Re: [Bacula-users] issue with setuid/gid on restored files

2014-07-23 Thread Stephen Thompson
Redhat 6.5 x86_64 On 7/23/14 12:50 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote: Different Linux OSes have very different behaviors, which OS are you running (distribution and version)? On 07/23/2014 12:10 AM, Stephen Thompson wrote: I'm running 7.0.4. Here's an example... (before backup) # ls -ld /bin

Re: [Bacula-users] issue with setuid/gid on restored files

2014-07-23 Thread Stephen Thompson
compiled from scratch. On 7/23/14 8:02 AM, Simone Caronni wrote: On 23 July 2014 16:18, Kern Sibbald k...@sibbald.com mailto:k...@sibbald.com wrote: On 07/23/2014 04:04 PM, Stephen Thompson wrote: Redhat 6.5 x86_64 OK, that is a particularly tricky system as they have

[Bacula-users] 7.0.4 director crashes

2014-08-12 Thread Stephen Thompson
-3 crashes, I hadn't disabled sudo's requirement for a tty, so in all three cases btraceback was not able to run properly. I believe I have this resolved in case it crashes again, but I thought I'd ping this list to see if anyone had thoughts. thanks, Stephen -- Stephen Thompson

Re: [Bacula-users] 7.0.4 director crashes

2014-08-12 Thread Stephen Thompson
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- Stephen Thompson Berkeley Seismological Laboratory step...@seismo.berkeley.edu215 McCone Hall # 4760 510.214.6506 (phone) University of California, Berkeley 510.643.5811 (fax) Berkeley, CA 94720

Re: [Bacula-users] 7.0.4 director crashes

2014-08-12 Thread Stephen Thompson
. Patti Clark Linux System Administrator RD Systems Support Oak Ridge National Laboratory From: Stephen Thompson step...@seismo.berkeley.edumailto:step...@seismo.berkeley.edu Date: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 at 1:20 PM To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.netmailto:bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] 7.0.4 director crashes

2014-08-12 Thread Stephen Thompson
. Patti Clark Linux System Administrator RD Systems Support Oak Ridge National Laboratory From: Stephen Thompson step...@seismo.berkeley.edumailto:step...@seismo.berkeley.edu Date: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 at 1:20 PM To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.netmailto:bacula-users

[Bacula-users] solaris sparc 7.0.5 clients crash

2014-08-19 Thread Stephen Thompson
/view.php?id=2094 thanks, Stephen -- Stephen Thompson Berkeley Seismological Laboratory step...@seismo.berkeley.edu215 McCone Hall # 4760 510.214.6506 (phone) University of California, Berkeley 510.643.5811 (fax) Berkeley, CA 94720-4760

Re: [Bacula-users] solaris sparc 7.0.5 clients crash

2014-08-19 Thread Stephen Thompson
Additionally, we run with Accurate backups. It looks like the crash may be occurring between the time the SD sends the list for accurate backups but before the client traverses the fileset. Stephen On 8/19/14 7:47 AM, Stephen Thompson wrote: Anyone with success in running a 7x client

Re: [Bacula-users] solaris sparc 7.0.5 clients crash

2014-08-19 Thread Stephen Thompson
the correct path to the database libs? http://bugs.bacula.org/view.__php?id=2094 http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=2094 thanks, Stephen -- Stephen Thompson Berkeley Seismological Laboratory

Re: [Bacula-users] solaris sparc 7.0.5 clients crash

2014-08-19 Thread Stephen Thompson
Ah. I think that fixed it. Thanks! On 8/19/14 10:28 AM, Martin Simmons wrote: On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:47:39 -0700, Stephen Thompson said: Anyone with success in running a 7x client on Solaris 10 SPARC? We've recently attempted to upgrade clients from 5x to 7.0.5 and it works fine

[Bacula-users] Error: block.c:255 Write errors?

2014-09-05 Thread Stephen Thompson
Hello, I sporadically get these types of alerts for one on my bacula tape libraries... 05-Sep 00:41 lawson-sd_L100_ JobId 389348: Error: block.c:255 Write error at 610:412 on device L100-Drive-0 (/dev/L100-Drive-0). ERR=Input/output error. Am I correct in assuming that this was indeed a

Re: [Bacula-users] Error: block.c:255 Write errors?

2014-09-05 Thread Stephen Thompson
389348: Re-read of last block succeeded. 05-Sep 00:41 SD_L100_ JobId 389348: End of medium on Volume IM0161 Bytes=1,090,307,051,520 Blocks=520,103 at 05-Sep-2014 00:41. On 09/05/2014 09:42 AM, Stephen Thompson wrote: Hello, I sporadically get these types of alerts for one on my bacula tape

Re: [Bacula-users] 7.2 mysql issue?

2015-10-14 Thread Stephen Thompson
n > Have you tried to run mysqltunner? > > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 07:33:46AM -0700, Stephen Thompson wrote: > > > > update... > > > > After adding more RAM, we are back to getting a about 3 queries a day > > that run longe

Re: [Bacula-users] 7.2 mysql issue?

2015-10-12 Thread Stephen Thompson
. Stephen On 10/9/15 2:08 PM, Stephen Thompson wrote: > > > Eric, > > I appreciate all the feedback. We went through a few iterations of > tuning awhile back and have not generally had any significant issues > over the years with database responsiveness. > > Back to the or

Re: [Bacula-users] 7.2 mysql issue?

2015-10-05 Thread Stephen Thompson
3 | FilenameId | A | 4494348205 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | +---++--+--+-+---+-+--++--++-+ On 10/05/2015 10:30 AM, Stephen Thompson wrote: > > > Ph

Re: [Bacula-users] 7.2 mysql issue?

2015-10-05 Thread Stephen Thompson
Nevermind about question concerning Snapshot table. I see what happened there. On 10/05/2015 10:17 AM, Stephen Thompson wrote: > > Eric, > > Thanks for the reply. > > I've heard the postgres recommendation a fair number of times. A couple > years back, we setup a paral

Re: [Bacula-users] 7.2 mysql issue?

2015-10-05 Thread Stephen Thompson
t, there have been a number of threads on this mailing > list recommending additional or modified indexes on the File table. > Have you added the suggested additional indexes? > > -- Stephen Thompson Berkeley Seismological Laboratory step...@seismo.berkeley.edu

Re: [Bacula-users] 7.2 mysql issue?

2015-10-07 Thread Stephen Thompson
ent.ClientId; -- Stephen Thompson Berkeley Seismological Laboratory step...@seismo.berkeley.edu215 McCone Hall #4760 Office: 510.664.9177 University of California, Berkeley Remote: 510.214.6506 (Tue,Wed) Berkeley, C

Re: [Bacula-users] 7.2 mysql issue?

2015-10-09 Thread Stephen Thompson
. Stephen On 10/08/2015 10:58 PM, Eric Bollengier wrote: > Hello Stephen, > > > Le 05. 10. 15 19:17, Stephen Thompson a écrit : >> >> Eric, >> >> Thanks for the reply. >> >> I've heard the postgres recommendation a fair number of times. A co

Re: [Bacula-users] 7.2 mysql issue?

2015-10-09 Thread Stephen Thompson
>> >> Best Regards, >> Eric >> >> Le 07. 10. 15 15:23, Ana Emília M. Arruda a écrit : >> >> Hello Stephen, >> >> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Stephen Thompson >> <step...@seismo.berkeley.edu >

[Bacula-users] 7.2 mysql issue?

2015-10-02 Thread Stephen Thompson
! Something is wrong and the coincidence is pretty strong that it's related to the upgrade. Ideas? thanks, Stephen On 09/25/2015 09:02 AM, Stephen Thompson wrote: > > > So far so good. Minor snafu on my part when updating database, but I'm > running 7.2 now. Looking good so far. Will f

[Bacula-users] bacula-fd.service systemd file?

2015-09-23 Thread Stephen Thompson
to see any systemd file example in the source tree. Am I just not looking in the right place? If one does not exist, does anyone have one that I could see? thanks, Stephen -- Stephen Thompson Berkeley Seismological Laboratory step...@seismo.berkeley.edu215 McCone Hall #4760

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-fd.service systemd file?

2015-09-23 Thread Stephen Thompson
Sorry, I don't know how I missed this before in src tree... ./platforms/systemd/bacula-fd.service On 9/23/15 10:45 AM, Stephen Thompson wrote: > > All, > > I build bacula 7.2 on rhel 7.1 but have not systemd file for bacula-fd. > Is there an example available? > &

[Bacula-users] is 7.2 ready for prime time?

2015-09-24 Thread Stephen Thompson
with it. I could always roll back, but that might entail the recovery from dump of a 900GB database. Opinions? thanks, Stephen -- Stephen Thompson Berkeley Seismological Laboratory step...@seismo.berkeley.edu215 McCone Hall # 4760 Office: 510.664.9177 University

Re: [Bacula-users] is 7.2 ready for prime time?

2015-09-25 Thread Stephen Thompson
and FreeBSD) have been corrected in the public git repository. > > Best regards, > Kern > > On 15-09-24 11:40 AM, Stephen Thompson wrote: >> All, >> >> I typically patch bacula pretty frequently, but I saw the somewhat >> unusual notice on the latest release no

Re: [Bacula-users] is 7.2 ready for prime time?

2015-09-25 Thread Stephen Thompson
to 7.0.5, and it sent me for a frenzy. I > didn't run a backup of the database because of all the great responses > from people. > > When is the 7.2.0 rpm expected? Not running update until the rpm is there. > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 10:43 AM Stephen Thompson > <step...

Re: [Bacula-users] is 7.2 ready for prime time?

2015-09-25 Thread Stephen Thompson
Spoke too soon, I see what's going on, I was running update script from new location (7.2.0) and it's referencing old location (7.0.5) and running the wrong mysql script. On 09/25/2015 08:34 AM, Stephen Thompson wrote: > > Help? > > Well, the compile and install went fine, bu

Re: [Bacula-users] is 7.2 ready for prime time?

2015-09-25 Thread Stephen Thompson
So far so good. Minor snafu on my part when updating database, but I'm running 7.2 now. Looking good so far. Will find out more when hundreds of jobs run tonight. Stephen On 09/24/2015 08:40 AM, Stephen Thompson wrote: > > All, > > I typically patch bacula pretty frequentl

Re: [Bacula-users] is 7.2 ready for prime time?

2015-09-25 Thread Stephen Thompson
Thanks, I'll be upgrading soon. What known bugs are in the update_bacula_tables scripts? thanks, Stephen On 9/24/15 10:51 PM, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 08:40:05AM -0700, Stephen Thompson wrote: >> >> All, >> >> I typically patch bacula p

Re: [Bacula-users] 7.2 mysql issue?

2015-10-05 Thread Stephen Thompson
ric Bollengier wrote: > Hello Stephen, > > On 10/03/2015 12:00 AM, Stephen Thompson wrote: >> >> >> All, >> >> I believe I'm having mysql database issues since upgrading to 7.2 (from >> 7.0.2). I run mysql innodb with 900Gb database that's largely the

[Bacula-users] client initiated backups - bconsole vs tray?

2018-07-03 Thread Stephen Thompson
" } I see the docs on this lean heavily toward tray. Does this even work for bconsole? I saw a Kern comment that they use bconsole for testing this feature, but I just cannot get it to let me run any command but a local status of the FD. Help? thanks, Stephen -- Stephen Thompson

Re: [Bacula-users] client initiated backups - bconsole vs tray?

2018-07-05 Thread Stephen Thompson
or from Director. Hmmm... Stephen On 7/5/18 8:21 AM, Martin Simmons wrote: On Tue, 3 Jul 2018 16:04:56 -0700, Stephen Thompson said: All, I've been trying to setup client initiated backups via FD remote=yes and bconsole with no success. Regardless of the ACLs defined on Director, the only

Re: [Bacula-users] client initiated backups - bconsole vs tray?

2018-07-08 Thread Stephen Thompson
connection from console to FD would break the FD's ability to proxy to the remote Director. Stephen On 7/6/18 2:44 PM, Stephen Thompson wrote: Well this led to unexpected results.  Still 9.0.6, but running both FD and DIR in foreground with d900 both show startup messages, show console connecting

Re: [Bacula-users] possibly new mtx timing bug in 9x?

2018-07-10 Thread Stephen Thompson
update... they may very well be hardware, though it did not seem like it at first. if it's a timing issue, it's not with the library but the drive. On 7/6/18 7:26 AM, Stephen Thompson wrote: Not sure if anyone else is seeing this, but sporadically, perhaps 2-3 times a month, after

Re: [Bacula-users] client initiated backups - bconsole vs tray?

2018-07-06 Thread Stephen Thompson
e: 1: Client1 ... Does it print "2000 proxy OK." and the "*" prompt after the proxy command? You could try running the Director in the foreground with -d900. __Martin On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 17:30:31 -0700, Stephen Thompson said: Thanks Martin. That got me a step

[Bacula-users] possibly new mtx timing bug in 9x?

2018-07-06 Thread Stephen Thompson
, but the tape is already in the drive AND bacula put it there. The only thing I can think is that the tape load step is somehow timing out and then not making the check to see whether the tape made it to the drive or not. thanks, Stephen -- Stephen Thompson Berkeley Seismo Lab step

Re: [Bacula-users] client initiated backups - bconsole vs tray?

2018-07-06 Thread Stephen Thompson
ed TLS with the same results. Stephen On 7/6/18 7:23 AM, Stephen Thompson wrote: Yes, it does print 2000 proxy OK, but then in my case, the 'run' below would hang.  And as I said, running the bacula-fd in the foreground shows a successful connection to Director when successful, but then nothing m

[Bacula-users] can file retention be job rather than client based?

2018-04-06 Thread Stephen Thompson
think of is to define 2 clients for 1 actual host, but I'd rather not go down that route, because tracking jobs and associating them, especially over multiple years, will get that much more tricky. Ideas? thanks, Stephen -- Stephen Thompson Berkeley Seismo Lab step

Re: [Bacula-users] can file retention be job rather than client based?

2018-04-11 Thread Stephen Thompson
speed up the backups of 50+million files.  It does this at a small extra expense (size) of the catalog. On 04/07/2018 06:21 AM, Stephen Thompson wrote: I believe the answer is no, but as a happy bacula user for 10 years I am somewhat surprised at the lack of flexibility. The scenarios

Re: [Bacula-users] can file retention be job rather than client based?

2018-04-07 Thread Stephen Thompson
p://bacula.us/bacula-fileset-on-client-configuration-remote-fileset/> Ideas? thanks, Stephen -- Regards, -- Stephen Thompson Berkeley Seismo Lab step...@seismo.berkeley.edu215 McCone Hall Office: 510.664.9177 University of California Remote: 510.214.6506 (Tue)

[Bacula-users] which database version for bacula 9.0.6?

2018-04-14 Thread Stephen Thompson
to know whether I really will doing a database upgrade or not. thanks! Stephen -- Stephen Thompson Berkeley Seismo Lab step...@seismo.berkeley.edu215 McCone Hall Office: 510.664.9177 University of California Remote: 510.214.6506 (Tue) Berkeley, CA 94720-4760

[Bacula-users] PurgedFiles in Job tables- Not toggled when Volumes are purged?

2018-04-16 Thread Stephen Thompson
had their Files purged and which have not. Stephen On 04/11/2018 06:25 AM, Stephen Thompson wrote: Thanks Kern. I think given the limited nature of his need, I may use a postrun script to simply wipe database records out of band. Also if I did use multi-client definitions, I would need

Re: [Bacula-users] which database version for bacula 9.0.6?

2018-04-14 Thread Stephen Thompson
Nevermind. I was looking in wrong place. I see that 9x involves an update from 15 to 16 and the script to do that with. Sorry, though I still wonder if there's a mapping somewhere that lists db versions against bacula versions. Stephen On 4/14/18 7:44 PM, Stephen Thompson wrote: I'm

Re: [Bacula-users] PurgedFiles in Job tables- Not toggled when Volumes are purged?

2018-04-19 Thread Stephen Thompson
t; command deletes the job records, so there is no row anymore in which to set PurgedFiles. What is the exact bconsole command line you are running to purge volumes? __Martin On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 09:25:11 -0700, Stephen Thompson said: In looking at doing this out of band (not pruning feature

Re: [Bacula-users] Packet size too big (NOT a version mismatch)

2022-01-04 Thread Stephen Thompson
However, even just backing up /Users results in... 04-Jan 11:31 SD JobId 88: Fatal error: bsock.c:530 Packet size=1387166 too big from "client:1.2.3.4:9103". Maximum permitted 100. Terminating connection. Stephen On 1/4/22 11:26 AM, Stephen Thompson wrote: Yes,

Re: [Bacula-users] Packet size too big (NOT a version mismatch)

2022-01-04 Thread Stephen Thompson
ula_config Thanks. -- Stephen Thompson Berkeley Seismology Lab stephen.thomp...@berkeley.edu 307 McCone Hall Office: 510.664.9177 University of California Remote: 510.214.6506 (Tue) Berkeley, CA 94720-4760 ___ Bacula-use

Re: [Bacula-users] Packet size too big (NOT a version mismatch)

2022-01-04 Thread Stephen Thompson
Yes, backing up a single file on my problem hosts does succeed. H... Stephen On 1/4/22 11:23 AM, Stephen Thompson wrote: That's a good test, which I apparently have not tried.  I will do so. thanks, Stephen On 1/4/22 11:20 AM, Martin Simmons wrote: Is this happening for all

Re: [Bacula-users] Packet size too big (NOT a version mismatch)

2022-01-04 Thread Stephen Thompson
user, I'm afraid. It seems that just owning a Mac automatically makes one the "Mac guy" . Thanks. -- Stephen Thompson Berkeley Seismology Lab stephen.thomp...@berkeley.edu 307 McCone Hall Office: 510.664.9177 University of Calif

Re: [Bacula-users] Packet size too big (NOT a version mismatch)

2022-01-04 Thread Stephen Thompson
:46 -0800, Stephen Thompson said: I am still seeing the same issue on Monterey as on Big Sur with 11.0.5 compiled from source and CoreFoundation linked in. 04-Jan 07:56 SD JobId 88: Fatal error: bsock.c:530 Packet size=1387165 too big from "client:1.2.3.4:9103". Maximum permitt

Re: [Bacula-users] Packet size too big (NOT a version mismatch)

2022-01-04 Thread Stephen Thompson
Stephen On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 7:02 AM Stephen Thompson < stephen.thomp...@berkeley.edu> wrote: > > Graham, > > Thanks for presenting Monterey as a possibility! I am seeing the same > issue under Monterrey as I have under Big Sur, but to know someone else > does not m

Re: [Bacula-users] Packet size too big (NOT a version mismatch)

2022-01-04 Thread Stephen Thompson
to log which files were being backedup as well as the error that terminated job. Stephen On 1/4/22 12:03 PM, Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users wrote: On 1/4/22 12:26, Stephen Thompson wrote: Yes, backing up a single file on my problem hosts does succeed. H... Stephen Hello Stephen

Re: [Bacula-users] Packet size too big (NOT a version mismatch)

2021-11-23 Thread Stephen Thompson
on as the director.) >> >> In general yes, the code is designed to support Old FDs but can have >> problems >> with newer FDs. In your case it may work. >> >> At least, you can try a status client to see if the problem is solved and >> if you can run a back

Re: [Bacula-users] Packet size too big (NOT a version mismatch)

2021-11-22 Thread Stephen Thompson
> if you can run a backup & a restore. > > Best Regards, > Eric > > > ___ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users > -- Stephen Thompson

Re: [Bacula-users] Packet size too big (NOT a version mismatch)

2021-11-12 Thread Stephen Thompson
ty of California, Santa Barbara ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- Stephen Thompson Berkeley Seismology Lab stephen.thomp...@berkeley.edu 307 Mc

Re: [Bacula-users] Packet size too big (NOT a version mismatch)

2021-12-01 Thread Stephen Thompson
, 2021 at 7:32 AM Stephen Thompson < stephen.thomp...@berkeley.edu> wrote: > > Josh, > > Thanks for the tip. That did not appear to be the cause of this issue, > though perhaps it will fix a yet to be found issue that I would have run > into after I get past this compil

Re: [Bacula-users] Packet size too big (NOT a version mismatch)

2021-12-08 Thread Stephen Thompson
ork Buffer Size' does not appear to solve issue. Are there users out there successfully running a bacula client on Big Sur?? Stephen On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 3:25 PM Stephen Thompson < stephen.thomp...@berkeley.edu> wrote: > > Not sure if this is correct, but I've been able to a

Re: [Bacula-users] Packet size too big (NOT a version mismatch)

2022-01-04 Thread Stephen Thompson
awkward to set up -- bacula really doesn't play well with SIP, for example, > and running "csrutil disable" on every system is not a security best > practice. > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 4:46 PM Stephen Thompson < > stephen.thomp...@berkeley.edu> wrote: > > > Disap

<    1   2