Hi,
#./batmand interface ath0
I simply get another command line #. Then when I try a:
#ps -e
I cannot see batman running as a process anywhere. Is there something
that I am missing?
if you don't start batman with debug mode enabled it forks into the
background. All error messages are
Hi,
Batman has a tunnel with gateway but is it possible to secure it? In first
step only clients with proper credentials can start tunnel and in second
step tunnel is crypted.
I agree that this would be a good idea. Using the batman tunnels would be much
easier to set up than IPSec as
Hi,
thanks for your statements, especially for kernel module (which was
puzzling me).
we found out that most of the CPU load caused by batman comes from sending
packets. Thats why we experimented to combine our daemon with a kernel modul
in order to reduce the load. Unfortunately, we found
Hi,
I'm running batman (experimental) on a debian linux as root but want to
access the debug levels (batmand -c -b -d 1) from within a apache that
is not running as root.
indeed a problem. As quick fix you could use sudo and allow www-data to access
batmand.
batman actually checks the
Am Samstag, 22. September 2007 20:00:04 schrieb a.anse...@oltrelinux.com:
great work Marek,
now client can ping outside mesh obtaining the correct IP from gateway.
Thanks!
God. This makes the weekend even better. ;-)
Still remain the minor problem in arrangement of IPIPA subnet mask:
Hi,
I hate to bother you but you were so responsive before...
no problem - I'm here. :-)
Antonio just put up a post. We are both seeing the same problem -
computers associated with repeaters on 0.3 (MIPS) can't browse. But ssh
into that node and do a wget and it works great!. If we
Hi,
Is not a problem of ports or firewall (batman' stream flows well over the
mesh... otherwise client node itself would not browse or would not find
any other originator): iI believe problem stay in front of mesh and not
inside the mesh. I've two roads to walk:
ok - seems logic. :-)
1)
Hi,
few weeks agoe I had sometimes the problem that batmand (experimental)
exits silently. Today I found maybe one reason for this.
When you have batman running and insert the iptable rule
iptables -I OUTPUT -o eth1 -j DROP
batmand exits. This also happen for additional interfaces
Hi,
r...@openwrt:/etc/init.d# route -n
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
[...]
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 !0 0 0 *
[...]
batmand has been started with the following parameters: /usr/sbin/batmand
-g 0 -r 0 eth2
as
Hi,
i just tried both and batmand_0.3-beta-rv674 gives a segmenation fault and
batmand_0.2-rv502 doesn't start (probably segfault as well).
can someone confirm/deny this?
has someone a link for a working (with batmand)
openwrt-g-freifunk-1.6.x-x.bin/trx ?
are you sure it segfaults or is it
Hi,
the problem semms to be found and very much trivial. the recent
openWRT-release (or especially the ixp4xx-port ?!) as well as the rather
old slackware10.2 comes _without_ policy-routing compiled into the kernel.
figure this out ... an OS for embedded routers comes without advanced
Hi,
coming from rv674 and approaching to rv719 the very first remarkable
difference I see is the second number (among parenthesis) in title
column
Router (#/255 #/64) issuing the command:
batmand -c -d 1 -b (or -d 2 looking for gateways)
There is a second sliding window (size) ?
yes
Hi,
maybe my fault... but I can't process rv733 ipk
what do you mean ? On a WRT a ipkg install
http://downloads.open-mesh.net/batman/development/wrt-freifunk/batmand_0.3-beta-rv733_mipsel-wr-elf-32-lsb-dynamic.ipk;
does fine. On mips you use the statically linked binary which is not an ipk.
Hi,
The laptop uses a proxy (squid) to only allow some URLs. Also the
firewall only allows some specific ip ranges. Does this have any
influence for the gateway detection? --
I dont know!
No. The gateway detection itself is only influenced by the batman
We experienced ~ 200% increase in cpu efficiency and ~ 300% in
network efficiency between 0.4.10 and 0.5.4.
c.f. http://olsr.funkfeuer.at for graphs.
Wow - you are part of the marketing team ?
I guess B.A.T.M.A.N. has over 1000% increase in efficiency
between 0.01 and now. ;-)
I'm sorry
Hi,
We playing around with B.A.T.M.A.N. 0.3-beta rv767 in our leipziger
Freifunk-testing-Firmware (based on v1.6.10):
the Routing works fine (if i start batmand eth1:bat vlan1:bat) -
great work!
exciting to hear. Keep us informed about all the trouble you experience
so that we can work on
We'll post a message to the list as soon as we think it is fixed and
worth a try.
i never saw that post (maybe i missed it?), so i only tested exp-0.3 :)
Right - i think it is ready to be tested now.
@Elektra: What about activating my latest routing improvement ?
Heute schon
How about forwarding the average TQ-Value of the best ranking neighbor
instead
of the actual incoming value? This should avoid inconsistency amongst
TQ-Values to a great degree!
That is what we do now !
It is the reason for the 10 seconds loops. Therefore I proposed to forward
the
May be we have to set the source address explicitely. I look into that.
I issued a patch. Could you test that for me (rev 779) ? At the moment
I can't do it myself.
Regards,
Marek
Machen Sie Yahoo! zu Ihrer Startseite. Los geht's:
http://de.yahoo.com/set
The non-usual setup: you have different parts of your mesh operating in
different subnets you need an additional ip rule to make the nodes in
the
non-homed subnet reachable from a node which has no interface in that
subnet.
So for example, if your setup looks like:
Hi,
For some reason (or another?) my middle unit keeps re-creating the
gate0
every few seconds. Sometimes it loses it completely and sometimes it
keeps
it for 10 seconds or so. The furthest node from the gw keeps it's
tunnel
permanently configured (which is nice).
to get to the bottom
Hi,
some thoughts regarding your problem. I debugged that issue with Björn from
Leipzig and it turned out that the source of your trouble lies within your
firmware configuration.
On a client you can have 2 situations (regarding the tunnel):
- The batman host generates traffic and sends it
[ 7946500] Is an internet gateway (class 1)
[ 7946510] Drop packet: incompatible batman version (105)
In revision 812 the header format was changed due to future compability issues
(the version field is now the first field in the header).
I'm sorry about the inconvenience - it wont
Hi,
batmand is now in Debian/unstable, see
http://packages.qa.debian.org/batmand
great news ! Thanks to all people involved in that process. :-)
Which means, we can now prepare 0.3 for Debian/experimental, or to unstable
if you you think that's better.
I think unstable would be fine for
now i found an issue which i didn't relate with batman
first. I got several reports of users, hotmail/msn/live.com
not being accessible anymore...
Yesterday i found out theres also problems with some pop server
not beeing accessible, but everything works fine directly at the
upstream gw,
The rv791 routes fine, but gateway make some Problems. So we included
this testet version and only request the users that _want_ to use
batman-gateway-tunnel tu update their batmand. (updatecheck is
includet) - now our Plans are broken... :-(
Sorry about that.
We don't do it to explicitly
Hi,
Which means, we can now prepare 0.3 for Debian/experimental, or to
unstable if you you think that's better.
I think unstable would be fine for the moment or any objections ?
Then 0.2 would be gone.. as I understood you, you have these two branches
for a reason... if not, let's
Hi,
ok, set mtu on upstream gw to 1400, and everything remains as before :-(
(didn't check at the upstream gw yet, but from inside the mesh i can
also access hotmail when 1-way-tunnel, and not access hotmail when
2-way-tunnel)
and tried another one with mtu 1200... still the same, seems not
Hi,
thanks for pointing that out, i cleaned the directory up and wrote a
little README. :)
thank you for doing so. I hope it is more understandable now. :-)
The kernel module might still be a little unstable, but have fun
testing.
Please give us feedback about your results - even the
Hi,
finally I finished updating all the batman OpenWRT packages. Additionally, you
can find the tunnel kernel modul, the battools and batman advanced (layer 2)
kernel module in OpenWRT now.
You need the latest trunk to get these updates. We are already working on a
backport to 07.09 kamikaze
Hi,
I was sent a backport of the batman package for OpenWRT 7.09. Download and
install instructions can be found here:
https://www.open-mesh.net/batman/patches
Regards,
Marek
On Monday, 17. March 2008 21:42:25 Bastian Bittorf wrote:
New checkins are not instantly in repo.
How long does it last or which algo is used
to make the build-it-now!-decision?
They are instantly in the repository. There is a post-commit script which
builds the packages directly after each
Hi,
I'd like to read the b.a.t.m.a.n-list over at gmane.org, e.g. in
gmane.org.freifunk.batman. I'll care about registering and stuff if
nobody speaks up.
its fine with me if you want to do it.
Any objections from others ?
Greetings,
Marek
Hi,
I am getting the message Unable to resolve ip_hdr while trying to load
batgat(r 963) on openwrt kamikaze 7.09
Batman however runs with tun module loaded.
Any suggestions on what i am missing .
which kernel version are you using ?
Greetings,
Marek
Hi,
I am getting the message Unable to resolve ip_hdr while trying to load
batgat(r 963) on openwrt kamikaze 7.09
Batman however runs with tun module loaded.
Any suggestions on what i am missing .
which kernel version are you using ?
Greetings,
Marek
In my/this case, it keeps switching from one to the other (since the
quality is almost the same on each). I guess it doesn't help keeping
things reliable for laptop connections behind... Playing with -r
doesn't seem to help because I only have one gateway node.
Correct - I misunderstood you.
On Wednesday, 16. April 2008 04:06:41 Vinay Menon wrote:
I am using 2.6.21 as with kamikaze 7.09 for MIPS
We did not test with 2.6.21. The kernel modules support 2.6.22 - 2.6.24
otherwise you might have to patch the code.
Greetings,
Marek
Hi,
I think the batman advanced topic is quite new and you wont find people
that can help you easily. The first weekend in May we will have a wireless
community weekend in Berlin (C-Base). I will be there and so will be
Simon. We are the main developers behind the layer 2 implementation.
Hi,
I tried the RO.B.IN firmware on 4 nodes and the symptoms are the same,
it's basically unusable.
when did you try this ? I helped them to fix some of these problems, so I know
it should be quite stable now.
Does anybody have a great success story to tell me with this hardware
On Monday, 5. May 2008 21:30:44 Philippe April wrote:
That's great! I'm trying it right now! (kamikaze-7.09)
Planning on removing the WARNING: You are using the unstable batman
branch. If you are interested in *using* batman get the latest stable
release ! soon? :)
Thanks for the hint - I
On Tuesday, 6. May 2008 07:22:23 donda...@reglue.org wrote:
Sorry for the density, but what is the link to the batman III stable
package (ipkg for openwrt/freifunk)?
The pre-compiled packages will be available at:
http://downloads.open-mesh.net/batman/stable
in the coming days. Give us some
On Tuesday, 6. May 2008 05:57:44 Holger Levsen wrote:
Holger, still more wanting signed checksums :)
We updated the whole source section which includes the checksums, signatures
and the vis server. Simon used his key to sign the checksums.
Have fun,
Marek
I would prefer that you copy it over. I think it is better to keep
things in one place. :)
Ok, I copied it and put a note on the website. See:
https://www.open-mesh.net/batman/patches
I renamed the patches from experimental to needs-testing otherwise people
might get confused with our
Hi,
I am mainly interested in redistributing zebra routes to batman as i do
with olsr_quagga plugin. This way, i can think about switching from olsr
to batman 0.3. Perhaps, you will enable it in your code again.
it was never enabled - it was part of a patch.
I'm not that familiar with
Hi,
Enabling zebra to tell batmand to add/remove routes needs a patch in
zebra. It would be really nice to have a batmand plugin whatever that
talks to zebra for getting dynamic HNA routes. So i dont have to modify
my zebra, but can enable a plugin in batmand (as it is in OLSR).
Your
Its a batman plugin like an olsr plugin. zebra doesnt provide any
plugins imo.
You provide a external switch to insert HNA by script. Unfortunately,
zebra cant call external script as i have to patch zebra then - or i
dont know how.
with the olsr-quagga-plugin i can redistribute zebra
On Tuesday, 6. May 2008 15:27:48 Marek Lindner wrote:
The pre-compiled packages will be available at:
http://downloads.open-mesh.net/batman/stable
in the coming days. Give us some time to recover from our release party.
;-)
Now it is done - have fun with it. :-)
Gruß,
Marek
Hi,
Is the BATMAN available for Mac OS X and windows ?
the batman layer 3 implementation has initial OS X support but it is not fully
functional. As we move forward to layer 2 in the kernel space a windows port
seems unlikely.
Is the BATMAN compatible with OLSR.
Batman is a new approach
Hi,
1- What is the procedure to identify gw?
I have initiated the daemon in the node switched into a ethernet like -a
1.2.3.4/16 -g 7 -s 2.3.4.5
Then in other nodes I begin the daemon in second option and always No
gateways in range... is displayed.
on the gateway you have to activate the
Hi,
subject says it all, batmand 0.3-1 has been uploaded to Debian sid.
well done - thanks a lot.
Greetings,
Marek
On Saturday, 31. May 2008 21:12:55 donda...@reglue.org wrote:
freifunk-batman is incompatible with batmand 0.3
I tried installing freifunk and the batman 0.3 package from
http://downloads.open-mesh.net/batman/stable/wrt-freifunk/batmand_0.3-rv105
7_mipsel-wr-elf-32-lsb-dynamic.ipk (no freifunk
On Thursday, 5. June 2008 00:11:31 Sven Eckelmann wrote:
Someone can help me?
Can you please test it further?
I used uml with linux 2.6.22.5 and uml_switch configured as hub to produce
the same problem, but dotslash told me that he wasn't able to reproduce it
with his uml image (2.6.24
Hi,
At the same hardware, are yields obtained different, with batmand-0.3
running on Linux kernel 2.6 vs. Linux kernel 2.4 ?
If so it is not related to batman. Linux 2.6 comes with considerably
improvements regarding wifi driver support and performance. It is likely that
you will feel
Hi,
I have heard that you already have a similar functionality implemented in
different batman branches. But this option will turn off setting the
routes and rules of batmand.
Can you please add/merge this functionality it to the exp-branch and
perhaps add an option so that the normal
On Wednesday, 25. June 2008 20:01:02 freif...@ddmesh.de wrote:
what option do I need to use the routing script for batman-ex rev1066?
AFAIK batman-ex does not support this function. If you want to get it in you
have to talk to Axel or patch it yourself. The sources is yours. :-)
Greetings,
Hi,
As I know you can not directly trigger to change the default route.
I don't know about batman-ex but batman allows that. Depending on your needs
you have several options:
- If you know what gateway you want you can use the -p option even at runtime:
batmand [-c] -p IP
- If you want that
Hi,
I try to research some possibilities to implement multipath-routing (MPR)
to BATMAN Advanced.
that sounds very cool ! Let me tell you that many people try but it seems not
that easy. :-)
To the first:
The idea is to use two paths through the mesh and to avoid crossed. I have
build
On Thursday, 11. September 2008 12:22:42 Outback Dingo wrote:
http://pastebin.com/m1677070a
batgat crashed out, and unloaded without batgat batman routes never stay
That does not look like a crash ?! Is your log related to the issue mentioned
by the original reporter ? He said his batmand
On Thursday, 11. September 2008 21:01:11 Outback Dingo wrote:
Batmand never established a stable route for clients, ie. they never get
reliable internet, actually to be honest, they get 0 internet cause routing
always loops
Please be precise here: Do you see routing loops or is your UDP
On Thursday, 11. September 2008 21:53:27 Sven Eckelmann wrote:
We must remove the /proc/net/batgat/clients file and /proc/net/batgat dir
correctly or otherwise we will get a oops when someone tries to access the
file. If we do not remove the directory it is possible that more then one
batgat
On Friday, 12. September 2008 06:18:58 Gustavo Lindberg wrote:
B.A.T.M.A.N. 0.3-beta (compatibility version 5)
It seems you are using an older version of the daemon together with the kernel
module. 0.3-beta may not be compatible with the latest kernel module.
[80] Error - can't set
On Friday, 12. September 2008 22:59:45 Sven Eckelmann wrote:
linux v2.6.24-rc1-1-gbada339 introduces a check for valid ethernet mac
address. We don't have such a valid one because it is just a virtual
gateway device which doesn't need such thing. To disable the
eth_validate_addr check we can
On Saturday, 13. September 2008 07:24:20 Sven Eckelmann wrote:
The calculation inside of update_internal_clock aren't atomic and can lead
to bogus time informations when many threads calling get_time_msec64 or
get_time_msec.
Just applied your latest patches as well. Thanks for looking over the
On Monday, 15. September 2008 16:28:19 freif...@ddmesh.de wrote:
When you find some problems in batman, can you also apply those patches to
the batman-experimental branch? At moment it is running without problems
for freifunk dresden. But if the network is growing perhaps some issues may
cause
On Friday, 26. September 2008 03:15:08 Sven Eckelmann wrote:
The compare functions had a different interpretation of its return value
and kmalloc can sleep inside batgat because we are running in user context
of kernel.
All your patches look very good - thanks (again) for your support. As far
Hi,
For example (can't remember the exact messages but this was about their
content):
Message on Gateway, Debugmode3:
Gateway assigned IP adress 169.254.0.1 to client 192.168.100.2
Message on Client, Debugmode3:
Got IP adress 169.254.0.1 from Gateway 192.168.100.1
so far, everything as
On Friday 17 October 2008 20:37:10 Tobias Gieseke wrote:
Strange: When I'm setting up the Network without Batman (setting a fixed
gateway on the client) I can ping the Gateway in the WAN. As soon as I
start the batmand with -g on the Mesh-Gateway the ping stops. Besides,
the ping does not end
Hi,
even if the news is still some days old - its worth mentioning:
batman-advanced is now available in Debian!
The packages are available through your favorite dpkg frontend (apt-get,
aptitude, ...) using the unstable repositories. To follow the package
development you can visit the
On Monday 17 November 2008 00:06:37 Outback Dingo wrote:
any good docs on configuring batman-adv for atheros ?
We are writing it but it takes time. :-)
Here the short intro:
Batman advanced is not aware of the Atheros driver. On every hardware it runs
in the same way.
Load the module -
On Monday 17 November 2008 00:37:35 Jan Groenewald wrote:
Is there an ipkg.conf line I can use to set the source url?
Sorry, we don't have a complete ipkg repository but you can simply install the
whole URL: ipkg install http://downloads.open-mesh.net/batman/package.ipk
Regards,
Marek
On Monday 17 November 2008 00:48:31 Simon Wunderlich wrote:
yep, bmxd/batman0.3 and batman-adv are both not compatible to each
other.
Let me try to be clear at this point: You can run batman and batman-adv at the
same time - no problem here. But you can't expect a batman node and a batman-
adv
On Monday 17 November 2008 01:12:52 Jan Groenewald wrote:
OK, they seem to be running due to the nvram settings from the previous
batmand. I do want them to last over flashes.
This is done from the previous freifunk-batman network migration.
Yes, freifunk-batman does this for you. It
On Monday 17 November 2008 01:22:24 Outback Dingo wrote:
ok, perfectly clear, one or the other
Good. :-)
now last question, there is a batman-adv kernel module and a batman-adv
userland
am i to assume i dont need the userland if running the kernel mod or are
both required
Correct - you
On Monday 17 November 2008 04:21:22 Outback Dingo wrote:
whats tells batmand-advanced its actually an internet gateway ???
Here is what Simon wrote some mails ago: :-)
You should know that batman-adv does not have special gateway support
like the layer 3 batman versions. It can be considered
On Monday 17 November 2008 06:48:03 Derek C wrote:
Please ignore my message - I [rather stupidly] forgot to put a MASQUERADE
rule into my gateway batmand board. I put that in and was working!
looking good (and very easy!) so far
Glad that you made it. Nat is often forgotten. I have an idea
Hi,
I've been trying to test this idea a bit but I'm a bit concerned - does
BATMAN only work with AdHoc wireless NICs?
no - its does not care about the lower layers. It will run on ad-hoc, managed,
ethernet, etc ...
Batman also runs on multiple interfaces. Simply supply several interfaces on
On Thursday 20 November 2008 17:27:07 Derek C wrote:
Overall that's great news (that I can route BATMAN over ethernet as well
as wireless) - it means that if routes flap from gateway to gateway for
whatever reason people will not drop connections as I'll keep the NAT at
the Internet source (I
On Saturday 22 November 2008 22:27:45 Derek C wrote:
Currently I'm constantly killing batmand and starting it up again
(different debugging levels, etc).
Sometimes I end up with a 2nd gate tunnel (so I'd have a gate0 and a
gate1).
I understand (guess?) that it's because I do kill -9 and
On Sunday 23 November 2008 00:20:55 Derek C wrote:
I see that BATMAN makes a tunnel to the gateway and then routes traffic
via the 169.254 gate0 subnet
Does this mean that all outgoing from the node should be NATed? or is it
possible for the upstream node(s) to ping the node via its true IP
On Sunday 23 November 2008 05:05:36 Derek C wrote:
Does this mean that the mesh nodes cannot ping all the other nodes? This
is if there is no routing to allow the nodes talk to far-away nodes not
within their own AdHoc single-hop network?
May be I was not clear enough:
* You can ping every
Hey,
How does the routing work for inter-node communications for 1 hop
neighbors?
If the gate0 tunnel is the default route for Internet communications how
does a node know how to talk to a node two hops (or more) away (that
doesn't go though the gate0 tunnel)?
I can understand how it
Hey,
thought I'd just let you know what I experienced when testing rv1152 on
an outdoor network with atheroses and broadcoms, olsr in parallel.
Interfaces are started with
ifconfig eth1:1 10.4.2.29 netmask 255.255.0.0 broadcast 10.4.255.255
The batman test area looks something like this:
On Saturday 29 November 2008 06:31:25 Chris W. wrote:
I don't know of precompiled packages, maybe someone else does? :)
well, I'll find a place ;-)
Offering kernel module packages is rather cumbersome as the kernel modules has
to match the given kernel _exactly_. I'm not sure how far this
On Friday 05 December 2008 17:19:25 Tobias Gieseke wrote:
I'm looking for Batman-advanced 0.1-alpha (compability version 1). We've
got some meshnodes III from a company called Saxnet and they seem to
work with this old version.. I can't find it in the repositories so
perhaps someone can tell
Hi,
its me again...
I fixed my problem, that I mentioned in the previous message. I choosed
the wrong interface, this was the mistake...
ok, thanks for letting us know.
But I have still a problem...
After maybe 10 minutes, the connection is broken between the Laptop and
the Routers...
Hello Sven,
Afterwards the development branch should change the RELEASE_VERSION to
the upcoming version number and the EXTRA_VERSION to a string which
informs the user that it is unstable and in development. This could be
for example -dev, -pre-alpha, -beta or -rc1.
I like your patch a lot.
Hi,
my freifunk firmware is v1.6.29 and the batmand version is :B.A.T.M.A.N.
0.2 rv502 (compability version 3)
please consider upgrading to the latest code. 0.2 is outdated (released May
2007). Version 0.3 is the current stable whereas the 0.3.1 release will happen
in the coming days.
I
Hi,
as Elektras test mail indicated - the server is up and running again. We had
some trouble in the beginning but we sorted it out.
With the new location a few changes come along: We completely moved to a trac
based website. This should reduce our maintenance burden and simpify our
website
Hi,
the B.A.T.M.A.N. team is pleased to announce the availability of batman 0.3.1
a bugfix and maintenance release. As usual, we provide precompiled packages:
http://downloads.open-mesh.net/batman/stable/binaries/
as well as signed source tarballs:
Hi,
I read some posts on the web about B.A.T.M.A.N being (or becoming)
a layer 2.5 protocol, which would make it operate below IP. But, at
the website and some papers I read this is not mentioned, and the
impression is that it is a regular layer 3 protocol. Can anyone please
clarify,
Hi,
Adding route to 169.254.0.0/16 via 0.0.0.0 (table 254 - gate0)
^CDeleting route to 169.254.0.0/16 via 0.0.0.0 (table 254 - gate0)
Error - can't delete route to 169.254.0.0/16 via 0.0.0.0 (table 254): No
such process
Deleting all BATMAN routes
Interface deactivated: ath2
The route
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 01:34:16 Gargi Purohit wrote:
I hope other than setting the interface ath0 in
/proc/net/batman-advanced/interfaces - i dont
need any other configuration changes.
Since I can batping between the two routers i guess the layer 2
connectivity is established between
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 16:14:23 SoukoussMan wrote:
Someone can help me to find which command is executed to add the
169.254.0.0/16 route to try to execute manually and look if i've a error ?
The command line would look like this:
ip route add 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0
You can use logread to
Hi,
How about in the laptops / pcs that access the WRT54G, which make
the infrastructure of the mesh? What kind of adapters do you use on
them?
I think Elektra made clear that the driver situation for mobile devices is
much worse. We stopped promoting laptops as part of the network.
Hi,
Thanks for the information. At least now I have some background
to work on - I already have several rt73 USB dongles, some notebooks
with Atheros, some OpenMokos (which have atheros chipsets) and a few
Nokia N810 tablets (which have a prism chipset).
although the Openmoko
On Thursday 12 February 2009 22:58:31 Gargi Purohit wrote:
however when i check the /proc/net/batman-adv/originatorsi see
that all other nodes are reachable but the interface mentioned is
ath1(even those which are actually reachable by ath0)
shouldn't some of the boards be reachable
Hi,
r...@openwrt:~# batmand -a 192.168.0.1/24 -g 1000 -d 3 ath0
WARNING: You are using the unstable batman branch. If you are interested
in *using* batman get the latest stable release !
Interface activated: ath0
Using interface ath0 with address 192.168.2.200 and broadcast address
On Thursday 19 March 2009 21:38:14 Max wrote:
Now I'm able to ping every originator in the network. The problem is
derived from some iptables filters that stop the ping. Executing the
following command I remove the filters solving the problem:
Glad to hear that.
When I launch the daemon in
On Friday 20 March 2009 21:03:24 Max wrote:
r...@meshboxa:~# batmand -c -d 4
But it does not display anything and it does not return.
Moreover, no OGM packets are observed to be travelling using Wireshark.
That sounds interesting - we are coming closer to the root of the problem.
Did you
On Saturday 21 March 2009 05:15:14 marco tozzini wrote:
and this is the results
192.168.2.200 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 1000/928/7%, min/avg/max = 1.23/2.04/92.8
192.168.2.201 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 1000/759/24%, min/avg/max = 1.28/3.11/27.5
192.168.2.203 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 1000/766/23%, min/avg/max =
1 - 100 of 2876 matches
Mail list logo
