. While I know you strive not to
let people down, I also recognize that pleasing everyone is an
unattainable goal, so attempting to do so would be futile.
Thank you for taking the time to consider my viewpoint.
Sincerely,
Tomas M
slax.org
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 4:44 PM J. R. Okajima wrote
It seems it worked just fine. Thank you!
Tomas M
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 3:20 PM J. R. Okajima wrote:
>
> Hi Tomas,
>
> > Finally I am trying to apply aufs5-base.patch and I get error.
> > It looks like while patching fs/inode.c, the function is no longer
&
(), but it is inode_update_time() and it is already
declared as non-static
Maybe the file aufs5-base.patch needs updating?
Or maybe I should checkout different branch?
Thank you
Tomas M
a profile configuration for aufs, which will allow aufs
to access all files, and this configuration could be either part of
aufs sources or could be noted in documentation.
Unfortunately I do not know how to configure apparmor so disabling it
entirely is easier for me now.
Tomas M
> There
You can add boot parameters in the syslinux boot menu.
Tomas M
Tomas M
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 4:59 AM J. R. Okajima <[2]hooanon...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> Ben Hutchings:
> > I think I noticed this a while ago, but since Debian doesn't run on
> > nommu
purposes.
By the way, I am very happy that Debian has aufs patches in their
stock kernel, so adding AUFS to debian is a matter of single command
(apt install aufs-dkms) without the need to recompile kernel.
This makes life so easier :)
Happy 2018! :-)
Tomas M
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 5:49 PM
.
Thank you
Tomas M
slax.org
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 1:45 AM, sfjro--- via Aufs-users
<aufs-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> o minor
> - remove a harmless warning about the internal file-close, reported by
> Ralf Jung.
>
It looks like first message bounces and others work fine ... maybe
TM
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Dan Kegel <d...@kegel.com> wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 3:36 AM, Tomas M <to...@slax.org> wrote:
>> My emails to aufs-users mailing list are bouncing back.
>> T
you
Tomas M
--
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control
My emails to aufs-users mailing list are bouncing back.
This is test if it works now. Please ignore.
Tomas M
--
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD
to load the aufs module.
But instead, I would like to compile only aufs module, and use
distribution's kernel as is without patching.
Is this entirely impossible?
Is there any chance to achieve this? Maybe even in a way which would
be "wrong", but working?
Thank you
Tomas
Thank you.
Maybe I am doing something wrong, but 'make headers_install' only installs
/usr/include/linux/aufs_type.h
which doesn't contain any text like EAU*
I'm compiling for kernel 3.10.14
Tomas M
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 2:36 AM, sf...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Hi Tomas,
Tomas M:
I
I have some strange errors while compiling aufs utils.
perror.c complains that EAU_Last is undeclared, as well as the other
constants starting with EAU
I've git-checked aufs utils as origin/aufs3.9
Where are those supposed to be defined?
Thank you
Tomas M
is that command. Something like:
git show me all checkpoints which I can checkout to
- that will make it easy for the user to see which nearest version of
aufs tools is available for his aufs version.
Thank you for consideration
Tomas M
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 9:35 PM, sf
How about this message?
Wrong version!
aufs3.x, but aufs is aufs3.y.
See README in detail and try git branch -a.
That would be excellent :)
Thank you
Tomas M
--
Introducing Performance
Hello,
while compiling aufs utils for Linux 3.10.9, I get error that aufs is
for 3.0 and later, but aufs is 3.10-...
Attached patch fixes that.
Thanks for consideration
Tomas M
a.diff
Description: Binary data
Hello,
can't git checkout aufs3.10. Would you please make it available?
Thank you very much
Tomas M
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
that the file as
seen through /union/file.txt may be different after move-down since
the unmodified version will show up from the readonly branch
I think I will not personally use the move-down function, this is just
my feedback as I understand it.
Thank you
Tomas M
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 8:15
by default, and allow user
to specify a parameter to skip the checks, if he knows what is he
doing :) That way you give the power and the responsibility to users
hands.
Tomas M
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:31 PM, sf...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Tomas,
Thank you for the comment.
Tomas M
confirm or clarify that.
Tomas M
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 11:02 AM, sf...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Ben Hutchings:
The base kernel is the 3.2.y stable/longterm branch which I'm
maintaining at kernel.org. It was updated from 3.2.39 to 3.2.41 today.
Hmm, so the y can grow in the future
I prefer if you drop support for all old kernels at all and maintain
only AUFS for latest stable kernel.
Just my personal preference :)
Tomas M
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Oliver Welter m...@oliwel.de wrote:
Hi,
as 3.4 is the latest longterm kernel, I would be happy if you can provide
Thank you for confirming the issue.
I fixed it locally.
I just wanted to assure that what I did is the correct way.
Tomas M
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 4:46 AM, sf...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Tomas M:
The problem is that 'make headers_install' does not install aufs_type.h
anywhere
very much
Tomas M
--
Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester
Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and remains a good choice in the
endpoint security space. For insight on selecting
Hello,
is AUFS available for 3.8 kernel?
I tried git checkout origin/aufs3.8
but get an error pathspec ... didn't match any files
Thank you
Tomas M
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster
Thank you very much
Tomas M
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 3:27 PM, sf...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Hi Tomas,
Tomas M:
is AUFS available for 3.8 kernel?
I tried git checkout origin/aufs3.8
but get an error pathspec ... didn't match any files
I will work on 3.8.
It will be released within
By the way, I recompiled kernel with aufs CONFIG_AUFS_DEBUG=y, I can
see in /proc/config.gz that CONFIG_AUFS_DEBUG=y, but mounting aufs
with debug=1 doesn't make any change, it reports debug=1 ignored in
dmesg. Is there anything I'm missing?
Thanks
Tomas M
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Tomas
for Junjiro Okajima to explain that :)
Tomas M
--
LogMeIn Central: Instant, anywhere, Remote PC access and management.
Stay in control, update software, and manage PCs from one command center
Diagnose problems and improve
I would like to report that I've built Slax (pre-release version) with
AUFS for 3.6.2 kernel and I see no problems whatsoever, aufs is used
as root filesystem, and it works just fine.
Thank you very much Junjiro!
Tomas M
slax.org
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 4:52 PM, sf...@users.sourceforge.net
or TAR here:
http://www.tomas-m.com/blog/18813-Slax-with-kernel-3-6-2.html
Tomas M
slax.org
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Guan Xin guanx@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 6:10 PM, sf...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Guan Xin:
I am not sure if this maillist accepts binary
not reproduce the situation
again, it's gone.
Now for me everything works as it should!
I have no explanation for what I did differently the previous time.
Tomas M
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:22 PM, sf...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Tomas M:
When I create unprivileged user, he can login
since when I try things on liveCD I don't care much)
Mystery is no longer a mystery :)
Aufs works properly! :)
Tomas M
--
Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM
Deploy New Relic app
no longer needed.
The answer to klaatu's question is:
make sure the newly compiled (and patched) kernel is actually the one
which you're booting:
uname -a
or cat /proc/version if you prefer
Also, if you are using LILO, rerun it to make sure it picks the new kernel.
Tomas M
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012
kernel tree) and then copy the prepared aufs_type.h manually to the
system includes.
Tomas M
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Tomas M to...@slax.org wrote:
But let me make sure again.
Did you choose the first method or second?
DESTDIR is for the second method only.
Actually I used
. This is sufficient for me, thank you for helping me
understand how to do that.
Tomas M
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed
it is probably wrong idea to simply copy the file
manually as the documentation suggests, so this should be perhaps
removed from the docs at all.
Thank you
Tomas M
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event
method I choose, so I need
make headers_install with INSTALL_HDR_PATH=/usr in both cases. Am I
wrong?
I wrote copty ./usr/include/linux/aufs_type.h to ..., which means
Ah, I didn't notice the leading dot in ./usr
Tomas M
headers_install' doesn't work as suggested by
aufs documentation.
Tomas M
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:28 PM, sf...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Hi Tomas,
Tomas M:
However later I use make headers_install, as requested in the
documentation, and it does nothing.
Output is
make[1]: Nothing
tried
'DESTDIR=/aaa make headers_install' with no result as well.
Thank you very much.
Tomas M
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has
for `relocs'.
I've searched entire system for aufs_type.h but it's nowhere, so it
didn't install it at all.
Is this normal? Am I missing anything?
Thank you
Tomas M
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event
part, I did it in Slax by switch_root. Let me know if you think
this is your case so I could perhaps explain in more detail if you
need.
4) do not use 2/dev/null redirection of stderr output - rather
analyze the error output of your remount commands
Tomas M
slax.org
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 6
) is performed, which however reorders branches:
mount -o remount,mod:/tmp/empty=ro /tmp/union
/tmp/empty=ro
/tmp/002=rw
/tmp/001=ro
Also attached is sample script to reproduce the problem (reproduce.sh)
Am I doing anything wrong?
Thank you very much
Tomas M
+ UNION=/tmp/union
+ mkdir -p /tmp/empty
M
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 9:20 AM, sf...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Hi,
Tomas M:
My question: Is it possible to release aufs in a different form, which
doesn't need the kernel to be recompiled and rebooted?
:::
Is it technically possible?
Or is it impossible?
Or is it possible
2.6.39.
I hope you understand my suggestion and question.
Please forgive my ignorance if my question is totally out of order, I
don't know anything about kernel in general, I am just a stupid user
:)
Thank you
Tomas M
it includes much
more data than just the kernel sources (if I understand it right).
In my opinion, average user wants to download AUFS just as a patch for
his particular kernel version. That may be the reason why people prefer to
use the standalone version of aufs.
Tomas M
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011
it's not needed
IMHO aufs should cleanup the si_* entry in sysfs after the step 2 even if
mounting fails due to xino on xfs.
Thank you
Tomas M
--
vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security
I personally suggest to stop supporting old kernels at all, and focus on the
newest kernel only. If a person needs aufs for any older kernel, he will have
to use the older version of aufs which were available for that particular old
kernel.
Just my suggestion :)
Tomas M
slax.org
result in no news, or another better way.
If it result in another new project instead of aufs, then I will ask
everyone how it will be. Until then, I hope you would not stop me.
I welcome everything you do since you can do it THE BEST :)
Thank you
Tomas M
slax.org
Hello Junjiro,
Tomas M makes a donation as monthly doubling.
I have tought about what I can do for users, especially for SLAX
users. Actually I have asked but there is no response.
I replied to your question some time ago, I hope you got the reply.
I told you that I really appreciate your
Tomas M says this is monthly donation.
Not exactly, what I meant is the opposite - all donations are just
one time payments, however everybody is welcome to donate again
every month.
It was a bit surprising for me how many people sent money,
I didn't really expect such interest, and I am
as is all the time the operating system is
running, unless you rm all files from it manually (or by using some program).
Tomas M
--
Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are
powering Web 2.0
I thought swtich_root or something do that
Ah yes you are right, switch_root is the program (application) which removes
all the files.
Tomas M
--
Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM
aufs man page. Because I see there is a lot of new features
since the time I last checked it.
Tomas M
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tomas M:
These processes are blocked:
1 (init)
2190 (posixovl)
3236 (udevd)
5291 (klogd)
5352 (dbus-daemon)
Your log shows two processes, dbus-daemon
for you to find out where the problem may be, after looking at
the dmesg?
Thank you very much
Tomas M
dmesg.gz
Description: application/gzip
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
.
Does it help?
I remember something regarding some change in fstatfs ... but I'm not sure if
the change was in fuse or aufs. I guess I shall try to upgrade to latest FUSE
version from CVS or something... maybe?
Tomas M
Tomas M wrote:
Good morning Junjiro.
I've updated to 2.6.26 kernel
) end all processes
2) close all files
3) switch_root back
4) umount /aufs, /ro and /rw
5) shutdown
Tomas M
slax.org
linux-live.org
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's
- 'make' will silently
replace it to =y automatically.
The only way to disable sysfs is when you set CONFIG_EMBEDDED=y, which is IMHO
very rare.
I believe it is completely safe to depend on CONFIG_SYSFS.
Tomas M
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
o news
- begin supporting linux-2.6.25 by ./fs/aufs25
Hi,
Apache uses sendfile, which went through several changes in latest kernels.
I believe you have to apply splice patch (see in /patches/ directory in aufs
sources).
But maybe I am wrong.
By the way, 2.6.24.24 doesn't exist yet :)
Tomas M
Wolfgang Barth wrote:
Hi,
I have a reproducable
better) functionality.
Just an idea :)
Tomas M
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tomas M:
'modprobe aufs' shows error message 'unknown symbol' and dmesg shows that it
doesn't know symbols do_vfsub_splice_from and do_vfsub_splice_to,
I am sure that I applied splice-2.6.23.patch correctly.
I verified 10 times that I applied them and I'm using
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tomas M:
I just received several reports (from 5 different people) that they are
trying to build a Live CD, and their squashfs filesystems seem corrupted
(while extracting the squashfs image using unsquashfs results in 100%
correct data).
So it seems to me like
- vfsub_notify_change
- aufs_setattr
seems aufs is somewhere deep.
If you need the precise log, I will try. But for now, I suggest to wait until
xfs is fixed in kernel, do you agree? I will also try 2.6.24-rc5 with your
aufs+xfs patch.
Thank you
Tomas M
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see XFS in linux-2.6.24
I usually use this simply after first co (as aufs/README says),
$ cd aufs.wcvs/aufs
(never remove CVS dirs. for Tomas only)
$ cvs update -D20061212
And thank you Junjiro :)
Tomas M
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check
Hello.
May I ask you, what is the trunc_xino useful for?
I didn't find anything in aufs.5 documentation,
only trunc_xib and notrunc_xib, but that is perhaps
something else, am I right?
Thank you
Tomas M
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
o bugfix
- bugfix: a race in revalidating a dentry, reported
Hello,
tried Monday release of aufs with 2.6.24-rc3 and doesn't compile for me:
sysaufs.c: error: implicit declaration of subsys_put and subsys_get
(in function reg and unreg)
Should I wait for 2.6.24 final?
Thank you
Tomas M
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
o news
- introduce a new semantics
- reorder only writable
branches (to balance free space on writable branches).
So I understand it is not such simple to implement in aufs.
I will try when I have time. Give me some time.
Yes of course I will wait.
I don't need it so hard anyway :)
It would be just nice to have :)
Tomas M
:) But if it is very easy, it may be interesting to have such a feature.
Thank you for consideration
Tomas M
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now
be:
/mnt/empty=rw
/mnt/hda3=ro
/mnt/hda1=ro
/mnt/hda2=ro
I am sorry for confusion.
Tomas M
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log
every
time user does something. The essential information for inode and
dentry exist in the allocated arrays.
So if I understand all of this correctly, it would only make AUFS slower
in remount time (adding a branch), but it would work the same speed
after then. Am I correct? :)
Tomas M
.5 man page :)
Second thing, I have a question. I believe that udf filesystem is
'writable', I think it may be used on DVD-RAM media and may be modified.
But maybe I'm wrong; please verify.
Thank you
Tomas M
slax.org
think it should _not_ be.
UDF is writable. That is, as long as you have a writable media...
Jan
So I am not alone who thinks this :) Thank you
Tomas M
slax.org
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy
think it should _not_ be.
UDF is writable. That is, as long as you have a writable media...
Jan
So I am not alone who thinks this :) Thank you
Tomas M
slax.org
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy
' and it shows the following:
Set by default for a branch whose fs-type is either 'iso9660', 'udf',
(and here the paragraph ends, no more text)
Tomas M
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges
understand whether FUSE does the right think or AUFS does it the
right way, nevertheless I prefer to keep aufs code clean, that means,
don't implement any workarounds for special filesystems.
Just my two cents :)
Thank you for consideration.
Tomas M
I was speaking with FUSE developer and he thinks aufs should be modified
a bit. Here is the important part for aufs:
Subject: Re: [fuse-devel] fuse - uninitialized root inode
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:04:45 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
deletion)
Would you please consider Jan's suggestion?
Thank you very much
Tomas M
slax.org
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML
getattr?
I don't think it is correct.
Did you try it actually by yourself?
I tested it myself and for some reason I believed it fixed the problem.
But I'm testing it again and it does nothing different at all. I'm sorry
for suggesting this as it seems it doesn't help anyway.
Tomas M
;
}
Thank you very much.
Tomas M
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http
I just experienced similar OOps today,
but WITHOUT AUFS at all.
I think it may be a bug in kernel, I'm using 2.6.21.5
Tomas M
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason Lunz:
Restarting system.
BUG: at arch/i386/kernel/smp.c:177 send_IPI_mask_bitmask()
:::
Is there an obvious cause
Probably I could reproduce the problem, but my environemnt is far from
yours. I put your iso image on my nfs server and used pxe-boot client.
On the nfs client, mount several squashfs images via NFS, and mount aufs.
The component(s) in KDE seems to issue inotify which refers inode
for taking care about this!
Tomas M
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http
if there is a way how to see if
aufs has any resources used from a given branch, nevertheless please
don't confuse them together :)
I will try the patch, thank you very much.
Tomas M
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
or
/sys). This would help very much. So please consider this as a feature
request for aufs sometime in the future :)
Thank you
Tomas M
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE
the resources
associated with the branch after 'remount,del' is issued? Or does it
still use something?
Thank you
Tomas M
aufs 20070618
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0198b830
printing eip:
c0173d5d
*pde =
Oops: [#1]
SMP
Modules linked in: i915 drm
Thank you very much for the patch, I'll try it tomorrow
Tomas M
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tomas M:
I was just wondering if there is a way to see what resources
(files/directories/etc) are used by aufs (perhaps through /proc or
/sys). This would help very much. So please consider
me, but it does nothing, or I can't see any
output in dmesg after remount,del, I'm sorry.
Thank you
Tomas M
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
, but
somewhere else.
Is there a possible way to find out what's wrong? How to debug why aufs
doesn't want to delete the branch? Some kind of 'lsof' for aufs, which
would show me what files are open on the given branch, or why the branch
is busy.
Thank you very much for any help.
Tomas M
More unfortunately, I cound use 2.6.21(.1) since the sis900 nic driver
is broken. But it seems to be fixed already in git tree. I am waiting
for 2.6.21.2.
I think it will take long time.
Here is the patch for 2.6.21.1 sis900 driver, if you are interested.
Tomas M
linux-2.6.21.1.sis.diff.gz
this time, and let me know if
you found anything or if I should start the process of rebuilding the
kernel with debug.
Tomas M
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tomas M:
So I enabled debug and here is the result (attached)
:::
kernel BUG at /usr/src/a/aufs/fs/aufs/iinfo.c:64
.
Tomas M
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0dd00e88
printing eip:
f03dec03
*pde =
Oops: [#1]
SMP
Modules linked in: i915 drm snd_seq_dummy snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi_event
snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss capability commoncap fuse lp
Hello,
I noticed aufs.ko with debug is only 150 KB. This is cool! I will leave
debug turned on from now, I thought it will be several megabytes so I
disabled debug, but 150 KB is OK :)
So I enabled debug and here is the result (attached)
Thank you
Tomas M
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
/src/linux-2.6.20'
make: *** [fs/aufs/aufs.ko] Error 2
--- end cut ---
Is my environment broken or is it aufs-compile problem?
Thank you very much
Tomas M
slax.org
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join
switchroot doesn't have exit code. switchroot replaces the current process
(the init in initrd) and then executes the new init.
How can you use switchroot in initrd ???
Read this:
http://www.mjmwired.net/kernel/Documentation/filesystems/ramfs-rootfs-initramfs.txt
Tomas M
automatically,
depending on what filesystems and partitions are detected. It makes
things easier but is not required.
Tomas M
linux-live.org
Patrick wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Hello Patrick,
Patrick:
Now my question is .. do I have to adapt /etc/fstab at all? What also
concerns me
command withOUT 'aufs' parameter.
Tomas M
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys
94 matches
Mail list logo
