On Thursday 05 October 2006 22:40, Michael Brennen wrote:
> On Thursday 05 October 2006 08:14, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> > I have just released Bacula BETA 1.39.24.20061002 source and the Win32
> > binaries to Source Forge. This is very likely to be the last beta release
&
a multiple drives were
being
> used for archives in different Pools That seems have been lost in recent
> versions, with no configuration changes. This is a status report on
> diagnosing the multi-drive problem.
>
> Kern, you mention in your README that running on a production
On Friday 06 October 2006 08:27, Dirk H. Schulz wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have started testing Bacula and do have a peculiar phenomen.
>
> I am using Bacula 1.36.x because it comes with Debian Sarge stable
> (compiling the current version comes after the first testing phase). The
> data I use fo
On Friday 06 October 2006 12:14, Heinz Ulrich Stille wrote:
> On Thursday 05 October 2006 15:14, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > I have just released Bacula BETA 1.39.24.20061002 source and the Win32
> > binaries to Source Forge. This is very likely to be the last beta release
> > or
On Friday 06 October 2006 12:43, Silver Salonen wrote:
> I just tried configuring tray-monitor to connect with bacula-dir and
bacula-sd
> over TLS, but bacula-tray-monitor says me "TLS Enable" is not supported in
> these resources.
>
> I found Landon Fuller's mail "Re: TLS Support" (2005-04-22
On Friday 06 October 2006 17:43, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 6 Oct 2006 at 17:34, Rudolph Bott wrote:
>
> > does anybody know if it is possible to let bacula split volume files
> > when you use disk storage? We think it might have a big impact on
> > performance when you tell bacula to have several
On Friday 06 October 2006 18:18, Rudolph Bott wrote:
> Dan Langille wrote:
> > On 6 Oct 2006 at 17:34, Rudolph Bott wrote:
> >
> >> does anybody know if it is possible to let bacula split volume files
> >> when you use disk storage? We think it might have a big impact on
> >> performance when yo
On Friday 06 October 2006 15:02, Sebastien Guilbaud wrote:
>
> > I have just released Bacula BETA 1.39.24.20061002 source and the Win32
> > binaries to Source Forge. This is very likely to be the last beta release
or
> > next to last release before the official 1.40 production release in the
On Monday 09 October 2006 11:21, Sebastien Guilbaud wrote:
>
> > You need to read the ReleaseNotes *very* carefully as there are a number
of
> > changes/difficult areas to get it to load the first time mainly if you
have
> > an older version of Bacula running.
> >
> > The Win32 section of the
On Monday 02 October 2006 21:58, Julián Hernández Gómez wrote:
> Hi Kern!
>
> I'm +1 on the choose of QT as the primary framework for developing the
> bacula GUI. But I strongly suggest to use QT4 (4.2) from the beginning
> and save everybody from the pain of a later migrat
On Friday 06 October 2006 21:13, Heinz Ulrich Stille wrote:
> On Friday 06 October 2006 14:11, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Friday 06 October 2006 12:14, Heinz Ulrich Stille wrote:
> > > In some circumstances the director process eats all available memory and
> > > then
But in
any case, if you really want this feature, the way to get it is the write up
a Feature Request (see www.bacula.org for how to do so) and then convince the
users that it is a good idea.
Regards,
Kern
-
Take Surveys.
On Saturday 07 October 2006 22:22, Gert Udby Nielsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> We have at Dell storage tape backup with bacula version 1.36.1
The first thing that I recommend that you do is to upgrade to Bacula version
1.38.11 (note you must do a database upgrade). Your current Bacula version
is very ol
On Monday 09 October 2006 16:17, James Ray wrote:
> Ryan Novosielski wrote:
...
>
> Unfortunately that is not possible in my case. So as I understand the
> rest of this thread, yes my assumption is right, but no bacula can't
> (Kern, and won't?) support binding to a
ee several ways out of the
problem:
1. Look at what is restored, and delete the undesired copy if one is restored.
2. Submit a patch that does it correctly.
3. Submit a Feature Request and convince the users that it is important so
that they vote to have it implement as soon as possible.
Regard
e memory cacheing that Unix does.
Best regards,
Kern
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & busines
On Monday 09 October 2006 18:46, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 06:36:53PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > The MySQL online documentation has a whole section that deals with
> > disconnects. It provides lots of advice on how to avoid it. There is a
link
>
On Monday 09 October 2006 20:53, Robert Keidel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I try to get bacula running on a Centos 4 running. I have VXA2
> autochanger. I went through the manuals, and everything seems to work
> fine. I started backup job and it looked very good. After the test
> run, I changed my bacula-
On Monday 09 October 2006 21:59, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/9/2006 9:13 PM, Joe wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've set up Bacula on a SuSE Linux 10.1 OSS machine using Smart Package.
Everything is working fine with the exception of automating the startup of
Bacula during the boot process.
would like to work on this?
Regards,
Kern
>
> Firstly, consider the need to be able to manually specify the outbound
> IPv4 address of "Client" connections from a daemon _as well_ as the
> inbound address on which to listen for incoming service requests.
>
>
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 02:53, Tim Schaab wrote:
> Howdy All,
>
> I am testing Bacula for a backup solution for the department's users and
> servers. When testing a Windows XP restore, I keep getting a Zlib buffer
> errors like the following:
>
> > 9-Oct 13:37 bartpe-fd: Windows_Full_Restor
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 07:21, Michael Brennen wrote:
>
> Kern, this is a brief update to the list but primarily with you in
> mind.
>
> Curiously, as of cvs a few days ago the system is now using multiple
> tape drives again, without any change at all in the configuratio
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 09:42, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 October 2006 02:53, Tim Schaab wrote:
> > Howdy All,
> >
> > I am testing Bacula for a backup solution for the department's users and
> > servers. When testing a Windows XP restore, I keep g
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 09:59, Anders Boström wrote:
> >>>>> "KS" == Kern Sibbald writes:
>
> KS> From the statistics you show, the backup does not appear slow to
> KS> me. The reason you might think it is slow is because you are
> KS> comparin
ing disk-changer.in script to eliminate most or all the
downsides ...
However, you are pretty much on your own.
Regards,
Kern
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and y
Hello,
Thanks for the input. I've taken everything you wrote into consideration and
taken a look at fwbuilder as well.
Regards,
Kern
On Monday 02 October 2006 21:58, Julián Hernández Gómez wrote:
> Hi Kern!
>
> I'm +1 on the choose of QT as the primary framework for deve
es; # lets Bacula label unlabeled media
Random Access = Yes;
AutomaticMount = yes; # when device opened, read it
RemovableMedia = no;
AlwaysOpen = no;
}
Interesting. You can see the date when I added the second harddisk, and
Bacula has just continued backing up and
projects learned how to contribute to those
projects (some have, but I believe they are the minority -- though possibly
quite important). Hopefully, Bacula and you our users will find the way
forward in this respect.
Well, there
Ah, after reading Bill's response, I think I responded to the wrong question.
Bacula will not follow symlinks when backing up data as Bill said.
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 17:10, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 October 2006 16:12, Janco van der Merwe wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 16:53, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> I have been working on a regression script for Bacula and am now
> starting to try to get Bacula to compile a regress environment on my
> test system. However, the trouble here is my test system runs HP-UX 11i,
> and apparently at least on
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 19:05, DAve wrote:
> Good afternoon,
>
> We solved most of our issues with Bacula and our windows backups. I have
> one remaining and I am afraid it is a Windows issue. I've been all over
> Google and microsoft.com and I've found no solution as of yet.
>
> Currently I
ive is empty or contains a tape other than
> the one for slot 1 when the fill command is started then the correct tape is
> loaded.
Thanks for fixing this. I suspect that we have made changes in the "core"
code, but that btape.c has not properly followed. Thanks for finding/fixing
n pick one. At that point, who can I get back
> to the console prompt without actually choose one job.
> If theres no way, can I implement it(creating a "cancel" option) or
> its better not to(since kern will(?) work soon on developing/improving
> the console protocol)?
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 18:50, DAve wrote:
> Hmm,
>
> Now that we have a lot of Bacula use I am looking to offload some
> monitoring of the backups onto support.
>
> For a test I am wanting to direct my messages from specific backup jobs
> to specific support personnel. As a test I am goin
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 20:28, Alan Davis wrote:
>
> I want to thank Kern et al for the excellent documentation for Bacula.
> The number of options and capabilities of the system is staggering and
> the documentation reflects that in it's depth and complexity. Everything
&g
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 20:40, DAve wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Wednesday 11 October 2006 18:50, DAve wrote:
> >> Hmm,
> >>
> >> Now that we have a lot of Bacula use I am looking to offload some
> >> monitoring of the backups onto support
On Friday 13 October 2006 19:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> bacula starts properly and I can get in to bconsole and do status on dir,
> sd and fd. When I try to run a backup job I get the following.
Most likely you are mixing Bacula daemons of different versions.
>
>
>
> 13-Oct 10:11 bacula
On Saturday 14 October 2006 01:33, Michael Brennen wrote:
> Hello again Kern,
>
> Sorry to be a pest, but current CVS as of this morning, after your post, is
> still failing the same way it was before.
>
> I have a totally different autochanger in place now to run the regress
Hello again,
On Saturday 14 October 2006 01:33, Michael Brennen wrote:
> Hello again Kern,
>
> Sorry to be a pest, but current CVS as of this morning, after your post, is
> still failing the same way it was before.
By the way, I don't consider you to be a pest. There is no p
beta releases, I have stopped appending the date to the release file, which
simplifies its name just a bit.
Best regards,
Kern
For your convenience, here are the ChangeLog items that have been added since
version 1.39.24 was released:
2Oct06
kes Apply the three patches from Richard Mor
sing my participation with the project.
If you have any comments or concerns about the above changes, please don't
hesitate to let me know. Even though I am on vacation, I will be thinking
about this and hopefully be able to answe
On Sunday 15 October 2006 17:14, Michael Brennen wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Oct 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> >> The problem again is that Bacula does the following:
> >>
> >> * loads slot 2 into drive 1
> >> * unloads slot 1 from drive 0
> >> * tries t
On Sunday 15 October 2006 17:22, Michael Brennen wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Oct 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> > I should have specified more clearly in previous email that I am
> > having problems distinguishing between two bug reports that you
> > have filed. One is bug #687,
On Sunday 15 October 2006 17:48, Michael Brennen wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> >> They are essentially the same bug. One was running
> >> two-pool-tape, the other 2drive-incremental-2tape, but the mtx
> >> logs show the same failur
On Sunday 15 October 2006 21:15, Julien Cigar wrote:
> I had exactly the same problem two weeks ago and I still haven't found
> an explanation why Bacula do this ...
>
> Perhaps there is a bug in Bacula recycling process when you only specify
> a Volume Retention (lower than a Job / File Retent
On Sunday 15 October 2006 20:08, Michael Brennen wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> > On Sunday 15 October 2006 17:48, Michael Brennen wrote:
> >>
> >> I am starting over with a fresh regress checkout and current
> >> bacula cvs. I will
>
> This is primarily for Kern, though I don't know when he might see
> it. Hopefully by now he's already gone.
Yes, I'm in California now ... :-)
>
> The problem with the timeout on my earlier regress tests was the
> AlwaysOpen parameter in the SD configur
mory list in terms of listings. Then
submit it as a bug to bugs.bacula.org
>
> MfG, Ulrich
>
> --
> Heinz Ulrich Stille / Tel.: +49-541-9400473 / Fax: +49-541-9400450
> design_d gmbh / Wilhelmstr. 16 / 49076 Osnabrück / www.design-d.de
>
>
Best regards, Kern
--
OME_DIR@ @TRAY_MONITOR_DIR@ @WX_DIR@ \
> + @READLINE_SRC@ src/console
>
> # Non-client-only directores
> subdirs =src/cats @DIRD_DIR@ @STORED_DIR@ src/tools
>
> __Martin
>
> --
; right on that one?).
No.
>
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
>> It is a problem on all platforms if you don't have any of the options.
>> Fixed in the current CVS.
>>
>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:55:41 -0400, Ryan Novosielski said:
>>
ed in the current copy of the CVS. If you pulled from
the CVS originally, simply do "cvs update" and the problem *should* go
away.
Regards,
Kern
PS: please don't anyone flame me for top posting, which I prefer, but
usually don't. I do it now because I am reduced to using Squirr
nload IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> ___
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.
es, a disk Volume would do quite well.
If you want to write directly to DVD, the current beta seems to be in
pretty good shape.
Regards,
Kern
> I'm trying to use a fifo for backup/restore.
>
> I have the storage set up for min and max block size = 1024.
>
> My runbeforejob sc
did work in that version. As I said, I strongly suspect that
it is broken in 1.39.x
At the moment there is no way with Bacula (that I can think of) to pass
your data to or through an external program. If you have some ideas, you
might try putting them in a Feature Request (see the Feature Re
need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
> easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=
> In answer to your question about packaging the regression tests:
>
> Once we release version 1.40 Kern is planning on moving from CVS to
> Subversion and changing the build process from "configure" based to CMake.
>
> At that time we will probably also switc
_
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>
Best regards, Kern
-
Using Tomcat but n
v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> ___
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacu
omcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
> easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
&g
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
>>> In answer to your question about packaging the regression tests:
>>>
>>> Once we release version 1.40 Kern is planning on moving from CVS to
>>> Subversion and changing the build process from "configure" based to
>
tree command in bconsole and doing a "dir xxx" and "dir yyy" on
the two files.
I'd really like to resolve this problem.
Best regards,
Kern
> Dear All
>
> I am trying to restore one users mailbox to another location since I do
> not want to damage the cur
> Hi,
>
> On 10/26/2006 6:34 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
>>>BTW: I would not recommend 1.39 for production use yet as I see some
>>>issues I find hard to analyze. For example, the DIR seems to have a
>>>serious memory leak in certain situations,
>>
&g
s-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> ___
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>
Best regards, Kern
; -
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
> easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/s
ifficulty googling this):
>
> http://www.freestandards.org/spec/booksets/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic
> /libzman.html
>
> Cheers,
> Landon
>
>
>
> -
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? N
conditions, then we need to carefully document it and inform the
users.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern
> Sibbald
> Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 4:15 PM
> To: Robert Nelson
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTE
x.
Ah, good point. Yes, I think it is reasonable to exclude previous
development versions from the definition of "previous versions".
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern
> Sibbald
> Sent: Friday, Nov
previously written archives using
> encryption aren't readable and should be recreated.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern
> Sibbald
> Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 4:40 PM
> To: Robert Nelson
&g
to this list.
Best regards,
Kern
FLA.en.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
>
> On Nov 6, 2006, at 16:42, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
>> If any of you have concerns, comments, or questions, please
>> do not hesitate to voice them now, either on the Bacula email
>> lists or directly to me.
>
> I'm somewhat concerned about the FSF's
>
> On Nov 6, 2006, at 16:42, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
>> If any of you have concerns, comments, or questions, please
>> do not hesitate to voice them now, either on the Bacula email
>> lists or directly to me.
>
> I'm somewhat concerned about the FSF's
ere broken, I would
be very worried ... :-)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kern Sibbald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 5:05 PM
> To: Robert Nelson
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Landon Fuller';
> bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: [
now is the time to speak up.
Again, this involves only the BETA Bacula and encryption with additional
options (Robert, please correct me if I am mistaken ...)
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Kern Sibbald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 5:05 PM
> To: R
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 06:09, Troy Daniels wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> We are looking at introducing 6 new Windows 2003 Enterprise 64 Servers
> into our business in the not too distant future.
> As the rest of the servers (Mostly Redhat EL3 with a few FreeBSD boxes
> and a couple of 32 bit Windo
On Thursday 09 November 2006 20:37, Robert Nelson wrote:
> Actually the Path name limit in version 1.39.x and above is 32767.
OK, noted -- thanks.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern
> Sibbald
> Sent: Thursd
On Monday 16 October 2006 17:26, Josh Fisher wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > 1. I have requested help setting up more community participation in
testing,
> > bug fixing, and builds of more platforms such as Solaris, FreeBSD, ...
This
> > is to ensure that all im
Hello Arno,
Thanks for your comments. Please see below for my responses:
On Saturday 04 November 2006 22:42, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/4/2006 1:46 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > Hello, 1 November 2006
> >
> > This co
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 23:00, Christoph Haas wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 October 2006 22:52, Martin Simmons wrote:
> > > On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:04:27 +0200, Christoph Haas said:
> > >
> > > On Wednesday 25 October 2006 15:15, Wolfgang Powisch (privat) wrote:
> > > > My Setup:
> > > >bacu
On Monday 30 October 2006 15:23, le dahut wrote:
> Hello,
>
> How can I avoid Bacula launching a second backup while the first one
> isn't finished ?
> This phenomenon occurred last WE with summer/winter time switching, a
> backup was scheduled for 2:00 am and wasn't finished at 3:00 am so when
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 12:58, Mathew Brown wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd read several times that the FD encryption feature was not yet
> stable but this was several months ago. Would you now consider it
> stable enough for use in production environments? Thanks for your
> help.
It is re
On Thursday 02 November 2006 08:08, G. Armour Van Horn wrote:
> I've got my bacula box setup running Fedora Core 5 using the
> 1.38.11-3.fc5.i386.rpms for bacula-posgresql, bacula-mtx,
> bacula-gconsole, and bacula-client. I have posgresql, bacula-dir,
> bacula-fd, and bacula-sd setup to run as
On Friday 03 November 2006 11:27, Jaap Stolk wrote:
> On 11/3/06, Jaap Stolk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I was wondering if i could do without the differential backups
altogether ?
>
> (in reply to my own post)
> I did some more reading and found that the differential backup only
> looks at th
On Friday 03 November 2006 15:32, Bill Moran wrote:
>
> Bacula seem not to understand that today is week 44 of the year.
> It seemed to understand that last week was week 43, as it ran the
> job that was scheduled for that week. Here's the schedule that
> applies:
>
> Run = Level=Full Pool=Off
On Thursday 09 November 2006 01:46, G. Armour Van Horn wrote:
> I hope whoever is maintaining the RPM build will eventually read this!
This doesn't have anything to do with the RPM. It is a PostgreSQL
installation/configuration issue. In a sense, it isn't even a Bacula issue.
If I am not mist
On Friday 10 November 2006 00:32, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/9/2006 1:55 AM, Bill Moran wrote:
> > On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:49:30 -0600
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Arno Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Currently, the windows FD is running stable and reliable
On Tuesday 07 November 2006 03:06, Veronica Hill wrote:
> Hi Kern et al,
> i also want to take the time to thank you for some fantastic
> software! I haven't had any problems since i started using Bacula. i
> have only had to post to the mailing list twic
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 01:46, Dan Langille wrote:
> What other projects have gone this way?
I have no idea and am not sure to find out ...
>
> Bacula users are most likely involved in other projects. Perhaps they
> can inquire and see how that transition went.
I'll ask FSFE what other p
s bug (fortunately on a
test system rather than my developement system), the bug totally trashed my
hard disks (total loss).
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208782
Best regards,
Kern
-
Using Tomcat but need t
Hello,
Note for Arno: 1.39.26+ does a better job of helping one diagnose these
problems by printing the full output from mtx when a failure occurs.
On Friday 10 November 2006 00:46, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/9/2006 7:25 AM, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> > I've gotten this one... I'd love
On Tuesday 07 November 2006 23:55, Colby Silver wrote:
> I didn't find anything specific to my setup so I'm sending it here.
> Sorry if it's the wrong place.
This is a good place. Thanks. I've put it in the doc queue.
>
> This drive has worked great for a number backup/restores and happily
> p
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 12:55, Jaime Ventura wrote:
> Hello
> This is my second email concerning this subject.
> Since no one answer me, and I've tested all possible ways (i think)
> should I consider this a bug?
> Thanks
>
>
> Message I sent before:
>
> I'm trying
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 15:48, Russell Sutherland wrote:
> There does not seem to be a port for Bacula for OpenBSD 4.0.
>
> I've tried building the package from source.
>
> After configuration, the "make" fails when trying to compile
> the stored code:
>
> ==>Entering directory /usr/local/
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 19:52, A Think Tank wrote:
>
> I am trying to go though the rescue procedures / preparation for
> Solaris, SunOS 5.10 Generic sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V240, as directed
> by the documentation. I have a couple of errors with the command
> /usr/local/src/bacula-resc
On Thursday 09 November 2006 07:50, Michael Brennen wrote:
>
> It worked. :)
>
> I installed Robert's 1.39.27 beta on a Windows 2k server, touched
> some files, archived and restored them, all without problems. PKI
> signatures were on. The sparse option was enabled, and compression
> was at
e
> configuration right, but I successfully restored a working RH server.
If there are any tips for the manual, please do write them down and send them
in ...
>
> 2.
> I'm still interested in testing the new recovery cd solution when Kern
> returns.
Ah, I would very much
On Friday 10 November 2006 11:08, Jaime Ventura wrote:
> kern,
> thanks for your reply.
> I've commented the line "mail = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = all, !skipped" so
> that there were only only one "mail" directive.
> I still receive the error messag
On Friday 10 November 2006 12:27, Martin Simmons wrote:
> >>>>> On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 07:18:52 +0100, Kern Sibbald said:
> >
> > The LICENSE will not be changed, only the copyright holder, so Bacula will
> > continue to be distributed under GPL version 2 + a f
On Friday 10 November 2006 15:01, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 05:27, Martin Simmons wrote:
> > >
> > > The LICENSE will not be changed, only the copyright holder, so Bacula
will
> > > continue to be distributed under GPL version 2 + a few additions that
are
> > > specified in t
users a big favor as I would be very happy to accept such
code ... :-)
>
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Wednesday 08 November 2006 19:52, A Think Tank wrote:
> >> I am trying to go though the rescue procedures / preparation for
> >> Solaris, SunOS 5.10 Generic sun4u sp
Hello again Martin,
I've changed the subject to be just slightly more readable than my orginal
one :-)
See below for the FSFE additions to my response:
On Friday 10 November 2006 15:21, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Friday 10 November 2006 12:27, Martin Simmons wrote:
> > >>>
601 - 700 of 4719 matches
Mail list logo
