Toni Van Remortel wrote:
How can I reduce bandwidth usage for full backups?
Even when using rsync, BackupPC does transfer all data on a full
backup,
and not only the modified files since the last incremental or full.
That's not true. Only modifications are transfered over the network
Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote:
Toni Van Remortel wrote:
How can I reduce bandwidth usage for full backups?
Even when using rsync, BackupPC does transfer all data on a full backup,
and not only the modified files since the last incremental or full.
That's not true. Only modifications are
Hi there, BackupPC Community,
what is the easiest way to let our users (we are about 30 here) browse and
restore
the backups that were made from their machines ?
- Without granting admin access to them. -
We'd need some restricted accounts to access backuppc via http, which should
allow
Toni Van Remortel wrote:
Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote:
Toni Van Remortel wrote:
How can I reduce bandwidth usage for full backups?
Even when using rsync, BackupPC does transfer all data on a full
backup,
and not only the modified files since the last incremental or full.
That's not
Alexander Lenz wrote:
Hi there, BackupPC Community,
what is the easiest way to let our users (we are about 30 here)
browse and restore
the backups that were made from their machines ?
- Without granting admin access to them. -
We'd need some restricted accounts to access backuppc via http,
Toni Van Remortel wrote:
How can I reduce bandwidth usage for full backups?
Even when using rsync, BackupPC does transfer all data on a full backup,
and not only the modified files since the last incremental or full.
That's not true. Only modifications are transfered over the network
when
Toni Van Remortel wrote:
Could you give us some numbers? How much traffic are you seeing for
a BackupPC backup compared to a 'plain rsync'?
Full backup, run for the 2nd time today (no changes in files):
- - BackupPC full dump : killed it after 30mins, as it pulled all data
again (2.8GB)
I'm a developer in Amanda (http://amanda.zmanda.com) project. Is anyone
using Amanda and Backuppc together?
I'm interested in integrating Backuppc with Amanda. Amanda will be
the media manager (support for tapes and other media) consolidator of data
from a group of BackupPC clients. Amanda's
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Paddy Sreenivasan wrote:
I'm a developer in Amanda (http://amanda.zmanda.com) project. Is anyone
using Amanda and Backuppc together?
I've always thought that Bacula was a better fit to be integrated (how
tightly or loosely is debatable) with BackupPC.
Looking at this
Paddy Sreenivasan wrote:
I'm a developer in Amanda (http://amanda.zmanda.com) project. Is anyone
using Amanda and Backuppc together?
I'm using them separately with some of the same hosts as targets.
I'm interested in integrating Backuppc with Amanda. Amanda will be
the media manager
Hello,
i habe 4 older ide devices a 160 gb and i want to backup a few client
hosts. So i cannot use one single device for backuppc. I read the doku
and read something of configuring topdir to config the path where the
data is backupt. On the other hand i read on debian package topdir is
Look in the config.pl file (if debian, it's probably
/etc/backuppc/config.pl).
If you have four 160GB drives, I would suggest using MD/LVM to create one
large logical volume. The best arrangement would probably be something
like a RAID 5 with all four drives, and maybe an LVM volume on top of
enter the ZFS troll :)
if you run opensolaris or a BSD with ZFS you can use ZFS as a zraid and you
get the benefits of LVM, Raid5, and filesystem level compression all in one.
I have noticed ZFS to be very resource friendly under heavy load even with
compression and zraid enabled.
search google
Holm Kapschitzki wrote:
i habe 4 older ide devices a 160 gb and i want to backup a few client
hosts. So i cannot use one single device for backuppc. I read the doku
and read something of configuring topdir to config the path where
the
data is backupt. On the other hand i read on debian
Toni Van Remortel wrote:
And I have set up BackupPC here 'as-is' in the first place, but we saw
that the full backups, that ran every 7 days, took about 3 to 4 days
to
complete, while for the same hosts the incrementals finished in 1
hour.
That's why I got digging into the principles of
15 matches
Mail list logo
