Em 20-02-2014 19:22, Armin K. escreveu:
On 02/19/2014 07:01 PM, Armin K. wrote:
FYI, I'll be building anything that has an init script in blfs in order
to provide the same for systemd, and doing so I can correct something
and/or mark them as checked.
More updates, for server software
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:27:53 +0100
From: Armin K. kre...@email.com
To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] BLFS Systemd Additions
On 02/19/2014 11:00 PM, Armin K. wrote:
Hello, I've taken some time to write modifications that are necessarry
for
Em 20-02-2014 23:00, LFS Trac escreveu:
#3505: linux-3.13.4
--+
Reporter: bdubbs@… | Owner: lfs-book@…
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal| Milestone: 7.5
Component: Book |Version: SVN
Severity:
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Em 20-02-2014 23:00, LFS Trac escreveu:
#3505: linux-3.13.4
--+
Reporter: bdubbs@… | Owner: lfs-book@…
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal| Milestone: 7.5
Component: Book
On 02/21/2014 03:51 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Em 20-02-2014 23:00, LFS Trac escreveu:
#3505: linux-3.13.4
--+
Reporter: bdubbs@… | Owner: lfs-book@…
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal
On 02/21/2014 05:29 PM, Armin K. wrote:
On 02/21/2014 03:51 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Em 20-02-2014 23:00, LFS Trac escreveu:
#3505: linux-3.13.4
--+
Reporter: bdubbs@… | Owner: lfs-book@…
Type: task
Armin K. wrote:
We can do this for 7.5. The rule here is that we can update point
versions but not major or minor versions.
Couldn't it be the same for blfs, for almost all packages?
That's worthy of discussion. Perhaps end packages and not libraries
would be amenable to this type
On 02/21/2014 11:40 AM, akhiezer wrote:
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:27:53 +0100
From: Armin K. kre...@email.com
To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] BLFS Systemd Additions
On 02/19/2014 11:00 PM, Armin K. wrote:
Hello, I've taken some time to write
Armin K. wrote:
I'm only one person and keeping up with LFS which is at least 10 times
smaller and making sure it's perfect is hard enough.
That's an understatement.
BLFS requires
modifications to more packages than the entire LFS has. Easiest approach
would be for both instructions to
On 02/21/2014 05:44 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
We can do this for 7.5. The rule here is that we can update point
versions but not major or minor versions.
Couldn't it be the same for blfs, for almost all packages?
That's worthy of discussion. Perhaps end packages and
I spend most my time in the arm world and have been slacking when it
comes to aarch64 (arm64)
the reason for this is there is no hardware in the wild to support it
but there some promising candidates
been released in Q2 +
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
We can do this for 7.5. The rule here is that we can update point
versions but not major or minor versions.
Couldn't it be the same for blfs, for almost all packages?
That's worthy of discussion. Perhaps end packages and not libraries
would be
Armin K. wrote:
I believe we need a policy to exactly define what exactly package
freeze means.
It means don't upgrade a package unless we talk it over and agree that
it can be upgraded without creating additional work during the release
testing period.
-- Bruce
--
On 02/21/2014 06:01 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
I'm only one person and keeping up with LFS which is at least 10 times
smaller and making sure it's perfect is hard enough.
That's an understatement.
BLFS requires
modifications to more packages than the entire LFS has. Easiest
On 02/21/2014 06:05 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
I believe we need a policy to exactly define what exactly package
freeze means.
It means don't upgrade a package unless we talk it over and agree that
it can be upgraded without creating additional work during the release
On 02/21/2014 06:02 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
We can do this for 7.5. The rule here is that we can update point
versions but not major or minor versions.
Couldn't it be the same for blfs, for almost all packages?
That's worthy of discussion. Perhaps
Em 21-02-2014 14:16, Armin K. escreveu:
On 02/21/2014 06:01 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
I'm only one person and keeping up with LFS which is at least 10 times
smaller and making sure it's perfect is hard enough.
That's an understatement.
BLFS requires
modifications to more
Armin K. wrote:
On 02/21/2014 06:01 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
I'm only one person and keeping up with LFS which is at least 10 times
smaller and making sure it's perfect is hard enough.
That's an understatement.
BLFS requires
modifications to more packages than the entire
On 02/21/2014 07:57 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
On 02/21/2014 06:01 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
I'm only one person and keeping up with LFS which is at least 10 times
smaller and making sure it's perfect is hard enough.
That's an understatement.
BLFS requires
On 02/21/2014 08:20 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
I know what you meant. I have no problems with shipping package specific
notes for now. Maintaining seperate BLFS is something I can't do alone
and maintaining same instructions in one branch, then generating two
different books is
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 20:04:15 +0100
From: Armin K. kre...@email.com
To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] BLFS Systemd Additions
.
.
I know what you meant. I have no problems with shipping package specific
notes for now.
Yes,
On 02/21/2014 08:34 PM, akhiezer wrote:
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 20:04:15 +0100
From: Armin K. kre...@email.com
To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] BLFS Systemd Additions
.
.
I know what you meant. I have no problems with shipping
Armin K. wrote:
On 02/21/2014 08:20 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
I know what you meant. I have no problems with shipping package specific
notes for now. Maintaining seperate BLFS is something I can't do alone
and maintaining same instructions in one branch, then generating two
Em 21-02-2014 16:34, akhiezer escreveu:
Had expected here that there _would_ be two separate xml trees, at least
for foreseeable, like for lfs. And then in time see how 'clean' the diffs
between the two can be; and from there if want to merge.
Thanks, akhiezer. Tha is exactly what i think.
On 02/19/2014 07:01 PM, Armin K. wrote:
FYI, I'll be building anything that has an init script in blfs in order
to provide the same for systemd, and doing so I can correct something
and/or mark them as checked.
This should be final one from me for the time being.
--
Note: My last name is
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 08:51:55AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Em 20-02-2014 23:00, LFS Trac escreveu:
#3505: linux-3.13.4
--+
Reporter: bdubbs@… | Owner: lfs-book@…
Type: task | Status: new
On 02/21/2014 10:12 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 08:51:55AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Em 20-02-2014 23:00, LFS Trac escreveu:
#3505: linux-3.13.4
--+
Reporter: bdubbs@… | Owner: lfs-book@…
Em 21-02-2014 18:04, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu:
Em 21-02-2014 16:34, akhiezer escreveu:
Had expected here that there _would_ be two separate xml trees, at least
for foreseeable, like for lfs. And then in time see how 'clean' the diffs
between the two can be; and from there if want to
We are making great progress on tagging. This is what is remaining in
the Post LFS Group.
editors/bluefish.xml:lfs74_checked;
editors/emacs.xml:lfs74_checked;
editors/joe.xml:lfs74_checked;
filesystems/reiser.xml:lfs74_checked;
filesystems/gptfdisk.xml:lfs74_checked;
Em 21-02-2014 21:19, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
We are making great progress on tagging. This is what is remaining in
the Post LFS Group.
editors/bluefish.xml:lfs74_checked;
editors/emacs.xml:lfs74_checked;
editors/joe.xml:lfs74_checked;
filesystems/reiser.xml:lfs74_checked;
Em 22-02-2014 00:19, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu:
I will do tomorrow, because I am too tired.
By do tomorrow, I mean: I will commit tomorrow.
I did all gnome and many dependencies. Here is the list:
--
[]s,
Fernando
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ:
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Em 22-02-2014 00:19, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu:
I will do tomorrow, because I am too tired.
By do tomorrow, I mean: I will commit tomorrow.
OK, I'll quit for now, but I will make a last commit. Feel free to
override if you need to.
-- Bruce
--
32 matches
Mail list logo
