Forwarded Message
Subject: BLSF-10.1: polkit / shadow; nspr
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 12:23:51 +0200
From: Rainer Fiebig
To: Bruce Dubbs
Hi!
polkit / shadow
***
The following command doesn't work, the directory /etc/polkit-1 is
*not* being created:
useradd -c
On 4/19/21 1:09 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 09:44:19PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 4/18/21 5:36 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
- Forwarded message from Ken Moffat via blfs-book
-
Arghh - I sent this to -book.
My first public
On 4/18/21 5:36 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
- Forwarded message from Ken Moffat via blfs-book
-
Arghh - I sent this to -book.
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 23:03:22 +0100
From: Ken Moffat via blfs-book
To: blfs-b...@lists.linuxfromscratch.org
Cc: Ken Moffat
Subject: [blfs-book]
On 4/14/21 6:24 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
When trying to push my changes to git, I got following error:
timtas@dalglish:~/src/blfs-git$ git commit -a
[trunk 8355679be] Upgrade to curl-7.76.1.
4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
timtas@dalglish:~/src/blfs-git$
On 4/1/21 3:52 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
I just discovered that curl apparently now also optionally supports
cmake as build system. Per official documentation however, ./configure
still seems first choice, or at least as supported as cmake.
As I personally don't see the
On 3/28/21 5:59 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I'm trying to get Apache SSIs to work. I am looking at
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/howto/ssi.html and
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_include.html
Testing a default apache install, I created a simple html page according
to the
I'm trying to get Apache SSIs to work. I am looking at
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/howto/ssi.html and
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_include.html
Testing a default apache install, I created a simple html page according
to the above in the document root directory:
On 3/24/21 3:25 PM, Wayne Blaszczyk via blfs-dev wrote:
On Wed, 2021-03-24 at 12:50 -0500, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
On 3/24/21 12:46 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
The link in the book gives a 404.
If I go to https://github.com/rhboot/efibootmgr/releases I can
use firefox to
On 3/17/21 2:40 PM, David Gherghita via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello,
In the "BLFS Systemd Units" section of the BLFS 10.0-systemd book, the
link to download the archive [1] is broken.
Navigating to the directory [2], I noticed that the version of the
archive available is 20180105, which seems to
On 3/8/21 8:03 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On Mon, 2021-03-08 at 19:49 +0800, Kevin Buckley via blfs-dev wrote:
2)
Installation of intel-vaapi-driver
appears to unpack the intel-vaapi-driver sources into the libva
directory.
Does it need to be installed from within the libva
On 3/3/21 5:54 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
I just saw that openssh has a new version and as I wondered about the
changes, I visited their page.
While the corresponding ticket
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/14725
was already assigned but had no changes comment,
On 3/2/21 5:36 AM, Ryan Marsaw via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello.
It appears that the URI perl module has a new maintainer. Version 5.08
of the URI module was released a couple of days ago, but is not listed
at the site referenced in BLFS. A search at metacpan.org shows that the
download location is
The Linux From Scratch community is pleased to announce the release of
LFS Version 10.1, LFS Version 10.1 (systemd), BLFS Version 10.1, and
BLFS Version 10.1 (systemd).
This release is a major update to both LFS and BLFS.
The LFS release includes updates to glibc-2.33, and binutils-2.36.1. A
On 2/27/21 4:39 PM, Ryan Marsaw via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello.
In the Mesa package there are -Dvalgrind=false and -Dlibunwind=false
Both of these switches give out a warning that "false" is deprecated in
favour of "disabled". It's not a big deal at the moment, but these two
switches might give an
We are about ready to release LFS/BLFS 10.1. All tickets have been
closed and all packages have been tested using the current instructions
in the books.
That said, there are probably issues that still need to be addressed.
If LFS is printed out on paper, it is about 300 pages. If BLFS is
The Linux From Scratch community announces the release of LFS Version
10.1-rc1. It is a preliminary release of LFS-10.1.
The Linux From Scratch community announces the release of LFS Version
10.1-rc1. It is a preliminary release of LFS-10.1. Major changes include
toolchain updates to
On 2/1/21 5:46 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
I just installed gparted for the first time as in the SVN book (version
1.2.0) and it seems that the part about root privileges seems to be
outdated.
I installed gparted without any helper stuff and it seems that the
provided
On 1/31/21 7:57 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
Current links:
2. The revised details for 10.0 are at
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/advisories/10.0.html with short
summaries of the issue / what to do, and links to fuller details on
the consolidated page.
I have not been following
On 1/28/21 9:37 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
A little while ago I proposed separating out our Security
Advisories. What I would now like to do is create an *extra* page
in the www/ repo listing (and in a couple of mutt cases creating[1])
advisories from 1st September when BLFS-10.0 was
On 1/22/21 3:59 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
SANE-1.0.29 seems to link against elogind when present and not
specifically told to not do so by specifying
--with-systemd=no
Since I don't know what the consequences of elogind support for sane
are, I did set that. Maybe one then
On 1/21/21 10:43 PM, DJ Lucas via blfs-dev wrote:
FYI, we are currently using a mkdir for the pidfile in postgresql
script. We have a mechanism in place for this outside of the init script
(createfiles):
echo "/run/postgresql dir 755 postgres postgres" >>
On 1/12/21 9:03 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 09:11:47AM +0100, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On Tue, 2021-01-12 at 08:50 +0100, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
Since a couple of days, I'm experiencing connect issues to
wiki.linuxfromscratch.org. Is
On 1/6/21 10:56 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 1/6/21 5:38 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 1/6/21 10:27 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 1/6/21 5:14 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 1/6/21 9:58 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Compile works for me
On 1/6/21 10:27 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 1/6/21 5:14 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 1/6/21 9:58 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Compile works for me with:
-DCONFIG_GDK_PIXBUF_XLIB=ON \
-DCONFIG_IMLIB2=OFF \
CONFIG_GDK_PIXBUF_XLIB does not turn
On 1/6/21 9:58 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Compile works for me with:
-DCONFIG_GDK_PIXBUF_XLIB=ON \
-DCONFIG_IMLIB2=OFF \
CONFIG_GDK_PIXBUF_XLIB does not turn off CONFIG_IMLIB2 by itself and
will still give an error.
Is it ok if I update the page accordingly? I'm
On 1/5/21 9:34 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 02:33:35PM +0100, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On Wed, 2020-12-30 at 18:21 +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi Guys,
some of you may have noticed that I have an aversion to gtk-doc (I'm
getting over it).
On 1/2/21 6:04 PM, Kevin Buckley via blfs-dev wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jan 2021 at 03:04, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev
wrote:
Looking in more depth, normally, according to meson.build, the
dependency on cairo is not required, even for 1.46. So it should be
able to compile if cairo is not available.
On 12/30/20 4:00 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
I've got as far as checking cogl in the packages needing autoreconf
(might as well do them all whilst on a system where gtkdocize is
made unavailable) - not surprisingly, gtkdocize gets needed more in
gnome packages.
Among these is cogl, but
On 12/30/20 3:55 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 03:46:58PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 12/30/20 1:18 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
I think you can start gnome without a dm, by putting "exec gnome-
session" in .xinitrc. Now how to
On 12/30/20 1:18 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
I think you can start gnome without a dm, by putting "exec gnome-
session" in .xinitrc. Now how to only start gnome-shell, I am not sure.
This is what I use:
$ cat .xinitrc
session=${2:-xfce}
dbus="dbus-launch --exit-with-session"
On 12/29/20 6:52 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
I just went through building xorg with elogind/dbus support until xinit,
as in the book.
I then still had to
chmod u+s $XORG_PREFIX/libexec/Xorg
in order to get X running. So just to make sure I did not fuck up
anywhere: is this
On 12/28/20 9:04 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
First, comment on gtkmm3 - the book does not have '..' in the meson
command. Seems unusual, Im using e conventional '..'.
Second, a question: why are the docs for this package so important ?
The book passes -Dbuild-documentation=true and
On 12/26/20 11:30 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
Using polkit-0.118 and our
polkit-0.118-fix_elogind_detection-1.patch, autoreconf fails with
current versions of everything. In my script I use autoreconf -fiv
instead of just autoreconf -fi, so this maybe shows a little more
detail than the
On 12/25/20 10:05 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 12/25/20 4:04 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 11:56:59PM +0100, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev
wrote:
Hi all
As a new release of my favorite DE is out and it's christmas, I
thought I
give it a go.
In short:
On 12/24/20 4:56 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
As a new release of my favorite DE is out and it's christmas, I thought
I give it a go.
In short: An upgrade from 4.14 as in blfs svn works seamlessly, in the
exact order as already in the book.
Apart from many bug-fixes and
I've been looking at the c++ interfaces to the glib based libraries today.
There are new versions available:
glibmm-2.68.0
cairomm-1.16.0
pangomm-2.48.0
atkmm-2.36.0
gtkmm-4.0.0
They need to be built in the above order to satisfy dependencies, but
ultimately, gtkmm-4.0.0 requires gtk+-4.
On 12/12/20 3:07 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
Presently, in the book, we have two pages for the Qt library: one for
full Qt, except we do not build qtwebengine, and another one for
qtwebengine. This has a couple of drawbacks:
- If a package needs only Qt core libraries, we require to
On 12/11/20 2:37 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
I've
also started to build the whole of my normal desktop in chroot so
that I can keep using the old desktop until everything has been
compiled.
Everyone develops their own techniques. Personally I only build enough
in chroot to get ssh
On 12/11/20 12:39 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
On 12/11/20 12:04 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 11:03:05AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 12/11/20 12:40 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On Fri, 2020-12-11 at 02:43 +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote
On 12/11/20 12:04 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 11:03:05AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 12/11/20 12:40 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On Fri, 2020-12-11 at 02:43 +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
Yes I've been bitten by that when
On 12/11/20 12:40 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On Fri, 2020-12-11 at 02:43 +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
I must have been evil in a previous existence, because I'm not
trying to use jhalfs to build kde.
In kf5 I stopped the build after a bit over an hour because nothing
was
On 12/10/20 8:43 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
I must have been evil in a previous existence, because I'm not
trying to use jhalfs to build kde.
In kf5 I stopped the build after a bit over an hour because nothing
was happening. The log said:
URL transformed to HTTPS due to an HSTS
On 12/8/20 3:34 PM, Marty Jack via blfs-dev wrote:
I see some discussion in the ticket on Qt 6.0.
This is a case where you will need both Qt 5 and Qt 6 in parallel for
potentially years, similar to the situation with GTK 2 and GTK 3 or Qt4 and Qt5.
I predict very slow adoption of Qt 6 because
On 12/4/20 2:11 PM, DJ Lucas via blfs-dev wrote:
On December 3, 2020 3:18:39 PM CST, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev
wrote:
In some cases PAM may use Berkeley DB libraries. We should probably
change the bdb build to move the libraries to /lib:
...
I don't think that is necessary, or at least
On 12/4/20 11:16 AM, Wayne Blaszczyk via blfs-dev wrote:
[snip]
Found that a user systemd-oom is require. However there are still issues:
Dec 05 04:13:20 lfs02 systemd-oomd[197]: Pressure Stall Information (PSI) is
not supported
Looks like a kernel option:
Symbol: PSI [=n]
Type : bool
On 12/3/20 6:38 PM, Kevin Buckley via blfs-dev wrote:
Noticed this when doing a PkgUser install because of a conflict
between Vim and CMake
The install of Vim has deployed, amongst other things
pkg cmake:cmake-3.18.1> ls -l /usr/share/vim/vim82/
total 384
drwxr-xr-x
In some cases PAM may use Berkeley DB libraries. We should probably
change the bdb build to move the libraries to /lib:
...
../dist/configure --prefix=/usr \
--libdir=/lib \ <-- added
--enable-compat185 \
--enable-dbm \
On 12/1/20 3:02 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 12/1/20 5:33 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 12/1/20 7:48 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
When re-building pam version 1.5.1, I noticed that it links against
bdb, because I had installed bdb since my last pam build
On 12/1/20 7:48 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
When re-building pam version 1.5.1, I noticed that it links against bdb,
because I had installed bdb since my last pam build.
As I'm not really fond of including bdb in all installations using pam,
I found out that by specifying
On 11/10/20 6:43 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
I'm just about to build llvm 11 as in current blfs, and wondered if it
would be better to install it in /opt/llvm11, instead of /usr.
The reason I'm asking is that llvm seems to be updated quite often and
I'm not sure about the
On 11/2/20 4:35 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 10:48:39PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
In LFS, we can make the symlink to p3. For p2 in BLFS, we will use 'make
altinstall'. Everything else would be for non-python packages that either
use p2 or create
On 11/1/20 2:52 PM, Ryan Marsaw via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello all.
The latest btrfs-progs now installs a pkgconfig file (libbtrfsutil.pc).
With current build instructions, this file is installed in
/lib/pkgconfig. To install this file to its proper location, the
configure section must add
On 10/29/20 5:22 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
As the subject says...
But another possibility is to not propose P2 modules at all for those
packages. I'm almost sure nothing uses P2 modules for those packages:
Markupsafe is here only for Mako and Jinja2, and we build only P3 for
those
On 10/23/20 12:00 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 11:22:06AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
Is there an official python recommendation for that, to quote at
them, please ?
That's a good question, but I would also like to see if there is a survey of
the major
On 10/23/20 11:01 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 10:27:51AM -0500, DJ Lucas via blfs-dev wrote:
On October 23, 2020 10:15:09 AM CDT, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 09:04:53AM +0200, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev
wrote:
Reluctantly, I have
On 10/22/20 12:56 AM, DJ Lucas via blfs-dev wrote:
On October 21, 2020 10:48:39 PM CDT, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev
wrote:
On 10/21/20 10:06 PM, DJ Lucas via blfs-dev wrote:
In LFS, we can make the symlink to p3. For p2 in BLFS, we will use
'make altinstall'. Everything else would
On 10/21/20 10:06 PM, DJ Lucas via blfs-dev wrote:
On 10/21/2020 7:12 PM, Kevin Buckley via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 at 00:26, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev
wrote:
Currently we have /usr/bin/python -> python2. Is it time to change that
to python3?
Probably a bit too drastic a v
Currently we have /usr/bin/python -> python2. Is it time to change that
to python3?
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On 10/19/20 11:20 PM, DJ Lucas via blfs-dev wrote:
On 10/19/2020 11:00 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 10/19/20 10:55 PM, DJ Lucas via blfs-dev wrote:
mkfontdir is no longer needed (probably hasn't been in a long time).
It is a shell script and both it and the manpage are included
On 10/19/20 11:20 PM, DJ Lucas via blfs-dev wrote:
On 10/19/2020 11:00 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 10/19/20 10:55 PM, DJ Lucas via blfs-dev wrote:
mkfontdir is no longer needed (probably hasn't been in a long time).
It is a shell script and both it and the manpage are included
On 10/19/20 10:55 PM, DJ Lucas via blfs-dev wrote:
mkfontdir is no longer needed (probably hasn't been in a long time). It
is a shell script and both it and the manpage are included with
makefontscale.
OK, I can remove that.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
On 10/15/20 5:51 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 05:03:54PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 10/15/20 4:51 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 03:59:32PM +0100, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 02:14:56PM +0100
On 10/15/20 4:51 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 03:59:32PM +0100, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 02:14:56PM +0100, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 04:17:50PM +0800, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote:
On 2020-10-14 02:45
On 10/14/20 11:43 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 11:11:13AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 10/12/20 10:15 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 09:41:37PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev
wrote:
They seem to be using system JBIG2DEC
On 10/13/20 11:11 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
On 10/12/20 10:15 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 09:41:37PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev
wrote:
I have been struggling today to get a satisfactory build of
mupdf-1.18.0. I can get it to build, but it also builds its own
On 10/12/20 10:15 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 09:41:37PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev
wrote:
I have been struggling today to get a satisfactory build of
mupdf-1.18.0. I can get it to build, but it also builds its own
copies of curl, freeglut, freetype
On 10/12/20 10:15 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 09:41:37PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev
wrote:
I have been struggling today to get a satisfactory build of
mupdf-1.18.0. I can get it to build, but it also builds its own
copies of curl, freeglut, freetype
I have been struggling today to get a satisfactory build of
mupdf-1.18.0. I can get it to build, but it also builds its own copies
of curl, freeglut, freetype, harfbuzz, lcms2, ligjpeg, openjpeg, and
zlib and links them into the executables.
There is supposedly a way to use system libraries
On 10/12/20 3:15 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
People might remember that I looked at llvm-11-rc1 in early August,
and discovered that rustc-1.42.0 could not use it. I see that
llvm-11.0.0 is now out, and the release notes for rust-1.47.0 say
that it ships with llvm-11 (although it
On 10/7/20 10:38 AM, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
On 10/7/20 2:38 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
Usually, the first thing I do after building a new lfs VM, and the
necessary tools to run jhalfs, is to build elogind first. In that case,
jhalfs builds gobject-introspection early.
On 10/6/20 9:06 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
I'm in the process of building BLFS 10, which is the first time that I
will have to build elogind.
I'm currently a bit lost regarding the circular dependencies in this
case, is this the correct order:
1. build X libraries
2.
On 10/4/20 10:26 PM, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote:
On 2020-10-04 21:48 -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 10/4/20 9:09 PM, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote:
On 2020-10-04 17:10 -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 10/4/20 5:03 PM, Joe Locash wrote:
On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 5:46 PM
On 10/4/20 9:09 PM, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote:
On 2020-10-04 17:10 -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 10/4/20 5:03 PM, Joe Locash wrote:
On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 5:46 PM Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev
mailto:blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org>> wrote:
On 10/4/20 3:45 PM, Joe
On 10/4/20 5:03 PM, Joe Locash wrote:
On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 5:46 PM Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev
<mailto:blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org>> wrote:
On 10/4/20 3:45 PM, Joe Locash via blfs-dev wrote:
> Why are --disable-search-provider and --without-nautilus-extension
On 10/4/20 3:45 PM, Joe Locash via blfs-dev wrote:
Why are --disable-search-provider and --without-nautilus-extension
passed to configure for the SytemV buiild of this? The command
explanations don't make much sense.
/|--disable-search-provider|/: This switch disables the “search
On 10/1/20 4:01 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
The postgresql boot script uses:
su - postgres -c '/usr/bin/pg_ctl start -W -D /srv/pgsql/data \
-l /srv/pgsql/data/logfile -o "-i" '
to start the server. The problem is that the -W option prevents the
On 9/27/20 2:32 PM, DJ Lucas via blfs-dev wrote:
Do we have a policy about reinstalls? If elogind is installed, both
make-ca and Linux-PAM create a /usr/lib/systemd directory (and
services). I intend to fix make-ca in a different way, but should
instructions be added to prevent this or remove
On 9/20/20 11:30 AM, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
On 9/20/20 8:04 AM, NicP via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello,
While building BLFS-10.0 systemd stable version, libsoup-2.70.0 fails
to build if brotli-1.0.9 is installed.
The build stops with this message : unrecognized command-line option
On 9/8/20 6:19 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 07:00:08PM +0100, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 01:33:49PM +0800, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote:
I just drafted js78 page. When it was built, the building system utilized some
LLVM tools
On 9/5/20 4:45 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I'm running into a problem with the glib-2.64.5 tests. Two tests are
failing that I don't think failed before:
166/270 glib:gio / tls-certificate
168/270 glib:gio / tls-database
They both have:
Can't find module 'gnutls-pkcs11' specified in GIO_USE_TLS
I'm running into a problem with the glib-2.64.5 tests. Two tests are
failing that I don't think failed before:
166/270 glib:gio / tls-certificate
168/270 glib:gio / tls-database
They both have:
Can't find module 'gnutls-pkcs11' specified in GIO_USE_TLS
When I look at
On 9/4/20 8:35 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
[snip]
I assume that ppp gets some kind of revival due to some ISP's requiring
it for fiber connections. Therefore I'd vote for de-archiving the
package. It now even has systemd suppport! Not that I'd care personally,
but probably useful
blfs-dev wrote:
On 9/1/20 7:55 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 9/1/20 12:24 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
As one of Switzerland largest ISP's requires pppoe with vlan
tagging
for fiber connections, I wondered if vlan tagging could get
supported
in the network scripts.
As I
On 9/3/20 5:44 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 9/3/20 10:29 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, 2020-09-03 at 21:47 +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 9/1/20 7:55 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 9/1/20 12:24 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
The Linux From Scratch community is pleased to announce the release of
LFS Version 10.0, LFS Version 10.0 (systemd), BLFS Version 10.0, and
BLFS Version 10.0 (systemd).
This release is a major update to both LFS and BLFS.
The LFS release includes updates to glibc-2.31, and binutils-2.34. A
On 9/1/20 12:24 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
As one of Switzerland largest ISP's requires pppoe with vlan tagging for
fiber connections, I wondered if vlan tagging could get supported in the
network scripts.
As I found out via https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/VLAN, one
On 8/31/20 5:07 AM, Ryan Marsaw via blfs-dev wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2020, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 03:11:02PM +0800, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote:
On 2020-08-31 07:49 +0100, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 01:20:52AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs
On 8/31/20 1:10 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
The download link works, but the download is
xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin-xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin-0.4.3-9de2b7865ecb95bdd2cbaae00a17b23ae8455fe5.tar.bz2
I wonder if we should remark on this - in places we remark on
directory names which do not match
On 8/30/20 9:03 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
I have not built libcanberra in recent times. I see now that it is
recommended for inkscape, so in future I wil lbe building it for
that to get closer to the book, and I see it gets used for plasma,
kmix, and various gnome packages.
Trying to
On 8/30/20 8:33 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
Now that pavucontrol is i nh book, it is in 'Other X-based Programs'
(chapter 41).
As it is a volume control, should it not be in 'Audio Utilities'
(chapter 43) alongside pnmixer ?
Yes, it probably should be. It was in the archives under
On 8/25/20 8:00 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
Release notes for latest firefox esr now available, three security
issues were fixed. Can I add this to 10.0, please ?
Yes. It is an 'end' package. Nothing depends on it.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
On 8/18/20 1:52 AM, DJ Lucas via blfs-dev wrote:
A fix to the issue mentioned on support is included as well as dropping
the sed. Also, not as important, but new bootscript releases in both
books to get the failsafe for $syslog in place (it's unlikely to ever
get triggered, but JIC).
I think
The Linux From Scratch community announces the release of LFS Version
10.0-rc1. It is a preliminary release of LFS-10.0.
This version of the book has undergone a major reorganization. It uses
enhanced cross-compilation techniques and an environment isolated from
the host system to build tools
On 8/12/20 3:00 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 02:54:30PM -0400, Joe Locash via blfs-dev wrote:
asciidoc will not build without libxml2 or libxslt installed. To reproduce
simply try building it on a fresh LFS install.
For the editors, that is hard to test (we
On 8/9/20 5:08 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 04:49:05PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 8/9/20 4:20 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 11:04:09AM -0500, Marty Jack via blfs-dev wrote:
The INSTALL file for git recommends
On 8/9/20 4:20 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 11:04:09AM -0500, Marty Jack via blfs-dev wrote:
The INSTALL file for git recommends the following incantation to derive the
path (at line 100).
This doesn't need updating when the Perl version changes.
On 8/2/20 9:13 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
Moving to the new-style LFS has greatly improved test results. I
remember the development of 'pure lfs' where the tests were added,
and at that time if the tests passed we got much better builds. So
I mostly run all the LFS tests when building
On 8/2/20 6:21 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
Testing re autoconf beta, I ran through the openldap client
instructions (in a chroot throwaway build), all completed including
the last one:
ln -sf ../lib/slapd /usr/sbin/slapd
But in the client configure we have:
--disable-slapd
And
On 7/25/20 8:45 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
Some people may have seen my comments on the thunderbird-78.0.1
ticket, particularly about libxul.so failing to link to dbus-glib
right at the end of the build.
For those who didn't - I do not normally build t-bird, but I'm
considering
On 6/27/20 7:24 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 07:58:52PM +0100, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 11:57:04AM -0500, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi folks,
While I'm working on updating the book to NSS-3.54, I wanted to let you guys
know
1 - 100 of 689 matches
Mail list logo
