to get your suggestions. I'd better try git, since many recommend. As
for svn, just svnadmin create a repository does work?
PS: Sorry for my stupidity. I'm new to mailing list, and don't know how to
reply a certain post.
Thank you all
On 08/24/2010 03:02 PM, Meyithi wrote:
On 24 August 2010 19:52, Carlos Mennenscarlosw...@gmail.com wrote:
I have read on Google searches and on all over so many different ways
to properly set a FQDN on Arch Linux and am more confused than I was
before I started looking this up. I don't ever
I am having some issues with K3b
Under KDE4 ( yes I hate it)
When I start K3b it detects a blank dvd in the dvd writer but when
selecting the burn image tool from the menu it does not reconize the
blank dvd.
I looked into the frums and the wiki but didn't find anything that was
helpful
David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
My weather page has stopped working in both Firefox and Opera. I
think it is a plugin issue. Can anyone else view this weather loop
from the National Weather Service?
http://radar.weather.gov/radar.php?rid=SHVproduct=N0Roverlay=1110loop=yes
If so
On 06/22/10 19:31, Allan McRae wrote:
On 23/06/10 07:01, Attila wrote:
Hello together,
since the new pacman a makepkg run creates a symlink to the package
file in the
directory of the PKGBUILD. Example:
# ls -l *.gz
opera-snapshot-10.60-6378.2ah-i686.pkg.tar.gz -
On 06/21/10 12:33, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
I'm laughing at myself for being unable to get swap activated.
Initially, when
I breezed through the install, I forgot to set /dev/sdb6 to type 82 so the box
came up with swap off (2G of ram so not much of an issue)
But now, I
1 - 100 of 289 matches
Mail list logo
