Re: [Architecture] Tomcat virtual host support for tenant users

Hi Nipuni, What happens when a tenant uploads a webapp to a virtual host? Can the user invoke it? On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Nipuni Perera nip...@wso2.com wrote: Hi, I am working on an improvement for WSO2-AS to enable tomcat virtual host support [1]. With the current improvements

[Architecture] Functionality of CAppDeployer cleanup operation

Hi, I've been testing the CAppDeployer functionality these days. One thing I noticed was that the cleanup operation in CappAxis2Deployer is an empty code block! Usually, the cleanup operation of an axis2 deployer gets called during the termination of ConfigurationContext. ie. during a tenant

Re: [Architecture] Feature Level Automation Testing

Hi, Will we be writing integration tests or unit tests with this approach? If we are writing integration tests here, then we will have integration tests in carbon component/feature repos in addition to what we already have in product repos. It's important to have automation tests at product

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] Fixing CApp story for Carbon 4.3.0

There's a parameter called allowRoles that can be used to enforce roles. It could contain a comma separated roles list. But, I believe it would be much cleaner if the roles can also be included in the RampartConfig of the policy. ESB can go ahead with this approach. Security wizard already

Re: [Architecture] How to release a milestone product pack ?

Hi Sagara, You can use the following system property to ignore snapshot validation check during release:prepare. So, for milestones, we can simply use this one. * -DignoreSnapshots=true* The maven doc reference can be found in [1] under *allowTimestampedSnapshots.* So, shall we use this

Re: [Architecture] Exploded web app deployment for developer studio

Hi Awanthika, It seems your mail body is empty. :-) On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Awanthika Senarath awanth...@wso2.com wrote: Adding Architecture group ___ Architecture mailing list Architecture@wso2.org

Re: [Architecture] Data Services services.xml support is removed? svn commit r206697 - in carbon/platform/branches/turing/components/data-services/org.wso2.carbon.dataservices.core/4.2.4: . src/main/j

? .. and I guess, the reason for doing this is because of some tooling complications we had with services.xml? .. Cheers, Anjana. On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 6:27 PM, KasunG Gajasinghe kas...@wso2.com wrote: Hi Anjana/Chanika, Did we decide to remove the services.xml support for the data services

Re: [Architecture] WebSocket Implementations which are based on Tomcat 7.x needs to change according to JSR-356 websocket spec to support in Tomcat 8.x

Hi, The current plan is to upgrade the Tomcat version to 8.x in Carbon 4.5.0. So, to move to Carbon 4.5.0 (when it's released) you will need to move the tomcat proprietary websocket implementation to JSR356. On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Thusitha Thilina Dayaratne thusit...@wso2.com wrote:

[Architecture] WSO2 AS 5.3.0 Alpha Released !!

Hi folks, WSO2 Application Server team is pleased to announce the first alpha release of WSO2 AS 5.3.0. The AS 5.3.0 Alpha distribution is available at [1]. This release introduces several major features and improvements. *New Features* - * JavaEE 6 Web Profile support

[Architecture] Custom AS specific WebApp configuration file for web applications

*Overview* Currently, there are several AS specific configuration options that are available for webapp developers when deploying webapps in AS. A set of identified configurations we have are as follows. 1. Configure the ClassLoader Runtime Environment and Classloading for web apps (such as

Re: [Architecture] Custom AS specific WebApp configuration file for web applications

, Jul 13, 2015 at 12:05 PM, KasunG Gajasinghe kas...@wso2.com wrote: Our next release is AS 5.3.0. AS 6.0 is planned for Q4 this year. So, we do not need this for DevS 3.8. Thanks. On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Jasintha Dasanayake jasin...@wso2.com wrote: I am also +1 for having

Re: [Architecture] Custom AS specific WebApp configuration file for web applications

that this is targeted for AS 6.0. Thanks, KasunG On Jul 10, 2015, at 9:57 AM, Susinda Perera susi...@wso2.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 12:12 PM, KasunG Gajasinghe kas...@wso2.com wrote: Adding DevStudio folks so that they can track this change. From DevStudio side what we have

Re: [Architecture] carbon-feature-plugin 2.0.0 Milestone 1 Released

Hi Dinusha, Looks good. Could you please share the documentation that is accessible without a Google login? May be we can add this to wso2 carbon documentation? Thanks. On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Dinusha Boteju wrote: > WSO2 Carbon Feature plugin 2.0.0 - Milestone 01

Re: [Architecture] Custom AS specific WebApp configuration file for web applications

, Jul 2, 2015 at 7:14 PM, KasunG Gajasinghe kas...@wso2.com wrote: *Overview* Currently, there are several AS specific configuration options that are available for webapp developers when deploying webapps in AS. A set of identified configurations we have are as follows. 1. Configure

Re: [Architecture] [MSS] [Carbon 5] [netty-http] JAX-RS Engine implementation

Hi Samiyuru, Can you check with Netty-http developers as to why they had made these constraints? They must had a good reason to introduce a parent class etc. We should find what it is to fix it on our end. On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Afkham Azeez wrote: > I have forked

Re: [Architecture] [BPMN]Skipping the instance creation with same state

Hi Firzhan, Are you providing a Java API as well in addition to the REST API? The reason is that underlying BPMN engine provides both REST and a rich Java API since it is an embedable engine. Thanks. On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Firzhan Naqash wrote: > Hi Philippe, > >

Re: [Architecture] Dep sync strategies for Carbon 4 products in Kubernetes

We've also written rsync based artifact synchronization for the stand-alone cluster mode. [1] This pushes the artifacts to workers periodically via a cron job. A shared public key is used for authentication. [1] https://gist.github.com/kasunbg/444df28a2e51a16bbd74 On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 5:05 PM,

Re: [Architecture] Dep sync strategies for Carbon 4 products in Kubernetes

not easy handle with rsync as I see since you can't sync the folders in a bi-directional manner. In cases like that, some kind of version control system is needed. This is where the SVN based depsync comes in. > > Thanks. > > > On Wednesday, 8 June 2016, KasunG Gajasinghe <ka

[Architecture] WSO2 Carbon Datasources 1.0.0 Released

WSO2 Carbon Datasources 1.0.0 Release The Carbon team is pleased to announce the release of Carbon Datasources 1.0 .0. Listed below are the features introduced with this release. Features - Create javax.sql.Datasource objects, and optionally bind it via JNDi - Exposing OSGi Services to

[Architecture] WSO2 Carbon Deployment 5.0.0 Released

WSO2 Carbon Deployment 5.0.0 Release The Carbon team is pleased to announce the release of Carbon Deployment 5.0.0. Listed below are the features introduced with this release. The Carbon deployment framework that was previously part of carbon-kernel is now maintained separately with this release.

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] Creating Gadgets for Web Application Statistics Monitoring Dashboard - Application Server 6.0.0

+architecture Hi Lochana, Can you describe what is the final deliverable of the dashboard? Also, please explain briefly how the users are going to use these gadgets as well as all other dependencies these need. Based on that, we can figure out how the folder structure should be. Btw, can you

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] Creating Gadgets for Web Application Statistics Monitoring Dashboard - Application Server 6.0.0

AS >> - Execute the given Spark script to summarize the event data in to a >> database >> - Configure the datasource definition in Dashboard Server to retrieve >> data from the database >> - Create and publish a dashboard using preferred HTTP monitoring gadgets &g

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] C5 - Enabling SOAP support for BPEL with Apache CXF integration

Hi Amal, Can you show the extension points we use inside the Apache CXF (Bus) box? In addition to the invocation flow, can you also show how you handle the service deployment? Thanks, KasunG On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Amal Gunatilake wrote: > Hi All, > > Following is

Re: [Architecture] [MSF4J][Improvement] Intercceptors as an annotation

+1 to provide a way to register interceptor via a class-level annotation. Is there really a need to register interceptor in a finer-level for service methods? I think that we need think about a better name for the annotation rather than @Interceptor. This gives the impression that the given class

[Architecture] WSO2 Carbon Datasources - 1.0.0-M1 Released

Hi, Please note $subject. The carbon-datasources feature can be installed with the following dependency - org.wso2.carbon.datasources org.wso2.carbon.datasource.core.feature 1.0.0-m1 zip Thanks, KasunG -- *Kasun Gajasinghe*Senior Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc. email: kasung AT

Re: [Architecture] [C5] Artifact deployment coordination support for C5

t; Sameera. >> >> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Srinath Perera <srin...@wso2.com> wrote: >> >>> Kasun, I would go with JMS as it gives event persistence and you will >>> not loose the events even if listener is restarted. >>> >>> --Srina

Re: [Architecture] [C5] Artifact deployment coordination support for C5

osing is a push model where all the nodes will push its whenever an artifact is deployed. An interested consumer can listen for these events and take actions as required. Thanks, KasunG > Regards > Nandika > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 3:45 PM, KasunG Gajasinghe <kas...@wso2.com> &

Re: [Architecture] [C5] Artifact deployment coordination support for C5

nt. The number of nodes should be pre-defined before hand in the consumer side. Or, may be we can send a server startup/shutdown message mentioning a new node has joined/left the cluster. Thanks, KasunG > Regards > Nandika > > > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:58 AM, KasunG Gajasinghe &

Re: [Architecture] [C5] Artifact deployment coordination support for C5

On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Aruna Karunarathna <ar...@wso2.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:45 AM, KasunG Gajasinghe <kas...@wso2.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Given several issues we discovered with automatic artifact >> synchr

Re: [Architecture] [C5] Lifecycle listeners to listen on Artifact deployment events

On Wednesday, March 23, 2016, Aruna Karunarathna <ar...@wso2.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 9:44 PM, KasunG Gajasinghe <kas...@wso2.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','kas...@wso2.com');>> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> To provide extens

[Architecture] [C5] Artifact deployment coordination support for C5

Hi, Given several issues we discovered with automatic artifact synchronization with DepSync in C4, we have discussed how to approach this problem in C5. We are thinking of not doing the automated artifact synchronization in C5. Rather, users should use their own mechanism to synchronize the

Re: [Architecture] [C5] Artifact deployment coordination support for C5

h docker based architecture, doing a new deployment means you just create a new docker image and spin it up, and then shutdown the older instance. > Are we planning to do this in C5? > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 1:42 PM, KasunG Gajasinghe <kas...@wso2.com> > wrote: > &g

Re: [Architecture] [C5] Lifecycle listeners to listen on Artifact deployment events

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:12 AM, KasunG Gajasinghe <kas...@wso2.com> wrote: > > > On Wednesday, March 23, 2016, Aruna Karunarathna <ar...@wso2.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 9:44 PM, KasunG Gajasinghe <kas...@wso2.com> >&

[Architecture] [C5] Java Util Logging vs Pax Logging for C5

Hi, We have done an initial POC on the affect of logging framework for the C5 server startup between SLF4J (via pax logging) and JUL. Below are the initial findings. *TL;DR* The c5 kernel starts in *0.7 seconds* with JUL, a 350ms decrease compared to pax-logging. But the time taken to log under

Re: [Architecture] [C5] [Hamming] Audit logs in C5.

MDC helps with capturing the information at relevant places such as at log-in time, and use that information later on when an auditable action is done. Then, we can capture this information using a logging appender and send it to an audit log file. We can also write a custom logging appender to

[Architecture] WSO2 Carbon Deployment 5.0.0-alpha Released

WSO2 Carbon Deployment 5.0.0-alpha Release The Carbon team is pleased to announce the release of Carbon Deployment 5.0.0-alpha. Listed below are the features introduced with this release. The Carbon deployment framework that was previously part of carbon-kernel is now maintained separately with

[Architecture] WSO2 Carbon Datasources 1.0.0-alpha Released

WSO2 Carbon Datasources 1.0.0-alpha Release The Carbon team is pleased to announce the release of Carbon Datasources 1.0.0-alpha. Listed below are the features introduced with this release. Features - Create javax.sql.Datasource objects, and optionally bind it via JNDi - Exposing OSGi

Re: [Architecture] [C5] [Hamming] Audit logs in C5.

audit logs to the distributed audit service. For that, we need to discuss the the best place to maintain it, and whether it needs to come from Kernel. [1] https://github.com/wso2/carbon-kernel/commit/e77f7f972c90e378ad00f44ce9228fea98e2ca2b On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 5:48 PM, KasunG Gajasinghe <ka

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] [C5] Upgrading Kernel Equinox version to Neon Releases

+1. It's good that we identified the issues that has previously prevented us updating to latest Equinox version. Thanks, KasunG On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Niranjan Karunanandham wrote: > +1 to upgrade the tycho plugin. Currently we are using 0.13.0 and AFAIR > the

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] [C5] Upgrading Kernel Equinox version to Neon Releases

Chanaka, let's test the fix for carbon-feature-plugin, and go for an immediate release. Kernel version upgrade can be followed after that. On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 11:39 AM, KasunG Gajasinghe <kas...@wso2.com> wrote: > > +1. It's good that we identified the issues that has previous

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] Provide Support to run Jaggery apps in Tomcat Server

Good work Nisala. Can we also do a performance round to see whether there are any perf gains when running Jaggery apps in vanilla Tomcat/AS6? How are you going to manage the codebase for Carbon vs Tomcat Jaggery support? Better if we can maintain it in the same place. On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] Provide Support to run Jaggery apps in Tomcat Server

gt; wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Kasun, >>>> >>>> Yes.We can do a performance round. Currently we manage the Tomcat >>>> Jaggery/ AS6 support code base under a new branch [1] in our jaggery >>>> repository. Current jaggery is based on to

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] Provide Support to run Jaggery apps in Tomcat Server

new branch [1] in our jaggery >> repository. Current jaggery is based on tomcat version 7 and Tomcat Jaggery >> implementation is based on tomcat version 8. So there are some api changes >> in the jaggery level. So it is difficult to manage these codebases in same >> place. >

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] WSO2 Enterprise Integrator 6.0.0 Milestone 2 Released !

AM, Malith Munasinghe <mali...@wso2.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Kasun, >> >> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 1:39 AM, KasunG Gajasinghe <kas...@wso2.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Malith, >>> >>> Have we prepared the vision docs for EI?

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] Fwd: Why re-write User class? Why re-wrap RealmService?

Hi Shariq, On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Muhammed Shariq <sha...@wso2.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 1:10 AM, KasunG Gajasinghe <kas...@wso2.com> wrote: > >> Hi Manu, >> >> #1. Because UUF's #createSession function expects an instance

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] WSO2 Enterprise Integrator 6.0.0 Milestone 2 Released !

Hi Malith, Have we prepared the vision docs for EI? Since this is a new product created by merging multiple products together, I'd like to know how we are positioning this. Also, please provide the link to the documentation. Thanks, KasunG On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:34 PM, Malith Munasinghe

Re: [Architecture] [C5] [Carbon-Feature-Plugin] Dynamic Creation of carbon.product via a Template

this file, carbon.product >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I believe this is only needed at product build time, so we do not need >>>>> to keep a file in the repo but only create the file during build time and >>>>> then del

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] [IS 6.0.0] [User Portal] Challenge Questions in Self sign-up page of user portal

Security questions are a thing of the past. Google, Facebook they all have removed the security questions based password recovery mechanisms. [1] [2] So, +1 to drop this support in IS 6. [1] http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2014/12/google-drops-support-for-security.html [2]

Re: [Architecture] [C5] [Carbon-Feature-Plugin] Dynamic Creation of carbon.product via a Template

+1. carbon.product file hasn't really been used by the products. So, +1 to make it optional. On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Dilan Udara Ariyaratne wrote: > Hi Folks, > > In the process of building C5, we currently require carbon.product for the > following goals. > [1]

Re: [Architecture] SSO Quick Start Guide for AS6

Hi Chanaka, Where can I find the guide to run the quickstart? Thanks. On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Chanaka Cooray wrote: > Hi, > > From WSO2 Application Server(AS) 6.0.0-m3 onwards, it > supports Single-Sign-On (SSO) for web applications with WSO2 Identity > Server(IS).

Re: [Architecture] [C5][IS 6.0.0] Add and Update Group UI for IS 6.0.0

On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Pushpalanka Jayawardhana wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 8:46 AM, Pushpalanka Jayawardhana > wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I am working on implementing 'add group' and 'update group' UIs for IS >> 6.0.0 as per the wire-frames [1]

Re: [Architecture] Multiple runtime support for C5 based products

Hi Danesh, Please find some comments in-line. On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:16 PM, Danesh Kuruppu wrote: > Hi all, > > In C5 based products, we can have multiple runtimes in the product > package. For each runtime, there will be configuration(deployment.yaml), > securevault,

Re: [Architecture] [IAM] [IS 6.0.0] Moving to global configuration model

On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Ashen Weerathunga wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Harsha Thirimanna > wrote: > >> >> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Ashen Weerathunga >> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> We are in the process of

Re: [Architecture] [IAM] [IS 6.0.0] Moving to global configuration model

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 5:59 PM, Danesh Kuruppu wrote: > > We have to understand the pattern to follow when modifying/removing/adding >> an item in a *list* with deployment.yaml. Copying the entire list to >> deployment.yaml and modify accordingly is the straight-forward

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] WSO2 Enterprise Integrator 6.1.0 Released

+announce On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Eranda Rajapakshe wrote: > *WSO2 Enterprise Integrator 6.1.0 Released* > > WSO2 Enterprise Integrator team is pleased to announce the release of WSO2 > Enterprise Integrator 6.1.0. > > *Release Note* > > April 2017 > > WSO2 EI is a

Re: [Architecture] [CARBON] C4 Migration from Log4J 1.x to Log4J 2.x

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 3:50 PM, KasunG Gajasinghe <kas...@wso2.com> wrote: > Hi Asma, > > Can you explain why we need to do this from a user perspective? What are > the advantages/disavantages? > > Log4j does not support the Log4j properties file format. So, this

Re: [Architecture] Cross Protocol Single Logout

Can you list possible customer usecases on why they want to use this? On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Sugirjan Ragunaathan wrote: > Hi, > > Currently I’m working on a project 'Cross protocol single logout'. WSO2 > Identity Server provides Single LogOut over applications,

Re: [Architecture] LDAP protocol inbound support for identity server

Proposal is good. I believe you are trying to use ApacheDS' ldap protocol implementation? We only need to direct the LDAP request to the back-end user store JDBC/LDAP as appropriate. If it is a LDAP user store, then we are simply doing request pass-thru. But, ApacheDS has its own directory

Re: [Architecture] License header in confi files

+1 Azeez. And, we should not blindly add them either. In the latest carbon-commons version, the INFO message box displays the license text. [1] :( [1] https://github.com/wso2/carbon-commons/issues/273 On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Afkham Azeez wrote: > I was wondering

Re: [Architecture] Milestone Plan for Redis Connector

Have we written this connector? I can't seem to find it in the Store [1]. [1] https://store.wso2.com/store/pages/top-assets?q=%22_default%22%3A%22redis%22 Thanks. On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Vanjikumaran Sivajothy wrote: > You have to forward this apim-> Esb > > > On

Re: [Architecture] Extending BCJSSE for Token binding

t; [3]https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/issues/250 > > > > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 8:34 AM, KasunG Gajasinghe <kas...@wso2.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Indra, >> >> Can you find out exactly what issues we faced before? I'm assuming it has >> some

Re: [Architecture] question to updates strategy

Hi Roman, 5.1.5 and 5.1.7 are two patch releases of 5.1.x minor version. That means there shouldn't be any API changes nor incompatibility between the two. Hence, you can replace the said dropons jar with the newer version. OSGi accepts version ranges. Usually, it is set to one minor version to

Re: [Architecture] question to updates strategy

tity.application.authenticator.samlsso-5.1.5.jar which depends > on > "org.wso2.carbon.identity.application.authentication.framework:bundle:5.5.0", > but there is no 5.5.0 jar for "application.authentication.framework", > only version 5.7.5 (org.wso2.carbon.id

Re: [Architecture] API Manager integration with Istio

Hi Sanjeewa, Just for clarification, the purpose of the API Manager in here is to do QoS like throttling, monetization, authorization? Secondly, I'm not clear where would the APIM deployment lie. Does it live on its own isolated namespace in K8S? Thanks, KasunG On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 4:07 PM

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] [VOTE] Release WSO2 Identity Server 5.7.0 RC3

Hi Pasindu, Sentha, On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 11:10 AM Pasindu Jayaweera wrote: > Hi all, > TestGrid team has executed integration-tests with the RC and please find > the effort in [1]. > We have observed bunch of test cases failing in our automated runs. > However when re-executing the failed