At 22:16 -0700 on 11/07/2010, LuKreme wrote about Re: i vs em and
b vs strong:
On 7-Nov-2010, at 11:31, Linda wrote:
How do I prevent Tidy in BBEdit when I reflow a document from changing
all of my i tags to em and all of my b tags to strong?
You don't. i and b should not be used
I am not going to argue about it. It was just a question.
Just how much HTML code are you writing?
Hopefully a whole library of books.
It sounds like a Text Factory might be useful to you
Thanks. I am using the demo version of BBEdit right now. I think
that it is a lot more powerful than I
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:16 AM, LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote:
i and b should not be used.
Right. Unless you need text that is italic or bold.
user hat=typographer pedant
I sometimes need to display type that is in italics, for the sake of
being italic, and not because it contains any
On 7 Nov 2010, at 11:16 PM, LuKreme wrote:
You don't. i and b should not be used.
This is the case when the intended semantics of the markup is that emphasis and
strong emphasis are to be indicated, and you don't care how the renderer
accomplishes it. Sometimes, however, the intended
On Nov 08, 2010, at 10:43 AM, Fritz Anderson fri...@manoverboard.org wrote:
On 7 Nov 2010, at 11:16 PM, LuKreme wrote:
You don't. i and b should not be used.
This is the case when the intended semantics of the markup is that emphasis and strong emphasis are to be
indicated, and you don't
If you have an at-all-common case for the content of your site
requiring a specific presentation, this is very simply accomplished
with a new span class. USS Enterprise, defining span.shipname in your
CSS as font-style: Italic;
On an author's site, for instance, it might be common convention for
At 13:06 -0500 on 11/08/2010, go...@fred.net wrote about Re: i vs
em and b vs strong:
If you have an at-all-common case for the content of your site
requiring a specific presentation, this is very simply accomplished
with a new span class. span class=shipnameUSS Enterprise/span,
defining
however you wish, but rude language does not help you make your
case.
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Robert A. Rosenberg rar...@banet.netwrote:
At 13:06 -0500 on 11/08/2010, go...@fred.net wrote about Re: i vs em
and b vs strong:
If you have an at-all-common case for the content of your site
At 14:12 -0500 11/07/2010, Morbus Iff wrote:
Linda 1anml...@gmail.com asked:
How do I prevent Tidy in BBEdit when I reflow a document from changing
all of my i tags to em and all of my b tags to strong?
Tidy does have this option at the command-line level (logical-emphasis), but
I don't think
I was going to stay out of this but foolishly decided to point out
that in HTML5 specification, both the b and i tags now have semantic
meaning. I quote from the Working Draft regarding the b tag, 'the
element has now been given the specific semantic purpose of
representing text “offset from its
How do I prevent Tidy in BBEdit when I reflow a document from changing
all of my i tags to em and all of my b tags to strong?
I know the debate about these tags. However, these pages will be
displayed within a native iPhone/iPad app in a UIWebView. I am in
control of the documents and they will
How do I prevent Tidy in BBEdit when I reflow a document from changing
all of my i tags to em and all of my b tags to strong?
Tidy does have this option at the command-line level (logical-emphasis), but
I don’t think you can tweak BBEdit’s implementation of Tidy to support it. What
I’d do is
At 10:31 -0800 on 11/07/2010, Linda wrote about i vs em and b
vs strong:
How do I prevent Tidy in BBEdit when I reflow a document from changing
all of my i tags to em and all of my b tags to strong?
If you can not find the setting to prevent Tidy from doing this type
of fixing/correction
you can always just do a find/replace of
em to i and strong to b just before you save
Thanks. That is what I am doing now. I was just trying to save 2
steps since there are hundreds of pages.
Linda
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
BBEdit Talk discussion group
I was just trying to save 2 steps since there are hundreds of pages.
It sounds like a Text Factory might be useful to you. It would allow you to
combine all your steps into one, and then run it against hundreds of
documents in one fell swoop.
--
You received this message because you are
On Sunday, November 7, 2010, Linda 1anml...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks. That is what I am doing now. I was just trying to save 2
steps since there are hundreds of pages.
Taking a step back: what are you trying to accomplish? Tidy
Reflow has a pretty specific set of behaviors, which includes
At 18:23 -0500 on 11/07/2010, Rich Siegel wrote about Re: i vs em
and b vs strong:
On the other hand, if you're counting bytes, then doing something
which adds them is probably contraindicated.
I agree. For that you would want to go with COMPACT. You can use
Hierarchical ot Tidy before
On 7-Nov-2010, at 11:31, Linda wrote:
How do I prevent Tidy in BBEdit when I reflow a document from changing
all of my i tags to em and all of my b tags to strong?
You don't. i and b should not be used.
I know the debate about these tags. However, these pages will be
displayed within a
On 08/11/2010, at 16:16 , LuKreme wrote:
You are worried about a couple of bytes? ... The smallest iPhone holds 8
BILLION characters.
There is a significant percentage reduction in file size effected when you
replace strong and emphasis with b and i, especially in text which is
heavily
19 matches
Mail list logo
