Re: [blfs-dev] Why/Why not systemd

by default. He got some interesting points there. Since I noticed that some of you don't really understand what systemd really does except the binary logs, adding bloat and using D-Bus, it might be worth to watch. Long time since we had a good war of words in the mailing list :) -- Dr. Tushar

Re: [blfs-dev] Recent commits and my resignation

On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 3:40 AM, Ken Moffat zarniwh...@ntlworld.com wrote: On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 04:22:36AM +0200, Armin K. wrote: Now with this, since I don't know to be part of the team, I want to resign. I find the way he was encouraged to quit highly demotivating. Maybe it works for

Re: [blfs-dev] compiling java on the systemd lfs branch fails

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Nathan Coulson conat...@gmail.com wrote: I guess the two choices would be to move those programs back to /bin in the systemd branch, patch java in the systemd version to not use hardcoded paths, or patch both variations of blfs. When I first compiled jdk for

Re: [blfs-dev] BLFS Package Currency

On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:10 PM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote: One of the more difficult things that I've found about BLFS is to determine whether a package in the book is current or not. I've decided to work on a set of scripts to help with that. Hi: I had taken a simplistic

Re: [blfs-dev] iced tea

they hard coded the paths so as to only used system programs instead of any incompatible programs that a user may have in their PATH. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:tus...@linuxfromscratch.org http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ

Re: Consolidated Tickets in Trac

of a meta bug. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: Trac #1980

for a reply from him. Based on the comments, I think it is now ok to remove the autoreconf command. I will modify the book. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http

Re: gtk+-1.x dependencies

On 5/25/06, Tushar Teredesai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The dependency list for gtk+-1.2.10 states that libtiff and libjpeg are required. I could not find any reference to tiff or jpeg in the source. Additionally, I could compile gtk+ without libtiff and libjpeg on the Tru64 server at work. Can

Re: gtk+-1.x dependencies

On 6/13/06, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 06/13/06 16:24 CST: Looks like no one uses gtk1?! Best I can tell, I see it as you do. That there is no reference to libjpeg or libtiff at all in the sources and the dependencies should be completely

Re: Status update

LFS has started you on a quest for * From Scratch. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Xorg-server compilation error: agpgart.h

The error mentioned at http://archives.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/blfs-support/2006-April/059140.html still exists in xorg-server-1.1.0. I believe there used to be a sed in the book to fix that. It needs to be put back in. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http

gtk+-1.x dependencies

confirmation. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: Xorg7 dependencies

package from opengl.org. The last release of GLUT was 3.7 dated 1998. Freeglut is more recent and maintained. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs

Re: Xorg7 sub sections

-packages up into 300+ smaller pieces. See http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/kde-split-ebuilds.xml. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html

Re: Xorg7 sub sections

to be a meta-application (similar to GNOME). -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: vim: gtk1 dependency

dependencies. Even if gtk1 is removed from the book, the dependency would still be mentioned till vim stops depending on it. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http

vim: gtk1 dependency

Hi: For vim, is there any reason for not mentioning the optional gtk1 dependency? --Tushar. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html

Re: popt

. I agree, I will put that in. If you could integrate this into the book, I'd appreciate it. Also, please change the SBU time from 0.29 to 0.3. Will do. BTW, I found that rpm-4.4.6 has an updated popt-1.10.6 inside it though the above fix is not in that version. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto

Re: SPAM Problem

email would go to /dev/null Before I do this, I am soliciting comments to see if there is anything I'm overlooking or any reason not to restrict the BLFS lists. IMO, it should be done for all LFS lists. BTW, what would happen to folks who post via newsgroups? -- Tushar Teredesai mailto

Re: popt and patch policy

there:) http://archives.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/blfs-dev/2006-January/013009.html -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe

Re: `backticks` or $(command) syntax

On 2/28/06, Dan Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/28/06, Tushar Teredesai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think it is bash only. Definitely not compatible with sh. On the system at work: $ uname -a OSF1 server V5.1 2650 alpha $ /bin/sh -c 'echo $(ls)' /bin/sh: syntax error

Re: unzip552 and PK 2.1 Compat

logic, the --enable-shared switch should be removed from binutils since none of the other packages link to the shared libs installed by binutils. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ

Re: NSS again (this time a real issue)

On 2/6/06, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 02/06/06 17:32 CST: 4.1) Perform a sed in the offending package's configure script to change mozilla-nss.pc to nss.pc. Yes, that would work, but there is a caveat. We would have to put ifs

Re: NSS again (this time a real issue)

the system installed nss, he would perform the sed. In reality, a user who has both nss and mozilla-nss is already a pariah since he is not using the recommended method (of using the system installed nss) ;-) -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar

Re: NSS again (this time a real issue)

On 2/6/06, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 4) Other suggestions provided by the community. 4.1) Perform a sed in the offending package's configure script to change mozilla-nss.pc to nss.pc. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar

Re: Seamonky

On 1/31/06, Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just noticed that Seamonky 1.0 has been released. http://www.mozillazine.org/talkback.html?article=7957 Should we be using this instead of the Mozilla suite? Yes. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: BLFS Wiki

at the very bottom, even after the program descriptions. IMO it should be at the begining in the Package Information section. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http

Re: BLFS Wiki

additions to the current instructions in the book. It is better to check out alternatives before starting to build the package. *) Creating a separate section just for the having a single link to the user notes is not a good use of the screen estate. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Move package management to LFS

are right. But the link to more_control should remain since it is unique:-) Well, the *real* reason that I mentioned the hints is coz I wanted a link to my fakeroot hint ;-) -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org

Re: Firefox and Thunderbird updates

On 1/23/06, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not to start an argument, or even a discussion about it for that matter, unless it is wanted, If a discussion is needed, do start a new thread. I do have some comments:) -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: Recommended and Optional Items

that Recommended == Required. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: Recommended and Optional Items

. I went thru the book y'day to make a list of pacakges that I need to install. Noticed that but since I have not yet compiled arts, I was not sure why the dependency was required. Will of course point out things that I notice as I compile them. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: r5589 - trunk/BOOK/postlfs/security

-m755 $NSS_LINUXDIR/lib/lib*.so /usr/lib. Ditto for .chk files. Though, having the files listed is also nice. BTW, Dan mentioned some useful tools that came with the package. Any plans on installing those as an optional thing? CCing blfs-dev for this. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL

Re: Mozilla Build

On 1/22/06, Dan Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here's a thought that I'll just throw out there. What about moving to the SeaMonkey builds? (IMO) It would be option once a stable version of SeaMonkey is released. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: cp -r to copy recursively (but not symlinks)

think he could do this: cp -RL Linux*/include/* ~/td I didn't go thru the entire e-mail (currently at work) but I think that's what you are looking for. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs

Re: cp -r to copy recursively (but not symlinks)

On 1/20/06, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 01/20/06 10:42 CST: cp -RL Linux*/include/* ~/td I didn't go thru the entire e-mail (currently at work) but I think that's what you are looking for. Yes, it works. And I would have sworn I tried

Re: popt's debian patch

On 1/18/06, Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Another good candidate is rsync. I checked out rsync. rsynced against gentoo's repository. Found no probs. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: Unzip 5.52 Max file size limit

On 1/17/06, Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tushar Teredesai wrote: On 1/17/06, Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It would be nice to do it in zip too, but I couldn't find an equivalent construct (didn't look a lot). The var is similar to unzip's - LOCAL_ZIP. I don't

Re: Unzip 5.52 Max file size limit

are specific for atheos, beos, macos, and tandem. Gotcha. I didn't check the details. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe

Re: popt's debian patch

On 1/18/06, Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tushar Teredesai wrote: It looks like upstream has a new release of popt - 1.10.1. Only problem is it is not distributed seperately. It is a part of the rpm-4.4.1. Don't know why they merged the two:( Where is the source? It is part

Re: popt's debian patch

on a package they update the config.{sub,guess} files with the latest from the gnuconfig package. Perhaps we can have such a note at the begining of the book. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev

Re: Unzip 5.52 Max file size limit

large zipped files around and the current unzip can't handle them. Looks good to me. I had no problems compiling with the switch, did not test it on a 4GB file but I will take your word for it. Unless there are any objections I will commit the change tomorrow. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL

popt's debian patch

patches configure but when make runs it causes the autotools to run needlessly. The book incorrectly states that configure.in was patched hence we need to let autotools run. IMO, we should remove the patch from the book and just make it a CMMI installation. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL

Re: popt's debian patch

versions. Your suggestion rolls back a current package for a negligible gain in time. I don't agree with it. The final fix is negligible, replacing if (arg == NULL || (((unsigned long)arg) (sizeof(*arg)-1))) with if (arg == NULL) will achive the same thing as the patch. -- Tushar Teredesai

Re: popt's debian patch

On 1/16/06, Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tushar Teredesai wrote: On 1/15/06, Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The only source for popt that I know of is debian. popt originated from Redhat's rpm package. The tarball is available at ftp.rpm.org. The only tarball I can find

Re: popt's debian patch

On 1/16/06, Tushar Teredesai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/16/06, Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tushar Teredesai wrote: On 1/15/06, Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The only source for popt that I know of is debian. popt originated from Redhat's rpm package. The tarball

openssl-0.9.8

Should the book be updated to the above series? Last I heard there were some incompatibilities, don't know if they have been resolved or not. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ

Re: Xorg 7.0

On 1/9/06, Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tushar Teredesai wrote: Agreed, it should either be /usr (my preference) or /usr/X11R7 (the appropriate version). My preference is /usr/X11R7. Though that will break a lot of packages that hard code the paths to X (I think most of them

Re: Xorg 7.0

for new versions:( -- -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: BLFS Expansion

. Things can be migrated to BLFS if they do not affect x86. For i18n and l10n, I think it is more appropriate to include the changes in the book, except for advanced configuration. Of course, the stuff can initially start on the wiki and then migrate to the book. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL

Re: Little problem with Xorg in /usr

their headers. Has upstream been notified? -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: xorg X11R7.0

in the bug. I am sorry I replied to your e-mail. Obviously you are correct. The fact that tons of packages out there do not have problem with Qt in /usr does not hold any merit. Feel free to remove the qt in /usr from the book. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: xorg X11R7.0

found that most of the packages out there have no problems with X installed in /usr, but I think there might be problems with putting X in /usr/X11R7 (unless ofcourse we have an additional backward compatibility link /usr/X11R6 - /usr/X11R7). -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: xorg X11R7.0

or absence of feature/programs every time? http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/manual/autoconf-2.57/html_node/autoconf_86.html -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http

Re: xorg X11R7.0

:) -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: xorg X11R7.0

version as the previous one. For example gnome-mime-data did not change between 2.10.2 and 2.12.0. It remained at version 2.4.2. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http

Re: ESP Ghostscript

the developer's wishes? -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

wvstreams: autoreconf

The instructions in the book for wvstreams apply a patch. This patch patches configure.ac and configure. If the diff for configure.ac is removed from the patch or a touch configure command is added after applying the patch, then there won't be any need to run autoreconf. -- Tushar Teredesai

Re: Firefox/Thunderbird-1.5 build instructions

it in the first place? My original hint on mozilla had the options in the mozconfig. But to make the commands consistent with other packages, it was changed to the current style. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http

Re: Firefox/Thunderbird-1.5 build instructions

. This allows upgrading the library without having to recompile all dependent packages. For example, if a bug were found in libjpeg, you would only need to recompile libjpeg without waiting for mozilla devs to patch their internal copy of libjpeg. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: which script

On 11/17/05, Jeremy Huntwork [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a question. The which script provided as an alternative to Gnu Which uses the syntax: type -pa | head -n 1 ... type -p has problems if the command is aliased to something. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: Shared library permissions

On 11/6/05, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And then doesn't receive warnings when running ldd against the .so file in question. If the Debian patch from January 2004 ever makes it way back to the official release that bogus warning will be suppressed. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto

Re: gcc-4 and SBU's

. The package should build on the current LFS-SVN. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: libexecdir

into libexecdir. Instead of blindly using --libexecdir=/usr/lib/packagename, the files installed into libexecdir need to be evaluated before deciding whether these belong to $prefix/sbin or or $prefix/lib or $prefix/lib/$package. That is, the decision has to be made for each pacakge individually. -- Tushar

Re: libexecdir

On 10/19/05, Tushar Teredesai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/19/05, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do programs that are not designed to be run by end users (not even the root user), but instead are called internally by a library or other program belong in /usr/sbin? Some packages

Re: libexecdir

On 10/19/05, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 10:57 -0600, Archaic wrote: On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 11:46:06AM -0500, Tushar Teredesai wrote: FYI, providing examples for all situtations mentioned above: * openssh: --libexecdir=/usr/sbin to install the server

Re: libexecdir

, looks like it does. What about openldap? -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: GNOME Icon Theme issue

/share/pkgconfig:$prefix/lib/pkgconfig (Note that the order may be reversed). -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above

Re: GNOME Icon Theme issue

the variable override the default settings? I think so. I found that /usr/share/pkgconfig is also in the default search path when we had the issue with the search paths when the package name was changed from pkgconfig to pkg-config. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: FAM/Gamin

to an oversight I also committed the change to BOOK/gnome/core/gnome-vfs.xml. I had to change it locally since my sandbox would not validate without it. Hopefully since I only changed fam to gamin in that file, it should not cause you a big problem. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: FAM/Gamin

the dependencies? The options are: 1. Replace all dependencies on FAM by Gamin. I plan to include a link to FAM's homepage on the gamin page. 2. Cast the dependencies as Gamin or FAM with the FAM link pointing to FAM's homepage. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: FAM/Gamin

On 10/7/05, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I could not tell from your previous message if you wanted me to go ahead and add Gamin to the book, or if you are going to do it. If you are, what is the time frame you are looking at? By Saturday. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL

Re: Remove GTK+-1? (was - Re: Nothing Doing (longish).)

instead of keeping it in the book? -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: Remove GTK+-1?

On 10/5/05, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 10/05/05 13:37 CST: Though gnome1 is useful for gnucash, it is not yet ported to gnome2. Perhaps gnucash should be made into an hint instead of keeping it in the book? Why? What useful purpose would

Re: Creating users that don't need a specific group

: groupadd -K GID_MIN=20 -K GID_MAX=100 GROUP_NAME useradd -K UID_MIN=20 -K UID_MAX=100 -g GROUP_NAME USER_NAME -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org

Re: gcc-4.x installation

that anyone who does not fit into that profile will be supported on the mailing lists but there won't be additions to the book to support these group of users. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: gcc-4.x installation

On 9/20/05, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Time is money. So saving some time on the gcc compile without a change in the end results is beneficial, right? :)) -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org

Re: gcc-4.x installation

On 9/20/05, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 09/20/05 00:00 CST: Not so little for my slow-poke Pentium III :) Umm. Upgrade perhaps? Perhaps we should put a note in LFS and BLFS that they should only build on a P-4 or Athlon and above

Re: gcc-4.x installation

On 9/20/05, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: relevant, but if someone were to follow the book, when the versions don't match, it's a good thing we do the bootstrap, at the expense of a few minutes. As I said above, a note/warning would take care of that. -- Tushar Teredesai

Re: gcc-4.x installation

includes a c compiler? I used to install ada before and I remember it only used gnat for bootstrapping ada, but used the system installed gcc to build everything else. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman

Re: gcc-4.x installation

gnat. In the book, Option 1 was used. Please revert the change and comment out the note for now. When building Ch 6, I will see if Option 2 mentioned above can still be used. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org

gcc-4.x installation

In BLFS, we use make bootstrap to build gcc, but LFS now uses make. Should we change BLFS to match the current LFS? -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http

Re: gcc-4.x installation

On 9/20/05, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 09/19/05 23:33 CDT: In BLFS, we use make bootstrap to build gcc, but LFS now uses make. Should we change BLFS to match the current LFS? No, I don't think so. In this instance we cannot assume

Re: RFC: Using gamin instead of fam

. Is this reported upstream? -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: gcc-4.x installation

On 9/20/05, Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: True, but what is the difference beside a little build time and disk space? Not so little for my slow-poke Pentium III :) -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http

Re: RFC: Using gamin instead of fam

On 9/20/05, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 09/19/05 23:54 CST: Is this reported upstream? Not that I know of. I just know it is the behavior I see. What happens when you exit from an application that uses Gamin? Surely you know, as you

Re: RFC: QT installation (Method 1) - Bug 1522

since qt4 has a different directory structure compared to qt3. But the above fix should work for now. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs

Re: NSS/NSPR libraries

that can use NSS/NSPR is evolution. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: RFC: Using gamin instead of fam

On 9/14/05, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 09/14/05 08:50 CST: I would like to propose replacing fam in the BLFS book by gamin. Have you tested this yet to ensure it compiles and works okay on a GCC-4 based system? Nope. Don't have gcc4. My

Re: NSS/NSPR libraries

). -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: RFC: Using gamin instead of fam

On 9/14/05, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just FYI, I use FAM out of xinetd. That way, the daemon is only started when it is actually needed. Will Gamin also work in this manner? You don't need to start the server manually. It is started automatically when required. -- Tushar

Re: NSS/NSPR libraries

On 9/14/05, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 09/14/05 17:38 CDT: Depends on whether the libraries installed by all these pacakges are binary compatible. As far as I know, they are identical. The same code is used in all 3 packages

Re: RFC: Using gamin instead of fam

On 9/14/05, Andrew Benton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does gamin depend on portmap and tcpwrappers? Nope. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs

Re: RFC: Using gamin instead of fam

, you don't need to start the server manually? gamin does not not need the daemon to be started. Whenever the application requires file monitoring, the server/daemon will be started by the gamin library. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar

Re: RFC: Using gamin instead of fam

On 9/14/05, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 09/14/05 16:18 CST: On 9/14/05, Andrew Benton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does gamin depend on portmap and tcpwrappers? Nope. Can it use Portmap? If it is truly binary compatible then it would

Re: libmad pkgconfig

. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: libmad pkgconfig

is a better soultion than creating it in cdrdao. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: Heimdal overwrites

On 9/2/05, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 09/02/05 00:00 CST: Will have to check which files are overwritten and take action accordingly. Let's see, can only tell you how it goes after I install it:) Tushar, don't get me wrong. I want

Re: Heimdal overwrites

On 9/2/05, Tushar Teredesai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Another nitpick (which may not be valid). The book states that berkeley db is a required dependency but configure has a --disable-berkeley-db switch. I just tried heimdal compliation and could compile without berkeley db and openssl. So

Re: Heimdal overwrites

On 9/2/05, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 09/02/05 13:46 CST: I just tried heimdal compliation and could compile without berkeley db I can believe this. However, the server side functionality has been disabled. Either that, or you've

  1   2   >