Re: [blfs-dev] Is the i686 patch needed for Qtwebengine-5.12.1?

2019-02-08 Thread Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev
Hello Ken, On 02/09/2019 12:27 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 12:01:43AM -0500, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote: Pretty sure, it is (my) "code 18" Please Note, I was blunt saying nothing was change between the 2 compile process I was keeping qt-5.12.0.

Re: [blfs-dev] Is the i686 patch needed for Qtwebengine-5.12.1?

2019-02-08 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 12:01:43AM -0500, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote: > > Pretty sure, it is (my) "code 18" > > Please Note, I was blunt saying nothing was change > between the 2 compile process > I was keeping qt-5.12.0. :) > > So that woul explain, Pierre successful compile on

Re: [blfs-dev] Is the i686 patch needed for Qtwebengine-5.12.1?

2019-02-08 Thread Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev
Hello, On 02/08/2019 10:50 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: [..] ‘void {anonymous}::DevToolsDataSource::StartRemoteDataRequest(const GURL&, const GotDataCallback&)’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function] void DevToolsDataSource::StartRemoteDataRequest( ^~ nin

Re: [blfs-dev] Is the i686 patch needed for Qtwebengine-5.12.1?

2019-02-08 Thread Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev
On 09/02/2019 05:16, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote: > > On 2/8/19 10:14 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: >> On 08/02/2019 21:37, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: >>> On 08/02/2019 19:48, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote: On 2/8/19 3:22 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:

Re: [blfs-dev] Is the i686 patch needed for Qtwebengine-5.12.1?

2019-02-08 Thread Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev
On 2/8/19 10:14 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: On 08/02/2019 21:37, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: On 08/02/2019 19:48, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote: On 2/8/19 3:22 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: Hi, Trying to build qtwebengine-5.12.1 (for x86_64), I applied the

Re: [blfs-dev] Is the i686 patch needed for Qtwebengine-5.12.1?

2019-02-08 Thread Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev
On 08/02/2019 21:37, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: > On 08/02/2019 19:48, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote: >> >> On 2/8/19 3:22 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Trying to build qtwebengine-5.12.1 (for x86_64), I applied the patch (done >>> automatically by jhalfs), a

Re: [blfs-dev] Is the i686 patch needed for Qtwebengine-5.12.1?

2019-02-08 Thread Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev
On 09/02/2019 02:34, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote: > Hello, > > Not sure about what is the list consensus about compiling qtwebengine > So, my 2 cents. > > On my side (x86_64, no patch applied) > qtwebengine-5.12.0 is compiling A_ONE > Then, --> everything else equals <-- > qtwebengine-5.12

Re: [blfs-dev] Is the i686 patch needed for Qtwebengine-5.12.1?

2019-02-08 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 08:34:22PM -0500, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote: > Hello, > > On my side (x86_64, no patch applied) > qtwebengine-5.12.0 is compiling A_ONE > Then, --> everything else equals <-- > qtwebengine-5.12.1 is NOT compiling > failing big trouble is very deep within the comp

Re: [blfs-dev] Is the i686 patch needed for Qtwebengine-5.12.1?

2019-02-08 Thread Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev
Hello, On 02/08/2019 03:50 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: On 02/08/2019 02:37 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: On 08/02/2019 19:48, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote: On 2/8/19 3:22 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: Hi, Trying to build qtwebengine-5.12.1 (for x86_64), I a

Re: [blfs-dev] Is the i686 patch needed for Qtwebengine-5.12.1?

2019-02-08 Thread Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev
On 02/08/2019 02:37 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: On 08/02/2019 19:48, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote: On 2/8/19 3:22 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: Hi, Trying to build qtwebengine-5.12.1 (for x86_64), I applied the patch (done automatically by jhalfs), and the build fa

Re: [blfs-dev] Is the i686 patch needed for Qtwebengine-5.12.1?

2019-02-08 Thread Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev
On 08/02/2019 19:48, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote: > > On 2/8/19 3:22 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Trying to build qtwebengine-5.12.1 (for x86_64), I applied the patch (done >> automatically by jhalfs), and the build failed quickly. Looking at the >> source, >> it se

Re: [blfs-dev] Is the i686 patch needed for Qtwebengine-5.12.1?

2019-02-08 Thread Roger Koehler via blfs-dev
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 10:44 AM Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: > On 08/02/2019 17:21, Roger Koehler via blfs-dev wrote: > > FYI, I am still unable to build Qt for some reason. > > I am curious what others see in their log file. Search for vulkan. > > > My log file is mangled, since I used -j4

Re: [blfs-dev] Is the i686 patch needed for Qtwebengine-5.12.1?

2019-02-08 Thread Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev
On 2/8/19 3:22 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: Hi, Trying to build qtwebengine-5.12.1 (for x86_64), I applied the patch (done automatically by jhalfs), and the build failed quickly. Looking at the source, it seems to me that the proper macro is now defined if gcc is used... So I wonder

Re: [blfs-dev] Is the i686 patch needed for Qtwebengine-5.12.1?

2019-02-08 Thread Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev
On 08/02/2019 17:21, Roger Koehler via blfs-dev wrote: > On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 2:22 AM Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Trying to build qtwebengine-5.12.1 (for x86_64), I applied the patch (done >> automatically by jhalfs), and the build failed quickly. Looking at the >> sou

Re: [blfs-dev] Is the i686 patch needed for Qtwebengine-5.12.1?

2019-02-08 Thread Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev
On 02/08/2019 10:21 AM, Roger Koehler via blfs-dev wrote: On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 2:22 AM Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: Hi, Trying to build qtwebengine-5.12.1 (for x86_64), I applied the patch (done automatically by jhalfs), and the build failed quickly. Looking at the source, it seems t

Re: [blfs-dev] Is the i686 patch needed for Qtwebengine-5.12.1?

2019-02-08 Thread Roger Koehler via blfs-dev
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 2:22 AM Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: > > Hi, > > Trying to build qtwebengine-5.12.1 (for x86_64), I applied the patch (done > automatically by jhalfs), and the build failed quickly. Looking at the source, > it seems to me that the proper macro is now defined if gcc is

[blfs-dev] Is the i686 patch needed for Qtwebengine-5.12.1?

2019-02-08 Thread Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev
Hi, Trying to build qtwebengine-5.12.1 (for x86_64), I applied the patch (done automatically by jhalfs), and the build failed quickly. Looking at the source, it seems to me that the proper macro is now defined if gcc is used... So I wonder whether the patch is still needed. Maybe, Douglas can conf