Re: [blfs-dev] ImageMagick-7.0.6-10 md5sum is not correct

> From: Bruce Dubbs <bruce.du...@gmail.com> > Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 12:32:38 -0500 > > akhiezer wrote: > > > The matter is clearly, obviously, not about how long a single error > > persists. > > > > > > It is about how long folks remain addicte

Re: [blfs-dev] ImageMagick-7.0.6-10 md5sum is not correct

> Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 19:26:32 +0100 > From: Ken Moffat <zarniwh...@ntlworld.com> > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 06:19:42PM +0100, akhiezer wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 17:44:13 +0100 > > > From: Ken Moffat <zarniwh...@ntlworld.com> > > >

Re: [blfs-dev] ImageMagick-7.0.6-10 md5sum is not correct

> From: Bruce Dubbs <bruce.du...@gmail.com> > Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 10:48:07 -0500 > > akhiezer wrote: > >> From: Wayne Blaszczyk <wblas...@bigpond.net.au> > >> Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 19:16:41 +1000 > >> > >> Again, it seemed not to ch

Re: [blfs-dev] ImageMagick-7.0.6-10 md5sum is not correct

> From: Wayne Blaszczyk > Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 19:16:41 +1000 > > Again, it seemed not to change from the previous version. > The central issue is that much of that 'header' info (dates/checksums/sizes/build-times/...) get input manually, instead of done

Re: [blfs-dev] Text quibble for xorg intel driver

> Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 23:57:43 +0100 > From: Ken Moffat <zarniwh...@ntlworld.com> > > On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 10:56:00PM +0100, akhiezer wrote: > > > Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 01:07:26 +0100 > > > From: Ken Moffat <zarniwh...@ntlworld.com> > >

Re: [blfs-dev] Text quibble for xorg intel driver

> Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 08:58:11 +0100 > From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer) > > > Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 23:57:43 +0100 > > From: Ken Moffat <zarniwh...@ntlworld.com> > > [...] > > tarball-unpack, then: > > man ./xf86-video-intel-20170826/man/inte

Re: [blfs-dev] Text quibble for xorg intel driver

> Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 23:57:43 +0100 > From: Ken Moffat > [...] > > 'Intel integrated graphics chipsets' ; ref e.g. 'man 4 intel' . > > Thanks. The problem with referring readers to that page is that the > text for the driver should help people to decide which drivers

Re: [blfs-dev] Text quibble for xorg intel driver

> Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 01:07:26 +0100 > From: Ken Moffat > > I'm reading the detail of pages in the book more than I normally do > between releases, and in the Xorg Intel Driver we say: > > "The Xorg Intel Driver package contains the X.Org Video Driver for > Intel

Re: [blfs-dev] Cannot bootstrap current rust

> Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 05:24:22 +0100 > From: Ken Moffat > > I took a look at firefox-56.0beta a few days ago, and it needs a > newer rustc. Only need one version newer, but I thought I'd try the > current rust-1.19.0 for future-proofing, particularly since Arch >

Re: [blfs-dev] mariadb-10.2.6 my.cnf file

> From: John Burrell > Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2017 08:33:57 + > > The line: > > "innodb_additional_mem_pool_size = 2M" > > in the /etc/my.cnf file causes this message: > > "[ERROR] /usr/sbin/mysqld: unknown variable > 'innodb_additional_mem_pool_size=2M'" > > when running

Re: [blfs-dev] Book additions due to udisks2

> From: Bruce Dubbs <bruce.du...@gmail.com> > Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 18:55:42 -0500 > > akhiezer wrote: > >> From: Bruce Dubbs <bruce.du...@gmail.com> > >> Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 17:04:06 -0500 > >> > >> udisks[...] > > >

Re: [blfs-dev] Book additions due to udisks2

> From: Bruce Dubbs > Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 17:04:06 -0500 > > udisks[...] ( - SPOS. ) > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/postlfs/cryptsetup.html [...] > > The configuration/use of cryptsetup definitely needs some text about > setting up encrypted

Re: [blfs-dev] [lfs-dev] Misspellings

> From: Bruce Dubbs > Date: Sun, 14 May 2017 01:15:12 -0500 > > Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > William Harrington wrote: > >> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/misspellings > >> > >> I've used this a lot with our CLFS book. It may help with the LFS book. > > > > Thanks, Tried it and it

[blfs-dev] typos: 'docummentation' .

trunk/BOOK/general/genlib/libassuan.xml Optional, to fix the docummentation build: trunk/BOOK/archive/webkitgtk2.xml docummentation also applies here: trunk/BOOK/pst/scanning/xsane.xml (for the help docummentation at runtime) (Yes, the webkit... is arkv now). akh -- --

[blfs-dev] typo: 'documention' .

trunk/BOOK/general/graphlib/jasper.xml (needed to regnerate the pdf documention) trunk/BOOK/multimedia/videoutils/ffmpeg.xml --disable-doc: Disables building html documention. -- -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html

[blfs-dev] typo: gnumeric: ot to

trunk/BOOK/xsoft/office/gnumeric.xml 'The valgrind tests are known ot fail.' (These 'typo' msgs are by-products of some testing of aspell to spellcheck b/lfs src (xml) trees; incl aut reporting/) akh -- -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ:

[blfs-dev] typo: developper*

trunk/BOOK/lxqt/desktop/post-install.xml: 'developpers) or another Display Manager,' trunk/BOOK/postlfs/security/sudo.xml: 'See the developper note above before the configure command' akh -- -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ:

[blfs-dev] typo: epiphany-extensions: 'debuging' .

BOOK/archive/gnome/epiphany-extensions.xml 'is an extension for debuging the Soup session' akh -- -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

[blfs-dev] small typo: llvm: 'to an binary' .

trunk/BOOK/general/prog/llvm.xml 'to an binary file' akh -- -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [blfs-dev] aspell-0.60.6.1 fails to compile

> From: John Burrell > Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 21:50:36 + > > > John Burrell wrote: > > I've installed the dev version of LFS and now compiling aspell-0.60.6.1 > > fails. > > > > > > The bug has been reported on debian here - > > > >

Re: [blfs-dev] Use HTTPS URL for HarfBuzz archive

> Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 16:31:38 +0100 > From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer) > > > From: Paul Menzel <pmen...@molgen.mpg.de> > > Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 17:06:05 +0200 > > > > Dear BLFS folks, > > > > > > It???d be awesome > > > ((

Re: [blfs-dev] Use HTTPS URL for HarfBuzz archive

> From: Paul Menzel > Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 17:06:05 +0200 > > Dear BLFS folks, > > > It???d be awesome (( - really, 'awesome' again: I guess the threshold for being awed, varies greatly. )) > if you used the more secure HTTPS URL for downloading > the HarBuzz

Re: [blfs-dev] [lfs-dev] b/lfs books' xml-formatting -vs- patch readability/fragility.

> From: Bruce Dubbs > Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2017 12:47:40 -0500 > [...] > > > > If the original xml were formatted thus: > > > > > > echo "/opt/llvm3/lib" >> /etc/ld.so.conf > > mkdir -v build > > cd build > >

[blfs-dev] b/lfs books' xml-formatting -vs- patch readability/fragility.

Hi, A high percentage of lfs/blfs book-commits' patches, could be a lot more readable - and therefore less fragile/error-prone - if the xml tags were kept on separate lines from the code. This would be do-able while still avoiding pitfalls like the old 'vertical-formatting' in *roff/ For

Re: [blfs-dev] seamonkey

> From: Bruce Dubbs > Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 23:15:38 -0600 > Subject: [blfs-dev] seamonkey > > After a lot of trials I've finally got seamonkey to run without a seg > fault. To do it, I had to disable system icu. I'm using icu-58.2. > > I seem to recall something about

Re: [blfs-dev] libtool/autotools [Was: nosym branches]

> From: DJ Lucas > Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 23:55:35 -0600 > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] nosym branches > . . > > (4) But then, libtool/ltmain.sh/ would throw warnings: cos they compare > > two path variables' values, and just complain at that stage that >

Re: [blfs-dev] nosym branches

> From: DJ Lucas > Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 21:48:20 -0600 > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] multiarch [Was: nosym branches] > . . > I don't intend to carry them forward. I might throw something in the > wiki some day, but I though it important to show at least

Re: [blfs-dev] [lfs-dev] nosym branches

> From: Bruce Dubbs > Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 16:10:27 -0600 > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] [lfs-dev] nosym branches > . . > I think we can probably put this in trunk as it is simpler than the > symlinks we have now and will avoid all those 'seems to be moved'

Re: [blfs-dev] nosym branches

> From: DJ Lucas > Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 17:10:28 -0600 > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] nosym branches > . . > release, and just for fun (I know it wasn't asked for by you, but > example anyway): > > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~dj/lfs-systemd-multiarch/

Re: [blfs-dev] nosym branches

> From: DJ Lucas <d...@linuxfromscratch.org> > Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 17:10:28 -0600 > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] nosym branches > > On 12/11/2016 03:58 PM, akhiezer wrote: > > > > Link to patches? > > > > Are you 'scripting'/parametrising all of the stuff

Re: [blfs-dev] drop modemmanager?

> From: Bruce Dubbs <bruce.du...@gmail.com> > Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 10:24:58 -0600 > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] drop modemmanager? > > akhiezer wrote: > >> From blfs-dev-boun...@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Tue Dec 13 10:45:39 2016 > >> Date: Tue, 1

Re: [blfs-dev] drop modemmanager?

> From blfs-dev-boun...@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Tue Dec 13 10:45:39 2016 > Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 10:45:26 + > From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer) > To: BLFS Development List <blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org> > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] drop modemmanager? > &g

Re: [blfs-dev] drop modemmanager?

> From: "Douglas R. Reno" > Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 20:39:58 -0600 > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] drop modemmanager? > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > > Looking at http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/8569, I am > >

Re: [blfs-dev] nosym branches

> From: DJ Lucas > Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 23:37:29 -0600 > Subject: [blfs-dev] nosym branches > > Howdy all. You might have noticed the nosym branches in SVN. This > removes the /usr/lib64 symlink and replaces the /lib64 symlink with a > directory containing only the

Re: [blfs-dev] seeking advice about exim

> From: Pierre Labastie > Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 10:29:54 +0100 > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] seeking advice about exim > . . > I think usual MUA like heirloom mailx use batch submission (exim -bm), (By default, yes; but can use smtp/tls/imap/pop/

Re: [blfs-dev] seeking advice about exim

> From: Pierre Labastie > Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 21:58:38 +0100 > Subject: [blfs-dev] seeking advice about exim > > Hi list, > With version 4.87 of exim, the instructions in the book do not produce a > functional MTA. Namely sending local mails is not possible (I have not

Re: [blfs-dev] pt.3 -- Re: Xorg bitmap fonts - deprecate them

> Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 23:17:40 + > From: Ken Moffat <zarniwh...@ntlworld.com> > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] pt.3 -- Re: Xorg bitmap fonts - deprecate them > > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 09:24:50PM +, akhiezer wrote: > > > > To reiterate in summa

Re: [blfs-dev] pt.3 -- Re: Xorg bitmap fonts - deprecate them

> Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 20:54:32 + > From: Ken Poppet <zarniwh...@ntlworld.com> > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] pt.3 -- Re: Xorg bitmap fonts - deprecate them > > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 03:55:57PM +, akhiezer wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 13:35:55 + &

Re: [blfs-dev] Xorg bitmap fonts - deprecate them

> Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 20:04:32 + > From: Ken Moffat <zarniwh...@ntlworld.com> > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Xorg bitmap fonts - deprecate them > > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 01:46:42PM +, akhiezer wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 13:45:09 + > >

[blfs-dev] pt.3 -- Re: Xorg bitmap fonts - deprecate them

> Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 13:35:55 + > From: Ken Moffat > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Xorg bitmap fonts - deprecate them > . . > diff -Naur BOOK-r18030/x/installing/x7legacy.xml > BOOK-deprecate/x/installing/x7legacy.xml > ---

[blfs-dev] pt.2 -- Re: Xorg bitmap fonts - deprecate them

> Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 13:35:55 + > To: BLFS Development List > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Xorg bitmap fonts - deprecate them > . . > diff -Naur BOOK-r18030/x/installing/x7font.xml > BOOK-deprecate/x/installing/x7font.xml > ---

Re: [blfs-dev] Xorg bitmap fonts - deprecate them

> Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 13:45:09 + > From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer) > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Xorg bitmap fonts - deprecate them > > > Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 13:35:55 + > > From: Ken Moffat <zarniwh...@ntlworld.com> > > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev

Re: [blfs-dev] Xorg bitmap fonts - deprecate them

> Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 13:35:55 + > From: Ken Moffat > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Xorg bitmap fonts - deprecate them > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 07:59:52PM +, Ken Moffat wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 01:02:33PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > > > > As an aside,

Re: [blfs-dev] Xorg bitmap fonts - deprecate them

> Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 02:43:27 + > From: Ken Moffat > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Xorg bitmap fonts - deprecate them > > On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 04:40:04PM +, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > Proposal to deprecate the Xorg bitmap fonts, etc. > >

Re: [blfs-dev] lxdm

> From: Roger Koehler > Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2016 08:49:47 -0700 > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] lxdm > > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 01:32:18AM +, Ken Moffat wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at

Re: [blfs-dev] Sendmail page - Think we are missing a command

> From: Bruce Dubbs > Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:18:59 -0600 > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Sendmail page - Think we are missing a command > . . > # Put in place as root > install -m755 /etc/mail (install -d ...) > install -m644 aliases /etc/mail/aliases >

Re: [blfs-dev] Sendmail page - Think we are missing a command

> From: "Douglas R. Reno" <renodr2...@gmail.com> > Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 03:17:23 -0600 > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Sendmail page - Think we are missing a command > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:53 AM, akhiezer <lf...@cruziero.com> wrote: > > > > Fro

Re: [blfs-dev] Sendmail page - Think we are missing a command

> From: "Douglas R. Reno" > Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 00:56:27 -0600 > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Sendmail page - Think we are missing a command > > Pierre Labastie wrote: > > On 01/12/2016 04:38, Douglas R. Reno wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> Upon trying to run the newaliases

Re: [blfs-dev] Seamonkey, Firefox, and Thunderbird all cause segfaults with the latest SVN build

> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 15:00:13 + > From: Ken Moffat <zarniwh...@ntlworld.com> > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Seamonkey, Firefox, > and Thunderbird all cause segfaults with the latest SVN build > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 09:23:11AM +, akhiezer wrote: > > >

Re: [blfs-dev] Seamonkey, Firefox, and Thunderbird all cause segfaults with the latest SVN build

> Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 21:59:07 + > From: Ken Moffat > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Seamonkey, Firefox, > and Thunderbird all cause segfaults with the latest SVN build > . . > > I'm surprised that links cuts it at all for you - I find it a pain > for

Re: [blfs-dev] Re3: Popt-1.16 http download corrupted file?

> Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 09:42:38 +0100 > From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer) > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Re3: Popt-1.16 http download corrupted file? > > > From: Peng HG <craftyflic...@hotmail.com> > > Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 18:28:14 + > > Subject: Re: [bl

Re: [blfs-dev] Re3: Popt-1.16 http download corrupted file?

> From: Peng HG > Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 18:28:14 + > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Re3: Popt-1.16 http download corrupted file? > > The source of the problem is probably this: > > http://superuser.com/questions/940605/chromium-prevent-unpacking-tar-gz > It certainly

Re: [blfs-dev] Popt-1.16 http download corrupted file?

> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 01:11:48 +0100 > From: Ken Moffat > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Popt-1.16 http download corrupted file? > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:56:24PM +, Peng HG wrote: > > Trying to extract the Popt-1.16 tarball downloaded from the http link fails > >

Re: [blfs-dev] systemd

> From: Roger Koehler > Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 12:24:31 -0600 > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] systemd > > On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Julien Lepiller wrote: > > On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 12:11:19 -0600 > > Roger Koehler wrote:

Re: [blfs-dev] systemd

> From: Roger Koehler <roger.o.koeh...@gmail.com> > Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 12:11:19 -0600 > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] systemd > > On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 11:37 AM, akhiezer <lf...@cruziero.com> wrote: > >> From: Roger Koehler <roger.o.koeh...@gmail.com>

Re: [blfs-dev] Question reguarding xorg rebuild due to latest changes

> From blfs-dev-boun...@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Wed Oct 5 20:03:09 2016 > From: Tim Tassonis > To: BLFS Development List , > Bruce Dubbs > Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 21:07:45 +0200 > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev]

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl modules

> From: Bruce Dubbs > Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2016 14:29:00 -0500 > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Perl modules > > Ken Moffat wrote: > > I'm still working out the deps for the new version of biber - I have > > them all now (more than 100 _plus_ LWP), including those needed at > >

Re: [blfs-dev] ImageMagick-6.9.5-8

> From blfs-dev-boun...@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Sat Sep 17 22:05:43 2016 > To: BLFS Development List > From: Bruce Dubbs > Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 16:25:50 -0500 > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] ImageMagick-6.9.5-8 > > Paul Hentschel wrote:

[blfs-dev] 'Valgrind' still listed in 'Other Programming Tools' .

'Valgrind' still listed (since <= 7.5) in: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/general/other-tools.html ; yet is in the book (since >= 7.6) : http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/general/valgrind.html akh -- -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev

Re: [blfs-dev] gimp-2.8.18 : is gtk-doc now required ?

> Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 16:26:54 +0100 > From: Ken Moffat > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] gimp-2.8.18 : is gtk-doc now required ? > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 12:01:38AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > First, autoreconf ended with a lot of error messages like > > gtk-doc.make:7:

Re: [blfs-dev] PAM now fails to build docs with links

> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 18:39:05 +0100 > From: Ken Moffat > Subject: [blfs-dev] PAM now fails to build docs with links > > I've been adding PAM to my desktop builds for a while. By the time > I get to that point I've already built links, docbook, xslt. > > Until now

[blfs-dev] systemd-230 auto-kill background processes on logout?

Hi, For new-ver 230 sysd, should b/lfs ([1,2]) use explicit default of '--without-kill-user-processes' &/or 'KillUserProcesses=no' per debian bug item below (where there are counter-points too): https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=825394 "systemd kill background processes

Re: [blfs-dev] Thinking about a new LFS Live CD/iso

> From: Tim Tassonis > Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 15:27:01 +0200 > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Thinking about a new LFS Live CD/iso > > On 04/18/16 22:24, Bruce Dubbs wrote: . . > - llvm, mdadm, good if used on a system where lvm/RAID is used ( - s/l// presumably.)

Re: [blfs-dev] Versioning -- [Was: GCC 6 annoyances]

> From: Bruce Dubbs <bruce.du...@gmail.com> > Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 09:14:56 -0500 > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Versioning -- [Was: GCC 6 annoyances] > > akhiezer wrote: > >> Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 19:57:34 +0100 > >> From: Ken Moffat <zarniwh...@ntlwor

[blfs-dev] (typo) icons / fonts : ch.28 intro.

== Ref: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/stable/x/icons-introduction.html http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/x/icons-introduction.html == "Chapter 28. Icons Window Managers and Desktop Environments can use icons from different sources. Generally fonts are installed in

Re: [blfs-dev] (small item): svn-20160323 + rel-7.9 : alsa intro: 5 -vs- 6 .

> Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 13:20:23 + > From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer) > Subject: [blfs-dev] (small item): svn-20160323 + rel-7.9 : alsa intro: 5 > -vs- 6 . > > > [ Ref: > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/stable/multimedia/alsa.html > http://www.lin

[blfs-dev] (small item): svn-20160323 + rel-7.9 : alsa intro: 5 -vs- 6 .

[ Ref: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/stable/multimedia/alsa.html http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/multimedia/alsa.html ] == " ALSA-1.1.0 . . The following five sections of the book deal with the five separate components of ALSA: the

[blfs-dev] (small item): svn-20160323 + rel-7.9 : seamonkey reqd deps not in alphab order.

- per subject; & cf firefox reqd deps. rgds, akh p.s. Got someone here working through ((sizeable) subset of) new b/lfs books: greatly enthused by such materials being available; also interesting perennially to view via ~noobs' perspective. -- --

Re: [blfs-dev] Acknowledgement to Ken.

> From: Fernando de Oliveira > Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 21:11:28 -0300 > Subject: [blfs-dev] Acknowledgement to Ken. > . . > > Until recently I liked you even more than Bruce. > > Perhaps my masochism should make me change may aka. > 'sisyphus' -> 'prissy

Re: [blfs-dev] terminals

> Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 04:00:05 + > From: Ken Moffat > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] terminals > > On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 08:30:00PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > I would like to cut down the number of packages in BLFS. The maintenance > > burden is tremendous and we

Re: [blfs-dev] Weirdnesses with desktop logins

> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 05:54:33 + > From: Ken Moffat > Subject: [blfs-dev] Weirdnesses with desktop logins > > Just anecdotal comments - I have been ensuring that all my > currently-maintained systems are updated to firefox-45. On my first > test box, where I had so

Re: [blfs-dev] kde4

> Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 17:11:42 + > From: Ken Moffat > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] kde4 > > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 09:56:21AM +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: > > On 29/02/2016 00:04, Ken Moffat wrote: > > >Tried that, it did not help, and user ken lost his 4 desktops and

Re: [blfs-dev] Dependency is missing (xinit)

> From: Pierre Labastie > Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 12:12:24 +0100 > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Dependency is missing (xinit) > > On 14/02/2016 11:24, Igor ??ivkovi?? wrote: > > On 02/13/2016 06:26 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote: > >> On 12/02/2016 16:36, Yukio Shiiya wrote: > >>>

Re: [blfs-dev] Minor correction to curl install

> To: BLFS Development List <blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org> > From: Fernando de Oliveira <fam...@yahoo.com.br> > Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2016 10:48:59 -0300 > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Minor correction to curl install > > Em 06-02-2016 09:17, akhiezer escreveu: > &

Re: [blfs-dev] Minor correction to curl install

> Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 17:47:27 + > From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer) > To: BLFS Development List <blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org> > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Minor correction to curl install > > > To: BLFS Development List <blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscrat

Re: [blfs-dev] Minor correction to curl install

> To: BLFS Development List > From: Tim Tassonis > Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 17:48:14 +0100 > Subject: [blfs-dev] Minor correction to curl install > > Hi all > > I just install curl from blfs and would suggest a minor correction to > the

Re: [blfs-dev] UDisks-1.0.5 dependencies

From blfs-dev-boun...@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Sun Dec 21 18:08:51 2014 Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 07:21:59 +1300 From: Christopher Gregory m...@pc-networking-services.com To: blfs-...@linuxfromscratch.org Subject: [blfs-dev] UDisks-1.0.5 dependencies Hello, I am a little confused here as

Re: [blfs-dev] UDisks-1.0.5 dependencies

Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 12:49:46 -0600 From: Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] UDisks-1.0.5 dependencies lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer) wrote: Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 07:21:59 +1300 From: Christopher

Re: [blfs-dev] Texlive and current svn

:09:48PM +, akhiezer wrote: Apols if is stated clearly earlier in thread, but: for non-build issues, if possible could you post - or refer to place(s) in thread - the cmdlines that you're seeing not work, along with the errors that you're seeing, and what is expected output (I did

Re: [blfs-dev] Texlive and current svn

Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:39:59 + From: Ken Moffat zarniwh...@ntlworld.com To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Texlive and current svn . . For xindy : yes, I used distros in qemu - I did not get around to testing

Re: [blfs-dev] lxpanel-0.8.0 has a new package requirement

Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 10:27:23 -0600 From: Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] lxpanel-0.8.0 has a new package requirement Bruce Dubbs wrote: Ken Moffat wrote: On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 08:35:56AM -0300,

Re: [blfs-dev] Some other packages that could possibly be archived

From: Christopher Gregory m...@pc-networking-services.com To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 23:18:10 +1300 Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Some other packages that could possibly be archived . . [...]. I also know for a FACT of

Re: [blfs-dev] LXDM: localization fixed but runlevel two different fixes [Was Re: ... bootscripts: . blfs/init.d]

From: Christopher Gregory m...@pc-networking-services.com To: blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 17:03:46 +1200 Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] LXDM: localization fixed but runlevel two different fixes [Was Re: ... bootscripts: . blfs/init.d] On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 20:05

Re: [blfs-dev] LXDM: localization fixed but runlevel two different fixes [Was Re: ... bootscripts: . blfs/init.d]

Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 11:04:18 -0500 From: Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] LXDM: localization fixed but runlevel two different fixes [Was Re: ... bootscripts: . blfs/init.d] . . (Hmmm.

Re: [blfs-dev] libpapersize, /etc/libpaper.d, runparts [ re #5454 ]

) 2. Add it to the book in its own right (so that it can be indexed). I suppose it might be generally useful to somebody. I supposed it would go into chapter 11, General Utilities. 3. Something else that I haven't thought of ? N.B. now that I have seen the version akhiezer kindly pointed

Re: [blfs-dev] Sendmail issues

Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 19:52:54 -0500 From: Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Sendmail issues . . The newaliases command from sendmail is actually the equivalent of running 'sendmail -bi'.

Re: [blfs-dev] Sendmail issues

Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 00:24:44 +0200 From: Armin K. kre...@email.com To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Sendmail issues Building sendmail packages and I hit an issue. Namely, the newaliases -v command seems to hang (or takes forever to

Re: [blfs-dev] Sendmail issues

Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 01:55:17 +0200 From: Armin K. kre...@email.com To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Sendmail issues Building sendmail packages and I hit an issue. Namely, the newaliases -v command seems to hang (or takes forever to

Re: [blfs-dev] postlfs/profile.html : '/etc/profile' : add 'unset script' ?

Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 16:44:12 -0500 From: Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] postlfs/profile.html : '/etc/profile' : add 'unset script' ? akhiezer wrote: Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 14:38:19 -0500 From

[blfs-dev] postlfs/profile.html : '/etc/profile' : add 'unset script' ?

Hi, On svn blfs page: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/postlfs/profile.html , in section '/etc/profile' there is at the end of the code: -- for script in /etc/profile.d/*.sh ; do if [ -r $script ] ; then . $script fi done -- But no ~usual-style

Re: [blfs-dev] postlfs/profile.html : '/etc/profile' : add 'unset script' ?

Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 14:38:19 -0500 From: Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] postlfs/profile.html : '/etc/profile' : add 'unset script' ? akhiezer wrote: Hi, On svn blfs page: http

[blfs-dev] postlfs/profile.html : PKG_CONFIG_PATH : allow for /usr/local/lib64/... ?

Hi, On svn blfs page: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/postlfs/profile.html , in section '/etc/profile.d/extrapaths.sh' there is: -- if [ -d /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig ] ; then pathappend /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig PKG_CONFIG_PATH fi -- Should there instead be a construct

Re: [blfs-dev] When naming versions of gcc

Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 14:33:53 +0200 From: Armin K. kre...@email.com To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] When naming versions of gcc . . If (new) compiler restrictions/rules caused an error, then it will be a problem with

Re: [blfs-dev] ... r13828 - in trunk/BOOK: . introduction/welcome lxde/desktop

Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 19:40:46 -0500 From: Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] ... r13828 - in trunk/BOOK: . introduction/welcome lxde/desktop Armin K. wrote: + paraWith this switch, parallel build

Re: [blfs-dev] ... r13824 - in trunk/BOOK: general/graphlib introduction/welcome

Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 11:01:44 -0300 From: Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] ... r13824 - in trunk/BOOK: general/graphlib introduction/welcome On 04-08-2014 10:26, Armin K. wrote: On

Re: [blfs-dev] /etc/logrotate.conf nomail option

Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2014 00:54:07 +0100 From: Ken Moffat zarniwh...@ntlworld.com To: blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Subject: [blfs-dev] /etc/logrotate.conf nomail option I'm just updating my build scripts. For years I have used a simple script to do log rotation, so now I am going to

Re: [blfs-dev] /etc/logrotate.conf nomail option

Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2014 21:10:16 +0100 From: Ken Moffat zarniwh...@ntlworld.com To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] /etc/logrotate.conf nomail option On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 08:27:02AM +0100, akhiezer wrote: Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2014 00:54:07

Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r13663 - branches/systemd/gnome-systemd/applications

Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 16:43:23 +0100 From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer) To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r13663 - branches/systemd/gnome-systemd/applications Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 10:40:37 -0500 From: Bruce Dubbs

Re: [blfs-dev] A couple of command inconsistencies

From: John Burrell john_burr...@hotmail.com To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 15:24:46 + Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] A couple of command inconsistencies Yes, those points've already been made in your first post, understood, and

Re: [blfs-dev] A couple of command inconsistencies

From: John Burrell john_burr...@hotmail.com To: blfs-...@linuxfromscratch.org blfs-...@linuxfromscratch.org Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 20:33:55 + Subject: [blfs-dev] A couple of command inconsistencies Dear Editors In the BLFS commands postlfs, 041-iptables has this line --enable-libipq

  1   2   >